Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutID2771-Contrac-Amendment-for-Highway-101-Bike-Ped-Bridge-6-11-12City of Palo Alto (ID # 2771) City Council Staff Report Report Type: Consent Calendar Meeting Date: 6/11/2012 June 11, 2012 Page 1 of 7 (ID # 2771) Summary Title: Contract Amendment for Highway 101 Bike/Pedestrian Bridge Title: Approve and Authorize the City Manager to Execute Contract Amendment No. 1 to Contract No. C10135025 in the Amount of $266,647 with Alta Planning + Design for Preliminary Design and Environmental Assessment Services for the Pedestrian & Bicycle Overpass at Highway 101 (PE-11011) and Feasibility Study of Adobe Creek Reach Trail Project Leading to the Overpass for a Total Contract Amount Not to Exceed $338,929. From:City Manager Lead Department: Public Works Recommendation Staff recommends that Council: Approve and authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute Contract Amendment No. 1 (Attachment A) to Contract No.C10135025 with Alta Planning + Design, in the amount of $266,647 for preliminary design and environmental assessment services for the Pedestrian & Bicycle Overpass at Highway 101 (CIP PE-11011). The amendment also includes a feasibility study of an Adobe Creek Reach Trail –(Phase 1),leading to the overpass. This amount includes $238,037 for basic services and $28,610 for additional services. The revised contract amount is not to exceed $377,628, including $338,929 for basic services and $38,699 for additional services. Executive Summary Staff is recommending that the City utilize a design consultant to prepare a preliminary design and environmental review of a pedestrian and bicycle bridge over Highway 101 near San Antonio Road. The work would include exploring the feasibility of a new trail along Adobe Creek to link up with the bridge.In November 2011, Council approved the concept of a bridge and staff is now June 11, 2012 Page 2 of 7 (ID # 2771) returning to Council with specific next steps.Staff is exploring funding options and including a design competition as part of the design process. Background This project provides year-round access in south Palo Alto between the Baylands, business parks, and residential districts.Six-month seasonal access is provided by the Adobe Creek underpass during fair weather conditions.An existing overcrossing at Oregon Expressway is approximately 1.4 miles north and inconvenient for users who live in south Palo Alto.The proposed bridge is the top-ranked “Across Barrier Connection”project in the City’s Draft Bicycle & Pedestrian Transportation Plan. The Bicycle & Pedestrian Transportation Plan also identifies the Adobe Creek Reach Trail as the second highest ranked Trail and Shared Use Pathway project. Feasibility and design of the Adobe Creek Reach Trail with the Adobe Creek/Highway 101 crossing is recommended as the trail project is immediately adjacent to the proposed bridge site and provides an alternative to access the proposed bridge. The City realizes 43,000 current users at the Adobe Creek seasonal crossing and the feasibility study identifies potential users of this facility may grow to 74,000 annually.The City is in the process of improving the bike network to the bridge site with proposed enhanced bikeway facilities on Fabian Way, the closure of bike lane gaps on Charleston Road between Fabian Way and the City of Palo Alto/Mountain View border, and new bike route improvements on San Antonio Avenue. In April 2010, Alta Planning +Design (Alta) was hired to prepare conceptual design plans and a feasibility study for the preferred over-and undercrossing at Highway 101 for a new Pedestrian/Bicycle Project. In November 2011, The Palo Alto City Council unanimously accepted the study that identifies an overcrossing across Highway 101 at Adobe Creek as the preferred location to provide year-round pedestrian and bicycle access (Attachment B).Preliminary cost estimates for the Adobe Creek overcrossing vary from $5M to $9M depending on design elements. Staff was asked to return to Council to begin preliminary design and environmental assessment of the overcrossing at Adobe Creek and to consider incorporating a design competition within the process. June 11, 2012 Page 3 of 7 (ID # 2771) Staff has been working with Caltrans Office of Local Assistance to complete all necessary paperwork in order to begin the environmental and design phase of the project. Staff was informed that a Cooperative Agreement between the City and Caltrans was also necessary because this project spans State Highway 101. Potential Funding There is a total of $10.4M of Santa Clara County funds from Stanford University for mitigating an environmental impact due to the Stanford campus planned expansion proposed in 2001. In February 2012, the terms to earmark and administer these funds were specified in an agreement between the County and Stanford University. During the May 22, 2012, County of Santa Clara Board of Supervisors (Board) meeting, the Board deferred action on the proposal to dedicate $5M of the County’s Stanford mitigation funds towards the City’s Adobe Creek/Highway 101 overcrossing project. This action included deferral of an additional $3M from the same funds to complete the Dumbarton Link of the Bay Trail. Members of the Palo Alto Parks & Recreation Commission,the Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition, Silicon Valley Leadership Group, and the community spoke in favor of dedicating $5M towards the overcrossing. The Board requested that County staff identify a list of projects for which the funds may be eligible and requested County staff to prepare project proposals by June and then return to the Board in August 2012 for approval. Discussion The current contract allows the City to amend Alta’s contract to provide preliminary design and environmental assessment services, if the City so chooses. Alta has provided excellent services and staff recommends that the City use Alta to provide consultant services for this next phase,which includes preliminary design and an environmental assessment for the Highway 101 Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge at Adobe Creek.In addition, the City would like to perform a feasibility study to improve the Adobe Creek Reach Trail access to the bridge site based on community feedback during the review of the City’s Draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. Consultant services will include structural, civil, geotechnical, environmental, surveying, and traffic engineering as required. Scope for the project includes: June 11, 2012 Page 4 of 7 (ID # 2771) ·Public outreach and community input on two bridge options for safe pedestrian and cyclist travel over Highway 101; ·Refining approach options and alternatives (bridge width, alignment over Highway 101, position of approach ramps on either side of Highway 101); ·Cost estimating of approach options with an evaluation of structural bridge types and constructability in an effort to minimize construction costs; ·Special studies (sun/shadow,traffic, geotechnical, lighting); ·Environmental assessment that defines the environmental impacts and mitigation measures; ·Recommendation of a preferred bridge approach option based on environmental analysis and community feedback; and ·Feasibility, conceptual design, cost estimates and coordination to install a bike trail along Adobe Creek with the Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD) Adobe Creek Trail Feasibility Study The Adobe Creek Reach Trail project proposes a new trail along the Adobe Creek levy managed by the SCVWD between East Meadow Drive and West Bayshore Road. The Adobe Creek Reach Trail feasibility study includes preliminary design, community outreach, engineer’s estimates and development of a Memorandum of Understanding with the SCVWD for future implementation of the project. This project is recommended to be completed concurrently with the Adobe Creek/Highway 101 project as the bridge alignment may ultimately