HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 3462 City of Palo Alto (ID # 3462)
City Council Informational Report
Report Type: Informational Report Meeting Date: 3/11/2013
March 11, 2013 Page 1 of 9
(ID # 3462)
Title: Downtown Monitoring Report 2011-2012
Subject: Downtown Monitoring Report 2011-2012
From: City Manager
Lead Department: Planning and Community Environment
Recommendation
This is an informational report and no Council action is required.
Executive Summary
The annual Commercial Downtown (CD) Monitoring Report tracks total non-residential growth
in the commercial downtown area (CD-C and CD-C(GF)(P)zones) and office and retail vacancy
rates in CD-C and CD-C (GF)(P) zones. Through mid-December of 2012, there was a 2.8 percent
vacancy rate within the Ground Floor Overlay District and a 1.6 percent overall vacancy rate in
the Commercial Downtown (CD) zoning district. In this monitoring cycle, approximately 49,860
square feet of space was approved or added to the total downtown non-residential square
footage. An additional 11,790 square feet of new non-residential development can be
accommodated before the re-evaluation limit of 235,000 square feet growth limit is reached.
Background
Annual monitoring of available space in Commercial Downtown (CD) zoning area was
established in 1998 by Comprehensive Plan Programs L-8 and L-9. These programs require
reporting of non-residential development activity and trends within the CD zone district.
Staff regularly has tracked vacancy rates, changes in floor area and parking in the CD district
resulting from approved development to comply with the Comprehensive Plan programs and to
determine the ground floor vacancy rate in the CD zone district. The zoning code included an
exception process to allow office development on the first floor if the ground floor vacancy rate
exceeds 5%.
In 2009, the City Council adopted zoning ordinance amendments to enhance protection of retail
uses in downtown commercial districts to ensure that retail uses are retained and viability
enhanced during the economic downturn and beyond. The ordinance also eliminated an
exception process triggered when the GF vacancy rate is found to be greater than 5% during
the annual monitoring. A map of the districts subject to the amendments was included in the
Council report (CMR 20:09), available on the City’s website.
March 11, 2013 Page 2 of 9
(ID # 3462)
Staff completed field visits for this 2011-2012 monitoring period in mid-December 2012.
Telephone interviews and email exchanges with local real estate leasing agents were also
compiled at the same time to determine current vacancy rates and prevailing rents. This report
also includes cumulative data on developments in the Commercial Downtown (CD) zone from
January 1987 through August 31, 2012 and has specific data on vacancy information and rental
rates through December 2012.
Discussion
The economic conditions of the Palo Alto downtown area are continuing to improve since last
year. Currently there is a 2.8 percent vacancy within the Ground Floor Overlay District and a 1.6
percent overall vacancy in the Commercial Downtown (CD) zoning district. This is a noticeable
drop of 2 percent vacancy in the Ground Floor Overlay District from last year. This number is
close to the 2006-2007 period vacancy rate, before the economic downturn. The retail rental
rates ranged from $3.00 to $6.50 per square foot based on the location, and office rental rates
ranged from $4.00 to $7.00 per square foot during this reporting period. Office rental rates
have increased marginally from last year and retail rental rates have remained steady through
the 2011-2012 monitoring period. The following table shows the approximate total vacant
square foot and percentage of vacancy from 2006.
TABLE 1: Total Vacancy in CD-C & CD-C (GF) (P) Zones in Downtown Palo Alto
Year
Total CD-C
Vacant
(SQFT)
% of CD-C
Vacancy
Total CD-C (GF)
(P) Vacant
(SQFT)
% of CD-C (GF)
(P) Vacancy
2006-2007 88,368 2.63 18,330 2.94
2007-2008 120,004 3.60 26,294 4.21
2008-2009 212,189 6.39 56,109 8.99
2009-2010 85,271 2.56 37,888 6.91
2010-2011 66,226 2.0 26, 290 4.8
2011-2012 52,368 1.6 15,550 2.8
Source: City of Palo Alto’s Planning Department.
Non-Residential Development Activity
The 1986 Downtown Study (and Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance) incorporated a
growth limit of 350,000 square feet of additional floor area above the total floor area existing in
1986, and provided for a re-evaluation of the CD regulations when net new development
reaches 235,000 square feet. Since 1986, a total of 223,210 square feet of non-residential floor
March 11, 2013 Page 3 of 9
(ID # 3462)
area has been added in the Downtown CD-C zoned area. In the past two monitoring cycles from
2009-2011, approximately 34,650 square feet of net new commercial floor area was added with
a few major contributing projects such as 524 Hamilton Avenue and 265 Lytton Avenue. In this
current cycle, 2011-2012, approximately 49,860 square feet of net new commercial floor area
has been added through one major project, 335-355 Alma Street.
Based on this recent monitoring, an additional 11,790 square feet of new non-residential
development remains for development before the re-evaluation limit of 235,000 square feet
growth limit is reached. Staff notes that the 135 Hamilton Avenue project was recently
approved (though parking issues haven’t been resolved), which would increase the total by
approximately 20,000 square feet, to about 245,000 square feet, in excess of the re-evaluation
threshold. Staff has developed a scope of work for the new Development Cap Study and will
initiate work in the next couple of months.
