Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 7014 City of Palo Alto (ID # 7014) City Council Staff Report Report Type: Consent Calendar Meeting Date: 6/6/2016 City of Palo Alto Page 1 Summary Title: Approval of First Amended San Francisquito Creek JPA Funding Agreement Title: Approval of the First Amended Agreement with the San Francisquito Creek Joint Powers Authority and its Member Agencies for Funding of Construction of the San Francisquito Creek Flood Reduction, Ecosystem Restoration, and Recreation Project, San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 From: City Manager Lead Department: Public Works Recommendation Staff recommends that Council approve, and authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute, the attached First Amended Agreement with the San Francisquito Creek Joint Powers Authority (JPA) and its member agencies, funding construction of the San Francisquito Creek Flood Reduction, Ecosystem Restoration, and Recreation Project, from San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 (Attachment A). Background San Francisquito Creek is the dividing line between San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties and is bordered by the cities of Palo Alto, Menlo Park, and East Palo Alto. The creek can cause severe flood damage with very little warning and has overflowed seven times since 1910. During the February 1998 El Niño event (approximately a 45-year event), record flooding caused an estimated $28 million in damages in Palo Alto, East Palo Alto, and Menlo Park. More than 1,100 homes were flooded in Palo Alto and numerous roadways closed, including Highway 101. Prior to the 1998 event, the largest flood on record occurred in December 1955, when the creek overtopped its banks in several locations resulting in approximately 1,200 acres of commercial and residential property being flooded and damages estimated at nearly $2 million. Total damages from a one percent City of Palo Alto Page 2 (100-year) flood event are estimated at $300 million in Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties, as calculated by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) in 2011. Following the historic flood event of 1998, the cities of Palo Alto, Menlo Park, and East Palo Alto, the San Mateo County Flood Control District, and the Santa Clara Valley Water District joined together to create the San Francisquito Creek Joint Powers Authority (JPA). The JPA and its member agencies have been working cooperatively to implement a series of projects to provide flood protection for local residents. The JPA’s first major capital improvement project will provide one percent flood protection from creek flooding for the communities of East Palo Alto and Palo Alto along San Francisquito Creek between San Francisco Bay and Highway 101. This portion of the creek is at a high risk of severe flooding from flows coming down the creek from the hills, with the extent of flooding influenced significantly by concurrent tide levels in the Bay. The San Francisquito Creek Flood Reduction, Ecosystem Restoration, and Recreation Project, San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 (Project) is the necessary first step in an overall plan to provide protection to properties located within the flood-prone areas of the San Francisquito Creek watershed. Work upstream of Highway 101 cannot be undertaken until the downstream reaches of the creek are expanded to accommodate higher flow rates and increase capacity. The scope of this project will include construction of setback levees and floodwalls from San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 that will provide one percent flood protection. Implementation of the Project has been delayed for several years while the JPA sought the necessary regulatory permits from state and federal resource agencies, including the United States Army Corps of Engineers, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board and Bay Conservation and Development Commission. All required permits have now been secured and work is authorized to proceed. In June 2014, the JPA and its member agencies agreed on the terms of a funding plan to pay for the construction of the Project based on estimated costs for the construction and related costs for construction administration, utility relocation and Project environmental mitigation. Discussion The Santa Clara Valley Water District (Water District), with its extensive workforce City of Palo Alto Page 3 resources and flood management project expertise, is serving as the JPA’s construction manager for the Project. The Water District advertised the Project for construction bids on February 26, 2016 and received bids on April 28. The Water District received eight bids from qualified contractors for the Project, with prices ranging from $26.4 million to $38.9 million. The low bid, which is approximately 12.8% above the final engineer’s estimate of $23.4 million, is valid for a period of 45 days, expiring on June 14, 2016. The bidding conditions were likely influenced by the recent discovery of Ridgway’s rails, an endangered bird species, unexpectedly nesting in the creek upstream of the Friendship Bridge. The presence of the birds necessitated a construction scheduling restriction that resulted in the Project timetable being extended from two construction seasons to three, with work scheduled for completion in December 2018. The cost of labor and equipment for an additional construction season likely drove contractor costs and resulting bid prices higher. Higher than expected construction bids, along with other cost escalations for utility relocations and permit mitigation measures, have increased the total Project construction cost beyond the funding sources identified in the 2014 funding agreement. Executive staff from the JPA and its member agencies have been meeting over the past several weeks on a regular basis to identify supplemental funding sources to close the Project funding gap. Each of the agencies has now given a tentative commitment, subject to approval by each governing body, to contribute a sum of money that will fully fund the Project and allow the Water District to award the construction contract to the low bidder. The revised funding plan will be enacted through the approval of the attached Amended Agreement. Changes to the original 2014 agreement are highlighted in the attached annotated version (Attachment B). Assuming the JPA Board and each member agency’s governing body approves the Amended Agreement, the Water District plans to award a construction contract before the bids expire on June 14, 2016 so work on the Project can begin this construction season. The original 2014 and the revised 2016 Project construction costs and proposed funding sources included in the Amended Agreement are listed in the following tables. San Francisco Bay to Hwy 101 Project - Estimated Construction Costs (2014 vs. 2016) Cost Item 2014 Amount 2016 Amount City of Palo Alto Page 4 Project construction cost $28.2M $29.0M SCVWD construction management $2.8M $3.6M DWR Grant administration $0.15M $0.15M Palo Alto Golf Course mitigation $3.0M $3.0M PG&E electric and gas utility relocation $2.7M $4.4M EPASD sanitary sewer relocation $0.4M $0.85M Right-of-way acquisition $0.1M $0.1M Project mitigation costs $0.05M $0.3M Total Project Funding $37.4M $41.4M San Francisco Bay to Hwy 101 Project - Construction Funding Sources (2014 vs. 2016) Funding Sources 2014 Amount 2016 Amount Palo Alto --- $0.4M Menlo Park --- $0.8M East Palo Alto $0.8M $1.3M San Mateo County $0.8M $2.1M SCVWD $27.95M $28.0M State of California DWR Grants $7.85M $8.9M Total Project Funding $37.4M $41.4M Under the terms of the Amended Agreement, Palo Alto’s financial contribution to the Project would be $400,000, payable over three fiscal years. The initial payment due in FY 2017 would be $133,334, with additional payments of $133,333 each payable in FY 2018 and 2019. Timeline The JPA Board and the governing body of each of the JPA member agencies are scheduled to approve the Amended Agreement between May 26 and June 14, 2016. Assuming that the Amended Agreement is approved by all parties, the City of Palo Alto Page 5 Water District intends to award a construction contract for the Project on June 14. Construction work will commence in July 2016 and continue through December 2018. The full flood protection benefits of the Project will be in place for the 2018-19 storm season. Resource Impact Funds for Palo Alto’s FY 2017 contribution to the Project are available from existing appropriated funds in Capital Improvement Program Project, OS-09001, Off-Road Pathway Resurfacing and Repair. This payment would be used to offset the Project cost of resurfacing the portion of the creek levee that serves as a segment of the regional Bay Trail. The remaining payments in FY 2018 and 2019 would be paid from the Infrastructure Reserve. Policy Implications The recommendation does not represent any changes to existing City policies. Environmental Review The San Francisquito Creek Joint Powers Authority certified the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the San Francisquito Creek Flood Reduction, Ecosystem Restoration, and Recreation Project, San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 as the Lead Agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in October 2012. Attachments:  A - First Amended Funding Agreement (PDF)  B - First Amended Funding Agreement (Redline/Strikeout Version) (PDF) First Amended SFC San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 Construction Funding Agreement May 24, 2016 Page 1 of 16 FIRST AMENDED AGREEMENT AMONG THE SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY, THE SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, THE SAN MATEO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, THE CITY OF PALO ALTO, THE CITY OF MENLO PARK, AND THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO FOR FUNDING CONSTRUCTION OF THE SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK FLOOD REDUCTION, ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, AND RECREATION PROJECT SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO HIGHWAY 101 This First Amended Agreement (“Agreement”) amends the terms and conditions of the original Agreement dated August 11, 2014, is made and entered into as of the date it is fully executed by and between the SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY (“Authority”), a California joint powers authority, the SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT (“Water District”), a special district of the State of California, the San Mateo County Flood Control District, a special district of the State of California (“Flood District”), the CITY OF PALO ALTO (“Palo Alto”), the CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO (“East Palo Alto”), and the CITY OF MENLO PARK (“Menlo Park”), collectively referred to as “the Parties” or individually as “Party.” The effective date of this Agreement will be the last date that this Agreement is executed by the Parties. The purpose of this Agreement is to define the roles and responsibilities of the Parties for funding construction and mitigation activities of the San Francisquito Creek Flood Reduction, Ecosystem Restoration, and Recreation Project, San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 (“Project”). R E C I T A L S A. San Francisquito Creek (“Creek”) has a history of flooding the communities in and around East Palo Alto, Menlo Park and Palo Alto, most recently in December 2012, impacting residential properties adjacent to the Creek. B. Following the severe flood in February 1998, East Palo Alto, Menlo Park, and Palo Alto along with the Flood District and the Water District formed the Authority on May 18, 1999. These entities are all full members of the Authority. The Authority was authorized to represent its member agencies as the local sponsor for a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ (“USACE”) San Francisquito Creek flood control project on May 23, 2002. C. In March 2005 the USACE, working with the Authority, completed a reconnaissance study for the Creek. The reconnaissance study results indicated a Federal Interest in developing a flood control project for San Francisquito Creek. Therefore, the USACE has engaged in the feasibility study (“Study”) phase of the San Francisquito Creek Flood Damage Reduction and Ecosystem Restoration Project (“FDRER”) which requires a Feasibility Cost Share Agreement with a local sponsor. D. The Authority entered into a Feasibility Cost Share Agreement (“FCSA”) with