impact the trail project. The trail could become a preferred access point to West Bayshore Road and the bridge. As a requirement of the SCVWD, completion of the bridge would be necessary before future grant opportunities are pursued to build the path. Public Outreach and Coordination with Agencies The project includes public outreach and meetings with the community, boards and commissions, various agencies such as SCVWD, Caltrans and private utility companies. The City will gain input on the bridge options, discuss opportunities and constraints and cost estimates of the bridge project. The environmental assessment process also will include outreach for public and agency comments. Through a separate agreement with Pacific Gas and Electric, a catenary study will be performed to evaluate the cost to relocate the high voltage lines should the vertical clearances not be sufficient between the high-voltage wires and the June 11, 2012 Page 5 of 7 (ID # 2771) proposed bridge. The City will work with Caltrans to obtain the required agreements for work with in the State right-of-way. Staff will return to Council at a later date to execute the agreements with Caltrans. Future Funding and Design Competition This overcrossing project appears to be eligible for the County’s Stanford mitigation funds and potential funding will likely be discussed during the Board meetings tentatively scheduled for this June and August. Staff will continue to work with County staff should there be a need for additional information about the project.Funding through State and Federal grants is more likely upon completion of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR)and the preliminary design to provide enough information on the environmental mitigations, optimum bridge alignment, ramp touch-down locations, bridge width and height. Staff continues to pursue public-private partnerships and grant opportunities as they become available. This preliminary design information,coupled with refined cost estimates,could provide sufficient design criteria and guidelines to begin a design competition. A design competition process could include a pre-qualification step, a request for proposals and establishment of selection panel. Following selection of a design and designer,the options would be: 1) to amend the current contract and include the designer on the existing team; 2) to establish a new contract with the winning designer;or 3) establish a new contract with a design/build firm. Before the EIR process is complete, staff will return to Council this winter with more detail and to provide an opportunity for Council to weigh in on a design competition process once the preliminary design shows the exact location of the approach ramps and bridge alignments. Resource Impact Funds for the bridge project in the amount of $226,705 are included in the FY 2011 Highway 101 Pedestrian/Bicycle Overpass Project Capital Fund budget (Capital Improvement Program Project PE-11011). Funds for the Adobe Creek Reach Trail feasibility study in the amount of $39,942 are included in the Capital Improvement Program (PL-12000, Transportation and Parking Improvements). Policy Implications Authorization of this project does not represent a change in existing City policies June 11, 2012 Page 6 of 7 (ID # 2771) including Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element Policies. In addition, the Adobe Creek/Highway 101 Overcrossing project and adjacent Adobe Creek Reach Trail project is identified as top-priority projects in the City’s Bicycle a Pedestrian Transportation Plan. Environmental Review The bridge project is subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). An Initial Study will be completed during this design phase. Initial environmental analysis indicates that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) would be required for the proposed project. Areas of potential impacts that would likely be analyzed include sun/shadow impacts, short-term construction (including noise), visual and traffic impacts. The environmental analysis will be done in accordance with the National Environmental Protect Act (NEPA) concurrently in anticipation of any Federal grant funding. The Adobe Creek Trail work is a planning and feasibility study and therefore exempt from CEQA review pursuant to Section 15262 of the CEQA guidelines. Should a trail project be approved, an environmental assessment in accordance with CEQA would be prepared during the next phase of the project. Next Steps Pending Council approval of the contract amendment, the tentative project timeline is as follows: ·Commence preliminary design process (Summer 2012) ·Meetings with community and project review of Architectural Review Board, PABAC, Park and Recreation Commission, Planning and Transportation Commission (Fall, 2012); ·Preparation of design options, estimates and environmental studies (Fall 2012); ·Administrative Draft EIR Circulation (Fall 2012); ·Environmental assessment and Planning and Transportation Commission review (Winter 2012/13); ·Complete public review (Winter, 2012/13); ·Final EIR Circulation (Winter 2012/13);and ·Completion of preliminary design, estimates and environmental assessment (Spring 2013) June 11, 2012 Page 7 of 7 (ID # 2771) ·Begin bridge design competition (Spring 2013), separate phase Attachments: ·Attachment A -Contract Amendment #1 Alta (PDF) ·Attachment B -Overcrossing Graphics (PDF) Prepared By:Elizabeth Ames, Senior Engineer Department Head:J. Michael Sartor, Director City Manager Approval: ____________________________________ James Keene, City Manager 1  120601 sm 010 Attachment A AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CONTRACT NO. C10135025   BETWEEN THE CITY OF PALO ALTO AND  ALTA PLANNING + DESIGN      This Amendment No. 1 to Contract No. C10135025 (“Contract”) is entered into  on  ________________, 2012 by and between the CITY OF PALO ALTO, a charter city and a municipal  corporation of the State of California (“CITY”), and Alta Planning + Design, a corporation in the State  of California, located at 1410 Third Street, San Rafael, CA 94901 (“CONSULTANT”).     R E C I T A L S:    WHEREAS, the Contract was entered into between the parties for the provision of  profession consulting design services for the Highway 101 underpass/overpass pedestrian/bicycle  feasibility study (“Project”); and    WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Contract to increase the scope of services,  schedule of performance  and compensation;    NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, terms, conditions, and  provisions of this Amendment, the parties agree:    SECTION 1.  Section 1, SCOPE OF SERVICES is hereby amended to add the following:      “Consultant shall perform the services described in Exhibit “A” as revised in  accordance with the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement.  The performance of all  Services shall be to the reasonable satisfaction of the CITY.”    SECTION  2.  Section 3, SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE, is hereby amended to add the  following:    “Time is of the essence in the performance of services.  CONSULTANT shall complete the Services  within the term of this Agreement and in accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit “B”, as  revised, attached to and made part of this Agreement.   Any Services for which times for  performance are not specified in the Agreement shall be commenced and completed by  CONSULTANT in a reasonably prompt and timely manner based upon the circumstances and  direction communicated to the CONSULTANT.   CITY’S agreement to extend the term or the  schedule for performance shall not preclude recovery of damages for delay if the extension is  required due to the fault of the CONSULTANT.”    SECTION  3.  Section 4, NOT TO EXCEED COMPENSATION, is hereby amended to read  as follows:    2  120601 sm 010 “ The compensation to be paid to CONSULTANT for performance of the Services  described in Exhibits “A”, including both payment for professional services and reimbursable  expenses, shall not exceed three hundred thirty eight thousand nine hundred twenty nine dollars  ($338,929).  