TABLE 2: Total Non-Residential SQFT Added in Downtown Palo Alto since 2006.
Year
Total Non-Residential SQFT
Added in CD-C
Total Non-Residential SQFT Left to
Reach the Re-evaluation Limit*
2006-2007 195 129,055
2007-2008 7,480 121,575
2008-2009 25,280 96, 295
2009-2010 21,150 75, 145
2010-2011 13,500 61,645
2011-2012 49,860* 11,790
Source: City of Palo Alto’s Planning Department
*Projects filed as of August 2012.
Below is a list of significant projects in the downtown CD-C zone area that added more than
5,000 square feet since 2006.
325 Lytton Ave--17,515 square feet
310 University Ave--7,481 square feet
265 Lytton Ave—21,151 square feet
524 Hamilton Avenue—9,345 square feet
355 Alma Street—49,860 square feet
Demonstrating Special Public Benefits
The Downtown Study reserved 100,000 square feet of the 350,000 square foot growth limit to
be used for projects demonstrating special public benefits. Since 1986, eleven projects in the
March 11, 2013 Page 4 of 9
(ID # 3462)
Downtown area have been developed under the Planned Community zoning that requires a
finding of public benefit. Six of the projects exceeded the non-residential floor area that would
otherwise be allowed under zoning by a total of 66,915 square feet. The total changes in
square footage of these projects are shown in the fourth column of Attachment C. The
remaining five projects were mixed-use projects that did not exceed allowable non-residential
floor areas. All of the projects either provided parking or paid a fee in-lieu of providing parking.
Only one project; 355 Alma Street, in this current cycle added square feet demonstrating public
benefit and provided in-lieu fees for parking.
Projects Qualifying for Seismic, Historic or Minor Expansion Exemptions
The Downtown Study designated 75,000 square feet of the 350,000 square foot cap for projects
that qualify for seismic, historic or minor expansion exemptions in order to encourage these
upgrades. Since 1986, 93,931 square feet have been added in this category. Two projects, 524
Hamilton Avenue and 668 Ramona, used close to 5000 square feet of Transfer Development
Rights (TDR) square footage. This year’s only approved project, 335-355 Alma Street, did not
add any square feet in this category. These projects are shown in the fifth column of
Attachment C.
Parking Inventory
The 1986 Downtown Study set performance measures that established that new commercial
development in the Downtown should not increase the total parking deficit beyond that was
existing or approved through May 1986, or 1,601 spaces. This base “deficit” number was
determined by counting the number of commercially bound vehicles (employees, customers,
etc.) parked in residential neighborhoods. Increases or reductions to the deficit are determined
by comparing the total number of commercial parking spaces constructed in the downtown
area with the amount of new commercial square footage constructed. In general, for every 250
square feet of commercial development, an additional parking space should be constructed.
There are certain projects that qualify for exemptions to parking requirements, which add to
the deficit. Conversely, parking improvements that are independent of development reduce
the deficit.
As noted above, certain projects are exempt from providing parking or a portion thereof, which
increases the deficit. The City tracks these exemptions, and at the end of the 2003 monitoring
period, the City determined a re-evaluation of the parking exemption regulations would be
undertaken when the unmet parking demand resulting from exemptions reaches a cumulative
450 spaces. Currently, the unmet parking demand resulting from exemptions is 350 parking
spaces.
In 2003, the City opened two new parking structures located at 528 High Street and 445 Bryant
Street. This added a total of 713 net new parking spaces. Other improvements that have
occurred since 1986 include a 2-floor addition to the Cowper/Webster Garage and significant
restriping of on-street parking spaces by the City’s Transportation Division. Per the
methodology prescribed in the 1986 downtown study, the total cumulative parking deficit has
been “reduced” from 1,601 in 1986 to 901 in 2012. Attachment D is a chart that details the CD
March 11, 2013 Page 5 of 9
(ID # 3462)
(Commercial Downtown) parking deficit. Although defined as a deficit reduction, there is a
general understanding that commercial parking intrusion into residential neighborhoods has
increased since that time. Staff believes that the parking intrusion is not accurately depicted in
Attachment D, as it likely doesn’t include factors such as a) increased employee density
downtown, b) conversions of existing retail or underused office space to more intensive office
uses, c) conversions of prior residential hotel uses to true hotel uses, and d) parking in
neighborhoods from areas other than the downtown business, such as for Caltrain commuters,
Palo Alto Medical Foundation, and/or Stanford. A better estimate of parking intrusion will be
developed as part of the Downtown Development Cap Study.
Recently, staff has been directed by City Council to undertake a site and feasibility study to
evaluate the possibility of construction of additional public parking structures in and around the
Downtown area, and to consider expansion of existing parking capacity through the use of
attendant parking at existing structures. In addition, City Council directed staff to conduct a re-
evaluation of the 1986 Downtown Development Cap Study. This study examined parking,
traffic and land use conditions of the Downtown area and restricting future non-residential
development to a total of 350,000 square feet in the Downtown CD-C zone area. The proposed
re-evaluation study will also include analysis of existing and projected traffic, parking capacity,
and the impacts from application of parking exemptions under transfer of development rights
and other code provisions.
