HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-03-18 City Council (4)City of Palo Alto
City Manager’s Report
TO:
FROM:
HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL
CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS12
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MARCH 18, 2002
DOWNTOWN PARKING STRUCTURES:
PARKING MITIGATION MEASURES
CMR:151:02
CONSTRUCTI01~
REPORT IN BRIEF
The designs of two new downtown parking structures have been completed and are
currently being advertised for construction bids. During construction a total of 152
parking spaces currently on Lot R and Lot S/L will be lost. This report is a plan for
regaining those spaces by re.striping existing curbside parking and by the use of the
former Palo Alto Medical Foundation parking lot.
In November 2001, Council seta goal of public parking spaces in the new garages at 40
to 60 percent. Since that .time, the design of the garages has been developed to the point
that more specific allocations can be determined. A confirmation of 42 percent public
spaces is requested.
CMR:151:02 Page 1 of 7
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that Council:
1.Approve the attached Mitigation Monitoring Program.
After hearing pubic testimony, adopt the attached Resolution to authorize the
addition of 34 on-street parking spaces at the specified downtown locations;
spaces; to eliminate a mid-block crosswalk on Emerson Street in order to add on-
street parking; to authorize angle parking in certain locations; and to designate
public and permit parking in the two parking garages, with a parking mix of
approximately 58% permit spaces/42% public spaces.
Approve use of the former Pal. Alto Medical Foundation (PAMF) parking lot for
permit parking and for Avenidas senior center staff and service vehicles during the
construction period for the new garages. This recommendation could be revisited
at a later point if staff is able to negotiate an agreement for early termination of the
lease for the Webster/Cowper garage.
BACKGROUND
On June 4, 2001, Council approved consultant contracts that provided for the final design
of two parking structures in the downtown area (CMR:263:01). The design of these
garages was completed in February 2002, and is being advertised for construction bids.
However, staff was directed to return to Council prior to construction with a plan
outlining parking mitigation measures to replace the 189 parking spaces that will be lost
during construction. There are 152 two-hour public spaces (115 in Lot S/L and 37 in
Lot R) and 37 permit spaces in Lot R.
The Environmental Impact Report for this project identified a number of issues that need
to be mitigated during the construction of the parking structures. The attached mitigation
monitoring program (Attachment A) is required to fulfill the monitoring requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Staff was directed by Council on November 27, 2000 to explore the possibility of valet
parking the Civic Center garage. Providing this service on one or more levels of the
Civic Center parking garage could provide an additional 55 parking spaces.
Also, on November 27, 2000, Council approved a goal of designating forty (40) to sixty
(60) percent of the new garage parking spaces as public parking (CMR:428:00). This
goal was based on the approximate mix Of public versus private parking at existing
downtown parking lots and garages. Since that time, staff has worked with the Chamber
of Commerce Parking Subcommittee to refine the details of that distribution. The results
of that dialog are discussed herein.
CMR:151:02 Page 2 of 7
DISCUSSION
Alternative Parking Sites during Construction
Effective this quarter, staff will sell no new permits in Lot R but will continue to renew
permits for existing permit holders. This will se~rve to reduce the number of permit
holders through attrition. At the time of construction on Lot R, those remaining permit
holders will be moved to the Lot Q garage (on High Street, between Lytton and
University Avenues). This will address the anticipated loss of 37 permit parking spaces.
In order to replace a portion of the 152 two-hour parking spaces that will be lost, staff
recommends converting certain existing curbside parallel parking spaces to diagonal
parking. Attachment B is the resolution that codifies these changes in accordance with
the Municipal Code; Attachment C shows the plans for these changes. Although the
anticipated spaces might need to be adjusted to accommodate field conditions, it is
estimated that this would result in a gain of approximately 34 new parking spaces. These
spaces would remain as two-hour parking spaces even after completion of the new
garages. This will require eliminating a mid-block crosswalk on Emerson Street. Section
21950.5 of the California Vehicle Code requires the Counci! provide an opportunity for
the publfc to provide input regarding the proposed elimination of a marked crosswalk, at
least .30 days before it is eliminated. Notice of the right to provide input is required to be
posted at the crosswalk, and has been done.
