HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-04-03 City CouncilCity of Palo Alto
City Manager’s Report
TO:
ATTENTION:
HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL
FINANCE COMMITTEE
FROM:CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PLANNING AND
COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APRIL 3, 2001 CMR: 180:01
PROPOSED FORGIVENESS OF CITY OF PALO ALTO’S NON-
PROFIT REHABILITATION LOAN IN THE AMOUNT OF $20,000
TO PALO ALTO SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT, INC. DBA ADLAI
E. STEVENSON HOUSE
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council forgive the entire $20,000 principal balance and
accrued interest on the non-profit facility rehabilitation loan that was made on December
22, 1989 with Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds to Palo Alto Senior
Housing Project, Inc. for improvements to Stevenson House.
BACKGROUND
Palo Alto Senior Housing Project, Inc. is the not-for-profit owner/operator of Adlai E.
Stevenson House, a 120-unit, low-income senior residential facility located at 455 E.
Charleston Road in Palo Alto. In 1989, the organization expended approximately
$135,000 to renovate the facility’s congregate kitchen and dining area. The City of Palo
Alto provided $40,000 to help leverage the cost of the project. $20,000 was provided as
a CDBG grant, and $20,000 was provided as a 10-year deferred loan at three (3) percent
interest through the Non-Profit Rehabilitation Loan (NPRL) program.
The $20,000 principal balance of the loan, along with $6,000 in accrued simple interest,
was due in full on December 22, 1999. (See attached letter dated July 12, 2000,
Attachment A). Stevenson House has requested that the City forgive the amount due, or
defer payment for an additional ten year period based on the continuing unmet
CMR:180:01
Page 1 of 4
rehabilitation needs of the facility, and the organization’s desire to maintain the lowest
.possible .rents .for the .elderly tenants.. (See attached letter dated July 27i 2000,
Attachment B): ~ "
The NPRL program was established to meet various facility rehabilitation needs of non-
profit organizations. (See attached Non-Profit Facility Rehabilitation Program
Guidelines, Attachment C). It was administered in the Planning and Community
Environment Department under the umbrella Housing ImProvement Program (HIP) that
provided low-interest loans to low-income single family homeowners for home
rehabilitation.
HIP and NPRL were initially capitalized with allocations of CDBG funds and maintained
through a revolving loan fund. Six loans were made through the NPRL program, and the
Stevenson House loan is the only outstanding loan in the program. Both of the loan
programs have been inactive for the past eight years.
DISCUSSION
On September 15, 2000, staff from Planning and Administrative Service Departments
reviewed the Stevenson House request. Staff supports the request to forgive the loan and
the accrued interest because Stevenson House provides 120 units of permanent,
affordable housing for 135 low-income seniors, and fills a critical need in the community.
It appears unlikely that Stevenson House’s ability to repay the loan will change in the
near future since the facility is 32 years old, and the need for repairs, rehabilitation and
capital improvements will continue to increase as the facility ages. Average rents for the
studio and one-bedroom units are currently $432 and $515 per month respectively.
Forgiving the loan will assist Stevenson House in its mission of keeping the rents as low
as possible for the income eligible senior residents, while maintaining the facility in good
condition.
The nine-member CDBG Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) also considered, the
Stevenson House request at its regularly scheduled meeting of February 15, 2001. The
CAC did not concur with the staff recommendation of forgiving the loan and accrued
interest. The CAC voted unanimously to support forgiveness of the principal balance due,
but to demand repayment of the $6,000 in accrued interest that was due as of December
22, 1999.
CMR:180:01
Page 2 of 4
ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Other options available to the City Council include extending the term of the loan for an
additional period of time, and re-evaluating the agency’s ability to repay at the end of that
period.