the San Francisco District of the USACE for the Study on the Creek. The USACE, pursuant to the FCSA, is developing a project to evaluate flood protection and ecosystem restoration opportunities within the San Francisquito Creek Watershed in Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties. At the conclusion of the Study, the USACE will issue a Federally First Amended SFC San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 Construction Funding Agreement May 24, 2016 Page 2 of 16 Preferred Plan, which will detail the pre-design actions to be taken to complete the FDRER. E. The USACE’s ability to complete the Study has been impacted by unanticipated delays due to federal funding constraints and USACE’s processes. F. Due to the USACE’s delay in completing the Feasibility Study and the Member Agencies’ desire to begin addressing the risk of flooding in their jurisdictions, the Authority and Member Agency staff conducted a process of evaluating alternatives for an initial capital project and recommended a preferred alternative with conceptual design drawings to the Authority Board of Directors for consideration. G. On July 23, 2009, the Authority’s Board of Directors unanimously approved the staff’s recommended Project and authorized its Executive Director to pursue funding opportunities and to contract with qualified consultants to perform 1) planning and design services and 2) environmental impact assessment and planning for the Project. H. The Authority, the Water District, and the Flood District entered into an agreement on November 3, 2009 to fund the design and environmental documentation of the Project. I. The Authority hired a design engineering firm and an environmental consulting firm to prepare design documents and an Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) for the Project. J. On October 25, 2012, the final EIR was certified by the Authority. The Notice of Determination (NOD) was filed by the Authority with the County of Santa Clara, Office of the Clerk/Recorder and by the County of San Mateo Office of the Recorder, on July 30, 2013. K. In November 2012, the voters of Santa Clara County approved Measure B, the Water District’s Safe, Clean Water special tax initiative which will provide significant funding toward the Project costs. The District will contribute approximately $28 million toward Project costs from its Safe, Clean Water program and other sources. L. On January 9, 2013, the Authority entered into an agreement with the State of California, Department of Water Resources (DWR) for $8 million in Proposition 1E (Prop 1E) grant funding from DWR’s Stormwater Flood Management Program to be applied towards Project costs. Of the amount awarded, $7,875,000 is available for reimbursement of Project costs. M. On January 13, 2016, DWR awarded $1,044,351 in Proposition 84 (Prop 84) funds to the Project as part of the Association of Bay Area Governments Shoreline Resiliency/Sea Level Rise Proposal to be administered by the State Coastal Conservancy. Of the amount awarded, $953,351 is available for reimbursement of Project costs. N. The Flood District will contribute $2,060,000 toward Project costs. The Flood District’s financial contribution will be in an amount equal to the combined financial contributions made by East Palo Alto and Menlo Park. O. The City of East Palo Alto will contribute $1,260,000 towards Project costs. First Amended SFC San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 Construction Funding Agreement May 24, 2016 Page 3 of 16 P. The City of Menlo Park will contribute $800,000 towards Project costs. Q. The City of Palo Alto will contribute $400,000 towards Project costs. R. The Project directly benefits the City of Menlo Park as its completion is necessary to accommodate future flood protection measures located in Menlo Park, upstream of the Project, which may be constructed in the future. In addition, Palo Alto is impacted by the Project because realignment of a portion of its municipal golf course is necessary to accommodate various flood protection construction elements of this Project. S. For the purpose of this Agreement, funding from Menlo Park, East Palo Alto, Palo Alto, the Flood District, the Authority, and any future funds from grants or other sources, contributed toward Project costs, shall be referred to as “Non Water District Funds.” T. On December 22, 2015, the Water District and the Authority entered into a Construction Management Agreement designating the Water District as the entity responsible for managing construction of the Project. U. The Parties desire to enter into this Agreement to provide for reimbursement of Water District expenditures towards construction of the Project from funding that may become available through Non Water District Funds. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals, and the covenants and conditions in the paragraphs contained herein below, the Parties agree as follows: P R O V I S I O N S 1. Project Purposes The Project’s purposes are to improve flood protection, restore the ecosystem, and provide recreational opportunities within the Project’s reach, with the following specific objectives: 1) protect properties and infrastructure between Highway 101 and the San Francisco Bay from San Francisquito Creek flows resulting from 100 year flood events in conjunction with a 100-year tide, including projected Sea Level Rise; 2) accommodate future flood protection measures upstream of the Project that may be constructed; 3) enhance habitat along the Project reach, particularly habitat for threatened and endangered species; 4) enhance recreational uses; and 5) minimize operational and maintenance requirements. 2. Identified Project Costs and Funding Amounts Construction of the Project, including finalization of the design, is currently estimated to cost approximately $41.32 million (Table 1), not including internal Project management costs incurred by the Water District or contingency costs for utility relocation expenses above the stated contract estimates. (remainder of page intentionally left blank) First Amended SFC San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 Construction Funding Agreement May 24, 2016 Page 4 of 16 Table 1 Identified Project Costs Costs Current Palo Alto Golf Course mitigation $3,000,000 Other mitigation activities $300,000 Pacific Gas & Electric Company (without contingency) Electric Relocation $1,267,000 Gas Relocation $3,141,000 East Palo Alto Sanitary District (without contingency Sewer Relocation $848,000 East Palo Alto real estate acquisition $85,000 Construction Management (Hatch Mott MacDonald) $2,565,000 Construction Support Services (HDR) $853,000 Completed design services (HDR) $230,000 Construction contract with 10% contingency $29,026,800 Total Identified Project Costs $41,315,800 Based on the Total Identified Project Costs as stated in Table 1 above, the Parties agree to contribute the following amounts toward these costs (Table 2). Table 2 Funding Funding Sources Original Funding Agreement Funds shifted from upstream project Newly identified funding Total contribution Water District Funds $28,000,000 $0 $0 $28,000,000 Non Water District Funds Authority Prop 1E Grant $7,875,000 $0 $0 $7,875,000 Prop 84 Grant $0 $0 $953,351 $953,351 Flood District $800,000 $700,000 $560,000 $2,060,000 East Palo Alto $800,000 $200,000 $260,000 $1,260,000 Menlo Park $0 $500,000 $300,000 $800,000 Palo Alto $0 $0 $400,000 $400,000 Total Funding $37,475,000 $1,400,000 $2,473,351 $41,348,351 3. Payment of Project Costs A. Through use of DWR Prop 1E and Prop 84 grant funds, along with agreements that provide additional funding to the Authority, including a cost sharing agreement whereby the Water District will fund the discrepancy between the available grant funding and anticipated expenses, the Authority agrees to pay the currently estimated Project costs as stated below. If the Authority receives additional grant or other funding for this project, such funds shall be applied first towards costs that are the responsibility of the Authority, itemized in paragraph #3. A. a) through g), with any remaining funds remitted to the Water District and applied toward Project Costs. The Authority will provide to the Water District documentation of all listed expenses incurred and paid for by the Authority. First Amended SFC San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 Construction Funding Agreement May 24, 2016 Page 5 of 16 a) $3,000,000 to the City of Palo Alto to mitigate for impacts to the City of Palo Alto Municipal Golf Course; b) $300,000 for other mitigation activities; c) $4,408,000 to Pacific Gas and Electric Company to relocate gas and electric transmission lines; d) $848,000 to the East Palo Alto Sanitary District to relocate a sewer line; e) $85,000 for property acquisition within East Palo Alto; f) $230,000 to HDR for completed design services; and g) $853,000 to HDR for construction support services. B. Flood District agrees to fund $2,060,000 of Project costs, payable to the Water District during three consecutive years. The payments will be made as follows: $800,000 (Year 1); $630,000 (Year 2); and $630,000 (Year 3). The Year 1 payment will be remitted to the Water District within 180 days after a construction contract is awarded. The Year 2 and Year 3 payments will be remitted to the Water District within 180 days of the beginning of each respective fiscal year. C. East Palo Alto agrees to fund $1,260,000 of Project costs, payable to the Water District during three consecutive years. The payments will be made as follows: $420,000 (Year 1); $420,000 (Year 2); and $420,000 (Year 3). The Year 1 payment will be remitted to the Water District within 180 days after a construction contract is awarded. The Year 2 and Year 3 payments will be remitted within 180 days of the beginning of each respective fiscal year. D. Menlo Park agrees to fund $800,000 of Project costs, payable to the Water District during three consecutive years. The payments will be made as follows: $300,000 (Year 1); $250,000 (Year 2); and $250,000 (Year 3). The Year 1 payment will be remitted to the Water District within 180 days after a construction contract is awarded. The Year 2 and Year 3 payments will be remitted within 180 days of the beginning of each respective fiscal year. E. Palo Alto agrees to fund $400,000 of Project costs, payable to the Water District during three consecutive years. The payments will be made as follows: $133,334 (Year 1); $133,333 (Year 2); and $133,333 (Year 3). The Year 1 payment will be remitted to the Water District within 180 days after a construction contract is awarded. The Year 2 and Year 3 payments will be remitted within 180 days of the beginning of each respective fiscal year. F. Through Water District funds and funds remitted to the Water District by Palo Alto, Flood District, East Palo Alto and Menlo Park, the Water District agrees to pay the currently estimated Project costs as stated below. a) $2,565,000 for Construction Management Consultant; and b) $26,388,000 for construction contract and a separate encumbrance of 10% of the construction contract amount ($2,638,800) for contingent expenses. 4. Unidentified Project Costs and/or Surplus Funds A. The Parties agree to apply any surplus funds toward unidentified Project costs which exceed the current estimated Identified Project Costs (Table 1). If there are First Amended SFC San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 Construction Funding Agreement May 24, 2016 Page 6 of 16 no surplus funds, the Parties agree to determine an appropriate cost sharing allocation to pay for any unidentified Project costs or costs which exceed the current estimated Identified Project Costs. B. If there are any surplus funds after paying all identified or unidentified Project costs, the Water District shall retain those funds which shall be reallocated toward construction of the San Francisquito Creek local-state-funding-only project, upstream of Highway 101. 5. Method and Timing of Transactions A. Water District shall prepare and submit quarterly invoice packages to the Authority. Water District’s Quarterly invoice packages will include Project progress reports and all other documentation required by DWR and the State Coastal Conservancy sufficient to enable the Authority to submit subsequent funding requests to DWR for grant funding reimbursement. B. Authority shall submit a request for grant fund reimbursement to DWR and the State Coastal Conservancy within 15 days of receipt of invoice packages from Water District, provided all DWR and the State Coastal Conservancy-related invoicing requirements are met. To the extent funds are available, the Authority will pay for all costs itemized in paragraph #3. A. a) through g). C. Non Water District Funds contributed by Flood District, East Palo Alto, Menlo Park, and Palo Alto will be remitted to the Water District as set forth in paragraph #3, Payment of Project Costs, subparagraphs B.