HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 2687City of Palo Alto (ID # 2687)
City Council Staff Report
Report Type: Action ItemsMeeting Date: 4/16/2012
April 16, 2012 Page 1 of 6
(ID # 2687)
Summary Title: Sand Hill Road Development Agreement Amendment
Title: Public Hearing: Adoption of an Ordinance Approving an Amendment to
the 1997 Sand Hill Road Development Agreement to Extend Lease on El Camino
Park and to Remove Approximately 10.25 Acres of Land (Searsville and Fremont
Roads) in Santa Clara County from Special Condition Area B to be Used for
Central Energy. (Cogeneration) Facility.
From: City Manager
Lead Department: Planning and Community Environment
Recommendation
Staff and the Planning and Transportation Commission recommend that Council
approve the attached Ordinance (Attachment A) approving the proposed
amendment to the 1997 Sand Hill Road Development Agreement to remove a
10.25-acre site from the 139-acre Special Condition Area B within the jurisdiction
of Santa Clara County, and to extend the lease of the 10.74-acre El Camino Park,
from June 30, 2033, to June 30, 2042 (Attachment B).
Executive Summary
The Ordinance for Council approval amends an existing Development Agreement
to enable the City to extend an existing lease with Leland Stanford Junior
University (Stanford) of 10.74 acres of dedicated parkland known as El Camino
Park until the year 2042, a nine year extension. The amendment would also allow
for removal of a 10.25 acre piece of land within the County’s jurisdiction from
“Area B” in the Agreement. Stanford would then pursue an application to the
County for development of a Central Energy Facility (cogeneration plant) within
Area B.
Background
April 16, 2012 Page 2 of 6
(ID # 2687)
In 1997 the City of Palo Alto and Stanford University entered into the Sand Hill
Road Development Agreement (Development Agreement) concerning Sand Hill
Road Projects, including Stanford West Apartments; Stanford West Senior
Housing; Stanford Shopping Center Expansion; a collection of various roadway
improvements; and the creation and annexation of a small parcel of property
created by the relocation of Pasteur Drive at Sand Hill Road. The 1997 Sand Hill
Road Development Agreement has been amended on two previous occasions, in
2001 and 2003.
Area B
Area B is located in Santa Clara County and is comprised of 139 acres that the
Development Agreement refers to as “Special Condition Area B.” The property is
within the permitting jurisdiction of Santa Clara County and is regulated under the
County’s 2000 Stanford Community Plan and General Use Permit (GUP). Although
the area is within the County, the Development Agreement between Stanford and
the City of Palo Alto addresses these parcels.
The proposed application is to remove a 10.25-acre area from Area B (shown on
Attachment B). The Development Agreement currently prohibits development in
a portion of Area B (including the proposed area) until December 31, 2020, except
for academic and recreational fields (including the golf course) and associated
support facilities and housing.
El Camino Park
The City of Palo Alto has an existing lease with Stanford for the use of El Camino
Park. The current lease, which covers an area of approximately 10.74 acres
(including the area of the El Palo Alto redwood tree on the north side of Palo Alto
Avenue), expires in June 2033. In June 2011, the City Council directed staff to
pursue a long-term lease with Stanford for El Camino Park beyond the current
expiration date. The 1997 Development Agreement extended the El Camino Park
and Depot leases from 2013 to 2033, removed the City from the MacArthur Park
and Red Cross leases, and allowed the City the right to terminate, in 2013, the
Depot lease.
Planning and Transportation Commission Review
The Planning and Transportation Commission (Commission) reviewed the
proposed amendment in a public hearing on March 14, 2012, and voted 5-0-1
April 16, 2012 Page 3 of 6
(ID # 2687)
(Commissioner Tuma not participating due to a conflict of interest) in support of
the proposed amendment as recommended by staff and set forth in the attached
ordinance, subject to a condition restricting the early use of the land removed
from the Special Condition Area B to a new cogeneration power plant. The
applicant had stated during the hearing that the area to be removed from Area B
is the preferred site for the energy plant and therefore stated no objection to the
condition. Attachment B incorporates the additional condition recommended by
the Commission. The Commissioners understood that the extension of the El
Camino Park lease was consistent with Council’s prior direction and would be
beneficial for Palo Alto.
One public speaker presented his opinion that the Council should be encouraged
to wait on the action until a project is filed with the County of Santa Clara for the
development of Area B, and asked the Commission to be aware of other pending
and potential projects adjacent to the El Camino Park. The applicant noted that
the County application and review process would be lengthy and costly and there
would be no reason to proceed without certainty about the requested
amendment.
A citizen’s letter to the Commission regarding the loss of a former bike path
through the County Area B due to installation of Stanford’s golf practice area was
noted by a Commissioner, and the applicant addessed this topic, stating that the
relocated bike path is a longer, less direct path, but that the request would be
considered.
The Commission’s staff report and minutes are included as Attachments C and D,
respectively, to this Council report.
Discussion
The City received an application from Stanford University to execute an
amendment to the 1997 Sand Hill Road Development Agreement Section 65868
of the California Government Code and section 8(b) of Palo Alto Resolution No.
6597 (Mar. 9, 1987) provide that a development agreement may be amended by
mutual consent of the parties to the agreement. A Development Agreement or
amendment thereof requires review and public hearing by the Planning and
Transportation Commission and Council.
April 16, 2012 Page 4 of 6
(ID # 2687)
The subject Property is located within the portion of Area B where the
Development Agreement currently allows housing. Except for this small piece of
land, the Development Agreement already allows development on the Property,
and the requested amendment to the Development Agreement would change
only the type of development that is allowed under the Agreement – from
housing to “academic and support uses.” The requested amendment to the
Development Agreement would allow Stanford to accelerate the development of
academic and support uses in advance of the December 31, 2020 date.
The Property lies within the Academic Growth Boundary and the Academic
Campus land use designation of the Community Plan and GUP, which allows the
development of academic facilities and support uses. The housing commitments
of those plans remain in place. Removal of the Property from Area B would not
result in any changes to either the Community Plan or GUP, which both would
continue to apply to the Property. By removing the Property from Area B, the City
is not approving or authorizing any development on the Property; such
development will remain subject to County review and approval.
Stanford University is considering this site for a new energy center to replace the
campus’ Cardinal Cogeneration energy facility. The new energy center is an
important part of Stanford’s long-range Energy and Climate Plan, which is
designed to increase energy efficiency while reducing the environmental impacts
associated with supplying energy to the Stanford campus.
Stanford is still in the planning process and has not yet proposed a specific project
for the County’s approval. The energy facility is not part of this application and is
not part of the Commission’s review.
El Camino Park
The City leases land from Stanford along El Camino Real that is improved with El
Camino Park and other facilities. In June 2011, the City Council, while discussing
improvements to the ball field, directed staff to see if Stanford would consider
extending the lease on El Camino Park. The current lease expires in June 2033.
Stanford is proposing that in exchange for releasing approximately 10-acres from
Area B nine years early (currently the restriction is until 2020), they will extend
the approximately 10-acre El Camino Real Park lease nine years, from 2033 to
2042.
April 16, 2012 Page 5 of 6
(ID # 2687)
Timeline
The applicant submitted the request for the amendment on February 2, 2012.
The Planning and Transportation Commission reviewed and recommended the
amendment in a public hearing on March 14, 2012.
Resource Impact
This amendment will not have a financial impact on the City, other than to assure
that the lease cost to the City for El Camino Park will remain negligible for another
nine years. The Development Agreement Amendment review is a cost-recovery
application process such that staff and consultant resources expended during the
process are covered by the applicant. Any economic benefits or costs of the
Energy Facility accrue to the County and Stanford.
Policy Implications
Extension of the El Camino Park lease is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
and with recent Council direction to pursue such an extension.
Environmental Review
The County of Santa Clara certified an Environmental Impact Report in December
2000 for the Stanford University Community Plan and General Use Permit (GUP).
The GUP EIR is a program-level EIR that addresses the impacts of developing
Stanford’s lands within the Academic Growth Boundary (AGB) established by the
County's Community Plan. The City's approval of the proposed amendment to
the Sand Hill Road Development Agreement would not result in any new or
substantially more severe impacts than were disclosed and evaluated in the GUP
EIR because the City's approval would not change any of the terms and conditions
of the Community Plan and GUP that govern development of the 10-acre site,
which have been evaluated in the GUP EIR. At most, the City's approval would
merely accelerate the development of academic support uses on the 10-acre site,
but still in a manner consistent with the Community Plan and the GUP.
Environmental review for the Energy Facility will be conducted by Santa Clara
County as part of the entitlement process.
Attachments:
Attachment A: Ordinance for the 3rd Amendment to Sand Hill Rd Development Agreement
(PDF)
April 16, 2012 Page 6 of 6
(ID # 2687)
Attachment B: Amendment to Sand Hill Road Development Agreement (PDF)
Attachment C: March 14, 2012 Planning and Transportation Commission Staff Report
(PDF)
Attachment D: March 14, 2012 Planning and Transportation Commission Minutes (PDF)
Prepared By:Amy French, Current Planning Manager
Department Head:Curtis Williams, Director
City Manager Approval: ____________________________________
James Keene, City Manager
Not Yet Approved
120325 jb 0130938
1
Ordinance No. _____
Ordinance of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Approving
The Third Amendment to the Development Agreement
Between the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior
University and the City of Palo Alto Dated August 14, 1997
The Council of the City of Palo Alto does ORDAIN as follows:
SECTION 1. Recitals.
A. The City of Palo Alto (City) and Stanford are parties to a certain Development
Agreement dated August 14, 1997 (the "Sand Hill Road Development Agreement" or
"Agreement"), concerning the Sand Hill Road Projects, which include, as described in Paragraph
l(k) of the Agreement, the Stanford West Apartment Project; the Stanford West Senior Housing
Project; the Stanford Shopping Center Expansion Project; a collection of various roadway
improvements, including widening and extension of Sand Hill Road, widening and improvement
of Quarry Road, construction of a new Vineyard Lane, extension of Palo Road, extension of
Stockfarm Road, and related roadway improvements; and the creation and annexation of a small
parcel of property created by the relocation of Pasteur Drive at Sand Hill Road.
B. Section 65868 of the California Government Code and section 8(b) of Palo Alto
Resolution No. 6597 (Mar. 9, 1987) provide that a development agreement may be amended by
mutual consent of the parties to the agreement.
C. Pursuant to these provisions, paragraph 11 of the Agreement provides that the City and
Stanford may amend the Agreement from time to time by mutual consent.
D. Paragraph 6(i) of the Agreement provides that until December 31, 2020, Stanford shall
not develop the approximately 139-acre parcel known as Special Condition Area B ("Area B"),
as defined by the 1989 General Use Permit issued by Santa Clara County (the "County") for the
Stanford campus, except for academic and recreational fields (including the golf course) and
associated support facilities; provided that the Agreement allows Stanford to propose and
construct faculty, staff or student housing within a specified portion of Area B regardless of the
December 2020 date. Exhibit H-3 to the Agreement contained a map that depicted Area B.
E. In April 2001, the City and Stanford executed a First Amendment to the Agreement
("First Amendment"). The First Amendment revised Area B to exchange restrictions on portions
of Area B such that (i) development would be precluded until December 31, 2020 on a 13-acre
area that previously had been slated for the near-term development of housing under the original
Agreement in 1997, and (ii) development of housing would be permitted on another, adjacent 13-
acre area that had been restricted under the original Agreement until December 31, 2020. Exhibit
B (dated Apr. 9, 2001) to the First Amendment amended Exhibit H-3 to the Agreement in order
to show the revised boundaries of the housing development areas within Area B.
F. Subsequently, in 2003, the City and Stanford executed a Second Amendment to the
Agreement ("Second Amendment"). This Second Amendment was intended to implement the
First Amendment, by defining more precisely the boundary between that portion of Area B
Not Yet Approved
120325 jb 0130938
2
where development was restricted until December 31, 2020, and that portion of Area B where
the development of housing was permitted regardless of the December 31, 2020 date. To that
end, the Second Amendment included a legal description and an accompanying plat map.
G. The property that is the subject of this Amendment consists of approximately 10.25
acres of land. This 10.25-acre area will be referred to as the "Property." This Amendment
removes the Property from Area B. Except for a small sliver of this land in the northwest comer
of the Property, the Property is within that portion of Area B that is contemplated for
development of housing under the Agreement (as amended by the First and Second
Amendments).
H. Area B is owned by Stanford and is located within the land use jurisdiction of the
County.
I. In December 2000, the County approved the Stanford Community Plan (the
"Community Plan") and a new General Use Permit (the "2000 GUP") for the Stanford campus,
which established an Academic Growth Boundary and permitted the development of 2,035,000
net new square feet of academic facilities and academic support uses on the campus within that
boundary on lands within the "Academic Campus" land use designation.
J. In approving the Community Plan and the 2000 GUP, the County in December 2000
certified, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), a Final
Environmental Impact Report (the "2000 GUP EIR") that evaluated at a program-level the
environmental impacts from the maximum level of development on the Stanford campus that
would be allowed under the Community Plan and the 2000 GUP.
K. The 2000 GUP contains detailed procedures for evaluating individual, site specific
building projects that Stanford proposes to build on the campus to implement the Community
Plan and the 2000 GUP.
L. The entirety of the Property is located within the Academic Growth Boundary on lands
designated for Academic Campus uses, and therefore may be developed for academic and
support uses under the Community Plan, 2000 GUP, and 2000 GUP EIR approved by the
County.
M. Stanford wishes to submit an application to the County to develop the Property as a
new energy center that is anticipated to increase energy efficiency while reducing several of the
environmental impacts associated with supplying energy to the campus, including greenhouse
gas emissions.
N. The precise footprint, design, and operational characteristics of the new energy center
have not yet been determined. At such time when Stanford submits an application to the County
to develop the Property, the County will review the application based on the 2000 GUP EIR and
will conduct any further environmental analysis that may be required under CEQA, in
accordance with the site-specific project review procedures contained in the 2000 GUP.
O. By removing the Property from Area B, the City is not approving or authorizing any
development on the Property; such development will remain subject to County review and
approval.
Not Yet Approved
120325 jb 0130938
3
P. The City leases land from Stanford along El Camino Real that is improved with El
Camino Park and other facilities; this lease will be referred to as the "El Camino Park Lease."
Q. The City wishes to extend the term of the El Camino Park Lease, and Stanford has
agreed to a nine-year extension of the El Camino Park Lease, conditioned upon approval of this
Amendment.
R. The City's Planning and Transportation Commission and City Council have given
notice of intention to consider this Amendment and have conducted public hearings on the
Amendment.
SECTION 2. Findings.
The City Council finds and determines that:
A. Notice of intention to consider the development agreement has been given
pursuant to Government Code section 65867.
B. The City’s Planning and Transportation Commission and City Council have
given notice of intention to consider this Agreement, have conducted public hearings thereon
pursuant to Government Code section 65867 and City’s Resolution No. 6597, and the City
Council has found that the provisions of this Agreement are consistent with City’s
Comprehensive Plan, as amended.
SECTION 3. The City Council hereby approves the Third Amendment to the
Development Agreement between the City of Palo Alto and the Board of Trustees of the Leland
Stanford Junior University, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and authorizes the
Mayor to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City.
SECTION 4. The City Clerk is directed to cause a copy of the development
agreement to be recorded with the County Recorder not later than ten (10) days after it becomes
effective.
SECTION 5. The County of Santa Clara certified an Environmental Impact
Report in December 2000 for the Stanford University Community Plan and General Use Permit
(GUP). The City's approval of the proposed amendment to the Sand Hill Road Development
Agreement would not result in any new or substantially more severe impacts than were disclosed
and evaluated in the GUP EIR because the City's approval would not change any of the terms
and conditions of the Community Plan and GUP that govern development of the 10-acre site,
which have been evaluated in the GUP EIR.
SECTION 6. This ordinance shall be effective upon the thirty-first (31st) day
after its adoption.
INTRODUCED:
Not Yet Approved
120325 jb 0130938
4
PASSED:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTENTIONS:
NOT PARTICIPATING:
ABSENT:
ATTEST: APPROVED:
__________________________ __________________________
City Clerk Mayor
__________________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Manager
__________________________ __________________________
Senior Asst. City Attorney Director of Planning and Community
Environment
120308 jb 0130941
This document is recorded for the benefit of
the City of Palo Alto and is entitled
to be recorded free of charge in accordance
with Section 6103 of the Government Code.
After Recordation, mail to:
Office of the City Attorney
City of Palo Alto
250 Hamilton Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94301
THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE SAND HILL ROAD DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
This Third Amendment to the Sand Hill Road Development Agreement is entered into as
of this ______ day of ______, 2012, by and between the CITY OF PALO ALTO, a chartered
city of the State of California (the "City"), and THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, a body having corporate powers under the laws
of the State of California ("Stanford").
RECITALS
This THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE SAND HILL ROAD DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT ("Amendment") is entered into on the basis of the following facts,
understandings and intentions of the parties:
A. The City and Stanford are parties to a certain Development Agreement dated
August 14, 1997 (the "Sand Hill Road Development Agreement" or "Agreement"), concerning
the Sand Hill Road Projects, which include, as described in Paragraph 1(k) of the Agreement, the
Stanford West Apartment Project; the Stanford West Senior Housing Project; the Stanford
Shopping Center Expansion Project; a collection of various roadway improvements, including
widening and extension of Sand Hill Road, widening and improvement of Quarry Road,
construction of a new Vineyard Lane, extension of Palo Road, extension of Stockfarm Road, and
related roadway improvements; and the creation and annexation of a small parcel of property
created by the relocation of Pasteur Drive at Sand Hill Road.
B. Section 65868 of the California Government Code and section 8(b) of Palo
Alto Resolution No. 6597 (Mar. 9, 1987) provide that a development agreement may be
amended by mutual consent of the parties to the agreement.
C. Pursuant to these provisions, paragraph 11 of the Agreement provides that the
City and Stanford may amend the Agreement from time to time by mutual consent.
120308 jb 0130941
D. Paragraph 6(i) of the Agreement provides that until December 31, 2020,
Stanford shall not develop the approximately 139-acre parcel known as Special Condition Area
B ("Area B"), as defined by the 1989 General Use Permit issued by Santa Clara County (the
"County") for the Stanford campus, except for academic and recreational fields (including the
golf course) and associated support facilities; provided that the Agreement allows Stanford to
propose and construct faculty, staff or student housing within a specified portion of Area B
regardless of the December 2020 date. Exhibit H-3 to the Agreement contained a map that
depicted Area B.
E. In April 2001, the City and Stanford executed a First Amendment to the
Agreement ("First Amendment"). The First Amendment revised Area B to exchange restrictions
on portions of Area B such that (i) development would be precluded until December 31, 2020 on
a 13-acre area that previously had been slated for the near-term development of housing under
the original Agreement in 1997, and (ii) development of housing would be permitted on another,
adjacent 13-acre area that had been restricted under the original Agreement until December 31,
2020. Exhibit B (dated Apr. 9, 2001) to the First Amendment amended Exhibit H-3 to the
Agreement in order to show the revised boundaries of the housing development areas within
Area B.
F. Subsequently, in 2003, the City and Stanford executed a Second Amendment
to the Agreement ("Second Amendment"). This Second Amendment was intended to implement
the First Amendment, by defining more precisely the boundary between that portion of Area B
where development was restricted until December 31, 2020, and that portion of Area B where
the development of housing was permitted regardless of the December 31, 2020 date. To that
end, the Second Amendment included a legal description and an accompanying plat map.
G. The property that is the subject of this Amendment consists of approximately
10.25 acres of land. This 10.25-acre area will be referred to as the "Property." This Amendment
removes the Property from Area B. Except for a small sliver of this land in the northwest corner
of the Property, the Property is within that portion of Area B that is contemplated for
development of housing under the Agreement (as amended by the First and Second
Amendments).
H. Area B is owned by Stanford and is located within the land use jurisdiction of
the County.
I. In December 2000, the County approved the Stanford Community Plan (the
"Community Plan") and a new General Use Permit (the "2000 GUP") for the Stanford campus,
which established an Academic Growth Boundary and permitted the development of 2,035,000
net new square feet of academic facilities and academic support uses on the campus within that
boundary on lands within the "Academic Campus" land use designation.
J. In approving the Community Plan and the 2000 GUP, the County in
December 2000 certified, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), a
Final Environmental Impact Report (the "2000 GUP EIR") that evaluated at a program-level the
environmental impacts from the maximum level of development on the Stanford campus that
would be allowed under the Community Plan and the 2000 GUP.
120308 jb 0130941
K. The 2000 GUP contains detailed procedures for evaluating individual, site-
specific building projects that Stanford proposes to build on the campus to implement the
Community Plan and the 2000 GUP.
L. The entirety of the Property is located within the Academic Growth Boundary
on lands designated for Academic Campus uses, and therefore may be developed for academic
and support uses under the Community Plan, 2000 GUP, and 2000 GUP EIR approved by the
County.
M. Stanford wishes to submit an application to the County to develop the
Property as a new energy center that is anticipated to increase energy efficiency while reducing
several of the environmental impacts associated with supplying energy to the campus, including
greenhouse gas emissions.
N. The precise footprint, design, and operational characteristics of the new
energy center have not yet been determined. At such time when Stanford submits an application
to the County to develop the Property, the County will review the application based on the 2000
GUP EIR and will conduct any further environmental analysis that may be required under
CEQA, in accordance with the site-specific project review procedures contained in the 2000
GUP.
O. By removing the Property from Area B, the City is not approving or
authorizing any development on the Property; such development will remain subject to County
review and approval.
P. The City leases land from Stanford along El Camino Real that is improved
with El Camino Park and other facilities; this lease will be referred to as the "El Camino Park
Lease."
Q. The City wishes to extend the term of the El Camino Park Lease, and Stanford
has agreed to a nine-year extension of the El Camino Park Lease, conditioned upon approval of
this Amendment.
R. The City's Planning Commission and City Council have given notice of
intention to consider this Amendment and have conducted public hearings on the Amendment.
S. The City has found that the terms and conditions of this Amendment are fair,
just and reasonable, and provide benefits to the City.
T. This Amendment is consistent with the public health, safety and welfare needs
of the residents of the City and the surrounding region. The City has determined that the
Amendment represents a reasonable balancing of the competing interests of the affected region.
U. This Amendment will bind future City Councils to the terms and obligations
specified in the Amendment.
V. After review by City staff, its Planning Commission, and the City Council, the
City has found that:
120308 jb 0130941
a. The provisions of this Amendment and its purposes are consistent with
the goals, policies, programs and standards specified in the City's
Comprehensive Plan;
b. This Amendment will help attain important economic, social,
environmental and planning goals of the City and enhances and protects the
public health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City and the
surrounding region;
c. This Amendment will allow Stanford to apply to the County for
development of a new campus energy center on the Property, which, if
approved by the County, is anticipated to reduce the air pollutant and
greenhouse gas emissions and water use associated with supplying the
Stanford campus with energy.
d. This Amendment will also provide for a nine-year extension of the
term of the El Camino Park Lease, thereby providing valuable recreational
and open space benefits to the residents of the City and the surrounding
region.
e. This Amendment will otherwise achieve the goals and purposes for
which the Development Agreement Act was enacted.
PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties do hereby agree as follows:
1. The Property is removed from Area B and is no longer subject to the provisions of
Paragraph 6(i) of the Agreement, provided, however, that until December 31, 2020, Stanford
may utilize the Property only for the preparation, construction, and operation of a new energy
center and associated uses.
2. A revised legal description and an accompanying map depicting the entirety of
Area B, as modified by this Amendment, are provided in Exhibit A to this Amendment. Revised
legal descriptions and an accompanying map for those portions of Area B that are contemplated
for the development of housing under the Agreement, as modified by this Amendment, are
provided in Exhibits A-1, A-2 & A-3 to this Amendment
3. Exhibit B to this Amendment revises Exhibit H-3 to the Agreement – as
previously amended by Exhibit B (dated Apr. 9, 2001) to the First Amendment – in order to
show the location and boundaries of the Property; the location and the changes to the boundaries
of Area B; and the location and the changes to the boundaries of those portions of Area B that
are contemplated for the development of housing under the Agreement.
4. The provisions of Paragraph 6(i) will continue to apply to all other parts of Area
B with the exception of the Property.
5. The parties shall execute the sixth amendment to the El Camino Park Lease to
extend the lease term for a period of nine years, from June 30, 2033 to June 30, 2042. The sixth
120308 jb 0130941
amendment to the El Camino Park Lease is attached to this Amendment as Exhibit C. The sixth
amendment to the El Camino Park Lease will become effective within 45 days after the final
passage of the ordinance approving this Amendment if that ordinance is not submitted to a
referendum. If that ordinance is submitted to a referendum, the sixth amendment to the El
Camino Park Lease will become effective only if the referendum approves the ordinance.
6. All other provisions of the Agreement continue to apply and are not affected by
this Amendment.
7. The following exhibits are attached to this Amendment and are incorporated
herein:
Exhibit A: Legal Description and Map of Revised Area B
Exhibits A-1, A-2 & A-3: Legal Descriptions and Map of Area B Housing Parcels
Exhibit B: Amended Exhibit H-3 to Sand Hill Road Development
Agreement
Exhibit C: Sixth Amendment to El Camino Park Lease (including
Exhibits 1, 2 & 3)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed by the parties as of the
day and year first above written.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Senior Asst. City Attorney
APPROVED:
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Director of Planning and
Community Environment
STANFORD
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford
Junior University
By:
Its:
120308 jb 0130939
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California )
County of ____________________ )
On ____________________ before me, ____________________ (insert here name
and title of the officer), personally appeared ____________________, who proved to me on the
basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within
instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their
authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),
or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature: ____________________
Place Notary Seal Above
120308 jb 0130941
EXHIBITS A, A-I, A-2 & A-3
TO THIRD AMENDMENT TO 1997
SAND HILL ROAD DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
~Bkr
ENGINW!51 SUJlVlYORS I PLANNtl!>
EXHIBIT "A"
Legal Description
REVISED AREA B
(For Development Agreement)
January 25,2012
BKF No. 20126007
Page 1 of 3
Real property in the County of Santa Clara, State of California, described as follows:
Being a portion of the lands of The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, a
body having corporate powers under the laws of the State of California, more particularly
described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point on the southeasterly line of Sand Hill Road, as said Road is described in
that certain Easement for street and roadway purposes, from The Board of Trustees of the Leland
Stanford Junior University to the City of Palo Alto, recorded June 7,2002, under Document No.
16304199, Official Records of Santa Clara County, said point being also the northwesterly
terminus of that certain Academic Growth Boundary line, described as Area "B" Housing Site
Boundary in the Second Amendment to Development Agreement between City of Palo Alto and
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, recorded December 23, 2003,
under Document No. 17544858, Official Records of said County;
Thence leaving said point and along said southeasterly line of Sand Hill Road, South 41 °10'12"
West, 206.35 feet to the most southerly comer of said Road as described in said Easement for
street and roadway purposes (Doc. 16304199), said comer being also a point in the center line of
San Francisquito Creek;
Thence leaving said comer and along said center line of San Francisquito Creek, southeasterly,
1780 feet more or less to the general n0I1herly line of Junipero Serra Boulevard;
Thence along said general northerly line of Junipero Serra Boulevard, easterly, 2681 feet more or
less to the general westerly line of Campus Drive West;
Thence along said general westerly line of Campus Drive West, nOltherly, 1769 feet more or less
to the intersection with the northwesterly prolongation of the center line of Santa Teresa Street;
Thence leaving said general westerly line of Campus Drive West, NOIth 77°03'50" West, 767
feet more or less to the general center of Fremont Road;
Thence along said general center of Fremont Road, southwesterly, 413 feet more or less to said
Academic Growth Boundary line;
Thence along said Academic Growth Boundary line, the following three (3) courses:
I) North 3 t °56'17" West, 277.02 feet;
2) North 40°47'55" West, 401.92 feet;
3) North 79°57'36" West, 310.20 feet;
Legal Description
REVISED AREA B
Page 2 of3
Thence leaving said Academic Growth Boundary line, the following fourteen (14) courses:
1) North 15°57'00" East, 4 J 6.28 feel;
2) South 74°03'00" East, 158.21 feet;
3) North 01 °26'58" East, 654.16 feet;
4) North 76°5J '57" East, 29.76 feet;
5) North 82°30'J5" East, 37.03 feet;
6) North 89°01 '45" East, 57.00 feet;
7) South 87°40'43" East, 7] .54 feet;
8) South 83°25'05" East, 50.57 feet;
9) South 7]028' 16" East, 44.53 feet;
J 0) South 77°J 6'32" Easl, 61.40 feet;
11) South 7]059'19" East, 46.42 feet;
12) South 79°]4'57" East, 77.68 feet;
13) South 87°52'44" East, 26.10 feet;
14) North 87°34'10" East, 25.93 feet to the general westerly Jine of Oak Road;
Thence along said general westerly line of Oak Road, 1248 feet more or less;
Thence leaving said general westerly line of Oak Road, NOlih 34°23' J 7" East, 527feet more or
less to the southwesterly line of Pasteur Drive, as said line is described in said Easement for street
and roadway purposes (Doc. No. 16304199);
Thence along said southwesterly line of Pasteur Drive, the following four (4) courses:
I) North 73°53'49" West, 302.39 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve to the right, having a
Radius of 200.00 feet;
2) Northwesterly along said curve, through a central Angle of 28°26'12", for an arc Length of
99.26 feet;
3) North 45°27'37" West, 51.43 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve to the left, having a
Radius of 40.00 feet;
4) Northwesterly along said curve, through a central Angle of 86°12'45", for an arc Length of
60.19 feet to said southeasterly line of Sand Hill Road;
Thence along said southeasterly line of Sand Hill Road, the following three (3) courses:
1) South 48°19'38" West, 2720.87 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve to the left, having a
Radius of 537.00 feet;
2) Southwesterly along said curve, through a central Angle of 07°09'26", for a arc Length of
67.08 feet;
3) South 41 °10' 12" West, 49.41 feet to the point of BEGINNING.
As shown on map entitled "Revised Area E" attached hereto and made a part hereof.
This description was prepared by me or under my direct supervision .
BKF Engineers
-J~
John Koroyan, P.L.S.
License expires 12-31-2013
A' -7;f1J. tt;, t ()/"Z-
Dated
Legal Description
REVISED AREA B
Page 3 of3
Legend
Academic Growth Boundary
Revised Special Condition
Area B. Development precluded
- -until December 31,2020, except
recreation and academic fields
and associated support uses.
Housing allowed as shown.
Revised Area B
Golf Course
Bkf
ENGINEEJlSJ SUIIVEYOR$l J>LAHN~RS
EXHIDIT "A·1"
Legal Descrl.ption
AREA B HOUSING PARCEL 1
(For Development Agreement)
January 25,2012
BKF No. 20126007
Page 1 of 2
Real propelty in the County of Santa Clara, State of California, described as follows:
Being a portion of the lands of The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, a
body having corporate powers under the laws of the State of California, more particularly
described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the southeasterly line of Sand Hill Road, as said Road is described in that
certain Easement for street and roadway purposes, from The Board of Trustees of the Leland
Stanford Junior University to the City of Palo Alto, recorded June 7, 2002, under Document No.
16304199, Official Records of Santa Clara County, said point being also the northwesterly
terminus of that certain Academic Growth Boundary line, described as Area "B" Housing Site
Boundary in the Second Amendment to Development Agreement between City of Palo Alto and
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, recorded December 23, 2003,
under Document No. 17544858. Official Records of said County;
Thence leaving said southeasterly line of Sand Hill Road and along said Academic Growth
Boundary line, the following six (6) courseS:
1) South 09°03'59" East, 12.50 feet;
2) South 04°05'08" East, 28.07 feet;
3) South 00°53'30" West, 32.13 feet;
4) South 05°39'44" East, 54.84 feet;
5) North 86°01 ' 41" East, 98.98 feet;
6) North 89°30'34" East. 80.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this
description;
Thence leaving said point and continuing along said Academic Growth Boundary line, the
following two (2) courses:
I) South 02°36'42" West, 262.32 feet;
2) South 79°57'36" East, 449.80 feet;
Thence leaving said Academic Growth Boundary line, the following three (3) courses:
I) North 15°57'00" East, 372.72 feet;
2) North 89°26'31" West, 532.36 feet;
3) South 02°36'42" West, 23.12 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this
description.
As shown on map entitled "Area B Housing" attached hereto and made a part hereof.
Legal Description
AREA B HOUSING PARCEL I
Page 2 of2
This description was prepared by me or under my direct supervision.
BKF Engineers
-frf-
John Koroyan, P.L.. . No. 8883
License expires 12-31-2013
~#J, ?5; ~ rz-
Dated
~~Bk" J ..• ' . -. EHGINEtRSJ SURVEYORS I PLANNERS
EXHIBIT "A-2"
Legal Description
AREA B HOUSING PARCEL 2
(For Development Agreement)
January 25, 2012
BKF No. 20126007
Page 1 of 2
Real property in the County of Santa Clara, State of California, described as follows:
Being a portion of the lands of The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, a
body having corporate powers under the laws of the State of California, more particularly
described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the southeasterly line of Sand Hill Road, as said Road is described in that
certain Easement for street and roadway purposes, from The Board of Trustees of the Leland
Stanford Junior University to the City of Palo Alto, recorded June 7,2002, under Document No.
16304199, Official Records of Santa Clara County, said point being also the northwesterly
terminus of that certain Academic Growth Boundary line, described as Area "B" Housing Site
Boundary in the Second Amendment to Development Agreement between City of Palo Alto and
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, recorded December 23, 2003,
under Document No. 17544858, Official Records of said County;
Thence leaving said southeasterly line of Sand Hill Road and along said Academic Growth
Boundary line, the following ten (10) courses:
1) South 09°03'59" East, 12.50 feet;
2) South 04°05'08" East, 28.07 feet;
3) South 00°53'30" West, 32.13 feet;
4) South 05°39'44" East, 54.84 feet;
5) North 86°01' 41" East, 98.98 feet;
6) North 89°30'34" East, 80.00 feet;
7) South 02°36'42" West, 262.32 feet;
8) South 79°57'36" East, 760.00 feet;
9) South 40°47'55" East, 401.92 feet;
10) South 31°56']7" East, 277.02 feet to a point in the general center of Fremont Road, said
point being also the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this descri,ption;
Thence leaving said point and continuing along said Academic Growth Boundary line, the
following four (4) courses:
I) South 31 °56' J 7" East, 55.13 feet;
2) South 77°45' 58" East, 220.52 feet;
3) South 33°07'55" East, 694.32 feet;
4) South 09°] 9' 46" West, 122.63 feet;
Thence leaving said Academic Growth Boundary line, the following six (6) courses:
1) South 04°48' 14" West, 29.85 feet;
2) South 17°56'09" West, 176.98 feet;
3) South 11 °23'48" West, 169.60 feet;
4) South 06°07'09" West, 149.98 feet;
5) South 06°10' 13" West, 93.04 feet;
Legal Description
AREA B HOUSING PARCEL 2
Page 2 of2
6) South 06°56' 54" West, 117 feet more or less to the general northerly line of Junipero SelTa
Boulevard;
Thence along said general nOitherly line of Junipero Serra Boulevard, easterly, 178 feet more or
less to the general westerly line of Campus Drive West;
Thence along said general westerly line of Campus Drive West, northerly, 1769 feet more or less
to the intersection with the n0l1hwesterly prolongation of the center line of Santa Teresa Street;
Thence leaving said general westerly line of Campus Drive West, North 77°03' 50" West, 767
feet more or less to the general center of Fremont Road;
Thence along said general center of Fremont Road, Soutllwesterly, 413 feet more or less to the
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description.
As shown on map entitled "Area B Housing" attached hereto and made a prut hereof.
This description was prepared by me or under my direct supervision.
BKF Engineers
-v~~~
John Koroyan, P.L.S. No. 8883
License expires 12-31-2013
Jd.~. 2~ 1..0/2-
Dated
~BkF
WGINE£1lSI SURVEYORS / PLANNERS
EXHffiIT "A-3"
Legal Description
AREA B HOUSING PARCEL 3
(For Development Agreement)
January 25, 2012
BKF No. 20126007
Page I of 2
Real property in the County of Santa Clara, State of California. described as follows:
Being a portion of the lands of The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, a
body having corporate powers under the laws of the State of California, more particularly
described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the southeasterly line of Sand Hill Road, as said Road is described in that
celtain Easement for street and roadway purposes, from The Board of Trustees of the Leland
Stanford Junior University to the City of Palo Alto, recorded June 7, 2002, under Document No.