RESOURCE IMPACT
Under the CDBG program regulations, the Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) allows the local jurisdiction to set policy relating to the repayment.
or granting of funds. If repaid, the loan proceeds would be treated as CDBG Program
Income and added to theCity’s Letter of Credit with HUD. The funds could then be
allocated to other CDBG-eligible activities in the annual CDBG allocation of funds
process. If the loan is not repaid, the additional funds would not be available for other
activities.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
The CDBG policy relating to the repayment of funds on real estate improvement projects
is outlined in the attached staff report dated July 9, 1979 (see amortization schedule, page
2, Attachment D). Converting the $20,000 loan to a grant alter 10 years is consistent
with this adopted policy.
Policy H-12 of Palo Alto’s adopted Comprehensive Plan calls for the support of agencies
and organizations that provide shelter, housing, and related services to very low, low and
moderate-income households. "The City should work with nonprofit housing
organizations and the local development community to ensure that all affordable housing,
including family housing and units for seniors on fixed incomes, remains affordable over
time. , Palo Alto is committed to providing continued support to local groups that serve
the housing needs of lower incomehouseholds."
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
CMR:180:01
Page ~ of 4
PREPARED BY:
DEPARTMENT HEAD REVIEW: "
G. EDWARD GAWF
Director of Planning and Coirlmunity Environment
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
Assistant City Manager
Attachment A: July 12, 2000 Letter from Suzanne Bayley
Attachment B: July 27, 2000 Letter from Stevenson House
Attachment C: Non-Profit Facility Rehabilitation Program Guidelines
Attachment D: July 9, 1979 Staff Report
cc:Genie Dee, Executive Director, Stevenson House
CDBG Citizen’s Advisory Committee
CMR: 180:01
Page 4 of 4
Cityo 2alo Alto.
Department of Planning and
Community Environment
July 12, 2000 ¯
Plarming Division
Genie Dee
Executive Director
Stevenson House
455 E. Charleston Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94306
Re’.Palo Alto Senior Housing Project, Inc.
Non Profit Facility Rehabilitation Loan (N-PFRL) #6
$20,000 10-Year Loan Dated 12/22/89
Dear Ms. Dee:
The intent of this letter is to inform you that theabove referenced Non-
Profit Facility Rehabilitation Loan #6 was due and payable on December
22, 1999. Demand is hereby made for payment in full as follows:
Unpaid principal balance
Unpaid interest @ 3 % per annum
Total due and payable
$20,000
6,000
$26,000
Since demand for payment of this note was not made earlier, interest will
only be assessed through the December 22, 1999 due date ifyour payment
is received by July 31, 2000-. Please send your check to the attention of the
undersigned. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at
650/329-2428.
Very truly yours,
CDBG Coordinator@~
250 Hamilton Avenue
EO. Box 10250
Palo Alto, CA 94303
650,329.2441
650.329.2154 fax
Suzanne Bayley
CDBG Coordinator
City of Palo Alto
P.O. Box 10250
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Stevenson House
A bridge to friendship
July 27, 2000
ATTACHMENT B
RE:Palo Alto Senior Housing Project, Inc.
Non-Profit Facility Rehabilitation Loan (NPFRL) #6
$20,000 10-Year Loan Dated 12/22/89
Dear Suzanne:
We received your letter of July 12th regarding the above loan: We would like to inquire
as to Whether it would be possible for the City to forgive this loan. If this is not possible,
we would like to request an extension of the loan term for an additional ten years.
This is due to the extensive capital improvement needs of our facility.
three years; we have:
In the past
¯Replaced the roofs on all three of our buildings, one with CDBG funds granted
by the City; .
¯Replaced both our boilers;
¯Removed for reroofmg and purchased our solar system;
¯Retrofitted windows and doors in one of our buildings {the first phase of a seven-
year retrofitting project, funded by Los Altos CDBG funds).
In addition, our board has recently approved application for a HUD Capital Improve-
ment Loan of $134,000 for other urgent improvements. This loan, if granted, will be at
5-7% interest, double the interest on the above loan.
Given these major financial requirements to maintain our facility, it would be most
helpful if the City is able to assist us. This loan, and other support from the City over
the past 32 years, have helped us to maintain Stevenson House as an important
community resource for low-income elders.
