HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-01-20 City Council Agenda PacketCITY OF PALO ALTO
CITY COUNCIL
JANUARY 20, 2015
Special Meeting
Council Chambers
6:00 PM
Agenda posted according to PAMC Section 2.04.070. Supporting materials are available in the
Council Chambers on the Thursday preceding the meeting.
PUBLIC COMMENT Members of the public may speak to agendized items; up to three minutes per speaker, to be determined by the presiding officer. If you wish to address the Council on any issue that is on this agenda, please complete a speaker request card located on the table at the entrance to the Council Chambers, and deliver it to the City Clerk prior to discussion of the item. You are not required to give
your name on the speaker card in order to speak to the Council, but it is very helpful.
TIME ESTIMATES
Time estimates are provided as part of the Council's effort to manage its time at Council meetings.
Listed times are estimates only and are subject to change at any time, including while the meeting is
in progress. The Council reserves the right to use more or less time on any item, to change the order
of items and/or to continue items to another meeting. Particular items may be heard before or after
the time estimated on the agenda. This may occur in order to best manage the time at a meeting or to adapt to the participation of the public. To ensure participation in a particular item, we suggest arriving at the beginning of the meeting and remaining until the item is called. HEARINGS REQUIRED BY LAW Applications and/or appellants may have up to ten minutes at the outset of the public discussion to make their remarks and up to three minutes for concluding remarks after other members of the public
have spoken.
Call to Order
Study Session 6:00-7:00 PM
1. Palo Alto Bicycle Boulevard Program Summary
Special Orders of the Day 7:00-7:10 PM
2. Recognition of Mitchell Park Library and Community Center Grand
Opening Volunteers
Agenda Changes, Additions and Deletions
City Manager Comments 7:10-7:20 PM
Oral Communications 7:20-7:35 PM
Members of the public may speak to any item NOT on the agenda. Council reserves the right to limit the duration of
Oral Communications period to 30 minutes.
1 January 20, 2015
MATERIALS RELATED TO AN ITEM ON THIS AGENDA SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AFTER DISTRIBUTION OF THE AGENDA
PACKET ARE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION IN THE CITY CLERK’S OFFICE AT PALO ALTO CITY HALL, 250 HAMILTON AVE.
DURING NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS.
Consent Calendar 7:35-7:40 PM Items will be voted on in one motion unless removed from the calendar by three Council Members.
3. Adoption of a Resolution to Authorize the City Manager or his Designee
to Purchase Greenhouse Gas Allowances to Satisfy the City's Cap-and-
Trade Compliance Obligations for the Gas Utility in an Amount Not to
Exceed $4,000,000 per Year and for the Electric Utility in an Amount
Not to Exceed $250,000 per Year
4. Approval of Utilizing CALNET3 State Contract for Telecommunications
in the Amount of $400,000 Annually for a 3.5 Year Term from January
1, 2015 to June 30, 2018
5. Approval of a Contract with C.F. Archibald Paving Inc. in The Amount
of $2,220,134 for the FY 2015 Asphalt Paving Project, the 2nd of 4
Contracts in the FY 2015 Street Maintenance Program Project (CIP PE-
86070)
6. Approval of a Contract Amendment to Sierra Infosys Inc. (C10135998)
in the Amount of $120,000 for the Support and Maintenance of SAP
Industry-Specific Solution for Human Resources Modules, Business
Mapping and Reporting.
7. SECOND READING: Adoption of Park Improvement Ordinance for
Bowden Park (First Reading: December 15, 2014, PASSED: 9-0)
Action Items
Include: Reports of Committees/Commissions, Ordinances and Resolutions, Public Hearings, Reports of Officials,
Unfinished Business and Council Matters. 7:40-8:45 PM
8. Approval of Concept Plan Line and Implementation Plan for the Maybell
Avenue Bicycle Boulevard and Churchill Avenue Enhanced Bikeway
Projects
8:45-9:15 PM
9. Adoption of Procedure to Vote Before Holding Closed Sessions
9:15-9:45 PM
10. Policy and Services Recommendation to Adopt an Ordinance Increasing
Council Salary From $600/Month to $1,000/Month, Effective January
1, 2017
2 January 20, 2015
MATERIALS RELATED TO AN ITEM ON THIS AGENDA SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AFTER
DISTRIBUTION OF THE AGENDA PACKET ARE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION IN THE CITY
CLERK’S OFFICE AT PALO ALTO CITY HALL, 250 HAMILTON AVE. DURING NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS.
Inter-Governmental Legislative Affairs
Council Member Questions, Comments and Announcements
Members of the public may not speak to the item(s)
Adjournment
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITY ACT (ADA)
Persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids or services in using City facilities, services or programs or who would like information on the City’s compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, may contact (650) 329-2364 (Voice) 24 hours in advance.
3 January 20, 2015
MATERIALS RELATED TO AN ITEM ON THIS AGENDA SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AFTER
DISTRIBUTION OF THE AGENDA PACKET ARE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION IN THE CITY
CLERK’S OFFICE AT PALO ALTO CITY HALL, 250 HAMILTON AVE. DURING NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS.
Additional Information
Schedule of Meetings
Schedule of Meetings
Tentative Agenda
Tentative Agenda
Informational Report
Recommendation from Policy and Services Committee Regarding 2015
City Council Priority Setting and Annual Retreat
Annual Review of the City Council Procedures and Protocols
City of Palo Alto's Energy Risk Management Report for the Fourth
Quarter, Fiscal Year 2014
Public Letters to Council
Set 1
4 January 20, 2015
MATERIALS RELATED TO AN ITEM ON THIS AGENDA SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AFTER
DISTRIBUTION OF THE AGENDA PACKET ARE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION IN THE CITY
CLERK’S OFFICE AT PALO ALTO CITY HALL, 250 HAMILTON AVE. DURING NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS.
City of Palo Alto (ID # 5424)
City Council Staff Report
Report Type: Study Session Meeting Date: 1/20/2015
City of Palo Alto Page 1
Summary Title: Bicycle Boulevard Program Update
Title: Palo Alto Bicycle Boulevard Program Summary
From: City Manager
Lead Department: Planning and Community Environment
Recommendation
This is a study session to describe the status of Palo Alto’s Bicycle Boulevard Program, and no
City Council action is requested.
Executive Summary
The Bicycle & Pedestrian Transportation Plan (hereinafter “Plan”) was adopted by the City
Council in July 2012. The Plan includes a recommended Bicycle Network of various facilities
that link together to provide the community with multiple alternatives to travel in and around
Palo Alto for both recreational, commute (school and work), or shopping purposes. The Bicycle
Network proposes new off-street (Class I) multi-use trails, Bicycle Boulevards, and Enhanced
Bikeway facilities. As it builds-out (over the next 25 to 30 years), the Bicycle Network will
increasingly complement the existing roadway and transit networks. As part of implementing
the Plan, residents have repeatedly expressed that projects must also recognize the needs of
pedestrians and where possible improve infrastructure to support all travel modes.
In 2013, the City Council prioritized implementation of the Plan through an infusion of funding
in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) in the amount of $1.2M each year for five years, not
including individually funded projects. In the Spring of 2014, the City initiated the Bicycle
Boulevard Program with a community engagement process unlike anything previously seen
within the City. Outreach included weekend Bicycle Ride-Alongs of all project corridors,
California Avenue Farmer’s Market outreach tables, standard weeknight community outreach
meetings, and establishment of an interactive online GIS-based mapping tool that allows
residents and visitors to provide their project or general comments or suggestions. The City
also established a new privately-hosted website for the Bicycle Boulevard program hosted by
Fehr & Peers Transportation Consultants, one of several consultants participating in the
program: www.cityofpaloalto.org/bike
City of Palo Alto Page 2
The Spring 2014 community outreach was complimented with citywide traffic data collection of
automobile, bicycle and pedestrian counts at each of the project corridors. Data collection
included the use of video-based recorders to document bicycle and pedestrian activity all
periods of the day including nights and weekends, periods where the city has historically lacked
data. During the Summer of 2014, consultant teams finalized project basemaps and started
development of Concept Plan Line concepts. Concept Plan Lines show roadway delineation
changes, approximate location of traffic calming devices such as median islands or traffic
circles, but do not include design details such as hardscape and landscape improvements.
Concept Plan Lines can also include roadway treatment options that residents can view to
ensure that project elements are context sensitive to their neighborhoods.
Concept Plan Line alternatives for all projects were reviewed by the city’s Pedestrian and
Bicycle Advisory Committee (PABAC) and a new Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) consisting
of members from PABAC, the Planning & Transportation Commission, Stanford University, and
Google (since Google is funding part of the program). Review by both PABAC and the TAC
helped staff to shape the delivery of presentations and improve early Concept Plan Line
drawings.
Concept Plan Lines for all projects were presented to the community at meetings beginning in
the Fall of 2014. Staff anticipates up to four community meetings for most projects in order to
refine the Concept Plan Lines before requesting review and approval by the Planning and
Transportation Commission and the City Council. Approval of concept plan lines ensures that
policy makers are aware of public input to-date on projects, and that projects are in alignment
with Council preferences prior to negotiating the scope and cost of the additional design and
environmental review needed before a project can be funded and constructed.
This report provides the status of all of the ongoing projects for the Council’s information and
discussion. Separately tonight, the City Council is being asked to consider approval of Concept
Plan Lines for the Maybell Bicycle Boulevard and the Churchill Avenue Enhanced Bikeway.
Background
In 2013 the City Council prioritized implementation of the Plan through an infusion of funding in
the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) in the amount of $1.2M each year for five years not
including individually funded projects. The City is utilizing the 10-step implementation model in
Table 1 to deliver each of the Bicycle Boulevard Program projects.
Table 1
Palo Alto Bicycle & Pedestrian Transportation Plan
Project Implementation Model
No. Description
A. Preliminary Community Outreach
1 Bicycle Ride-alongs
City of Palo Alto Page 3
2 Cal Av Farmer’s Markets
3 Online GIS Interactive Maps
B. Planning
4 Concept Plan Line Development and Community Outreach
5 Concept Plan Line Policy Approval
C. Environmental
6 CEQA/NEPA Document Development and Grant Pursuit
D. Design
7 Implementation Plan Community Outreach
8 Implementation Plan Policy Approval
9 Final Design and Final CEQA/NEPA
E. Construction
10 Construction
Table 2 shows the current status of each of the project currently active in the City and includes
projects led by other agencies but in which the city is actively involved including projects led by
the County of Santa Clara or Stanford University.
Table 2
Palo Alto Bicycle Boulevard Program Status
No. Project Project Phase
City of Palo Alto Projects
1 Adobe Creek Highway 101 Overpass
$8M in secured grants
Design
2 Barron Park Neighborhood Bicycle Routes
Planning
3 Bryant St Bicycle Boulevard Update
Planning
4 Bryant St Bicycle Boulevard Extension
Planning
5 Charleston Rd/Arastradero Rd Corridor
$1.5M in secured grants
Design
6 Churchill Avenue Enhanced Bikeway
Planning
7 Fabian Way Enhanced Bikeway Environmental
8 Greer Road Bicycle Boulevard Planning
City of Palo Alto Page 4
9 Homer Ave/Channing Ave Enhanced Bikeway Planning
10 Matadero Ave/Margarita Av Bicycle Boulevard Construction
11 Maybell Bicycle Boulevard Planning
12 Moreno Av/Amarillo Av Bicycle Boulevard Planning
13 Park Boulevard Bicycle Boulevard Planning
14 Ross Road Bicycle Boulevard Planning
15 Stanford Avenue Bicycle Boulevard Planning
16 Wilkie Way Bicycle Boulevard Planning
Google/Palo Alto Bicycle Partnership Projects
17 Alma Street Enhanced Bikeway Planning
18 Cubberly Community Center Trail Planning
19 Middlefield Road Enhanced Bikeway Planning
20 Montrose Avenue Bicycle Boulevard Planning
21 San Antonio Avenue Bicycle Route Planning
22 San Antonio Road Bicycle Route Planning
Stanford/Palo Alto Trail Program
23 Midtown East-West Connector (City Lead)
$1.5M in Secured Grants for Creek Alignment
Not Started
24 Stanford Perimeter Trail (Stanford Lead)
$4.5M in Secured Grants
Design
25 Arastradero Road Trail Upgrade (City Lead)
Construction
County of Santa Clara Expressway Study 2040 Program (County Lead)
26 Foothill Exp/Arastradero Rd Intersection Concept
27 Page Mill Road Plan Line Study Concept
28 Page Mill Road & I-280 Interchange Concept
Discussion
Table 2 summarizes the current status of each of the Bicycle Boulevard Program projects. A
summary of reach of the project Concept Plan Lines is provided in this section along with a brief
summary of public input and any action staff plans to take prior to the next community
outreach meetings. Most projects are still in the Preliminary Planning phase where Concept
Plan Line drawings are continuing to be vetted with the community and staff anticipates up to 4
community meetings for each project prior to the start of policy approvals. Due to file size
individual Concept Plan Line drawings for each project are not included within this report but
are available within the Bicycle Boulevard Program website that can be accessed from
www.cityofpaloalto.org/bike.
City of Palo Alto Page 5
Barron Park Neighborhood Bicycle Routes
The Barron Park Neighborhood Bicycle Route project includes concepts for Bike Route and
Share the Road “Sharrow” roadway markings on various streets in the Barron Park
Neighborhood:
Barron Avenue, Laguna Avenue to El Camino Real
Los Robles Avenue, Laguna Avenue to El Camino Real
La Donna Avenue, Barron Avenue to Los Robles Avenue
Amaranta Avenue, Los Robles Avenue to Maybell Avenue
Laguna Avenue, Matadero Avenue to Los Robles Avenue
Residents input focused on pedestrian safety as part of this project due to the lack of grade-
separate sidewalk facilities within the Barron Park Neighborhood. In response, Concept
Plan Line drawings include options for the use of Stamped Asphalt treatments to delineate
and highlight roadway space for bicycle and pedestrian use without the construction of
sidewalk facilities. During voting exercises the city also introduced options for the use of
innovative Advisory Bicycle Lane roadway marking treatments. Advisory Bicycle Lanes
narrow vehicle travel lanes and designate roadway space for bicycle/pedestrian use.
Bryant Street Bicycle Boulevard – Update
The Bryant Street Bicycle Boulevard Update project includes upgrades to the existing bicycle
boulevard segment between Palo Alto Avenue to E Meadow Drive. The Bryant Street
Bicycle Boulevard in this segment is the country’s first Bicycle Boulevard facility but updates
to take advantage of evolving roadway markings and signage have lagged.
The project currently proposes the use of more pronounced innovations through the
Downtown section between Lytton Avenue and Hamilton Avenue including the use of Super
Sharrow markings. Super Sharrows include delineation of green shared roadway space.
Between University Avenue and Forest Avenue the use of rear-in angled parking concepts
are also introduced to allow motorists existing their parking spaces to more easily view
bicyclists traveling on Bryant Street. Staff is recommending implementation of the rear-in
angle parking concepts as a near-term improvement by Summer 2015.
Within the Old Palo Alto segment of Bryant Street the Concept Plan Line alternatives
presented to the community included the use of Sharrow roadway markings. Many
residents in the neighborhood organized to express concerns regarding Sharrows not being
context sensitive to the existing community. In response staff introduced voting options
during a community meeting on December 4th and included options for residents to vote on
that included great spacing for Sharrows or limiting use of green bicycle treatments to entry
points of the neighborhood (Embarcadero Road and Oregon Expressway). The residents
chose to limit use of green bicycle treatments and the plan intends to honor the community
input within this neighborhood and limit improvements to entry point improvements and
limited Bicycle Boulevard signage. Residents in this neighborhood also expressed interest in
City of Palo Alto Page 6
context-sensitive safety improvements at North California Avenue that preserve the existing
all-way stop at the intersection. In response staff developed concepts that limit
improvements to markings crosswalks at the intersection but also utilizing decorative paver
treatments to better highlights the crosswalks. The revised Concept Plan Line
improvements with input from the Old Palo Alto residents will be made available in the
Spring 2015.
Bryant Street Bicycle Boulevard Extension
This project aims to extend the Bryant Street Bicycle Boulevard from E Meadow Drive to the
city’s southern limits at San Antonio Road & Nita Avenue. The project currently proposes a
new traffic signal at E Meadow Drive & Bryant St, traffic calming measures through the
“Circles” neighborhood that include options for bulb-out and traffic circles at intersections
such as Redwood Circle, along with greenback Sharrow roadway marking treatments and
enhanced pedestrian crosswalk facilities. At Nelson Drive & Cubberly Center the project
introduced options for residents that include raised intersection tables in response to
community concerns regarding the number of bicyclists and pedestrians that enter/exit the
Cubberly Center fields from the intersection.
Charleston Road-Arastradero Road Corridor
The Charleston Road-Arastradero Road Corridor is currently in the design phase of
improvements between Charleston Road & Fabian Way to Arastradero Road & Miranda
Avenue. Through Charleston Road the project currently proposes a combination of
landscape median island treatments along with landscape chicanes to break-up long
straight sections of the roadway where higher vehicles speeds were expressed by residents.
Major improvements at each of the existing signalized intersections are proposed to
introduce protected left turn signal phasing (Fabian Way) and to better align bicycle lane
facilities and pedestrian crosswalks (Middlefield Road, Nelson Drive, Carlson Court, and
Alma Street). The use of green bicycle lane treatments and buffered bicycle lane facilities
are also proposed.
On Charleston Road between Alma Street and El Camino Real the project is being
coordinated with Caltrain for safety improvements at the Caltrain tracks. The City is
exploring traffic signal improvement at Alma Street to stop automobiles before the tracks in
the eastbound direction as a proactive safety measure to reduce the risk of
automobile/train crashes. The traffic signal improvements may require the use of median
islands extending from the Caltrain tracks to Park Boulevard limiting access off of Park
Boulevard to protect access to the Caltrain tracks in the event of a Caltrain preemption
event. Major improvements at Wilkie Way are also being considered to introduce left turn
lanes and left turn signal phasing at the intersection, an improvement requested by
residents.
At El Camino Real major improvements are being considered in coordination with the Valley
Transportation Authority – Bus Rapid Transit project based on a Mixed-Flow BRT operation.
City of Palo Alto Page 7
Improvements being explored include the addition of bicycle lanes across the intersection
and removal of existing free right turn lanes in exchange for widened sidewalk space at the
intersections to support BRT facilities.
Along Arastradero Road a combination of landscape median islands and widened sidewalk
sections are being considered to support the large volume of student bicycle and pedestrian
activity to Terman Middle and Gunn High School. Improvements to the Los Altos Trail Spur
south of Arastradero Road adjacent to Alta Mesa Cemetery are also included along with
new multi-use trails to support connections to Gunn High School.
Churchill Avenue Enhanced Bikeway
The Churchill Avenue Enhanced Bikeway is scheduled for City Council policy approval of a
Concept Plan Line in January 2015. This project received quick community consensus on
proposed improvements due to early coordination with the Southgate Neighborhood and
Gunn High School staff as part of the planning work on the Castilleja Avenue Green Street
project. The Planning & Transportation Commission considered the Concept Plan Line at its
December 10th meeting and recommended that the City Council review and consider final
approval of the Plan as soon as possible.
Proposed improvements include two raised speed tables that also double as crosswalks at
Castilleja Avenue (West Side) and Madrono Avenue. At Castilleja Avenue the existing east
leg crosswalk would be removed to support westbound auto turns into Gunn High School.
A bicycle lane exit ramp at the intersection is also proposed as an immediate near-term
improvement to remove bicycle traffic from auto traffic turning into Gunn High School.
Lighting improvements and pedestrian rail improvements would also channelize and extend
the Caltrain multi-use path to El Camino Real where a new westbound right turn lane would
be added to improve capacity of the intersection. Bicycle and pedestrian safety at the El
Camino Real intersection would also be enhanced through traffic signal modifications, the
introduction of a new crosswalk on the north leg of the intersection and new bicycle lane
markings and ramps to support connections to the Stanford Perimeter Trail project.
Approval of the Concept Plan Line for the Churchill Avenue Enhanced Bikeway is critical for
the City to begin negotiations with Caltrans for improvements at the El Camino Real
intersection and to position the city for competitive grant funding that will be made
available in the Spring as part of the Active Transportation Program (ATP) fund program.
Fabian Way Enhanced Bikeway
The Fabian Way Enhanced Bikeway project proposes a lane reduction on Fabian Way from
4-lanes to 3-lanes to support the installation of a two-way left turn down the center of the
street to support left turn access into and out of parcels on the street. Bike lanes already
exist on Fabian Way but would be widened to support anticipated demand in bicycle
activity from the planned Adobe Creek/Highway 101 Bike/Ped project currently under
design. The project also proposed reconfiguration of existing mid-block crosswalks
City of Palo Alto Page 8
throughout the street. A traffic impact analysis report was prepared in 2013 but the project
delayed due to negotiations with adjacent property owners that require on-site parking lot
changes on private properties. Those discussions will continue in 2015 and the traffic
impact analysis revised at the time. The use of green bicycle lanes at merge zones of the
street are also recommended to improve the visibility of bicycle lane facilities.
Green Road Bicycle Boulevard
The Green Road Bicycle Boulevard project proposes minor traffic calming measures
including the installation of speed humps and greenback Sharrows to highlight bicycle route
activities on the street. Select intersections include traffic circle improvements with
enhanced crosswalk markings or bulb-out improvements to reduce crosswalk distances
including the intersections of N California Avenue, Amarillo Avenue, Moreno Avenue,
Colorado Avenue, Maddux Drive, and Loma Verde Avenue. On Greer Road through the
Midtown District the installation of short landscape median islands is also recommended to
help introduce tree canopies into the area and to visually reduce the width of the roadway
in efforts to encourage lower vehicle speeds.
Homer Avenue-Channing Avenue Enhanced Bikeway
The Homer Avenue-Channing Avenue one-way couple provides east-west access into and
out of the Downtown. The project proposes converting the right curb lane at select
intersections to Right Turn Only lanes “Except Bikes” creating a prioritized bicycle route
from Guinda Avenue to Alma Street. Greenback Sharrows are proposed to highlight the
bicycle route along the right lane of the street and landscape treatments would prevent
automobile movements and locations where only bicycles can go through an intersection
from the right lane.
On Homer Avenue the project proposes to extend the popular contraflow bicycle lane that
connects to the Homer Tunnel one block east towards Emerson Street. This proposal does
include parking impacts to convert six on-street parking spaces to the bicycle lanes and
additional analysis is taking place.
Matadero Avenue-Margarita Avenue Bicycle Boulevard Project
The City Council approved an implementation plan and Concept Plan Line for which
construction started in 2014. Construction impacts resulted in the construction of speed
tables on Matadero Avenue until December 2014. A slurry seal of the street is planned in
Summer 2015 at which time final roadway marking including greenback Sharrows will be
installed on the street. A Project Study Report for improvements at the El Camino Real &
Matadero Avenue-Margarita Avenue intersection will begin in the Summer 2015 to allow
time for coordination with the Valley Transportation Authority – Bus Rapid Transit project.
A focused traffic study to evaluate the opportunities to install a traffic circle at Margarita
Avenue & Orinda Street will also take place in 2015. The intersection is currently an all-way
stop but removal of the Margarita Avenue stops will be evaluated including appropriate
mitigations such as the traffic circle installation.
City of Palo Alto Page 9
Maybell Avenue Bicycle Boulevard
The Maybell Bicycle Boulevard was one of the early projects to be implemented as part of
the Bicycle Boulevard program. Existing bicycle boulevard facilities existing on Maybell
Avenue between El Camino Real and Amaranta Avenue limited to Speed Tables, Bicycle
Route signage. The bicycle boulevard is being expanded to included El Camino Way (W
Meadow Drive to El Camino Real), Donald Drive (Terman Middle School to Georgia Avenue),
and Georgia Avenue (Donald Drive to Arastradero Road). The project responds to resident
concerns for better delineated bicycle and pedestrian space on Maybell Avenue without the
installation of sidewalk facilities to comply with the Barron Park Neighborhood Design
Guidelines. A combination of stamped colored asphalt treatments with signage and
roadway markings will delineate roadway space in a context sensitive manner to the
surrounding community. Time-of-Day parking restrictions are proposed to support large
queues of student bicyclists and pedestrians accessing local schools.
At Georgia Avenue & Gunn High School Spur Trail an enhanced crosswalk facility with bulb-
outs and a combination speed table/crosswalk are proposed along with trail alignments to
improve pedestrian/automobile visibility. Additional speed tables on Georgia Avenue are
being considered but under a phased implementation model in response to local resident
concerns regarding aesthetic impacts.
Moreno Avenue-Amarillo Avenue Bicycle Boulevard
The Moreno Avenue-Amarillo Avenue Bicycle Boulevard provide an east-west connection
route across the northern periphery of the Midtown District. The corridor starts at W
Bayshore Boulevard with traffic calming measures to encourage reduced vehicle speeds
entering the residential neighborhood. At Ohlone School a new speed table/enhanced
crosswalk will ensure reduce vehicle speeds along the school frontage. Sidewalk widening
from Ohlone School to Louis Road is recommended to support the high volume of bicycle
and pedestrian activity to the school. Louis Road improvements between Moreno Avenue
and Amarillo Avenue include options for raised intersection speed tables or Super Sharrow
roadway markings. Greenback Sharrow treatments along the corridor are recommended to
highlight the bicycle route activities with focused intersection improvements at Ross Road
and Greer Road where intersecting Bicycle Boulevards meet.
Park Boulevard Bicycle Boulevard
This project includes updates to the existing bicycle boulevard along Park Boulevard from
Castilleja Street to W Meadow Drive. Enhanced wider bike lanes are provided where bike
lanes exists and where the bicycle boulevard shares space with vehicles greenback Sharrows
are recommended. Within the California Avenue Business District area residents have
requested crosswalk improvements at Grant Avenue and Sherman Avenue that will be
provided in future Concept Plan Line intersections in the Spring 2015. Bulb-outs with
supporting traffic circles and enhanced crosswalks are being considered at Lambert Avenue,
Fernando Avenue, Ventura Avenue, MacLane Street, W Meadow Drive, and Tennessee
City of Palo Alto Page 10
Lane. The project is being coordinated with the Charleston Road-Arastradero Road Corridor
improvements to address Caltrain safety improvements where limited access at Park Blvd &
Charleston Road is being considered.
Ross Road Bicycle Boulevard
Implementation of this project started in 2014 with the construction of a new bicycle-
priority traffic signal at Oregon Expressway. The traffic signal allows bicyclists to travel
across Oregon Expressway while automobiles are forced to turn right. The street has
existing traffic calming measures with speed humps between Oregon Expressway and
Colorado Avenue. Greenback Sharrows are recommended to highlight the bicycle route
activities. Pedestrian safety was a big concern for local residents so new crosswalk
markings parallel to Ross Road are recommended along the corridor along with bulb-out
and focused intersection improvements at Colorado Avenue, Clara Drive, Loma Verde
Avenue, Talisman Drive, E Meadow Drive, and Louis Road. At E Meadow Drive a mini-
roundabout with Yield controls and pedestrian crosswalks prior to each intersection
approach is recommended and includes opportunities for neighborhood gateway
treatments.
Stanford Avenue Bicycle Boulevard
The Stanford Avenue Bicycle Boulevard project offers the city some of the most
transformative element opportunities being considered as part of the entire program. The
street section currently sees lower vehicle volumes but higher vehicle speeds consistent
with resident input. During Concept Plan Line introductions the city offers three treatments
for the corridor for residents to vote on: 1) Standard Greenback Sharrows, 2) Advisory
Bicycle Lanes, and 3) Woonerf treatments. The community voted overwhelmingly for
Woonerf treatments that can include reconstructing the street to provide an outdoor plaza
experience for all travel modes. Traditional curb and gutter improvements would go away
providing landscaped buffered treatments that build on already mature trees in the area
providing an outdoor plaza experience. Straight continuous travel lanes would be removed
with chicane treatments in the new landscape treatments to ensure reduced vehicle
speeds. Traffic circles are also being considered at Ash Street and Park Boulevard.
Wilkie Way Bicycle Boulevard
The Wilkie Way Bicycle Boulevard connects to the Park Boulevard Bicycle Boulevard via
MacLane Street and provides a connection to Mountain View via Miller Avenue and Del
Medio Avenue. The street currently provides wide vehicle travel lanes where residents
have expressed concerns regarding vehicle speeds between MacLane Street and Charleston
Rd. Major intersection improvements with bulb-out treatments and traffic circles are
proposed in this section in response and offer opportunities to transform the streetscape of
the neighborhood into a more walkable and livable community with large tree canopies.
Similar improvements were initially considered south of Charleston Road but residents
expressed concern regarding the benefit of larger improvements in this neighborhood given
the existing End of Street condition south of Whitclem Drive. When the Concept Plan Line is
City of Palo Alto Page 11
revised and presented to the community in the Spring 2015 community preferred
improvements south of Charleston Rd will be provided. South of the Wilkie Way Bridge
significant traffic calming improvements in the Monroe neighborhood are being considered
to improve walkability and quality of life for residents through traffic calming measures.
Bulb-outs with enhanced crosswalks and traffic circles were presented to the community to
break a complete street solution for the city’s south most community.
Google Partnership Projects
Google is funding the Preliminary Planning work to develop Concept Plan Lines for several
corridors in South Palo Alto. The projects will create a network of facilities around the
Cubberly Community Center and tie directly into Google’s future Mountain View Campus
located at San Antonio Road & Nita Avenue (former HP Offices). The following corridors are
included in the Google Partnership Projects:
Alma Street Enhanced Bikeway, Charleston Road to San Antonio Avenue
Cubberly Community Center Trail, Middlefield Road to Nelson Drive
Middlefield Road Enhanced Bikeway, Charleston Road to South City Limit
Montrose Avenue Bicycle Boulevard, Charleston Road to Middlefield Road
San Antonio Avenue Bicycle Route, Byron Street to Alma Street
San Antonio Road Bicycle Route, Bayshore Parkway to Byron Street
Improvements vary from greenback Sharrows on low-volume residential streets such as
Montrose Avenue to reconfiguration of arterial streets such as Middlefield Road to extend
existing bicycle lanes that end north of Charleston Road. At the Cubberly Center-Montrose
Avenue intersection left turn lanes and left turn signal phasing at the existing traffic signal
are proposed to improve access to Cubberly.
Stanford-Palo Alto Trail Program
On December 11th the County of Santa Clara approved Stanford University’s permit for
implementation of the Stanford Perimeter Trail project. The project will provide new multi-
use trials to support bicycle and pedestrian activities along Junipero Serra Boulevard (Page
Mill Road to Stanford Avenue), Stanford Avenue (Junipero Serra Boulevard to El Camino
Real), and El Camino Real (Stanford Avenue to Quarry Road). Design improvements were
coordinated with the City and introduce exciting linkages for the city’s Safe Routes to School
program.
The City is leading the planning phase of the Midtown Connector Project (formerly known
as Matadero Creek Trail). In December 2014 the City released an invitation to residents to
apply for a Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) that the City is trying to create to provide a
working group to help guide the development of outreach materials and route options for
the project. This project is eligible for funding by a grant from the County for alternatives
along Matadero Creek. The project strives to identify community-preferred route
alternatives including options parallel to Matadero Creek.
City of Palo Alto Page 12
In Spring 2015 the City plans to rebuild the Arastradero Road pathway west of Foothill
Expressway as part of the Capital Improvement Program. This completes the Stanford Palo
Alto Trail program linkages which also include the Park Boulevard Bicycle Boulevard and the
Adobe Creek/Highway 101 Bridge project.
County of Santa Clara Expressway 2040 Program
The proposed Bikeway Network of the Bicycle & Pedestrian Transportation Plan
(Attachment A) identifies Page Mill Road as an existing Class II Bike Lane but notes the area
in and around El Camino Real as requiring additional improvements. The City of Palo Alto
funded the Concept Plan Line work for Page Mill Road between Birch Street and I-280 to
support the planning activities of the County of Santa Clara Expressway 2040 Program. The
study also includes focused analysis of Spot Intersection improvements identified in the
Plan including the Page Mill Road & I-280 intersection, Foothill Expressway & Arastradero
Rd intersection, Foothill Expressway & Page Mill Rd intersection, and connections of Old
Page Mill Road to Junipero Serra Boulevard. The County will be releasing its first draft of
Concept Plan Line options to the community in the Spring 2015.
Education
Early on during the community outreach phases of the Bicycle Boulevard Program residents
expressed confusion on new bicycle innovations being introduced into the community
including Sharrows and green bike lane facilities. In response, staff has started a nation-
leading Education campaign on new treatments. Full page ads on Sharrows and Bike Lanes
have been published and are now being used by cities around the country (Attachment B
and C). Ads for Enhanced Crosswalk Facilities and Bicycles at Traffic Signals will be
developed and published during the Winter. The ads are also available online at
www.cityofpaloalto.org/bike.
Timeline
Each of the Bicycle Boulevard projects will follow the Project Implementation Model in Table 1.
Each project will move into a policy approval of Concept Plan Lines during 2015 following two
to four outreach meetings to help refine and respond to as many community concerns prior to
approval. The Maybell Bicycle Boulevard and the Churchill Avenue Enhanced Bikeway projects
are already in the Policy Approval stage for the Concept Plan Lines and City Council
consideration is anticipated in January 2015.
Following the Concept Plan Line policy approvals staff will negotiate additional design contracts
for consultant teams for final design and environmental assessment and include an
implementation schedule to complete the design. Construction of all projects will pursue
regional grant funds to leverage local funding in the CIP Program.
Resource Impact
City of Palo Alto Page 13
The CIP includes $1.2M per year (PL-04010, Bicycle & Pedestrian Transportation Plan
Implementation Project) for five years to fund the planning and design phases of the Bicycle
Boulevard program. In addition, the City Council approved Infrastructure Plan identifies up to
$20 million in funding for implementation of the Plan. Staff seeks to apply for grant funding to
offset resources identified in the Infrastructure Plan. As grant funds are secured or low-cost
project improvements identified the Transportation Division will coordinate with Public Works
for implementation as part of the Street Resurfacing Program.
To date the City has already started implementation of demonstration projects around the City
to support the Bicycle Boulevard program and provide residents with real life in-town examples
of projects. Sample demonstrations built to date include:
W Meadow Drive Green Bike Lanes (Wilkie Way to El Camino Way)
Lytton Avenue Green Bike Lanes/Bike Box/Bike Traffic Signals (High Street to Alma
Street)
El Camino Way & James Road Enhanced Crosswalk (Bulb-Outs with Flashing Beacons)
Cowper Street Greenback Sharrows (North of E Meadow Drive)
These and other minor safety improvements such as red curb improvements are being installed
using CIP PL-04010 in efforts to provide immediate responses to resident concerns regarding
safety.
Policy Implications
Implementation of the Bicycle & Pedestrian Transportation Plan and its associated projects is
supported by all of the policies and programs provided in the Walking and Bicycling section of
the Comprehensive Plan:
Goal T-3 Facilities, Services, and Programs that Encourage and Promote Walking and
Bicycling
In terms of other policy implications, some of Palo Alto’s bicycle-related improvements have
been criticized for being too “cutting edge” or experimental, and for not complying with a strict
interpretation of State standards. To address concerns like this, AB 1193 (Ting), signed by the
Governor in September 2014, allows "Cycle tracks” or separated bikeways, also referred to as
“Class IV bikeways” and directs Caltrans to develop minimum standards by 2016. In lieu of
Caltrans standards, cities are allowed to adopt their own standards as long as three criteria are
met: there has to be an engineer sign-off, a public hearing, and the standards need to meet
"guidelines established by a national association of public agency transportation officials."
These NACTO guidelines can be found here: http://nacto.org/cities-for-cycling/design-guide/,
and are generally more permissive than the State standards that currently apply. Staff will
bring an action item to the City Council for further discussion and adoption of the NACTO
guidelines in the near future.
City of Palo Alto Page 14
Environmental Review
Each of the individual projects discussed in Table 2 will require their own level of environmental
assessment following the policy approval of Concept Plan Lines for each project. This staff
report intends to provide only an update on each project, no environmental assessment is
discussed or approval requested.
Attachments:
Attachment A: Palo Alto Bicycle Network (PDF)
Attachment B: Sharrow Advertizing Flyer (PDF)
Attachment C: Green Bike Lane Advertizing Flyer (PDF)
Recommended Facilities and Conditions | 6-3
Alta Planning + Design
Chapter 6
Map 6-1. Proposed Bikeway Network
6-4 | Bicycle + Pedestrian Transportation Plan
City of Palo Alto
Chapter 6
CITY OF PALO ALTO OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
January 20, 2015
The Honorable City Council
Palo Alto, California
Recognition of Mitchell Park Library and Community Center Grand
Opening Volunteers
There is no report associated with this item. This item is to provide formal recognition of the
volunteers who assisted with the grand opening of the Mitchell Park Library and Community
Center.
Department Head: Beth Minor, Acting City Clerk
Page 2
City of Palo Alto (ID # 5402)
City Council Staff Report
Report Type: Consent Calendar Meeting Date: 1/20/2015
City of Palo Alto Page 1
Summary Title: Resolution Approving the Purchase of Allowances
Title: Adoption of a Resolution to Authorize the City Manager or his Designee
to Purchase Greenhouse Gas Allowances to Satisfy the City's Cap-and-Trade
Compliance Obligations for the Gas Utility in an Amount Not to Exceed
$4,000,000 per Year and for the Electric Utility in an Amount Not to Exceed
$250,000 per Year
From: City Manager
Lead Department: Utilities
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Council of the City of Palo Alto (City) adopt a resolution (Attachment
A) authorizing the City Manager or his designee to purchase California greenhouse gas (GHG)
allowances in the California cap-and-trade auction to satisfy the City’s actual and/or forecast
compliance obligations for the gas utility in an amount not to exceed $4,000,000per year and
for the electric utility in an amount not to exceed $250,000 per year where the maximum term
of any Allowance transaction would not exceed three (3) years, commencing on the date of
execution of the transaction.
Executive Summary
The City must purchase GHG allowances for the gas utility and may need to purchase
allowances for the electric utility to comply with California’s cap-and-trade program. These
allowances may be purchased through the cap-and-trade auction run by the California Air
Resources Board (CARB). Pursuant to Palo Alto Municipal Code section 2.30.340(b) and
consistent with the City’s Energy Risk Management Policy’s Section G listing of authorized
products, The proposed resolution attached to this staff report will give the City Manager, or his
designee, the necessary authority to purchase GHG allowances in auctions run by CARB (or any
successor state agency) for the purpose of satisfying the City’s actual and/or forecast
compliance obligation for the gas utility and electric utility. The attached resolution would
authorize the City Manager (or his designee) to procure GHG allowances from CARB-run
auctions for the gas utility in an amount not to exceed $4,000,000 per year, and for the electric
utility, in an amount not to exceed $250,000 per year. The maximum term of any Allowance
transaction would not exceed three (3) years, commencing on the date of execution of the
transaction.
City of Palo Alto Page 2
Background
The Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, also known as Assembly Bill (AB) 32, requires that
California’s GHG emissions in 2020 be the same as in 1990, an estimated 15% reduction. CARB
was authorized to develop regulations to reach this goal, and the cap-and-trade program is one
of several tools designed by CARB to achieve the desired GHG reduction goal. Under the terms
of CARB’s cap-and-trade program, an overall limit on GHG emissions from capped sectors of the
state’s economy was set. In short, covered facilities subject to the cap must procure sufficient
“allowances,” like permits, to cover their GHG obligations, and those facilities also are able to
trade allowances to emit GHGs up to the capped amount. A more detailed discussion of the
cap-and-trade program is available in Staff Report No. 5174.
CARB’s implementation of its cap-and-trade program started November 2012 and included
electric distribution companies. Starting in 2015, the scope of the cap-and-trade program
expands and natural gas suppliers become covered entities with a compliance obligation based
on their retail gas sales.
Entities covered by the cap-and-trade program are required to purchase one allowance for each
metric ton of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) of GHG they emit. An “allowance” means a
limited tradable authorization to emit up to one metric ton of CO2e. Burning one therm of
natural gas produces approximately 0.0053 metric tons of CO2e.
Discussion
Beginning in 2015, both the City’s gas and electric utilities are covered by CARB’s cap-and-trade
program. Under the terms of the cap-and-trade program, the City’s gas utility will be allocated
some free allowances, but will need to purchase enough allowances to cover all GHG emissions
caused by the City’s gas utility customers’ natural gas usage. While the City does not own fossil-
fueled generation, if the City’s electric utility imports energy from out of the state, it may incur
an obligation and may be required to purchase allowances.
With the City’s gas utility becoming subject to cap-and-trade requirements beginning in 2015,
the City anticipates that allowance purchases through the CARB auction to satisfy gas utility
compliance obligations will commence in February 2015. The City’s electric utility has been
covered under the cap-and-trade program since 2013. No allowances have been needed thus
far for the electric utility, but the proposed resolution will give the City Manager the necessary
authority should the need arise.
As noted above, the attached resolution would authorize the City Manager (or his designee) to
procure GHG allowances from CARB-run auctions for the gas utility in an amount not to exceed
$4,000,000 per year, and for the electric utility, in an amount not to exceed $250,000 per year.
These limits on the City Manager’s purchase authority were developed based on the
assumptions concerning the price of GHG allowances and projections for the City’s gas and
electric utilities described in more detail in the Resource Impact section of this staff report.
City of Palo Alto Page 3
Council may authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to procure GHG allowances pursuant
to section 2.30.340(b) of the Palo Alto Municipal Code. In addition, GHG allowances are listed
as “authorized products” in Section G of the City’s Energy Risk Management Policy.
The proposed resolution only seeks authority for the City Manager or his designee to purchase
GHG allowances in the CARB auction. As the market for compliance instruments develops,
additional Council authority may be sought to purchase allowances and carbon offsets through
bilateral contracts.
Resource Impact
The gas utility will be required to purchase an increasing number of allowances each year. By
2020, 50% of the emissions generated by the combustion of natural gas within the City will
need to be covered with purchased allowances. The cost of those allowances depends upon
the City’s gas use and the price of the allowances in the auction.
Staff recommends Council authorize the City Manager or his designee to purchase GHG
allowances in CARB auctions in an amount not to exceed $4 million per year for the gas utility.
Staff recommends this limit based on half the expected gas use (15 million therms/year) and an
Allowance price of $50/metric tons CO2e:
15,000,000 therms/yr * 0.0053 metric tons CO2e/therm * $50/metric tons CO2e =
$3,975,000/year
Staff recommends Council authorize the City Manager or his designee to purchase GHG
allowances in an amount not to exceed $250,000 for the electric utility. For the electric utility,
assuming 1% of the City’s electric load (10,000 megawatt-hours, or MWh) may need to be
covered by GHG allowances, staff recommends Council authorize the City Manager or his
designee to purchase GHG allowances for the electric utility in an amount not to exceed
$250,000 per year. (10,000 MWh/year * 0.5 metric tons CO2e /MWh * $50/metric tons CO2e =
$250,000/year.
The Fiscal Year 2015 Budget for purchase of GHG allowances reflects current GHG allowance
price projections. The Fiscal Year 2016 Proposed Budget will be updated to include anticipated
allowance purchases. Costs of any purchases of allowances will be funded via rate adjustment.
Policy Implications
Authorizing the City Manager to purchase allowances to comply with the State’s cap-and-trade
regulations is consistent with and does not change existing City policy.
City of Palo Alto Page 4
Environmental Review
Adoption of this resolution is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act review
because it does not meet the definition of a “project” under California Public Resource Code
section 21065.
Attachments:
Attachment A: Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Approving the Purchase
of Greenhouse Gas Allowances in the California Cap-and-Trade Auction (PDF)
*NOT YET APPROVED*
150105 mf 0180121
Resolution No.____
Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Authorizing the City Manager or his Designee
to Purchase California Greenhouse Gas Allowances in the California Cap-and-Trade Auction to
Satisfy the City’s Compliance Obligations for the Gas Utility in an Amount Not to Exceed
$4,000,000 per Year and for the Electric Utility in an Amount Not to Exceed $250,000 per Year
R E C I T A L S
A. The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has been authorized by California
Assembly Bill 32 (AB32) to develop regulations, including the Cap-and-Trade Program to reduce
California’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.
B. An “Allowance” means a limited tradable authorization to emit up to one metric
ton of carbon dioxide equivalent.
C. Burning 1 therm of natural gas produces approximately 0.0053 metric tons of
carbon dioxide equivalent.
D. Entities covered by the Cap-and-Trade Program are required to purchase one (1)
Allowance for each metric ton of carbon dioxide equivalent of GHG they emit.
E. Beginning in 2015, the City of Palo Alto’s (the “City”) gas and electric utilities are
both covered by the Cap-and-Trade Program, such that the City will be obligated to secure
sufficient Allowances to cover the City’s GHG emissions.
F. Under the terms of the Cap-and-Trade Program, the City’s gas utility will be given
some free Allowances, but the City will also likely need to purchase additional Allowances to
cover all GHG emissions attributable to the City’s gas utility.
G. The City does not own fossil-fueled generation, but if the City’s electric utility
imports energy, the City may be required to purchase Allowances to cover all GHG emissions
attributable to the electric utility.
The Council of the City of Palo Alto RESOLVES, as follows:
SECTION 1. Pursuant to Section 2.30.340(b) of the Palo Alto Municipal Code and
consistent with Section G of the City’s Energy Risk Management Policy, the Council hereby
authorizes the City Manager or his designee, the Director of Utilities, on behalf of the City to
purchase Allowances in the CARB Allowance auction (a) to meet the City’s gas utility GHG actual
and/or forecast compliance obligation for the gas utility, (b) in an amount not to exceed
$4,000,000 per year, and (c) where the maximum term of any Allowance transaction shall not
exceed three (3) years, commencing on the date of execution of the transaction.
ATTACHMENT A
*NOT YET APPROVED*
150105 mf 0180121
SECTION 2. Pursuant to Section 2.30.340(b) of the Palo Alto Municipal Code and
consistent with Section G of the City’s Energy Risk Management Policy, the Council hereby
authorizes the City Manager or his designee, the Director of Utilities, on behalf of the City to
purchase Allowances in the CARB Allowance auction (a) to meet the City’s electric utility GHG
actual and/or forecast compliance obligation for the electric utility, (b) in an amount not to
exceed $250,000 per year, and (c) where the maximum term of any Allowance transaction shall
not exceed three (3) years, commencing on the date of execution of the transaction.
SECTION 3. The Council finds that the adoption of this resolution does not meet the
definition of a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to
California Public Resources Case Section 21065, and therefore, no environmental assessment is
required.
INTRODUCED AND PASSED:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
ATTEST:
__________________________ ______________________________
City Clerk Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED:
__________________________
Sr. Deputy City Attorney ______________________________
City Manager
______________________________
Director of Utilities
______________________________
Director of Administrative Services
City of Palo Alto (ID # 5161)
City Council Staff Report
Report Type: Consent Calendar Meeting Date: 1/20/2015
City of Palo Alto Page 1
Summary Title: CALNET3 AT&T
Title: Approval of Utilizing CALNET3 State Contract for Telecommunications
in the Amount of $400,000 Annually for a 3.5 Year Term from January 1, 2015
to June 30, 2018
From: City Manager
Lead Department: IT Department
Recommendation
Staff recommends that Council approve, and authorize the City Manager or designee to
execute, the attached State contract with CalNET3 for city-wide telecommunication
services with AT&T in an amount not to exceed $400,000 annually for a 3.5-Year term
from January 2015 through June 30, 2018 with an option for one two-year extension,
subject to annual appropriation of funds.
Staff also recommends that Council approve and authorize the City Manager or
designee to allow a 10% contingency for unforeseen telecommunication charges.
Background
On October 20, 2009, the Finance Committee forwarded to the City Council a
recommendation to direct staff to pursue a CALNET2 contract for telecommunications
services. The action was taken in response to the City’s Auditors audit of telephone
rates that was presented to the Finance Committee on September 8, 2009 and the full
Council on November 2, 2009.
The City entered into the State of California CALNET2 contract on November 18, 2009,
with Council approval. The CALNET2 contracts allowed for lower telecommunication
rates as well as consolidated billing. In previous years, it was estimated that $540,000
was spent on services with AT&T annually. Based upon the Auditor’s Office calculations,
the City could save approximately $235,000 annually by executing the CALNET2
contract.
The term of the original CALNET2 contract was from January 30, 2007 and extended
through January 29, 2014. The State approved the extension of CALNET2 on January
City of Palo Alto Page 2
23, 2014 for two more years (January 30, 2014 – January 29, 2016) until CALNET3,
CALNET2’s replacement, was anticipated to be ready. Council approved the continued
use of CALNET2 on March 17, 2014.
Discussion
CALNET3 is available now for use and Staff is asking for authorization to utilize this
State contract through June 2018 with a possible two-year term extension.
The services that the City utilizes are:
Core Services -
This Module encompasses voice and data services such as, business access lines,
central office trunks, and T1s.
Long Distance Service for Voice -
This Module includes services such as long distance voice network services and
functionality consisting of inter-state and international calling.
Resource Impact
The costs for this contract, $400,000 annually, are included in the Adopted FY 2015
Technology Fund Budget. Funding for this contract for Fiscal Year 2016 and beyond is
subject to annual appropriation of funds.
Environmental Review
Approval of these contracts do not constitute a project under the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); therefore, no Environmental Assessment is required.
Attachments:
CALNET3 Contract (PDF)
City of Palo Alto - Signed Authorization to Order (PDF)
CMR 4328 Mini-Packet (PDF)
Office of Technology Services
Statewide Telecommunications & Network Division
P.O. Box 1810 Rancho Cordova
CA 95741-1810
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TELECOMMUNICATIONS MULTIPLE AWARD CONTRACT
CALNET 3
User Instructions
CALNET 3 Contract Contact Information
Contract Management and Technical Inquiries: Brad Bailey: (916) 657-9713 Brad.Bailey@state.ca.gov
Eric Scott: (916) 657-9184 Eric.Scott@state.ca.gov Kari McConnell: (916) 657-9155 Kari.McConnell@state.ca.gov Fax: (916) 463-9920
Contract Administration: Calvin McGee
Voice: (916) 431-6297
Fax: (916) 463-9920
E-mail: Calvin.McGee@state.ca.gov
CONTRACTORS: VARIOUS (IFB-A Identified in Attachment A) (IFB-B Identified in Attachment B)
CONTRACT NUMBERS: VARIOUS
(IFB-A Identified in Attachment A) (IFB-B Identified in Attachment B)
CONTRACT TERM: VARIOUS (IFB-A Identified in Attachment A) (IFB-B Identified in Attachment B)
SERVICE: Telecommunications Services
DISTRIBUTION CODE:
Electronic version of all documents associated with this contract can be found on the
Department of Technology, Statewide Telecommunications and Network Division (STND) Internet web
page: http://marketing.dts.ca.gov/calnet3/
Page 1 of 15
1. Scope
CALNET 3 is designed to allow customers to easily order services without the need of going
through a lengthy procurement process. CALNET 3 provides statewide telecommunications
services for all State and local government agencies. Non-exempt State Agencies are mandated by policy to utilize the CALNET 3 Statewide
Contract(s) to obtain “Required” telecommunications and network services unless otherwise
authorized by the Department of Technology. Non-exempt State Agencies are those under the
jurisdiction of the Executive Branch of California state government.
Exempt State Agencies are encouraged, but are not required, to use the CALNET 3
Statewide Contract(s) to order telecommunications products and services. While the State of
California makes CALNET 3 Statewide Contract(s) available to exempt governmental
agencies, each agency should make its own determination whether these competitively bid
contracts are consistent with its procurement policies and regulations. Exempt State Agencies are any agencies headed by constitutional officers.
Local government agencies are encouraged, but are not required to use the CALNET 3
Statewide Contract(s) to order telecommunications services. Eligible local government agencies may use the CALNET 3 Statewide Contract(s) by completing an Authorization to
Order agreement (ATO). While the State of California makes CALNET 3 Statewide
Contract(s) available to local governmental agencies, each local agency should make its own
determination whether these competitively bid contracts are consistent with its procurement
policies and regulations. Local government agencies are any city, county, district or other governmental body empowered to expend public funds in accordance to the Office of
Technology Services, Non-State Agency Service Policy and Agreement.
Customers have the option of ordering like services from one or more contractors.
2. Contract Information
CALNET 3, IFB-A contains six different telecommunications subcategories. CALNET 3, IFB-B contains seven different telecommunications categories/subcategories. Both IFB-A and IFB-B
offer a variety of services. Each category/subcategory may contain multiple
telecommunications providers. Customers have the option of choosing the vendor of their
choice for their services. Following is a list of services by category/subcategory.
IFB-A
Category/Subcategory Type of Services
1.1 Dedicated Transport
1.2 MPLS, VPN & Converged VoIP Telephony
1.3 Standalone VoIP Telephony 1.4 Long Distance Calling
1.5 Toll Free Voice Calling
1.6 Legacy Telecommunications
Page 2 of 15
See Attachment A for a list of Contractors and their awarded contracts (subcategory).
IFB-B
Category/Subcategory Type of Services
2 Network Based Web Conferencing 3 Metro Area Network (MAN) Ethernet (MAE) 4.1 SONET – Ring Connectivity
4.2 SONET – Point-to-Point
5 Managed Internet Services
6.1 Hosted IVR/ACD Services 7 Network Based Managed Security
See Attachment B for a list of Contractors and their awarded contracts
(category/subcategory).
The CALNET 3 Product Catalogs can be found at http://marketing.dts.ca.gov/calnet3/
3. Ordering Guidelines
Ordering agencies must follow all applicable state mandated guidelines, i.e. Statewide
Telecommunications Management Manual (STMM), State Contracting Manual (SCM),
Government Code (GC), Management Memos (MM) and any Agency Directives.
Ordering agencies are encouraged to obtain multiple quotes from the contractors identified in CALNET 3 to facilitate obtaining the best price for services.
Non-exempt State Agencies
o Agencies must have a designated Chief Agency Telecommunications Representative
(CATR) or an Agency Telecommunications Representative (ATR) who can place order(s) for their agency. State Agencies are requires to use the STD. 20 to place orders for
services.
o Professional Services, Project Management or Consulting Services can only be in support
of the “Required” services offered in the CALNET 3 Statewide Contract(s). State agencies
must include a Statement of Work (SOW) along with the STD. 20. The SOW should identify the specific services that the CALNET 3 Contractor will render to the ordering
agency. To order Professional Services, Project Management or Consulting Services, it is
required that the STD. 20 and the SOW is submitted to:
Statewide Telecommunications and Network Division Statewide Contracts Management Section
Contract Customer Services Unit, Attn: Review Intake
PO Box 1810, MS# Y14.
Rancho Cordova, CA 95741
Statewide Telecommunications and Network Division (STND) staff will then send the approved STD. 20 and the SOW to the CALNET 3 contractor for fulfillment. A copy of the
Page 3 of 15
approved documents will also be sent to the ordering agency to place in their procurement file.
o Exemption requests – Non-exempt state agencies with a compelling business reason not to
use the Required CALNET 3 service(s) must submit a written exemption request to the
Department or Technology, Office of Technology Services (OTech), (STND) for evaluation and approval, prior to purchasing services elsewhere. The “Process and Procedure” to obtain an exemption request is outlined in STMM, Chapter 501.0
o Delegation – Agencies must obtain a Telecommunications Delegation from OTech/STND
for CALNET 3 services specifically identified as requiring delegation. Refer to STMM Chapter 502.0 for detailed instruction regarding the Telecommunications Delegation process. Refer to the CALNET 3 online service catalogs for delegation requirements.
o Services Ordering Designations – each service identified in Catalog B will have the
following designations. These designations define customer ordering options.
• Required Services – Non-exempt state agencies are mandated by policy to utilize the
CALNET 3 contracts to obtain “Required” telecommunications and network services
unless otherwise authorized by the California Department of Technology.
• Discretionary Services – Agencies are not required to order Discretionary
telecommunications and network services. Discretionary items can only be ordered if it
directly supports a “Required” service.
Local government agencies
Local government agencies must complete a Non-State Agency Service Policy first to obtain
eligibility. Once eligibility is established an ATO must be completed prior to your first order.
Local governments are encouraged to use the STD. 20 to place orders for services but are not required to do so. Access to the Non-State Service Policy, ATO and the form 20 can be
located at http://marketing.dts.ca.gov/calnet3/
Local government agencies with an ATO agreement have no “Required” or “Discretionary”
procurement restrictions imposed by the state. Local government is required to follow their own procurement guidelines.
4. Resource and Contact Information
CALNET 3 Statewide Contract(s), Service Catalogs, forms and policies are located at
http://marketing.dts.ca.gov/calnet3/.
Please refer any CALNET 3 questions to a CALNET representative @ 1-916-657-9150.
Page 4 of 15
ATTACHMENT A
CALNET 3 ORDERING INFORMATION
Contractor Name AT&T
Awarded Category/Subcategory 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6
Contract Term
Subcategory Contract Award Contract End 1 Year Optional Extensions 1.1 November 15, 2013 June 30, 2018 2
1.2 November 15, 2013 June 30, 2018 2 1.3 November 15, 2013 June 30, 2018 2 1.4 November 15, 2013 June 30, 2018 2
1.5 November 15, 2013 June 30, 2018 2 1.6 November 15, 2013 June 30, 2017 3
Contract Number C3-A-12-10-TS-01
CALNET 3 http://marketing.dts.ca.gov/calnet3/
Ordering Address 2700 Watt Avenue Rm 1213 Sacramento, CA 95820
Contact AT&T Customer Care Center
Phone 1-877-972-6279
Fax - State 1-888-371-0200
Fax - local government North 1-888-515-7900
Fax - local government South 1-800-693-3304
Fax - healthcare 1-877-972-2684
Email - State GEM.North.State@att.com
Email - local government GEM.North.Local@att.com
Page 5 of 15
ATTACHMENT A
CALNET 3 ORDERING INFORMATION
Contractor Name CenturyLink
Awarded Category/Subcategory 1.4 & 1.5
Contract Term
Subcategory Contract Award Contract End 1 Year Optional Extensions 1.4 November 15, 2013 June 30, 2018 2
1.5 November 15, 2013 June 30, 2018 2
Contract Number C3-A-12-10-TS-03
CALNET 3 http://marketing.dts.ca.gov/calnet3/
Ordering Address 2377 Gold Meadow Way, Suite 200 Gold River, CA 95670
Contact Michael Smith
Phone 1-916-463-6268
Fax 1-916-463-6631
Email mike.smith1@centurylink.com
Page 6 of 15
ATTACHMENT A
CALNET 3 ORDERING INFORMATION
Contractor Name Integra
Awarded Category/Subcategory 1.2 & 1.3
Contract Term
Subcategory Contract Award Contract End 1 Year Optional Extensions
1.2 November 15, 2013 June 30, 2018 2 1.3 November 15, 2013 June 30, 2018 2
Contract Number C3-A-12-10-TS-09
CALNET 3 http://marketing.dts.ca.gov/calnet3/
Ordering Address 2495 Natomas Park Drive, Suite 300 Sacramento, CA 95833
Contact Haakon Austefjord
Phone 1-800-333-4380
Fax 1-916-231-2210
Email CALNET3ORDERS@integratelecom.com
Page 7 of 15
ATTACHMENT A
CALNET 3 ORDERING INFORMATION
Contractor Name Jive
Awarded Category/Subcategory 1.2 & 1.3
Contract Term
Subcategory Contract Award Contract End 1 Year Optional Extensions 1.2 November 15, 2013 June 30, 2018 2
1.3 November 15, 2013 June 30, 2018 2
Contract Number C3-A-12-10-TS-10
CALNET 3 http://marketing.dts.ca.gov/calnet3/
Ordering Address 1275 W 1600 North
Orem, UT 84057
Contact CALNET 3 Account Team
Phone – State & Local
Government 877-333-8880
Fax – State & Local Government 1-866-372-5429
Email – State & Local
Government gov+calnet@jive.com
Phone - Education 888-850-3009
Fax - Education 1-866-372-5429
Email - Education edu+calnet@jive.com
Page 8 of 15
ATTACHMENT A
CALNET 3 ORDERING INFORMATION
Contractor Name NWN
Awarded Category/Subcategory 1.2
Contract Term
Subcategory Contract Award Contract End 1 Year Optional Extensions
1.2 November 15, 2013 June 30, 2018 2
Contract Number C3-A-12-10-TS-12
CALNET 3 http://marketing.dts.ca.gov/calnet3/
Ordering Address 11931 Foundation Place, Suite 250 Gold River, CA 95670
Contact Chris Joslin
Phone 1-916-637-2200
Fax 1-916-596-4800
Email SCA_Sales_Team@nwnit.com
Page 9 of 15
ATTACHMENT A
CALNET 3 ORDERING INFORMATION
Contractor Name Verizon
Awarded
Category/Subcategory 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.5
Contract Term
Subcategory Contract Award Contract End 1 Year Optional Extensions
1.1 November 15, 2013 June 30, 2018 2 1.2 November 15, 2013 June 30, 2018 2 1.3 November 15, 2013 June 30, 2018 2
1.5 November 15, 2013 June 30, 2018 2
Contract Number C3-A-13-02-TS-08
CALNET 3 http://marketing.dts.ca.gov/calnet3/
Ordering Address 11080 White Rock Rd, Suite 200
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Contact Ross Shapiro
Phone 1-916-508-4707
Fax 1-888-3CALNET (1-888-322-5638)
Email CALNET3-ORDERS@VERIZON.COM
Page 10 of 15
ATTACHMENT B
CALNET 3 ORDERING INFORMATION
Contractor Name AT&T
Awarded Category/Subcategory 2, 3, 4.2, 5, 6.1, 7
Contract Term
Subcategory Contract Award Contract End 1 Year Optional Extensions
2 April 1, 2014 June 30, 2018 2 3 April 1, 2014 June 30, 2018 2
4.2 April 1, 2014 June 30, 2018 2 5 April 1, 2014 June 30, 2018 2 6.1 April 1, 2014 June 30, 2018 2
7 April 1, 2014 June 30, 2018 2
Contract Number C3-B-12-10-TS-01
CALNET 3 http://marketing.dts.ca.gov/calnet3/
Ordering Address 2700 Watt Avenue Rm 1213
Sacramento, CA 95820
Contact AT&T Customer Care Center
Phone 1-877-972-6279
Fax - State 1-888-371-0200
Fax - local government North 1-888-515-7900
Fax - local government South 1-800-693-3304
Fax - healthcare 1-877-972-2684
Email - State GEM.North.State@att.com
Email - local government GEM.North.Local@att.com
Page 11 of 15
ATTACHMENT B
CALNET 3 ORDERING INFORMATION
Contractor Name CenturyLink
Awarded Category/Subcategory 2, 3, 7
Contract Term
Subcategory Contract Award Contract End 1 Year Optional Extensions
2 April 7, 2014 June 30, 2018 2 3 April 7, 2014 June 30, 2018 2
7 April 7, 2014 June 30, 2018 2
Contract Number C3-B-12-10-TS-03
CALNET 3 http://marketing.dts.ca.gov/calnet3/
Ordering Address 2377 Gold Meadow Way, Suite 200 Gold River, CA 95670
Contact Michael Smith
Phone 1-916-463-6268
Fax 1-916-463-6631
Email mike.smith1@centurylink.com
Page 12 of 15
ATTACHMENT B
CALNET 3 ORDERING INFORMATION
Contractor Name Integra
Awarded Category/Subcategory 3, 4.1, 4.2, 5
Contract Term
Subcategory Contract Award Contract End 1 Year Optional Extensions
3 April 7, 2014 June 30, 2018 2 4.1 April 7, 2014 June 30, 2018 2
4.2 April 7, 2014 June 30, 2018 2 5 April 7, 2014 June 30, 2018 2
Contract Number C3-B-12-10-TS-09
CALNET 3 http://marketing.dts.ca.gov/calnet3/
Ordering Address 2495 Natomas Park Drive, Suite 300 Sacramento, CA 95833
Contact Haakon Austefjord
Phone 1-800-333-4380
Fax 1-916-231-2210
Email CALNET3ORDERS@integratelecom.com
Page 13 of 15
ATTACHMENT B
CALNET 3 ORDERING INFORMATION
Contractor Name NWN
Awarded Category/Subcategory 2, 6.1
Contract Term
Subcategory Contract Award Contract End 1 Year Optional Extensions
2 April 1, 2014 June 30, 2018 2 6.1 April 1, 2014 June 30, 2018 2
Contract Number C3-B-12-10-TS-12
CALNET 3 http://marketing.dts.ca.gov/calnet3/
Ordering Address 11931 Foundation Place, Suite 250 Gold River, CA 95670
Contact Chris Joslin
Phone 1-916-637-2200
Fax 1-916-596-4800
Email SCA_Sales_Team@nwnit.com
Page 14 of 15
ATTACHMENT B
CALNET 3 ORDERING INFORMATION
Contractor Name Verizon
Awarded
Category/Subcategory 4.1, 4.2, 6.1, 7
Contract Term
Subcategory Contract Award Contract End 1 Year Optional Extensions
4.1 April 7, 2014 June 30, 2018 2 4.2 April 7, 2014 June 30, 2018 2 6.1 April 7, 2014 June 30, 2018 2
7 April 7, 2014 June 30, 2018 2
Contract Number C3-B-13-02-TS-08
CALNET 3 http://marketing.dts.ca.gov/calnet3/
Ordering Address 11080 White Rock Rd, Suite 200
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Contact Ross Shapiro
Phone 1-916-508-4707
Fax 1-888-3CALNET (1-888-322-5638)
Email CALNET3-ORDERS@VERIZON.COM
Page 15 of 15
City of Palo Alto (ID # 4328)
City Council Staff Report
Report Type: Consent Calendar Meeting Date: 3/17/2014
City of Palo Alto Page 1
Summary Title: CALNET2 AT&T Contract Extension Approval
Title: Approval to Extend CALNET2 State Contract with AT&T for
Telecommunications in an Amount Not to Exceed $400,000 Annually,
Contract: C10133753
From: City Manager
Lead Department: IT Department
Recommendation
Staff recommends that Council approve and authorize the City Manager or his designee
to execute the necessary documentation to continue to utilize the State of California
extended CALNET2 Contracts with AT&T (contract C10133753) for city-wide
telecommunications services, term: January 30, 2014 and ending January 29, 2016 in
an amount not to exceed $400,000 per year subject to annual appropriation of funds.
Background
On October 20, 2009, the Finance Committee forwarded to the City Council a
recommendation to direct staff to pursue a CALNET2 contract for telecommunications
services. The action was in response to the City’s Auditors audit of telephone rates that
was presented to the Finance Committee on September 8, 2009 and the full Council on
November 2, 2009.
The City entered into the State of California CALNET2 contract on November 18, 2009,
with Council approval (CMR: 427:09 attached). The CALNET2 contracts allowed for
lower telecommunication rates as well as consolidated billing. In previous years, it was
estimated that $540,000 was spent on services with AT&T annually. Based upon the
Auditor’s Office calculations, the City could save approximately $235,000 annually by
executing the CALNET2 contract.
The term of the original CALNET2 contract was from January 30, 2007 and extended
through January 29, 2014 (Attached Files: MSA1Amend16 012914.pdf and
MSA2Amend7 012914.pdf). State contract CALNET3 is assumed to be CALNET2’s
replacement; however, at this time, the State has not fully executed CALNET3.
Instead, the State approved the extension of CALNET2 on January 23, 2014 for two
City of Palo Alto Page 2
more years (January 30, 2014 – January 29, 2016).
Discussion
The State of California performed a competiive bid process for telecommunications
services (RFP DGS-2053) which resulted in the execution of four Master Service
Agreements (MSAs) collectively referred to as the CALNET2 contracts. There are
approximately 1,800 agencies Statewide using CALNET2 services.
Summary of CALNET2 Plan
The services that the City utilizes are:
MSA 1 (Module 1) – Core Services
This Module encompasses voice and data services such as, business access lines,
central office trunks, and T1s.
MSA 2 (Module 2) – Long Distance Service for Voice
This Module includes services such as long distance voice network services and
functionality consisting of inter-state and international calling.
Resource Impact
The costs for this contract, $400,000 annually, were included in the Adopted FY 2014
Technology Fund Budget and assumed as part of the development of the FY 2015
Proposed Technology Fund Budget. No additional funding is needed for this contract
amendment.
Environmental Review
Approval of these contracts do not constitute a project under the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); therefore, no Environmental Assessment is required.
Attachments:
Approved Amendment MSA2 CALNET2 - Extension (PDF)
Approved Amendment MSA1 CALNET2 - Extension (PDF)
MSA1Amend16 012914 (PDF)
MSA2Amend7 012914 (PDF)
CMR 427-09 (PDF)
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 1 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
6.1.3.2.5 Service Identifier: Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and Wide Area
Network (WAN) Services
Attachment 4
Pricing is for standard components only, additional buildout shall be considered on an ICB basis.