16304199, Official Records of Santa Clara County, said point being also the northwesterly
terminus of that certain Academic Growth Boundary line, described as Area "B" Housing Site
Boundary in the Second Amendment to Development Agreement between City of Palo Alto and
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, recorded December 23, 2003,
under Document No. 17544858, Official Records of said County;
Thence leaving said southeasterly line of Sand Hill Road and along said Academic Growth
Boundary line, the following ten (10) courses:
I) South 09°03' 59" East, 12.50 feet;
2) South 04°05'08" East, 28.07 feet;
3) South 00°53' 30" West, 32.l3 feet;
4) South 05°39'44" East, 54.84 feet;
5) North 86°01'41" East, 98.98 feet;
6) North 89°30'34" East, 80.00 feet;
7) South 02°36'42" West, 262.32 feet;
8) South 79°57'36" East, 760.00 feet;
9) South 40°47'55" East, 401.92 feet;
10) South 3] °56'17" East, 332.15 feet;
Thence leaving said Academic Growth Boundary line and along the general easterly line of
Fremont Road, South 15°45'59" West, 212.04 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of
this descIiption;
Thence leaving said point and continuing along said general easterly line of Fremont Road, the
following seven (7) courses:
I) . South 40°45'55" West, J 81.65 feet;
2) South Irl7'45" West, 199.01 feet;
3) South 14°57'16" West, 179.39 feet;
4) South 14°12'32" West, 237.09 feet;
5) South 14°36'45" West, 214.05 feet;
6) South 14°32'43" West, 119.45 feet;
Legal Description
AREA B HOUSING PARCEL 3
Page 2 of2
7) South 14°35'20" West, 58 feet more or less to the general northerly line of Junipero Serra
Boulevard;
Thence along said general northerly line of Junipero Serra Boulevard, easterly, 711 feet more or
less;
Thence leaving said general nOitherly line of Junipero Serra Boulevard, the following eleven (11)
courses:
1) North 04°01 '52" West, 160.67 feet;
2) North 01 °50'47" East, 201.73 feet;
3) North 24°32'54" West, 119.l4 feet;
4) NOith 04°54'33" West, 122.70 feet;
5) North 13°13'20" East, 89.63 feet;
6) North 06°28'36" West, 150.71 feet;
7) North 16°20'47" West, ]03.04 feet;
8) North 33°13'44" West, 77.56 feet;
9) North 17°53' 17" West, 66.31 feet;
10) North 44°34'03" West, l53.38 feet;
11) North 19°57'59" West, 94.41 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this
description.
As shown on map entitled "Area B Housing" attached hereto and made a part hereof.
This description was prepared by me or under my direct supervision.
BKF Engineers
-!~f:zo~
License expires 12-31-2013
.Jt9IJ, '2~ "'2P/Z-
Dated
Legend
--
· Growth Boundary Academic
Golf Course
500
I
120308 jb 0130941
EXHIBIT B
TO THIRD AMENDMENT TO 1997
SAND HILL ROAD DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
Revision to Sand Hill Road Development Agreement Special Condition Area B
Amended Exhibit H-3
Legend
Academic Growth Boundary
Revised Special Condition
Area B. Development precluded
- -until December 31, 2020, except
recreation and academic fields
and associated support uses.
Housing allowed as shown.
Golf Course
Revised Area B Boundary and
Property to be Removed from Arear B
120308 jb 0130941
EXHIBIT C
TO THIRD AMENDMENT TO 1997
SAND HILL ROAD DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
120308 jb 0130941
This document is recorded for the benefit of
the City of Palo Alto and is entitled
to be recorded free of charge in accordance
with Section 6103 of the Government Code.
After Recordation, mail to:
Office of the City Attorney
City of Palo Alto
250 Hamilton Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94301
SIXTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE
This Sixth Amendment to Lease (the “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of
____________, 2012 by and between the BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD
JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, a body having corporate powers under the laws of the State of California
(“Lessor”), and the CITY OF PALO ALTO, a California municipal corporation (“Lessee”) in the
following factual context:
A. Lessor and Lessee are the parties to that certain lease dated as of June 10. 1915, as
amended by five previous amendments, dated June 29, 1971, February 26, 1973, March 31, 1981, July
31, 1981 and January 18, 2000 respectively (as amended, the “Lease”), pursuant to which Lessee leases
from Lessor that certain real property more particularly described in the Lease (the “Premises”).
Capitalized terms used in this Amendment without definition shall have the meanings set forth in the
Lease.
B. Lessor and Lessee now desire to, among other things, further amend the Lease to correct
the legal description of the Premises, extend the term of the Lease, and modify the rent provisions with
respect to a portion of the Premises.
NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree to amend the Lease as follows:
1. Modification of Legal Description of Premises. The parties acknowledge that the legal
description of the Premises as set forth in the Lease is inaccurate in certain respects. Specifically, the
Lease, as amended on January 18, 2000, depicts those portions of the Premises that constitute the "Park"
and those portions of the Premises that constitute the "Depot." However, there is a conflict in the exhibits
to the Lease in that a small strip of land is depicted as part of the "Park" on Exhibit H-2 to the Lease (as
that exhibit was amended on January 18, 2000), but this small strip of land is not included as part of the
"Park" in the legal description of the Premises (as that description was amended on January 18, 2000).
The parties desire to correct this discrepancy in accordance with their prior intention to include this small
strip of land as part of the "Park." To that end, the correct description of the Premises, which hereby
amends all prior legal descriptions, plats and other maps, consists of the following: (a) the Premises, as
more particularly described on the attached Exhibit 1; (b) that portion of the Premises more particularly
120308 jb 0130941
described on the attached Exhibit 2 (the “Park Parcel”); and (c) that portion of the Premises more
particularly described on the attached Exhibit 3 (the "Depot Parcel").
2. Extension of Lease Term. The term of the Lease as to the Park Parcel only is hereby
extended to June 30, 2042. Such extension shall not apply to the Depot Parcel. The term of the Lease as
to the Depot Parcel only shall expire on June 30. 2033, unless Lessee terminates the Lease as to the Depot
Parcel as provided in Section 2 of the Fifth Amendment to Lease dated as of January 18, 2000.
3. Depot Rent. The agreements stated in this paragraph shall apply notwithstanding the
terms and conditions of Section II of the Fourth Amendment to Lease dated as of July 31, 1981 (the
“Fourth Amendment”). Lessor and Lessee hereby agree that the rent for the Depot Parcel to be paid on
September 28, 2012 shall be in the amount of $160,000 (the “2012 Rent”). Lessor and Lessee further
agree that, in the event Lessee elects not to exercise its option to terminate the Lease as to the Depot
Parcel as of February 26, 2013, the rent for the Depot Parcel to be paid on September 28, 2013 shall be
based on the 2012 Rent, as adjusted based on the increase, if any, between the Consumer Price Index
published by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (San Francisco, Oakland, San Jose
Area, All Urban Consumers, All Items) (“CPI”) in effect as of September 2012 and the CPI in effect as of
September 2013 (the “2013 Rent”). Lessor and Lessee further agree that, in the event Lessee elects not to
exercise its option to terminate the Lease as to the Depot Parcel as of February 26, 2013, the rent
adjustment next due pursuant to the Fourth Amendment for the lease year commencing on July 1, 2014
and ending June 30, 2015 shall be made in accordance with the Fourth Amendment, and the 2012 Rent
and 2013 Rent shall not be the basis for such adjustment. Lessor and Lessee further agree that, in the
event Lessee elects to exercise its option to terminate the Lease as of February 26, 2013, the 2013 Rent
shall be pro-rated through February 26, 2013, but Lessee will not be obligated to pay any portion of the
pro-rated 2013 Rent to Lessor, provided that the sublessee of the Depot Parcel pays the full amount of the
2013 Rent directly to Lessor.
4. Grant of Easement. Lessor and Lessee are the parties to that certain Grant of Reservoir
Easements dated as of January 20, 2009 and recorded January 29, 2009 as Document No. 20114059 in the
Official Records of Santa Clara County, California (the “Reservoir Easement”), pursuant to which
Lessor granted to Lessee certain easements in connection with Lessee’s development of a reservoir
underneath a portion of the Park Parcel. In addition to the easements granted pursuant to the Reservoir
Easement, Lessee has identified the need for an additional access easement across the Depot Parcel (the
“Access Easement”) that was not included in the Reservoir Easement. Lessee has indicated that it will
require this Access Easement once the Lease expires as to the Depot Parcel, or if the Lease is terminated
as to the Depot Parcel before that time. Lessor and Lessee hereby agree that they will execute the Access
Easement, substantially in the form of the attached Exhibit 4, prior to the expiration or termination of the
Lease as to the Depot Parcel, whichever occurs first.
5. Effect of Amendment. As modified by this Amendment, the Lease shall remain in full
force and effect.
6. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which
shall be an original, and all of which together shall constitute one original of the Lease.
120308 jb 0130941
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Lessor and Lessee have executed this Lease as of the date
first above written.
LESSOR:
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND
STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
By:
Its:
LESSEE:
CITY OF PALO ALTO,
a municipal corporation
____________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________
Senior Asst. City Attorney
APPROVED:
__________________________
City Manager
120308 jb 0130939
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California )
County of ____________________ )
On ____________________ before me, ____________________ (insert here name
and title of the officer), personally appeared ____________________, who proved to me on the
basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within
instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their
authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),
or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature: ____________________
Place Notary Seal Above
~B kf
ENGINEERS! SURVEYORS ' PLAlmEJtS
Park Parcell
EXHffiITl
Legal Description
PARK & DEPOT PARCELS
March 5,2012
BKF No. 20126006
Page I of 7
Real property in the City of Palo Alto, County of Santa Clara. State of California, described as
follows:
Being a portion of the lands of The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, a
body having corporate powers under the laws of the State of California, described as follows:
Being also a portion of the lands described as EI Camino Park, in that cellain Resolution passed
and adopted by the City Council of the City of Palo Alto on February 26, 1973 by Resolution No.
4709, recorded February 28. 1973 in Book 257 at Page 281, Official Records of Santa Clara
County and the lands described in that certain Director's Deed (Quitclaim), from State of
California to The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, recorded March 29,
2004 as Document No. 17686571, Official Records of said County, more particularly described
as follows:
BEGINNING at the most westerly comer of the Palo Alto Station Grounds, as said Station
Grounds is described in that certain Easement from Leland Stanford to Southern Pacific Railroad
Company, dated November 23. 1892 and recorded October 28,1915 in Volume 435 of Deeds at
Page 244, Records of Santa Clara County, said comer being also the most northerly comer of the
lands described as Parcel No.2 in that certain Sublease between City of PaJo Alto, a municipal
corporation of the State of California and Southern Pacific Railroad Company, a corporation,
recorded October 30, 1939 in Book 951 at Page 580, Official Records of Santa Clara County;
Thence leaving said comer and along the general southwesterly line of said Parcel' No.2 (951
O.R. 580), the following two (2) courses and distances:
l) South 16°12'28" East, 143.13 feet;
2) South 50°40'30" East, 136.47 feet to the most northerly comer of that certain parcel of land
described in that certain Assignment and Assumption of Sublease, between the City of Palo
Alto and The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, recorded February
28.2000 as Document No. 15163824, Official Records of Santa Clara County;
Thence leaving said comer and along the northwesterly and southwesterly lines of said Sublease
(Doc. 15163824), the following two (2) courses and distances:
1) South 39°19'30" West, 120.00 feet;
2) South 50Q40'30" East, 200.00 feet to the northwesterly line of that certain parcel of land
described in that certain Assignment and Assumption of Sublease. between the City of Palo
Alto and The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, recorded February
28,2000 as Document No. 15163822, Official Records of said County;
Thence along said northwesterly line and the southwesterly lines of said Sublease (Doc.
15163822) the following two (2) courses and distances:
I) SOLlth 39'>19'30~' West. 15.00 feet;
Legal Description
EXHlB1T I -PARK & DEPCT PARCELS
Page 2 of7
2) South 50°40'.10" East. 329.02 fecI 10 a point on the northwesterly line of University Avenue,
said point being also the beginning of a non-tangent curve, concave to the southeaSL having
a Radius of 68.00 feet, from the ccnter of said curve a radial line bears North 81 °58'07"
V,lest;
Thence along said northwesterly line of University Avenue, the following two (2) courses and
distimces:
I) Southwesterly, along said curve, through a central Angle of 05v 54'25", for all arc Length of
7.0 I feet to the heginning of a reverse curve, concave to the l1orthwe~t, having a Radius of
33.40 feet, from the center of said curve a radial line bears South SrS2'3T East;
2) SOllthwesterly, along said curve, through a central Angle of 78°21 '21 ", for an arc Length of
45.68 feet to the northeasterly line orE] Camino Real, being also SlaLe Highway 82;
Thence along said llorthca~terly line of El Camino Real, the following eight (8) courses and
distances:
I) North 50°11 '43" \Vest, 566.13 feet:
2) North 41 "18'51" West, 80.45 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve, concave to the
south\\'cst, having a Radius (If 1333 ,00 feet, from the center of said curve a radial line bears
North 48° 17 '29" East;
3) Northwesterly, along said curve, through a central Angle ofOW'24'00", for an arc Length of
195.43 feet;
4) North 50"06' J I" West, 171.20 feel:
5) North 44°57'30" West, 898.73 feet;
6) North 40° 14' 44" West, 151.00 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve to the right, having a
Radius of 102.00 feet;
7) Northwesterly, along said curve,through a central Angle of 16°19'30",for an arc Length of
29.06 feet to the beginning of a compound curve, concave to the ~outheasl, having a Radius
of 12.00 feet, from the center of said curve a radial I ine bears South 66"04' 46" West;
8) NOl1heasterly, along said curve. through a central Angle of 90°08' 53". for an arc Length of
18.88 feet to a point on the southerly line of Palo Alto A venue, said southerly line is
described in that certain exception parcel for said EI Camino Park per Resolution No. 4709
(2:17 O.R. 281), said point being al~o the beginning of a compound curve, concave to the
southeast, having a Radius of 182.00 feet, from the center of said curve II radial line bears
North 23 °46 '21" West, said point being also hereafter referred to as Point "A";
Thence along said southerly line of Palo Alto Avenue, the following three (3) courses and
distances:
1) Easterly along said curve. through a central Angle of 16°34'46", for an arc Length of 52.66
feet;
2) North 82°48'25" East, 64.12 feet;
3) North 8S n41 '34" East, 154.45 feet to the southwesterly line of the Southern Pacific Railroad
Company right of way:
Legal Description
EXHIBIT I -PARK & DEPOT PARCELS
Page 3 of 7
Thence along said southwesterly line of Southern Pacific Railroad Company right of way, South
50°40'30" East, 514.64 fect to the most westerly comer of the land~ described as Parcel No. J in
that ceJtain Sublease between City of Palo Alto. a municipal corporation of the State of California
and Southern Pacific Rai Iroad Company. a corporation. recorded October 30. 1939 in Book 951
at Page 580. Official Records of said CoullIy;
Thence leaving said comer and along the southwesterly line of said Parcel No.1 (951 O.R. 580).
South 45°54' 41 " East, 602.08 feet to the northwesterly line of the lands described as Parcel I A in
that certain Quitclaim Deed from Southern Pacific Transportation Company. 11 Delaware
corporation 10 The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. recorded August
7, 1981 ill Book G263 at Page 298, Official Records of said County;
Thence along said n0l1hwesterly line of said Parcel I A (G263 O.R. 298). South 39°19' 30" West,
60.00 feel to the point of HEG1NNING,
Containing an area of9.714 acres, more or less.
Being also AssC-';sor' s Parcel Number 120-31-009 per Roll Year 2011-20 J 2.
Park Parcel 2
Real properly in the City of PaJo Alto, COlll1ty of Santa Clara. State of CaJifomia, described as
follows:
Being a portion of the lands of The Board of Tmstees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, a
hody having corporate powers under the law~ of the State of California. de~cribed as follows:
Being also the lands described as Parcel No. I in that certain Sublease between City of Palo Alto.
a municipal corporation of the State of California and Southern Pacific Railroad Company, a
corporation, recorded October 30, 1939 in Book 951 at Page 580, Official Records of Santa Clara
County. more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at the most southerly corner of said Parcel No. I (951 O.R. 580);
Thence leaving said corner and along the southeasterly line of said Lands, North 39° 19'30" East,
50.00 feet to a point on the southwesterly line of Southern Pacific Railroad Company right of
way, said point being also the most easterly comer of said Parcel No. J;
Thence leaving said corner and along said southwesterJy line of Southern Pacific Railroad
Company right of way, North 50°40'30" West, 600.00 feet to the most westerly corner of said
Parcel No. I;
Thence leaving said corner and along the southwesterly line of ~aid Parcel No. I (95 I O.R. 580).
South 45°54' 41" East. 602.08 feet to the point of BEGINNING.
Containing an area of 0.344 acres. more or less.
Being al~o Assessor's Parcel Number 120-31-008 rer Roll Year 20 I 1-2012.
Park Parcel 3
Legal Description
EXHIBIT I -PARK & DEPOT PARCELS
Page 4 of 7
Real property in the City of Palo Alto, County of Santa Clara, State of California, described :t!'
follows:
Being a portion of the lands of The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, a
body huving corporate powers under the laws of the State of California, described as follows:
Being also a portion of the lnnds described a~ EI Camino Park, in that ce11ain Resolution pa<;sed
and adopted by the City Council of the City of Palo Alto on Febmary 26, 1973 by Resolution No.
4709, recorded Febmary 28, 1973 in Book 257 at Page 281, Official Records of Santa Clara
County, more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the point hereinabove referred to as Point "A";
Thence leaving said point and along the northeasterly line of EI Camino Real, being also State
Highwl1}' 82, North 30°09'09" West. 85.53 feel to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this
description;
Thence leaving said point and along said northeasterly line of EJ Cnmino Real. the following two
(2) courses and distances:
I) North 50°29' 4 I" We~t, 123.49 feet;
2) North 48°30'Or West, 69.11 feet to the center line of San Fr:mcisquito Creek;
Thence along said center line of San Francisquito Creek, the following two (2) courses and
distances:
1) South 84"S5'30" East, 164.52 feet;
2) North 63°32'30" East, 77.21 fect to the southwc8terly line of Southern Pacific Railroad
Company right of way;
Thence along said southwesterly line of Southern Pacific Railroad Company right of way, the
following two (2) courses and distances:
I) Soulh 50°33' 41" East, 7.93 feet;
2) South 50°40' 30" East, 196.25 feet to lhe northerly line of Palo Alto A venue, said northerly
line is described in that certain exception parcel for said EI Camino Park per Resolution
No. 4709 (257 OK 281);
Thence along ~aid northerly line of Palo Alto Avenue, the following 1""'0 (2) courses and
distances:
1) South 85°41' 34" v.,lesl. 192.22 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve to the right, having J
Radius of 382.00 feet;
2) Westerly, along said curve. through a central Angle of 07°50'22", for an arc Length of
51.27 feel (0 (he TRlJE POlNT OF BEGINNING of this dc:o;cription.
Containing an area of 0.69 I acres, more or les~.
Being also Assessor's Parcel Number 120-31-001 per Roll Year 2011-2012.
Depot Parcel A
Legal Description
EXHlBlT J -PARK & DEPOT PARCELS
Page 5 of7
Real prOpeJ1y in the City of Palo Alto, COllnty of Santa Clara. State of California, described as
follows:
Being a portion of the lands of The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, a
body having corporate powers under the laws of tile State of CaJifomia. described as follows:
Being also the lunds described as Parcel 1 A in that certain Quitclaim Deed from Southern Pacific
Transportation Company, a Delaware corporation to The Board of Trustees of the Leland
Stanford Junior Unjver~ity, recorded Augu~t 7, 1981 in Book G263 al Page 298, Official Records
of Santa Clara County and the lands described as Parcel No.2 in that certain Sublease between
City of Palo Alto, a municipal corporation of the Stale of California and Sou(hern Pacific
Railroad Company, a corporation, recorded October 30, 1939 in Book 95) at Page 580, Official
Records of said County, more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at a point of intersection between the center line of University Avenue and the
southwesterly line of the Palo Alto StatiOl) Grounds. as said Station Grounds is described in that
certain Easement frorn Leland Stanford to Southem Pacific Railroad Company. dated November
D. 1892 and recorded October 28, 1915 in Volume 435 of Deeds at Page 244, Records of Santa
Clara County;
Thence leaving said point and along: said southwesterly line of said Palo Alto Station Grounds,
North 50"40'30" West. 112.08 feet to a point on the northwesterly line of said University
AVellue, ~aid point being also the beginning of a non-tangent curve, concave to the southeast,
having a Radius of 300.00 feet, from the center of said curve a radial line bears North 28°45'32"
West, said point being also the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description;
Thence leaving said point and along the general nOr1hwesterly line of said University Avenue, the
following two (2) courses and dislances:
3) Northeasterly, along said curve, through a cenlral Angle of 1]°55'52", for an arc Length of
62.47 feci to the beginning of a non-tangent curve, concave to the sOllthwest, having a
Radius of 189.00 feel, from the center of said curve a radial line bears North 13°18'04" East;
4) Southeasterly. along said curve, through a central Angle of 10°55'44", for all arc Length of
36.05 feet to a point. said point being at the illlersection of a line drawn 50.00 feet
northwesterl)', right angle measurement, from said center line of University Avenue;
Thence leaving said point and parallel with said cenler line of University Avenue, North
39°59' 30" East, 2.24 feet to the most easterly comer of said Parcell A (G263 O. R. 298);
Thence leaving said corner and along the nOl1heasterly line of said Parcell A, North 50°40'30"
West, 847.79 feet to the most northerly comer of said Parcel I A (G263 O.R. 298);
Thence leaving said corner ant! along the northwesterly line of said Parcell A. South 39°19'30"
West, 70.00 feet to the most northerly corner of said Parcel No.2 (951 O.R. 580), said corner
being also the most westerly corner of said Palo Alto Station Grounds (435 Deeds 244);
Legal Description
EXHlBlT 1 -PARK & DEPOT PARCELS
Page 6 of7
Thencc leaving said corner and along the gelleral southwesterly linc of said Parcel NO.2 (951
0.1<.580), the following fi\c (5) courses and distances:
I) SOUTh 16°12'28" East, 143.13 feet;
2) South 50"40' 30" East. 420.98 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve to the left, having a
Radius of 13.64 feet;
3) Northeasterly. along sCiid curve, through a central Angle of 90°00'00", for an arc Length of
21.43 feet to the beginning of l:I reverse curve, concave to the southeast, having a Radius of
13.64 feel, from the center of said curve a radial line bears North 50°40'30" West;
4) Southeasterly. along said curve, through a central Angle of 90"00'00", for an arc Length of
21.43 feer;
5) South 50°40' 30" Ea"t, 202.67 feet to a point on said northwesterly line of said University
Avenue, said point beillg also the beginning of a non-tangent curve, concave to the
southeast, having a Radius of 300.00 feet, frol11 the center of said curve a radial line bears
North 39°28'48" West;
Thence northeasterly and along said northwesterly line of said University A venue, along said
curve, through a central Angle of 10°43' 16", for an arc Length of 50.14 feet to the TRUE
POINT OF BEGII\'NING of this description.
Containing an area of 2.488 acres, more or less.
Being also Assessor's Parcel Number 120-31-021 per Roll Year 2011-2012.
Depot Parcel B
Real property in the City of Palo Alto, County of Santa Clara, State of California, described as
follows:
Being a portion of the lands of The Board of Tmsrees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, a
body having corporate power~ under the laws of the State of Cajifol11ia, described as follows:
Being also the lands described as Parcel I B in that certain Quitclaim Deed from Sourhel11 Pacific
Transportation Company. a Delaware corporation to The Board of Trustees of the Leland
Stanford Junior University, recorded August 7, 1981 ill Book G263 at Page 298, Official Records
of Santa Clara County, more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at a point of intersection between the center line of University Avenue and the
:;outhwesterly line of the Palo Alto Station Grounds, as said Station Grounds is desclibed in that
certain Easement from Leland Stanford to Southern Pacific Railroad Company, dated November
23, 1892 and recorded October 28, 1915 in Volume 435 of Deeds at Page 244, Records of Santa
Clara County;
Thence leaving said point and along said southwesterly line of said Palo Alto Station Grounds,
South 50°40' 3~'' East, 113.68 feet to a point on the southeasterly line of said UniverSity Avenue.
said point being also the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description;
Legal Description
EXHIBIT I -PARK & DEPOT PARCELS
Page 7 of7
Thl!nce leaving said point and along the soulhwe~{erly line of said Parcel 1 B (G263 O.R. 298).
said line being also the nOJtheasterly line of Parcel 2 of Lot 38, as shown on that certain map
entitled "Survey of Lots 37 and 38. Stanford University Lands. Palo Alto. California", dated
August 1955, Sheet 2 of 2, prepared by Lawrence G. Blian, Civil Engineer. South 50°40'30"
East, 16J .50 feet to the most southerly corner of said Parcel I B:
Thence leaving said northeasterly line of Parcel 2 of Lot 38, NOlth 39° 19'30" East, 76.00 feet to
the most easterly corner of said Parcel I B;
Thence leaving said comer and along the general northeasterly line of said Parcel I B (G263 o.R.
298), the following three (3) courses and distances:
I) North 50°40'30" West, 94.50 feet;
2) South 39°19'30" West, 26.00 feet;
3) North 50°40'30" West, 95.74 feet to a poim on said southeasterly line of said University
Avenue, said point being also the beginning of a non-tangent curve, concave to the northwest,
having a Radius of 380.00 feet, from the center of &aid curve a radial line bears South
84°55' 18" East;
Thence southwesterly, along said curve, through a central Angle of 08°42'16", for an arc Length
of 57.73 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description.
Containing an area of 0.257 acres, more or less.
Being also Assessor's Parcel Number 120-32-012 per Roll Year 2011-2012.
Park Parcels 1,2 & 3; and Depot Parcels A & B, as shown on plat entitled "EXHmIT 1"
attached hereto and made a part hereof.
This description was prepared by me or under my direct supervision.
BKF Engineers
~~A
John Koroyan, P.L.S.
License expires 12-31-2013
Dated
LEGEND 0 100 200 400
POINT OF BEGINNING I I---I I----~I P.D.B.
T.P.D.B. TRUE: POINT OF BEGINNING I ~
ALMA STREET
(SCALE IN FEET) . ~
~ .----........:
Ui ~
~
UNIVERSITY A 'IE.
UNDERPASS
PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS BOARD
(FORMERL Y SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAlLROAD COMPANY) \i~./
T.P.O.B. FOR-) 'Jf> /' DEPOT PARC£L B
DEPOT PARCEL A P.D.B. I I ?'O':' i.~") 0.257 ACR£S:/;
N50'40'30"W 847.79' ~ I r. /' L27 APN 120-.12-012
NJ. ~\~ I I ' l29 len I~ DEPOT PARCEl. A -~?!!1!!"w if ..L' ..L '1X ~ I~ APN 120-.12-023 2..48B ACRES:f: \R) ".... -l ..,g~~~_",-______ _
APN 120-31-021 '!> L23 . ~O/'-L24 ~L25 , • , (J' \'%.).. S50'40 30 E 420.98 :*~ ~ ~ .-. kI T.P.O.B. FOR
L2 (,\ \~ \~I (;;::i DEPOT PARCEL B
4J RED CROSS MacARTHUR PARK LEASE: ~~ \($). Q:: ~
I.Li PARK PARCEL 1 ~ LEASE DOC. 15163822 ~,$-LLi LiJ PARCEl. 2 OF LOT .18
(fj 9.714 ACRES± DOC. 1516.3824 III APN 120-31-010 ~ I ~ ~:s APN 120-J2-006
APN 120-31-009 -J ?J jY.;Q <: ~
L4 S50·40'30·£ J2g.02'/1~ \Z-·I ~;:j ~ LINE TABLE
CJ .~( L6 ,-' N5011'43 W 566.13' I UNE BEARING LENGTH ~/1!? £L CAMINO R,'~ L1 51612'28"£ 143.1J'
1"-/ 'C (STATE HIGHWAY af)AL .r~/ L2 S50'40'.10"[ 1J6.47'
--,-..... -~,_ Jrf.' ~ LJ 539"9'30"W 120.00' ., $' ~ L4 550'40'30"[ 200.00' "'-~ "/ L5 5J9"19'30"W 15.00' o L6 N4t1B'5'''W 80.45'
It: CURVE: TABL£ LlI 5J9"19'30·W 60.00'
)... L20 N50'4Q'30"W 112.08' ~ CURVE RADIUS DEl. TA LENGTH ~ C1 68.00' 05'54'25" 7.01' L21 NJ9'59'JO"£ 2.24' ~ C2 33.40' 78'27'21" 45.68' L22 5J9.,9'30-W 70.00'
;:j x.~ .1!!!E. SII L2J 550'40'30"£ 202.67' O .".<" '.?'" CJ 1J33.00' 08'24'00" 195.43' c,"<,~ <".... L24 550'40'30"[ 11J.68'
::; JOHN ~ C10 300.00' 11'55'52" 62,47' L25 S50'4(J'JO"E 161.50' Cl1 189.00' 10'55'44" J6.05' ~ KOROYAN L.. C12 13.64' 90'00'00· 21.43' L26 N3919'30"[ 76.00'
J" CT3 ' 13.64' 90'00'00" 21.43' L27 N50'4Q'30"W 94.50'
C14 JOO.OO' 10'43'16" 56.14' L2B 5J919'.10·W 26.00'
C15 J80.00' 08'42"6" 57.73' L29 N50'4Q'30"W 95.74' I
PALO ALTO. SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CAUf'ORNIA
K: \SUR12\126006\DWG\PLA1S\PARK de DEPOT PARCELS PLAT.dwg
Bkf
_II rw".-
1650 TECHNOLOGY ORNE
SUITE 650
SAN JOSE, CA 95110
408-467 -9100
406-467-9199 (FAX)
L.1O NJ919'JO"[ 50.00'
EXHIBIT "1"
PLA T TO ACCOMPANY
LEGAL DESCRJPllON
~
Subject PARK AND DEPQT PARCELS
LANDS OF LELAND ST ANF'ORD JUN I OR UN I V ,
Job No. 20126006
By JG Date 03-05-12 Chkd. JVK
SHEET 1 OF 3
0 100 200 400
::,:
'C( (SCALE IN FEET)
~ :> ~ .q: 'C( ~ I:: :c=: ~ ~ ~ ..q;: ~ J: lLJ -.I
ALMA STREET
P£NINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS BOARD
(FORMERL Y SOUTHERN PACIFIC PARK PARCEL 2
RAILROAD COMPANY) 0,3# ACR£S±
--. .-N50'40'30"W 500.00' APN 120-31-008 ... -=~~zae:==~~~~;;;;~~~::~~~~~~::~~N~50~~~0~~~0~"~W~B~4~7~.7~9~'~~ __ ===-~ "'> 545"54'41 E 602.08
..... DEPOT PARCEL A _N.J9 "28'4IrW ~ P.O.B. FOR 2.488 ACRES± (RJ -'"'\
IJ..j PARK PARCEL 2 APN 120-31-021 ~ v,":>'R=o....,.,;;;;; ............. iJII VI P.O.B. FOR 550"40'30"E 420.9B'
PARK PARC£L 1 """==z!OO:=L2~~';;;";;=-"";';;;iBiiii=r-""'~v'''V W PARK PARCEL 1 RED CROSS MacARTHUR PARK LEASE
(fj 9.714 ACRES:!: :J LEASE DOC. 15163B22
APN 120-31-009 DOC. 15163824 10 APN 120-JI-01O
L7
STANFORD SHOPPING CENTER
CURVE TABLE
CURVE RADIUS DELTA LENGTH
C3 13.3.3.00' OB'2·f.'OO" 195.43'
C10 JOO.OO' 11'55'52" 62.47'
C72 1J.64· 90'00'00· 21.43'
CI3 13.64' 90iJO'OO" 21.4.3'
C14 JOO.OO' 10'43'16" 55.14'
LEGEND
P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING
-..l
L4 550'40'30·£ 329.02'
N50il'4J"W 566.1.3'
£L CAMINO R£
(STAl[' HIGHWAY B2)AL rp---___
UN£ TABLE
UNE BEARING LENGTH
L1 516'12'28"£ 143.1.3'
L2 S50'4Q'30M£ 136.47'
L3 53919'JO"W 120.00'
L4 550'40'30·£ 200.00'
L5 539i9'30·W 15.00'
L6 N41iB'Sl"W 80AS'
L7 N50'06'J1·W 177.20'
L11 S39i9'30·W 60.00'
l2J . 550'40'30"£ 202.67'
LJO N39i9'30"E 50.00'
.~/ til ~/ ~~ ~~ ~/
....
.....
ttl Vi
~ ~
PALO ALTO, 5ANTA CLARA COUNTY. CAUFORNIA EXHIBI T "1"
K: \SUR12\126006\DWG\PLATS\PARK de DEPOT PARCELS PLAT.dwg
1650 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE
SUITE 650
SAN JOSE, CA 95110
408-467 -9100
408-467-9199 (FAX)
PLA T TO ACCOMPANY
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Subject PARK AND DEPOT PARCELS
LANDS orLEIANDSTANFORD JUNIOR UNIV,
Job No. 20126006
By JG Date 03-05-12 Chkd, JVK
SHEET 2 OF 3
---IE CURVE: TABLE ~ \ z
CURVE RADIUS DEL TA LENGTH ~ ~ \08 ......
C6 102.00' 1619'30· 29.06' 0 fl:: I-.-\..)«-1<_
12.00' 90V8'S.3" 18.8B' 0 Q. \ '<t fl:: .... C7
CB
C9
182.00' 16'34'46" 52.66' \::! 3 \3 dO
.382.00' 07'50'22· 52.27' ~ ~ ~ « ~
Z I 'Z<'
§ "" 0l}j e <3 ~/ "'-, <. R/'~ Q.. ~/t I ~ __________________ ~ irr PARK PARCEL J 0.691 ACRES± ALMA STREET
APN 120-.31-001 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT POYtf:RS BOARD
I rFORMERL Y SOUTHERN PAClnc RAILROAD COMPANY) I L17
PARK PARCEl. 1
9.714 ACRES±
APN 120-.31-009
--.. -
~
I-~ Vj
T.P.O.B. FOR N44'S730 W 436.48' VI ~;;'~L8~~~ __ ~~~~~~~~ __________ ~~
PARK PARCeL 3 £L CAMINO
-------f--------____ -r-----________ ~(~:A:T:£~H~IGH~W~A~yR~8~~~A=L~ __________ ___
Qj ~ STANFORD SHOPPING CENTER
LEGEND
'C
;J :t:
~ ~
T,P.O.B. TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING (SCALE IN FEET)
PALO ALTO. SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CAUFORNIA
K:\5UR12\126006\DWG\PLATS\PARK & DEPOT PARCELS PLAT.dwg
1650 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE
SUITE 650
SAN JOSE, CA 951 10
408-467-9100
408-467-9199 (FAX)
400
UNE
La
L9
L10
L12
L1.3
L14
U5
U6
U7
UB
L19
LINE TABLE
BEARING LENGTH
N4-014'44"W 151.00'
NB2 '48'25 "E 64.12'
N85'41'J4"E 154.45'
N.301J9'09·W 85.53'
N50"29'41·W 12J.49'
N48'JO'02·W 69.11'
SB4'5S'.30u£ 164.52'
N6J',32'30"£ 77.21'
550'3,3'41 N£ 7.9J'
550'40'.30·£ 196.25'
S8S'41'J4uW 192.22'
EXHIBIT "1 II
PLAT TO ACCOMPANY
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
subb'ect PARK AND DEPOT PARCELS
LAN S OF LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIV,
Job No. 20126006
By JG Dote 03-05-12 Chkd, JVK
SHEET :3 OF 3
~B F
ENGIIIEUS; SURVEYORS ! PLAHNfftS
Park Parcell
EXHIBIT 2
Legal Description
PARK PARCELS
March 5, 2012
BKF No. 20126006
Page 1 of 5
Real property in the City of Palo Alto, County of Sania Clara, State of California, described as
follows:
Being a portion of the lands of The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. a
body having corporate powers under the laws of the State of California. described as follows:
Being also a portion of the lands described as El Camino Park. in that certain Resolution passed
and adopted by the City Council of the City of Palo Alto on February 26. 1973 by Resolution No.
