Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-06-24 City Council (10)City of Palo Alto City Manager’s Report TO:HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL FROM:CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES DATE: SUBJECT: JUNE 24, 2002 CMR:285:02 APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO TO THE DELOITTE AND TOUCHE CONTRACT C9115650 FOR RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES TO INCREASE THE FUNDING IN THE AMOUNT OF $300,000 FOR A TOTAL MAXIMUM COMPENSATION OF $740,000 TO CONTINUE ASSISTANCE IN IMPLEMENTING AN ENERGY RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Council approve the Amendment No. 2 (Attachment A) to the Deloitte and Touche Contract C9115650 for risk management services to increase the funding in the amount of $300,000 for a total not-to-exceed amount of $740,000. BACKGROUND On April 5, 1999, Council authorized the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Deloitte and Touche for risk management services (CMR:186:99). Funds for services were budgeted during FY 1998-99 and FY 1999-00 for a total not to exceed $225,000. Council further delegated the City Manager the authority to extend the contract term as needed. Funds for the contract were carried over through FY 2000-01. Deloitte and Touche was selected through the City’s Request for Proposal process to assist the Utilities Department (CPAU) in the development and implementation of a comprehensive energy risk management program. Deloitte and Touche was selected from eight other firms because of its professional approach, talent pool and in-depth knowledge of the relationship between CPAU and the Northern California Power Agency (NCPA). The scope of services under the Deloitte and Touche agreement were to be carried out in three phases, as follows: CMR:285:02 Page 1 of 5 Phase 1: Phase 2: Phase 3: Review of existing risk management materials and program. Develop suggested risk management plan and senior management training. Assistance with risk management implementation. Deloitte and Touche completed Phase 1 and Phase 2 in the fall of 1999. In Spring 2000, D&T began assisting CPAU under Phase 3 of the contract. Tasks under Phase 3 were broadly defined in the original contract, and included review of risk management controls and infrastructure and assistance with development .of risk management policies and procedures. In calendar year 2001, Deloitte and Touche provided the following Phase 3 services: ¯Review of NCPA’s risk management systems; ¯Review of CPAU’s commodity pricing policY; ¯Review of CPAU’s interim risk management policies and procedures; ¯Development of draft credit risk management guidelines and procedures; ¯High level assessment of CPAU’s risk .management control infrastructure; ¯Review and feedback on various gas and electric supplier contracts;and ¯Staff training for Financial Accounting Standard Board Statement 133 applicability. In August 2001, Deloitte and Touche completed the Risk Management Control Infrastructure Assessment, in which it made several recommendations to improve and formalize CPAU’s risk management program. The recommendations from that rePort included: ¯Reorganize and update the control documents (policies, guidelines, and procedures) including the establishment of formal policies and procedures for credit approval and credit risk management; ¯Establish validation and risk measurement methodology and procedures for all transactions; ¯Define the roles and responsibilities of all parties responsible for risk management and develop and train staff as appropriate for those roles; ¯Ensure that systems support CPAU activities; ¯Perform annual audits of the policies and procedures to ensure alignment with objectives; and ¯Create senior management reports for improved oversight. On November 19, 2001 (CMR:409:01), Council approved Amendment #1 to the contract and increased the contract funding by $215,000 ($105,000 for FY 2001-2002 and CMR:285:02 Page 2 of 5 $110,000 for FY 2002-03) for a total maximum not to exceed amount of $440,000 for the amended contract. Amendment #1 to the contract provided additional funds for completing additional Phase 3 tasks. Those tasks included performing annual and mid- year review of energy risk management controls, processes, and performance, and other general risk management tasks. Some of this work has been completed and the funds budgeted for-FY 02-03 ($110,000) are expected to be utilized to complete the annual review and mid-year review of the risk management program. DISCUSSION In early 2002, Deloitte and Touche provided assistance in