In the event Additional Services are authorized, the total compensation for services  and additional and reimbursable expenses shall not exceed three hundred seventy seven thousand  six hundred twenty eight dollars ($377,628).  The applicable rates and schedule of payments are set  out in Exhibit “C”, as revised, which are attached to and made part of this Agreement.    Additional Services, if any, shall be authorized in accordance with and subject to the provisions of  Exhibit “C”.  CONSULTANT shall not receive any compensation for Additional Services performed  without the prior written authorization of CITY.  Additional Services shall mean any work that is  determined by CITY to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which is not  included within the Scope of Services described in Exhibit “A”.    SECTION  4.  Section 12, SUBCONTRACTING, is hereby amended to read as follows:       “Notwithstanding Section 11 above, CITY agrees that subconsultants may be used to  complete the Services.  The subconsultants authorized by CITY to perform work on this Project are:    1. Mark Thomas and Company   ‐ Transportation, Civil and Structural Engineering, Survey                  Support  2. ESA          ‐ Environmental Analysis  3. Parikh        ‐ Geotechnical Engineering Support  4. AEC          ‐ Lighting    CONSULTANT shall be responsible for directing the work of any subconsultants and for any  compensation due to subconsultants.  CITY assumes no responsibility whatsoever concerning  compensation.  CONSULTANT shall be fully responsible to CITY for all acts and omissions of a  subconsultant.  CONSULTANT shall change or add subconsultans only with the prior approval of the  city manager or his designee. “    SECTION  5.  Section 13, PROJECT MANAGEMENT, is hereby amended to read as  follows:       “CONSULTANT will assign Randy Anderson as the principal‐in‐charge to have  supervisory responsibility for the performance, progress and execution of the Services and Casey  Hildreth as the project manager to represent CONSULTANT during the day‐to‐day work on the  Project.  If circumstances cause the substitution of the principal‐in‐charge, project manager, or any  other key personnel for any reason, the appointment of a substitute principal‐in‐charge and the  assignment of any key new or replacement personnel will be subject to the prior written approval  of the CITY’s project manager.  CONSULTANT, at CITY’s request, shall promptly remove personnel  who CITY finds do not perform the Services in an acceptable manner, are uncooperative, or present  a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project or a threat to the safety of person or  property.       The CITY's project manager is Elizabeth Ames, Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division, at P.O. Box 10250, Palo Alto, CA 94303, Telephone: 650.329.2502. The project manager w ill be the point of contact with respect to performance, progress and execution of the Services. The project engineer is Holly Boyd, Telephone: 650.329.2612. The CITY may designate an alternate project manager from time to time. SECTION 6. The following exhibit(s) to the Contract is/are hereby amended to read as set forth in the attachment(s) to this Amendment, which are incorporated in full by this refer­ ence: a. Exhibit "A" entitled "SCOPE OF SERVICES". b. Exhibit "B" entitled "SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE". c. Exhibit "c" entitled "COMPENSATI ON & HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE". SECTION 7. Except as herein modified, all other provisions ofthe Contract, including any exhibits and subsequent amendments thereto, shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have by their duly authorized representatives executed this Amendment on the date first above written. APPROVED: City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: Senior Asst. City Attorney Attachments: EXHIBIT "A": SCOPE OF SERVICES EXHIBIT "B": PROJECT SCHEDULE :":ir:" Name: fA I ,J,ceJ d 6!l:!O Title: QP'!\C rf ~\ EXHIBIT "C": COMPENSATION & HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE 3 12Q601 smOIO Adobe Creek POC and Trail May 24, 2012 Alta Planning + Design 1 City of Palo Alto Highway 101 Pedestrian/Bicycle Overcrossing Preliminary Design & Environmental Assessment / Adobe Creek Reach Trail Feasibility Study & 30% Design Scope of Work General Information/Background The Highway 101 Pedestrian/Bicycle Overcrossing Feasibility Study was completed and approved by the City Council in November 2011. The result of the feasibility study was the preference for an overcrossing at the Adobe Creek location to provide year-round access for pedestrians and cyclists over Highway 101. The next steps for implementation of the overcrossing project is to refine and evaluate bridge alignment/design alternatives; identify a preferred alternative with community input; conduct environmental review and secure project funding; and initiate the Caltrans permitting and approval processes. Because this project crosses over Highway 101, a Caltrans facility, the project must comply with Caltrans procedures as outlined in the Caltrans’ Project Development Procedures Manual (PDPM) dated September 29, 2011. Upon review of this manual and in consultation with Caltrans staff, this project is expected to require the development and approval of a Permit Engineering Evaluation Report (PEER). The intent of this phase of the project is to provide sufficient information to make decisions on preferred alignment and understand costs associated with construction, right of way, utilities and mitigation measures. Should the City decide to proceed with a project to construct an overpass, the preliminary design shall be used as the basis to pursue funding opportunities project and for Caltrans review. A separate bridge design competition process will be considered to select a designer simultaneously or after the completion of this phase to guide the project through to construction. Closely related but independent from the bridge overcrossing design is the potential for a trail connection along Adobe Creek from the existing seasonal underpass to E. Meadow Drive utilizing the existing Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD) maintenance road. In order to ensure compliance with SCVWD guidelines and to position this project for outside grant funding, a separate trail feasibility study and preliminary design task is included in the scope of work. Services Alta Planning + Design will serve as the Prime Consultant and provide project management, planning, public outreach, and data collection services. Mark Thomas and Company, Inc. (MTCo) will provide engineering, survey, and structural design services including Caltrans coordination. ESA will provide environmental documentation services, Parikh Consultants will provide geotechnical investigation services, and ACE will provide electrical engineering services for this Scope of Work. Consultant services will consist of preliminary design & engineering, public involvement, and evaluation of two feasible overcrossing alignment alternatives within the vicinity of Adobe Creek, followed by the development and support of a preferred alternative to support project funding and environmental review. A joint CEQA/NEPA environmental assessment will be conducted along with data collection of pedestrian, Adobe Creek POC and Trail May 24, 2012 Alta Planning + Design 2 bicycle, motor vehicle, and leisure/recreational activities and needs to inform the project’s basis of design, outreach, and mitigations. An additional task includes a feasibility study and preliminary design for the Adobe Creek reach trail, which will follow an independent project schedule and for which the City will perform environmental evaluation