Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council (5)BACKGROUND Two parking structures are currently under construction downtown. The larger garage is located at Lot S/L (Bryant/L3cton) and the smaller garage is at Lot R (between High and Alma Streets, south of University Avenue). Construction began in May 2002. When both garages are completed by November 2003, they will provide over 700 additional parking spaces downtown. Construction was funded via an assessment district formed by a majority vote of downtown property owners. DISCUSSION Staff is requesting approval of two contract amendments that would provide for additional desi~, inspection and staffing services. The additional monies are available in Capital Improvement Project (CIP) 19530, Downtown Parking Structures, financed by the Downtown Parking Assessment District. Since the amount of services required exceeds the remaining contingency budget for both Turner Construction and Watry Design, contract amendments are being requested to provide for future work. In addition, the contingency budgets for both the Turner and Watry contracts have been depleted and staff is requesting additional contingency funding for potential unforeseen future work. There is approximately $3 million remaining in CIP 19530 available for the amendments and increased contingency. Contract Amendment with Turner Construction and Watrv Desi,on Group Turner Construction was hired to provide construction management at the job site to support City staff, as City staffing levels are not sufficient for a project of this size. The propose_d Contract Amendment No. 3 for $76,800 with Turner is to provide for: An extended on-site work period resulting from legal actions and subsequent project delays at Lot R ($49,900). Legal actions brought by the owner of the Yoga Source building regarding access issues extended the Lot R construction period. This in turn will extend the amount of time that Turner staff and its construction trailer would need to remain on-site. Stone tiles will be installed on the exterior of the Lot R garage. Installing the tiles correctly is critical to ensure that they stay secured to the building. To n-take sure that the contractor secures the tiles correctly, the Building Division requires an inspector be present during the installation. This requirement, at a cost of $26,900, was not in Turner’s original subcontract for inspection services. Watry Design Group is the project’s architect. Amendment No. 4 for $37,400 would pro¥ide for: Additional Architect Oversight An additional $10,350 in fees was requested to provide for a geater involvement by the architect in the inspection process at both garages. As mentioned previously, legal CMR:229:03 Page 2 of 5 actions by Yoga Source delayed the work at the Lot R site and impacted the contractor’s planned work flow by requiring larger crews to work simultaneously on both garages in order to meet the completion date. This compressed work schedule in turn impacted the City’s inspectors, who were already involved in several other large projects throughout the City. The Building Division requested pre-inspections by the architect, and a geater involvement with the Building Division’s Plan Check engineer in order to reduce the amount of time it would take to inspect and approve the project. Review and Archive As-Built Record Drawings A budget increase of $23,050 is requested for the architect’s review of the ~as-built" record drawings for both garages. During construction, various changes are made to the building plans to accommodate field conditions or other concerns. The contractor then makes hand-marked revisions on the plans in order to track these changes over the course of a project. The architect will review the 360 sheets for correctness, transfer field changes to Watry’s Design Group computer drawings as needed, and finally scan the drawings into a computer format that will allow for future retrieval by staff. Additional Design for Leased-Space Restrooms: An additional $4,000 is requested for Watry Design Group to design toilet spaces, connections and fixtures for the City’s future commercial/retail tenant space at the corner of L?cton/Bryant. This two-floor space will be leased by the City in order to recover construction costs for the commercial space, as well as to provide revenue for youth activities and other General Fund services. Initially, Watry Design Group had designed only the stubbed-out plumbing connection points, leaving construction of walls, fixtures and lighting to the tenant. After recent