Vacancy Rate for Ground Floor (GF) Combining District
The Ground Floor Combining District (GF) was created to encourage active pedestrian uses in
the Downtown area such as retail, eating and drinking and personal services. There is
approximately 548,675 square feet of total Ground Floor area in the CD-C (GF) (P) zoning
district after the adoption of the amended ordinance in December 2009.
Staff surveyed downtown CD-C (GF) (P) zoned areas to assess vacancy in the second week of
December 2012. Staff also consulted local real-estate agents and other databases and compiled
a list of only five properties in the CD-C (GF) (P) area, which met the requirements for vacancy.
The total vacancy amounted to 15,550 square feet.
TABLE 3: Vacant Property Listings for Only Ground Floor (GF) Spaces in
CD-C (GF) (P) Combining District.
(As of December 14, 2012)
Address Vacant Square Feet
575 High 4,437
174 University 2,300
March 11, 2013 Page 6 of 9
(ID # 3462)
355 University 3,694
429-447 University 3,300
436-440 University 1,818
Source: City of Palo Alto’s Planning Department
This results in a GF vacancy rate of approximately 2.8 percent this year; 2 percent less than
previous year’s vacancy rate.
FIGURE1. Vacancy Rates in CD-C and CD-C (GF)(P) Zones Since 2006
Source: City of Palo Alto’s Planning Department
Vacancy Rate for Entire CD District
The entire CD area contains approximately 3,850,000 gross square feet of floor area, including
approximately 330,000 square feet within the SOFA CAP Phase 2 area. About 525,000 square
March 11, 2013 Page 7 of 9
(ID # 3462)
feet is used for religious or residential purposes or is vacant and not available for occupancy.
Thus, the net square footage of available commercial space is approximately 3,325,000 square
feet.
Staff conducted a field survey in mid-December 2012 and communicated with local real estate
agents during same time to assess overall vacancies in the downtown area. In this monitoring
cycle there was a total vacancy of 52,368 square feet. This vacancy equals a rate of 1.6 percent
compared to 2.0 percent in last year’s monitoring report. The overall CD-C vacancy rate has
reduced considerably since the 2008-2009 period, close to a drop of 5 percent.
Table 4 was compiled based on staff conducted fieldwork, researches of different real estate
websites and responses received from local downtown real estate agents.
TABLE 4: Vacant Property Listings for Rest of Commercial Downtown (CD).
(As of December 14, 2012))
Includes Upper Floor Office Space in CD-C (GF) (P) Combining District and all floors of CD-C (P) District
Address
Zoning District
Vacant Square Feet
526 Bryant CD-C (GF)(P) 5,753
542 Emerson CD-C(GF) (P) 1,850
385 Forest CD-C (GF)(P) 2,038
201-225 Hamilton CD-C (GF)(P) 8,660
205 Hamilton CD-C (GF)(P) 9,857
437 Lytton CD-C (P) 1,204
550 Lytton CD-C (P) 2,662
355 University CD-C (GF)(P) 4,795
CD – Commercial Downtown, (C) – Commercial,
GF – Ground Floor Combining District, P - Pedestrian Overlay
March 11, 2013 Page 8 of 9
(ID # 3462)
Trends in Use Composition
The primary observation of change in the use composition of Downtown was, in this cycle
about 48,360 square feet of new non-residential use was added through the 355 Alma Street
project. Since the enactment of new CD zoning regulations in 1986, the total floor area devoted
to higher-intensity commercial uses such as office, retail, eating/ drinking and housing has
increased, while the total floor area in lower-intensity commercial uses like manufacturing,
warehousing and business services has decreased (see Attachment E).
Retail Rents
Retail rental rates have marginally increased since last year’s monitoring report. According to
the data gathered during December 2012 staff survey of commercial real estate agents offering
properties for lease in Downtown, rents for retail space are generally ranging from $3.00 to
$6.00 per square foot triple net (i.e. rent plus tenant assumption of insurance, janitorial
services and taxes). The lower end of this range is generally for spaces in older buildings and
away from University Avenue. Retail rental rates on core downtown University Avenue goes up
to $5.00 to $6.50. For some vacant properties outside the downtown core, rental rates are
lower and listed as negotiable.
Office Rents
Based on the information gathered from commercial real estate agents listing properties for
lease in Downtown, rents for Class A Downtown office space (i.e. newer and/or larger buildings
on University Avenue and Lytton Avenues) and Class B office space (i.e. older and/or smaller
buildings further from University Avenue) are ranging from $3.75 to $7.00 per square foot triple
net, more or less similar to last year’s monitoring cycle.
Timeline
This is an annual report.
Resource Impact
This report has no impact on resources, though the implications of reduced vacancy rates have
positive impacts on the City’s property and sales tax receipts.
Policy Implications
This report on the Commercial Downtown (CD) zoning area is mandated by Comprehensive
Plan Programs L-8 and L-9 and by the Downtown Study approved by the City Council on July 14,
1986.