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of measure Change Charge
GigaMAN®
GigaMAN Local Distribution
Channel
LNVX5 $ 1,350.00 $ 2,280.00 Per Channel N/A
GigaMAN Repeater VU4X5 N/A $ 550.00 per additional
repeater
N/A
GigaMAN Inter-Office Mileage - Variable 1L5X3 N/A $ 10.00 per mile N/A
GigaMAN Inter-Office Mileage Fixed 1L5X3 $ - $ 160.00 channel N/A
GigaMAN Channel Termination
Diversity (Local Channel Diversity)
CPAL5 $ - $ 600.00
channel N/A
GigaMAN Alternate Wire Center
Diversity
CPAA5 $ - $ 960.00
channel N/A
GigaMAN Inter-Wire Center Diversity CPAT5 $ - $ 475.00 circuit N/A
GigaMAN Equipment Only Protection CPAE3 $ 625.00 $ 840.00 channel N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 2 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of measure Change Charge
GigaMAN Equipment plus
Alternate Wire Center Path
Protection
CPAF3 $ 1,400.00 $ 1,280.00 channel N/A
GigaMAN Equipment plus Channel Termination Path Protection CPAG3 $ 1,225.00 $ 1,140.00 channel N/A
GigaMAN Inter-Wire Center Path
Protection
CPAH3 $ 625.00 $ 120.00 channel N/A
GigaMAN Power Protection VBBG3 $ 475.00 $ 384.00 rack or cabinet N/A
GigaMAN Administration Charge NRBAO $ 46.00 N/A order N/A
DecaMAN®
DecaMAN Local Distribution
Channel LAN-PHY
1RSTX $ 1,500.00 $ 8,400.00 channel N/A
DecaMAN Local Distribution
Channel WAN-PHY
1RSTX $ 1,500.00 $ 10,560.00 channel N/A
DecaMAN Interoffice Channel
Mileage - Fixed
JZ68S N/A $ 1,260.00 channel N/A
DecaMAN Interoffice Channel
Mileage - Variable
JZ68S N/A $ 175.00 mile N/A
DecaMAN Repeater VU4 N/A $ 1,920.00 per additional
repeater
N/A
DecaMAN Channel Termination
Diversity (Local Channel Diversity)
CPALX $ 850.00 $ 2,160.00 channel N/A
DecaMAN Alternate Wire Center
Diversity
CPAAX $ 950.00 $ 3,456.00 channel N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 3 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of measure Change Charge
DecaMAN Inter-Wire Center
Diversity
CPATX $ 700.00 $ 1,440.00 circuit N/A
DecaMAN Equipment Only
Protection
CPAEX $ 3,000.00 $ 5,880.00 channel N/A
DecaMAN Equipment plus Alternate Wire Center Path
Protection
CPAFX $ 4,500.00 $ 8,832.00 channel N/A
DecaMAN Equipment plus Channel Termination Path Protection CPAGX $ 4,200.00 $ 7,920.00 channel N/A
DecaMAN Inter-Wire Center Path Protection CPAHX $ 625.00 $ 480.00 circuit N/A
DecaMAN Power Protection VBBGX $ 475.00 $ 420.00 rack or cabinet N/A
DecaMAN Administration Charge NRBAO $ 46.00 N/A order N/A
FibreMAN®
FibreMAN Local Distribution
Channel - 1 Gbps
25P8X $ 1,500.00 $ 2,850.00 channel N/A
FibreMAN Local Distribution
Channel - 2 Gbps
25P9X $ 1,500.00 $ 4,000.00
channel
N/A
FibreMAN Repeater VU4 $ - $ 1,150.00 per additional
repeater
N/A
FibreMAN Alternate Wire Center
Diversity
AVOYX $ - $ 1,200.00 channel N/A
FibreMAN Channel Termination
Diversity (Local Channel Diversity)
DJVYX $ - $ 750.00 channel N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 4 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of measure Change Charge
FibreMAN Inter-Wire Center
Diversity
DEQYX $ - $ 500.00 circuit N/A
FibreMAN Inter-Office Mileage -
Fixed
JZ4XS $ - $ 200.00 channel N/A
FibreMAN Inter-Office Mileage - Variable JZ4XS $ - $ 100.00 mile N/A
MON Ring
MON Ring Customer Prem Node F2ND1 $ - $ 4,680.00 node N/A
MON Ring Customer Prem Node F2NDS $ - $ 3,510.00 node N/A
MON Ring Central Office Node F2NC1 $ - $ 4,680.00 node N/A
MON Ring Central Office Node F2NCS $ - $ 3,510.00 node N/A
MON Ring Interoffice Mileage 1L5X5 $ - $ 195.00 ring N/A
MON Bulk Power CBVDX $ - $ 1,240.00 node N/A
MON Bulk Power CVBDS $ - $ 992.00 node N/A
MON Ring Central Office Optical
Amplifier - Per location C-Band
67QXX $ - $ 3,240.00 amplifier N/A
MON Ring Central Office Optical
Amplifier - Per location L-Band
67QSX $ - $ 3,240.00 amplifier N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 5 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of measure Change Charge
MON Ring Central Office
Regenerator
V8RXX $ - $ 4,500.00 regenerator N/A
MON Ring Central Office
Regenerator
V8R2C $ - $ 9,000.00 regenerator N/A
MON Ring Port ETR Unprotected POYKW $ - $ 585.00 port N/A
MON Ring Port Fibre Channel POYNW $ - $ 720.00 port N/A
MON Ring Port Fibre Channel
Protected
POYNP $ - $ 1,440.00 port N/A
MON Ring Port Fibre Channel 2G POYYW $ - $ 1,020.00 port N/A
MON Ring Port Fibre Channel 2G
Protected
POYYP $ - $ 2,040.00 port N/A
MON Ring Port FICON POYMW $ - $ 585.00 port N/A
MON Ring Port FICON Protected POYMP $ - $ 1,170.00 port N/A
MON Ring Port FICON 2G POYWW $ - $ 1,020.00 port N/A
MON Ring Channel Port FICON
2G
POYWP $ - $ 2,040.00 port N/A
MON Ring Port Gigabit Ethernet POYLW $ - $ 720.00 port N/A
MON Ring Port Gigabit Ethernet
Protected
POYLP $ - $ 1,440.00 port N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 6 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of measure Change Charge
MON Ring Port 10W Gigabit
Ethernet
POYTW $ - $ 9,000.00 port N/A
MON Ring Port 10W Gigabit
Ethernet Protected
POYTP $ - $ 12,000.00 port N/A
MON Ring Port 10L Gigabit Ethernet POYUW $ - $ 9,225.00 port N/A
MON Ring Port 10L Gigabit Ethernet Protected POYUP $ - $ 12,300.00 port N/A
MON Ring Port SONET OC-
12/OC-12c
POYFW $ - $ 780.00 port N/A
MON Ring Port SONET OC-
12/OC-12c Protected
POYFP $ - $ 1,560.00 port N/A
MON Ring Port SONET OC-
48/OC-48c
POYGW $ - $ 2,640.00 port N/A
MON Ring Port SONET OC-
48/OC-48c Protected
POYGP $ - $ 3,960.00 port N/A
MON Ring Port SONET OC-
192/OC-192c
POYOW $ - $ 9,000.00 port N/A
MON Ring Port SONET OC-
192/OC-192c Protected
POYOP $ - $ 12,000.00 port N/A
MON Ring Fibre Channel SRM
Port
POY6W $ - $ 300.00 port N/A
MON Ring FibreChannel SRM Port
Protected
POY6P $ - $ 600.00 port N/A
MON Ring Ficon SRM Port POY7W $ - $ 240.00 port N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 7 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of measure Change Charge
MON Ring Ficon SRM Port
Protected
POY7P $ - $ 480.00 port N/A
MON Gigabit Ethernet SRM Port POY4W $ - $ 300.00 port N/A
MON Gigabit Ethernet SRM Port Protected POY4P $ - $ 600.00 port N/A
MON SONET OC-12/OC-12c SRM Port POY5W $ - $ 300.00 port N/A
MON SONET OC-12/OC-12c SRM
Port Protected
POY5P $ - $ 600.00 port N/A
MON SONET OC-3/OC-3c SRM
Port
POYEW $ - $ 60.00 port N/A
MON SONET OC-3/OC-3c SRM
Port
POYEP $ - $ 60.00 port N/A
MON ESCON SRM Port POYHW $ - $ 60.00 port N/A
MON ESCON SRM Port Protected POYHP $ - $ 60.00 port N/A
OPT-E-MAN®
OPT-E-MAN Basic Connection
10/100 Mbps
P9FEX N/A $ 323.61 port N/A
OPT-E-MAN Basic Connection
Gigabit Ethernet
P9FGX N/A $ 681.66
port N/A
OPT-E-MAN Basic Plus
Connection 10/100 Mbps
P9FFX N/A $ 323.61
port N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 8 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of measure Change Charge
OPT-E-MAN Basic Plus
Connection Gigabit Ethernet
P9FHX N/A $ 681.66 port N/A
OPT-E-MAN Additional MAC
Addresses (51-100)
M2CAX N/A $ 4.00 N/A
OPT-E-MAN Repeater Service VU4 N/A $ 260.00 repeater N/A
OPT-E-MAN Service Order Change Charge NHCEO $ 75.00 N/A N/A
OPT-E-MAN Miscellaneous
Change Charge
NHCEN $ 50.00 N/A N/A
OPT-E-MAN Service Order
Cancellation Charge
OGCEO $ 200.00 N/A N/A
OPT-E-MAN Expedite Charge EODEO $ 300.00 N/A N/A
OPT-E-MAN Ethernet Virtual
Connection (EVC)
OMEVC $ - $ - virtual circuit N/A
Best Effort Grade of Service
OPT-E-MAN Committed
Information Rate – 2 Mbps Best
Effort
R6E2E N/A $ 50.02 port N/A
OPT-E-MAN Committed
Information Rate – 4 Mbps Best Effort
R6E4E N/A $ 75.04 port N/A
OPT-E-MAN Committed
Information Rate – 8 Mbps Best Effort
R6E8E N/A $ 133.41 port N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 9 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of measure Change Charge
Bronze Grade of Service
OPT-E-MAN Committed
Information Rate – 2 Mbps Bronze
R6E2B N/A $ 58.85 port N/A
OPT-E-MAN Committed Information Rate – 4 Mbps Bronze R6E4B N/A $ 88.28 port N/A
OPT-E-MAN Committed Information Rate – 5 Mbps Bronze R6EAB N/A $ 102.02 port N/A
OPT-E-MAN Committed
Information Rate – 8 Mbps Bronze
R6E8B N/A $ 156.95 port N/A
OPT-E-MAN Committed
Information Rate – 10 Mbps Bronze
R6EBB N/A $ 305.06
port N/A
OPT-E-MAN Committed
Information Rate – 20 Mbps Bronze
R6EDB N/A $ 427.67
port N/A
OPT-E-MAN Committed
Information Rate – 50 Mbps Bronze
R6EHB N/A $ 521.84
port N/A
OPT-E-MAN Committed
Information Rate – 100 Mbps Bronze
R6ELB N/A $ 616.01 port N/A
OPT-E-MAN Committed
Information Rate – 150 Mbps Bronze
R6ENB N/A $ 392.26 port N/A
OPT-E-MAN Committed
Information Rate – 250 Mbps Bronze
R6EQB N/A $ 588.54 port N/A
OPT-E-MAN Committed
Information Rate – 500 Mbps
R6ETB N/A $ 686.63 port N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 10 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of measure Change Charge
Bronze
OPT-E-MAN Committed
Information Rate – 600 Mbps
Bronze
R6EUB N/A $ 735.68 port N/A
OPT-E-MAN Committed
Information Rate – 1000 Mbps
Bronze
R6EZB N/A $ 778.83 port N/A
Silver Grade of Service
OPT-E-MAN Committed
Information Rate – 2 Mbps Silver
R6E2C N/A $ 58.85 port N/A
OPT-E-MAN Committed Information Rate – 4 Mbps Silver R6E4C N/A $ 88.28 port N/A
OPT-E-MAN Committed Information Rate – 5 Mbps Silver R6EAC N/A $ 102.02 port N/A
OPT-E-MAN Committed
Information Rate – 8 Mbps Silver
R6E8C N/A $ 156.95 port N/A
OPT-E-MAN Committed
Information Rate – 10 Mbps Silver
R6EBC N/A $ 368.82 port N/A
OPT-E-MAN Committed
Information Rate – 20 Mbps Silver
R6EDC N/A $ 503.20 port N/A
OPT-E-MAN Committed
Information Rate – 50 Mbps Silver
R6EHC N/A $ 607.18
port N/A
OPT-E-MAN Committed
Information Rate – 100 Mbps Silver
R6ELC N/A $ 711.15 port N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 11 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of measure Change Charge
OPT-E-MAN Committed
Information Rate – 150 Mbps Silver
R6ENC N/A $ 490.45 port N/A
OPT-E-MAN Committed
Information Rate – 250 Mbps Silver
R6EQC N/A $ 784.72 port N/A
OPT-E-MAN Committed Information Rate – 500 Mbps Silver R6ETC N/A $ 882.81 port N/A
OPT-E-MAN Committed Information Rate – 600 Mbps Silver R6EUC N/A $ 907.33 port N/A
OPT-E-MAN Committed
Information Rate – 1000 Mbps
Silver
R6EZC N/A $ 924.99 port N/A
AT&T Switched Ethernet
(ASE) Service and Features
Basic Service Arrangement (Basic
or BSA) Ports
ASE (BSA) Connection 10/100
Mbps
EYQEX N/A $225.00 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Connection 1 Gigabit
Ethernet
EYQFX N/A $632.50 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Connection 10 Gigabit
Ethernet
EYQGX N/A $2,280.00 port N/A
Basic Service Arrangement Class
of Service (CoS) and Committed Information Rate (CIR)
Real Time
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 12 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of measure Change Charge
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 2 Mbps Real Time
R6E2XRT N/A $61.20 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 4 Mbps Real Time
R6E4XRT N/A $104.50 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information Rate – 5 Mbps Real Time R6EAXRT N/A $130.00 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information Rate – 8 Mbps Real Time R6E8XRT N/A $150.00 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 10 Mbps Real Time
R6EBXRT N/A $202.00 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 20 Mbps Real Time
R6EDXRT N/A $260.00 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 50 Mbps Real Time
R6EHXRT N/A $496.40 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 100 Mbps Real Time
R6ELXRT N/A $561.00 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 150 Mbps Real Time
R6ENXRT N/A $356.00 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 250 Mbps Real Time
R6EQXRT N/A $514.80 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 500 Mbps Real Time
R6ETXRT N/A $680.00 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 600 Mbps Real Time
R6EUXRT N/A $775.00 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 1000 Mbps Real Time
R6EZXRT N/A $877.50 port N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 13 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of measure Change Charge
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 2000 Mbps Real Time
R61BXRT N/A $1,391.50 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 2500 Mbps Real Time
R61CXRT N/A $1,669.80 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information Rate – 4000 Mbps Real Time R61FXRT N/A $1,971.10 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information Rate – 5000 Mbps Real Time R61HXRT N/A $2,318.40 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 7500 Mbps Real Time
R61NXRT N/A $3,045.20 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 9500 Mbps Real Time
R61RXRT N/A $3,624.80 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 10000 Mbps Real Time
R61SXRT N/A $3,767.40 port N/A
Interactive
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 2 Mbps Interactive
R6E2XIA N/A $56.40 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 4 Mbps Interactive
R6E4XIA N/A $98.80 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 5 Mbps Interactive
R6EAXIA N/A $122.00 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 8 Mbps Interactive
R6E8XIA N/A $140.00 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 10 Mbps Interactive
R6EBXIA N/A $188.00 port N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 14 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of measure Change Charge
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 20 Mbps Interactive
R6EDXIA N/A $242.00 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 50 Mbps Interactive
R6EHXIA N/A $459.00 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information Rate – 100 Mbps Interactive R6ELXIA N/A $523.60 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information Rate – 150 Mbps Interactive R6ENXIA N/A $330.00 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 250 Mbps Interactive
R6EQXIA N/A $479.60 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 500 Mbps Interactive
R6ETXIA N/A $632.50 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 600 Mbps Interactive
R6EUXIA N/A $722.50 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 1000 Mbps Interactive
R6EZXIA N/A $820.00 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 2000 Mbps Interactive
R61BXIA N/A $1,301.80 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 2500 Mbps Interactive
R61CXIA N/A $1,559.40 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 4000 Mbps Interactive
R61FXIA N/A $1,842.30 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 5000 Mbps Interactive
R61HXIA N/A $2,166.60 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 7500 Mbps Interactive
R61NXIA N/A $2,845.10 port N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 15 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of measure Change Charge
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 9500 Mbps Interactive
R61RXIA N/A $3,385.60 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 10000 Mbps Interactive
R61SXIA N/A $3,521.30 port N/A
Business Critical-High
ASE (BSA) Committed Information Rate – 2 Mbps Business Critical
High
R6E2XBH N/A $48.00 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information Rate – 4 Mbps Business Critical
High
R6E4XBH N/A $86.45 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information Rate – 5 Mbps Business Critical
High
R6EAXBH N/A $110.00 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 8 Mbps Business Critical
High
R6E8XBH N/A $131.00 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 10 Mbps Business Critical
High
R6EBXBH N/A $166.00 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information Rate – 20 Mbps Business Critical
High
R6EDXBH N/A $220.00 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information Rate – 50 Mbps Business Critical
High
R6EHXBH N/A $421.60 port N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 16 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of measure Change Charge
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 100 Mbps Business Critical
High
R6ELXBH N/A $486.20 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information Rate – 150 Mbps Business Critical
High
R6ENXBH N/A $317.00 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information Rate – 250 Mbps Business Critical
High
R6EQXBH N/A $431.20 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information Rate – 500 Mbps Business Critical
High
R6ETXBH N/A $577.50 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 600 Mbps Business Critical High
R6EUXBH N/A $667.50 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 1000 Mbps Business Critical High
R6EZXBH N/A $765.00 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 2000 Mbps Business Critical High
R61BXBH N/A $1,258.10 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 2500 Mbps Business Critical
High
R61CXBH N/A $1,507.65 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 4000 Mbps Business Critical
High
R61FXBH N/A $1,781.35 port N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 17 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of measure Change Charge
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 5000 Mbps Business Critical
High
R61HXBH N/A $2,095.30 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information Rate – 7500 Mbps Business Critical
High
R61NXBH N/A $2,750.80 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information Rate – 9500 Mbps Business Critical
High
R61RXBH N/A $3,274.05 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information Rate – 10000 Mbps Business
Critical High
R61SXBH N/A $3,405.15 port N/A
Business Critical-Medium
ASE (BSA) Committed Information Rate – 2 Mbps Business Critical
Medium
R6E2XBM N/A $39.60 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 4 Mbps Business Critical Medium
R6E4XBM N/A $74.10 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 5 Mbps Business Critical Medium
R6EAXBM N/A $100.00 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 8 Mbps Business Critical Medium
R6E8XBM N/A $122.00 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 10 Mbps Business Critical
R6EBXBM N/A $144.00 port N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 18 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of measure Change Charge
Medium
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 20 Mbps Business Critical
Medium
R6EDXBM N/A $198.00 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 50 Mbps Business Critical
Medium
R6EHXBM N/A $384.20 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information Rate – 100 Mbps Business Critical
Medium
R6ELXBM N/A $448.80 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information Rate – 150 Mbps Business Critical
Medium
R6ENXBM N/A $304.00 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information Rate – 250 Mbps Business Critical
Medium
R6EQXBM N/A $382.80 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 500 Mbps Business Critical Medium
R6ETXBM N/A $522.50 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 600 Mbps Business Critical Medium
R6EUXBM N/A $612.50 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 1000 Mbps Business Critical Medium
R6EZXBM N/A $710.00 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 2000 Mbps Business Critical
R61BXBM N/A $1,214.40 port N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 19 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of measure Change Charge
Medium
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 2500 Mbps Business Critical
Medium
R61CXBM N/A $1,455.90 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 4000 Mbps Business Critical
Medium
R61FXBM N/A $1,720.40 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information Rate – 5000 Mbps Business Critical
Medium
R61HXBM N/A $2,024.00 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information Rate – 7500 Mbps Business Critical
Medium
R61NXBM N/A $2,656.50 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information Rate – 9500 Mbps Business Critical
Medium
R61RXBM N/A $3,162.50 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 10000 Mbps Business Critical Medium
R61SXBM N/A $3,289.00 port N/A
Non-Critical High
ASE (BSA) Committed Information Rate – 2 Mbps Non-Critical High R6E2XNH N/A $37.20 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information Rate – 4 Mbps Non-Critical High R6E4XNH N/A $70.30 port N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 20 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of measure Change Charge
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 5 Mbps Non-Critical High
R6EAXNH N/A $93.00 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 8 Mbps Non-Critical High
R6E8XNH N/A $114.00 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information Rate – 10 Mbps Non-Critical High R6EBXNH N/A $134.00 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information Rate – 20 Mbps Non-Critical High R6EDXNH N/A $185.00 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 50 Mbps Non-Critical High
R6EHXNH N/A $358.70 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 100 Mbps Non-Critical High
R6ELXNH N/A $418.20 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 150 Mbps Non-Critical High
R6ENXNH N/A $282.00 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 250 Mbps Non-Critical High
R6EQXNH N/A $355.30 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 500 Mbps Non-Critical High
R6ETXNH N/A $486.25 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 600 Mbps Non-Critical High
R6EUXNH N/A $570.00 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 1000 Mbps Non-Critical
High
R6EZXNH N/A $660.00 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 2000 Mbps Non-Critical
High
R61BXNH N/A $1,131.60 port N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 21 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of measure Change Charge
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 2500 Mbps Non-Critical
High
R61CXNH N/A $1,357.00 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information Rate – 4000 Mbps Non-Critical
High
R61FXNH N/A $1,603.10 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information Rate – 5000 Mbps Non-Critical
High
R61HXNH N/A $1,886.00 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information Rate – 7500 Mbps Non-Critical
High
R61NXNH N/A $2,475.95 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 9500 Mbps Non-Critical High
R61RXNH N/A $2,947.45 port N/A
ASE (BSA) Committed Information
Rate – 10000 Mbps Non-Critical High
R61SXNH N/A $3,064.75 port N/A
Per Packet Class of Service
(PPCoS) Arrangement Ports
N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Connection 10/100
Mbps
EYQLX N/A $294.00 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Connection 1 Gigabit Ethernet EYQMX N/A $759.00 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Connection 10 Gigabit Ethernet EYQNX N/A $2,736.00 port N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 22 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of measure Change Charge
Per Packet Class of Service
Arrangement Class of Service (CoS) Packages and Committed
Information Rate (CIR)
Multimedia High
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 2 Mbps
Multimedia High
R6E2XMH N/A $61.20 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 4 Mbps
Multimedia High
R6E4XMH N/A $104.50 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 5 Mbps
Multimedia High
R6EAXMH N/A $130.00 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 8 Mbps
Multimedia High
R6E8XMH N/A $150.00 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed Information Rate – 10 Mbps
Multimedia High
R6EBXMH N/A $202.00 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed Information Rate – 20 Mbps
Multimedia High
R6EDXMH N/A $260.00 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed Information Rate – 50 Mbps
Multimedia High
R6EHXMH N/A $496.40 port N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 23 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of measure Change Charge
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 100 Mbps
Multimedia High
R6ELXMH N/A $561.00 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed Information Rate – 150 Mbps
Multimedia High
R6ENXMH N/A $356.00 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed Information Rate – 250 Mbps
Multimedia High
R6EQXMH N/A $514.80 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed Information Rate – 500 Mbps
Multimedia High
R6ETXMH N/A $680.00 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 600 Mbps Multimedia High
R6EUXMH N/A $775.00 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 1000 Mbps Multimedia High
R6EZXMH N/A $877.50 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 2000 Mbps Multimedia High
R61BXMH N/A $1,391.50 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 2500 Mbps
Multimedia High
R61CXMH N/A $1,669.80 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 4000 Mbps
Multimedia High
R61FXMH N/A $1,971.10 port N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 24 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of measure Change Charge
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 5000 Mbps
Multimedia High
R61HXMH N/A $2,318.40 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed Information Rate – 7500 Mbps
Multimedia High
R61NXMH N/A $3,045.20 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed Information Rate – 9500 Mbps
Multimedia High
R61RXMH N/A $3,624.80 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed Information Rate – 10000 Mbps
Multimedia High
R61SXMH N/A $3,767.40 port N/A
Multimedia Standard
ASE (PPCoS) Committed Information Rate – 2 Mbps
Multimedia Standard
R6E2XMS N/A $56.40 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 4 Mbps Multimedia Standard
R6E4XMS N/A $98.80 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 5 Mbps Multimedia Standard
R6EAXMS N/A $122.00 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 8 Mbps Multimedia Standard
R6E8XMS N/A $140.00 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 10 Mbps
R6EBXMS N/A $188.00 port N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 25 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of measure Change Charge
Multimedia Standard
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 20 Mbps
Multimedia Standard
R6EDXMS N/A $242.00 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 50 Mbps
Multimedia Standard
R6EHXMS N/A $459.00 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed Information Rate – 100 Mbps
Multimedia Standard
R6ELXMS N/A $523.60 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed Information Rate – 150 Mbps
Multimedia Standard
R6ENXMS N/A $330.00 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed Information Rate – 250 Mbps
Multimedia Standard
R6EQXMS N/A $479.60 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 500 Mbps Multimedia Standard
R6ETXMS N/A $632.50 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 600 Mbps Multimedia Standard
R6EUXMS N/A $722.50 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 1000 Mbps Multimedia Standard
R6EZXMS N/A $820.00 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 2000 Mbps
R61BXMS N/A $1,301.80 port N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 26 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of measure Change Charge
Multimedia Standard
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 2500 Mbps
Multimedia Standard
R61CXMS N/A $1,559.40 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 4000 Mbps
Multimedia Standard
R61FXMS N/A $1,842.30 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed Information Rate – 5000 Mbps
Multimedia Standard
R61HXMS N/A $2,166.60 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed Information Rate – 7500 Mbps
Multimedia Standard
R61NXMS N/A $2,845.10 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed Information Rate – 9500 Mbps
Multimedia Standard
R61RXMS N/A $3,385.60 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 10000 Mbps Multimedia Standard
R61SXMS N/A $3,521.30 port N/A
Critical Data
ASE (PPCoS) Committed Information Rate – 2 Mbps Critical
Data
R6E2XCD N/A $39.60 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 4 Mbps Critical Data
R6E4XCD N/A $74.10 port N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 27 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of measure Change Charge
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 5 Mbps Critical
Data
R6EAXCD N/A $100.00 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed Information Rate – 8 Mbps Critical
Data
R6E8XCD N/A $122.00 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed Information Rate – 10 Mbps Critical
Data
R6EBXCD N/A $144.00 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed Information Rate – 20 Mbps Critical
Data
R6EDXCD N/A $198.00 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 50 Mbps Critical Data
R6EHXCD N/A $384.20 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 100 Mbps Critical Data
R6ELXCD N/A $448.80 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 150 Mbps Critical Data
R6ENXCD N/A $304.00 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 250 Mbps
Critical Data
R6EQXCD N/A $382.80 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 500 Mbps
Critical Data
R6ETXCD N/A $522.50 port N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 28 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of measure Change Charge
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 600 Mbps
Critical Data
R6EUXCD N/A $612.50 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed Information Rate – 1000 Mbps
Critical Data
R6EZXCD N/A $710.00 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed Information Rate – 2000 Mbps
Critical Data
R61BXCD N/A $1,214.40 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed Information Rate – 2500 Mbps
Critical Data
R61CXCD N/A $1,455.90 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 4000 Mbps Critical Data
R61FXCD N/A $1,720.40 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 5000 Mbps Critical Data
R61HXCD N/A $2,024.00 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 7500 Mbps Critical Data
R61NXCD N/A $2,656.50 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 9500 Mbps
Critical Data
R61RXCD N/A $3,162.50 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 10000 Mbps
Critical Data
R61SXCD N/A $3,289.00 port N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 29 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of measure Change Charge
Business Data
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 2 Mbps
Business Data
R6E2XBD N/A $37.20 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 4 Mbps
Business Data
R6E4XBD N/A $70.30 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed Information Rate – 5 Mbps
Business Data
R6EAXBD N/A $93.00 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed Information Rate – 8 Mbps
Business Data
R6E8XBD N/A $114.00 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed Information Rate – 10 Mbps
Business Data
R6EBXBD N/A $134.00 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 20 Mbps Business Data
R6EDXBD N/A $185.00 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 50 Mbps Business Data
R6EHXBD N/A $358.70 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 100 Mbps Business Data
R6ELXBD N/A $418.20 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 150 Mbps
R6ENXBD N/A $282.00 port N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 30 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of measure Change Charge
Business Data
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 250 Mbps
Business Data
R6EQXBD N/A $355.30 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 500 Mbps
Business Data
R6ETXBD N/A $486.25 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed Information Rate – 600 Mbps
Business Data
R6EUXBD N/A $570.00 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed Information Rate – 1000 Mbps
Business Data
R6EZXBD N/A $660.00 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed Information Rate – 2000 Mbps
Business Data
R61BXBD N/A $1,131.60 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 2500 Mbps Business Data
R61CXBD N/A $1,357.00 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 4000 Mbps Business Data
R61FXBD N/A $1,603.10 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 5000 Mbps Business Data
R61HXBD N/A $1,886.00 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 7500 Mbps
R61NXBD N/A $2,475.95 port N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 31 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of measure Change Charge
Business Data
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 9500 Mbps
Business Data
R61RXBD N/A $2,947.45 port N/A
ASE (PPCoS) Committed
Information Rate – 10000 Mbps
Business Data
R61SXBD N/A $3,064.75 port N/A
Optional Features
ASE Additional MAC Addresses
(51-100) Per Port
M2CBX $0.00 $0.00 port $0.00
ASE Regenerator 10/100 Mbps port EYQHX $0.00 $260.80 port $0.00
ASE Regenerator 1 Gbps port EYQJX $0.00 $260.80 port $0.00
ASE Regenerator 10 Gbps port EYQKX $0.00 $768.00 port $0.00
ASE Administrative Change Charge ORCMX $49.98 $0.00 Per order $49.98
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
OPT-E-MAN (OEM) Managed Service Bundles w/ Standard Features
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 32 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
10/100 Mbps Connection – Bronze
CIR Grade of Service
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection
10/100 Mbps – 2 Mbps Bronze w Type 7A Router Cu Ethernet
OEMB2A $143.00 $751.45 Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection
10/100 Mbps – 2 Mbps Bronze w Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet
OEMB2B $143.00 $1,009.84 Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 10/100 Mbps – 4 Mbps Bronze w
Type 7A Router Cu Ethernet
OEMB4A $143.00 $780.88 Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles Basic or Basic Plus Connection
10/100 Mbps – 4 Mbps Bronze w Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet
OEMB4B $143.00 $1,039.27 Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 10/100 Mbps – 5 Mbps Bronze w
Type 7A Router Cu Ethernet
OEMB5A $143.00 $794.62 Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles Basic or Basic Plus Connection
10/100 Mbps – 5 Mbps Bronze w Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet
OEMB5B $143.00 $1,053.01 Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles Basic or Basic Plus Connection OEMB8A $143.00 $849.55 Bundle N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 33 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
10/100 Mbps – 8 Mbps Bronze w
Type 7A Router Cu Ethernet
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection
10/100 Mbps – 8 Mbps Bronze w Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet
OEMB8B $143.00 $1,107.94 Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection
10/100 Mbps – 10 Mbps Bronze w Type 7A Router Cu Ethernet
OEMB10A $143.00 $997.66 Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 10/100 Mbps – 10 Mbps Bronze w
Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet
OEMB10B $143.00 $1,256.05 Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles Basic or Basic Plus Connection
10/100 Mbps – 20 Mbps Bronze w Type 7A Router Cu Ethernet
OEMB20A $143.00 $1,120.27 Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 10/100 Mbps – 20 Mbps Bronze w
Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet
OEMB20B $143.00 $1,378.66 Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles Basic or Basic Plus Connection
10/100 Mbps – 50 Mbps Bronze w Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet
OEMB50A $143.00 $1,472.83 Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles Basic or Basic Plus Connection OEMB50B $143.00 $1,589.38 Bundle N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 34 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
10/100 Mbps – 50 Mbps Bronze w
Type 10A Router Cu Ethernet
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection
10/100 Mbps – 100 Mbps Bronze w Type 10A Router Cu Ethernet
OEMB100A $143.00 $1,683.55
Bundle N/A
10/100 Mbps Connection – Silver CIR Grade of Service
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 10/100 Mbps – 2 Mbps Silver w
Type 7A Router Cu Ethernet
OEMS2A $143.00 $751.45 Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles Basic or Basic Plus Connection
10/100 Mbps – 2 Mbps Silver w Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet
OEMS2B $143.00 $1,009.84 Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles Basic or Basic Plus Connection
10/100 Mbps – 4 Mbps Silver w
Type 7A Router Cu Ethernet
OEMS4A $143.00 $780.88 Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 10/100 Mbps – 4 Mbps Silver w
Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet
OEMS4B $143.00 $1,039.27 Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles Basic or Basic Plus Connection
10/100 Mbps – 5 Mbps Silver w Type 7A Router Cu Ethernet
OEMS5A $143.00 $794.62 Bundle N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 35 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection
10/100 Mbps – 5 Mbps Silver w
Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet
OEMS5B $143.00 $1,053.01 Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection
10/100 Mbps – 8 Mbps Silver w Type 7A Router Cu Ethernet
OEMS8A $143.00 $849.55 Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 10/100 Mbps – 8 Mbps Silver w
Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet
OEMS8B $143.00 $1,107.94 Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection
10/100 Mbps – 10 Mbps Silver w Type 7A Router Cu Ethernet
OEMS10A $143.00 $1,061.42 Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection
10/100 Mbps – 10 Mbps Silver w Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet
OEMS10B $143.00 $1,319.81 Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 10/100 Mbps – 20 Mbps Silver w
Type 7A Router Cu Ethernet
OEMS20A $143.00 $1,195.80 Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles Basic or Basic Plus Connection
10/100 Mbps – 20 Mbps Silver w Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet
OEMS20B $143.00 $1,454.19 Bundle N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 36 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection
10/100 Mbps – 50 Mbps Silver w
Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet
OEMS50A $143.00 $1,558.17 Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection
10/100 Mbps – 50 Mbps Silver w Type 10A Router Cu Ethernet
OEMS50B $143.00 $1,674.72
Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 10/100 Mbps – 100 Mbps Silver w
Type 10A Router Cu Ethernet
OEMS100A $143.00 $1,778.69
Bundle N/A
1 Gbps Connection – Bronze CIR
Grade of Service
OEM Managed Service Bundles Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1
Gbps – 2 Mbps Bronze w Type 21A Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMBG2A $143.00 $1,125.19 Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1 Gbps – 2 Mbps Bronze w Type 9A
Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMBG2B $143.00 $1,383.58
Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1
Gbps – 4 Mbps Bronze w Type 21A Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMBG4A $143.00 $1,154.62 Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1 OEMBG4B $143.00 $1,413.01 Bundle N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 37 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
Gbps – 4 Mbps Bronze w Type 9A
Router Fiber Ethernet
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1
Gbps – 5 Mbps Bronze w Type 21A Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMBG5A $143.00 $1,168.36
Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1
Gbps – 5 Mbps Bronze w Type 9A Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMBG5B $143.00 $1,426.75
Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1 Gbps – 8 Mbps Bronze w Type 21A
Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMBG8A $143.00 $1,223.29
Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1
Gbps – 8 Mbps Bronze w Type 9A Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMBG8B $143.00 $1,481.68 Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1 Gbps – 10 Mbps Bronze w Type
21A Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMBG10A $143.00 $1,371.40
Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1
Gbps – 10 Mbps Bronze w Type 9A Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMBG10B $143.00 $1,629.79 Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1 OEMBG20A $143.00 $1,494.01 Bundle N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 38 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
Gbps – 20 Mbps Bronze w Type
21A Router Fiber Ethernet
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1
Gbps – 20 Mbps Bronze w Type 9A Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMBG20B $143.00 $1,752.40
Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1
Gbps – 50 Mbps Bronze w Type 9A Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMBG50A $143.00 $1,846.57
Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1 Gbps – 50 Mbps Bronze w Type
11A Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMBG50B $143.00 $1,963.12
Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1
Gbps – 50 Mbps Bronze w Type 26 Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMBG50C $143.00 $2,348.44 Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1 Gbps – 100 Mbps Bronze w Type
11A Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMBG100A $143.00 $2,057.29
Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1
Gbps – 100 Mbps Bronze w Type 26 Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMBG100B $143.00 $2,442.61 Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1 OEMBG150A $143.00 $1,833.64 Bundle N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 39 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
Gbps – 150 Mbps Bronze w Type
11A Router Fiber Ethernet
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1
Gbps – 150 Mbps Bronze w Type 26 Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMBG150B $143.00 $2,218.96
Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1
Gbps – 250 Mbps Bronze w Type 26 Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMBG200A $143.00 $2,415.14
Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1 Gbps – 250 Mbps Bronze w Type
27 Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMBG250B $143.00 $2,836.58
Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1
Gbps – 500 Mbps Bronze w Type 27 Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMBG500A $143.00 $2,934.67 Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1 Gbps – 600 Mbps Bronze w Type
27 Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMBG600A $143.00 $2,983.72
Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1
Gbps – 1000 Mbps Bronze w Type 27 Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMBG1KA $143.00 $3,026.87 Bundle N/A
1 Gbps Connection – Silver CIR Grade of Service
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 40 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1
Gbps – 2 Mbps Silver w Type 21A
Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMSG2A $143.00 $1,125.19
Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1
Gbps – 2 Mbps Silver w Type 9A Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMSG2B $143.00 $1,383.58
Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1 Gbps – 4 Mbps Silver w Type 21A
Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMSG4A $143.00 $1,154.62
Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1
Gbps – 4 Mbps Silver w Type 9A Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMSG4B $143.00 $1,413.01
Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1
Gbps – 5 Mbps Silver w Type 21A Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMSG5A $143.00 $1,168.36
Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1 Gbps – 5 Mbps Silver w Type 9A
Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMSG5B $143.00 $1,426.75
Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1
Gbps – 8 Mbps Silver w Type 21A Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMSG8A $143.00 $1,223.29 Bundle N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 41 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1
Gbps – 8 Mbps Silver w Type 9A
Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMSG8B $143.00 $1,481.68
Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1
Gbps – 10 Mbps Silver w Type 21A Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMSG10A $143.00 $1,435.16
Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1 Gbps – 10 Mbps Silver w Type 9A
Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMSG10B $143.00 $1,693.55
Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1
Gbps – 20 Mbps Silver w Type 21A Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMSG20A $143.00 $1,569.54
Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1
Gbps – 20 Mbps Silver w Type 9A Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMSG20B $143.00 $1,827.93
Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1 Gbps – 50 Mbps Silver w Type 9A
Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMSG50A $143.00 $1,931.91
Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1
Gbps – 50 Mbps Silver w Type 11A Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMSG50B $143.00 $2,048.46 Bundle N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 42 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1
Gbps – 50 Mbps Silver w Type 26
Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMSG50C $143.00 $2,433.78
Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1
Gbps – 100 Mbps Silver w Type 11A Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMSG100A $143.00 $2,152.43
Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1 Gbps – 100 Mbps Silver w Type 26
Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMSG100B $143.00 $2,537.75
Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1
Gbps – 150 Mbps Silver w Type 11A Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMSG150A $143.00 $1,931.73
Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1
Gbps – 150 Mbps Silver w Type 26 Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMSG150B $143.00 $2,317.05
Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1 Gbps – 250 Mbps Silver w Type 26
Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMSG250A $143.00 $2,611.32
Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1
Gbps – 250 Mbps Silver w Type 27 Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMSG250B $143.00 $3,032.76 Bundle N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 43 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1
Gbps – 500 Mbps Silver w Type 27
Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMSG500A $143.00 $3,130.85
Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1
Gbps – 600 Mbps Silver w Type 27 Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMSG600A $143.00 $3,155.37
Bundle N/A
OEM Managed Service Bundles
Basic or Basic Plus Connection 1 Gbps – 1000 Mbps Silver w Type
27 Router Fiber Ethernet
OEMSG1KA $143.00 $3,173.03
Bundle N/A
OPT-E-MAN Managed Service
Bundle s Life Cycle Management Features and Services
Moves, Adds, Changes and Deletes
Move Router Site (Inside) - Low
Complexity
13092L $600.00 N/A Router N/A
Move Router Site (Inside) -
Medium Complexity
13092M $720.00 N/A Router N/A
Move Router Site (Inside) - High Complexity 13092H $850.00 N/A Router N/A
Move Router Site (Outside) - Low
Complexity
13093L $1,200.00 N/A Router N/A
Move Router Site (Outside) - Medium Complexity 13093M $1,440.00 N/A Router N/A
Move Router Site (Outside) - High
Complexity
13093H $1,700.00 N/A Router N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 44 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
Router Site Add - Low Complexity 13118L $1,500.00 N/A Router N/A
Router Site Add - Medium Complexity 13118M $1,620.00 N/A Router N/A
Router Site Add - High Complexity 13118H $1,750.00 N/A Router N/A
Add/Delete Router Boards – Low
Complexity
13127L $300.00 N/A Router N/A
Add/Delete Router Boards – Medium Complexity 13127M $360.00 N/A Router N/A
Add/Delete Router Boards – High
Complexity
13127H $425.00 N/A Router N/A
Site Delete for AT&T Provided Equipment 13119 $0.00 N/A Router N/A
Site Insufficiently Prepared to
Receive On-Site Services / Vendor
Turn-Away
14570 $200.00 N/A Router N/A
Cancellation to Receive on Site Services with Less Than Five
Business Days notice to AT&T
13109A $200.00 N/A Router N/A
Supplementary Professional, Engineering and Technical
Services
Standard Hours (8AM – 5PM local
time) First Hour
13109B N/A $360.00 Hour N/A
Standard Hours (8AM – 5PM local
time) Subsequent Hours
13109C N/A $180.00 Hour N/A
Non-Standard Hours First Hour 13109D N/A $460.00 Hour N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 45 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
Non-Standard Hours
Subsequent Hours
13109E N/A $230.00 Hour N/A
Lost Equipment Charge for AT&T
Owned CPE
13054 Residual Value of
Lost CPE
N/A N/A N/A
Router Configuration Changes 14158 $150.00 N/A Router N/A
OPT-E-MAN Managed Service
Bundle s Optional Up lift Features
and Services
Router Protocol, Memory and Misc Managed Router Feature
Upgrades
Enterprise Services IOS w/o encryption for 18XX series
managed router feature upgrade
MSB1000 $590.00 N/A Router $150.00* *Applies to Upgrade to
existing router
Enterprise Services IOS w/o encryption for 28XX series
managed router feature upgrade
MSB1001 $826.00 N/A Router $150.00* *Applies to Upgrade to
existing router
Enterprise Services IOS w/o
encryption for 38XX series
managed router feature upgrade
MSB1002 $1,180.00 N/A Router $150.00*
*Applies to Upgrade to
existing router
Advanced Enterprise Services IOS
w encryption for 18XX series
managed router feature upgrade
MSB1003 $1,062.00 N/A Router $150.00*
*Applies to Upgrade to
existing router
Advanced Enterprise Services IOS w encryption for 28XX series
managed router feature upgrade
MSB1004 $1,416.00 N/A Router $150.00* *Applies to Upgrade to
existing router
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 46 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
Advanced Enterprise Services IOS
w encryption for 38XX series
managed router feature upgrade
MSB1005 $2,065.00 N/A Router $150.00*
*Applies to Upgrade to
existing router
Advanced Enterprise Services IOS w encryption for 72XX series
managed router feature upgrade
MSB1006 $3,835.00 N/A Router $150.00* *Applies to Upgrade to
existing router
Extra Memory for Enterprise and Advanced Enterprise IOS for 18XX
series managed router feature upgrade
MSB1007 $295.00 N/A Router *See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router.
Extra Serial Port Card for 18XX,
28XX and 38XX series managed
router feature upgrade
MSB1008 $236.00 N/A Card *See Professional
Engineering and Technical Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router.
Extra 4 Port Serial Port Adapter
Card for 72XX and 73XX series
managed router feature upgrade
MSB1009 $2,655.00 N/A Card *See Professional Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router. 2-Port Fast Ethernet 100Base TX Port Adapter for 72XX and 73XX
series managed router feature upgrade
MSB1010 $2,242.00 N/A Card *See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router.
4-Port Ethernet 10BaseT Port
Adapter fro 72XX and 73XX managed router feature upgrade
MSB1011 $2,655.00 N/A Card *See Professional Engineering and Technical Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router.
1-Port Gigabit Ethernet Port Adapter for 72XX and 73XX series
managed router feature upgrade
MSB1012 $3,540.00 N/A Card *See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router.
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 47 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
1000BASE-SX Short Wavelength
GBIC (Multimode only) for 72XX
and 73XX series managed router
feature upgrade
MSB1013 $295.00 N/A Card *See Professional
Engineering and Technical Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router.
1000BASE-SX Short Wavelength
GBIC (Copper) for 72XX and
73XX series managed router feature upgrade
MSB1014 $295.00 N/A Card *See Professional Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router.
Extra 4 port 10/100 Ethernet switch
interface card for 28XX and 38XX series managed router feature
upgrade
MSB1015 $250.75 N/A Card *See Professional Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router
10/100 routed port HWIC Card for
28XX and 38XX series managed
router feature upgrade
MSB1016 $531.00 N/A Card *See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router.
GE SFP, LC connector LX/LH
transceiver for 38XX series managed router feature upgrade
MSB1017 $587.05 N/A Connector *See Professional Engineering and Technical Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router.
1000BASE-SX SFP (DOM) for 38XX series managed router feature
upgrade
MSB1018 $324.50 N/A Connector *See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router. 7304 Carrier Card for 7200 Series
Port Adapters managed router
feature upgrade
MSB1019 $737.50 N/A Card *See Professional Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router.
Serial Cable managed router feature
upgrade
MSB1020 $59.00 N/A Cable *See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router.
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 48 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
Console Port to CAS cable managed
router feature upgrade
MSB1021 $20.05 N/A Cable *See Professional
Engineering and Technical Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router.
Fiber Cable managed router feature
upgrade
MSB1022 $45.89 N/A Cable *See Professional Engineering and Technical Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router.
Rack Mount Kit managed router feature upgrade MSB1023 $59.00 N/A Kit *See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router. Extra Serial Port for ASR1000
series managed router feature
upgrade
MSB1024 $324.50
N/A Card
*See Professional
Engineering and Technical Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router.
Extra Serial Cable for ASR1000
series managed router feature
upgrade
MSB1025 $259.60
N/A Card *See Professional Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router. Copper SFP - SX Cisco 2-Port Gigabit Ethernet Shared Port
Adapter for ASR1000 series managed router feature upgrade
MSB1026 $6,277.60 N/A Adapter *See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router.
2 port 100M Ethernet Cisco 4-Port
Fast Ethernet (TX) Shared Port Adapter for ASR1000 series
managed router feature upgrade
MSB1027 $5,022.08 N/A Adapter *See Professional Engineering and Technical Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router.
Adv Ent IOS for DLSw and IPSEC
Cisco ASR 1000 Series RP1 managed router feature upgrade
MSB1028 $6,277.60 N/A Router *See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router.
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 49 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
Cisco ASR 1000 Series RP1
managed router feature upgrade
MSB1029 $6,277.60 N/A Router *See Professional
Engineering and Technical Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router. G2 Series Routers 19xx, 29xx, 39xx managed router feature upgrades
GE SFP, LC connector LX/LH
transceiver managed router feature upgrade
MSB1030 $587.05 N/A Transceiver *See Professional
Engineering and Technical Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router.
GE SFP, LC connector SX transceiver managed router feature
upgrade
MSB1031 $295.00 N/A Transceiver *See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router. 1000BASE-T SFP managed router
feature upgrade
MSB1032 $233.05 N/A Card *See Professional Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router.
1-port 10/100 Routed Port HWIC
managed router feature upgrade
MSB1033 $531.00 N/A Card *See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router.
GigE high speed WIC managed router feature upgrade MSB1034 $1,180.00 N/A Card *See Professional
Engineering and Technical Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router. 1-Port Serial WAN Interface Card
managed router feature upgrade
MSB1035 $236.00 N/A Card *See Professional Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router. 4-Port 10/100 Ethernet switch
interface card managed router
feature upgrade
MSB1036 $250.75 N/A Card *See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 50 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
upgrade to existing router.
1000BASE-SX SFP (DOM)
managed router feature upgrade
MSB1037 $324.50 N/A Card *See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router. 1-Port 2nd Gen Multiflex Trunk
Voice/WAN Int. Card - T1/E1 managed router feature upgrade
MSB1038 $767.00 N/A Card *See Professional
Engineering and Technical Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router.
2-Port 2nd Gen Multiflex Trunk Voice/WAN Int. Card - T1/E1
managed router feature upgrade
MSB1039 $1,180.00 N/A Card *See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router. Data IOS for Cisco 19XX Series
managed router feature upgrade
MSB1040 $354.00 N/A Router *See Professional Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router.
Security IOS for Cisco 19XX Series
managed router feature upgrade
MSB1041 $590.00 N/A Router *See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router.
Data IOS for Cisco 29XX Series managed router feature upgrade MSB1042 $413.00 N/A Router *See Professional
Engineering and Technical Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router. Security IOS for Cisco 29XX Series
managed router feature upgrade
MSB1043 $708.00 N/A Router *See Professional Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router. Data IOS for Cisco 39XX Series
managed router feature upgrade
MSB1044 $590.00 N/A Router *See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 51 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
upgrade to existing router.
Security IOS for Cisco 39XX Series
managed router feature upgrade
MSB1045 $1,180.00 N/A Router *See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router. COS device 4 port COS switch
managed router feature upgrade
MSB1046 $432.47 N/A Switch *See Professional
Engineering and Technical Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router.
Cable from: OOB modem to: COS/4 managed router feature
upgrade
MSB1047 $17.70 N/A Cable *See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router.
Cable from: CO to: Router's
Console Port (DB25M-RJ45, 10ft.)
managed router feature upgrade
MSB1048 $11.83 N/A Cable *See Professional Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router.
AIM Module 1800/2800/3800
managed router feature upgrade
MSB1049 $1,475.00 N/A Module *See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router.
SC type to SC type MMF 62.5 micron 15' for WS-G5484 modules
managed router feature upgrade
MSB1050 $45.89 N/A Cable *See Professional
Engineering and Technical Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router. 12 port COS Switch managed router
feature upgrade
MSB1051 $6,590.60 N/A Switch *See Professional Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router.
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 52 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
Optional Architectural Validation
Professional Services
13096 N/A $350.00 Hour N/A
Dial Backup N/A
Analog (POTS) Dial Backup
Management
13060A N/A $10.00 Router N/A
ISDN Basic Rate Interface (BRI)
Dial Backup Management
13060B N/A $10.00 Router N/A
ISDN Primary Rate Interface (PRI)
Dial Backup Management
13060C N/A $25.00 Router N/A
TACACS (Terminal Access
Controller Access Control
System) Read Only Access
TACACS Read Only Access –
Router Enablement
TACACSRE $40.00 N/A Router $150.00
TACACS Read Only Access –
Support
TACACSRS N/A $18.00 Router N/A
TACACS Read Only Access –
Enablement 1-6 Enabled Employees
TACACS1 $0.00 N/A Enabled
Employee
$150.00
TACACS Read Only Access –
Enablement 7-12 Enabled Employees
TACACS2 $250.00 N/A Enabled
Employee
$150.00
TACACS Read Only Access –
Enablement 13 to 25 Enabled Employees
TACACS3 $750.00 N/A Enabled
Employee
$150.00
OPT-E-MAN Managed Services
Data Center Stand Alone Routers
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 53 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
Legacy Protocol (SNA, DLSw and
IPX ) Standalone router Type 20
MSDCRT1 $0.00 $1,324.00
Router $0.00
IPSEC Standalone router Type 24 MSDCRT2 $0.00 $1,084.34
Router $0.00
Traffic Aggregation Standalone router Type 25 MSDCRT3 $0.00 $3,355.44 Router $0.00
Traffic Aggregation Standalone router Type 27 MSDCRT4 $0.00 $1,340.07 Router $0.00
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring Charge
(NRC)
Monthly Recurring
Charge (MRC)
Unit of measure Change Charge
OPT-E-WAN
OPT-E-WAN (OEW) Switched Port Only
OEW Switched Port - .5M
(IntraState)
84433 $0.00 $40.70 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port - .5M
(InterState)
84435 $0.00 $40.70 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port - 1M
(IntraState)
80326 $0.00 $48.30 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port - 1M
(InterState)
80390 $0.00 $48.30 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port - 1.5M
(IntraState)
84434 $0.00 $48.80 Port $0.00
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 54 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
OEW Switched Port - 1.5M
(InterState)
84436 $0.00 $48.80 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port - 2M
(IntraState)
80327 $0.00 $62.40 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port - 2M (InterState) 80391 $0.00 $62.40 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port - 3M (IntraState) 80328 $0.00 $75.20 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port - 3M
(InterState)
80392 $0.00 $75.20 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port - 4M
(IntraState)
80329 $0.00 $87.70 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port - 4M
(InterState)
80393 $0.00 $87.70 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port - 5M
(IntraState)
80330 $0.00 $109.20 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port - 5M
(InterState)
80394 $0.00 $109.20 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port - 6M
(IntraState)
80331 $0.00 $115.80 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port - 6M
(InterState)
80395 $0.00 $115.80 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port - 7M
(IntraState)
80332 $0.00 $124.70 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port - 7M
(InterState)
80396 $0.00 $124.70 Port $0.00
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 55 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
OEW Switched Port - 8M
(IntraState)
80333 $0.00 $134.90 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port - 8M
(InterState)
80397 $0.00 $134.90 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port - 9M (IntraState) 80334 $0.00 $145.10 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port - 9M (InterState) 80398 $0.00 $145.10 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port - 10M
(IntraState)
80335 $0.00 $152.60 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port - 10M
(InterState)
80399 $0.00 $152.60 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port - 11M
(IntraState)
80336 $0.00 $159.10 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port - 11M
(InterState)
80400 $0.00 $159.10 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 12M
(IntraState)
80337 $0.00 $171.80 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 12M
(InterState)
80401 $0.00 $171.80 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 13M
(IntraState)
80338 $0.00 $172.20 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 13M
(InterState)
80402 $0.00 $172.20 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 14M
(IntraState)
80339 $0.00 $172.60 Port $0.00
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 56 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
OEW Switched Port – 14M
(InterState)
80403 $0.00 $172.60 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 15M
(IntraState)
80340 $0.00 $177.00 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 15M (InterState) 80404 $0.00 $177.00 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 16M (IntraState) 80341 $0.00 $182.00 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 16M
(InterState)
80405 $0.00 $182.00 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 17M
(IntraState)
80342 $0.00 $187.00 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 17M
(InterState)
80406 $0.00 $187.00 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 18M
(IntraState)
80343 $0.00 $192.00 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 18M
(InterState)
80407 $0.00 $192.00 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 19M
(IntraState)
80344 $0.00 $197.00 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 19M
(InterState)
80408 $0.00 $197.00 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 20M
(IntraState)
80345 $0.00 $209.70 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 20M
(InterState)
80409 $0.00 $209.70 Port $0.00
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 57 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
OEW Switched Port – 30M
(IntraState)
80346 $0.00 $278.50 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 30M
(InterState)
80410 $0.00 $278.50 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 40M (IntraState) 80347 $0.00 $336.00 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 40M (InterState) 80411 $0.00 $336.00 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 50M
(IntraState)
80348 $0.00 $401.20 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 50M
(InterState)
80412 $0.00 $401.20 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 60M
(IntraState)
80349 $0.00 $468.30 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 60M
(InterState)
80413 $0.00 $468.30 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 70M
(IntraState)
80350 $0.00 $531.00 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 70M
(InterState)
80414 $0.00 $531.00 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 80M
(IntraState)
80351 $0.00 $571.70 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 80M
(InterState)
80415 $0.00 $571.70 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 90M
(IntraState)
80352 $0.00 $623.40 Port $0.00
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 58 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
OEW Switched Port – 90M
(InterState)
80416 $0.00 $623.40 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 100M
(IntraState)
80353 $0.00 $670.70 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 100M (InterState) 80417 $0.00 $670.70 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 150M (IntraState) 80354 $0.00 $973.20 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 150M
(InterState)
80418 $0.00 $973.20 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 200M
(IntraState)
80355 $0.00 $1,285.00 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 200M
(InterState)
80419 $0.00 $1,285.00 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 250M
(IntraState)
80356 $0.00 $1,511.80 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 250M
(InterState)
80420 $0.00 $1,511.80 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 300M
(IntraState)
80357 $0.00 $1,665.10 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 300M
(InterState)
80421 $0.00 $1,665.10 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 350M
(IntraState)
80358 $0.00 $1,818.30 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 350M
(InterState)
80422 $0.00 $1,818.30 Port $0.00
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 59 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
OEW Switched Port – 400M
(IntraState)
80359 $0.00 $1,971.50 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 400M
(InterState)
80423 $0.00 $1,971.50 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 450M (IntraState) 80360 $0.00 $2,124.70 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 450M (InterState) 80424 $0.00 $2,124.70 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 500M
(IntraState)
80361 $0.00 $2,277.90 Port $0.00
OEW Switched Port – 500M
(InterState)
80425 $0.00 $2,277.90 Port $0.00
OPT-E-WAN (OEW) Dedicated Port Only
OEW Dedicated Port – 550M
(IntraState)
80362 $0.00 $2,430.95 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 550M
(InterState)
80426 $0.00 $2,430.95 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 600M
(IntraState)
80363 $0.00 $2,584.00 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 600M
(InterState)
80427 $0.00 $2,584.00 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 650M
(IntraState)
80364 $0.00 $2,920.65 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 650M
(InterState)
80428 $0.00 $2,920.65 Port $0.00
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 60 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
OEW Dedicated Port – 700M
(IntraState)
80365 $0.00 $3,257.30 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 700M
(InterState)
80429 $0.00 $3,257.30 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 750M (IntraState) 80366 $0.00 $3,406.70 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 750M (InterState) 80430 $0.00 $3,406.70 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 800M
(IntraState)
80367 $0.00 $3,556.10 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 800M
(InterState)
80431 $0.00 $3,556.10 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 850M
(IntraState)
80368 $0.00 $3,712.90 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 850M
(InterState)
80432 $0.00 $3,712.90 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 900M
(IntraState)
80369 $0.00 $3,869.70 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 900M
(InterState)
80433 $0.00 $3,869.70 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 950M
(IntraState)
80370 $0.00 $4,025.25 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 950M
(InterState)
80434 $0.00 $4,025.25 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 1G
(IntraState)
80371 $0.00 $4,180.80 Port $0.00
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 61 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
OEW Dedicated Port – 1G
(InterState)
80435 $0.00 $4,180.80 Port $0.00
OPT-E-WAN (OEW) Dedicated Port
Only
OEW Dedicated Port – 1500M (IntraState) 96777 $0.00 $5,943.10 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 1500M (InterState) 96776 $0.00 $5,943.10 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 2000M
(IntraState)
96779 $0.00 $7,878.70 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 2000M
(InterState)
96778 $0.00 $7,878.70 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 2500M
(IntraState)
96781 $0.00 $9,420.40 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 2500M
(InterState)
96780 $0.00 $9,420.40 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 3000M
(IntraState)
96783 $0.00 $10,915.90 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 3000M
(InterState)
96782 $0.00 $10,915.90 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 3500M
(IntraState)
96785 $0.00 $12,363.90 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 3500M
(InterState)
96784 $0.00 $12,363.90 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 4000M
(IntraState)
96787 $0.00 $13,772.70 Port $0.00
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 62 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
OEW Dedicated Port – 4000M
(InterState)
96786 $0.00 $13,772.70 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 4500M
(IntraState)
96789 $0.00 $15,147.90 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 4500M (InterState) 96788 $0.00 $15,147.90 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 5000M (IntraState) 96791 $0.00 $16,494.30 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 5000M
(InterState)
96790 $0.00 $16,494.30 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 5500M
(IntraState)
96793 $0.00 $17,814.80 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 5500M
(InterState)
96792 $0.00 $17,814.80 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 6000M
(IntraState)
96795 $0.00 $19,112.50 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 6000M
(InterState)
96794 $0.00 $19,112.50 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 6500M
(IntraState)
96797 $0.00 $20,389.50 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 6500M
(InterState)
96796 $0.00 $20,389.50 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 7000M
(IntraState)
96799 $0.00 $21,648.00 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 7000M
(InterState)
96798 $0.00 $21,648.00 Port $0.00
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 63 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
OEW Dedicated Port – 7500M
(IntraState)
96801 $0.00 $22,889.20 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 7500M
(InterState)
96800 $0.00 $22,889.20 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 8000M (IntraState) 96803 $0.00 $24,114.50 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 8000M (InterState) 96802 $0.00 $24,114.50 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 8500M
(IntraState)
96805 $0.00 $25,325.50 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 8500M
(InterState)
96804 $0.00 $25,325.50 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 9000M
(IntraState)
96807 $0.00 $26,522.60 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 9000M
(InterState)
96806 $0.00 $26,522.60 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 9500M
(IntraState)
96809 $0.00 $27,707.10 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 9500M
(InterState)
96808 $0.00 $27,707.10 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 10G
(IntraState)
96811 $0.00 $28,879.60 Port $0.00
OEW Dedicated Port – 10G
(InterState)
96810 $0.00 $28,879.60 Port $0.00
OEW Class of Service Options :
CoS 1 Real Time - IntraState 92993 $0.00 See below Port $0.00
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 64 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
CoS 1 Real Time - InterState 92997 $0.00 See below Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 0.5M See above $0.00 $31.75 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 1M See above $0.00 $37.67 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 1.5M See above $0.00 $38.06 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 2M See above $0.00 $48.67 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 3M See above $0.00 $58.66 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 4M See above $0.00 $68.41 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 5M See above $0.00 $85.18 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 6M See above $0.00 $90.32 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 7M See above $0.00 $97.27 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 8M See above $0.00 $105.22 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 9M See above $0.00 $113.18 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 10M See above $0.00 $119.03 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 11M See above $0.00 $124.10 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 12M See above $0.00 $134.00 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 13M See above $0.00 $134.32 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 14M See above $0.00 $134.63 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 15M See above $0.00 $138.06 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 16M See above $0.00 $141.96 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 17M See above $0.00 $145.86 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 18M See above $0.00 $149.76 Port $0.00
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 65 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
CoS 1 – 19M See above $0.00 $153.66 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 20M See above $0.00 $163.57 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 30M See above $0.00 $217.23 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 40M See above $0.00 $262.08 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 50M See above $0.00 $312.94 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 60M See above $0.00 $365.27 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 70M See above $0.00 $414.18 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 80M See above $0.00 $445.93 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 90M See above $0.00 $486.25 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 100M See above $0.00 $523.15 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 150M See above $0.00 $759.10 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 200M See above $0.00 $1,002.30 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 250M See above $0.00 $1,179.20 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 300M See above $0.00 $1,298.78 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 350M See above $0.00 $1,418.27 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 400M See above $0.00 $1,537.77 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 450M See above $0.00 $1,657.27 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 500M See above $0.00 $1,776.76 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 550M See above $0.00 $1,896.14 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 600M See above $0.00 $2,015.52 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 650M See above $0.00 $2,278.11 Port $0.00
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 66 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
CoS 1 – 700M See above $0.00 $2,540.69 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 750M See above $0.00 $2,657.23 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 800M See above $0.00 $2,773.76 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 850M See above $0.00 $2,896.06 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 900M See above $0.00 $3,018.37 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 950M See above $0.00 $3,139.70 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 1G See above $0.00 $3,261.02 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 1500M See above $0.00 $4,635.62 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 2000M See above $0.00 $6,145.39 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 2500M See above $0.00 $7,347.91 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 3000M See above $0.00 $8,514.40 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 3500M See above $0.00 $9,643.84 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 4000M See above $0.00 $10,742.71 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 4500M See above $0.00 $11,815.36 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 5000M See above $0.00 $12,865.55 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 5500M See above $0.00 $13,895.54 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 6000M See above $0.00 $14,907.75 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 6500M See above $0.00 $15,903.81 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 7000M See above $0.00 $16,885.44 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 7500M See above $0.00 $17,853.58 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 8000M See above $0.00 $18,809.31 Port $0.00
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 67 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
CoS 1 – 8500M See above $0.00 $19,753.89 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 9000M See above $0.00 $20,687.63 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 9500M See above $0.00 $21,611.54 Port $0.00
CoS 1 – 10G See above $0.00 $22,526.09 Port $0.00
COS 2V – Interactive (Video) (IntraState) 92994 $0.00 See below Port $0.00
COS 2V – Interactive (Video) (InterState) 92998 $0.00 See below Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 0.5M See above $0.00 $31.75 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 1M See above $0.00 $37.67 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 1.5M See above $0.00 $38.06 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 2M See above $0.00 $48.67 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 3M See above $0.00 $58.66 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 4M See above $0.00 $68.41 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 5M See above $0.00 $85.18 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 6M See above $0.00 $90.32 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 7M See above $0.00 $97.27 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 8M See above $0.00 $105.22 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 9M See above $0.00 $113.18 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 10M See above $0.00 $119.03 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 11M See above $0.00 $124.10 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 12M See above $0.00 $134.00 Port $0.00
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 68 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
CoS 2V – 13M See above $0.00 $134.32 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 14M See above $0.00 $134.63 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 15M See above $0.00 $138.06 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 16M See above $0.00 $141.96 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 17M See above $0.00 $145.86 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 18M See above $0.00 $149.76 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 19M See above $0.00 $153.66 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 20M See above $0.00 $163.57 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 30M See above $0.00 $217.23 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 40M See above $0.00 $262.08 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 50M See above $0.00 $312.94 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 60M See above $0.00 $365.27 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 70M See above $0.00 $414.18 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 80M See above $0.00 $445.93 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 90M See above $0.00 $486.25 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 100M See above $0.00 $523.15 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 150M See above $0.00 $759.10 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 200M See above $0.00 $1,002.30 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 250M See above $0.00 $1,179.20 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 300M See above $0.00 $1,298.78 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 350M See above $0.00 $1,418.27 Port $0.00
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 69 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
CoS 2V – 400M See above $0.00 $1,537.77 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 450M See above $0.00 $1,657.27 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 500M See above $0.00 $1,776.76 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 550M See above $0.00 $1,896.14 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 600M See above $0.00 $2,015.52 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 650M See above $0.00 $2,278.11 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 700M See above $0.00 $2,540.69 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 750M See above $0.00 $2,657.23 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 800M See above $0.00 $2,773.76 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 850M See above $0.00 $2,896.06 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 900M See above $0.00 $3,018.37 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 950M See above $0.00 $3,139.70 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 1G See above $0.00 $3,261.02 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 1500M See above $0.00 $4,635.62 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 2000M See above $0.00 $6,145.39 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 2500M See above $0.00 $7,347.91 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 3000M See above $0.00 $8,514.40 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 3500M See above $0.00 $9,643.84 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 4000M See above $0.00 $10,742.71 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 4500M See above $0.00 $11,815.36 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 5000M See above $0.00 $12,865.55 Port $0.00
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 70 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
CoS 2V – 5500M See above $0.00 $13,895.54 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 6000M See above $0.00 $14,907.75 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 6500M See above $0.00 $15,903.81 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 7000M See above $0.00 $16,885.44 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 7500M See above $0.00 $17,853.58 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 8000M See above $0.00 $18,809.31 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 8500M See above $0.00 $19,753.89 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 9000M See above $0.00 $20,687.63 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 9500M See above $0.00 $21,611.54 Port $0.00
CoS 2V – 10G See above $0.00 $22,526.09 Port $0.00
COS 3 – Business Critical Medium
(IntraState)
92995 $0.00 See below Port $0.00
COS 3 – Business Critical Medium
(InterState)
92999 $0.00 See below Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 0.5M See above $0.00 $15.87 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 1M See above $0.00 $18.84 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 1.5M See above $0.00 $19.03 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 2M See above $0.00 $24.34 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 3M See above $0.00 $29.33 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 4M See above $0.00 $34.20 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 5M See above $0.00 $42.59 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 6M See above $0.00 $45.16 Port $0.00
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 71 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
CoS 3 – 7M See above $0.00 $48.63 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 8M See above $0.00 $52.61 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 9M See above $0.00 $56.59 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 10M See above $0.00 $59.51 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 11M See above $0.00 $62.05 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 12M See above $0.00 $67.00 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 13M See above $0.00 $67.16 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 14M See above $0.00 $67.31 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 15M See above $0.00 $69.03 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 16M See above $0.00 $70.98 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 17M See above $0.00 $72.93 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 18M See above $0.00 $74.88 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 19M See above $0.00 $76.83 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 20M See above $0.00 $81.78 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 30M See above $0.00 $108.62 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 40M See above $0.00 $131.04 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 50M See above $0.00 $156.47 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 60M See above $0.00 $182.64 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 70M See above $0.00 $207.09 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 80M See above $0.00 $222.96 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 90M See above $0.00 $243.13 Port $0.00
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 72 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
CoS 3 – 100M See above $0.00 $261.57 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 150M See above $0.00 $379.55 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 200M See above $0.00 $501.15 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 250M See above $0.00 $589.60 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 300M See above $0.00 $649.39 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 350M See above $0.00 $709.14 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 400M See above $0.00 $768.89 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 450M See above $0.00 $828.63 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 500M See above $0.00 $888.38 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 550M See above $0.00 $948.07 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 600M See above $0.00 $1,007.76 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 650M See above $0.00 $1,139.05 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 700M See above $0.00 $1,270.35 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 750M See above $0.00 $1,328.61 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 800M See above $0.00 $1,386.88 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 850M See above $0.00 $1,448.03 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 900M See above $0.00 $1,509.18 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 950M See above $0.00 $1,569.85 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 1G See above $0.00 $1,630.51 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 1500M See above $0.00 $2,317.81 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 2000M See above $0.00 $3,072.69 Port $0.00
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 73 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
CoS 3 – 2500M See above $0.00 $3,673.96 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 3000M See above $0.00 $4,257.20 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 3500M See above $0.00 $4,821.92 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 4000M See above $0.00 $5,371.35 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 4500M See above $0.00 $5,907.68 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 5000M See above $0.00 $6,432.78 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 5500M See above $0.00 $6,947.77 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 6000M See above $0.00 $7,453.88 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 6500M See above $0.00 $7,951.91 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 7000M See above $0.00 $8,442.72 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 7500M See above $0.00 $8,926.79 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 8000M See above $0.00 $9,404.66 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 8500M See above $0.00 $9,876.95 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 9000M See above $0.00 $10,343.81 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 9500M See above $0.00 $10,805.77 Port $0.00
CoS 3 – 10G See above $0.00 $11,263.04 Port $0.00
CoS 4 Non Critical High (IntraState) 92996 Included Included Port $0.00
CoS 4 Non Critical High (InterState) 93000 Included Included Port $0.00
Other Non-Recurring Charges:
OPT-E-WAN Bandwidth Setup
(IntraState)
80372 $0.00 N/A Port $0.00
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 74 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
OPT-E-WAN Bandwidth Setup
(InterState)
80436 $0.00 N/A Port $0.00
CoS Service Establishment (IntraState) 80376 $0.00 N/A Port $0.00
CoS Service Establishment (InterState) 80440 $0.00 N/A Port $0.00
Additional MAC Addresses,
EVCs/VLANs (50 per site) (IntraState)
80385 $0.00 N/A Per order $0.00
Additional MAC Addresses,
EVCs/VLANs (50 per site) (InterState)
80443 $0.00 N/A Per order $0.00
Initial Service Order Change Charge
(IntraState)
80386 $0.00 N/A Per order $0.00
Initial Service Order Change Charge
(InterState)
80444 $0.00 N/A Per order $0.00
Service Order Cancellation
(IntraState)
80387 $0.00 N/A Per location $0.00
Service Order Cancellation
(InterState)
80445 $0.00 N/A Per location $0.00
Miscellaneous Change Charge (IntraState) 80388 $0.00 N/A Per order $0.00
Miscellaneous Change Charge (InterState) 80446 $0.00 N/A Per order $0.00
OPT-E-WAN Site Termination Charge
(IntraState)
80389 $0.00 N/A Per location $0.00
OPT-E-WAN Site Termination Charge (InterState) 80447 $0.00 N/A Per location $0.00
Other Features:
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 75 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
Diverse POP Service Set-Up Charge
(IntraState)
80384 $1,000.00 N/A Port $0.00
Diverse POP Service Set-Up Charge
(InterState)
80442 $1,000.00 N/A Port $0.00
Diverse Line Card (IntraState) 93013 N/A 10% of Port MRC Card N/A
Diverse Line Card (InterState) 93014 N/A 10% of Port MRC Card N/A
POP Diversity (IntraState) 93018 N/A 10% of Port MRC Port N/A
POP Diversity (InterState) 93019 N/A 10% of Port MRC Port N/A
OPT-E-WAN (OEW) Managed
Service Bundles w/ Standard Features
OEW Managed Service Bundle - .5M w
/ Type 7A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS05A $143.00 $792.15 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - .5M w
/ Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS05B $143.00 $1,050.54 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 1M w / Type 7A Router Cu Ethernet OEWMS1A $143.00 $799.75 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 1M w / Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet OEWMS1B $143.00 $1,058.14 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle – 1.5M
w / Type 7A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS015A $143.00 $800.25 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle – 1.5M w / Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet OEWMS015B $143.00 $1,058.64 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 2M w / Type 7A Router Cu Ethernet OEWMS2A $143.00 $813.85 Bundle $0.00
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 76 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 2M w
/ Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS2B $143.00 $1,072.24 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 3M w
/ Type 7A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS3A $143.00 $856.08 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 3M w / Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet OEWMS3B $143.00 $1,114.47 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 4M w / Type 7A Router Cu Ethernet OEWMS4A $143.00 $868.58 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 4M w
/ Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS4B $143.00 $1,126.97 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 5M w
/ Type 7A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS5A $143.00 $903.82 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 5M w
/ Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS5B $143.00 $1,162.21 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 6M w
/ Type 7A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS6A $143.00 $965.35 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 6M w
/ Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS6B $143.00 $1,223.74 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 7M w
/ Type 7A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS7A $143.00 $974.25 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 7M w
/ Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS7B $143.00 $1,232.64 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 8M w
/ Type 7A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS8A $143.00 $984.45 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 8M w
/ Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS8B $143.00 $1,242.84 Bundle $0.00
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 77 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 9M w
/ Type 7A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS9A $143.00 $1,206.52 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 9M w
/ Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS9B $143.00 $1,464.91 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 10M w / Type 7A Router Cu Ethernet OEWMS10A $143.00 $1,214.02 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 10M w / Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet OEWMS10B $143.00 $1,472.41 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 11M
w / Type 7A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS11A $143.00 $1,354.90 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 11M
w / Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS11B $143.00 $1,613.29 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 12M
w / Type 7A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS12A $143.00 $1,367.60 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 12M
w / Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS12B $143.00 $1,625.99 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 13M
w / Type 7A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS13A $143.00 $1,368.00 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 13M
w / Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS13B $143.00 $1,626.39 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 14M
w / Type 7A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS14A $143.00 $1,368.40 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 14M
w / Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS14B $143.00 $1,626.79 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 15M
w / Type 7A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS15A $143.00 $1,372.80 Bundle $0.00
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 78 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 15M
w / Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS15B $143.00 $1,631.19 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 16M
w / Type 7A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS16A $143.00 $1,377.80 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 16M w / Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet OEWMS16B $143.00 $1,636.19 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 17M w / Type 7A Router Cu Ethernet OEWMS17A $143.00 $1,382.80 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 17M
w / Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS17B $143.00 $1,641.19 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 18M
w / Type 7A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS18A $143.00 $1,387.80 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 18M
w / Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS18B $143.00 $1,646.19 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 19M
w / Type 7A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS19A $143.00 $1,392.80 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 19M
w / Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS19B $143.00 $1,651.19 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 20M
w / Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS20A $143.00 $1,405.50 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 20M
w / Type 10A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS20B $143.00 $1,663.89 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 30M
w / Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS30A $143.00 $1,836.67 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 30M
w / Type 10A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS30B $143.00 $1,953.22 Bundle $0.00
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 79 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 40M
w / Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS40A $143.00 $1,894.17 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 40M
w / Type 10A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS40B $143.00 $2,010.72 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 50M w / Type 22A Router Cu Ethernet OEWMS50A $143.00 $1,959.37 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 50M w / Type 10A Router Cu Ethernet OEWMS50B $143.00 $2,075.92 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 60M
w / Type 10A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS60A $143.00 $2,246.99 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 70M
w / Type 10A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS70A $143.00 $2,309.69 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 80M
w / Type 10A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS80A $143.00 $2,350.39 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 90M
w / Type 10A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS90A $143.00 $2,402.09 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 100M
w / Type 10A Router Cu Ethernet
OEWMS100A $143.00 $2,449.39 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 150M
w / Type 11A Router Fiber Ethernet
OEWMS150A $143.00 $2,904.93 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 150M
w / Type 26 Router Fiber Ethernet
OEWMS150B $143.00 $3,290.25 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 200M
w / Type 11A Router Fiber Ethernet
OEWMS200A $143.00 $3,511.00 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 200M
w / Type 26 Router Fiber Ethernet
OEWMS200B $143.00 $3,896.32 Bundle $0.00
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 80 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 250M
w / Type 26 Router Fiber Ethernet
OEWMS250A $143.00 $4,123.12 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 250M
w / Type 27 Router Fiber Ethernet
OEWMS250B $143.00 $4,544.56 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 300M w / Type 26 Router Fiber Ethernet OEWMS300A $143.00 $4,374.51 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 300M w / Type 27 Router Fiber Ethernet OEWMS300B $143.00 $4,795.95 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 350M
w / Type 27 Router Fiber Ethernet
OEWMS350A $143.00 $4,949.15 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 400M
w / Type 27 Router Fiber Ethernet
OEWMS400A $143.00 $5,102.35 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 450M
w / Type 27 Router Fiber Ethernet
OEWMS450A $143.00 $5,255.55 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 500M
w / Type 27 Router Fiber Ethernet
OEWMS500A $143.00 $5,408.75 Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 550M
w / Type 11 Router Fiber Ethernet
OEWMS550A ICB ICB Bundle ICB
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 550M
w / Type 26 Router Fiber Ethernet
OEWMS550B ICB ICB Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle -
600M w / Type 11 Router Fiber
Ethernet
OEWMS600A ICB ICB Bundle ICB
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 600M
w / Type 26 Router Fiber Ethernet
OEWMS600B ICB ICB Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle -
650M w / Type 11 Router Fiber
OEWMS650A ICB ICB Bundle ICB
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 81 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
Ethernet
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 650M
w / Type 26 Router Fiber Ethernet
OEWMS650B ICB ICB Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 700M w / Type 11 Router Fiber
Ethernet
OEWMS700A ICB ICB Bundle ICB
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 700M w / Type 26 Router Fiber Ethernet OEWMS700B ICB ICB Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 750M w / Type 11 Router Fiber
Ethernet
OEWMS750A ICB ICB Bundle ICB
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 750M w / Type 26 Router Fiber Ethernet OEWMS750B ICB ICB Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 800M w / Type 11 Router Fiber
Ethernet
OEWMS800A ICB ICB Bundle ICB
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 800M w / Type 26 Router Fiber Ethernet OEWMS800B ICB ICB Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 850M w / Type 11 Router Fiber
Ethernet
OEWMS850A ICB ICB Bundle ICB
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 850M w / Type 26 Router Fiber Ethernet OEWMS850B ICB ICB Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 900M w / Type 11 Router Fiber
Ethernet
OEWMS900A ICB ICB Bundle ICB
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 82 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 900M
w / Type 26 Router Fiber Ethernet
OEWMS900B ICB ICB Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle -
950M w / Type 11 Router Fiber
Ethernet
OEWMS950A ICB ICB Bundle ICB
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 950M
w / Type 26 Router Fiber Ethernet
OEWMS950B ICB ICB Bundle $0.00
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 1G w / Type 11 Router Fiber Ethernet OEWMS1KA ICB ICB Bundle ICB
OEW Managed Service Bundle - 1000M w / Type 26 Router Fiber
Ethernet
OEWMS1KB ICB ICB Bundle $0.00
OPT-E-WAN Managed Service Bundle s Life Cycle Management
Features and Services
Moves, Adds, Changes and Deletes
Move Router Site (Inside) - Low Complexity 13092L $600.00 N/A Router N/A
Move Router Site (Inside) - Medium
Complexity
13092M $720.00 N/A Router N/A
Move Router Site (Inside) - High Complexity 13092H $850.00 N/A Router N/A
Move Router Site (Outside) - Low
Complexity
13093L $1,200.00 N/A Router N/A
Move Router Site (Outside) - Medium
Complexity
13093M $1,440.00 N/A Router N/A
Move Router Site (Outside) - High 13093H $1,700.00 N/A Router N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 83 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
Complexity
Router Site Add - Low Complexity 13118L $1,500.00 N/A Router N/A
Router Site Add - Medium Complexity 13118M $1,620.00 N/A Router N/A
Router Site Add - High Complexity 13118H $1,750.00 N/A Router N/A
Add/Delete Router Boards – Low
Complexity
13127L $300.00 N/A Router N/A
Add/Delete Router Boards – Medium
Complexity
13127M $360.00 N/A Router N/A
Add/Delete Router Boards – High
Complexity
13127H $425.00 N/A Router N/A
Site Delete for AT&T Provided Equipment 13119 $0.00 N/A Router N/A
Site Insufficiently Prepared to Receive On-Site Services / Vendor Turn-Away 14570 $200.00 N/A Router N/A
Cancellation to Receive on Site
Services with Less Than Five Business
Days notice to AT&T
13109A $200.00 N/A Router N/A
Supplementary Professional, Engineering and Technical Services
Standard Hours (8AM – 5PM local
time) First Hour
13109B N/A $360.00 Hour N/A
Standard Hours (8AM – 5PM local
time) Subsequent Hours
13109C N/A $180.00 Hour N/A
Non-Standard Hours
First Hour
13109D N/A $460.00 Hour N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 84 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
Non-Standard Hours
Subsequent Hours
13109E N/A $230.00 Hour N/A
Lost Equipment Charge for AT&T
Owned CPE
13054 Residual Value
of Lost CPE
N/A N/A N/A
Router Configuration Changes 14158 $150.00 N/A Router N/A
OPT-E-WAN Managed Service
Bundle s Optional Up lift Features and Services
Router Protocol, Memory and Misc
Managed Router Feature Upgrades
Enterprise Services IOS w/o encryption
for 18XX series managed router feature upgrade
MSB1000 $590.00 N/A Router $150.00*
*Applies to Upgrade to existing router.