-E. 6. Indemnification A. In lieu of and notwithstanding the pro rata risk allocation, which might otherwise be imposed between the Parties pursuant to Government Code Section 895.6, the Parties agree that all losses or liabilities incurred by a Party shall not be shared pro rata but, instead, the Member Agencies agree that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, each of the Parties hereto shall fully indemnify and hold each of the other Parties, their officers, board members, employees, and agents, harmless from any claim, expense or cost, damage or liability imposed for injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of the negligent acts or omissions or willful misconduct of the indemnifying Party, its officers, employees, or agents, under or in connection with or arising out of any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to such party under this Agreement. No Party, nor any officer, board member, or agent thereof shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of the negligent acts or omissions or willful misconduct of the another party hereto, its officers, board members, employees, or agents, under or in connection with or arising out of any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to such other Party under this Agreement. The obligations set forth in this paragraph will survive termination and expiration of this Agreement. B. In the event of concurrent intentional or unintentional misconduct, negligent acts or omissions by any one of the Parties (or each of their respective officers, directors and/or employees), then the liability for any and all claims for injuries or First Amended SFC San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 Construction Funding Agreement May 24, 2016 Page 7 of 16 damages to persons and/or property which arise out of each and any of their performance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be apportioned according to the California law of comparative negligence. The Parties hereto are not jointly and severally liable on any liability, claim, or lawsuit. C. The Water District’s construction contract will require the construction contractor to secure and maintain in full force and effect all times during construction of the Project and until the Project is accepted by the Parties, general liability and property damage insurance, business automobile insurance and such other insurance as the Parties deem appropriate, in forms and limits of liability acceptable to the Parties, naming Water District, Authority and each of its Member Agencies and their respective directors, council members, officers, employees and agents as additional insureds from and against all damages and claims, losses, liabilities, costs or expenses arising out of or in any way connected to the construction of the Project. D. The duties and obligations of paragraph #6. Indemnification, will survive and continue in full force and effect after the termination, completion, suspension, and expiration of this Agreement. 7. Retention of Records, Right to Monitor and Audit Unless a longer period of time is required by law or federal or state grant funding agreements, the Parties shall maintain all financial records related to this Agreement and/or the Project for five (5) years after the Agreement expires or is terminated earlier pursuant to paragraph #9. Termination, of this Agreement. The records shall be subject to the examination and/or audit of either Party. 8. Agreement Term This Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and remain in place until the construction of the Project is completed and accepted by the Parties, or this Agreement is terminated earlier by the Parties in the manner authorized by paragraph #9. Termination. 9. Termination A. If any Party fails to perform any of its material obligations under this Agreement, in addition to all other remedies provided by law, any other Party may terminate this Agreement but only after giving written notice of the failure of performance to the Party committing the failure with a copy of such notice given to all other Parties. Such notice shall explain the alleged failure of performance and provide a reasonable opportunity for the failure to be cured which in no case will be less than 30 days. If the failure of performance is not satisfactorily cured within the cure period, the Agreement may be terminated upon the delivery of a written notice of termination to all of the Parties. B. A final notice of termination may be given only after completion of the notice and cure process described in paragraph #9.A. and only with the approval of the governing body of the Party terminating the Agreement. First Amended SFC San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 Construction Funding Agreement May 24, 2016 Page 8 of 16 C. In event of termination, each Party shall deliver to all of the other Parties, upon request, copies of reports, documents, and other work performed by any Party under this Agreement. The cost of work performed under this Agreement to the date of termination shall be due and payable in accordance with the provisions of this Construction Funding Agreement to be executed by the Parties prior to Water District’s commencement of the bid process for award of a construction contract for the Project. D. Notwithstanding the foregoing, after the Water District awards a construction contract for the Project, this Agreement may only be terminated by the mutual written agreement of all of the Parties as approved by the governing body of each Party or pursuant to a delegation of such authority. 10. Notices Any notice or other communication required or permitted to be given hereunder shall not be effective unless it is given in writing and shall be delivered (a) in person, (b) by certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, or (c) by a commercial overnight courier that guarantees next day delivery and provides a receipt, and addressed to the parties at the addresses stated below, or at such other address as either party may hereafter notify the other parties in writing: Authority: San Francisquito Creek Joint Powers Authority 615-B Menlo Avenue Menlo Park, California 94025 Attention: Len Materman, Executive Director len@sfcjpa.org Water District: Santa Clara Valley Water District 5750 Almaden Expressway San Jose, California 95118 Attention: Norma Camacho, Interim Chief Executive Officer ncamacho@valleywater.org Palo Alto City of Palo Alto 250 Hamilton Avenue P.O. Box 10250 Palo Alto, CA 94303 Attention: James Keene, City Manager james.keene@cityofpaloalto.org East Palo Alto City of East Palo Alto 2415 University Avenue East Palo Alto, CA 94303 Attn: Carlos Martinez, City Manager cmartinez@cityofepa.org First Amended SFC San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 Construction Funding Agreement May 24, 2016 Page 9 of 16 Menlo Park City of Menlo Park 701 Laurel Street Menlo Park, CA 94025 Attention: Alex McIntyre, City Manager admcintyre@menlopark.org Flood Control District Department of Public Works 555 County Center, 5th Floor Redwood City, CA 94063 Attention: James Porter, Director jporter@smcgov.org Service of any such notice or other communications so made shall be deemed effective on the day of actual delivery (whether accepted or refused) as evidenced by: a) confirmed in-person delivery by the addressee or other representative of the Party authorized to accept delivery on behalf of the addressee, b) as shown by the addressee’s return receipt if by certified mail, or c) as confirmed by the courier service if by courier; provided, however, that if such actual delivery occurs after 5:00 p.m. (local time where received) or on a non-business day, then such notice or demand so made shall be deemed effective on the first business day immediately following the day of actual delivery. No communications via electronic mail shall be effective to give any notice, request, direction, demand, consent, waiver, approval or other communications hereunder. 11. Severability In the event any portion of this Agreement is declared by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, such portion shall be severed from this Agreement and the remaining parts hereof shall remain in full force and effect as fully as though such invalid, illegal or unenforceable portion had never been part of this Agreement. 12. Governing Law and Compliance with Laws The parties agree that California law governs this Agreement. In the performance of this Agreement each Party will comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, codes and regulations of the federal, state, and applicable local government. 13. Venue In the event that suit shall be brought by any party to this contract, the parties agree that venue shall be exclusively vested in the state courts of either the County of Santa Clara, or the County of San Mateo or where otherwise appropriate, exclusively in the United States District Court, Northern District of California. 14. Assignability and Subcontracting Parties shall not assign this Agreement or any portion thereof to a third party or subcontract with a third party to provide services required under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other parties. Any unauthorized attempt by any Party to so assign or transfer shall be void and of no effect. Notwithstanding the foregoing, First Amended SFC San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 Construction Funding Agreement May 24, 2016 Page 10 of 16 a Party may hire a consultant to fulfill its obligations as described above in paragraph #5. Method and Timing of Transactions. 15. Ownership of Materials All reports, documents, or other materials developed or discovered by any Party or any other person engaged directly or indirectly by any Party to perform the services required hereunder shall be and remain the mutual property of Authority and Water District without restriction or limitation upon their use. 16. Entire Agreement This First Amended Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior offers and negotiations, oral and written, including but not limited to the original Agreement dated August 11, 2014. This First Amended Agreement may not be amended or modified in any respect whatsoever except by an instrument in writing signed by authorized representatives of all Parties. 17. Further Actions The Authority and Water District agree to execute all instruments and documents, and to take all actions, as may be reasonably required to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. 18. Counterparts This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which, when executed and delivered, shall be deemed to be an original, and all of which, taken together, shall be deemed to be one and the same instrument. 19. Non Waiver A Party’s waiver of any term, condition, or covenant, or breach of any term, condition or covenant will not be construed as a waiver of any other term, condition or covenant. 