implementing its recommendations to improve the energy risk management program. Work has focused on establishing proper roles and responsibilities of the Council and staff, including the staff Risk Oversight Committee (ROC). Deloitte and Touche assisted in a ROC retreat in May 2002 and in redrafting the risk management policies and guidelines. Additional Phase 3 tasks have been identified resulting from improvements suggested by the ROC, Utilities and ASD staff, and the City Auditor’s office to continue implementation of the risk management recommendations and additional funds are needed to perform these tasks. These tasks include, but are not limited, to the following: ¯ Continued support of ROC activities (finalizing the policy and guidelines, developing an organizational structure and functional review to align with roles and responsibilities of designated staff); ¯Education (training and/or tutorials for City Councill City Manager, and City Auditor and operational training for ROC and other City staff); ¯Response to audit report(analysis and context for the materiality and consistency with industry practices of the City Auditor’s recommendations); ¯Control documentation (development of detailed risk management and transacting procedures); and ¯Middle Office implementation (assist in the development of the middle office - risk management - function as this function is recommended to be under the supervision of the Director of ASD). As a result of working with the City for over three years, Deloitte and Touche has gained a thorough understanding of CPAU’s gas and electric procurement and hedging operations and the relationship and dynamics between Utilities and other City departments. This makes Deloitte and Touche uniquely qualified in assisting the City in carrying out its risk management objectives. Deloitte and Touche has demonstrated its CMR:285:02 Page 3 of 5 ability to provide valuable and objective advice and services and to work cooperatively and productively with many departments and divisions within the City. RESOURCE IMPACT As of June 10, approximately $18,000 remains in budgeted FY 01-02 funds for this contract. The estimated cost to complete the additional identified Phase 3 tasks is shown in the table below. Activity ROC support Education Audit Response Control Documentation Middle Office Implementation TOTAL (not including expenses) Estimated Professional Costs $56,OOO $42,O00 $14,000 $33,600 $175,600 $321,200 An additional $300,000 is requested for these additional activities from the F¥ 01-02 budget. There are sufficient funds in the gas and electric fund budgets for FY 01-02 and no budget increase is required. " City staff is currently developing a formal "middle office" function (risk oversight and control) as per consultant and City Auditor’s recommendations. A comprehensive proposal is being developed to address all those recommendations. Preliminarily, the proposal will include a recommendation to create a newly defined ,’Risk Manager" position. The estimated additional costs above might be substantially reduced (by as much as 50%) depending on the speed with which the City can establish and fill this position. The envisioned Risk Manager would assume many of the interim functions which City staff has requested assistance from Deloitte and Touche. Staff’s c.omPrehensive proposal will address any decreased funding for Deloitte and Touche that can be accommodated. CMR:285:02 Page 4 of 5 POLICY IMPLICATIONS This recommendation is consistent with the Council approved Utilities Strategic Plan Strategy 2: preserve a supply cost advantage compared to the market price. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW These services do not constitute a project for the purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act ATTACHMENT A. Amendment No. 2 To.Agreement No. C9115650 Between the City of Palo Alto and Deloitte & Touche LLP B.Fee Schedule for Phase 3 Extension (Amendment 2 to Agreement No. C9115650 between City of Palo Alto and Deloitte and Touche LLP) PREPARED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD: CITy MANAGER APPROVAL: /- ~-L3 ¯ - JANE RATCHYE Se3aior Resource Planner EMIL~ Assistant City Manager CMR:285:02 Page 5 of 5 AMENDMENT NO. TWO TO AGREEMENT NO. C9115650 BETWEEN THE CITY OF PALO ALTO AND DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP This Amendment No. Two to Agreement No. C9115650 ~("Agreement") is entered into , 2002, by and betweenthe CITY OF PALO ALTO ("CITY"), and DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP, ("CONTRACTOR") a Delaware limited liability partnership