Enterprise Services IOS w/o encryption
for 28XX series managed router feature upgrade
MSB1001 $826.00 N/A Router $150.00*
*Applies to Upgrade to existing router
Enterprise Services IOS w/o encryption
for 38XX series managed router feature upgrade
MSB1002 $1,180.00 N/A Router $150.00*
*Applies to Upgrade to existing router
Advanced Enterprise Services IOS w
encryption for 18XX series managed
router feature upgrade
MSB1003 $1,062.00 N/A Router $150.00*
*Applies to Upgrade to
existing router
Advanced Enterprise Services IOS w
encryption for 28XX series managed
router feature upgrade
MSB1004 $1,416.00 N/A Router $150.00*
*Applies to Upgrade to
existing router
Advanced Enterprise Services IOS w
encryption for 38XX series managed
MSB1005 $2,065.00 N/A Router $150.00*
*Applies to Upgrade to
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 85 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
router feature upgrade existing router
Advanced Enterprise Services IOS w
encryption for 72XX series managed
router feature upgrade
MSB1006 $3,835.00 N/A Router $150.00*
*Applies to Upgrade to
existing router
Extra Memory for Enterprise and
Advanced Enterprise IOS for 18XX
series managed router feature upgrade
MSB1007 $295.00 N/A Router *See Professional
Engineering and Technical Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router.
Extra Serial Port Card for 18XX, 28XX
and 38XX series managed router feature upgrade
MSB1008 $236.00 N/A Port *See Professional Engineering and Technical Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router.
Extra 4 Port Serial Port Adapter Card for 72XX and 73XX series managed
router feature upgrade
MSB1009 $2,655.00 N/A Port *See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router. 2-Port Fast Ethernet 100Base TX Port
Adapter for 72XX and 73XX series
managed router feature upgrade
MSB1010 $2,242.00 N/A Card *See Professional
Engineering and Technical Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router.
4-Port Ethernet 10BaseT Port Adapter
fro 72XX and 73XX managed router feature upgrade
MSB1011 $2,655.00 N/A Card *See Professional Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router. 1-Port Gigabit Ethernet Port Adapter for 72XX and 73XX series managed
router feature upgrade
MSB1012 $3,540.00 N/A Card *See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router. 1000BASE-SX Short Wavelength
GBIC (Multimode only) for 72XX and 73XX series managed router feature
MSB1013 $295.00 N/A Card *See Professional
Engineering and Technical Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router.
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 86 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
upgrade
1000BASE-SX Short Wavelength
GBIC (Copper) for 72XX and 73XX
series managed router feature upgrade
MSB1014 $295.00 N/A Card *See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router. Extra 4 port 10/100 Ethernet switch
interface card for 28XX and 38XX series managed router feature upgrade
MSB1015 $250.75 N/A Card *See Professional
Engineering and Technical Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router.
10/100 routed port HWIC Card for 28XX and 38XX series managed router
feature upgrade
MSB1016 $531.00 N/A Card *See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router. GE SFP, LC connector LX/LH
transceiver for 38XX series managed
router feature upgrade
MSB1017 $587.05 N/A Connector *See Professional Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router.
1000BASE-SX SFP (DOM) for 38XX
series managed router feature upgrade
MSB1018 $324.50 N/A Connector *See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router.
7304 Carrier Card for 7200 Series Port Adapters managed router feature
upgrade
MSB1019 $737.50 N/A Card *See Professional
Engineering and Technical Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router. Serial Cable managed router feature
upgrade
MSB1020 $59.00 N/A Cable *See Professional Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router. Console Port to CAS cable managed
router feature upgrade
MSB1021 $20.05 N/A Cable *See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 87 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
upgrade to existing router.
Fiber Cable managed router feature
upgrade
MSB1022 $45.89 N/A Cable *See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router. Rack Mount Kit managed router feature
upgrade
MSB1023 $59.00 N/A Kit *See Professional
Engineering and Technical Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router.
Extra Serial Port for ASR1000 series managed router feature upgrade MSB1024 $324.50 N/A Card
*See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router. Extra Serial Cable for ASR1000 series
managed router feature upgrade
MSB1025 $259.60 N/A Card *See Professional Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router.
Copper SFP - SX Cisco 2-Port Gigabit
Ethernet Shared Port Adapter for ASR1000 series managed router feature
upgrade
MSB1026 $6,277.60 N/A Adapter *See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router.
2 port 100M Ethernet Cisco 4-Port Fast Ethernet (TX) Shared Port Adapter for
ASR1000 series managed router feature upgrade
MSB1027 $5,022.08 N/A Adapter *See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router.
Adv Ent IOS for DLSw and IPSEC
Cisco ASR 1000 Series RP1 managed router feature upgrade
MSB1028 $6,277.60 N/A Router *See Professional Engineering and Technical Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router.
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 88 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
Cisco ASR 1000 Series RP1 managed
router feature upgrade
MSB1029 $6,277.60 N/A Router *See Professional
Engineering and Technical Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router.
G2 Series Routers 19xx, 29xx, 39xx managed router feature upgrades
GE SFP, LC connector LX/LH
transceiver managed router feature upgrade
MSB1030 $587.05 N/A Transceiver *See Professional
Engineering and Technical Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router.
GE SFP, LC connector SX transceiver managed router feature upgrade MSB1031 $295.00 N/A Transceiver *See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router. 1000BASE-T SFP managed router
feature upgrade
MSB1032 $233.05 N/A Card *See Professional Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router.
1-port 10/100 Routed Port HWIC
managed router feature upgrade
MSB1033 $531.00 N/A Card *See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router.
GigE high speed WIC managed router feature upgrade MSB1034 $1,180.00 N/A Card *See Professional
Engineering and Technical Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router. 1-Port Serial WAN Interface Card
managed router feature upgrade
MSB1035 $236.00 N/A Card *See Professional Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router. 4-Port 10/100 Ethernet switch interface
card managed router feature upgrade
MSB1036 $250.75 N/A Card *See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 89 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
upgrade to existing router.
1000BASE-SX SFP (DOM) managed
router feature upgrade
MSB1037 $324.50 N/A Card *See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router. 1-Port 2nd Gen Multiflex Trunk
Voice/WAN Int. Card - T1/E1 managed router feature upgrade
MSB1038 $767.00 N/A Card *See Professional
Engineering and Technical Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router.
2-Port 2nd Gen Multiflex Trunk Voice/WAN Int. Card - T1/E1 managed
router feature upgrade
MSB1039 $1,180.00 N/A Card *See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router. Data IOS for Cisco 19XX Series
managed router feature upgrade
MSB1040 $354.00 N/A Router *See Professional Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router.
Security IOS for Cisco 19XX Series
managed router feature upgrade
MSB1041 $590.00 N/A Router *See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router.
Data IOS for Cisco 29XX Series managed router feature upgrade MSB1042 $413.00 N/A Router *See Professional
Engineering and Technical Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router. Security IOS for Cisco 29XX Series
managed router feature upgrade
MSB1043 $708.00 N/A Router *See Professional Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router. Data IOS for Cisco 39XX Series
managed router feature upgrade
MSB1044 $590.00 N/A Router *See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 90 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
upgrade to existing router.
Security IOS for Cisco 39XX Series
managed router feature upgrade
MSB1045 $1,180.00 N/A Router *See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router. COS device 4 port COS switch
managed router feature upgrade
MSB1046 $432.47 N/A Switch *See Professional
Engineering and Technical Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router.
Cable from: OOB modem to: COS/4 managed router feature upgrade MSB1047 $17.70 N/A Cable *See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router. Cable from: CO to: Router's Console
Port (DB25M-RJ45, 10ft.) managed
router feature upgrade
MSB1048 $11.83 N/A Cable *See Professional Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router.
AIM Module 1800/2800/3800 managed
router feature upgrade
MSB1049 $1,475.00 N/A Module *See Professional
Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site upgrade to existing router.
SC type to SC type MMF 62.5 micron 15' for WS-G5484 modules managed
router feature upgrade
MSB1050 $45.89 N/A Cable *See Professional
Engineering and Technical Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router. 12 port COS Switch managed router
feature upgrade
MSB1051 $6,590.60 N/A Switch *See Professional Engineering and Technical
Services Charges for on-site
upgrade to existing router. Optional Architectural Validation
Professional Services
13096 N/A $350.00 Hour N/A
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 91 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
Dial Backup
Analog (POTS) Dial Backup Management 13060A N/A $10.00 Router N/A
ISDN Basic Rate Interface (BRI)
Backup Management
13060B N/A $10.00 Router N/A
ISDN Primary Rate Interface (PRI) Backup Management 13060C N/A $25.00 Router N/A
TACACS (Terminal Access Controller Access Control System)
Read Only Access
TACACS Read Only Access – Router Enablement TACACSRE $40.00 N/A Router $150.00
TACACS Read Only Access - Support TACACSRS N/A $18.00 Router N/A
TACACS Read Only Access –
Enablement 1-6 Enabled Employees
TACACS1 $0.00 N/A Enabled
Employee
$150.00
TACACS Read Only Access –
Enablement 7-12 Enabled Employees
TACACS2 $250.00 N/A Enabled
Employee
$150.00
TACACS Read Only Access –
Enablement 13 to 25 Enabled
Employees
TACACS3 $750.00 N/A Enabled
Employee
$150.00
OPT-E-WAN Managed Services
Data Center Stand Alone Routers
Legacy Protocol (SNA, DLSw and
IPX) Standalone router Type 20
MSDCRT1 $0.00 $1,324.00
Router $0.00
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 92 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of
measure
Change Charge
IPSEC Standalone router Type 24 MSDCRT2 $0.00 $1,084.34
Router $0.00
Traffic Aggregation Standalone router
Type 25
MSDCRT3 $0.00 $3,355.44
Router $0.00
Traffic Aggregation Standalone router Type 27 MSDCRT4 $0.00 $1,340.07 Router $0.00
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring Charge
(NRC)
Monthly Recurring
Charge (MRC)
Unit of Measure Change Charge
CSME
CSME Basic Connection 10 Mbps P9FYX $ 1,600.00 $ 967.20 port NRC
applies
CSME Basic Connection -
subsequent 10 Mbps
P9FZX $ 1,150.00 $ 725.00 port NRC
applies
CSME Basic Connection 100 Mbps P9FKX $ 1,925.00 $ 1,246.20
port NRC
applies
CSME Basic Connection
Subsequent 100 Mbps
P9FPX $ 1,200.00 $ 1,012.00 port NRC
applies
CSME Basic Connection 1 Gigabit P9FLX $ 2,500.00 $ 2,717.00 port NRC
applies
CSME Ethernet Virtual Connection
(EVC)
EVNDE $ - $ - virtual circuit
CSME Media Access Control
(MAC) Addresses
M2CAX $ 70.00 $ 5.00 block NRC
applies
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 93 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of Measure Change
Charge
CSME Repeater VU4 $ 250.00 $ 320.00
repeater NRC
applies
CSME Service Order Change
Charge
NHCEO $ 75.00 N/A N/A
CSME Miscellaneous Change Charge NHCEN $ 50.00 N/A N/A
CSME Service Order Cancellation Charge OGCEO $ 200.00 N/A N/A
CSME Service Expedite Charge EODEO $ 300.00 N/A N/A
EPLS-WAN (POP to POP) Requires Ethernet LD Access
EPLS-WAN 600Mbps SCRM-
OKLD
WAN60A $0.00 $4,050.00 circuit NRC applies
EPLS-WAN 600Mbps SCRM-
ANHM
WAN60B $0.00 $5,153.00 circuit NRC applies
EPLS-WAN 600Mbps SCRM-
SNDG
WAN60C $0.00 $6,143.00 circuit NRC applies
EPLS-WAN 600Mbps OKLD-
ANHM
WAN60D $0.00 $4,973.00 circuit NRC applies
EPLS-WAN 600Mbps ANHM-
SNDG
WAN60E $0.00 $4,050.00 circuit NRC applies
EPLS-WAN 1000Mbps SCRM-
OKLD
WAN1GA $0.00 $8,100.00 circuit NRC applies
EPLS-WAN 1000Mbps SCRM-
ANHM
WAN1GB $0.00 $9,482.00 circuit NRC applies
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 94 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Name Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of Measure Change
Charge
EPLS-WAN 1000Mbps SCRM-
SNDG
WAN1GC $0.00 $10,012.00 circuit NRC applies
EPLS-WAN 1000Mbps OKLD-
ANHM
WAN1GD $0.00 $9,158.00 circuit NRC applies
EPLS-WAN 1000Mbps ANHM-SNDG WAN1GE $0.00 $8,100.00 circuit NRC applies
EPLS-WAN 10Gbps SCRM-OKLD WAN10GA $0.00 $20,000.00 circuit NRC applies
EPLS-WAN 10Gbps SCRM-
ANHM
WAN10GB $0.00 $30,000.00 circuit NRC applies
EPLS-WAN 10Gbps SCRM-SNDG WAN10GC $0.00 $30,000.00 circuit NRC applies
EPLS-WAN 10Gbps OKLD-
ANHM
WAN10GD $0.00 $30,000.00 circuit NRC applies
EPLS-WAN 10Gbps ANHM-
SNDG
WAN10GE $0.00 $20,000.00 circuit NRC applies
ETHERNET ACCESS to LONG DISTANCE POP
Feature Description Identifier Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge (MRC)
Unit of Measure Change
Charge
100-Base-TX 2 Mbps Ethernet LNET2 $0.00 $450.00 Per circuit NRC applies
100-Base-TX 4 Mbps Ethernet LNET4 $0.00 $500.00 Per circuit NRC applies
6.1.3.2.5 – Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) and 95 of 95 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Wide Area Network (WAN) Services 11/29/12
Attachment 4
Feature Description Identifier Non-Recurring Charge
(NRC)
Monthly Recurring
Charge (MRC)
Unit of Measure Change Charge
100-Base-TX 5 Mbps Ethernet LNET5 $0.00 $540.00 Per circuit NRC applies
100-Base-TX 8 Mbps Ethernet LNET8 $0.00 $590.00 Per circuit NRC applies
100-Base-TX 10 Mbps Ethernet LNET10 $0.00 $720.00 Per circuit NRC applies
100-Base-TX 20 Mbps Ethernet LNET20 $0.00 $860.00 Per circuit NRC applies
100-Base-TX 50 Mbps Ethernet LNET50 $0.00 $975.00 Per circuit NRC applies
100-Base-TX 100 Mbps Ethernet LNET100 $0.00 $1,125.00 Per circuit NRC applies
1000-Base-SX/LX 150 Mbps Ethernet LNET150 $0.00 $1,400.00 Per circuit NRC applies
1000-Base-SX/LX 250 Mbps
Ethernet
LNET250 $0.00 $1,725.00 Per circuit NRC applies
1000-Base-SX/LX 500 Mbps
Ethernet
LNET500 $0.00 $2,200.00 Per circuit NRC applies
1000-Base-SX/LX 600 Mbps Ethernet LNET600 $0.00 $2,544.90 Per circuit NRC applies
1000-Base-SX/LX 1000 Mbps
Ethernet
LNET1G $0.00 $3,200.00 Per circuit NRC applies
10G-Base-LSR 10000 Mbps Ethernet LNET10G $0.00 $4,700.00 Per circuit NRC applies
See Required CPE and Other Equipment for descriptions of additional equipment and service offered
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 1 of 30 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16
Attachment 3 11/29/12
6.1.7 Service Identifier: Managed Internet Service (MIS)
Attachment 3
Description of Service
AT&T Managed Internet Service (MIS) is a dedicated Internet access service that provides
businesses with high-speed Internet access through communications facilities managed by
AT&T. The service consists of a dedicated Internet Port, and separately, transport from the
customer site to the nearest AT&T Point-of-Presence (POP). AT&T MIS connects a business’s Local Area Network or application to the Internet.
Underlying AT&T MIS is AT&T’s highly reliable transport, the IP connectivity to the
customer, and the IP backbone. Customer connectivity to the backbone is provided through
the AT&T transport network. Access speeds range from 56 Kbps to 10 Gbps (LAN-PHY), and access methods (priced separately with FCC tariffs) include Private Line, Frame Relay,
Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM), and Ethernet connectivity. AT&T provides access
service points at more than 600 ACCUNET points of presence (POPs) in the United States.
AT&T personnel coordinate the provisioning of the local access circuit for customers. Not
all speeds are available in all areas or via all "Access Methods" described below. All DS3, OC-X and Ethernet opportunities must be pre-qualified. Access transport circuits used with
MIS are found under DS1 and DS3 services. Ethernet access transport circuits used with MIS
are found below. For Ethernet access to MIS where less than 10% of the traffic on the circuit
is used for MIS Internet access, OPT-E-MAN may be used.
Three service types are available:
• AT&T MIS with AT&T Managed Router
• AT&T MIS with Customer Managed Router
• AT&T Dedicated Internet Access (DIA) with Customer Managed Router –
Grandfathered, for existing customers only. Use MIS for new orders.
The distinction is whether the Customer Premises Equipment (CPE) is provided by AT&T or provided and managed by the customer. At a minimum, the CPE provided to AT&T MIS with Managed Router customers consists of a Router, a CSU/DSU, and a diagnostic Modem
providing managed "end-to-end" connectivity to the Internet. Additional CPE components
may be required/provided depending upon the configuration. For customers who prefer to
manage several elements of their IP service in-house and retain control of the premises equipment, we offer AT&T MIS without the Managed Router. With this offer, the customer is responsible for providing, configuring, installing, maintaining, and managing the premises
equipment.
MIS with Managed Router customers have the option of Tele-installation or On-site installation (except for speeds of T3 and above where only on-site installation is available, Tele-Install can be used for Ethernet speeds 100 Mbps and below if using electrical interface).
If the customer selects tele-installation, the customer is responsible for unpacking and
connecting the CPE, with telephone assistance from AT&T if required. With on-site
installation, an authorized AT&T Service Technician will unpack, connect, and test the CPE
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 2 of 30 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16
Attachment 3 11/29/12
and completes the cooperative testing with the NOC. Charges apply for On-Site (Managed Router Service), no charge for Tele-Install.
Under each AT&T MIS service type - there are 3 types of port billing services are available:
1. Flat Rate Billing Port Only offers a fixed recurring charge. 2. Hi Cap Flex Billing Port Only customers are provisioned with a fully dedicated access
circuit, but only pay for actual sustained bandwidth usage—not the full line rate. It differs
from the Burstable Billing option in that customers select a minimum monthly bandwidth
commitment. 3. With Burstable Billing Port Only, customers only pay for actual sustained bandwidth
usage—not the full line rate. Burstable Billing customers can "burst" up to the full
capacity of the access circuit when needed and are charged based on usage.
For all port types, an access circuit is ordered and billed separate from the port.
All new Internet access services will be provisioned with AT&T MIS.
AT&T Dedicated Internet Access (DIA) with Customer Managed Router Service is being grandfathered. Existing AT&T DIA Ports may be upgraded subject to bandwidth availability. Ethernet Access is not available for DIA upgrade.
The Customer Managed Flat Rate Port pricing for AT&T MIS as shown in Attachment 4
applies to DIA ports, as available.
Additional MIS Features Include (priced individually) Class of Service, Additional DNS Admin, Alternate Backbone Node, CPE Redundant Configuration, Managed Firewall Solutions, MIS Access
Redundancy Options (MARO), and Secure Email Gateway.
FLAT RATE INTERNET PORT
Feature Description Identifier
AT&T MIS @ 56Kbps 5323
AT&T MIS @ 128Kbps 5324
AT&T MIS @ 256Kbps 5325
AT&T MIS @ 384Kbps 5326
AT&T MIS @ 512Kbps 5327
AT&T MIS @ 768Kbps 5328
AT&T MIS @ 1024 Kbps 5700
AT&T MIS @ 1.544 Mbps (T1) 5701
AT&T MIS @ 2Mbps 5329
AT&T MIS @ 3 Mbps 5702
AT&T MIS @ 3 Mbps NxT1 5702
AT&T MIS @ 4Mbps 5330
AT&T MIS @ 4.5Mbps 5331
AT&T MIS @ 5Mbps 5332
AT&T MIS @ 6Mbps 5333
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 3 of 30 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16
Attachment 3 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
AT&T MIS @ 6Mbps NxT1 5333
AT&T MIS @ 7Mbps 5334
AT&T MIS @ 7.5 Mbps 5382
AT&T MIS @ 8Mbps 5335
AT&T MIS @ 9Mbps 5336
AT&T MIS @ 9Mbps NxT1 5336
AT&T MIS @ 10 Mbps 5703
AT&T MIS @ 10.5 Mbps 5383
AT&T MIS @ 12 Mbps 5384
AT&T MIS @ 15 Mbps 5704
AT&T MIS @ 20 Mbps 5705
AT&T MIS @ 25 Mbps 5706
AT&T MIS @ 30 Mbps 5707
AT&T MIS @ 35 Mbps 5708
AT&T MIS @ 40 Mbps 5709
AT&T MIS @ 45 Mbps (T3) 5710
AT&T MIS @ 60Mbps (OC3) 5338
AT&T MIS @ 155 Mbps (OC3) 5712
AT&T MIS @ 622 Mbps (OC12) 6528
AT&T MIS @ 2.45 Gbps (OC48) 6837
FLAT RATE INTERNET PORT WITH ROUTER
Feature Description Identifier
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 56Kbps 5348
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 128Kbps 5349
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 256Kbps 5350
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 384Kbps 5351
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 512Kbps 5352
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 768Kbps 5353
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 1024 Kbps 5713
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 1.544 Mbps (T1) 5714
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 2Mbps 5354
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 4 of 30 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16
Attachment 3 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 3Mbps 5355
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 3Mbps NxT1 5355
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 4Mbps 5356
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 4.5Mbps 5357
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 5Mbps 5358
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 6Mbps 5359
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 6Mbps NxT1 5359
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 7Mbps 5360
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 7.5 Mbps 5385
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 8Mbps 5361
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 9Mbps 5362
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 9Mbps NxT1 5362
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 10Mbps 5363
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 10.5 Mbps 5386
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 12 Mbps 5387
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 15Mbps 5364
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 20Mbps 5365
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 25Mbps 5366
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 30Mbps 5367
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 35Mbps 5368
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 40Mbps 5369
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 45Mbps 5370
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 60Mbps 5374
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 155 Mbps (OC3) 5716
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 622 Mbps
(OC12)
6529
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 5 of 30 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16
Attachment 3 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 2.45 Gbps (OC48) 6840
HI CAP FLEX T3 - PRIVATE LINE, ATM (ASYNCHRONOUS TRANSFER MODE)
Feature Description Identifier
MIS HiCap T3 2 Mbps 7400
MIS HiCap T3 3 Mbps 7401
MIS HiCap T3 4 Mbps 7402
MIS HiCap T3 5 Mbps 7403
MIS HiCap T3 6 Mbps 7404
MIS HiCap T3 7 Mbps 7405
MIS HiCap T3 8 Mbps 7406
MIS HiCap T3 9 Mbps 7407
MIS HiCap T3 10 Mbps 7408
MIS HiCap T3 15 Mbps 7409
MIS HiCap T3 20 Mbps 7410
MIS HiCap T3 25 Mbps 7411
MIS HiCap T3 30 Mbps 7412
MIS HiCap T3 35 Mbps 7413
MIS HiCap T3 40 Mbps 7414
MIS HiCap T3 45 Mbps 7415
HI CAP FLEX T3 - PRIVATE LINE, ATM (ASYNCHRONOUS TRANSFER MODE) with Managed Router
Feature Description Identifier
MIS HiCap T3 w/Mgd Rtr 2 Mbps 7420
MIS HiCap T3 w/Mgd Rtr 3 Mbps 7421
MIS HiCap T3 w/Mgd Rtr 4 Mbps 7422
MIS HiCap T3 w/Mgd Rtr 5 Mbps 7423
MIS HiCap T3 w/Mgd Rtr 6 Mbps 7424
MIS HiCap T3 w/Mgd Rtr 7 Mbps 7425
MIS HiCap T3 w/Mgd Rtr 8 Mbps 7426
MIS HiCap T3 w/Mgd Rtr 9 Mbps 7427
MIS HiCap T3 w/Mgd Rtr 10 Mbps 7428
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 6 of 30 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16
Attachment 3 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
MIS HiCap T3 w/Mgd Rtr 15 Mbps 7429
MIS HiCap T3 w/Mgd Rtr 20 Mbps 7430
MIS HiCap T3 w/Mgd Rtr 25 Mbps 7431
MIS HiCap T3 w/Mgd Rtr 30 Mbps 7432
MIS HiCap T3 w/Mgd Rtr 35 Mbps 7433
MIS HiCap T3 w/Mgd Rtr 40 Mbps 7434
MIS HiCap T3 w/Mgd Rtr 45 Mbps 7435
HI CAP FLEX OC3 - PRIVATE LINE
Feature Description Identifier
MIS HiCap OC3 35 Mbps 8050
MIS HiCap OC3 40 Mbps 8051
MIS HiCap OC3 45 Mbps 8052
MIS HiCap OC3 60 Mbps 8053
MIS HiCap OC3 70 Mbps 8054
MIS HiCap OC3 80 Mbps 8055
MIS HiCap OC3 90 Mbps 8056
MIS HiCap OC3 100 Mbps 8057
MIS HiCap OC3 120 Mbps 8058
MIS HiCap OC3 144 Mbps 8059
MIS HiCap OC3 155 Mbps 8060
HI CAP FLEX OC3 - PRIVATE LINE with Managed Router
Feature Description Identifier
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 35 Mbps 8070
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 40 Mbps 8071
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 45 Mbps 8072
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 60 Mbps 8073
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 70 Mbps 8074
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 80 Mbps 8075
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 7 of 30 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16
Attachment 3 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 90 Mbps 8076
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 100 Mbps 8077
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 120 Mbps 8078
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 144 Mbps 8079
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 155 Mbps 8080
HI CAP FLEX OC12 - PRIVATE LINE
Feature Description Identifier
MIS HiCap OC12 70 Mbps 7500
MIS HiCap OC12 80 Mbps 7501
MIS HiCap OC12 90 Mbps 7502
MIS HiCap OC12 100 Mbps 7503
MIS HiCap OC12 120 Mbps 7504
MIS HiCap OC12 144 Mbps 7505
MIS HiCap OC12 155 Mbps 7506
MIS HiCap OC12 200 Mbps 7507
MIS HiCap OC12 250 Mbps 7508
MIS HiCap OC12 300 Mbps 7509
MIS HiCap OC12 350 Mbps 7510
MIS HiCap OC12 400 Mbps 7511
MIS HiCap OC12 450 Mbps 7512
MIS HiCap OC12 500 Mbps 7513
MIS HiCap OC12 550 Mbps 7514
MIS HiCap OC12 600 Mbps 7515
MIS HiCap OC12 622 Mbps 7516
HI CAP FLEX OC12 - PRIVATE LINE - with Managed Router
Feature Description Identifier
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 70 Mbps 7525
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 80 Mbps 7526
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 90 Mbps 7527
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 100 Mbps 7528
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 8 of 30 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16
Attachment 3 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 120 Mbps 7529
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 144 Mbps 7530
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 155 Mbps 7531
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 200 Mbps 7532
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 250 Mbps 7533
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 300 Mbps 7534
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 350 Mbps 7535
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 400 Mbps 7536
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 450 Mbps 7537
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 500 Mbps 7538
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 550 Mbps 7539
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 600 Mbps 7540
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 622 Mbps 7541
HI CAP FLEX OC48 - PRIVATE LINE
Feature Description Identifier
MIS HiCap OC48 600 Mbps 7450
MIS HiCap OC48 622 Mbps 7451
MIS HiCap OC48 700 Mbps 7452
MIS HiCap OC48 800 Mbps 7453
MIS HiCap OC48 1250 Mbps 7454
MIS HiCap OC48 1550 Mbps 7455
MIS HiCap OC48 1850 Mbps 7456
MIS HiCap OC48 2150 Mbps1 7457
MIS HiCap OC48 2450 Mbps1 7458
1Due a technical limitation with the Cisco Gigabit Router cards, actual speed of the service is limited to
1.9 Gbps. Therefore, 1850 Mbps should be the highest "Minimum Bandwidth Commitment" offered to customers at this time.
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 9 of 30 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16
Attachment 3 11/29/12
HI CAP FLEX OC48 - PRIVATE LINE - With Managed Router
Feature Description Identifier
MIS HiCap OC48 600 Mbps 7470
MIS HiCap OC48 622 Mbps 7471
MIS HiCap OC48 700 Mbps 7472
MIS HiCap OC48 800 Mbps 7473
MIS HiCap OC48 1250 Mbps 7474
MIS HiCap OC48 1550 Mbps 7475
MIS HiCap OC48 1850 Mbps 7476
MIS HiCap OC48 2150 Mbps1 7477
MIS HiCap OC48 2450 Mbps1 7478 1Due a technical limitation with the Cisco Gigabit Router cards, actual speed of the service is limited to 1.9 Gbps. Therefore, 1850 Mbps should be the highest "Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment" offered to customers at this time.
HI CAP FLEX ETHERNET PORT ONLY
Feature Description Identifier
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet 2 Mbps 8301
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet 3 Mbps 8302
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet 4 Mbps 8303
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet 5 Mbps 8304
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet 6 Mbps 8305
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet 7 Mbps 8306
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet 8 Mbps 8307
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet 9 Mbps 8308
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet 10 Mbps 8309
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet 15 Mbps 8310
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 10 of 30 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16
Attachment 3 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 20 Mbps 8311
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 25 Mbps 8312
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 30 Mbps 8313
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 35 Mbps 8314
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 40 Mbps 8315
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 45 Mbps 8316
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 50 Mbps 8382
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 60 Mbps 8317
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet 70 Mbps 8318
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 80 Mbps 8319
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet 90 Mbps 8320
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 100 Mbps 8321
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet 120 Mbps 8346
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 144 Mbps 8347
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet 155 Mbps 8348
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 200 Mbps 8349
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet 250 Mbps 8350
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 300 Mbps 8351
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet 350 Mbps 8352
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 400 Mbps 8353
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet 450 Mbps 8354
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 500 Mbps 8355
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet 550 Mbps 8356
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 11 of 30 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16
Attachment 3 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet 600 Mbps 8357
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 622 Mbps 8358
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet 700 Mbps 8359
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 800 Mbps 8360
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet 900 Mbps 8361
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 1000 Mbps 8362
HI CAP FLEX – 10 Gig ETHERNET PORT ONLY
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 1500 Mbps 8385
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet 2000 Mbps 8386
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 2500 Mbps 8387
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet 3000 Mbps 8388
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 3500 Mbps 8389
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet 4000 Mbps 8390
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 4500 Mbps 8391
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet 5000 Mbps 8392
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 5500 Mbps 8393
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet 6000 Mbps 8394
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 6500 Mbps 8395
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet 7000 Mbps 8396
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 7500 Mbps 8397
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet 8000 Mbps 8398
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 8500 Mbps 8399
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 12 of 30 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16
Attachment 3 11/29/12
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 9000 Mbps 8400
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet 9500 Mbps 8401
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 10000 Mbps 8402
HI CAP FLEX ETHERNET PORT ONLY with Managed Router
Feature Description Identifier
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 2 Mbps 8323
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 3 Mbps 8324
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 4 Mbps 8325
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 5 Mbps 8326
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 6 Mbps 8327
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 7 Mbps 8328
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 8 Mbps 8329
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 9 Mbps 8330
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 10 Mbps 8331
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 15 Mbps 8332
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 20 Mbps 8333
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 25 Mbps 8334
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 30 Mbps 8335
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 35 Mbps 8336
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 40 Mbps 8337
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 45 Mbps 8338
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 50 Mbps 8383
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 60 Mbps 8339
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 13 of 30 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16
Attachment 3 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 70 Mbps 8340
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 80 Mbps 8341
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 90 Mbps 8342
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 100 Mbps 8343
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 120 Mbps 8365
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 144 Mbps 8366
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 155 Mbps 8367
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 200 Mbps 8368
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 250 Mbps 8369
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 300 Mbps 8370
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 350 Mbps 8371
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 400 Mbps 8372
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 450 Mbps 8373
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 500 Mbps 8374
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 550 Mbps 8375
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 600 Mbps 8376
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 622 Mbps 8377
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 700 Mbps 8378
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 800 Mbps 8379
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 900 Mbps 8380
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 1000 Mbps 8381
ETHERNET ACCESS to LONG DISTANCE POP
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 14 of 30 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16
Attachment 3 11/29/12
Used with HI CAP FLEX ETHERNET PORT ONLY service.
Feature Description Identifier
100-Base-TX 2 Mbps Ethernet LNET2
100-Base-TX 4 Mbps Ethernet LNET4
100-Base-TX 5 Mbps Ethernet LNET5
100-Base-TX 8 Mbps Ethernet LNET8
100-Base-TX 10 Mbps Ethernet LNET10
100-Base-TX 20 Mbps Ethernet LNET20
100-Base-TX 50 Mbps Ethernet LNET50
100-Base-TX 100 Mbps Ethernet LNET100
1000-Base-SX/LX 150 Mbps Ethernet LNET150
1000-Base-SX/LX 250 Mbps Ethernet LNET250
1000-Base-SX/LX 500 Mbps Ethernet LNET500
1000-Base-SX/LX 600 Mbps Ethernet LNET600
1000-Base-SX/LX 1000 Mbps Ethernet LNET1G
10G-Base-LSR 10000 Mbps Ethernet LNET10G
BURSTABLE T1 - PRIVATE LINE, FRAME RELAY
Feature Description Identifier
MIS Burstable T1 Up to 128 Kbps
7301
MIS Burstable T1 128.01 to 256 Kbps
MIS Burstable T1 256.01 to 384 Kbps
MIS Burstable T1 384.01 to 512 Kbps
MIS Burstable T1 512.01 to full T1
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 15 of 30 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16
Attachment 3 11/29/12
BURSTABLE T1 - PRIVATE LINE, FRAME RELAY - with
Managed Router
Feature Description Identifier
MIS Burstable T1 w/Mgd Rtr Up to 128 Kbps
7302
MIS Burstable T1 w/Mgd Rtr 128.01 to 256 Kbps
MIS Burstable T1 w/Mgd Rtr 256.01 to 384 Kbps
MIS Burstable T1 w/Mgd Rtr 384.01 to 512 Kbps
MIS Burstable T1 w/Mgd Rtr 512.01 to full T1
BURSTABLE T3 - PRIVATE LINE, ATM
Feature Description Identifier
MIS Burstable T3 Up to 6 Mbps
7303
MIS Burstable T3 6.01 to 7.5 Mbps
MIS Burstable T3 7.51 to 9.0 Mbps
MIS Burstable T3 9.01 to 10.5 Mbps
MIS Burstable T3 10.51 to 12.0 Mbps
MIS Burstable T3 12.01 to 13.5 Mbps
MIS Burstable T3 13.51 to 15.0 Mbps
MIS Burstable T3 15.01 to 16.5 Mbps
MIS Burstable T3 16.51 to 18.0 Mbps
MIS Burstable T3 18.01 to 19.5 Mbps
MIS Burstable T3 19.51 to 21.0 Mbps
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 16 of 30 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16
Attachment 3 11/29/12
MIS Burstable T3 21.01 to 45.0 Mbps
BURSTABLE T3 - PRIVATE LINE, ATM - with Managed Router
Feature Description Identifier
MIS Burstable T3 w/Mgd Router Up to 6
Mbps
7304
MIS Burstable T3 w/Mgd Router 6.01 to 7.5
Mbps
MIS Burstable T3 w/Mgd Router 7.51 to 9.0
Mbps
MIS Burstable T3 w/Mgd Router 9.01 to 10.5
Mbps
MIS Burstable T3 w/Mgd Router 10.51 to
12.0 Mbps
MIS Burstable T3 w/Mgd Router 12.01 to
13.5 Mbps
MIS Burstable T3 w/Mgd Router 13.51 to
15.0 Mbps
MIS Burstable T3 w/Mgd Router 15.01 to
16.5 Mbps
MIS Burstable T3 w/Mgd Router 16.51 to
18.0 Mbps
MIS Burstable T3 w/Mgd Router 18.01 to
19.5 Mbps
MIS Burstable T3 w/Mgd Router 19.51 to
21.0 Mbps
MIS Burstable T3 w/Mgd Router 21.01 to
45.0 Mbps
BURSTABLE OC3 - PRIVATE LINE
Feature Description Identifier
MIS Burstable OC3 Up to 35 Mbps
7305
MIS Burstable OC3 35.01 to 45 Mbps
MIS Burstable OC3 45.01 to 55 Mbps
MIS Burstable OC3 55.01 to 65 Mbps
MIS Burstable OC3 65.01 to 75 Mbps
MIS Burstable OC3 75.01 to 85 Mbps
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 17 of 30 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16
Attachment 3 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
MIS Burstable OC3 85.01 to 100 Mbps
MIS Burstable OC3 100.01 to 125 Mbps
MIS Burstable OC3 125.01 to 155 Mbps
BURSTABLE OC3 - PRIVATE LINE - with Managed Router
Feature Description Identifier
MIS Burstable OC3 w/Mgd Router Up to 35
Mbps
7306
MIS Burstable OC3 w/Mgd Router 35.01 to
45 Mbps
MIS Burstable OC3 w/Mgd Router 45.01 to
55 Mbps
MIS Burstable OC3 w/Mgd Router 55.01 to
65 Mbps
MIS Burstable OC3 w/Mgd Router 65.01 to
75 Mbps
MIS Burstable OC3 w/Mgd Router 75.01 to
85 Mbps
MIS Burstable OC3 w/Mgd Router 85.01 to
100 Mbps
MIS Burstable OC3 w/Mgd Router 100.01 to
125 Mbps
MIS Burstable OC3 w/Mgd Router 125.01 to
155 Mbps
BURSTABLE OC-12- PRIVATE LINE
Feature Description Identifier
MIS Burstable OC12 Up to 75 Mbps
7307
MIS Burstable OC12 75.01 to 150 Mbps
MIS Burstable OC12 150.01 to 225 Mbps
MIS Burstable OC12 225.01 to 300 Mbps
MIS Burstable OC12 300.01 to 375 Mbps
MIS Burstable OC12 375.01 to 450 Mbps
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 18 of 30 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16
Attachment 3 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
MIS Burstable OC12 450.01 to 525 Mbps
MIS Burstable OC12 525.01 to 622 Mbps
BURSTABLE OC-12- PRIVATE LINE - with Managed Router
Feature Description Identifier
MIS Burstable OC12 w/Mgd Router Up to 75 Mbps
7308
MIS Burstable OC12 w/Mgd Router 75.01 to 150 Mbps
MIS Burstable OC12 w/Mgd Router 150.01 to 225 Mbps
MIS Burstable OC12 w/Mgd Router 225.01 to 300 Mbps
MIS Burstable OC12 w/Mgd Router 300.01 to 375 Mbps
MIS Burstable OC12 w/Mgd Router 375.01 to 450 Mbps
MIS Burstable OC12 w/Mgd Router 450.01 to 525 Mbps
MIS Burstable OC12 w/Mgd Router 525.01 to 622 Mbps
BURSTABLE OC-48 - PRIVATE LINE
Feature Description Identifier
MIS Burstable OC48 Up to 1250 Mbps
7309 MIS Burstable OC48 1251 to 1350 Mbps
MIS Burstable OC48 1351 to 1450 Mbps
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 19 of 30 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16
Attachment 3 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
MIS Burstable OC48 1451 to 1550 Mbps
MIS Burstable OC48 1551 to 1650 Mbps
MIS Burstable OC48 1651 to 1750 Mbps
MIS Burstable OC48 1751 to 1850 Mbps
MIS Burstable OC48 1851 to 1950 Mbps*
MIS Burstable OC48 1951 to 2050 Mbps*
MIS Burstable OC48 2051 to 2150 Mbps*
MIS Burstable OC48 2151 to 2250 Mbps*
MIS Burstable OC48 2251 to 2350 Mbps*
MIS Burstable OC48 2351 to 2450 Mbps*
BURSTABLE OC-48 - PRIVATE LINE - with Managed Router
Feature Description Identifier
MIS w/Mgd Router Burstable OC48 Up to 1250 Mbps
7310
MIS w/Mgd Router Burstable OC48 1251 to 1350 Mbps
MIS w/Mgd Router Burstable OC48 1351 to
1450 Mbps
MIS w/Mgd Router Burstable OC48 1451 to
1550 Mbps
MIS w/Mgd Router Burstable OC48 1551 to 1650 Mbps
MIS w/Mgd Router Burstable OC48 1651 to 1750 Mbps
MIS w/Mgd Router Burstable OC48 1751 to
1850 Mbps
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 20 of 30 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16
Attachment 3 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
MIS w/Mgd Router Burstable OC48 1851 to
1950 Mbps*
MIS w/Mgd Router Burstable OC48 1951 to
2050 Mbps*
MIS w/Mgd Router Burstable OC48 2051 to
2150 Mbps*
MIS w/Mgd Router Burstable OC48 2151 to 2250 Mbps*
MIS w/Mgd Router Burstable OC48 2251 to 2350 Mbps*
MIS w/Mgd Router Burstable OC48 2351 to
2450 Mbps*
Optional Features – Class of Service
Description of Service
The Class of Service (CoS) feature enables Customer to prioritize traffic among four classes:
real-time, high-grade data, medium-grade data, and low-grade data. Each CoS has a specific
amount of bandwidth allocation so that all classes can transmit data during congestion.
However, if any class does not use its entire bandwidth allocation, packets of other classes can share the unused bandwidth. Customer may select from a number of "profiles" that have
predetermined bandwidth allocations for each CoS.
CPE Marking and Differentiation
The Customer Equipment (CE) has two critical functions in the performance architecture:
identification and marking of application traffic flows, and differential queuing into the WAN
network. The marking of packets is done by setting specific Diff-Serv Codepoint (DSCP)
values within the TOS byte of the IP header. Each marking indicates the type of treatment
that a packet should receive from the network. The set of flows that share a common marking, and resulting treatment are referred to as a ‘class’. MIS supports 4 user markings (or classes):
Class Marking Behavior
COS1 EF CS5 Priority
COS2 AF31 CS3 Bursty Data
COS3 AF21 CS2 Bursty Data
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 21 of 30 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16
Attachment 3 11/29/12
COS4 Default “0” Best Effort
Allocation Profiles
For each IP service connection, customers order a pair of ‘allocation profiles’, one to control
ingress policing and one to control egress queuing. The profile specifies the amount of
bandwidth reserved for each CoS class. When ordering CoS, the allocation profile can be
specified as ‘simple’ or ‘complex’. The simple allocation profiles provide a set of the most
common allocation profiles. Use of these profiles is suitable for the vast majority of enterprise needs and is highly recommended. The table below shows traffic class allocation options
using simple profiles. Priority CoS1 traffic can be allocated from 10-80% of the bandwidth.
The remaining classes can use bandwidth not being used by CoS1 in the percentages shown in
the table.
CoS1 CoS2 CoS3 CoS4
10-80% 80% 10% 10%
10-80% 40% 30% 30%
10-80% 60% 30% 10%
On ingress, CoS1 traffic exceeding the allocation is dropped, for the remaining data queues traffic exceeding the allocation is considered ‘out of contract’, and is marked accordingly (i.e.
mapped to an e-LSP which has a higher drop probability during core congestion) for transport
across the network core. The ingress allocation is defined as a percentage. For most services,
the percentage is based on the speed of the access port. On egress, the allocations control the relative servicing of the classes out of the egress port11
toward the customer site. This allocation is only in effect when the total data arrival rate is
greater than the port capacity (i.e. the egress port is congested). Each allocation profile defines
the percentage of available bandwidth for each CoS class. For any class that is not consuming its full allocation, the excess bandwidth for the class becomes available for the remaining queues in a ratio proportional to their allocation. Note that the CoS1 class is an exception.
Traffic is not allowed to exceed its allocation, even if bandwidth is available on the port.
CoS1 traffic exceeding the allocation is discarded. Unused COS1 bandwidth is still available
for consumption by the remaining data classes. Class of Service (CoS) Option
Feature Description Identifier
Class of Service 1.5 Mbps Flat Rate FRCOST1
Class of Service MLPPP NxT1 (3 to 12 Mbps) FCOSML
Class of Service 10 Mbps Flat Rate FRCOS10
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 22 of 30 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16
Attachment 3 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
Class of Service 15 Mbps Flat Rate FRCOS15
Class of Service 20 Mbps Flat Rate FRCOS20
Class of Service 25 Mbps Flat Rate FRCOS25
Class of Service 30 Mbps Flat Rate FRCOS30
Class of Service 35 Mbps Flat Rate FRCOS35
Class of Service 40 Mbps Flat Rate FRCOS40
Class of Service 45 Mbps Flat Rate FRCOS45
Class of Service Burstable T1 BCOST1
Class of Service Burstable T3 BCOST3
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex .05-1.5Mbps*
*Only Available with Ethernet Access
FCOS05
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 2 Mbps FCOS2
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 3 Mbps FCOS3
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 4 Mbps FCOS4
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 5 Mbps FCOS5
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 6 Mbps FCOS6
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 7 Mbps FCOS7
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 8 Mbps FCOS8
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 9 Mbps FCOS9
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 10 Mbps FCOS10
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 15 Mbps FCOS15
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 20 Mbps FCOS20
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 25 Mbps FCOS25
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 30 Mbps FCOS30
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 35 Mbps FCOS35
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 23 of 30 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16
Attachment 3 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 40 Mbps FCOS40
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 45 Mbps FCOS45
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex OC3 FCOS155
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 45.1 – 155 Mbps FCOS250
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 200 – 250 Mbps FCOS350
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 300 – 350 Mbps FCOS600
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 400 – 600 Mbps FCOS622
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 622 Mbps FCOS1G
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 700 – 1000 Mbps FCOST1
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 1500 Mbps FCOS15G
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 2000 Mbps FCOS2G
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 2500 Mbps FCOS25G
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 3000 Mbps FCOS3G
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 3500 Mbps FCOS35G
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 4000 Mbps FCOS4G
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 4500 Mbps FCOS45G
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 5000 Mbps FCOS5G
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 5500 Mbps FCOS55G
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 6000 Mbps FCOS6G
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 6500 Mbps FCOS65G
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 7000 Mbps FCOS7G
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 7500 Mbps FCOS75G
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 8000 Mbps FCOS8G
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 8500 Mbps FCOS85G
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 24 of 30 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16
Attachment 3 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 9000 Mbps FCOS9G
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 9500 Mbps FCOS95G
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 10000 Mbps FCOS10G
Optional Features – AT&T Secure E-Mail Gateway (SEG)
Description of Service
AT&T Secure E-Mail Gateway (SEG) is a network-based Security as a Service (SecaaS) offering. SEG protects customers from internal and external email threats that can include:
commercial spam, malicious attachments, direct email server connections from spammers and
botnet-controlled endpoints, and email embedded URL-based attacks. SEG provides features
and tools that enable customers to comply with data privacy and retention regulations, meet legal discovery requirements, and implement data loss prevention strategies. SEG customers retain responsibility and control over much of the configuration and settings for the service.
SEG is offered with two different service levels – “Advanced” or “Premium”. SEG Advanced
The Secure E-Mail Gateway (SEG) Advanced service helps protect customer networks from
inbound messages containing spam, viruses, and malware. The Service provides features that enable customer to manage and enforce its security policy
on outbound email content.
The Service provides disaster recovery protection against lost email data in the event of a customer email server outage and provides end-user continuity functionality if the customer email server becomes unavailable.
SEG is administered by the customer through a self-service web console and provides a suite
of reports. SEG requires that the Customer own and manage their own Simple Mail Transfer Protocol
(SMTP) email server or servers. The customer must also own and manage their own internet
domain(s) in order to direct email to the Service for filtering.
SEG Premium
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 25 of 30 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16
Attachment 3 11/29/12
The SEG Premium Level of Service includes all features of the Secure E-Mail Gateway Advanced service plus additional Premium features.
SEG Premium provides enhanced capabilities that enable the Customer to implement more
robust outbound email security policies to support their email confidentiality, privacy, and
data loss prevention requirements. Messages sent by the Customer can be encrypted automatically through policy or through
end-user self initiated encryption. Encrypted messages are delivered for pick-up by an
authenticated recipient and can be retrieved up to 30 days from the day they have been sent
after which they are destroyed. Optional Feature - Message Archiving
The Message Archiving option of the Secure E-Mail Gateway Service provides capabilities that can assist the Customer in complying with company, industry, and government requirements for email retention. Message Archiving is designed to automatically archive all
inbound, outbound and internal email message and associated meta data to a secure
centralized location and provides search and export functionality. Message Archiving is
administered through a customer managed web console and provides a suite of reports. The customer must have a base service (SEG Advanced or SEG Premium) to order the archiving service option.
Customers determine how long their e-mails need to be retained to meet business, compliance or legal requirements. The Service will support from 1 year to a maximum of 7 year retention period.
Features Table & Descriptions The following summarizes the Features included under the two SEG service levels, as well as
detailed descriptions of the features:
Feature SEG Advanced SEG Premium
Customer Managed Administration Included Included
Anti-Virus Protection Included Included
Spam Filtering Included Included
Policy Enforcement Included Enhanced
Quarantine Included Included
Disaster Recovery Included Included
Transport Layer Security Included Included
Administrator Reports Included Included
Policy based Encryption Included
End-User Initiated Encryption Included
Sender Notification Included
Web-based Delivery Included
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 26 of 30 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16
Attachment 3 11/29/12
Feature SEG Advanced SEG Premium
Direct Delivery Included
Mobile Device Support Included
Standards Support Included
Message Archiving Option Option
Standard Features – SEG Advanced
Customer Managed Administration
The primary interface to the SEG Advanced service is the Administration Center web
console. This console is available 24 x 7 and allows Customer Administrators to define and manage settings and configurations for their domains, including spam treatment options, virus scanning selections, content filter settings, policy rules and user permissions.
Anti-Virus Protection
Anti-Virus Protection provides an extensive and redundant anti-virus filtering process that is designed to detect, clean, and record virus infected e-mail messages before they enter the Customer’s network. Virus Protection can be configured to scan all inbound and outbound
messages for viruses as recognized by industry standard virus scanning technologies.
Spam Filtering Spam Filtering detects Spam e-mail messages before they enter the Customer’s network. Captured spam is routed to the spam quarantine and can be accessed by administrators or end
users at any time through a web-based interface. The Customer administrator may configure
spam quarantine notification options for messages that have that been quarantined.
Policy Enforcement Policy enforcement supports the ability to apply the Customer’s corporate messaging policies
on unwanted and malicious content to e-mail messages entering and leaving the Customer’s e-
mail system. Policy enforcement features are definable by domain or user level. Content
categories that can be filtered for policy include: keyword groups, HTML, spam beacons or web bugs, hyperlinks, attachments, deny and allow lists. The Customer can define text,
referred to as an “outbound disclaimer” that will be appended to the email content. The
Customer administrator may configure policy enforcement notification options for emails
have been identified by policy rules.
Quarantine The Service provides multiple quarantine areas with different security access requirements to
store and support review of suspect email outside of your email network. Emails that violate
configured policies and that have the quarantine action applied are sorted into multiple
quarantines.
• Spam Quarantined Messages – Accessible to all users, with users with role of User or
Reports Manager allowed to access only their own personal spam quarantine
• Virus Quarantined Messages – Accessible to only Administrators and Quarantine
Managers
• Attachment Quarantined Messages – Accessible to only Administrators and
Quarantine Managers
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 27 of 30 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16
Attachment 3 11/29/12
• Content Keyword Quarantined Messages – Accessible to only Administrators and Quarantine Managers
Disaster Recovery
Disaster Recovery provides added protection against lost emails in the case the Customer’s
inbound email server may be unavailable to receive email. Disaster recovery provides:
• Automatic email fails over and rolling storage for up to sixty (60) days.
• Automatic monitoring of Customer’s e-mail server to establish return of service with attempt to deliver the e-mail every 20 minutes.
• Automatic forwarding of stored e-mail once Customer’s e-mail service is restored
• User access to read and send messages through a web-based interface while messages
are in fail-over storage status. Messages can remain in fail-over storage for up to 60 days.
Transport Layer Security
The SEG Advanced Service supports both forced and opportunistic Transport Layer Security
(TLS) connections between the Customer’s email server and the SEG network. TLS is designed to provide basic network level encryption through an encrypted tunnel for message
transfer.
Administrator Reports
Included in the SEG Administration Center console is access to a suite of reports providing a view into the statistics and use of the Service. All mail messages processed by the Service are
recorded in these statistical reports, measured on an hourly, daily, weekly, and monthly basis.
The reports furnished to Customer depend of the Service components and features in use by
the Customer.
Standard Features - SEG Premium The SEG Premium Level of Service includes all features of the Secure E-Mail Gateway
Advanced service and also includes the additional Premium features described below.
SEG Premium provides enhanced capabilities that enable the Customer to implement more robust outbound email security policies to support their email confidentiality, privacy, and data loss prevention requirements.
Messages sent by the Customer’s end-users can be encrypted automatically through policy or
through end-user self initiated encryption. Encrypted messages and are delivered for pick-up by an authenticated recipient and can be
retrieved up to 30 days from the day they have been sent after which they are destroyed.
The SEG Premium Service requires Customer acknowledgement that it is the Customer’s responsibility to store or process, in an unencrypted format, any and all messages or attachments which it desires to have unencrypted access after 30 days and/or post-expiration
or termination of the Services.
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 28 of 30 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16
Attachment 3 11/29/12
Customer Managed Administration SEG Premium policies and features are configured by the Customer administrator through the SEG Premium control console.
Enhanced Policy Enforcement
A comprehensive set of policy rules to identify email messages can be defined by the Customer including the following examples:
• Keyword Rules: Rules based on keywords within the subject line and body of the
email.
• Regular Expression Rules: Rules based on content such as social security numbers, drivers’ license numbers, credit card numbers, accounting numbers, credit card numbers within the subject line and body of the email message.
• Domain & Sender Level Rules: Rules based on sender domains, recipient domains and
sender lists.
• Regulation Dictionaries: Rules based on HIPAA, SOX and PCI oriented content.
• 3rd Party Keyword Library Support: Ability to import 3rd party keyboard libraries
such as common drug codes, common drug names, and common profanity keywords.
• Keywords such as “Confidential”, “Secure”;
• Sender & Recipient Groups such as the Legal Department in a company, Executives,
HR Business Partners.
A comprehensive set of actions to manage identified email messages can be assigned based on policy rules defined by the Customer:
• Log and Continue: Email message is logged as identified by the policy and SEG
continues processing the email against the remaining policies.
• Log and Send: Email message is logged as identified by the policy name and SEG sends the email directly out. No additional policies will be executed.
• Return to Sender: The email will be discarded and a notification will be sent to sender
of the email with information about what policy triggered the bounce back message. No additional policies are executed.
• Discard: The email is deleted. No additional policies are executed.
• Encrypt: The email is sent out encrypted and logged against this policy. No additional
polices are executed
Policy based Encryption
The SEG Premium Service provides a policy-based encryption and decryption process. The
process is designed to analyze messages leaving the Customer’s network using the policy
engine, match an outbound encrypt rule and enable the encryption. Outbound content policies are centrally created using the policy manager. One or more conditions (e.g. contains credit
card number, message body contains keywords, email address of sender or recipient matches
a domain name, message attachment is of a certain type, etc.) are defined by the Customer,
and the policy is associated with the ‘encrypt message’ action. If a message matches one of
the policies it is encrypted within the AT&T SEG network and sent to the recipient. End-User Initiated Encryption
SEG Premium enables End Users to invoke encrypted email messages from the gateway by
simply pressing an “Encrypt” button installed on the mail client. End-User Initiated
Encryption is supported through an email client plug-in that provides an “encrypt button”. The plug-in is available for versions of Microsoft Outlook and Outlook Web Access.
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 29 of 30 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16
Attachment 3 11/29/12
Sender Notification SEG Premium provides notification to senders when messages are encrypted at the AT&T
SEG network. Senders also receive notifications when message recipients pickup and decrypt
messages. Notification messages are customizable.
Web-based Delivery The Encrypted Message portal is a web based portal for message pick-up. After an encrypted
message is sent, the recipient is prompted through an email notification to collect their
message at the Encrypted Message Portal. First time users of the portal are required to create
a password protected profile. Once a recipient has created a profile, they collect subsequent messages by clicking the link in the email notification and logging in to Encrypted Message Portal with their email address and password. The Encrypted Message portal and email
notifications can be customer branded as an optional service.
Direct Delivery Recipients of encrypted email messages have the option of downloading the Encrypted Reader application, which will enable them to receive, and open encrypted messages directly
in their existing desktop or webmail email client. For users who have opted to use the reader,
encrypted messages arrive in their inbox as an attachment to a regular message. When
opening the attachment, the user is prompted for their password before the message is displayed. Mobile Device Support
SEG Premium supports mobile devices that can render HTML on a mobile browser. As an
example, SEG supports Blackberry devices, Apple iPhone, Windows mobile devices, and more. All encrypted messages being decrypted on the web-based message portal can be read on any traditional mobile browser.
The SEG Premium service has the ability to recognize which mobile browser is being used by
the recipient to read and decrypt messages and adjust accordingly. In addition, all notification messages delivered to the sender and recipient of encrypted
messages can be delivered via SMS (Text messaging) to instant mobile verification. For
example, when a recipient has received encrypted messages, SEG Premium can deliver a
short text messages to the recipient’s mobile phone with a link for the message pickup portal. Standards Support The SEG Premium Service leverages industry recognized standards such as PKI, X.509,
S/MIME, SSL, and TLS for sending electronically signed and encrypted email messages. The
solution is interoperable with other PKI based systems. Administrator Reports Included in the SEG Administration Center console is access to a suite of reports providing a
view into the statistics and use of the Service. All mail messages processed by the Service are
recorded in these statistical reports, measured on an hourly, daily, weekly, and monthly basis. The reports furnished to Customer depend of the Service components and features in use by the Customer.
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 30 of 30 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16
Attachment 3 11/29/12
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 1 of 33 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Attachment 4 11/29/12
6.1.7 Service Identifier: Managed Internet Service (MIS)
Attachment 4
Three service types are available:
• AT&T MIS with AT&T Managed Router and
• AT&T MIS with Customer Managed Router
• AT&T Dedicated Internet Access (DIA) with Customer Managed Router – Grandfathered, for existing customers only. Use MIS for new orders. Under each AT&T MIS service type, 3 types of port billing services are available:
• Flat Rate Port Only,
• Hi Cap Flex Port Only, and
• Burstable Port Only.
For all port types, an access circuit is ordered and billed separate from the port.
All new Internet access services will be provisioned with AT&T MIS.
AT&T Dedicated Internet Access (DIA) with Customer Managed Router Service is being grandfathered. Existing AT&T DIA Ports may be upgraded subject to bandwidth availability. Ethernet Access is not available for DIA upgrade.
The Customer Managed Flat Rate Port pricing for AT&T MIS below applies to DIA ports, as available.
Note: Charges apply for On-Site (Managed Router Service), no charge for Tele-Install.
MIS Installation Table
Port Speed
Tele-
Install On-Site
56 Kbps - 1.5 Kbps N/C $999.00*
NxT1 (3.0 Mbps - 6.0
Mbps) N/C $999.00*
Tiered/Full T3 N/C $1000.00*
OC-X N/C $10000.00*
Ethernet Access N/C $0.00*
* - ICB pricing is available.
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 2 of 33 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Attachment 4 11/29/12
FLAT RATE INTERNET PORT The Customer Managed Flat Rate Port pricing for AT&T MIS below applies to DIA ports, as available.
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring
Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
AT&T MIS @ 56Kbps 5323 N/C $ 72.20 Port
AT&T MIS @ 128Kbps 5324 N/C $ 85.50 Port
AT&T MIS @ 256Kbps 5325 N/C $ 106.40 Port
AT&T MIS @ 384Kbps 5326 N/C $ 127.30 Port
AT&T MIS @ 512Kbps 5327 N/C $ 148.20 Port
AT&T MIS @ 768Kbps 5328 N/C $ 155.80 Port
AT&T MIS @ 1024 Kbps 5700 N/C $ 161.50 Port
AT&T MIS @ 1.544 Mbps (T1) 5701 N/C $ 178.60 Port
AT&T MIS @ 2Mbps 5329 N/C $ 147.50 Port
AT&T MIS @ 3 Mbps 5702 N/C $ 212.50 Port
AT&T MIS @ 3 Mbps NxT1 5702 N/C $ 212.50 Port
AT&T MIS @ 4Mbps 5330 N/C $ 268.75 Port
AT&T MIS @ 4.5Mbps 5331 N/C $ 275.00 Port
AT&T MIS @ 5Mbps 5332 N/C $ 281.25 Port
AT&T MIS @ 6Mbps 5333 N/C $ 312.50 Port
AT&T MIS @ 6Mbps NxT1 5333 N/C $ 312.50 Port
AT&T MIS @ 7Mbps 5334 N/C $ 353.75 Port
AT&T MIS @ 7.5 Mbps 5382 N/C $ 370.00 Port
AT&T MIS @ 8Mbps 5335 N/C $ 391.25 Port
AT&T MIS @ 9Mbps 5336 N/C $ 428.75 Port
AT&T MIS @ 9Mbps NxT1 5336 N/C $ 428.75 Port
AT&T MIS @ 10 Mbps 5703 N/C $ 460.00 Port
AT&T MIS @ 10.5 Mbps 5383 N/C $ 478.75 Port
AT&T MIS @ 12 Mbps 5384 N/C $ 547.50 Port
AT&T MIS @ 15 Mbps 5704 N/C $ 616.25 Port
AT&T MIS @ 20 Mbps 5705 N/C $ 772.50 Port
AT&T MIS @ 25 Mbps 5706 N/C $ 931.25 Port
AT&T MIS @ 30 Mbps 5707 N/C $ 1,087.50 Port
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 3 of 33 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Attachment 4 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
AT&T MIS @ 35 Mbps 5708 N/C $ 1,247.50 Port
AT&T MIS @ 40 Mbps 5709 N/C $ 1,403.75 Port
AT&T MIS @ 45 Mbps (T3) 5710 N/C $ 1,562.50 Port
AT&T MIS @ 60Mbps (OC3) 5338 N/C $ 1,956.25 Port
AT&T MIS @ 155 Mbps (OC3) 5712 N/C $ 4,450.00 Port
AT&T MIS @ 622 Mbps (OC12) 6528 N/C $12,675.00 Port
AT&T MIS @ 2.45 Gbps (OC48) 6837 N/C $49,000.00 Port
FLAT RATE INTERNET PORT WITH ROUTER
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 56Kbps 5348 See Above $ 98.80 Port
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 128Kbps 5349 See Above $ 112.10 Port
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 256Kbps 5350 See Above $ 133.00 Port
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 384Kbps 5351 See Above $ 153.90 Port
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 512Kbps 5352 See Above $ 174.80 Port
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 768Kbps 5353 See Above $ 182.40 Port
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 1024 Kbps 5713 See Above $ 188.10 Port
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 4 of 33 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Attachment 4 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 1.544 Mbps (T1) 5714 See Above $ 205.20 Port
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 2Mbps 5354 See Above $ 221.25 Port
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 3Mbps 5355 See Above $ 286.25 Port
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 3Mbps NxT1 5355 See Above $ 286.25 Port
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 4Mbps 5356 See Above $ 342.50 Port
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 4.5Mbps 5357 See Above $ 348.75 Port
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 5Mbps 5358 See Above $ 355.00 Port
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 6Mbps 5359 See Above $ 386.25 Port
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 6Mbps NxT1 5359 See Above $ 386.25 Port
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 7Mbps 5360 See Above $ 573.75 Port
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 7.5 Mbps 5385 See Above $ 590.00 Port
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 8Mbps 5361 See Above $ 611.25 Port
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 9Mbps 5362 See Above $ 648.75 Port
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 9Mbps NxT1 5362 See Above $ 648.75 Port
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 10Mbps 5363 See Above $ 680.00 Port
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 10.5 Mbps 5386 See Above $ 698.75 Port
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 12 Mbps 5387 See Above $ 767.50 Port
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 5 of 33 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Attachment 4 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 15Mbps 5364 See Above $ 836.25 Port
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 20Mbps 5365 See Above $ 992.50 Port
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 25Mbps 5366 See Above $ 1,151.25 Port
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 30Mbps 5367 See Above $ 1,307.50 Port
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 35Mbps 5368 See Above $ 1,467.50 Port
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 40Mbps 5369 See Above $ 1,623.75 Port
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 45Mbps 5370 See Above $ 1,782.50 Port
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 60Mbps 5374 See Above $ 2,251.25 Port
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 155 Mbps (OC3) 5716 See Above $ 4,745.00 Port
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 622 Mbps (OC12) 6529 See Above $13,126.25 Port
AT&T MIS w/Mgd Router @ 2.45 Gbps (OC48) 6840 See Above $49,763.75 Port
HI CAP FLEX T3 - PRIVATE LINE, ATM (ASYNCHRONOUS TRANSFER MODE)
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
Incremental Usage Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 6 of 33 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Attachment 4 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
Incremental Usage Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
MIS HiCap T3 2 Mbps 7400 N/C $ 236.00 Port 248.50 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap T3 3 Mbps 7401 N/C $ 340.00 Port 238.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap T3 4 Mbps 7402 N/C $ 430.00 Port 227.50 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap T3 5 Mbps 7403 N/C $ 450.00 Port 189.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap T3 6 Mbps 7404 N/C $ 500.00 Port 175.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap T3 7 Mbps 7405 N/C $ 566.00 Port 171.50 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap T3 8 Mbps 7406 N/C $ 626.00 Port 164.50 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap T3 9 Mbps 7407 N/C $ 686.00 Port 161.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap T3 10 Mbps 7408 N/C $ 736.00 Port 157.50 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap T3 15 Mbps 7409 N/C $ 986.00 Port 140.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap T3 20 Mbps 7410 N/C $ 1,236.00 Port 133.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap T3 25 Mbps 7411 N/C $ 1,490.00 Port 126.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap T3 30 Mbps 7412 N/C $ 1,740.00 Port 122.50 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap T3 35 Mbps 7413 N/C $ 1,996.00 Port 122.50 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap T3 40 Mbps 7414 N/C $ 2,246.00 Port 119.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap T3 45 Mbps 7415 N/C $ 2,500.00 Port N/A Per Mbps
HI CAP FLEX T3 - PRIVATE LINE, ATM (ASYNCHRONOUS TRANSFER MODE) with Managed Router
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
Incremental Usage Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
MIS HiCap T3 w/Mgd Rtr 2 Mbps 7420 See Above $ 354.00 Port 248.50 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap T3 w/Mgd Rtr 3 Mbps 7421 See Above $ 458.00 Port 238.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap T3 w/Mgd Rtr 4 Mbps 7422 See Above $ 548.00 Port 227.50 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap T3 w/Mgd Rtr 5 Mbps 7423 See Above $ 568.00 Port 189.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap T3 w/Mgd Rtr 6 Mbps 7424 See Above $ 618.00 Port 175.00 Per Mbps
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 7 of 33 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Attachment 4 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
Incremental Usage Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
MIS HiCap T3 w/Mgd Rtr 7 Mbps 7425 See Above $ 918.00 Port 171.50 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap T3 w/Mgd Rtr 8 Mbps 7426 See Above $ 978.00 Port 164.50 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap T3 w/Mgd Rtr 9 Mbps 7427 See Above $ 1,038.00 Port 161.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap T3 w/Mgd Rtr 10 Mbps 7428 See Above $ 1,088.00 Port 157.50 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap T3 w/Mgd Rtr 15 Mbps 7429 See Above $ 1,338.00 Port 140.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap T3 w/Mgd Rtr 20 Mbps 7430 See Above $ 1,588.00 Port 133.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap T3 w/Mgd Rtr 25 Mbps 7431 See Above $ 1,842.00 Port 126.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap T3 w/Mgd Rtr 30 Mbps 7432 See Above $ 2,092.00 Port 122.50 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap T3 w/Mgd Rtr 35 Mbps 7433 See Above $ 2,348.00 Port 122.50 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap T3 w/Mgd Rtr 40 Mbps 7434 See Above $ 2,598.00 Port 119.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap T3 w/Mgd Rtr 45 Mbps 7435 See Above $ 2,852.00 Port N/A Per Mbps
HI CAP FLEX OC3 - PRIVATE LINE
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
Incremental Usage Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 8 of 33 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Attachment 4 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
Incremental Usage Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
MIS HiCap OC3 35 Mbps 8050 N/C $ 1,996.00 Port 122.50 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC3 40 Mbps 8051 N/C $ 2,246.00 Port 119.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC3 45 Mbps 8052 N/C $ 2,500.00 Port 119.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC3 60 Mbps 8053 N/C $ 3,130.00 Port 112.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC3 70 Mbps 8054 N/C $ 3,550.00 Port 108.50 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC3 80 Mbps 8055 N/C $ 3,970.00 Port 105.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC3 90 Mbps 8056 N/C $ 4,390.00 Port 105.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC3 100 Mbps 8057 N/C $ 4,810.00 Port 101.50 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC3 120 Mbps 8058 N/C $ 5,650.00 Port 101.50 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC3 144 Mbps 8059 N/C $ 6,490.00 Port 98.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC3 155 Mbps 8060 N/C $ 7,120.00 Port N/A Per Mbps
HI CAP FLEX OC3 - PRIVATE LINE with Managed Router
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
Incremental Usage Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 35 Mbps 8070 See Above $ 2,348.00 Port 122.50 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 40 Mbps 8071 See Above $ 2,598.00 Port 119.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 45 Mbps 8072 See Above $ 2,852.00 Port 119.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 60 Mbps 8073 See Above $ 3,602.00 Port 112.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 70 Mbps 8074 See Above $ 4,022.00 Port 108.50 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 80 Mbps 8075 See Above $ 4,442.00 Port 105.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 90 Mbps 8076 See Above $ 4,862.00 Port 105.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 100 Mbps 8077 See Above $ 5,282.00 Port 101.50 Per Mbps
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 9 of 33 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Attachment 4 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
Incremental Usage Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 120 Mbps 8078 See Above $ 6,122.00 Port 101.50 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 144 Mbps 8079 See Above $ 6,962.00 Port 98.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 155 Mbps 8080 See Above $ 7,592.00 Port N/A Per Mbps
HI CAP FLEX OC12 - PRIVATE LINE
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge
(NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge
(MRC)
Unit of
Measure
Incremental Usage Monthly Recurring
Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
MIS HiCap OC12 70 Mbps 7500 N/C $ 3,550.00 Port $ 108.50 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC12 80 Mbps 7501 N/C $ 3,970.00 Port $ 105.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC12 90 Mbps 7502 N/C $ 4,390.00 Port $ 105.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC12 100 Mbps 7503 N/C $ 4,810.00 Port $ 101.50 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC12 120 Mbps 7504 N/C $ 5,650.00 Port $ 101.50 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC12 144 Mbps 7505 N/C $ 6,490.00 Port $ 98.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC12 155 Mbps 7506 N/C $ 7,120.00 Port $ 98.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC12 200 Mbps 7507 N/C $ 8,390.00 Port $ 91.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC12 250 Mbps 7508 N/C $ 9,806.00 Port $ 84.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC12 300 Mbps 7509 N/C $11,220.00 Port $ 80.50 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC12 350 Mbps 7510 N/C $12,640.00 Port $ 77.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC12 400 Mbps 7511 N/C $14,056.00 Port $ 77.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC12 450 Mbps 7512 N/C $15,470.00 Port $ 73.50 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC12 500 Mbps 7513 N/C $16,886.00 Port $ 73.50 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC12 550 Mbps 7514 N/C $18,300.00 Port $ 70.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC12 600 Mbps 7515 N/C $19,716.00 Port $ 70.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC12 622 Mbps 7516 N/C $20,280.00 Port N/A Per Mbps
HI CAP FLEX OC12 - PRIVATE LINE - with Managed Router
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 10 of 33 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Attachment 4 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
Incremental Usage Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 70 Mbps 7525 See Above $ 4,022.00 Port $ 108.50 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 80 Mbps 7526 See Above $ 4,442.00 Port $ 105.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 90 Mbps 7527 See Above $ 4,862.00 Port $ 105.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 100 Mbps 7528 See Above $ 5,282.00 Port $ 101.50 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 120
Mbps 7529 See Above $ 6,122.00 Port $ 101.50 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 144
Mbps 7530 See Above $ 6,962.00 Port $ 98.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 155 Mbps 7531 See Above $ 7,592.00 Port $ 98.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 200
Mbps 7532 See Above $ 9,112.00 Port $ 91.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 250 Mbps 7533 See Above $10,528.00 Port $ 84.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 300 Mbps 7534 See Above $11,942.00 Port $ 80.50 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 350
Mbps 7535 See Above $13,362.00 Port $ 77.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 400
Mbps 7536 See Above $14,778.00 Port $ 77.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 450 Mbps 7537 See Above $16,192.00 Port $ 73.50 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 500 Mbps 7538 See Above $17,608.00 Port $ 73.50 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 550
Mbps 7539 See Above $19,022.00 Port $ 70.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 600 Mbps 7540 See Above $20,438.00 Port $ 70.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC3 w/Mgd Rtr 622
Mbps 7541 See Above $21,002.00 Port N/A Per Mbps
HI CAP FLEX OC48 - PRIVATE LINE
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 11 of 33 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Attachment 4 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
Incremental Usage Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
MIS HiCap OC48 600 Mbps 7450 N/C $19,716.00 Port $ 70.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC48 622 Mbps 7451 N/C $20,280.00 Port $ 70.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC48 700 Mbps 7452 N/C $22,546.00 Port $ 70.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC48 800 Mbps 7453 N/C $25,376.00 Port $ 70.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC48 1250 Mbps 7454 N/C $40,500.00 Port $ 70.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC48 1550 Mbps 7455 N/C $50,000.00 Port $ 70.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC48 1850 Mbps 7456 N/C $59,500.00 Port $ 70.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC48 2150 Mbps1 7457 N/C $69,000.00 Port $ 70.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC48 2450 Mbps1 7458 N/C $78,400.00 Port N/A N/A
1Due a technical limitation with the Cisco Gigabit Router cards, actual speed of the service is limited to 1.9 Gbps. Therefore,
1850 Mbps should be the highest “Minimum Bandwidth Commitment” offered to customers at this time.
HI CAP FLEX OC48 – PRIVATE LINE – With Managed Router
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
Incremental Usage Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
MIS HiCap OC48 600 Mbps 7470 See Above $20,438.00 Port $ 70.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC48 622 Mbps 7471 See Above $21,002.00 Port $ 70.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC48 700 Mbps 7472 See Above $23,268.00 Port $ 70.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC48 800 Mbps 7473 See Above $26,098.00 Port $ 70.00 Per Mbps
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 12 of 33 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Attachment 4 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
Incremental Usage Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
MIS HiCap OC48 1250 Mbps 7474 See Above $41,722.00 Port $ 70.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC48 1550 Mbps 7475 See Above $51,222.00 Port $ 70.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC48 1850 Mbps 7476 See Above $60,722.00 Port $ 70.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC48 2150 Mbps1 7477 See Above $70,222.00 Port $ 70.00 Per Mbps
MIS HiCap OC48 2450 Mbps1 7478 See Above $79,622.00 Port N/A N/A
1Due a technical limitation with the Cisco Gigabit Router cards, actual speed of the service is limited to
1.9 Gbps. Therefore, 1850 Mbps should be the highest "Minimum Bandwidth Commitment" offered to customers at this time.
HI CAP FLEX ETHERNET PORT ONLY
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
Incremental Usage Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet 2 Mbps 8301 $0.00 $165.20 Port $99.40 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet 3 Mbps 8302 $0.00 $238.00 Port $95.20 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet 4 Mbps 8303 $0.00 $301.00 Port $91.00 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet 5 Mbps 8304 $0.00 $315.00 Port $75.60 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet 6 Mbps 8305 $0.00 $350.00 Port $70.00 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet 7 Mbps 8306 $0.00 $396.20 Port $68.60 Per Mbps
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 13 of 33 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Attachment 4 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
Incremental Usage Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 8 Mbps 8307 $0.00 $438.20 Port 65.80 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 9 Mbps 8308 $0.00 $480.20 Port $64.40 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 10 Mbps 8309 $0.00 $515.20 Port $63.00 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 15 Mbps 8310 $0.00 $690.20 Port $56.00 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 20 Mbps 8311 $0.00 $865.20 Port $53.20 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 25 Mbps 8312 $0.00 $1,043.00 Port $50.40 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 30 Mbps 8313 $0.00 $1,218.00 Port $49.00 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 35 Mbps 8314 $0.00 $1,397.20 Port $49.00 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 40 Mbps 8315 $0.00 $1,235.30 Port $37.40 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 45 Mbps 8316 $0.00 $1,375.00 Port $37.40 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 50 Mbps 8382 $0.00 $1,489.40 Port $36.30 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 60 Mbps 8317 $0.00 $1,721.50 Port $35.20 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet 70 Mbps 8318 $0.00 $1,952.50 Port $34.10 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 80 Mbps 8319 $0.00 $2,183.50 Port $33.00 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet 90 Mbps 8320 $0.00 $2,414.50 Port $33.00 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 100 Mbps 8321 $0.00 $2,645.50 Port $31.90 Per Mbps
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 14 of 33 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Attachment 4 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
Incremental Usage Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet 120 Mbps 8346 $0.00 $3,107.50 Port $31.90 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 144 Mbps 8347 $0.00 $3,569.50 Port $30.80 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet 155 Mbps 8348 $0.00 $3,916.00 Port $30.80 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 200 Mbps 8349 $0.00 $4,614.50 Port $28.60 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet 250 Mbps 8350 $0.00 $5,393.30 Port $26.40 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 300 Mbps 8351 $0.00 $6,171.00 Port $25.30 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet 350 Mbps 8352 $0.00 $6,320.00 Port $22.00 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 400 Mbps 8353 $0.00 $7,028.00 Port $22.00 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet 450 Mbps 8354 $0.00 $7,735.00 Port $21.00 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 500 Mbps 8355 $0.00 $8,443.00 Port $21.00 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet 550 Mbps 8356 $0.00 $9,150.00 Port $20.00 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 600 Mbps 8357 $0.00 $9,858.00 Port $20.00 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet 622 Mbps 8358 $0.00 $10,140.00 Port $20.00 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 700 Mbps 8359 $0.00 $10,145.70 Port $18.00 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet 800 Mbps 8360 $0.00 $11,419.20 Port $18.00 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 900 Mbps 8361 $0.00 $12,757.50 Port $18.00 Per Mbps
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 15 of 33 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Attachment 4 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
Incremental Usage Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet 1000 Mbps 8362 $0.00 $14,085.00 Port N/A Per Mbps
HI CAP FLEX – 10 Gig ETHERNET PORT ONLY
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge
(NRC)
Monthly
Recurring Charge
(MRC)
Unit of
Measure
Incremental
Usage Monthly Recurring
Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 1500 Mbps 8385 $0.00 $13,158.75 Port $14.09 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet 2000 Mbps 8386 $0.00 $12,880.00 Port $8.77 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 2500 Mbps 8387 $0.00 $13,720.00 Port $6.44 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet 3000 Mbps 8388 $0.00 $14,400.00 Port $5.62 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 3500 Mbps 8389 $0.00 $16,747.50 Port $4.80 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet 4000 Mbps 8390 $0.00 $19,080.00 Port $4.79 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 4500 Mbps 8391 $0.00 $21,397.50 Port $4.77 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet 5000 Mbps 8392 $0.00 $23,400.00 Port $4.76 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 5500 Mbps 8393 $0.00 $25,987.50 Port $4.68 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet 6000 Mbps 8394 $0.00 $28,260.00 Port $4.73 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 6500 Mbps 8395 $0.00 $30,517.50 Port $4.71 Per Mbps
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 16 of 33 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Attachment 4 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
Incremental Usage Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet 7000 Mbps 8396 $0.00 $32,340.00 Port $4.70 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 7500 Mbps 8397 $0.00 $34,987.50 Port $4.62 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet 8000 Mbps 8398 $0.00 $37,200.00 Port $4.67 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 8500 Mbps 8399 $0.00 $39,397.50 Port $4.65 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet 9000 Mbps 8400 $0.00 $41,040.00 Port $4.64 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment Ethernet 9500 Mbps 8401 $0.00 $43,177.50 Port $4.56 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth Commitment
Ethernet 10000 Mbps 8402 $0.00 $45,300.00 Port $4.55 Per Mbps
HI CAP FLEX ETHERNET PORT ONLY – with Managed Router
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
Incremental Usage Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
On-Site Install Charges apply - see MIS Install Table above.
