HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-02-19 City Council (6)City of Palo Alto
City Manager’s Report
TO:HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PLANNING AND
COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT
DATE:
SUBJECT:
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM
CMR:147:02
This is an informational report and no Council action is required.
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this report is to update Council on the status of the City’s Neighborhood
Traffic Calming program traffic calming program, procedures for which were adopted by
Council on April 9,’2001 (CMR: 187:01). These procedures set forth qualifying and ranking
criteria for prospective traffic calming projects one or two local or collector streets. Palo
Alto’s arterial streets and expressways are excluded from consideration from this program.
Staff informally refers to this initiative as "spot treatment" traffic calming. "Spot
treatments" involve limited use of measures such as speed humps and cushions, bulb-outs,
and diverters. The Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program (NTCP) booklet contains full
details on qualifying and ranking criteria, as well as descriptions of representative traffic
calming measures. Council has funded this program at $100,000 per year under the Capital
Improvement Program (CIP project #19073).
DISCUSSION
Since approval of the program, nine petitions have been received, each representing at least
25 percent of the households on the street or street section nominated. Of these, six have
qualified for a traffic calming study; data is being collected for two to determine if they
qualify for a traffic calming study; and one has been deemed not to qualify for
consideration. Residents on twelve additional streets have contacted staff about the program
and have indicated interest in circulating petitions of support. A full list of requests by street
or street section is shown on Attachment A.
Council did not adopt the formal procedures for traffic calming on an area-wide basis that
staff proposed on April 9, 2001. These wider-area efforts are presently undertaken, as in the
past--Evergreen Park and the first College Terrace traffic calming projects being two
examples--on an ad hoc basis and funded from a variety of sources: developer contribution
(Downtown North traffic calming study), City of Palo Alto General Fund (Downtown North
CMR:147:02 Page 1 of 5
traffic calming trial implementation), and Stanford University contribution (College~Terrace
Traffic calming study). In April, staff will prepare an information report updating Council
on area-wide traffic calming efforts underway. The following month, staff will return to
Council with another proposal for area-wide traffic calming procedures.
Of the six projects that have qualified to date, four projects are in progress:
1)Churchill Avenue between Embarcadero Road and Alma Street--Churchill Avenue
is a collector and one of the few Caltrain grade crossings; thus it presents a difficult
setting. Average weekday traffic volume of about 4,000 vehicles each weekday is the
primary concern of petitioners; 85th percentile speeds of about 30 mph (25 mph is the
posted speed limit) is an additional concern. Work to-date includes collection and
evaluation of license plate survey data on local and through trips, as well as traffic
count and vehicle speeds data. Alternative schemes for volume and speed control are
now being considered by’ the neighborhood working group, in conjunction with
Transportation Division staff. This project is currently at Step 4 of the traffic calming
program procedure (refer to Chapter III of the NTCP booklet for full detail on
program procedure).
2)Louis Road between East Meadow Drive and Charleston Road--Louis Road is also a
collector. Vehicle speed is the predominant issue for petitioners on this street. Work
to-date includes a demonstration of speed cushions (a narrowed version of the speed
hump which can be straddled by fire trucks but not by automobiles-see Attachment
B) that has been received favorably by residents, the Fire Department, the Palo Alto
Bicycle Advisory Committee. A traffic calming plan has been created that includes
speed cushions at five locations between Charleston and East Meadow, a reduced
curb radius on the northeast comer of the Louis/Charleston intersection, and a raised
concrete centerline divider on the north leg of that intersection. This plan won the
support of thirty-six of forty-four households (82 percent) who voted by mail-in
postcard. On January 30, the Planning and Transportation Commission voted to
recommend to the Director of Planning and Community Environment a four-month
trial of this traffic calming program. Evaluation of the trial will be undertaken by
analysis of before and after data (speeds, volumes, and accidents), City staff
evaluations (Fire, Police, and the Transportation Division staff), and residents
advisory committee input. Should the trial be judged to be successful, another
residents mail-in ballot will take place on making the program permanent. This
project is currently at Step 8 of the program procedure.
3)Ross Road between Colorado and Loma Verde Avenues--Ross Road is a local
street. Cut-through traffic and vehicle speeds are the issues of concern to petitioners.
The resident working group and staff have agreed to implement a four-month trial
traffic calming program consisting of enhanced enforcement, along with traffic safety
CMR: 147:02 Page 2 of 5
education for Ross Road. Specific elements of this effort will include increased
traffic police patrol, deployment of neighborhood volunteer "pace cars" (hat will
always drive at or below the speed limit, resident use of radar speed guns to
document incidents of speeding, along with publicity about these measures. No
formal Planning and Transportation Commission or Council review of this trial is
required since Ross is a collector street, no City traffic calming funds are being
expended, and there is no proposed change to the street section itself. Evaluation of
the trial will be undertaken by analysis of before and after data (speeds, volumes, and
accidents), City staff evaluations (Fire, Police, and the Transportation Division staff),
and residents working group input. Should the trial be judged successful, a residents’
mail-in ballot will determine if this project should be continued in some variation. If
not, the working group and staff will begin working on a program of physical
measures. This project is at Step 8 of the program procedure.