Environmental Review
This is an informational report only and is exempted from CEQA review.
March 11, 2013 Page 9 of 9
(ID # 3462)
Courtesy Copies:
Planning and Transportation Commission
Architectural Review Board
Palo Alto Chamber of Commerce
Palo Alto Board of Realtors
Palo Alto Downtown Business & Professional Association
Downtown North Neighborhood Association
Professorville Neighborhood
University Park Neighborhood Association
Attachments:
: Attachment A: Downtown Study Summary (PDF)
: Attachment B: Map of Downtown CD(C) District (PDF)
: Attachment C: Non-Residential Square Footage (PDF)
: Attachment D: Parking Changes (PDF)
: Attachment E: Changes by Land Use Category (PDF)
ATTACHMENT A
DOWNTOWN STUDY RESULTS SUMMARY (July 1986)
The following are the primary measures adopted as a result of the study:
1. A new Commercial Downtown (CD) zoning district, including three sub districts (CD-C, CD-S and CD-N), was created and
applied to most of the Downtown area previously zoned Community Commercial (CC) or Service Commercial (CS). The
basic provisions of the CD district include floor area ratios (FARs) that are more restrictive than in the previous CC and CS
zones, limits to project size and to the overall amount of future development, and special development regulations for sites
adjacent to residential zones.
2. Growth limits were applied to the CD district restricting future development to a total of 350,000 square feet beyond what was
existing or approved in May 1986 and providing for a re-evaluation of the CD regulations when new development reaches
235,000 square feet. In addition, 100,000 square feet of the total new floor area was reserved for projects demonstrating
special public benefits and 75,000 square feet for projects which qualify for seismic, historic or minor expansion exemptions.
3. Exemptions to the floor area ratio restrictions of the CD zone were established for certain building expansions involving
historic structures, seismic rehabilitation, provision of required handicapped access, or one-time additions of 200 square feet or
less.
4. New parking regulations were established for the University Avenue Parking Assessment District that requires new non-
residential development to provide parking at a rate of one space per 250 square feet of floor area. Exemptions to this
requirement are provided for certain increases in floor area related to provision of handicapped access, seismic or historic
rehabilitation, one-time minor additions (200 square feet or less) and development of vacant land previously assessed for
parking. The regulations also permit, in certain instances, off-site parking and parking fees in lieu of on-site parking.
5. Performance measures were established that specify that new development in the Downtown should not increase the total
parking deficit beyond that expected from development that was existing or approved through May, 1986 (1600 spaces) and
that call for re-evaluation of the parking exemption regulations when the unmet parking demand, resulting from exemptions,
reaches one half (225 parking spaces) of the minimum 450 parking spaces deemed necessary for construction of a new public
parking structure. Staff was directed to monitor the parking deficit.
6. A new Ground Floor (GF) Combining District was created and applied to the area along University Avenue and portions of the
major side streets between Lytton and Hamilton Avenues, in order to restrict the amount of ground floor area devoted to uses
other than retail, eating and drinking or personal service.
7. Staff was directed to monitor the Downtown area in terms of development activity, vacancy rates, sales tax revenues, and
commercial lease rates to facilitate evaluation of the effectiveness of the new regulations.
8. Staff was directed to undertake a site and feasibility study to evaluate an additional public parking structure elsewhere in the
Downtown, to consider development of a parking facility on public lots S, L and F, and to explore the possibility of leasing or
purchasing privately-owned vacant lots suitable as parking structure sites.
9. Policies and regulations were adopted which encourage Planned Community (PC) zoning for parking structures and limit
underground parking to two levels below grade, unless there is proof that regular pumping of subsurface water will not be
necessary.
10. A Twelve-Point Parking Program was adopted to increase the efficiency of existing parking.
11. Traffic policies were adopted which prohibit new traffic signals on portions of Alma Street and Middlefield Road, and prohibit
a direct connection from Sand Hill Road to Palo Alto/Alma Street. In addition, new signs were approved directing through
traffic off of University Avenue and onto Hamilton and Lytton Avenues.
12. Staff and the Architectural Review Board (ARB) were directed to consider the possibility of an Urban Design Plan for
Downtown and to develop design guidelines for commercial structures in neighborhood transition areas and for driveways
which cross pedestrian walkways.
13. A temporary Design and Amenities Committee was created and charged with developing an incentive program (including FAR
increases of up to 1.5) to encourage private development to provide a variety of public amenities in the Downtown area.
14. Staff was directed to study possible restrictions on the splitting and merging of parcels as well as the establishment of
minimum lot sizes in the new CD district.