20. Third Parties This Agreement is entered into only for the benefit of the Parties executing this Agreement and not for the benefit of any other individual, entity, or person. (remainder of page intentionally left blank) Signatures follow on next pages First Amended SFC San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 Construction Funding Agreement May 24, 2016 Page 11 of 16 FIRST AMENDED AGREEMENT AMONG THE SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY, THE SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, THE SAN MATEO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, THE CITY OF PALO ALTO, THE CITY OF MENLO PARK, AND THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO FOR FUNDING CONSTRUCTION OF THE SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK FLOOD REDUCTION, ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, AND RECREATION PROJECT SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO HIGHWAY 101 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the San Francisquito Creek Joint Powers Authority has executed this Funding Agreement as of the date and year stated below. Each Party has executed a separate signature page. APPROVED AS TO FORM: San Francisquito Creek Joint Powers Authority By: ______________________________ By: ______________________________ Greg Stepanicich Len Materman SFCJPA General Counsel Executive Director Date: ____________________________ Date: ____________________________ First Amended SFC San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 Construction Funding Agreement May 24, 2016 Page 12 of 16 FIRST AMENDED AGREEMENT AMONG THE SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY, THE SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, THE SAN MATEO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, THE CITY OF PALO ALTO, THE CITY OF MENLO PARK, AND THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO FOR FUNDING CONSTRUCTION OF THE SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK FLOOD REDUCTION, ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, AND RECREATION PROJECT SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO HIGHWAY 101 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Santa Clara Valley Water District has executed this Funding Agreement as of the date and year stated below. Each Party has executed a separate signature page. APPROVED AS TO FORM: Santa Clara Valley Water District By: ___________________________ By: ____________________________ Leslie Orta Barbara Keegan Senior Assistant District Counsel Chair/Board of Directors Office of the District Counsel Date: __________________________ Date: ___________________________ ATTEST: MICHELE L. KING, CMC __________________________________ Clerk/Board of Directors First Amended SFC San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 Construction Funding Agreement May 24, 2016 Page 13 of 16 FIRST AMENDED AGREEMENT AMONG THE SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY, THE SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, THE SAN MATEO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, THE CITY OF PALO ALTO, THE CITY OF MENLO PARK, AND THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO FOR FUNDING CONSTRUCTION OF THE SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK FLOOD REDUCTION, ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, AND RECREATION PROJECT SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO HIGHWAY 101 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Palo Alto has executed this Funding Agreement as of the date and year stated below. Each Party has executed a separate signature page. APPROVED AS TO FORM: City of Palo Alto By: ___________________________ By: ____________________________ Molly Stump James Keene City Attorney City Manager Date: __________________________ Date: ___________________________ First Amended SFC San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 Construction Funding Agreement May 24, 2016 Page 14 of 16 FIRST AMENDED AGREEMENT AMONG THE SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY, THE SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, THE SAN MATEO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, THE CITY OF PALO ALTO, THE CITY OF MENLO PARK, AND THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO FOR FUNDING CONSTRUCTION OF THE SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK FLOOD REDUCTION, ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, AND RECREATION PROJECT SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO HIGHWAY 101 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of East Palo Alto has executed this Funding Agreement as of the date and year stated below. Each Party has executed a separate signature page. APPROVED AS TO FORM: City of East Palo Alto By: ___________________________ By: ____________________________ Print Name:______________________ Print Name:______________________ Title: ___________________________ Title: ___________________________ Date: __________________________ Date: ___________________________ First Amended SFC San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 Construction Funding Agreement May 24, 2016 Page 15 of 16 FIRST AMENDED AGREEMENT AMONG THE SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY, THE SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, THE SAN MATEO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, THE CITY OF PALO ALTO, THE CITY OF MENLO PARK, AND THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO FOR FUNDING CONSTRUCTION OF THE SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK FLOOD REDUCTION, ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, AND RECREATION PROJECT SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO HIGHWAY 101 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Menlo Park has executed this Funding Agreement as of the date and year stated below. Each Party has executed a separate signature page. APPROVED AS TO FORM: City of Menlo Park By: _____________________________ By: ______________________________ William L. McClure Alex D. McIntyre City Attorney City Manager Date: _________________________ Date:______________________________ First Amended SFC San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 Construction Funding Agreement May 24, 2016 Page 16 of 16 FIRST AMENDED AGREEMENT AMONG THE SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY, THE SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, THE SAN MATEO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, THE CITY OF PALO ALTO, THE CITY OF MENLO PARK, AND THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO FOR FUNDING CONSTRUCTION OF THE SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK FLOOD REDUCTION, ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, AND RECREATION PROJECT SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO HIGHWAY 101 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the San Mateo Flood Control District has executed this Funding Agreement as of the date and year stated below. Each Party has executed a separate signature page. APPROVED AS TO FORM: San Mateo County Flood Control District By: ___________________________ By: ______________________________ John Beiers Warren Slocum County Counsel President, Board of Supervisors, San Mateo Date: __________________________ Date: _____________________________ First Amended SFC San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 Construction Funding Agreement February 4May 172034, 2016 Page 1 of 1516 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE FIRST AMENDED AGREEMENT AMONG AGREEMENT AMONG THE SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY, THE SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, THE SAN MATEO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, THE CITY OF PALO ALTO, THE CITY OF MENLO PARK, AND THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO FOR FUNDING CONSTRUCTION OF THE SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK FLOOD REDUCTION, ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, AND RECREATION PROJECT SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO HIGHWAY 101 This First Amended Agreement (“Agreement”) amends the terms and conditions of the original Agreement dated August 11June 10, 2014, is made and entered into as of the date it is fully executed by and between the SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY (“Authority”), a California joint powers authority, the SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT (“Water District”), a special district of the State of California, the San Mateo County Flood Control District, a special district of the State of California (“Flood District”), the CITY OF PALO ALTO (“Palo Alto”), the CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO (“East Palo Alto”), and the CITY OF MENLO PARK (“Menlo Park”), collectively referred to as “the Parties” or individually as “Party.” The effective date of this Agreement will be the last date that this Agreement is executed by the Parties. The purpose of this Agreement is to define the roles and responsibilities of the Parties for funding construction and mitigation activities of the San Francisquito Creek Flood Reduction, Ecosystem Restoration, and Recreation Project, San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 (“Project”). R E C I T A L S A. San Francisquito Creek (“Creek”) has a history of flooding the communities in and around East Palo Alto, Menlo Park and Palo Alto, most recently in December 2012, impacting residential properties adjacent to the Creek. B. Following the severe flood in February 1998, East Palo Alto, Menlo Park, and Palo Alto along with the Flood District and the Water District formed the Authority on May 18, 1999. These entities are all full members of the Authority. The Authority was authorized to represent its member agencies as the local sponsor for a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ (“CorpsUSACEUSACE”) San Francisquito Creek flood control project on May 23, 2002. C. In March 2005 the CorpsUSACE, working with the Authority, completed a reconnaissance study for the Creek. The reconnaissance study results indicated a Federal Interest in developing a flood control project for San Francisquito Creek. Therefore, the CorpsUSACE has engaged in the feasibility study (“Study”) phase of the San Francisquito Creek Flood Damage Reduction and Ecosystem Restoration Project (“FDRER”) which requires a Feasibility Cost Share Agreement with a local sponsor. D. The Authority entered into a Feasibility Cost Share Agreement (“FCSA”) with the San Francisco District of the CorpsUSACE for the Study on the Creek. The CorpsUSACE, Formatted: Space After: 0 pt First Amended SFC San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 Construction Funding Agreement March 4May 1224307, 2016 Page 2 of 22 Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt pursuant to the FCSA, is developing a project to evaluate flood protection and ecosystem restoration opportunities within the San Francisquito Creek Watershed in Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties. At the conclusion of the Study, the CorpsUSACE will issue a Federally Preferred Plan, which will detail the pre-design actions to be taken to complete the FDRER. E. The CorpsUSACE’ ability to complete the Study has been impacted by unanticipated delays due to federal funding constraints and CorpsUSACE’ processes. F. Due to the Corp’sUSACE’s delay in completing the Feasibility Study and the Member Agencies’ desire to begin addressing the risk of flooding in their jurisdictions, the Authority and Member Agency staff conducted a process of evaluating alternatives for an initial capital project and recommended a preferred alternative with conceptual design drawings to the Authority Board of Directors for consideration. G. On July 23, 2009, the Authority’s Board of Directors unanimously approved the staff’s recommended Project and authorized its Executive Director to pursue funding opportunities and to contract with qualified consultants to perform 1) planning and design services and 2) environmental impact assessment and planning for the Project. H. The Authority, the Water District, and the Flood District entered into an agreement on November 3, 2009 to fund the design and environmental documentation of the Project. I. The Authority hired a design engineering firm and an environmental consulting firm to prepare design documents and an Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) for the Project. J. On October 25, 2012, tThe final EIR was certified by the Authority on October 25, 2012. The Notice of Determination (NOD) was filed by the Authority with the County of Santa Clara, Office of the Clerk/Recorder and by the County of San Mateo Office of the Recorder, on July 30, 2013. K. In November 2012, the voters of Santa Clara County approved Measure B, the Water District’s Safe, Clean Water special tax initiative which will provide significant funding toward the Project costs. The District will contribute approximately $28 million toward Project construction costs from its Safe, Clean Water program and other sources. ML. On January 9, 2013, the Authority entered into an Agreement agreement with the State of California, Department of Water Resources (DWR) for $8 million in Proposition 1E (Prop 1E) grant funding from DWR’s Stormwater Flood Management Program to be applied towards Project construction costs. Of the amount awarded, $7,875,000 is available for reimbursement of Project costs. NM. On January 13, 2016, DWR awarded $1,044,351 in Proposition 84 (Prop 84) funds to the Project as part of the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) sShoreline Rresiliency/Ssea Llevel Rrise Pproposal to be administered by the State Coastal Conservancy. Of the amount