discussions with the Real Estate Division and architect, staff feels the space will be more leaseable if the restroom facilities are already provided as it would allow for faster occupation by a future tenant. In addition, McCarthy Contractors will have plumbing contractors already on- site as part of the parking structure construction. This would result in lower plumbing costs than might be available to a future tenant as they would not incur mobilization costs and would benefit from McCarthy’s quantity of scale orders on restroom parts (both garages will have public restrooms). Costs incurred by a tenant in up~’ading their building are passed on to the owner (in this case the City), usually through some form of lease reduction. Contingency Increases for Turner and Watrv Desi~ An increase of $100,000 is being requested in order to replenish the contingency budget for the Turner contract, which was depleted early in the project due to: The adjacent building to the south of the site and fronting Alma Street (former home of Yoga Source) once housed an automobile repair shop and records indicate that at one time there was an under~ound storage tank on Lot R. Exploratory excavations prior to CMR:229:03 Page 3 of 5 construction did not locate any tanks in the area. During construction, 5 abandoned oil storage tanks, 2 hydraulic car lifts and some asbestos pipe were uncovered. The tanks were removed, the soil tested and clean soil was backfilled into the holes. The physical removal of the tanks was done by McCarthy Contractors, while the site inspection and testing was done by Lowney Associates (Geotechnical Engineers) under a subcontract to Turner Construction. There was sufficient construction contingency to reimburse McCarthy Contractors for the physical removal of the tanks. However Turner’s contingency budget was reduced by $71,637 (nearly 50 percent) by costs incurred for soils testing. Inspection of the shoring and underpinning process was overlooked by the architect and staff in Watry Design Group’s construction phase contract. Since Watry’s remaining contingency was not sufficient to cover this cost, Turner subcontracted with the geotechnical engineer for this service. The cost for this inspection service was $27,623. Turner’s contingency fund at the start of the construction phase was $163,205, of which $121, 586 remains. There are, however, currently two potentially large change orders currently being researched by Turner. If these change orders are approved by the Public Works Director, the remaining contingency would likely be ten percent of the original contingency budget with more than half of the project remaining to be built. Replenishing the contingency amount by $100,000 would reduce the potential for project delaysifstaffneeded to return to Council for additional monies. Staff and consultants try to anticipate unforeseen construction issues, but in a project of this size, even minor changes can add up to many thousands of dollars in additional design fees. If the needed fees exceed the contingency budget, returning to Council for additional monies can add over a month to the project duration. Both garages have been on an extremely tight construction schedule and construction delays would almost certainly extend the pre-holiday season opening date. Any contingency funds that remain at the end of the project will be used to offset debt service payments and reduce the annual assessment to District property owners. On June 4, 2001, Council approved a contract amendment with Watry Design Group that provided for both the final design and the construction phase for the parking structures (CMR:263:01), with a contingency of $163,000. The contingency has now been almost completely expended on various design modifications, such as architectural support during the Lot R litigation, redesign to avoid under~ound utilities and revisions to the fire alarn~ system as requested by the Fire Department. Since construction is roughly half complete, staff is requesting additional contingency funds of $80,000, which is nearly half of the original $163,000. CMR:229:03 Page 4 of 5 RESOURCE IMPACT Funding for the garage construction and construction administration services was budgeted for Capital Improvement Project (CIP) 19530 within the $45.9 million assessment district. The additional monies requested in the contract amendments for Turner Construction and Watry Design Group is available within CIP 19530. POLICY IMPLICATIONS Approval of the contract and contract amendment are consistent with existing City policies. TIMELINE Groundbreaking on both structures was in May 2002. Lot R is expected to be completed in August _00~ and Lot S/L in November 2003. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT An Environmental Impact Report was prepared as part of.the PC zoning application and was certified by Council on December 20, 1999. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Amendment No. 3 to Contract C8103688 with Turner Construction Attachment B: Amendment No. 4 to Contract C6076145 with Watry Design, Inc. PREPARED BY: ~<2AREN BENGARD Senior Engineer / " GLE~ S. ROBERTS Dkector of Public Works CITY ~AGER ~PROV~:~ SON Assistant City Manager CMR:229:03 Page 5 of ~ ATTACHMENT A AMENDMENT NO. THREE TO CONTRACT NO. C8!03688 BETWEEN THE CITY OF PALOALTOAND TtrP!qER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY This ~Len~ment No. Three to Contract No. C8!03688 ("Contract") is entered into , by and between the ___ ~- ALTO chartered c~tv and a mu~ci~a! cormoration ofCTTY OF ~O , a - _ <he State of California ("CITY"), and TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a New York corporation, !ocated at !0! Park Center Plaza, Suite !!00, San Jose, CA 95113 ("CONSULTANT"). RECITALS: WHEREAS, the Contract was enteric into between the parties ~_o._ the ~rovis~on of n<c{=~iona! con~u’~t’:r,g services relating to the Downtown Parking Structures; and wHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Contract; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, terms, conditions, and provisions of this ~.endment, the parties agree: SECTION !. read as follows: Section 5.1 of Section 5 is hereby &mended to 5. !. ! in consideration of the full merformance of the Basic Services, including any authorized reimbursable exm-~nses, CTTY will pay CONSULTANT a {ee not to exceed Two ~i ] ~ £on Eighty-Four Thousand Five Hundred Ninety Eight Dollars ($2,084,598) . The total amount payable per mhase shal! not exceed One Hundred Sixty-Seven. Thousand Four Hundred Twelve Dollars ($167,412) {or Phases i & ii; -"" ~Two Hu .....d Eighty-Five Thousand one Hundred Th-:~t?--m{g’~ Dollars (5285 ~38) ~or Phase iii; and One ~0 ~ { n Six _.und~:d...... o._~- ~- Thirty-Two Thousand ~orry-=~gn~ Dollars (S~,632,048) for Phase IV (construczion) ¯ The amount of compensation will be ca!cu!aZed in accordance with the hourly rate schedule se: forzh in Exhibits "B" for Phase i and ii, "B-!" for Phase ~!!, and "B-2" for Phase iV, on a time ....m~x~and mat=r~a~s basis, up to ~b_e -- ~ m amount ’~ ne fe= { theset forth in <his Section. T._~s o consulzants, who have direct contractua! relazionships with CONSULTANT,wil! be approved, in advance, by CITY. CITY reserves 020401 sdl 0100062 the right to refuse pa~.ent of such fees, if such prior approval is not obtained by CONSoL±:~NT. 5. !. 2 in consideration of the ful! performance of Additiona! Services, including any authorized reimbursable expenses, CITY will pay CONSULTANT a fee not to exceed Eight Thousand Three Hundred Seventy-One Dollars ($8,371) . in consideration of ~ ful! performance of Extra Services as set forth in Exhibit "A-3", CTTy~ .... wiT1 pay CONSULTANT a fee not to exceed Seventy-Six Thousand Eight nun@,_~d Dollars (S76,800) .T~,e amount of compensation for additional services will be calculated in accordance with the hourly rate schedule set forth in Exhibits "B" and "B-3", according to the time period of when the services were performed, on a time and materials bas~s, up to ~:.e maximum amount set forth in this Section._~_n~ em~!ovee’_ _ s time wil! be computed at a multiple of one (!.0) times the employee’s direct personnel expense described below. The rate schedules may be updated by CONSULTANT only once each calendar year, and the rate schedules will not become ~_~_~c~±~-e~’ - for _.~urposes o~ this Contract, unless and unti~ ...... CONSULTANT g~v~s~--= CITY__ thirty (30) days’ prior written notice of the effective date of any revised rate schedule. 5.1.3 The ful! ~a?~.ent of charges for extra work or changes, or both, in the execution of the Project wil! be made, provided such request for payment is initiated by CONSULTANT and authorized, in writing, by the project manager. Payment will be made within thirty (30) days of submission by CONSULTANT of a statement, in triplicate, of itemized costs covering such work or changes, or both. Prior to com_mencing such extra work or changes, or both, the parties wil! agree upon an estimated maximum cost for such extra work or changes. Al! extra work or changes shall be in writing and approved by the City Manager or his designee prior to performing ’ ~’~ ~~ will ’ be~ona! services ~S~_~no~ paid for extra work or changes, including, without limitation, any design work or change order preparation, which is made necessary on 020401 sdl 0100062 2 account of CONSULTANT’s errors, omissions, oversights. 