COMMERCIAL DOWNTOWN (CD) ZONE DISTRICT MAP ATTACHMENT B
Page 1
ATTACHMENT C
CD NON-RESIDENTIAL CHANGE IN SQUARE FOOTAGE 09/01/86 TO 08/31/12
Project Address Zoning Date Approved Public Benefit
Bonus Non
Residential
Square Footage
Seismic, Historic,
or Minor Bonus
Square Footage
Net change in
non-Residential
Floor Area
520 Ramona Street A
CDCGFP
11/20/84
-
400
+400
220 University Avenue
CDCGFP
2/5/87
-
65
+65
151 Homer Avenue
CDSP
3/17/88
-
-
-9,750
314 Lytton Avenue
CDCP
5/5/88
-
-
-713
247-275 Alma Street
CDNP
8/4/88
-
-
+1,150
700 Emerson Street
CDSP
9/15/88
-
-
+4,000
431 Florence Street
CDCP
9/15/88
-
2,500
+2,500
156 University Avenue
CDCGFP
12/15/88
-
4,958
+4,958
401 Florence Street
CDCP
3/2/89
-
2,407
+2,407
619 Cowper Street
CDCP
5/6/89
-
-
+2,208
250 University Avenue
PC-3872
5/15/89
11,000B
300
+20,300
550 University Avenue
CDCP
6/1/89
-
-
-371
Page 2
Project Address Zoning Date Approved Public Benefit
Bonus Non
Residential
Square Footage
Seismic, Historic,
or Minor Bonus
Square Footage
Net change in
non-Residential
Floor Area
529 Bryant Street
PC-3974
5/3/90
2,491C
2,491
+2,491
305 Lytton Avenue
CDCP
9/28/90
-
200
+200
550 Lytton AvenueDE
CDCP
10/22/90
-
-
+4,845
531 Cowper Street
PC-4052
5/21/91
9,000
475
+9,475
540 Bryant Street
CDCGFP
3/24/92
-
404
+404
530/534 Bryant Street
CDCGFP
4/15/93
-
432
+432
555 Waverley Street/425
Hamilton AvenueE
CDCP
9/21/93
-
-
+2,064
201 University Avenue
CDCGFP
11/18/93
-
2,450
+2,450
Page 3
Project Address Zoning Date Approved Public Benefit
Bonus Non
Residential
Square Footage
Seismic, Historic,
or Minor Bonus
Square Footage
Net change in
non/Residential
Floor Area
518 Bryant Street
CDCGFP
3/3/94
-
180
+180
245 Lytton Avenue
CDCP
7/21/94
-
-
-21,320
400 Emerson StreetEF
PC-4238
9/19/94
-
200
+4,715
443 Emerson Street
CDCGFP
1/5/95
-
26
+26
420 Emerson Street
CDCP
3/16/95
-
125
+125
340 University Avenue
CDCGFP
4/6/95
- -
-402
281 University Avenue
CDCGFP
4/20/95
- -
-2,500
456 University Avenue
CDCGFP
5/18/95
-
7,486
+7,486
536 Ramona Street
CDCGFP
7/11/95
-
134
+134
725/753 Alma Street
PC-4283
7/17/95
-
-
-1,038
552 Emerson Street
CDCGFP
7/18/95
-
177
+177
483 University Avenue G
PC-4296
10/2/95
3,467C
2,789
+7,289
424 University Avenue
CDCGFP
9/21/95
-
2,803
+2,803
Page 4
Project Address Zoning Date Approved Public Benefit
Bonus Non
Residential
Square Footage
Seismic, Historic,
or Minor Bonus
Square Footage
Net change in
non/Residential
Floor Area
901/909 Alma Street E,F
PC-4389
8/1/96
-
-
+4,425
171 University Avenue
CD-C(GF)(P)
9/19/96
-
1,853
+1,853
401 High Street
CD-C(P)
10/3/96
-
350
+350
430 Kipling Street D,H
CD-C(P)
10/22/96
-
200
+1,412
460-476 University
Avenue
CD-C(GF)(P)
3/20/97
-
1,775
+1,775
400 Emerson Street D
PC-4238
3/21/97
-
-
+2,227
275 Alma Street
CD-N(P)
7/8/97
-
200
+3,207
390 Lytton Avenue
PC-4436
7/14/97
8,420C
689
+17,815
411 High Street H
CDCP
12/18/97
-
2,771
+2,771
530 Ramona CDCGFP 05/20/99 - 2852 +2852
705 Alma St CDSP 09/21/99 - 2814 +2814
200 Hamilton Ave CDCP 10/21/99 - 10913 +10913
550 Lytton Ave CDCP 08/11/00 - - +93
Page 5
Project Address Zoning Date Approved Public Benefit
Bonus Non
Residential
Square Footage
Seismic, Historic,
or Minor Bonus
Square Footage
Net change in
Non Residential
Floor Area
437 Kipling St CDCGFP 02/01/01 - - +945
701 Emerson St CDSP 05/29/01 - - +434
723 Emerson St CDSP 05/29/01 - - +400
880 - 884 Emerson St CDSP 05/29/01 - - +312
539 Alma St CDCGFP 10/23/01 - 2,500 +2,500
270 University Ave CDCGFP 11/01/01 - 2,642 +2,642
901 High St. E, F CDSP 12/12/02 - - +12,063
