HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 7026
City of Palo Alto (ID # 7026)
City Council Staff Report
Report Type: Consent Calendar Meeting Date: 6/27/2016
City of Palo Alto Page 1
Summary Title: Net Surplus Electricity Compensation Rate
Title: Utilities Advisory Commission Recommendation that the City Council
Adopt a Resolution Amending the Net Surplus Electricity Compensation Rate
(E-NSE-1)
From: City Manager
Lead Department: Utilities
Recommendation
Staff and the Utilities Advisory Commission (UAC) recommend that the City Council adopt a
resolution (Attachment A) amending the Net Surplus Electricity Compensation Rate Schedule
(E-NSE).
Executive Summary
Electric utilities must offer Net Energy Metering (NEM) to eligible customers under specific
conditions set by state law. One such requirement is that electric utilities establish a Net
Surplus Electricity Compensation Rate Schedule to compensate eligible customer-generators for
electricity produced in excess of on-site load at the end of each twelve-month period. In
December 2010, the City adopted the Net Surplus Electricity Compensation Rate Schedule (E-
NSE) rate effective January 1, 2011, to compensate eligible customers for their net surplus
electricity at a value of 5.841 cents per kilowatt-hour (kWh), and the rate has remained
unchanged since. Staff proposes to update the valuation methodology supporting the E-NSE
rate to reflect the City’s avoided cost of local solar from the prior calendar year, updated
annually. Using this methodology and 2015 data, the proposed E-NSE rate is 7.21 cents per
kilowatt-hour effective July 1, 2016.
Staff expects the total cost of energy purchases under the proposed 7.21 cents/kWh rate will be
$15,000 to $20,000 a year at full NEM program capacity of 9.5 MW, or $5,000 more per year
compared to the current E-NSE rate. The proposed E-NSE rate is a cost-justified rate that meets
statutory requirements set out in State law and applies only to NEM customers.
Background
Assembly Bill (AB) 920 (2009) modified the California Public Utilities Code’s terms and
conditions for Net Energy Metering (PUC Section 2827, et. seq.). AB 920 required the City
City of Palo Alto Page 2
Council to establish a Net Surplus Electricity Compensation Rate Schedule effective January 1,
2011, to compensate eligible customer-generators for electricity produced in excess of on-site
load at the end of each twelve-month period. The Net Metering Net Surplus Electricity
Compensation rate (Utility Rate Schedule E-NSE-1) was adopted by Council in December 2010
(Resolution 9124).
Eligible customer-generators may choose to receive their Net Surplus Energy compensation as a
monetary bill credit or as cash. Settlement periods are twelve months and are deemed to start
when the utility receives the customer’s completed and signed election form. If the customer
fails to make an election, electric utilities are not obligated to offer compensation or carry
forward the net-surplus electricity; PUC Section 2827(h)(3) requires the City to claim the surplus
as its own. State law (PUC Section 2827(h)(6)) also requires that the net surplus electricity
purchased by the electric utility counts toward the electric utility’s renewables portfolio
standard (RPS) annual procurement targets.
In December 2010, the City adopted the E-NSE rate to compensate eligible customers for their
net surplus electricity at a value of 5.841 cents/kWh, which is based on the average cost of the
City’s renewable portfolio standard (RPS)-eligible supply contracts in FY2010. This value
includes the value of the electricity and renewable attributes, and excludes the value of
avoided costs for transmission and losses. The valuation methodology was chosen because of
its simplicity and because it does not shift costs between eligible customer-generators and
other bundled service customers, in compliance with PUC 2827(h)(5).
As of April 30, 2016, the City has 885 eligible NEM customers with a total generating capacity of
7.6 MW. Total net surplus generation over the past four calendar years is shown in Table 1. The
aggregate amount of net surplus generation is minimal compared to the City’s total energy
purchases1, and predominantly from the residential customer class. The number of net surplus
generators is small compared to the overall number of solar customers. Customers may end up
producing electricity beyond their on-site needs because of a variety of reasons, including: 1)
the customer sized the solar system larger than the current load in anticipation of adopting an
electric vehicle, but has not done so yet, 2) the customer decreased load significantly after
adopting a solar installation, due to energy efficiency measures or reduced family size, or 3) the
solar system was mistakenly sized to be larger than the customer’s on-site needs.
1 Net Surplus compensation paid to customers in 2015 totaled $10,605.09, or less than 0.02% of total electricity
purchases.
City of Palo Alto Page 3
Table 1: Historical annual net surplus generation by customer class
Customer Class Annual Net Surplus Generation (kWh)
2012 2013 2014 2015
Residential 211,445 238,192 349,857 391,025
Small Commercial 168 212 1,946 4,680
Medium Commercial 0 3 3 0
Total 211,613 238,407 351,806 395,705
Discussion
Public Utilities Code Section 2827 describes the terms and conditions of net energy metering,
including the requirements for the net surplus electricity compensation rate. Pertinent sections
of the PUC Section 2827 are copied below.