services. Task 1 –Project Initiation / Management  Task 1 includes project kickoff and scoping activities, ongoing project oversight, and an initial site visit to collect data from which decisions can be made. Task 1.1 Project Kickoff/Scoping An organization and scoping meeting will be held with staff and others (as directed) to: a. Introduce key staff accessible to the consultant team b. Review objectives of the project c. Review scope of services d. Confirm project area limits e. Collect available data and published materials f. Establish meeting and presentation schedule g. Establish communication channels with other departments h. Review and list State and Federal required elements i. Review and list all applicable design and planning standards j. Coordinate with City departments and other agencies Task 1.2 Project Management This task includes overall project oversight and quality control, as well as regular meetings/calls with the Public Works Department, other City departments and agencies, sub consultants, and potential vendors. Alta will prepare a detailed schedule for the immediate and potential final design processes. Project coordination activities will result in a comprehensive project work plan, schedule, submittals, project meetings, and agendas, minutes and information. This schedule will be monitored and updated as the project progresses. Throughout the duration of design of this project, the Consultant Team will coordinate and communicate with the following entities as needed:  City of Mountain View, City of East Palo Alto, City of Palo Alto (other departments)  Agency stakeholders [Caltrans, Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD), Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) and other utility providers, US Army Corps of Engineers (Army Corps), San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC), and the Valley Transportation Authority (VTA)]  Others as identified by Consultant and City Task 1.3 Site Visit The Consultant Team will conduct a site visit and inventory of the overcrossing and project area that will include site photography, assessment of traffic, bicycling patterns, pedestrian/leisure activities, aerial utilities, mature vegetation, drainage, and other features and information. These activities will result in a site analysis diagram to be used for decision-making throughout the preliminary design phase. Task 1 Deliverables:  Project schedule and work plan (through final design phase) Adobe Creek POC and Trail May 24, 2012 Alta Planning + Design 3  Project coordination including regular City Public Works meetings/calls, schedule tracking and updates, agendas, meeting minutes and document preparation for each task  One kickoff meeting / One site investigation meeting Task 2 – Survey & Site Investigation  2.1 Base Mapping & Initial Topographic Survey MTCo will provide topographic mapping for the project limits of the Adobe Creek Overcrossing and Reach Trail projects, at 1”=40' scale with 1' contours. MTCo will prioritize the collection of existing survey data from Caltrans, including for the Highway 101 Auxiliary Lane Project, and perform conform topographic surveys to supplement existing base survey information at locations where elevations of features need to be more precisely determined for design purposes. 2.2 Utilities MTCo is a professional licensed surveyor and will survey the locations of surface-visible utilities not shown on existing maps and provide inverts of accessible gravity utilities along the two frontage roads. The Consultant team will consult with PG&E to determine the feasibility of raising the existing 60kV lines and necessary horizontal and vertical clearance distances. For activities requiring work on land not controlled by the City, the Consultant will obtain the necessary written permission to enter the premises. 2.3 Right of Way Sufficient street monuments will be located so that the right-of-way lines of Highway 101 and the adjacent properties of the parcels affected by the proposed crossing may be geo-referenced to the topographic surveys. Right of way determination will be based on the locations of these monuments along with title reports, available maps and documents from Santa Clara County Official Records and Caltrans records. Property ownership will be based upon title reports and Assessor’s information. Plat exhibits and legal descriptions for parcel acquisitions, including temporary construction easements, will be prepared by MTCo. It is assumed that only Assessor’s Parcel Number 127-10-103 may be affected by acquisition, and the maximum number of plats and legal descriptions is two. Task 2.4 Preliminary Geotechnical Report Parikh will prepare the Preliminary Foundation Recommendation Report for the Bridge APS Report. The potential geotechnical/geologic impacts and mitigations will be discussed on a broad basis including but not limited to geology, seismic impacts, groundwater conditions, etc. for the proposed structure foundations. Generally, the geotechnical issues relevant to the proposed project are presented in a qualitative manner with no specific design recommendations. Certain design assumptions are made as to the type of foundations, approximate pile lengths and approximate slope angles. These are helpful in defining the overall design and evaluating the cost impacts. The report will be based on site review and readily available data including as-built Log of Test Borings from existing projects and other Caltrans records. No field exploration work will be completed at this time. Task 2.5 Preliminary Environmental Review Project Description A detailed description of the proposed project will be developed in consultation with the City to form the basis for future environmental assessment. The project description will include the assumed physical characteristics of the project, including proposed width and height of overpass, area of footings, etc. Maps and graphics of the general project alignment will be included to illustrate the text. The project description will be refined based on selection of a preferred alignment for proceeding with Tasks 5 and 6. Adobe Creek POC and Trail May 24, 2012 Alta Planning + Design 4 Phase I Initial Site Assessment The Phase I Initial Site Assessment (ISA) study will focus on the proposed crossing and related improvements only. The ISA will be prepared to identify potential hazardous waste sites and evaluate environmental factors that may have impacted the soil groundwater quality at the site. The study will include data collection (VISTA report) and documents research including historical land use based on study of aerial photographs and other relevant agency documents. No field exploration and/or testing are proposed in this subtask. The potential for hazardous materials shall be assessed to include potential impacts and mitigation measures discussed on a broad basis including but not limited to an evaluation of:  potential for soil conditions to include aerial deposited lead, metals and petroleum hydrocarbons within project boundaries  Investigate soil within, project boundaries, to determine if soil should be classified as a hazardous waste in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Initial Environmental Checklist The Alta team will evaluate each alternative project layout and identify potential environmental constraints to assist in the determination (and evaluation) of the community preferred project alignment. This evaluation will assume complete build-out of the Route 101 auxiliary lanes and the Adobe Creek Reach Trail. The evaluation will also consider potential impacts from nearby land use changes in the Fabian/Meadow Circle and Shoreline sub-areas, and other projects and factors identified by the City and Consultant. The discussion of potential environmental impacts at each location would be refined at this stage of the planning process to inform the Initial Study checklist, based on information that has been developed on alignment