HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 3454
City of Palo Alto (ID # 3454)
City Council Staff Report
Report Type: Consent Calendar Meeting Date: 2/11/2013
City of Palo Alto Page 1
Council Priority: Environmental Sustainability
Summary Title: Electric Demand Response Pilot Program Extension
Title: Utilities Advisory Commission Recommendation that Council Approve a
Three Year Extension of the Demand Response Pilot Program for Large
Commercial Electric Customers
From: City Manager
Lead Department: Utilities
Recommendation
Staff and the Utilities Advisory Commission (UAC) recommend that the City Council approve a
three-year extension of the demand response (DR) pilot program for large commercial electric
customers.
Executive Summary
Providing appropriate incentives to customers through DR programs can help utilities reduce
electricity usage during high-demand periods, thereby reducing capacity costs as well as
limiting production from inefficient and polluting electric generation resources across the state.
The City’s DR pilot ran during the summers of 2011 and 2012 with the objective to evaluate the
cost-effectiveness and customer appeal of DR incentives in Palo Alto. However, mild weather in
both summers resulted in the need for few DR events, which created a lack of sufficient data to
evaluate the program. A three-year extension of the pilot is proposed to further explore the
benefits of DR in Palo Alto. At its January 9 meeting, the UAC voted unanimously to
recommend the three-year pilot program extension.
Background
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 required utilities to offer customers time-based rate options such
as time-of-use pricing, critical-peak pricing, real-time pricing, and peak load reduction credits.
In June 2008, staff communicated these requirements to Council, but recommended against
implementing such options based on the estimated low level of community benefit, constraints
on the City’s automated customer information and billing system software (SAP), and
City of Palo Alto Page 2
insufficient metering capability (CMR: 215:08). Subsequently, the 2010 Ten-year Electric Energy
Efficiency Plan (CMR: 218:10) identified cost-effective DR as a City of Palo Alto Utilities (CPAU)
initiative. In March 2011, Council approved a two-year small-scale DR pilot program designed
to work with current systems that would yield valuable insight at a relatively low cost (Staff
Report 1450).
Benefits of DR in California
Electric utilities increasingly rely on DR and time-based retail rates to reduce supply costs and
encourage efficient energy use. Large investor-owned utilities in California have implemented
DR programs that offer incentives to customers for energy use reduction during high-use
periods and for investing in automation technology. Utility providers generally base the
amount of energy reduction credits offered on their estimated avoided costs. Typically, large
national service providers manage these DR programs for the utility providers.
In addition to reducing costs to the utility and providing a financial incentive for participating
customers, DR may reduce the need for new power plant construction and reduce air pollution
by limiting production from inefficient and polluting electric generation resources in California
and the Bay Area. Furthermore, new applications may improve electric transmission grid
reliability and prove to be a useful tool to address the supply peaks and valleys caused by
intermittent renewable energy sources such as wind and solar.
Program Results to Date
CPAU’s DR pilot program was limited to two years (summers of 2011 and 2012) and two
megawatts (MW) of peak energy use reduction. CPAU compensated participating customers at
the cost-neutral rate of 50 cents for every kilowatt-hour (kWh) of energy reduced below a
specified baseline. Baseline usage was calculated for each customer based on prior usage
patterns. Most of CPAU’s commercial customers have limited flexibility to curtail their electric
usage, but potential avenues for usage reduction include limiting non-critical lighting and pre-
cooling buildings early in the day.
In the first summer of the pilot, 3 customers participated and only one test event occurred. In
the second summer, 7 participants registered for the program, 3 received compensation
totaling $1,749.50, and a reduction of 1.2 MW was achieved, representing about 0.8% of the
total City peak that day. The results are shown in the table below:
Pilot Program Year Summer 2011 Summer 2012
Total Participants 3 7
Number of Test Events Held 1 1 (May 31)
Number of Actual DR Events 0 1 (July 11)
City of Palo Alto Page 3
Participants in Actual DR Event 2
Demand Reduced in Actual DR Event 1.2 MW
Compensation Paid Out $1,749.50
A graphical representation of the load reductions achieved on July 11, 2012 is shown below.
The chart shows hourly load profiles for one of the customers who participated in the 2012 DR
event. An algorithm based on the customers’ previous days’ usage was used to determine what
the customer load would have been during the DR event from hour 15 through hour 17.