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 2 Mbps 8323 $0.00 $247.80 Port $99.40 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 3 Mbps 8324 $0.00 $320.60 Port $95.20 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 4 Mbps 8325 $0.00 $383.60 Port $91.00 Per Mbps
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 17 of 33 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Attachment 4 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
Incremental Usage Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 5 Mbps 8326 $0.00 $397.60 Port $75.60 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 6 Mbps 8327 $0.00 $432.60 Port $70.00 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 7 Mbps 8328 $0.00 $642.60 Port $68.60 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 8 Mbps 8329 $0.00 $684.60 Port $65.80 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 9 Mbps 8330 $0.00 $726.60 Port $64.40 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 10 Mbps 8331 $0.00 $761.60 Port $63.00 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 15 Mbps 8332 $0.00 $936.60 Port $56.00 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 20 Mbps 8333 $0.00 $1,111.60 Port $53.20 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 25 Mbps 8334 $0.00 $1,289.40 Port $50.40 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 30 Mbps 8335 $0.00 $1,464.40 Port $49.00 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 35 Mbps 8336 $0.00 $1,643.60 Port $49.00 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 40 Mbps 8337 $0.00 $1,428.90 Port $37.40 Per Mbps
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 18 of 33 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Attachment 4 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
Incremental Usage Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 45 Mbps 8338 $0.00 $1,568.60 Port $37.40 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 50 Mbps 8383 $0.00 $1,719.30 Port $36.30 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 60 Mbps 8339 $0.00 $1,981.10 Port $35.20 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 70 Mbps 8340 $0.00 $2,212.10 Port $34.10 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 80 Mbps 8341 $0.00 $2,443.10 Port $33.00 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 90 Mbps 8342 $0.00 $2,674.10 Port $33.00 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 100 Mbps 8343 $0.00 $2,905.10 Port $31.90 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 120 Mbps 8365 $0.00 $3,367.10 Port $31.90 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 144 Mbps 8366 $0.00 $3,829.10 Port $30.80 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 155 Mbps 8367 $0.00 $4,175.60 Port $30.80 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 200 Mbps 8368 $0.00 $5,011.60 Port $28.60 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 250 Mbps 8369 $0.00 $5,790.40 Port $26.40 Per Mbps
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 19 of 33 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Attachment 4 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
Incremental Usage Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 300 Mbps 8370 $0.00 $6,568.10 Port $25.30 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 350 Mbps 8371 $0.00 $6,681.00 Port $22.00 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 400 Mbps 8372 $0.00 $7,389.00 Port $22.00 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 450 Mbps 8373 $0.00 $8,096.00 Port $21.00 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 500 Mbps 8374 $0.00 $8,804.00 Port $21.00 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 550 Mbps 8375 $0.00 $9,511.00 Port $20.00 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 600 Mbps 8376 $0.00 $10,219.00 Port $20.00 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 622 Mbps 8377 $0.00 $10,501.00 Port $20.00 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 700 Mbps 8378 $0.00 $10,470.60 Port $18.00 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 800 Mbps 8379 $0.00 $11,744.10 Port $18.00 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 900 Mbps 8380 $0.00 $13,307.40 Port $18.00 Per Mbps
MIS Minimum Bandwidth
Commitment Ethernet w/Mgd Rtr 1000 Mbps 8381 $0.00 $14,634.90 Port N/A Per Mbps
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 20 of 33 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Attachment 4 11/29/12
ETHERNET ACCESS to LONG DISTANCE POP
Used with HI CAP FLEX ETHERNET PORT ONLY service.
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC) Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
100-Base-TX 2 Mbps Ethernet LNET2 $0.00 $450.00 Per circuit
100-Base-TX 4 Mbps Ethernet LNET4 $0.00 $500.00 Per circuit
100-Base-TX 5 Mbps Ethernet LNET5 $0.00 $540.00 Per circuit
100-Base-TX 8 Mbps Ethernet LNET8 $0.00 $590.00 Per circuit
100-Base-TX 10 Mbps Ethernet LNET10 $0.00 $720.00 Per circuit
100-Base-TX 20 Mbps Ethernet LNET20 $0.00 $860.00 Per circuit
100-Base-TX 50 Mbps Ethernet LNET50 $0.00 $975.00 Per circuit
100-Base-TX 100 Mbps Ethernet LNET100 $0.00 $1,125.00 Per circuit
1000-Base-SX/LX 150 Mbps Ethernet LNET150 $0.00 $1,400.00 Per circuit
1000-Base-SX/LX 250 Mbps Ethernet LNET250 $0.00 $1,725.00 Per circuit
1000-Base-SX/LX 500 Mbps Ethernet LNET500 $0.00 $2,200.00 Per circuit
1000-Base-SX/LX 600 Mbps Ethernet LNET600 $0.00 $2,544.90 Per circuit
1000-Base-SX/LX 1000 Mbps Ethernet LNET1G $0.00 $3,200.00 Per circuit
10G-Base-LSR 10000 Mbps Ethernet LNET10G $0.00 $4,700.00 Per circuit
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 21 of 33 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Attachment 4 11/29/12
BURSTABLE T1 - PRIVATE LINE, FRAME RELAY
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring
Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
MIS Burstable T1 Up to 128 Kbps
7301
N/C $ 148.50 Port
MIS Burstable T1 128.01 to 256 Kbps N/C $ 187.00 Port
MIS Burstable T1 256.01 to 384 Kbps N/C $ 222.75 Port
MIS Burstable T1 384.01 to 512 Kbps N/C $ 258.50 Port
MIS Burstable T1 512.01 to full T1 N/C $ 310.75 Port
BURSTABLE T1 - PRIVATE LINE, FRAME RELAY - with Managed Router
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
MIS Burstable T1 w/Mgd Rtr Up to 128 Kbps
7302
See Above $ 187.00 Port
MIS Burstable T1 w/Mgd Rtr 128.01 to 256 Kbps See Above $ 225.50 Port
MIS Burstable T1 w/Mgd Rtr 256.01 to 384 Kbps See Above $ 261.25 Port
MIS Burstable T1 w/Mgd Rtr 384.01 to 512 Kbps See Above $ 297.00 Port
MIS Burstable T1 w/Mgd Rtr 512.01 to full T1 See Above $ 349.25 Port
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 22 of 33 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Attachment 4 11/29/12
BURSTABLE T3 - PRIVATE LINE, ATM
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring
Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring
Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
MIS Burstable T3 Up to 6 Mbps
7303
N/C $ 606.00 Port
MIS Burstable T3 6.01 to 7.5 Mbps N/C $ 716.00 Port
MIS Burstable T3 7.51 to 9.0 Mbps N/C $ 826.00 Port
MIS Burstable T3 9.01 to 10.5 Mbps N/C $ 916.00 Port
MIS Burstable T3 10.51 to 12.0 Mbps N/C $ 1,006.00 Port
MIS Burstable T3 12.01 to 13.5 Mbps N/C $ 1,096.00 Port
MIS Burstable T3 13.51 to 15.0 Mbps N/C $ 1,186.00 Port
MIS Burstable T3 15.01 to 16.5 Mbps N/C $ 1,260.00 Port
MIS Burstable T3 16.51 to 18.0 Mbps N/C $ 1,336.00 Port
MIS Burstable T3 18.01 to 19.5 Mbps N/C $ 1,410.00 Port
MIS Burstable T3 19.51 to 21.0 Mbps N/C $ 1,486.00 Port
MIS Burstable T3 21.01 to 45.0 Mbps N/C $ 3,006.00 Port
BURSTABLE T3 - PRIVATE LINE, ATM - with Managed Router
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 23 of 33 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Attachment 4 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
MIS Burstable T3 w/Mgd Router Up to 6 Mbps
7304
See Above $ 724.00 Port
MIS Burstable T3 w/Mgd Router 6.01 to 7.5 Mbps See Above $ 1,068.00 Port
MIS Burstable T3 w/Mgd Router 7.51 to 9.0 Mbps See Above $ 1,178.00 Port
MIS Burstable T3 w/Mgd Router 9.01 to 10.5 Mbps See Above $ 1,268.00 Port
MIS Burstable T3 w/Mgd Router 10.51 to 12.0 Mbps See Above $ 1,358.00 Port
MIS Burstable T3 w/Mgd Router 12.01 to 13.5 Mbps See Above $ 1,448.00 Port
MIS Burstable T3 w/Mgd Router 13.51 to 15.0 Mbps See Above $ 1,538.00 Port
MIS Burstable T3 w/Mgd Router 15.01 to 16.5 Mbps See Above $ 1,612.00 Port
MIS Burstable T3 w/Mgd Router 16.51 to 18.0 Mbps See Above $ 1,688.00 Port
MIS Burstable T3 w/Mgd Router 18.01 to 19.5 Mbps See Above $ 1,762.00 Port
MIS Burstable T3 w/Mgd Router 19.51 to 21.0 Mbps See Above $ 1,838.00 Port
MIS Burstable T3 w/Mgd Router 21.01 to 45.0 Mbps See Above $ 3,358.00 Port
BURSTABLE OC3 - PRIVATE LINE
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge
(NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge
(MRC) Unit of Measure
MIS Burstable OC3 Up to 35 Mbps 7305 N/C $ 2,396.00 Port
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 24 of 33 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Attachment 4 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
MIS Burstable OC3 35.01 to 45 Mbps N/C $ 3,006.00 Port
MIS Burstable OC3 45.01 to 55 Mbps N/C $ 3,506.00 Port
MIS Burstable OC3 55.01 to 65 Mbps N/C $ 4,010.00 Port
MIS Burstable OC3 65.01 to 75 Mbps N/C $ 4,516.00 Port
MIS Burstable OC3 75.01 to 85 Mbps N/C $ 5,020.00 Port
MIS Burstable OC3 85.01 to 100 Mbps N/C $ 5,776.00 Port
MIS Burstable OC3 100.01 to 125 Mbps N/C $ 7,036.00 Port
MIS Burstable OC3 125.01 to 155 Mbps N/C $ 8,546.00 Port
BURSTABLE OC3 - PRIVATE LINE - with Managed Router
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
MIS Burstable OC3 w/Mgd Router Up to 35 Mbps
7306
See Above $ 2,748.00 Port
MIS Burstable OC3 w/Mgd Router 35.01 to 45 Mbps See Above $ 3,358.00 Port
MIS Burstable OC3 w/Mgd Router 45.01 to 55 Mbps See Above $ 3,978.00 Port
MIS Burstable OC3 w/Mgd Router 55.01 to 65 Mbps See Above $ 4,482.00 Port
MIS Burstable OC3 w/Mgd Router 65.01 to 75 Mbps See Above $ 4,988.00 Port
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 25 of 33 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Attachment 4 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
MIS Burstable OC3 w/Mgd Router 75.01 to 85 Mbps See Above $ 5,492.00 Port
MIS Burstable OC3 w/Mgd Router 85.01 to 100 Mbps See Above $ 6,248.00 Port
MIS Burstable OC3 w/Mgd Router 100.01 to 125 Mbps See Above $ 7,508.00 Port
MIS Burstable OC3 w/Mgd Router 125.01 to 155 Mbps See Above $ 9,018.00 Port
BURSTABLE OC-12- PRIVATE LINE
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
MIS Burstable OC12 Up to 75 Mbps
7307
N/C $ 4,516.00 Port
MIS Burstable OC12 75.01 to 150 Mbps N/C $ 7,500.00 Port
MIS Burstable OC12 150.01 to 225 Mbps N/C $10,486.00 Port
MIS Burstable OC12 225.01 to 300 Mbps N/C $13,466.00 Port
MIS Burstable OC12 300.01 to 375 Mbps N/C $16,016.00 Port
MIS Burstable OC12 375.01 to 450 Mbps N/C $18,566.00 Port
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 26 of 33 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Attachment 4 11/29/12
MIS Burstable OC12 450.01 to 525 Mbps N/C $21,086.00 Port
MIS Burstable OC12 525.01 to 622 Mbps N/C $24,340.00 Port
BURSTABLE OC-12- PRIVATE LINE - with Managed Router
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
MIS Burstable OC12 w/Mgd Router Up to 75
Mbps
7308
See
Above $ 4,988.00 Port
MIS Burstable OC12 w/Mgd Router 75.01 to 150
Mbps
See
Above $ 7,972.00 Port
MIS Burstable OC12 w/Mgd Router 150.01 to 225
Mbps
See
Above $10,958.00 Port
MIS Burstable OC12 w/Mgd Router 225.01 to 300
Mbps
See
Above $14,188.00 Port
MIS Burstable OC12 w/Mgd Router 300.01 to 375
Mbps
See
Above $16,738.00 Port
MIS Burstable OC12 w/Mgd Router 375.01 to 450
Mbps
See
Above $19,288.00 Port
MIS Burstable OC12 w/Mgd Router 450.01 to 525
Mbps
See
Above $21,808.00 Port
MIS Burstable OC12 w/Mgd Router 525.01 to 622
Mbps
See
Above $25,062.00 Port
BURSTABLE OC-48 - PRIVATE LINE
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
MIS Burstable OC48 Up to 1250 Mbps 7309 N/C $48,600.00 Port
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 27 of 33 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Attachment 4 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
MIS Burstable OC48 1251 to 1350 Mbps N/C $52,390.00 Port
MIS Burstable OC48 1351 to 1450 Mbps N/C $56,180.00 Port
MIS Burstable OC48 1451 to 1550 Mbps N/C $59,970.00 Port
MIS Burstable OC48 1551 to 1650 Mbps N/C $63,760.00 Port
MIS Burstable OC48 1651 to 1750 Mbps N/C $67,550.00 Port
MIS Burstable OC48 1751 to 1850 Mbps N/C $71,340.00 Port
MIS Burstable OC48 1851 to 1950 Mbps* N/C $75,130.00 Port
MIS Burstable OC48 1951 to 2050 Mbps* N/C $78,920.00 Port
MIS Burstable OC48 2051 to 2150 Mbps* N/C $82,710.00 Port
MIS Burstable OC48 2151 to 2250 Mbps* N/C $86,500.00 Port
MIS Burstable OC48 2251 to 2350 Mbps* N/C $90,290.00 Port
MIS Burstable OC48 2351 to 2450 Mbps* N/C $94,080.00 Port
BURSTABLE OC-48 - PRIVATE LINE - with Managed Router
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 28 of 33 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Attachment 4 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
MIS w/Mgd Router Burstable OC48 Up to 1250
Mbps
7310
See
Above $49,822.00 Port
MIS w/Mgd Router Burstable OC48 1251 to 1350
Mbps
See
Above $53,612.00 Port
MIS w/Mgd Router Burstable OC48 1351 to 1450
Mbps
See
Above $57,402.00 Port
MIS w/Mgd Router Burstable OC48 1451 to 1550 Mbps See Above $61,192.00 Port
MIS w/Mgd Router Burstable OC48 1551 to 1650 Mbps See Above $64,982.00 Port
MIS w/Mgd Router Burstable OC48 1651 to 1750
Mbps
See
Above $68,772.00 Port
MIS w/Mgd Router Burstable OC48 1751 to 1850 Mbps See Above $72,562.00 Port
MIS w/Mgd Router Burstable OC48 1851 to 1950 Mbps* See Above $76,352.00 Port
MIS w/Mgd Router Burstable OC48 1951 to 2050
Mbps*
See
Above $80,142.00 Port
MIS w/Mgd Router Burstable OC48 2051 to 2150
Mbps*
See
Above $83,932.00 Port
MIS w/Mgd Router Burstable OC48 2151 to 2250 Mbps* See Above $87,722.00 Port
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 29 of 33 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Attachment 4 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
MIS w/Mgd Router Burstable OC48 2251 to 2350
Mbps*
See
Above $91,512.00 Port
MIS w/Mgd Router Burstable OC48 2351 to 2450
Mbps*
See
Above $95,302.00 Port
Optional Features – Class of Service
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge
(NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge
(MRC) Unit of Measure Class of Service 1.5 Mbps Flat Rate FRCOST1 N/C $45.00 Port
Class of Service MLPPP NxT1 (3 to 12
Mbps)
FCOSML N/C $45.00 Port
Class of Service 10 Mbps Flat Rate FRCOS10 N/C $165.00 Port
Class of Service 15 Mbps Flat Rate FRCOS15 N/C $215.00 Port
Class of Service 20 Mbps Flat Rate FRCOS20 N/C $265.00 Port
Class of Service 25 Mbps Flat Rate FRCOS25 N/C $315.00 Port
Class of Service 30 Mbps Flat Rate FRCOS30 N/C $365.00 Port
Class of Service 35 Mbps Flat Rate FRCOS35 N/C $420.00 Port
Class of Service 40 Mbps Flat Rate FRCOS40 N/C $470.00 Port
Class of Service 45 Mbps Flat Rate FRCOS45 N/C $550.00 Port
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 30 of 33 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Attachment 4 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
Class of Service Burstable T1 BCOST1 N/C $45.00 Port
Class of Service Burstable T3 BCOST3 N/C $550.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex .05-1.5Mbps*
*Only Available with Ethernet Access
FCOS05 N/C $45.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 2 Mbps FCOS2 N/C $57.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 3 Mbps FCOS3 N/C $72.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 4 Mbps FCOS4 N/C $87.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 5 Mbps FCOS5 N/C $102.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 6 Mbps FCOS6 N/C $115.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 7 Mbps FCOS7 N/C $128.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 8 Mbps FCOS8 N/C $141.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 9 Mbps FCOS9 N/C $153.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 10 Mbps FCOS10 N/C $165.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 15 Mbps FCOS15 N/C $215.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 20 Mbps FCOS20 N/C $265.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 25 Mbps FCOS25 N/C $315.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 30 Mbps FCOS30 N/C $365.00 Port
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 31 of 33 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Attachment 4 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 35 Mbps FCOS35 N/C $420.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 40 Mbps FCOS40 N/C $470.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 45 Mbps FCOS45 N/C $550.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex OC3 FCOS155 N/C $550.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 45.1 – 155
Mbps FCOS250 N/C $1,000.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 200 – 250 Mbps FCOS350 N/C $1,080.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 300 – 350 Mbps FCOS600 N/C $1,160.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 400 – 600 Mbps FCOS622 N/C $1,240.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 622 Mbps FCOS1G N/C $1,400.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 700 – 1000
Mbps FCOST1 N/C $1,560.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 1500 Mbps FCOS15G N/C $1,580.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 2000 Mbps FCOS2G N/C $1,600.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 2500 Mbps FCOS25G N/C $1,620.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 3000 Mbps FCOS3G N/C $1,640.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 3500 Mbps FCOS35G N/C $1,660.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 4000 Mbps FCOS4G N/C $1,680.00 Port
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 32 of 33 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Attachment 4 11/29/12
Feature Description Identifier
Non-Recurring Charge (NRC)
Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 4500 Mbps FCOS45G N/C $1,700.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 5000 Mbps FCOS5G N/C $1,720.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 5500 Mbps FCOS55G N/C $1,740.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 6000 Mbps FCOS6G N/C $1,760.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 6500 Mbps FCOS65G N/C $1,780.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 7000 Mbps FCOS7G N/C $1,800.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 7500 Mbps FCOS75G N/C $1,820.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 8000 Mbps FCOS8G N/C $1,840.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 8500 Mbps FCOS85G N/C $1,860.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 9000 Mbps FCOS9G N/C $1,880.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 9500 Mbps FCOS95G N/C $1,900.00 Port
Class of Service Hi Cap Flex 10000 Mbps FCOS10G N/C $1,920.00 Port
Optional Features – AT&T Secure E-Mail Gateway (SEG)
Feature Name Non-Recurring Charge (NRC) Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
SEG Advanced
• Less than 50 $ 150.00 (Set Up Fee) $ 6.00 Per Seat
• 50 – 74 None $ 1.58 Per Seat
6.1.7 – Managed Internet Service 33 of 33 Revised: MSA 1 - Amendment No. 16 Attachment 4 11/29/12
Feature Name Non-Recurring Charge (NRC) Monthly Recurring Charge (MRC) Unit of Measure
• 75 – 99 None $ 1.40 Per Seat
• 100 – 500 None $ 1.25 Per Seat
• 501 – 1000 None $ 1.05 Per Seat
• 1001 – and above None $ 1.00 Per Seat
SEG Premium
• Less than 50 None $ 9.00 Per Seat
• 50 – 74 None $ 3.06 Per Seat
• 75 – 99 None $ 2.77 Per Seat
• 100 – 500 None $ 2.66 Per Seat
• 501 – 1000 None $ 2.49 Per Seat
• 1001 – 2500 None $ 2.39 Per Seat
• 2501 – and above None $ 2.29 Per Seat
Archiving – 1 year
• Less than 50 $ 1,800.00 (Set Up Fee) $ 4.17 Per Seat
• 50 – 99 None $ 2.03 Per Seat
• 100 – 750 None $ 1.70 Per Seat
Archiving – 7 years
• Less than 50 $ 1,800.00 (Set Up Fee) $ 4.17 Per Seat
• 50 – 99 None $ 3.34 Per Seat
• 100 – 750 None $ 2.80 Per Seat
CALNET 2 – MSA 1 SLA
MSA 1 SLA Revised: MSA 1 – Amendment No. 16
11/29/12
Volume 1 - Page 6-807
6.1.11.2.14 Time to Repair (TTR) – Minor (M)
Services Time to Repair (TTR)-Minor
Analog
Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM)
Carrier (DS0,DS1,DS3)
Frame Relay
Managed Frame Relay
ISDN Primary Rate Interface (PRI)
SONET (Ring and Point-to-
Point)
AVPN
AVPN Managed Service Bundles
OPT-E-MAN
AT&T Switched Ethernet
(ASE)
OPT-E-MAN Managed
Service Bundles
OPT-E-WAN Managed
Service Bundles
CSME
EPLS-WAN
FibreMAN
MON Ring
Ethernet to LD POP
Switched 56
Definition
A Minor Fault shall be defined as a trouble ticket opened with the Contractor’s helpdesk on the loss of any circuit or service to a single
End-User at a site.
Measurement Process
This Service Level Agreement (SLA) applies to the services listed in the adjacent column. This SLA is based on a trouble ticket outage
durations. The circuit or service is unusable during the time the trouble ticket is recorded as open in the Contractors trouble ticket
system minus stop clock conditions. This SLA is applied per occurrence. Trouble reporting shall be 7X24. Any circuits or service
reported by End-User/Customer as not having been restored shall have the outage time adjusted to the actual restoration time.
Objectives
Analog=less than 5 hours
DS0=less than 5 hours
DS1=less than 4 hours
DS3=less than 2 hours
PRI ISDN=less than 5 hours
10/100 Mbps = less than 4 hours
1000 Mbps (1 Gbps) = less than 4 hours
10 Gbps = less than 4 hours
OC-X = less than 3 hours
LAN-PHY (10.3 Gbps) = less than 4 hours
WAN-PHY (9.95 Gbps) = less than 4 hours
Immediate Rights and Remedies
Failing to meet the SLA Objective shall result in a 15 percent rebate
of the TMRC per occurrence.
End-User Escalation Process
DTS/ONS Escalation Process
Monthly Rights and Remedies
N/A
CALNET 2 – MSA 1 SLA
MSA 1 SLA Revised: MSA 1 – Amendment No. 16
11/29/12
Volume 1 - Page 6-810E
6.1.11.2.14.e Time to Repair (TTR) – Opt-E-WAN
Services Time to Repair (TTR) – OPT-E-WAN
OPT-E-WAN Definition
A Minor Fault shall be defined as a trouble ticket opened with the Contractor’s helpdesk on the loss of any circuit or service to a single
End-User at a site.
Measurement Process
This Service Level Agreement (SLA) applies to the services listed in the adjacent column. This SLA is based on a trouble ticket outage
durations. The circuit or service is unusable during the time the trouble ticket is recorded as open in the Contractors trouble ticket
system minus stop clock conditions. This SLA is applied per occurrence. Trouble reporting shall be 7X24. Any circuits or service
reported by End-User/Customer as not having been restored shall have the outage time adjusted to the actual restoration time.
Objective:
< 1 Minute
Immediate Rights and Remedies:
Failing to meet the SLA objective shall result in a rebate of the
TMRC based on the credit schedule below:
Outage Time No Resiliency
1 minute <= 2 hours 3.3%
2 hours <= 4 hours 10%
4 hours <= 8 hours 25%
8 hours <= 12 hours 50%
> 12 hours 100%
Monthly Rights and Remedies
N/A
City of Palo Alto (ID # 5378)
City Council Staff Report
Report Type: Consent Calendar Meeting Date: 1/20/2015
City of Palo Alto Page 1
Summary Title: Contract for FY 15 Asphalt Paving Project
Title: Approval of a Contract with C.F. Archibald Paving Inc. In The Amount of
$2,220,134 for the FY 2015 Asphalt Paving Project, the 2nd of 4 Contracts in
the FY 2015 Street Maintenance Program Project (CIP PE-86070)
From: City Manager
Lead Department: Public Works
Recommendation
Staff recommends that Council:
1. Approve, and authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute, the
attached construction contract with C.F. Archibald Paving Inc. (Attachment
A) in an amount not to exceed $2,220,134 for the Palo Alto FY 2015 Asphalt
Paving Project (Capital Improvement Program Projects PE-86070, PE-09003,
OS-09001, and SD-06101); and
2. Authorize the City Manager or his designee to negotiate and execute one or
more change orders to the contract with C.F. Archibald Paving Inc. for
related, additional but unforeseen work which may develop during the
project, the total value of which shall not exceed $222,013.
Background
The Public Works Engineering Services Division manages construction contracts
for concrete repair, preventive maintenance, resurfacing and reconstruction of
various city streets on an annual basis. The candidate streets are surveyed
biannually by Public Works Engineering staff and then rated by a computerized
pavement maintenance management system (PMMS) and by the Metropolitan
Transportation Commission’s (MTC) pavement analysis program. This contract is
the second of four contracts for the FY 2015 streets program.
City of Palo Alto Page 2
All work on the streets has been coordinated with the City’s Utilities Department
and the Planning and Community Environment Department’s Transportation
Division to minimize cutting newly resurfaced streets. Extensive public outreach
will be conducted before and during the construction phase to inform the
community step-by-step throughout the process, including flyers sent to adjacent
residences and businesses, and notices will be posted on Nextdoor and the City’s
website. In addition, staff will interface with the Palo Alto Downtown Business
and Professional Association, neighborhood associations, and other organizations
and businesses as appropriate.
Discussion
Project Description
Staff is recommending approval of the second of four street resurfacing contracts
to be implemented this fiscal year as part of an enhanced program to improve the
surface condition of Palo Alto’s streets. Work to be performed under this contract
is estimated to raise the city-wide average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) score
by approximately one point. Palo Alto has a goal of raising the city-wide average
PCI to 85, representing very good or excellent pavement conditions, by 2019. The
City’s 2014 year end PCI was 78.
This project includes repaving 5.7 lane miles (543,000 square feet of new asphalt).
Additionally, the project scope includes more than 21,000 square feet of concrete
road base repair, 3,000 lineal feet of new curb and gutter and 36 new Americans
With Disabilities Act-compliant (ADA) sidewalk ramps. The list of streets being
resurfaced is included as Attachment B. Maps of the FY 2015 street maintenance
work and the 5-year plan for street repaving are available at
www.cityofpaloalto.org/streets.
The project addresses the 50% of the Southgate neighborhood that remains in
need of resurfacing, along with various streets throughout the City which are in
poor condition. In addition to street maintenance work, the project will repave
and widen the Terman School pathway, repave the multi-use pathway along
Arastradero Road and replace much of the rutted baserock in the Baylands Sailing
Station Parking lot with concrete. On Laguna Avenue, new storm drain inlets will
be installed and tied into the existing system in advance of the planned One Bay
Area Grant (OBAG) street resurfacing project planned for the Spring of 2015.
City of Palo Alto Page 3
Bid Process
On November 26, 2014, a notice inviting formal bids (IFB) for the Palo Alto FY
2015 Asphalt Paving Project was posted at City Hall and was sent to 16 builder’s
exchanges and 18 contractors. The bidding period was 21 calendar days. Bids
were received from 6 contractors on December 16, 2014 as listed on the attached
Bid Summary (Attachment C).
Summary of Bid Process
Bid Name/Number Palo Alto FY 2015 Asphalt Paving Project
Proposed Length of Project 150 calendar days
Number of Bid Packages Sent
to Builder’s Exchanges 16
Number of Bid Packages Sent
to Contractors 18
Total Days to Respond to Bid 21
Pre-Bid Meeting? No
Number of Bids Received: 6
Bid Price Range
(base bid only) From a low of $2,108,707 to a high of $3,151,022
Bids ranged from a high of $3,151,022 to a low bid of $2,108,707 and from 40%
above to 7% below the engineer’s estimate of $2,266,397. Staff has reviewed all
bids and recommends that the bid of $2,108,707 submitted by C.F. Archibald
Paving Inc. be accepted and that C.F. Archibald Paving Inc. be declared the lowest
responsible bidder. Staff recommends awarding the base bid plus Add Alternate
#1, resulting in a contract amount of $2,220,134. Add Alternate #1 provides for
the repaving of San Jude Avenue and one block of Kendall Avenue, both in the
Barron Park neighborhood. A contingency allocation in the amount of $222,013,
which equals ten percent of the total contract price, is requested for related,
additional, but unforeseen work which may develop during the project.
Staff reviewed other similar projects performed by the lowest responsible bidder,
C.F. Archibald Paving Inc., including past paving projects performed for the City.
There were no significant complaints with its previous work. Staff also checked
with the Contractors State License Board and found that the contractor has an
active license on file.
City of Palo Alto Page 4
Resource Impact
Funding for the Palo Alto FY 2015 Asphalt Paving Project is available in Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) Projects PE-86070 Street Resurfacing, PE-09003 City
Facility Parking Lot Maintenance, SD-06101 Storm Drain Replacement and
Rehabilitation, and OS-09001 Off-Road Pathway Resurfacing and Repair. The
Baylands Sailing Station parking lot maintenance work will be funded in part by a
$40,000 grant awarded by the California Coastal Commission to the Community
Services Department for ADA improvements to the parking lot. The acceptance of
this grant and related Budget Amendment Ordinance will be brought forward
separately for City Council consideration for the January 26, 2015 City Council
meeting. The remaining funding is provided by CIP PE-09003. The funding
allocation is as follows:
Funding
Source Contract Contingency
Total
Encumbrance
1 PE-86070 $1,718,465 $ 171,846 $ 1,890,311
2 PE-09003 $ 221,301 $ 22,130 $ 243,431
3 OS-09001 $ 251,606 $ 25,160 $ 276,767
4 SD-06101 $ 28,762 $ 2,876 $ 31,638
Totals $2,220,134 $ 222,013 $ 2,442,147
Policy Implications
This project is in conformance with the City of Palo Alto’s Comprehensive Plan
and does not represent any changes to existing City policies.
Environmental Review
Street resurfacing projects are categorically exempt from the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15301c of the CEQA Guidelines
as repair, maintenance and/or minor alteration of the existing facilities and no
further environmental review is necessary.
Attachments:
A - C.F. Archibald Paving Inc Contract (PDF)
B - FY15 Streets List (PDF)
City of Palo Alto Page 5
C - FY 15 AC PAVING PROJECT BID SUMMARY (PDF)
Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 1 Rev. July 2012
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
Contract No. C15157278
City of Palo Alto
and
C.F. Archibald Paving Inc.
PROJECT
FY 2015 Asphalt Paving Project
Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 2 Rev. July 2012
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION 1. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS AND DEFINITIONS……………………………….. .................... 5
1.1 Recitals ................................................................................................................ 5
1.2 Definitions ........................................................................................................... 5
SECTION 2. THE PROJECT……………………………………………………………………………… .............................. 5
SECTION 3. THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS…………………………………………………………. ......................... 5
3.1 List of Documents …………………………………………………………………………………………. ..... 5
3.2 Order of Precedence …………………………………………………………………………… ................ 6
SECTION 4. THE WORK ………………………………………………………………………………… .............................. 7
SECTION 5. PROJECT TEAM ………………………………………………………………………….. ............................. 7
SECTION 6. TIME OF COMPLETION ………………………………………………………………….. .......................... 7
6.1 Time Is of Essence ........................................................................................ ……… 7
6.2 Commencement of Work ..................................................................................... 7
6.3 Contract Time ....................................................................................................... 7
6.4 Liquidated Damages ............................................................................................. 7
6.4.1 Entitlement……………………………………………………………………………………………. 7
6.4.2 Daily Amount…………………………………………………………………………………………. 8
6.4.3 Exclusive Remedy………………………………………………………………………………….. 8
6.4.4 Other Remedies…………………………………………………………………………………... 8
6.5 Adjustments to Contract Time ........................................................................... … 8
SECTION 7. COMPENSATION TO CONTRACTOR………………………………………………………………………... 8
7.1 Contract Sum ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 1
7.2 Full Compensation …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 9
7.3 Compensation for Extra or Deleted Work …………………………………………………………….9
7.3.1 Self Performed Work………………………………………………………………………………… 9
7.3.2 Subcontractors…………………………………………………………………………………………. 9
SECTION 8. STANDARD OF CARE ................................................................................................... 9
SECTION 9. INDEMNIFICATION ...................................................................................................... 10
9.1 Hold Harmless…………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 10
9.2 Survival………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 10
SECTION 10. NONDISCRIMINATION .............................................................................................. 10
SECTION 11. INSURANCE AND BONDS .......................................................................................... 10
Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 3 Rev. July 2012
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
SECTION 12. PROHIBITION AGAINST TRANSFERS .......................................................................... 11
SECTION 13. NOTICES .................................................................................................................... 11
13.1 Method of Notice ………………………………………………………………………………………………..11
13.2 Notice Recipients ................................................................................................. 11
13.3 Change of Address ............................................................................................... 12
14.1 Resolution of Contract Disputes ........................................................................... 12
14.2 Resolution of Other Disputes ............................................................................... 12
14.2.1 Non‐Contract Disputes ……………………………………………………………………………….12
14.2.2 Litigation, City Election ……………………………………………………...........................13
14.3 Submission of Contract Dispute …………………………………………………………………………..13
14.3.1 By Contractor …………………………………………………………………………………………. 13
14.3.2 By City ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 13
14.4 Contract Dispute Resolution Process ............................................................... …… 13
14.4.1 Direct Negotiation………………………………………………………………………… ………….13
14.4.2 Deferral of Contract Disputes ………………………………………………………………… 14
14.4.3 Mediation ………………………………………………………………………………………………….14
14.4.4 Binding Arbitration ……………………………………………………………………………………15
14.5 Non‐Waiver …………………………………………………………………………………………………………16
SECTION 15. DEFAULT ................................................................................................................... 16
15.1 Notice of Default .................................................................................................. 16
15.2 Opportunity to Cure Default ................................................................................ 16
SECTION 16. CITY'S RIGHTS AND REMEDIES .................................................................................. 16
16.1 Remedies Upon Default ....................................................................................... 16
16.1.1 Delete Certain Servic………………………………………………………...........................16
16.1.2 Perform and Withhold ……………………………………………………………………………. 16
16.1.3 Suspend The Construction Contract ………………………………………………………….16
16.1.4 Terminate the Construction Contract for Default ……………………………………..17
16.1.5 Invoke the Performance Bond ………………………………………………………………….17
16.1.6 Additional Provisions ……………………………………………………………………………….17
16.2 Delays by Sureties ................................................................................................ 17
16.3 Damages to City ................................................................................................... 17
16.3.1 For Contractor's Default …………………………………………………………………………..17
16.3.2 Compensation for Losses ………………………………………………………………………….17
16.5 Suspension by City for Convenience ..................................................................... 18
16.6 Termination Without Cause ................................................................................. 18
Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 4 Rev. July 2012
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
16.6.1 Compensation ………………………………………………………………………………………….18
16.6.2 Subcontractors …………………………………………………………………………………………18
16.7 Contractor’s Duties Upon Termination ................................................................. 19
SECTION 17. CONTRACTOR'S RIGHTS AND REMEDIES ................................................................... 19
17.1 Contractor’s Remedies ......................................................................................... 19
17.1.1 For Work Stoppage ………………………………………………………………………………….. 19
17.1.2 For City's Non‐Payment …………………………………………………………………………… 19
17.2 Damages to Contractor ........................................................................................ 19
SECTION 18. ACCOUNTING RECORDS ............................................................................................ 19
18.1 Financial Management and City Access .......................................................... ……. 19
18.2 Compliance with City Requests ........................................................................ …. 20
SECTION 19. INDEPENDENT PARTIES ............................................................................................. 20
SECTION 20. NUISANCE ................................................................................................................. 20
SECTION 21. PERMITS AND LICENSES ............................................................................................ 20
SECTION 22. WAIVER .................................................................................................................... 20
SECTION 23. GOVERNING LAW ..................................................................................................... 20
SECTION 24. COMPLETE AGREEMENT ........................................................................................... 21
SECTION 25. SURVIVAL OF CONTRACT .......................................................................................... 21
SECTION 26. PREVAILING WAGES .................................................................................................. 21
SECTION 27. NON APPROPRIATION .............................................................................................. 21
SECTION 28. GOVERNMENTAL POWERS ........................................................................................ 21
SECTION 29. ATTORNEY FEES ........................................................................................................ 21
SECTION 30. COUNTERPARTS ........................................................................................................ 22
SECTION 31. SEVERABILITY ........................................................................................................... 22
Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 5 Rev. July 2012
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
THIS CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT entered into on January 20, 2015 (“Execution Date”) by and between the
CITY OF PALO ALTO, a California chartered municipal corporation ("City"), and C.F. ARCHIBALD PAVING INC.
("Contractor"), is made with reference to the following:
R E C I T A L S:
A. City is a municipal corporation duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the State of
California with the power to carry on its business as it is now being conducted under the statutes of the
State of California and the Charter of City.
B. Contractor is a California Corporation duly organized and in good standing in the State of Ca,
Contractor’s License Number 267077. Contractor represents that it is duly licensed by the State of
California and has the background, knowledge, experience and expertise to perform the obligations set
forth in this Construction Contract.
C. On November 26, 2014, City issued an Invitation for Bids (IFB) to contractors for the Fy 2015
Asphalt Paving Project (“Project”). In response to the IFB, Contractor submitted a bid.
D. City and Contractor desire to enter into this Construction Contract for the Project, and other
services as identified in the Bid Documents for the Project upon the following terms and conditions.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and undertakings hereinafter set forth
and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, it is mutually agreed by and between the undersigned parties as follows:
SECTION 1 INCORPORATION OF RECITALS AND DEFINITIONS.
1.1 Recitals.
All of the recitals are incorporated herein by reference.
1.2 Definitions.
Capitalized terms shall have the meanings set forth in this Construction Contract and/or in the
General Conditions. If there is a conflict between the definitions in this Construction Contract and
in the General Conditions, the definitions in this Construction Contract shall prevail.
SECTION 2 THE PROJECT.
The Project is the construction of the FY 2015 Asphalt Paving Project ("Project").
SECTION 3 THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.
3.1 List of Documents.
The Contract Documents (sometimes collectively referred to as “Agreement” or “Bid Documents”) consist
of the following documents which are on file with the Purchasing Division and are hereby incorporated by
reference.
1) Change Orders
2) Field Change Orders
Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 6 Rev. July 2012
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
3) Contract
4) Project Plans and Drawings
5) Technical Specifications
6) Special Provisions
7) Notice Inviting Bids
8) Instructions to Bidders
9) General Conditions
10) Bidding Addenda
11) Invitation for Bids
12) Contractor's Bid/Non‐Collusion Affidavit
13) Reports listed in the Bidding Documents
14) Public Works Department’s Standard Drawings and Specifications dated 2007 and
updated from time to time
15) Utilities Department’s Water, Gas, Wastewater, Electric Utilities Standards dated 2005
and updated from time to time
16) City of Palo Alto Traffic Control Requirements
17) City of Palo Alto Truck Route Map and Regulations
18) Notice Inviting Pre‐Qualification Statements, Pre‐Qualification Statement, and Pre‐
Qualification Checklist (if applicable)
19) Performance and Payment Bonds
20) Insurance Forms
3.2 Order of Precedence.
For the purposes of construing, interpreting and resolving inconsistencies between and among the
provisions of this Contract, the Contract Documents shall have the order of precedence as set forth in the
preceding section. If a claimed inconsistency cannot be resolved through the order of precedence, the City
shall have the sole power to decide which document or provision shall govern as may be in the best
interests of the City.
Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 7 Rev. July 2012
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
SECTION 4 THE WORK.
The Work includes all labor, materials, equipment, services, permits, fees, licenses and taxes, and all other
things necessary for Contractor to perform its obligations and complete the Project, including, without
limitation, any Changes approved by City, in accordance with the Contract Documents and all Applicable
Code Requirements.
SECTION 5 PROJECT TEAM.
In addition to Contractor, City has retained, or may retain, consultants and contractors to provide
professional and technical consultation for the design and construction of the Project. The Project requires
that Contractor operate efficiently, effectively and cooperatively with City as well as all other members of
the Project Team and other contractors retained by City to construct other portions of the Project.
SECTION 6 TIME OF COMPLETION.
6.1 Time Is of Essence.
Time is of the essence with respect to all time limits set forth in the Contract Documents.
6.2 Commencement of Work.
Contractor shall commence the Work on the date specified in City’s Notice to Proceed.
6.3 Contract Time.
Work hereunder shall begin on the date specified on the City’s Notice to Proceed and shall be
completed
not later than .
within One Hundred And Twenty calendar days (120) after the commencement date
specified in City’s Notice to Proceed.
6.4 Liquidated Damages.
6.4.1 Entitlement.
City and Contractor acknowledge and agree that if Contractor fails to fully and
satisfactorily complete the Work within the Contract Time, City will suffer, as a result of
Contractor’s failure, substantial damages which are both extremely difficult and
impracticable to ascertain. Such damages may include, but are not limited to:
(i) Loss of public confidence in City and its contractors and consultants.
(ii) Loss of public use of public facilities.
(iii) Extended disruption to public.
Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 8 Rev. July 2012
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
6.4.2 Daily Amount.
City and Contractor have reasonably endeavored, but failed, to ascertain the actual
damage that City will incur if Contractor fails to achieve Substantial Completion of the
entire Work within the Contract Time. Therefore, the parties agree that in addition to all
other damages to which City may be entitled other than delay damages, in the event
Contractor shall fail to achieve Substantial Completion of the entire Work within the
Contract Time, Contractor shall pay City as liquidated damages the amount of $500 per
day for each Day occurring after the expiration of the Contract Time until Contractor
achieves Substantial Completion of the entire Work. The liquidated damages amount is
not a penalty but considered to be a reasonable estimate of the amount of damages City
will suffer by delay in completion of the Work.
6.4.3 Exclusive Remedy.
City and Contractor acknowledge and agree that this liquidated damages provision shall
be City’s only remedy for delay damages caused by Contractor’s failure to achieve
Substantial Completion of the entire Work within the Contract Time.
6.4.4 Other Remedies.
City is entitled to any and all available legal and equitable remedies City may have where
City’s Losses are caused by any reason other than Contractor’s failure to achieve
Substantial Completion of the entire Work within the Contract Time.
6.5 Adjustments to Contract Time.
The Contract Time may only be adjusted for time extensions approved by City and agreed to by
Change Order executed by City and Contractor in accordance with the requirements of the
Contract Documents.
SECTION 7 COMPENSATION TO CONTRACTOR.
Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 1 Rev. July 2012
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
7.1 Contract Sum.
Contractor shall be compensated for satisfactory completion of the Work in compliance with the
Contract Documents the Contract Sum of Two Million Two Hundred Twenty Thousand One
Hundred Thirty Four Dollars ($2,220,134).
[This amount includes the Base Bid and Add Alternates 1 .]
/ /
/ /
Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 9 Rev. July 2012
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
7.2 Full Compensation.
The Contract Sum shall be full compensation to Contractor for all Work provided by Contractor
and, except as otherwise expressly permitted by the terms of the Contract Documents, shall cover
all Losses arising out of the nature of the Work or from the acts of the elements or any unforeseen
difficulties or obstructions which may arise or be encountered in performance of the Work until
its Acceptance by City, all risks connected with the Work, and any and all expenses incurred due to
suspension or discontinuance of the Work. The Contract Sum may only be adjusted for Change
Orders issued, executed and satisfactorily performed in accordance with the requirements of the
Contract Documents.
7.3 Compensation for Extra or Deleted Work.
The Contract Sum shall be adjusted (either by addition or credit) for Changes in the Work involving
Extra Work or Deleted Work based on one or more of the following methods to be selected by
City:
1. Unit prices stated in the Contract Documents or agreed upon by City and Contractor,
which unit prices shall be deemed to include Contractor Markup and
Subcontractor/Sub‐subcontractor Markups permitted by this Section.
2. A lump sum agreed upon by City and Contractor, based on the estimated Allowable
Costs and Contractor Markup and Subcontractor Markup computed in accordance
with this Section.
3. Contractor’s Allowable Costs, plus Contractor Markup and Subcontractor Markups
applicable to such Extra Work computed in accordance with this Section.
Contractor Markup and Subcontractor/Sub‐subcontractor Markups set forth herein are the full
amount of compensation to be added for Extra Work or to be subtracted for Deleted Work that is
attributable to overhead (direct and indirect) and profit of Contractor and of its Subcontractors
and Sub‐subcontractors, of every Tier. When using this payment methodology, Contractor
Markup and Subcontractor/Sub‐subcontractor Markups, which shall not be compounded, shall be
computed as follows:
7.3.1 Markup Self‐Performed Work.
10% of the Allowable Costs for that portion of the Extra Work or Deleted Work to be
performed by Contractor with its own forces.
7.3.2 Markup for Work Performed by Subcontractors.
15% of the Allowable Costs for that portion of the Extra Work or Deleted Work to be
performed by a first Tier Subcontractor.
SECTION 8 STANDARD OF CARE.
Contractor agrees that the Work shall be performed by qualified, experienced and well‐supervised
personnel. All services performed in connection with this Construction Contract shall be performed in a
manner consistent with the standard of care under California law applicable to those who specialize in
providing such services for projects of the type, scope and complexity of the Project.
Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 10 Rev. July 2012
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
SECTION 9 INDEMNIFICATION.
9.1 Hold Harmless.
To the fullest extent allowed by law, Contractor will defend, indemnify, and hold harmless City, its
City Council, boards and commissions, officers, agents, employees, representatives and volunteers
(hereinafter collectively referred to as "Indemnitees"), through legal counsel acceptable to City,
from and against any and all Losses arising directly or indirectly from, or in any manner relating to
any of, the following:
(i) Performance or nonperformance of the Work by Contractor or its Subcontractors or Sub‐
subcontractors, of any tier;
(ii) Performance or nonperformance by Contractor or its Subcontractors or Sub‐
subcontractors of any tier, of any of the obligations under the Contract Documents;
(iii) The construction activities of Contractor or its Subcontractors or Sub‐subcontractors, of
any tier, either on the Site or on other properties;
(iv) The payment or nonpayment by Contractor to any of its employees, Subcontractors or
Sub‐subcontractors of any tier, for Work performed on or off the Site for the Project; and
(v) Any personal injury, property damage or economic loss to third persons associated with
the performance or nonperformance by Contractor or its Subcontractors or Sub‐
subcontractors of any tier, of the Work.
However, nothing herein shall obligate Contractor to indemnify any Indemnitee for Losses
resulting from the sole or active negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitee. Contractor
shall pay City for any costs City incurs to enforce this provision. Nothing in the Contract
Documents shall be construed to give rise to any implied right of indemnity in favor of Contractor
against City or any other Indemnitee.
9.2 Survival.
The provisions of Section 9 shall survive the termination of this Construction Contract.
SECTION 10 NONDISCRIMINATION.
As set forth in Palo Alto Municipal Code section 2.30.510, Contractor certifies that in the performance of
this Agreement, it shall not discriminate in the employment of any person because of the race, skin color,
gender, age, religion, disability, national origin, ancestry, sexual orientation, housing status, marital status,
familial status, weight or height of such person. Contractor acknowledges that it has read and understands
the provisions of Section 2.30.510 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code relating to Nondiscrimination
Requirements and the penalties for violation thereof, and will comply with all requirements of Section
2.30.510 pertaining to nondiscrimination in employment.
SECTION 11 INSURANCE AND BONDS.
On or before the Execution Date, Contractor shall provide City with evidence that it has obtained insurance
and Performance and Payment Bonds satisfying all requirements in Article 11 of the General Conditions.
Failure to do so shall be deemed a material breach of this Construction Contract.
Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 11 Rev. July 2012
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
SECTION 12 PROHIBITION AGAINST TRANSFERS.
City is entering into this Construction Contract based upon the stated experience and qualifications of the
Contractor and its subcontractors set forth in Contractor’s Bid. Accordingly, Contractor shall not assign,
hypothecate or transfer this Construction Contract or any interest therein directly or indirectly, by
operation of law or otherwise without the prior written consent of City. Any assignment, hypothecation or
transfer without said consent shall be null and void.
The sale, assignment, transfer or other disposition of any of the issued and outstanding capital stock of
Contractor or of any general partner or joint venturer or syndicate member of Contractor, if the Contractor
is a partnership or joint venture or syndicate or co‐tenancy shall result in changing the control of
Contractor, shall be construed as an assignment of this Construction Contract. Control means more than
fifty percent (50%) of the voting power of the corporation or other entity.
SECTION 13 NOTICES.
13.1 Method of Notice.
All notices, demands, requests or approvals to be given under this Construction Contract shall be given in
writing and shall be deemed served on the earlier of the following:
(i) On the date delivered if delivered personally;
(ii) On the third business day after the deposit thereof in the United States mail, postage prepaid, and
addressed as hereinafter provided;
(iii) On the date sent if sent by facsimile transmission;
(iv) On the date sent if delivered by electronic mail; or
(v) On the date it is accepted or rejected if sent by certified mail.
13.2 Notice Recipients.
All notices, demands or requests (including, without limitation, Claims) from Contractor to City
shall include the Project name and the number of this Construction Contract and shall be
addressed to City at:
To City: City of Palo Alto
City Clerk
250 Hamilton Avenue
P.O. Box 10250
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Copy to: City of Palo Alto
Public Works Administration
250 Hamilton Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Attn: Holly Boyd
Or
Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 12 Rev. July 2012
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
City of Palo Alto
Utilities Engineering
250 Hamilton Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Attn:
In addition, copies of all Claims by Contractor under this Construction Contract shall be provided
to the following:
Palo Alto City Attorney’s Office
250 Hamilton Avenue
P.O. Box 10250
Palo Alto, California 94303
All Claims shall be delivered personally or sent by certified mail.
All notices, demands, requests or approvals from City to Contractor shall be addressed to:
C.F. Archibald Paving Inc.
Po Box 37
Redwood City, Ca 94064
Attn: Curtis Archibald
13.3 Change of Address.
In the event of any change of address, the moving party shall notify the other party of the change
of address in writing. Each party may, by written notice only, add, delete or replace any
individuals to whom and addresses to which notice shall be provided.
SECTION 14 DISPUTE RESOLUTION.
14.1 Resolution of Contract Disputes.
Contract Disputes shall be resolved by the parties in accordance with the provisions of this Section
14, in lieu of any and all rights under the law that either party have its rights adjudged by a trial
court or jury. All Contract Disputes shall be subject to the Contract Dispute Resolution Process set
forth in this Section 14, which shall be the exclusive recourse of Contractor and City for such
Contract Disputes.
14.2 Resolution of Other Disputes.
14.2.1 Non‐Contract Disputes.
Contract Disputes shall not include any of the following:
(i) Penalties or forfeitures prescribed by statute or regulation imposed by a
governmental agency;
(ii) Third party tort claims for personal injury, property damage or death relating to
any Work performed by Contractor or its Subcontractors or Sub‐subcontractors
of any tier;
(iii) False claims liability under California Government Code Section 12650, et. seq.;
(iv) Defects in the Work first discovered by City after Final Payment by City to
Contractor;
(v) Stop notices; or
(vi) The right of City to specific performance or injunctive relief to compel
performance of any provision of the Contract Documents.
Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 13 Rev. July 2012
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
14.2.2 Litigation, City Election.
Matters that do not constitute Contract Disputes shall be resolved by way of an action
filed in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Clara, and shall not
be subject to the Contract Dispute Resolution Process. However, the City reserves the
right, in its sole and absolute discretion, to treat such disputes as Contract Disputes.
Upon written notice by City of its election as provided in the preceding sentence, such
dispute shall be submitted by the parties and finally decided pursuant to the Contract
Dispute Resolution Process in the manner as required for Contract Disputes, including,
without limitation, City’s right under Paragraph 14.4.2 to defer resolution and final
determination until after Final Completion of the Work.
14.3 Submission of Contract Dispute.
14.3.1 By Contractor.
Contractors may commence the Contract Dispute Resolution Process upon City's written
response denying all or part of a Claim pursuant to Paragraph 4.2.9 or 4.2.10 of the
General Conditions. Contractor shall submit a written Statement of Contract Dispute (as
set forth below) to City within seven (7) Days after City rejects all or a portion of
Contractor's Claim. Failure by Contractor to submit its Statement of Contract Dispute in a
timely manner shall result in City’s decision by City on the Claim becoming final and
binding. Contractor’s Statement of Contract Dispute shall be signed under penalty of
perjury and shall state with specificity the events or circumstances giving rise to the
Contract Dispute, the dates of their occurrence and the asserted effect on the Contract
Sum and the Contract Time. The Statement of Contract Dispute shall include adequate
supporting data to substantiate the disputed Claim. Adequate supporting data for a
Contract Dispute relating to an adjustment of the Contract Time shall include both of the
following:
(i) All of the scheduling data required to be submitted by Contractor under the
Contract Documents to obtain extensions of time and adjustments to the
Contract Time and
(ii) A detailed, event‐by‐event description of the impact of each event on
completion of Work. Adequate data to support a Statement of Contract Dispute
involving an adjustment of the Contract Sum must include both of the following:
(a) A detailed cost breakdown and
(b) Supporting cost data in such form and including such information and
other supporting data as required under the Contract Documents for
submission of Change Order Requests and Claims.
14.3.2 By City.
City's right to commence the Contract Dispute Resolution Process shall arise at any time
following City's actual discovery of the circumstances giving rise to the Contract Dispute.
City asserts Contract Disputes in response to a Contract Dispute asserted by Contractor.
A Statement of Contract Dispute submitted by City shall state the events or
circumstances giving rise to the Contract Dispute, the dates of their occurrence and the
damages or other relief claimed by City as a result of such events.
14.4 Contract Dispute Resolution Process.
The parties shall utilize each of the following steps in the Contract Dispute Resolution
Process in the sequence they appear below. Each party shall participate fully and in good
faith in each step in the Contract Dispute Resolution Process, and good faith effort shall
be a condition precedent to the right of each party to proceed to the next step in the
process.
14.4.1 Direct Negotiations.
Designated representatives of City and Contractor shall meet as soon as possible (but not
later than ten (10) Days after receipt of the Statement of Contract Dispute) in a good
Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 14 Rev. July 2012
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
faith effort to negotiate a resolution to the Contract Dispute. Each party shall be
represented in such negotiations by an authorized representative with full knowledge of
the details of the Claims or defenses being asserted by such party in the negotiations,
and with full authority to resolve such Contract Dispute then and there, subject only to
City’s obligation to obtain administrative and/or City Council approval of any agreed
settlement or resolution. If the Contract Dispute involves the assertion of a right or claim
by a Subcontractor or Sub‐subcontractor, of any tier, against Contractor that is in turn
being asserted by Contractor against City (“Pass‐Through Claim”), then the Subcontractor
or Sub‐Subcontractor shall also have a representative attend the negotiations, with the
same authority and knowledge as described above. Upon completion of the meeting, if
the Contract Dispute is not resolved, the parties may either continue the negotiations or
any party may declare negotiations ended. All discussions that occur during such
negotiations and all documents prepared solely for the purpose of such negotiations shall
be confidential and privileged pursuant to California Evidence Code Sections 1119 and
1152.
14.4.2 Deferral of Contract Disputes.
Following the completion of the negotiations required by Paragraph 14.4.1, all
unresolved Contract Disputes shall be deferred pending Final Completion of the Project,
subject to City’s right, in its sole and absolute discretion, to require that the Contract
Dispute Resolution Process proceed prior to Final Completion. All Contract Disputes that
have been deferred until Final Completion shall be consolidated within a reasonable time
after Final Completion and thereafter pursued to resolution pursuant to this Contract
Dispute Resolution Process. The parties can continue informal negotiations of Contract
Disputes; provided, however, that such informal negotiations shall not be alter the
provisions of the Agreement deferring final determination and resolution of unresolved
Contract Disputes until after Final Completion.
14.4.3 Mediation.
If the Contract Dispute remains unresolved after negotiations pursuant to Paragraph
14.4.1, the parties shall submit the Contract Dispute to non‐binding mediation before a
mutually acceptable third party mediator.
.1 Qualifications of Mediator. The parties shall endeavor to select a mediator who
is a retired judge or an attorney with at least five (5) years of experience in
public works construction contract law and in mediating public works
construction disputes. In addition, the mediator shall have at least twenty (20)
hours of formal training in mediation skills.
.2 Submission to Mediation and Selection of Mediator. The party initiating
mediation of a Contract Dispute shall provide written notice to the other party
of its decision to mediate. In the event the parties are unable to agree upon a
mediator within fifteen (15) Days after the receipt of such written notice, then
the parties shall submit the matter to the American Arbitration Association
(AAA) at its San Francisco Regional Office for selection of a mediator in
accordance with the AAA Construction Industry Mediation Rules.
.3 Mediation Process. The location of the mediation shall be at the offices of City.
The costs of mediation shall be shared equally by both parties. The mediator
shall provide an independent assessment on the merits of the Contract Dispute
and recommendations for resolution. All discussions that occur during the
mediation and all documents prepared solely for the purpose of the mediation
shall be confidential and privileged pursuant to California Evidence Code
Sections 1119 and 1152.
Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 15 Rev. July 2012
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
14.4.4 Binding Arbitration.
If the Contract Dispute is not resolved by mediation, then any party may submit the
Contract Dispute for final and binding arbitration pursuant to the provisions of California
Public Contract Code Sections 10240, et seq. The award of the arbitrator therein shall be
final and may be entered as a judgment by any court of competent jurisdiction. Such
arbitration shall be conducted in accordance with the following:
.1 Arbitration Initiation. The arbitration shall be initiated by filing a complaint in
arbitration in accordance with the regulations promulgated pursuant to
California Public Contract Code Section 10240.5.
.2 Qualifications of the Arbitrator. The arbitrator shall be approved by all parties.
The arbitrator shall be a retired judge or an attorney with at least five (5) years
of experience in public works construction contract law and in arbitrating public
works construction disputes. In addition, the arbitrator shall have at least
twenty (20) hours of formal training in arbitration skills. In the event the parties
cannot agree upon an arbitrator, the provisions of California Public Contract
Code Section 10240.3 shall be followed in selecting an arbitrator possessing the
qualifications required herein.
.3 Hearing Days and Location. Arbitration hearings shall be held at the offices of
City and shall, except for good cause shown to and determined by the arbitrator,
be conducted on consecutive business days, without interruption or
continuance.
.4 Hearing Delays. Arbitration hearings shall not be delayed except upon good
cause shown.
.5 Recording Hearings. All hearings to receive evidence shall be recorded by a
certified stenographic reporter, with the costs thereof borne equally by City and
Contractor and allocated by the arbitrator in the final award.
.6 Limitation of Depositions. The parties may conduct discovery in accordance
with the provisions of section 10240.11 of the Public Contract Code; provided,
however, that depositions shall be limited to both of the following:
(i) Ten (10) percipient witnesses for each party and 5 expert witnesses per
party.
Upon a showing of good cause, the arbitrator may increase the number of
permitted depositions. An individual who is both percipient and expert shall, for
purposes of applying the foregoing numerical limitation only, be deemed an
expert. Expert reports shall be exchanged prior to receipt of evidence, in
accordance with the direction of the arbitrator, and expert reports (including
initial and rebuttal reports) not so submitted shall not be admissible as
evidence.
.7 Authority of the Arbitrator. The arbitrator shall have the authority to hear
dispositive motions and issue interim orders and interim or executory awards.
Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 16 Rev. July 2012
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
.8 Waiver of Jury Trial. Contractor and City each voluntarily waives its right to a
jury trial with respect to any Contract Dispute that is subject to binding
arbitration in accordance with the provisions of this Paragraph 14.4.4.
Contractor shall include this provision in its contracts with its Subcontractors
who provide any portion of the Work.
14.5 Non‐Waiver.
Participation in the Contract Dispute Resolution Process shall not waive, release or compromise
any defense of City, including, without limitation, any defense based on the assertion that the
rights or Claims of Contractor that are the basis of a Contract Dispute were previously waived by
Contractor due to Contractor’s failure to comply with the Contract Documents, including, without
limitation, Contractor’s failure to comply with any time periods for providing notice of requests
for adjustments of the Contract Sum or Contract Time or for submission of Claims or supporting
documentation of Claims.
SECTION 15 DEFAULT.
15.1 Notice of Default.
In the event that City determines, in its sole discretion, that Contractor has failed or refused to
perform any of the obligations set forth in the Contract Documents, or is in breach of any
provision of the Contract Documents, City may give written notice of default to Contractor in the
manner specified for the giving of notices in the Construction Contract.
15.2 Opportunity to Cure Default.
Except for emergencies, Contractor shall cure any default in performance of its obligations under
the Contract Documents within two (2) Days (or such shorter time as City may reasonably require)
after receipt of written notice. However, if the breach cannot be reasonably cured within such
time, Contractor will commence to cure the breach within two (2) Days (or such shorter time as
City may reasonably require) and will diligently and continuously prosecute such cure to
completion within a reasonable time, which shall in no event be later than ten (10) Days after
receipt of such written notice.
SECTION 16 CITY'S RIGHTS AND REMEDIES.
16.1 Remedies Upon Default.
If Contractor fails to cure any default of this Construction Contract within the time period set forth
above in Section 15, then City may pursue any remedies available under law or equity, including,
without limitation, the following:
16.1.1 Delete Certain Services.
City may, without terminating the Construction Contract, delete certain portions of the Work,
reserving to itself all rights to Losses related thereto.
16.1.2 Perform and Withhold.
City may, without terminating the Construction Contract, engage others to perform the Work or
portion of the Work that has not been adequately performed by Contractor and withhold the cost
thereof to City from future payments to Contractor, reserving to itself all rights to Losses related
thereto.
16.1.3 Suspend The Construction Contract.
City may, without terminating the Construction Contract and reserving to itself all rights to Losses
related thereto, suspend all or any portion of this Construction Contract for as long a period of
time as City determines, in its sole discretion, appropriate, in which event City shall have no
Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 17 Rev. July 2012
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
obligation to adjust the Contract Sum or Contract Time, and shall have no liability to Contractor
for damages if City directs Contractor to resume Work.
16.1.4 Terminate the Construction Contract for Default.
City shall have the right to terminate this Construction Contract, in whole or in part, upon the
failure of Contractor to promptly cure any default as required by Section 15. City’s election to
terminate the Construction Contract for default shall be communicated by giving Contractor a
written notice of termination in the manner specified for the giving of notices in the Construction
Contract. Any notice of termination given to Contractor by City shall be effective immediately,
unless otherwise provided therein.
16.1.5 Invoke the Performance Bond.
City may, with or without terminating the Construction Contract and reserving to itself all rights to
Losses related thereto, exercise its rights under the Performance Bond.
16.1.6 Additional Provisions.
All of City’s rights and remedies under this Construction Contract are cumulative, and shall be in
addition to those rights and remedies available in law or in equity. Designation in the Contract
Documents of certain breaches as material shall not waive the City’s authority to designate other
breaches as material nor limit City’s right to terminate the Construction Contract, or prevent the
City from terminating the Agreement for breaches that are not material. City’s determination of
whether there has been noncompliance with the Construction Contract so as to warrant exercise
by City of its rights and remedies for default under the Construction Contract, shall be binding on
all parties. No termination or action taken by City after such termination shall prejudice any other
rights or remedies of City provided by law or equity or by the Contract Documents upon such
termination; and City may proceed against Contractor to recover all liquidated damages and
Losses suffered by City.
16.2 Delays by Sureties.
Without limiting to any of City’s other rights or remedies, City has the right to suspend the
performance of the Work by Contractor’s sureties in the event of any of the following:
(i) The sureties’ failure to begin Work within a reasonable time in such manner as to insure
full compliance with the Construction Contract within the Contract Time;
(ii) The sureties’ abandonment of the Work;
(iii) If at any time City is of the opinion the sureties’ Work is unnecessarily or unreasonably
delaying the Work;
(iv) The sureties’ violation of any terms of the Construction Contract;
(v) The sureties’ failure to perform according to the Contract Documents; or
(vi) The sureties’ failure to follow City’s instructions for completion of the Work within the
Contract Time.
16.3 Damages to City.
16.3.1 For Contractor's Default.
City will be entitled to recovery of all Losses under law or equity in the event of
Contractor’s default under the Contract Documents.
16.3.2 Compensation for Losses.
In the event that City's Losses arise from Contractor’s default under the Contract Documents, City
shall be entitled to withhold monies otherwise payable to Contractor until Final Completion of the
Project. If City incurs Losses due to Contractor’s default, then the amount of Losses shall be
deducted from the amounts withheld. Should the amount withheld exceed the amount deducted,
the balance will be paid to Contractor or its designee upon Final Completion of the Project. If the
Losses incurred by City exceed the amount withheld, Contractor shall be liable to City for the
difference and shall promptly remit same to City.
Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 18 Rev. July 2012
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
16.4 Suspension by City for Convenience.
City may, at any time and from time to time, without cause, order Contractor, in writing, to
suspend, delay, or interrupt the Work in whole or in part for such period of time, up to an
aggregate of fifty percent (50%) of the Contract Time. The order shall be specifically identified as
a Suspension Order by City. Upon receipt of a Suspension Order, Contractor shall, at City’s
expense, comply with the order and take all reasonable steps to minimize costs allocable to the
Work covered by the Suspension Order. During the Suspension or extension of the Suspension, if
any, City shall either cancel the Suspension Order or, by Change Order, delete the Work covered
by the Suspension Order. If a Suspension Order is canceled or expires, Contractor shall resume
and continue with the Work. A Change Order will be issued to cover any adjustments of the
Contract Sum or the Contract Time necessarily caused by such suspension. A Suspension Order
shall not be the exclusive method for City to stop the Work.
16.5 Termination Without Cause.
City may, at its sole discretion and without cause, terminate this Construction Contract in part or
in whole by giving thirty (30) Days written notice to Contractor. The compensation allowed under
this Paragraph 16.5 shall be the Contractor’s sole and exclusive compensation for such
termination and Contractor waives any claim for other compensation or Losses, including, but not
limited to, loss of anticipated profits, loss of revenue, lost opportunity, or other consequential,
direct, indirect or incidental damages of any kind resulting from termination without cause.
16.5.1 Compensation.
Following such termination and within forty‐five (45) Days after receipt of a billing from
Contractor seeking payment of sums authorized by this Paragraph 16.5, City shall pay the
following to Contractor as Contractor’s sole compensation for performance of the Work :
.1 For Work Performed. The amount of the Contract Sum allocable to the portion
of the Work properly performed by Contractor as of the date of termination,
less sums previously paid to Contractor.
.2 For Close‐out Costs. Reasonable costs of Contractor and its Subcontractors and
Sub‐subcontractors for:
(i) Demobilizing and
(ii) Administering the close‐out of its participation in the Project (including,
without limitation, all billing and accounting functions, not including
attorney or expert fees) for a period of no longer than thirty (30) Days
after receipt of the notice of termination.
.3 For Fabricated Items. Previously unpaid cost of any items delivered to the
Project Site which were fabricated for subsequent incorporation in the Work.
16.5.2 Subcontractors.
Contractor shall include provisions in all of its subcontracts, purchase orders and other contracts
permitting termination for convenience by Contractor on terms that are consistent with this
Construction Contract and that afford no greater rights of recovery against Contractor than are
afforded to Contractor against City under this Section.
Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 19 Rev. July 2012
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
16.6 Contractor’s Duties Upon Termination.
Upon receipt of a notice of termination for default or for convenience, Contractor shall, unless the
notice directs otherwise, do the following:
(i) Immediately discontinue the Work to the extent specified in the notice;
(ii) Place no further orders or subcontracts for materials, equipment, services or facilities,
except as may be necessary for completion of such portion of the Work that is not
discontinued;
(iii) Provide to City a description, in writing no later than fifteen (15) days after receipt of the
notice of termination, of all subcontracts, purchase orders and contracts that are
outstanding, including, without limitation, the terms of the original price, any changes,
payments, balance owing, the status of the portion of the Work covered and a copy of
the subcontract, purchase order or contract and any written changes, amendments or
modifications thereto, together with such other information as City may determine
necessary in order to decide whether to accept assignment of or request Contractor to
terminate the subcontract, purchase order or contract;
(iv) Promptly assign to City those subcontracts, purchase orders or contracts, or portions
thereof, that City elects to accept by assignment and cancel, on the most favorable terms
reasonably possible, all subcontracts, purchase orders or contracts, or portions thereof,
that City does not elect to accept by assignment; and
(v) Thereafter do only such Work as may be necessary to preserve and protect Work already
in progress and to protect materials, plants, and equipment on the Project Site or in
transit thereto.