5.1.4 Direct personnel expense of employees assigned to the execution of the -~ ....theProS~- =ec: by CONSULTANT wi!7_ =nc=ud~ only_ work of project managers, estimators, and a6ministrazive personnel pertaining to the Project, and in services rendered during construction at the site, to the ex:ent such services are expressly contemplated under this Contract. included in the cost of direct personne! expense of these employees are salaries and mandatory and customary benefits such as statutory employee benefits, insurance, sick leave, holidays and vacations, pensions and similar benefits. SECTION 2. The fol!owing exhibits are hereby added to the Contract and are incorporated in ful! by this reference: Exhibit "A-3", entitled "Revised Extra Services Request"; and b. Exhibit "B-3" entitled "2003 Hour%y Rates". SECTION 3. Except as herein modified, all other provisions of the Contract, including any exhibits and subsequent amendments thereto, shall remain in full force and effect.. // // // // // // // // / / // // 020401 sdl 0100062 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have by their duly authorized remresentat{ves executed this Contract on the date firs< above written. ATTEST:_--P’- _~L.OCTTY OF _A~O ~-~ City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mayor TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Senior Asst. City Attorney By: Name: Assistant City Manager Title: Director of A6ministrative Services By: Name: Director of Public Works Title: Taxpayer identification No. Risk Manager 13-1401980 (Compliance wi:h Corp. Code ~ 313 is r=~u{<=d ~{ the enzity on whose behalf this ~on~rasz is s~=d ~ a cormoration in the a!rernative~ a cerzified corporate reso!u:ion at:es:ing :o zhe signa:ory au:hority of the individuals signing in their respec:ive camaci<ies, is ~c=~=b~=)_~ ~: .... Attachments : EXHIBIT "~ %" EXHIBIT "B-3" : Revised Extra Services Request 2003 Hourly Rates 020401 sdl 0100062 CERTIFICATE OF ACKI~OW’LEDGI~ENT (Civil Code 6 1189) ~ ,_~_~ ~ OF COUNTY On , 2003 before me, the undersigned, a notary public in and for said County, personally appeared persona~!y_. _ ~:~own" to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is!are subscribed-to the within instrument, and acknowledged to meauuno_!zedhe/she/they executed the same in his!her/their capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on instrument the person(s), or ~ne entmtv upon m=n=!~ or which the person(s) a~ee, executed the instrument. w±~N~<S hand and official <e=~ Signature of Notary Public 020401 sdl 0100062 CERTIFICATE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT (Civi! Code ~ 1189) STATE OF ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) On , 2003 before me, the undersigned, a notary public in and for said County, me<:onal~v aDDeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that !~=/she/they executed the ~ame in his!he</the~< authorized capac!ty(ies), and that by hisi~er/rne_< signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf o{ which the _person(s) acted, executed the ±nsurumenu ~ ~ ~. WITNESS my hand and official sea!. Signature of Notar.y Public 020401 sdl 0100062 Turner A Century of Excel~nce Turner Construction Company Palo Alto Parking Structures Project Office 445 Bryant Street Palo Alto, CA 94301 Exhibit Public Works Engineering Parking Structures Project March 17, _00a Karen Bengard Public Works Engineering City of Pa!o Alto 250 Hamilton Ave. Palo Alto, CA 94301 RE: Revised Extra Services Request Dear K~en We now project extra construction management services for the Parking Structures Project will exceed the contingency amounts provided for. Adjustments vdthin the scope of our original services have been covered by the contingency established. However, there are sQmaificant increases the scope of services requested that the contingency wouldn’t be able to cover. We recommend see’king council approval to replenish the contingency and provide for these added services. Attached is a detail of these added services. They are summarized as follows: 1. Lot R extended completion date 2. Continuous inspection of stone tile installation Total services added to date $ $ $ 49,900. 26,900. 