With the addition of 34 curbside two-hour parking spaces, the two-hour parking deficit
during construction would be reduced to 118 spaces. Staff explored several options to
gain these 118 spaces. Only one viable option was found, which involves use of the
former Pale Alto Medical Foundation (PAMF) parking lot. The parking lot at the former
PAMF site is now owned by the City and could be used during the year it will take to
construct the Lot R garage. Given the uncertainty in obtaining spaces at other sites, staff
recommends the use of this site for interim parking. Approximately 100 spaces are
available, which, if used in conjunction with the 34 spaces gained by re-striping, would
come closest to replacing the number of spaces lost by construction of the garages than
the other options which were explored. The remaining deficit, even with the use of the
PAMF lot, would be 18 spaces. Any use of the PAMF lot for temporary parking has no
effect on the schedule to re-use the land for a park.
Staff recommends that parking on the former PAMF site-be permit only, in order to
reduce the volume of in-and-out traffic at .the site. City staff who are currently parking at
the Cowper/Webster garage could be moved to the former PAMF site, which would be a
closer walk to the Civic Center and would also free up more desirable permit spaces at
Cowper/Webster. People currently on a waiting list to receive Civic Center parking
permits could also be offered permits at the former PAMF site. Since the PAMF parking
lot is not in a high demand location, parkingpermits should be sold at the reduced rate
used for other less desirable lots such as those near the train station.
CMR:151:02 Page 3 of 7
Avenidas has also requested that its staff be allowed use of the PAMF lot if needed, since
so many of its clients currently use Lot S, the site of the new Lot SiL garage. Allowing
staff or service vehicles to park at the former PAMF lot would free up spaces at Lot C for
senior visitors. Lot C, which is located behind Avenidas, has approximately 25 spaces
(out.of 54 total) reserved for use by Avenidas. Avenidas staff or service vehicles would
be issued a dashboard pass and be allowed to park in the former PAMF lot at no cost.
Staff considered a number of other alternatives to use of the former PAMF lot, including:
Cowper-Webster Garage: For over a year, staff has been in negotiations with Premier
Properties and 529 Partners regarding an early termination of the Cowper-Webster
lease. The two upper floors of the garage are currently not open to the public. These
spaces could be used for public or permit parking and would offset the remaining 108-
space parking deficit caused by construction of the new garages. An early termination ’
of the lease could result in over 100 spaces that would revert to the City, while still
maintaining a certainnumber of private spaces for the use of the tenants of 529
Partners. Closure on the negotiations has been difficult to achieve due to the current
volatility of the commercial retail market, as the number of private spaces that 529
Partners wishes to retain is based upon the type of company interested in leasing
adjacent commercial space. Given the uncertainty of this situation, it is recommended
that additional spaces at the Cowper-Webster garage should not be planned as part of
the parking mitigation plan for the new parking structures. If staff is able to reach an
agreement with Premier Properties and 529 Partners in the future, however, it would
then be possible to use any newly acquired parking spaces for mitigation of the
construction deficit. Plans for new public spaces in the Cowper-Webster garage
would be presented to Council for approval along with any new agreement relating to
the Webster-Cowper lease. At that time, the use of the former PAMF lot for permit
parking could be revisited, with any permit parking at the PAMF site moved into the
newly available spaces at Cowper/Webster garage.
Valet Parking at the Civic Center: Staff worked with the current parking vendor for
Lot S, National Parking and Valet, to investigate the feasibility of valet parking at the
Civic Center. National Parking recommended using the C level of the garage because
it has a more open geometry for parking. The valet parking would result in an
additional 55 parking spaces on the C level. Level A would still have short-term
public parking, and the bulk of the permit parking would be moved to Level B. The
cost for this valet service would be $22,000 per month. There would also be a one-
time estimated cost of $15,000 to repaint and re-sign the parking levels as Level C
permit parkers would need to be distributed to other levels. The cost to repaint and
sign the garages could be paid by the Parking Assessment District, however, the cost
of valet service would need to be paid by the General Fund, as any revenue generated
returns to the City. Due to start-up and operational costs and the reduced demand for
parking downtown, valet parking is not recommended at this time.