Thank you for your consideration of this request.
Sincerely,
"L/Executive Director A community for active older adults
455 E. Charleston Road * Palo Alto * CA * 94306-4231
Phone (650) 494-1944 * Fax (650) 493-7437
ATTACHMENT c
CITYWIDE
NON-PROFIT FACILITY REHABILITATION PROGRAM
GUIDELINES
DESCRIPTION
This program will establish a revolving !oan fund to meet various
rehabilitation needs of non-profit organizations throughout the p~ogram
year. Th~ funds will be loaned to eligible organizations at 3% interest
with either a fully amortized ow deferred payment. The method of repayment
will be determined by the organizations ability to repay theloan. Review
of loan applications and loan decisions will be made by a City Manager
appointed Loan Committee. This Committee will b~ comprised of the
existing three-person Housing Improvement Program Loan Committee plus an
additional fourth member designated by. the City Manager.
ELIGIBILITY OF NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION
.Non-profit organizations with 1 or more years of exi.stence who serve
primarily low and moderate income persons (80% of county median), or
elderly and disabled members of the community~ .The organization mustown
or have the right to encumber the property to be rehabilitated, ..
ELIGIBLE LOAN USES
A.Code conditions or code work requiring immediate correction to
prevent rapid deterioration of this structure.
Code correction necessary to correct immediate health and safety danger
to building occupants,
Code problems identified by.a Building DePartment inspection that
left uncorrected could jeopardize, continued operation or use of the
facility.
LOAN TERMS AND CONDITIONS
A~ The maximum Ioanamount shall be $I0,000.
~rogram funds will provide 3% interest loans, for a maximum term of-I0
years. Payment of the loan may be deferred for up to lO years on both
interest and principle. This repayment may be extended if the organiza-
tion still meets program guidelines, and is unable to refinance the loan,
without adverse impactto p~ogramservices.
Upon sale or transfer of the property the loan shall be due and payable
with the funds returned.to the Non-Profit Facility Rehabilitation Account,
to be used for additional loans.
D.All loans will be securedby a Deed of Trust.
E.I00% of the rehabilitation loan must be used to cover code deficiencies.
.~"
REHABILITATION PROCESS
Non-profit organizations will be encouraged to submit loan applications
throughout the year.
Upon receipt of an appl~cation, the rehabilitation program staff will
inspect the .property to prepare a scope of rehabilitation and accurate
cost estimate.
.:3.A report describing the improvements required tobring the prdp~rtY up
.to code will be presented to the organization. -
4.Staff will prepare work write-up specifying the work to be done.
Competitive bids will be received via theCity’s Purchasing Services
Procedures. All applicable Federal Labor Standards and Contract
Compliance procedures will be followed.
The program manager will prepare and present the loan application based
upon the. accepted bid and proper .verifications to the Loan.Committee.
Upon approval.by the Loan Committee,the program manager will execute
the necessary documents with the owner.
Progress and final payments based upon work comPleted and inspected will
:be paid; from the loan escrow account bythe City Controller only Upon
written approval of the owner and the improvements advisor.
The program staff will prepare required federal reports for funds
disbursed.
A~TACHIKENT’D
HONOrAbLE CIr. OUNCIL "
Palo Alto, California ~. ..
’Eepayment Of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG).Funds on keel
Estate Improvement Projects ....
Background
¯ .. In the last three CDBG prog~a~ years~"the.C~tY’has a~located Federal
funds to proj.ects involving capital.Improvements to. real estate.. These
projects include renovation of the Downtown Senior Center, elimination
of architectural barriers at Community Assoclatlon.for Retarded.(C.A.R.),
’ . new.facilities for theSenior Day Care Program,a~d..a work activityprogram facility, atC,A.R. In,theseand. similar situations, CDBG. funded
~improvements have.signiflcantly increased .the value ofthe property~
This staff report recommendsa procedure .tha~ will.preclude or m~n~mize
a substantial windfall upon anyfuture saleof theproperty~when a
property’s, use is altered fromthat whlch, was"orlgihally intended.. This
procedure would <i) return a. substantlal revenue.which the City would
use to aug~eDt other. CDBG p.r6grams upon a property sale orchange in "
use, or .(2) guarantee that the funded program will .ontinu~ for-a period.
of time commensurate, with theamount ofthe.grant. .i- ..