SECTION 17 CONTRACTOR'S RIGHTS AND REMEDIES.
17.1 Contractor’s Remedies.
Contractor may terminate this Construction Contract only upon the occurrence of one of the
following:
17.1.1 For Work Stoppage.
The Work is stopped for sixty (60) consecutive Days, through no act or fault of Contractor, any
Subcontractor, or any employee or agent of Contractor or any Subcontractor, due to issuance of
an order of a court or other public authority other than City having jurisdiction or due to an act of
government, such as a declaration of a national emergency making material unavailable. This
provision shall not apply to any work stoppage resulting from the City’s issuance of a suspension
notice issued either for cause or for convenience.
17.1.2 For City's Non‐Payment.
If City does not make pay Contractor undisputed sums within ninety (90) Days after receipt of
notice from Contractor, Contractor may terminate the Construction Contract (30) days following a
second notice to City of Contractor’s intention to terminate the Construction Contract.
17.2 Damages to Contractor.
In the event of termination for cause by Contractor, City shall pay Contractor the sums provided
for in Paragraph 16.5.1 above. Contractor agrees to accept such sums as its sole and exclusive
compensation and agrees to waive any claim for other compensation or Losses, including, but not
limited to, loss of anticipated profits, loss of revenue, lost opportunity, or other consequential,
direct, indirect and incidental damages, of any kind.
SECTION 18 ACCOUNTING RECORDS.
18.1 Financial Management and City Access.
Contractor shall keep full and detailed accounts and exercise such controls as may be necessary
for proper financial management under this Construction Contract in accordance with generally
Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 20 Rev. July 2012
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
accepted accounting principles and practices. City and City's accountants during normal business
hours, may inspect, audit and copy Contractor's records, books, estimates, take‐offs, cost reports,
ledgers, schedules, correspondence, instructions, drawings, receipts, subcontracts, purchase
orders, vouchers, memoranda and other data relating to this Project. Contractor shall retain these
documents for a period of three (3) years after the later of (i) final payment or (ii) final resolution
of all Contract Disputes and other disputes, or (iii) for such longer period as may be required by
law.
18.2 Compliance with City Requests.
Contractor's compliance with any request by City pursuant to this Section 18 shall be a condition
precedent to filing or maintenance of any legal action or proceeding by Contractor against City
and to Contractor's right to receive further payments under the Contract Documents. City many
enforce Contractor’s obligation to provide access to City of its business and other records referred
to in Section 18.1 for inspection or copying by issuance of a writ or a provisional or permanent
mandatory injunction by a court of competent jurisdiction based on affidavits submitted to such
court, without the necessity of oral testimony.
SECTION 19 INDEPENDENT PARTIES.
Each party is acting in its independent capacity and not as agents, employees, partners, or joint ventures’
of the other party. City, its officers or employees shall have no control over the conduct of Contractor or
its respective agents, employees, subconsultants, or subcontractors, except as herein set forth.
SECTION 20 NUISANCE.
Contractor shall not maintain, commit, nor permit the maintenance or commission of any nuisance in
connection in the performance of services under this Construction Contract.
SECTION 21 PERMITS AND LICENSES.
Except as otherwise provided in the Special Provisions and Technical Specifications, The Contractor shall
provide, procure and pay for all licenses, permits, and fees, required by the City or other government
jurisdictions or agencies necessary to carry out and complete the Work. Payment of all costs and expenses
for such licenses, permits, and fees shall be included in one or more Bid items. No other compensation
shall be paid to the Contractor for these items or for delays caused by non‐City inspectors or conditions set
forth in the licenses or permits issued by other agencies.
SECTION 22 WAIVER.
A waiver by either party of any breach of any term, covenant, or condition contained herein shall not be
deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant, or condition
contained herein, whether of the same or a different character.
SECTION 23 GOVERNING LAW.
This Construction Contract shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of
California.
Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 21 Rev. July 2012
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
SECTION 24 COMPLETE AGREEMENT.
This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between the parties and supersedes all
prior negotiations, representations, and contracts, either written or oral. This Agreement may be amended
only by a written instrument, which is signed by the parties.
SECTION 25 SURVIVAL OF CONTRACT.
The provisions of the Construction Contract which by their nature survive termination of the Construction
Contract or Final Completion, including, without limitation, all warranties, indemnities, payment
obligations, and City’s right to audit Contractor’s books and records, shall remain in full force and effect
after Final Completion or any termination of the Construction Contract.
SECTION 26 PREVAILING WAGES.
This Project is not subject to prevailing wages. The Contractor is not required to pay prevailing wages in
the performance and implementation of the Project, because the City, pursuant to its authority as a
chartered city, has adopted Resolution No. 5981 exempting the City from prevailing wages. The City
invokes the exemption from the state prevailing wage requirement for this Project and declares that the
Project is funded one hundred percent (100%) by the City of Palo Alto.
Or
The Contractor is required to pay general prevailing wages as defined in Subchapter 3, Title 8 of the
California Code of Regulations and Section 16000 et seq. and Section 1773.1 of the California Labor Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has
obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work
in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of worker needed to execute the contract for this
Project from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. Copies of these rates may be obtained
at cost at the Purchasing office of the City of Palo Alto. Contractor shall provide a copy of prevailing wage
rates to any staff or subcontractor hired, and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum.
Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1810, and 1813 of the Labor
Code.
SECTION 27 NON APPROPRIATION.
This Agreement is subject to the fiscal provisions of the Charter of the City of Palo Alto and the Palo Alto
Municipal Code. This Agreement will terminate without any penalty (a) at the end of any fiscal year in the
event that the City does not appropriate funds for the following fiscal year for this event, or (b) at any time
within a fiscal year in the event that funds are only appropriated for a portion of the fiscal year and funds
for this Construction Contract are no longer available. This section shall take precedence in the event of a
conflict with any other covenant, term, condition, or provision of this Agreement.
SECTION 28 AUTHORITY.
The individuals executing this Agreement represent and warrant that they have the legal capacity and
authority to do so on behalf of their respective legal entities.
SECTION 29 ATTORNEY FEES.
Each Party shall bear its own costs, including attorney’s fees through the completion of mediation. If the
claim or dispute is not resolved through mediation and in any dispute described in Paragraph 14.2,
22
Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package Rev. July 2012
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
the prevailing party in any action brought to enforce the provision of this Agreement may recover its
reasonable costs and attorney’s fees expended in connection with that action. The prevailing party shall be
entitled to recover an amount equal to the fair market value of legal services provided by attorneys
employed by it as well as any attorney’s’ fees paid to third parties.
SECTION 30 COUNTERPARTS
This Agreement may be signed in multiple counterparts, which shall, when executed by all the parties,
constitute a single binding agreement.
SECTION 31 SEVERABILITY.
In case a provision of this Construction Contract is held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity,
legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not be affected.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Construction Contract to be executed the
date and year first above written.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
____________________________
Purchasing Manager
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________
Senior Asst. City Attorney
APPROVED:
___________________________
Public Works Director
CONTRACTOR
C.F. Archibald Paving Inc.
By:___________________________
Name:_________________________
Title:________________________
STREET FROM TO
1 Alexis Drive Laurel Glen Drive City Limit
2 Bandera Drive Alexis Drive End
3 Country Club Court Alexis Drive End
4 Curtner Avenue El Camino Real Park Boulevard
5 Escobita Avenue Manzanita Avenue Miramonte Avenue
6 Kendall Avenue Josina Avenue La Donna Street
7 Madrono Avenue Churchill Avenue Miramonte Avenue
8 Manzanita Avenue Portola Avenue Castilleja Avenue
9 Maple Street University Avenue End
10 Miramonte Avenue El Camino Real Portola Avenue
11 Monroe Drive City Limits Miller Avenue
12 Nevada Avenue High Street Ramona Avenue
13 Seneca Street Palo Alto Avenue University Avenue
14 Portola Avenue Manzanita Avenue Miramonte Avenue
15 Robb Road Manuela Avenue End
16 San Jude Avenue La Donna Street End
17 Santa Rita Avenue Alma Street Bryant Street
18
19
20
21
FY 2015 List of Streets
Misc Storm Drain Improvements
Terman Pathway
Arastradero Pathway
Sailing Station Parking Lot
ATTACHMENT B
PE‐86070 IFB 157278
FY 15 ASPHALT PAVING PROJECT
BID SUMMARY
ATTACHMENT B
UNIT COST TOTAL COST UNIT COST TOTAL COST UNIT COST TOTAL COST UNIT COST TOTAL COST UNIT COST TOTAL COST UNIT COST TOTAL COST UNIT COST TOTAL COST
1 Asphalt Overlay: 5,286 TON $ 100.00 528,600.00$ $ 99.50 525,957.00$ $ 101.00 533,886.00$ $ 135.00 713,610.00$ $ 100.00 528,600.00$ $ 104.00 549,744.00$ $ 117.00 618,462.00$
2 PCC Base Repair:38,700 SF $ 11.00 425,700.00$ $ 12.20 472,140.00$ $ 11.50 445,050.00$ $ 12.50 483,750.00$ $ 13.00 503,100.00$ $ 11.50 445,050.00$ $ 11.50 445,050.00$
3 AC Base Repair 3”:525 TON $ 165.00 86,625.00$ $ 148.00 77,700.00$ $ 145.00 76,125.00$ $ 250.00 131,250.00$ $ 170.00 89,250.00$ $ 181.00 95,025.00$ $ 157.00 82,425.00$
4 Wedge cut :4,000 LF $ 2.50 10,000.00$ $ 2.20 8,800.00$ $ 1.75 7,000.00$ $ 1.40 5,600.00$ $ 2.25 9,000.00$ $ 2.00 8,000.00$ $ 3.75 15,000.00$
5 AC Milling: 311,000 SF $ 0.42 130,620.00$ $ 0.38 118,180.00$ $ 0.35 108,850.00$ $ 0.40 124,400.00$ $ 0.36 111,960.00$ $ 0.43 133,730.00$ $ 0.51 158,610.00$
6 Interlayer Membrane:6,500 LF $ 3.00 19,500.00$ $ 2.35 15,275.00$ $ 1.90 12,350.00$ $ 2.40 15,600.00$ $ 3.00 19,500.00$ $ 4.71 30,615.00$ $ 7.00 45,500.00$
7 Crack Sealing:20,000 LF $ 0.52 10,400.00$ $ 0.50 10,000.00$ $ 0.50 10,000.00$ $ 0.50 10,000.00$ $ 0.55 11,000.00$ $ 0.60 12,000.00$ $ 0.50 10,000.00$
8 Reset Utility Box:118 EA $ 285.00 33,630.00$ $ 350.00 41,300.00$ $ 365.00 43,070.00$ $ 420.00 49,560.00$ $ 550.00 64,900.00$ $ 400.00 47,200.00$ $ 410.00 48,380.00$
9 Pothole:22 EA $ 220.00 4,840.00$ $ 500.00 11,000.00$ $ 200.00 4,400.00$ $ 80.00 1,760.00$ $ 350.00 7,700.00$ $ 700.00 15,400.00$ $ 475.00 10,450.00$
10 Reset Manhole:51 EA $ 650.00 33,150.00$ $ 600.00 30,600.00$ $ 625.00 31,875.00$ $ 720.00 36,720.00$ $ 650.00 33,150.00$ $ 439.00 22,389.00$ $ 715.00 36,465.00$
11 Type A Curb and Gutter, 1’ Buried Pan:800 LF $ 48.00 38,400.00$ $ 33.00 26,400.00$ $ 36.00 28,800.00$ $ 33.50 26,800.00$ $ 36.00 28,800.00$ $ 36.00 28,800.00$ $ 36.00 28,800.00$
12 Asphalt berm:300 LF $ 15.00 4,500.00$ $ 17.00 5,100.00$ $ 20.00 6,000.00$ $ 20.00 6,000.00$ $ 17.00 5,100.00$ $ 21.00 6,300.00$ $ 16.00 4,800.00$
13 Type A Curb and Gutter, 2’ Pan:1,150 LF $ 60.00 69,000.00$ $ 42.00 48,300.00$ $ 44.00 50,600.00$ $ 45.00 51,750.00$ $ 44.00 50,600.00$ $ 44.00 50,600.00$ $ 44.00 50,600.00$
14 Type A Curb and Gutter, 3’ Pan:310 LF $ 70.00 21,700.00$ $ 43.00 13,330.00$ $ 52.00 16,120.00$ $ 48.00 14,880.00$ $ 52.00 16,120.00$ $ 52.00 16,120.00$ $ 52.00 16,120.00$
15 Type B Rolled Curb and Gutter, 3’:100 LF $ 75.00 7,500.00$ $ 68.50 6,850.00$ $ 52.00 5,200.00$ $ 72.00 7,200.00$ $ 52.00 5,200.00$ $ 52.00 5,200.00$ $ 52.00 5,200.00$
16 Concrete Driveway:8,380 SF $ 11.00 92,180.00$ $ 9.70 81,286.00$ $ 10.50 87,990.00$ $ 11.00 92,180.00$ $ 11.00 92,180.00$ $ 10.50 87,990.00$ $ 21.00 175,980.00$
17 Concrete Sidewalk:7,405 SF $ 9.00 66,645.00$ $ 8.75 64,793.75$ $ 9.00 66,645.00$ $ 9.50 70,347.50$ $ 9.00 66,645.00$ $ 9.00 66,645.00$ $ 9.00 66,645.00$
18 Concrete header 1’ wide:100 LF $ 25.00 2,500.00$ $ 48.00 4,800.00$ $ 25.00 2,500.00$ $ 60.00 6,000.00$ $ 15.00 1,500.00$ $ 10.00 1,000.00$ $ 60.00 6,000.00$
19 Demo Concrete/Asphalt:10,400 SF $ 4.00 41,600.00$ $ 3.00 31,200.00$ $ 2.50 26,000.00$ $ 2.70 28,080.00$ $ 0.50 5,200.00$ $ 3.00 31,200.00$ $ 5.50 57,200.00$
20 Curb Ramp:36 EA $ 1,900.00 68,400.00$ $ 2,100.00 75,600.00$ $ 2,500.00 90,000.00$ $ 2,100.00 75,600.00$ $ 2,500.00 90,000.00$ $ 2,500.00 90,000.00$ $ 2,500.00 90,000.00$
21 ADA Dome Upgrade:9 EA $ 525.00 4,725.00$ $ 285.00 2,565.00$ $ 300.00 2,700.00$ $ 289.00 2,601.00$ $ 350.00 3,150.00$ $ 300.00 2,700.00$ $ 300.00 2,700.00$
22 Traffic Loops:1,500 SF $ 5.00 7,500.00$ $ 3.00 4,500.00$ $ 3.00 4,500.00$ $ 3.00 4,500.00$ $ 4.00 6,000.00$ $ 4.00 6,000.00$ $ 3.00 4,500.00$
23 Reset Catch Basin:6 EA $ 1,050.00 6,300.00$ $ 850.00 5,100.00$ $ 1,200.00 7,200.00$ $ 850.00 5,100.00$ $ 1,200.00 7,200.00$ $ 439.00 2,634.00$ $ 1,700.00 10,200.00$
24 Recycling of Inert Solid Materials:5,331 TON $ 5.00 26,655.00$ $ 3.00 15,993.00$ $ 0.50 2,665.50$ $ 6.50 34,651.50$ $ 3.00 15,993.00$ $ 2.39 12,741.09$ $ 1.00 5,331.00$
25 2 x 6 Pressure treated Doug Fir headers:10,400 LF $ 4.00 41,600.00$ $ 5.90 61,360.00$ $ 6.00 62,400.00$ $ 5.00 52,000.00$ $ 10.00 104,000.00$ $ 6.00 62,400.00$ $ 5.00 52,000.00$
26 Brick Work/Specialty Finishes:100 SF $ 20.00 2,000.00$ $ 15.00 1,500.00$ $ 20.00 2,000.00$ $ 15.00 1,500.00$ $ 30.00 3,000.00$ $ 20.00 2,000.00$ $ 28.00 2,800.00$
27 Blue Pavement Markers:17 EA $ 26.00 442.00$ $ 20.00 340.00$ $ 25.00 425.00$ $ 25.00 425.00$ $ 30.00 510.00$ $ 15.00 255.00$ $ 20.00 340.00$
28 2” AC Driveway/Pathway:63,300 SF $ 3.00 189,900.00$ $ 1.50 94,950.00$ $ 2.00 126,600.00$ $ 2.00 126,600.00$ $ 1.60 101,280.00$ $ 1.51 95,583.00$ $ 1.50 94,950.00$
29 Curb Paint:200 LF $ 4.00 800.00$ $ 2.00 400.00$ $ 2.00 400.00$ $ 2.00 400.00$ $ 2.00 400.00$ $ 2.00 400.00$ $ 1.25 250.00$
30 Thermo Striping, Caltrans Detail 1:4,400 LF $ 1.00 4,400.00$ $ 0.75 3,300.00$ $ 0.50 2,200.00$ $ 0.50 2,200.00$ $ 0.50 2,200.00$ $ 0.60 2,640.00$ $ 0.75 3,300.00$
31 Thermo Striping, Caltrans Detail 2:4,200 LF $ 1.00 4,200.00$ $ 0.75 3,150.00$ $ 0.60 2,520.00$ $ 0.60 2,520.00$ $ 0.70 2,940.00$ $ 1.00 4,200.00$ $ 0.75 3,150.00$
32 Thermo Striping, Detail 23:900 LF $ 2.00 1,800.00$ $ 2.00 1,800.00$ $ 1.40 1,260.00$ $ 1.40 1,260.00$ $ 1.50 1,350.00$ $ 3.00 2,700.00$ $ 2.00 1,800.00$
33 Ex./Install 4” Agg base Terman pathway:1,600 SF $ 6.00 9,600.00$ $ 7.00 11,200.00$ $ 4.00 6,400.00$ $ 10.00 16,000.00$ $ 10.00 16,000.00$ $ 4.00 6,400.00$ $ 11.00 17,600.00$
34 Thermoplastic Striping, White, 4” 390 LF $ 1.50 585.00$ $ 1.50 585.00$ $ 2.00 780.00$ $ 2.00 780.00$ $ 2.00 780.00$ $ 3.00 1,170.00$ $ 1.50 585.00$
35 Thermo Striping, 12" White:465 LF $ 4.00 1,860.00$ $ 4.00 1,860.00$ $ 4.00 1,860.00$ $ 4.00 1,860.00$ $ 4.00 1,860.00$ $ 7.00 3,255.00$ $ 4.00 1,860.00$
36 Thermoplastic Paving Legends:136 EA $ 55.00 7,480.00$ $ 22.00 2,992.00$ $ 25.00 3,400.00$ $ 25.00 3,400.00$ $ 30.00 4,080.00$ $ 70.00 9,520.00$ $ 22.00 2,992.00$
37 Traffic Control:1 LS $ 84,000.00 84,000.00$ $ 76,000.00 76,000.00$ $ 140,000.00 140,000.00$ $ 200.00 200.00$ $ 66,000.00 66,000.00$ $ 150,000.30 150,000.30$ $ 112,000.00 112,000.00$
38 Tree Trimming:50 HRS $ 231.00 11,550.00$ $ 200.00 10,000.00$ $ 275.00 13,750.00$ $ 200.00 10,000.00$ $ 225.00 11,250.00$ $ 225.00 11,250.00$ $ 200.00 10,000.00$
39 Notices:1 LS $ 7,500.00 7,500.00$ $ 4,500.00 4,500.00$ $ 3,500.00 3,500.00$ $ 5,000.00 5,000.00$ $ 5,000.00 5,000.00$ $ 9,000.00 9,000.00$ $ 7,500.00 7,500.00$
40 Planter Area Conform:1 LS $ 5.00 5.00$ $ 7,500.00 7,500.00$ $ 6,000.00 6,000.00$ $ 5,000.00 5,000.00$ $ 2,000.00 2,000.00$ $ 7,000.00 7,000.00$ $ 8,200.00 8,200.00$
41 Misc. Transportation Improvements:1 LS $ 50,000.00 50,000.00$ $ 50,000.00 50,000.00$ $ 50,000.00 50,000.00$ $ 50,000.00 50,000.00$ $ 50,000.00 50,000.00$ $ 50,000.00 50,000.00$ $ 50,000.00 50,000.00$
42 Utility Tie Out Drawings:1 LS $ 5.00 5.00$ $ 2,750.00 2,750.00$ $ 500.00 500.00$ $ 1,000.00 1,000.00$ $ 3,000.00 3,000.00$ $ 5,000.00 5,000.00$ $ 1,500.00 1,500.00$
43 Recycling of Inert Solid Materials 5,000 TON $ 10.00 50,000.00$ $ 8.25 41,250.00$ $ 200.00 1,000,000.00$ $ 10.00 50,000.00$ $ 4.00 20,000.00$ $ 5.00 25,000.00$ $ 1.50 7,500.00$
44 Remove bollard and plug with AB:2 EACH $ 250.00 500.00$ $ 2,000.00 4,000.00$ $ 400.00 800.00$ $ 150.00 300.00$ $ 500.00 1,000.00$ $ 1,000.00 2,000.00$ $ 325.00 650.00$
45 Install new catch basins 5 EACH $ 3,700.00 18,500.00$ $ 1,500.00 7,500.00$ $ 4,100.00 20,500.00$ $ 1,500.00 7,500.00$ $ 4,100.00 20,500.00$ $ 4,100.00 20,500.00$ $ 3,300.00 16,500.00$
46 Install and connect 12” RCP pipe 150 LF $ 250.00 37,500.00$ $ 110.00 16,500.00$ $ 230.00 34,500.00$ $ 80.00 12,000.00$ $ 175.00 26,250.00$ $ 230.00 34,500.00$ $ 124.00 18,600.00$
47 Relocate Bollards at Sailing Station 1 LS $ 1,500.00 1,500.00$ $ 8,500.00 8,500.00$ $ 1,700.00 1,700.00$ $ 4,500.00 4,500.00$ $ 2,000.00 2,000.00$ $ 2,000.00 2,000.00$ $ 4,900.00 4,900.00$
2,266,397.00$ 2,108,706.75$ 3,151,021.50$ 2,352,385.00$ 2,217,248.00$ 2,273,856.39$ 2,413,395.00$
UNIT COST TOTAL COST UNIT COST TOTAL COST UNIT COST TOTAL COST UNIT COST TOTAL COST UNIT COST TOTAL COST UNIT COST TOTAL COST UNIT COST TOTAL COST
1 Asphalt Overlay: 439 TON $ 100.00 43,900.00$ $ 110.00 48,290.00$ $ 130.00 57,070.00$ $ 143.00 62,777.00$ $ 100.00 43,900.00$ $ 104.00 45,656.00$ $ 123.00 53,997.00$
2 AC Milling: 33,000 SF $ 0.42 13,860.00$ $ 0.40 13,200.00$ $ 1.50 49,500.00$ $ 0.40 13,200.00$ $ 0.36 11,880.00$ $ 0.43 14,190.00$ $ 0.65 21,450.00$
3 Crack Sealing:7,000 LF $ 0.52 3,640.00$ $ 1.00 7,000.00$ $ 1.50 10,500.00$ $ 1.00 7,000.00$ $ 1.00 7,000.00$ $ 1.00 7,000.00$ $ 1.00 7,000.00$
4 Reset Utility Box:6 EA $ 285.00 1,710.00$ $ 350.00 2,100.00$ $ 550.00 3,300.00$ $ 420.00 2,520.00$ $ 550.00 3,300.00$ $ 400.00 2,400.00$ $ 410.00 2,460.00$
5 Pothole:4 EA $ 220.00 880.00$ $ 500.00 2,000.00$ $ 500.00 2,000.00$ $ 100.00 400.00$ $ 350.00 1,400.00$ $ 700.00 2,800.00$ $ 500.00 2,000.00$
6 Reset Manhole:3 EA $ 650.00 1,950.00$ $ 600.00 1,800.00$ $ 800.00 2,400.00$ $ 720.00 2,160.00$ $ 650.00 1,950.00$ $ 439.00 1,317.00$ $ 715.00 2,145.00$
7 Type A Curb and Gutter, 2’ Pan:20 LF $ 60.00 1,200.00$ $ 45.00 900.00$ $ 120.00 2,400.00$ $ 46.00 920.00$ $ 42.00 840.00$ $ 42.00 840.00$ $ 84.00 1,680.00$
G. Bortolotto & Co.
G. Bortolotto & Co.
Ghilotti Construction Co., Inc.
Ghilotti Construction Co., Inc.
Granite Construction Company
Granite Construction Company
O'Grady Paving, Inc.
O'Grady Paving, Inc.
C.F. Archibald Paving, Inc.MCK Services, Inc.
C.F. Archibald Paving, Inc.MCK Services, Inc.
APPROX. QTY
Base Bid Total (Items 001 through 047)
UNIT
DESCRIPTION APPROX. QTY UNIT ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
BID ITEM DESCRIPTION ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
ADD ALT # 1
BID
ITEM
PE‐86070 IFB 157278
FY 15 ASPHALT PAVING PROJECT
BID SUMMARY
ATTACHMENT B
8 Type B Rolled Curb and Gutter 10 LF $ 75.00 750.00$ $ 45.00 450.00$ $ 200.00 2,000.00$ $ 46.00 460.00$ $ 60.00 600.00$ $ 70.00 700.00$ $ 103.00 1,030.00$
9 4’ Valley Gutter:680 SF $ 120.00 81,600.00$ $ 18.00 12,240.00$ $ 65.00 44,200.00$ $ 19.00 12,920.00$ $ 18.00 12,240.00$ $ 18.00 12,240.00$ $ 30.00 20,400.00$
10 2” AC Driveway/Pathway:500 SF $ 3.00 1,500.00$ $ 10.00 5,000.00$ $ 10.00 5,000.00$ $ 17.00 8,500.00$ $ 10.00 5,000.00$ $ 7.00 3,500.00$ $ 3.00 1,500.00$
11 Recycling of Inert Solid Materials:439 TON $ 5.00 2,195.00$ $ 15.00 6,585.00$ $ 15.00 6,585.00$ $ 6.00 2,634.00$ $ 3.00 1,317.00$ $ 4.00 1,756.00$ $ 1.00 439.00$
12 Blue Pavement Markers:2 EA $ 26.00 52.00$ $ 20.00 40.00$ $ 25.00 50.00$ $ 25.00 50.00$ $ 30.00 60.00$ $ 20.00 40.00$ $ 20.00 40.00$
13 Thermo Striping, 12" White:52 LF $ 4.00 208.00$ $ 4.00 208.00$ $ 4.00 208.00$ $ 4.00 208.00$ $ 4.00 208.00$ $ 7.00 364.00$ $ 4.00 208.00$
14 Thermoplastic Paving Legends:12 EA $ 55.00 660.00$ $ 22.00 264.00$ $ 25.00 300.00$ $ 25.00 300.00$ $ 30.00 360.00$ $ 70.00 840.00$ $ 22.00 264.00$
15 Traffic Control:1 LS $ 8,000.00 8,000.00$ $ 7,500.00 7,500.00$ $ 20,000.00 20,000.00$ $ 18,000.00 18,000.00$ $ 20,000.00 20,000.00$ $ 17,000.00 17,000.00$ $ 6,400.00 6,400.00$
16 Tree Trimming:8 CREW $ 125.00 1,000.00$ $ 200.00 1,600.00$ $ 500.00 4,000.00$ $ 200.00 1,600.00$ $ 225.00 1,800.00$ $ 225.00 1,800.00$ $ 200.00 1,600.00$
17 Notices:1 LS $ 500.00 500.00$ $ 1,500.00 1,500.00$ $ 5,000.00 5,000.00$ $ 1,750.00 1,750.00$ $ 4,000.00 4,000.00$ $ 3,000.00 3,000.00$ $ 1,500.00 1,500.00$
18 Utility Tie Out Drawings:1 LS $ 1,000.00 1,000.00$ $ 750.00 750.00$ $ 1,500.00 1,500.00$ $ 500.00 500.00$ $ 2,000.00 2,000.00$ $ 2,000.00 2,000.00$ $ 500.00 500.00$
164,605.00$ 111,427.00$ 216,013.00$ 135,899.00$ 117,855.00$ 117,443.00$ 124,613.00$
UNIT COST TOTAL COST UNIT COST TOTAL COST UNIT COST TOTAL COST UNIT COST TOTAL COST UNIT COST TOTAL COST UNIT COST TOTAL COST UNIT COST TOTAL COST
1 Asphalt Overlay: 678 Tons $ 100.00 67,800.00$ $ 105.00 71,190.00$ $ 130.00 88,140.00$ $ 163.00 110,514.00$ $ 100.00 67,800.00$ $ 109.00 73,902.00$ $ 120.00 81,360.00$
2 PCC Base repair: 1,000 SF $ 11.00 11,000.00$ $ 14.50 14,500.00$ $ 20.00 20,000.00$ $ 15.00 15,000.00$ $ 13.00 13,000.00$ $ 14.00 14,000.00$ $ 25.00 25,000.00$
3 Wedge Cut:2,000 LF $ 2.50 5,000.00$ $ 2.50 5,000.00$ $ 5.00 10,000.00$ $ 2.00 4,000.00$ $ 2.25 4,500.00$ $ 3.00 6,000.00$ $ 6.50 13,000.00$
4 Crack Sealing:5,000 LF $ 0.52 2,600.00$ $ 1.00 5,000.00$ $ 1.50 7,500.00$ $ 1.00 5,000.00$ $ 1.00 5,000.00$ $ 1.00 5,000.00$ $ 1.00 5,000.00$
5 Reset Utility Box:35 EA $ 285.00 9,975.00$ $ 350.00 12,250.00$ $ 550.00 19,250.00$ $ 420.00 14,700.00$ $ 550.00 19,250.00$ $ 400.00 14,000.00$ $ 410.00 14,350.00$
6 Pothole:2 EA $ 220.00 440.00$ $ 500.00 1,000.00$ $ 500.00 1,000.00$ $ 100.00 200.00$ $ 350.00 700.00$ $ 700.00 1,400.00$ $ 500.00 1,000.00$
7 Reset Manhole:14 EA $ 650.00 9,100.00$ $ 600.00 8,400.00$ $ 800.00 11,200.00$ $ 720.00 10,080.00$ $ 650.00 9,100.00$ $ 439.00 6,146.00$ $ 715.00 10,010.00$
8 Curb and Gutter, 3’ Exposed Pan:250 LF $ 70.00 17,500.00$ $ 56.00 14,000.00$ $ 100.00 25,000.00$ $ 56.00 14,000.00$ $ 52.00 13,000.00$ $ 56.00 14,000.00$ $ 92.00 23,000.00$
9 Curb and Gutter, 1’ Buried Pan:50 LF $ 48.00 2,400.00$ $ 40.00 2,000.00$ $ 75.00 3,750.00$ $ 41.00 2,050.00$ $ 45.00 2,250.00$ $ 45.00 2,250.00$ $ 97.00 4,850.00$
10 Curb and Gutter, 7’ Exposed Pan:250 LF $ 120.00 30,000.00$ $ 90.00 22,500.00$ $ 225.00 56,250.00$ $ 91.00 22,750.00$ $ 110.00 27,500.00$ $ 110.00 27,500.00$ $ 113.00 28,250.00$
11 Concrete driveway:500 SF $ 11.00 5,500.00$ $ 14.00 7,000.00$ $ 40.00 20,000.00$ $ 14.00 7,000.00$ $ 11.00 5,500.00$ $ 11.00 5,500.00$ $ 27.00 13,500.00$
12 Concrete Sidewalk:800 SF $ 9.00 7,200.00$ $ 9.50 7,600.00$ $ 35.00 28,000.00$ $ 10.00 8,000.00$ $ 9.00 7,200.00$ $ 10.00 8,000.00$ $ 21.00 16,800.00$
13 Demo Concrete:100 SF $ 4.00 400.00$ $ 4.00 400.00$ $ 10.00 1,000.00$ $ 4.00 400.00$ $ 5.00 500.00$ $ 5.00 500.00$ $ 10.00 1,000.00$
14 Recycling of Inert Solid Materials:678 TON $ 5.00 3,390.00$ $ 15.00 10,170.00$ $ 5.00 3,390.00$ $ 7.00 4,746.00$ $ 3.00 2,034.00$ $ 4.00 2,712.00$ $ 1.00 678.00$
15 New ADA Curb ramps:10 EACH $ 1,900.00 19,000.00$ $ 2,700.00 27,000.00$ $ 4,500.00 45,000.00$ $ 2,750.00 27,500.00$ $ 2,500.00 25,000.00$ $ 2,500.00 25,000.00$ $ 3,700.00 37,000.00$
16 ADA Dome Upgrades/Retrofit:2 EACH $ 525.00 1,050.00$ $ 300.00 600.00$ $ 2,500.00 5,000.00$ $ 305.00 610.00$ $ 350.00 700.00$ $ 400.00 800.00$ $ 3,200.00 6,400.00$
17 Reset Catch basin:5 EACH $ 1,050.00 5,250.00$ $ 1,000.00 5,000.00$ $ 500.00 2,500.00$ $ 1,000.00 5,000.00$ $ 1,200.00 6,000.00$ $ 1,200.00 6,000.00$ $ 2,000.00 10,000.00$
18 Blue Pavement Markers:1 EA $ 26.00 26.00$ $ 20.00 20.00$ $ 25.00 25.00$ $ 25.00 25.00$ $ 30.00 30.00$ $ 17.00 17.00$ $ 20.00 20.00$
19 Thermoplastic Striping, Detail 2:400 LF $ 1.00 400.00$ $ 0.75 300.00$ $ 0.60 240.00$ $ 0.60 240.00$ $ 0.70 280.00$ $ 1.00 400.00$ $ 0.75 300.00$
20 Thermoplastic Striping, Detail 21:800 LF $ 3.00 2,400.00$ $ 2.00 1,600.00$ $ 1.00 800.00$ $ 1.00 800.00$ $ 1.00 800.00$ $ 2.00 1,600.00$ $ 2.00 1,600.00$
21 Thermoplastic Striping, Curb paint:200 LF $ 4.00 800.00$ $ 2.00 400.00$ $ 2.00 400.00$ $ 2.00 400.00$ $ 2.00 400.00$ $ 5.00 1,000.00$ $ 2.00 400.00$
22 Thermoplastic Striping, White, 4” Wide:2,600 LF $ 1.00 2,600.00$ $ 1.00 2,600.00$ $ 2.00 5,200.00$ $ 2.00 5,200.00$ $ 2.00 5,200.00$ $ 1.00 2,600.00$ $ 1.00 2,600.00$
23 Thermoplastic Paving Legends:27 EA $ 55.00 1,485.00$ $ 22.00 594.00$ $ 25.00 675.00$ $ 25.00 675.00$ $ 30.00 810.00$ $ 70.00 1,890.00$ $ 22.00 594.00$
24 Traffic Control:1 LS $ 4,000.00 4,000.00$ $ 18,000.00 18,000.00$ $ 20,000.00 20,000.00$ $ 19,000.00 19,000.00$ $ 20,000.00 20,000.00$ $ 39,000.00 39,000.00$ $ 6,400.00 6,400.00$
25 Tree Trimming:8 CREW $ 62.50 500.00$ $ 200.00 1,600.00$ $ 500.00 4,000.00$ $ 200.00 1,600.00$ $ 225.00 1,800.00$ $ 225.00 1,800.00$ $ 200.00 1,600.00$
26 Notices:1 LS $ 250.00 250.00$ $ 2,500.00 2,500.00$ $ 5,000.00 5,000.00$ $ 1,800.00 1,800.00$ $ 4,000.00 4,000.00$ $ 3,000.00 3,000.00$ $ 1,500.00 1,500.00$
27 Utility Tie Out Drawings:1 LS $ 1,000.00 1,000.00$ $ 900.00 900.00$ $ 1,500.00 1,500.00$ $ 500.00 500.00$ $ 2,000.00 2,000.00$ $ 3,000.00 3,000.00$ $ 500.00 500.00$
211,066.00$ 242,124.00$ 384,820.00$ 281,790.00$ 244,354.00$ 267,017.00$ 306,712.00$
G. Bortolotto & Co. Ghilotti Construction Co., Inc.MCK Services, Inc.Granite Construction Company O'Grady Paving, Inc.C.F. Archibald Paving, Inc.
Add Alt #1 Total (Items 001 through 018)
Add Alt #2 Total (Items 001 through 027)
DESCRIPTION APPROX. QTY UNITBID ITEM
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
ADD ALT # 2
City of Palo Alto (ID # 5321)
City Council Staff Report
Report Type: Consent Calendar Meeting Date: 1/20/2015
City of Palo Alto Page 1
Summary Title: Approval of a Contract Amendment to the Sierra Infosys Inc.
for SAP Consultant for Human Resources
Title: Approval of a Contract Amendment to Sierra Infosys Inc. (C10135998)
in the Amount of $120,000 for the Support and Maintenance of SAP Industry-
Specific Solution for Human Resources Modules, Business Mapping and
Reporting.
From: City Manager
Lead Department: Human Resources
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve Amendment No. 4 to Contract No. C10135998
between the City of Palo Alto and Sierra Infosys Inc. to increase compensation by $120,000
from $1,334,000 to a total not to exceed amount of $1,454,000.
BACKGROUND
On July 12, 2010, City Council approved a three-year contract with Sierra Infosys Inc. in the
amount of $750,000 ($250,000/year) for support and maintenance of SAP industry-specific
solutions for Utilities, SAP Financials, Customer Relationship Management System, Business
Intelligence System and Utilities Customer Electronic Services (Attachment B). On June 20,
2011, City Council approved an amendment to the contract in the amount of $84,000 for a one-
time SAP basis support package (Attachment C). These actions increased the total contract
authority $834,000. On May 6, 2013 City Council approved Amendment No. 2 to extend the
contract for an additional year in the amount of $250,000 with the option to renew for another
year for an additional $250,000 (Attachment D). Staff exercised the option to renew the
contract (Amendment No. 3) for the additional year which has brought the total not to exceed
to $1,334,000 for the remainder of Fiscal Year 2015.
DISCUSSION
During the Fiscal Year 2015 Budget process, City Council approved $156,000 within the People
Strategy & Operations Department (Human Resources) to hire an SAP consultant to focus on
City of Palo Alto Page 2
data entry review and data analysis of city-wide salaries and benefits. Staff conducted a market
analysis of vendors and concluded that an existing City vendor, Sierra Infosys Inc., has the best
capability of sourcing a consultant with the needed expertise.
Staff is returning to City Council for authorization to begin work. The scope of services for this
contract specifically includes the following:
• Review specific SAP system configuration setup for HR modules and recommend
improvements
• Provide assistance with technical troubleshooting in our various SAP modules, with
reports such as administration of leave of absences and health benefit employee
contributions so that Payroll process is not disrupted, troubleshoot “FMLA buckets”; and
fixing dental eligibility report
• Document process requirements and data mapping, for example to streamline CalPERS
health enrollment, create an SAP interface to eliminate entry duplication, and create a
data dictionary or data index
• Review and draft business process documentation and recommend improvements such
as how to enhance and use Employee Self Service/Management Self Service, and how to
create and archive job classifications, salary grades, and title changes.
• Create needed reports such as auditing CalPERS medical invoices for active employees
compared to the employee medical plan data in SAP and automate delivery,
downloading data to create salary schedules and creating other employee
compensation reports
• Provide assistance troubleshooting specific business operational issues to improve
consistency, accuracy, and efficiency such as how to hide Infotypes not relevant to PSO
(HR) users
• Recommend best practices for human resource operations based on industry
knowledge and experience
As mentioned in the attached staff reports, the City has been utilizing SAP since 2003. As the
City’s Enterprise Resources Planning (ERP) system SAP is highly configurable with processes
integrated via interlinked configuration rules in various modules. The software requires a high
degree of specialized expertise to provide effective ongoing maintenance and support. City staff
in the People Strategy & Operations Department do not have the level of SAP expertise
required, yet they are responsible for accurately entering, maintaining and sharing the data
with other City departments as well as external partners such as CalPERS. Sierra Infosys Inc.,
through its consultants, has proven to be an effective resource for staff in other City
City of Palo Alto Page 3
departments. The People Strategy & Operations department believes that an SAP consultant
will be able to map and improve processes, reduce the risk of error, increase staff effectiveness
through training, and allow for interdepartmental and interagency data sharing. Overall this will
improve the department’s operations and allow for City staff to focus on more strategic human
resources initiatives such as recruiting, succession planning, employee engagement, and health
and wellness.
Furthermore, the IT Department’s SAP Steering Committee is currently conducting an
assessment of the SAP environment, including business processes and support resource
requirements, and it is developing a strategic plan for the ERP system. Implementation of this
contract is aligned with the committee’s work and will provide the City with additional data and
information for a more informed ERP strategic plan.
RESOURCE IMPACT
One-time General Fund funding for this contract was approved as part as part of the adoption
of the Fiscal Year 2015 Budget.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Approval of the recommended Contract amendment is not a project for purposes of the
California Environmental Quality Act and thus no environmental review under is required.
Attachments:
Attachment A - C10135998 Amendment No 4 (PDF)
Attachment B - July 12, 2010 Staff Report (PDF)
Attachment C - June 20, 2011 Staff Report (PDF)
Attachment D - May 6, 2013 Staff Report (PDF)
1 Revision April 28, 2014
AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO CONTRACT NO. C10135998 BETWEEN THE CITY OF PALO ALTO AND
SIERRA INFOSYS INC.
This Amendment No. 4 to Contract No. C10135998 (“Contract”) is entered into
December 29, 2014, by and between the CITY OF PALO ALTO, a California chartered municipal
corporation (“CITY”), and SIERRA INFOSYS, INC., a Texas corporation, authorized to do business
in California, located at 6001 Savoy Drive, Suite #210, Houston Texas, 77030, Telephone (713) 747-
9693 (“CONSULTANT”).
R E C I T A L S
A. The Contract was entered into between the parties for the provision of
Maintenance and Support of SAP applications.
B. CITY intends increase compensation from $1,334,000.00 by $120,000.00 to
$1,454,000.00 for additional support of SAP applications as specified in Amendment No. 4,
modification to EXHIBIT “A”.
C. The parties wish to amend the Contract.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, terms, conditions, and
provisions of this Amendment, the parties agree:
SECTION 1. Section 4 is hereby amended to read as follows:
“SECTION 4. NOT TO EXCEED COMPENSATION. The compensation to be paid to
CONSULTANT for performance of the Services described in Exhibit “A”, including both payment
for professional services and reimbursable expenses, shall not exceed One Million Four Hundred
Fifty Four Thousand Dollars ($1,454,000.00) over the final-year term of the Agreement with annual
payments not to exceed:
1. $250,000.00 for Fiscal Year 2011;
2. $334,000.00 for Fiscal Year 2012;
3. $250,000.00 for Fiscal Year 2013;
4. $250,000.00 for Fiscal Year 2014
5. $370,000.00 for Fiscal Year 2015.
In the event Additional Services are authorized, the total compensation for Services, Additional
Services and reimbursable expenses shall not exceed One Million Four Hundred Fifty Four
Thousand Dollar ($1,454,000.00). The applicable rates and schedule of payment are set out in
Exhibit “C-1”, entitled “HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE,” which is attached to and made a part of this
Agreement.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4EA30597-A742-4BBC-9CD0-D887D4287150
2 Revision April 28, 2014
Additional Services, if any, shall be authorized in accordance with and subject to the provisions of
Exhibit “C”. CONSULTANT shall not receive any compensation for Additional Services performed
without the prior written authorization of CITY. Additional Services shall mean any work that is
determined by CITY to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which is not
included within the Scope of Services described in Exhibit “A”.”
SECTION 2. The following exhibit(s) to the Contract is/are hereby amended to read
as set forth in the attachment(s) to this Amendment, which are incorporated in full by this reference:
a. Exhibit “A” entitled “Scope of Services”.
b. Exhibit “C” entitled “Compensation”.
SECTION 3. Except as herein modified, all other provisions of the Contract,
including any exhibits and subsequent amendments thereto, shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have by their duly authorized representatives
executed this Amendment on the date first above written.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
SIERRA INFOSYS, INC.
Attachments:
EXHIBIT "A": SCOPE OF SERVICES
EXHIBIT “C” COMPENSATION
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4EA30597-A742-4BBC-9CD0-D887D4287150
Sr.VP
3 Revision April 28, 2014
EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES
Per Amendment No. 4, EXHIBIT “A” is hereby modified to incorporate the following scope of
services.
Consultant will perform following tasks (contingent on priorities established):
Review specific SAP system configuration setup for HR modules and recommend any
improvements, to be discussed with CITY SAP PMO.
Provide assistance with technical troubleshooting in CITY’s various SAP modules or
with reports such as administration of leave of absences and health benefit employee
contributions so that Payroll process is not disrupted, troubleshoot “FMLA buckets”; and
fixing dental eligibility report
Document process requirements and data mapping as needed, for example to streamline
CalPERS health enrollment and create SAP interface to eliminate entry duplication and
create data dictionary or data index
Review and draft business process documentation and recommend improvements as
needed such as how to enhance and use ESS/MSS and how to create and archive job
classifications, salary grades, title changes, etc.
Create various reports as needed such as how to audit CalPERS medical invoice for
active employees compared to employee medical plan data in SAP and automate delivery;
download data to create salary schedules and other compensation reports
Provide assistance troubleshooting specific business operational issues to improve
consistency and accuracy and efficiency such as how to hide info types not relevant to
PSO (HR) users
Recommend industry best practice knowledge and experience
Each task order with CONSULTANT will be reviewed by PSO project manager and CITY SAP
PMO, providing supporting documentation such as task scope; objectives, resource planning, and
schedule.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4EA30597-A742-4BBC-9CD0-D887D4287150
4 Revision April 28, 2014
EXHIBIT “C”
COMPENSATION
The CITY agrees to compensate the CONSULTANT for professional services performed in
accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement based on the hourly rate schedule
attached as Exhibit C-1.
The compensation to be paid to CONSULTANT under this Agreement for all services
described in Exhibit “A” (“Services”) and reimbursable expenses shall not exceed
$1,454,000.00. CONSULTANT agrees to complete all Services, including reimbursable
expenses, within this amount. In the event CITY authorizes any Additional Services, the
maximum compensation shall not exceed $1,454,000.00. Any work performed or expenses
incurred for which payment would result in a total exceeding the maximum amount of
compensation set forth herein shall be at no cost to the CITY.
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
The administrative, overhead, secretarial time or secretarial overtime, word processing,
photocopying, in-house printing, insurance and other ordinary business expenses are included
within the scope of payment for services and are not reimbursable expenses. CITY shall
reimburse CONSULTANT for the following reimbursable expenses at cost. Expenses for
which CONSULTANT shall be reimbursed are:
A. Travel outside the San Francisco Bay area, including transportation and meals, will be
reimbursed at actual cost subject to the City of Palo Alto’s policy for reimbursement of travel
and meal expenses for City of Palo Alto employees.
B. Long distance telephone service charges, cellular phone service charges, facsimile
transmission and postage charges are reimbursable at actual cost.
All requests for payment of expenses shall be accompanied by appropriate backup information.
Any expense shall be approved in advance by the CITY’s project manager.
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
The CONSULTANT shall provide additional services only by advanced, written authorization
from the CITY. The CONSULTANT, at the CITY’s project manager’s request, shall submit a
detailed written proposal including a description of the scope of services, schedule, level of
effort, and CONSULTANT’s proposed maximum compensation, including reimbursable
expenses, for such services based on the rates set forth in Exhibit C-1. The additional
services scope, schedule and maximum compensation shall be negotiated and agreed to in
writing by the CITY’s Project Manager and CONSULTANT prior to commencement of the
services. Payment for additional services is subject to all requirements and restrictions in this
Agreement.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4EA30597-A742-4BBC-9CD0-D887D4287150
Purchasing, Project Management, Plant Maintenanee, Budgeting, Payroll, Human Resource
Management, and Service Order management.
On July 23, 2007, the Council approved contract changes with SAP for the SAP upgrade (from
release 4.6 C to ECC6.0) and implementation of SAP's industry-specific solution for utilities
(IS-U) to replace the aging Utilities Department's Customer Information System (CIS). The
SAP upgrade was completed in fiscal year 2008 and the implementation of the SAP IS-U,
Customer Relationship Management, and Business Inte\ligenee systems were subsequently
completed in fiscal year 2009. These systems replaced the old Utilities Customer Information
System known as Banner. Annual support for the Banner system was in the $200,000 per year
rangc.
Similar to many major project implementations the SAP IS-U projcet, since go-live in May 2009,
has gone through a period of post go-live support, issue resolution, and change management. To
ensure smooth transition from project post go-live support to normal support and maintenance,
the Axon consultants who did the original project were retained to assist staff to carry out the
project post go-live support from September 2009 to June 2010. The systems now are stabilized
and the City's SAP team is transitioning to normal support and maintenance where system
stability, system tuning and continuous improvements are the key objectives.
DISCUSSION
With the implementation of the SAP IS-U project, SAP has become the cornerstone of the City'S
business continuity, supporting Financial, Procurement, HR processes, and Utilities' meter-read
to billing, payment and collection processes. This centralization relocated the Utilities customer
information and support system from Banner to SAP. As the system became integrated with the
utilities modules, the breadth and depth of SAP knowledge and skill requirements for effective
SAP support and maintenance also has increased in these areas. Compared to the prior stand
alonc Banner system, SAP is a highly configurable system with processes integrated via inter-
linked configuration rules in the various modules. Configuration change requires thorough
knowledgc of multiple related modules and wbile these skills have been developing since the
system go-live on May 2009, the City's current resource for configuration and trouble-shooting
for the mission critical areas of the Utilities modules are insufficient.
After analyzing the past 12 months of SAP support and maintenance requests and considering
the scope and complexity and limited in-house resource capacity and capability; the SAP Project
Management Office (PMO) recommended that leveraging an extemal vendor to supplement the
City internal resources would be the best solution for the next three years.
The support and maintenance consulting cost will be similar to that under the former Banner
system. The SAP modules for Finance, HR, and Procurcment, in place since 2003 will also be
supported under this contract at approximately 20% of the contract.
CMR:291:IO Page 2 of 5
F 11 fh d o owmg IS a summary 0 t even or se cctton process.
Proposal Description/Number NamelNumber of Proposal here
, Proposed Length of Contract ~months . __ .-
Total Days to Rcspond to Proposal
i Pre-proposal Meeting Date 4/1912010
Number of Attendees at Pre-proposal 21
Meeting
Number of Proposals Received: 9
Company Name ' Location (city, Selected for oral
!ltate) interview? ' .
1. Alijon Consulting Walnut Creek,CA No
. 2. EA Consulting Folsom, CA Yes
3. HCL-Axon Jersey City, NJ Yes
4. HPC America San Ramon, Ca No
5. CSC El Segnado, CA No
6. Sage Group Hazlet, NJ Yes
7. Sierra Infosys Houston TX Yes
i 8. Terra Information Group, Inc. Naperville, IL No
9. The Basis Group! Inc. Hales Corners, WI Yes
Range of Proposal Am,ounts Submitted
$137,915 to $lM
An evaluation committee consisting of six staff from Administrative Services and Utilities
Departtnents reviewed the proposals. From the nine RFPs submitted, the evaluation committee
selected five firms that met the first level of ranking to participate in an oral interview on Jnae 1,
2010. Firms were not invited to interview if their proposals were inadequate or out of scope.
The committee carefully rated and ranked each frrm's qualifications and submittal in response to
the criteria identified in the RFP. Criteria used for the, evaluation is as follow:
Criteria
Weight
1. Quality and completeness of proposal 5%
2. Qualification and experience of proposed project manager and key staff 20%
3. Similar experience and expertise in the type of work required 25%
4. Demonstrated understanding of the scope of services required, timeframe, 20%
Scheduling ability, ability to provide back-up or follow-up services, if needed
5. Financial stability of Firm, current and looking forward 10%
6. Thc proposed fee schedule relative to the services to be provided 20%
Sierra Infosys, Inc was selected unanimously by all RFP evaluation committee members as the
first choice with the reasons summarized as:
I. The work model proposed by Sierra best complements City's existing 1'1 level support
capabilitics; with Sierra providing 2nd level support on as-needed basis. Under this
model City staff is contacted first for all SAP issues that come to the Helpdesk. The 2nd
level of support is only used if City staff needs assistance with a particular issue. This
CMR:291:10 Page 3 of 5
!
,
model enables the City to access Sierra's support resource pool to resolve unforeseen
critical system problems swiftly and provides the City with sufficient flexibility to
schedule plamled maintenance work effectively. Sierra's perfonnance will be measured
according to the service level agreement.
2. Sierra's proven implementation and support maintenance experience and expertise in
similar environments, such as City of San Diego, State of Kentucky, Clark County,
Nevada, and Broward County School District. Reference check results collected £i'om
these organizations are consistent and positive.
3. What differentiates Sierra Infosys from the other vendors responding to the Palo Alto
RFP is their strategic focus on providing Support and Maintenance services to mid-size
organization such as City of Palo Alto and their commitment to retain ample in-house
knowledge of SAP for prompt problem diagnosis and resolution of client problems.
Over the years, Sierra also has established a deep relationship with SAP Global
Support. Sierra has been selected by as a partner for the SAP GSS-Global Network of
Subject Matter Experts, providing quick resource deployment to SAP clients, when
needed.
The City Of Palo Alto SAP Steering Committee comprised of the directors of the
Administrative Services, Public Works and Utilities Departments are in agreement with the
selection of Sien'a Infosys, Inc for the work outlined in the City's Request for Proposal.
RESOURCE IMPACT
As a result of the on-going Information Teehnology funding structure, funds for this project have
been included in the Technology Internal Scrvice Fund (ISF) 2011-2012 budget.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
Approval of these contracts is consistent with current City policies.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
CMR:191:l0 Page 4 of 5
ATTACHMENT A
CITY. OF J?ALO ALTO CONTRACT NO. CI0135998
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY 01' PALO ~LTO AND SIERRA INFOSYS INC.
FOR PROI'ESSIONAL SERVICES
PROVISION SAP APPLICATION MAINTENANCE SUPPORT
This Agreement is entered into on this 13TH day of July, 2010, ("Agreement") by
and between the CITY OF PALO ALTO, a California chartered municipal corporation ("CITY"),
and SIERRA INFOSYS INC., a Texas Corporation authorized to do business in California, located
at 6001 Savoy Drive, Suite #210, Houston, TX, 77030 (PH) 713-747-9693 ("CONSULTANT").
RECITALS
The following recitals are a substantive portion of this Agreement.
A. CITY intends to maintain SAP Applications ("Project") and desires to engage a consultant to
provide Maintenance Support Consultant Services in connection with the Project ("Services").
B. CONSULTANT has represented that it has the necessary professional expertise,
qualifications, and capability, and all required licenses and/or certifications to provide the Services.
C. CITY in reliance on these representations desires to engage CONSULT ANT to provide the
Services as more fully described in Exhibit "A", attached to and made a part of this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the recitals, covenants, terms, and conditions, this
Agreement, the parties agree:
AGREEMENT
SECTION 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES. CONSULTANT shall perform the Services described in
Exhibit "A" in accordance with the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement. The
performance of all Services shall be to the reasonable satisfaction of CITY.
D Optional On-Call Provision (This provision only applies if checked and only applies to on-call
agreements.)
Services will be authorized by the CITY, as needed, with a Task Order assigned and approved by the
CIYY's Project Manager. Each Task Order shall be in substantially the same form as Exhibit A-I.
Each Task Order shall designate a City Project Manager and shall contain a specific scope of work, a
specific schedule of performance and a specific compensation amount. The total price of all Task
Orders issued under this Agreement shall not exceed the amount of Compensation set forth in
Section 4 of this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall only be compensated for work performed under
an authorized Task Order and the CITY may elect, but is not required, to authorize work up to the
maximum compensation amount set forth in Section 4.
ProfessiDrud Services
Rev. June 2, 2010
SECTION 2. TERM.
The term ofthis Agreement shall be from the date ofits full execution through July 12, 2013,
unless terminated earlier pursuant to Section 19 of this Agreement.
OR
The term of this Agreement shall be from the date of its full execution through completion of the
services in accordance with the Schedule of Performance attached as Exhibit "B" unless terminated
earlier pnrsuant to Section 19 of this Agreement.
SECTION 3. SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE. Time is of the essence in the performance of
Services under this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall complete the Services within the term of this
Agreement and in accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit "B", attached to and made a part
of this Agreement. Any Services for which times for performance are not specified in this Agreement
shall be commenced and completed by CONSULTANT in a reasonably prompt and timely manner
based upon the circumstances and direction communicated to the CONSULTANT. CITY's
agreement to extend the term or the schedule for performance shall not preclude recovery of damages
for delay if the extension is required due to the fault of CONSULTANT.
SECTION 4. NOT TO EXCEED COMPENSATION. The compensation to be paid to
CONSULTANT for performance of the Services described in Exhibit "A", including both
payment for professional services and reimbursable expenses, shall not exceed Seven Hundred
Fifty Thousand Dollars, over the three year term of the Agreement ($750,000.00), with annual
payments not to exceed $250,000.00 per year .. In the event Additional Services are authorized,
the total compensation for services and reimbursable expenses shall not exceed Seven Hundred
Fifty Thousand Dollars ($750,000.00). The applicable rates and schedule of payment are set out
in Exhibit "C-I", entitled "HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE," which is attached to and made a part
ofthis Agreement.
Additional Services, if any, shall be authorized in accordance with and subject to the provisions of
Exhibit "C". CONSULTANT shall not receive any compensation for Additional Services performed
without the prior written authorization of CITY. Additional Services shall mean any work that is
determined by CITY to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which is not
included within the Scope of Services described in Exhibit "A".
SECTION 5. INVOICES. In order to request payment, CONSULTANT shall submit monthly
invoices to the CITY describing the services performed and the applicable charges (including an
identification of personnel who performed the services, hours worked, hourly rates, and reimbursable
expenses), based upon the CONSULTANT's billing rates (set forth in Exhibit "C-l "). If applicable,
the invoice shall also describe the percentage of completion of each task. The information in
CONSULTANT's payment requests shall be subject to verification by CITY. CONSULT ANT shall
send all invoices to the CITY's project manager at the address specified in Section 13 below. The
CITY will generally process and pay invoices within thirty (30) days of receipt.
SECTION 6. QUALIFICATIONS/STANDARD OF CARE. All of the Services shall be
2
Professional Services
Rev, June2,2010
S:\ASDIPURCHISOLICITA TJONSICURRENT BUYER·CM FOLDERS\KATHYlContra elslCI 0 135998·Sicrra inf",ys, InelOmtract
CI0135998J doc
performed by CONSULTANT or under CONSULTANT's supervision. CONSULTANT represents
that it possesses the professional and technical personnel necessary to perform the Services required
by this Agreement and that the personnel have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services
assigned to them. CONSULTANT represents that it, its employees and subconsultants, if pennitted,
have and shall maintain during the term of this Agreement all Iieenses, permits, qualifications,
insurance and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the Services.
All of the services to be furnished by CONSULTANT under this agreement shall meet the
professional standard and quality that prevail among professionals in the same discipline and of
similar knowledge and skill engaged in related work throughout California under the same or similar
circumstances.
SECTION 7. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. CONSULTANT shall keep itselfinformed of and
in compliance with all federal, state and local laws, ordinances, regulations, and orders that may
affect in any manner the Project or the performance of the Services or those engaged to perform
Services under this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall procure all permits and licenses, pay all
charges and fees, and give all notices required by law in the performance of the Services.
SECTION 8. ERRORS/OMISSIONS. CONSULTANT shall correct, at no cost to CITY, any and
all errors, omissions, or ambiguities in the Services rendered to CITY, provided CITY gives
appropriate notice to CONS UL T ANT. If CONSULTANT has prepared plans and specifications or
other design documents to construct the Project, CONSULTANT shall be obligated to correct any
and all errors, omissions or ambiguities discovered prior to and during the course of the Project.
This obligation shall survive termination of the Agreement.
SECTION 9. COST ESTIMATES. If this Agreement pertains is the design of a publie works
prejeot, C()'NSULTf~IT shall Sllblllcit estimates of pro19allle eonstruction BOSts at eaeh phase of
deSigfl sa19mittal. l[the totsl estimated eonstruetion eost at any sabmittal elteeeds ten pareent (1 0%)
of.the CITY's statee. eonstruetion lme.get; CONSULTA"IT shall mal(e reeemmendations to the CITY
for aligning the PROJECT e.esign with the badge!, ineorporate CITY approyed reeommentiations,
and revise the design to meet the Pre;ieet 1gedge!, at HO additional eost to CITY. Section Not
Applicable.
SECTION 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. It is understood and agreed that in performing
the Services under this Agreement CONSULT ANT, and any person employed by or contracted with
CONSULTANT to furnish labor and/or materials under this Agreement, shall act as and be an
independent contractor and not an agent or employee of the CITY.
SECTION 11. ASSIGNMENT. The parties agree that the expertise and experience of
CONSULTANT are material considerations for this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall not assign or
transfer any interest in this Agreement nor the perfonnance of any of CONSULTANT's obligations
hereunder without the prior written consent of the city manager. Consent to one assignment will not
be deemed to be consent to any subsequent assignment. Any assignment made without the approval
of the city mauager will be void.
3
Professional Services
Rev. June 2, 2010
S:IASDIPURCHlSOLlCIT A TlONSICURRENT BUYER.cM FOWERSIKA THYlContr. elslCI 0\35998-Sierr. infosys, lnc\O:mtract
ClO135998Ldoc
SECTION 12. SUBCONTRACTING.
!8IOption A: No Subcontractor: CONSULTANT shall not subcontract any portion of the work to
be performed under this Agreement without the prior written authorization of the eity manager or
designee.
DOption B: Subcontracts Authorized: Notwithstanding Section 11 above, CITY agrees that
subconsultants may be used to complete the Serviees. The subconsultauts authorized by CITY to
perform work on this Project are:
CONSULTANT shall be responsible for directing the work of any subconsultants and for any
compensation due to subconsultants. CITY assumes no responsibility whatsoever concerning
compensation. CONSULTANT shall be fully responsible to CITY for all acts and omissions of a
subconsultaut. CONSULTANT shall change or add subconsultauts only with the prior approval of
the city manager or his designee.
SECTION 13. PROJECr MANAGEMENT. CONSULT ANT will assign Robert Nyman as
the Account Executive to have supervisory responsibility for the performance, progress, and
execution of the Services and Fazle Navqi as the Project Manager/Support
S e rv ic e s Manager to represent CONSULTANT during the day-to-day work on the Project. If
cireumstances cause the substitution of the Account Executive, Project Manager/Support Services
Manager, or any other key personnel for any reason, the appointment of a substitute Account
Executive and the assignment of any key new or replacement personnel will be subject to the prior
written approval of the CITY's project manager. CONSULTANT, at CITY's request, shall promptly
remove personnel who CITY fmds do not perform the Services in an acceptable manner, are
uncooperative, or present a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project or a threat to
the safety of persons or property.
The City's project manager is Jennifer Leu, Administrative Services Department, Information
Technology Services Division, 250 Hamilton Avenue, Palo Alto, CA 94303, Telephone: 650-853-
8 I S9. The project manager will be CONSULTANT's point of contact with respect to performance,
progress and execution of the Services. The CITY may designate an alternate CITY projcct manager
from time to time.
SECTION 14. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS. Upon delivery, all work product, including
without Ihnitation, all writings, drawings, plans, reports, specifications, calculations, documents,
other materials and copyright interests developed under this Agreement shall be and remain the
exclusive property of CITY without restriction or limitation upon their use. CONSULTANT agrces
that all copyrights which arise from creation of the work pursuant to this Agreement shall be vested
in CITY, and CONSULTANT waives and relinquishes all claims to copyright or other intellectual
property rights in favor of the CITY. Neither CONSULT ANT nor its contractors, if any, shall make
any of such materials available to any individual or organization without the prior written approval of
the City Manager or designee. CONSULTANT makes no representation of the suitability of the
work product for use in or application to circumstances not contemplated by the scope of work.
4
Professional Services
Rev, JUfle2.2010
SlASDIPURCHISOLlG1TATlONSlCURRENT BUYER.cM FOWERSIKATHYlC<>ntra cts1ClO135998-Siem infosys, InclContrac\
CI01359981.doc
SECTION 15. AUDITS. CONSULTANT will permit CITY to audit, at any reasonable time during
the term of this Agreement and for three (3) years thereafter, CONSULT ANT's records pertaining to
matters covered by this Agreement. CONSULTANT further agrees to maintain and retain such
records for at least three (3) years after the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement.
SECTION 16. INDEMNITY.
OIOption A applies to the following design professionals pursuant to Civil Code Section
2782.8: architects; landscape architects; registered professional engineers and licensed
professional land surveyors.] 16, I, To the fullest extent pennitted by law, CONSULTANT shall
protect, indemnifY, defend and hold harmless CITY, its Council members, officers, employees and
agents (each an "Indemnified Party") from and against any and all demands, claims, or liability of
any nature, including death or injury to any person, property damage or any other loss, including all
costs and expenses of whatever nature including attorneys fees, experts fees, court costs and
disbursements ("Claims") that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or
willful misconduct of the CONSULTANT, its officers, employees, agents or contractors under this
Agreement, regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by an Indemnified Party,
~IOption B applies to any eonsultant who does not qualify as a design professional as defined
in Civil Code Section 2782.8.) 16.1. To the fullest extent permitted by law, CONSULT ANT shall
protect. indemnifY. defend and hold harmless CITY, its Council members, officers, employees and
agents (each an "Indemnified Party") from and against any and all demands, claims, or liability of
any nature, including death or injury to any person, property damage or any other loss, including all
costs and expenses of whatever nature including attorneys fees, experts fees, court costs and
disbursements ("Claims") resulting from, arising out of or in any manner related to performance or
nonperformance by CONSULTANT, its officers, employees, agents or contractors under this
Agreement, regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by an Indemnified Party.
16.2, Notwithstanding the above, nothing in this Section 16 shall be construed to
require CONSULTANT to indemnifY an Indemnified Party from Claims arising from the active
negligence, sole negligence or willful misconduct of an Indemnified Party,
16.3, The acceptance of CONSULTANT's services and duties by CITY shall not
operate as a waiver of the right of indemnification. The provisions of this Section 16 shall survive
the expiration or early termination of this Agreement.
SECTION 17. WAIVERS. The waiver by either party of any breach or violation of any covenant,
term, condition or provision of this Agreement, or of the provisions of any ordinance or law, will not
be deemed to be a waiver of any other term, covenant, condition, provisions, ordinance or law, or of
any subsequent breach or violation of the same or of any other term, covenant, condition, provision,
ordinance or law,
SECTION 18. INSURANCE.
18.1 , CONSULTANT, at its sole cost and expense, shall obtain and maintain, in full
5
Professional Services
Rev, June 2, 2010
S:IASDIPURCffiSOUCIT ATIONSICURRENT BUYER·CM FOillERS\KATHy\Contra clS\CI0135998·Sierra inf!l5)'S, [nc\Contract
CI0135998[doc
force and effect during the term of this Agrecment, the insurance coverage described in Exhibit "D".
CONSU'LT ANT and its contractors, if any, shall obtain a policy endorsement naming CITY as an
additional insured under any general liability or automobile policy or policies.
18.2. All insurance coverage required hereunder shall be provided through carriers
with AM Best's Key Rating Guide ratings of A -: VII or higher which are licensed or authorized to
transact insurance business in the State of California. Any and all contractors of CONSULTANT
retained to perform Services under this Agreement will obtain and maintain, in full force and effect
during the term of this Agreement, identical insurance coverage, naming CITY as an additional
insured under such policies as required above.
18.3. Certificates evidencing such insurance shall be filed with CITY concurrently
with the execution of this Agreement. The certificates will be subject to the approval of CITY' s Risk
Manager and will contain an endorsement stating that the insurance is primary coverage and will not
be canceled, or materially reduced in coverage or limits, by the insurer except after filing with the
Purchasing Manager thirty (30) days' prior written notice of the cancellation or modification,
CONSULTANT shall be responsible for ensuring that current certi.ficates evidencing the insurance
are provided to CITY's Purchasing Manager during the entire term of this Agreement.
18.4. The procuring of such required policy or policies of insurance will not be
construed to limit CONSULTANT's liability hereunder nor to fulfill the indemnification provisions
of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the policy or policies of insurance, CONSULTANT will be
obligated for the full and total anlOunt of any damage, injury, or loss caused by or directly arising as
a result of the Services performed under this Agreement, including such damage, injury, or loss
arising after the Agreement is terminated or the term has expired.
SECTION 19. TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION OF AGREEMENT OR SERVICES.
19.1. The City Manager may suspend the performance of the Services, in whole or
in part, or terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, by giving ten (10) days prior written
notice thereof to CONSULTANT. Upon receipt of such notice, CONSULTANT will immediately
discontinue its performance of the Services.
19.2. CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement or suspend its performance of
the Services by giving thirty (30) days prior written notice thereof to CITY, but only in the event of a
substantial failure of performance by CITY.
19.3. Upon such suspension or termination, CONSULTANT shall deliver to the
City Manager immediately any and all copies of studies, sketches, drawings, computations, and other
data, whether or not completed, prepared by CONSULTANT or its contractors, if any, or given to
CONSULTANT or its contractors, if any, in connection with this Agreement. Such materials will
become the property of CITY.
19.4. Upon such suspension ortermil1ation by CITY, CONSULTANT will be paid
for the Services rendered or materials delivered to CITY in accordance with the scope of services on
or before the effective date (Le., 10 days after giving notice) of suspension or tenninatiol1; provided,
6
Profussional Services
Rev. Ju.e 2, 2010
S,\ASD\PURCHISOLlClT ATIONSI(.'URRENT BUYER ·CM FOLDERSIKATHYlContra ctslClO 135998·Sierra infosys. InelContract
ClOI359981.doe
however, if this Agreement is suspended or terminated on account of a default by CONSULTANT,
CITY will be obligated to compensate CONSULTANT only for that portion of CONSULT ANT's
services which are of direct and immediate benefit to CITY as such determination may be made by
the City Manager acting in the reasonable exercise ofhislher discretion. The following Seetions will
survive any expiration or termination of this Agreement: 14, 15, 16, 19.4,20, and 25.
19.5. No payment, partial payment, acceptance, or partial acceptance by CITY will
operate as a waiver on the part of CITY of any of its rights under this Agreement.
SECTION 20. NOTICES.
All notices hereunder will be given in writing and mailed, postage prepaid, by
certified mail, addressed as follows:
To CITY: Office of the City Clerk
City of Palo Alto
Post Office Box 10250
Palo Alto, CA 94303
With a copy to the Purchasing Manager, address sarue as above for City Clerk
To CONSULTANT: Attention of the project director
at the address of CONSULTANT recited above
SECTION 21. CONFLICT OF INTEREST.
21.1. In accepting this Agreement, CONSULTANT covenants that it presently has
no interest, and will not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, financial or otherwise, which would
conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of the Services.
21.2. CONSULTANT further covenants that, in the performance of this Agreement,
it will not employ subconsultants, contractors or persons having such an interest. CONSULTANT
certifies that no person who has or will havc any financial intcrest under this Agreement is an officer
or employee of CITY; this provision will be interpreted in accordance with the applicable provisions
of the Palo Alto Municipal Code and the Government Code of the State of California.
21.3. If the Project Manager determines that CONSULTANT is a "Consultant" as
that term is defined by the Regulations of the Fair Political Practices Commission, CONSULTANT
shall be required and agrees to file the appropriate financial disclosure documents required by the
Palo Alto Municipal Code and the Political Reform Act.
SECTION 22. NONDISCRIMINATION. As set forth in Palo Alto Municipal Code section
2.30.510, CONSULTANT certifies that in the performance of this Agreement, it shall not
discriminate in the employment of any person because of the race, skin color, gender, age, religion,
disability, national origin, ancestry, sexual orientation, housing status, marital status, familial status,
weight or height of such person. CONSULTANT acknowledges that it has read and understands the
7
Professional Services
Re,dune 2, 2010
S:IASDIPURCHlSOLICITATlONSICURRENT BUYER-eM FOLDERSIKATHYlContr. etsICI0I35998-Sierra infosys, InclConlnlet
C101359981.doc
provisions of Section 2.30.510 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code relating to Nondiscrimination
Requirements and the penalties for violation thereof, and agrees to meet all requirements of Section
2.30.510 pertaining to nondiscrimination in employment.
SECTJON23. ENVIRONMENTALLY PREFERRED PURCHASING AND ZERO WASTE
REOUIREMENTS. CONSULTANT shall comply with the CITY's Environmentally Preferred
Purchasing policies which are available at the CITY's Purchasing Division, Administrative Services
Department, incorporated by reference and may be amended from time to time. CONSULTANT
shall comply with waste reduction, reuse, recycling and disposal requirements of the CITY's Zero
Waste Program. Zero Waste best practices include first minimizing and reducing waste; second,
reusing waste and third, recycling or composting waste. In particular, Consultant shall comply with
the following zero waste requirements:
• All printed materials provided by Consultant to CITY generated from a personal
computer and printer including but not limited to, proposals, quotes, invoices,
reports, and public education materials, shall be double-sided and printed on a
minimum of 30% or greater post-consumer content paper, unless otherwise approved
by the City's Project Manager. Any submitted materials printed by a professional
printing company shall be a minimum of30% or greater post-consumer material and
printed with vegetable based inks.
• Goods purchased by Consultant on behalf of the CITY shall be purchased in
accordance with the CITY's Environmental Purchasing Policy including but not
limited to Extended Producer Responsibility requirements for products and
packaging. A copy of this policy is on file at the Purchasing Office.
• Reusable/returnable pallets shall be taken back by the Consultant, at no additional
cost to the CITY, for reuse or recycling. Consultant shall provide documentation
from the facility accepting the pallets to verifY that pallets are not being disposed.
SECTION 24. NON-APPROPRIATION
24.1. This Agreement is subject to the fiscal provisions of the Charter of the CITY
of Palo Alto and the Palo Alto Municipal Code. This Agreement will terminate without any penalty
(a) at the end of any fiscal year in the event that funds are not appropriated for the following fiscal
year, or (b) at anytime within a fiscal year in the event that funds are only appropriated for a portion
of the fiscal year and funds for this Agreement are no longer available. This section shall take
precedence in the event of a conflict with any other covenant, term, condition, or provision of this
Agreement.
SECTION 25. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.
25.1. This Agreement will be governed by the laws of the State of California.
25.2. In the event that an action is brought, the parties agree that trial of such action
will be vested exclusively in the state courts of California in the County of Santa Clara, State of
8
Professionat Services
Rev. June 2, 2010
S:\ASD\PURCH\SOLICITATIONS\CURRENT BUYER-CM FOiDERSIKATHYlConlra c(,\CIOI35998.sicrra infosys,lnc\Conlracl
CI0J359981.doc
California.
25.3. The prevailing party in any action brought to enforce the provisions of this
Agreement may recover its reasonable costs and attorneys' fees expended in connection with that
action. The prevailing party shall be entitled to recover an amount equal to the fair market value of
legal services provided by attorneys employed by it as well as any attorneys' fees paid to third
parties.
