HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-05-15 City Council (3)BUDGET
y Ma ager’ Rep r
TO:HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES
ATTENTION: FINANCE COMMITTEE
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MAY 15, 2003
ADOPTION OF
WASTEWATER
EFFECT A
INCREASE
CMR: 269:03
A RESOLUTION AMENDING VARIOUS
COLLECTION RATE SCHEDULES TO
WASTEWATER COLLECTION RATE
RECOMMENDATION
Staff and the Utilities Advisory Commission (UAC) recommend that the City Council
adopt the attached resolution to increase wastewater rates approximately $1.7 million, to
be effective July 1, 2003.
DISCUSSION
A review of the FY 03-04 proposed budget for the Wastewater Collection Fund indicates
that current revenues are insufficient to meet the Utility’s financial obligations. Over the
past few years, funds from the Rate Stabilization Reserve (RSR) have been used to help
fund the cost of the capital improvement pro~am (CIP), cover treatment costs, and
stabilize rates. Consequently, the RSR balance is below the minimum guidelines
approved by Council. Given that a 25 percent wastewater collection rate increase was
in-tplemented July 2002 and many customers are experiencing financial challenges during
this recession, staff has limited the proposed increase to 15 percent in 2003-04. Despite
the proposed 15 percent rate increase, the RSR will remain below the minimum guideline
level through FY 04-05. During the FY04-05 budget process, staff wil! evaluate the need
to propose a rate increase if the RSR has not risen above the mininmm guideline level.
When the economy rebounds from the cunent recession, wastewater collection revenues
are expected to pick up, which may negate the need to raise rates.
The proposed 15 percent system wide revenue increase has been allocated appropriately
between customer classes. A higher percentage increase has been applied to non-
residential customers to cover the sales revenue shortfall related to reduced water usage
from this customer class.
CMR:269:03 Page 1 of 2
BOARD/COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The UAC reviewed and approved this recommendation at the May 7, 2003 meeting.
RESOURCE IMPACT
Approval of this proposed rate increase will
approximately $1.7 million for FY 03-04.
raise the Water Fund sales revenues by
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
This proposed rate increase would satisfy the Strategic Plan objective of providing
superior financial performance to the City and competitive rates to customers. These
recommendations do not represent a change in current City policies.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The adoption of the resolution does not constitute a project under the California
Environmental Quality Act. Therefore, no environmental assessment is required.
ATTACHMENTS
A: Wastewater Rate Schedules S-land S-2
B:UAC Report "Adoption of a Resolution Amending Various Wastewater Collection
Rate Schedules to Effect a Wastewater Collection Rate Increase"
PREPARED BY:
DEPARTMENT HEAD:
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
Lucie Hirmina
Utilities Rates Manager
Directo~ of Utilities ~
EM~H~--RRISON
Assistant City Manager
CMR:269:03 Page 2 of 2
DOMESTIC WASTEWATER COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL
UTILITY RATE SCHEDULE S-!
A. APPLICABILITY:
No
This schedule applies to each occupied domestic dwelling unit.
TERRITORY:
Co
Within the incorporated limits of the City of Palo Alto and on land owned or leased by the City.
RATES:
Per Month
Each domestic dwelling unit ..................................................................................................$19.25
SPECIAL NOTES:
An occupied domestic dwelling is designated as any house, cottage, flat, duplex unit, oi
apartment unit having kitchen, bath, and sleeping facilities and to which utilities services are
being rendered.
Any dwelling unit being individually served by a water, gas, or electric meter will be
considered as continuously occupied.
For two or more occupied dwelling units served by one water meter, the monthly wastewater
charge will be calculated by multiplying the cun-ent wastewater rate by the number of
dwelling units.
Each developed separate lot shall have a separate service lateral to a sanitary, main or
manhole.
CITY OF PALO ALTO UTILITIES
Issued by the City Council
Supersedes Sheet No.S-l-1 dated 7-%02 UTILITIES
Effective 7-1-2003
Sheet No.S-l-1
COMMERCIAL WASTEWATER COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL
UTILITY RA_TE SCHEDULE S-2
No
Co
APPLICABILITY:
This schedule appties to all establishments other than domestic dwelling units.