PUC section 2827 (h) (5) (A):
The net surplus electricity compensation valuation shall be established so as to provide
the net surplus customer-generator just and reasonable compensation for the value of
net surplus electricity, while leaving other ratepayers unaffected. The ratemaking
authority shall determine whether the compensation will include, where appropriate
justification exists, either or both of the following components:
(i) The value of the electricity itself.
(ii) The value of the renewable attributes of the electricity.
PUC section 2827 (h) (5) (B):
In establishing the rate pursuant to subparagraph (A), the ratemaking authority shall
ensure that the rate does not result in a shifting of costs between solar customer-
generators and other bundled service customers.
Staff proposal
Staff proposes increasing the net surplus electricity compensation rate to 7.21 cents per kWh,
shown in Figure 1, which is calculated based on a historical short-term avoided cost of local
solar for calendar year 2015. The value would take effect July 1, 2016, and would be updated
annually. The value of 7.21 cents per kWh was determined utilizing historical data and takes
into account the value of the energy and congestion, avoided capacity charges, avoided
transmission and ancillary service (AS) charges, avoided transmission and distribution (T&D)
system losses, and renewable energy credits (RECs), or environmental attributes. The energy
component to the overall credit rate is calculated by taking historical wholesale monthly round-
the-clock market price data for northern California, and weighting them based on the typical
generation profile of rooftop solar PV systems in Palo Alto and the hourly profile of market
prices in northern California. In this way, the valuation methodology accounts for the fact that
solar energy is often generated at times of peak system demand. Avoided transmission and AS
charges are calculated based on the actual charges that the City pays to the California
Independent System Operator (CAISO) for these services. The value of the environmental
City of Palo Alto Page 4
benefits is based on historical market price indicatives for the value of a “Bucket 1” REC. The
valuation methodology is consistent with the 2016 electric cost of service analysis (COSA).
Figure 1: Value of net metering net surplus electricity rate (E-NSE)
The proposal uses an updated valuation methodology for two primary reasons. First, the
proposal is consistent with the valuation model used to calculate the proposed NEM successor
credit rate for energy exports (proposed Utility Rate Schedule E-EEC), which is also a short-term
avoided supply cost of local solar. The only difference in the application of the valuation
methodology is that the NEM successor credit rate is a forward-looking value that uses input
data for the upcoming fiscal year (FY 2017) and the NEM net surplus electricity compensation
rate is a backward-looking value that uses input data from the prior calendar year (CY 2015)2.
Second, the prior valuation methodology adopted in 2010 utilized RPS-eligible renewable
energy costs, which are all long-term energy contracts, many of which span multiple decades.
The proposed valuation methodology is a short-term avoided cost based on market purchases,
which is more consistent with how CPAU balances small amounts of energy (such as that from
net surplus electricity generators) when managing the electric supply portfolio.
2 Net surplus compensation is for generation in excess over the past 12-month period so it uses data from the past
year. The NEM successor credit rate (E-EEC) is for energy that will be generated in the future, which is why it uses
forecasts for the input data for the next fiscal year.
City of Palo Alto Page 5
Alternatives
There are alternative valuation methodologies that could be used to calculate the net surplus
electricity compensation rate that also fulfill statutory requirements. Using the same valuation
methodology as that adopted in 2010 (average cost of RPS-eligible renewable energy supply
excluding transmission), the value of the rate would be 6.835 per kWh for FY 2017 (based on FY
2016 costs). Staff does not recommend this alternative because it does not take into account a
variety of avoided costs of local generation and it is inconsistent with the proposed valuation
methodology to calculate the NEM successor rate for electricity exports. A second alternative
would be to adopt the same value as the proposed NEM successor credit rate for energy
exports (proposed Utility Rate Schedule E-EEC), which is 7.485 cents per kWh. Staff also does
not recommend this methodology since, although the underlying valuation model is the same,
the E-EEC rate is forward-looking and based on input data for FY 2017, whereas net surplus
compensation is by definition backward-looking and based on input data from CY 2015.
Committee Review and Recommendation
The UAC reviewed the recommendation at its June 1, 2016 meeting. After hearing that the rate
affected only a few customers whose annual on-site generation exceeds their annual usage,
that the methodology change was made to be consistent with the methodology for the NEM
successor program and that the rate was increasing from 5.841 cents/kWh to 7.21 cents/kWh,
the UAC supported the proposal.
The UAC voted unanimously (6-0 with Chair Cook, and Commissioners Ballantine, Forssell,
Johnston, Schwartz and Trumbull voting yes and Vice Chair Danaher absent) to recommend that
Council amend the surplus electricity compensation rate as proposed. The excerpted draft
minutes of the UAC’s June 1, 2016 meeting are provided as Attachment C.