Discussion
Accomplishments of the 2011/2012 Pilot
Some valuable experience was gained during the 2011/2012 DR pilot. First, the framework of a
DR program including the terms and conditions and the participant application were
successfully deployed, and a small number of participants’ targeted energy reductions were
shown to be possible. Second, by grappling with the metering issues that arose for certain
customers, staff is now more prepared and will know what to look for when additional
customers enter the program. Third, a new and improved forecasting model was developed in-
house which will provide a more accurate prediction of peak demand days.
Another important accomplishment was the innovative use of cloud-based technologies to
semi-automate CPAU’s DR process. Web-based communication software developed by
Autogrid, a Palo Alto start-up, was used to manage all DR-related communications and financial
calculations. Notifications about events were sent out via the system. The system keeps track
City of Palo Alto Page 4
of DR events, participation, performance and payments due to participants. User-friendly
graphical representations of DR event results are accessible to participants and utility staff.
Some important lessons regarding active versus passive responses from customers, and system
improvements are underway as a result. The semi-automation provided by this system or
something similar will provide scalability to the program as it expands.
The participation of the City Hall building in the second year of the pilot afforded many learning
opportunities. City staff worked inter-departmentally and with City Hall’s Building
Management System (BMS) and lighting contractors to ready the building for DR. The process
for programming the building control systems was educational for all involved staff. In
addition, a communication plan to notify City Hall occupants of pending DR events was
developed and shared with the facility managers of other pilot program participants.
Reasons for Extending the Pilot
Staff proposes extending the pilot program for three additional summers for the following
reasons: (1) mild weather resulted in insufficient data about DR potential; (2) metering and
BMS technical problems restricted the participation of some customers; and (3) there may be
synergies between a full-scale DR and a future commercial advanced meter pilot program.
The objective of CPAU’s two-year pilot program was to assess the magnitude and
dispatchability of DR on hot summer days. However, both summers (within the program dates
of May 1 through September 30) were unusually mild. While the City’s peak load is expected to
be about 185 MW, a peak of only 170 MW was reached on September, 20 2011 and a peak of
only 174 MW on October 1, 2012 (the day after the DR pilot expired). Because the weather was
so mild, CPAU did not declare any DR events in 2011. The two customers who participated in
the event achieved their targeted energy reductions, but there is not enough data to determine
the reliability of demand reduction through a DR program without greater customer
participation in more DR events.
Second, metering and BMS problems were challenging in the first two years of the pilot. For
several participants, CPAU had issues obtaining the 15-minute interval data needed to monitor
usage for DR. While staff eventually resolved the metering issues, several participants were not
able to participate in the one event that occurred in 2012. Likewise, several participants
experienced BMS programing delays causing them to forego participation. Again, the result
was incomplete data, although both customers and staff learned from the experiences.
Lastly, effective DR may be enhanced by advanced metering solutions, and coordinating the
timing of full-scale DR implementation with other related CPAU efforts may be prudent. CPAU
launched CustomerConnect, a residential advanced meter and customer engagement pilot, in
City of Palo Alto Page 5
2013 (Staff Report 3330). A commercial customer version of such a program will likely be
implemented by 2015. By 2016, CPAU may be in a position to integrate advanced metering
programs with full-scale deployment of commercial DR if synergies between those two
programs become clear.
Proposed 2013-2015 DR Pilot Extension
The proposed extended DR pilot is substantively the same as the original pilot. Compensation
remains $0.50 per kWh with no penalty for non-performance. The compensation rate was
calculated by quantifying the benefit to the electric supply portfolio of peak demand reduction.
CPAU’s cost of supplying additional megawatt of peak demand is approximately $20,000 per
year. These savings accrue mostly from reducing the costs associated with the requirement to
retain sufficient reliability reserve capacity required by the California Independent System
Operator (CAISO). The compensation rate for the pilot program was designed to pass on all the
savings to the participants. This strategy may change in a full roll-out of the program when the
savings may be shared between the utility and participants, but for the pilot program, the
participants will be getting the full savings as they are helping CPAU establish the DR program.
For 2013, staff proposes to accept up to 15 participants. This number may be expanded in 2014
and 2015 depending on customer interest. Given that 1.2 MW of demand reduction was
achieved by just two customers responding to the July 11, 2012 event, the maximum demand
reduction target for the extended program will be raised from 2 MW to 4 MW. Because the
2012 peak occurred in October, the end of the DR season has been extended to October 15.