TERRITORY:
Within the incorporated limits of the City of Palo Alto and on land owned or leased by the City.
RATES:
1.Restaurants
(A) Minirnum charge per connection per month ..................................................$19.25
(B)Quantity Rates:
Based on metered water, per 100 cubic feet ..................................................$8.10
2.Any establishment dischar~in~ sewaae in excess of 25,000 ~atlons or quality equivalent of
sewage.per day as determined by metered water usaae and sampling.
(A) Collection System Operation, Maintenance, and Infiltration Inflow:
$2,751.00 per million gallons ($2.06 per 100 cubic feet of metered water).
(B)Advanced Waste Treatment Operations and Maintenance Charge:
$1,506.50 per million gallons ($1.13 per 100 cubic feet of metered water).
(C)$204.25 per 1000 pounds of COD
(D)$ 451.50 per 1000 pounds of SS
(E)$ 3,440.00 per 1000pounds of NH3
(F)- $14,781.25 per 1000pounds oftoxics*
*Toxics include sum of chromium, copper, cyanide, lead, nickel, silver, and zinc.
CITY OF PALO ALTO UTILITIES
Issued by the City, Council
Supersedes Sheet No. S-2-1 dated 7-1-02
CITY OF PALO ALTO
UTILITIES
Effective 7-1-2003
Sheet No. S-2-1
COMMERCIAL WASTEWATER COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL
All Other Establishments
UTILITY RATE SCHEDULE S-2
(Continued)
Do
(A)Minimum Charge per connection per month .................................................$19.25
Quantity Rates:
Based on metered water per 100 cubic feet ...................................................$ 4.17
SPECIAL NOTES:
Upon application from establishments maintaining extensive irrigated landscaping, the
monthly charge will be based upon the average water usage for the months of January,
February and March. If a water meter is identified as exclusively serving irrigation
landscaping, such meter will be exempted from sewer charge calculations.
Sewage metering facilities may be required, in which case service will be governed by temps
of a special agreement.
Charges for large discharges (25,000 gallons per day or greater) will be determined on the
basis of sampling as outlined in Utilities Rule and Regulation 23C. However, for purposes
of arriving at an accurate flow estimate, discharge meters, if installed, can be utilized to
measure outflow for billing purposes. Annual charges will be determined and allocated
monthly for billing purposes.
Discharsers of Unmetered Contaminated Groundwater
Quantity rates for collection and treatment of the contaminated groundwater will be based
on the same rates applicable to meter.ed usage for customers discharging less than 25,000
gallons of sewage per day. Discharge permits are issued by the Enviromnental Compliance
Manager at the Water Quality Control Plant, 2501 Embarcadero Way, Palo Alto.
Industrial Waste Discharge Fee
A fee of $750 will be required for the issuance of an Industrial Discharge Permit, including
any Exceptional Waste Permits. This fee may be reduced to $250 for a one-time batch
discharge permit. [End]
CITY OF PALO ALTO UTILITIES
Issued by the City Council
Supersedes Sheet No.S-2-2 dated 7-1-02 CiTY OF #ALQ ALTO
UTILITIES
Effective 7-1-2003
Sheet No, S-2-2
MEMORANDUM 3E
TO:UTILITIES ADVISORY COMMISSION
FROM:UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
DATE:MAY 7, 2003
SUBJECT:ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AMENDING VARIOUS
WASTEWATER COLLECTION RATE SCHEDULES TO EFFECT
A WASTEWATER COLLECTION RATE INCREASE
RECOMMENDATION
This report requests that the Utilities Advisory Commission (UAC) recommend that the
City Council approve a 15 percent Wastewater Collection rate increase effective July 1,
2003.
BACKGROUND
The Wastewater Collection Utility’s revenue requirement consists of a number of
components including the cost to operate and maintain a reliable system, pay for the
capital improvement program (CIP), fund prudent reserve levels and pay Palo Alto’s
share of treatment costs. Any change in one or more of these components or a change in
sales revenues may trigger a need for a rate adjustment. Sales revenue collected from
non-residential users is tied to water consumption. Consequently, a decline in water usage
among commercial users has a corresponding adverse impact on wastewater collection
revenues.