awarded, $953,351 will beis available for paymentreimbursement of construction fundingProject costs. First Amended SFC San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 Construction Funding Agreement March 4May 1224307, 2016 Page 3 of 22 Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt NON. The Flood District will contribute $800,0002,06100,000 toward Project construction costs. The Flood District’s financial contribution will be in an amount equal to the combined financial contributions made by East Palo Alto and Menlo Park. ONO. The City of East Palo Alto will contribute $1,30260,000 towards Project construction costs. OPOP. The City of Menlo Park will contribute $800,000 towards Project construction costs. QPQ. The City of Palo Alto isare not directlyfinancially contributing toward the Project costs at this time, but is considered to be a contributor through the Safe, Clean Water tax initiative.will contribute $400,000 towards Project construction costs. RQR. , however, construction of tThe Project directly benefits the City of Menlo Park as its completion is necessary to accommodate future flood protection measures located in Menlo Park, upstream of the Project, which may be constructed in the future. In addition, Palo Alto is impacted by the Project because realignment of a portion of its municipal golf course may beis necessary to accommodate various flood protection construction elements of this Project. PQRS. For the purpose of this Agreement, funding from Menlo Park, East Palo Alto, Palo Alto, the Flood District, the Authority, and any future funds from grants or other sources, contributed toward Project construction costs, shall be referred to as “Non Water District Funds.” QRST. On December 232, 2015, tThe Water District and the Authority intend to enterentered into a Construction Management Agreement designating the Water District as the entity responsible for managing construction of the Project. RSTU. The Parties desire to enter into this Agreement to provide for reimbursement of Water District expenditures towards construction of the Project from funding that may become available through Non Water District Funds. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals, and the covenants and conditions in the sections paragraphs contained herein below, the Parties agree as follows: P R O V I S I O N S 1. Project Purposes The Project’s purposes are to improve flood protection, restore the ecosystem, and provide recreational opportunities within the Project’s reach, with the following specific objectives: 1) protect properties and infrastructure between Highway 101 and the San Francisco Bay from San Francisquito Creek flows resulting from 100 year flood events in conjunction with a 100-year tide, including projected Sea Level Rise; 2) accommodate future flood protection measures upstream of the Project that may be constructed; 3) enhance habitat along the Project reach, particularly habitat for threatened and endangered species; 4) enhance recreational uses; and 5) minimize operational and maintenance requirements. First Amended SFC San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 Construction Funding Agreement March 4May 1224307, 2016 Page 4 of 22 Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt 2. Identified ConstructionProject Costs and Funding Amounts Construction of the Project, including finalization of the design, is currently estimated to cost approximately $37.4541.4432 million (Table 1), not including internal projectconstructionPproject management costs incurred by the Water District or contingency costs for utility relocation expenses above the stated contract estimates with the utility providerss. (remainder of page intentionally left blank) Table 1 Identified Construction Project Costs Costs Current Palo Alto Golf Course mitigation $3,000,000 Other mitigation activities $300,000 Pacific Gas & Electric Company (without contingency) Electric Relocation $1,267,000 Gas Relocation $3,141,000 East Palo Alto Sanitary District (without contingency Sewer Relocation $848,000 East Palo Alto real estate acquisition $85,000 Prop 1E Grant Administration by Authority $125,000 Prop 84 Grant Administration by ABAG $91,000 Construction Management (Hatch Mott MacDonald) $2,565,000 Construction Support Services (HDR) $853,000 Costs to complete design (HDR) $230,000 Construction contract with 10% contingency $29,026,800 Total Identified Construction Project Costs $41,440531,800 Table 1 Identified Project Costs Costs Current Palo Alto Golf Course mitigation $3,000,000 Other mitigation activities $300,000 Pacific Gas & Electric Company (without contingency) Electric Relocation $1,267,000 Gas Relocation $3,141,000 East Palo Alto Sanitary District (without contingency Sewer Relocation $848,000 East Palo Alto real estate acquisition $85,000 Construction Management (Hatch Mott MacDonald)$2,565,000 Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt Formatted Table Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial First Amended SFC San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 Construction Funding Agreement March 4May 1224307, 2016 Page 5 of 22 Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted ... [1] Construction Support Services (HDR) $853,000 Completed osts to complete design services (HDR) $230,000 Construction contract with 10% contingency $29,026,800 Total Identified Project Costs $41,315,800 Based on this estimatethe Total Identified Project Costs as stated in Table 1 above,, the Parties agree to contribute the following amounts toward these costs (Table 2). Table 2 Funding Funding Sources Original Funding Agreement Funds shifted from upstream project Newly identified funding Total contribution Water District Funds $28,000,000 $0 $0 $28,000,000 Non Water District Funds Authority Prop 1E Grant $7,875,000 $0 $0 $7,875,000 Prop 84 Grant $0 $0 $953,351 $953,351 Flood District $800,000 $700,000 $560,000 $2,060,000 East Palo Alto $800,000 $200,000 $260,000 $1,260,000 Menlo Park $0 $500,000 $300,000 $800,000 Palo Alto $0 $0 $400,000 $400,000 Total Funding $37,475,000 $1,400,000 $2,473,351 $41,348,351 Table 2 Funding Funding Sources Original Funding Agreement Funds shifted from upstream project Newly identified funding Total contribution Water District Funds $28,000,000 $0 $0 $28,0400,00 0 Non Water District Funds Authority Prop 1E Grant $8,000,000 $0 $0 $8,000,000 Prop 84 Grant $0$953,351 $0 $1,044,351 953,351$0 $1,044,3519 53,351 Flood District $800,000 $700,000 $66705600,0 00 $2,12100060 ,000 East Palo Alto $800,000 $200,000 $300260,000 $1,300260,0 00 Menlo Park $0 $53500,000 $34300,000 $87800,000 Palo Alto $0 $0 $400,000 $400,000 Total Funding $38,553,351 7,600,000 $1,42400,000 $1,600,0002, 57553473,35 1564,351 $41,553473, 351564,351 3. Payment of ConstructionProject Costs Formatted: Indent: Left: 0" Formatted Table Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial Formatted Table Formatted ... [2] Formatted ... [3] Formatted ... [4] Formatted ... [5] Formatted ... [6] Formatted ... [7] Formatted ... [8] Formatted ... [9] Formatted ... [10] Formatted ... [11] Formatted ... [12] Formatted ... [13] Formatted ... [14] Formatted ... [15] Formatted ... [16] Formatted ... [17] Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt Formatted ... [18] Formatted ... [19] Formatted ... [20] Formatted: Font: 11 pt Formatted: Font: 11 pt Formatted: Font: 11 pt Formatted: Font: 11 pt Formatted: Font: 11 pt Formatted ... [21] Formatted ... [22] Formatted ... [23] Formatted ... [24] Formatted ... [25] First Amended SFC San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 Construction Funding Agreement March 4May 1224307, 2016 Page 6 of 22 Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt A. Through a cost-share agreement with the Water District and use of DWR $1,000,000 contribution from Water District funds through a cost-share agreement, along with Prop 1E and Prop 84 grant funds, along with agreements that provide additional funding to the Authority, including a cost- shareing agreement with thewhereby the Water District will fund the discrepancy between the available grant funding and anticipated expenses for approximately $900,000, the Authority agrees to pay the will provide Project funding in the currently estimated constructionProject costs amounts as stated below. If the Authority receives additional grant or other funding for this project, such funds shall be applied first towards costs that are the responsibility of the Authority, itemized in paragraph #3. A. a) through g), with any remaining funds remitted to the Water District and applied toward Project Costs. The Authority will provide to the Water District documentation of all listed expenses incurred and paid for by the Authority. a) $3,000,000 to the City of Palo Alto to mitigate for impacts to the City of Palo Alto Municipal Golf Course; b) $50245300,000 for other mitigation activities; c) $2,700,0004,408,000 to Pacific Gas and Electric Company to relocate gas and electric transmission lines; d) $400,000848,000 to the East Palo Alto Sanitary District to relocate a sewer line; e) $10085,000 for property acquisition within East Palo Alto; $150125,000 DWR Prop 1E grant administration costs incurred by the Authority; $91,000 Prop 84 grant administration costs incurred by ABAG; $ 91,000 Prop 84 grant administration costs incurred by the Authority; f) $230,000 to HDR to completefor completed Plans & Specificationsdesign services; and $853,000 to HDR for construction support services. g) B. Flood District agrees to payfund $2,061100,000 of Project costs, payable to the Water District over the course ofduring three consecutive years for theirits contribution to the identified construction costsProject costs. The payments will be dividedmade as follows: $800,000 (Year 1); $630,000 (Year 2); and $630,000 (Year 3). The firstYear 1 payment will be remitted to the Water District within 180 days after a construction contract is awarded by the Water District. The twoYear 2 and Year 3 following payments will be remittedThe payment will be remitted to the Water District to the Water District within 180 days of the beginning of each respective each respective fiscal year. fiscal year. in the amount of $800,000 in the first year and $xx650,000 a year over the next two years after a construction contract is awarded by the Water District. The payment will be remitted to the Water District in the amount of $xx700,000 a year over the course of xxthree years after a construction contract is awarded by the Water District.: $800,000 (matching East Palo Alto’s contribution of $800,000 currently identified from Non Water District Funds). Formatted: Indent: Hanging: 0.5" Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt, Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt, NotHighlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt, NotHighlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt, NotHighlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt, NotHighlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt, NotHighlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt, NotHighlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt, NotHighlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted ... [26] Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Normal (Web), Indent: Left: 1.5" Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted ... [27] First Amended SFC San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 Construction Funding Agreement March 4May 1224307, 2016 Page 7 of 22 Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt C. East Palo Alto agrees to payfund $1,32600,000 of Project costs, payable to the Water District over the course ofduring three consecutive years for its for their contribution to the identified construction costsProject costsyears. The payments will be dividedmade as follows: $420,000 (Year 1); $420,000 (Year 2); and $420,000 (Year 3). The Year 1 payment will be remitted to the Water District within 180 days after a construction contract is awarded by the Water District. The Year 2 and Year 3 payments will be remitted within 180 days of the beginning of each respective fiscal year. The payment will be remitted to the Water District in the amount of $1,00420,000 in the first year and $xx100,000 a year over the course of xxthe next three years after a construction contract is awarded by the Water District. B. . D. Menlo Park agrees to payfund $800,000 toof Project costs, payable to the Water District over the course ofduring three consecutive years for its for their contribution to the identified constructionProject costs years. The payments will be dividedmade as follows: $300,000 (Year 1); $250,000 (Year 2); and $250,000 (Year 3). The Year 1 payment will be remitted to the Water District within 180 days after a construction contract is awarded by the Water District. The Year 2 and Year 3 payments will be remitted within 180 days of the beginning of each respective fiscal year. The payment will be remitted to the Water District in the amount of $3200,000 in the first year and $25300,000xx a year over tthe course of threenext two years after a construction contract is awarded by the Water District. xx years. C. : $800,000 (matching East Palo Alto’s contribution of $800,000 currently identified from Non Water District Funds). E. Palo Alto agrees to payfund $400,000 of Project costs, payable to the Water District to the Water District over the course ofduring three consecutive years for its contribution to Project costs.for their contribution to the identified construction costs. The payments will be dividedmade as follows: $200,000133,334 (Year 1); $100,000133,333 (Year 2); and $133,333 100,000 (Year 3). The Year 1 payment will be remitted to the Water District within 180 days after a construction contract is awarded by the Water District. The Year 2 and Year 3 payments will be remitted within 180 days of the beginning of each respective fiscal year.The payment will be remitted to the Water District in the amount of $100,000 in the first year and $150,000 a year over the next two years after $xx a year over the course of three years after a construction contract is awarded by the Water District. xx years. Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Normal (Web), Indent: Left: 1", No bullets or numbering Formatted: Normal (Web), Indent: Left: 1", No bullets or numbering Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt, NotHighlight Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt, NotHighlight First Amended SFC San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 Construction Funding Agreement March 4May 1224307, 2016 Page 8 of 22 Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Through Water District funds and funds remitted to the Water District by Palo Alto, Flood District, East Palo Alto and Menlo Park, the Water District agrees to pay the currently estimated constructionProject costs as stated below. o F. A. BThrough Water District funds and funds remitted to thehe Water District by Palo Alto, Flood District, East Palo Alto and Menlo Park, the Water District will agrees to pay the currently estimated construction costs as stated below. expend an amount not to exceed $28,000,000 for expenditures incurred in constructing the Project. $1,000,000 cost-share agreement with Authority for HDR construction support services; a) $2,565,000 for Construction Management Consultant; and 3. $29,026,80026,388,000 for construction contract and a separate encumbrance of 10% of the construction contract amount ($2,638,800) for contingent expenses. with 10% contingency. b) 4. Unidentified Construction Project Costs and/or Surplus Funds and Funding Amounts A. The Parties agree to apply any surplus funds toward unidentified Project costs which exceed the current estimated Identified Project Costs (Table 1). If there are no surplus funds, tThe Parties agree to determine an appropriate cost sharing allocation to pay for any unidentified Project costs or costs which exceed the current estimated Identified Project Costs, such as utility relocation and construction costs that exceed the stated contract amounts plus a 10% contingency already allocated. . B. If there are any surplus funds after paying all identified or unidentified Project costs, the Parties agree to applyreimburse those funds to the Water District so thatWater District shall retain those funds maywhich shall be reallocated through the Safe, Clean Water Program toward construction of the San Francisquito Creek local-state-funding- only project, upstream of Highway 101. For utility relocation contingency costs and any additional construction contingency costs not currently identified, or increases to identified Project cost estimates, the Parties agree to to split the costs equally, not to exceed a total cost increase of $2,5000,000. Flood District, East Palo Alto, Menlo Park, and Palo Alto will each remit its portion of theThese unidentified cost reimbursements will be remitted to the Water District within three years of incurrence of these costsmeet and confer to determine a cost-share to cover the shortfall. Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt, NotHighlight Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt Formatted: Style After: 12 pt, Indent: Left: 0.5", Hanging: 0.5", Numbered + Level: 1 +Numbering Style: A, B, C, … + Start at: 2 +Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 1.25" + Indentat: 1.5" Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt, NotHighlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Space After: 0 pt, Numbered +Level: 1 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 1.25" +Indent at: 1.5", Don't keep with next Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt, Not Highlight Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5", Space After: 0pt, Don't keep with next Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5", Space After: 0pt Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5", Space After: 0pt, No bullets or numbering, Don't keep withnext Formatted: Indent: Hanging: 0.5", Numbered+ Level: 1 + Numbering Style: A, B, C, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.75" + Indent at: 1" Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets ornumbering Formatted: No underline Formatted: No underline Formatted: No underline Formatted: No underline First Amended SFC San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 Construction Funding Agreement March 4May 1224307, 2016 Page 9 of 22 Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt 4. . 5. Method and Timing of Transactions A. Water District shall prepare and submit quarterly invoice packages to the Authority. Water District’s Quarterly invoice packages will include Project progress reports and all other documentation required by DWR and the State Coastal Conservancy sufficient to enable the Authority to submit subsequent funding requests to DWR for grant funding reimbursement. B. Authority shall submit a request for grant fund reimbursement to DWR and the ABAG State Coastal Conservancy within 15 days of receipt of invoice packages from Water District, provided all DWR and ABAGthe State Coastal Conservancy- related invoicing requirements are met. To the extent funds are available, after the Authority will pays for all costs itemized in paragraph #23. A. a) through fhig) above, the Authority will issue payment to the Water District for Project costs of construction managed by the Water District within thirty days of receipt of grant funds) from DWR and Prop. 84 Bay Area IRMP. C. Non Water District Funds contributed by Flood District, East Palo Alto, Menlo Park, and Palo Alto and the Flood District will be remitted to the Water District as within one hundred and eighty days (180) after a construction contract is awarded by the Water District’s Board of Directorsas set forth in paragraph #3, Payment of Project Costs, s . Sub-paragraphsSections B.-E. 46. Mutual Hold HarmlessIndemnification Mutual Hold Harmless and Indemnification Obligations A. In lieu of and notwithstanding the pro rata risk allocation, which might otherwise be imposed between the Parties pursuant to Government Code Section 895.6, the Parties agree that all losses or liabilities incurred by a Party shall not be shared pro rata but, instead, the Member Agencies agree that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, each of the Parties hereto shall fully indemnify and hold each of the other Parties, their officers, board members, employees, and agents, harmless from any claim, expense or cost, damage or liability imposed for injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of the negligent acts or omissions or willful misconduct of the indemnifying Party, its officers, employees, or agents, under or in connection with or arising out of any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to such party under this Agreement. No Party, nor any officer, board member, or agent thereof shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of the negligent acts or omissions or willful misconduct of the another party hereto, its officers, board members, employees, or agents, under or in connection with or arising out of any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to such other Party under this Agreement. The obligations set forth in this paragraph will survive termination and expiration of this Agreement. Formatted: No underline Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets ornumbering, Keep with next First Amended SFC San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 Construction Funding Agreement March 4May 1224307, 2016 Page 10 of 22 Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt B. In the event of concurrent intentional or unintentional misconduct, negligent acts or omissions by any one of the Parties (or each of their respective officers, directors and/or employees), then the liability for any and all claims for injuries or damages to persons and/or property which arise out of each and any of their performance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be apportioned according to the California law of comparative negligence. The Parties hereto are not jointly and severally liable on any liability, claim, or lawsuit. C. The Water District’s construction contract and bid documents will require the construction contractor to agree to appropriate indemnity provisions allowable by law to protect the Parties, and to secure and maintain in full force and effect all times during construction of the Project and until the Project is accepted by the Parties, general liability and property damage insurance, business automobile insurance and such other insurance as the Parties deem appropriate, in forms and limits of liability acceptable to the Parties, naming Water District, Authority and each of its Member Agencies and their respective directors, council members, officers, employees and agents as additional insureds from and against all damages and claims, losses, liabilities, costs or expenses arising out of or in any way connected to the construction of the Project. D. The duties and obligations of paragraph #6. Indemnification, this Section will survive and continue in full force and effect after the termination, completion, suspension, or and expiration of this Agreement. 57. Retention of Records, Right to Monitor and Audit Unless a longer period of time is required by law or federal or state grant funding agreements, the Parties shall maintain all financial records related to this Agreement and/or the Project for five (5) years after the Agreement expires or is terminated earlier pursuant to Section paragraph #7 9. Termination, of this Agreement. The records shall be subject to the examination and/or audit of either Party. 68. Agreement Term This Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and remain in place until the construction of the Project is completed and accepted by the Parties, or this Agreement is terminated earlier by the Parties in the manner authorized by Section paragraph #79. Termination. 79. Termination A. If any Party fails to perform any of its material obligations under this Agreement, in addition to all other remedies provided by law, any other Party may terminate this Agreement but only after giving written notice of the failure of performance to the Party committing the failure with a copy of such notice given to all other Parties. Such notice shall explain the alleged failure of performance and provide a reasonable opportunity for the failure to be cured which in no case will be less than 30 days. If the failure of performance is not satisfactorily cured within the Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt First Amended SFC San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 Construction Funding Agreement March 4May 1224307, 2016 Page 11 of 22 Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt cure period, the Agreement may be terminated upon the delivery of a written notice of termination to all of the Parties. B. A final notice of termination may be given only after completion of the notice and cure process described in Section paragraph #79.A. and only with the approval of the governing body of the Party terminating the Agreement. C. In event of termination, each Party shall deliver to all of the other Parties, upon request, copies of reports, documents, and other work performed by any Party under this Agreement. The cost of work performed under this Agreement to the date of termination shall be due and payable in accordance with the provisions of this Construction Funding Agreement to be executed by the Parties prior to Water District’s commencement of the bid process for award of a construction contract for the Project. D. Notwithstanding the foregoing, after the Water District awards a construction contract for the Project, this Agreement may only be terminated by the mutual written agreement of all of the Parties as approved by the governing body of each Party or pursuant to a delegation of such authority. E. The Chief Executive Officer of the Water District and the Executive Director of Authority are empowered to terminate this Agreement on behalf of their respective agencies in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. 