800 High St. I PC-4779 02/03/03 - - -15,700
164 Hamilton Ave CDCP 01/13/05 - - -2,799
335 University Ave CDCGFP 08/10/05 - 4,500J +5,249
382 University Ave CDCGFP 07/27/06 - 194 +194
102 University Ave CDCGFP 10/10/2006 - - +8
325 Lytton Ave CDCP 5/2006 - - +17,515
Page 6
Project Address Zoning Date Approved Public Benefit
Bonus Non
Residential
Square Footage
Seismic, Historic,
or Minor Bonus
Square Footage
Net change in
Non Residential
Floor Area
310 University Ave CDCGFP 07/31/2008 - 7,481 +7,481
317-323 University Ave CDCGFP 01/2008 - 2,500 +3,290
564 University Ave CDCP 7/2008 - 2,500 +4,475
278 University CDCGFP 11/2008 - - +137
265 Lytton CDCP 7/2010 - 3,712 +21,151
340 University CDCP 12/2010 - - -1,360
524 Hamilton CDCP 2/2011 - 5,200 +9,345
630 Ramona CDCP 6/2011 - 437 +437
668 Ramona CDCP 7/2011 - 4,940 +4,940
661 Bryant CDCP 2/2011 - 1,906 0
335-355 Alma CDCP 8/11 9,700 - 49,863
Totals 1986-2012 44,078 93,931 223,219
A: Project approved during the Downtown Moratorium (9/84 to 9/86), but was not included in the Downtown EIR’s “pipeline projects.” As a result, the project is counted among
the CD District’s nonresidential development approvals since the enactment of the Downtown Study Policies in 1986
B: Through Assessment District project provided additional 64 public parking spaces as part of public benefit instead of required 44 private spaces
C: Project exceeded square footage otherwise allowed by zoning
Page 7
D: Project converted residential space to non-residential space. Net non-residential space counts toward the 350,000 square foot limit
E: Project included covered parking that counts as floor area but not counted 350,000 square foot limit
F: Project was approved pursuant to PAMC Sections 18.83.120 or 18.83.130 which allow for a reduction in the number required parking spaces for shared parking facilities, joint
use parking facilities, or substitution of 8 bike parking spaces for one vehicle space.
G. In addition, project paid in-lieu fee for loss of 2 on-site parking spaces
H: In addition, projects paid in-lieu fee for loss of 4 on-site spaces
I: Part of the SOFA 2 CAP
J: Transfer of Development Right (TDR) agreement with 230 and 232 Homer Avenue. 5000 total sq ft of TDR but only 4,500 sq. ft used for Non Residential Floor Area.
Page 8
Page 1
CD PARKING DEFICIT FROM 9/1/86 to 8/31/2012 ATTACHMENT D
PROJECT
ADDRESS
ZONING
NET CHANGE
IN NON/
RESIDENTIAL
FLOOR AREA
ADDED
PARKING
REQUIRED
NET
ADDED
PARKING
SPACES
PARKING
EXEMPTIONS
PER 18.52.060
OF PAMC
NET
DEFICIT
CHANGE
TOTAL
CUMULATIVE
DEFICIT
1986 deficit
1,601
520 Ramona
StreetA
CDCGFP
+400
2
0
0
+2
1,603
220 University
Avenue
CDCGFP
+65
0
0
0
0
1,603
151 Homer
Avenue
CDSP
-9,750
0
11
0
-50
1,553
314 Lytton
Avenue
CDCP
-713
0
0
0
-3
1,550
247-275 Alma
Street
CDNP
+1,150
5
5
0
0
1,550
700 Emerson
Street
CDSP
+4,000
16
16
0
0
1,550
431 Florence St
CDCP
+2,500
10
0
10
+10
1,560
Page 2
PROJECT
ADDRESS
ZONING
NET CHANGE
IN NON/
RESIDENTIAL
FLOOR AREA
ADDED
PARKING
REQUIRED
NET
ADDED
PARKING
SPACES
PARKING
EXEMPTIONS
PER 18.52.060
OF PAMC
NET
DEFICIT
CHANGE
TOTAL
CUMULATIVE
DEFICIT
156 University
Avenue
CDCGFP +4,958 20 0 20 +20 1,580
401 Florence
Street
CDCP
+2,407
10
0
10
+10
1,590
619 Cowper
Street
CDCP
+2,208
9
9
0
0
1,590
250 University
Avenue
PC-3872
+20,300
103
131B
0
-28
1,562
550 University
Avenue
CDCP
-371
0
0
0
-1
1,561
529 Bryant
Street
PC-3974
+2,491
10
0
10
+10
1,571
520 Webster
StreetC
PC-3499
0
0
163
0
-163
1,408
305 Lytton Ave
CDCP
+200
1
0
1
+1
1,409
550 Lytton
Avenue
CDCP
+4,845
19
19
0
0
1,409
Downtown