footprints. Subterranean impacts will also be considered at this stage, as will any suggested mitigation for likely environmental impacts. The initial discussion of impacts would be refined to the level of an Initial Study Checklist in Task 6. Task 2.6 Traffic and Circulation Study Alta will develop a traffic and circulation technical memorandum that will include an assessment of bicycle/pedestrian and traffic counts (including an assessment of seasonal variation), a summary of existing parking supply and utilization within the project area, and a description of conformance to local and regional transportation plans and policies. Preliminary identification of temporary construction impacts and development of an initial Highway 101 traffic control plan will also be prepared using bridge assumptions developed in coordination with the City. The description of impacts and traffic control plan will be revised in Tasks 5 and 6 upon selection and refinement of a preferred alignment. This subtask includes the following activities:  Manage and incorporate seasonal bicycle/pedestrian counts o 24-hour counts will be conducted for a minimum of four days (Thursday through Sunday) in both the winter and summer months at trail and roadway locations on each side of Highway 101 in the project vicinity, and at alternative highway crossing locations.  The recommended locations for traffic data collection include:  Embarcadero & Highway 101 Overcrossing  Oregon Expressway Pedestrian/Bicycle Crossing  San Antonio Road & Highway 101 Overcrossing  Adobe Creek/Highway 101 Undercrossing o Assumptions: City will provide/install automatic counters; the Consultant will provide research, site planning, data retrieval and evaluation services for automatic counts at up to 5 locations Adobe Creek POC and Trail May 24, 2012 Alta Planning + Design 5  Conduct parking occupancy surveys (detailed scope to be determined in coordination with City staff) for the perimeter parking as well as in the adjacent neighborhoods near the proposed overcrossing (up to ¼ mile from project area)  Review and synthesize the following information:  City of Palo Alto Highway 101 Pedestrian/Bicycle Overcrossing Feasibility Study  Relevant design guidelines & standards (City, Caltrans, CAMUTCD, AASHTO, SCVWD, VTA, etc.)  City of Palo Alto, City of Mountain View General Plan circulation and open space elements, and relevant park, bicycle & pedestrian, and strategic master plans  Parking and transportation program uses in the area, including SCVWD maintenance activities  Existing traffic data: o Review current and planned pedestrian and bicycle routes with volumes and destinations. This review would consider where there are existing connections, or could logically be connections for pedestrians and cyclists to access and circulate through the adjacent neighborhoods, commercial, and park areas o Inventory existing traffic control features (within one mile of project area) o Existing/collected counts and parking studies o Traffic crash data/analysis Task 2 Deliverables:  Site Topographic and Utility Survey  Base Map, existing Cross Sections, plan and profile drawings in AutoCAD, 1”=40' scale  Phase I ISA, Project Description, and Initial Environmental Evaluation  Preliminary Bridge Foundation Report  Traffic & Circulation Study  10 (5 draft/5 final) sets of information, schedules, reports, drawings as noted Assumptions:  Surveys will be conducted in State Plane Coordinates and NAVD’88 datum  Title Reports will be provided by the City  City will provide/install non-motorized counters Exclusions:  Caltrans encroachment permits, night surveys and lane closures  Corner Records and Record of Surveys for monument perpetuation  Digital ortho-rectified photo and color, aerial photos  Catenary surveys (PG&E)  Elevations of the channel below the water level  Traffic modeling and new vehicle traffic counts Task 3 – Schematics and Preliminary Engineering  Task 3.1 Propose Bridge Alternatives Two alternative bridge plans will be developed based on the information and evaluation of elements from Tasks 1 and 2, and from outreach to key agencies and/or property owners. Bridge span/approach ramps will include options with landings:  Two geometric alignments of the bridge over Highway 101  Two geometric alignments of the approach ramps Adobe Creek POC and Trail May 24, 2012 Alta Planning + Design 6  Two dimensional images of each alternative where appropriate (1:40 scale plan, 1:10 scale section, up to one photo simulation) Revise/Expand Site Analysis Diagram and Circulation Study:  Identification of how bridge approach ramps relates to connecting neighborhoods, businesses and adjacent trails and roadways  Circulation & access for bridge users, summarizing anticipated pedestrian, bicycle and ADA movements, location of ramps, stairs, walls, etc. Initial Agency/Stakeholder Review  Submit necessary information for the relocation or adjustment of affected utilities to the City  The Consultant will assist in coordinating the processing of required agreements  The Consultant will attend up to three (3) coordination meetings with the affected utility companies, agencies or other key stakeholders Task 3.2 Bridge and Value Engineering Report In an effort to reduce project costs and solidify project design assumptions, MTCo will provide a report outlining the type of bridge structure(s) and the optimum construction method(s).  Structural design and estimates  Discussion of various bridge structure types (concrete, steel, pre-cast concrete, etc.)  Recommended bridge loading including maintenance vehicle and landscaping loads  Caltrans and AASHTO regulations  Comparative merits and deficiencies of each type, including aesthetic considerations  Constructability issues related to each structure type including construction impacts, design integration and sequencing  Fabrication/Erection/Phasing plan for each structure type  Costs of each structure type, including life-cycle costs, incorporating maintenance and repair  Recommended structure type This investigation will help define the overall design program, preferred alignment, and cost impact evaluation. Detailed geotechnical design and bridge foundation reports will be prepared during the final design phase. Task 3.3 Preliminary Cost Estimates Mark Thomas (MTCo) will serve as the professional estimating firm and prepare an estimate of probable cost based on the preferred design and available information on sub-surface and right-of-way conditions. We will use clearly stated unit cost assumptions based on recent over-crossing experience in the area. Alta will assist MTCo with its in-house database of construction cost estimates for design and operating elements of trail, pedestrian, and bikeway facilities. Task 3.4 Decision Matrix Alta, with input from MTCo and ESA, will develop a decision matrix of cost estimates, opportunities and constraints of the various design components that characterize and contrast the pros and cons of the alternatives. Task 3 Deliverables:  Site constraints/opportunities evaluation - geotechnical, structural design, utilities, right-of-way, circulation  Plan, section and elevation drawings (at 1”= 40’ or 1”=10’) of two alternative bridge alignments/structures Adobe Creek POC and Trail May 24, 2012 Alta Planning + Design 7  Project cost estimate, maintenance and operating costs for each alternative  Bridge & Value Engineering Report  Decision matrix of opportunities and constraints and costs of each bridge alternative Task 4 – Community Participation  Bridge and civil/landscape design concepts will be presented to the public throughout the preliminary design stage, and will be refined based on city comments and feedback from each community, board, and commission meeting as necessary. Consultant is responsible for preparation of meeting materials and presentations. Task 4.1 Initial Public Workshop After City staff review of the site analysis, parking/traffic study, and initial bridge alignment and ramp