CMR: 151:02 Page 4 of 7
Other Parking Areas: Staff has investigated the possibility of leasing several private
-parking lots (Attachment D). In general, private property owners are not interested in
entering a long-term lease with the City, particularly given liability issues that could
arise with public use. Staff is currently investigating leasing the new Joint Powers
Board (JPB) parking lot near Alma and Forest Avenue. Past queries to the JPB
regarding its other lots indicated that it preferred to keep them exclusively for the use
of commuters, particularly since non-commuting drivers already tend to use the JPB
lot for inexpensive daily parking ($1 per day) for the downtown area.
Parking Distribution and Duration in New Structures
As stated in a previous staff report (CMR:428:00) on the subjectof parking alternatives
during construction, a number of factors are relevant when determining the mix of.permit
versus public parking. Those factors include:
¯The need to keep at least as many public spaces as currently exist on the surface lots.
The recommended goal of 40 to 60 percent public spaces is subject to design and/or
enforcement constraints. For example, .full bays, sections, or aisles would be assigned
as either public or permit parking, as opposed to allowing a handful of permit parking
on a floor otherwise filled with public pa~king.
Any acquisition of the now-private floors of the Cowper/Webster garage would shift
the allocations of permit and public parking in the new garages. The top two levels of
the Cowper/Webster garage would likely be permit parking as it is not convenient to
have public parking on the top floor.
The ratio of public/permit parking in the new garages or other downtown parking
garages or lots may be adjusted to accommodate the needs of any Residential Parking
Permit program. Sufficient amounts of permit parking will be needed downtown in
order to accommodate increased downtown parking demands resulting from
nonresident parkers that would be displaced from residential neighborhoods.
All public parking spaces in the new garages would be two hour spaces. This will
prevent people from using the public spaces as a way to circumvent the Color Zone
parking. If the new garages had free parking for more than 2 hours, it would be possible
to move one’s car from one color zone to the next throughout the day and not get a
parking ticket or a parking permit. This is contrary to the objectives of the Color Zone
system, a waste of productive time for downtown employees, and it would adversely
affect the City’s permit revenues. The concept of having the public spaces in the new
garages being limited to 2 hours has been approved by the Chamber of Commerce’s
Parking Subcommittee.
The public spaces would be located on the most convenient levels. Staff recommends
that the 83 spaces on the first and second level of the Lot R garage be public spaces and
CMR." 151 ".02 Page 5 of 7
that the remaining 130 spaces on the third, fourth, and fifth levels be permit parking.
Staff also recommends that 296 spaces on the first, basement, and sub-basement levels of
the Lot S/L garage be two-hour spaces and that the remaining 396 spaces on the second,
third, fourth, and fifth levels be permit parking. This would provide approximately twice
as many public spaces as presently exist on those lots. This would yield a proportion of
58% permit parking to 42% public parking, or approximately 60/40. This proportion is
consistent with the proportion of parking spaces throughout the downtown parking
assessment district lots.
RESOURCE IMPACT
It will cost approximately $20,000 to re-stripe the curbside parallel parking stalls in order
to acquire 34 new diagonal parking spaces. This cost will be paid from the Downtown
Parking Assessment District funding.
In order for the PAMF parking lot to be adequate for permit parking, the lights will need
to be re-connected (they were disconnected during the demolition of the former PAMF
building) and new stall striping and signage added. It will cost approximately $10,000 to
reconnect the lights at the PAMF lot, add signage and other minor improvements. These
costs would be paid from.construction funds for the new parking structures.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
These recommendations are consistent with existing City policies.
TIMELINE
The final design of both garages is expected to be complete, by February 2002. The
construction documents could then be advertised for bids in late March 2002, with the
construction contract awarded in April 2002. It will take approximately 1.5 years to
complete construction of both garages.
2002
February
March
April
Design completed. Construction bids solicited.