Attachment A contains the terms and conditions of the proposed 2013-2015 pilot DR program.
The table below highlights the changes from the original 2-year pilot.
Program Attribute 2011-2012 DR Pilot Proposed 2013-1015 DR Pilot
Compensation $0.50 per kWh $0.50 per kWh
Penalty none none
Maximum Peak Reduction 2 MW 4 MW
DR Season May 1-September 30 May 1-October 15
Goals for Extended Pilot
Over three summers, it is hoped that enough evidence will be gathered to prove or disprove
the effectiveness of DR as a reliable resource in CPAU’s electric portfolio. The experience
gained will assist CPAU in determining if a CPAU DR program could be designed to effectively
participate in emerging market opportunities related to grid reliability.
Another goal is to test the “Open Automated Demand Response (ADR)” platform, and at least
one customer has expressed an interest in this. Open ADR is a communication protocol that
allows a utility’s DR communication program to “talk” directly to the participant’s BMS. The
BMS is pre-programmed to accept the DR event notification signal, and energy reduction
City of Palo Alto Page 6
measures are taken automatically. Of course, there is a process for a human to override the
system and opt out of a DR event. Staff intends to work closely with any participants interested
in pursuing this opportunity, and while no incentives for automation are proposed at this time,
the benefits will be evaluated and a proposal may be brought to the UAC and Council in the
future.
Electric vehicles (EV) present another interesting DR opportunity. CPAU has a professional
services contract with a Palo Alto start-up that plans to aggregate EVs for the purpose of DR.
The technology allows the potential aggregator to “talk” directly to the participating EV and
cause it to reduce or stop charging during a DR event. CPAU plans to test the ability of the
aggregator to meet the minimum demand reduction of 50 KW.
Next Steps
The future of DR in Palo Alto may extend beyond peak demand reduction. As CPAU’s electric
portfolio consists of greater amounts of renewable resources, using DR to balance supply with
demand may provide additional economic value to CPAU and its customers. Other synergies
may exist with the City’s Emerging Technology Demonstration Program which invites
organizations to partner with CPAU to showcase and test new innovative products.
Staff expects to gain experience and better understand customer interests over the pilot
program period and will report back to the UAC and Council in the Fall of 2015 on proposed
next steps for a full-scale DR program. Results from this pilot will also assist in better defining
an Automated Metering Infrastructure (AMI) or smart grid deployment plan for commercial
customers throughout the City. Staff is currently investigating the value of incentives to
encourage customers to install building equipment to enable automated DR.
Board/Commission Review and Recommendations
At its January 9 meeting, the UAC voted unanimously (6-0 with Commissioner Waldfogel
absent) to recommend that the City Council extend the DR pilot for three years. There was no
discussion.
Resource Impact
Total compensation per customer will vary depending on the energy reduction undertaken by
the participant and the number of times that CPAU calls for energy reductions. If the program
results in a 4 MW reduction of the City’s annual peak load, the resulting annual savings is
$80,000, an amount equal to the potential total compensation to participants. The
compensation payments are available in the existing supply procurement budget since program
participation will cause CPAU’s electric supply cost to be lowered by a similar amount, making
the program cost-neutral. Since the payments to participating customers will be processed
outside the automated customer billing system, no billing system upgrades or SAP software
modifications will be required.
City of Palo Alto Page 7
The program administrative budget is estimated to be $15,000 per year for the web-based DR
management system. The funds needed for program administration are available in the
existing local generation evaluation budget. Staff resources needed to administer the program
total 0.25 FTE and include staff from Resource Management and Utility Marketing Services.
Policy Implications
Demand Response programs were contemplated in the Council-approved 2010 Ten-Year
Electric Energy Efficiency Plan (CMR: 218:10). No new policies are established with the
extension of the DR pilot program.
Environmental Review
The extension of the pilot DR program does not meet the California Environmental Quality Act’s
definition of a “project” under Public Resources Code 21065, thus environmental review is not
required for this project.