Resource Impact
Staff anticipates the resource impact of updating the cost-based net surplus electricity
compensation E-NSE rate from 5.841 cents/kWh to 7.21 cents/kWh for eligible customers will
be negligible. Based on the historical levels of net surplus electricity and trends in customer
elections discussed above, staff expects the total cost to be approximately $15,000 to $20,000 a
year at full NEM program capacity of 9.5 MW. The rate change will result in an additional
$5,000 per year cost to the electric fund.
Policy Implications
This recommendation does not represent a change to current City policies. The proposed
revisions do not have any policy implications.
Environmental Review
Council’s adoption of the proposed net surplus electricity compensation rate is not subject to
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to California Public Resources Code
Sec. 21080(b)(8) and Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Sec. 15273(a). After
reviewing the staff report and all attachments presented to Council, the Council incorporates
City of Palo Alto Page 6
these documents herein and finds that sufficient evidence has been presented setting forth
with specificity the basis for this claim of CEQA exemption.
Attachments:
Attachment A: Resolution Adopting Electric Rate E-NSE (PDF)
Attachment B: Net Surplus Energy Compensation Rate Schedule E-NSE-1 effective 07-01-
2016 in redline format (PDF)
Attachment C: Excerpted Draft UAC Minutes of June 1, 2016 Meeting (PDF)
Attachment A
NOT YET APPROVED
160531 jb 6053781
Resolution No. ______
Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Amending Electric
Rate Schedule E-NSE-1 (Net Metering Net Surplus Electric
Compensation).
R E C I T A L S
A. Net Energy Metering (NEM), is a billing arrangement that provides credit to
customers for the full retail value of the electricity their system generates.
B. State law, California Public Utilities Code Section 2827 et. seq., requires all
electric utilities to offer NEM to eligible customers and to establish a Net Surplus Electricity
Compensation Rate to compensate eligible customer-generators for electricity produced in
excess of on-site load at the end of each twelve month period.
C. In December 2010, the Council adopted the City’s first E-NSE rate to compensate
eligible customer-generators for their net surplus electricity at a value of 5.841 cents/kWh
(Resolution 9124), based on the average cost of the City’s renewable portfolio standard-eligible
contracts in FY 2010.
D. Staff has developed, in conjunction with the FY 2016 electric cost of service
analysis, an updated E-NSE-1 compensation rate to reflect the City’s avoided cost of local solar
for calendar year 2015. The updated E-NSE-1 compensation rate is based on historical data,
taking into account the value of the energy and congestion costs, avoided capacity charges,
avoided transmission and ancillary service charges, avoided transmission and distribution
system loses and renewable energy credits.
E. Pursuant to Chapter 12.20.010 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code, the Council of
the City of Palo Alto may by resolution adopt rules and regulations governing utility services,
fees and charges.
The Council of the City of Palo Alto does hereby RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. Pursuant to Section 12.20.010 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code, Utility
Rate Schedule E-NSE-1 (Net Metering Net Surplus Electric Compensation) is hereby amended to
read as attached and incorporated.
a) Utility Rate Schedule E-NSE-1, as amended, shall become effective July 1,
2016.
b) The Net Metering Net Surplus Electric Compensation rate adopted by this
resolution is based on a detailed analysis of historical data, the value of
energy and congestion costs, avoided capacity charges, avoided
transmission and ancillary service charges, avoided transmission and
distribution system loses and renewable energy credits, and was
developed in coordination with the City’s 2016 electric cost of service
analysis.
Attachment A
NOT YET APPROVED
160531 jb 6053781
SECTION 2. The Council finds that the revenue derived from the adoption of this
resolution shall be used only for the purpose set forth in Article VII, Section 2, of the Charter of
the City of Palo Alto.
SECTION 3. The Council finds that the fees and charges adopted by this resolution are
charges imposed for a specific government service or product provided directly to the payor
that are not provided to those not charged, and do not exceed the reasonable costs to the City
of providing the service or product.
SECTION 4. The Council finds that the adoption of this resolution changing electric
rates is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to California
Public Resources Code Sec. 21080(b)(8) and Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Sec.
15273(a). After reviewing the staff report and all attachments presented to Council, the
Council incorporates these documents herein and finds that sufficient evidence has been
presented setting forth with specificity the basis for this claim of CEQA exemption.
INTRODUCED AND PASSED:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
ATTEST:
___________________________ ___________________________
City Clerk Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED:
___________________________ ___________________________
Senior Deputy City Attorney City Manager
___________________________
Director of Utilities
___________________________
Director of Administrative Services
NET METERING NET SURPLUS ELECTRICITY COMPENSATION
UTILITY RATE SCHEDULE E-NSE-1
CITY OF PALO ALTO UTILITIES
Issued by the City Council
Effective 7-1-1-20112016
Sheet No.E-NSE-1
A. APPLICABILITY:
This schedule applies to eligible residential and small commercial net meteringNet Energy Metering
Customers who, at the end of an annual settlement period, as defined bydescribed in Rule 29, are net
surplus customer-generatorsNet Surplus Customer-Generators of electricity and who elect to receive
monetary compensation as such preference is indicated on the net surplus electricity election form.