Extensive restriping by Transportation Division of on and off/street parking
-96
1,313
Page 3
PROJECT
ADDRESS
ZONING
NET CHANGE
IN NON/
RESIDENTIAL
FLOOR AREA
ADDED
PARKING
REQUIRED
NET
ADDED
PARKING
SPACES
PARKING
EXEMPTIONS
PER 18.52.060
OF PAMC
NET
DEFICIT
CHANGE
TOTAL
CUMULATIVE
DEFICIT
531 Cowper
Street
PC-4052 +9,475 38 0 2 +38 1,351
540 Bryant
Street
CDCGFP
+404
2
0
2
+2
1,353
530/534 Bryant
Street
CDCGFP
+432
2
0
2
+2
1,355
555 Waverley
Street/425
Hamilton
AvenueD
CDCP
+2,064
8
0
0
+8
1,363
201 University
Avenue
CDCGFP
+2,450
10
0
10
+10
1,373
518 Bryant
Street
CDCGFP
+180
1
0
1
+1
1,374
245 Lytton Ave
CDCP
-21,320
90
149
0
-59
1,315
400 Emerson
Street
PC-4238
+4,715
18
5
1
+14
1,329
443 Emerson
Street
CDCGFP
+26
0
0
0
0
1,329
Page 4
PROJECT
ADDRESS
ZONING
NET CHANGE
IN NON/
RESIDENTIAL
FLOOR AREA
ADDED
PARKING
REQUIRED
NET
ADDED
PARKING
SPACES
PARKING
EXEMPTIONS
PER 18.52.060
OF PAMC
NET
DEFICIT
CHANGE
TOTAL
CUMULATIVE
DEFICIT
420 Emerson
Street
CDCP +125 1 0 1 +1 1,336
340 University
Avenue
CDCGFP
-402
0
0
0
-2
1,334
281 University
Avenue
CDCGFP
-2,500
0
0
0
-10
1,324
456 University
Avenue
CDCGFP
+7,486
30
0
30
+30
1,354
536 Ramona
Street
CDCGFP
+134
1
0
1
+1
1,355
725-753 Alma
Street
PC-4283
-1,038
7
7
0
-11
1,344
552 Emerson
Street
CDCGFP
+177
1
0
1
+1
1,345
483 University
Avenue
PC-4296
+7,289
29
-2E
11
+31
1,376
424 University
Avenue
CDCGFP
+2,803
11
0
11
+11
1,387
901/909 Alma
PC-4389
+4,425
18
18
0
0
1,387
Page 5
PROJECT
ADDRESS
ZONING
NET CHANGE
IN NON/
RESIDENTIAL
FLOOR AREA
ADDED
PARKING
REQUIRED
NET
ADDED
PARKING
SPACES
PARKING
EXEMPTIONS
PER 18.52.060
OF PAMC
NET
DEFICIT
CHANGE
TOTAL
CUMULATIVE
DEFICIT
StreetD
171 University
Avenue
CDCGFP
+1,853
7
0
7
+7
1,394
401 High Street
CDCP
+350
1
0
1
+1
1,395
430 Kipling
Street
CDCP
+1,412
5
-4E
1
+10
1,405
460/476
University
Avenue
CDCGFP
+1,775
7
0
7
+7
1,412
400 Emerson
Street
PC-4238
+2,227
9
0
0
+9
1,421
275 Alma
StreetF
CDNP
+3,207
0
0
1
+1
1,422
390 Lytton
Avenue
PC-4436
+17,815
74
50
3
+27
1,449
411 High Street
CDCP
+2,771
0
-4E
11
+15
1,464
530 Ramona CDCGFP 2852 11 0 11 +11 1475
Page 6
PROJECT
ADDRESS
ZONING
NET CHANGE
IN NON/
RESIDENTIAL
FLOOR AREA
ADDED
PARKING
REQUIRED
NET
ADDED
PARKING
SPACES
PARKING
EXEMPTIONS
PER 18.52.060
OF PAMC
NET
DEFICIT
CHANGE
TOTAL
CUMULATIVE
DEFICIT
705 Alma St CDSP 2814 11 0 11 +11 1486
200 Hamilton
Ave
CDCP 10,913 44 3E 35 +41 1527
550 Lytton Ave CDCP 93 0 0 0 0 1527
528 High St PF 0 0 138 G 0 -138 1389
445 Bryant PF 0 0 575 G 0 -575 814
437 Kipling St CDCGFP 945 4 0E 2 +4 818
701 Emerson St CDSP 434 2 1 1 +1 819
723 Emerson St CDSP 400 2 2 0 0 819
880 / 884
Emerson St
CDSP 312 2 5 0 -3 816
Page 7
PROJECT
ADDRESS
ZONING
NET CHANGE
IN NON/
RESIDENTIAL
FLOOR AREA
ADDED
PARKING
REQUIRED
NET
ADDED
PARKING
SPACES
PARKING
EXEMPTIONS
PER 18.52.060
OF PAMC
NET
DEFICIT
CHANGE
TOTAL
CUMULATIVE
DEFICIT
539 Alma St CDCGFP 2,500 10 0 10 +10 826
270 University
Ave
CDCGFP 2,642 11 0E 11 +11 837
SUBTOTAL
86-02
106,930 672 1297 236 -764 837
901 High St. CDSP 12,063 59D 60 0 -1 836
800 High St. H PC-4779 -15,700 0 63 0 -63 773
164 Hamilton
Ave
CDCP -2499 0 0 0 0 773
335 University
AveI
CDCGFP 5,249 0 0 0 0 773
Page 8
PROJECT
ADDRESS
ZONING
NET CHANGE
IN NON/
RESIDENTIAL
FLOOR AREA
ADDED
PARKING
REQUIRED
NET
ADDED
PARKING
SPACES
PARKING
EXEMPTIONS
PER 18.52.060
OF PAMC
NET
DEFICIT
CHANGE
TOTAL
CUMULATIVE
DEFICIT
382 University
Ave
CDCGFP 194 0 0 1 +1 774
102 University
Ave
CDCGFP 8 0 0 0 0 774
310 University
Ave
CDCGFP 7,481 30 0 30 +30 804
317-323
University Ave
CDCGFP 3,290 0 0 0 0 804
564 University
Ave
CDCP 4,475 10 0 10 +10 814