alternatives, the Consultant shall prepare and facilitate one community meeting to gather information and suggestions and the project goals and objectives from the community. The public workshop process and outcomes will be documented and summarized for City and public review, with photos and illustrated plans/maps to accompany a written memorandum. Task 4.2 Board/Commission/Council Meetings The Consultant will present draft and preferred bridge alternatives, existing conditions data, landscape and civil design concepts, and public outreach summaries to various boards, commissions, and advisory committees, and to City Council. Attendance at up to eight (8) meetings is budgeted, as detailed in Task 4 Deliverables. Task 4.3 Public Workshop #2 Once the City and consultant team have selected a (draft) preferred bridge alignment and complementary site design program, the Consultant will prepare and facilitate a second community meeting that confirms and/or identifies the necessary changes to reach a preferred alternative. The public workshop process and outcomes will be documented and summarized for City and public review, with photos and illustrated plans/maps to accompany a written memorandum. Task 4 Deliverables:  Presentation Graphics, Community Workshop Facilitation, and Meetings Documentation  Meeting Attendance and Presentation: o Up to 2 Palo Alto Bicycle Advisory Commission Meetings (3 color sets) o Up to 2 Parks & Recreation Commission Meetings (8 color sets) o Up to 2 Planning & Transportation Commission Meetings (9 color sets) o Up to 1 Architectural Review Board Meeting (12 color sets) o Up to 1 City Council Meeting Task 5 –Preliminary Design  Task 5.1 Select Preferred Alignment After review of the alternative alignments developed in Task 3 and feedback collected from Task 4, the Consultant will identify and present a preferred alignment for approval by the City. The primary goals of this task are to finalize geometry and preferred circulation, and to establish requirements that allow the right-of-way engineering and environmental review process to proceed. Adobe Creek POC and Trail May 24, 2012 Alta Planning + Design 8 Task 5.2 Preliminary Trail and Geometric Drawings In consultation with the City, Alta and MTCo will prepare preliminary trail design and bridge plans. Drawings will be formatted for consistency with Caltrans’ standards and future preparation of a Permit Engineering Evaluation Report in a later project phase. Anticipated plan sheets for submittal to the City include the following: Number of Sheets for 15% 1. Title Sheet 1 2. Typical Cross Sections 2 3. Layout and Profiles (including curve and line tables) 2 4. Drainage and Grading Plans 2 5. Stage Construction Plan 1 6. Pavement Delineation 1 7. Architectural & Landscape Plans 1 8. Structural Plans 3 9. Electrical and bridge lighting Plans 3 10. Traffic Circulation and Signage 4 Total Sheets 19  Plans shall be drafted and prepared consistent with the requirements of Caltrans Bridge Design Details Manual and in anticipation of Permit Engineering Evaluation Report (PEER) requirements  Drawings will include profile and super elevation diagrams, and preliminary construction details (footings, falsework and superstructure)  Specifications, where required, will use the most current version available of the Standard Special Provisions from Caltrans  Up to twenty (20) hours of preliminary electrical engineering design services are included in this scope of work, to be based on a preferred lighting, security, surveillance and communications program agreed upon by the City Task 5.3 City/Agency Review  Attend up to 4 meetings with City, Caltrans, SCVWD, PG&E and other agencies to resolve issues identified during the preliminary design review  Attend up to 4 City staff coordination meetings (in-person), and additional conference calls as requested, to review the products of Task 5. Up to 3 iterations of the products (admin / public / final drafts) are budgeted, based on response to consolidated, internally-consistent comments from the City.  The Consultant team will consult with PG&E to determine the feasibility of raising the existing 60kV lines and necessary horizontal and vertical clearance distances. For activities requiring work on land not controlled by the City, the Consultant will obtain the necessary written permission to enter the premises. Task 5.4 Cost Estimates  Prepare an estimate of probable project and construction costs. This estimate will be based upon a quantity estimate prepared by the design engineer and unit cost information for each of the materials. This cost estimate shall be prepared by Mark Thomas.  Perform quality control and review of preliminary plans, specifications and cost estimates Task 5.5 Preliminary Design Report / Guidelines Alta and MTCo will work with the City to determine the appropriate format for documenting preliminary design plans, cost estimates, public outreach, and priority/potential design features for the bridge Adobe Creek POC and Trail May 24, 2012 Alta Planning + Design 9 overcrossing and related improvements. Although completion of the Caltrans PEER review process is not anticipated in the current scope of services, supportive elements will be developed including:  Project description, purpose and need  Existing facility background information  Description of the preferred alternative  Preferred alternative preliminary cost estimates  Proposed non-standard features and existing non-standard features to remain  Alternatives reviewed during the preliminary design phase, including community involvement  Environmental determination  Anticipated funding sources  Anticipated project delivery schedule To the extent practical within the budget and in coordination with the City, the Consultant will consider the following information when developing the preliminary design report:  Architectural guidelines and opportunities for exterior paved areas, planting and irrigation, approach ramps, railing and stair design, lighting and stair and ramp accessibility requirements  Historical land use and adjacent land use information  Mature vegetation, wind/sun orientation and exposure  Visual corridors and viewer sensitivities for the project vicinity  Easement acquisition and right-of-way issues  Code and regulation requirements from the City, Army Corps, BCDC, Caltrans, SCVWD, State Architect and various agencies  Storm water objectives and other storm water compliance improvement considerations (NPDES)  Applicable City sustainability efforts and requirements The Alta team will prepare Administrative Draft, Public Review Draft and Final Report versions based on single sets of consolidated, internally consistent comments provided by the City and other entities approved by the Consultant. Task 5 Deliverables:  Preferred Alignment Graphics & Presentation Materials  Attendance and summary for up to 8 agency/city meetings  Preliminary Design Plans (up to 15 copies and electronic PDF)  Preliminary Project Cost Estimate Summary  Admin Draft/Draft/Final Report (up to 15 copies and electronic PDF per cycle, final source files) Task 6 ­ Environmental Documentation  Task 6.1 CEQA/NEPA Requirements The City, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed Highway 101 pedestrian/bicycle bridge at Adobe Creek warrants completion of a Joint California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and a National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) Environmental Impact Report and Environmental Impact Statement. City staff has identified the following tasks (as a minimum) for preparation of the EIR.  