’This procedure being recommendedby ~taff will no~ apply to ~heHouslng..
"Improvement Progra~ (low interest rehabilitati0~-~oans). ¯That:program
already.uses a loan¯repayment program. Al~o,i thes’e recommendationE
’.~_~o~ a~p!y to¯the Rental Housing-Acqulsition Program;¯ there, a
promissory .note s~cured:~~a.~6c6~d-~eed-~f ~rdst is required ~or ’the
p~rc~na~e.of_ ~~ .proper~y. " ...... .
CDBG ¯Real¯Property Loan Procedure . .... : ".. "
The rationale behindthe proposed.procedure is.to assure that funds¯¯
...,.allocated toCDBG.projects continua to be
¯ Under. the.propose~ procedure,, whenever an. ellgible.grant request is
approved for improving (not repairing) real estate, the ~ecipient.~ust.
agree to the following:
CM~; 3~0:9 " ~"’
carry out ~the program (or ~thereiigible’CDBG activity if -
~pproved by City ManaEeror a designee) for a specific period
of time¯related to the amount~ of the grant; or
should the property.besold before th~ time period elapses,
thexeclpient will repay the City that pro-rated balance of "
the. CDBG gran~ obligation plus interest at 3% per annumfor
owners and 7% per annum when the. recipient is not the property
owner.
In all cases, the above obligatlon(s) will be secured by a promissory
note, and where t~e recipient is. the owner, the obligation will also be
secured by a deed of trust or other form o~. security acceptable to the "
City Manager. The 3% rate-of Interest on obligations where the g~antee
is the owner of the property is consistent with the rate of interest.
charged for the ¯City’s rehabilitation program. In these cases, the
obligation is secured by a second deed .of trust. In situations where -
the grantee is hot the oWner and is. unabie to provide security such as a
second deed of...trust or_other similar guarantee,-the’obligation to the
City is less secure. Because the risk is greater, staff recommends the . "
higher 7% re.re, which is. still quite reasonable in the market, place. ".
The above is essentially a 10a~’ pr6cedureo . It is important ~o note that "
it is not-intended that the .City¯ "make money" from the loan and interest
repayments; rather, it-is the City’s intent to assure that the promised
projects and iservicaa are ¯provided to eligible res.idents: ¯consequently,
¯ item #i above .provides for. an. amortization period Which allowsloan
repayments to..ba .relieved as long as .the original (or slmilar).program
is in .opera~ion for a"given period.°f .time.... ........
mple of Loan Procedure ...-~., ~ :
The following table represents a £ec0mmended amortiza’~ion:and repayment -
schedule...The annual¯ repa.yment is calculated by multiplying ’the ¯loan ..
amount by .itha..appropriate annual .repayment factor. .. ’ "
¯"""~nnual repayment
’--..’" "factor -"Promissory
Note Secured by ~" Annual
"Deed of Trust or repayment factor -
Amortization ’ot~er acceptable Promissory.
Amount of Grant Period security (3%). N6te Alone .(7%)
$25,000 to $50,000 5 year,s_".. 0.218355 0.243891
$50,000 to $75,000 10.years 0.117231"’0~142378 ..
...... ~ 75’~ D0D ~"~5"~ $ i 0D;DDD .....[~I~ "years. .....¯°I) ~D~3757 ""D;TD9795
$i00,000 tO $15.0,000 20 years.0.067216..0.094393
$150,000 t.o $200,000 25 years . 0.057428 ..0.085811 .
Above $200,000 30 years 0.051019 0.080586
7 i9179"