25.4. 1bis document represents the entire and integrated agreement between the
parties and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, and contracts, either written or oral.
This document may be amended only by a written instrument, which is signed by the parties.
25.5. The covenants, terms, conditions and provisions of this Agreement will apply
to, and will bind, the heirs, successors, executors, administrators, assignees, and consultants of the
parties.
25.6. If a court of competent jurisdiction finds or rules that any provision of this
Agreement or any amendment thereto is void or unenforceable, the unaffected provisions of this
Agreement and any amendments thereto will rernain in full force and effect.
25.7. All exhibits referred to in this Agreement and any addenda, appendices,
attachments, and schedules to this Agreement which, from time to time, may be referred to in any
duly executed amendment hereto are by such reference incorporated in this Agreement and will be
deemed to be a part ofthis Agreement.
25.8 If, pursuant to this contract with CONSULTANT, CITY shares with
CONSULT ANT personal information as defined in California Civil Code section 1798.81.5( d) about
a California resident ("Personal Information"), CONSULTANT shall maintain rcasonable and
appropriate security procedures to protect that Personal Information, and shall inform CITY
immediately upon learning that there has been a breach in the security of the system or in the security
of the Personal Information. CONSULTANT shall not use Personal Information for direct marketing
purposes without CffY's express written consent.
25.9 All unchecked boxes do not apply to this agreement.
25.1 0 The individuals executing this Agreement represent and warrant that they have
the legal capacity and authority to do so on behalf of their respective legal entities.
9
Professional Services
Rev. June 2, 2010
S:IASDIPURCHISOLICITATIONSICURRENT BUYER.cM FOLDERSIKA THYlContr. elsie I 0135998-Siert. inrosys, InclContract
CW1359981.doc
I. BACKGROUND.
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The CITY OF PALO ALTO (hereinafter "City") hereby requested proposals for SAP Support
Consultant Services. The CITY sought application support services for its SAP ECC 6.0 -
Enterprise Resourcc Planning Central Component System, ISUlCCS-Industry Solution Utilities
Customer Care and Service System, CRM Customer Relationship Management IC Web, UCES -
Utilities Customers eServices U CES Systems and Business Intelligence (BI) System. The most
recent ECC 6.0 was upgraded in July 2008, ISUlCCS was implemented in May 2009, and BI was
implemented in October 2009.
II. OVERVIEW
Sierra InfoSys (hereinafter "CONSULTANT') is to provide 2nd level of SAP Support and
Maintenance Consulting Services to supplement CITY in house resource when one or more of
the following scenarios occur:
• A quick solution is needed to fix system malfunction in areas such as payroll, utility bill
print, where system malfunction will disrupt normal business operation of multiple
departments or the entire organization.
• A quick solution is needed when customer facing systems such as UCES -Utility
Customer Electronic Services is down.
• Additional resource is needed to deliver system solution to meet legal compliance date,
such as Assombly Bill 920 -California Surplus Act of2009 or tax law changes.
• Industry best practice knowledge and experience is needed when City is evaluating,
designing, and implementing new business process and system fnnctions.
• At SAP PMO's discretion to perform special tasks such as new technOlogy evaluation,
feasibility study and/or reviewing system configuration setup.
Consultants are expected to have in-depth SAP knowledge and experience to perform tasks
inelude but not limited to system configuration custoinization, master data design and setup,
process design, custom table design, system analysis, and integration, focusing on the following
modules.
2
Professional Services
Rev, June 2, 2010
S:IASDIPURCH\SOLICITA TlONSlCURRENT BUYER-CM FOWERSIKA THy\Cootra elslCl 0 13599S.sierra infooys, InclCofllract
ClO135998Ldoc
Ill. SCOPE
SAP System SAP Modules Est Hours %
(per year)
IS-UtCCS DM-Device Management Support and Maintenance 200 12% I
BM-Billing Management Support and Maintenance 200 12%
FICA-Contract Account Finance Support and Maintenance 133 8%
UT·CRMllcWeb -Customer Relationship Management 200 12%
-Support and Maintenance
BI -Business Intelligence Support and Maintenance 133 8%
UCES -Utility Customer Electronic Services 133 8%
Core ERP ERP-Core SAP modules Support and Maintenance 333 20%
SAP Basis SAP BASIS consulting 333 20%
Total 1667
IV. WORK MODEL
Contract engagement with CONSULTANT primarily is based on Labor Hour for each Approved
Task Order. Hourly rate is fixed according to rate schedule. Total labor hours and cost is not to
exceed $250,000 annually.
Each task order with CONSULTANT, except urgent system fix, will be reviewed and approved
by SAP PMO, providing supporting material such as task scope; objectives, cost estimate,
resource planning, and schedule are available. CONSULTANT's Account Executive will
collaborate with CITY project manager and PMO to align objects, schedule, resource, and cost
closely.
V. DELIVERABLES
For each task order assigned, Consultant must follow CITY's system design and development
standards, to conduct the following tasks and produce deliverables:
Conduct problem investigation, root cause analysis, problem resolution, and knowledge transfer on
as-needed basis
Prepare functional specification, technieal specification, testing plan, and training material
Document configuration changes and process changes
Others: Solution comparaison, gap analysis, etc
VI. AREAS OF FOCUS
Areas of Business Operation where support and maintenance consulting is imperative to sustain
business continuity, to hnprove efficiency and fine tune process,
3
Professional Services
Rev, June 2, 20 to
S:IASDIPURCHISOLlClTATlONSlCURRENT BUYER-CM FOLDERSIKATHYlContra ctsICI013599S.sierra infos)'$, Inc\Contract
Cl 0 135998Ldoc
• DM-Device Management Support and Maintenance
o Device and installation
o Meter reading optimization and fine tuning, including meter reading unit and scheduling,
implausible reading results setting and estimate read activation
• BM-Billing Management Support and Maintenance
o Creating Consolidated Rate structure for Retail Settlement, Distributor and Retailer
consolidated Billing for Deregulated transactions
o Configuration of Billing Schema, Rate Category, Rates and Operands for Industrial
o Preparing specification for Print workbench requirement for custom specific application
form, to display unbundled billing with Power, Water and Sewer contracts and Rate
information.
• FICA-Contract account Support and Maintenance
o Configuring New Dunning Procedures and Dunning Levels with Dunning Activities
o Creating functional specifications for Reset Clearing, Payments, Dunning, Security
Deposits, Automatic Clearing, and Clearing rules
• UT-CRM/IcWeb -Customer Relationship Management -Support and Maintenance
o Base Customization like Product master, Business Partners, Organizational Mgmt, Lead
MgmtXxx
o Configuring IC Web client like Business Roles, Profile setup, Interaction records, Partner
determination, broadcast messaging, Transaction launcher, Authorization Setup,
o Creating Users for Web UI and integration between ECC and CRM.
• BI -Business Intelligence Support and Maintenance
o Redesigning BI Landscape to improve loading and Query performance
o Creating custom reports and workbooks using BEx Analyzer
• UCES -Support and Maintenance
o Sustaining UCBS Utility Customer E-Service
• ERP-Core Support and Maintenance Consulting
o Plarming production support activities for ERP Core activities
o Identify change management opportunities and implement organizational solutions
involving functional department efficiency improvement and workload balancing
• SAP Basis Consulting
o SAP Solution Management evaluation and implementation
o SAP Enterprise portal architecture
4
Professional Services
Rev. June 2,2010
S:IASDlPURCHISOLlCIT ATlONs\CURRENT BUYER-CM FOLDERS\l<ATHY\Coll". elSIC 10 135998-Sierra iIlCosy" InclContract
CI0135998I.doc
[
, Low
I
L
• Small number of users are affected.
• Isolated incident.
• Degraded performance and/or is difficult to use,
• User requests general information, servioe or
consultation,
• Cosmetic enhancements
• Report enhancements
5 days
5 days
2
2·3 weeks Requires resouroe
estimation, City's
approval, prioritization and
scheduling I
4-6 weeks' I Requires resource 'II ... =' ~timatiOn, City's
approval, prioritization and
scheduling
._-L ___ . . . . .
Professional Services
Rev. June 2, 2010
S:IASDIPURCH\SOUCITATIONSICURRENT BUYER-CM FOLDERS\KATHYIContra cts\CI0135998-Sierr. infos;., Inc\Contract Cl 013S9981.doc
EXHIBIT "C"
COMPENSATION
The CITY agrees to compensate the CONSULTANT for professional services performed in
accordance with the terms and conditions ofthis Agreement on a Time and Materials basis,
based on the hourly rate schedule attached as Exhibit C-I.
The compensation to be paid to CONSULTANT under this Agreement for all services
described in Exhibit "A" ("Services") and reimbursable expenses shall not exceed
$750,000.00 ($250,000.00 per year). CONSULTANT agrees to complete all Services,
including reimbursable expenses, within this amount. In the event CITY authorizes any
Additional Services, the maximum compensation shall not exceed $750,000.00 ($250,000.00
per year). Any work performed or expenses incurred for which payment would result in a
total exceeding the maximum amount of compensation set forth herein shall be at no cost to
the CITY.
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
The administrative, overhead, secretarial time or secretarial overtime, word processing,
photocopying, in-house printing, insurance and other ordinary business expenses are included
within the scope of payment for services and are not reimbursable expenses. CITY shall
reimburse CONSULTANT for the following reimbursable expenses at cost. Expenses for
which CONSULTANT shall be reimbursed are:
A. Travel outside the San Francisco Bay area, including transportation and meals, will be
reimbursed at actual cost subject to the City of Palo Alto's policy for reimbursement of travel
and meal expenses for City of Palo Alto employees.
B. Long distance telephone service charges, cellular phone service charges, facsimile
transmission and postage charges arc reimbursable at actual cost.
All requests for payment of expenses shall be accompanied by appropriate backup information.
Any expense anticipated to be more than $250.00, shall be approvad in advance by the CITY's
project manager.
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
The CONSULTANT shall provide additional services only by advanced, written authorization
from the CITY. The CONSULTANT, at the CITY's project manager's request, shall submit a
detailed written proposal including a description of the scope of services, schedule, level of
effort, and CONSULTANT's proposed maximum compensation, including reimbursable
expenses, for such services based on the rates set forth in Exhibit C-l. The additional
services scope, schedule and maximum compensation shall be negotiated and agreed to in
writing by the CITY's Project Manager and CONSULTANT prior to commencement of the
services. Payment for additional services is subject to all requirements and restrictions in this
Agreement.
Professional Services 18
Rev June 2,2010
S:IASDIPURC!l\SOLlCITATIONSICURRENT BUYER-CM FOLDERSIKA THYlContra ctsICI0135998-Sierra infosys, InclContrac!
ClOI35998l.doc
[SCOPE !
i i
IIS:U/CCS I i1
~--'
____ M
I 2 ,
3
,
I--4
,
r-5 1---'"
6
i COREERP
!
!
i
'"
EXHIBIT "C-l"
HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE
I LABOR CATEGORIES (e.g. Sr. Consultant,
' Lead, Consultant, Clerical, etc.)
i
ONSITE CONSULTING
SAP ISU DM Support and Maintenance
Sr. Consultant -----------,-,
____ M.
SAP ISU BM-BILLING Support and
Maintenance
Sr. Consultant
SAP ISU FICA Support and Maintcmmee
' Sr. Consultant
' SAP CRM & ICWEB Support and
Maintenance
Sr. Consultant
SAP BI Support and Maintenance
Sr. Consultant
SAP UCES Support and Maintenance
Sr. Consultant
ERP-CORE Support and Maintenance
FUNCTIONAL'
SAP
ESSIMSS, FI, HR, SD, MM, PM, WM, PS,
CO,BCS,FA ___ M.
CONSULTANTS
ERP-CORE Support and Maintenance
TECHNICAL
ABAP, ALV, Workftow, Report, Painter,
JAVA, JSP, HTML, Web Service, XML,
, RFC,JCO
BSP Architecture and Development
CONSULTANTS
.... ..---
HOURLY EXTENDED
RATE
135
125
135
125
125
135
HOURLY RATE
(HOURLY RATE
160 ! ... -----_ ....
,
150 ,
""-~ ....
160 ,
125
125 ..... ~ ...
160
"'-"
,
Professional Services 19
Rev June 2, 2010
i
i
i
I
I
I
i
S:IASDIPURCHlSOLICITATIONSlCURRENT BUYER·CM FOLDERS\KA THY\Contra elSIC! 0135998..s1erra inCosys, In.IContract
CI01359981.doe
'---.. ··1 7 I ERP-CORE Support and Maintenance 100
SAP Basis Is 1 BASIS CONSULTING
! I Sr. Con~uItant 100_ :~ I i
~--~ ..
! I
Assumptions: Hourly Rates and implementation eosts cbange for any otber extra
consulting services.
100
100
Professional Services 20
Rev June 2, 2010
S:\ASDIPURCH\sOLICITATIONSICURRENT BUYER-CM FOLDERS\KA llIY1Conlra elS\cI 0135998-Sierr. infosys, Ine\Contract
CIOI3S998I.doc
.-
._.
TIlE NAMING OF MORE THAN ONE PERSON, FIRM, OR CORFORA TlON AS INSUREDS UNDER THE POLICY SHALL
NOT, FOR THAT REASON ALONE, EXTINGUISH ANY RIGHTS OF THE INSURED AGAINST ANOTIlER, BUT THIS
ENDORSEMENT, AND THE NAMING OF MULTIPLE INSUREDS, SHALL NOT INCREASE TIlE TOTAL LIABILITY OF
TIlE COMPANY UNDER THIS POLICY,
C. NOTICE OF CANCELLATION
1. IF THE POLICY IS CANCELED BEFORE ITS EXPIRATION DATE FORANY REASON OTHER
THAN THE NON·PAYMENT OF PREMlUM, THE ISSUING COMl'ANY SHALL PROVIDE CITY
AT LEAST A HURTY (30) DAY WRlTTEN NOTICE BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF
CAl'lCELLA TlON.
2. IF THE POLICY IS CANCELED BEFORE ITS EXPIRATION DATE FOR TIlE NON·PAYMENT
OFPREMlUM, TIlE ISSUING COMPANY SHALL PROVIDE CITY AT LEAST A TEN (10) DAY
WRllTEN NOTICE BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF CANCELLATION.
NOTICES SHALL BE MAILED TO:
PURCHASING AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
CITY OF PALO ALTO
P.O. BOX 10250
PALOALTO,CA 94303
Professional Services 22
Rev June 2. 2010
S :IASDlPURCHISOLlCrrATIONSICURRENT BUYER-CM FOLDERSIKA THY\Contra e!SICI 0 11599li-Sicrra infusys, lnclContract
C101359981.doc
EXHIBITE
TRANSITION PLAN
. am enance Planning Setup Transfer . D I' ervlce e Ive
> TMOOW'" ~",m'.OO"~KOOW.dg, ~t~port
-....
, Establish scope • Setup connectivity
and time!ines for remote access
• Identify • Identify and deploy
stakeholders & connectivity and
~ process owners access
• Identify • Authorltation :r Organization • Sierra System
• Define service
levels
• Support process
;==
~ • Transition plan • SAP account
• Support Org • Authorization
;: • Support flow • Network Access
• Sierra system
= QQB'I QQB'I
SAP PMO members SAP PMO members 0 SAP Basis :r ;:: lli!lrqi
Engagement Manager Sierra
Support Service Manager Engagement Manager
Support consultant s
~
• Understand
Business process,
Configuration,
Master data
"' Customization
• Understand and
review change
management
process
• On site training
ticketing system
• Blue prlnl
• Scheduled jobs
• Operation manuals
• Customization
specification
• Interfaces
.~ CUPA
SAP PMO
SAP Core Team
AXON -as needed ~ d Engagement Manager
Suooort Con,ullar
• Reporting req
• Tas~ Order planning
, Prioritization
• Perfonnance
management
• Scheduling
• Cost conlrol
• Performance
• Slatus Report
QQB'I
SAPPMO
SAP Core Team
~ Engagement Manager
Support Service Manager
Professional Services 2 4
Rev June2,:WIQ
S:IASDIPURCH\SOLlClT A TIONSICURRENT BUYER-CM FOLDERSIKA THY\Conka c!sIClO 13599&-Sicrra Infosl"', Ine\Contract
CI0!359981.doc
City of Palo Alto (ID # 1764)
City Council Staff Report
Report Type: Consent Calendar Meeting Date: 6/20/2011
June 20, 2011 Page 1 of 3
(ID # 1764)
Council Priority: {ResProject:ClearLine}
Summary Title: SAP Basis Support
Title: Approval Of Software Consulting Service Contract Amendment with Sierra
Infosys, Inc. in the amount of $84,000 for the SAP Basis Support of SAP Industry-
Specific Solution for Utilities, SAP Financials, Customer Relationship
Management System, Business Intelligence System and Utilities Customer
Electronic Services
From:City Manager
Lead Department: Administrative Services
Recommendation
Staff recommends that Council approve and authorize the City Manager or his designee to
execute the amendment of the attached usage-based professional services agreement
(Attachment B) with Sierra Infosys Inc. in the amount not to exceed a one-time increase of
$84,000 for SAP Basis support in fiscal year 2012. The total contract amount for fiscal year 2012
will not exceed $334,000. Fiscal 2013 amount will remain the same as $250,000. The total
contract amount for fiscal 2011, 2012 and 2013 not-to-exceed $834,000
Executive Summary
SAP Basis encompass a wide spectrum of tasks, ranging from Oracle data base administration,
system security, system monitoring and tuning, user authorization, system backup, system
landscape maintenance, support package application, SAP audit support, and project support.
These tasks are essential to SAP system health and security so that ongoing business continuity
is assured. The two in house Basis staff support five systems, over 1400 SAP users, 17 servers,
and 11 oracle databases in the live, 24/7 operating environment. To provide the necessary
support resources and skills for the SAP system, Basis together with six other support areas was
incorporated into the three-year overall SAP support and maintenance contract agreement,
established in 2010 with Sierra Infosys (CMR:291:10). The portion allocated to Basis support,
approximately $50K per year, would normally be sufficient with two full time in house Basis
staff. Unfortunately, one of the Basis staff has been out on medical leave since February 2011
and the period of absence will be up to twelve months. To minimize business impacts of staff
on medical leave, additional SAP Basis support from external vendors is needed.
Background
June 20, 2011 Page 2 of 3
(ID # 1764)
On July 2010, the City Council approved a three-year software consulting services contract with
Sierra Infosys Inc. in the amount of $750,000 for the support and maintenance of the following
SAP modules: Industry-Specific Solution for Utilities, financials, customer relationship
management, business intelligence and utilities customer electronic services, with each year
not to exceed $250,000. To address the in house Basis resource and skill gap, a portion of the
Sierra Infosys contract, approximately $50K per year was allocated to SAP Basis. The scope of
work for Basis support in the original contract was to implement various modules of SAP
Solution Manager, a tool to improve system management and monitoring efficiencies. With the
three-year contract in place, Sierra Infosys has been working with in house Basis staff and has
established a good working relationship through projects such as SAP Solution Manager, QAS
environment, and BI QAS/Dev rebuild. To fill in the resource gap while Basis staff on medical
leaves, a new list of Basis support scope of work has been established.
Discussion
Requests for quotation for the following scope of work, approximately equivalent to 5+ months
SAP Basis Support were sent to: Group Basis, Sierra Infosys, Inc. Cronus Consulting, and
GlobalSource IT.
o Perform and document Oracle data base related daily/weekly/monthly/quarterly
monitoring and tuning tasks for five SAP systems (UCES, ESS/MSS, ECC, CRM and BI)
o Perform and document SAP portal system monitoring tasks (CRM IcWeb, UCES, and
ESS/MSS)
o Provide assistance to SAP Basis Authorization Admin to implement fixes according to
SOSS report for ECC production, CRM production and BI production
o Perform Oracle data base patch/release upgrade ( from 10.2.0.20 to 11.2.0) for all
systems
o Assess and enhance ECC production file system configuration
o Perform ECC Support package upgrade to the latest version
o Perform CRM Support package upgrade to latest version
o Perform BI Support package upgrade to the latest version
o Perform UCES Support package upgrade to the latest version
o Develop Central User admin (CUA) strategy and implement plan
Sierra Infosys was selected because of the following reasons:
June 20, 2011 Page 3 of 3
(ID # 1764)
a.Lowest hourly rate ( $92/hour remote, $113 on site)
b.Efficiency and productivity: Sierra Infosys has been working with City’s Basis team and
functional team in the past few months and they are familiar with City’s environment
and configurations.
c.Dedicated resource : Sierra Infosys has dedicated one resource to support the City
Timeline
The time period for this request will be from July 2011 to July 2012.
Resource Impact
This contract will be funded from existing funds in the Information Technology Internal Service
Fund.
ATTACHMENTS:
·Attachment A: Amendment to Sierra Infosys Contract (PDF)
Prepared By:Jennifer Leu, Manager, IT
Department Head:Lalo Perez, Director
City Manager Approval: James Keene, City Manager
City of Palo Alto (ID # 3566)
City Council Staff Report
Report Type: Consent Calendar Meeting Date: 5/6/2013
City of Palo Alto Page 1
Summary Title: Approval of a One-Year Extension of the Sierra Infosys
Contract for Annual SAP Support
Title: Approval of a One-Year Extension of the Sierra Infosys Contract
(C10135998) for Annual SAP Support in the amount of $250,000.00 per year
for the Support and Maintenance of SAP Industry-Specific Solution for
Utilities (IS-U), SAP Enterprise Central Component (ECC 6.0), Customer
Relationship Management System (CRM), Business Intelligence System (BI)
and Utilities Customer Electronic Services (UCES)
From: City Manager
Lead Department: IT Department
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Council:
1. Approve, and authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute, the attached one
year usage-based professional services contract (Attachment A) with Sierra Infosys Inc. in
the amount not to exceed $250,000 per year for the support and maintenance of various
SAP modules. The contract will be for fiscal year 2014.
2. Approve, and authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute, a one year usage-
based professional services contract extension with Sierra Infosys Inc. in the amount not
to exceed $250,000 per year for the support and maintenance of various SAP modules.
The extension will be for fiscal year 2015. The total not-to-exceed value of the
agreement and renewal is $500,000.
MOTION
City of Palo Alto Page 2
I move to accept staff’s recommendation to approve and authorize the City Manager or his
designee to execute the attached one year usage-based professional services contract
(Attachment A) for fiscal year 2014, with an optional second-year extension for fiscal year 2015,
with Sierra Infosys Inc. for the support and maintenance of various SAP modules, in the amount
not to exceed $250,000 per year, with a total not-to-exceed value of $500,000.
BACKGROUND
The City’s history with SAP began in 2002 when the City selected SAP as its preferred vendor for
an Enterprise Resource Planning system with the purpose of integrating various business
processes within the City and to pave the path for the City to moving toward the direction of
electronic government. The SAP system has been running in the City since 2003, supporting
Accounting, Finance, Purchasing, Project Management, Plant Maintenance, Budgeting, Payroll,
Human Resource Management, and Service Order management. In 2009, the City completed a
major upgrade to the SAP ERP system and replaced the former utility billing system (Banner)
with the implementation of the SAP IS-U module, Customer Relationship Management, Utilities
Customer Electronic Services (also known as My Utilities Account customer portal) and Business
Intelligence systems.
By supporting the critical business processes in Finance, Procurement, HR, and Utilities’ meter-
read to billing, payment and collection SAP has become an integral part of City’s business
continuity.
Examples of the operational scope of SAP include:
Manages and maintains a City budget of over half billion dollars
Issues 11,000 A/P checks, processes 2,200 purchases documents, and issues 36,000
payroll checks each year
Generates 370,000 utilities invoices and collects approx. $220M for 30,500 utilities
accounts
Currently, 12,100 active customers registered to use “My Utilities Account” for e-bills
and online payments
Provides concise business information to support 38,000 incoming calls into the Utilities
Customer Service Center
Interfaces to City Business Partners such as Wells Fargo, Check Free, JP Morgan
(procurement card services), Green Waste (refuse), and non-SAP City systems
City of Palo Alto Page 3
City staff provides internal SAP resources and knowledge to support and maintain the following
six SAP systems: Enterprise Planning system, SAP Industry-Specific Utilities system, Customer
Relationship Management system, Utilities Customer Electronic Services system, Employee and
Manger Self-Service system, and Business Intelligence systems. To supplement staff support of
SAP, the City, on July 1, 2010, entered a three (3) year software consulting services contract
with Sierra Infosys Inc. in the amount of $750,000 In July 2011, to cope with the resource
shortage due to staff medical leave, the City amended the contract to include additional basis
system support in the amount of $84,000. Sierra’s existing contract will expire on June 30,
2013.
DISCUSSION
SAP is a highly configurable system with processes integrated via inter-linked configuration
rules in the various modules. SAP requires a high degree of specialized expertise to provide
effective ongoing maintenance and support. Sierra augments City staff resources in order to
adequately provide coverage across the depth and breadth of SAP.
For the past two and a half years, the City has leveraged Sierra’s expertise to support numerous
technical and functional areas. Sierra’s annual performance evaluations have been satisfactory.
Examples of Sierra’s support include the following:
Perform functional configuration for the various business modules
Provide assistance with functional troubleshooting specific complex business
operational issues
Provide assistance with technical troubleshooting in our various SAP environments
Provide assistance with authorization and security administration
Perform Oracle data base patch/release upgrade
Perform Support package upgrade to the latest version including all database tasks
Perform and document SAP portal system monitoring tasks
The IT Department and SAP Steering Committee will conduct an assessment of our current SAP
environment, business processes, support resources needs, and develop a strategic plan for the
Enterprise Resource Planning systems. The assessment is one of the proposed FY 2014 capital
City of Palo Alto Page 4
improvement projects. Until the full assessment report and Enterprise Resource Planning
strategic plan is ready, staff recommends extending the service contract with Sierra Infosys to
maintain current support levels.
RESOURCE IMPACT
With the new on-going Information Technology funding structure, funds for this project will
come from the Technology Internal Service Fund. Funds for this contract and extension are
available in the current 2013 and proposed 2014 budgets. The proposed contract amount of
$250,000 per year does not present an increase over current funding levels for the Sierra
contract.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
Approval of these contracts is consistent with current City policies.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Attachments:
C10135998 W-Sierra Infosys Amend No 2 (PDF)
FY14 Sierra Contract CMR (MinuteTraq vesion1) (DOC)
CMR291-10 (PDF)
1 Revision July 25, 2012
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CONTRACT NO. C10135998 BETWEEN THE CITY OF PALO ALTO AND
SIERRA INFOSYS, INC.
This Amendment No. 2 to Contract No. C10135998 (“Contract”) is entered into April , 2013, by and between the CITY OF PALO ALTO, a California chartered
municipal corporation (“CITY”), and SIERRA INFOSYS, INC., a Texas corporation, authorized
to do business in California, located at 6001 Savoy Drive, Suite # 210, Houston, TX 77030,
Telephone: (713) 747-9693 (“CONSULTANT”). R E C I T A L S:
A. The Contract was entered into between the parties for the maintenance and
support of SAP Applications; and B. The parties wish to amend the Contract to extend for one year and make
other changes described herein;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, terms, conditions, and provisions of this Amendment, the parties agree:
SECTION 1. Section 2 is hereby amended to read as follows:
“SECTION 2. TERM. The term of this Agreement shall be from the date of its full execution through June 30, 2014 with the option to extend the Agreement for a one-year extension, unless terminated earlier pursuant to Section 19 of this Agreement.
SECTION 2. Section 4 is hereby amended to read as follows:
“SECTION 4. NOT TO EXCEED COMPENSATION. The compensation to be paid to
CONSULTANT for performance of the Services described in Exhibit “A”, including both
payment for professional services and reimbursable expenses, shall not exceed One Million
Dollars ($1,000,000.00), over the four-year term of the Agreement, with annual payments not to
exceed $250,000.00 per year. In the event the parties exercise the option to extend the contract for a one-year extension, the compensation to be paid to CONSULTANT for performance of the
Services described in Exhibit “A”, including both payment for professional services and
reimbursable expenses, shall not exceed One Million Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars
($1,250,000.00), over the term of the Agreement with annual payments not to exceed
$250,000.00 per year. In the event Additional Services are authorized, the total compensation for services and reimbursable expenses shall not exceed One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) or
shall not exceed One Million Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($1,250,000.00) in the event
the parties exercise the option to extend the contract for a one-year extension. The applicable
rates and schedule of payment are set out in Exhibit “C-1”, entitled “HOURLY RATE
SCHEDULE,” which is attached to and made a part of this Agreement.
2 Revision July 25, 2012
Additional Services, if any, shall be authorized in accordance with and subject to the provisions
of Exhibit “C”. CONSULTANT shall not receive any compensation for Additional Services
performed without the prior written authorization of CITY. Additional Services shall mean any
work that is determined by CITY to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which is not included within the Scope of Services described in Exhibit “A”.
SECTION 3. The following exhibit(s) to the Contract is/are hereby amended to
read as set forth in the attachment(s) to this Amendment, which are incorporated in full by this
reference: a. Exhibit “C” entitled “COMPENSATION”
SECTION 4. Except as herein modified, all other provisions of the Contract, including any exhibits and subsequent amendments thereto, shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have by their duly authorized
representatives executed this Amendment No. 2 on the date first above written.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
____________________________
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ Senior Asst. City Attorney
SIERRA INFOSYS, INC.
By:___________________________ Name:_________________________
Title:________________________
Attachments: EXHIBIT "C": COMPENSATION
Professional Services Rev June 2, 2010
Year 1 to Year 3
07/12/2010 to 07/12/2013
The CITY agrees to compensate the CONSULTANT for professional services performed in
accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement on a Time and Materials basis,
based on the hourly rate schedule attached as Exhibit C-1.
The compensation to be paid to CONSULTANT under this Agreement for all services
described in Exhibit “A” (“Services”) and reimbursable expenses shall not exceed
$750,000.00 ($250,000.00 per year). CONSULTANT agrees to complete all Services,
including reimbursable expenses, within this amount. In the event CITY authorizes any
Additional Services, the maximum compensation shall not exceed $750,000.00 ($250,000.00
per year). Any work performed or expenses incurred for which payment would result in a
total exceeding the maximum amount of compensation set forth herein shall be at no cost to
the CITY.
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
The administrative, overhead, secretarial time or secretarial overtime, word processing,
photocopying, in-house printing, insurance and other ordinary business expenses are included
within the scope of payment for services and are not reimbursable expenses. CITY shall
reimburse CONSULTANT for the following reimbursable expenses at cost. Expenses for
which CONSULTANT shall be reimbursed are: A. Travel outside the San Francisco Bay area, including transportation and meals, will be reimbursed at actual cost subject to the City of Palo Alto’s policy for reimbursement of travel and meal expenses for City of Palo Alto employees.
B. Long distance telephone service charges, cellular phone service charges, facsimile
transmission and postage charges are reimbursable at actual cost.
All requests for payment of expenses shall be accompanied by appropriate backup
information. Any expense anticipated to be more than $250.00, shall be approved in advance
by the CITY’s project manager.
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
The CONSULTANT shall provide additional services only by advanced, written
authorization from the CITY. The CONSULTANT, at the CITY’s project manager’s request,
shall submit a detailed written proposal including a description of the scope of services,
schedule, level of effort, and CONSULTANT’s proposed maximum compensation, including
reimbursable expenses, for such services based on the rates set forth in Exhibit C-1. The
additional services scope, schedule and maximum compensation shall be negotiated and
agreed to in writing by the CITY’s Project Manager and CONSULTANT prior to
commencement of the services. Payment for additional services is subject to all requirements
and restrictions in this Agreement.
Professional Services Rev June 2, 2010
Year Four
07/12/2013 to 06/30/2014
EXHIBIT “C”
COMPENSATION
The CITY agrees to compensate the CONSULTANT for professional services performed in
accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement on a Time and Materials basis,
based on the hourly rate schedule attached as Exhibit C-1.
The compensation to be paid to CONSULTANT under this Agreement for all services
described in Exhibit “A” (“Services”) and reimbursable expenses shall not exceed
$1,000,000.00 ($250,000.00 per year). CONSULTANT agrees to complete all Services,
including reimbursable expenses, within this amount. In the event CITY authorizes any
Additional Services, the maximum compensation shall not exceed $1,000,000.00
($250,000.00 per year). Any work performed or expenses incurred for which payment would
result in a total exceeding the maximum amount of compensation set forth herein shall be at
no cost to the CITY.
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
The administrative, overhead, secretarial time or secretarial overtime, word processing,
photocopying, in-house printing, insurance and other ordinary business expenses are included
within the scope of payment for services and are not reimbursable expenses. CITY shall
reimburse CONSULTANT for the following reimbursable expenses at cost. Expenses for
which CONSULTANT shall be reimbursed are:
A. Travel outside the San Francisco Bay area, including transportation and meals, will be
reimbursed at actual cost subject to the City of Palo Alto’s policy for reimbursement of travel
and meal expenses for City of Palo Alto employees.
B. Long distance telephone service charges, cellular phone service charges, facsimile
transmission and postage charges are reimbursable at actual cost.
All requests for payment of expenses shall be accompanied by appropriate backup
information. Any expense anticipated to be more than $250.00, shall be approved in advance
by the CITY’s project manager.
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
The CONSULTANT shall provide additional services only by advanced, written
authorization from the CITY. The CONSULTANT, at the CITY’s project manager’s request,
shall submit a detailed written proposal including a description of the scope of services,
schedule, level of effort, and CONSULTANT’s proposed maximum compensation, including
reimbursable expenses, for such services based on the rates set forth in Exhibit C-1. The
additional services scope, schedule and maximum compensation shall be negotiated and
agreed to in writing by the CITY’s Project Manager and CONSULTANT prior to
commencement of the services. Payment for additional services is subject to all requirements
and restrictions in this Agreement.
Professional Services Rev June 2, 2010
Year Five [One (1) Year-Extension]
07/12/2014 to 06/30/2015
EXHIBIT “C”
COMPENSATION
The CITY agrees to compensate the CONSULTANT for professional services performed in
accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement on a Time and Materials basis,
based on the hourly rate schedule attached as Exhibit C-1.
The compensation to be paid to CONSULTANT under this Agreement for all services
described in Exhibit “A” (“Services”) and reimbursable expenses shall not exceed
$1,250,000.00 ($250,000.00 per year). CONSULTANT agrees to complete all Services,
including reimbursable expenses, within this amount. In the event CITY authorizes any
Additional Services, the maximum compensation shall not exceed $1,250,000.00
($250,000.00 per year). Any work performed or expenses incurred for which payment would
result in a total exceeding the maximum amount of compensation set forth herein shall be at
no cost to the CITY.
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
The administrative, overhead, secretarial time or secretarial overtime, word processing,
photocopying, in-house printing, insurance and other ordinary business expenses are included
within the scope of payment for services and are not reimbursable expenses. CITY shall
reimburse CONSULTANT for the following reimbursable expenses at cost. Expenses for
which CONSULTANT shall be reimbursed are:
A. Travel outside the San Francisco Bay area, including transportation and meals, will be
reimbursed at actual cost subject to the City of Palo Alto’s policy for reimbursement of travel
and meal expenses for City of Palo Alto employees.
B. Long distance telephone service charges, cellular phone service charges, facsimile
transmission and postage charges are reimbursable at actual cost.
All requests for payment of expenses shall be accompanied by appropriate backup
information. Any expense anticipated to be more than $250.00, shall be approved in advance
by the CITY’s project manager.
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
The CONSULTANT shall provide additional services only by advanced, written
authorization from the CITY. The CONSULTANT, at the CITY’s project manager’s request,
shall submit a detailed written proposal including a description of the scope of services,
schedule, level of effort, and CONSULTANT’s proposed maximum compensation, including
reimbursable expenses, for such services based on the rates set forth in Exhibit C-1. The
additional services scope, schedule and maximum compensation shall be negotiated and
agreed to in writing by the CITY’s Project Manager and CONSULTANT prior to
commencement of the services. Payment for additional services is subject to all requirements
and restrictions in this Agreement.
CMR: 3566:13291:10 Page 1 of 5
TO: HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DATE: MAY 9APRIL XX, 2013 CMR:
3566XXX:13 REPORT TYPE: ACTION
SUBJECT: Approval of a One Year Software Consulting Services extension of contract (C10135998) with the an opOptional sSecond yYear extension with Sierra Infosys Inc. in the Amount of $2150,000 per year for the Support and Maintenance of SAP Industry-Specific Solution for Utilities (IS-U), SAP Enterprise Central Component (ECC 6.0), Customer Relationship Management System (CRM), Business Intelligence System (BI) and Utilities Customer Electronic Services (UCES).
RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Council: 1. Approve and authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute the attached one
year usage-based professional services agreement contract (Attachment A) with
Sierra Infosys Inc. in the amount not to exceed $2150,000 per year for the support and maintenance of various SAP modules. The contract will be for fiscal years 2014. and 2015. The total not-to-exceed value of this agreement is $300,000. This is a reduction of the current contract value of $250,000 per year.
2. Approve and authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute a one year usage-based professional services contract extension with Sierra Infosys Inc. in the amount not to exceed $250,000 per year for the support and maintenance of various SAP modules. The extension will be for fiscal year 2015.Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute the renewal agreement at the rate of $150,000 per year for a maximum of two years. The total not-to-exceed value of the agreement and renewal
this agreement is $300,000 $500,000. MOTION I move to accept staff’s recommendation to approve and authorize the City Manager or his
designee to execute the attached one year usage-based professional services contract (Attachment A) for fiscal year 2014, with an optional second year extension for fiscal year 2015, with Sierra Infosys Inc. for the support and maintenance of various SAP modules, in the amount not to exceed $250,000 per year, with a total not-to-exceed value of $500,000. [David R – can you please recommend a motion?]
Formatted: Font: (Asian) Japanese
Formatted: Font color: Auto
CMR: 3566:13291:10 Page 2 of 5
BACKGROUND The City’s history with SAP began in 2002 when the City selected SAP as its preferred vendor for an Enterprise Resource Planning system with the purpose of integrating various business processes within the City and to pave the path for the City to moving toward the direction of electronic Government. In fiscal year 2003, the implementation of the above
SAP core modules were completed and the SAP system has been running in the City since 2003, supporting Accounting, Finance, Purchasing, Project Management, Plant Maintenance, Budgeting, Payroll, Human Resource Management, and Service Order management. In 2009, tThe City completed a major upgrade to the SAP ERP system in 2009 and , which also replaced the former utility billing system (Banner) with the
implementation of the SAP IS-U module, Customer Relationship Management, Utilities Customer Electronic Services (also known as My Utilities Account customer portal) and Business Intelligence systems. By supporting the critical business processes in Finance, Procurement, HR, and Utilities’ meter-read to billing, payment and collection SAP has become thean integral part of City’s
business continuity. SAP is the system of record for the City and represents the cornerstone of the business continuity by supporting critical business processes in Finance, Financial, Procurement, HR processes, and Utilities’ meter-read to billing, payment and collection processes.
Some Eexamples of the values generated by services that SAP provides include:
Manages and maintains a City budget of over half billion dollars
Issues 11,000 A/P checks, processes 2,200 purchases documents, and issues 36,000 payroll checks each year
Generates 370,000 utilities invoices and collects approx. $220M for 30,500 utilities accounts
Currently, 12,100 active customers registered to use “My Utilities Account” for e-bills and online payments
Provides concise business information to support 38,000 incoming calls into the Utilities Customer Service Center
Interfaces to City Business Partners such as Wells Fargo, Check Free, JP Morgan (procurement card services), Green Waste (refuse), Hartford, and ICMA as well as to non-SAP City systems
To complement internal SAP support resource and knowledge in providing support and maintainancemaintenance services to the following six systems: Enterprise Planning system, SAP Industry-Specific Utilities system, Customer Relationship Management system, Utilities Customer Electronic Services system, Employee and Manger Self-Service system, and Business Intelligence systems, onOn July 1, 2010 the City we entered into a
CMR: 3566:13291:10 Page 3 of 5
three (3) year software consulting services contract with Sierra Infosys Inc. in the amount of $750,000 for the Support and Maintenance of SAP Industry-Specific Solution for Utilities (IS-U) , SAP Enterprise Central Component (ECC 6.0), Customer Relationship Management System (CRM), Business Intelligence System (BI) and Utilities Customer Electronic Services (UCES). In July 2011, to cope with the resouecresource shortage due to staff medical leave, the Ccity amended the contract to include additional basis system
support in the amount of added funds in the amount of $84,000 to account for a staff member on medical leave in order to minimize business impacts. Sierra’s existing The current contract will expire is due to expire on June 30, 2013. DISCUSSION
SAP is a highly configurable system with processes integrated via inter-linked configuration rules in the various modules. SAP requires a high degree of specialized expertise to provide effective ongoing maintenance and support. Sierra augments city staff in order to adequately provide coverage across the depth and breadth of SAP.
For the past two and a one half years, through a collaborative working relationship the City has leveraged Sierra’s Sierra’s expertise to support numerous technical and functional areas. Sierra’s annual performance evaluations have been satisfactory. has yielded Satisfactory result.
current support contract with Sierra Infosys Inc. has been leveraged to provide adequate
support. Sierra has been providing support in both technical and functional areas of the system to supplement the City internal resources and has established a collaborative working relationship. These areas of HighlighsExamples of Sierra’s support include the following:
Perform functional configuration for the various business modules
Provide assistance with functional troubleshooting specific complex business operational issues
Provide assistance with technical troubleshooting in our various SAP environments
Provide assistance with authorization and security administration
Perform Oracle data base patch/release upgrade
Perform Support package upgrade to the latest version including all database tasks
Perform and document SAP portal system monitoring tasks Moving forward, tTThe IT Department and SAP Steering Committee will have proposed to cconduct an assessment onof identified a requirement to assess our current SAP environment, business processes, support resources needs, and to develop a strategic plan
for the ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning systems) strategy; T the assessment is one of the proposed FY 2014 capital improvement projects. is will tentatively occur during FY 2014. Upon completion of the ERP assessment, management will be better able to forecast
CMR: 3566:13291:10 Page 4 of 5
system resource requirements. This will also enable staff to define a more precise scope of work for future professional services contracts. Until the full assessment report and Enterprise Resource Planning steategicstrategic plan is ready, In the meanwhile, staff recommends extending the service contract with Sierra Infosys to maintain current support levels.
RESOURCE IMPACT As a result of With the new the on-going Information Technology funding structure, funds for this project will come from have been included in the Technology Internal Service Fund. Fund (ISF) 20131-20142 budget.
Funds for this contract and extension are available in the current 2013 and proposed 2014 budgets. POLICY IMPLICATIONS Approval of these contracts is consistent with current City policies.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW This is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
CMR: 3566:13291:10 Page 5 of 5
PREPARED BY: JENNIFER LEU, Manager, Information Technology
REVIEWED BY: DAVID RAMBERG Assistant Director, Administrative Services TOMM MARSHALL Assistant Director, Utilities Engineering
TOM AUZENNE
Assistant Director, Utilities Customer Support Services
DEPARTMENT HEAD: _____________________________________ Jonathan Reichental, CIO
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: _________________________________ JAMES KEENE, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Contract
Purchasing, Project Management, Plant Maintenanee, Budgeting, Payroll, Human Resource
Management, and Service Order management.
On July 23, 2007, the Council approved contract changes with SAP for the SAP upgrade (from
release 4.6 C to ECC6.0) and implementation of SAP's industry-specific solution for utilities
(IS-U) to replace the aging Utilities Department's Customer Information System (CIS). The
SAP upgrade was completed in fiscal year 2008 and the implementation of the SAP IS-U,
Customer Relationship Management, and Business Inte\ligenee systems were subsequently
completed in fiscal year 2009. These systems replaced the old Utilities Customer Information
System known as Banner. Annual support for the Banner system was in the $200,000 per year
rangc.
Similar to many major project implementations the SAP IS-U projcet, since go-live in May 2009,
has gone through a period of post go-live support, issue resolution, and change management. To
ensure smooth transition from project post go-live support to normal support and maintenance,
the Axon consultants who did the original project were retained to assist staff to carry out the
project post go-live support from September 2009 to June 2010. The systems now are stabilized
and the City's SAP team is transitioning to normal support and maintenance where system
stability, system tuning and continuous improvements are the key objectives.
DISCUSSION
With the implementation of the SAP IS-U project, SAP has become the cornerstone of the City'S
business continuity, supporting Financial, Procurement, HR processes, and Utilities' meter-read
to billing, payment and collection processes. This centralization relocated the Utilities customer
information and support system from Banner to SAP. As the system became integrated with the
utilities modules, the breadth and depth of SAP knowledge and skill requirements for effective
SAP support and maintenance also has increased in these areas. Compared to the prior stand
alonc Banner system, SAP is a highly configurable system with processes integrated via inter-
linked configuration rules in the various modules. Configuration change requires thorough
knowledgc of multiple related modules and wbile these skills have been developing since the
system go-live on May 2009, the City's current resource for configuration and trouble-shooting
for the mission critical areas of the Utilities modules are insufficient.
After analyzing the past 12 months of SAP support and maintenance requests and considering
the scope and complexity and limited in-house resource capacity and capability; the SAP Project
Management Office (PMO) recommended that leveraging an extemal vendor to supplement the
City internal resources would be the best solution for the next three years.
The support and maintenance consulting cost will be similar to that under the former Banner
system. The SAP modules for Finance, HR, and Procurcment, in place since 2003 will also be
supported under this contract at approximately 20% of the contract.
CMR:291:IO Page 2 of 5
F 11 fh d o owmg IS a summary 0 t even or se cctton process.
Proposal Description/Number NamelNumber of Proposal here
, Proposed Length of Contract ~months . __ .-
Total Days to Rcspond to Proposal
i Pre-proposal Meeting Date 4/1912010
Number of Attendees at Pre-proposal 21
Meeting
Number of Proposals Received: 9
Company Name ' Location (city, Selected for oral
!ltate) interview? ' .
1. Alijon Consulting Walnut Creek,CA No
. 2. EA Consulting Folsom, CA Yes
3. HCL-Axon Jersey City, NJ Yes
4. HPC America San Ramon, Ca No
5. CSC El Segnado, CA No
6. Sage Group Hazlet, NJ Yes
7. Sierra Infosys Houston TX Yes
i 8. Terra Information Group, Inc. Naperville, IL No
9. The Basis Group! Inc. Hales Corners, WI Yes
Range of Proposal Am,ounts Submitted
$137,915 to $lM
An evaluation committee consisting of six staff from Administrative Services and Utilities
Departtnents reviewed the proposals. From the nine RFPs submitted, the evaluation committee
selected five firms that met the first level of ranking to participate in an oral interview on Jnae 1,
2010. Firms were not invited to interview if their proposals were inadequate or out of scope.
The committee carefully rated and ranked each frrm's qualifications and submittal in response to
the criteria identified in the RFP. Criteria used for the, evaluation is as follow:
Criteria
Weight
1. Quality and completeness of proposal 5%
2. Qualification and experience of proposed project manager and key staff 20%
3. Similar experience and expertise in the type of work required 25%
4. Demonstrated understanding of the scope of services required, timeframe, 20%
Scheduling ability, ability to provide back-up or follow-up services, if needed
5. Financial stability of Firm, current and looking forward 10%
6. Thc proposed fee schedule relative to the services to be provided 20%
Sierra Infosys, Inc was selected unanimously by all RFP evaluation committee members as the
first choice with the reasons summarized as:
I. The work model proposed by Sierra best complements City's existing 1'1 level support
capabilitics; with Sierra providing 2nd level support on as-needed basis. Under this
model City staff is contacted first for all SAP issues that come to the Helpdesk. The 2nd
level of support is only used if City staff needs assistance with a particular issue. This
CMR:291:10 Page 3 of 5
!
,
model enables the City to access Sierra's support resource pool to resolve unforeseen
critical system problems swiftly and provides the City with sufficient flexibility to
schedule plamled maintenance work effectively. Sierra's perfonnance will be measured
according to the service level agreement.
2. Sierra's proven implementation and support maintenance experience and expertise in
similar environments, such as City of San Diego, State of Kentucky, Clark County,
Nevada, and Broward County School District. Reference check results collected £i'om
these organizations are consistent and positive.
3. What differentiates Sierra Infosys from the other vendors responding to the Palo Alto
RFP is their strategic focus on providing Support and Maintenance services to mid-size
organization such as City of Palo Alto and their commitment to retain ample in-house
knowledge of SAP for prompt problem diagnosis and resolution of client problems.
Over the years, Sierra also has established a deep relationship with SAP Global
Support. Sierra has been selected by as a partner for the SAP GSS-Global Network of
Subject Matter Experts, providing quick resource deployment to SAP clients, when
needed.
The City Of Palo Alto SAP Steering Committee comprised of the directors of the
Administrative Services, Public Works and Utilities Departments are in agreement with the
selection of Sien'a Infosys, Inc for the work outlined in the City's Request for Proposal.
RESOURCE IMPACT
As a result of the on-going Information Teehnology funding structure, funds for this project have
been included in the Technology Internal Scrvice Fund (ISF) 2011-2012 budget.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
Approval of these contracts is consistent with current City policies.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
CMR:191:l0 Page 4 of 5
ATTACHMENT A
CITY. OF J?ALO ALTO CONTRACT NO. CI0135998
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY 01' PALO ~LTO AND SIERRA INFOSYS INC.
FOR PROI'ESSIONAL SERVICES
PROVISION SAP APPLICATION MAINTENANCE SUPPORT
This Agreement is entered into on this 13TH day of July, 2010, ("Agreement") by
and between the CITY OF PALO ALTO, a California chartered municipal corporation ("CITY"),
and SIERRA INFOSYS INC., a Texas Corporation authorized to do business in California, located
at 6001 Savoy Drive, Suite #210, Houston, TX, 77030 (PH) 713-747-9693 ("CONSULTANT").
RECITALS
The following recitals are a substantive portion of this Agreement.
A. CITY intends to maintain SAP Applications ("Project") and desires to engage a consultant to
provide Maintenance Support Consultant Services in connection with the Project ("Services").
B. CONSULTANT has represented that it has the necessary professional expertise,
qualifications, and capability, and all required licenses and/or certifications to provide the Services.
C. CITY in reliance on these representations desires to engage CONSULT ANT to provide the
Services as more fully described in Exhibit "A", attached to and made a part of this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the recitals, covenants, terms, and conditions, this
Agreement, the parties agree:
AGREEMENT
SECTION 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES. CONSULTANT shall perform the Services described in
Exhibit "A" in accordance with the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement. The
performance of all Services shall be to the reasonable satisfaction of CITY.
D Optional On-Call Provision (This provision only applies if checked and only applies to on-call
agreements.)
Services will be authorized by the CITY, as needed, with a Task Order assigned and approved by the
CIYY's Project Manager. Each Task Order shall be in substantially the same form as Exhibit A-I.
Each Task Order shall designate a City Project Manager and shall contain a specific scope of work, a
specific schedule of performance and a specific compensation amount. The total price of all Task
Orders issued under this Agreement shall not exceed the amount of Compensation set forth in
Section 4 of this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall only be compensated for work performed under
an authorized Task Order and the CITY may elect, but is not required, to authorize work up to the
maximum compensation amount set forth in Section 4.
ProfessiDrud Services
Rev. June 2, 2010
SECTION 2. TERM.
The term ofthis Agreement shall be from the date ofits full execution through July 12, 2013,
unless terminated earlier pursuant to Section 19 of this Agreement.
OR
The term of this Agreement shall be from the date of its full execution through completion of the
services in accordance with the Schedule of Performance attached as Exhibit "B" unless terminated
earlier pnrsuant to Section 19 of this Agreement.
SECTION 3. SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE. Time is of the essence in the performance of
Services under this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall complete the Services within the term of this
Agreement and in accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit "B", attached to and made a part
of this Agreement. Any Services for which times for performance are not specified in this Agreement
shall be commenced and completed by CONSULTANT in a reasonably prompt and timely manner
based upon the circumstances and direction communicated to the CONSULTANT. CITY's
agreement to extend the term or the schedule for performance shall not preclude recovery of damages
for delay if the extension is required due to the fault of CONSULTANT.
SECTION 4. NOT TO EXCEED COMPENSATION. The compensation to be paid to
CONSULTANT for performance of the Services described in Exhibit "A", including both
payment for professional services and reimbursable expenses, shall not exceed Seven Hundred
Fifty Thousand Dollars, over the three year term of the Agreement ($750,000.00), with annual
payments not to exceed $250,000.00 per year .. In the event Additional Services are authorized,
the total compensation for services and reimbursable expenses shall not exceed Seven Hundred
Fifty Thousand Dollars ($750,000.00). The applicable rates and schedule of payment are set out
in Exhibit "C-I", entitled "HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE," which is attached to and made a part
ofthis Agreement.
Additional Services, if any, shall be authorized in accordance with and subject to the provisions of
Exhibit "C". CONSULTANT shall not receive any compensation for Additional Services performed
without the prior written authorization of CITY. Additional Services shall mean any work that is
determined by CITY to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which is not
included within the Scope of Services described in Exhibit "A".
SECTION 5. INVOICES. In order to request payment, CONSULTANT shall submit monthly
invoices to the CITY describing the services performed and the applicable charges (including an
identification of personnel who performed the services, hours worked, hourly rates, and reimbursable
expenses), based upon the CONSULTANT's billing rates (set forth in Exhibit "C-l "). If applicable,
the invoice shall also describe the percentage of completion of each task. The information in
CONSULTANT's payment requests shall be subject to verification by CITY. CONSULT ANT shall
send all invoices to the CITY's project manager at the address specified in Section 13 below. The
CITY will generally process and pay invoices within thirty (30) days of receipt.
SECTION 6. QUALIFICATIONS/STANDARD OF CARE. All of the Services shall be
2
Professional Services
Rev, June2,2010
S:\ASDIPURCHISOLICITA TJONSICURRENT BUYER·CM FOLDERS\KATHYlContra elslCI 0 135998·Sicrra inf",ys, InelOmtract
CI0135998J doc
performed by CONSULTANT or under CONSULTANT's supervision. CONSULTANT represents
that it possesses the professional and technical personnel necessary to perform the Services required
by this Agreement and that the personnel have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services
assigned to them. CONSULTANT represents that it, its employees and subconsultants, if pennitted,
have and shall maintain during the term of this Agreement all Iieenses, permits, qualifications,
insurance and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the Services.
All of the services to be furnished by CONSULTANT under this agreement shall meet the
professional standard and quality that prevail among professionals in the same discipline and of
similar knowledge and skill engaged in related work throughout California under the same or similar
circumstances.
SECTION 7. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. CONSULTANT shall keep itselfinformed of and
in compliance with all federal, state and local laws, ordinances, regulations, and orders that may
affect in any manner the Project or the performance of the Services or those engaged to perform
Services under this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall procure all permits and licenses, pay all
charges and fees, and give all notices required by law in the performance of the Services.
SECTION 8. ERRORS/OMISSIONS. CONSULTANT shall correct, at no cost to CITY, any and
all errors, omissions, or ambiguities in the Services rendered to CITY, provided CITY gives
appropriate notice to CONS UL T ANT. If CONSULTANT has prepared plans and specifications or
other design documents to construct the Project, CONSULTANT shall be obligated to correct any
and all errors, omissions or ambiguities discovered prior to and during the course of the Project.
This obligation shall survive termination of the Agreement.
SECTION 9. COST ESTIMATES. If this Agreement pertains is the design of a publie works
prejeot, C()'NSULTf~IT shall Sllblllcit estimates of pro19allle eonstruction BOSts at eaeh phase of
deSigfl sa19mittal. l[the totsl estimated eonstruetion eost at any sabmittal elteeeds ten pareent (1 0%)
of.the CITY's statee. eonstruetion lme.get; CONSULTA"IT shall mal(e reeemmendations to the CITY
for aligning the PROJECT e.esign with the badge!, ineorporate CITY approyed reeommentiations,
and revise the design to meet the Pre;ieet 1gedge!, at HO additional eost to CITY. Section Not
Applicable.
SECTION 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. It is understood and agreed that in performing
the Services under this Agreement CONSULT ANT, and any person employed by or contracted with
CONSULTANT to furnish labor and/or materials under this Agreement, shall act as and be an
independent contractor and not an agent or employee of the CITY.
SECTION 11. ASSIGNMENT. The parties agree that the expertise and experience of
CONSULTANT are material considerations for this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall not assign or
transfer any interest in this Agreement nor the perfonnance of any of CONSULTANT's obligations
hereunder without the prior written consent of the city manager. Consent to one assignment will not
be deemed to be consent to any subsequent assignment. Any assignment made without the approval
of the city mauager will be void.
3
Professional Services
Rev. June 2, 2010
S:IASDIPURCHlSOLlCIT A TlONSICURRENT BUYER.cM FOWERSIKA THYlContr. elslCI 0\35998-Sierr. infosys, lnc\O:mtract
ClO135998Ldoc
SECTION 12. SUBCONTRACTING.
!8IOption A: No Subcontractor: CONSULTANT shall not subcontract any portion of the work to
be performed under this Agreement without the prior written authorization of the eity manager or
designee.
DOption B: Subcontracts Authorized: Notwithstanding Section 11 above, CITY agrees that
subconsultants may be used to complete the Serviees. The subconsultauts authorized by CITY to
perform work on this Project are:
CONSULTANT shall be responsible for directing the work of any subconsultants and for any
compensation due to subconsultants. CITY assumes no responsibility whatsoever concerning
compensation. CONSULTANT shall be fully responsible to CITY for all acts and omissions of a
subconsultaut. CONSULTANT shall change or add subconsultauts only with the prior approval of
the city manager or his designee.
SECTION 13. PROJECr MANAGEMENT. CONSULT ANT will assign Robert Nyman as
the Account Executive to have supervisory responsibility for the performance, progress, and
execution of the Services and Fazle Navqi as the Project Manager/Support
S e rv ic e s Manager to represent CONSULTANT during the day-to-day work on the Project. If
cireumstances cause the substitution of the Account Executive, Project Manager/Support Services
Manager, or any other key personnel for any reason, the appointment of a substitute Account
Executive and the assignment of any key new or replacement personnel will be subject to the prior
written approval of the CITY's project manager. CONSULTANT, at CITY's request, shall promptly
remove personnel who CITY fmds do not perform the Services in an acceptable manner, are
uncooperative, or present a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project or a threat to
the safety of persons or property.
The City's project manager is Jennifer Leu, Administrative Services Department, Information
Technology Services Division, 250 Hamilton Avenue, Palo Alto, CA 94303, Telephone: 650-853-
8 I S9. The project manager will be CONSULTANT's point of contact with respect to performance,
progress and execution of the Services. The CITY may designate an alternate CITY projcct manager
from time to time.
SECTION 14. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS. Upon delivery, all work product, including
without Ihnitation, all writings, drawings, plans, reports, specifications, calculations, documents,
other materials and copyright interests developed under this Agreement shall be and remain the
exclusive property of CITY without restriction or limitation upon their use. CONSULTANT agrces
that all copyrights which arise from creation of the work pursuant to this Agreement shall be vested
in CITY, and CONSULTANT waives and relinquishes all claims to copyright or other intellectual
property rights in favor of the CITY. Neither CONSULT ANT nor its contractors, if any, shall make
any of such materials available to any individual or organization without the prior written approval of
the City Manager or designee. CONSULTANT makes no representation of the suitability of the
work product for use in or application to circumstances not contemplated by the scope of work.
4
Professional Services
Rev, JUfle2.2010
SlASDIPURCHISOLlG1TATlONSlCURRENT BUYER.cM FOWERSIKATHYlC<>ntra cts1ClO135998-Siem infosys, InclContrac\
CI01359981.doc
SECTION 15. AUDITS. CONSULTANT will permit CITY to audit, at any reasonable time during
the term of this Agreement and for three (3) years thereafter, CONSULT ANT's records pertaining to
matters covered by this Agreement. CONSULTANT further agrees to maintain and retain such
records for at least three (3) years after the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement.
SECTION 16. INDEMNITY.
OIOption A applies to the following design professionals pursuant to Civil Code Section
2782.8: architects; landscape architects; registered professional engineers and licensed
professional land surveyors.] 16, I, To the fullest extent pennitted by law, CONSULTANT shall
protect, indemnifY, defend and hold harmless CITY, its Council members, officers, employees and
agents (each an "Indemnified Party") from and against any and all demands, claims, or liability of
any nature, including death or injury to any person, property damage or any other loss, including all
costs and expenses of whatever nature including attorneys fees, experts fees, court costs and
disbursements ("Claims") that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or
willful misconduct of the CONSULTANT, its officers, employees, agents or contractors under this
Agreement, regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by an Indemnified Party,
~IOption B applies to any eonsultant who does not qualify as a design professional as defined
in Civil Code Section 2782.8.) 16.1. To the fullest extent permitted by law, CONSULT ANT shall
protect. indemnifY. defend and hold harmless CITY, its Council members, officers, employees and
agents (each an "Indemnified Party") from and against any and all demands, claims, or liability of
any nature, including death or injury to any person, property damage or any other loss, including all
costs and expenses of whatever nature including attorneys fees, experts fees, court costs and
disbursements ("Claims") resulting from, arising out of or in any manner related to performance or
nonperformance by CONSULTANT, its officers, employees, agents or contractors under this
Agreement, regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by an Indemnified Party.
16.2, Notwithstanding the above, nothing in this Section 16 shall be construed to
require CONSULTANT to indemnifY an Indemnified Party from Claims arising from the active
negligence, sole negligence or willful misconduct of an Indemnified Party,
16.3, The acceptance of CONSULTANT's services and duties by CITY shall not
operate as a waiver of the right of indemnification. The provisions of this Section 16 shall survive
the expiration or early termination of this Agreement.
SECTION 17. WAIVERS. The waiver by either party of any breach or violation of any covenant,
term, condition or provision of this Agreement, or of the provisions of any ordinance or law, will not
be deemed to be a waiver of any other term, covenant, condition, provisions, ordinance or law, or of
any subsequent breach or violation of the same or of any other term, covenant, condition, provision,
ordinance or law,
SECTION 18. INSURANCE.
18.1 , CONSULTANT, at its sole cost and expense, shall obtain and maintain, in full
5
Professional Services
Rev, June 2, 2010
S:IASDIPURCffiSOUCIT ATIONSICURRENT BUYER·CM FOillERS\KATHy\Contra clS\CI0135998·Sierra inf!l5)'S, [nc\Contract
CI0135998[doc
force and effect during the term of this Agrecment, the insurance coverage described in Exhibit "D".
CONSU'LT ANT and its contractors, if any, shall obtain a policy endorsement naming CITY as an
additional insured under any general liability or automobile policy or policies.
18.2. All insurance coverage required hereunder shall be provided through carriers
with AM Best's Key Rating Guide ratings of A -: VII or higher which are licensed or authorized to
transact insurance business in the State of California. Any and all contractors of CONSULTANT
retained to perform Services under this Agreement will obtain and maintain, in full force and effect
during the term of this Agreement, identical insurance coverage, naming CITY as an additional
insured under such policies as required above.
18.3. Certificates evidencing such insurance shall be filed with CITY concurrently
with the execution of this Agreement. The certificates will be subject to the approval of CITY' s Risk
Manager and will contain an endorsement stating that the insurance is primary coverage and will not
be canceled, or materially reduced in coverage or limits, by the insurer except after filing with the
Purchasing Manager thirty (30) days' prior written notice of the cancellation or modification,
CONSULTANT shall be responsible for ensuring that current certi.ficates evidencing the insurance
are provided to CITY's Purchasing Manager during the entire term of this Agreement.
18.4. The procuring of such required policy or policies of insurance will not be
construed to limit CONSULTANT's liability hereunder nor to fulfill the indemnification provisions
of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the policy or policies of insurance, CONSULTANT will be
obligated for the full and total anlOunt of any damage, injury, or loss caused by or directly arising as
a result of the Services performed under this Agreement, including such damage, injury, or loss
arising after the Agreement is terminated or the term has expired.
SECTION 19. TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION OF AGREEMENT OR SERVICES.
19.1. The City Manager may suspend the performance of the Services, in whole or
in part, or terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, by giving ten (10) days prior written
notice thereof to CONSULTANT. Upon receipt of such notice, CONSULTANT will immediately
discontinue its performance of the Services.
19.2. CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement or suspend its performance of
the Services by giving thirty (30) days prior written notice thereof to CITY, but only in the event of a
substantial failure of performance by CITY.
19.3. Upon such suspension or termination, CONSULTANT shall deliver to the
City Manager immediately any and all copies of studies, sketches, drawings, computations, and other
data, whether or not completed, prepared by CONSULTANT or its contractors, if any, or given to
CONSULTANT or its contractors, if any, in connection with this Agreement. Such materials will
become the property of CITY.
19.4. Upon such suspension ortermil1ation by CITY, CONSULTANT will be paid
for the Services rendered or materials delivered to CITY in accordance with the scope of services on
or before the effective date (Le., 10 days after giving notice) of suspension or tenninatiol1; provided,
6
Profussional Services
Rev. Ju.e 2, 2010
S,\ASD\PURCHISOLlClT ATIONSI(.'URRENT BUYER ·CM FOLDERSIKATHYlContra ctslClO 135998·Sierra infosys. InelContract
ClOI359981.doe
however, if this Agreement is suspended or terminated on account of a default by CONSULTANT,
CITY will be obligated to compensate CONSULTANT only for that portion of CONSULT ANT's
services which are of direct and immediate benefit to CITY as such determination may be made by
the City Manager acting in the reasonable exercise ofhislher discretion. The following Seetions will
survive any expiration or termination of this Agreement: 14, 15, 16, 19.4,20, and 25.
19.5. No payment, partial payment, acceptance, or partial acceptance by CITY will
operate as a waiver on the part of CITY of any of its rights under this Agreement.
SECTION 20. NOTICES.
All notices hereunder will be given in writing and mailed, postage prepaid, by
certified mail, addressed as follows:
To CITY: Office of the City Clerk
City of Palo Alto
Post Office Box 10250
Palo Alto, CA 94303
With a copy to the Purchasing Manager, address sarue as above for City Clerk
To CONSULTANT: Attention of the project director
at the address of CONSULTANT recited above
SECTION 21. CONFLICT OF INTEREST.
21.1. In accepting this Agreement, CONSULTANT covenants that it presently has
no interest, and will not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, financial or otherwise, which would
conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of the Services.
21.2. CONSULTANT further covenants that, in the performance of this Agreement,
it will not employ subconsultants, contractors or persons having such an interest. CONSULTANT
certifies that no person who has or will havc any financial intcrest under this Agreement is an officer
or employee of CITY; this provision will be interpreted in accordance with the applicable provisions
of the Palo Alto Municipal Code and the Government Code of the State of California.
21.3. If the Project Manager determines that CONSULTANT is a "Consultant" as
that term is defined by the Regulations of the Fair Political Practices Commission, CONSULTANT
shall be required and agrees to file the appropriate financial disclosure documents required by the
Palo Alto Municipal Code and the Political Reform Act.
SECTION 22. NONDISCRIMINATION. As set forth in Palo Alto Municipal Code section
2.30.510, CONSULTANT certifies that in the performance of this Agreement, it shall not
discriminate in the employment of any person because of the race, skin color, gender, age, religion,
disability, national origin, ancestry, sexual orientation, housing status, marital status, familial status,
weight or height of such person. CONSULTANT acknowledges that it has read and understands the
7
Professional Services
Re,dune 2, 2010
S:IASDIPURCHlSOLICITATlONSICURRENT BUYER-eM FOLDERSIKATHYlContr. etsICI0I35998-Sierra infosys, InclConlnlet
C101359981.doc
provisions of Section 2.30.510 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code relating to Nondiscrimination
Requirements and the penalties for violation thereof, and agrees to meet all requirements of Section
2.30.510 pertaining to nondiscrimination in employment.
SECTJON23. ENVIRONMENTALLY PREFERRED PURCHASING AND ZERO WASTE
REOUIREMENTS. CONSULTANT shall comply with the CITY's Environmentally Preferred
Purchasing policies which are available at the CITY's Purchasing Division, Administrative Services
Department, incorporated by reference and may be amended from time to time. CONSULTANT
shall comply with waste reduction, reuse, recycling and disposal requirements of the CITY's Zero
Waste Program. Zero Waste best practices include first minimizing and reducing waste; second,
reusing waste and third, recycling or composting waste. In particular, Consultant shall comply with
the following zero waste requirements:
• All printed materials provided by Consultant to CITY generated from a personal
computer and printer including but not limited to, proposals, quotes, invoices,
reports, and public education materials, shall be double-sided and printed on a
minimum of 30% or greater post-consumer content paper, unless otherwise approved
by the City's Project Manager. Any submitted materials printed by a professional
printing company shall be a minimum of30% or greater post-consumer material and
printed with vegetable based inks.
• Goods purchased by Consultant on behalf of the CITY shall be purchased in
accordance with the CITY's Environmental Purchasing Policy including but not
limited to Extended Producer Responsibility requirements for products and
packaging. A copy of this policy is on file at the Purchasing Office.
• Reusable/returnable pallets shall be taken back by the Consultant, at no additional
cost to the CITY, for reuse or recycling. Consultant shall provide documentation
from the facility accepting the pallets to verifY that pallets are not being disposed.
SECTION 24. NON-APPROPRIATION
24.1. This Agreement is subject to the fiscal provisions of the Charter of the CITY
of Palo Alto and the Palo Alto Municipal Code. This Agreement will terminate without any penalty
(a) at the end of any fiscal year in the event that funds are not appropriated for the following fiscal
year, or (b) at anytime within a fiscal year in the event that funds are only appropriated for a portion
of the fiscal year and funds for this Agreement are no longer available. This section shall take
precedence in the event of a conflict with any other covenant, term, condition, or provision of this
Agreement.
SECTION 25. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.
25.1. This Agreement will be governed by the laws of the State of California.
25.2. In the event that an action is brought, the parties agree that trial of such action
will be vested exclusively in the state courts of California in the County of Santa Clara, State of
8
Professionat Services
Rev. June 2, 2010
S:\ASD\PURCH\SOLICITATIONS\CURRENT BUYER-CM FOiDERSIKATHYlConlra c(,\CIOI35998.sicrra infosys,lnc\Conlracl
CI0J359981.doc
California.
25.3. The prevailing party in any action brought to enforce the provisions of this
Agreement may recover its reasonable costs and attorneys' fees expended in connection with that
action. The prevailing party shall be entitled to recover an amount equal to the fair market value of
legal services provided by attorneys employed by it as well as any attorneys' fees paid to third
parties.
25.4. 1bis document represents the entire and integrated agreement between the
parties and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, and contracts, either written or oral.
This document may be amended only by a written instrument, which is signed by the parties.
25.5. The covenants, terms, conditions and provisions of this Agreement will apply
to, and will bind, the heirs, successors, executors, administrators, assignees, and consultants of the
parties.
25.6. If a court of competent jurisdiction finds or rules that any provision of this
Agreement or any amendment thereto is void or unenforceable, the unaffected provisions of this
Agreement and any amendments thereto will rernain in full force and effect.
25.7. All exhibits referred to in this Agreement and any addenda, appendices,
attachments, and schedules to this Agreement which, from time to time, may be referred to in any
duly executed amendment hereto are by such reference incorporated in this Agreement and will be
deemed to be a part ofthis Agreement.
25.8 If, pursuant to this contract with CONSULTANT, CITY shares with
CONSULT ANT personal information as defined in California Civil Code section 1798.81.5( d) about
a California resident ("Personal Information"), CONSULTANT shall maintain rcasonable and
appropriate security procedures to protect that Personal Information, and shall inform CITY
immediately upon learning that there has been a breach in the security of the system or in the security
of the Personal Information. CONSULTANT shall not use Personal Information for direct marketing
purposes without CffY's express written consent.
25.9 All unchecked boxes do not apply to this agreement.
25.1 0 The individuals executing this Agreement represent and warrant that they have
the legal capacity and authority to do so on behalf of their respective legal entities.
9
Professional Services
Rev. June 2, 2010
S:IASDIPURCHISOLICITATIONSICURRENT BUYER.cM FOLDERSIKA THYlContr. elsie I 0135998-Siert. inrosys, InclContract
CW1359981.doc
I. BACKGROUND.
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The CITY OF PALO ALTO (hereinafter "City") hereby requested proposals for SAP Support
Consultant Services. The CITY sought application support services for its SAP ECC 6.0 -
Enterprise Resourcc Planning Central Component System, ISUlCCS-Industry Solution Utilities
Customer Care and Service System, CRM Customer Relationship Management IC Web, UCES -
Utilities Customers eServices U CES Systems and Business Intelligence (BI) System. The most
recent ECC 6.0 was upgraded in July 2008, ISUlCCS was implemented in May 2009, and BI was
implemented in October 2009.
II. OVERVIEW
Sierra InfoSys (hereinafter "CONSULTANT') is to provide 2nd level of SAP Support and
Maintenance Consulting Services to supplement CITY in house resource when one or more of
the following scenarios occur:
• A quick solution is needed to fix system malfunction in areas such as payroll, utility bill
print, where system malfunction will disrupt normal business operation of multiple
departments or the entire organization.
• A quick solution is needed when customer facing systems such as UCES -Utility
Customer Electronic Services is down.
• Additional resource is needed to deliver system solution to meet legal compliance date,
such as Assombly Bill 920 -California Surplus Act of2009 or tax law changes.
• Industry best practice knowledge and experience is needed when City is evaluating,
designing, and implementing new business process and system fnnctions.
• At SAP PMO's discretion to perform special tasks such as new technOlogy evaluation,
feasibility study and/or reviewing system configuration setup.
Consultants are expected to have in-depth SAP knowledge and experience to perform tasks
inelude but not limited to system configuration custoinization, master data design and setup,
process design, custom table design, system analysis, and integration, focusing on the following
modules.
2
Professional Services
Rev, June 2, 2010
S:IASDIPURCH\SOLICITA TlONSlCURRENT BUYER-CM FOWERSIKA THy\Cootra elslCl 0 13599S.sierra infooys, InclCofllract
ClO135998Ldoc
Ill. SCOPE
SAP System SAP Modules Est Hours %
(per year)
IS-UtCCS DM-Device Management Support and Maintenance 200 12% I
BM-Billing Management Support and Maintenance 200 12%
FICA-Contract Account Finance Support and Maintenance 133 8%
UT·CRMllcWeb -Customer Relationship Management 200 12%
-Support and Maintenance
BI -Business Intelligence Support and Maintenance 133 8%
UCES -Utility Customer Electronic Services 133 8%
Core ERP ERP-Core SAP modules Support and Maintenance 333 20%
SAP Basis SAP BASIS consulting 333 20%
Total 1667
IV. WORK MODEL
Contract engagement with CONSULTANT primarily is based on Labor Hour for each Approved
Task Order. Hourly rate is fixed according to rate schedule. Total labor hours and cost is not to
exceed $250,000 annually.
Each task order with CONSULTANT, except urgent system fix, will be reviewed and approved
by SAP PMO, providing supporting material such as task scope; objectives, cost estimate,
resource planning, and schedule are available. CONSULTANT's Account Executive will
collaborate with CITY project manager and PMO to align objects, schedule, resource, and cost
closely.