4709. recorded February 28, 1973 in Book 257 at Page 281. Official Records of Santa Clara
County and the lands described in that certain Director's Deed (Quitclaim), from State of
Califomia to The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. recorded March 29.
2004 as Document No. 17686571, Official Records of said County, more particularly described
as follows:
BEGINNING at the most westerly corner of the Palo Alto Station Grounds, as said Station
Grounds is described in that certain Easement from Leland Stanford to Southern Pacific Railroad
Company. dated November 23,1892 and recorded October 28,1915 in Volume 435 of Deeds at
Page 244, Records of Santa Clara County, said comer being also the most northerly comer of the
lands desclibed as Parcel No.2 in that certain Sublease between City of Palo Alto, a municipal
corporation of the State of California and Southern Pacific Railroad Company, a corporation,
recorded October 30, 1939 in Book 951 at Page 580, Official Records of Santa Clara County;
Thence leaving said comer and along the general southwesterly line of said Parcel No. 2 (951
O.R. 580), the following two (2) courses and distances:
1) South 16°12'28" East, 143.13 feet;
2) South 50°40'30" East, 136.47 feet to the most northerly comer of that certain parcel of land
descLibed in that certain Assignment and Assumption of Sublease. between the City of Palo
Alto and The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, recorded February
28.2000 as Document No. J 5163824, Official Records of Santa Clara County;
Thence leaving said comer and along the northwesterly and southwesterly lines of said Sublease
(Doc. 15163824), the following two (2) courses and distances:
1) South 39°19'30" West, 120.00 feet;
2) South 50°40'30" East, 200.00 feet to the northwesterly line of that certain parcel of land
described in that certain Assignment and Assumption of Sublease, between the City of Palo
Alto and The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, recorded February
28, 2000 as Document No. 15163822, Official Records of said County;
Thence along said northwesterly line and the southwesterly lines of said Sublease (Doc.
15163822) the following two (2) courses and distances:
I) South 39° 19' 30" West. 15.00 feet:
Legal Description
EXHIBIT 2 -PARK PARCELS
Page 2 of 5
2) South 50°40'30" East. 329.02 feet to a point on the nOl1llwesterly linc of University Avenue,
said point heing also the beginning of a non-tangent CllJ'YC, concave to the southeast. having
a Radius of 68.00 feet, from the center of said curve a radial line bears North 8J °58'07"
\Vest;
Thence along said northwesterly line of University Avenue, the following two (2) COurses and
dblance~:
J) Southwesterly, along said ClIrve, through a centra) Angle of 05"54 '25", for an arc Length of
7.01 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve, concave to the northwest, having a Radius of
:'3.40 feet, from the center of said curve a radial line bears South 87°52'32" East;
2) Southwesterly, along said curve, through () central Angle of 78°21 '21 ", for an arc Length of
45 .68 feet to the northeasterly line of EI Camino Real, being also State Highway 82;
Thence along said northeasterly line of PI Camino Real, the following eight (8) courses and
distances:
1) North 50"11 '43" West, 56613 feet;
1) North 41°18'5J" West, 80,45 fcet to the beginning of a non-tangent curvc, concave to the
southwest. having a Radius of 13.13 .00 feet, from the center of said curve a radial line bears
North 48° 17'29" East:
3) Northwesterly, along said curve. through il central Angle of 08°24'00", for an arc Length of
195.43 feet;
4) North 50°06'31" West, 171.20 feet;
5) North 44°57'30" West, 898.73 feet;
6) North 40°14'44" Wcst, 151.00 feet to Ihe beginning of a tangent curve 10 the right , having a
Radius of 102.00 feet;
7) Northwt:sterly, along said curve, through a central Angle of 16° 19' 30", for an arc Length of
29.06 feet to the beginning of a compound curve, concave to the southea~t, having a Radius
of 12.00 feet, from the center of said curve a radial line bears South 66"04'46" West;
8) Northeasterly, along said curve, through a central Angle of 90u08'53", for an arc Length of
18.88 feet to (J point on the southerly line of Palo Alto Avenue, said southerly line is
described in that certain exception parcel for said EI Camino Park per Resolution No, 4709
(257 O.R. 28]), said point being ~lIso the beginning of a compound curve, concave to the
southeast. having a Radius of 182.00 feet, from the center of said curve a radial line bears
North 23"46' 21 " West, said poi nt bei ng also hereafter refen-cd to as Point "A";
Thence along said southerly line of Palo Alto Avenue, the following three (3) courses and
distances:
1) Easterly along said curve, through a centra! Angle of 16°34'46", for an arc Length of 52.66
feet ;
2) North 82°48'25" East, 64.12 feet;
3) North ~5°41 ' 34" East, 154.45 feet to the southwesterly line of the Southern PacifIC Railroad
Company right of way;
Legnl Description
EXHIBIT 2 -PARK PARCELS
Page 3 of 5
Thence along said southwesterly line of Southern Pacific Railroau Company right of way. SOUlh
50"40'30" East, 514.64 feet (0 the most westerly corner of the lands described as Parcel No.1 in
that certain Sublease between City of Palo Alto, a municipal corporation of the State of Califomia
and Southern Pacific Railroad Company, a corporation. recorded October 30, 1939 in Book 951
at Page 580, Orfil:ial Records of said Coullty;
Thence leaving said corner and along the southwesterly line of said Parcel No.1 (95 I O.R 580),
South 45°54'41" East, 602.08 feet to the northwesterly line of the lands de~crjbed as Parcel IA in
that certain Quitclaim Deed from Southern Pacific Transportation Company, a Delaware
corporation to The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, recorded August
7, 1981 in Book G263 at Page 298, Official Records of said County;
Thence along said nOJ1hwestcrly line of said Parcel 1 A (G263 O.R. 298), South 39° 19' 30" West,
60.00 feet to the pOInt of BEGINNING.
Containing an area of 9.714 acres, more or le~s.
Beillg also Assessor's Parcel Number 120-31-009 per Roll Year 2011-2012.
Park Parcel 2
Real property in the City of Pillo Alto, County of Santa Clara, State of California, described as
follows:
Being a portion of the lands of The Board of Trustee$ of the Leland Stanford Junior University, a
body having corporate powers under the laws of the State of California, described as follows:
Being also the lands described as Parcel No.1 in that certain Sublease between City of Palo Alto,
a municipal corporation of the State of California and Southern Pacific Railroad Company, a
corporation, recorded October 30, 1939 in Book 951 at Page 580, Official Records of Santa Clara
County, more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at the most southerly comer of said Parcel No.1 (951 O.R. 580);
Thence leaving said comer and along the southeasterly line of said Lands, North 39°19'30" East,
50.00 feet to a point on the~outhwesterly line of Southern Pacific Railroad Company right of
way, said point being also the most easterly corner of said Parcel No. I;
Thence leaving said comer and along said southwesterly line of Southern Pacific Railroad
Company right of way, North 50°40'30" West, 600,00 fet:! to the most westerly comer of said
Parcel No.1;
Thence leaving said corner and along the southwesterly line of said Parcel No.1 (951 O.R. 580),
South 45°54'41" East, 602.08 feet to the point of BEGINNING.
Containing an area of 0.344 acres, more or less.
Being also Assessor's Parcel Number 120-31-008 per Roll Year 2011-2012.
Park Parcel :I
Legal Description
EXHlBIT 2 -PARK PARCELS
Puge <.\ of 5
Real property in the City of Palo Alto, County of Santa Clara, State of California, described as
follows:
Being a portion of the lands of The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, a
body having corporate power~ under (he laws of the State of California, described as follows:
Being all'o a portion of the lands described as El Camino Park, in thai cel1ain Resolution passed
and adopted by the City Council o[ the City of Palo A Ito on FeblUary 26, 1973 by Resolution No.
4709, recorded February 28. 1973 in Book 257 at Page 281, Official Records of Santa Clara
County. more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the point hereinabove referred to as Point "A";
Tnence leaving said point and along the northeasterly line of EI Camino Real, being also State
Highway 82, North 30"09'09" Wesl , 85.53 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this
description;
Thence leaving said point and along said northeasterly line of EI Camino Real, the following I wo
(2) courses and distances:
1) North 50c 29' 41" VI.'esl, 123.49 feet;
2) North 48"30'02" West, 69.11 fect to the center line of San Francisquito Creek;
Thence along said center line of San Francisquito Creek, the following two (2) courses and
distances:
1) South 84c 55'30" East, 164.52 feet;
2) North 63"32'30" East, 77.21 feet to the southwe~terly line of Southem Pacific Railroad
Company right of way;
Thence along said southwesterly line of Southem Pacific Railroad Company right of way, the
following two (2) courses and distances:
I) SOllth 50°33'41" East, 7.93 feet;
2) South 50"40' 30" East, 196.25 feet to the northerly line of Palo Alto Avenue, said northerly
line is described in that cel1ain exception parcel for said EI Camino Park per Resolution
No. 4709 (257 O.R. 281);
Thence along said northerly line of Palo Alto A venue, the following two (2) courses and
distances:
I) South 85n 41 '34" West, 192.22 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve 10 the right, having a
Radius of 382.00 feet;
2) Weslerly, along said curve, through a central Angle of 07°50'22", for an arc Length of
52.27 fect to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING 01 this description.
Containing an area of 0.691 acres, more or less.
Being also Assessor's Parcel Number 120-31-001 per Roll Year 2011-2012.
Legal Descliption
EXHIBIT 2 -PARK PARCELS
Page 5 of 5
Park Parcels 1, 2 and 3, as shown on plat entitled "EXHIBIT 2" attached hereto and made a
part hereof.
This description was prepared by me or under my direct supervision.
BKF Engineers
J~)
John Karoyan, P.L.S.
License expires 12-31-2013
Dated
LEGEND
T.P.O.B. 'TRUE POINT OF" BEGINNING
:>
----------,~r__-------____,
l: l&J ~ l&J
N50'4O'JO"W 600.00'
C"I 545'54'-4"-£ 602.08'
I-P.O.B. FOR 4J PARK PARCEL 2
~ (jj
ALMA STREET
PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS BOARD
PARK PARCEL 2 (F"ORMERL Y SOUTHERN PACIFlC
0.344 ACRES:I: RAILROAD COMPANY)
APN 120-31-008
L2
DEPOT PARCEL
APN 120-31-021
ttl (j)
PARK PARCEL 1
9.714 ACRES±
APN 120-31-009
RED CROSS
LEASE
DOC. 15163824
MacARTHUR PARK LEASE
DOC. 15163822
APN 120-31-010
898.7']' L7 L6
~J-____
L4
N50'l1 43·W 566.13'
EL CAMINO R£
(STAT£ HIGHWAY 82) AL
UNE TABLE CURVE TABLE
UNE BfA RING
L1 516'2'28"£
L2 550'40'30"£
LJ S39i9'30"W
L4-550'40'30·£
L5 S39i9'30"W
L6 N41'lB'S1·W
L7 N50"05'Jl"W
Ll1 SJ9'19'lO"W
L20 NJ919'30"E
PALO ALTO, SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CAUFORNIA
K:\SUR12\126006\DWG\PLATS\BALLPARK PLAT.dwg
_f"'iL'_"~
, 650 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE
SUITE 650
SAN JOSE, CA 95110
408-467-9100
408-467-9199 (FAX)
LENGTH
lof.J.13'
136.47'
120.00'
200.00'
15.00'
BO,4S'
171.20'
60.00'
50.00'
CURVE RADIUS DELTA LENGTH
C1 58.00' 05'54'25" 7.01'
C2 ll.40· 78'21'21" 45.68'
CJ 1333.00' 08'24'00· 195.43'
o 100 200 400 I ]a I !
(SCALE IN FEET)
EXHIBI T "2"
PLA T TO ACCOMPANY
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Sub I eet PARK PARCELS 1, 2 AND 3
LANDs OF LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR~·-U-N-IV-,
Job No. 20126006
By JG Date 03=05-12 Chkd. JYK
SHEET 1 OF 2
LEGEND
P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING
PARK PARCEL J
0,691 ACRES± ~
APN 120-31-001 \."
ALMA STREET
PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT POYo£RS BOARD
(FORMERL Y SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY)
550'40'30"£ 514.64' -..-N50'40'30"W 600.00'
PARK PARCEL 1
9.714 ACR£5±
APN 120-31-009
I-~ ~
.---------------~~~~~7Y----~--~J~~ T.P.O.B. FOR ~ N44 '57'30 W 898.73' (fj
----(----___ PARK PARCEL 3 £L CAMINO R
jr----------------____________ ~(~~~A~n~HJ~G:HW~A~Y~B~f'~)A~L~ ______ __
STANFORD SHOPPING CENTER
LINE TABLE CURVE TABLE
LINE BEARING LENGTH CURVE RADIUS DELTA LENGTH
LB N4-0'14'4-4"W 151.00' CS 102,00' 16'19'30· 29.06'
L9 NB2'48'25"£ 64.12' 07 12,00' 90'08'53" 7B.SS'
ltD NB5'41'J4"£ 154.45' CB 182,00' 16'34'4-6" 52.66'
L12 N30"09'09"W B5.53' CS! 382,00' 07'50'22" 52.27'
L13 N50'29'41·W 123.49'
L 14 N4B'JO'02"W 69.11'
L1S 584'55'30"£ 164.52'
U6 N6Y32'JO·£ 77.21' 0 100 200 400
L17 S50'33'41"£ 7.93' ~ I I
LtB 550'40'30"'£ 196.25' ilbR_.-.
L19 S85'41'J4"W 192.22'
I
PALO ALTO, SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
K: \SUR12\125006\DWG\PLA TS\BALLPARK PLAT.dwg
'650 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE
SUITE 650
SAN JOSE, CA 95110
408-467-9100
408-467-9199 (FAX)
(SCALE IN FEET)
EXHIBIT "2"
PLA T TO ACCOMPANY
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Subject PAR~ PARCELS 1.2 AND 3
LANDS OF LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIV,
Job No. 20126006
By JG Date 03--05-12 Chkd. JVK
SHEET 2 OF 2
~Bkf
ENGINEERS' SURVEYORS' PLAIIN£R5
Depot Parcel A
EXHIBIT 3
Legal Description
DEPOT PARCELS
March 5,2012
BKF No. 20126006
Page I of 3
Real property in the City of Palo Alto, County of Santa Clara, State of California, described as
follows:
Being a portion of the lands of The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, a
body having corporate powers under the laws of the State of California, described as follows:
Being also the lands described as Parcell A in that certain Quitclaim Deed from Southern Pacific
Transportation Company, a Delaware corporation to The Board of Trustees of the Leland
Stanford Junior University, recorded August 7,198] in Book G263 at Page 298, Official Records
of Santa Clara County and the lands described as Parcel No.2 in that certain Sublease between
City of Palo Alto, a municipal corporation of the State of California and Southern Pacific
Railroad Company, a corporation, recorded October 30, 1939 in Book 951 at Page 580, Official
Records of said County, more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at a point of intersection between tile center line of University Avenue and the
southwesterly line of the Palo Alto Station Grounds, as said Station Grounds is described in that
certain Easement from Leland Stanford 10 Southern Pacific Railroad Company, dated November
23, 1892 and recorded October 28, 19) 5 in Volume 435 of Deeds at Page 244, Records of Santa
Clara County;
Thence leaving said point and along said southwesterly line of said Palo Alto Station Grounds,
North 50°40'30" West, 1] 2.08 feet to a point on the northwesterly line of said University
A venue, said point being also the beginning of a non-tangent curve, concave to the southeast,
having a Radius of 300.00 feet, from the center of said curve a radial line bears North 28°45'32"
West, said point being also the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of litis description;
Thence leaving said point and along the general northwesterly line of said University Avenue, the
following two (2) courses and distances:
1) Northeasterly, along said curve, through a central Angle of 11 °55' 52", for an arc Length of
62.47 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve, concave to the southwest, having a
Radius of ) 89.00 feet, from the center of said curve a radial line bears North 13°) 8'04" East;
2) Southeasterly, along said curve, through a central Angle of 10°55'44", for an arc Length of
36.05 feet to a point, said point being at the intersection of a line drawn 50.00 feet
northwesterly, right angle measurement, from said center line of University Avenue;
Thence leaving said point and parallel with said center line of University Avenue, North
39°59'30" East, 2.24 feet to the most easterly corner of said Parcell A (G263 O.R. 298);
Thence leaving said corner and along the northeasterly line of said Parcel I A, North 50°40'30"
West, 847.79 feet to the most northerly corner of said Parcell A (G263 O.R. 298);
Legal Description
EXHIRTT .~ -DEPOT PARCELS
Page 2 of 3
Thence leaving said comer and along the northwesterly line of said Parcel I A, South 39° 19' 30"
West, 70.00 feet to the most northerly corner of said Parcel No.2 (95 I O.R. 580), said corner
being also the most westerly comer of said Palo Alto Station Grounds (435 Deeds 244);
Thence leaving said corner and along the general southwesterly line of said Parcel No.2 (951
O.R. 580), the following five (5) courses and distance~:
I) South 16°12'28" East, 143.13 feet;
2) South 50°40'30" East, 420.98 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve to the left, having a
Radius of 13.64 feet;
3) N0I1heasterly, along said curve, through a central Angle of 90"00'00", for an afC Length of
21.4:1 feet 10 the beginning of a reverse curve, concave to the southeast, having a Radius of
13.64 feet, from the center of said curve a radial line bears North 50°40' 30" West;
4} Southeasterly, along said curve, through a central Angle of 90°00'00", for an arc Length of
21.43 feet;
5) South 50°40'30" East, 202.67 feet to a point on said northwesterly line of said University
Avenue, said point being also the beginning of a non-tangent curve, concave to the
southeast, having a Radius of 300.00 feet, from the center of said curve a fildial line hears
North 39°28'48" Wesl;
Thence northeasterly and along ~aid northwesterly line of said University A venue, along said
curve, through a central Angle of 10°43'16", for an arc Length of 56.14 fect to the TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING of this de~cription.
Containing an area of 2.488 acres, more or less,
Being also Assessor's Parcel Number 120-31-021 per Roll Year 2011-2012.
Depot Parcel B
Real property in the City of Palo Alto, County of Santa Clara, State of California, described as
follows:
Being a portion of the lands of The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, a
body having corporate powers under the laws of the State of California, desclibed as follows:
Being also the lands described as Parcel IB in that certain Quitclaim Deed from Southem Pacific
Transportation Company, a Delaware corporation to The Board of Trustees of the Leland
Stanford Junior University, recorded August 7, J 981 in Book G263 at Page 298, Official Record~
of Santa Clara County, more purticu larl y de!-icribed as follows:
Beginning at a poinl of intersection between the center line of University Avenue and the
southwesterly line of the Palo AllO Station Groullds, as said Station Grounds is described in that
certain Easement from Leland Stanford to Southern Pacific Railroad Company, dated November
23, J 892 and recorded October 28, 1915 in Volume 435 of Deei'll' at Page 244, Records of Santa
Clara County;
Legal Description
EXH1BIT 3 -DEPOT PARCELS
Page 3 of 3
Thence leaving said point and along said southwesterly line of said Palo Alto Station Grounds,
South 50°40'30" East, 113.68 feet to a point on the southeasterly line of said University Avenue,
said point being also the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description;
Thence leaving said point and along the southwesterly line of said Parcel ) B (0263 O.R. 298),
said line being also the northeasterly line of Parcel 2 of Lot 38, as shown on that certain map
entitled "Survey of Lots 37 and 38, Stanford University Lands, Palo Alto, Califomia", dated
August 1955, Sheet 2 of 2, prepared by Lawrence O. Brian, Civil Engineer, South 50°40'30"
East, 161 .50 feet to the most southerl y corner of said Parcel J B;
Thence leaving !iaid northeasterly line of Parcel 2 of Lot 38, North 39° 19' 30" East, 76.00 feet to
the most easterly comer of said Parcel I B;
Thence leaving said corner and along the general northeasterly line of said Parcell B (G263 O.R.
298), the following three (3) courses and distances:
I) North 50°40'30" West, 94.50 feet;
2) South 39°) 9' 30" West, 26.00 feet;
3) North 50°40' 30" West. 95.74 feet to a point on said southeasterly line of said University
A venue, said point being also the beginning of a non-tangent curve, concave to the northwest,
having a Radius of 380.00 feet, from the center of said curve a radial line bears South
84°55'18" East;
Thence southwesterly. along said curve, through a central Angle of 08°42'16", for an arc Length
of 57.73 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description.
Containing an area of 0.257 acres, more or less.
Being also Assessor's Parcel Number 120-32-0) 2 per Roll Year 20 11-2012.
Depot Parcels A and B, as shown on plat entitled "EXHIBIT 3" attached hereto and
made a part hereof.
This description was prepared by me or under my direct supervision.
BKF Engineers
John Koroyan, P.L.S.
License expires 12-31-2013
;11 A-Il.CJf 5> J "t 0 /'2 ,
Dated
LEGEND
P.D.B. POINT OF BEGINNING
T.P.D.B. TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING
:>
~~----------------,
I::
l&J ~
l&J
ALMA STREET
PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT POMJ?S BOARD
(FORMERL Y SOUTHERN PACIF1G RAILROAD COMPANY)
... 1\'<'86 ..~~j-< ..
N50'40'30·W 847.79' (R) '" 11-
DEPOT PARCEL A IV. \.. ~
2.488 ACRES± -;;r£.~48 .. w .....
APN 120-31-021 h (R) 1.5 -l1
550'40'30"£ 420.98' C/i;+:-_ ..... __ ~rIItI
"'-----..--R-""" ..... CR-O .. S-S ..... -.....;'..c;> T.P.O.B. FOR r:.'LEAs£ DEPOT PARCEL A PARK PARCEl...
APN 120-31-009 DOC. 15163824 MacARTHUR PARK LEASE DOC. J5163822
APN 120-31-010
cL CAMINO R
(STATE HIGHWAY 82.~AL
NIVCRSITY AVE.
UNDERPASS
DEPOT PARCEL B
0.257 ACRES±
APN 120-32-012
APN
120-32-023
PARca 2 OF LOT .1B
APN 120-32-006
CURVE: TABL£ LINE TABLE
CURVE: RADIUS DELTA LENGTH
Cl 300.00' 11'55'52"
C2 789.00' 10'55'44"
C.1 103.64' 90'00'00·
G4 13.64' 90'00'00·
C5 0300.00' 10'4.1'16"
CB 0380.00' 08'42'16"
o 100 200 400
I " ! (SCALE IN FEET)
PALO AL TO, SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CAUFORNIA
K: \5UR12\126006\DWG\PLA75\D£POT PLA T.dwg
62.47'
36.05'
21.43'
21.43'
56.14'
57.7J'
UNE
L1
L2
L.1
L4-
L5
L6
L7
L8
L9
LtD
Ll1
1650 TECHNOLOGY ORNE
SUITE 650
_'.SIUm-
SAN JOSE, CA 951 10
408-467-9100
408-467-9199 (FAX)
BEARING
550'40'30"E
N.19'59'JO"E
SJ919'30·W
51612'28"£
550'40'30"£
550'40'30"£
550'40'30"£
NJ919'30"£
N50'40'30"W
S3919'30"W
N50'40'30"W
LENGTH
112.08'
2.24'
70.00'
143.13'
202.67'
113.68'
161.50'
76.00'
94.50'
26.00'
95,74'
EXHIBIT "3"
PLA T TO ACCOMPANY
LEGAL D£SCRIPTION
Subject DEPOT PARCELS A AND B
LANDS OF LELAND STANFORD JUNIQR UNIV,
Job No. 20126006
By JG Dote 03-05-12 Chkd. JVK
SHEET 1 OF 1
120308 jb 0130941
EXHIBIT 4
This document is recorded
for the benefit of the City
of Palo Alto and is entitled
to be recorded free of charge
in accordance with Section 6103 of the
Government Code.
After Recordation, mail to:
Office Of The City Attorney
City of Palo Alto
250 Hamilton Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94301
GRANT OF ACCESS EASEMENT
For good and valuable consideration, receipts and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR
UNIVERSITY, a body having corporate powers under the laws of the State of California
(“Grantor”), hereby grants to the CITY OF PALO ALTO, a California chartered city and
municipal corporation (“Grantee”), an easement, as further defined below, in, on, under, along
and across the real property of Grantor, as more particularly described in Exhibit ___ attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the “Parcel”), for the purpose of accessing
facilities related to the operation, inspection, maintenance, repair, and replacement an
underground water storage and distribution system located on the Parcel.
In furtherance of the foregoing, the parties hereby agree as follows:
1. Grant of Easement. Grantor HEREBY GRANTS to Grantee an easement for
ingress to and egress from the Parcel in the area more particularly described in Exhibit ___ and
depicted in Exhibit ___ each of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference (the “Easement Area”).
2. Reservation of Grantor’s Rights. Subject to Grantee’s rights under that certain
lease dated June 10, 1915, as amended by that certain Amendment to Lease dated June 29,
1971, and by that certain Second Amendment to Lease dated February 26, 1973, and by that
certain Third Amendment to Lease dated March 31, 1981, and by that certain Fourth Lease
Amendment dated July 31, 1981, and by that certain Fifth Amendment to Lease dated January
1, 2000 (collectively, the “Lease”), Grantor reserves the right to use the Easement Area for any
purposes which will not interfere with Grantee’s full enjoyment of the rights hereby granted;
provided that Grantor shall not erect or construct any building or other structure, drill or operate
any well, plant any trees or construct any fence that will interfere with Grantee’s access to and
egress from the Easement Area. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Grantee agrees and
acknowledges that upon the expiration or earlier termination of the Lease, Grantor may pave the
Easement Area and use it for vehicular access, parking and pedestrian walkways. After the
120308 jb 0130941
expiration or earlier termination of the Lease, Grantee shall not make any use of the surface of
the Parcel that interferes with Grantor’s use of the Parcel.
3. Incorporation of Prior Grant of Easements. Grantor and Grantee hereby
agree that the provisions of Section 2(b), and Sections 5 through 15 of that certain Grant of
Easements recorded January 29, 2009 as Document No. 20114059 of the Official Records of
Santa Clara County, California are incorporated herein by this reference and shall apply to the
Easement Area and this Grant of Access Easement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor and Grantee have duly executed this Grant of
Reservoir Easements as of this ____ day of ______________, 2012.
GRANTOR:
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY,
a body having corporate powers within the
laws of the State of California
By:
Its:
GRANTEE:
CITY OF PALO ALTO, a chartered city and
municipal corporation
By:
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM
By:
City Attorney
120308 jb 0130939
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California )
County of ____________________ )
On ____________________ before me, ____________________ (insert here name
and title of the officer), personally appeared ____________________, who proved to me on the
basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within
instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their
authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),
or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature: ____________________
Place Notary Seal Above
120308 jb 0130939
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
This is to certify that the interest in real property created by the Grant of Access
Easement dated _____________, 2012, by THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND
STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, as Grantor, to the CITY OF PALO ALTO, a chartered city
and municipal corporation as Grantee, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council by the
undersigned officer or agent on behalf of the City of Palo Alto, pursuant to authority conferred by
Resolution No. 4434, of the City of Palo Alto adopted on March 15, 1971, and the Grantee
consents to recordation thereof by this duly authorized officer.
Dated: _______________, 2012 CITY OF PALO ALTO
By: ________________________________
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
City Attorney
TO:
FROM:
PLANNING & TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION
STAFF REPORT
PLANNING & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
Whitney McNair, Consultant DEPARTMENT: Planning and
Community Environment
AGENDA DATE: March 14,2012
SuBJECT: Amendment to 1997 Sand Hill Road Development Agreement
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning and Transportation Commission recommend City Council
approval of the proposed amendment to the 1997 Sand Hill Road Development Agreement
(Attachment B).
BACKGROLTND
In 1997 the City of Palo Alto and Stanford University entered into the 1997 Sand Hill Road
Development Agreement (Development Agreement) concerning Sand Hill Road Projects,
including Stanford West Apartments; Stanford West Senior Housing; Stanford Shopping Center
Expansion; a collection of various roadway improvements; and the creation and annexatiol1 of a
small parcel of property created by the relocation of Pasteur Drive at Sand Hill Road.
Area B is located in Santa Clara County and is comprised of 139-acres that the Developmehf
Agreement refers to as "Special Condition Area B." The property is within the permitting
jurisdiction of Santa Clara County and is regulated under the County's 2000 Stanford
Community Plan and General Use Permit (GlTP). Although the area is within the County,the
Development Agreement between Stanford and the City of Palo Alto incorporates these parcels.
Theproposed application is to remove a 10.2S-acre area from Area B (Attachment C). The
Development Agreement prohibits development in a portion of Area B (including the proposed
area) until December 31, 2020, except for academic and recreational fields (including the golf
course) and associated support facilities ..
City of Palo Alto Page 1
The City of Palo Alto has an existing lease with Stanford for the use of EI Camino Park. The
current lease expires in June 2033. In June 2011, the City Council directed staff to pursue a long
term lease with Stanford for EI Camino Park beyond the current expiration date. (Attachment E),
The 1997 Sand Hill Road Development Agreement has been amended on two previous
occasions, in 2001 and 2003.
DISCUSSION
The City received an application from Stanford University to execute an amendment to the 1997
Sand Hill Road Development Agreement (Attachment D). Section 65868 of the California
Government Code and section 8(b) of Palo Alto Resolution No. 6597 (Mar. 9, 1987), provide
that a development agreement may be amended by mutual consent of the parties to the
agreement.
The application is to remove a 10.25-acre site from Special Condition Area B, and to extend the
lease of the approximately 10-acre EI Camino Park, from June 30,2033, to June 30,2042
(Attachment C).
Except for a snlall piece of land located in the northwest conler of Area B proposed for removal
from the Development Agreement, the Property is located within the portion of Area B where the
Development Agreement currently allows housing. Except for this small piece of land, the City
of Palo Alto already has approved development on the Property, and the requested amendment to
the Development Agreement would change only the type of developnlent that is allowed under
the Agreement -from housing to academic and support uses. With respect to the small piece of
land that is within the non-housing portion of Area B, the requested amendment to the
Development Agreement would merely allow Stanford to accelerate the development of
academic and support uses in advance of the December 31, 2020 date.
The Property is within the Academic Growth Boundary and the Academic Campus land use
designation, which allows the development of academic facilities and support uses. Removal of
the Property from Area B would not result in any changes to either the Community Plan or GlJP,
which both would continue to apply to the Property in full force. By removing the Property from
Area B, the City is not approving or authorizing any development on the Property; such
development will remain subject to County review and approval.
Stanford University is considering this site for a new energy center to replace the campus'
Cardinal Cogeneration energy facility. The new energy center is an inlportant part of Stanford's
long-range Energy and Climate Plan, which is designed to increase energy efficiency while
reducing the environmental impacts associated with supplying energy to the Stanford campus.
Stanford is still in the planning process and has not yet proposed a specific project for the
County's approval. The energy facility is not part of this application and is not part of the
Commission's review.
The City leases land from Stanford along EI Camino Real that is improved with EI Camino Park
City of Palo Alto Page 2
and other facilities. In June 2011, the City Council, while discussing improvenlents to the ball
field, directed staff to see if Stanford would consider extending the lease on EI Camino Park
(Attachment E). The current lease expires in June 2033. Stanford is proposing that in exchange
for releasing approximately 10-acres from Area B nine years early (currently the restriction is
until 2020), they will extend the approximately 10-acre EI Camino Real Park lease nine years,
from 2033 to 2042.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS:
Extension of the EI Camino Park lease is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and with recent
Council direction to pursue such an extension.
RESOURCE IMPACT:
This amendment will not have a financial impact on the City.
TIMELINE
The City Council is scheduled to review this application at their meeting of April 9, 2012.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
The County of Santa Clara certified an Environmental Impact Report in December 2000 for the
Stanford University Community Plan and General Use Permit (GUP). The GUP EIR is a
program-level EIR that addresses the impacts of developing Stanford's lands within the
Academic Growth Boundary (AGB) established by the County's Conlmunity Plan. The City's
approval of the proposed amendment to the Sand Hill Road Development Agreement would not
result in any new or substantially more severe impacts than were disclosed and evaluatedin the
GUP EIR because the City's approval would not change any of the terms and conditions of the
Community Plan and GUP that govemdevelopment of the 10-acre site, which have been
evaluated in the GUP EIR. At most, the City's approval would merely accelerate the
development of academic support uses on the 10-acre site, but still in a manner consistent with
the Community Plan and the G1JP.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Ordinance
B. Development Agreement and Exhibits*
C. Location Maps (Area Band EI Camino Park)
D. Project Description*
E. City Council Excerpt Minutes of June 13,2011
* Prepared by Applicant; all other attachments prepared by Staff
COURTESY COPIES:
Bill Phillips -Senior Associate Vice President, Stanford University
Catherine Palter -Associate Director, Stanford University
Marc Bruner -Partner, Perkins Coie LLP
City of Palo Alto Page 3
PREPARED BY: Whitney McNair, Consultant
REVIEWED BY: Amy French, Acting Assistant Director
DEPARTMENTIDIVISION HEAD APPROVAL: ~~ ---------------------------------Curtis Williams, Director
City of Palo Alto Page 4
ATTACHMENT A
Not Yet Approved
Ordinance No. ---
Ordinance of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Approving
The Third Amendment to the Development Agreement
Between the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior
University and the City of Palo Alto Dated August 14, 1997
The Council of the City of Palo Alto does ORDAIN as follows:
SECTION 1. Recitals.
A. The City of Palo Alto (City) and Stanford are parties to a certain Development
Agreement dated August 14, 1997 (the "Sand Hill Road Development Agreement" or
"Agreement"), concerning the Sand Hill Road Projects, which include, as described in Paragraph
l(k) of the Agreement, the Stanford West ,Apartment Project; the Stanford West Senior Housing
Project; the Stanford Shopping Center Expansion Project; a collection of various roadway
improvements, including widening and extension of Sand Hill Road, widening and improvement
of Quarry Road, construction of a new Vineyard Lane, extension of Palo Road, extension of
Stockfarm Road, and related roadway improvements; and the creation and annexation of a small
parcel of property created by the relocation of Pasteur Drive at Sand Hill Road.
B. Section 65868 of the California Government Code and section 8(b) of Palo Alto
Resolution No. 6597 (Mar. 9, 1987) provide that a development agreement may be amended by
mutual consent of the parties to the agreement.
C. Pursuant to these provisions, paragraph 11 of the Agreement provides that the City and
Stanford may amend the Agreement from time to time by mutual consent.
D. Paragraph 6(i) of the Agreement provides that until December 31, 2020, Stanford shall
not develop the approximately 139-acre parcel known as Special Condition Area B ("Area B"),
as defined by the 1989 General Use Permit issued by Santa Clara County (the "County") for the
Stanford campus, except for academic and recreational fields (including the golf course) and
associated support facilities; provided that the Agreement allows Stanford to propose and
construct faculty, staff or student housing within a specified portion of Area B regardless of the
December 2020 date. Exhibit H-3 to the Agreement contained a map that depicted Area B.
E. In April 2001, the City and Stanford executed a First Amendment to the Agreement
("First Amendment"). The First Amendment revised Area B to exchange restrictions on portions
of Area B such that (i) development would be precluded until December 31, 2020 on a 13-acre
area that previously had been slated for the near-term development of housing under the original
Agreement in 1997, and (ii) development of housing would be pennitted on another, adjacent 13-
acre area that had been restricted under the original Agreement until December 31, 2020. Exhibit
B (dated Apr. 9, 2001) to the First Amendnlent amended Exhibit H-3 to the Agreement in order
to show the revised boundaries of the housing development areas within Area B.
F. Subsequently, in 2003, the City and Stanford executed a Second Amendment to the'
Agreement C'Second Amendment"). This Second Amendment was intended to implement the
First Amendment, by defining more precisely the boundary between that portion of Area B
1
120307 jb 0130938
Not Yet Approved
where development was restricted until December 31, 2020, and that portion of Area B where
the development of housing was permitted regardless of the December 31, 2020 date. To that
end, the Second Amendment included a legal description and an accompanying plat map.
G. The property that is the subject of this Amendment consists of approximately 10.25
acres of land. This 10.25-acre area will be referred to as the "Property." This Amendment
removes the Property from Area B. Except for a small sliver of this land in the northwest comer
of the Property, the Property is within that portion of Area B that is contemplated for
development of housing under the Agreement (as amended by the First and Second
Amendments ).
H. Area B is owned by Stanford and is located within the land use jurisdiction of the
County.