76,800. Attached is our 2003 rate schedule with the escalation increase provided for in our contract. We request council authorization to fund these additional services and a corresponding change order to our construction management contract. Cordially TURNER CONSTRUCITON Gregory R. Smith, Construction Manager File 00230, 00300 Project Office Phone: 650-321-2132 Fmx: 650-321-2901 Information Hot Line: 650-321-2372 Palo Alto Par "ldng Structures Detail of Extra Construction Management Services March 17, 2003 Lot R extended completion date The Lot R completion date has been extended 78 calendar days (56 work days). The staffmg plan calls for the project manager to be half time after completion of Lot R. Retain project manager full time during time extension. Retain resident inspector 21 workdays. Consolidated Engineering (168 hours x $65) Turner Construction Fee on consultant Project Manager (224 hours x 169) Total $ 10,920. 49,900 Continuous inspection of stone tile installation During plan check, full time inspection of stone tile installation at Lot R was added to the inspection requirements. The inspection contract had already been awarded. Consolidated Engineering Inspection (360 hours x $65)$23,400. Testing 1,000. Turner Construction 2.440. Total $ 26,900. Total extra construction management services added $ 76,800.00 Project Office Phone: 650-321-2132 Fax: 650-321-2901 Information Hot Line: 650-321-2372 EXHIBIT "B-3" Palo Alto Par ~king Structures Turner Construction Company 2003 Hourly Rates Position Name Hourlv. Rate Full/PartTime Project Executive Craig Bj orkman $193 PT Project Manager Greg Smith $169 FT Superintendent Engineer Administrative Harmon Roberts $133 FT Victor Shek $96 FT " Staff $65 PT Scheduling Lars Tanner $162 PT Accounting Sr. Estin~ator / Purchasing Agent Estimator / Purchasing Agent Cindy Carlotta $131 PT Dave Alexander $162 PT Bob Murelli Staff 142 PT Safety En=4neer Ron Vimng $131 PT Full time staff will bill hours for a ful! month including vacation, sick time and holiday time. Part time staff will be billed for actual hours worked. If City. requests full time staffto work on other City projects, the Parking Structure Project will be credited. Rates are subject to 5% increase on January 1, 2004. Project Office Phone: 650-321-2132 Fax: 650-321-2901 Information Hot Line: 650-321-2372 ~T~’~NT NO. FO~r~ TO CONTACT NO. C60~CHMENT B BE~N THE CITY OF P~O ~TO ~ "~T~Y DESi~, iNC. This ~:men~ment No.Four to Contract NO. 06076145 ("Contract") is into ’, by and between the CITY OF Pg~O ALTO, a chartered city and a municipal corporation of the State of ("CITY"), and WATRY DESIGN, iNC., a corporation, !oca:ed at 815 Hamilton Street, Redwood City, CA 94063 ("CONSULTANT). RE C I TAL S: WHEREAS, the Contract was into between the marries for the provision of design consul:ant services; and parties wi~ to amend the Contract" NOW, P~=R<PORm_~=~.=_ ._, in consideration of the covenants, te~s, conditions, and provisions of this ~_men~ment, the agree: SECTION !.Section 6.1 is hereby amended to read as "in consideration for the full of the Basic Services and Rei~ursab!e described in Section 4.1 and 6.1.3 o~ this Agreement, C!TY -~==- to may cONSUI~T~NT a ~ee not to exceed Seventy Thousand Dollars (570,000) for ~,ase One; Six Hundred Eighty-two Thousand One Hundred Thirty- six Thousand Dollars ($682,i36) for Phase Two; and One Hi]lion s!x Huncred Thirty-six Thousand Doi~=~ (~!,636,000 {or Phase ±±± and iV final design and ...... ~ ~n a6minis<ration.~m ...........co~:=~:@~:’~-~~Ait~mal fee not to exceed Thousand Two Hundred Dollars ($69,200) shall be maid by CITY {or fee costs, additional subconsu!tant design oversight and construction document rei-~ursables, as s~ibed in Ex~i~ >’C-~ .... n~ = .......... to exceed ~i r~v-S~v=n T~-,~sand Four Dollars (S37,400) shal! be ~aid by CiTYo for additional design services as described in "~2" =~------~- . ~ amount of commensation for additlon~ or extra will be calculated in accordance WIE~ the nour!v rate set fo~h i~ "C-3", on a ~{._-m~ = and materia~=- ~ bas~- =, um maxim~mm amount set forth in this Section. =~ior to ~=~{no such extra work or mo~n, marries wi~ -~"== ~ writinc umon an estimated maximum cost for such or extra work. n~ work snail" be authorized ~ym-- the Citv_ Manager or his mrior addi:ional or ex:ra wor~. 030417 sd! 0100063 SECTTON 2 The {o]]ow~ng =wh~ ~t are hereby added to the contract to read as set forth in the attachments to this ~.en~ment, which are incorporated in ful! by this reference: .....".