Construction bids opened.
Publish and mail notices of second assessment payment to each
property owner. Property owners have 30 days to pay cash for all or
part of their confirmed assessment.
Award construction contract
Council adopts Resolution Authorizing the Issuance of Limited
Obligation Improvement Bonds. This resolution confirms unpaid
assessments after the second cash payment, authorizes the second.
CMR: 151:02 Page 6 of 7
series of bonds and approves the bond sale documents for the second
seres.
.City issues second series of bonds to finance construction of garages
and non-parking area
May Construction begins
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
On December 20, 1999, the City Council adopted a resolution certifying the adequacy of
the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the parking structure project and made the
required CEQA findings.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A:Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Downtown Parking Structures
Attachment B:Resolution for the creation of 34 additional on-street parking spaces
Attachment C:Curbside Parking Conversion - Parallel to Diagonal Parking Locations
Attachment D:Parking areas considered for lease during garage construction
PREPARED BY:
DEPARTMENT HEAD:
KAREN BENGARD
Senior Engineer, Public Works
Director of Public Works
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
HARRISON
Assistant City Manager
cc: Downtown Parking Committee, Chamber of Commerce
CMR: 151:02 Page 7 of 7
ATTACHMENT A
Parking Lot S/L and Parking Lot R - Final Environmental Impact Report
City Council Resolution 7917
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
Mitigation Number 1
In addition to the specific mitigation measures enumerated below, the development of
properties shall be in compliance with applicable land use requirements that would
normally be applied to said private development. These shall include but not limited to:
¯
¯
¯
¯
¯
¯
¯
Title
Title
Title
Title
Title
Title
8, Trees and Vegetation, of the Palo Alto Municipal Code (PAMC);
12, Public Works and Utilities, of the PAMC;
15, Fire Prevention, of the PAMC;
16, Building Regulations, of the PAMC;
17, Hazardous Materials Storage and Handling, of the PAMC;
18, Zoning of the PAMC;
Title 21, Subdivisions and Other Divisions of Land of the Palo Alto Municipal
Code (PAMC), and;
The Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan
Responsible Agency for mitigation monitoring:
1. City of Palo Alto
Time frame for mitigation monitoring: ~
1. Design Development and precori~truction activities for any site-specific project.
Applicable City department is responsible for review of technical analysis
prepared by the developer/contractor to ensure mitigation is included in the
project.
2.During construction, applicable department is responsible for on-site inspection to
ensure implementation of site specific mitigation measures.
Mitigation Number 2
The developer shall incorporate Best Management Practices (BMP), as defined within
Policy N-21 of the Comprehensive Plan, into project plans. Preparation of a stormwater
pollution prevention plan identifying the specific BMP to be followed during the project
is the responsibility of all future project developers. Incorporation of BMP shall be
completed prior to grading permit approvals, subject to approval by the City Public
Works Engineering Division.
Responsible Agency for mitigation monitoring:
1. City of Palo Alto Department of Public Works
Time frame for mitigation monitoring:
1. Design Development and preconstruction activities for any site-specific project. The
.Department of Public Works is responsible for review of technical analysis prepared
by the developer to ensure mitigation is included in the project.
2. Monitor during construction activities.
Mitigation Number 3
The developer shall, if determined necessary by the City Engineer, contract with a
qualified soils or geotechnical engineer to perform a detailed geotechnical study for any
development proposed with the planning area. All mitigation measures identified in the
geotechnical report shall be implemented in order to reduce geologic-related impacts to a
less than significant level. The geotechnical report shall be subject to review and
approval by the Palo Alto Public Works Department prior to grading activities.
Responsible Agency for mitigation monitoring:
1. City of Palo Alto - Department of Public Works
Time frame for mitigation monitoring:
2. Design Development and preconstruction activities for any site specific project.
Applicable department is responsible for review of technical analysis prepared by the
developer to ensure mitigation is included in the project prior to grading activities.
