Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-08-14 City CouncilCity of Palo Alto City Manager’s. Report TO:HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL FROM:CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DATE:AUGUST 14, 2003 CMR:396:03 SUBJECT:DISCHARGE PERMIT FOR THE REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL PLANT This is an information report and no Council action is required. BACKGROUND Treated wastewater from the RWQCP is discharged to San Francisco Bay and a new permit with stringent requirements and discharge limits is issued ever), five years by the Regional Board, the State agency which regulates wastewater discharges. Similar permits for Sunnyvale and San Jose will be issued in the same time frame, and the requirements for the three plants have been negotiated during the past year through the Santa Clara Basin Watershed Management Initiative, a stakeholder group which includes government agencies, businesses, and environmental organizations. It is anticipated that the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Board) will issue a new 5-year permit for discharge to San Francisco Bay to Palo Alto’s Regional Water Quality Control Plant (RWQCP) on August 20, 2003. DISCUSSION Four key issues were negotiated: Mercury Discharge Limits - In an effort to control mercury releases to San Francisco Bay, the Regional Board staff had proposed very stringent limits which would not have allowed the full utilization of the design capacity of the RWQCP. An alternative approach was negotiated which calls for Palo Alto to work with dental offices to install new mercury-reducing technology. o Pathogens - New limitations on pathogenic (disease causing) organisms were negotiated which target human pathogens more precisely, and reduce chlorine usage by one-half. 3.Cyanide Limits - Compliance with the initially proposed cyanide limits would not have been possible due to complications with the analytic method for cyanide. CMR:396:03 Page 1 of 2 Understanding that the test method was not really detecting toxic forms of cyanide, all parties agreed on limitations which are achievable. Monlmrlng Costs - Expensive no,x~ to~tlng ,~,~ n~,,,,,~A ,,,~,~, ~,;,~,h~oh ,~,~ ~ooloA back during the negotiation process. However, an increased frequency requirement for chronic toxicity testing will cost Palo Alto and its Partners $15,000-$33,000 per year. RESOURCE IMPACT In addition to the monitoring cost increase noted above, is the State’s annual fee increase for the permit, which is part of the Budget debate occurring in Sacramento. At this time, it appears that the permit fee could increase from $20,000 to $60,000 per year, a three-fold increase. The final figure could be even higher. PREPARED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD: PHILIP BOBEL Manager, Environmental Compliance Division GLENN S. ROBERTS Director of Public Works CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: Assistant City Manager CMR.a96.0o Page 2 of 2