~ _i fora. ~x~ ~ b~ t "C-2" entitled ~em~est ~_menckment ; and Contract Rates." b o Exhibit "C-3"= " ~ " of Hourly Billingentitled Sc~e@ule <~. ~ -.herein modified, all other~EC~±ON 3 Except as provisions of the Contract, including any exhibits and subsequent ~ r~ sha~ remain in fu!] force and effectamendments ~ne_~o, -_-¯ iN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have by their duly authorized representatives executed this ~mendment on the date {irst above written. ATTEST:CITY OF PAL0 ALTO City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: senior Asst. City Attorney APPROVED: Mayor WATRY ~-GN TNC~m~!,--. By: Name: Title: Assistant City Manager By: Director o{ Public Works Name: Title: Director of A~minist~-~i Services insurance Review Taxpayer identification No. 94-2302782 (Compliance wi<h Corp. Code .~ 3i3 is re.aired if the en~i~v on whose behalf this con~rac: is signed is a corporation, in the alternative, a cerzified corporaze re_o_@~on a~zesrinm zo =he signaLory authority of the individuals si~ning in their respective capacities is acceptable) A:tachments: EXHIBIT "C-2": Request for Contract ~_mendment EXHIBIT "C-3": Schedule o{ Hourly Billing Rates 030417 sdl 0100063 2 CERTIFICATE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT (Civil Code § !189) STATE OF COUNTY OF SS. On , before me, the undersigned, a notary public in and for said County, personally personaq ] y known to me (or mroved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be theperson(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her!their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. o{ Notary Public 030417 sdl 0100063 CERTIFICATE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT (Civi! Code ~ 1189) a~ OF COUN~ OF ) ) ) SS. On notary public in and before me, the undersigned, a for said County, personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is!are subscribed to the within instr’@ment, and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and ~_a~ by his/he-/their s£gnature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entit.y upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and officia! sea!. Signature of Notary Public 030417 sdl 0100063 4 EXHIBIT C-2 March 3, 2003 Ms. Karen Bengard CiD~ Of Palo ~to 250 Hamilton Ave. Pa!o Aho, CA 94303 Palo Alto Parking Structures Phase FV Project #9533A.312 Request for Contract Amendment Dear Karen, Per our discussion last week, we are writing to request an amendment to our contract of June 4, 200! for the Pato Alto Parking Structures Phase IX,". We have identified the following scope changes which modi~ our corm-act: Record Drawings (ref. W-DI Contract Fee Proposa! p.4: Assumptions Item 7) WDI’s corm-act excludes Record Drawings. CPA has requested that record drawings be prepared upon completion of the project. The fee sho,am below assumes the Construction Manager will prepare the drawings. WDI and the sub-consultants will then spend up to 30 minutes per sheet to review. This fee includes an al!owance of $450 of reproduction costs to scan all the drawings for future retrieval SUBTOTA_L ITEM 1 $23,050 Additional On-site Meetings (ref. WDI Contract Fee Proposa! Exhibit A Optional Services Item 4: Assumptions item 61) W-DI has been requested to attend j obsite meetings in excess of those included in the scope of services. Additional meetings are anticipated throu~out the course of construction, and this fee a!!ows for this meeting contingency. SUBTOTAL ITEM $10,z_0 3. Lot SFL Tenant Layout Studies (ref. WDI Contract Fee Proposal Exhibit A page 7: Additional Services item !3) WDI’s basic services did not include additional studies for potentia! locations of tenant toilets and room layouts of leased spaces. This fee includes va, o tenant layouts and code review. SU-BTOT.4Jb ITEM 3 S4.000 Total Compensation for this Contract _axnendment:$37,400 Karen Bengard Palo Aho Par~g Structures 9533A page 2 of 2 03/31/03 We appreciate your consideration of our request for t~s contract amendment. Sincerely, WATRY DESIGN, INC. Gary- Newgard, _~rchitect Senior Project Manager CC: Michelle Wendler, Lisa Blanton, John Purinton, David Lococo, Ray Bligh C :~,TEMP",030303 KarenB engard.doc EXHIBIT C-3 _-’kPPEN~I)Eg. A: WATRY DESIGN ~C. SCHEDULE OF HOUP,_LY BILLLNG It, TES Our current standard hourly rate schedule is: Nick Warty:$185/fhour Asst. Project M~.$100/hour Senior Consultant:$165/hour Senior Job Captain:$100/hour Consultant:$140/hour Job Captain:$95ihour Principal:$135/hour Senior Designer:$85/hour St. Project M~:$120/hour Staff Desig-ner:$80/hour Project Manager:S110/hour Clerical:$50!hour These rates wi!l be adjusted by 4% per year starting on the f~rst anniversary date of the contract.