Mitigation Number 4
The developer shall require the City Engineer to develop and implement, for each of the
garages, a short-term parking management plan for reducing the impacts of loss of the
existing surface parking on Lots S/L andR during construction. A total of 180 parking
spaces shall be mitigated by using a short term parking management plan. The short term
plan includes reestablishing 44 on street parking spaces, utilizing 120 parking spaces at
the existing Palo Alto Medical Foundation (PAMF) parking lot and use 47 spaces at the
El. Camino Ballpark parking lot.
Responsible Agency for mitigation monitoring:
1. City of Palo Alto Department of Public Works
2. Department of Planning and Community Environment
Time frame for mitigation monitoring:
1. Design Development and preconstruetion activities for any site-specific project.
Applicable department is responsible for review of parking management plan
prepared by the developer to ensure mitigation is included in the project.
2. Monitor during construction activities.
Mitigation Number 5
The developer shall provide a permanent traffic calming devices at the crosswalk on
Bryant Street between Garage S/L and the Senior Center after the construction of the
garage as part of the project approval process.
Responsible Agency for mitigation monitoring:
1. City of Palo Alto Department of Public Works
Time frame for mitigation monitoring:
2. Design Development and postconstruction activities for any site-specific project.
Applicable department is responsible for review of traffic analysis prepared by the
developer to ensure mitigation is included in the project.
3. Monitor during operational activities.
Mitigation Number 6
The developer shall adhere to the following Air Quality standards during the appropriate
stages of construction plan as part of the project approval process.
¯ Usewater sprays to control dust during demolition and pavement removal.
¯ Water construction areas at least twice daily.
¯ Water or cover stockpiles of debris, soil, sand or other materials that can be blown by
the wind.
¯ Cover all trucks hauling soil, sand and other loose materials that can be blown by the
wind.
¯ Pave, apply water three times daily, or apply non-toxic soil stabilizers on all unpaved
access roads, parking areas and staging areas at construction sites.
o Sweep daily (preferably with water sweepers) if visible soil material is carried onto
adjacent public streets.
¯ Enclose, cover, water twice daily or apply non-toxic soil binders to exposed stockpiles
(dirt, sand, etc.).
¯ Limit traffic speeds on unpaved areas to 15 mph,
Responsible Agency for mitigation monitoring:
1. City of Palo Alto Department of Public Works
Time frame for mitigation monitoring:
2. Design Development and preconstruction activities for any site-specific project.
Applicable department is responsible for review of technical analysis prepared by the
developer to ensure mitigation is included in the project.
3. Monitor during construction activities.
Mitigation Number 7
The developer shall contract with a qualified acoustical engineer to review and approve
the final construction documents to certify future noise levels from vents and mechanical
equipment to comply With City noise standards. The acoustical engineer’s certification
shall be subject to review,and approval by the Palo Alto Building Department and Police
Department prior to approval of the building permit.
Responsible Agency for mitigation monitoring:
1. Department of Planning and Community Environmrnt.
Time frame for mitigation monitoring:
2. Design Development and preconstruction activities for any site-specific project.
Applicable department is responsible for review of technical analysis prepared by the
deve.loper to ensure mitigation is included in the project.
3. Monitor during construction activities.
Mitigation Number 8
The City shall monitor the acoustical measurements of the maintenance and cleaning
equipment used in the garages to be limited to a maximum noise exposure level of 75 dB
at a distance of 25 feet between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Monday to Friday.
Responsible Agency for mitigation monitoring:
1. City of Palo Alto Police Department:
Time frame formitigation monitoring:
2~ Monitor during operational activities.
Mitigation Number 9
All design development shall be consistent with the Downtown Urban Design Guidelines
that includes decorative architectural elements and materials that enhance the pedestrian
experience of the urban environment.
¯ Incorporate a combination of decorative metal screens and/or plant boxes located in the
wall openings.
¯ Provide architectural bas-relief panels on the building fagade.