4)Indian Drive and Moreno Avenue (Moreno to Greer Road; Indian to Oregon
Expressway)--These are local streets. The issue for petitioners on each (they
intersect) is vehicle speed and cut-through traffic. At its initial meeting, the residents
advisory committee and staff developed a preliminary plan in two phases. The first
phase would be implemented and evaluated for results prior to initiation of phase
two. The first phase would include deployment of a series of speed cushions and
extended curbing at two corners of one intersection to create a "slow point". Phase
two, which would only be initiated should phase one be deemed unsuccessful, would
comprise a left turn restriction from Oregon Expressway. Implementing such a
restriction would require consultation with Santa Clara County Staff. City staff is
presently refining the phase I plan. This project is at Step 4 of the program procedure.
Two additional projects are awaiting initiation. Both have had petitions circulated and
submitted, all relevant data has been collected and evaluated on each, and each has been
deemed to qualify for the Neighborhood Traffic Calming program.
5)Moreno Avenue between Middlefield and Ross Roads--Moreno, which has a higher-
ranking score than Waverley Street, is scheduled to begin by late February.
6)Waverley Street between East Meadow Drive and E1 Verano Avenue--Waverley
Street will start upon initiation of the trial projects on Louis Road and!or Churchill
Avenue.
CMR:147:02 Page 3 of 5
Other
7)
Projects Include:
Santa Catalina Street (a cul-de-sac off Oregon Expressway)--This is a non-
qualifying request. Santa Catalina was determined to be a low-speed, low-volume
street without any vehicle crashes within the past three years and not in proximity to
a major pedestrian trip generator, "thus it did not meet qualifying criteria for the
NTCP.
Streets for which a Petition has been Submitted and Data Collection is Underway:
8)
9)
Matadero Avenue between Laguna Avenue and Tippawingo Drive
Matadero Avenue between E1 Camino Real and Josina Avenue
Streets on Which Initial Request has been made and Petitions are being Awaited:
10)
11)
12)
1,3)
14)
15)
16)
17)
18)
19)
20)
21)
North California Avenue
Center Drive
Loma Verde Avenue
Miranda Avenue
Laura Glen and Alexis Dives.
Newell Road
Kendall and La Donna Avenues
West Bayshore Road between Amarillo Avenue and Chabot Terrace
Amaranta Avenue
Pepper Avenue
Briarwood to Scripps Nelson
Cowper (between Embarcadero and past Seele)
Program Evaluation
In late spring Staff will report first to the Planning and Transportation Commission, then to
Council on the results of the first year of the Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program and
recommendations for Program revision.
ATTACHMENTS
A.Table of Traffic Calming Requests
B.Speed Cushion Photo
CMR: 147:02 Page 4 of 5
PREPARED BY:
DEPARTMENT HEAD:
Chief Transportation Official
STEVE EMSLIE
Director of Planning and
Community Environment
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
Assistant [Atc~y "~anager
co: Planning and Transportation Commission
CMR: 147:02 Page 5 of 5
Date Rcvd
11/1/2000
11/10/2000
5/8/2001
8/26/2001
10/25/2001
11/30/2001
10/8/2001
1/9/2002
1/17/2002
(Initial)
1/14/2002
(Initial)
12/6/2001
(Initial)
10/27/2001
(Initial)
10/19/2001
Primary
Street(s)
Louis between
East Meadow and
Charleston
Churchill between
Alma and
Emerson
Ross Road
between Colorado
and Loma Verde
Indian Dr and
Moreno Avenue
(till Greer Road)
Moren~) between
middlefield and
ross
Waverley Street
between East
Meadow and El
Vet&no
Santa ’Catalina
;.(~l-d~-sac ~n ~;
OregonAvenue)
Matadero
Avenue(between
Laguna and
Tippawingo)
Matadero
Avenue(between
El Camino Real
and Josina Ave)
North California
Center Drive
near Hamilton Ave
Laurel Glen and
Alexis Drive
Miranda Avenue
Spot or
Neighbor
hood?
Spot
Spot
Spot
Spot
Spot
Spot
Spot
Spot
Spot
Spot
Spot
Spot
Spot
25%1
HH?I
" Yes
Yes I
Yes
f’es (78%)
Yes
(56%)
Yes
(37.5%)
Yes
(83%)
Yes
(60°/o)
PALO
Street
Class
Collector
Collector
Local
Local
Local
Local
Local
Collector
Collector
Collector
Local
Local
Local
,nts
received
)eed cushion plan on 30th Jan
received
nent as per working group meeetings
received
! implemented from Jan 20th
received
discussed in the first meeting
~n one of the above is complete
on received
~n one of the above is complete
ion received
enforcement done in Oct-Nov.
neer, if the street qualifies for 15mph
sign
ion received
~ffic counts sent on 22rid jan
ion received
i the petition received -
ling petition
toed Traffic Calming Booklet
petition
Calming Booklet
petition
I Traffic Calming Booklet
petition
~borhood Traffic Calming booklet
ATTACHMENT A
Prepared by Fluchika Aggarwal 1/31/2002 Page 1
REQUESTS
Fhru?Crashes prior 3 yrs
#Sat?
Qualified? Rank
Meets 2 Pts
Criteria?I
Status/Comments
Awaiting petition
Sent the Neighborhood Traffic Calming booklet
Awaiting petition
Sent the Neighborhood Traffic Calming Booklet
Awaiting petition
Sent the Neighborhood Traffic Calming Booklet
Awaiting petition
Sent the Neighborhood Traffic Calming Booklet
Replied saying she would pass the matter to those who are
interested
Awaiting petition
Sent the Neighborhood Traffic Calming Booklet
Yes
Awaiting petition
Awaiting petition
Sent the Neighborhood Traffic Calming Booklet
Awaiting petition
Sent the Neighborhood Traffic Calming Booklet
Page 2
,ACHMENT B