Kick-off Meeting – Work Program Refinement  EIR Schedule  Refine Project Description  Preparation of Notice of Preparation (NOP) and Initial Study Checklist (IS) using City of Palo Alto’s checklist template Adobe Creek POC and Trail May 24, 2012 Alta Planning + Design 10  Public Scoping Meeting The environmental documentation budget assumes that required (separate) environmental analysis for the approval of the Adobe Creek Reach Trail will be conducted by the City. Task 6.2 Evaluation of Alternatives  Identification of Alternatives (no action/no project, 2 build alternatives)  Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives Task 6.3 Prepare EIR/EA ESA, with assistance from Alta, will lead the preparation of draft and final Environmental Impact Reports (CEQA) and Environmental Assessments (NEPA). These reports are anticipated to include the following elements: Description of Setting, Impacts and Mitigation  Aesthetics o Visual Simulation/sun shadow study  Air Quality  Biological Resources o Prepare Biotic Study Report o Prepare arborist report - Review will include health / condition, life expectancy, numbering, and development guidelines for work around trees in the proposed construction area  Cultural Resources  Hazards and Hazardous Materials  Land Use and Planning  Noise  Public Services, Utilities and Service Systems  Transportation/Traffic/Parking Analysis  Greenhouse Gas Emissions Project Consistency with Local and Regional Plans  City of Palo Alto General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan and Other Local Plans  Pertinent Regional Plans CEQA/NEPA Required Assessment Conclusions  Growth-Inducing Effects  Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts  Irreversible Environmental Changes  Cumulative Impacts  Effects Found Not to be Significant Preparation of the EIR/EA  Conduct all document coordination including collection of all comments  Prepare all responses to comments for each revision Administrative Draft EIR/EA  First Administrative Draft EIR /EA  Second Administrative Draft EIR /EA  Screen Check Draft EIR/EA  Public Release Draft EIR/EA Adobe Creek POC and Trail May 24, 2012 Alta Planning + Design 11 Final EIS/EA  Prepare Administrative Final EIS/EA and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP)  Prepare Final EIS/EA, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP) and Notice of Determination (NOD)  Assumes up to 250 pages and up to 5 color graphics Task 6.4 Meetings and Public Hearings  Staff Meetings (up to 3)  Public Hearings (up to 3) Task 6 Deliverables:  Kick-off Meeting attendance/agenda/notes  Scoping Meeting attendance/agenda/notes  Administrative EIR Project Description & Refined EIR Project Description  Notice of Preparation and Distribution List  Initial Study Checklist  Materials for Public Scoping Meeting including PowerPoint Presentation, Sign-in Sheets and Comment Cards  Twenty (20) printed copies and electronic versions of First Administrative Draft EIR/EA  Twenty (20) printed copies and electronic copies (PDF, Word) of Second Administrative Draft EIR/EA  Two (2) printed copies of the Screen check Draft EIR/EA  Fifty (50) printed copies and electronic files (PDF, Word) of the Public Release Draft EIR/EA  Distribution of the Public Release Draft EIR/EA (other than to the City of Palo Alto)  Twenty Five (25) printed copies and electronic files (PDF, Word) of Administrative Final EIR/EA and MMRP  Fifty (50) printed copies and electronic files of Final EIR/EA  One (1) printed copy of each of the draft and final NOD Assumptions:  The project description will not change substantively during the preparation of the Initial Study or EIR.  Alta/ESA will be responsible for preparing all CEQA-required notices of environmental documents, for hand-recording public comments received at the public hearing on the Draft EIR, and for copies of materials required for community meetings on the environmental review (e.g., summary tables, agendas, etc.).  Work will not be stopped or slowed by circumstances outside the consultant’s control. Additional administrative, management, scheduling, and rescheduling costs caused by any external delay shall be recoverable by consultant as extra work.  Meeting/City Involvement: Collect and forward comments to consultant, meet to discuss appropriate level of response to comments and format for preparing the Administrative and Final EIR/EA. Scope assumes no more than 20 public comment letters and further assumes no substantive issues would be introduced during the public comment process. Task 7 – Additional Services (Optional)  Task 7.1 Grant Assistance  Assist in grant writing on a time and materials basis (optional task budget assumes up to one major grant application (e.g. Tiger) or up to three state/local grant applications) Adobe Creek POC and Trail May 24, 2012 Alta Planning + Design 12 Task 7.2 Design Contingency (10%)  General contingency for design, environmental, or other services not anticipated in the scope of work Task 7 Deliverables:  Grant assistance (optional)  Project elements/level of effort (TBD) not anticipated in the base scope of work Task 8 ­ Adobe Reach Trail Feasibility & Design  The Adobe Creek Reach Trail project, as currently envisioned by the City, will be approximately 650-ft in length and located along the eastern/southern portion of Adobe Creek along the SCVWD maintenance road. Projected design elements include:  Upgrade of maintenance road to meet Caltrans’ Class I Trail standards  Decorative Guard Rail along creek  Illuminated Bollards  Decorative Landscaping  Access gate to Creek Landing  Enhanced Trail Gate Access at W Bayshore Drive  Enhanced Pedestrian Crossing at E Meadow Drive  Sidewalk Improvements along W Bayshore Drive The project takes advantage of the existing gravel access road and proposes minor grading to help maintain ADA-access while preserving the natural aesthetic of the new trail. Task 8.1 Project Management, Scoping, and Initiation  Project Kickoff Meeting  Revised scope  Project design and construction schedule  Regular, ongoing conference calls to review project status and deliverables Task 8.2 Trail Conceptual Design & Feasibility The Alta team will conduct the following activities to ensure a feasible trail design that is compliant with applicable agency requirements, forms, and agreements:  Research and summarize the necessary features, guidelines, agreements, and processes for completing a successful trail project along the SCVWD Adobe Creek maintenance road.  Conduct an initial topographic survey and preparation of a basemap (accomplished in conjunction with Task 2.1 above – cost to be apportioned between projects).  Develop initial schematic plans and graphics for presentation and discussion purposes, including up to one photo simulation or rendering  Provide preliminary project cost estimates, prepared by a professional cost estimating firm  Coordinate with CEQA environmental review team, as necessary Based on the above, Alta will prepare a trail feasibility technical memorandum and work with the City to develop an initial draft MOU, project checklist, and other required elements as identified by the Consultant and City Task 8.3 City/Agency Review and Coordination  Attend and facilitate up to 4 meetings with City and/or SCVWD staff ; provide summary meeting notes  Revise feasibility study, and conceptual design based on agency/City feedback  Assist with the refinement and finalization of SCVWD MOU and related trail use agreements Adobe Creek POC and Trail May 24, 2012 Alta Planning + Design 13 Task 8.4 Board/Commission/Council Meetings  Prepare, attend, present, and summarize for the following City review meetings: o Up to 2 PABAC meetings o Up to 2 PRC meetings o Up to 1 Planning and Transportation Meetings o Up to 1 City Council Meeting Task 8.5 Preliminary Trail Design (30% Plans)  Prepare preliminary trail plan sheets: Number of Sheets for 30% 1. Title Sheet and Notes 1 2. Trail Layout & Demo 2 3. Utilities & Drainage 2 4. Pavement & Markings 2 5. Planting & Irrigation 2 6. Lighting & Electrical Plans 2 7. Details (Misc.) 2 Total Sheets 13  Alta will prepare revised cost estimates based on 30% design and quantities  Attend one meeting with City to review the plans and estimate  Revise the plans based on one consolidated, internally consistent set of comments. Additional revisions will be