I. In December 2000, the County approved the Stanford Community Plan (the
"Community Plan") and a new General Use Permit (the "2000 GUP") for the Stanford campus,
which established an Academic Growth Boundary and permitted the development of 2,035,000
net new square feet of academic facilities and academic support uses on the campus within that
boundary on lands within the "Academic Campus" land use designation.
J. In approving the Community Plan and the 2000 GUP, the County in December 2000
certified, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), a Final
Environmental Impact Report (the "2000 GUP EIR") that evaluated at a program-level the
environmental impacts from the maximum level of development on the Stanford campus that
would be allowed under the Conlmunity Plan and the 2000 GUP.
K. The 2000 GUP contains detailed procedures for evaluating individual, site specific
building projects that Stanford proposes to build on the campus to implement the Community
Plan and the 2000 GUP.
L. The entirety of the Property is located within the Academic Growth Boundary on lands
designated for Academic Campus uses, and therefore may be developed for academic and
support uses under the Community Plan, 2000 GUP, and 2000 GUP EIR approved by the
County.
M. Stanford wishes to submit an application to the County to develop the Property as a
new energy center that is anticipated to increase energy efficiency while reducing several of the
environmental impacts associated with supplying energy to the campus, including greenhouse
gas emissions.
N. The precise footprint, design, and operational characteristics of the new energy center
have not yet been determined. At such time when Stanford submits an application to the County
to develop the Property, the County will review the application based on the 2000 GUP EIR and
will conduct any further environmental analysis that may be required under CEQA, m
accordance with the site-specific project review procedures contained in the 2000 GUP.
o. By removing the Property from Area B, the City is not approving or authorizing any
development on the Property; such development will remain subject to County review and
approval.
2
120307 jb 0130938
Not Yet Approved
P. The City leases land fronl Stanford along EI Camino Real that is improved with EI
Camino Park and other facilities; this lease will be referred to as the "EI Camino Park Lease."
Q. The City wishes to extend the term of the EI Camino Park Lease, and Stanford has
agreed to a nine-year extension of the EI Camino Park Lease, conditioned upon approval of this
Amendment.
R. The City's Planning and Transportation Commission and City Council have given
notice of intention to consider this Amendment and have conducted public hearings on the
Amendment.
SECTION 2. Findings.
The City Council finds and determines that:
A. Notice of intention to consider the development agreement has been given
pursuant to Government Code section 65867.
B. The City's Planning and Transportation Commission and City Council have
given notice of intention to consider this Agreement, have conducted public hearings thereon
pursuant to Government Code section 65867 and City's Resolution No. 6597, and the City
Council has found that the provisions of this Agreement are consistent with City's
Comprehensive Plan, as amended.
SECTION 3. The City Council hereby approves the Third Amendment to the
Development Agreement between the City of Palo Alto and the Board of Trustees of the Leland
Stanford Junior University, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and authorizes the
Mayor to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City.
SECTION 4. The City Clerk is directed to cause a copy of the development
agreement to be recorded with the County Recorder not later than ten (10) days after it becomes
effective.
SECTION 5. The County of Santa Clara certified an Environmental Impact
Report in December 2000 for the Stanford University Community Plan and General Use Permit
(GUP). The City's approval of the ,proposed amendment to the Sand Hill Road Development
Agreement would not result in any new or substantially more severe impacts than were disclosed
and evaluated in the GUP EIR because the City's approval would not change any of the terms
and conditions of the Community Plan and GUP that govern development of the la-acre site,
which have been evaluated in the GUP EIR.
3
120307 jb 0130938
SECTION 6.
after its adoption.
INTRODUCED:
PASSED:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTENTIONS:
NOT PARTICIPATING:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Senior Asst. City Attorney
120307 jb 0130938
Not Yet Approved
This ordinance shall be effective upon the thirty-fIrst (31st) day
APPROVED:
Mayor
City Manager
Director of Planning and Community
Environment
4
This docunlent is recorded for the benefit of
the City of Palo Alto and is entitled
to be recorded free of charge in accordance
with Section 6103 of the Government Code.
After Recordation, mail to:
Office of the City Attorney
City of Palo Alto
250 Hamilton Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94301
ATTACHMENT B
THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE SAND HILL ROAD DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
This Third Amendment to the Sand Hill Road Development Agreement is entered into as
of this day of , 2012, by and between the CITY OF PALO ALTO, a chartered
city of the State of California (the "City"), and THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, a body having corporate powers under the laws
of the State of California ("Stanford").
RECITALS
This THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE SAND HILL ROAD DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT ("Amendment") is entered into on the basis of the following facts,
understandings and intentions of the parties:
A. The City and Stanford are parties to a certain Development Agreement dated
August 14, 1997 (the "Sand Hill Road Development Agreement" or "Agreement"), concerning·
the Sand Hill Road Projects, which include, as described in Paragraph 1 (k) of the· Agreement, the
Stanford West Apartment Project; the Stanford West Senior Housing Project; the Stanford
Shopping Center Expansion Project; a collection of various roadway improvements, including
widening and extension of Sand Hill Road, widening and improvement of Quarry Road,
construction of a new Vineyard Lane, extension of Palo Road, extension of Stockfarm Road, and
related roadway inlprovements; and the creation and annexation of a small parcel of property
created by the relocation of Pasteur Drive at Sand Hill Road.
B. Section 65868 of the California Government Code and section 8(b) of Palo
Alto Resolution No. 6597 (Mar. 9, 1987) provide that a development agreement may be
amended by mutual consent of the parties to the agreement.
C. Pursuant to these provisions, paragraph 11 of the Agreement provides that the
City and Stanford may amend the Agreement from time to time by mutual consent.
120308 jb 0130941
D. Paragraph 6(i) of the Agreement provides that until December 31, 2020,
Stanford shall not develop the approximately 139-acre parcel known as Special Condition Area
B ("Area B"), defined by the 1989 General Use Permit issued by Santa Clara County (the
"County") for the Stanford campus, except for academic and recreational fields (including the
golf course) and associated support facilities; provided that the Agreement allows Stanford to
propose and construct faculty, staff or student housing within a specified portion of Area B
regardless of the December 2020 date. Exhibit H-3 to the Agreement contained a map that
depicted Area B.
E. In April 2001, the City and Stanford executed a First Amendment to the
Agreement ("First Amendment"). The First Amendment revised Area B to exchange restrictions
on portions of Area B such that (i) development would be precluded until December 31, 2020 on
a 13-acre area that previously had been slated for the near-term development of housing under
the original Agreement in 1997, and (ii) development of housing would be permitted on another,
adj acent 13 -acre area that had been restricted under the original Agreement until December 31,
2020. Exhibit B (dated Apr. 9, 2001) to the First Amendment amended Exhibit H-3 to the
Agreement in order to show the revised boundaries of the housing development areas within
Area B.
F. Subsequently, in 2003, the City and Stanford executed a Second Amendment
to the Agreement ("Second Amendment"). This Second Amendment was intended to implement
the First Amendment, by defining more precisely the boundary between that portion of Area B
where development was restricted until December 31, 2020, and that portion of Area B where
the development of housing was permitted regardless of the December 31, 2020 date. To that
end, the Second Amendment included a legal description and an accompanying plat map.
G. The property that is the subject of this Amendment consists of approximately
10.25 acres of land. This 10 .25-acre area will be referred to as the "Property. 11 This Amendment
removes the Property from Area B. Except for a small sliver of this land in the northwest comer
of the Property, the Property is within that portion of Area B that is contemplated for
development of housing under the Agreement (as amended by the First and Second
Amendments ).
H. Area B is owned by Stanford and is located within the land use jurisdiction of
the County.
I. In December 2000, the County approved the Stanford Community Plan (the
"Community Plan") and a new General Use Permit (the "2000 GUP") for the Stanford campus,
which established an Academic Growth Boundary and permitted the development of 2,035,000
net new square feet of academic facilities and acadenlic support uses on the campus within that
boundary on lands within the "Academic Campus" land use designation.
J. In approving the Community Plan and the 2000 GUP, the County in
December 2000 certified, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), a
Final Environmental Impact Report (the "2000 GUP EIR") that evaluated at a program-level the
environmental impacts from the maximum level of development on the Stanford campus that
would be allowed under the Community Plan and the 2000 GUP.
120308 jb 0130941
K. The 2000 GUP contains detailed procedures for evaluating individual, site-
specific building projects that Stanford proposes to build on the campus to inlplement the
Community Plan and the 2000 GUP.
L. The entirety of the Property is located within the Academic Growth Boundary
on lands designated for Academic Campus uses, and therefore may be developed for academic
and support uses under the Community Plan, 2000 GUP, and 2000 GUP EIR approved by the
County.
M. Stanford wishes to submit an application to the County to develop the
Property as a new energy center that is anticipated to increase energy efficiency while reducing
several of the environmental impacts associated with supplying energy to the campus, including
greenhouse gas emissions.
N. The precise footprint, design, and operational characteristics of the new
energy center have not yet been determined. At such time when Stanford submits an application
to the County to develop the Property, the County will review the application based on the 2000
GUP EIR and will conduct any further environmental analysis that may be required under
CEQA, in accordance with the site-specific project review procedures contained in the 2000
GUP.
O. By renloving the Property from Area B, the City is not approving or
authorizing any development on the Property; such development will remain subject to County
review and approval.
P. The City leases land from Stanford along El Camino Real that is improved
with El Camino Park and other facilities; this le.ase will be referred to as the "El Camino Park
Lease."
Q. The City wishes to extend the term of the El Camino Park Lease, and Stanford
has agreed to a nine-year extension of the El Camino Park Lease, conditioned upon approval of
this Amendnlent.
R. The City's Planning Commission and City Council have given notice of
intention to consider this Amendment and have conducted public hearings on the Amendment.
S. The City has found that the terms and conditions of this Amendment are fair,
just'and reasonable, and provide benefits to the City.
T. This Amendment is consistent with the public health, safety and welfare needs
of the residents of the City and the surrounding region. The City has determined that the
Amendment represents a reasonable balancing of the competing interests of the affected region.
U. This Amendment will bind future City Councils to the terms and obligations
specified in the Amendment.
V. After review by City staff, its Planning Commission, and the City Council, the
City has found that:
120308 jb 0130941
a. The provisions of this Amendment and its purposes are consistent with
the goals, policies, programs and standards specified in the City's
Comprehensive Plan;
b. This Amendment will help attain important economic, social,
environmental and planning goals of the City and enhances and protects the
public health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City and the
surrounding region;
c. This Amendment will allow Stanford to apply to the County for
development of a new campus energy center on the Property, which, if
approved by the County, is anticipated to reduce the air pollutant and
greenhouse gas emissions and water use associated with supplying the
Stanford campus with energy.
d. This Amendment will also provide for a nine-year extension of the
tenn of the El Camino Park Lease, thereby providing valuable recreational
and open space benefits to the residents of the City and the surrounding
region.
e. This Amendment will otherwise achieve the goals and purposes for
which the Development Agreement Act was enacted.
PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties do hereby agree as follows:
1. The Property is removed from Area B and is no longer subject to the provisions of
Paragraph 6(i) of the Agreement.
2. A revised legal description and an accompanying map depicting the entirety of
Area B, as modified by this Amendment, are provided in Exhibit A to this Amendment. Revised
legal descriptions and an accompanying map for those portions/of Area B that are contemplated
for the development of housing under the Agreement, as modified by this Amendment, are
provided in Exhibits A-I. A-2 & A-3 to this Amendment
3. Exhibit B to this Amendment revises Exhibit H-3 to the Agreement -as
previously amended by Exhibit B (dated Apr. 9, 2001) to the First Amendment -in order to
show the location and boundaries of the Property; the location and the changes to the boundaries
of Area· B; and the location and the changes to the boundaries of those portions of Area B that
are contemplated for the development of housing under the Agreement.
4. The provisions of Paragraph 6(i} will continue to apply to all other parts of Area
B with the exception of the Property.
5. The parties shall execute the sixth amendment to the El Camino Park Lease to
extend the lease tenn for a period of nine years, from June 30, 2033 to June 30, 2042. The sixth
amendment to the El Camino Park Lease is attached to this Anlendment as Exhibit C. The sixth
amendment to the El Camino Park Lease will beconle effective within 45 days after the final
120308 jb 0130941
passage of the ordinance approving this Amendment if that ordinance is not submitted to a
referendum. If that ordinance is submitted to a referendum, the sixth amendment to the El
Camino Park Lease will become effective only if the referendum approves the ordinance.
6. All other provisions of the Agreement continue to apply and are not affected by
this Amendment.
7. The following exhibits are attached to this Amendment and are incorporated
herein:
Exhibit A:
Exhibits A-I, A-2 & A-3:
Exhibit B:
Exhibit C:
Legal Description and Map of Revised Area B
Legal Descriptions and Map of Area B Housing Parcels
Amended Exhibit H -3 to Sand Hill Road Development
Agreement
Sixth Amendment to El Camino Park Lease (including
Exhibits 1,2 & 3)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed by the parties as of the
day and year first above written.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Senior Asst. City Attorney
APPROVED:
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Director of Planning and
Community Environment
120308 jb 0130941
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Mayor
STANFORD
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford
Junior University
By: __________________ __
Its: ____________ _
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California
County of ________ _
On before me, (insert here name
and title of the officer), personally appeared , who proved to me on the
basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within
instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their
authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),
or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature:
Place Notary Seal Above
120308 jb 0130939
EXHIBITS A, A-I, A-2 & A-3
TO THIRD AMENDMENT TO 1997
SAND HILL ROAD DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
120308 jb 0130941
I I
,I
,I
~lkF
EXHIBIt '~'Ai.
Legal :Descl"tptlon
REVISED AREA ,B
(For Developml.lotAgreeJnent)
JatlUllry 2S,'MI2
BKfl No. 2Qt2600'7
Page 1 Qf3
Realprop:erty In the'Coll~lY of Sante: Clara, State of CalifOrtlin, de-~ribed a.s fOlloWS:
B~i.ng a portion ohhe lands of The :B:GatO of'ThUstee$ of'-the Leland Stanford luoiOr ,urii.verslty, a
'be&y ha~lng· @rpo(4ilO powers onder the 18"\~.S .. of ,the St~te of. California, more particularly'
described 8.s' frillpw~
lmGINNJNG ~t' a potl.11 on tbe.s¢l:l.tbellslerly Une. ef '$fl.Qd-lJlIl. Rood, •. as saId.Road 18 deseJfbed fn
tll'ilt: eertain' Basement for street DrId road'way purp.oses.. from The B.bard of"l'rustees of the Leland
,Slanforo Junior Unlvel'~it}'to the City of Palo, 1dl'0, ~.tdej:l June,1: 2002:.. underD.o-cument No.
},6304199" Offlchi! ,Records of Santa Clara County, sai4 ,Pbint being al~ the nonhw~terly
(~j:n:tirw:$ of that c~$jn Ma(iemlc Growth BOUllOlltY Ul)a; d~cJlibed 8S Area "B" H'Quslng Sire
B:~un.aJlr)' ln' the·Second. Amemiment'lO: Development Agreement between City of Palo ~Ito IlIld,
TlJe RallJ'd of Tntstees ,of tbe Leland Samford Illnior University", J'eCOlded peeernber ~3, 2003',
)lnder,I)oournenl N:o. 1 75'4:4U8. Om:ola'l'l~:f;lCQrd,a' of said (Jaunty;
ThenCe-:leaving said RoJnt and along said 'S;Outheas~erly lilJ,e of'Sand Hill R6ac4 South 41"10' (2"
WeSf, 206.35 feet to tbe .tl'i0$1' 'soptherly earner -of ao1;I1' RQ«d .at;: c;lescdbed' ill' 'S~4 Easement for
!ilreet and roadway P~UIJI~ (Ddc. J63()4199.~. ~d oomed~eing alsea·,point In the ceriW Un.e ot
SM FllUlefflgUjlO Ct~eki
Thence leaving Uld oor't!~r. and along said center line of SJln 'Prancisquito, Creek. SO\ltheflsterly,
11.80-f~ more or.le:s-no tb~ genend 1'\ortherl~ line of lunlporo Sel18 B_ou:lenrci:
nnm~tlong"s81d. &.enei1!l norlher.lyline Of IuniperoSerrnl)01lleY:tli'd, easterly. Il6S,l feet more or
les&-t(J ,the~eneml w.esterly line of Campll8 Drl~.e WesJ;
Thence altm:g: ~_ .general weit~ly If!\~-of Camp.u~ Drive West, Mitherl)!. i 76.9 fc.et. mo;i'e-,or les,s
to the~iQ.te~~on' 'With, th~northwesrcrl}' prplong~tI'O'Ir Qf"th.~ center Ijn~ of' Santa 'I'e~ S1reet;
The)}ce I~Vi:ng said gene:ra.l Westerly 'line of. Campus Drl.\I~ Wost~ No\1ll 77Gfi'!/50" West, 167
feel'more or less to (be g*ra1 :C'enter-of P~m9tlt...R,(jad:'
t1'l¢nce ,along ~Bid general center of Ff'emont. Road. soUthwesfer:)}f, 4U feet more or leu' to said
Academ,lc Q'rOwth,Bound'ary line;
I~' N.orth '3 I °S6~1.7" w.es~ 277.02 feel;
2) Nortll40"4?~5:8'1 W~.t. 40~,92f~t\
3) .N6JlJl19Q57'36" West. 3-1'0:20 f~t.
, .
~g~tOescrlpijQU
r$vtSEP AREA a
P*ge2ofS
Tllencelt}Hving ~rottAead<'rnic ;Orowth Houndaryline., ,tJtefoll()Win~'fourteen (,14>cQurs~~l
s·
l) North154S1~o()~"a~l~ 416!~8 'f~~r:
~ $PUJh 14il03·i·00·'East~ 15BA2J ·feeli
3) NbrJlIOIQ26't)sn$!ast, '65'4.15 feet;
4} NQrth?Q.°$1~~7hE~t~ 2~!:16(~h
$') Not1h~a9BJl·:1$Ji'E~!)t,11.Q~ -fee.t;
.8) Nottlt 89·°Q-P4$it Ea:st, :57iOO t~t~
7) S_oulh 8.7P40'43nEMt~ 1] .54 feet;
8) 'SouthSao2S;t:O:SH all~t. ~O.57 feet;
9) ~~th 1:t"q;~8·~t~~lia.sfl 44.S3 fee~;
to}. South. 719l6'I'j'2:I·'Ea~u, 6] ,40 feet;
tl): Snu,tb 17Q$:c.}tt9~' aa~~, 46\42fee~;
t2~S0tlt1n>'19ii14'~7'~~J:';~stt 7j.'.68 feet:
l~lSqutlr 8Vb~2~44·· (I$Mff46 •. ,IOf$~H
li~j NQl~q87~~4;t"1.(:)H13ast,2S~~3f¢et:t(;ltb¢.gei1.emJ we~tetty line.orOak l~Qadi
Then~Je,~vf~t '$~ijdgeil~rill westotly'1J~~ Qf)'Ol\k .lQadj NQq~34~~] 1'(:Ea~1~ 5Z1&ettrlQteor
le~$ tothe··S"QJlthwester,t}'lineof'Paste.urr:biv;~l:\s:;saidlin~J$'de.scdb.ed in Sijfd Basementfol' street
and roadwa.~:Ptl"tllOSQs~'DQc;~;No .. l: 6$041',991;
th~@~ aJ"JJtlJ slJi.d.$P1ltbw¢ste1'lY· HneQfF'as.~tlrnd~e.lb~·f:w:l1oWillgtour{4;" CQu.r:sest
1'): Nt1rlh 71oSa~'49'~ Viest,. s-ng~"S&feet t0~ thebeginnJngof:a 'taQ8¢nfeurve to~ tij'e fi~flt; havina a,
~tl,dip.$·pf';2Q9~Q0'f~¢t; -
~l 'Northwest~rJy al;()ng;snf:dcutV~, tbrougba.~¢ntr"JAl\tletiif2RP26~12~~i .for@.n:arc l.;¢ngth of
99,.26 ft-tt; .
~}North 4S027j.a7;) West,'lA3 feet. :to; ,tbe beginning .of u tange:ntCl!t;\le; to the l&ftt :ha~inga
Ii~i\1S of 40.()O reet~ .,
4) rJQnh~estedl" ,alongisaid~ll,tve, ~hm~~b lt~eJl~lAllg(~9f'869t2~4~t'\fflrJUl :at~ 'Length .. of
'6Q,19 fe~t'tQ$alQ$'Qulbea&terlyline,QfSMd;mUtRQad~,
Thet)c~al()pg, s~id~()AtFteu,$t¢dy Htle.Qf$.~a:NmR,.efl~~tbeftdlowi'Ji.g' thr~(~)Qo1.),rses~·
Ij~pJ;1tb4.8iP19~3'~~~ ~~t~ ~g.ZO,8Y· feet~pttJl~b.egi~niflg:~f a-·f:~gent: cUNe to tbe:leftr'navlnga.
Badius of537.00-feet;:
2) S:outhwestetly atollgs~d c\lrve,th.rougl'18 central AggIe of n7°09'26~(,for ,~ ,~~ ~l1gtll Qf
6f}Qaf~et~
'~)S.op.tl\'41 q"lO' ll'I'W,s~r 49~4i'f~tlp 'h~ 'point ·of.aE~tNNtttlt~
r 'I
! j
I
1 I
(
i
i
! I i I
I l. } j .
:1
1
1
·1
,
I .
1l1i~;d~.ctipDon was, pr~pll1e4·~)' 1lI~ .orqnder l:11y-(b'):e:cJ ~.ptlrviij,Q..r1.
BRF Enghteew -JJ.. .' . '--.
John J{()'tQ¥a~h p .L.s.. ,0 .. 888'3
.Li~nse expi~ 112~31 ... 2013
-fif.;.) .. 6'~, t ()f¥
Dated
Lega.J ~~criptron
RBV'IS:at> AREA B'
Pag~.3 of~
Legen.d
-----Ac::ademlc GrowtI1 Boondary
, Re\l1Sad SJSlftIi J·'donditlon
Art~·", ~~IoP'JlilllltP(fol~cI' ~ -until D.ecel11ber':Ji, 2020i;8XC'epl· ~QIJ:,8nd ·8¢.ld~~.f1eld$ ~ ~J811td ,up.P.9,rt. . .,.. 'kbuil~)JI.~ .... trowll.
EXlnISIT'UA .. l ')
LegaJ;UesCliptiop
~ pBOUSlliGEM$eEL 1
(For 'Devej opmentAgreement)
Ja'nuary 25,2012-
BKFNo.2Ot26007
p~ 1 (,\f2
Real property iu' the .counlY of'S.anta Clara. State'of Cali'fornja,.. des<ir:Jhe;d as fQl(Qwsl,
Be/irs a portion-Of'th~ lands of'nle-Boat'd',.of'TnlSlees or tbe,Le1and-SUlnfQrd, lunio!' "l1n1versityi Q
body' hav,jog cbrporate po.w~ under the, laws of the State of Ca1ifoqU~, more particularly
,de-s(:_rll:Jed a.& fOJ/!)W81
Beginning at a point on 'toe 'southe:as.ferly line' or S Wld' Hl.U Road; as sate! Road is 'deS(j(ib~(l ib that
certain Bilsemenl for s_treet aod roadway purpose&> from The B'o6l'd of Trustees of the leland
Stanfatd, Junior Un'ive£Slty to 'the 'City of Palo Alto, 'record'~-June: 1, 200~ under ,Do:cu ment No.
l'6304l99, Official R.eoo~-bf Santa q~ra, county, said ~Int being aJso tbe northwe:sJ,erty
.t.emUMs ,of tllat celJaitr Academic GrQwtt! BOl:ilic!ary Une. described a_s, aIejl '13" Housing'SIte
BoundBl)'-in the Second Amend'ment (0 Development A~t,nent between City of Palo AltO and
:rt\e-B~rd of'Trustees of the-l.eland Stanford Junior 'tJni-'lersity., teeord.sxl December 23, 2003,
\,IfI'~er Do"Cqm~ot N£). I 1544MB, Official ,Records 'of 8ai~ GP'unty~
Thence teaving laid southeaslerly line of Sand Hill Road and clang said Academic Growth
BOl!lndarY'Jin~ t~ folJ!3WiIlg,-s·t~ (~ eourseal
1.) 's'o-ulli-Q9v03J 59-tj Eas.t. l'2.:SD f~t)
2) South '04PQS' OS" Eas~ za,01'feet;
'3:) South OOP5-~"3l)" West, 3'2.13 feet:
4-) 'South 05"39,"44" 'East, 54.84 reet;
.5); Nortb ,&()~Ol'4 l" &8t, 98'.98 feet;
'6) North '_89"·30'Mj, ,Ea~t, :8'O.0tl feel to the-'tR.UE: p,QINr OF BE"SJNNlNG of this
descdptioll:
Thence I~avjhg said point lind cOI)(fl1.l.!jJJ$ a10ug s'!lid A~den'1ic Growth ~ouiidi1l'iY tfn~, ,he
(QUowing two (2;):e,ourses:
1) -South Q1°36'42" West,", f,62;32' ~l;
~), S,o\ltb 7.(j,°5-?'J(/' East. i{49,60 feet;'
Thenoe le~,vi,ng ~d, Academic, Growth 'Boundary line, Ihe.'followlng' rbree, Q). CGUrses:
tJ North l-5.\>j7'(fO't:2ast, 37:a.nf~l.).
2) N:arth :S9"26"3l'i West;-S32.36,'fe:et;
1) South _02Q36'42" West, 23.12. feet to lbo' 'OltJlt P.0~ Of BEGlNNI:NG of this
description.
As. sbown on map entitled "Af('l):"allou,sirrg" ~t:t8ched-horetp IUld made a parJ be(e.of,
I I
·1 ! r
I I
I I
! f
·Le.~ Description
AREA 13 HO.uSIjI(O 'P.~GBI" 1·
Page 2 6f2
Thi&-{~s'Qriptlof! w~ prepa.-eO hy me. or under'my direct ~1J~J'vtgjo.n.
.jo~Koro)'ll.n, P,L... No, gg:~
-L~Qt"-i~~pire$ 12,.Jl..zo13·
J;1¥J" 'r-~ ~,~ .
Dated,
I' j
i
! ~Ikf
E-xm:BIT "A,.l)'
Legal D~criptiori'
AREA B ,qUSING,MRGEL 2,
(por Developrnenl.Agreement)
January 25,20:1'.1
BKF No. 20126001
Page 1.0("2.
.Befog .n"p.ortion of the lands ofThe:B.tlaro afTros~ .of the Leland StaJ)ford,Junior Universi~,.~
body havlng corporate· pOwets under the laws ,of the State of Califuiiiilb r/)ore particularly
de&Cribe:d 88 follows: .
Beginning at. point on the southeasterly line o(Sand HilI.Road. as said Rpad Is descrlbed in that
certain Bilsement for street ~d roadWay PurpOSesl from The Board: of Trustees ,of tbe. Le\l!1)d
StanfOrd, 1uhior UlliVe~ty to tho Ci~'y pf ;Pa,Io Alto" ~rded June /,,2002, utlder'DOOl,Im~t N,c"
16304:199', Official Records. of Sanla Clar:Il CQI,lniy ... SJlid. PQlnl being also, the, nor1.hw.~terly
terminus of that certain Academic Growth lroundary Iin~ desdribed Ii&' Area "R" Housing Site
Boundary.ln the Second Amendment 'fo; Development AgreeJl'101lt betw.eerr, Ctfy of Palo .Arto 1Ul~
'The BCi!ard, ~f trustees of tl:\e Leland S~fQ.l,'d .T\lni~' Un'iveJ;"Sit:y. ,recol.'ded Dccemb,~ 23. 20~ .•
ul1detiOoerulncwf No. 1154485~. Offi~i8f ~.!\ pf said COlIhtr,'
Thence leaving' said sopthensterly !fne of Sand Hlfl. Road aDd along said Academic 6rowth
l:Ioundary Jln~. the. fQlIowln'g, ten ,(~Q) CQ1lrS"es:
1), So.utb ()9T>O~' 59" EasJ, i2,50 feet:
2) South:94"otP0.8" E4st. 28.0:7 feet;
3) S()u.thoo'bS3·30"W~8t,32.13"fiset;
4) South OSD39~44"'Eaft. S4M leet~
~ li..Qr.tl\ ~oOl' 41" Eastdl.S:98 feet;~
6) ,North 89030;34" east, 80,00 feet;
7) South 02~~~42." W~.t. '262.32 ~eet;
B) 'Soutll 19"Sl7'3!S(' Bist; 700',QO ~t:
9) SQuth 401047'$5" mt.·4Q:t ,9.1.·fCGJ;
IO) ,South 31 °S6'1~" }ifst:.1.11JJ!l. feet to a pofnllg ih.6 'ge~l:Ul ce.ntar of 'Fremont" Road. said
, point·bejn~olso thQ'QVe POINT OFiBEGINNING. af'l~i.s d~SYrl.l>nQlll
l'hence f~v,in's wd 'point ,lIJId ~ilml~'g at~g ,~~ Acaruimic Growth .Bp,UDdIlJ'y line. the
failowlng four Qt)cours(lS~
l:l SOtith 3J 0."i!S'] 7»"&''1'" s.~.U' feet;
1) :SCi)l1ttl71~45'·S8!FEast. 220,.52 ff:;eJ~
3) SOuth 3"3<>(}7' 55" East. 694.3;' feet;
4) South 09°t9 .. 46'~West. 122.63 feet;
1) S~.uth 04~'"14n Wes,t •. 29.85 feet;
2) SOUl); r,05t\'''Q9'' West, 176.98 lUI:
3.} Sou.th. 11~'48" West. 19'1.60 feet:
4) South q6~07·0.9" Wesl, 14~;,98 ,~[t
5) SOu.th Q6"'H1''i3'' West. 9.a .04 f~t:
Legal D~crlptlon
AREA II HOUS1NG PfoRC)jL2
Page 2 of2
6) SQ\!th Q6~56'54!' West', .t 17 feet more or less to the gen~re1 northerl¥ Une of Iunipero, Serra
Boulevard;
Then~ flton& sai,d g~eOll nQ~th,~rl)' Uo:e:'o(1u\iipero Serra Boufeva.rd, ~teily, 178 feet more or
less to the g,e~l westet1y Iin~ of Campus Drive West:
Thence along,sllid,genora1 westerly Un~,of:Campus [))rive West. north~':.ly. 1169 (-eel mOle or less
to tl}e iOtei'Sec'lion, with the north\ve8redy lJrohmgntlon of the center line of'Sanla Tere,sa S.lreeti
Then~e leaving said' general westerly line: of Campus Drive West, North 77°03'-50" West'. V67
feet more or less to the ~ne(lll' center ()f FremontRo~d:
Thence aJon8 sald general .canter of Fremont:R-oad, SouthweSterly, 413 feet more or less to the
TRUE POINTO.F 'BEGINNING of-this descdplton.
~s shpwn onm,ap entitled" Area B Uousing'" attached' nereto ~d ll'fade 8-p811, hereof.
~BkF . ,
EX'lgBIT I/A~"
lA~ 'i>~er1pttr,>n
AREA B HOtJSINQ'PARCEL 3
(For: DevelGpment Agreement)
lnnuary lS" 21)12
BKFNo.20126007
P-a~ I of'2
Belng 'a portion of the lands Of 'the Board ofTrusrees of the Leland St!nford lunlar UniverSity, n
b.~ ,~~.yipg c:orp01'!1to power'S und.er the lnws (Sf 'the .$tll(e of Canfomls, In<;ire p'lirticulatly
descri.b~£H18 fOIl!>ws':
BeginnIng at &.;puint on the· s~easterly' 1il16 of Sand 'Hlil Road. as said Road 1& d.eS!ldlled ~lJl th.al
cerialn-Easement' for &~t ·and oo!lAway purposes, from. 'The J30ard Qf TntSt~ of rne Ulai'ld
Stanford J,uni't}f tlm'Yt:l'6ity tQ theCl Il' of Palo' AltQ. recol'ded June 7. 2002. llnder b(l¢Ujnen.l N~.
163041$.9; Offi!1ial ~e,c.o.rds of Bania Clara C-()uoty,;. nld point being &11IiP \hI> Jlortli~ferly
faaninus of that cerlaic Acad~mic Qrowth B,oundary' Jine. described. 88 Area '-B:'" HO\l~lfl'& Site
;aonndDO' in the Second AmOll<lmelit tp p¢~lQp.ment t\greement between' City. of"P.alo' Alto and
The BOArd of1'ru:&t:ees of Ih'~ LeJ,and S t.3Jl ford JuniOF Un;"eoo.ty. ~rVed,necember 23. 2003.
under D,OCJJroent 'No. 17544B58. 00i'c1-aJ. Records-of Baid CQun.~
Thence ,losving, '~aid .aoutheas:terly-'liue of SruuI HIU .Road and along said Academic Growth
Boo e dary, tine" th'e',(ollpwing teO (1 0) cotirses.~
f) South 09,°03'1:59," East. 12S0 '&el1
2) South 04°0S~O~""Ea'St, 2-8·.IJ1··f~
3) SQ"4tJl··00tt53"'30'''Wen. 32.1 j f~t;
4), SqQlh ()5~~44" Eaat,·S4.-&'4·feet;
.5) N'0rtb'86"01 '41';· Bast, 98,98:feet;
ti) NOrth 89°30"34"'I3.ast. 8.0 .. 0.tYfeet~
1) Sout.h 02°~J'6' 42··W~. 262.32 feet;
&) 'SQJlth 19°51'.$6" East,.7G()'.OOfeet:; ,
9-) South 40°4-7'55" EIl,st. 401.9Meet;
10) :SoulJr 3'1 °56' 1-'7" Ba.st, 3'3.41D 'feet;
Thence Ie'aVlh.8 ,~aid Academic Growth B.OUlld!lfY. line and' aliiin~ the ten'~' ~~t1y Hne 'of
Fremont'RG"', S6uth 'lS,o~~S9" West., 21'204 feet lb the TlliPE W)INT QF B~N.ING of
tl'tfs.deseripfion;.
TIlence. leaving-~d ,p-oi'ot and condnuing along .said genera'll eastetl>, line of Fremont Roid, .the
following 116\>6)\ (7:) courses:
n ,80001,40°45'55" West:; 1181.6H~':
,$) South fi]°1?'4'5" West, 199,01 ffl~,t~
3) 'South 14°57'1(i"'West, 179.j9'fetl;
4) Souffll4:°12'32"'We.&t. M7.09 fet}t;
5) South 14D3!S'4S", West, 2J4.0p feet:
i ,I
I !
I
I
I
1
!
&) Souch 14"32'4Y'West,II9..45'feet;
~gal ,1)O$cription
ARJl;A '8 HOUSIN,G BARcBL 3
P{lge 2. of"2
7) 'South 14"35"ilO" W~t\~8 feet I~Qre or I~s 16 !be general northerly lfne of-iUJiipero' Serra
Bou:levard~
Thence;along said ,g~ner81 nQrlherly line of Junip,o~ Sen'll &ouievB!d. eiI$r1y. 711f~ t:Oj)~e ifr
less; ,
Tnence I¢lving sa,l'd g~nernl nortllorly line Qf Juuipero Serra .Bo.lllevai'd.,theloU9'wtn'g ~level1' (:,( 1)
.courses:,
1) No!'i1l 04~l' 52l ' 'West" (-60.67 Jee,f;
2J North 01 °50'47"~'t,,201.73'feet;
3) North 24:03~o'54" West, I L9.14 l'eet;
4) North '(W!W'gJ" West, tni.1Of~t;
5) North 1~ol~"20" B1Ii{t, 8!t~3 ~eet~
6} North 0'6~28)~6' W~st! tSO.71 feef.;
7} N@rth 16"'20'47" West, 103.04 feet;
',~ N\:'ll'th ~Bo13(44" West. 77'.56 fee~,
~} N'~r:th ,17°51' 1 '7JO, West; ,6(;'.31 ,f¢e~
10) N.orth ~~4"<l3" West;, lS3..3~ teet;
tl}Norrn 19'O57'-5911' West, 94\41 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of flli.s
d!}sc.t'iptiQn.
n.1~ d~rlpfiQn was p('~pared by me Qi' uader 'my direct, supervision.
,BKF Eugfueers
JJ.~.a......
;lohn &oro~an:. Pi::N0'. '8'8'83 ,~i~8~exp'ltis 12,,3J -~13
:-/AN', 2~~'I~ ..