In FY 02-03, the City Council approved a 25 percent rate increase for the Wastewater
Collection Fund. This was necessary because of rising treatment costs, increased CIP
expenditmles, and reduced revenue due to declining water consumption. Despite this rate
increase, it was recognized that it would be necessary to continue to draw down on the
Rate Stabilization Reserve (RSR) and that a subsequent rate increase would be required
to address the RSR balance.
DISCUSSION
A review of the FY 03-04 proposed budget for the Wastewater Collection Fund indicates
that current revenues are insufficient to meet the Utility’s financial obligations. Over the
past few years, funds from the Rate Stabilization Rese~-v-e (RSR) have been used to help
Page 1 of 3
fund the cost of the capital improvement pro~am (CIP), cover treatment costs, and
stabilize rates. Consequently, the RSR balance is below the minimum guidelines
approved by Council. Despite the proposed rate increase, the RSR will continue to be
below the minimum level tl’nough FY 04-05. During the FY04-05 budget process, staff
will evaluate the need to propose a rate increase if the RSR has not risen above the
minimum guideline level. When the economy rebounds from the current recession,
wastewater collection revenues will pick up which may negate the need to raise rates.
The proposed 15 percent system wide revenue increase has been spread
disproportionately bet-ween customer classes. A higher percentage increase has been
applied to non-residential customers to accommodate the sales revenue shortfall related
to r educed water u sage from these c ustomer c lasses. T able 1 s hows the impact of the
proposed rates on customer wastewater bills.
TABLE 1
Impact of Rate Increase on Customer Bills
Proposed Dollar Percentage
Customer Current Rate Rate Difference Increase
Residential $17.50 $19.25 $1.75 10
Commercial/CCF 3.42 4.17 .75 22
Restaurants / CCF 6.44 8.10 1.66 22
Comparison of Palo Alto Wastewater Rates and Surroundin~ Cities:
Palo Alto’s wastewater rates are currently 2% higher than the surrounding areas of Menlo
Park, Redwood City, Mountain View, and Los Altos, primarily due to an aggressive
infrastructure pro~am. Comparing the current rates of these cities with the proposed
rates for Palo Alto, the residential rate differential would rise to approximately 17%.
However, other cities are or will be evaluating the possibility of rate increases. For
example, Los Altos estimates a residential increase between $1 to $3 per month.
RESOURCE IMPACT
Approval of this rate proposal will increase the Wastewater Fund sales revenues by
approximately $1.7 million on a fiscal year basis. The Rate Stabilization Reserve in the
Wastewater Utility is projected to be $800,000 below the minimum reserve guideline
approved by the Council for FY 2003/04 and $1.1 million for FY 2004/05.
Page 2 of 3
ALTERNATIVES
Staff evaluated other alternative rate increases. For example, to build up the reserve
sooner, a 25% rate increase was evaluated. However, there is some uncertainty with
projections over the next two ?,ears as the economy will dictate the size and timing for
future rate increases. For this reason, staff proposes a modest 15% in F¥ 2003/04 and
will re-evaluate the need for a rate adjustment in FY 2004/05.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
This rate proposal meets the following Utilities Strategic Plan objectives: to invest in
utility infrastructure, to deliver reliable service and to provide superior financial service
to the City and competitive rates to customers. Approval of the proposed wastewater rate
increase does not represent a change to existing policies.
TIMELINE
The effective dates of the proposed water rates are July 1,2003.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The adoption of the resolution does not constitute a project under the California
Environmental Quality Act; therefore, no environmental assessment is required.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Wastewater Rate Schedules S-1 and S-2
PREPARED BY:
LUCIE HIRMINA
Pricing Manager
REVIEWED BY:
DEPARTMENT HEAD:
RAN~Y BALDSCHUN
As.~tant Director Utilities Administrative Services
Dir~ of Utilities
Page 3 of 3