¯ Introduce different building materials that include tile or brick. "
Responsible Agency for mitigation monitoring:
1. City of Palo Alto Department of Planning and Community Environment
2. City of Palo Alto Department of Community Services
Time frame for mitigation monitoring:
2. Monitor during preconstruction activities of the project.
Mitigation Number 10
The developer shall contract with a qualified lighting engineer to provide a lighting plan
to be in conformance with the recommendations of the Illuminating Engineering Society,.
to enhance security for the project property. The lighting engineer’s plan shall be subject
to review and approval by the Palo Alto Planning Department prior to approval of the
building permit.
Responsible Agency for mitigation monitoring:
City of Palo Alto Department of Planning and Community Environment
Time frame for mitigation monitoring: i
2. Applicable department is responsible for review of the lighting plan by the developer
to ensure mitigation is included in the project.
ATTACHMENT B
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALO
ALTO APPROVING AND ADOPTING PARKING RESTRICTIONS
IN CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THE DOWNTOWN NECESSITATED
BY THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE LOT R AND THE LOTS
S/L PARKING STRUCTURES
WHEREAS, the City Council has previously approved the
construction of two parking structures in the downtown area: at
City Parking Lot R and at City Parking Lots S/L, for the purpose
of decreasing the parking deficit in the downtown area; and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the
downtown parking structure project noted that the existing
parking at Lots R, S and L will be eliminated during
construction, thus leading to a temporary increase in the
parking deficit; and
WHEREAS, staff has Presented to Council certain
proposals for increasing the amount of parking, to partially
offset the temporary loss of parking during construction of the
parking structures; and
WHEREAS, Paio Alto Municipal .Code’ section 10.44.010
provides that the City Council may establish by resolution such
parking restrictions and prohibitions as may be necessary; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has previously established a
scheme of parking restrictions within the downtown area, known
as ’~Color Zones."
NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Palo Alto
does RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION I. The City Council hereby confirms the
addition of five parking spaces on the south side of Hamilton
between Bryant and Ramona, as proposed by staff, and shown on
Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference,
and establishes color zone restrictions on that parking in
conformance with its earlier approval, as described in Exhibit
B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
SECTION 2. The City Council hereby confirms the.
elimination of a restricted, parking space on the east side of
Waverly between Hamilton and Forest, and the addition of a left
turn pocket, as proposed by staff, as shown in Exhibit C,
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
020312 sm 0032515 1
SECTION 3. In accordance with section 21950.5 of the
Vehicle Code, the City has provided the public with notice and
the right to be heard on the staff proposal to eliminate the
mid-block crosswalk on the west side of Emerson, between
Hamilton and University. After consideration of the public
input, the City Council hereby confirms the elimination of the
crosswalk, as proposed by staff, and the addition of one parking
space, as shown on Exhibit D, attached hereto and incorporated
herein by reference, and establishes color zone restrictions on
that parking ~= in conformance with its earlier approva!, as
described in Exhibit B.
SECTION 4. The City Council hereby establishes parking
restrictions (free 2 hour/permit parking mix) in the parking
structure to be constructed on Lot R, which shall be known as
the High/Alma South Garage, as shown on, and in conformance
with, the color zone restrictions described in Exhibit B.
SECTION 5. The City Council hereby establishes parking
restrictions (free 2 hour/permit parking mix) in the parking
structure to be constructed on Lots S/L, which shall be known as
the Bryant/Florence Garage, as shown on, and in conformance
with, the color zone restrictions described in Exhibit B.
SECTION 6. The City Council hereby establishes angle
parking in the following locations, as shown’on the exhibits
identified for each location, which are attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference, and in accordance with the
color zone restrictions described in Exhibit A:
a)East and west sides of Bryant between Hamilton
and Forest (shown. on Exhibit E);
b)West side of Waverly, between Lytton and
University (shown on Exhibit C);
c)West side of Emerson, between Lytton and
University (shown on Exhibit F);
d)West side of Emerson, between University and
Hamilton (shown on Exhibit D).
SECTION 7. ~On December 20, 1999, the City Council
adopted Resolution No. 7917 certifying the adequacy of the EIR
for the parking structure project, and made certain findings
with respect thereto. Further, the Council finds that the
020312 sm 0032515 2
specific actions approved hereby are categorically exempt from
the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") under Section
15301 (minor alterations to existing facilities) of the CEQA
guidelines.