This schedule only applies to Customers who participate in Net Energy Metering, and does not apply
to Customers that take service under the City’s Net Energy Metering Successor Rate, as each of
these terms are defined in Rule and Regulation 2.
B. TERRITORY:
Applies to locations within the service area ofThis rate schedule applies anywhere the City of Palo
Alto provides electric service.
C. RATES:
Per kWh
Net energy compensationSurplus Electricity Compensation rate $0.058410721
D. SPECIAL CONDITIONS
1.Net surplus compensation eligibility will be determined as specified in Rule 29. The
determination of a Customer’s net surplus electricity measured in kWh will be based on a
twelve-month settlement period. The twelve-month settlement period starts on the date of
Interconnection of the facility, or for Customers with dates of Interconnection of their facilities
prior to February 1, 2010, on the day after CPAU’s receipt of the Customer’s net surplus
electricity election form.Net Surplus Electricity Compensation Rate eligibility shall be
determined as specified in Rule 29. Net surplus electricity, as specified in Rule 29, if applicable,
will be multiplied by the above compensation rate to determine the Customer’s annual net
surplus electricity compensation stated in dollars. This compensation will be provided to the
Customer as a credit applied to the Customer’s Utility account.
2.If the Customer does not provide CPAU with an election form selecting a compensation option,
the Customer will be deemed to not make an election as required by law, and no compensation
will be provided to the Customer for net surplus electricity.
3.In the event a Customer terminates Service prior to the natural expiration of the twelve-month
period, the net surplus electricity status will be evaluated at that time. Compensation, if
applicable, will be provided in accordance with D.2 above.
4.2.For all otherAdditional terms, conditions and definitions please refer to Rule 29,govern Net
Energy Metering Service and Interconnection, as described in Rule 29.
{End}
ATTACHMENT B
EXCERPTED DRAFT MINUTES OF THE JUNE 1, 2016
UTILITIES ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING
ITEM 4. ACTION: Staff Recommendation that the Utilities Advisory Commission Recommend
that the City Council Amend the Net Surplus Electricity Compensation Rate (E-NSE-1)
Chair Cook asked that the staff presentation on the item be kept to a minimum as he
understands that this item is administrative in nature and has a very small dollar impact on the
utility. Assistant Director Jane Ratchye confirmed that this rate affects a very small group of
customers and that the annual impact is quite small. She said that basically the proposal is to
increase the rate for surplus generation to use the same methodology that is used for the Net
Energy Metering (NEM) successor rate and only impacts those customers who generate more
energy on-site than they use on-site over a 12-month period. For most NEM customers are not
affected by the change since they usually generate less energy than they use over a 12-month
period.
Acting Rates Manager Eric Keniston stated that the proposal is to increase the Net Surplus
Electricity Compensation Rate (E-NSE-1) from 5.841 cents per kilowatt-hour (kWh) to 7.21
cents/kWh for the amount of energy that is generated that is surplus to a customers’’ needs
over a 12-month period. The methodology is changed from the current rate, which is based on
the cost of renewable supplies, to be consistent with the NEM successor rate, except that it
looks back 12 months using actual costs, while the NEM successor rate looks forward 12
months using projected costs.
Commissioner Johnston asked how this program is different from the Palo Alto CLEAN program.
Ratchye explained that the CLEAN program pays for 100% of the solar generation at the
established price for the contract term, but that for customers with net energy metering, the
majority of the generation is used onsite to meet the customer’s energy usage and this rate is
only for buying the generation that exceeds the customer’s usage over a 12-month period.
Chair Cook said that has a PV system on his roof and does not have surplus energy generation,
but may in the future and asked the City Attorney if there would be a personal conflict of
interest since he could be a beneficiary of this rate. Deputy Assistant City Attorney Jessica
Mullan recommended that any potential conflict of interest be discussed in advance of the
meeting. She said that the considerations include whether the actions would have an impact on
a commissioner’s personal finances and whether that impact would be foreseeable and
material and whether you would be impacted differently from any member of the public.
ATTACHMENT C
ACTION:
Commissioner Schwartz made a motion that the UAC recommend that Council amend the Net
Surplus Electricity Compensation Rate Schedule (E-NSE-1) as proposed. Commissioner
Ballantine seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously (6-0) with Chair Cook, and
Commissioners Ballantine, Forssell, Johnston, Schwartz and Trumbull voting yes and Vice Chair
Danaher absent.