'Dnled -r. '
L~g,end
~d&rlilo GI'OY;th BO\l,i)dafY
Rev~d Spadal Condition'
Al.e!J e. DavelopmElnf pre,c)uded
until Df!celJ\b$f" 3-1 , ~a2t!, 'e~t
recreation II1Id academlo nelds
8f}d 8880,clated suppOrt USIIS, H9usih~ eJiOwed ull shoWn.
F_8CU Itt'/StafflStudsn I ftciu81;r~ al[oW(id under'
amel'lded .agreem S)l\.
Golf Course
,_ t ,I
EXHIBITB
TO' THIRD AMENDMENT TO 1997
SAND HILL ROAD DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
120308jb 0130941
Revision to Sand Hili Road Deveropment Agreement Special CondltJon Area B
Amended EX,fiIbit H--3
. Re'v,ise'd' Area B ,BoundarY ,and~
P to· iRe fro,m Area,,·.'
EXHIBITC
TO THIRD AMENDMENT TO 1997
SAND HILL ROAD DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
120308 jb 0130941
This document is recorded for the benefit of
the City of Palo Alto and is entitled
to be recorded free of charge in accordance
with Section 6103 of the Government Code.
After Recordation, mail to:
Office of the City Attorney
City of Palo Alto
250 Hamilton Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94301
SIXTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE
This Sixth Amendment to Lease (the "Amendment") is made and entered into as of
_____ " 2012 by and between the BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD
JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, a body having corporate powers under the laws of the State of California
("Lessor"), and the CITY OF PALO ALTO, a California municipal corporation ("Lessee") in the
following factual context:
A. Lessor and Lessee are the parties to that certain lease dated as of June 10. 1915, as
amended by five previous amendments, dated June 29,1971, February 26,1973, March 31,1981, July
31,1981 and January 18,2000 respectively (as amended, the "Lease"), pursuant to which Lessee leases
from Lessor that certain real property more particularly described in the Lease (the "Premises").
Capitalized terms used in this Amendment without definition shall have the meanings set forth in the
Lease.
B. Lessor and Lessee now desire to, among other things, further amend the Lease to correct
the legal description of the Premises, extend the term of the Lease, and modify the rent provisions with
respect to a portion of the Premises.
NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree to amend the Lease as follows:
1. Modification of Legal Description of Premises. The parties acknowledge that the legal
description of the Premises as set forth in the Lease is inaccurate in certain respects. Specifically, the
Lease, as amended on January 18, 2000, depicts those portions of the Premises that constitute the "Park"
and those portions of the Premises that constitute the "Depot." However, there is a conflict in the exhibits
to the Lease in that a small strip of land is depicted as part of the "Park" on Exhibit H-2 to the Lease (as
that exhibit was amended on January 18, 2000), but this small strip of land is not included as part of the
"Park" in the legal description of the Premises (as that description was amended on January 18, 2000).
The parties desire to correct this discrepancy in accordance with their prior intention to include this small
strip of land as part of the "Park." To that end, the correct description of the Premises, which hereby
amends all prior legal descriptions, plats and other maps, consists of the following: (a) the Premises, as
more particularly described on the attached Exhibit 1; (b) that portion of the Premises more particularly
120308jb 0130941
described on the attached Exhibit 2 (the "Park Parcel"); and (c) that portion of the Premises more
particularly described on the attached Exhibit 3 (the "Depot Parcel").
2. Extension of Lease Term. The term of the Lease as to the Park Parcel only is hereby
extended to June 30, 2042. Such extension shall not apply to the Depot Parcel. The term of the Lease as
to the Depot Parcel only shall expire on June 30. 2033, unless Lessee terminates the Lease as to the Depot
Parcel as provided in Section 2 of the Fifth Amendment to Lease dated as of January 18,2000.
3. Depot Rent. The agreements stated in this paragraph shall apply notwithstanding the
terms and conditions of Section II of the Fourth Amendment to Lease dated as of July 31, 1981 (the
"Fourth Amendment"). Lessor and Lessee hereby agree that the rent for the Depot Parcel to be paid on
September 28, 2012 shall be in the amount of $160,000 (the "2012 Rent"). Lessor and Lessee further
agree that, in the event Lessee elects not to exercise its option to terminate the Lease as to the Depot
Parcel as of February 26, 2013, the rent for the Depot Parcel to be paid on September 28, 2013 shall be
based on the 2012 Rent, as adjusted based on the increase, if any, between the Consumer Price Index
published by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (San Francisco, Oakland, San Jose
Area, All Urban Consumers, All Items) ("CPI") in effect as of September 2012 and the CPI in effect as of
September 2013 (the "2013 Rent"). Lessor and Lessee further agree that, in the event Lessee elects not to
exercise its option to terminate the Lease as to the Depot Parcel as of February 26, 2013, the rent
adjustment next due pursuant to the Fourth Amendment for the lease year commencing on July 1, 2014
and ending June 30, 2015 shall be made in accordance with the Fourth Amendment, and the 2012 Rent
and 2013 Rent shall not be the basis for such adjustment. Lessor and Lessee further agree that, in the
event Lessee elects to exercise its option to tenninate the Lease as of February 26, 2013, the 2013 Rent
shall be pro-rated through February 26, 2013, but Lessee will not be obligated to pay any portion of the
pro-rated 2013 Rent to Lessor, provided that the sublessee of the Depot Parcel pays the full amount of the
2013 Rent directly to Lessor.
4. Grant of Easement. Lessor and Lessee are the parties to that certain Grant of Reservoir
Easements dated as of January 20,2009 and recorded January 29,2009 as Document No. 20114059 in the
Official Records of Santa Clara County, California (the "Reservoir Easement"), pursuant to which
Lessor granted to Lessee certain easements in connection with Lessee's development of a reservoir
underneath a portion of the Park Parcel. In addition to the easements granted pursuant to the Reservoir
Easement, Lessee has identified the need for an additional access easement across the Depot Parcel (the
"Access Easement") that was not included in the Reservoir Easement. Lessee has indicated that it will
require this Access Easement once the Lease expires as to the Depot Parcel, or if the Lease is terminated
as to the Depot Parcel before that time. Lessor and Lessee hereby agree that they will execute the Access
Easement, substantially in the fonn of the attached Exhibit 4, prior to the expiration or termination of the
Lease as to the Depot Parcel, whichever occurs first.
5. Effect of Amendment. As modified by this Amendment, the Lease shall remain in full
force and effect.
6. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which
shall be an original, and all of which together shall constitute one original of the Lease.
120308jb 0130941
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Lessor and Lessee have executed this Lease as of the date
first above written.
LESSOR:
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND
STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
By: ____________ _
Its: ______________ _
120308 jb 0130941
LESSEE:
CITY OF PALO ALTO,
a municipal corporation
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Senior Asst. City Attorney
APPROVED:
City Manager
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California
County of ________ _
On before me, (insert here name
and title of the officer), personally appeared , who proved to me on the
basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within
instrument and acknowledged to me that he/shelthey executed the same in his/her/their
authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),
or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing para'graph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature:
Place Notary Seal Above
120308 jb 0130939
!~.' :,B>k-'-.-.,
~1i6\I/IU.l' Su.~f)'.oJl~/PtAIIIltt$
Park J!1t«1_~
'EmmiT 1
141i1-D~rlp(ion
March $-tOll
BKF No. 201 ;6005
Pllge t,Mi
,Re-a.l pro,pluly -In .. the, Ow of' .PalQ' AIII5.< CoU'Oly of $Mta <;Iarn, SUUe of'Califomia., d,escribed -as
foltow5:
Seinga pot/.tQlJof'lho landt of "Che-J~()'cI1:d ofTru~tees of Qi~ ~,.tlli SI\Ultor'(1. Junior Vnl-verslly~
5'ody, hll.vjl)~.eolj>.o'j'ale powers. li-ru!ieJ !he biw.-s o~ the Sta:~· o~ catifo)'lilllr des¢6b~ oas ft>tTow&:'
:aelhg ·also 11 potrien of the I'llilds_ ~d.bed, as Bt .Camilli;> 'Pnl:k~ ill 'that certain 'R~olqtiG9 pas'~
-gud ad~p~d by the Cit\yCouMll of'the C((~ orPa(o~,A:lto on' February 26-, I ~7j: by R,esojrit;lon No .
. 4109', re~(:)rded. 'February· 28, 1~13' to 'Book 257 '~~ PlI.ge 281; Oftlciai .Recoids.· of -S-.nln ·Clara
'C(),unty-:L1I1a l.h~ lIDi~ descl'ih~' I'~ ~bat ocutat!'t. :1)\~Jo(s O.eed (QutlClahtJ)~_ fi'om StaJe_ .of
~\i(Q'fni.a, 'Lo 'Fhe: }ibll,rd· or'l'ru.~~8o(·fbe.L.elarid StltO(otd Juni'QrUnivel'Si(y., ~_~March -~9,
l,0f)4 as. 'Doc'Qmellt No. t %8:.6,57'1, OffkiaJ; Recprds of .said' CQu:n~y-, more panlcularl'y d'escfibed
-as follows: -
:iW:GINN'-IN.G at the· rtto,st' ~~.sterly (:or.qet of the PnJ() Alto :Stati.on Gt'J)urtd,s-. a.s wa~ Sl~(ion
'GfGuuds"s·'Ciesnribed ~n'n\at ~~_Bii1 Easem.ent from Leland ~lanf~~ ro' Sp.lI~em :pactm~ R.aliroad
CQmpan:x, ~a:ted !November n. 1892-and ~!frded October 28. t915' in Vdlum.e 435' of Deeds lit
:P~ge-'244-. R~rds of.S~t& CI..-a COU~J)tYi said comer Ming -also the moSl i:lor(h'er\y: ~Qmer-of ,the
~Jld$ dellCribed asP1,U"~el No.. 2 10', thaI ,eenain: Sob1etlSe, between City (jf-PalO -Allo; a mu..ilje\pa~
PdJ:pQy~ti-(jfI of tbe SUlt~ 'Pf. Catlfomi.a .and' .SouJhei1l ,PaeiJic ~'1~o4(l. ~~rnp.an~,l1 WWott1QfL,
_~ri1,ed Oofobet~ J~t .19.39"111 Bqq'k:9M. ~t -p~~ S80,.-Omcia': ~~Qrds· o.f S$ta ClaUl:CQllnty~
"mlen:ee leaving ~d.' '~91et and a1Qrtg' tir~ g~iJ'er.a1 SO\1,lbw.est~1y nne of sgid Parcel'No. ~ (951 -a.It ~$Q), :th~ fQnowing twa (2) -COUI'~ ~d dill~n~~:
1.) Souih t~1~'2S'tTiailJ, 14~.13 ~t'i
'2') Sooth 5:064G'3Q!~ EllsI, f3'6;47 feet-ta tlTe ,~.ost nottherly comeH)fthal,certai.'n paroel ·on~cl,
d~iti.ed in that certain Assigom.ent 'And ,As8!1mptiQn Qr-·SubleaBe,. bef~n, the Cityc,f Pal~_
Allo'and. Th~ Hoard .ofT~ of the Leland 'Stanford llinfor University, ~corded .,Fel)JjUary
2-6'. ·~QOO·'8S' Dacgmen:l No, l..5l~2'4. Offieful R~Qrd~,of S~«t Clara Q5,umy;;
Tbenc!%: leav-ing: -sai\;I GQtb~ 1l!'I¢. 'aJ6l1,g :ttl.,e-·n.Qnhw~terly., tlllc!. ~th.we!i~r.ly!\nes of $ai..c;l '.SlIblea:s~
t~, 1516;3'~4",lh~ .'folloWinrtWo:.(2-) .COUF'!.'e1I an'~ (ljst~;
t~, South 19~11J'3tf West, lW,tlOifeetj
2), SbJlUl $0-9-40;~.O" ~. '2Q{);'OO fe.et 'to, -Ut!; D~'i,f.eSfurlY Hne Q[ -that cm~in plU'C~l of l.!md'
·desCribed ,II)' {hat c:e.tQlUI Ass'ig-nti\e)'lfanq As.sqmprion of_Sttbl~e. ~~een th~ CilS" of Pillo
AIlo.-and T,l~ S6,ard ()f'Tf1lSl~ oft~ ~I~d IStJJJfoJd J,uffltiJ.:·Universlty~, ~orded February,
2$.:2ffOO' as D~ll~enl -No. "],S.163'82~, 'OftlcllilRe;co$ ohaitfCOIllltyi
to:errc;'~' ,gloog StJid northwes{er~y' .iibe and, thE!' 8®QwlesterLy }_l!n~ of sal~ Subr~e (:000.
,1.s1.6;3~B22-) IO~ foIlQwjngtw~(2-) c'('juo;~ aod·l;li6tan6'e~~ -
1), SOI1\h J9n llng" We~L 1.';,00 Teel;
Legal D~C;Jiptien
EXHIBiT '1 -PARK & DEPOT PARCELS
Page 2 ofi
2')' Soli111 50'040']O·"'B1..q, :129.02 reef.tO D, f)Obll on the MnhweJ\tel'ly fi:ne or Univet'illt.y ~ \',emte;
stlid poi'llt PCill'g l,l1~ the ix;ginllillg of a· non-tangen.1 o,UTV.e; concn~e} 10 tile Si)ltlh,~~st" halt'j,3g
1\ Ra:cliu!I of ~6.flQ feet. (rojf\ th,e cenler of ~d cur\'l! a I1:Idilll III,!! ,bears North 81OS8'Or
We!!k.
'fhel~e nlcln',§, sl{l'd oorfh\\le.~lerLY' dint of Uni~er.\\ty' Av.eOllo. rhe fp'lIowiJlg lWO (1) cotfl'l¢& .anp
I:fisrllnce":
I,) ·SOIi.lh\\'ester!~. ~lQ"g sWd cjli've. IhrO\fgb a ctJ\tl'1li ,!\r'lgle of 05'jS4"25'~, rOt aO'lIre Length of
7,01 fe_ell'o Ih~. beginning of a re·ve~ cur·ve, .cQneJl>/t'·t.o th.e northwest. h~vin8 a Radius-bf
33-.40' feet). from the-center o[.suid. cur,lIe, a t'll.dial Jim; b:etir:s' Sou!):l (f7"52.'-32·· Eal)'1:
'2) 'Southwes.lerly. al~mll. ,!\aidc\Jm~, throu·gh fl ~ill(ltl Angle:o! 78(,211 "11 ", for. 'IIlllU,,·.Lengih qf
4~,!5B ~t 10 lite nOl1h(!llst~l.>: line of Ei CfuniIW Rea'I, -bcto8 I\.lsO Slale Htgli'W8¥ S-2-.;
Thefl~ ttJ6lJg. ~llid l1or-tbe_lI,.~ter\y H[1e of Er Cnmmo IRca! .. ,Ule-following: eigN eS') C-OUJ:8e.~ aT(d
dis1&nces: -,
l) NQnh 5o<'ll'43"WeI\l, !i66. IJ feel: ,
'2)-N()~h 41°urSI" 'rie$(, 80.4~ feet ro the begInning qf 'i l1on·tnngerjt BUn'!; _COllea\'e lCf ~e
'Sou-lh-W'flSt. na"ing a IUdi u~ of I n3 ,~O fee\" (l'om lile. ccll~r,df sQ'id ,C'(.Ifve '~ Ji\d1.allfn~ ,btwt>
Nor.th.48"'17"29,'! East;
3') Norihwcsttrly. along said curve, lh ruugb a ,cen I!1f!:_! Angle Qf O~ "24 ·00", for iln aoc Lengf\l' of
1!}.5A?'!eel\ . ..
4) .Nodh 50"06'31 \. "",'ISSI, t 71 .20·f~l;
5} ~orth·44~·S.7'·:'W' WC~I, 898,7~'·(t.e1.:
6-) Nm:lh 4{)"14'44'\'West, I 'j \',00 feet to Ihe bCglJ\tllng o( a ·Iangenl.curve to the righi, .having a
Ra.d;u~,of f.02.00.fee~
7) No~hwesfer1)', along :;{lid cur.ve.-'iomugh a C!'\itr.aJ Ao.g!e of 16"T-9LW', 'for 'un ·arc Length of
~9,06 &t !(;) f.~C b~ginn ingdf R C:Ql\"lpo~nd C)\m!Ci, concave-10-·lbe'iou(h~81. hlIving a. R!4dil\~
of non feet,. &om II,e oenter·-of·said' CUfven f~cHlIlllne'bt!<lf'll Sou\]l66°W-i.46" Wes\;
81 NC>r.lhe<!Sterly.nJong.·said curve. through· a central Angle of 9000',S· 53", for -M arc Length of
",&.:..~S-feel 10 11 Pf.ll'{lL on. I,he lioutberly lroo of Palo: Alto Avenue., said-sou1oer.l:Y line .. j's
described 'irr dlat c;edain ,~cepljOlX lWee] fqr :<.aid RI .Ca~i.l1Q, Pllrk',per R-'<."X.Gluiion No.. 4709
(2j 7 'O,~, 28 n. '$lIid 'I?o.rti~ being aho tile 'beginnlng of. {I eompoumi cu l"Ve.-cOlic1tVe to Ott
swtn,gllSt,· Oaving. tl R~dil,l6 of. r82.00 feet, 'nomthe ~J)ler of ~io. cutVc.l~ rndinl lint,'! be,a.rs
-N-6rth 23·"l1.6~.2:1" We~t. slI1'd p.oi1~t beJh~ alSQ he~.after referred \(1 !IS 'P'oh)'t I~";
'Thence ulong ~ai'd-.~uth6rrY line of' Putt>· Alto -A veti(le, lhe (orrowing 'three (3) t:earl!$ and;
di!ltlll'lc~::
1), "Ensterly a!ong ~and eUJ"\'e. through <t cellt~1 An&le .. of !,6°34'46·~. f(ire aJla~ Le.ngtj1 (if 52,Ifl:6
.feet;-. " ,
2) .Nimh 8~o4g.'1S" ijac;t,6A \ ~ fe:et;
~) North 8'-5"4 t 'g~' '~~ 1,.54:4S f~, m Ithe f;$l\lil1\ .... 'e~erly \loe,of lh.~ Southern Pooific IfallfQad
Comp.any right of yto:~!
Legal'Descriptioo'
EXHIBIT T ~PARJ<&J)~ OT PARcELS
Page 3ni7
~h~nee >:tlttng>~tljcl,SQutllwe~t~1"~yJilleoTSOll~~ern R~mcRflnto~d' Com,panr ri'ght,,,,fWA:y., Soulh
5,(i94Q'3,O!' East,. 514';Q4t~et'totbe 'mQS1'wc,stc~dy,;cOl~n~n<lf tbelandsdescf,ib~ S,l~'PAl'¢'t}il~0~ lin
th'at~~rtaln Sub lens~?e:t~ve'elltityo~Valo, j;\ltQ •. ~::.l~~\~id~al<r(jr~qt~ti~J)"ol:,tJje ,gtnt6,iQfCWlfol1ntu'
'(;,ln4:~og!thern Pa~iflq>Rai:lt?il(1 GUUlpa~);~ .~c9tpQrf:\tf¢I\, ttl'QQ"d~~l OQtQber 3{)~ ] 9£19 in IilQ~k9~1 at;Rag~ :5$Q, QfficialR.cc()t'e~9f Mlid! County:;
'<1~heI1ee feoving ~8id c:omer ~ndatotlg the,sQuthwestetl,yllfltfO{ ,said RUfceJ N~;l{9~tO.R.580)t
S~{Hh 45°S4'41" East~601i;O~f(tet to'thenorthwesterJyfhlenfthe flln:ds4'¢~'¢fiJjm~$ POrcellA j:ll
thijJ~crlail1 QuholabJ')'J)eedfr0fl1~outtlel11;pacifie, l'rM~PQf(~ti~~'Onlpat1~'taDe\awate
~QrPQlaliQI110 . r~e BQatdof~Jil~toeKi'Qf the Leiand S~anford Junior !Jniveir$Hy~ recorded Augu$.{
1; 1~8:1 in l3'QQk 0263 lttfklgt!iZ9,t\~,Q.fficinl ~ecQrds of aid CounlY~
'thence 0101'18 said nOI1hwester'l~nne-Qfsaid Parcell:,A (G26.30.lt. 298),S'ouIhJ~(ft9j30'?'W~st,
(jO,OO feel to lh.e point of BEGfNNfNG"
J?aik Parcell
1$:eafl)'rope,rty jintheChyofPtllo Al1o~ County of Sanla CllltllkS't.ate ~)f California. dtJ;¢tfboo' ·t~
fm.JJ(l~s'.
Behlg aportitmof'the lat1d~ of n,e BO~di.of 1'ttlSt¢t,~ Qf fh~t~:Ia),\(JSnmfotd'uniQr :UniversUy, a
;body hn viog corp.or~le PQwer$ under the tllw~ oObe S't:at~ o.fCalifQrnia)~descrihedas' f'QUow$~
,l;ieJ,~8aJ~othe' tands,de$e~~(f a,s<p,areelNo. I itlthat;iCel1a11l :~llbJeaSe 'belWe¢q~it~ pf ~~lp: Pdt~~
:~1l1~»i~jp~t ~91)J~r:~ti()n~f. the', ,StaJ~ ~f ~H~o.l't1i;lrmd ... S,t)ttt~em,l1at;ifi~,\'Rl!iltQ~~j ~(i,rnp.IJf:l)hai
~qmrQtatjon~recQrq~ ,~CfoQ~~$~JH}3'~~i .,B'ook ~;$'l· :a;t '~i).&~'5i$(), Q("ifi'at ;S;~O[ds'Qf,Sanla (;;Jal"a,
Count:y:, ,m()l"epm:tl~uJart)f. (i~crib,~di'!i f()H()W~f
Tben!:¢;\¢aYing; ~md ¢QtJ)",r auo along the ~®th:~(J$f&rlf'lltli~ of s~id Laud~f NQrlb 390 19'30~IEa5tt
,5£M),(}t~et to a.. poih1on the, 'i~Quthwesterly tl'n~; ;o.f SOittlJ~triPacific 'Bj{ihiQad~o'l}l,panyrigbf0f
\~Nty •. srudwllll..being al~o\tle; most ea~terl)' ~Qrn.erQj:$ailIPil:r~~l No.1;
'rb~l1ce;.l~ytrtg:$aicl comer andalQi)g ;said .:s()ud}:.w'~terlr 'line 0fSOil(h~m ,Fa.qif'i~Rl1j}r9ad
taQ1l111al'J~' irigl1t o'f:Wi\¥~.Nptth 5Qt140' 3 O~>'Wen~ 6J:ID/0'~;f~~r tt}theq~Q,st;.'we.~t.~d}1. .cQro,~l'Qf'sajd
,P~tQ¢lWo, 1;
Tbepte, J~{i~ifi$'$~id . C()m~r .attailll90g thl} south~e\$(~lyline! of sl11(tPareet .No. 1·(9~J ·Oi}'{.$8Q}~
SQU~fu. 45'°54'4~" J!a.~ti. o04ij()&::teet'~o,(he' poitltofB:EG11'QN'ING.
ParJt P~ltccl~
L~gal[)e'$etj,jltiQJJ
E'XHtB1T ,I """:PA.RK .& fJEP'Q1' PARCBhS
P;Ige 4 of?
Real prap~Ji~ ill IheCiry ofFplo Alrl}~, 'C'ollnt,>'·qf$i~ln~l Clorn. SO\IC of Cat i fOllJfa,.des(Wil1e"q ,;!~
f91Ipw.:. .
13.~fl~ga porti,on Ci>fiJheJ~uclsofThe: fJ:Q~rd. Qf"~Jl,J,st~e,~ oftl1e .lJJ,.hlna~ ~t8nford'TUliiQl' 'Ul1ive rsi.t)' \ a
lKld~ ihA"'in~; ~Qrp:o\"at~ fJdwe[S [lOde r tfr~ laws. of the State of Cal i QMith desc ri1;t~ .j)'$; 'il;)J I OW$;
Bcing ~d$lllt,P9~fQl~,\:if Ihlt14~¢S tJ~tj~iW' .})'!:f, ~I, ·~q~TIt~l~~~l'k\ in,tna( c¢1"t~d~ Re:;;~J:tl1j~l)i~flS$~d
and udopl~4 ;byth~;Cit;¥.'Councj,J (;jflheC,,.ty ·(If Palnf\ltt(r()n;~'bruot1 26. 1973 QY :Re~qlMtlQb.~Q.I:
41(}~.,; r:ecord~~Jf~~nl'ar:,y 28, 1973 in :6ook 25i 1l.t.Pttg~ 2,~J"., Offidal RecorQ$Qf $'fJ;J1ta Oa(R
~ou;nt.Y\ moreopatti¢platly descTiJ,jed ~'if~UQWS:
Thence lellv11~g~tlfdp0fnto.n-d atong tile nOr1heasteNyUne:'QfEl Cantjno R:~al\b~ll&a.l$9S1al~
tlighwaX,82, Nort113tYQO,9J0rf West., 85.S.3 feel to Jhel'lUJI<1.PQINT O.F B11Z~;~N~l:NGQf this
l:f~'s~ti1itinn;
'fier\c:e'J~~¥ing:$'ai~' pCllnt~)fld, alQll~ s,uid· ilQrtheosterly Hne,Qr:E'l'C~nl~n:Q '~eal" ;tJ~¢ fOUQ,Wing two
,'~) cout efu nlld~·ctlstt)l;lc~~: -
I ,"lSlprtl) 50~ 19· +1'" w¢,~t\ l2,.1.49,"ifeet~
2~' M~tlft.48°30.:02:~\};,t~g:t\ 69.11 teet t~.i'th¢ C1$ntef'{hl(; ,of San Fmncisql1ilQ Creek;
~l~ncealen.g: 'sat(f," ce~1ter l:lJ'le Qf S:anFral\~isqldto C~el~f,fba falluwlng .. tWO! r2,lcolirses: and' fJ~~~n)lceSC ' .', .,
h $~u(h~84r'55'3b" Ect~t, 164.52 fetm
2/) {\{ttltfn '6lJQaz~3q~' :~stli tt .. ~'~ fe¢[ l()~h;e ;$.Qll,tllw~:stt}tl): "tnc '&fS'Qntbem ~~cirrca:ttn#oa~
QQIll.p'an,Yrighi'of w 3Y'
'{~li~n!:1eafot't~)~Ji:i:d southwi.lSjJefl~, ti"ne of SotrthetfJ,Pucific Railroad COmpafiiy iight Of ~flr .. t!'le,
~9,tlI!}Wim'K]w{j ,(2:rC{nH·se.~.,i1nQ djsttaoccs: .'
lJ: $'~utn,~Gfl33);4tli';Eijsli 7,.9) fc¢u
~f) $Qutll 5Gv4{j'!::llU'~: EaSl.l~6.l3 f~up:tb~ cllQrtherl~' Itheqf !f?alo·,Ail)(l AV.teh'U:e.~isajd northerly
line (s:aesc'iji~ fh"tbJtt cerfili'll' ¢X'cep~iol1pa~l~:for ;~aidE~C:.~mj,no park· ;p~w B.~olutiE)rl
N:o;.4q;QJt '~'5Z D.lt. 281 )i '
Thence along $;aid oodhetf~ linJ;' uti .}lc(Ie,AItAA;Y¢tlll¢., tbe: tQH,aWitlgn,'{!';:!'(21 ~p~)rse.s .and
i;tis'anc~~;
11 $()tnlf8~~.r'34"We!;r, 19,~i22.reet to the begiJlnin& Qf'1tfa:t~g6fitC.ut\{C:1D1he ligOl; having ~
RatWos bf'J8,;2\OG fe~r; ,
1) W~sterl y. (~l~I1g suitJ ~1:IrY~~i tnrough a. c'entl'al ~~1~leQf07Q50lZ2:'\ .lor ,1t,)li' arc ,L.etlg~hof
;2",27 fcct f~rtlle TRUE POINt OF BEGINNlNG,,·Q(.,thi:$ tlescri.P.~i'Oll. .
Col1ftliningian area of C:h(}9) acres:, 'inore<ot tes~'.
S(titJg<1Us~Agsessor' s Par¢~tN(ifilfx:t120-3j:~fJ~H J)~r,rtdll Y eat ':2~rt l"~(n:t
Legal'Descript1t1t1
Exfili3'lT J: ~,f.'ARK .~.,. DEPO'T p t\~;r;£tLs
Pag¢ 5'0(7
I)£Qof.'))ar£~] ~ R~' I PfQP~J~;Y{H tn(!"(;XtyefP~dG Altol CQ1lnty 9r8:nnt~ Clnro Slate of Culitomjatd:~sc.rjfpea~s
foIlO\y~: ?
;R -g 0 port rOfiflfd~ff Itttids ot~rhe i~oafd nIT ~ rf~.~ ,o~'lheLelatid ';8mn.f(~rd .Jl,! rrtQrl1nlver~i I y. £\
,body havil)~ cQrp{jr.at~l?liW . ur cler Ih 'laW$of th~ Slnt~ of Califantla. desC:ftb~; a,~ tollow~:
l$eirlg,:tlIsotlle luncl!\ de·stmibeq as Parcel lA 'In. thilt cerfiijiI1QuifolaJroD¢¢(J. from Southern Pae,iifl~
Transpottill1oI). COllipail'Y, ~J)ehlwar~corjl?:r.&ffon.UJ Tbe .·l:lfiJ.~ ()f lh,.,ree. of t,~~L&I:~i)tl
Slanfo~ljU~iol':tl~jv~rsiIY~ .re~Oniea AU~".51j •. J98tl.in~ti?ktJ;26~.·a.tJla~e . ~9,~.9fl1c·i~1 >~~¢orn~
of arnrtC:I~~~.C~ruy >ltlldtn~h'll1ij~ :tJe~t;~il;lecta~?c1t9f3l~,Q,2 intha~ ~tt:~in. S1Jl11alls.e b~IW~J1
Cjty-of'Wf!to' AI~<'l;a mlm'ioi,pttJ ¢oll'-Qt~d(mpf the· Sr6lf! ~fCafi(omia ~O)d SQutlternp6clfi:c
RailroadC'Ql'11)iU\I1)!, ai ,'qt;porati9P:~ rec~rd¢QQ~d~r30:, ] ~$' li\.Book: 951 at 'Pag~ 58.0,; Offici~J
,R~cordS qf s'oid Coohty.mbte pnrtltllf.Arly (J,~~-J:!ihl}das: fQ1Jo,w~'!
Be~inn'in8 a(i! pol'Olo" ·it~let.s~ottQllbet\\t~e.'l tbe ¢~nt:et:(in~ .Qf ll~h/el'sity . ~venpeilP~ th~
s~ulhw~~d6dly Hn~,Qf;the P:~lo' J\lt.Q·.$ta(iQrt;Gr~l!t)tt$.; «~~!,\ldStaJiQt1· GtQtJticJs it{ d~$ytibed' ill that
~r~jJJ etl$~Ol~nt.ftQm··:J..eJan6S1al1fQl'{;I, lo$0l1then)P'4~lfi'C' JlA,itoad Compan;y.dtUedi~,Qi'lembet
.2:11892 alto rre~Qi'ded Dclo~rz:g, l~iI';!). in Volume4J'S. qr,D~d$" al Page, :144. '~e¢()t4'S of Santa
~lIJrCl County;
llt~~l'H;ie,.t.li!a~ng sn~'p t)~tt11 i£tilQ.ulon ~aid :-io,q:tbw~$t rJy 11ne of &~td RalD 14lro Sla(i~f\ ~roJlI16s,
:No:it.hf··.5·0,14J'Or3Q"W:~$t.. 1 J:·~I.QS feet to a 'PQh1t9\1 ln~uor,({J\ye~~~tly 'line o1'SnW .. t1;p'iv8(sity;
f:\. venue, $-Aid POlllt h(!ing 'alrm the ooglnlllng,Qf£lJ).on-fangent iI$Jli\fe'):~~O(faN'~"fQ~h~ :sat((h as(~
:~ul¥jns a R.nulUs of 300.00 feet, frQllllhc cefH~r'l1f &:uidcul c tA>ta~;i.lAnjne 1?~fl.t.:RNqrt1!J{2go45·3J~·
West, ~aid pOint being iilso IhcTRt.ra.IOJN;rOF BEGI'N'TS1NGor ,tijis,de:sct1p.t~tyJ;l:
[he.nGe ,J~a ,/j og said PQinta:Qdal!Jll;¥tbf.lgenetal'nQ.rtlJvlestcrl~/H:ne J:)fs~lnUi1i\fersh,~ A~,enne.the
ft1lfo,,~~,Jhg twa (2) cours~!u'nd d'iSll),oces:
:3) :h1otth~st~tty\, ~lon3 SatdelJI1V~t. through, acent:raIAI1;Je ~r I t ~5'~~;5~?~f~raJ1 atcten gtb Q[
62:4 7 {~t't~<' (b~ bcgitl:lthl~~r W non~tangeot~tJf'¥c)¢oJlcavc lirl. r.neSQ,t!:tl),-,!,C~';l,hQY~ng: .~
Radius pf I ~9;P0 feel. ft9rrt. tli~'e."l1,t~r Qf said l?itr.V~~ r:~(j~atdine bear$N(:)l1tr L~pr8 '04" East;;
4) SOutheasledY;~'i.dong q:id'rfnr:ve. tbtPugb.: a~¢~nlral A.ngle:pI 1.0~5$~?\ rQl'Cl~l;~j'(; Lengal 'lJf
)'6,05 fe.et (<:t a. PQiQl~ said point t1etng ot the tntenJ,e,ctj~nt;lfn li'nedtaWl! SQ,(lO reer
)lprt.hwe~letly~ ':mgnlsai'(gl me8$Urell),enl. from said cetll~fli;n~ pfUpr.yel1iljAwet:fu:e;
thellc~ fea'viog$lid, ,~i.J)( .. f}~d;PataUe.lWjJh';$~M ·,gel'm.ftl~~~Qft1qJ(Iv;.erstl? ~l£~'et,jll~~ hl:Otth
3:9°S9130" l&a$t~ '2.~4 feet to tIle; m~}~l ;eus!etly .ct;wner'~f:St1l(l Fa;f(!"el 1 A (02 ' . ().~R .. S9~)~
lh¢t'1c.~le~ving ~id( Ctntftf!f' and along \he; nm1~erl y 1t.)eorsa.iqp,afc:¢1 tA,i,~'()tthi:50'?~{Y3iO"
W¢$t~~&41.19 feet fP tll~ m~~t nortl1erly\coq1~r;(}fs(lid Parcel I A (0261 D.R. Z98)~
ThenceJ~a.vft1g I1mo co.rm~taod alQng Jfu~:ttQnhw.es(et:1y lin~ of . aid Parcel lA: .. $'Quth'.J9}?Q,9,130n
Wesll 1f.Lt)O r~t (0 tb¢.lnp~t: mniherly comer or saidi'p'U,l'cei No. 2 'Cf),~lQ,R,580)t ~Aid'¢Q(.net
b~ill;g :a;J$;Q(he,1t:il()5t we~{erl.y comer of said Palo Alto Station Grounds (43:$E1~eJils 244.)~
, ' .. " , . .... ..' tegal'I)es~riptlMn Etrf~JHI1 1 -<·PARK '& i)EPf0.T. :pI\RCeLS
l?~,ge.6,of7
Thci1p~ Jcovi n g , l(l~OrnerLHld al{Jng"the~~ltcr:ll .s(Juth\'\I'CSf¢tIY U,ll~ .of ~JJ2idl)~1rE:elN'o. 2.t951
0\1*. 580:)( the f(lI IOW,Jflg: rIve ($}~~lIr~,e5{)'l1q 'aj~tM';;~:S~
U i8(rlUti :l6C.1212g·'·~Ea~l,.14~;.13; feet
:lJ 'Sou~h .• @o~~~o~a(J'" 'East 4:2()}9:~ Jt~~t to the. hegtnjlillg·of II tangen'loln've to lne l~ft{ h"ying:a
Rn~illS'of 13.,{)4 '\lelt
~:). No~h~8t~~ly~.atQn~ ~j¢1Q(jfVe, thtOllgh ;l~e:nlrarAngleo1l 90000'OQ\'\ for an a't.cl.i;!I1s,th:,h~
2 t ~$ f:~e;t t~ Jhe begjni1i:t~~of 0 reverse curv~~·{,'()nC(lvc: lo~he 50uche,ast.~~V.j;llg a: R4d,11;ls;af
J ~.64 fee( •. 6[~tm:theQen,el"(jf -tiuld curve, H rgdinJ lhre,b:euTK Norfh SO,()40~'3t1~~· \Ye~lj .