billed on a time and materials basis. Task 8.6 Prepare Final Report / Grant Application Alta will work with City staff to refine and expand the feasibility memorandum into a project report and/or into a SCVWD grant application package. Task 8.7 Design Contingency (Optional)  Optional design services based on direction and approval to proceed from the City. Task 8 Deliverables:  Kickoff meeting attendance/agenda/notes  Final scope and project schedule  Trail Feasibility Memorandum, including cost estimate by estimating firm (up to 5 sets of draft/final)  Assist preparation of SCVWD MOU, related trail use agreements  Agency coordination meeting attendance and summaries  30% Design Plan Sheets (5 full size and 5 half size sets, plus pdf and CAD files)  Updated cost estimate  Presentation graphics and materials  Final Project Report or grant application package PROJECT SCHEDULE* 24-May-12 City of Palo Alto Highway 101/Adobe Creek Overcrossing & Reach Trail ALTA PLANNING + DESIGN TEAM 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Task 1: Project Initiation / Data Collection Task 1.1 Project Kickoff/Scope Task 1.2 Project Management Task 1.3 Site Visit Task 2: Survey, Utilities, and Right-of-Way Task 2.1 Base Mapping & Topographic Survey Task 2.2 Utilities Task 2.3 Right-of-Way Task 2.4 Prelim Geotechnical Report Task 2.5 Preliminary Environmental Review Task 2.6 Traffic & Circulation Study Task 3: Schematics & Preliminary Engineering Task 3.1 Propose Bridge Alternatives Task 3.2 Bridge & Value Engineering Report Task 3.3 Preliminary Cost Estimates Task 3.4 Decision Matrix Task 4: Community Participation Task 4.1 Initial Public Workshop ♦ Task 4.2 Board/Commission/Council Meetings (up to 8)♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ Task 4.3 Public Workshop #2 ♦ Task 5: 15% PS&E Task 5.1 Select Preferred Alignment Task 5.2 Integrated Site Design Guidelines Task 5.3 Prepare Plan Sheets Task 5.4 City/Agency Review (up to 8 meetings) Task 5.5 Cost Estimates Task 5.6 Prepare Project Report / PEER elements Task 6: Environmental Documentation Task 6.1 CEQA/NEPA Requirements Task 6.2 Evaluation of Alternatives Task 6.3 Prepare EIS/EIA Task 6.4 Meetings and Public Hearings Task 7: Optional Tasks Tasks and Schedule TBD Task 8: Adobe Creek Reach Trail Task 8.1 Project Management, Scope, & Initiation Task 8.2 Conceptual Design and Feasibility Task 8.3 Agency/City Review (up to 4 meetings) Task 8.4 Board/Commission/Council Meetings (up to 6)♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ Task 8.5 Develop Preliminary Design (30%) (1 review meeting/revision) Task 8.6 Prepare Final Report/ Grant Application Task 8.7 Design Contingency (Optional) TBD * Subject to Change  PR C PA B A C Co m m M t g # 1 PT C Co u n c i l PA B A C CE Q A S c o p i n g PR C AR B PT C Co m m M t g # 2 Co u n c i l TB D September October November December January February March April Task 2012 2013 July August SCHEDULE OF FEES & CHARGES City of Palo Alto Highway 101/Adobe Creek Overcrossing & Reach Trail ALTA PLANNING + DESIGN TEAM 5/24/2012 Parikh AEC Principal in Charge Project Manager Senior Designer Environmental Advisor Project Advisor Planner CADD/ Mapping Principal Project Manager Project Engineer Structural Manager Structural Engineer Structural Tech Survey Manager Project Surveyor Survey Tech Survey Crew Parikh AEC Project Director Project Manager CEQA Analyst Cultural Biologist Anderson Hildreth Daley-Peng Woltering Donlon Maravilla Burchfield Ayupan M. Fisher T. Chow P. Chen T. Walker T. Tran J. MacRory S. Prevost XXX XXX Geotech Lighting Rosenblatt Davidian Chan Bowden Giolli 2012 Hourly Rate*$185 $110 $125 $100 $105 $85 $65 $230 $172 $165 $255 $175 $85 $155 $135 $105 $270 $150 $150 $175 $150 $125 $110 $110 Task 1: Project Initiation / Data Collection Task 1.1 Project Kickoff/Scope 4 6 2 2 4 18 $2,904 Task 1.2 Project Management 12 22 2 4 2 14 56 $8,748 Task 1.3 Site Visit 4 4 4 4 2 2 2 4 26 $3,824 Task 2: Survey, Utilities, and Right-of-Way Task 2.1 Base Mapping & Topographic Survey 2 2 4 4 12 12 36 $6,134 Task 2.2 Utilities 4 16 4 24 $3,200 Task 2.3 Right-of-Way 4 16 4 24 $3,200 Task 2.4 Prelim Geotechnical Report 1 2 45 48 $7,355 Task 2.5 Preliminary Environmental Review 2 6 20 40 4 24 16 12 12 136 $15,370 Task 2.6 Traffic & Circulation Study 6 8 32 40 86 $6,820 Task 3: Schematics & Preliminary Engineering Task 3.1 Propose Bridge Alternatives 4 12 12 4 24 12 4 4 2 78 $8,658 Task 3.2 Bridge Value Engineering / Advanced Planning Study 2 4 2 8 20 48 84 $10,760 Task 3.3 Preliminary Cost Estimates 2 2 1 12 1 6 24 $4,047 Task 3.4 Decision Matrix 2 4 2 8 2 2 2 4 26 $3,544 Task 4: Community Participation Task 4.1 Initial Public Workshop 2 6 4 6 18 $2,040 Task 4.2 Board/Commission/Council Meetings (up to 8)6 32 8 8 4 58 $6,998 Task 4.3 Public Workshop #2 2 6 4 6 4 22 $2,728 Task 5: Preliminary Design Task 5.1 Select Preferred Alignment 2 6 12 18 4 8 50 $6,068 Task 5.2 Preliminary Trail & Conceptual Geometric Drawings 2 2 6 8 16 2 8 32 20 96 $13,176 Task 5.3 City/Agency Review (up to 8 meetings)4 16 4 8 12 4 4 52 $8,584 Task 5.4 Cost Estimates 1 2 2 2 12 4 23 $4,209 Task 5.5 Prepare Preliminary Design Report / Guidelines 4 8 8 16 4 4 12 2 4 8 70 $9,458 Task 6: Environmental Documentation Task 6.1 CEQA/NEPA Requirements 2 4 4 6 12 16 44 $5,810 Task 6.2 Evaluation of Alternatives 2 4 4 4 20 32 66 $8,910 Task 6.3 Prepare EIS/EIA 2 4 8 16 80 120 32 32 294 $38,330 Task 6.4 Meetings and Public Hearings (up to 2 staff and 2 public)4 8 8 8 16 16 60 $7,720 Labor Hours 59 158 64 36 12 190 70 20 55 86 28 32 56 12 36 20 12 45 20 60 160 200 44 44 1931 Labor Cost $10,915 $17,380 $8,000 $3,600 $1,260 $16,150 $4,550 $4,600 $9,460 $14,190 $7,140 $5,600 $4,760 $1,860 $4,860 $2,100 $3,240 $6,750 $3,000 $10,500 $24,000 $25,000 $4,840 $4,840 Subtotal $198,595 Reimbursable Expenses &Travel $7,500 Travel & Meals $3,000 Printing & Materials $4,500 Bridge Project - Base Total $206,095 Task 7: Additional Services (Optional)$20,610 Task 7.1 Grant Assistance TBD TBD Task 7.2 Design Contingency (10%)TBD $20,610 Bridge Project Total with Optional Services 0 $226,705 Task 8: Adobe Creek Reach Trail Task 8.1 Project Management, Scope, & Initiation 4 8 4 16 $2,120 Task 8.2 Conceptual Design and Feasibility 4 8 8 16 8 2 4 2 4 4 4 64 $7,854 Task 8.3 Agency/City Review (up to 4 meetings)4 8 8 6 2 28 $3,474 Task 8.4 Board/Commission/Council Meetings (up to 6)4 12 8 12 36 $4,080 Task 8.5 Develop Preliminary Design (30%) (1 review meeting/revision)2 2 12 32 40 2 8 5 103 $9,824 Task 8.6 Prepare Final Report or Grant Application 2 12 2 16 6 38 $3,690 Task 8.7 Design Contingency (25%)0 $8,000 Labor Hours 20 50 42 0 0 82 54 0 6 12 0 0 0 2 4 4 4 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 285 Labor Cost $3,700 $5,500 $5,250 $0 $0 $6,970 $3,510 $0 $1,032 $1,980 $0 $0 $0 $310 $540 $420 $1,080 $0 $750 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal $31,042 Reimbursable Expenses &Travel $900 Adobe Creek Reach Trail - Base Total $31,942 Adobe Creek Reach Trail - w/ Contingency $39,942 Bridge and Trail Project Total - base services $238,037 Bridge and Trail Project Total - w/ additional services $266,647 * These are fully burdened rates that include salary, benefits, firm overhead charges, administrative fees and profit Original Contract Amount (Base Services)Original Contract + Amendment #1 (Base Services) Original Contract Amount (Additional Services)Original Contract + Amendment #1 (with Additional Services) Task Budget Task Alta Planning + Design Mark Thomas ESA $100,892 $10,089 $338,929 $377,628 Task Hours p. 1 ATTACHMENT B  6 Adobe Creek Standard  Overcrossing   Figure 1: Highway 101 Pedestrian and Bicycle Standard Overcrossing ($5M)    7 Adobe Creek Enhanced Overcrossing   Figure 2: Highway 101 Pedestrian and Bicycle Enhanced Overcrossing ($9M)  p. 2 Figure 3: Highway 101 Pedestrian and Bicycle Standard Overcrossing Rendering      Figure 4:  Highway 101 Pedestrian and Bicycle Standard Overcrossing  Rendering – Alternate View