Attachments:
Attachment A: Demand Response Pilot Program Terms and Conditions (PDF)
Attachment B: Excerpted Draft UAC Minutes of 1-9-13 (PDF)
Attachment A
Page 1 of 4
Demand Response Pilot Program
Terms and Conditions
The Demand Response Pilot Program (Program) is designed to help participating customers
earn incentives for reducing their electricity use on days when demand is high, which helps
reduce Palo Alto’s annual peak electricity demand. The Program’s incentive payments share
the anticipated savings between the utility and Program participants.
Through the Program, CPAU will provide monetary incentives to participating customers who
are able to reduce their electrical usage when called upon by CPAU during high load periods in
the summer of 2013. Participation will be limited to 15 commercial customers and four MW, or
about 2% of the City’s annual peak load. Demand Response Pilot Program Terms and
Conditions are outlined below. Interested Participants must file an application by April 15th,
2013 in order to be eligible to participate in the Program on its start date of May 1st, 2013.
1. Defined Terms:
1.1. Adjusted Baseline: The Baseline multiplied by a Morning-of Adjustment Factor to
capture the anticipated change in the Participant’s Baseline usage on the day that
CPAU calls for a reduction in energy usage.
1.2. Baseline: A Participant’s typical hourly energy usage in the absence of a PLR Event,
calculated from the average hourly usage of the previous ten the last ten weekdays,
excluding PLR Event Days, weekends and Program Holidays.
1.3. Bonus Payment: An annual additional payment of $2 per kW of Peak Load Reduction
to a Participant who completes Full Performance for all PLR Events during either of
the Program Years.
1.4. CPAU: The City of Palo Alto Utilities Department.
1.5. Estimated PLR Quantity: The amount of load that a Participant promises to curtail
during a PLR Event, specified in kWs, which is set by a Participant on their
application form.
1.6. Full Performance: A Peak Load Reduction equal to or greater than the Estimated PLR
Quantity for the full PLR Event Duration.
1.7. Program Holidays: Memorial Day, Independence Day and Labor Day.
1.8. Kilowatt (kW): Electricity capacity measurement unit.
1.9. Kilowatt-hour (kWh): A unit of energy in which one kW of power expended for one
hour results in one kWh of energy usage.
1.10. Morning-of Adjustment (MoA): A ratio of (a) the average load in the first three of
four hours before the PLR Event, to (b) the average load of the same hours from the
last 10 weekdays, excluding PLR Event Days, weekends and Program Holidays. The
MoA factor is limited to + 20% of the Participant’s Baseline.
Attachment A
Page 2 of 4
1.11. Meterlinks: The CPAU program used to record electricity usage in 15-minute interval
data format that can be retrieved and displayed in graphical or tabular format by the
customer or by CPAU staff.
1.12. Non-Performance: Failure of a Participant to respond to a PLR Event Notification by
10 a.m. Pacific Standard Time on the day of PLR Event, or a Peak Load Reduction
equal to less than half of the Estimated PLR Quantity.
1.13. Participant: CPAU commercial customer participating in the Demand Response Pilot
Program.
1.14. Participation Period: For Program Year 2012, from Wednesday May 1, 2013 through
Tuesday October 15, 2013. The Participation Period excludes weekends and Program
Holidays.
1.15. Peak Load: Participant’s electrical load during the hours of noon to 6:00 p.m. during
the Participation Period, specified in kWs.
1.16. Peak Load Reduction (PLR): The decrease in a Participant’s Peak Load during a PLR
Event equal to the difference between a Participant’s Adjusted Baseline and its Peak
Load on a PLR Event Day, specified in kWs.
1.17. PLR Event: A CPAU request for Participants to reduce their load the following day for
the hours specified by CPAU. PLR Events will typically be called for hot summer days
when CPAU’s load is projected to approach the annual peak.
1.18. PLR Event Day: The calendar date for which a Peak Load Reduction is requested.
1.19. PLR Event Duration: The number of hours that each PLR Event lasts in any given day.
1.20. Program: Demand Response Pilot Program that will be administered by CPAU in
2013, 2014, and 2015.
1.21. Program Year(s): The calendar years 2013, 2014, and 2015 during which the Program
is in effect.
2. Participant Eligibility
2.1. Participant must be an electric customer of CPAU in good standing.
2.2. Participant must be enrolled in Meterlinks.
2.3. Participant must be able to commit to an Estimated PLR Quantity of at least 50 kW and
identify and document associated loads.