4) Soulhea~lC'l~ij ,~lpJlg; s~itJ (:urv~, If}toU'!4Wa ;~bn.trall\ngJe Q,f 90 00" ()'~''. f'0( anatq Len-gtlui(
.2.1 .43 feet~
$:) ;$9{jlh~ $(;)°4U·3(W~"h1~0.2~61 f~e~ taaj:)olnl, ~m said northwe!iterly line:t.lf s~Jtit lJnlversity,
l\Yttmle. !itt l~ .. Pbitll~ei'll~ . aJs() .. tIle, .. oe~iJlilm~;()f '~ .. o Qn-tangcnt cUrve;, corrc.ave. t~;the'
$W1tbeast iha\fi'lg n R,tdius of ~OO.OO fee~, frc;>,ll1! tll~'!?~Ater of ~ijfdcurve a tudial1in~;.b,:eaJ's:
'NrJl:1h;3:~,~i:4B'4t~" Wc.~t: '
~b~ll~e north¢lt~tel'I~~lal1d; ;110118 ~afdnG~h~~SH~Fty n,nt?'of'~aip, tJQ1\'erS;!ts:' A¥enlt~,aIQtig su,(d
~,Ulv¢,tllIougha.;~~ll·t~Angle 0t. J;0643·1~t. fllr lltlar~ t.en,tthof~f),~:i4 feet :tn th~ tRW
~('j)liNT OF BJi!O;IN'NI1'S:~ of lhi. de;s'C.I'l,pti;oll.
'"~PQt Parcelll' rt I propert")' tn. the CHyof' J?aloAlto,QoUllty .of Santa, etara~state()f C'ali rotlj'la" d:e$¢riped ,A~
f(;JU'Q\v;,s'~
:a~1118:~PQlt:11l~~~t~:e lil~nl~~ffhe];lcr~d;Q~ rttlst~:e$ ~f·tbe, 'Le'l~n4! iSfijJ'ifg:tdJ;tIOlprll ni V4t$i'tYt .3
~Qdy ba\~ing}~.otptl1fJtecp;m;'ite~ Cln~[~r'thc l3;W$' ef;th,¢ Stal& QLca:nf{')".l'ia.dj~StlribJeli as: f oIlOx.vs,:
~eh)g :a,;I~~JQtl ;]~tid$·d~$cri·bedJ. aSP:~f:(;~:JIB irttb.~t,~g~~.p·~U:f~clalU1neej (£(9t11 !S~~lb.:tn ~~Ql:tI?
~FFll:~Sp?ffanon Company .at}cl~w;a,rB:~~q>omrlo", :lP,.~e .a~~tdQf T.ruM~~&~()f. :~~~.Leh"tJd S~~~t:Qf~Junj'o:Vf1iM~J",~it¥.,reQQ~(I~Alf~:~st 7. 1981 jl~~~gpk G~fi3.·af 'P-age 298,af,fi~i:afRe,~ntd~
'(JFS'an:taCla.t(,Ctu.1n(¥.JtlPll; ipardcuJ,arJx 'de.sc:t'i:bed as fi.1HQ\Vs;
Begillning at .apdtrtt ;0£ liltetsect ion I)et,w~ttt~~ .~~·nle'lille 'Qr 'tJ.?jv~tift y Ayenue'an:n J~e
souih;W~I~rt*,'lih~,of ,t~u~: ~~l~ }\1~~St~'rQ!lClf9~n~F~{4~ sait1'~f~tfcyn(3:Q'~Jllds. B d'. ribed J»'.t~at
t ertnin Easemenlft(}fn Lelnnd$t~nfQrd ·to: 'Soulliem:~f.l<iin({Rnilrom.J,:~glt\~~.\~ \ daled ~oveirt~~r
23. 1892 and r~'~~"de.q: 9(,{'(()b~J,' 2.8* 11115 in, VQlume:43:; Qf ,m.~ds Ql·J;tflg~ ~2f,4,. ~~gQm~~f SJmla:
Cla.ra COUnt); ,
th~nce lea\'ing sard~~ib,tilJJd along, ~,aUi;~9\.t~1l\V~terry fihe flf ~m4}[~lQ Alt0S.tB;f~;o~(.lrou}]d;sj
'South 50<;.40' 301
' Ea~t.· 'lt~Jj8: feet .io l\:PPl11t Ql1' th,e soulheaslcrl y ltne of said. UniverSity Avenue.
said pOlin being also Ih~rBWE POINTOFnSS:lNNING of this. ciescriplion;
\
L~.guJ J)escriptiM
E)'(.HlBIT I ~ P~'K 8? .P~POtPAR'CEJ;.S_
Page:1of?
_Theru:e'-leaVing, said :point and, ... I~mg ,the, southwe,stedy line. efS'.lid P.arcel IE: (02& O)}t. M_8-)j
said nnl!' being.-,all>o tile, D'ortheasterly HIla of POJtiI 2 of Lot 38, assh-own on tb.llt' eettatn: map
entitled "SJ:ltvey of L{)~, 37 W\d 38, S1M1fotd t::111'lver-sity La_ttds.P-alQ Alto. QIlif6mhi",. d4!ted
-AW1s~ 19~5. S,h~t> 2 'Qf 2, prepareQ oNUvJ;rence. C;, Bliat'l. ClvH Engi l1.~r1 s'Q\1lh-50.0-40'30"
'BasI. 1:61.50 ,feet '(0 the:mon SQulherly cQrner of-~id parcel I Bi
~Il~ I~vil\g Sl6d northeasterly 'Une' of Rarcel 2 Qf Lot ~8"NCJrtti 39°19'30" &S(, 7,(;,.00 (eeup
the h\~LeIl$Jer.l.y 'com~r of s~tGi' Parcel I'B;
theti¢:~ l~~n,g ~id ,cOOler Md .aicmg, t\1e .. ~iloJ'lll not'lheaSterly ljl'le of $llid parcel LR{G263 'O.1t
'2,911). '-'be-'f(l'UOWiDg th[~ (3) C9,1iI'S6S' hil.Q Qlsfance.sr
t) N.orth~o;00-46'·3J:)"We!iI' • .94~~~;
1) ,$'oUfu 39D WS'O'" West" 26:00 f~
-3) North. 50"40'30." Wes~, 95.74-f~l [0 a Rolnl' on said so~l)reast6{:ly Ilne of s!kid Uhi"mily
AV'enue,said point be.lng i1Iso the beginl'!_mg, Of fl., rro!\.tal1$~t-curve. conCAve to the northwest;,
ha~iJ(g a ~a,d.ilas of, 3-80;00' feet 'fmm ,ihe. center of said curVe-a l'1ldial ,line--beal'S Sooth
~1f'\S:~';lg" Easr.
'Tb.en~e sou.tb·we_'St_edy" ~Io.~g. s~jd curv~ .. t~(opgh ~ central Angle C1fogo42116".-.(OI·!ln, a(C Length.
Qf57,73 fee( !Q.-the-mUB"PQIN,T OF BEGINNING oNtl i$d~Gtiptj'~rt, -
C9ntal,olh8.an area of 0.157 ncre~\ more or-less.
)]emg afso AsSessor's Pateel.Np:mber' I '20-3~·O t~'-eer Ron Year 20H .. W12,
Park Par~Js.l. 2 &. 3~ and Depot p~, A & 8, 85 show·n on plat enUtled'-u,&oXlimIT 11'
.. ttsche4, he'r~to and Ibl}dep part ber:eof.
J{K}' Eilg,fn~t$
~~A)~
Jelm ~ylltl,'P,L .. S. 0.11883,
I.;i~ns~.e.xl?i~ 1~1.-20J.'3
#l'1#l.fYI ~ i ~~I'1;..
i -_ iF --
Dnted:
III
'--'-""''''_. IMt _
PARqeL_ ~ or ~t.01' .APN. ,fllO-~_~,
'~
OC(
~~---' ~: :~
.~ Z '
ALMA. STRE£r
-tL ------CURVE _TABLE ',' 'II
, CURVE RADIUS, 1 DEl. TA -I LENG7H1
CJ tJJJ.OO' ' OB'24:00"11 1~5.43'
C10' , .300.00', 1" '55'52·,11 62.47"
C'2 '3.6'" 90t)O'oo· . 2'.4,]'
'3.84' 90-1lo'OO" -~ . ..,. crJ
CT4 JOOAlO' ~'-tr4-J-'fB· 65.;l4'.
LINE TABLE
, J,UNf BcARlNG : LENGTH,
t7 , S"6"2'~B·E '43 'J~ -J,J S50'40'JO~E 1J6."7~
l. ~9'9'3Ct'W '20.00
L4 SSO·.fO".JO~ I 200.00'
L6 $J9,'9'JO-W ' 15.00 , i8 ,N4n,s'51,·wi 80M'
L7 N50't16'JJ ·Wll 'n~' Lu " SJ§,9'.:JI)*W 60.00', ~
I W -S50'40';3'O-t 2O.zj;j~ I
I L30 'NJ9'1t';JO."e _ 5ClOD,'
L'£GEND
-P;~.B. PQIN'T Of ·/3fGlNNIN,G
'PAL·O Ai.TO. SliNT~ ~A«A,CO/)NTY.; C}J;JF()R!WI\ K~ \SUR.1.2\i~fJ006\OWG--\Pt.ATS\PA~K.& 'OBPM PAACEl.S Pt.Atdwg .. . .".
s~ct ,P,A~~D DEPOT 'PAA'CgtS l~ or t:_~ STA~FORD JUNI.OR UNW,
J"ob No, 20'1260Q6 . . -, t ,
'By', JG' "Ptlte 03=05=:t2 Chkd'. JyI<
SHEET 20f J' ~'_tW"'-'
, ,
'. • I
LEGEND
, ! r.p.&JJ. rRv.e: P()Iffl OF 8~QWN'N~
I ,
l ""BkF -. - -
~r"-"'~
PAr« ,p~CEl. i ,t1.n'+, ACRES±
APH 12D-J1-D{!9
tiNE TABLE
UNE BcARING LI..ENG1F.I La 'N4D'1"'~·W ' 'lSf.tJ()
L.9 N82'i8'2oE, 64.'2'
t.fd ' N~'''J'J''-£ 15'4..~·
LLf2 iNJO'D9~~·W "8"-5J'
I UJ N.M'29~.fl,~ '23..9'
I tf. N~':lO'02"W .. lI~I'
11~ S8.f~3O"F 16452'
LIB N6J'J2:'JO'E .17:.2"
U7 S50',JJ'.,-£ 'J-JJ3'
_~f8 S$O'4O'JO·£ 19~
,J.-f9' S8S'04r'.).·w ,192.22f.1 -,
I , ~
I
I
1-
~BkF
'Park RarfeJ 1
'PARK P'A'RQELS
March S,lO't~
BKF'No; 20126006
Page 1 of5
Rear'WQpeu,y if! the City of' Palo A lU" Count)' of SImla C1~Stllte or ('AlUforni.il" d,escribed as'
feUo.ws;:
Selng.: a 'pom:on 'of the-.l8l1ds oti'he Board drl'rusl~ of-the,l.eLancJ Sianford junior' Ur)I ver!iJ;y..ca
liody'h8~lftg cq~~rate '~owe(S·under the laws of lhe-State. of Cnlifomi'a, descl1bed, as follows;
Being· al!;'o a pOr1i,(i)i) Qf ;he Jan'd~ descr;i~ as-m, ~ili~~T:.k. l!l' that :,eerta(n Resa~liol1 passed'
and a9QPced by It}e.-Cftf-CQuncil oftbe City o£hl~ Al.to Q(tF~bl:Ual'y2(» 1-973 'hy Resclutlan N,Q..
!i'.7Q9~ recorded' :Fet;>J:UIJ~~i U!; 1-973 in. B,ock 25'J i!f J'age '28'1, Official Records of, Smlta Clara
Co,uo~y: _W)cl the lands described in 1l1a1' certwn 'DirecIQe~ Deed, (.Quitt11Iihu), fr~ State or
calif{)!1)'~ to The 8'oard'ofTilJsCee&Qf the LeIf\~(fSt8T1ford JUnlof',t,:Jn1¥ersity. 'recorded MQi:th 29.
2004. as D.$!ument NQ. J 7,6'8~Sn. Offtcial ~,~j'ds of saId C(JQ.lJt,y. !'Dore parHcwllI'ty destrlb~
~fGJlews:
BE(;IN~(; IU the mOSt Westerly comer of the Palo, Alto Sratitm Grotinds" 'as $'aJd Statio"
Gt0ll1\ds 1$ de$cri bed , in ih~ certain E~~nt frem Lelan<l Stanford to-S~the.m 'Pacific Iml,road,
Company" dated ,Nov.ember ~.3, Hfn, and rec>c'l'ded. October 2..~'. 19-t5 In V olil.me -485 M-Dee.ds· at
P~ge 244, Rec;Qrdscof. ~ta' CI~' c.Cront.Y. said40mer-,,~jng also fho ll\9St 'PQ\1.h!arlY COmer-of' the
land~·desitFibed as P~l No; '2. In that' ,Uitldn '8l,lblease between CIty of]'alo Alto, a, municipal
cprpQ[atio~ !If ihe Slate of Califi>(nia,and Sp,U(~cn Paj::jfic;, R:a1lr08d Compa">" a coTpOQlUcn.
re<;Qrd.~ o.c(ober 3(:J, f.939 'in ItoQk 95'-at.-Page S~O. Offfula'1 Records of Slln~.Ciarn c()J:mtr,
Th~ce. teli~lrig !lltd CAm,er and 1'lql;lg the ~en6~al Wltth~e's~l}' Hn~ of s:l1~ BuccI N:o. 2, (9S 1
c). R. S80), (he following two-(2) c'~({rses 1lJ)~, d~e,st
t) 5Qutl) U)'oU'28'J"East, 143.1l-feet;
2,)-,South 'SD,040',30"' East, 136.47 _feet tQ th~.most n:9.rtlierly'.com-et'of that ~rt~J\ :pllre~1 of land
,d~s.oti~~ ,hi" tni!t ~t1ainl Assigfimerll1md A.$$l.lIl'!Jlflon of Sublo[J8e, ,\)~lW@o· t~~e Cit}! ",f-'P,aio
Alla and 1'''\I~"Board !lft.rust~· ot!he lclBll'd $,tMfOrd· Junior t!1nfve'tSit-y.. -recordat' February-
28, 'OOO"~ kumertL NQ. J~l (i3~ Official Records of' Satlla Clam'Counly;
Tne:o«e. 1~\'ll1g' &ala CQrnar itnd: ilf;J1'!g the-,northwesterly-and southwesterly :lines, Af 1!Bi.tl SU:bl~~
(Doc:.. ) S163g2.Jt;). 'the f'oJlowlng' lWO,(2) c6urses and dislasf@s: •
l) SOllili 39"f9'3,0" W.esr, 116:00 (eetJ 11 S'oUlf) SO"4QY'30') East. 20<100 feet to the northwesterly lioe of lhat -certa1n' parcel of ,lMtj
~n'bed in ~·.certain As:.i~meRt lrod A3Sumption ofSubl~. betw~ Ute CiTy of p~o!
Alto.and 'The.:B~d of'l'rust~S' of'the ~I~d $tan!9rd llinior Unive~tly;, «!CarCled Febnlai)'
2'&. iooo-~ DOcu~elJfNo, 151.()3S22~ Qffie1atR,ecordS 9f sajd, Co~n.ty. -
T.he'nce alQng s-aid ns>tlliwes}er1y line and the southweste,dy lines ,of said S\lb1e:ue (DQt.
1 S'1'6~g22)-t1'u!l,,(Pl)nwfng 1,,\'10' (2.) cou:mes and dtstancftS:
. !'J Soum Wl) \j' 30" West, lS.QD reeq
ugJlL D,esariPliltn
J;:X'HI:BlT 2, PAEK PARC6:lS
P~e2'ofj
2) SOllth $O.<!~()' ,30" ,EII~1. 329;OZ'f~~J to 11 poInt on the ~OrihWI$.I:I-Jy Hne or-Ur,.iversiLY Avenue,
~'"Ilid po!'ol: beillg ~tso .the i:!egi'nniog of Q M.n-tMgenl curve, c,oncave to Ille ~)lth~'St. ha-\lillg
a Rad'iu:~ of 68.00 feet, fr.6m the c:enl(!t of ~'Ilrd curve a rnd.fal JlI~e bears Norlh S 1°'58'07"
Wesl~
Thence alohg 5<lid-norl!tv,ieslerly, line of UnIversity Av~ni,le. Ufe. foJ Jo\vi n'g' t-IhO (2) courses and
'cJi~lllnct5;
n S'OOll'tw~{~r,)s', alo"l\'g said .eo n'e .. through a c-entro( Ang·le Qf'Os'''5W'2'5''', tOr an lire Lefl,gth-o'f
7,0'1 feel to the beginniilg' of Q ,~evep.;e ~urve. conc:t\le -\() the-north wast·, hl/ving a R!idrus of
33.-4Q feet. f'rBOl ,the ce,nt~ 6f sru'd curve a l'l\"dlal nne be:ars Soulh g7°52' 32" :Ea$t;
2:) S:o.UthWehlerly, aiong. $md G'UfVe, tlll'ough Il central Anglc t>l' 7'8~l';21". for an lire Length-of
48 .. 68 fe.~1 to·me nOl'thens1ctly Ii ne ofEi 'CilrriinQ ({elil, b~b~ IIlso .state H ~ghway' 8Z~
rh~l1cc 'along said' n'Orthe8!Uerly· Ijn~, of EJ Camlno"Renl. (fie foH,owirrg. els/ll (.8~ cour,seJ;-and
dJsran~s:
1:) NortI150'bll'<t1'" West, 566.1,1 tee~;
2) J'fo,tth 41()18'51" West, 80,4~, fcM'to ,the beginnJng M 11 non-tangenl C1JrI~e. concave 1<'), the
-t;OUt,hw~sl.. havi,ng " RadiUS: of \333".00 feet. fi:om·lhe center of saId cun'erll roti,nl, ii-f'l,e -b~n~,
Nt:!rth 48°11'29" Eu~t; ~l North\\lestel"!?;, nl'on-g sllid.cl,Irve, throUgh 0 centitllf Angle ,of.'(i8"24~Of~. 'for an arc Lerrgth of
1·9~i.1I3-f~el;
4) &orth 50Q06'3:r'" West.. 111,:m feet:
,5) North 44 °5? '30" We'st, :S98.13 feet{
6) Noi11I','40° 14>'44" W c~t. 1'51':00 -feet to !he beginnfng Iff Ii : UIilge.n I ourve \'0. the.rigbt-;. ha:viIig II
R~lis of lQU)Ofeet.· ,
J)' .North,we~n~r1y, aTong said,wrYe, [hr.eugh II central Angle,qf l'6°l'9'30!\, ({jr an are ,Len'g-lh (If
29,06 feet to Lhe beginnin-g of-il CO"lP,QQlld:'!>Ilrve'. cO[Jeav,e, to ,the soulheast. having a ~adill,s
¢f 12. 00 f~1. from tho c:en~ of Strid ~1lNC: a radial line' bears South 66°0<1' 46'-' W'e~t,:
,8) Notthea:>terIx', .tllOlig sjl'id cu r.:l;, Ib'ro'-!gh a ccn.f,ctd Angl~ of. -96"0.8' 5 3" L for un 4tC' ,Wgth Of
18i88 feet to il poi1i! on the ~oiJthetly li~ of P4IG-AltO AV~\'Iue-. -l'tJtld soutller1y Hne ;s
dc~ribe{l in ,thflf ~rr:aiit c~:cepllon ,parC~1 for 's!'\id' EI~ 'camino PArk ,p~ Res'oluI'iOll No. 4709'
(257 O,.R. 2M)~ ~id·'p.oiW ~fug, also dlC beglnolng of a..~oJll.pQ..iJnd curve. concave 10 the,
~oi:Jtlte~~. hav~ng a Radlo-~ of 182,;00 feel • .from 'the -celfier Of said CtlI·\'& 11 radial' ,I@! beJJj'~
'N~rlh '23"'46'21" WeSl, said 'pCli'fl\ being also neroa'fler rofua:ed (0 as Point '~A'~
TtJetlce alOllg said sOlltherly tioe 9; Pl\l-o Alto Avenue. Ib¢: foJlowingl))re,e. (3) courses ,and
qil;tp.neel;-:
I ) ~t'el(ly nloi\g said ,cU-r:ye,. :threug/1 a c.e:lltiaL~,ngJe of 16"34 '46". for an are Length (:If 5;2,6.6
fr~ .
:2.) N.orth 81948'25" -easl. 64.l:Z feel';
),) North' 8.5°41'34" Ea'it J 54.45 fei:t 1'0 tb.e SQll~WC5ti;rl)' nl)e Of tl\e S.Quth!lrn P.adfic Ratrroad
COmpany'ri.ght of way;
L.egal D~scrjpJi()n
EXHIB-\T '2, -PART{ 'PARCELS
Puge<p of:)
Thence along said :\Qu:tllwestex1:y·ljne Qf S,o.u~b¢t'Il PJlcrOc RlIiiroai/ Comp.an f' tighl of Wl:I)" SOUJh
$O~4o'J6" &t>l 514.611 feel 10 !he mOli'r' ~'eswr:ly' conlcrof the lands~~~rib'ed, og ~lIrce' No.1 in
Ih'an:er\ofn Suble.1:Ole Tmt~,n CIIY' of P.aJe Al(o, 'll munic.iPlll coll':orilfion crf the Slill'(: Of C~li(QJTlt;l,
l\.nd'$'Quiht!m1>altit1c iAAfltoad Cotnp3f\Y),-ac,orpomti'On, r~cordea {)clob:er: 30, 1~~9 in 'B.Q.Q.k 9$.1
ilL P:.tgl! s:aO .. ,Omcial: ~C0'rJS Of'\iuid Cb~mY,:
Tfu!~ Ie&\<j-n'g: S'/,lj'(1 QQrner and: a\'OIlg, the ~Glith'Westtrly' line _Gha.id Parcel No, 1 (%,1 0..\{-. .?aO).
South 45°54'-4 it! ~~r" 6Q:1,()8 feet ro 'the ,o'orl'nw¢slerlt Ifn'e' of the land,s t.I~c.Tip:ed it'S' Pnreel lA in
tIlet' te'rlM'!) -QuilC'lain'! D.red ~m S'Ou,tltem Pacifto TraJI'Sp6rtarion COIl'lP;l,\'fY, a Di:,[aware
cor:p orati em 'to The 'ijoorP' (l! rru~rees"of tho ~O;eland $lttnford Jurum U\l'"ecsif~. ~tdBd Al.Igu!;t,
7. 1981 in-Ba_(!)k 'm63 al' Page; 29fs'. :OJflci'al,..R.~)"d~, m~ald COU'l\f:y~
l.'h~nce ,1,110([& sa~a nortl1\Yestc[j)y -tine of sailfP~c~1 lA (Q263 O:R. '298.). SOllln -3'~"'1'9"SO" West.
~;j)O {~t lO {he" poiflt-of'.BEGINNING'.
C-Oi1roilJfng: all :area 'Qf '9', 714 ~s, :m~r~' or Jel;s.,
brk,~I;~\2
Real prope-rty jo, ,~hc City 0f P.lllo AltQ. e-OtlD(Y of San11\-'CllH1l.. State .of Calit0hri~ de!\cribed a,!;
fQIIPw;s;
13cing a:.pm:Uoll of the In'i'ltl$ of The: Board of Tr'llSle~ of Inc LeI~ndSt-allf:6rtl; Junior C:JiliVI;:I'lIlfY. a
OOUy h~[l'fg-eorp(')I'ale powet's under thq -',8WI'), of,the SILUe 'O'f Culi iOl'n ill , d~sLrihed 'jl.S fol\,Q-w'~:
-J3eing a1$0, the lalfd~ d~nbed as Parcel No. I-in tliat certain Sllblea;;ebelwcco -City Of PalQ Alta.
~ il1\Joicipal corprmliio'il of-tne :Slate. of OHfoml'a' lUl'd' SQUJhern Pacific RaiJrotl~r GompWlY. a
,eorpora.tiol1, I'eCdtoed OClober 30, J 939' 10 8:ook 951 at R&:ge 5130, Qfficial Rec0rd\; of .$anti) .. Clnra,
CO\lniy. mOTe,particularJy des~uibe,d ,a,.;, follows~
B'E.c;~NNING ar (he mo,li{ ~1)1.HherJ.~ c..Qm~· ~f:;nid Pnu:e1.N'Q. -J (~M O.1t 5"8.0);
, 1'herIGe :leavirrg ~a:ld' co:tn« ahd dlong the-~b\Jt-h.C8!ite:d~ fine :or!lald Lr)nd'S:, North '$'9.0 19 ',3:(Y' ElIst, ~O;@: f~e[ [Q a pOfnr 'an the SOllmwe'Sletly lI'ne of SO_Uitlel11 Pa01Ti-c R,aj)Joa</; C'Q01paO_Y' ri'ght ~f
way,., ISliiO point bei'l1g a-l~(I thc~o~t~Il!9rlt ~otl1:er'of $aid f!i_~1 No, l',~
Tnem:ff le,aving 'said c"drh:er and 'along 'JlEU-,d \;,outbwe,Sterly lIne of SO!Jlliem Rac;:ifie R'ai,lr~_arl
GomplU'lY tighi of WilY, North 50°40"'30" w.est" 60.0.00. feet to the mnsl w:~[erly ~orl'jef' ~f said
Pitr~~ No. 1; -
Thence lt41vin~, Sflid' Q('lmer fll1d' a,IOJ:lg Ibe so!lthwes~d~' 'Hne 0f said Par,o,e} No.1 (9.5<1 o.,R_§8Q~.
S",uIIl459SIP4'\" En~I.,6.~W,(~,t (Q the point of.n~ING".
Cdlituiniflg: en area of 0.3441l£res, mQ.te.-or-\ess,
~~ng '!Ilsp A~~or' s f-arccl Number ,j 20-31·008 perJ~oJ.l Y~r ~Qj f ~1iQ.)2.
Le~al'ae~qriptiol)
EXHlf{ITl ~ ,P~Rl{ ,PARCELs
Puge4 pf5
larkPAr(;C!l;l
&t}a)ptop~rtY ill :th~City(}fPaJo Ano~ CQuntYQf Santa Clar~~ S:tafebfe~Hf()rt)i~; deSCt'il;jed 'as
follows:
]~eiJtg a portion of tb~ IUl1ds of'TheBoarciof Trustees of'tl)eLeiandStanford J\111l0r tJ:tlivetSity~ a
bodY-Vl'i;i;t)rtg cQl>'PQrat,e,po\\lersundel" lh~ laws:"of:~he State dfCalifornia:. desCriQ,~d 'as f()l:)()W,S~ .
B¢ingla:ls~ J,{ portiQl10ffhe· JaJtds; desctib¢dasBIC~tmbl(}' Park. :In. that "C~)1ain Res~lun'Qfi; passed
-atl~t adup.tedl>}' lhe; City Coum.~Jlur (he~City o(:I."ido At~o oJ)February'26~Hn-3 b~ R~))QtUtt9P N(},
4'tt9t re,'C~ffi:ded F~bruaryZB. 1972 JniOQK 251" at Page. 281, Uffichi.1 :Re¢Qrds :of Sant~', Clara
¢,Qunt¥i rtl(lTe particlllatLyde$:cribecla~ ,(dHows:
le~lvh~g:S'tiid pOitl11!nd .alQllg, the llotttre~sterfy Un.e of et Ca.-mino Real, b~big al~o State
H:tgl1way -&2. North 30'c09'a9~i' WOes!. ~5.5'3 fe~t :te the TRUE POINT OFBE(}INNIN{j{;?f c~his
" aeset:iptjlm~'
Tlaenc'e lea"r:ng.s'4llr:l ;PQintnn<ialong $(tid nOfrhe~st.er:ry Hnf:;of EJ Camino R:ea1, tht} fQf]£)wing: r~vQ
cputs~;;atl{.t distances;
1J J~()rth u~ A9 'fe,et; North )I O"?I\~,I\"In .6,9,.) 1 f~et ~othe c~rltet lime: Qf S~Ji Fra,nci~quh()Cre¢k~<
Tftei1~ealoi18 su:td ~entet Hne, of ,sal); Fr~n¢i~qpl1Q C:re~k> the fi'iHqwll)g t'W:(.~ (2)" Courses 'and.
(fi~l(l,tl~es~
$01;lth84<t$·5" 3()i·'E~Sl. J 64,52 fe~t;
-No-nil ·63rI3,~~3,Q~· :Eil~.t. 77 ,2,1 f~,ettQ :the s:(}vthW~~t¢tly :line Qrsouth~nl Papjf(G~ailr{)ad.
«~omp~)frtg~l·ofW:~Y;
Th:ell~~ ,along sa:id;s~utflwe~ueil~ line of StiQtbern Pnc'Lficl{ailrond' Company ri~tft;Qf way, ~th~
fQ!loWh\g:tWQc(1;) ,c~9t~~/tuld dista"ces:
o SOltth $(;):'a3;'4 l" East~1;,9~ fft0t~
2,~ S()uJb 50'~40'3Q"; Ea.'ll, 'i:9'60~2.Sfeet to the' no:rthe.tly line 'of Pal,,): Alto Avel1ue~;$ai:dI1Qtlhedy
line!!) Q~~~d~eCl;ill that cemiill c}\ceptlb-trparcel: 'for ;si\i;d EI ,CaUlinoPatk iperRe~Qlution
Nq:,,4'O(J{;~~7 c,tR. .. :&81 )~
1':n~nce;~J~tlgsaid l),ortbet~y IJn~ ;of p'alQ Alto A:~et1\let the ;t()ltQWJflg, ,two (!J 'dQur$~s' ,and:
disln!1ce:~:-
r ,) Scutll,g5°41;::;4'~ West, 192;22 feet tb,tlte beglhl1ing of a tilt)get;11CllTve to the ;tig;ht, h;a~.dliga
~adl~s. ofS8~J)(}'f,e~t; . ,
~l W~sterly.n'long~aid ¢tn~e~ inr~)llghac~ll~ral;Angle, ·of (};jl.).)O~t~ZU~ t~i 81) atc Lengtb ,PI
5~'1~1 feet t<> the'TRiWE '}J,OlNT OF' B'EG]$NlN'(j:' o1f tnls ct¢$cri:pli~l(
c.Pj)~jning#n &,re(,i()f, 0.69'1 increS,n10re ('}r'les~. . _,
Being ~t's~ .A,S$;essof~s, P~tcer Number 12.0~')1-nOl pet'l{<5H 'f'ear20:tt; 1 ~20f2r
LegtlJ Q¢,SCriptiOR
E~JaIT 2 ~ PA:RK P-ARCELS
Pa~ 5 of'S
~;trk ;~r«:elS> l~ 2, and 3, as$bown 'C1n pl(lt.entftJed c"EKRmrr 2." 8«acbed h~~t() 4nd made 1l pari '~'erC4)t ; 1
1J1iS:description was.prepared .~ me;or;ubder my"directsupe!yjston-,
BKI" -E'ngtneers
-f~)
J9bO-I<orQyan,' r .L,~--0.8&83
. .Liceose.tiplfe$. 'li~ 1.2QJ$
A?~q'G7~ &rz.
LeGEND
T.P;O:B: -tRu~ POINT OF ermf.JNtNG
Bkf _ , ...... 1PLIIIIiI
~ --"-
S~cl "Pt!WJr b;m2 ti· -,L~ OL __ ~F _ r= lJN1V.-
Jp~ No. 20126006 _" I ',--' a, JG. , Dah 03-0.5::12 Chkd. JW< -,SHEET ,_ Or: t". 2'. _
LEGEND
P,O,B. POINT 'OF BeGINNING
PEN/HSUL.A CORR(OOR JOINT P.OM'RS BOAR(}} (FORJifER~Y sOVntf:RN P~C.lFlC RAJLRDI.D COMP-XNY)
SSD'·4d·Jo~r_s ..... ' --• " ' 50~4l!i.!'W '80Q;Do.'
-PM)( PARCEL J-
, O.!.~f ACRfS::t' ,-
': A#J:.I-~g-._31-QfJ1_ ~\ .' " I:
-' T.P'O,Et.'~PQf1; __ ~, :-----;...-'N:;"Uili5~JO~W"~;;i:B.;~7.,J;o----..... J~~':; ---~ .. ~f-~------"P~,A,~lKr'P-~~-~~--_J~ ______ ~~ __ ~fl_'·!'~,Q.~~:Ii~~:O~R!'~-"~~ __ _ (~A:n HIGHWAY J'AL
--.:~ '"
, ; ._' ';:J ~' ..... ~~' ~":-::-:~:r----1
,~, ~~~~~~~=d
:',!I '"
',I, Oi) :,
1,·1
BkF
~Bk,r
DeD'ot .cacm A
J~X'H'mrr3
Legal Descr.lption
March ~ 20:1'2
~KP No. '20126:006
Page lof3
R.eal propcny in the City ofPii\o. h\lto, COJlUly ~f San[a Clw-a,Stale of California,descnQed ali
foJlowsi
iletilg .a· portion af itI~ lands bf 'The' Soard of Trustees of tbe, Leland 'S~nfoi'd iilnior Unj ver:sity, a
bod)' havin.g corporate. pDWefS under the .i'IlWS Qf the' State of'CAI'iJolTlla. desciibe.d·1IS follQW&:
Be{ng also the,l:nnds described a6. Pru:ce] I A in that certain Qulte'laim Deed fro!1l SouJ.O~'t)l~I!.CI'.6t
Tralt8pcJrt.adon· Company, a Delaware-corporation to The Board of ~s.te,.es of tbe Leland
Stanfordlunior IJnlv,enJil'j. ~ed August· 7, H~alln 8'ookc;m;'l at-Page -2.9..8 •. Qffl.li:lal Records
of Sa pta Clara. Cou!lty'iUld-tile iilI)d~ describe4 as: PDt~l 'No. 2 ~~ Il\al ~~itClil1 Subfease betweetl
City of '(!alo Al~o, a· tn)lflTcipal Cbrpo'i;4tibn ot the Swe of Calif.omia and 'SoatheroPacme
Railroad 'C<lmpany.· a, c.otpQQltil;)n, f!lcorded ,October 30, 1:939,\n Book 951 at 'Faile :58'0\ O(ficial
R~r<I~ 'of gaid.:COti.nt¥. more plit\wlarly deScribed' as foJlows~
&g!(lJ\\h1! lit a ,pC!int of i'iller~lion lfetween tlie center lin~, 'of. Uni(.o,ersil): Avenlle and the
So.uthWes.rer.ly line. of' me; Pal'Q Aho SrZUion QIoUnds~_ a$ S1ild StaUOf:1; GtOqnd& :is' descr.lbe({ ~n tl\.'Bt
certain. E_asement from tAlllnd $tunfQrd 10 Soothem P&'ClfreRalfroaci CompfIJIY', .(Iat&'l NQv~{I)ber'
23, 1892 a,td recorded Ocio~r 2&:. 191:5' in Volume 43-5 of Deeds at Page 244, 'R~.itls of Santa
Clara Coun~;
Thenc~ leaving sald poilit ~d :along said ~authwe,s(l:Sfly tine of said Palo· Alta Station Gro\fnifs.
N'orth 50"40'30" W~st. ] 12,O.S fe.e~ to ~ point ,on: tbe ncrU}we:slerly. line of. 'said UQlvel1riW
ANoo.ue. said pdj~t b~ing al~b tf;-e beginning of ~n:Ori-t.angenl CUrv6, concave, 10 the SQ,Uth~~,
having'a R~i~a Qf 300.00 feet." fl'9JTl tbl) center Qf~aid cur-ve~' mdlallin.e-bOOS North 28<'45'3-2"
West>. saM pol'l'Ir beIng al$O Ihe TRUE POINT Ol!'BEGINNING of ihls d@crlpt\()n:
Thencecleav\ng said poill,1 ,lltl~ along tt,-e.,ge:n§l'ilf ~on:liw.es~lY' llfJ~ orSllW Un~versity Avenue" the
fQIlowing:two (2~ courses and di'Sta~
t), NOrIheas.lecly. al<mg'said cur-ve. Ihto,u'gi1 a' Qe'nf~41\ A,-1l81e Of 1.l"~5'52". fur .om 'at~ Length of
62.47~.r 10 ··th,e begihnlhg: ota flo~-llln8".nt cu.ry~ 1;0J)P:a~ ~ the SOJltl"fw.est, baving a.