V. DELIVERABLES
For each task order assigned, Consultant must follow CITY's system design and development
standards, to conduct the following tasks and produce deliverables:
Conduct problem investigation, root cause analysis, problem resolution, and knowledge transfer on
as-needed basis
Prepare functional specification, technieal specification, testing plan, and training material
Document configuration changes and process changes
Others: Solution comparaison, gap analysis, etc
VI. AREAS OF FOCUS
Areas of Business Operation where support and maintenance consulting is imperative to sustain
business continuity, to hnprove efficiency and fine tune process,
3
Professional Services
Rev, June 2, 20 to
S:IASDIPURCHISOLlClTATlONSlCURRENT BUYER-CM FOLDERSIKATHYlContra ctsICI013599S.sierra infos)'$, Inc\Contract
Cl 0 135998Ldoc
• DM-Device Management Support and Maintenance
o Device and installation
o Meter reading optimization and fine tuning, including meter reading unit and scheduling,
implausible reading results setting and estimate read activation
• BM-Billing Management Support and Maintenance
o Creating Consolidated Rate structure for Retail Settlement, Distributor and Retailer
consolidated Billing for Deregulated transactions
o Configuration of Billing Schema, Rate Category, Rates and Operands for Industrial
o Preparing specification for Print workbench requirement for custom specific application
form, to display unbundled billing with Power, Water and Sewer contracts and Rate
information.
• FICA-Contract account Support and Maintenance
o Configuring New Dunning Procedures and Dunning Levels with Dunning Activities
o Creating functional specifications for Reset Clearing, Payments, Dunning, Security
Deposits, Automatic Clearing, and Clearing rules
• UT-CRM/IcWeb -Customer Relationship Management -Support and Maintenance
o Base Customization like Product master, Business Partners, Organizational Mgmt, Lead
MgmtXxx
o Configuring IC Web client like Business Roles, Profile setup, Interaction records, Partner
determination, broadcast messaging, Transaction launcher, Authorization Setup,
o Creating Users for Web UI and integration between ECC and CRM.
• BI -Business Intelligence Support and Maintenance
o Redesigning BI Landscape to improve loading and Query performance
o Creating custom reports and workbooks using BEx Analyzer
• UCES -Support and Maintenance
o Sustaining UCBS Utility Customer E-Service
• ERP-Core Support and Maintenance Consulting
o Plarming production support activities for ERP Core activities
o Identify change management opportunities and implement organizational solutions
involving functional department efficiency improvement and workload balancing
• SAP Basis Consulting
o SAP Solution Management evaluation and implementation
o SAP Enterprise portal architecture
4
Professional Services
Rev. June 2,2010
S:IASDlPURCHISOLlCIT ATlONs\CURRENT BUYER-CM FOLDERS\l<ATHY\Coll". elSIC 10 135998-Sierra iIlCosy" InclContract
CI0135998I.doc
[
, Low
I
L
• Small number of users are affected.
• Isolated incident.
• Degraded performance and/or is difficult to use,
• User requests general information, servioe or
consultation,
• Cosmetic enhancements
• Report enhancements
5 days
5 days
2
2·3 weeks Requires resouroe
estimation, City's
approval, prioritization and
scheduling I
4-6 weeks' I Requires resource 'II ... =' ~timatiOn, City's
approval, prioritization and
scheduling
._-L ___ . . . . .
Professional Services
Rev. June 2, 2010
S:IASDIPURCH\SOUCITATIONSICURRENT BUYER-CM FOLDERS\KATHYIContra cts\CI0135998-Sierr. infos;., Inc\Contract Cl 013S9981.doc
EXHIBIT "C"
COMPENSATION
The CITY agrees to compensate the CONSULTANT for professional services performed in
accordance with the terms and conditions ofthis Agreement on a Time and Materials basis,
based on the hourly rate schedule attached as Exhibit C-I.
The compensation to be paid to CONSULTANT under this Agreement for all services
described in Exhibit "A" ("Services") and reimbursable expenses shall not exceed
$750,000.00 ($250,000.00 per year). CONSULTANT agrees to complete all Services,
including reimbursable expenses, within this amount. In the event CITY authorizes any
Additional Services, the maximum compensation shall not exceed $750,000.00 ($250,000.00
per year). Any work performed or expenses incurred for which payment would result in a
total exceeding the maximum amount of compensation set forth herein shall be at no cost to
the CITY.
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
The administrative, overhead, secretarial time or secretarial overtime, word processing,
photocopying, in-house printing, insurance and other ordinary business expenses are included
within the scope of payment for services and are not reimbursable expenses. CITY shall
reimburse CONSULTANT for the following reimbursable expenses at cost. Expenses for
which CONSULTANT shall be reimbursed are:
A. Travel outside the San Francisco Bay area, including transportation and meals, will be
reimbursed at actual cost subject to the City of Palo Alto's policy for reimbursement of travel
and meal expenses for City of Palo Alto employees.
B. Long distance telephone service charges, cellular phone service charges, facsimile
transmission and postage charges arc reimbursable at actual cost.
All requests for payment of expenses shall be accompanied by appropriate backup information.
Any expense anticipated to be more than $250.00, shall be approvad in advance by the CITY's
project manager.
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
The CONSULTANT shall provide additional services only by advanced, written authorization
from the CITY. The CONSULTANT, at the CITY's project manager's request, shall submit a
detailed written proposal including a description of the scope of services, schedule, level of
effort, and CONSULTANT's proposed maximum compensation, including reimbursable
expenses, for such services based on the rates set forth in Exhibit C-l. The additional
services scope, schedule and maximum compensation shall be negotiated and agreed to in
writing by the CITY's Project Manager and CONSULTANT prior to commencement of the
services. Payment for additional services is subject to all requirements and restrictions in this
Agreement.
Professional Services 18
Rev June 2,2010
S:IASDIPURC!l\SOLlCITATIONSICURRENT BUYER-CM FOLDERSIKA THYlContra ctsICI0135998-Sierra infosys, InclContrac!
ClOI35998l.doc
[SCOPE !
i i
IIS:U/CCS I i1
~--'
____ M
I 2 ,
3
,
I--4
,
r-5 1---'"
6
i COREERP
!
!
i
'"
EXHIBIT "C-l"
HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE
I LABOR CATEGORIES (e.g. Sr. Consultant,
' Lead, Consultant, Clerical, etc.)
i
ONSITE CONSULTING
SAP ISU DM Support and Maintenance
Sr. Consultant -----------,-,
____ M.
SAP ISU BM-BILLING Support and
Maintenance
Sr. Consultant
SAP ISU FICA Support and Maintcmmee
' Sr. Consultant
' SAP CRM & ICWEB Support and
Maintenance
Sr. Consultant
SAP BI Support and Maintenance
Sr. Consultant
SAP UCES Support and Maintenance
Sr. Consultant
ERP-CORE Support and Maintenance
FUNCTIONAL'
SAP
ESSIMSS, FI, HR, SD, MM, PM, WM, PS,
CO,BCS,FA ___ M.
CONSULTANTS
ERP-CORE Support and Maintenance
TECHNICAL
ABAP, ALV, Workftow, Report, Painter,
JAVA, JSP, HTML, Web Service, XML,
, RFC,JCO
BSP Architecture and Development
CONSULTANTS
.... ..---
HOURLY EXTENDED
RATE
135
125
135
125
125
135
HOURLY RATE
(HOURLY RATE
160 ! ... -----_ ....
,
150 ,
""-~ ....
160 ,
125
125 ..... ~ ...
160
"'-"
,
Professional Services 19
Rev June 2, 2010
i
i
i
I
I
I
i
S:IASDIPURCHlSOLICITATIONSlCURRENT BUYER·CM FOLDERS\KA THY\Contra elSIC! 0135998..s1erra inCosys, In.IContract
CI01359981.doe
'---.. ··1 7 I ERP-CORE Support and Maintenance 100
SAP Basis Is 1 BASIS CONSULTING
! I Sr. Con~uItant 100_ :~ I i
~--~ ..
! I
Assumptions: Hourly Rates and implementation eosts cbange for any otber extra
consulting services.
100
100
Professional Services 20
Rev June 2, 2010
S:\ASDIPURCH\sOLICITATIONSICURRENT BUYER-CM FOLDERS\KA llIY1Conlra elS\cI 0135998-Sierr. infosys, Ine\Contract
CIOI3S998I.doc
.-
._.
TIlE NAMING OF MORE THAN ONE PERSON, FIRM, OR CORFORA TlON AS INSUREDS UNDER THE POLICY SHALL
NOT, FOR THAT REASON ALONE, EXTINGUISH ANY RIGHTS OF THE INSURED AGAINST ANOTIlER, BUT THIS
ENDORSEMENT, AND THE NAMING OF MULTIPLE INSUREDS, SHALL NOT INCREASE TIlE TOTAL LIABILITY OF
TIlE COMPANY UNDER THIS POLICY,
C. NOTICE OF CANCELLATION
1. IF THE POLICY IS CANCELED BEFORE ITS EXPIRATION DATE FORANY REASON OTHER
THAN THE NON·PAYMENT OF PREMlUM, THE ISSUING COMl'ANY SHALL PROVIDE CITY
AT LEAST A HURTY (30) DAY WRlTTEN NOTICE BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF
CAl'lCELLA TlON.
2. IF THE POLICY IS CANCELED BEFORE ITS EXPIRATION DATE FOR TIlE NON·PAYMENT
OFPREMlUM, TIlE ISSUING COMPANY SHALL PROVIDE CITY AT LEAST A TEN (10) DAY
WRllTEN NOTICE BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF CANCELLATION.
NOTICES SHALL BE MAILED TO:
PURCHASING AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
CITY OF PALO ALTO
P.O. BOX 10250
PALOALTO,CA 94303
Professional Services 22
Rev June 2. 2010
S :IASDlPURCHISOLlCrrATIONSICURRENT BUYER-CM FOLDERSIKA THY\Contra e!SICI 0 11599li-Sicrra infusys, lnclContract
C101359981.doc
EXHIBITE
TRANSITION PLAN
. am enance Planning Setup Transfer . D I' ervlce e Ive
> TMOOW'" ~",m'.OO"~KOOW.dg, ~t~port
-....
, Establish scope • Setup connectivity
and time!ines for remote access
• Identify • Identify and deploy
stakeholders & connectivity and
~ process owners access
• Identify • Authorltation :r Organization • Sierra System
• Define service
levels
• Support process
;==
~ • Transition plan • SAP account
• Support Org • Authorization
;: • Support flow • Network Access
• Sierra system
= QQB'I QQB'I
SAP PMO members SAP PMO members 0 SAP Basis :r ;:: lli!lrqi
Engagement Manager Sierra
Support Service Manager Engagement Manager
Support consultant s
~
• Understand
Business process,
Configuration,
Master data
"' Customization
• Understand and
review change
management
process
• On site training
ticketing system
• Blue prlnl
• Scheduled jobs
• Operation manuals
• Customization
specification
• Interfaces
.~ CUPA
SAP PMO
SAP Core Team
AXON -as needed ~ d Engagement Manager
Suooort Con,ullar
• Reporting req
• Tas~ Order planning
, Prioritization
• Perfonnance
management
• Scheduling
• Cost conlrol
• Performance
• Slatus Report
QQB'I
SAPPMO
SAP Core Team
~ Engagement Manager
Support Service Manager
Professional Services 2 4
Rev June2,:WIQ
S:IASDIPURCH\SOLlClT A TIONSICURRENT BUYER-CM FOLDERSIKA THY\Conka c!sIClO 13599&-Sicrra Infosl"', Ine\Contract
CI0!359981.doc
CITY OF PALO ALTO OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
January 20, 2015
The Honorable City Council
Palo Alto, California
SECOND READING: Adoption of Park Improvement Ordinance for
Bowden Park (First Reading: December 15, 2014, PASSED: 9-0)
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A: Bowden Park Improvement Ordinance (PDF)
Department Head: Beth Minor, Acting City Clerk
Page 2
*****NOT YET APPROVED*****
ORDINANCE NO. ______
ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALO ALTO APPROVING
AND ADOPTING A PLAN FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO
BOWDEN PARK
The Council of the City of Palo Alto does ORDAIN as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. The City Council finds and declares that:
(a) Article VIII of the Charter of the City of Palo Alto and Section 22.08.005 of
the Palo Alto Municipal Code require that, before any substantial building, construction,
reconstruction or development is commenced or approved, upon or with respect to any land
held by the City for park purposes, the Council shall first cause to be prepared and by ordinance
approve and adopt a plan therefor.
(b) Bowden Park is dedicated to park, playground and recreational space.
(c) The City intends to authorize the construction of certain park improvements
within Bowden Park, as shown on the Schematic Improvement Plans (the “Plan”), attached as
Exhibit “A”:
(1) Replacing the children’s tot playground structures and rubberized
surface with ADA accessible surfacing;
(2) Renovating the fence and replacing damaged asphalt sections with
new asphalt materials in the playground area;
(3) Installation of a retaining wall and concrete edge in the playground
area;
(4) Renovation of the current irrigation system;
(5) Planting of new plants and trees;
(6) Renovating on-site furniture, including, without limitations, benches,
a seat and a table as well as replacing a drinking fountain, trash and
recycling receptacles and adding new tables and benches;
(7) Installation of decomposed granite to protect two tree sections from
the playground sand surface and a pathway for park access from
Alma Street;
(8) Installation of landscape metal header board at the edge of
decomposed granite pathways;
140807sdl 00710427 1
*****NOT YET APPROVED*****
(9) Installation of bike racks near the corner of North California Street
and Alma Street; and
(10) Installation of landscape bark mulch in the northeast and southeast
section of the park
(d) The project improvements will avoid protected trees and other sensitive
resources, if any. In addition, existing park uses will be restored following the completion of
project construction.
(e) The project described above and as more specifically described in the Plan,
attached hereto as Exhibit "A,” is consistent with park and conservation purposes.
(f) The Council desires to approve the project described above and as more
specifically described in the Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit "A.”
SECTION 2. The Council hereby approves the Plan for the construction of the
improvements at Bowden Park , and it hereby adopts the Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit "A,”
as part of the official plan for the construction of the park improvements at Bowden Park.
SECTION 3. The Council finds that the project to construct the facilities at
Bowden Park will not have a significant impact on the environment and thus is categorically
exempt from the preparation of environmental documents and/or significant environmental
review under Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Guidelines.
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
140807sdl 00710427 2
*****NOT YET APPROVED*****
SECTION 4. This ordinance shall be effective on the thirty-first day after the
date of its adoption.
INTRODUCED:
PASSED:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
ATTEST:
_____________________________ ____________________________
City Clerk Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED:
_____________________________ ____________________________
Senior Asst. City Attorney City Manager
____________________________
Director of Community Services
____________________________
Director of Administrative Services
140807sdl 00710427 3
*****NOT YET APPROVED*****
Exhibit “A”
140807sdl 00710427 4
*****NOT YET APPROVED*****
Exhibit “A”
140807sdl 00710427 5
City of Palo Alto (ID # 5421)
City Council Staff Report
Report Type: Consent Calendar Meeting Date: 1/20/2015
City of Palo Alto Page 1
Council Priority: Land Use and Transportation Planning
Summary Title: Maybell Bicycle Boulevard and Churchill Enhanced Bikeway
Concept Plan Approval
Title: Approval of Concept Plan Line and Implementation Plan for the
Maybell Avenue Bicycle Boulevard and Churchill Avenue Enhanced Bikeway
Projects
From: City Manager
Lead Department: Planning and Community Environment
Recommendation
Staff recommends that Council approve the Maybell Avenue Bicycle Boulevard Project and
Churchill Avenue Enhanced Bikeway Concept Plan Lines and Implementation Plans as shown
in Attachments A and B.
Executive Summary
The Palo Alto Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan 2012 (Bike Plan) identifies
Maybell Avenue Bicycle Boulevard as an existing bicycle boulevard with Georgia Avenue,
Donald Drive, and El Camino Way as bike route connectors in the citywide bicycle route
network. The Maybell Bicycle Boulevard project would provide a key link between the
Bol Park Path, Gunn High School, the Park Boulevard/Wilkie Way Bicycle Boulevard, and the
Park Blvd Bicycle Boulevard.
The Maybell Avenue Bicycle Boulevard Project includes traffic calming measures to encourage
both bicycle and pedestrian use, branding signage consistent with other bicycle
boulevard facilities, high visibility green bicycle markings at key points to the boulevard,
and provisions for studies to implement additional improvements at key intersections such
as El Camino Real and Orinda Avenue. A new bike lane would be introduced to the west
(Southbound) side of El Camino Way as part of this project.
For the Churchill Avenue Enhanced Bikeway, coordination with the Palo Alto Unified School
District (PAUSD) and the California Department of Transportation – Caltrans is required for
City of Palo Alto Page 2
right-of-way access and possible future improvements at El Camino Real. Discussions with
each agency will begin following approval of the Concept Plan Line.
The City held four community outreach meetings for the Maybell Avenue Bicycle Boulevard
project in 2013 and 2014 to develop the proposed concept plan (Attachment A), and two
separate community outreach meetings were held as part of the development of the Churchill
Avenue Enhanced Bikeway concept plan (Attachment B). The Planning & Transportation
Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of both projects on December 10,
2014. City Council approval will enable environmental review and final design of the Churchill
project (currently included in the CIP), as well as installation of simpler improvements with
independent utility (such as signage and minor striping) that can be implemented as part of
other existing CIP projects. The Maybell Bicycle Boulevard project is not currently funded for
environmental review and final design.
Background
The Bicycle & Pedestrian Transportation Plan 2012 includes a Proposed Bikeway Network
of multi-use paths, bicycle boulevards, enhanced bikeway facilities, bicycle lane facilities,
and bicycle routes. The Proposed Bikeway Network, provided in Attachment C, is the guiding
policy document for the deployment of bicycle facilities in the City of Palo Alto.
The Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan was developed through an extensive community outreach
process that took place over 18 months through 2011 and 2012. The Council approved the Plan
at its July 9, 2012 meeting.
Implementation of the plan started in 2013 with the expansion of the Park Boulevard Bicycle
Boulevard along Castilleja Avenue and Park Boulevard to Oregon Expressway and followed
with the start of the planning phases of the Maybell Avenue Bicycle Boulevard and the
Matadero Avenue-Margarita Avenue Bicycle Boulevard Projects. The City Council also
authorized up to $1.2M per year over five years as part of the current year Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) to help implement the plan.
Discussion
Maybell Bicycle Boulevard
The proposed Maybell Avenue Bicycle Boulevard project would provide additional
improvements along an existing Bicycle Boulevard and extend the route to include El Camino
Way, Donald Drive, and Georgia Avenue, providing a connection to the Bol Park Class I Path
connecting with Gunn High School to the west and the Park Boulevard/Wilkie Way Bicycle
Boulevard to the east. At El Camino Way, the projects would expand on existing traffic calming
measures and bicycle facilities by adding a new green bike lane as an extension of the existing
green bike lane on East Meadow Drive to help improve the ride for school commuters.
City of Palo Alto Page 3
The Maybell Avenue Bicycle Boulevard takes advantage of existing traffic calming features
such as speed humps on Maybell Avenue, and bike lanes on East Meadow Drive, creating a
connection between neighborhoods on the east side of Alma Street and connecting to Gunn
High School, Terman Middle School, and Juana Briones Elementary School. This corridor sees
substantial use of bicycle and pedestrian activity as a Safe Route to School, and
commuter activities to the west side of Palo Alto. In general, the proposed
improvements are separated into two groups: simple improvements that can
be implemented easily, and more significant physical changes that would
require additional environmental review and a more detailed final design
before construction. Below is a summary of the proposed implementation plan for the
Maybell Avenue Bicycle Boulevard project:
Phase 1 – Traffic Calming Improvements (2015)
Speed Tables – A total of three to five (3 to 5) new speed tables are proposed along
Maybell Avenue between Donald Drive and Arastradero Road, including a raised
pedestrian crosswalk at the Gunn High School path connection. The number of speed
tables is anticipated to start with three tables, and continued speed data collection
and outreach would be conducted to determine if additional speed tables would be
needed. The Gunn High School path speed table/crosswalk will be implemented later
following additional community input during the Design phase.
Bicycle Lanes – A new green bicycle lane is proposed to connect East Meadow Drive
and continue to just south of James Way. This bicycle lane would provide an
extension to the heavily used green bike lane on East Meadow Drive, which
terminates at El Camino Way. Due to limited right of way, a bicycle lane is not
proposed for the northbound direction, and instead this plan proposes the use of
green-back sharrows to compliment the southbound bicycle lane.
On Maybell Avenue, a bike lane in the westbound direction previously ended just
west of El Camino Real. Due to existing parking restrictions on the north side of
Maybell, this concept plan includes extending the bicycle lane to Amaranta Avenue.
Parking Restrictions near Briones Park – The proposed concept plan includes time of
day parking restrictions on the north side of Maybell between Amaranta Avenue and
Juana Briones Elementary School. This would affect four single family homes and
approximately four parking spaces. In conjunction with this restriction, parking on
the south side along Juana Briones Park would be formalized with parking “T”
pavement markers.
Share the Road Pavement markings – “Share the Road” pavement markings (sharrow)
are a standard pavement treatment for bicycle routes that do not provide a dedicated
bicycle lane and are used in Palo Alto and throughout the California. Although still
City of Palo Alto Page 4
considered experimental traffic control devices, greenback sharrow markings are
proposed to highlight the presence of bicyclists to motorists and to guide bicyclists
where to position themselves on the roadway. The City has greenback Sharrows
installed along Cowper Street – North of E Meadow Drive and on Channing Avenue –
East of Guinda Avenue. This proposed concept plan includes the use of green back
sharrows on Maybell Avenue and El Camino Way. Due to local residential
characteristics, Donald Drive and Georgia Avenue are proposed to use traditional
(non-colored) sharrows.
Bicycle Boulevard Branding and Wayfinding Signage – New signage at every
intersection corner to brand the bicycle boulevard facility and wayfinding signage to
highlight the path to points of interest.
Phase 2 – Bicycle Boulevard Treatment Implementation (Implementation TBD pending
Final Design)
Shared Use Path Extension – The existing sidewalk on the north side of Maybell
Avenue is at the same height as the vehicle roadway, separated only by a concrete
valley gutter in most areas. This concept plan includes providing additional width in
the form of a shared path on the asphalt with the use of a textured, colored, or other
treatment to distinguish the area for use by pedestrians and/or bicyclists.
Raised Intersections – The proposed concept plan includes raised intersections at the
intersections of Maybell Avenue at Amaranta Avenue and at Coulombe Ave. The
raised intersection and crosswalks would be at the same height as the sidewalks, and
each approach would be ramped up similar to a speed table or raised crosswalk.
Crosswalk Improvements – Enhanced crosswalk markings at the Gunn High School/Bol
Park Path on Georgia Avenue, and at the intersections of Maybell Avenue/Donald
Drive and Georgia Avenue/Donald Drive.
Phase 3 – Future Year Improvements (No Schedule)
Caltrans Project Study Report – Begin a study with Caltrans to determine the level of
improvements at the El Camino Real & Maybell Avenue/El Camino Way intersection
that are acceptable to the State of California.
Churchill Avenue Enhanced Bicycle Way
The proposed concept plan for the Churchill Avenue Enhanced Bikeway project would provide
an improved connection between the Castilleja-Park Bicycle Boulevard to the existing Class I
bicycle path that runs parallel to the Caltrain tracks on the west side. The proposed concepts
would also extend the Class 1 path along Churchill Avenue up to the intersection with El
City of Palo Alto Page 5
Camino Real, where an improved crossing at El Camino Real would connect to the future
Stanford Perimeter Trails and onto the Stanford University campus.
The Churchill Avenue concept plans would provide improved facilities for all modes including
bicycles, pedestrians, and motor vehicles turning into Palo Alto High School. This corridor sees
substantial use of bicycle and pedestrian activity as a Safe Route to School and use by
automobile commuters who travel north and south through Palo Alto. Below is a summary
of the proposed implementation plan for the Churchill Avenue Enhanced Bikeway project:
Phase 1 – Traffic Calming Improvements (2015)
Time of Day Parking Restrictions – City Staff would outreach to the neighbors on the
south side of Churchill Avenue between Castilleja Avenue and Miramonte Avenue and
seek to incorporate time of day parking restrictions (no parking 7 AM to 7 PM). This
would provide a wider area for bicyclists and or vehicles that want to turn right onto
southbound Alma Street.
Bicycle Lane Ramp Connection – The proposed concept plan includes a small ramp for
bicycles that wish to connect from the westbound bicycle lane onto the existing Class
1 pathway and/or to the pathway connecting to the Palo Alto High School campus
without having to travel through the intersection of Castilleja Avenue and Churchill
Avenue. The path connector ramp would be located approximately 30 to 50 feet
east of the Palo Alto High School driveway.
Phase 2 – Intersection Modification and Extended Pathway (Implementation TBD pending
Final Design)
Intersection Modifications – The proposed concept plan line includes a substantial
traffic signal modification at the intersection of El Camino Real and Churchill Avenue,
with removal of the existing “pork chop” island, the addition of a pedestrian
crosswalk across the north leg of the intersection, and the addition of a right-turn
vehicle lane. Textured or color treatments, enhanced detection, and connection to
Stanford University campus and trails are also proposed as part of this modification,
which would require consultation with Caltrans, PAUSD, and Stanford.
Raised Pedestrian Crosswalks – The intersection of Castilleja and Churchill Avenues
would also receive intersection modification treatments that include raised
crosswalks that act as a speed table. A raised crossing is proposed as an option, both
for crossing Churchill Avenue and the Palo Alto High School Driveway. In addition, a
sidewalk extension (bulb-out) on the south-west corner is proposed to reduce the
pedestrian crossing distance and accommodate rectangular rapid flashing beacons.
Similarly, a raised enhanced crosswalk with optional bulb-out at Madrono Avenue is
proposed.
City of Palo Alto Page 6
Class I Pathway Extension – The proposed concept plan line includes extending the
existing pathway that currently terminates at the Palo Alto High School Driveway, to
the west and terminating at El Camino Real where the modified traffic signal would be
designed to accommodate users the pathway crossing El Camino Real. This aspect of
the project would also require consultation with Caltrans, PAUSD, and Stanford.
Outreach and Planning and Transportation Commission Discussion and Recommendation
The City held four community outreach meetings for the Maybell Avenue Bicycle Boulevard
project in 2013 and 2014 to develop the proposed concept plan. Two separate community
outreach meetings were held as part of the development of the Churchill Avenue Enhanced
Bikeway concept plan, and both projects were reviewed by the Palo Alto Bicycle Advisory
Committee (PABAC) and a Technical Advisory Committee comprised of representatives from
PABAC, the Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC), and others with specific, technical
expertise in the planning and design of bicycle facilities.
On December 10, 2104, the PTC reviewed the proposed projects and voted unanimously, 7-0,
to provide a recommendation for approval of the Concept Plan Line alignments to the City
Council for both the Maybell Avenue Bicycle Boulevard and Churchill Avenue Enhanced Bikeway
projects.
The Planning & Transportation commission reviewed, asked questions, commented, and
provided to City Staff and consultants on the concept plan lines. As part of the review, several
key questions, comments and suggestions were discussed, and included the following:
Consider Time of Day parking restrictions on the west side of El Camino Way during the
AM school commute peak,
Why is Mariposa/Churchill not included as a designated crossing for the project?
Use of in pavement, flashing lights versus rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFB),
Were there any community concerns that could not be addressed or conflicts?
Location of bike lane ramp to path on Churchill Avenue,
Consider dashed center line on El Camino Way to make passing safer (compared to
existing double yellow).
Include adequate wayfinding signage,
Suggestion for instructional videos for new features and traffic devices.
Resource Impact
The near-term Phase 1 improvements that consist of simple striping, signage, or other
approved traffic devices could be implemented in the immediate future using allocated funds
to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan Implementation CIP (PL-04010). The Phase
2 improvements for the Churchill Avenue Enhanced Bikeway are currently funded for
environmental review and final design as part of the El Camino Real & Churchill Avenue
Intersection Improvements (PL-14000). The Maybell Avenue Bicycle Boulevard project is not
City of Palo Alto Page 7
yet funded for environmental review and final design. The Phase 2 improvements for both
projects are included in the Infrastructure Plan as approved by Council in June 2014.
Policy Implications
The Comprehensive Plan goals, policies, and programs that support the development of the
Maybell Bicycle Boulevard and the Churchill Avenue Enhanced Bikeway project include:
Goal T-1: Less Reliance on Single-Occupant Vehicles
Goal T-3: Facilities, Services, and Programs the Encourage and Promote Walking and
Bicycling
Program T-19: Develop, periodically update, and implement a bicycle facilities
improvement program and a pedestrian facilities improvement program that identify
and prioritize critical pedestrian and bicycle links to parks, schools, retail centers, and
civic facilities.
Program T-22: Implement a network of bicycle boulevards, including extension of the
southern end of the Bryant Street bicycle boulevard to Mountain View.
Policy T-25: When constructing or modifying roadways, plan for usage of the roadway
space by all users, including motor vehicles, transit vehicles, bicyclists, and
pedestrians.
Policy T-34: Implement traffic calming measures to slow traffic on local and collector
residential streets and prioritize these measures over congestion management.
Include traffic circles and other traffic calming devices among these measures.
The Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan 2012 lays out the development of the Bicycle
Boulevard network and prioritizes the corridors for development of these facilities. The Bike
Plan objectives that are furthered by the development of the Maybell Avenue Bicycle
Boulevard and Churchill Avenue Enhanced Bikeway include:
Objective 1: Double the rate of bicycling for both local and total work commutes by
2020 (to 15% and 5%, respectively).
Objective 2: Convert discretionary vehicle trips into walking and bicycling trips in order
to reduce City transportation-related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions 15% by 2020.
Objective 3: Develop a core network of shared paths, bikeways, and traffic-calmed
streets that connects business and residential districts, schools, parks, and open
spaces to promote healthy, active living.
Objective 4: Plan, construct, and maintain ‘Complete Streets’ that are safe and
accessible to all modes and people of all ages and abilities.
Objective 5: Promote efficient, sustainable, and creative use of limited public
resources through integrated design and planning.
Environmental Review
City of Palo Alto Page 8
A Mitigated Negative Declaration was approved by City Council for adoption of the Bicycle Plan
on July 9, 2012. Certain aspects of Phases 2 of the Maybell Avenue Bicycle Boulevard project
and the Churchill Avenue Enhanced Bikeway will require additional environmental review at a
later time.
Attachments:
Attachment A: Maybell Avenue Bicycle Boulevard Concept Plan (PDF)
Attachment B: Churchill Enhanced Bikeway Concept Plan Line (PDF)
Attachment C: Bike Network Map (PDF)
PTC Packet Page 13 of 19
PTC Packet Page 14 of 19
PTC Packet Page 15 of 19
PTC Packet Page 16 of 19
PTC Packet Page 17 of 19
PTC Packet Page 18 of 19
ATTACHMNT B
PTC Packet Page 19 of 19
Recommended Facilities and Conditions | 6-3
Alta Planning + Design
Chapter 6
Map 6-1. Proposed Bikeway Network
PTC Packet Page 11 of 19
6-4 | Bicycle + Pedestrian Transportation Plan
City of Palo Alto
Chapter 6 PTC Packet Page 12 of 19
CITY OF PALO ALTO OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
January 20, 2015
The Honorable City Council
Attention: Policy & Services Committee
Palo Alto, California
Adoption of Procedure to Vote Before Holding Closed Sessions
Recommendation
The Policy & Services Committee considered and did not reach a recommendation on whether
Council should amend its procedures to require that Council vote before holding closed
sessions. The Committee forwards the matter to the Council for its consideration.
Background
The Brown Act recognizes that under limited circumstances the City Council may best consider
certain matters in non-public closed sessions. Closed sessions are the exception to the general
rule that Council meetings must be public. These exceptions are strictly limited, and specifically
defined in state law. Unless the Brown Act explicitly authorizes a topic to be discussed in closed
session, the Council may not hold a closed session. The most common types of closed sessions
are:
• Personnel matters (Gov. Code § 54954.5(e))
• Litigation (Gov. Code § 54954.5(c))
• Real estate negotiations (Gov. Code § 54954.5(b))
• Labor negotiations (Gov. Code § 54954.5(f))
The Council’s agenda must list the closed session and identify certain information pertaining to
the matters to be discussed in closed session. The Brown Act lists the information that must be
made public for each type of closed session. (See generally Gov. Code section 54954.5.) Before
holding the closed session, the Council must publicly announce the closed session agenda item
and receive public comment.
Customarily, a closed session is placed on the Council’s agenda when the City Manager (or City
Attorney, where litigation is involved) identifies the need for Council consideration of an issue
that the Brown Act identifies as a permissible topic for closed session. In most cases, however,
the Council has the authority to decide whether to actually hold the closed session. In other
words, even where the law allows the Council to meet in closed session, it is not usually
required that the Council do so.1 If a Council Member has a question about the basis for the
closed session or believes that the item would be better addressed in open session, the Council
1 The exception to this general rule involves situations where state or federal law requires that the Council keep
certain matters confidential, such as medical or other information involving the privacy rights of individuals. In
these rare cases, the Council is prohibited from publically disclosing the protected information and may only
discuss it in a closed session.
Page 2
Member can raise those questions or concerns in open session when the item is called. If a
majority of Council Members determine a closed session is not appropriate, the Council will not
hold the agendized closed session.2
In Palo Alto, as in most jurisdictions, there has not been a structured process of voting before
holding closed sessions. Rather, after the closed session agenda item is announced and public
comment, if any, is received, the Mayor announces that the Council is retiring into closed
session, and the Council typically adjourns to a private space to conduct the closed session
without further process.
Discussion
On September 8, 2014, while considering the City’s response to the 2014 Grand Jury report,
Council Members voted to refer to Policy & Services potential adjustments to the Council’s
procedures to formalize the decision to go into closed session. This could be done by amending
the Council’s Policies and Protocols to provide that before retiring into closed session, the
Council would require a motion, second and majority vote to hold the closed session. As
discussed above, even without this change in procedure, it is permissible for any Council
Member to initiate a discussion about whether to go into closed session, and for the Council to
discuss and vote on this procedural issue. Having a formalized procedure would ensure that it
occur each time the Council holds a closed session. Most local jurisdictions do not have a formal
process for voting on going into closed session. We are aware of one jurisdiction – San
Francisco – where this process is in regular use by most Brown Act bodies.
On October 21, 2014, the Policy & Services Committee considered this issue. The Committee
discussed the advantages and disadvantages of a Council procedure requiring a vote each time
the Council holds a closed session. A motion to recommend Council adopt such a procedure
failed 2-2 (Schmid, Scharff yes; Klein, Price no).
Staff Impact
A potential change to the Council’s procedures will not have an impact on staff resources.
Environmental Review
This is not a project requiring environmental review.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A: 10-21-14 Policy & Services Staff Report (PDF)
Attachment B: 10-21-14 Policy & Services Minutes (PDF)
2 If the Council chooses not to hold an agendized closed session, it may not immediately take up the item in open
session unless it has also been noticed as an open session item. In the absence of such a notice, the item must be
placed on a subsequent agenda as an open session item. This ensures that the public is aware in advance that the
Council will address the item in open session.
Page 3
Department Head: Molly Stump, City Attorney
Page 4
CITY OF PALO ALTO OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
October 21, 2014
The Honorable City Council
Attention: Policy & Services Committee
Palo Alto, California
Discussion Regarding Possible Procedure to Vote to go Into Closed
Session
Recommendation
Staff recommends that Council consider whether to amend its procedures to establish a
structured process for voting on going into closed session.
Background
The Brown Act recognizes that under limited circumstances the City Council may best consider
certain matters in non-public closed sessions. Closed sessions are the exception to the general
rule that Council meetings must be public. These exceptions are strictly limited, and specifically
defined in state law. The most common types of closed sessions are:
• Personnel matters (Gov. Code § 54954.5(e))
• Litigation (Gov. Code § 54954.5(c))
• Real estate negotiations (Gov. Code § 54954.5(b))
• Labor negotiations (Gov. Code § 54954.5(f))
The Council’s agenda must list the closed session and identify certain information pertaining to
the matters to be discussed in closed session. The Brown Act lists the information that must be
made public for each type of closed session. (See generally Gov. Code section 54954.5.) Before
going into closed session, the Council must publicly announce the closed session agenda item
and receive public comment.
Customarily, a closed session is placed on the Council’s agenda when the City Manager, in
consultation with the Mayor, identifies the need for Council consideration of an issue (or the
City Attorney whose litigation is involved) that the Brown Act identifies as a permissible topic
for closed session. In most cases, however, the Council has the authority to decide whether to
actually hold the closed session. In other words, even where the law allows the Council to meet
in closed session, it is not usually required that the Council do so. (The exception to this general
rule involves situations where state or federal law requires that the Council keep certain
matters confidential, such as medical information or certain matters involving the privacy rights
of individuals. In those cases, the Council is prohibited from publically disclosing the protected
information and may only discuss it in a closed session.)
Note however, that if the Council chooses not to go into an agendized closed session, it may not
immediately take up the item publicly unless it is also noticed as an open session item. In the
Page 2
absence of such a notice, the item must be placed on a subsequent agenda as an open session
item. This ensures that the public is aware in advance that the Council will address the item in
open session.
In Palo Alto, as in most jurisdictions, there has not been a structured process to go into closed
session. Rather, after the closed session agenda item requiring the full Council to vote is
announced and public comment, if any, is received, the Mayor announces that the Council is
retiring into closed session, and the Council typically adjourns to a private space to conduct the
closed session without further process. On one recent occasion, a Council Member raised a
question about whether a closed session was warranted. The Council discussed this procedural
issue, decided not to go into closed session and directed that a discussion on the procedure be
placed on a future agenda. This situation illustrates a permissible way to consider whether to
go into closed session, but one that is not structured or formalized.
Discussion
On September 8, 2014, while considering the City’s response to the 2014 Grand Jury report,
Council Members voted to refer to Policy & Services potential adjustments to the Council’s
procedures to formalize the decision to go into closed session. This could be done by amending
the Council’s Policies and Protocols to provide that before retiring into closed session, the
Council would require a motion, second and majority vote to go into closed session. Even
without this change in procedure and practice, it is permissible for any Council Member to
initiate a discussion about whether to go into closed session, and for the Council to discuss and
vote on this procedural issue. Having a specific procedure would formalize this process and
ensure that it occur each time the Council goes into closed session.
Most local jurisdictions do not have a formal process for voting on going into closed session. We
are aware of one jurisdiction – San Francisco – where this process is in regular use by most
Brown Act bodies.
Staff Impact
A potential change to the Council’s procedures will not have an impact on staff resources.
Environmental Review
This is not a project requiring environmental review.
Department Head: Molly Stump, City Attorney
Page 3
FINAL MINUTES
Page 21 of 26
Policy and Services Committee Special Meeting
Final Minutes 10/21/14
Council Member Klein did not agree. He wanted new nonprofit agencies to
apply for grants.
Chair Price concurred with extending the scope beyond the three partners.
She asked if Staff had sufficient information.
James Keene, City Manager, replied yes.
4. Discussion Regarding Possible Procedure to Vote to go Into Closed
Session.
MOTION: Council Member Klein moved, seconded by Chair Price to
continue Agenda Item Number 4.
Council Member Schmid felt the question was the amount of time needed to
discuss the item.
SUBSTITUTE MOTION: Council Member Scharff moved, seconded by
Council Member Schmid to hear Agenda Item Number 4.
Council Member Scharff advised that the question was whether to have a
Motion to move into Closed Session. That would not require a great deal of
discussion.
Council Member Klein asked if Council Member Scharff was proposing the
San Francisco process.
Council Member Scharff replied no. The Council should vote to move into
Closed Session rather than simply holding a Closed Session. Council
Members should think about holding a Closed Session.
Chair Price asked if there would be any criteria or guidance for holding a
Closed Session.
Council Member Scharff noted any discussion of whether to hold a Closed
Session would be part of a public meeting.
James Keene, City Manager, understood the Motion would not change the
definition of a Closed Session or the reasons for holding a Closed Session.
The current practice was to notice a Closed Session, and at the appointed
time the Council moved to the Closed Session. Under the Motion, Staff
would agendize a Council vote to move into a recommended Closed Session.
The public would have an opportunity to comment on the appropriateness of
holding a Closed Session. The City Attorney would advise the Council as to
whether State law allowed the Council to hold a Closed Session.
FINAL MINUTES
Page 22 of 26
Policy and Services Committee Special Meeting
Final Minutes 10/21/14
Council Member Scharff understood from the City Attorney that the Council
had a choice whether to hold a Closed Session for almost all topics. Certain
matters were required to be discussed in Closed Session. The better process
would be a Council vote to retire to a Closed Session.
Chair Price inquired whether Council Members would vote without any input
from Staff regarding their recommendation for a Closed or Open Session.
Council Member Scharff advised that a Council Member could move not to
hold a Closed Session, at which point a Council Member could inquire about
Staff's reasons for a Closed Session.
Mr. Keene reported the discussion would focus on holding an open meeting
beyond the standard of the Brown Act. Some situations could compromise
Staff's ability to explain the need for a Closed Session. In that situation, the
City Attorney could provide the Council with a confidential memorandum,
but that might occur after the fact.
Council Member Scharff suggested Staff simply state that Staff's reasons
were confidential.
Council Member Schmid recalled two instances in which the Council
questioned holding a Closed Session. In circumstances similar to those two
instances, a brief discussion of the issues would be helpful.
Council Member Klein recalled moving an Open Session regarding interviews
of finalists for the City Manager position in 2008.
Council Member Schmid felt a formal process to raise concerns would be
beneficial.
Council Member Klein felt raising the issue of Closed Sessions encouraged
future Council Members to vote against a Closed Session.
Council Member Schmid noted five votes in support of an Open Session were
needed.
Council Member Klein believed Council Members would not support a Closed
Session even though they knew a Closed Session was appropriate, because
their vote would generate publicity.
Council Member Schmid was concerned that a vote and discussion would
further lengthen Council meetings.
Council Member Klein would not support the Motion because the process was
already in place.
FINAL MINUTES
Page 23 of 26
Policy and Services Committee Special Meeting
Final Minutes 10/21/14
Council Member Schmid inquired whether a Council Member could call for a
vote prior to every Closed Session.
Molly Stump, City Attorney, reported that was permissible.
Council Member Scharff noted some Council Members did not attend the
proceedings in Chambers prior to retiring to a Closed Session.
Council Member Klein believed a Motion could be offered at the beginning of
a meeting when all Council Members were present.
SUBSTITUTE MOTION: Council Member Schmid moved, seconded by
Council Member Scharff to recommend the City Council vote to go into
Closed Session before going into Closed Session.
Council Member Schmid stated a vote was permissible; however, the Motion
provided an official process.
Council Member Scharff added that a vote would increase transparency.
This process would signal the community that a discussion could occur.
Council Member Schmid asked if a topic could be agendized as a Closed
Session and an Open Session.
Ms. Stump responded yes. In order to hear an item in Open Session, the
item had to be agendized as an Open Session.
Mr. Keene clarified that a topic had to be agendized as an Open Session to
be heard at the same meeting.
Ms. Stump indicated the topic could be continued to a future meeting. A
topic could be agendized as both a Closed and an Open Session if there was
some question as to the Council's wishes. Although not legally required, a
note on the Agenda indicating one or both of those sessions might not occur
would be good.
Council Member Schmid believed the statement should clearly indicate a
Closed Session or an Open Session was possible.
Mr. Keene explained that any discussion held in Closed Session required by
law would be effectuated subsequently through a public discussion and
action by the Council. The public should understand that the Council, in a
Closed Session, was giving direction to Staff who would return to the Council
for action in a public forum.
FINAL MINUTES
Page 24 of 26
Policy and Services Committee Special Meeting
Final Minutes 10/21/14
Council Member Klein did not believe there was a problem that warranted
this action. A solution already existed.
Chair Price concurred with Council Member Klein.
SUBSTITUTE MOTION FAILED: 2-2 Klein, Price no
5. Auditor's Office Quarterly Report as of September 30, 2014.
Council Member Klein inquired about the amount of time needed to discuss
Agenda Item Number 5.
Chair Price felt the item should be heard.
Council Member Scharff indicated some time would be required to discuss
the future status of policy.
Harriet Richardson, City Auditor, reported the Franchise Fee Audit contained
three objectives; two being performed by the City Auditor's Office and one
by a consultant. Staff had almost completed their work on the two
objectives. Information regarding the consultant's objective would be
presented at a later time. The Utility Meter Audit was close to completion.
Field work for the audit of Parking Funds was approximately 75 percent
complete. With respect to the National Citizens Survey, the correct number
of respondents was 796. The response rate was 27 percent, 2 percent lower
than the previous year; however, 3,000 surveys rather than 1,200 were
mailed to residents. Marketing efforts did not increase the rate of
participation. The Sales and Use Tax Audit recovered $31,699. The City
received two hotline complaints during the quarter, and Staff closed both as
unsubstantiated. In the future, Departments would report directly to the
Policy and Services Committee regarding the status of responses to audit
recommendations. Within the quarterly report, she would provide a
summary of overall activity during the quarter.
Council Member Schmid suggested Audits of Franchise Fees and Utility
Meters would not provide the greatest payback.
Ms. Richardson indicated the Utility Meter Audit resulted from issues
identified during the Inventory Management Audit.
Council Member Schmid noted the numbers were higher for the National
Citizens Survey. He requested a categorization of hotline complaints.
Ms. Richardson advised that most complaints pertained to employees' use of
time. In most instances, there was no evidence to support complaints.
City of Palo Alto (ID # 5300)
City Council Staff Report
Report Type: Action Items Meeting Date: 1/20/2015
City of Palo Alto Page 1
Summary Title: City Council Salary Increase (2017)
Title: Policy and Services Recommendation to Adopt an Ordinance Increasing
Council Salary From $600/Month to $1,000/Month, Effective January 1, 2017
From: City Manager
Lead Department: City Manager
Recommendation
The Policy and Services Committee recommends that the Council adopt the attached Ordinance
to increase Council salaries, effective January 1, 2017, from $600/month to $1,000/month, and
to clarify Council travel and expense allowance procedures.
Background
Council Members receive a salary of $600/month. This salary was set in 2001 and has not been
increased since that time.
On May 20, 2014, the Policy and Services Committee considered several possible Charter
amendments relating to Council governance, including changes to council member
compensation. The Committee decided not to pursue a Charter amendment with respect to
council member salaries, and instead directed staff to provide additional information on
changes that could be accomplished by ordinance. On June 17, 2014, the Committee reviewed
survey data on council compensation from neighboring jurisdictions and recommended 2-1
(Klein, Price yes; Scharff no; Schmid absent) that the Council adopt an ordinance increasing
salaries to $1,000 per month, effective January 1, 2017.
Discussion
As noted in the staff report presented to the Policy and Services Committee on June 17, 2014
(attached as Attachment A), council member salaries may be increased by 5% of the existing
salary for each “calendar year” since the Council last set council member salaries. . A change
in Council salaries may only be implemented at the beginning of a new council term.
The last ordinance setting council member salaries (at $600 per month) was effective May 24,
2001.By January 1, 2017, fifteen full calendar years will have passed; thus, the maximum
monthly salary Council could approve for January 1, 2017 is $1,050, or a 75% increase.
City of Palo Alto Page 2
The attached Ordinance amends Palo Alto Municipal Code section 2.04.360 to provide an
increase in Council salaries to $1,000 per month effective January 1, 2017. The Ordinance also
updates and clarifies the Council’s travel and expense allowance procedures. Municipal Code
section 2.04.350 provides that the Council may adopt a travel and expense policy and create a
schedule for expense allowances by resolution. Currently, however, section 2.04.350 also sets
expense limits for the Mayor and Vice Mayor at $200 and $50 per month, respectively. In
practice, the Council has periodically revised expense allowances for all members, including the
Mayor and Vice Mayor, by resolution. When there has been a discrepancy between the
amounts provided by resolution and in the Municipal Code, the City has adhered to the
resolutions as the most recent policy of the Council. This Ordinance would resolve any
ambiguity going forward and clarify that the Council shall set expense allowances for all of its
members by resolution.
People, Strategy, and Operations staff has also updated the graphs and tables provided to the
Policy and Services Committee based on feedback from the Committee. Staff identified and
noted comparable market cities’ council member benefits, including health and retirement
benefits for council members, and any miscellaneous benefits provided to council members,
including life insurance, car allowances, electronic allowances, et cetera. Staff surveyed a total
of 36 cities and included this data in the comparable market cities table (attached as
Attachment B). At the Committee’s direction, staff has also removed from the council salaries
average those cities that provide no salary to council members and the City of San Jose that
provides a full time salary to council members.
Resource Impact
The proposed ordinance can be readily absorbed into future budgets.
Environmental Review
Adoption of this Ordinance is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA).
Attachments:
Attachment A: June 17 2014 Policy and Services Committee Staff Report (PDF) (PDF)
Attachment B: Table for Council Terms Salaries (PDF) (PDF)
Attachment C: Ordinance to Increase the Salary of Council Members Effective (PDF)
Attachment D: Minutes of June 17, 2014 Policy and Services Committee (PDF)
CITY OF PALO ALTO OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
June 17, 2014
The Honorable City Council
Attention: Policy & Services Committee
Palo Alto, California
Discussion and Recommendation to Council Regarding Potential
Ordinance Making Changes to Council Compensation
On May 12, 2014, the Council considered a variety of possible Charter changes to Council
Member seats and governance matters, as reflected in the attached staff report. (Attachment
A.) Council voted unanimously to refer these items to the Policy and Services Committee for
consideration and recommendation. On May 20, 2014, the Committee discussed the items and
made recommendations to City Council on possible Charter amendments. These items are
scheduled for Council on June 16, 2014.
With respect to Council compensation, the Committee voted not to recommend a Charter
amendment, but rather to consider changes that could be made by ordinance. The Committee
directed staff to gather additional comparative data from neighboring jurisdictions and return
to Committee on June 17th for further discussion.
The Charter provides that Council may receive compensation in amounts not to exceed those
provided in state law. (Charter, Art. III, Sec. 17.) By ordinance implementing this section,
Council compensation is currently set at $600/month. (PAMC 2.04.360.) Council compensation
was last updated in 2001.
State law provides that city council members may be compensated in an amount not to exceed
a cap that is graduated depending on the city’s total population. Once set, however,
compensation may be increased not more than 5% per year (non-compounded) from the
operative date of the last adjustment. In Palo Alto, this means that Council Member
compensation may be increased 5% for each of the 13 years that have elapsed since the last
increase, or $390/month, for a maximum possible compensation of $990/month.
State law requires that any salary increase only go into effect at the beginning of the next
council term, or January 2015.
At the May 20, 2014, Committee meeting, staff distributed a survey that included population,
charter city status, number of council seats, term limits, and council transition date for cities in
Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties. Staff has updated the chart with additional salary
information. (Attachment B.)
Staff is also reattaching a chart prepared by the Los Angeles Times using data assembled by the
California Controller in 2011, showing council compensation in all California cities. (Attachment
Page 2
C.) While the chart is readable and places information in a helpful comparative context, it is
somewhat dated.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A - May 12, 2014 P&S Staff Report (PDF)
Attachment B - Table for Council Terms Salaries (PDF)
Attachment C - Los Angeles Times Chart (PDF)
Department Head: Molly Stump, City Attorney
Page 3
CITY OF PALO ALTO OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
May 12, 2014
The Honorable City Council
Palo Alto, California
Discussion and Council Direction Regarding Potential November 2014
Charter Amendments Related to Council Seats, Including Term Limits,
Beginning/End of Council Terms and Annual Reorganization Meeting,
and Other Matters
Recommendation
Council should consider the recommendations of the Policy & Services Committee and provide
direction to staff regarding any Charter or other legislative changes Council would like to make
with respect to Council seats and governance matters, including:
1.Term Limits
2.Beginning and Ending of Council Terms and Scheduling of the Annual Reorganization
Meeting
3.Other Matters, including possibly “Full Time” Service, Compensation, Districts, Direct
Election of Mayor, or related matters
Background
In 2013, the Council raised several proposals for changes to Council seats, terms and other
aspects of Council composition and structure. This report brings those issues back to Council for
further discussion and direction.
A Colleagues’ Memo dated February 4, 2013 (Klein, Schmid) expressed concern that in odd
numbered years, when new Council Members begin service, there is a “gap” between January 1
and the first Monday business meeting in January, during which time Palo Alto does not have a
full nine Council Members sworn and ready to conduct business, should an emergency arise.1
The Colleagues’ Memo also commented that the Council’s typical practice of using a regular
Monday business meeting exclusively for ceremonial purposes means that important policy
matters are not taken up until mid or late January. The Memo recommended that Council set
the first business day of the calendar year as the date for the swearing in of new Council
Members, the election of Mayor and Vice Mayor and the recognition of departing Council
Members/Mayor/Vice Mayor, with no other business transacted at the meeting.
Council considered the Colleagues’ Memo on February 4, 2013 and referred the item to Policy
& Services for further consideration.
1 Palo Alto has an Emergency Standby Council, established annually and composed of former Council Members
that can be activated to vote as Council Members in an emergency situation.
ATTACHMENT A
Page 2
On March 19, 2013, Policy & Services (Kniss, Klein, Holman & Price) heard the item and made
the following recommendations:
1. Recommend that Council do all things reasonable and necessary to have newly elected
Council Members sworn in on January 1st, and that the City Clerk make that a part of the
package given to all candidates (4-0)
2. Recommend that the reorganizational meeting for election of Mayor and Vice Mayor in
odd numbered years take place on the first business day in January (3-1, Kniss no)
3. Recommend that Council consider an amendment to the Charter to eliminate the “gap”
problem (4-0)
Also in the Spring of 2013, a second Colleagues’ Memo (Price, Kniss, Shepherd) recommended
that Council consider a Charter Amendment to: (a) change Council term limits from no more
than two consecutive terms, to no more than three consecutive terms, (b) reduce Council size
from nine to seven members, and (c) consider other possible changes. The Memo commented
that the two-term limit can restrict Palo Alto’s ability to secure leadership positions on
important regional boards, and noted that Santa Clara County voters had recently increased
permissible terms for County Supervisor to three. Regarding the number of seats, the Memo
noted that it is unusual for a mid-sized city to have nine council seats, and that seven might
provide a better balance between effectiveness and distribution of responsibilities. The Memo
encouraged Council to consider reducing the Council to seven members in a future cycle,
potentially fall of 2018.
On June 3, the Council took up the 2nd Colleagues’ Memo and the recommendations from Policy
& Services on the timing of the Council reorganization. The Council directed:
1. The City Attorney should draft language for a Charter Amendment that would extend
terms from two to three, and, in the alternative, language that would eliminate term
limits.
2. Staff should return for further discussion of all remaining items, including reduction of
seats, compensation, any other matters including options for immediate or phased
implementation of any changes.
This item returns these issues to the Council for further discussion and direction.
Discussion
Procedural Requirements
Charter Amendments. A Charter amendment would be required to change term limits, the
number of seats, and the beginning/end of council terms. A charter amendment would also be
required to increase council member compensation above the amounts authorized for general
law cities. Council may put such a Charter amendment on the November 4, 2014 ballot. The
Page 3
final date to call a local election and put a matter on the ballot is August 8th. Charter
amendments require voter approval. A simple majority (50% of votes cast, plus 1) is required.
Ordinances, Resolutions and Procedures. Other potential changes are within the Council’s
authority to enact. Changes in the timing of the Council’s ceremonial meeting can be adopted
by policy direction, resolution or amendment of the Council’s Procedures. Adjustments to
Council compensation could be adopted by ordinance if they fall within the amounts authorized
for general law cities, or put to a vote of the people if the Council so directed.
Implementation of Changes. A Charter amendment is effective upon declaration of the canvass
of results and transmission to the Secretary of State. If the Council wishes, however, language
can be inserted into the Charter amendment providing that changes be implemented at a later
date. Whether to do so is a policy matter for the Council to determine. Sitting council members
have no vested right to continue in office under the same terms that applied at their election.
Voters may amend the Charter to change the number of seats, term limits, and timing of terms,
and may make those changes applicable to sitting members.
Issue #1: Term Limits
The Council requested language for two potential Charter amendments: (a) extending term
limits from two to three; and (b) eliminating term limits.
The operative language is contained in Charter Article III (Council), Section 2 (Number – Term).
The following amendment would extend permissible terms from two to three:
Sec. 2. Number - Term.
Commencing July 1, 1971, said council shall be composed of nine
members, each of whom shall be an elector and shall have been a
resident of the city of Palo Alto for at least thirty days next preceding the
final filing date for nomination papers for such office. The members of
said council shall be known as councilmen, councilwomen, or council
members and their terms of office shall be four years, commencing on
the first day of January next succeeding their election. The terms of
council members who took office on July 1, 1977, shall expire on
December 31, 1981. Commencing January 1, 1992, no person shall be
eligible to serve consecutively in more than two full terms of office as a
member of the council. Any partial term of office longer than two years
shall be deemed a full term. Terms of office commenced before January
1, 1992, shall not be counted when determining eligibility under this
section. No Council Member shall serve more than three consecutive full
terms of office. Any partial term of office longer than two years shall be
deemed a full term.
In the alternative, the following amendment would eliminate term limits:
Page 4
Sec. 2. Number - Term.
Commencing July 1, 1971, said council shall be composed of nine
members, each of whom shall be an elector and shall have been a
resident of the city of Palo Alto for at least thirty days next preceding the
final filing date for nomination papers for such office. The members of
said council shall be known as councilmen, councilwomen, or council
members and their terms of office shall be four years, commencing on
the first day of January next succeeding their election. The terms of
council members who took office on July 1, 1977, shall expire on
December 31, 1981. Commencing January 1, 1992, no person shall be
eligible to serve consecutively in more than two full terms of office as a
member of the council. Any partial term of office longer than two years
shall be deemed a full term. Terms of office commenced before January
1, 1992, shall not be counted when determining eligibility under this
section.
If no language is included establishing an alternative implementation schedule, these
amendments, if adopted by the voters on November 4th, would be effective in December 2014.
This means they would apply to all sitting and future Council Members. If the Council directs,
language can be drafted to provide for a later implementation date.
Issue #2: Beginning and End of Terms; Scheduling of the Annual Reorganization Meeting
The City Charter provides that Council terms begin on January 1st and end on December 31st.
New Council Members may take the oath of office at any time on or after 12:01 a.m. on January
1. The oath cannot be administered effectively before January 1. Taking the oath of office is a
prerequisite to taking official action as a Council Members.
Council Members must be sworn in person, but not necessarily in a public ceremony; the oath
may be taken privately. Typically the Clerk administers the oath, though other officials may be
deputized to perform this duty.2
The City’s administrative offices are typically closed during the last week of December and on
January 1. The City’s current practice is to swear in new Council members, elect the Mayor and
Vice Mayor, and recognize outgoing Council Members for their service at the first Monday
business meeting in January. No other official business is conducted at that meeting.
The discussion at Council and Policy & Services centered around three goals: (1) eliminating or
reducing the number of days when fewer than 9 Council Members are sworn and immediately
ready to take official action, a problem that is primarily caused by the Charter language fixing
the transition date as January 1st, which is a holiday; (2) allowing the new Mayor to make
2 At the federal and state level, it is relatively common for newly elected officials to take the oath
privately at the earliest possible time, followed by a ceremonial public swearing in at a more convenient
time.
Page 5
assignments and appointments earlier in January; and (3) freeing up an additional Monday
meeting for policy matters.
Policy and Services made three recommendations, which are listed above. The first two
recommendations can be adopted together or separately. They require only an action of
Council giving policy direction.
The Committee’s third recommendation – to consider amending the Charter to address the
“gap” – could result in a system that provides for an earlier and more seamless transition
between outgoing and incoming Members in December and the elimination of the potential
“gap.” Such an amendment would also give Council the ability to elect the Mayor and Vice-
Mayor in December, allowing the Mayor to make early assignments and freeing up an
additional Monday in January for policy matters.
If Council wishes to pursue a Charter amendment, we recommend the Charter be amended to:
Provide that Council terms begin on the first regular meeting of the Council that occurs
after the canvass of the returns of the election and the declaration of results by the
agency or officer authorized to make the declaration.
In addition, provide that council members hold office until successors are elected and
qualified.
Provide for earlier selection of Mayor and Vice Mayor (current Charter Article III, Section
8 requires selection at first meeting in January).
Under state law, the County Registrar of Voters completes the canvass of returns within 28
days. The County transmits the results to the City Clerk, who issues the declaration of results.
This usually occurs in late November or early December. If the Charter were amended as
described above, the first regular Council meeting after the Clerk’s declaration would mark the
transition of terms. The Council would adopt the Resolution declaring the results, then the new
members would be sworn.3 If for some reason a regular meeting were not held in December,
terms of outgoing members would continue until a regular meeting is held, resulting in no
“gap.” This approach to council transition is the one used by general law cities and by a number
of neighboring charter cities.
Other charter cities use the first regular meeting in January or a fixed date (typically January 1st)
for the transition to occur. These approaches are alternatives that Council may wish to
consider.
Other Issues Related to Council Seats/ Governance Matters
3 Note that while the taking of the oath is a prerequisite to exercising official authority, it is not an element of
“election and qualification” for office. Under the proposed Charter amendment, the term of newly elected council
members would begin on the first regular meeting after the canvass of results and Clerk’s declaration.
Page 6
In addition to these items, various Council Members and/or members of the community from
time to time have raised additional questions about the organization and function of the Palo
Alto Council. These include:
1. Should the Council be reduced from nine members to seven.
2. Should Council service be considered “full time,” with or without adjustments to
compensation. Normally charter cities are not subject to State law limits on council
member compensation. Palo Alto’s Charter however provides that council member
compensation shall not exceed State law. Any compensation adjustments within the
State law cap can be adopted by ordinance. Adjustments in excess of the State law limit
would require a Charter amendment.
3. Should some or all Council Member seats be chosen by district as opposed to the City
at-large.
4. Should voters elect the Mayor directly, for a four-year term.
In addition, if the Council decides to place a Charter amendment on the ballot, the City Clerk
recommends eliminating the requirement that the order of candidates’ names be determined
by lot (Charter Art. VII, Sec. 3.) If this requirement is deleted, Palo Alto would follow the
random name order set for each election by the County Registrar of Voters.
Council Members may have additional items related to Council seats or the structure or the
Council, which may be raised at this time.
If Council wishes to pursue any of the ideas listed above, or other matters related to Council
seats, staff will return in early June with further analysis.
Timeline
August 8th is the last day to call a municipal election and place a matter on the November 4
ballot.
Resource Impact
Modest resources in the City Manager’s Office, Clerk’s Office and City Attorney’s Office will be
required to draft and implement the changes to term limits and beginning/end of council
terms.
The other items listed in this report require more complex analysis of resource implications.
Reduction of the number of seats and direct election of Mayor could result in increased
efficiencies and streamlining of workflow. If Council directs further work on any of these topics,
staff will return with a fuller exploration of the resource implications.
Policy Implications
The items in this report are policy matters for the Council to determine, subject in many cases
to voter approval.
Page 7
Environmental Review
Council governance matters are not projects subject to review under the California
Environmental Quality Act.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A - Colleagues Memo dated 2-4-13 (PDF)
Attachment B - Policy and Services Staff Report dated 3-19-13 (PDF)
Attachment C - Policy and Services Committee Meeting Minutes dated 3-19-13 (PDF)
Attachment D - Colleagues Memo dated 6-3-13 (PDF)
Department Head: Molly Stump, City Attorney
Page 8
City of Palo Alto
PALO COLLEAGUES MEMO
ALTO
DATE:February 4,2013
TO: City Council Members
FROM:Council Member Schmid,Council Member Klein
SUBJECT: COLLEAGUES MEMO FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS KLEIN AND SCHMID
REGARDING ANNUAL COUNCIL REORGANIZATION MEETING
Problem:Ourpresent practiceof holding our annual Reorganization meetingon the first
business MondayinJanuary creates legaland practicalproblems.
Proposed Solution:Council to direct staff to prepare the necessary Resolution or Ordinance to
set the first business dayofthe calendaryearasthe date forthe swearing inofnew Council
Members,the electionofthe Mayorand Vice Mayorand the recognition of departing Council
Members/Mayor/Vice Mayor,with noother business to betransactedat such meeting.
Discussion:Under our Charter terms of outgoing Council Members end at midnight on
December 31. New Council Members cannot act until they are sworn in.By delayingthe
swearing in untilas late as January 8 we run the riskof not havingsufficient Council Members
on hand to act ifan emergency should arise. Further, when the Mayor isa departing Council
Member, as was true in2012,he/she cannot serve in that position past December 31. Ifboth
the Mayor and ViceMayor were departing Council Members we would have no person in those
positions until the Reorganization meeting.
Our present schedule also creates an unnecessary delay in getting down to business inJanuary.
The newly elected Mayor cannot make appointments until she/he is in fact chosen.Thisdelays
such appointments until mid-month.Further,by using the first business Monday solely for
swearing in and reorganization we leave ourselves with only two Mondays (three when January
has five Mondays) in January for regular business meetings,since the Martin Luther King
holidayfallson the third Monday each year. Atthe very time when enthusiasm ishigh-
particularly in years when new people are joining the Council -we in effect are dawdling.Please
join us in supporting this simple change in our schedule.
February 04,2013 Page 1 of 1
(ID#3513)
c.tvof City of Palo Alto (id#3634)
PALOALTO Policy and Services Committee Staff Report
Report Type:Meeting Date:3/19/2013
Summary Title:Annual Reorganization Meeting
Title:Review and Consider Recommendations to the City Council on
Potential Changes to the Conduct of the Annual Reorganization Meeting
From:City Manager
Lead Department:City Manager
Recommendation
Draft motion:
The Policy and Services Committee recommends that the City Council direct staffto prepare the
necessary Resolution or Ordinance to amend the City's practice for conducting the City'sannual
reorganization meeting as follows:
Background
On February 4,2013,the CityCouncil considered a Colleagues Memo from Council Member
Klein and Council Member Schmid regarding the annual reorganization meeting. The Colleagues
Memo,included as Attachment A,identifies a number of potential legal and practical problems
associated with the City's current practice of holding the City'sannual reorganization meeting
on the first business Monday inJanuary. The Council discussed potential changes to the City's
current practice and ultimately referred the item to the Policy and Services Committee for
further consideration.
Discussion
The City's current practice is to swear in new Council Members,elect the Mayor and Vice
Mayor,and recognize outgoing Council Members at the first business meeting of each calendar
year.A reception follows at the close of the meeting.No additional business is considered at
the reorganization meeting.This memo identifies potential issues that the Committee may
want to consider and potential options for changes to the City's current practice that Council
Members and staff have raised.
Considerations:
CityofPaloAlto Page1
1. Under the City'sCharter,terms of outgoing Council Members end at midnight on
December 31. New Council Members may not be sworn into office until January 1. New
Council Members cannot act until they are sworn in.
2. The City typicallytakes a holiday break the last week of December and the first day of
the new year (January 1).
3.IfCouncil Members are not sworn inon January 1, the City may not have sufficient
Council Members to act in the case of an emergency.Inthis situation the Citywould
initiate its Emergency Standby Council.The City'sEmergency Standby Council is
composed of former Council Members that have indicated a willingnessto serve inan
emergency.
4. The City's current practice delays the conduct of business until the second Council
meeting in January.This isa time when enthusiasm and momentum is high.
5. The annual reorganization meeting provides a ceremonial opportunity to recognize the
City's incoming Council Members and acknowledge outgoing Council Members for their
service to the community.
Attachment Bprovides a calendar of the month ofJanuary over the next four years and
illustrates the first business day and first calendar day of each year.
Potential Options for Changes to Current Practice (options are not mutually exclusive)
1. Set the first business day of the calendar year as the date for the meeting to swear in
new Council Members, elect the Mayorand Vice Mayorand recognizedeparting Council
Members, with no other business to be transacted at such meeting.
2. Swear in new Council members the first business day of the year individually in the
Clerk's Office.
3. Keep the City's current practice of swearing in new Council members at the first
business meeting of each calendar year and conduct additional City business after the
reorganization.A reception may or may not follow the meeting.
4. Conduct the swearing in ceremony and reception at an event separate from the
Council's first business meeting of the year.
5. Keep the City's current practice.
Attachments:
•Attachment A.Colleagues Memo (PDF)
•Attachment B.Four Year Calendar (DOCX)
CityofPaloAlto Page2
City of Palo Alto
Palo Colleagues Memo
ALTO
DATE:February 4,2013
TO: City Council Members
FROM:Council Member Schmid,Council Member Klein
SUBJECT:COLLEAGUES MEMO FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS KLEIN AND SCHMID
REGARDING ANNUAL COUNCIL REORGANIZATION MEETING
Problem:Our present practice of holding our annual Reorganization meeting on the first
business Monday inJanuary creates legaland practical problems.
Proposed Solution:Council to direct staffto prepare the necessary Resolution or Ordinance to
set the first business day of the calendar year as the date for the swearing inof new Council
Members,the election of the Mayor and Vice Mayor and the recognition of departing Council
Members/Mayor/Vice Mayor, with no other business to be transacted at such meeting.
Discussion:Under our Charter terms of outgoing Council Members end at midnight on
December 31. New Council Members cannot act until they are sworn in. By delaying the
swearing in until as late as January 8 we run the risk of not having sufficient Council Members
on hand to act ifan emergency should arise.Further,when the Mayor isa departing Council
Member,as was true in 2012,he/she cannot serve in that position past December 31. Ifboth
the Mayor and Vice Mayor were departing Council Members we would have no person in those
positions until the Reorganization meeting.
Our present schedule also creates an unnecessary delay in getting down to business in January.
The newly elected Mayor cannot make appointments until she/he isinfact chosen. Thisdelays
such appointments until mid-month.Further, byusing the first business Monday solely for
swearing in and reorganization we leave ourselves with onlytwo Mondays (three when January
has five Mondays)in January for regular business meetings,since the Martin Luther King
holiday falls on the third Monday each year.At the very time when enthusiasm is high-
particularly in years when new people are joining the Council -we in effect are dawdling.Please
join us in supporting this simple change in our schedule.
February 04,2013 Page 1 of 1
(ID #3513)
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
B.
Fo
u
r
Ye
a
r
Ca
l
e
n
d
a
r
-
Mo
n
t
h
on
Ja
n
u
a
r
y
JA
N
U
A
R
Y
2
0
1
6
s
M
T
W
T
F
•
i
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
0
11
12
13
1
4
1
5
16
1
7
18
19
2
0
21
2
2
2
3
24
25
26
2
7
2
8
2
9
3
0
31
J
Fir
s
t
Ca
l
e
n
d
a
r
Day
of
th
e
Mo
n
t
h
/
H
o
l
i
d
a
y
•
J
A
N
U
A
R
Y
2
0
1
5
fl
s
M
T
W
T
F
S
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
1
2
1
3
14
15
16
1
7
18
1
9
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2
8
29
30
31
JA
N
U
A
R
Y
2
0
1
7
s
M
T
W
T
F
S
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
1
2
13
14
15
1
6
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2
4
25
26
2
7
2
8
29
30
31
Fi
r
s
t
Bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
Da
y
o
f
th
e
Mo
n
t
h
Itxo CITY OF PALO ALTO CITY COUNCIL
EXCERPT MINUTES
Special Meeting
February 4,2013
Colleagues Memo From Council Members Klein and Schmld Regarding Annual
Council Reorganization Meeting.
Council Member Klein reported twice in the last 10-12 years,the City came
close to having an emergency in early January.The flood in 1998 occurred
on December 28,and the third heaviest rain storm In the history of San
Francisquito Creek occurred on December 24 or 25,2012.If there was a
need for an emergency Council meeting on January 1 or 2,in many years
the Council would not have a quorum.Council Members who were reelected
needed to take a new oath before they could act in the new term.If Council
Members did not take their oath until January 6,7 or 8,they were not
authorized to act.
Molly Stump,City Attorney agreed.All Council Members who were elected
to a new term needed to take the oath before they took any official action.
Council Member Klein explained in the years five Council Members were
elected,the City could conceivably not have a quorum.The easiest solution
that did not require a Charter Amendment was to set the swearing in and
reorganization date on the first business day of the year or January 2.The
City Charter was out of sync,but a Charter Amendment required a vote of
the people.Term ending dates could be earlier,but that would also require
a Charter Amendment and vote of the people.The City Attorney correctly
instructed former Mayor Yeh that he could not perform any actions as Mayor
after December 31,2012,because he was no longer In office.Having the
swearing in ceremony on the first Monday in January could result in a
serious problem.
MOTION:Council Member Klein moved,seconded by Council Member
Schmid to request Staff prepare the necessary Resolution or Ordinance to
set the first business day of the calendar year as the date for the swearing in
of new Council Members,the election of the Mayor and Vice Mayor and the
recognition of departing Council Members/Mayor/Vice Mayor, with no other
business to be transacted at such meeting.
Page1 of 5
EXCERPT MINUTES
Council Member Schmtd noted four Council meetings in January and
February were not business meetings.It made sense to have the
organizational meeting on the first business day,and hopefully the first
Monday would add a meeting to keep the Agenda moving.
Council Member Kniss did not believe this had been a problem for many
years.There was a historical precedent for holding the organizational
meeting on the first Monday in January.The City liked the pomp and
ceremony.She inquired whether anyone could be sworn in as early as
January 1.
Ms.Stump answered yes.The only people who needed to be sworn were
folks who were elected to a new term.They were eligible to be sworn from
the first moment of January 1 under the Charter.
Council Member Kniss recalled that If the Council wished,it could extend the
time period for the Mayor's service until January 7.She asked Council
Member Klein If his term was extended in 1984 or 1985 because of
extenuating circumstances.
Council Member Klein stated the terms of Mayor and Vice Mayor were
defined differently.Council Members left office at midnight on December 31.
Mayors and Vice Mayors,if they were still Council Members,continued in
office until their successors were elected.Former Mayor Yeh could not
continue in office beyond December 31,because he was no longer on the
Council.The extension of his Mayoral term for three or four weeks in 1985
was not extenuating circumstances;it was a nice honor by his colleagues.
Council Member Kniss reiterated that the Mayor's term could be extended.
Council Member Klein clarified that only a Mayor serving a new term or
continuing on the Council could have his term extended.Former Mayor
Yeh's term could not have been extended.
Council Member Kniss concurred.That situation was not an issue,because
Vice Mayor Scharff was on the Council.She inquired whether an emergency
Council could be utilized at any time.
Ms.Stump replied yes.Those individuals were available as provided by
Ordinance in an emergency where the regular Council was not available.
Council Member Kniss felt Staff could handle an emergency.A meeting on
January 2 could interfere with holiday vacations.She did not understand
why the Council was trying to fix this;it was not broken.The public enjoyed
Page2 of5
CityCouncil Meeting
Excerpt Minutes:2/4/13
EXCERPT MINUTES
attending the ceremony.She would support sending the Item to the Policy
and Services Committee if there was strong sentiment for that.
Vice Mayor Shepherd was aware that Mayor Yeh could not perform any
Council work after midnight on December 31.She asked if the candidate's
oath was the same as the Council Member's oath.
Donna Grider,City Clerk responded yes.The oath was administered to a
candidate and then to a Council Member.
Vice Mayor Shepherd inquired whether the oath was merely ceremonial.
