Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-06-11 City CouncilTO: City of Palo Alto CityManager’s Report HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL FROM:CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS 8 DATE:JUNE 11, 2001 CMR:265:01 SUBJECT:PUBLIC HEARING - ASSESSMENT FOR CALIFORNIA AVENUE AREA PARKING BONDS - PLAN G: FY.2001-2002 REPORT IN BRIEF This repo~ requests that Council hold a public hearing and approve the annual assessment for the California Avenue area parking bonds Plan G for FY 2001-02. The assessment is levied on the basis of building square footage, with a credit given for the off-street parking provided by the property owner. This annual assessment is exempt from Proposition 218 because .the assessment district was formed prior to the enactment of Proposition 218, and the assessments are used to pay the cost of existing bonds. Routine maintenance costs for the district are covered by parking permit fees. CMR:265:01 Page 1 of 4 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Council adopt the attached resolutions confirming the Engineer’s Report and Assessment Roll for: ¯California Avenue District, Project No. 86-01 ¯California Avenue District, Project No. 92-13 BACKGROUND On March 19, 2001, property owners of the proposed University Avenue Parking Assessment District approved the formation of a new assessment district and financing for construction of two new downtown parking structures. Along with the financing of new bonds, the City is refinancing several existing, older University Avenue bonds for which the property owners were being assessed. Refinancing the existing bonds into the newly formed assessment district requires that a fixed lien process, by which the new assessment district will operate, be substituted for the old assessment process. Under the fixed lien process, individual property assessments are fixed and there is no annual public hearing requirement.. Therefore, the University Avenue Parking AssessmentDistrict bonds, which are usually presented with the California Avenue Parking Assessment District .bonds, will no longer be part of this annual process~ Council action is required to annually levy assessments for the two active parking projects in the California Avenue area. These assessments Will be utilized for the payment of principal and interest on bonds for capital improvements pursuant to the attached resolutionsl These funds are separate and distinct from permit fees that are used to pay for operation and maintenance of parking facilities. Parking bonds issued under Bond Plan G require that a public hearing be held annually (the second Monday in June) on the assessments which must be levied to pay principal and interest on the bonds. The purpose of the public hearing is to allow each property owner the opportunity to question the computation of his/her assessment and the elements which comprise it, that is, the square footage of each occupied building, the off-street parking requirements for the usage, and the off-street parking provided. Assessments are levied on the basis of building square footage, with a credit given for the off-street parking provided by the property owner. The two active projects are listed and described as follows: California Avenue District, former Keystone Lot Parking, Project 86-01: Surface parking lot on Cambridge Avenue, construction of interim improvements, and a feasibility study for a parking structure on the lot. CMR:265:01 Page 2 of 4 ,¸California Avenue District, Ted Thompson Parking Structure, Project 92-13: Construction of a two-level parking structure on Cambridge Avenue between Birch Street and Nogal Lane. Additional details about the Parking Assessment District-Plan G bond capital improvement projects can be found in Attachment C. DISCUSSION The annual assessment rates for FY 2001-02 have two components, one based on the land square footage and the other based on the square footage of adjusted building area. The amounts levied for each project are: PROJECT California Avenue District, Keystone Lot Parking, Project 86-01 ASSESSMENT RATE PER ADJUSTED BLDG SQUARE FOOTAGE $9.60* $0.0524** Total: DOLLARS . LEVIED $107,573.29 $ 35,857.71 $143,431:00 California Avenue District, Ted Thompson Parking Structure, Project 92-13 $10.11’$117,244.51 $0.0571’*$ 39,081.48 Total:$156,325.99 *Rate per weighted assessment factor. **Rate per land square footage. Attachment B lists changes made to the assessment rolls. The estimated assessments were sent to property owners within the California Avenue district on May 15, 2001. Assessments were modified due to recent changes in business site conditions (square footage, vacancy, etc.) brought to staft~s attention by property owners since the estimated assessments were prepared. Because the hearing itself is the legally prescribed process by which questions about the basis of assessment and the property owners’ individual circumstances may be heard, it may be necessary to have a second addendum available at the Council meeting that reflects changes brought to staft~s attention since the Council packet was delivered. The public hearing for the assessment district may need to be continued, if last minute information brought forward by property owners cannot be verified and included in the amended rolls prior to the hearing. RESOURCE IMPACT The projects are funded by the assessment district and no City General Fund monies are involved. Although assessments are generally subject to Proposition 218, these particular CMR:265:01 Page 3 of 4 assessments are exempt from Proposition 218 since all of the assessment proceeds are pledged to repay previously issued bond indebtedness. Parking district maintenance costs, including sweeping, landscaping, signing and lighting are paid for by parking permit fees, which were last increased in 1984 in the California Avenue Parking District. POLICY IMPLICATIONS Approval of this action does not represent any change to existing City policies. TIMELINE The assessments will be sent to the Santa Clara County Tax Collector in July and will appear on the October property tax bills. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Approval of assessments is exempt by statute for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Attachment B: Attachment C: Attachment D: Attachment E: California Avenue Boundary Map Addendum Capital Improvement Projects California Avenue Assessment Rates Resolutions (2) PREPARED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD: CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: Senior Engineer, Public Works Engineering GLENN S. ROBERTS Director of Public Works HARRISON Assistant City Manager California Avenue Area Development Association Chamber of Commerce CMR:265:01 Page 4 of 4 Ted Thompson~ Parking Garage. 92-13 ATTACHMENT A California Avenue Parking Assessment District Park BOUlevard h I Lot K C-I ! . Lot _..j ~\/~6. 86-01 Birch Street Lot/I :, c-6 (,I /I Lot 0 Lot C-4 Lot C-4 ¯ Lot i ii i Lot c-7 ;,’;,7" / / Ash Street E1 Camino Real Public Parking. Lois./. Currently Assessed~ Parking Assessment District Boundary .......... SCALE IOO: 200 FEET ~00. 400 AB61 507 Attachment A ATTACHMENT B ATTACHMENT C California Avenue Area Parking District Annual Assessment Rates Project 86-01 o.o8 0.06 0.04 , ® 0.02 Land Assessment c~ co co o o 8~7 8.__8 8~9 9~0 9~1 9._~2 9.3 9/. 9.5 9~6 97 9~8 919 0~0 0~1 88 89 90 91 92 9.3 94-95 96 97 98 99 O0 01 02 Year ~ 8.0 ® 4.0E Building Assessment oo o 1995 base ),ear weighting 8~7 8~8 89 90 9~I 9:2 9.3 9~4 9.5 9~6 9~7 9~8 9~9 0~0 0~i 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 O0 O~ 02 Year Attachment D ABl15-200C Pa.qe 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT D CALIFORNIA AVENUE AREA PARKING DISTRICT ANNUAL ASSESSMENT RATES Project 92-13 ,,, 0.08 0.04 0102 0 -0 0 LAND ASSESSMENT 9~4 9.5 9~6 9~7 9~8 9~9 O0 0._~1 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 YEAR i 13.0 I0.0 9.0 BUILDING ASSESSMENT 9~4 9_55 9~6 9~7 9__68 9~ 0~0 0__11 95 96 97 98 99 O0 01 02 YEAR Attachment D AB!58-2000 Pa_~e 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT E RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALOALTO CONFIRMING ENGINEER’S REPORT AND ASSESSMENT ROLL CALIFORNIA AVENUE KEYSTONE LOT PARKING PROJECT NO. 86-01 (For Fiscal Year 2001-2002) THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALO ALTO DOES RESOLVE as follows: Section i: After proceedings to that end duly had and taken pursuant to the Palo Alto Municipal Code, a public hearing has been duly held on the-Engineer’s Report and assessment roll prepared for the above fiscal year to pay the principal and interest on bonds issued pursuant to Resolution of Intention No. 6485, adopted by the Council of the City of Palo Alto. on January 20, 1986; Section 2: This Council has heard all persons having an interest in any real property within the parking assessment district; has heard all objections, protests, or other written communications from any persons interested in the real property within the district; has taken and received oral and documentary evidence pertaining to the matters contained in the report; has remedied and corrected any errors or informalities, in the report and revised and corrected any of the .acts or determinations of the various City officials as contained therein, and is fully informed in the premises; Section 3: The Engineer’s Report and assessment roll, and each of the assessments therein as fully revised and corrected, is hereby approved and confirmed. ~ Section 4: The report together with the certificate of the City Clerk as to the fact and date of approval by this Council, shall forthwith be delivered to the County of Santa Clara, and the proper County officer shall cause to be posted to the tax rolls, in the column provided therefor the amount of each of the assessments .proposed to be levied and collected for the fiscal year as set forth in the report as confirmed. INTRODUCED AND PASSED: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: .. . . . . . . , . . . ATTEST:APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jones Hall, A Profess~~~tion Bond Counsel City Manager Director of Public Works Director, Administrative Services Sr.Assistant City Attorney -2- ATTACHMENT E RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CIT~OF PALOALTO CONFIRMING ENGINEER’S REPORT AND ASSESSMENT ROLL CALIFORMIAAVENUE PARKING PROJECT NO. 92-13 ¯ (For Fiscal Year 2001-2002) THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALO ALTO DOES RESOLVE as follows: Section i: After proceedings to that end duly had and taken pursuant to the Palo Alto Municipal Code, a public¯ hearing has been duly held on ~the Engineer’s Report and assessment rQll prepared for the above fiscal year to pay the principal and interest on bonds issued pursuant to Resolution of Intention No. 7230, adopted by the Council of the City of Palo Alto on August 9, 1993; Section 2: This Council has heard all persons having an interest in any real property within the parking assessment district; has heard all objections, protests, or other written communications from any persons interested in the real property within the district; has taken and received oral and documentary evidence pertaining to the matters contained in the report; has remedied and corrected any errors or informalities¯ in¯ the report and revised and corrected any of the acts or determinations of .the various City officials as contained therein, and is fully informed in the premises;¯ Section 3: The Engineer’s Report and assessment roll, and each of the assessments therein as fully revised and corrected, is hereby approved, and confirmed. ~ Section 4: The report’ together with the certificate of the City Clerk as to the fact and date of approval by this Council, shall forthwith be delivered to the County of Santa Clara, and the proper County officer sh~ll cause to be posted to the tax rolls, in the column provided therefor the ~mount of each of the assessments proposed to be levied and collected for the fiscal year as set forth in the report as confirmed. INTRODUCED AND PASSED: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: ATTEST:APPROVED: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jones Hall, A Professional Law Co By : R. Casaleggio Bond Counsel Mayor City Manager Director of Public Works Director, Administrative Services Sr.Assistant City Attorney -2-