located at 1000 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1500, Los Angeles, CA 90017. RECITALS: WHEREAS," the Agreement was entered into between the parties for the provision of risk management consulting services; and WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, terms, conditions, and provisions of this Amendment, .the parties agree: SECTION i. Section 4 entitled "COMPENSATION" is hereby amended to read as follows: "4.1 In consideration of the full performance of the Services by CONTRACTOR, CITY will pay CONTRACTOR a total sum not to exceed Seven Hundred Forty Thousand Dollars ($740,000) ~aya~le within thirty (30) days of submission by CONTRACTOR of its itemized billings, in triplicate, in accordance with o~the following fee and expense schedule set forth in Exhibit "B". SECTION 2. The following exhibit-to the Agreement is hereby amended to read as set forth in the attachment to this Amendment, which is incorporated in full by this reference: a. Exhibit "B" entitled "Rate Schedule" SECTION 3. Except as herein modified, all other provisions of the Agreement, including any exhibits and subsequent amendments thereto, shall remain in full force and effect. 020613 Ih 0072179 1 ZN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have by their duly authorized representativeH executed .this Amendment on the date first above written. ATTEST:CITY OF PALO ALTO City Clerk APPROVEDAS TO FORM: Senior Asst. City Attorney APPROVED: Assistant Ci~yMamager Mayor DRLOITTE h TOUCHE <LLP Name: ’ ~. Title: Director 0f Administ~ativ~ Services TaxpayerI.D. No. 12-3891517 Director of Utilities Insurance Revie~ At t~ch~ent : EXHIBIT "B" :RATE SCHEDULE 2 STATE OF COUNTY OF CERTIFICATE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT (Civil Code § 1189) ) ) ) On , 2002 before me, the undersigned, a notary public in and for said County, personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be-the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which ’the person~(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature of Notary Public 020613 lh 0072179 Attachment B Exhibit B: Fee Schedule for Phase 3 Extension (Amendment 2 to Agreement No. C9115650 between City of Palo Alto and Deloitte and Touche LLP) The following fees are for work to be performed in Phase 3 under the extension of the contract between CPAU and Deloitte and Touche dated March 16, 1999. The fees for Phase 3 tasks are estimated between $200,000 - $425,000, plus out-of-pocket expenses, subject to the overall engagement fee and expense limitations per the contract. The following are the hourly rates for Phase 3 tasks: Partner Senior Manager Manager Staff Hourly R~e $430 $350 $310 $200 The hourly rates reflect a discount of approximately 30% from CONSULTANT’s standard hourly rate schedule, and are subject to change as CONSULTANT,s standard rate schedule changes. Professional fees for the tasks to be completed in Phase 3 are estimated as follows: Task 1A Energy Risk Management Program Assessment - Annual Review Professional Fee Estimate $70,000 Task 1B Energy Risk Management Program Assessment - Mid Year Review $35,000 Task 2 $56,000 General Energy Risk Management Project Tasks ’ Continued support of ROC activities (Finalizing Risk Management Policies and Guidelines, developing an organizational structure, refining transaction authorization matrix, moderating, developing agenda, and preparing summary report for ROC retreat) Education (high level, strategic, and operational training for Finance Committee, City Council, City Manager, Auditor’s Office, ASD, and the ROC) Audit Response (provide support in ensun.’ng the CPAU response to the City Auditor’s report is consistent with industry practices) Control Documentation (assist in the front, middle, and back office procedures) Middle Office Implementation (develop skills matrix for front and middle. office staff, data input, security and verification guidelines, prototype risk management reports, and strategy and schedule for assumption of Risk Manager position) $42,000 $14,000 Total $426,200 $33,600 $175,600 Attachment B CONSULTANT will endeavor to keep out-of-pocket expenses to a reasonable level by scheduling travel for on-site visits in a prudent manner and performing work off-site to the extent possible. Out- of-pocket expenses are additional to the amounts above and are expected to be approximately 12-15% of total professional fees. This contract maximum not-to-exceed amount is $740,000. No work will be done in Phase 3 until a detailed scope of work is completed and CONSULTANT receives CPAU’s written authorization. 2