2.4. Participant may adjust the Estimated PLR Quantity after the first PLR Event.
2.5. Participant may not use backup generation to reduce metered load during a PLR Event.
2.6. Participant, at its own expense, must have access to email and telephone during normal
business hours.
3. Parameters of a PLR Event and PLR Event Duration
3.1. A PLR Event may occur up to 15 days per year during the Participation Period.
3.2. A PLR Event may occur between the hours of 12 noon and 6 p.m. during the
Participation Period.
Attachment A
Page 3 of 4
3.3. The PLR Event Duration may not exceed five hours.
3.4. CPAU may call no more than one PLR Event per day and no more than 10 PLR Events
per month.
3.5. The sum of all PLR Event Durations may not exceed 75 hours per Program Year.
4. Notification of a PLR Event
4.1. CPAU, or its designated agent (the Northern California Power Agency), will notify the
Participant by email by noon Pacific Standard Time, on the business day prior to the PLR
Event Day. If Monday is a PLR Event Day, CPAU will notify Participants by noon on the
Friday immediately preceding the PLR Event. This notification will contain the following
information:
4.1.1. Date of the PLR Event;
4.1.2. PLR Event Duration; and
4.1.3. Participant’s Estimated PLR Quantity.
5. Participant’s Response to a PLR Event Notification
5.1. Participant must inform CPAU (via phone, email, or CPAU’s DR management system) by
10 a.m. Pacific Daylight Time on the day of the PLR Event that (1) the PLR Event
Notification was received, and (2) the Participant’s intent regarding meeting its
Estimated PLR Quantity for the full PLR Event Duration.
6. Quantification of PLR Response of Participant with Adjusted Baseline
6.1. CPAU will base all Program calculations on data from Meterlinks.
6.2. CPAU will compute a Baseline for a Participant’s electricity usage based on an hourly
average of the 10 days immediately prior to the PLR Event Day excluding weekends,
Program Holidays and PLR Event Days.
6.3. CPAU will compute the Participant’s MoA factor.
6.4. CPAU will compute the Participant’s Adjusted Baseline for each PLR Event.
6.5. Within 2 business days after each PLR Event, CPAU will provide the Participant with the
resulting Participant Peak Load Response.
7. Payments and Penalties for Peak Load Reduction
7.1. There will be no payments or penalties for Non-Performance.
7.2. Payment for Peak Load Reduction will be made at a rate of 50 cents per kWh up to a
maximum of the Estimated PLR Quantity as determined by CPAU by November 30th of
each Program Year.
7.3. Participants who exhibit Full Performance on all PLR Events during a Program Year will
be provided a Bonus Payment for that Program Year, to be paid as determined by CPAU
by November 30th of each Program Year
7.4. If there are no PLR Events in a Program Year, Participants will receive neither a Peak
Load Reduction Payment nor a Bonus Payment .
Attachment A
Page 4 of 4
8. Exiting the Program
8.1. Participant may leave the Program at any time, by providing five days prior written
notice to CPAU, provided via e-mail to the CPAU address provided on the Program
Application.
8.2. CPAU may terminate a Participant’s involvement in the Program at any time by
providing five days prior written notice, provided via email sent to the address provided
by the Participant on its Program Application.
9. Program Administration and Termination
CPAU reserves the right to modify or terminate the Program and any of its Terms and
Conditions at any time, for any reason. If CPAU terminates the Program, it will provide
all Participants written notice by email and first class mail sent to the address provided
by the Participant on its Program Application of CPAU’s intent to terminate the Program
on a set date. CPAU agrees to pay any amounts earned by Participants under the
Program within ninety (90) days of the date of Program termination.
EXCERPTED DRAFT MINUTES OF THE JANUARY 9, 2013
UTILITIES ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING
ITEM 1: ACTION: Staff Recommendation that the Utilities Advisory Commission Recommend
that City Council Approve a Three-Year Extension of the Demand Response Pilot Program for
Large Commercial Electric Customers
Senior Resource Planner Karla Dailey stated that she was available for questions, if any. No
commissioners had any questions on the report or recommendation.
ACTION:
Commissioner Melton made a motion that the UAC recommend that Council approve a three-
year extension of the Demand Response pilot program for large commercial electric customers.
Commissioner Chang seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously (6-0) with
Commissioner Waldfogel absent.