HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-01-28 City Council (4)City .of Palo Alto
City Manager’s Report
TO:HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES
DATE:
TITLE:
JANUARY 28, 2002 CMR: 122:02
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES
This is an informational report and no Council action is required.
BACKGROUND
The Utilities Department advocates energy and water-related issues at federal and state
legislative forums in order to meet its strategic mission of building value for its citizen
owners, providing dependable returns to the City and citizens of Palo Alto and being the
preferred full service utility provider while sustaining the environment. These priorities
are meant to be very broad as the issties may change during the year, thus requiring mid-
course corrections. These priorities were presented to the Utilities Advisory Commission
(UAC) at its December 5, 2001 meeting. Comments from the UAC are included in this
report.
As in past years, action on some of these priorities may require active involvement of
Palo Alto elected officials. Elected official participation in Washington D.C. and in
Sacramento has proved invaluable during last year’s energy crisis. For example, progress
on building Path-15, a congested electric transmission corridor in Central California, was
influenced by the active advocacy of Palo Alto’s elected officials in conjunction with the
efforts of elected officials from other Northern California cities. There was also
increased responsiveness from San Francisco Public Utility Commission related to
rebuilding the regional water system when Palo Alto elected officials took a lead role in
meeting with the mayor of San Francisco last year.
CMR:122:02 Page 1 of 5
Some of the issues being considered could have a tremendous impact on the cost and
quality of utility commodities. For example, increasing the speed at which the SFPUC
repairs the regional water delivery system could result in tens of millions of dollars of
savings to Palo Alto residents from increased reliability and lower costs. Another
example is maintaining the Western contract at cost-based rates; in the last year, Palo
Alto customers saved more than $50 million.
DISCUSSION
The following are the priorities, resources and venues related to the Utilities Department
legislative priorities.
Water
Priorities
1. Advocate for regional system governance that enhances the reliability of the
water supplies for Palo Alto citizens.
Work with Assemblyman Lou Papan and others who are proposing legislation
in the next session (Jan/Feb 2002) to speed completion of needed
improvements and change governance as necessary for more effective regional
system management
3. Support allocation of funds for increasing the security of infrastructure
Support the development of a regional crisis management plan since fixes to
the regional system will take years to implement and there are great risks in the
intervening time
5.Support increased state and federal grant funding for increased water efficiency
projects.
Resources
1. Advocate positions mainly through the Bay Area Water Users Association with
additional support from Palo Alto staff
2.Advocate that joint resources through BAWUA be increased to’support the
advocacy (and especially the legislative) efforts underway
CMR:122:02 Page 2 of 5
o Ensure the support and active involvement of elected officials since that is one
of the only sources of power BAWUA agencies have given our contract status
with San Francisco and lack of governmental representation
4. Leverage the influence of trade groups and individual customers
Venue: Mainly at the state level with some advocacy at the federal level
Gas
Priorities
1. Support efforts to clarify IRS regulations to allow for pre-pay of gas
commodity purchases using tax-exempt financing.
2. Support allocation of funds for increasing the security of infrastructure
3. Support ability of municipal utilities to develop their own public-benefit
programs
4. Support efforts to increase the reliability of the gas transmission system
5. Protect value of existing contracts and regulatory regimes in a PG&E
Bankruptcy Reorganization Plan
6. Support increased state and federal grant funding for gas efficiency projects.
Resources
1. Advocate these positions mainly through the American Public Gas Association
with minor support from Palo Alto staff
2. Involve elected officials
3. Leverage the influence of trade groups and individual customers
Venue." Primarily at the federal level with negligible advocacy at the state level
Electric
Priorities
1. Protect status of Western PMA and cost-based rates
2. Protect value of existing contracts and regulatory regimes in a PG&E
Bankruptcy Reorganization Plan
3. Improve reliability and equitable cost allocation of the regional electric system:
CMR: 122:02 Page 3 of 5
(a)Special emphasis on encouraging transmission, generation and
demand-reduction projects that enhance the reliability of the Bay
Area and the peninsula.
(b)Promote development of Regional Transmission Organizations
(RTO’s) that would increase reliability and reduce market power
(c)Promote legislation that decreases the likelihood of congestion zones
being created in the Bay Area
4.Protect against imposition of state-owned electric contract costs on municipal
utility customers
5.Protect ability of municipal utilities to exercise local control
(a) Support ability of municipal utilities to set their own renewable
portfolio standards
(b) Support ability of municipal utilities to develop their own public-
benefit programs
(c)Allow for municipal utilities to develop their own policies regarding
the appropriate interconnection and economic standards in this area
6.Support allocation of funds for increasing the security of infrastructure
7.Promote funding for distributed generation
8.Support state and federal grant funding for increased electric efficiency
projects.
Resoul’ces
1. Advocate mainly through Northern California Power Agency, California
Municipal Utilities Association, and American Public Power Association, with
additional support from Palo Alto staff
Leverage the influence of trade groups and individual customers
Involve elected officials
Venue." Active at both federal and state level
RESOURCE IMPACT
There is no incremental
priorities.
resource impact associated with advocating these legislative
CMR:: 122:02 Page 4 of 5
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
These priorities are consistent with the Council approved Utilities Strategic Plan.
PREPARED BY:
GIRI’,
Assistant Director of Utilities
DEPARTMENT HEAD:
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
EMILY HARRISON
Assistant City Manager
CMR: 122:02 Page 5 of 5