810. Notices Any notice or other communication required or permitted to be given hereunder shall not be effective unless it is given in writing and shall be delivered (a) in person, (b) by certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, or (c) by a commercial overnight courier that guarantees next day delivery and provides a receipt, and addressed to the parties at the addresses stated below, or at such other address as either party may hereafter notify the other parties in writing: Authority: San Francisquito Creek Joint Powers Authority 615-B Menlo Avenue Menlo Park, California 94025 Attention: Len Materman, Executive Director len@sfcjpa.org Water District: Santa Clara Valley Water District 5750 Almaden Expressway San Jose, California 95118 Attention: Norma Camacho, ActingInterim Chief Executive Officer ncamacho@valleywater.org Formatted: Right: 0", Don't keep with next,Don't keep lines together Formatted: Indent: Left: 0", First line: 0" Formatted: Normal, Right: -0.15" Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt, Nounderline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt, Nounderline, Font color: Auto First Amended SFC San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 Construction Funding Agreement March 4May 1224307, 2016 Page 12 of 22 Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Palo Alto City of Palo Alto 250 Hamilton Avenue P.O. Box 10250 Palo Alto, CA 94303 Attention: James Keene, City Manager james.keene@cityofpaloalto.org East Palo Alto City of East Palo Alto East Palo Alto 2415 University Avenue East Palo Alto, CA 94303 Attn: Carlos Martinez, City Manager cmartinez@cityofepa.org Menlo Park City of Menlo Park 701 Laurel Street Menlo Park, CA 94025 Attention: Alex McIntyre, City Manager admcintyre@menlopark.org Flood Control District Department of Public Works 555 County Center, 5th Floor Redwood City, CA 94063 Attention: James Porter, Director jporter@smcgov.org Service of any such notice or other communications so made shall be deemed effective on the day of actual delivery (whether accepted or refused) as evidenced by: a) confirmed in-person delivery by the addressee or other representative of the Party authorized to accept delivery on behalf of the addressee, b) as shown by the addressee’s return receipt if by certified mail, or c) as confirmed by the courier service if by courier; provided, however, that if such actual delivery occurs after 5:00 p.m. (local time where received) or on a non- business day, then such notice or demand so made shall be deemed effective on the first business day immediately following the day of actual delivery. No communications via electronic mail shall be effective to give any Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt, Nounderline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline Formatted: No underline Formatted: No underline Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt, Nounderline, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt, Nounderline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt, Nounderline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto First Amended SFC San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 Construction Funding Agreement March 4May 1224307, 2016 Page 13 of 22 Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt notice, request, direction, demand, consent, waiver, approval or other communications hereunder. 911. Severability In the event any portion of this Agreement is declared by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, such portion shall be severed from this Agreement and the remaining parts hereof shall remain in full force and effect as fully as though such invalid, illegal or unenforceable portion had never been part of this Agreement. 1012. Governing Law and Compliance with Laws The parties agree that California law governs this Agreement. In the performance of this Agreement each Party will comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, codes and regulations of the federal, state, and applicable local government. 1113. Venue In the event that suit shall be brought by any party to this contract, the parties agree that venue shall be exclusively vested in the state courts of either the County of Santa Clara, or the County of San Mateo or where otherwise appropriate, exclusively in the United States District Court, Northern District of California. 1214. Assignability and Subcontracting Parties shall not assign this Agreement or any portion thereof to a third party or subcontract with a third party to provide services required under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other parties. Any unauthorized attempt by any Party to so assign or transfer shall be void and of no effect. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Party may hire a consultant to fulfill its obligations as described above in paragraph #under Section 35. Method and Timing of Transactions of this Agreement. 1315. Ownership of Materials All reports, documents, or other materials developed or discovered by any Party or any other person engaged directly or indirectly by any Party to perform the services required hereunder shall be and remain the mutual property of Authority and Water District without restriction or limitation upon their use. 1416. Entire Agreement Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font: (Default) Times New Roman,12 pt Formatted: Normal (Web), Indent: Left: 0" Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto First Amended SFC San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 Construction Funding Agreement March 4May 1224307, 2016 Page 14 of 22 Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt This First Amended Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the Authority and the Water District Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior offers and negotiations, oral and written, including but not limited to the original Agreement dated August 11, 2014. This First Amended Agreement may not be amended or modified in any respect whatsoever except by an instrument in writing signed by authorized representatives of the Authority and Water District.eachall Partiesy. 1517. Further Actions The Authority and Water District agree to execute all instruments and documents, and to take all actions, as may be reasonably required to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. 1618. Counterparts This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which, when executed and delivered, shall be deemed to be an original, and all of which, taken together, shall be deemed to be one and the same instrument. 1719. Non Waiver A Party’s waiver of any term, condition, or covenant, or breach of any term, condition or covenant will not be construed as a waiver of any other term, condition or covenant. 1820. Third Parties This Agreement is entered into only for the benefit of the Parties executing this Agreement and not for the benefit of any other individual, entity, or person. (remainder of page intentionally left blank) Signatures follow on next pages Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt Formatted: Normal (Web), Indent: Left: 0" Formatted: Normal (Web), Centered, Indent:Left: 0" Formatted: Normal (Web), Indent: Left: 0" Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt, Nounderline, Font color: Auto Formatted: Normal (Web), Centered, Indent:Left: 0" Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt Formatted: Normal (Web), Indent: Left: 0" First Amended SFC San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 Construction Funding Agreement March 4May 1224307, 2016 Page 15 of 22 Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt FIRST AMENDED AGREEMENT AMONG THE SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY, THE SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, THE SAN MATEO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, THE CITY OF PALO ALTO, THE CITY OF MENLO PARK, AND Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: Space After: 0 pt Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto First Amended SFC San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 Construction Funding Agreement March 4May 1224307, 2016 Page 16 of 22 Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO FOR THE FUNDING OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK FLOOD REDUCTION, ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, AND RECREATION PROJECT SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO HIGHWAY 101 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the San Francisquito Creek Joint Powers Authority has executed this Funding Agreement as of the date and year stated below. Each Party has executed a separate signature page. APPROVED AS TO FORM: San Francisquito Creek Joint Powers Authority By: ______________________________ By: ______________________________ Greg Stepanicich Len Materman Title: SFCJPA General Counsel Title: Executive Director Date: ____________________________ Date: ____________________________ Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto First Amended SFC San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 Construction Funding Agreement March 4May 1224307, 2016 Page 17 of 22 Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt FIRST AMENDED AGREEMENT AMONG THE SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY, THE SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, THE SAN MATEO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, THE CITY OF PALO ALTO, THE CITY OF MENLO PARK, AND THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO FOR THE FUNDING OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK FLOOD REDUCTION, ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, AND RECREATION PROJECT SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO HIGHWAY 101 AGREEMENT AMONG THE SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY, THE SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, THE SAN MATEO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, THE CITY OF PALO ALTO, THE CITY OF MENLO PARK, AND THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO FOR THE FUNDING OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK FLOOD REDUCTION, ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, AND RECREATION PROJECT SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO HIGHWAY 101 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Santa Clara Valley Water District has executed this Funding Agreement as of the date and year stated below. Each Party has executed a separate signature page. APPROVED AS TO FORM: Santa Clara Valley Water District By: ___________________________ By: ____________________________ Leslie Orta Tony EstremeraBarbara Keegan Title: Senior Assistant District Counsel Title: Chair/Board of Directors Office of the District Counsel Date: __________________________ Date: ___________________________ ATTEST: MICHELE L. KING, CMC __________________________________ Clerk/Board of Directors Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto First Amended SFC San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 Construction Funding Agreement March 4May 1224307, 2016 Page 18 of 22 Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: No underline, Font color: AutoI <--------------------------------------------------------------------~L_ ____ _ /;II----~ " ,~( t L. ____________ -.J _____________________________________________________ J u,' '" " ____________ L ________ L ___________________________ J I <--------------------------------------------------------------------~L_ ____________________ ~ /,;I~====:::j , " L ____________ _ f ,(,' _________________________ ..1 Ilf " U ____________ L ________ L ___________________________ J First Amended SFC San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 Construction Funding Agreement March 4May 1224307, 2016 Page 19 of 22 Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt FIRST AMENDED AGREEMENT AMONG THE SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY, THE SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, THE SAN MATEO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, THE CITY OF PALO ALTO, THE CITY OF MENLO PARK, AND THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO FOR THE FUNDING OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK FLOOD REDUCTION, ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, AND RECREATION PROJECT SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO HIGHWAY 101 AGREEMENT AMONG THE SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY, THE SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, THE SAN MATEO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, THE CITY OF PALO ALTO, THE CITY OF MENLO PARK, AND THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO FOR THE FUNDING OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK FLOOD REDUCTION, ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, AND RECREATION PROJECT SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO HIGHWAY 101 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Palo Alto has executed this Funding Agreement as of the date and year stated below. Each Party has executed a separate signature page. APPROVED AS TO FORM: City of Palo Alto By: ___________________________ By: ____________________________ Molly Stump James Keene City Attorney City Manager Print Name:_____________________ Print Name:______________________ Title: __________________________ Title: ___________________________ Date: __________________________ Date: ___________________________ Formatted: Space After: 0 pt Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt, Nounderline, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto First Amended SFC San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 Construction Funding Agreement March 4May 1224307, 2016 Page 20 of 22 Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt FIRST AMENDED AGREEMENT AMONG THE SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY, THE SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, THE SAN MATEO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, THE CITY OF PALO ALTO, THE CITY OF MENLO PARK, AND THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO FOR THE FUNDING OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK FLOOD REDUCTION, ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, AND RECREATION PROJECT SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO HIGHWAY 101 AGREEMENT AMONG THE SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY, THE SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, THE SAN MATEO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, THE CITY OF PALO ALTO, THE CITY OF MENLO PARK, AND THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO FOR THE FUNDING OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK FLOOD REDUCTION, ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, AND RECREATION PROJECT SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO HIGHWAY 101 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of East Palo Alto has executed this Funding Agreement as of the date and year stated below. Each Party has executed a separate signature page. APPROVED AS TO FORM: City of East Palo Alto By: ___________________________ By: ____________________________ John Nagel Print Name:______________________ Print Name:______________________ Title: ___________________________Title: City Attorney Title: ___________________________ Date: __________________________ Date: ___________________________ Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt, No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt, Nounderline, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto First Amended SFC San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 Construction Funding Agreement March 4May 1224307, 2016 Page 21 of 22 Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt FIRST AMENDED AGREEMENT AMONG THE SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY, THE SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, THE SAN MATEO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, THE CITY OF PALO ALTO, THE CITY OF MENLO PARK, AND THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO FOR THE FUNDING OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK FLOOD REDUCTION, ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, AND RECREATION PROJECT SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO HIGHWAY 101 AGREEMENT AMONG THE SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY, THE SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, THE SAN MATEO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, THE CITY OF PALO ALTO, THE CITY OF MENLO PARK, AND THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO FOR THE FUNDING OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK FLOOD REDUCTION, ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, AND RECREATION PROJECT SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO HIGHWAY 101 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Menlo Park has executed this Funding Agreement as of the date and year stated below. Each Party has executed a separate signature page. APPROVED AS TO FORM: City of Menlo Park By: _____________________________ By: ______________________________ Print Name: ____________________William L. McClure Print Name:________________________ Title: ___________________________ Title: City Attorney Title: ______________________________William L. McClure Alex D. McIntyre City Attorney City Manager Date: _________________________ Date:______________________________ Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: Space After: 0 pt Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: Normal, Right: 0" Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font: Not Bold, No underline, Fontcolor: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto First Amended SFC San Francisco Bay to Highway 101 Construction Funding Agreement March 4May 1224307, 2016 Page 22 of 22 Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt Formatted: Font: 10.5 pt FIRST AMENDED AGREEMENT AMONG THE SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY, THE SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, THE SAN MATEO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, THE CITY OF PALO ALTO, THE CITY OF MENLO PARK, AND THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO FOR THE FUNDING OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK FLOOD REDUCTION, ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, AND RECREATION PROJECT SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO HIGHWAY 101 AGREEMENT AMONG THE SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY, THE SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, THE SAN MATEO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, THE CITY OF PALO ALTO, THE CITY OF MENLO PARK, AND THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO FOR THE FUNDING OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK FLOOD REDUCTION, ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, AND RECREATION PROJECT SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO HIGHWAY 101 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the San Mateo Flood Control District has executed this Funding Agreement as of the date and year stated below. Each Party has executed a separate signature page. APPROVED AS TO FORM: San Mateo County Flood Control District By: ___________________________ By: ______________________________ John Beiers Warren Slocum County Counsel President, Board of Supervisors, San Mateo Print Name: ____________________ Print Name: ________________________ Title: __________________________ Title: _____________________________ Date: __________________________ Date: _____________________________ Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: Space After: 0 pt Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: Normal, Right: 0" Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font: Not Bold, No underline, Fontcolor: Auto Formatted: No underline, Font color: Auto Page 1: [1] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:28:00 PM Font: 10.5 pt Page 1: [1] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:28:00 PM Font: 10.5 pt Page 1: [1] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:28:00 PM Font: 10.5 pt Page 5: [2] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [2] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [3] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [3] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [4] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [4] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [5] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [5] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [6] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [6] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [6] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [7] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [7] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [8] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [8] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [9] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [9] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [10] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [10] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [10] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [10] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [11] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [11] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [11] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [11] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [12] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [12] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [13] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [13] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [14] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [14] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [15] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [15] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [15] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [16] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [16] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [16] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [17] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [17] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [18] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [18] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [18] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [19] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [19] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [19] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [20] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [20] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [20] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [21] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [21] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [22] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [22] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [23] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [23] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [23] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [24] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [24] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [25] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [25] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 5: [25] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:12:00 PM Font: (Default) Arial Page 6: [26] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:29:00 PM Normal (Web), Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 1.25" + Indent at: 1.5" Page 6: [27] Formatted Author 5/12/2016 4:05:00 PM Normal (Web), No bullets or numbering