Radius of 1'8'9 :00 (eet..·fr'olinhe center ,of ~d ~u.rve' a ~i'i(ll1n~ IieIrs NOI'th 13 a,1'.8 '04.~ Ea&.ti
2) S,oll'lh~aterly, alO'ng ,s'lid: emnce. lhro.ugb ·8 ~ Angle. af t,()b·S.1\*4"'. for an.8I'(: ~Il~ =Of
36::05 'feet to -a p.oint. said t/Olnt being ,r),t the inl'ersettion of 8 1,1 I)e , (ir.a.wn SOiOll ~t
I\(lJtb~.estedy. ri~t.~le ~ment, ffolU.<Sllid unter line ,ofU!\tvetshy; A!v,en'oei
Thence leal(ing .saki paine ~ pamHet With 9a:1~. ctf)t~r Ifne '.Of OP.lversit)'. Ayonue., Nerth
39GS9' 3d'" East" 2.2~ rut to ~fle. most ea~rl.Y ,comer of s~id' Pan:cl 1 A. (0263 O.R. 29a};'
Tbe:iJ~e lea\ri.ng slI,id comer andalon'g the. northe'Mteri'Y lirfe Qf said PatCel lAo NoOh~ $'QD"O' 3D"
Wes.t., 847.79. feef: 'to lite mQst uortl:1erly cqmer of S!1id :Parce.ll A ,026'3 ·Q.R. 198};
· .•. . ...... ~galD ·ct1~ric;.n BXH1B1T}\c,. tlEPOT PARCELS
Pag~~()r3
'rhenc~le4,iang s(dd'oomer mi{\: '~Hong the·J)t>I1I)weslerfy al;~ O:(~I.d4 Parcel I A, SO(ftti '3~¢1 9{]0'·
'W~Sh 70'J)0 fe.~l lQ th~ !l1()~t rlqtth¢,dY·~,911let.Qt:"~~~lt:J: 'pt;lr,cef~t6;.2 :(~$l Q.R .. 5,SQ.)isairl tonter
b~i)lgalS'Q the lnOM wesl~rW~Qln~rof' s~iidRa10 l\1 tJJ:$tl)tiQnQJQlmcl!i(435r.lel!ds.'244);
"f11~Jlee: leltvtt(gS'Llidu(l'l1:)et'8rl'd' 'afong' the;getJetat:~()uth\v~sted~)': Hntlo.f said li'at¢~tNQ.,2 (95 J
~.:R, . ~(!J1~tJ1¢JQHowhlg'five IS), cou rS¢satlddi~toall~~~
1,) :Soutb l6RTl~~'~.BilS{! 14,.1J; ;f(}~M
·~~,$QuIll$G!'J4H·~.e'$·:east~4~Q~;9S ·t~~I, tQJh:~'begtt)Jll:n8of ,t$ ·t~llg~nt ~'i!~yet;o.·tlle Jeft~ Ila\'if:!ga
R;l\din$' f:1f' tl,.~·.te~(~ .
~), Nt)11fu~~~tetly!.~lQi\g,!1~id'cur,:e. thrQugh ,4ljcenttal: '~i1g1e"nf9,(jQaO~£}o··. for ·a,tlllfc'f,;,ellgth of
41A·3 .feelIQlJ'te:oegtOllir-.tg0;f at.¢y·erse,~ur\.\e.. ooncave tUlbt! sou~heasf,h:a,~i.ng a ]Radius o(
1;3~(l4· :r~~l,(tOI'tI tb~C~11lei of$ai'd:,¢urv~~"t~d1M Jjp~,:b;e~f:,~~North 500.40'30" West~
4J SQiJ.fbeaste'I¥,~lQ"gsaj4curve;. thrQ~~lJ~,t:.e)Urp.)! Aogf~';Qf9nbt)o'():o" _ . far an :at.cl.~ngtJ1 Qf
1l.A~feet:· .
~!S,O:Qth'50o40'30" Easl, 202.6i feel tq ia point 'Qn' saia;gnnhweSlerlM ti'ne,uf sai~JJnjver,~i,~,
Avenue. said poim being al.~o, .thei '~ghlP.iJfit Df ' UtiDn-rangent €n)~;v:e. eOllCQ£~ :(6 ttte.
sQuttleast. having a Radi\1$ of3(l~~JjQfttelt ':f~m·~h~ t[~fit~ Qf ~aidC;f:Hr.~i~;~ {aQ1A}'.irn~r bears
N~J~h,39~8'48" West~ .
llk¢nce ;l1fftlhell~tel'lyand :along$nld n~rtltwestet'ly line: ofsai~' Unlversi t)t'AvenUef,al(5n$,~~ltl
q"tf\l,~,tl1roUgh, ;i eenttAl i\n·gl:eQfl,()943.' 16':1., for a~ nrc Length of 5;6-.J4f~~~. t4l~h~ 'Tlttr~
PQiN$ 0FBE,$INNING :ef.t~is'Qt;s¢ri,ptibI\~ .
Depol ;Par.~elB; ..
Real ,propeny 1n tbe City o;r pa10 AllOt L'.oWJt-)'of,$ahla Clata.,r 'iSt:@te 0,f. alifol'nia, desGribed as
rbHowst
Beit!~ a·:PQrtt~n .()f{~e :Jan~sotfhe Board of tt\1Stee.S.~flb~'Lefana :,{~nford.Jufilor Utl~\'eT~ityi~ .~
bQt;J:y;fi~~ftl~,,-¢or.porate;~(l)w~ts l}:nde;r (he laws ~{~U.w. $t~le.: of'Caltf(1)fOhl. 'i;i¢~~ri\Ml as (ollows.:
B~i'llifil~at~A3nd$:desc-tib~d ~$iPJn'c,el1B in. tllllt;certain'Qufteburn lleed ft()nrSoutti~m l?q~jJ;jlt
tt~"~PQIl!l(;iqtl 001l1p-an}'~8 'Del~ware, cQl};,etatipn' it>: 'The' :Soard of Tro~tees. ~rtJl~L¢latt<;f
:$l~nf~td ·J1i.f\i()r ttpj-vcn;it y, recor(feti,Ao'gu81 7, 198 f lp,~:~~i Q2'3atBag~Z9a'f. Q:ffi¢.i~n;Q~cor,ds
:of S:ant'4:~CIllT~(Cojjflly.,tllo):e purtltOI~l1'J, de~Q.f,ib~~l,gs tQl.JQW$~
;Be,gJt:Ull'~~at .~ ,PQilX~ 'oJ inlef$~cti~ft ,\~e,(;w;¢e)), .,tbe 'c.ente.r Jtn~ .:llf"(J;.il\ler,silYA:veJl\l'e .. andl tbe
SP~.t}jW~Sll;}rl)t lin~,Qt·(be.P"lo AnoSla(i(m:Gfoul1d~', ,as:s.a:i(J'Sta'tion GrQund~ is descr{~~ In lhtit
'C$aitlEQselllenf fhll11.'L~f~Ud~~~f!f~t~~?, S~u.U)em .'l';~~ifi.'O"Rantoad'C0nt ..... ' ...... ;·~at~NQv.emb~r
20l'1: 1'69jand ·r¢¢o.rQ~" 'Qc·tP~r·~8, :F9d $ 'in \l.Cijlt;Hlle :43'$9.t" ~t1e.~d~' nrpl:\~t¥ M,RecQx8.ir OfiS'a1*~
;C'~l'.llC~upty;
-Legal D~lption
EXJtIBiT 3 -D"EPOT P,AR.CE1...S
Pagelof'3
Tllen6e leaYing said poh,t and alon~ ,said southwesterlY, .Itlle of ~d !;lalo A:lto Station ,d.r91mcis.
$'oulh 50°40'30" East, I 1.3 ,68· feet ,16 Ii point '00 '11:t~ s.Qutn~teriy nne-of S1lid University Avenue,
said paiO r :beilfg al!)o, £he TRUB'POfNT OF 8EGlNNING of this descripti9n; -
Th~nc,e lea"irfg ,s!iid 'fX5il\~ tI,110 &l,on'g tlie &,outh\V'eI)tet\}' Un'll Qf $a1d .PaI'C~[ 1$ (G26~ O:R. 2~g), ~ld line belng ~!;o the nor.the@~ly Jine· of Parcel :2 of L.Qt M •. as sha.Wn 0.0"1111;\ ~j'nl maJ>
etIliUed ''Surv.oy of Lois 37 and, 380, StanfQrd Uoj-versHy L,.ands, Palo A:lto, California", drj(ed
August 1,9-.5S. Shool 2. of ? .... 'prepared by Lawte(\ce G. Bn8.nj ctvJl Engineer, South: 50°4n10"
&st. )'6.1.S0.reet',tG the-mQ:st soulherly ootncr ofsaid Faroel 1'8.;
'Ehe\lce leaving Silid ilOJ1ne~(et\y line'orP'ar(]ef1 of Lot 3-8. North 39°-19'3'0" BaM. 7(;.00 feet to
tJre-'most easteriy,c_omer of'said'FaTtel 'I:B';' -
Thenc't leaving $aid comer and 1110n& the general northeasterly I toe ohatd P-&rcei, J'J;! {G263 O.R.
2-9a}~ _the fQJ lbwirig-tl'u'e-e t3) 'COll,m'S aod di'sfailCe$:
I} North SJJ!'4Qc·3.~-' Wcest",94':S(>'feet;
2) Sooth 3~~.\'1·30" Wesl.;_,26.®,feet;
3) North 5()'o40!~" West 95.1.4 feet,to a poinl,on said sQurliea'sltflY line of SAId UI1N~rS.ilY
AveilUe, said point b.ein,g, also tbe;:beginning.of II non-tangenf curve. concwe to -fhe,northw~.
'hav:ln~ a Radiu/; of 3StWO feel, from -(he; ~rt~~t of$'~itl' ctl~,e n, radial ,tib~' bear'§: South
:84~55'lg!i East:
'tfien:co soull\W6Sterly" along SJlid, curve, through a central Angle.of'0r'42r I6'-'. fot' 'an, ~l.'C, Length
0J 57,13 feet ~o'(he 'tRUE POINT OF 1;\~ of this descriptIon.
,"
Seing.--a'IS9,Assessor's'Parcef NUmbeJll20~3Q-012 pt=t &011 Yeat'2(U t -2~12.
D,epot' 'Parcels A and' B, as, sbbwil oil plat-entitled "''EXHIBIT :3" ~Chcd 'be~to and '
Il\llde-a, ,part: h~reof.
'J:t!is'descrlprl'on WaS' prepared by me.-or under my direct, sllpe(lIislon.
,lalrfl J{orr;yan, ':Itt,S.. O. 8883
Li~,el\s.o ,~pi,re9 11.-:31·2£)13
_A?A-It~ ~ /' "z o/'Z
nate(i'·
,LEGEND
p.;o.~' POINT O.F 8ECi.!NNING T.:p.fiB. rR(j'~ POJN7 or BE'c;lNNlNG
rl'~.L ..
(seQ W FBT),
~t.d At.:m ,SArITA Q4ARItCQ~~ CAUF'ORNJA
,K!'\SvR'2\ U60ol\j)~\PiAlS\OEPOT' PJ;A1;~
1':,11',', ' "Ill . -~ .. , ......... -
" ,
, ,
This document is recorded
for the benefit of the City
of Palo Alto and is entitled
to be recorded free of charge
in accordance with Section 6103 of the
Government Code.
After Recordation, mail to:
Office Of The City Attorney
City of Palo Alto
250 Hamilton Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94301
EXHIBIT 4
GRANT OF ACCESS EASEMENT
For good and valuable consideration, receipts and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR
UNIVERSITY, a body having corporate powers under the laws of the State of California
("Grantor"), hereby grants to the CITY OF PALO ALTO, a California chartered city and
municipal corporation ("Granteell
), an easement, as further defined below, in, on, under, along
and across the real property of Grantor, as more particularly described in Exhibit _ attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Parcelll
), for the purpose of accessing
facilities related to the operation, inspection, maintenance, repair, and replacement an
underground water storage and distribution system located on the Parcel.
I n furtherance of the foregoing, the parties hereby agree as follows:
1. Grant of Easement. Grantor HEREBY GRANTS to Grantee an easement for
ingress to and egress from the Parcel in the area more particularly described in Exhibit _ and
depicted in Exhibit _ each of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference (the "Easement Area").
2. Reservation of Grantor's Rights. Subject to Grantee's rights under that certain
lease dated June 10, 1915, as amended by that certain Amendment to Lease dated June 29,
1971, and by that certain Second Amendment to Lease dated February 26, 1973, and by that
certain Third Amendment to Lease dated March 31, 1981, and by that certain Fourth Lease
Amendment dated July 31, 1981, and by that certain Fifth Amendment to Lease dated January
1, 2000 (collectively, the "Lease"), Grantor reserves the right to use the Easement Area for any
purposes which will not interfere with Grantee's full enjoyment of the rights hereby granted;
provided that Grantor shall not erect or construct any building or other structure, drill or operate
any well, plant any trees or construct any fence that will interfere with Grantee's access to and
egress from the Easement Area. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Grantee agrees and
acknowledges that upon the expiration orearlier termination of the Lease, Grantor may pave the
Easement Area and use it for vehicular access, parking and pedestrian walkways. After the
120308 jb 0130941
expiration or earlier termination of the Lease, Grantee shall not make any use of the surface of
the Parcel that interferes with Grantor's use of the Parcel.
3. Incorporation of Prior Grant of Easements. Grantor and Grantee hereby
agree that the provisions of Section 2(b), and Sections 5 through 15 of that certain Grant of
Easements recorded January 29, 2009 as Document No. 20114059 of the Official Records of
Santa Clara County, California are incorporated herein by this reference and shall apply to the
Easement Area and this Grant of Access Easement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor and Grantee have duly executed this Grant of
Reservoir Easements as of this __ day of ,2012.
GRANTOR:
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY,
a body having corporate powers within the
laws of the State of California
By:
Its: ___________ _
120308 jb 0130941
GRANTEE:
CITY OF PALO ALTO, a chartered city and
municipal corporation
By: .
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM
By: .
City Attorney
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California
County of ________ _
On before me, (insert here name
and title of the officer), personally appeared , who proved to me on the
basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) 'whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within
instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their
authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),
or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature:
Place Notary Seal Above
120308 jb 0130939
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
This is to certify that the interest in real property created by the Grant of Access
Easement dated , 2012, by THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND
STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, as Grantor, to the CITY OF PALO ALTO, a chartered city
and municipal corporation as Grantee, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council by the
undersigned officer or agent on behalf of the City of Palo Alto, pursuant to authority conferred by
Resolution No. 4434, of the City of Palo Alto adopted on March 15, 1971, and the Grantee
consents to recordation thereof by this duly authorized officer.
Dated: ______ , 2012 CITY OF PALO ALTO
By: _______________ __
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: __________________________ _
City Attorney
120308 jb 0130939
legend
~dllmlc Growth Boundary
ReviSled Special Condillon
Area B. Development precluded
- -until December3i, 2020, except
recreation and academic /lelds
and essocleled supporluses.
Housing allowed as shown.
.~~~
':
Faculty !Staff/Sludent
housing allowed under
amended agreement
Revised Area B Boundary and
Property to be Removed from Area B ',,,",,,IJ-"..
"
Legend
Il!I!I!IIm 8all Park Lease (EI Camino Park)
~::::J Depot-Intermodal Center (Subleased to VTA) r=:.J City Jurisdictional Limits
The City or
Palo Alto
rttv."" 1
fll<x:-lNI!'I!'qIoSIQI.ladmhlS' .. _",..,. ... a,lI'Idbj
Attachment C
Summary ofEI Camino Park
Lease Boundaries
Area Map
This map Is a product of the
City of Palo Alto GIS
--,
TN>doo..wnenlis~\IfOIphlc I
1M City 01 P.lo Mo .. ~ no "oponolboli!}l rO( .~y Mort (ll~9 ~ 2012 cny 01 Pllo,oJ",
legend
Academic Growth Boundary
Re\'lsed Special Condltlon
Area B. Developmenl precluded
- -untl December 31.2020. 6XC8j)1
rea-salion and academic fields
and associated support uses.
Housing allowed as shown.
FaoultylStafflStudem
houSing allowed under
amended agreem&nl
Revised Area B Boundary and
Pro rty to be Removed from Area B ''''''''''1."",-
ATTACHMENT D
STANFORD UNIVERSITY
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION
AMENDMENT TO 1997
SAND HILL ROAD DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
ATTACHMENT 1
Attachment 1 January 27,2012
Development Review Application -Stanford University
Amendment to 1997 Sand Hill Road Development Agreement
Attachment 1 -Property Location
As described in greater detail in Attachment 2 to this Application, the requested action is
the amendment of the 1997 Sand Hill Road Development Agreement to (a) remove
approximately 10.25 acres of land 'from Special Condition Area B, and (b) extend the
lease of the approximately 10-acre EI Camino Park site by nine years, from June 30,
2033, to June 30, 2042.
The 10.25 acres of fand that is proposed for removal from Area B will be referred to as
the "Property." The attached map depicts the Property and the bound~ries of Area B,
as revised by the proposed amendment to the Sand Hill Road Development Agreement.
The Property is located within a portion of APN No. 142-06-001. The Property is within
the permitting jurisdiction of Santa Clara County and is designated as "Academic
Campus" in the County's 2000 Stanford Community Plan and General Use Permit. This
designation allows the development of academic facilities and academic support uses.
The EI Camino Park site subject to the EI Camino Park lease is located within the City
of Palo Alto and includes APN No. 120-31-001, APN No. 120-31 .. 008, and a portion of
APN No. 120-31-09. The site is zoned as both "Stanford University Lands" and "Park or
Preserve."
22509630.1
STANFORD UNIVERSITY
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION
AMENDMENT TO 1997
SAND HILL ROAD DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
ATTACHMENT 2
Attachment 2 January 27, 2012
Development Review Application -Stanford University
Amendment to 1997 Sand Hill Road Development Agreement
Attachment 2 -Description of Requested Action
Stanford University requests that the City of Palo Alto execute an amendment to the 1997
Sand Hill Road Development Agreement to remove an approximately 10.25-acre area
(which will be referred to as the IIProperty") from Special Condition Area B. A map
showing the Property is enclosed as part of Attachment 1 to this Application. In exchange
for the removal of the Property from Area B, the City of Palo Alto has requested a nine
year extension of the lease for EI Camino Park. Accordingly, it is proposed that the 1997
Sand Hill Road Development Agreement be amended to (a) remove the Property from
Area B and from any development restrictions and specifications that apply under the
Agreement to Area B; and (b) extend the lease of the approximately 1 ()..acre EI Camino
Park site by nine years, from June 30, 2033, to June 3D, 2042.
The Property is within the permitting jurisdiction of Santa Clara County and is regulated
under the County's 2000 Stanford Community Plan and General Use Permit ("GUPIl). The
Property is within the Academic Growth Boundary and the Academ,ic Campus land use
designation, which allows the development of academic facilities and support uses.
Stanford University plans to seek County approval to build a new energy center on the
Property to replace the campus' aging and increasingly inefficient Cardinal Cogeneration
energy facility. The new energy center is an important part of Stanford's long-range
Energy and Climate Plan, which is designed to increase energy efficiency while reducing
the environmental impacts associated with supplying energy to the Stanford campus.
Stanford is still in the planning process and has not yet proposed a specific project for the
County's approval Stanford has identified the Property as its preferred site for the new
energy center and accordingly submits this application to amend the Sand Hill Road
Developnlent Agreement to remove the Property from Special Condition Area B.
The Development Agreement prohibits development in a portion of Area B until December
31, 2020, except for academic and recreationa.1 fields and associated support' facilities.
The Development Agreement allows the development of housing within another portion of
Area B regardless of the December 2020 date. Except for a small sliver of land located in
the northwest comer of the Property, the Property is located within the portion of Area B
where the Development Agreement currently allows housing. Except for this small sliver of
land, the City of Palo Alto already has approved development on the Property, and the
requested amendment to the Development Agreement would change only the type of
development that is allowed under the Agreement -from housing to academic and support
uses. With respect to the small sliver of land that is within the non-housing portion of Area
B, the requested amendment to the Development Agreenlent would merely allow Stanford
to accelerate the development of academic and support uses in advance of the December
31, 2020 date.
As expla.ined above, the entirety of the Property is deSignated for academic and support
uses under the County's Community Plan and 2000 GUP. Removal of the Property from
1
Attachment 2 january 271 2012
Area B would not result in any changes to either the Community Plan or GUP, which both
would continue to apply to the Property in full force.
The Sand Hill Road Development Agreement has been amended on two previous
occasions, in 2001 and 2003. Stanford's proposed text for the third amendment to the
Development Agreement is enclosed as Attachment 3 to this Application.
2
ATTACHMENT E
an amendment with the State.
Council Member Price said Council but did not
have a defensible methodology to count~~
Council Member
projection
BAG's methodology for the entire region
but Palo Alto projections were questionable. ABAG
in the same because Palo Alto did not have a
MOTION PASSED: 9-0
11. Approval of Park Development Impact Fees to Fund Park
Improvements at EI Camino Park in Conjunction With Utilities
Department CIP WS-OB002 EI Carrlino Park Reservoir Project.
Director of Community Services, Greg Betts provided a brief presentation.
Parks & Open Space Division Manager, Daren Anderson said since June 2010
,the Parks and Recreation Commission (PARC) discussed park design
improvements at six regular meetings and one special on-site meeting at the
park. The Comrrlission raised concerns regarding pedestrian/bike access to
the park, restroom location related to safety and access, tree protection,
maximizing parking spaces., fencing for dog exercise area, and lighting
improvements. The Commission's guidance on design included the
Recreation staff's input from various field user groups that preferred features
such as synthetic turf, field size, and multi-use designs to accommodate
various sports. The input provided direction for the conceptual design of
park improvements. Some options were not taken into consideration
because user demand was not as high as other features or did not
compliment the field design. On February 22, 2011, Staff presented the
Commission with two possible impact fee options and had recommended
"Option A" that included synthetic turf for the north and south playing fields,
a storage building for maintenance equipment, expanded parking lot,
lighting conduit for future lighting of north field, mulch for non-turf areas,
soccer catchment fenCing and funding for tree removal and design fees. This
option would use $2,360,500 of the current impact fee balance of $2.B
million. The Commission recommended ."Option B" which was similar to
"Option A" except for natural turf at the south field, a lighted granite
pathway and four picnic tables and would use $1,420,500 of the current
impact fee balance which was $940,000 less than "Option A." Staff agreed
with the 4-2 Commission vote that "Option B" represented the best use of
impacts fees for EI Camino Park.
22 06/13/2011
Parks & Recreation Commission Chair, Daria Walsh, said the Commission
wanted to see the park get used more by the residents. The soccer fields
had the most value for the money but needed improvements. Synthetic turf
allowed for more usage.
Parks & Recreation Commissioner, Pat Markevitch, said she supported
"Option A" because she believed in tearing down and rebuilding the park all
at once. Shutting down the park twice would be more costly. She said south
of the baseball field, between the park and the Red Cross building, was land
that could be utilized for parking and she did not perceive parking was an
issue.
Paul Snyder, Seigfried Engineering gave a presentation that addressed
design concepts. He said there were many connectivity issues that
surrounded the sites such as the Alma crossing along the tracks, the Caltrain
bus station, the Stanford Mall and the existing parking lot in the middle. The
existing pump station was being replaced in the same position and the
placement of the reservoir created additional issues. Efforts were made to
preserve and enhance the urban forest. The northern field had the parking
expansion, new buildings and the synthetic field. The southern field
addressed the restoration of the park utilities project. His presentation
included detailed information on how every effort was made to meet all
amenities and desires of the community and Staff in creating a conceptual
design.
Herb Borock said there were several environmental documents that were
missing from the Staff report such as a draft of the Mitigated Negative
Declaration and a recommendation that action would be taken on an
Environmental Review (ER). He noted that all the park fee funds would be
spent on synthetic material for the playing fields. Playing fields were not the
only park use and other parks needed money. He said it was a bad use of
money and violated the environmental law.
Council Member Klein asked Staff to respond to Mr. Borock's concerns.
Mr. Betts clarified the plans were only conceptual plans and Staff had
worked closely with the Planning Department in reviewing the plans. He
said the conceptual plans and the allocation of funds were being presented
to the Council this evening before getting too far down the road. All
required environmental documents would be provided when final plans were
presented to the Council. A top 10 list adopted by the Council in 2007 was
in the Staff report regarding fund usage and included monies for the Bixby
Park Hills expansion. He said there was sufficient money for that and other
23 06/13/2011
projects including the Magical Bridge project that was included in the
budget.
Council Men1ber Klein said the discussion was on the direction of funds and
where they eventually would be allocated and was not being expended at
this point.
Mr. Betts that was correct.
Council Member Klein said the plan called for 13 additional parking spaces
and asked for the total number of spaces.
Mr. Snyder said he thought it was in the mid 40's but not certain.
Council Member Klein asked if there would be ample parking if both fields
were in full use along with other activities. What would be the maximum
amount of people in attendance.
Mr. Betts said the north field would not have bleachers and did not expect
any more than 20-30 people when the north field was used for soccer.
Scheduling of events would be controlled and would limit the number of
activities that could occur at one time and booking of major events. He said
t~e project was on a bicycle route and transit corridor with easy access to
Alma Street for overflow parking. Parking was being increased from 33 to
47 spaces and he felt it was the right size parking for the expanded capacity
with multi-use of both fields.
Council Men1ber Klein said Alma Street had limited parking area and raised
concerns about getting cornplaints from offices and stores. He said
Commissioner Markevitcl1 indicated parking use towards University Avenue
and asked Staff to elaborate on its feasibility.
Mr. Betts said the lot had potentials. There was a diagonal pedestrian
pathway between Quarry Road and EI Camino Real, across from PF Changs
Restaurant, into a field. The field has a number of utility vaults, water and
electrical meters, and two power poles. A feasibility study of gaining
automobile access and parking at the field had not been done and was a
concern.
Council Member Klein said it would be a trade off of EI Camino Real, which
was a State highway and would require Caltran's approval.
Mr. Betts sa id that was correct.
24 06/13/2011
Council Member Klein asked if there was an appropriate number of parking
spaces in that area.
Mr. Snyder said the area had several constraints and tree preservation
issues. The biggest issue was a slope near the bus turn-around area. There
would be approximately 20-25 spaces depending on Caltran's perrTlission,
signal timing and accessibility.
Council Member Klein asked if the Olympic Memorial trees located at the
southwest corner would remain as is.
Mr. Snyder said every effort would be made to preserve the trees.
Council Member Klein asked where the dog park would be located.
Mr. Snyder referred to a wall map and pOinted to the area where the dog
park area could be fenced off.
Council Member Klein asked how definite the dog park was in the plan.
Mr. Anderson said the dog park was not definite at this time. The area was
intended to be a passive recreation area. Issues and options needed to be
studied during the conceptual phase.
Council Member Klein said this was not a topic of discussion for this evenings
meeting and asked Staff to see about changing the name Stanford/Palo Alto
Soccer Facilities to differentiate the facility's location.
Council Member Shepherd asked if a fence was planned along Alma Street
across from EI Palo Alto.
Mr. Snyder made reference to the wall map and indicated there was an
existing fence in an internal area with shorter fencing for the dog park and
would not limit access to the park.
Council Member Shepherd
c
had issues on voting on an area with only the
possibility for parking. She asked if there was an inventive way to create a
pathway from the Red Cross building or the transit center to access the
area.
Mr. Snyder asked as an engineer or a person in a truck.
Council Member Shepherd said a person in a truck.
25 06/13/2011
Mr. Snyder said the area had several obstacles and a person in a truck could
possibly create a path through the area. The opportunity would be there for
a planner or an engineer but they would need to deal with leased property.
Council Merrlber Shepherd said it would eliminate dealing with Caltrans. She
asked who owned the property.
Mr. Betts said the property was part of EI Camino Park. One of the
challenges was relocating a JC Decaux Public Toilet that existed at the end of
the street past the Red Cross building.
Council Member Shepherd said she was interested to see if access could be
pursued in getting to the potential parking area.
Ms. Walsh said most of the Commissioners were expecting the area to be
part of the park and not for parking.
Council Member Price asked what the life span was for heavily used
synthetic turf.
Mr. Betts said seven to eight years.
Council Member Price said a comment was made that having two synthetic
fields would bring a bigger demand for field use. She raised concerns
regarding the cost for the additional parking area since it had not been
included in the plan. She asked what the maintenance cost would be for a
grass field where the base diamond currently existed.
Mr. Anderson said he could not provide a hard figure or hours. He said grass
whipping was required once every 1-2 weeks where grass grew along the
fence line versus synthetic material that did not require mowing, watering,
or trimming.
Mr. Betts said additionally due to wear, a grass field required closing down
for two months out of the year to reseed, reestablish, and re-thatch its
growth. That would not be necessary for artificial turf.
Mr. Anderson said artificial turf needed to be groomed but far less than a
grass field. Another advantage was not having pest making trip hazards in
synthetic material.
Council Member Holman said Alma Street and the train tracks were
impediments in getting to the park and asked if Staff had given more
thought in providing connectivity to the neighborhood.
26 06/13/2011
Mr. Anderson referred to the wall map and pOinted to a pathway into Palo
Alto Park. He said it required walking a few hundred yards along the park's
edge which was not level and was unsafe.
Council M~mber Holman asked Staff to point on the map at the path to the
train station.
Mr. Betts said he rode his bike almost daily from Menlo Park and took a
route that crossed EI Camino, entered the park, continued along the north
field, a path along the baseball field and connected to a path near PF
Chang's.
Council Member Holman asked if there was another path that ran along the
tracks.
Mr. Betts said not behind the train station. There was one between the
depot and MacArthur Park Restaurant and over to Homer tunnel and behind
the Palo Alto Medical Foundation, on to the backside of the Town and
Country Shopping Center, over Embarcadero Road and behind Palo Alto High
School.
Council Member Holman said another reason for having one instead of two
synthetic fields was because it left more funds for other projects. She said
improvements would be cornpleted in 2013 which was 20 years from the
expiration of the lease agreement. Stanford housing was considered for that
area and asked Staff if the lease would be extended.
Mr. Betts said if Stanford were to pursue housing they proposed not to move
forward until after expiration of the 2033 lease.
Council Member Holman asked what the likelihood was of having an
extension of the lease agreement beyond 2033 or was 2033 the horizon
when Stanford wanted to use the property for housing.
Mr. Betts said in consultation with the City Attorney's office there had been
discussions with Stanford whether or not the lease could be extended when
they looked into obtaining the easement for the reservoir.
City Attorney, Molly Stump it was her understanding that during the
negotiations for the Stanford Hospital project the issue was raised and the
City did pursue the extension. Stanford was not interested at the time and it
was not included in the hospital agreement.
27 06/13/2011
Council Member Holman said that would be an indication that Stanford would
not renew the lease when it expired.
Ms. StUlTlP said that was the understanding at this time.
Council Member Holman said during the presentation, Staff made a
comment to continue working with PARC on furthering the design. The Staff
Report did not indicate the process of moving forward and wanted
clarification on pursuing the design.
Mr. Betts said he would calion Seigfried representatives to provide the
process in moving forward ·in finalizing specifications and design and ask Mr.
Anderson to talk about the next steps in reviewing the project.
Mr. Snyder said the next step would be to incorporate input from the City
Council, City departments, PARC, and public feedback. They would evaluate
any added elements and costs to the plan and move forward in putting
together improvement plans for the park.
Council Member Holman asked what was a typical practice in reviewing plans
for a park.
Mr. Anderson said Staff would go to the Arc~litectural Review Board (ARB) to
get final approval on their recolTlmendations, return to PARC for approval
and move forward in getting the project to 100 percent.
Council Member Schmid asked whether 11 or 12-year children were
scheduled to play on the field.
Mr. Betts said that was not the intent at this particular field. Younger
children are advised to use facilities that are surrounded by homes with not
a lot of street parking and can safely be accessed by bicycle or walking.
Council Member Burt said present use of the baseball field did include Little
Leaguers and that would be a change in use to not allow younger children on
the field. He said the bike path south of the Quarry area was makeshift bike
routes started on the other side of the oval. It was a maze, dangerous and
chaotic in terms of competition of bikes, vehicles, and buses. There was
discussion of the getting the area redone with Stanford funds in getting
connectivity and he raised a concern why that was not included in the Staff
Report. He asked that be included in the record and to concentrate on the
park portion. He was not in favor of extending the park into the dirt area
south of Quarry area. He said the existing parking area was an oval
28 06/13/2011
between the two ball fields. He asked what prevented extending the oval
towards Alma Street to add more parking.
Mr. Snyder said the extension would be encroaching into Caltrain's right-of-,
way and the structural section supporting the tracks and high voltage boxes
located at the edge of the parking lot. There was already encroachment into
the area for future restrooms and storage buildings.
Council Member Burt said it appeared there was some latitude to extend the
oval to allow for added parking in the area where buildings are located. He
said he would advocate reexamining extending the oval.
Mr. Snyder said he agreed there was some flexibility in the area.
Council Member Burt asked if it was possible to move the baseball field 10
feet south to allow widening the oval for additional spaces.
Mr. Snyder said there were challenges. The distance to the outField fence
was short. He said a proposed wall would mass two utility boxes which were
access pOints to the buried reservoir and would limit adding the extra space.
Council Member Burt asked what the current zoning was.
Mr. Betts said it was Parking Facility (PF) zone.
Council Member Burt said PF was not necessarily recreational.
Mr. Betts said that was correct. Fire stations, community centers, and
libraries were zoned PF.
Council Member Burt asked if zoning should be looked at for the park for
retaining the land for recreational purposes.
Ms. Stump said it was her understanding PF was the correct zoning for the
present use. Stanford would need to pursue an amendment for future
housing on the site.
Council Member Burt said housing was one thing and asked if Stanford
would be able to use it for other public facility functions different from the
recreational park functions used by Palo Alto.
Ms. Stump said she would need to get back with the information.
29 06/13/2011
Council Member Burt asked if Palo Alto would be incentivizing Stanford with
Palo Alto's zoning that would cause Stanford to want to take the land back.
Council Member Scharff asked if it would be hopeless to try to pursue
extension of the Stanford lease agreement since they indicated they were
not interested of an extension at this time.
Ms. Stump said 2033 was a ways away and in recent discussions Stanford
was not interested in advancing the issue at that pOint.
Council Member Scharff said one of Staff's recommendation stated that the
Council direct Staff to pursue a long-term lease with Stanford for EL Camino
Park beyond the current June 2033 expiration date. He said the issue was
confusing and needed clarification on what the Council was asked to do.
Mr. Betts said that was a PARC recommendation and that Staff had not
specifically gone to Stanford to ask them to reconsider.
Council Member Scharff asked for pOint of clarification, was Staff asking for
the Council to direct Staff to pursue the issue or not to pursue the issue at
this time.
City Manager James Keene said he thought the Council should direct Staff to
pursue the long-term lease with Stanford.
,
Holman to accept S'taff recommendation to:
Recreation Commission and Staff's suggested use of $1,420,50
Development Impact Fees (Impact Fees) to fund the Parks a ecreation
Commission's recommended list of improvements to EI Ca . 0 Park; and 2)
direct Staff to pursue a long-term lease with Stanfo or EI Camino Park
beyond the current June 2033 expiration date.
Council Member Scharff said PARC ha a lot of thought to the
recommendation and felt the park an asset to the community. He
raised concerns regarding Little uers no longer being able to play there.
Mr. Betts clarified the . 'e· League park was primarily at Hoover and
Middlefield Road. Li eague ma~tplay .some games at this park but it was
cation and would only be used as.,.a backup.