325 Lytton Ave CDCP 17,515 110 6 0 -6 808
265 Lytton CDCP 21,151 106 52 0 +54 860
278 University CDCGFP +137 1 0 1 +1 861
340 University CDCP -1,360 861
524 Hamilton CDCP +9,345 31 8 23 +23 884
Page 9
PROJECT
ADDRESS
ZONING
NET CHANGE
IN NON/
RESIDENTIAL
FLOOR AREA
ADDED
PARKING
REQUIRED
NET
ADDED
PARKING
SPACES
PARKING
EXEMPTIONS
PER 18.52.060
OF PAMC
NET
DEFICIT
CHANGE
TOTAL
CUMULATIVE
DEFICIT
630 Ramona CDCP +437 2 0 2 +2 886
668 Ramona CDCP +4,940 20 0 20 +20 906
661 Bryant CDCP 0 0 0 0 0 906
Downtown
Extensive restriping by Transportation Division of on and off/street parking
-32 874
180 Hamilton
Avenue
CDCP 0 0 0 5 +5 879
355 Alma Street CDCP +49,863 166 144 22 +22 901
TOTAL 223,219 1,077 1,816 350 676 901
A: Project approved during the Downtown Moratorium (9/84 to 9/86, but was not included in the Downtown EIR’s “pipeline projects.”) As a result, the project
is counted among the CD District’s nonresidential development approvals since the enactment of the Downtown Study Policies in 1986
B: Through Assessment District project provided additional 64 public parking spaces as part of public benefit
C: Addition of 2 levels of parking to Cowper/Webster garage
D: Project was approved pursuant to PAMC Sections 18.83.120 or 18.83.130 which allow for a reduction in the number required parking spaces for shared
parking facilities, joint use parking facilities, or substitution of 8 bike parking spaces for one vehicle space.
Page 10
E. Project removed existing on-site spaces or met required parking by paying in-lieu fee
F: Site had existing parking sufficient to allow expansion
G: Construction of 2 city parking lots. 528 High completed on Aug. 2003 and 445 Bryant completed on Nov. 2003
H: Part of the SOFA 2 CAP
I: As per PAMC 18.87.055, the TDR area transferred to the site does not increase the number of automobile parking spaces required for the additional floor area.
Page 11
ATTACHMENT E
Commercial Downtown (CD) and SOFA 2 CAP Floor Area by Use Category
Use Category Area
(October
1986)
Area
(October
2012)
Area Change,
percentage
1. Offices 1,100,000 1,400,000 27%
% 2. Retail 500,000 625,000 25.00%
3. Eating & Drinking 150,000 275,000 83.33%
4. Financial Services 200,000 200,000 0.00%
5. Business Services 150,000 175,000 16.67%
6. Basement Storage 175,000 100,000 -42.86%
7. Hotels 100,000 150,000 50.00%
8. Personal Services 75,000 125,000 66.67%
9. Utility Facility 150,000 100,000 -33.33%
10. Public Facilities 50,000 75,000 50.00%
11. Automotive Services 150,000 50,000 -66.67%
12. Recreation/Private Club 25,000 50,000 100.00%
13. Theaters 50,000 25,000 -50.00%
14. Warehousing &
Distribution
50,000 25,000 -50.00%
15. Manufacturing 50,000 0 -100.00%
16. Religious Institutions 50,000 25,000 -50.00%
17. Multi-Family Residential 250,000 400,000 50.00%
18. Single Family
Residential
50,000 25,000 -50.00%
19. Vacant & Under
Construction
150,000 50,000 -66.66%
20. Vacant & For Sale 0 0
21. Vacant & Available 150,000 100,000 -33.33%
Total 3,625,000 3,875,000 5.52%
ADJUSTED TOTAL: (Deduct
residential uses, religious institutions,
vacant & for sale and vacant & under
construction.)
3,125,000 3,350,000
(Rounded to the nearest 25,000 square feet)
* The above table is rounded to the nearest 25,000 square feet and was based on
a table originally prepared in 1986. Over the years, because of the rounding to 25,000
square foot increments, the table has had a greater margin of error. Staff attempted to
update the table from the beginning in 1998; therefore the numbers may not compare
directly to tables prepared prior to the 1998 report.