SECTION 8. This resolution is effective as of £he date
of its adoption; provided, however, that the elimination of the
crosswalk, as approved in Section 3, shall not occur earlier
than 30 days from the date of adoption of this resolution, and
provided, further, that all other actions approved by this
resolution shall be effected at a time and in a manner as the
City Manager determines is in the public interest.
INTRODUCED AND PASSED:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Mayor
APPROVED:
Senior Asst. City Attorney City Manager
Director of Planning and
Community Environment
Chief Transportation Official
020312 ~m 0032515 3
BRYANT STREET
RAMONA STREET
EXHIBIT A
Downtown Palo Alto
Parking Lots & Parking Color Zones
Legend
Parking lot restrictions and
colorzone re’qulrementsin -
effect 8 am - 5 pm Monday to
Friday only. Holidays
excepted. OnCe the time limit
expires In a given color zone
you. must mov6 .your vehicle
out of that zone, " ’ ¯
KEY to Lots and Garages
A. Emerson/Lytton lot
B. Ramona/University garage
C. Ramona/Lytton lot
D, HamlltonNVaverley lot’
E, Gilman/Bryant lot
F. Florence/Lytton lot
G. Gilman/WaVerley lot
H. Oowp~riH~nilton lot
K., Lytton/Waverley lot
L. Bryant/, Florence garage
N. Emerson/Ramona lot
O..Emerson/High Iot-
R .HIg h/Hamilton .lot
Q. High/Alma North garage.
R. High/Alma South garage
8. BryantJEIorence garage
T. Lytton/Kipling lot
CC~. Clvlc Center Garage
WC. Webster/Cowper Garage.
Web#or Street
~ Ta~o street
400 Cowper Street 600
Blue
400 Bryant Street
400 Ramona Street
5O0
5OO
EXHIBIT B
FOREST A VENUE
"1
HAMIL TOI%A VENUE
A VENUE
EXHIBIT-D’
i
/
./
FOREST A VENUE
HAMIL TON A VENUE
EXHIBIT
//
L YT-I’ON
I
A VENUE
VENUE
EXHIBIT G
SHEET #6
SHEET #1
SHEET
A TTACHMENT C
DOWNTOWN STRIPING PROGRAM CITY OF PALO ALTO
CALIFORNIA
SHE[TS
n
BUS STOP COMM. LOADING L
BUS STOP r T T T T
HAMIL TON A VENUE
1 I o-~
A TTACHMENT C
No.
DOWNTOWN STRIPING PROGRAM ALTERNATIVE #1
CITY OF PALO ALTO
CALIFORNIA
Or S-1
A TTACHMENT C
BRYANT STREET
NO.BY I]~te Revisions
DOWNTOWN STRIPING PROGRAM AL TERNA TIVE #2
!.,,~ : "="~’~°’""~^’"S 2CALIFORNIA..
SHI~£T NO,Of SHEETS
A TTACHMENT C
L ~ L 3 L ~ [ ~ ~
EMERSON STREET
13
Revisions
DOWNTOWN STRIPING PROGRAM AL TERNA TIVE #3
CITY OF PALO ALTO
CAUFORNIA
A TTACHMENT C
L J L J L J LZo~.ol
F-
J.l I l I
EMERSON STREET MOTORCYCLEPARKING
NO. By D~te Revisions
DOWNTOWN STRIPING PROGRAM
S-4
A TTACHMENT C
o I I
~WAVERLEY STREET ’~,
a
F-
Revisions
DOWNTOWN STRIPING PROGRAM ALTERNATIVE #5
CITY OF PALO ALTO
CALIFORNIA
SH£Lq’S
A TTACHMENT C
[I I ]~[ ] L I, I I I I
WA VERLEY STREET
CURB
"1III
INo. I ~v J D~,teI Revisions
DOWNTOWN STRIPING PROGRAM ALTERNATIVE #6
CITY OF PALO ALTO
CALIFORN|A
SHrL~S
ATTACHMENT D