' •• ~". '"", ... ~1'!tr'l~ ... ,
''!·l-.,. ... ..:''rf~.~
in expending money' on,property
control over but made it mOre
30 06/13/2011
Page 1 of 15
Planning and Transportation Commission 1
March 14, 2012 2
Verbatim Minutes 3
4
DRAFT EXCERPT 5
6
El Camino Park, between Sand Hill and Quarry Roads, Palo Alto and 10 acres near 7
Searsville and Fremont Roads in the County of Santa Clara (Special Condition Area B)*: 8
Request by Stanford University for Planning and Transportation Commission review of an 9
amendment to the 1997 Sand Hill Road Development Agreement to extend the lease on the El 10
Camino Park site for a period of nine years, from June 2033 to June 2042 and to remove 11
approximately 10.25 acres of land from Special Condition Area B. The amendment to the 12
Development Agreement would not change the environmental impacts analyzed in the General 13
Use Permit EIR. No additional environmental review is required. 14
15
Ms. Whitney McNair, Consultant: The Agreement covers land within the City of Palo Alto and 16
within the County of Santa Clara. City zoning applies to those parcels within the City limits and 17
the County’s 2,000 Stanford Community Plan and General Use Permit apply to the lands outside 18
of the City boundaries. Even though some of the land is outside of the City’s jurisdiction, it is 19
still covered by this Development Agreement and the reasoning behind that was to regulate some 20
of the timing of development along the Sand Hill Road corridor. 21
22
Development Agreements are a negotiated contract between two parties. Both parties have to 23
agree to the terms as well as any amendment. In this case the existing terms of the Development 24
Agreement are subject to tonight or subject to debate and before you tonight is a proposed 25
Amendment to the Agreement that involves two properties, the El Camino Park and an area off 26
of Sand Hill Road located in Santa Clara County known as Special Condition Area B. 27
28
Special Condition Area B is approximately 139 acres and is not within the City of Palo Alto. As 29
I mentioned earlier it’s within the County of Santa Clara and is on land owned by Stanford. The 30
area proposed for removal from Area B is roughly ten acres and is noted here in the brighter 31
orange color. I think it’s pretty clear on the screen. 32
33
The Development Agreement currently identifies the site as a possible site for housing and 34
restricts development until December 1, 2020. The time restriction does not apply to recreational 35
fields and support facilities. The proposed change to the Development Agreement would change 36
only the type of development that is allowed under the Agreement from housing to academic and 37
support uses which would then allow for development of this area prior to the December 2020 38
date. This accelerates development of this parcel by approximately nine years. Removal of the 39
property from Area B would not result in any changes to either the Community Plan or the 40
General Use permit. The County permits academic and support uses so this Amendment would 41
be consistent with their land use designations. Although the site allows for housing, no housing 42
is contemplated here and other sites designated for housing are still available and as shown on 43
the diagram within Area B there are still three other sites designated that still have a housing 44
designation on them. 45
46
Page 2 of 15
By removing the property from Area B the City is not approving any development on the 1
property. Stanford University is considering this site for a new energy center to replace the 2
campus’s Cardinal Cogeneration Energy Facility and representatives from Stanford are here 3
tonight and will be discussing this possibility in further detail. As is currently the case, all 4
approvals will remain subject to the County review and approval. 5
6
The second part of the Proposed Amendment involved El Camino Park. El Camino Park is 7
within the City limits and is the site of a new reservoir and ball fields. The land is owned by 8
Stanford and the City of Palo Alto has an existing lease with Stanford for the park. In June of 9
2011 the City Council, while they were discussing improvements to the ball field directed Staff 10
to see if Stanford would consider extending the lease on El Camino Park. The current lease 11
expires in June 2033. With this Proposed Amendment Stanford is willing to extend the lease 12
nine years from 2033 to 2042. In the Staff Report is a copy of the Development Agreement and 13
an exhibit to the Agreement is the amended lease. Representatives from Stanford as well as 14
Senior Assistant City Attorney Cara are here tonight to answer any questions you might have 15
about the lease. 16
17
There are no policy implications or resource impacts or necessary environmental review for the 18
Commission to consider. This Amendment is merely removing one property from a 19
Development Restriction nine years early to allow Stanford to consider the site for a new energy 20
center in exchange for an extension of the El Camino Ball Park lease nine years. The timing 21
allowances are roughly the same and the size of the parcels are roughly the same. Additionally 22
the City Council directed Staff to try to work with Stanford to get a lease extension for El 23
Camino Park. Staff supports the Proposed Amendment to the Development Agreement and 24
recommends that the Planning Commission provide a recommendation to City Council for the 25
approval of the Proposed Amendment. 26
27
The City Council is scheduled to consider this item at their April 9th meeting and that’s the end 28
of my presentation and representatives from Stanford are here as well. 29
30
Ms. Catherine Palter: Thank you Chair Martinez and Commissioners. My name is Catherine 31
Palter and I’m the Associate Director of Stanford’s Land Use and Environmental Planning 32
Office. As the Staff was mentioning, this Development Agreement dates back to 1997 when it 33
was approved by the voters and include the construction showed on this diagram, the widening 34
and extension of Sand Hill Road and some associated roads shown there in green, senior housing 35
in purple, the dark brown apartment housing and some expansion at the Stanford Shopping 36
Center. 37
38
As part of that was also you can see, I’m sorry the laser pointer just isn’t working on there but to 39
the left hand side is Area B which we were just discussing and to the right of your view there is 40
the El Camino Park leases. So the Area B land was included in the Development Agreement for 41
Stanford land that is located in the Sand Hill Road corridor in Santa Clara County and it places 42
development restrictions to include only allowed recreation and academic field however on about 43
37 of those acres the City did allow that housing could be built. Again, this is layered on top of 44
any restrictions that would occur as a result of County jurisdiction. 45
46
Page 3 of 15
There have been Amendments to this area already, the biggest being the location of where the 1
City did the housing. Originally the housing was allowed in a rectangular area which again I’m 2
sorry I can’t show you on this. It doesn’t read on the screen so… Okay. So originally this was 3
the area that the City said that housing would be allowed in in 1997 and in 2001 after there were 4
discussions for the General Use Permit in 2000 this piece was removed from consideration for 5
housing and this piece was added so that leaves us these 37 acres that the City said housing could 6
be constructed. The Development Restrictions placed by the Development Agreement would 7
expire at the end of 2020, a little less than nine years from now. 8
9
In addition, there was affect on the El Camino leases with the Development Agreement. The El 10
Camino Park Lease and the Depot Lease which includes the Intermodal Transit Center were 11
extended from 20 years to the year 2033. In addition at that time in 1997 the City returned the 12
Red Cross and MacArthur Park leases to Stanford and the City has a termination right for the 13
Depot Lease for the Intermodal Transit Center so that’s where we are today and the proposal 14
moving forward again affects Area B to remove this approximately ten acre parcel from the 15
Development Agreement and its restrictions and that would allow Stanford to have more 16
flexibility as it considers the citing and planning for a replacement Central Energy Facility. 17
Anything that would be proposed at this site would need environmental review and approval by 18
the County. 19
20
In the trade that the Staff was referring to would extend this ten acre parcel for a similar nine 21
years from 2033 to 2042 so again it’s kind of a swap of removal of Development Restrictions in 22
Area B of ten acres nine years early and extension of the City’s lease for the park for nine years. 23
Now I’d like to introduce Joe Stagner who is the Executive Director of Stanford’s Sustainability 24
and Energy Management Department to explain some of the new technologies that Stanford is 25
considering for a more sustainable energy supply for the campus. I also wanted to mention that 26
Bill Phillips, the Associate Vice President for Land, Buildings and Real Estate is here and we’re 27
available to answer any of your questions. Thank you. 28
29
Mr. Joe Stagner: Thank you. As Catherine mentioned I’m Joe Stagner and I’m Head of the 30
Sustainability and Energy Management Department at Stanford which includes campus utilities 31
and the ability to acquire and produce energy for the buildings and so forth. Some of you may 32
know but today we have Cardinal Cogen which is where most of the campus gets its energy. We 33
have electricity of course used in the buildings and a central district heating and cooling system 34
where we transport steam to the buildings to provide warmth and sterilization and so forth and 35
we have a chill water system of pipes that take cold water around from the central plant to 36
provide air conditioning for the buildings. Probably 95% of the campus’ energy is supplied by 37
the Cogeneration plant this way and that’s the source of the campus’ greenhouse emissions for 38
all intents and purposes so while it’s a very efficient system that was started in 1987 it still is not 39
as efficient as the things we can do today. It is the source of most of the greenhouse gas and it 40
consumes about 25% of our drinking water supply from Hetch Hetchy through evaporative 41
cooling. This is an aerial picture of the cooling towers at that facility and you can see even on 42
cool days how much heat is coming out of the cooling towers and how much water is being 43
consumed in the process. As you look at cooling towers on cool days you wonder why we’re 44
throwing away good heat we could heat buildings with and why we’re using a lot of our precious 45
drinking water in the process with these cooling towers. 46
Page 4 of 15
1
In considering that we have to have a new energy plant to eventually replace the Cogeneration 2
Plant which was built in the 80s and is about 25 years old now and nearing the end of its useful 3
life we really took a look at the total energy coming and going from our central energy plant to 4
heat the campus on every hour of the year to see if we could find some more sustainable 5
solutions. These charts show that we found a considerable overlap in the simultaneous amount 6
of heat we were making with the Cogen and sending out to the buildings and the heat we were 7
collecting from our chilled water system. So you could think of the chilled water system even 8
though its delivering cold water its really a system for collecting unwanted heat and if you think 9
if it reverse like that you realize hey, we’ve got this system that collects heat from all our 10
buildings and brings it back to a central location and then we throw it away out at cooling towers 11
and use a lot of water in the process. At the same time we’re making heat with fossil fuel and 12
sending it out for all of our buildings. So we decided to take a look at that in detail and see if 13
there’s an opportunity to do something better. 14
15
This shows in three seasons, summer, winter and the spring and fall shoulder seasons what a 16
daily profile might look like for the campus. So on the big picture on the left on a typical 17
summer day we have a cool nighttime weather here and so we have a low cooling load but of 18
course it peaks in the days, you can see on the blue line. During those same 24 hours we have a 19
constant need for heat and you may ask why that’s the case but today’s modern laboratory 20
buildings and computer rooms you have to cool air into a building going down to a certain 21
temperature to keep computers cool but then other areas that are occupied you might want it a 22
little warmer, you might want is 66 in the computer room and 72 here so you have reheat devices 23
in the air ducts that use heat to warm that 66 degree air to say 72 in here. That’s called reheat 24
process for those of you familiar with building HVAC design. 25
26
So that’s why there’s this big simultaneous need for heating and cooling of a very research 27
intensive modern campus like that and it also presents the opportunity though to take that waste 28
heat and to heat other buildings that need heat at the same time or perhaps store it overnight and 29
use it when you need it. So all those green areas show for each of the typical seasonal profiles 30
how much waste heat there is available that we can use to heat the campus rather than burning 31
fossil fuel to do it. 32
33
When you look at it over the course of a whole year you see our cooling loads over the course of 34
a year from January to December are on top and our heating loads for the campus are on the 35
bottom. The shaded area shows that if we took all the heat and the cooling heat recovery 36
potential area and redirected it, reuse, recycled it to heat the campus we can meet about 80% of 37
our heating load now using waste heat. The goal of our new sustainable energy system is to 38
create this new heat recovery energy plan powered by electricity from the grid and it will be 39
significantly more efficient than what we have today and certainly more affordably sustainable. 40
41
In summary, instead of having another say 100% fossil fuel Cogen Plant we’d have this new 42
plant and immediately cut our greenhouse gas emissions in half by reusing this energy and not 43
burning fossil fuel to make it. It allows the campus eventually to be 100% sustainable so when 44
the grid electricity supply is deemed sustainable and moved onto greener balance with the 45
Page 5 of 15
environment then so will Stanford as a essentially 100% electric campus so will Stanford be 1
empowered to be sustainable because all out thermal needs are being met by this new system. 2
3
The last thing is that given that the energy plant uses 25% of our water and we’d cut the use of 4
that water by 70% we’re actually saving 18% of the total campus water supply and so those are 5
the great benefits of the project and we hope to locate it somewhere on the north side of campus 6
over in the vicinity where the existing plant is because that’s where all the pipes and wires come 7
together on campus so its got to be in that general location. If this site is approved it would 8
facilitate perhaps putting the plant there as one of the better locations in addition to the other 9
locations we are considering along Sand Hill. And that concludes our presentation. 10
11
Chair Martinez: Okay I’m going to open the Public Hearing. We have one member of the 12
public to speak. 13
14
Vice Chair Fineberg: Herb Borock. 15
16
Chair Martinez: Mr. Borock you’ll have three minutes. 17
18
Mr. Herb Borock: Thank you Chair Martinez and good evening. I urge you to recommend to 19
the Council that they not take any action on this proposal and instead that you wait until Stanford 20
has a project before the County and if that project happens to be on this site that it can be 21
conditioned in the County on getting approval on a change to the Development Agreement. 22
Everything you just heard about the proposed Cogeneration Plant should be ignored because 23
there is no project and as the previous speaker said it may end up someplace else. You haven’t 24
seen on what’s before you where the current site is so you can compare what’s going to happen 25
to that site. 26
27
In addition, when you’re looking at El Camino Park you need to be aware of the other projects 28
that are taking place at the same time. Just two evenings ago on the City Council agenda there 29
was an item for approval of most of the City’s in lieu park funds for playing fields at El Camino 30
Park which was removed from the agenda so that Staff could revise the report to include 31
coordination with other local projects adjacent to El Camino Park. As we know Mr. Arrillaga 32
has proposed projects, a 250,000 square foot office building to be donated to Stanford and a 33
70,000 shell for a theater to be donated to I guess Theater Works but when the Council saw those 34
neither Mr. Emslie or the person sitting with the Theater Works people who looked very much 35
like Dan Garber provided any maps to show the relationship of that property to El Camino Park. 36
I took and assessed this parcel map and drew in the missing piece of the Red Cross building and 37
as you can see from the material before you there are between 50 and 75 feet between those 38
parcels and El Camino Real which is all part of dedicated park land which is El Camino Park so 39
you’re getting a proposal now to extend all of El Camino’s parks at least for a period of time 40
when if those projects come through a piece of El Camino Park is the front lawn of those two 41
projects which is supposed to be fronted on El Camino. 42
43
I think the best thing to do is follow normal planning practice and that is when Stanford has a 44
project that is defined for a specific site it should go to the County for approval and if that site 45
Page 6 of 15
requires amendment to the Development Agreement that should be one of the Conditions of 1
Approval that can be fulfilled by Palo Alto and Stanford. Thank you. 2
3
Commissioner Keller: So my first question is does it make sense to condition the use of the 4
space that’s removed from Area B as being used for a Cogen Plant and not for another use 5
without approval of the City. Is that something that is feasible? Is that something that makes 6
sense? 7
8
Ms. Silver: Cara Silver, Senior Assistant City Attorney. I don’t think that it’s necessary to do 9
that. It’s a possibility and I don’t think Staff would have any objection to that. You might want 10
to ask the Applicant if they have any objection to that since it is a negotiated Development 11
Agreement and they would have to agree to any revisions of the terms. 12
13
Commissioner Keller: Thank you. Does the Applicant want to respond to that? 14
15
Mr. Phillips: Bill Phillips with Stanford University. We’d have no objection to that Condition. 16
That would be the alternative use we would see for that site. If we decided not to use it for that 17
the lease extension would still be in effect for the City and we would not use it for anything else. 18
19
Commissioner Keller: Thank you. While you’re there I would assume this would also allow 20
you to, the current Cogen Plant is currently in the middle of the western part of campus proper 21
and so that would allow for reuse of additional academic buildings but that would be within the 22
growth cap of the current GUP. Is that right? 23
24
Mr. Phillips: That’s correct. 25
26
Commissioner Keller: One more thing. There was a member of the public who responded about 27
the closure of the bike route on Searsville. 28
29
Mr. Phillips: Correct. 30
31
Commissioner Keller: Do you have any comments on that? 32
33
Mr. Phillips: The closure of the bike route that went from basically where Sand Hill and the 34
bridge occur took a diagonal path. I would say northeast over to Searsville or excuse me Stock 35
Farm and Oak. People liked that path because it was a short cut. When the University installed 36
the golf course practice facility it did not provide for a viable bike route through there but a bike 37
pedestrian route because it would have been right in the middle of where golf balls were going 38
back and forth so the bike route was relocated around the golf facility and its quite a nice bike 39
route but it’s a little bit longer than what they were used to. 40
41
I had been asked just recently whether we would take another look at the exact location of the 42
bike route when we did our planning for whatever would occur on this area to be removed from 43
Area B and in any reconfiguration of the golf practice facility and I said I would and we will and 44
we would meet with that person as we proceed with our planning. 45
46
Page 7 of 15
Commissioner Keller: Thank you. I appreciate that and obviously that’s not directly in the path 1
of what we’re doing but I appreciate your cooperation on that matter. 2
3
Chair Martinez: While you’re up there, can I ask you to respond to Mr. Borock’s point. Why 4
would you not wait until you’re sure this is the site you want for the new Energy Center. 5
6
Mr. Phillips: I think what it really comes down to is the Application and the entitlement process 7
for a major new replacement energy facility will involve a lot of preparatory work, a lot of 8
environmental work, a lot of analysis and a significant amount of time and money in order to 9
conduct all that. We don’t want to proceed with that only to find out that there may or may not 10
be satisfaction by the City with respect to that proposal given the control they have over Area B. 11
So the proposal is to allow us to proceed with the difficult work of entitlement that will have to 12
take place with the County knowing that we have the ability to cite something in that area of 13
Area B. 14
15
Chair Martinez: So this is your preferred site? 16
17
Mr. Phillips: Yes it is our preferred site but it wouldn’t be if it wasn’t removed. 18
19
Chair Martinez: I understand. Thank you. Vice Chair Fineberg 20
21
Vice Chair Fineberg: Can we get an exact acreage on both parcels? I see it being referred to 22
approximately ten, El Camino Park maybe ten and a quarter and Area B 975. If Staff can come 23
back with that in a moment and let me continue. 24
25
In the meeting that we received minutes, Council’s meeting on June 13th of 2011 there was 26
discussion about the allowed uses on the site. This is mostly going to be directed at our City 27
Attorney. Thank you. Ms. Stump talked about the underlying zoning being PF but that housing 28
be an allowed use in the future should Stanford want to develop that but they would need to 29
amend the zoning if they wanted to build housing and then she would look at and get back to 30
Council about what other uses Stanford could make of El Camino Park should the lease expire at 31
El Camino Park. Do you know if any of that research was conducted? Do we know what 32
current use Stanford could make of that land as it is currently zoned as PF? 33
34
Ms. Silver: Yes thank you Vice Chair Fineberg. I just realized that with the new Chamber 35
configuration the code book is now locked up so I can’t look up what the uses are in the Public 36
Facility zone although Amy has a copy so we can also look that up now in real time and get back 37
to you on that. 38
39
Ms. McNair: I can answer your question about the size of the site. The Area B site is 10.25 40
acres and the El Camino Park site is 10.5 acres. 41
42
Vice Chair Fineberg: So let me just confirm. El Camino Park is 10.5 and Area B is 10.25 43
because on the map it shows it as 10.75 so I think we need, not tonight necessarily but we need 44
clarity on the acreage and that point is going to with the possibility that there is going to be an 45
incoming application by Arrillaga and Theater Works, how much land is going to be needed by 46
Page 8 of 15
that project? How much land is the City going to be asked to undedicated of that park land and 1
where I’m trying to go with that is are we swapping equivalent amounts if one starts off larger or 2
smaller and then we give up some of the park land? 3
4
Ms. McNair: Let me just pull up… Two points is I wanted to clarify on the map the property 5
showed 9.25 and I just want to make sure I know which map. 6
7
Vice Chair Fineberg: I think I said 9.75 but I may have been trying to talk fast. 8
9
Ms. McNair: So then you had a question about the area in which the City would need to request 10
undedicated for park land. That has not yet been determined because there is no application yet 11
for the project that’s being titled as 27 University. That project is looking at developing a site 12
generally in the area that is shown here but again until site plans are drawn up and an application 13
is presented the exact area of land that would need to be undedicated is yet to be determined. 14
The lease however still exists. The designation for park land is a City designation on that park 15
land and wouldn’t affect the lease. The portion of the site that may be possibly undedicated in 16
the future would be the area that is sort of next to, kind of in this area here and perhaps the area 17
that goes along the front but again that would all be considered when a future application comes 18
forward. 19
20
Vice Chair Fineberg: So forgive me if I’m unclear with my exact words but when they were 21
talking about the Comp Plan designation or zoning being PF, was that Public Facility or in the 22
minutes I think it actually even said Park Facility so I don’t have a copy of that designation. Is it 23
Public Facility or is it Park Facility? 24
25
Ms. French: The PF zone is Public Facility. 26
27
Vice Chair Fineberg: So what allowed uses would Stanford have for that if the lease at El 28
Camino were to expire and it reverted back to Stanford, what allowed uses would they have 29
without a zone change? 30
31
Ms. French: The intent of the Public Facilities is basically City land, basically City of Palo Alto, 32
County of Santa Clara, State of California governmental agency. There are instances where PF 33
is for instance Palo Alto Medical Foundation is a PF site zone but there are quite a few 34
conditional use permit entitlements and can be achieved or granted for neighborhood recreation 35
centers, outdoor recreation services, this kind of thing and the permitted uses include park uses 36
and uses incidental to park operation and basically that’s it between the two. The governmental 37
and the park uses. The rest are all Conditional Use Permits required and I can bring this up and 38
you can pass it along if that would help to see it in more detail. 39
40
Vice Chair Fineberg: If we can just at some point have clarity on the acreage of both parcels and 41
if the Chair would recognize either the Applicant or Commissioner Keller I think they have 42
feedback. 43
44
Chair Martinez: Commissioner Keller first. He’s been waiting. 45
46
Page 9 of 15
Commissioner Keller: If you look at Exhibit 1 which is Exhibit C to the Third Amendment to 1
1997 Sand Hill Road Development Agreement there is a map by BKF which lists Park Parcel 1 2
and Park Parcel 2. Park Parcel 3 being 0.691 acres and Park Parcel 1 being 9.714 acres. I did 3
the math and that comes out to 10.405 acres that reflects the El Camino Park and with respect to 4
the Stanford Special Condition Area B I don’t have any comment. 5
6
Mr. Borock: I disagree there’s a third parcel that’s marked as Parcel 2 which is 0.344 acres and 7
perhaps Mr. Phillips can either acknowledge whether that’s part of El Camino Park or not, I 8
think it is. 9
10
Commissioner Keller: Yeah I missed 0.344 acres Parcel 2. 11
12
Mr. Phillips: The referenced parcel that Mr. Borock mentioned brings you into not only the little 13
wedge that was brought into the park parcel which is just to the left of the depot parcel but also 14
the portion where the El Palo Alto stands and when you total all those up you will add up to 15
10.74 acres. So 10.75 acres. 16
17
Commissioner Keller: 10.749. 18
19
Vice Chair Fineberg: And are all those little bits and pieces in play or just portions of them? 20
21
Mr. Phillips: All those bits and pieces are in play and that includes the jug handle portion which 22
was quick claimed back to Stanford and then given back to the City under the lease at the time of 23
the rearrangement of the entrances to the shopping center after 1997. 24
25
Vice Chair Fineberg: So if I got it right then all the little pieces at El Camino Park add up to 26
10.75 acres and then do we know what the exact acreage is of the portion of Area B? 27
28
Mr. Phillips: It’s just short of 10.2 acres. Its exact acreage is measured in the analysis and we 29
come to I believe 10.19. 30
31
Vice Chair Fineberg: Thank you. 32
33
Chair Martinez: Vice Chair can you let us know where you’re going with that? 34
35
Vice Chair Fineberg: I wanted to know if all we were looking at was the number of acres how 36
the trade compared and then the impact if a portion of it was undedicated. If it started off at 37
uneven levels or just advantageous levels for either party and then the undedication pushed it 38
further in either direction and from what you’re saying we still don’t know about the 39
undedication amount but the El Camino Park is larger than the land at Area B so there’s just 40
simply a difference there. 41
42
Chair Martinez: Staff you said this but the undedicated part is not being used as park land right 43
now? Is that true? I mean it’s not part of the playing fields. 44
45
Page 10 of 15
Ms. French: My understanding is there are some utilities underground there and its being used 1
for utilities. I don’t know if there’s any more information on that. 2
3
Ms. Palter: Are you referring to the possible undedication that might occur in the future as a 4
result of the 27 University? That’s really speculative at this point. There isn’t a set of plans that 5
have even been submitted. 6
7
Chair Martinez: What do you mean? We lost a Commissioner over it. What do you mean? 8
9
Ms. Palter: We don’t have any footprints. It’s possibly that frontage area in front of Red Cross 10
and MacArthur Park and that currently is dedicated park land and it is in use as park land. 11
12
Chair Martinez: Okay. 13
14
Mr. Phillips: Can I mention one thing? The lease between the City and Stanford goes back a 15
long way. It does not include a use provision that restricts the City’s use to the parcel as only 16
park land so I think the extension of the lease applies to the lease and the use changes that could 17
take place within that extended time period are really up to the City. 18
19
Chair Martinez: Anyone else? Commissioner Michael. 20
21
Commissioner Michael: So I’m very impressed with the potential for the new energy plant at 22
Stanford. It seems it would be worth accelerating the time that you could commence this subject 23
to County approval and at a location that would be optimal. I’m a little bit distracted by the 24
symmetry between the exact acreage of the Area B and the park parcel. It isn’t clear to me that 25
the exact right trade off that’s negotiated is the exact same amount of acreage for the exact same 26
period of time. You may want to just explore what the real value there is. For example, if the 27
use of the park parcel is very attractive in terms of the University and the City is good neighbors 28
and getting closer to in perpetuity, is extended for ten years long enough? This seems to be 29
particularly since the whole study of the Rail Corridor and the diversity of uses in this area and 30
there being a real shortage and imporosity of parks, this is one that exists and it seems to be 31
enthusiastically used and enjoyed and its attractive even to people passing by on El Camino and 32
so forth so I just want to encourage people to be creative in terms of the negotiation. 33
34
I’m also curious, I didn’t quite get the details relative to the lease arrangement for the depot 35
parcels where the Intermodal Transit Center is and this again seems very central to the Rail 36
Corridor Study and a lot of the plans probably benefit again Stanford because of Stanford 37
employees and students using that transit to come to campus and then they use the shuttle. If an 38
extension of that lease might also be part of the arrangement I was just curious as to why that 39
wasn’t part of the proposal here tonight although I do think it’s an excellent proposal I want to 40
make sure that it’s struck in the interest of both parties. 41
42
Ms. Silver: If I could just respond to that question briefly, the depot parcel has been historically 43
discussed among the City and Stanford and essentially the depot parcel is really used by VTA 44
and they have built of course a bus turnaround on that parcel and then the historic building is 45
leased out to a coffee vendor and this City has essentially been serving as a middle man in that 46
Page 11 of 15
arrangement so Stanford leases the depot parcel to the City and then the City subleases it to VTA 1
and we have essentially been brokering sort of a deal and so it is not necessary that the City be 2
involved as that middle element. The City is very supportive of the depot operating at that 3
location as is Stanford and we are hoping that Stanford and VTA will take it upon themselves to 4
work out a private arrangement so that the City can terminate its lease under the terms of the 5
original Lease Agreement next year actually. If that’s not the case, if an arrangement is not 6
made the City has the ability to extend the lease further through 2033. So that certainly was 7
something that was considered and as another part of the consideration in terms of the 8
arrangement here there was a rent reduction that was factored into the equation. Thank you. 9
10
Chair Martinez: Anything else? Commissioner Keller then. 11
12
Commissioner Keller: Two more questions. One is are all of the identified 10.749 or so acres of 13
El Camino Park dedicated park land or El Palo Alto Park? Whatever it’s called. 14
15
Ms. French: I believe so. Yes, the Public Facility zoned these areas. 16
17
Commissioner Keller: Public Facility zoning is different from the City’s dedicated park land 18
according to the City’s Park Land Dedication Ordinance so I’m not asking about zoning I’m 19
asking with respect to the City’s Park Land Dedication Ordinance. 20
21
Ms. French: I could have answered that more precisely and I’m sorry about that. It is as you 22
suggest, all dedicated park land. 23
24
Commissioner Keller: Considering that that is dedicated park land and my understanding is to 25
undedicated park land or to apply park land to any use other than dedicated park land requires a 26
vote of the people, the citizens of Palo Alto in an election. Can Stanford make any use, let’s just 27
suppose on the hypothetical that in 2042 the land reverts back to Stanford. Can Stanford make 28
any use of that land other than as park land without a vote of the people? 29
30
Ms. Silver: At what point in time? After the lease terminates? 31
32
Commissioner Keller: After the lease is up, if this land is dedicated park land, can Stanford 33
make any use of the land other than park land considering that any land use change requires the 34
vote of the people. Am I off base there or am I on track to something? 35
36
Ms. Silver: The charter only allows the people to dedicate park land that is either owned by the 37
City or controlled by the City and so a long term lease would be under control of the City but if 38
the lease terminated then I don’t believe that the park land protection would still apply. 39
40
Commissioner Keller: So the Park Land Dedication Ordinance that requires a vote of the people 41
would not apply if the lease terminates? 42
43
Ms. Silver: I believe that’s the case. 44
45
Commissioner Keller: It would be helpful to explore that if that’s not the case. 46
Page 12 of 15
1
Ms. French: And if I may that’s when the zoning would kick in. 2
3
MOTION 4
5
Commissioner Keller: I realize zoning kicks in and I appreciate that thank you. I move the Staff 6
Recommendation with the restriction of the use of the land from Special Condition Area B that is 7
removed as part of this agreement be used only for a new energy plant so moving the Staff 8
Recommendation with that one restriction. Thank you. 9
10
Chair Martinez: Is there a Second? 11
12
SECOND 13
14
Chair Martinez: Commissioner Michael seconds. Do you want to speak to your Motion? 15
16
Commissioner Keller: Yes. I think this is an intriguing project. I see this as benefiting the City 17
in terms of having an assured use of El Palo Alto Park for another nine years. I see this as 18
benefiting Stanford in terms of being able to relocate the energy plant from the Cardinal Cogen 19
Plant that was state of the art when it was built but is far from state of the art now to this new 20
location. It restricts the new location for that use so if the use is to change from that then that 21
does come back to the City for further analysis. 22
23
It allows Stanford to continue its entitlement process with knowing that it can from the City’s 24
point of view be rest assured that it has the entitlements to build from the City that project. I 25
think also from the point of view of a plan for Stanford moving that industrial zone if you will, 26
the current Cogen building is right in the middle of academic buildings, allows for a more 27
sensible use of that land for academic uses within the overall 2000 general use permit for 28
Stanford so I see this as a rational thing to do and something that the Planning Commission 29
should recommend to the City Council to move forward with. Thank you. 30
31
Commissioner Michael: I agree generally with all that Commissioner Keller just outlined. I 32
would also just note that in response to the suggestion that we wait for action by the County 33
before taking this up and giving our approval now, I think that there are as I’m learning, 34
instances of the Palo Alto process that slow things down and make things difficult and I take 35
seriously the statement of intention from the representatives of Stanford that this would be their 36
plan to go forward with this facility at this location and that by coming to us first they’re not 37
looking to exploit our good relationship and on that basis I’m happy to further deepen the good 38
relationship with Stanford and appreciate the negotiation of the lease extension for the park. 39
40
Chair Martinez: Anybody else want to weigh in? Yes Vice Chair Fineberg. 41
42
Vice Chair Fineberg: As a general concept I believe the intentions of the Applicant to build a 43
more energy efficient plant are good. They are outside the legal bounds of our Palo Alto 44
incorporated planning area but just in thinking in terms of land use a project size of that site and I 45
understand our rules don’t apply to that land but a ten acre parcel that can achieve significant 46
Page 13 of 15
energy savings and water efficiencies is a good thing so I see that as it may be outside the scope 1
of the City’s control but yet a good use of land. I have reservations with the amount of 2
uncertainty about the proposed project that’s adjacent and how much park land would be 3
undedicated so there is a side of me that says while I’m in favor of approving it a pause might be 4
beneficial. 5
6
Part of Commissioner Keller’s Motion, the Condition that the land be used for the energy plant 7
answers the concern about how the parcel is used but without knowing and I’ve seen what’s in 8
the public that the project in the adjacent Red Cross area might be moving forward in three 9
months so I don’t know if there’s a way to accommodate the need of Stanford to be able to move 10
forward and not wait but kind of hedge the City’s ability to figure out what’s going on with the 11
adjacent parcel so one question I have for the City Attorney is there any way to execute the Staff 12
Recommendation but with either a Condition or a mechanism that the land agreement as stated in 13
the Staff Report would not be executed unless one condition might be if and when the 14
application for the Cogeneration Plant is either submitted or approved by the County so if it 15
failed to happen the lease wouldn’t be executed and some kind of mechanism for us to know 16
what’s going on and I don’t know how to word that and I’m not trying to create a delay but is 17
there any mechanism you could recommend… One do you think it would be better to not 18
execute the lease if there is no plant built, or I should say land swap, or two is there some way 19
for us to have some additional certainty about what’s going on in the adjacent parcel? 20
21
Ms. Silver: At this point I don’t think there is any way to have certainty about the adjacent 22
parcel given Stanford’s time requirements for the energy facility. They really do need to start 23
moving on that project and I understand that there is a small window of opportunity here and if 24
the time requirements are not met on this parcel they’ll have to look at an alternative parcel so I 25
don’t think that’s possible. Also I think that putting aside the land use issues which are really 26
only related to Area B which is in the County’s jurisdiction, if you look at this as a straight 27
contract deal the question you need to ask yourself is whether taking the deed restriction off the 28
portion of Area B is something that you would recommend to the Council and whether a lease 29
extension for even a portion of El Camino is something that would be beneficial to the City so if 30
you just look at the issue of the contract provisions I don’t know that there’s really a reason to 31
want to postpone this transaction because the City is getting something of value by facilitating 32
perhaps a cleaner facility on Area B and then also by extending the El Camino Park but certainly 33
that’s a policy called for this body and the Council. 34
35
Commissioner Tanaka: I had a few questions I wanted to ask. First one is I think the City 36
Attorney mentioned that we have the right to terminate if we want and I don’t understand why 37
the depot lease? 38
39
Ms. Silver: That’s just the depot parcel and there was an agreement that was entered into a few 40
years ago that carved out portions of the El Camino Park lease and one of those portions was the 41
depot parcel and it allowed for an early termination and the reason for that was that the City is 42
not in the business of operating a transit facility. That’s a VTA function and so the City at one 43
point took over the lease and helped with the historic renovations I believe but that policy or that 44
initiative now is completed and so really I think all parties envision that the VTA will be the 45
main player at that site. 46
Page 14 of 15
1
Commissioner Tanaka: Does that save Palo Alto money to get out of this lease arrangement? 2
3
Ms. Silver: Palo Alto passes on the rent to VTA but there is really for whatever reason it has 4
been a difficult lease to administer so there are some internal Staff costs associated with the 5
implementation of that lease. 6
7
Commissioner Tanaka: I realize this Area B is not in Palo Alto but are there improvements? 8
Does the property tax actually go to Palo Alto or does it stay with Santa Clara? 9
10
Ms. Silver: The entitlements? 11
12
Commissioner Tanaka: No the property tax? Santa Clara right? I see. Okay. For me it’s my 13
general comment and it seems to make sense for both parties so I can’t see why we would not 14
want to support this effort. Thanks. 15
16
Chair Martinez: This is kind of a first for us. Stanford is proposing a project which we all 17
support, its good for the environment and on the other hand there is an arts facility project that is 18
under completely our control and we’re expressing our doubts about. I think if we do have such 19
concerns when that project comes before us we should express them at that time and I think I’m 20
supporting the Motion that we recommend the approval of this amendment. Commissioner 21
Keller would like to add two things. 22
23
Commissioner Keller: The first is that the fact that Stanford is extending the lease of El Camino 24
Park including, I’ll call that section the pan handle if you will, that pan handle section through 25
2042. If it turns out that some of that pan handle becomes part of another project then in some 26
sense any reversion of that land to some other use removes value from Palo Alto perhaps and 27
Palo Alto would then presumably get compensated so extending the lease for another nine years 28
on that pan handle that does Palo Alto no harm and perhaps some good. 29
30
Secondly, continuing the Cal Train Depot Lease means that Palo Alto has more control even 31
though there is Staff effort involved. Palo Alto has more control over what happens at the 32
intermodal station. It means if there is a potential future use of putting say as part of the 33
undergrounding of Cal Train a hotel, multimodal station facility there with retail and hotel or 34
something like that that we’ve talked about as a possibility there’s a possibility that Palo Alto 35
would gain some revenue from that, that the lease was directly from VTA they would gain more 36
revenue from that so it would give us more control on the potential land use and revenue from 37
that. I think both of these are good things to continue. Thank you. 38
39
VOTE 40
41
Chair Martinez: Those in favor say Aye. Aye. And none opposed. The Motion passes 42
unanimously with Commissioner Michael, Keller, Martinez, Fineberg, Tanaka voting in support 43
and Commissioner Tuma recusing himself. Thank you all very much and good luck with the 44
project. 45
46
Page 15 of 15
MOTION PASSED 1
2