Ms.Stump explained the California Constitution provided that,before
exercising official duties,local officials must take the oath of that office.
Taking the oath as a candidate was not the same.Council Members needed
to take the oath before exercising the duties of the office they were
assuming under the City Charter on January 1.
Vice Mayor Shepherd inquired whether the oath had to be administered to all
Council Members at the same time.
Ms.Stump indicated swearing in could be performed in private.
AMENDMENT:Vice Mayor Shepherd moved,seconded by Mayor Scharff
instead of having a Council Meeting the new Council Members are sworn In
on the first business day of the year.
Vice Mayor Shepherd believed the concern was having an official nine-
member Council as soon as the year began.
Mayor Scharff felt the pomp and ceremony on the first Monday was a
community transition of power.It would be a shame to lose that tradition
and many of the community.The practical issue was not having all Council
Members sworn In,and the Amendment would take care of that issue.If an
emergency occurred,the City would have sworn Council Members and a full
contingent of Council Members.This was a situation of more perceived risk
than actual risk.
Council Member Berman supported the Amendment and original concern.
The Amendment did not address voting for Mayor and Vice Mayor and the
number of working meetings in January.He did not want to lose the
community meeting of the reorganization.The Amendment was a good
compromise on the issue.He did not believe the Council could require
Council Members to be sworn on January 2.
Page3 of5
City Council Meeting
Excerpt Minutes:2/4/13
EXCERPT MINUTES
Council Member Holman indicated the Motion had a conflict in that the first
business day was not always January 2. The Motion also mentioned election
of Mayor and Vice Mayor.The Mayor did not have more authority to take
action than the Council majority did. A standby Council was available for
service.There were a number of questions and issues that required more
vetting.
SUBSTITUTE MOTION:Council Member Holman moved,seconded by
Council Member Klein to refer this Item to the Policy and Services
Committee.
Council Member Klein stated the Motion used the first business day.He
would support the Substitute Motion.The Amendment may be out of order,
because it moved the status quo which was not allowed.The Amendment
was not a compromise,because it was already possible.He was concerned
about any use of the Emergency Standby Council.There could be situations
where both the Mayor and Vice Mayor were leaving office. The Council
needed to protect themselves from that.The people's business was more
important than a nice party.
Council Member Burt recalled as recently as January 1,2010,both the
Mayor and Vice Mayor were termed out, leaving no Council leadership.
There was real confusion as to whether the outgoing Mayor was In charge
when there was almost a flood at Chaucer Bridge on January 1,2006.He
inquired whether the State Constitution and the Charter prohibited newly
elected and reelected Council Members from taking the oath before January
1.
Ms.Stump explained the Charter did not prohibit any oath taking wish to
engage In,but the oath was ineffective to make one eligible to take
authority as a Council Member until one was in the office,which was the first
moment of January 1.
Council Member Burt stated Mr.Borock asserted that Council Members had
taken office prior to January 1 in the past.
Ms.Stump indicated,with due respect to Mr.Borock,the office began at the
first moment of January 1.
Council Member Burt did not believe it was the intention of the community to
rely on an Emergency Standby Council.He encouraged the Policy and
Services Committee to consider adding a circumstance where if the Mayor
Page4 of 5
CityCouncil Meeting
Excerpt Minutes:2/4/13
EXCERPT MINUTES
and Vice Mayor were termed out and only on that occasion,then the first
meeting would be moved to the first business day of the year.
Council Member Price supported the Substitute Motion,and agreed with
comments made in support of the Substitute Motion.
Council Member Kniss suggested the Council determine why it had an
Emergency Standby Council;consider electing a Vice Mayor that would be in
office longer than January 1 of the next year;and,consider actions of other
cities in similar situations.
Council Member Schmid urged the Policy and Services Committee to address
the issue of only four business meetings in January and February.
SUBSTITUTE MOTION PASSED:9-0
Page5 of 5
CityCouncil Meeting
Excerpt Minutes:2/4/13
Slto policy and services committee
MINUTES
Regular Meeting
Tuesday,March 19,2013
Chairperson Kniss called the meeting to order at 7:03 P.M. in the Council
Conference Room,250 Hamilton Avenue,Palo Alto,California.
Present:Holman,Klein,Kniss (Chair),Price
Absent:
AGENDA ITEMS
1.Consideration of a Recommendation to Council to Adopt an Ordinance
Prohibiting Smoking in Three Public Parks.
Chair Kniss wished to include Johnson Park,a small park used by many
children.
Council Member Holman suggested including Scott Park.
Chair Kniss inquired about the size of Johnson Park.
Greg Betts,Director of Community Services reported Johnson Park was
about 2.2 acres.
Council Member Klein noted Johnson Park was named after the first female
obstetrics/gynecology doctor in the Palo Alto area.
Chair Kniss stated two parks were added to the original three parks
proposed for a smoking ban.
Council Member Price suggested including Juana Briones Park,and asked if
the proposal would return to the Parks and Recreation Commission (PARC)
for discussion.
Chair Kniss felt limiting the number of parks to six would not require PARC
involvement.
Policy&Services Meeting
March 19,2013
Page 1 of17
MINUTES
Council Member Price proposed Juana Briones Park,because it was used by
all ages.
Chair Kniss believed few people opposed a smoking ban in parks.
Council Member Klein indicated the Policy and Services Committee
(Committee)was establishing a rule for parks.
Chair Kniss noted the City had 36 parks.
Council Member Klein recommended the Committee list all the parks that a
smoking ban did not apply to so that parks similar to the named parks were
not omitted.He inquired about the number of parks containing less than 10
acres.
Council Member Holman reported all parks in College Terrace contained less
than 10 acres.
Council Member Klein asked why the Committee wanted to distinguish
among similar parks.
Chair Kniss felt including that many parks required a discussion with the
PARC.She was willing to double the number of parks included in a smoking
ban.
Council Member Klein suggested including all parks containing less than five
acres.
Chair Kniss inquired about the number of parks within the City that
contained less than five acres.She felt additional Staff work was needed to
phrase a recommendation in that manner.She inquired about the size of
Scott Park.
Council Member Holman felt it was probably 1/3 acre.
Council Member Price requested the number of parks containing five acres or
less.
Mr.Betts named off parks and preserves in Palo Alto: Mitchell Park,
Rinconada Park,Seale Park,Baylands Athletic Center,Esther Clark Nature
Preserve,Arastradero Preserve,Baylands Nature Preserve,and Foothills
Park.
James Keene,City Manager wondered why smoking was allowed in Foothills
Page 2 of 17
Policyand Services Committee Regular Meeting
Minutes 3/19/2013
MINUTES
Park when the City staffed a fire station in that area during fire season.
Council Member Price agreed with Council Member Klein's suggestion to
broaden the scope of a recommendation.
Chair Kniss wanted more information before moving in that direction,but
estimated between 20 and 25 of the 36 parks contained less than five acres.
Council Member Holman noted the Agenda Item was noticed for only three
parks,and expressed concern that the public objected because it was not
given an opportunity to provide input.
Mr.Keene indicated the Committee had two concerns:1)broadening the
scope of the recommendation from three parks to many parks and 2) a
policy interpretation.
Molly Stump,City Attorney reported the Committee could make a
recommendation.There was a full hearing at the Council on the first
reading,and then a second reading was required but said the Committee
could direct Staff to broaden the Ordinance.
Chair Kniss noted another question was whether the Committee should
include all parks under a certain size.She noted Council Member Holman's
concern regarding public reaction,and inquired about the size of Juana
Briones Park.
Mr.Betts reported Juana Briones Park contained 4.1 acres.
Chair Kniss believed Juana Briones Park was the largest of the parks noted
for inclusion.
Ms.Stump stated the Committee could ban smoking in all parks or could
name selected parks.She suggested that Staff could draft reasonable and
supportable findings to ban smoking in all parks below five acres.
Chair Kniss felt incremental increases worked better politically.
Council Member Holman agreed with banning smoking in all parks;however,
banning smoking in Foothills and Arastradero Parks was logical because of
the fire hazard.She questioned the ability of the Planning and
Transportation Commission (P&TC)to expand an Agenda Item without
providing additional notice.
Ms.Stump explained P&TC was distinct from all other Commissions.The
Page 3 of 17
Policyand Services Committee Regular Meeting
Minutes 3/19/2013
MINUTES
Council was able to determine how to use its Commissions.Not all policy
matters were reviewed by Commissions.She said a policy item could be
handled by the Council,or by a Committee and then the Council.Under the
Brown Act,a full hearing was required with proper notice.
Council Member Holman inquired whether the P&TC was able to expand the
scope of an Agenda Item to be as broad as the Committee was asking.
Ms.Stump stated much of P&TC's work was quasi-adjudicative,which was
different.P&TC's work was governed by provisions of the Municipal Code,
and that did not apply to this discussion.
Mr.Keene stated Council policy allowed Council Members to place a
recommendation on the Council Agenda through a Colleagues Memo.A
Committee recommendation was not very different from a Colleagues Memo
regarding process and notice requirements.
Ms.Stump believed a smoking ban was in effect for Foothills Park.
Mr.Betts reported a smoking ban was placed on trails in Foothills Park,but
not on the meadow or in the picnic areas.
Chair Kniss suggested expanding the smoking ban for Foothills Park.She
viewed a smoking ban as a public health issue,and the Council was a
guardian of community health.
Mr.Betts reported Sarah Wallis Park contained 0.3 acres;Cogswell Plaza 0.5
acres;Lytton Plaza 0.5 acres;El Camino Park 12.2 acres;Eleanor Pardee
Park 9.6 acres;El Palo Alto Park 0.5 acres;Mayfield Park 1.1 acres;Mitchell
Park 21.4 acres;Monroe Park 0.55 acres;Rinconada Park 19 acres;
Cameron Park 1.1 acres;Boulware Park 1.5 acres;Bowden Park 2 acres;
Bowling Green Park 2 acres;Juana Briones Park 4.1 acres;Peers Park 4.7
acres;Ramos Park 4.4 acres;Bol Park 13.8 acres;Greer Park 22 acres;
Heritage Park 2.01 acres;Hoover Park 4.2 acres;Hopkins Creekside Park
12.4 acres;Edith Johnson Park 2.5 acres;Foothills Park 1,400 acres;Esther
Clark Preserve 22 acres;Pearson Arastradero Park 622 acres.
Chair Kniss estimated between 10 and 14 parks contained less than five
acres.
MOTION:Council Member Klein moved,seconded by Council Member Price
to recommend the City Council:1)adopt an Ordinance amending Section
9.14 to establish new smoking restrictions in all parks that are 5 acres or
less in size;2)increase no-smoking buffer zones from 20 to 25 feet for
Page 4 of 17
Policyand Services Committee Regular Meeting
Minutes 3/19/2013
MINUTES
consistency with Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED)
standards;and 3)direct the Parks and Recreation Commission to consider
and make recommendations regarding expanding a no-smoking regulation
to possibly include other City parks and open space areas within two to
three months.
Mr.Betts indicated 17 parks contained less than five acres of a total of 34
urban parks and four open space preserves.
Chair Kniss stated almost half the number of parks contained less than five
acres,but only a small percentage of total acreage.
Russ Cohen,Executive Director of Palo Alto Downtown Business and
Professional Association supported a smoking prohibition in the three parks
originally proposed for inclusion.
Herb Borock reported Hoover Park contained approximately 6.4 acres after
acquiring land from Hoover School.He noted that under the Brown Act,the
Committee could only act on the three parks noticed.The PARC had to
make policy recommendations for parks.He suggested the Committee refer
the item to the PARC.
Chair Kniss was comfortable with the City Attorney's statement that the
Committee could recommend more than three parks.
Mr.Betts revised his previous count to a total of 22 parks containing less
than five acres.
Council Member Holman requested Staff respond to Mr.Borock's comment
that Hoover Park was larger than reported.
Mr.Betts reported records indicated Hoover Park contained 4.2 acres.
Mr.Keene indicated the acreage of Hoover Park would be clarified prior to
the Ordinance being written.
Ms.Stump noted the Ordinance would enumerate the parks being affected
by the smoking ban.
MOTION PASSED:4-0
Page S of 17
Policyand Services Committee RegularMeeting
Minutes 3/19/2013
MINUTES
2.Discussion and Recommendation on the Process to be Used to
Establish Guiding Principles/Core Values.
James Keene,City Manager recalled that the full Council referred this item to
the Policy and Services Committee (Committee)at the end of the Retreat.A
second Retreat was scheduled to discuss Guiding Principles and Core Values.
Council directed the Committee to propose a process for the Retreat,and
directed Council Members to submit three Core Values to the Mayor.Staff
received Council Members'proposed Core Values,and forwarded them to
the Mayor.Staff proposed the Committee Chair and the Mayor work with
Staff to organize the proposed Core Values to present to the Council at the
next Retreat.Staff welcomed Committee recommendations regarding a
process for use at the Retreat.
Chair Kniss noted the Mayor would be involved in the process.She inquired
when a Retreat could be held.
Mr.Keene indicated Council Members requested a Retreat be scheduled for a
weekday,which required facilitating scheduling for a Retreat in May.
Chair Kniss believed Guiding Principles and Core Values concerned long-term
goals and were easily understood by the public.
Council Member Klein expressed concerns about defining a Core Value,the
number of Core Values,and having topics that distinguished Palo Alto from
other communities.Having too many Core Values was the same as having
none,but he thought there should be more Core Values than Priorities.He
preferred avoiding feel-good phrases.He requested Council Members
reconsider Youth Well Being,which was a Priority which omitted other
aspects of the population.
Chair Kniss believed Healthy Communities Healthy Cities would include
Youth Well Being.
Council Member Klein noted mental health issues affected the entire
population,not just youth.
Council Member Holman recalled a comment at the Retreat that Healthy
Communities Healthy Cities was a Core Value rather than a Priority.She
was unclear about the purpose of the exercise,and was unsure about the
number of Core Values that was needed.Many Core Values were included in
the Comprehensive Plan.She questioned whether the list of Core Values
should be the same as or different from Core Values contained within the
Comprehensive Plan.
Page6 of17
Policyand Services Committee Regular Meeting
Minutes 3/19/2013
MINUTES
Mr.Keene noted a material difference among Guiding Principles,Core
Values,and other terms.Values were internally direct.They were
agreements or commitments among a group of people regarding the conduct
of the group.He mentioned that the Council could use Core values to
communicate the foundations of the City to the wider world.
Chair Kniss explained the Council needed a docking place for topics not
considered Priorities.Priorities were different from Guiding Principles or
Core Values.
Council Member Price agreed with comments regarding group conduct.She
inquired whether the Council reviewed Core Values yearly.
Mr.Keene believed Core Values would be ongoing,given the fact that a new
set of Council members could revisit any of these topics.
Council Member Price suggested the Sub-Committee review Vision
Statements in each chapter of the Comprehensive Plan in order to refine
values.Having a Mission Statement provided a framework for values and
related to the Comprehensive Plan.At the Retreat,a time limit for Council
discussion prevented lengthy self-examination.
Chair Kniss agreed with the suggestion to review Vision Statements in the
Comprehensive Plan,but was uneasy with Mission Statements because they
required a great deal of time to draft.The Sub-Committee organized
information in order to hold a Retreat.She inquired whether the Committee
would agree to the Sub-Committee being comprised of the Mayor,
Committee Chair,and City Manager.
Council Member Klein favored that general policy,and asked if the Mayor
was interested in being part of the Sub-Committee.
Chair Kniss stated he was.
Council Member Klein viewed the process as a series of questions.The
Committee needed to draft a series of questions for Council consideration
and some proposed language.
Chair Kniss agreed,and suggested limiting the number of Core Values to
four to six.She inquired whether Council Member Klein meant for the item
to return to the Committee prior to holding a Retreat.
Page7 of 17
Policyand Services Committee Regular Meeting
Minutes 3/19/2013
MINUTES
Council Member Klein did not believe further Committee discussion was
necessary.
Council Member Holman had difficulty with setting a finite number of Core
Values because a Mission Statement was helpful in reaching fewer Core
Values. The Committee had to know what it was doing in order to establish
a process.
Chair Kniss believed the discussion indicated Priorities were not Core Values
or Guiding Principles;Core Values and Guiding Principles were considered by
some interchangeable.She thought it might be good to include a Mission
Statement.
Council Member Price suggested the number of Core Values be a guideline.
She agreed with Council Member's Klein suggestion of drafting options for
Mission Statements and providing a simplified list of Core Values.Vision
Statements in the Comprehensive Plan provided some perfect phrases for
Core Values or Mission Statements.
Chair Kniss felt the Committee had to limit the number of Priorities/Core
Values.
MOTION:Council Member Klein moved,seconded by Chair Kniss to
recommend the City Council:1)appoint the Mayor,Committee Chair,and
City Manager as a Sub-Committee to organize Guiding Principles/Core
Values submitted by Council Members;2)prepare drafts of Core
Values/Mission Statement/Guiding Principles;3)provide recommendations
as to which term to use;and,4)prepare clearly focused questions for
Council discussion.
Chair Kniss inquired whether the Motion stated a specific number of Core
Values.
Council Member Klein answered no because he thought the Sub-Committee
should recommend a number.
Chair Kniss suggested that number be five to seven.
Council Member Price suggested the Sub-Committee review examples from
other cities and Vision Statements in the Comprehensive Plan as part of the
process.
Page8 of 17
Policyand Services Committee RegularMeeting
Minutes 3/19/2013
MINUTES
Council Member Holman was not comfortable with a specific number,and
suggested checking the City Charter because it might contain a Mission
Statement.
Chair Kniss reported the Mission Statement was no longer relevant.
Council Member Holman opposed a specific number of Core Values.
Chair Kniss explained the number was a guide or way to prevent having far
too many Core Values
Council Member Klein agreed with not having a specific number in the
Motion.
MOTION PASSED:4-0
Council Member Holman noted not all Council Members submitted proposed
Core Values and asked if there was a time limit.
Chair Kniss requested Staff send a final request for submissions.
3.Review and Consider Recommendations to the City Council on
Potential Changes to the Conduct of the Annual Reorganization
Meeting.
Council Member Klein reported a Council Member's term of office expired at
midnight on December 31,and a new Council Member was sworn-in on the
first Monday of the new year.Therefore,on January 1 it was possible to
have a Council with only four,five,or six Council Members.Use of an
emergency Council was not feasible.He suggested Council Members be
sworn-in on January 1 or 2.
Chair Kniss inquired whether it was necessary for a Council Member to be
sworn-in in person.
Molly Stump,City Attorney reported Council Members had to be sworn-in in
person,but not in public.She mentioned that the ceremony could be held in
private,and other people could be deputized to swear-in the Council
Member's.
Council Member Klein noted a problem arose when emergencies occurred in
late December or early January,and the Council did not have a quorum to
conduct business.Typically,the Mayor continued in office until his successor
was elected;however,the Mayor's term ended on December 31 and was no
Page9 of 17
Policyand Services Committee RegularMeeting
Minutes 3/19/2013
MINUTES
longer qualified to serve as a Council Member. If the Vice Mayor along with
the Mayor were not qualified to serve as Council Members,then the Council
was without both leaders beginning on January 1.These problems arose
only in odd years,because Council elections were held in even years.
MOTION:Council Member Klein moved,seconded by XXXX to recommend
the City Council hold the swearing-in ceremony and election of Mayor and
Vice Mayor on the first business day of the year in odd years.
MOTION FAILED DUE TO LACK OF A SECOND
Chair Kniss indicated the first business day was January 2 and said there
were a number of other issues that were not addressed.
Council Member Klein felt swearing in Council Members was the primary
goal.
Chair Kniss inquired whether Council Member Klein wished to hold the
reorganizational meeting in the evening of January 2.
Council Member Klein suggested it be held in the evening or afternoon.
Chair Kniss noted the Council's Winter Break typically extended through that
Friday.Holding the reorganizational meeting at that time required Council
Members to return early from vacation.
Council Member Klein indicated the reorganizational meeting was held on the
first business day of the year only in odd-numbered years.
Chair Kniss suggested the City Manager and emergency personnel handle
emergencies if the Council did not have a quorum.If the Council had a
quorum but no Mayor or Vice Mayor in place,then the longest-serving
Council Member would act as Mayor.
Council Member Klein felt it was possible for Council Members to return from
vacation every other year to tend to City business.
Council Member Holman noted Staff often scheduled vacation time over the
holidays,and was unavailable.School schedules were also a consideration
in determining the Winter Break.She asked if the reorganizational meeting
would be held on the first business day of the year or on January 1.
Council Member Klein stated the first business day.
Page 10 of17
Policy and ServicesCommittee Regular Meeting
Minutes 3/19/2013
MINUTES
Council Member Holman inquired whether the swearing-in of Council
Members occurred on January 1.
Council Member Klein suggested the Council strongly encourage new Council
Members to be sworn-in on January 1.
Council Member Holman asked if the Council could require Council Members
be sworn-in on January 1.
Chair Kniss suggested changing the City Charter regarding end of term
provisions because other cities held swearing in ceremonies and
reorganizational meetings as soon as election results were certified.
Council Member Holman asked when election results were certified.
Ms.Stump reported that depended on how quickly the County Registrar
worked;however,it was usually the first week in December.
Chair Kniss stated results could not be certified any sooner than 28 days
after the election.
Council Member Holman inquired about the process for changing the
reorganizational meeting to a date in December.
Ms.Stump explained a Charter Amendment had to be proposed by the
Council,placed on the ballot,and approved by a vote of the electorate.The
City's Charter was unusual in that it stated a conclusion date of Council
terms.
Council Member Holman preferred to avoid the cost of an election,and
asked if there was a way to amend the Charter without an election.
Ms.Stump Charter responded no.Amending the Charter required a vote of
the people.
Council Member Price supported encouraging Council Members to be sworn-
in on January 1,and inquired whether it was simpler to state the first
business day or January 1.
Ms.Stump reported the Council could direct the City Manager to ensure that
the appropriate Staff was available to swear-in Council Members at the first
moment a Council Member was eligible to be sworn-in,or January 1.Taking
the oath of office was a voluntary action,and the Council was not able to
require Council Members to be sworn-in on January 1.She suggested that
Page11 of17
Policyand Services Committee Regular Meeting
Minutes 3/19/2013
MINUTES
the Council schedule a meeting on January 1,assuming a quorum was
present.
Council Member Price proposed that newly elected Council Members be
encouraged to take the oath on January 1.
Chair Kniss questioned whether a Council Member had to be in the State to
take the oath of office.
Ms.Stump said she would review the location issue,because she was unsure
whether a Council Member was required to be in the jurisdiction or in the
State to take the oath of office.
Chair Kniss separated the issues of Council Member's swearing-in from a
date for the reorganizational meeting.She inquired whether Council
Member Klein proposed holding a reorganizational meeting on the first
business day in January in every other year.
Council Member Klein responded yes.The ceremonial aspect and
celebration continued to be held on the first Monday of the year.Voting for
Mayor and Vice Mayor was held on the first business day of the year.
Chair Kniss noted holding the reorganizational meeting on January 2,2015
required changing the Council Winter Break.
Council Member Klein indicated the Winter Break start date could be
adjusted.
Chair Kniss was not in support of that point.
Council Member Price inquired whether Council Member Klein would consider
setting January 3 for the election of Mayor and Vice Mayor,the second
business day.
Council Member Klein indicated the second business day in 2015 was
Monday.In 2017,the first business day was Tuesday,January 3.
Chair Kniss suggested holding the reorganizational meeting on the first
business day after the end of Council's Winter Break.
Council Member Price asked if the second business day of the year was
agreeable.
Page12 of 17
Policy and Services Committee Regular Meeting
Minutes 3/19/2013
MINUTES
Council Member Klein stated the second business day left a gap of five days
in 2017.
Chair Kniss suggested holding the reorganizational meeting on January 5,
2015 and January 3,2017,and wanted to include language that encouraged
Council Members to be sworn-in on January 1.
Council Member Klein agreed with encouraging Council Members to be
sworn-in on January 1,and added the Council needed to direct the City
Manager to ensure that Staff was available to assist in the swearing-in
process.
Chair Kniss inquired whether Council Member Klein agreed to the two dates
for the reorganizational meeting.
Council Member Klein answered no.
Council Member Holman asked why the reorganizational meeting could not
be held on January 2,2017.
Council Member Klein explained that was a holiday.
Chair Kniss noted Staff would not be working on a holiday.
Council Member Price recalled the City Manager could require an individual
be present to conduct the swearing-in.
Chair Kniss wished to choose two dates for the reorganizational meeting in
2015 and 2017.
Council Member Klein chose January 2 in 2015 and 2017.
Chair Kniss asked if he wished to keep those dates even though they were
holidays.
Council Member Klein replied yes.
Council Member Price inquired whether Council Member Klein proposed
separating the selection of Mayor and Vice Mayor from the celebration.
Council Member Klein answered yes.
Council Member Price supported scheduling the first Monday for the
celebration with the Mayor and Vice Mayor already in place.
Page 13 of 17
Policyand Services Committee RegularMeeting
Minutes 3/19/2013
MINUTES
Council Member Klein suggested amending the Charter to avoid the awkward
process.
Ms.Stump reported Staff would follow Council direction.
Chair Kniss suggested adding a Charter Amendment to the ballot in 2014.
Council Member Holman was concerned about the cost of an election,but
felt a Charter Amendment was cleaner.A gap existed between Council
Members being sworn-in on January 1 and a reorganizational meeting being
held on the first business day.
Council Member Klein proposed amending the Charter to hold the
reorganizational meetings in December or to have Council Members serve
until successors were sworn-in.
Council Member Price agreed that was better.
Chair Kniss also agreed,and inquired whether an emergency Council
meeting was needed in the past on a holiday.
Council Member Klein indicated that there were three different occasions
that came close to requiring emergency Council meetings.
Ms.Stump clarified that January 2 was the first business day of 2015 and
2017.
Chair Kniss reiterated that new Council Members would be sworn-in on
January 1 if possible,and a meeting to elect the Mayor and Vice Mayor were
held on the first business day in 2015 and 2017.
Council Member Price clarified that they were talking about odd numbered
years.
Chair Kniss agreed with swearing-in Council Members on January 1.
Council Member Holman inquired whether that worked with moving the
organizational meeting to December.
Council Member Klein suggested the Committee ask the City Clerk about the
cost of an election to amend the City Charter.
Page 14 of 17
Policy and Services Committee Regular Meeting
Minutes 3/19/2013
MINUTES
Chair Kniss believed the January 2 dates for organizational meetings were a
compromise until the Committee discussed it fully at another meeting.
Council Member Holman suggested a series of Motions that began with
moving the swearing-in date to January 1 for all newly elected Council
Members.
Council Member Kniss recalled that Council Members were not required to be
sworn-in on January 1.
Council Member Klein noted incumbent Council Members reelected to office
were not official Council Members from January 1 until sworn-in.
Chair Kniss inquired whether reelected Council Members were not officially
Council Members from January 1 until they were sworn-in.
Ms.Stump explained a Council Member who served four years was out of
office at midnight on December 31, and were not eligible to act as a Council
Member.
MOTION:Council Member Klein moved,seconded by Council Member
Holman to recommend to the Council that it do all things reasonable and
necessary to have newly elected Council Members sworn-in on January 1;
and the City Clerk make that a part of the package given to all candidates.
MOTION PASSED:4-0
MOTION:Council Member Klein moved,seconded by Council Member
Holman to recommend to the Council that the reorganizational meeting for
election of Mayor and Vice Mayor in odd-numbered years take place on the
first business day in January.
MOTION PASSED:3-1 Kniss no
MOTION:Council Member Klein moved,seconded by Council Member Price
to recommend to the Council to consider,depending on information from the
City Clerk regarding cost,the possibility of a Charter Amendment to
eliminate this problem.
MOTION PASSED:4-0
Chair Kniss suggested the Committee obtain parameters for amending the
Charter in two to three months.
Page 15 of17
Policy and Services Committee Regular Meeting
Minutes 3/19/2013
MINUTES
Council Member Holman noted the Council would meet the first business day
of January for its reorganizational meeting,and that they retain the first
regular Monday meeting for celebration.
Chair Kniss indicated the Mayor and Vice Mayor would not be elected at the
first regular Monday Council meeting.
Council Member Klein explained in odd years,the reorganizational meeting
occurred on the first business day,and the ceremonial event occurred the
following Monday.
Council Member Price appreciated the modification to explore the possibility
of moving the reorganizational meeting to December.
Chair Kniss referred the issue of a Charter Amendment to the City Clerk and
noted an ending date for the Winter Break was not set.
Ms.Stump stated the Winter Break was scheduled to begin on December 20,
2013.
Chair Kniss indicated the Winter Break could end on January 3,2014;in
2015,it had to end a day earlier.
FUTURE MEETINGS AND AGENDAS
Sheila Tucker,Assistant to the City Manager noted Staff would return to the
May 2013 meeting with vehicle habitation and an update on the emerging
technologies pilot program for the April 2013 meeting.
Council Member Price suggested Val Fong and Thomas Fehrenbach be
present for the emerging technologies update.
Ms.Tucker anticipated the emerging technologies pilot as an informational
item.
Chair Kniss hoped the City Clerk could provide a report regarding amending
the Charter at the April or May meeting.
Council Member Holman inquired whether the recommendation for a Charter
Amendment would be presented to the Council.
Chair Kniss answered no and said it would return to the Committee.
Page 16 of17
Policy and Services Committee Regular Meeting
Minutes 3/19/2013
MINUTES
Molly Stump,City Attorney anticipated a Staff Report would consider election
date options for a Charter Amendment,cost estimates for an election,and a
survey of surrounding jurisdictions with options for framing the Amendment.
Council Member Holman inquired whether recommendations other than the
Charter Amendment would be presented to the Council with a note that the
Policy and Service Committee was considering a Charter Amendment.
Chair Kniss responded yes.
ADJOURNMENT:Meeting adjourned at 9:00 P.M.
Page 17 of 17
Policyand Services Committee RegularMeeting
Minutes 3/19/2013
City of Palo Alto
palo Colleagues Memo
ALTO
DATE:June 3,2013
TO: City Council Members
FROM:Council Member Price, Council Member Kniss,Vice Mayor
Shepherd
SUBJECT: COLLEAGUES MEMO FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS KNISS,PRICE AND
VICE MAYOR SHEPHERD REGARDING POTENTIAL CHARTER CHANGE INITIATIVES
FOR COUNCIL TERMS,NUMBER OF SEATS AND OTHER RELATED MATTERS FOR
NOVEMBER 2013 BALLOT
Description
Recommend that Council discuss and consider directing the City Attorney to return with
language at the June 10,2013 meeting for a draft Charter Amendment regarding possible
changes:
1) Under the Charter, council members are limited to serving two consecutive four-year
terms.We recommend that the Council propose a Charter amendment to extend
permissible terms to three,
2) That the Council sizebe reduced from nine members to seven. Furthermore, that staff
consider the various options for timing of such a reduction with respect to the election
cycle if this were to be considered,and
3) Other charter items whichshould be considered ifthese changes were brought forward.
Background:Item 1,Term Limits
In1992 the City limitedcouncilmembers to two terms. Althoughterm limitsinthe 1980swere
an immerging actionbymanyelected bodiesthroughoutthe state and nation,recently the
voters ofSanta Clara Countydecided to change the limitationon terms for Supervisorsfrom
two terms to three.We believe this isa good idea that PaloAlto voters should consider.
Term limitsplaya valuablefunction of bringing new people intogovernment. Onthe other
hand,there isa steep learning curve required to be an effective council member.PaloAlto
council members serve on regional planningand regulatory bodies with complex
responsibilities,for example preserving the Bay,countywide public transit,regional water
planning,gas/electric regulation,ABAG,VTA,Caltrain and more.To effectively represent Palo
Alto's interests,the city's representatives need time to gain expertise and build seniority on
these bodies.Term limits interrupt this process.Under the current charter,members can sit
out an election cycle and re-runfor two more terms, but we considerthis disruptive and not in
the City'sinterest.We think PaloAltowill be better served by extending consecutive terms.
June 03,2013 Page1of3
(ID#3874)
Recommendation 1
We think countyvoters struck the right balance by keeping term limits but extending the
number of terms from two to three.Palo Alto should consider following their lead.
Background:Item 2,Council Seats
The size of the Palo Alto CityCouncil body of nine members is unusual for municipal
government for a city of our population.Although reduced in 1971 from 15 to 9 members,we
believe that council should discuss the merits of reducing the body of government further from
nine to seven members.It is typical for municipalities to have a smaller council.Menlo Park is
a five member council,we consider this to be too small.On the other hand,Mountain View has
seven and we think that this could bring efficiencies of meeting effectiveness and workload
which deserves discussion and consideration while also reducing costs.
Our Charter established a council/manager form of government making council the legislative
body of the City. It sets policy and establishes the City's overall priorities and direction.The
Cityis run through the professional expertise of four Council Appointed Officers (CAOs),the City
Manager,Attorney,Auditor and Clerkwho administer the City business and serve at the
pleasure of the council.The rotation of Mayor and Vice Mayor are elected each year through
the council member body and their role isfor a period of time,customarily one calendar year.
Council members are elected at large to a four-year term ina general municipal election,four
members during a Presidential year and fiveduring the mid-term congressional elections.In
2014 there will be an election of five council members.We consider that a possible reduction
of council members might need to occur during a future mid-term election cycle,perhaps
during the election cyclein 2018 for two reasons;1)the mid-term isa likely period to reduce
elections from five to three council members,and 2)current seats from this last election cycle
(four members)were elected for their first term and could disrupt the developing efforts and
measured experiences of colleagues representing various regional organizations and related
expertise.
Recommendation 2
That council discuss the merits of a reduced body and consider having the City Attorney
prepare draft languageto reduce the mid-term elections ofcouncilmembers from fiveto three
in the year 2018 for the June 10,2013 council meeting.
Background:Item 3.Other
In the event that council size is reduced,elected members would need to manage more liaison
positions, roles and appointments which will impact their abilityto serve intime and quality.
Additionally,serving on the CityCouncil demands a significant amount of time, including
preparingand attending meetings, meeting withthe communityand attending events. We
recommend that council discuss this impact,consideran increaseto the $600per month (plus
benefits)stipend,to accommodate this possible change. Althoughthis isnot a Charter change,
June 03,2013 Page2of 3
(ID#3874)
we think that at the appropriate time and if the voters reduce council members the Finance
Committee should take up the task of discussing council member pay.
Furthermore,there may be other charter changes which are not identified in this memo based
on these possible changes to the election process.We recommend that staff help identify
these changes for the purposes ofconsideration at the June 10 meeting.
Recommendation 3
That council discuss these items and direct staff to identify a thoughtful process/changes to
help address the various requirements for Council members for the meeting ofJune 10,2013.
Financial Impact:
When this item returns to Council,the Clerk should report the estimated cost ofone or more
Charter amendment measures for the November 2013 ballot.Additionally,prepare an
estimate ofadministration expenses for reduction of work from nine to seven council
members.
June 03,2013 Page 3of 3
(ID #3874)
SURVEY OF CITIES IN SAN MATEO AND SANTA CLARA COUNTY
1
05-30-2014
CITY/COUNTY POPULATION CHARTER CITY
YES/NO
# OF COUNCIL
SEATS
COMMENCEMENT DATE
OF TERM
TERM LIMITS SALARIES
(MONTHLY)
BALLOT
MEASURE?
CITY OF PAL O ALTO 66,363 YES 9 2 TERMS $600
TOWN OF
ATHERTON
7,191 NO 5 COMMENCE AT THE
DECEMBER COUNCIL
MEETING FOLLOWING
THE NOVEMBER
ELECTION
NO LIMIT $0 No
CITY OF BELMONT 26,491 NO 5 COMMENCES AT THE
NEXT REGULAR COUNCIL
MEETING AFTER THE
CANVASS BY THE COUNTY
(USUALLY WITHIN 28
DAYS OF THE ELECTION)
2 TERMS $390 No
CITY OF BRISBANE 4,394 NO 5 COMMENCES THE
TUESDAY SUCCEEDING
THE ELECTION WHICH IS
THE FIRST TUESDAY
FOLLOWING THE FIRST
MONDAY IN NOVEMBER
NO LIMIT $150 No
CITY OF
BURLINGAME
29,660 NO 5 COMMENCES THE FIRST
MONDAY IN DECEMBER
OF EVERY ODD YEAR
NO LIMIT $590 No
CITY OF CAMPBELL 40,272 NO 5 COMMENCES THE FIRST
TUESDAY IN DECEMBER
2 TERMS Current: $619.90
Jan 2015: $650.90
No; Just approved
5% increase to be
effective Jan 5,
2015
TOWN OF COLMA 1,470 NO 5 COMMENCES ON THE
TUESDAY AFTER THE
GENERAL MUNICIPAL
ELECTION
NO LIMIT $924 No; just increased
Nov 2013
CITY OF CUPERTINO 60,009 NO 5 COMMENCES ON THE
NEXT REGULAR COUNCIL
MEETING AFTER THE
2 TERMS $730.24 No
ATTACHMENT B
SURVEY OF CITIES IN SAN MATEO AND SANTA CLARA COUNTY
2
05-30-2014
CITY/COUNTY POPULATION CHARTER CITY
YES/NO
# OF COUNCIL
SEATS
COMMENCEMENT DATE
OF TERM
TERM LIMITS SALARIES
(MONTHLY)
BALLOT
MEASURE?
CANVASS BY THE COUNTY
(USUALLY WITHIN 28
DAYS OF THE ELECTION)
CITY OF DALY CITY 103,690 NO 5 COMMENCES IN
DECEMBER - 30 DAYS
AFTER GENERAL ELECTION
IN NOVEMBER
NO LIMIT $1,414 No
CITY OF EAST PALO
ALTO
28,867 NO 5 COMMENCES THE FIRST
TUESDAY SUCCEEDING
THE ELECTION
NO LIMIT $370 No
CITY OF FOSTER
CITY
32,129 NO 5 USUALLY COMMENCES
THE FIRST COUNCIL
MEETING IN DECEMBER.
ELECTIONS ARE ON ODD
YEARS
2 TERMS $496 +
$30/meeting max 3
paid meetings
No
CITY OF FREMONT 221,986 No 5 2 TERMS Mayor = $2,211
Council = $1,407
No
CITY OF GILROY 50,665 YES 7 COMMENCES ON THE
FIRST REGULAR MEETING
FOLLOWING THE
CERTIFICATION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL ELECTION
BY THE DULY
AUTHORIZED ELECTION
OFFICIAL
NO LIMIT Mayor = $1,120
Council = $746
No; frozen since
2009
CITY OF HALF
MOON BAY
11,653 NO 5 COMMENCES ON THE
FIRST REGULAR MEETING
AFTER THE COUNTY
CERTIFIES THE ELECTION
RESULTS (TYPICALLY THE
FIRST MEETING IN
DECEMBER)
NO LIMIT $300 No; there has been
talk about an
increase but no
action taken
SURVEY OF CITIES IN SAN MATEO AND SANTA CLARA COUNTY
3
05-30-2014
CITY/COUNTY POPULATION CHARTER CITY
YES/NO
# OF COUNCIL
SEATS
COMMENCEMENT DATE
OF TERM
TERM LIMITS SALARIES
(MONTHLY)
BALLOT
MEASURE?
CITY OF HAYWARD 149,392 YES 7 Mayor = $3,333.20
Council =
$2,081.73
No
CITY OF LOS ALTOS 29,929 NO 5 COMMENCES ON THE
FIRST TUESDAY AFTER THE
FIRST MONDAY IN
NOVEMBER OF EACH
EVEN-NUMBERED YEAR
2 TERMS $300 No
CITY OF MENLO
PARK
32,881 NO 5 COMMENCES ON THE
FIRST COUNCIL MEETING
IN DECEMBER (THEIR
REORGANIZATION
MEETING) OF EACH YEAR
NO LIMIT $640 No
CITY OF MILLBRAE 22,078 NO 5 COMMENCES IN
DECEMBER AFTER
GENERAL MUNICIPAL
ELECTIONS HELD ON THE
FIRST TUESDAY AFTER THE
FIRST MONDAY IN
NOVEMBER OF ODD-
NUMBERED YEARS
2 TERMS $345 No
CITY OF MILPITAS 68,800 NO 5 COMMENCES 28 DAYS
AFTER THE ELECTION AND
THEY RECEIVE
CERTIFICATION FROM THE
COUNTY, WHICH IS
USUALLY THE FIRST
MEETING IN DECEMBER.
3 TERMS (4
TERMS IF
ELECTED
MAYOR)
Mayor = $1,076.92
Council = $861.29
No
SURVEY OF CITIES IN SAN MATEO AND SANTA CLARA COUNTY
4
05-30-2014
CITY/COUNTY POPULATION CHARTER CITY
YES/NO
# OF COUNCIL
SEATS
COMMENCEMENT DATE
OF TERM
TERM LIMITS SALARIES
(MONTHLY)
BALLOT
MEASURE?
THIS YEAR IT WILL BE
DECEMBER 2, 2014
CITY OF MONTE
SERENO
3,464 NO 5 COMMENCES FROM AND
AFTER THE FIRST
MEETING AT WHICH THE
RESULTS OF THE CANVASS
OF THE ELECTION ARE
DECLARED AND THE
PERSON IS SWORN INTO
OFFICE. CITY COUNCIL
ELECTIONS ARE HELD THE
FIRST TUESDAY OF
NOVEMBER IN EVEN
NUMBERED YEARS
2 TERMS $0 No
CITY OF MOUNTAIN
VIEW
74,066 YES 7 COMMENCES AFTER FIRST
MEETING IN JANUARY
FOLLOWING THEIR
ELECTION AND
CONTINUING UNTIL THEIR
RESPECTIVE SUCCESSORS
QUALIFY
2 TERMS Mayor = $750
Council = $600
To be reviewed on
6/10/14
PENDING
CITY OF PACIFICA 38,189 NO 5 COMMENCES ON THE
FIRST TUESDAY
FOLLOWING THE
GENERAL MUNICIPAL
ELECTION IN NOVEMBER
2 TERMS $700 No
CITY OF REDWOOD
CITY
79,009 YES 7 COMMENCES FROM AND
AFTER THE FIRST
REGULAR MEETING OF
THE COUNCIL FOLLOWING
THE CANVASS OF THE
RETURNS OF THE
ELECTION AND THE
4 TERMS $750 No
SURVEY OF CITIES IN SAN MATEO AND SANTA CLARA COUNTY
5
05-30-2014
CITY/COUNTY POPULATION CHARTER CITY
YES/NO
# OF COUNCIL
SEATS
COMMENCEMENT DATE
OF TERM
TERM LIMITS SALARIES
(MONTHLY)
BALLOT
MEASURE?
DECLARATION OF THE
RESULTS BY THE AGENCY
OR OFFICER SO
EMPOWERED. COUNCIL
MEMBERS SHALL HOLD
OFFICE UNTIL
SUCCESSORS ARE
ELECTED AND QUALIFIED
CITY OF SARATOGA 29,926 NO 5 COMMENCES THE NIGHT
OF THE COUNCIL
REORGANIZATION –
USUALLY THE FIRST
TUESDAY OR WEDNESDAY
OF DECEMBER
NO LIMIT $250 No
CITY OF SAN BRUNO 42,165 NO 5 COMMENCES ON THE
NEXT TUESDAY
SUCCEEDING THE DATE
OF EACH GENERAL OR
SPECIAL MUNICIPAL
ELECTION
NO LIMIT $487 No
CITY OF SAN
CARLOS
29,092 NO 5 COMMENCES ON THE
TUESDAY SUCCEEDING
THE ELECTION
NO LIMIT $300 No
CITY OF SAN JOSE 982,765 YES 11 COMMENCES ON THE
FIRST DAY OF JANUARY
NEXT FOLLOWING, AND
END ON THE LAST DAY OF
DECEMBER IN THE
FOURTH CALENDAR YEAR
SUCCEEDING, THE DATE
OF THE MEMBER’S
ELECTION
2 TERMS Mayor = $9,500
Council = $6,750
No; Salary Setting
Commission
recommended
increase in 2012
but Council
declined
SURVEY OF CITIES IN SAN MATEO AND SANTA CLARA COUNTY
6
05-30-2014
CITY/COUNTY POPULATION CHARTER CITY
YES/NO
# OF COUNCIL
SEATS
COMMENCEMENT DATE
OF TERM
TERM LIMITS SALARIES
(MONTHLY)
BALLOT
MEASURE?
CITY OF SAN MATEO 99,670 YES 5 COMMENCES ON THE
FIRST REGULAR COUNCIL
MEETING IN DECEMBER
AND UNTIL THE GENERAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION THE
FOUR YEAR THEREAFTER
AND THE ELECTION AND
QUALIFICATION OF THEIR
SUCCESSORS
3 TERMS $600 No
CITY OF SANTA
CLARA
119,311 YES 7 COMMENCES ON THE
DATE THE CITY COUNCIL
CERTIFIES THE CANVASS
OF THE ELECTION
RETURNS
2 TERMS Mayor = $1,352.82
Council= $811.68
No; CPI increase
annually
CITY OF SOUTH SAN
FRANCISCO
65,547 NO 5 COMMENCES IN
NOVEMBER OF ODD
NUMBERED YEARS
NO LIMIT $500 No
CITY OF SUNNYVALE 146,197 YES 7 COMMENCES ON THE
FIRST REGULAR MEETING
IN JANUARY
2 TERMS Mayor = $2,925.83
Council =
$2,194.33
No
TOWN OF
HILLSBOROUGH
11,144 NO 5 COMMENCES ON THE
FIRST REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL
HELD IN DECEMBER (THAT
BEING THE MONTH
FOLLOWING THE MONTH
IN WHICH THE ELECTION
FOR CITY COUNCIL
MEMBERS IS HELD)
NO LIMIT $0 No
TOWN OF LOS 8,000 NO 5 COMMENCES AT THE 2 TERMS $250 No
SURVEY OF CITIES IN SAN MATEO AND SANTA CLARA COUNTY
7
05-30-2014
CITY/COUNTY POPULATION CHARTER CITY
YES/NO
# OF COUNCIL
SEATS
COMMENCEMENT DATE
OF TERM
TERM LIMITS SALARIES
(MONTHLY)
BALLOT
MEASURE?
ALTOS HILLS DECEMBER MEETING
TOWN OF LOS
GATOS
30,141 NO 5 COMMENCES ONCE
COUNCIL CERTIFIES THE
ELECTION RESULTS (28
DAYS AFTER ELECTION)
AND THE SWEARING IN
CEREMONY TAKES PLACE.
NORMALLY THIS IS THE
SECOND MONDAY IN
DECEMBER
NO LIMIT $150 No
TOWN OF PORTOLA
VALLEY
4,490 NO 5 COMMENCES WHEN
ELECTIONS ARE HELD
FIRST MEETING IN
DECEMBER WHERE AT
THAT TIME NEWLY
ELECTED COUNCIL IS
SWORN INTO OFFICE
NO LIMIT $0 No
TOWN OF
WOODSIDE
5,287 NO 7 COMMENCES FROM THE
SPECIAL ELECTION SHALL
BE HELD ON THE DATE OF
THE NEXT REGULARLY
ESTABLISHED ELECTION,
OR REGULARLY
ESTABLISHED GENERAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO
BE HELD THROUGHOUT
THE TOWN, NOT LESS
THAN 114 DAYS FROM
THE CALL OF THE SPECIAL
ELECTION
NO LIMIT $0 No
COUNTY OF SAN
MATEO
739,311 N/A 5 BOARD OF
SUPERVISOR
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
TERM COMMENCES ON
3 TERMS N/A N/A
SURVEY OF CITIES IN SAN MATEO AND SANTA CLARA COUNTY
8
05-30-2014
CITY/COUNTY POPULATION CHARTER CITY
YES/NO
# OF COUNCIL
SEATS
COMMENCEMENT DATE
OF TERM
TERM LIMITS SALARIES
(MONTHLY)
BALLOT
MEASURE?
MEMBERS EITHER JANUARY 1, APRIL
1, JULY 1 OR OCTOBER 1ST
COUNTY OF SANTA
CLARA
1.838 million N/A 5 BOARD OF
SUPERVISOR
MEMBERS
COMMENCES AT NOON
ON THE FIRST MONDAY
OF JANUARY
3 TERMS N/A N/A
California city council compensation scorecard - Spreadsheets - Los Angeles Times
http://spreadsheets.latimes.com/city-council-salaries/[5/14/2014 8:38:46 AM]
RELATED ITEMS
Spreadsheet: California city council
healthcare benefits
Database: Government compensation in
California
Story: Most cities pay council members
less than the state allows
Published: Aug. 1, 2011 Download: CSV | XLS | JSON
SPREADSHEET
California city council compensation scorecard
Unlike the notorious Bell, most California cities fall well within state guidelines for council
salaries. But such add-ons as health benefits and pay for sitting on special boards push some
council members’ compensation above the line.
Cities without a charter have maximum council salaries set by a formula based on their 1984
population with a 5% annual increase. A Times analysis of 2009 data found 25 of those cities
paid more than the limit. The number grew to 90 with health benefits included. The chart be-
low lists the combined salary and all other benefits for all cities and indicates whether they are
legally bound by the guideline.
City Guideline is binding State guideline Average total pay Comparison
Vernon $12,191 $156,605
Bell $16,255 $98,793
Indian Wells $12,191 $56,215
Los Angeles $40,636 $179,815
Rancho Mirage $12,191 $43,289
Inglewood $24,382 $75,361
Palm Desert $20,318 $58,581
Palm Springs $16,255 $46,522
San Francisco $40,636 $116,167
Member Center Alerts & Newsletters Jobs Cars Real Estate Rentals Weekly Circulars Local Directory Place Ad
DATA DESK
LOCAL U.S. WORLD BUSINESS SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT HEALTH STYLE TRAVEL OPINION SHOP
Search:
L.A. NOW POLITICS CRIME EDUCATION O.C. WESTSIDE NEIGHBORHOODS ENVIRONMENT DATA & MAPS LOCAL PLUS
1 1m
Like
ATTACHMENT C
California city council compensation scorecard - Spreadsheets - Los Angeles Times
http://spreadsheets.latimes.com/city-council-salaries/[5/14/2014 8:38:46 AM]
Industry $12,191 $32,238
San Jose $40,636 $107,407
Laguna Hills $12,191 $31,798
Bell Gardens $16,255 $40,632
Desert Hot Springs $12,191 $29,941
La Quinta $16,255 $39,016
Santa Barbara $24,382 $54,932
Maywood $12,191 $27,197
Hawaiian Gardens $12,191 $27,049
Menlo Park $12,191 $26,799
Santa Fe Springs $12,191 $26,717
Rosemead $20,318 $44,209
Santa Paula $12,191 $26,510
Commerce $12,191 $26,293
Compton $24,382 $52,454
Colma $12,191 $26,209
Oakland $40,636 $86,714
San Diego $40,636 $86,579
Suisun City $12,191 $25,827
Chula Vista $32,509 $68,796
Sacramento $40,636 $85,829
Atwater $12,191 $24,894
Sand City $12,191 $24,820
Walnut $12,191 $24,592
South El Monte $12,191 $24,538
Chino $24,382 $49,031
California city council compensation scorecard - Spreadsheets - Los Angeles Times
http://spreadsheets.latimes.com/city-council-salaries/[5/14/2014 8:38:46 AM]
Napa $24,382 $47,700
Irwindale $12,191 $23,841
Azusa $16,255 $31,567
Lakewood *$24,382 $46,802
Emeryville $12,191 $23,372
Clearlake $12,191 $22,980
Costa Mesa $24,382 $44,355
Fresno $40,636 $73,856
Santee $20,318 $36,738
Vista $24,382 $43,877
Orange $24,382 $43,836
Belmont $12,191 $21,918
Baldwin Park *$24,382 $42,347
Union City $24,382 $42,113
Solana Beach $12,191 $20,761
Benicia $12,191 $20,705
Colton $20,318 $34,159
South Lake Tahoe $12,191 $20,268
Carson $24,382 $40,355
Mendota $12,191 $20,068
Escondido $24,382 $39,856
Burlingame $12,191 $19,804
Thousand Oaks $24,382 $39,553
Simi Valley $24,382 $39,357
Port Hueneme $12,191 $19,646
Scotts Valley $12,191 $19,565
California city council compensation scorecard - Spreadsheets - Los Angeles Times
http://spreadsheets.latimes.com/city-council-salaries/[5/14/2014 8:38:46 AM]
Glendale $32,509 $51,874
Paso Robles $12,191 $19,326
Cerritos $20,318 $31,912
Calexico $16,255 $25,229
Berkeley $24,382 $37,018
Beverly Hills $16,255 $24,590
Carlsbad $24,382 $36,818
Cudahy $12,191 $18,362
La Mirada $20,318 $29,942
Orange Cove $12,191 $17,800
Arroyo Grande $12,191 $17,611
St. Helena $12,191 $17,486
American Canyon $12,191 $17,483
Riverside $40,636 $58,173
San Fernando $12,191 $17,422
Monterey $12,191 $17,402
Coronado $12,191 $17,337
Hermosa Beach $12,191 $17,309
Yucca Valley $12,191 $17,255
Rialto $24,382 $34,181
Santa Cruz $20,318 $27,767
Upland $24,382 $33,318
Moreno Valley $32,509 $44,361
Morro Bay $12,191 $16,558
Fort Bragg $12,191 $16,491
Redondo Beach $20,318 $27,482
California city council compensation scorecard - Spreadsheets - Los Angeles Times
http://spreadsheets.latimes.com/city-council-salaries/[5/14/2014 8:38:46 AM]
Aliso Viejo $16,255 $21,868
San Gabriel $16,255 $21,804
Huntington Park $20,318 $27,231
San Ramon $20,318 $27,217
Gardena $20,318 $27,060
Brisbane $12,191 $16,179
Signal Hill $12,191 $16,134
Westlake Village $12,191 $16,062
Cypress $16,255 $21,338
Daly City $24,382 $31,943
Turlock $20,318 $26,610
Loma Linda $12,191 $15,901
Sunnyvale $24,382 $31,769
Santa Clarita $32,509 $42,321
Milpitas $20,318 $26,363
San Pablo $12,191 $15,677
Brawley $12,191 $15,617
Ripon $12,191 $15,615
Tustin $24,382 $31,023
Crescent City $12,191 $15,400
Coachella $16,255 $20,461
Paramount $20,318 $25,562
Wildomar $12,191 $15,308
Highland $20,318 $25,461
Pacifica $16,255 $20,303
Malibu $12,191 $15,120
California city council compensation scorecard - Spreadsheets - Los Angeles Times
http://spreadsheets.latimes.com/city-council-salaries/[5/14/2014 8:38:46 AM]
Mammoth Lakes $12,191 $15,075
West Hollywood $16,255 $19,967
Menifee $20,318 $24,950
San Dimas $16,255 $19,959
Norco $12,191 $14,913
Lemon Grove $12,191 $14,906
Alhambra $24,382 $29,747
Irvine $32,509 $39,553
Diamond Bar $20,318 $24,667
Healdsburg $12,191 $14,775
Ceres $16,255 $19,690
Millbrae $12,191 $14,752
Ridgecrest $12,191 $14,746
Hercules $12,191 $14,591
San Marcos $24,382 $29,129
Ontario $32,509 $38,476
Buena Park $24,382 $28,511
Duarte $12,191 $14,150
Santa Monica $24,382 $28,272
Parlier $12,191 $14,118
El Segundo $12,191 $14,070
Brea $16,255 $18,682
Perris $20,318 $23,327
Vallejo $24,382 $27,921
Cathedral City $20,318 $23,211
National City $20,318 $23,098
California city council compensation scorecard - Spreadsheets - Los Angeles Times
http://spreadsheets.latimes.com/city-council-salaries/[5/14/2014 8:38:46 AM]
La Puente $16,255 $18,425
San Luis Obispo $16,255 $18,418
Richmond $24,382 $27,620
Oroville $12,191 $13,767
El Monte $24,382 $27,479
El Cajon $24,382 $27,453
Blythe $12,191 $13,626
Adelanto $12,191 $13,593
Cloverdale $12,191 $13,584
Camarillo $20,318 $22,523
Antioch $24,382 $26,953
Arcata $12,191 $13,456
Santa Maria $24,382 $26,881
Oceanside $32,509 $35,730
Pismo Beach $12,191 $13,354
Encinitas $20,318 $22,154
West Covina $24,382 $26,550
California City $12,191 $13,200
Pleasanton $20,318 $21,968
Pleasant Hill $12,191 $13,133
Foster City $12,191 $13,122
Lodi $20,318 $21,648
Hesperia $24,382 $25,533
Banning $12,191 $12,701
Long Beach $40,636 $42,100
Culver City $16,255 $16,701
California city council compensation scorecard - Spreadsheets - Los Angeles Times
http://spreadsheets.latimes.com/city-council-salaries/[5/14/2014 8:38:46 AM]
Ojai $12,191 $12,506
Hayward $32,509 $33,224
Oxnard $32,509 $33,052
Clovis $24,382 $24,727
Lawndale $12,191 $12,348
Chino Hills $24,382 $24,554
El Centro $16,255 $16,250
Concord $24,382 $24,304
San Carlos $12,191 $12,135
Imperial Beach $12,191 $12,066
Lakeport $12,191 $12,060
Temecula $24,382 $24,027
Sanger $12,191 $11,881
Manhattan Beach $16,255 $15,810
Carpinteria $12,191 $11,817
Big Bear Lake $12,191 $11,748
Bellflower $24,382 $23,468
Newport Beach $24,382 $23,353
Albany $12,191 $11,622
Gonzales $12,191 $11,541
Pasadena $32,509 $30,593
La Verne $12,191 $11,466
Fontana $32,509 $30,553
Los Banos $16,255 $15,224
Placerville $12,191 $11,298
Indio $24,382 $22,370
California city council compensation scorecard - Spreadsheets - Los Angeles Times
http://spreadsheets.latimes.com/city-council-salaries/[5/14/2014 8:38:46 AM]
Montebello $20,318 $18,626
Coalinga $12,191 $11,143
Montclair $16,255 $14,835
Norwalk $24,382 $22,242
San Rafael $20,318 $18,484
La Mesa $20,318 $18,312
Lake Elsinore $20,318 $18,299
Martinez $16,255 $14,594
San Juan Capistrano $16,255 $14,397
Galt $12,191 $10,763
Salinas $32,509 $28,609
Yorba Linda $20,318 $17,862
Los Altos Hills $12,191 $10,676
Fullerton $24,382 $21,224
Cupertino $20,318 $17,669
Rancho Cucamonga $32,509 $28,109
Monrovia $16,255 $13,990
Pico Rivera $20,318 $17,485
Barstow $12,191 $10,389
San Jacinto $16,255 $13,791
San Leandro $24,382 $20,584
Arcadia $20,318 $17,084
Artesia $12,191 $10,237
Hillsborough $12,191 $10,183
Mission Viejo $24,382 $20,293
Los Altos $12,191 $10,115
California city council compensation scorecard - Spreadsheets - Los Angeles Times
http://spreadsheets.latimes.com/city-council-salaries/[5/14/2014 8:38:46 AM]
Moorpark $16,255 $13,430
Anaheim $40,636 $33,522
Redding $24,382 $19,946
Yountville $12,191 $9,947
Lincoln $16,255 $13,210
Westminster $24,382 $19,706
Auburn $12,191 $9,843
Calabasas $12,191 $9,792
Folsom $20,318 $16,213
Ukiah $12,191 $9,648
Hawthorne $24,382 $19,263
Poway $20,318 $15,998
Goleta $12,191 $9,582
Monterey Park $20,318 $15,927
Sebastopol $12,191 $9,537
Huntington Beach $32,509 $25,422
Hollister $16,255 $12,683
Fairfield $24,382 $19,004
San Bruno $16,255 $12,656
Rancho Santa Margarita $16,255 $12,647
Redwood City $24,382 $18,916
Murrieta $24,382 $18,885
Palo Alto $20,318 $15,601
Eureka $12,191 $9,293
Susanville $12,191 $9,289
Hemet $24,382 $18,492
California city council compensation scorecard - Spreadsheets - Los Angeles Times
http://spreadsheets.latimes.com/city-council-salaries/[5/14/2014 8:38:46 AM]
Gilroy $20,318 $15,393
Willits $12,191 $9,221
Pinole $12,191 $9,197
Chico $24,382 $18,355
Jackson $12,191 $9,147
Glendora $20,318 $15,205
Dublin $16,255 $12,133
Grand Terrace $12,191 $9,006
West Sacramento $16,255 $11,879
Selma $12,191 $8,827
Brentwood $20,318 $14,658
Windsor $12,191 $8,780
Burbank $24,382 $17,171
South San Francisco $20,318 $14,274
Stanton $16,255 $10,963
Yuba City $20,318 $13,702
Rohnert Park $16,255 $10,948
South Gate $24,382 $16,410
Morgan Hill $16,255 $10,934
Visalia $24,382 $16,343
Apple Valley $20,318 $13,474
Davis $20,318 $13,376
Wasco $12,191 $7,981
Elk Grove $24,382 $15,900
Vacaville $24,382 $15,869
Santa Ana $40,636 $26,438
California city council compensation scorecard - Spreadsheets - Los Angeles Times
http://spreadsheets.latimes.com/city-council-salaries/[5/14/2014 8:38:46 AM]
Firebaugh $12,191 $7,888
Campbell $16,255 $10,481
Los Gatos $12,191 $7,609
Laguna Beach $12,191 $7,487
Redlands $20,318 $12,414
Buellton $12,191 $7,358
Walnut Creek $20,318 $12,249
Sausalito $12,191 $7,327
Corona $32,509 $19,500
Seal Beach $12,191 $7,290
Live Oak $12,191 $7,279
Dana Point $16,255 $9,669
Beaumont $12,191 $7,182
Bishop $12,191 $7,162
Soledad $12,191 $7,116
Modesto $32,509 $18,812
Lompoc $16,255 $9,400
San Mateo $24,382 $14,054
Madera $20,318 $11,660
Citrus Heights $24,382 $13,923
Fremont $32,509 $18,527
Capitola $12,191 $6,781
Alturas $12,191 $6,600
Bakersfield $40,636 $21,932
Rancho Cordova $20,318 $10,933
Alameda $24,382 $13,008
California city council compensation scorecard - Spreadsheets - Los Angeles Times
http://spreadsheets.latimes.com/city-council-salaries/[5/14/2014 8:38:46 AM]
Shasta Lake $12,191 $6,434
Livermore $24,382 $12,833
Lynwood $20,318 $10,693
Santa Rosa $32,509 $17,023
Garden Grove $32,509 $16,955
Laguna Niguel $20,318 $10,502
Claremont $16,255 $8,399
Mountain View $24,382 $12,541
Woodland $20,318 $10,377
Lancaster $24,382 $12,427
Temple City $16,255 $8,275
Twentynine Palms $12,191 $6,139
Rancho Palos Verdes $16,255 $8,172
Marina $12,191 $6,113
McFarland $12,191 $6,100
Newark $16,255 $8,133
Sonoma $12,191 $6,080
Stockton $40,636 $20,080
Danville $16,255 $7,981
Torrance $24,382 $11,863
Pomona $32,509 $15,634
San Bernardino $32,509 $15,582
Palmdale $32,509 $15,546
Agoura Hills $12,191 $5,809
San Joaquin $12,191 $5,750
Placentia $20,318 $9,565
California city council compensation scorecard - Spreadsheets - Los Angeles Times
http://spreadsheets.latimes.com/city-council-salaries/[5/14/2014 8:38:46 AM]
Fountain Valley $20,318 $9,434
Pacific Grove $12,191 $5,643
La Canada Flintridge $12,191 $5,612
Pittsburg $20,318 $9,222
Red Bluff $12,191 $5,419
Novato $20,318 $8,897
El Cerrito $12,191 $5,318
Lemoore $12,191 $5,252
Victorville $24,382 $10,408
Imperial $12,191 $5,160
Calimesa $12,191 $5,100
Cotati $12,191 $5,047
Fairfax $12,191 $5,040
Santa Clara $24,382 $10,048
Los Alamitos $12,191 $4,924
Petaluma $20,318 $8,131
Lomita $12,191 $4,860
Rocklin $20,318 $8,080
Greenfield $12,191 $4,774
Lake Forest $24,382 $9,433
Paradise $12,191 $4,680
Manteca $20,318 $7,697
Loomis $12,191 $4,594
Whittier $24,382 $9,173
Clayton $12,191 $4,563
Hanford $20,318 $7,491
California city council compensation scorecard - Spreadsheets - Los Angeles Times
http://spreadsheets.latimes.com/city-council-salaries/[5/14/2014 8:38:46 AM]
East Palo Alto $12,191 $4,440
Dinuba $12,191 $4,409
Seaside $12,191 $4,374
Fortuna $12,191 $4,314
La Palma $12,191 $4,314
Mill Valley $12,191 $4,200
Grover Beach $12,191 $4,176
Avalon $12,191 $4,175
La Habra $20,318 $6,892
Holtville $12,191 $4,130
Avenal $12,191 $4,030
Dixon $12,191 $4,008
Marysville $12,191 $3,942
Ventura $24,382 $7,785
Covina $16,255 $5,174
Delano $20,318 $6,452
Riverbank $12,191 $3,845
Gustine $12,191 $3,770
Yreka $12,191 $3,738
Del Mar $12,191 $3,720
Arvin $12,191 $3,669
Truckee $12,191 $3,663
Tracy $24,382 $7,275
Oakdale $12,191 $3,628
Canyon Lake $12,191 $3,600
Colusa $12,191 $3,600
California city council compensation scorecard - Spreadsheets - Los Angeles Times
http://spreadsheets.latimes.com/city-council-salaries/[5/14/2014 8:38:46 AM]
Escalon $12,191 $3,600
Half Moon Bay $12,191 $3,600
Livingston $12,191 $3,600
Portola $12,191 $3,600
South Pasadena $12,191 $3,600
Taft $12,191 $3,600
Tehachapi $12,191 $3,600
Yucaipa $20,318 $6,000
Atascadero $12,191 $3,599
Biggs $12,191 $3,592
Corning $12,191 $3,552
Lathrop $12,191 $3,438
Corte Madera $12,191 $3,374
Grass Valley $12,191 $3,300
Kerman $12,191 $3,295
Sonora $12,191 $3,225
Chowchilla $12,191 $3,180
San Clemente $20,318 $5,135
Huron $12,191 $3,065
Larkspur $12,191 $3,049
Saratoga $12,191 $3,006
Kingsburg $12,191 $3,000
Sierra Madre $12,191 $2,999
Gridley $12,191 $2,988
Hughson $12,191 $2,900
Westmorland $12,191 $2,880
California city council compensation scorecard - Spreadsheets - Los Angeles Times
http://spreadsheets.latimes.com/city-council-salaries/[5/14/2014 8:38:46 AM]
Oakley $16,255 $3,738
Watsonville $20,318 $4,668
Patterson $12,191 $2,640
Calistoga $12,191 $2,400
Tulare $20,318 $3,981
Ione $12,191 $2,208
Rio Vista $12,191 $2,192
Weed $12,191 $2,112
Fowler $12,191 $2,074
Guadalupe $12,191 $2,058
Reedley $12,191 $2,000
Winters $12,191 $1,980
Carmel-by-the-Sea $12,191 $1,920
Dos Palos $12,191 $1,800
Monte Sereno $12,191 $1,800
Waterford $12,191 $1,800
Williams $12,191 $1,760
Del Rey Oaks $12,191 $1,728
Willows $12,191 $1,680
Mount Shasta $12,191 $1,530
Maricopa $12,191 $1,372
San Anselmo $12,191 $1,329
Colfax $12,191 $1,320
Calipatria $12,191 $1,260
Plymouth $12,191 $1,200
Wheatland $12,191 $1,200
California city council compensation scorecard - Spreadsheets - Los Angeles Times
http://spreadsheets.latimes.com/city-council-salaries/[5/14/2014 8:38:46 AM]
King City $12,191 $978
Point Arena $12,191 $930
Newman $12,191 $850
Montague $12,191 $780
Roseville $24,382 $1,536
Downey $24,382 $1,357
Anderson $12,191 $600
Trinidad $12,191 $600
Exeter $12,191 $529
Loyalton $12,191 $515
Porterville $20,318 $818
Merced $24,382 $840
Solvang $12,191 $300
Fillmore $12,191 $30
Amador $12,191 $0
Atherton $12,191 $0
Belvedere $12,191 $0
Blue Lake $12,191 $0
Bradbury $12,191 $0
Corcoran $12,191 $0
Dorris $12,191 $0
Dunsmuir $12,191 $0
Etna $12,191 $0
Farmersville $12,191 $0
Ferndale $12,191 $0
Hidden Hills $12,191 $0
California city council compensation scorecard - Spreadsheets - Los Angeles Times
http://spreadsheets.latimes.com/city-council-salaries/[5/14/2014 8:38:46 AM]
Isleton $12,191 $0
La Habra Heights $12,191 $0
Lafayette $12,191 $0
Laguna Woods $12,191 $0
Lindsay $12,191 $0
Moraga $12,191 $0
Needles $12,191 $0
Nevada City $12,191 $0
Orinda $12,191 $0
Orland $12,191 $0
Palos Verdes Estates $12,191 $0
Piedmont $12,191 $0
Portola Valley $12,191 $0
Rio Dell $12,191 $0
Rolling Hills $12,191 $0
Rolling Hills Estates $12,191 $0
Ross $12,191 $0
San Juan Bautista $12,191 $0
San Marino $12,191 $0
Shafter $12,191 $0
Sutter Creek $12,191 $0
Tehama $12,191 $0
Tiburon $12,191 $0
Villa Park $12,191 $0
Woodlake $12,191 $0
Woodside $12,191 $0
California city council compensation scorecard - Spreadsheets - Los Angeles Times
http://spreadsheets.latimes.com/city-council-salaries/[5/14/2014 8:38:46 AM]
Readers: What’s your take? Share it here.
Corrections Horoscopes Media Kit About Us Contact Us Site Map
Angels City N/A N/A
Fort Jones N/A N/A
Tulelake N/A N/A
Note: Salaries and benefits of fulltime mayors were excluded from the analysis because they are not subject to the state guideline.
Footnote: The total compensation above can be too high if a city erroneously reported health benefits twice, both as salary and benefits. These cities say their
actual average compensation is lower for that reason: Baldwin Park ($14,400); Lakewood ($11,778).
Sources: California State Controller, California Department of Finance
Credits: Maloy Moore, Sandra Poindexter, Catherine Saillant, Abby Sewell, Doug Smith, Ben Welsh
Burbank Leader | Coastline Pilot | Daily Pilot | Huntington Beach Independent | News Press | Valley Sun | KTLA | Hoy
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | Los Angeles Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel | The Morning Call
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | About Our Ads | Los Angeles Times, 202 West 1st Street, Los Angeles, California, 90012 | Copyright 2014
A Tribune Newspaper website
advertisement
20 celebrities we didn't know
were gay before they came out.
See why millions are praising
this as the "Holy Grail" of
weight loss...
Top 10 Child Stars Who Became
Broken Adults
Ads By
Also post on Facebook
Norma C. Majano Aronne
The hope in this world, is that any person or individual who make a conscious decision torepresent City , County of State , Country is motivated by what differences he/she can bring to
that specific region.Efforts with positives outcomes that in turn, benefit the people they represent.. In our Country USA, that has been forgotten long ago. City Of Bell is not unique in that , thereare many others Counties with the same problem individuals looking after themselves, and notthe well being of their fallow citizen. norma Aronne
Reply · Like · April 21 at 3:38pm
Mark Montes · Lawndale High School
La city council $179,815 no wonder the the city is broke, cut that salary by a third and then wewill have start on making a dent?
Reply · Like · · December 30, 2012 at 11:21am1
SURVEY OF CITIES IN SAN MATEO AND SANTA CLARA COUNTY
1
11/12/14
CITY/COUNTY POPULATION CHARTER CITY
YES/NO
# OF COUNCIL
SEATS
COMMENCEMENT DATE
OF TERM
TERM LIMITS SALARIES
(MONTHLY)
Benefits
(Monthly)
BALLOT
MEASURE?
CITY OF PAL O ALTO
66,363 YES 9 2 TERMS $600 Health = 90/10
cost‐share for
medical (City pays
90% of premiums);
City pays dental
and vision
MISC = $2500
Excess benefit
annually; Life
insurance and LTD
paid by the City
Retirement = PERS
participation after
5 year vesting
period; members
pay EE contribution
Retiree medical =
available based on
years of service
and eligibility
schedule; fully paid
for members
elected PRIOR TO
1/1/04
TOWN OF
ATHERTON
7,191 NO 5 COMMENCE AT THE
DECEMBER COUNCIL
MEETING FOLLOWING
THE NOVEMBER
ELECTION
NO LIMIT $0
Health = NONE
Retirement =
NONE
No
ATTACHMENT B
SURVEY OF CITIES IN SAN MATEO AND SANTA CLARA COUNTY
2
11/12/14
CITY/COUNTY POPULATION CHARTER CITY
YES/NO
# OF COUNCIL
SEATS
COMMENCEMENT DATE
OF TERM
TERM LIMITS SALARIES
(MONTHLY)
Benefits
(Monthly)
BALLOT
MEASURE?
CITY OF BELMONT
26,491 NO 5 COMMENCES AT THE
NEXT REGULAR COUNCIL
MEETING AFTER THE
CANVASS BY THE COUNTY
(USUALLY WITHIN 28
DAYS OF THE ELECTION)
2 TERMS $390
*Council tied to
Mid Management
Confidential group
Health = City
contribution of
$122 for medical;
City pays Dental;
Vision City
contribution of $19
per member, and
per dependent
Retirement = PERS
participation (City
pays full cost of
employee
contribution either
7% or 9%)
No
CITY OF BRISBANE 4,394 NO 5 COMMENCES THE
TUESDAY SUCCEEDING
THE ELECTION WHICH IS
THE FIRST TUESDAY
FOLLOWING THE FIRST
MONDAY IN NOVEMBER
NO LIMIT $150
Health = medical
coverage with City
contribution up to
approx. $1948.29;
fully paid vision
and dental
Retirement=NONE
No
CITY OF
BURLINGAME
29,660 NO 5 COMMENCES THE FIRST
MONDAY IN DECEMBER
OF EVERY ODD YEAR
NO LIMIT $590
Health = members
get health benefits
and retiree health
benefits; as of Jan
1, 2015 members
pay 7.5% of cost
No
ATTACHMENT B
SURVEY OF CITIES IN SAN MATEO AND SANTA CLARA COUNTY
3
11/12/14
CITY/COUNTY POPULATION CHARTER CITY
YES/NO
# OF COUNCIL
SEATS
COMMENCEMENT DATE
OF TERM
TERM LIMITS SALARIES
(MONTHLY)
Benefits
(Monthly)
BALLOT
MEASURE?
Retirement = PERS;
city pays both
member and ER
contributions
CITY OF CAMPBELL 40,272 NO 5 COMMENCES THE FIRST
TUESDAY IN DECEMBER
2 TERMS Current: $619.90
Jan 2015: $650.90
Health = City
contribution of
$1160/mo; fully
paid vision and
dental
Retirement = PERS
participation; City
contribution of
17.174%, member
contribution of
6.75%
No; Just approved
5% increase to be
effective Jan 5,
2015
TOWN OF COLMA 1,470 NO 5 COMMENCES ON THE
TUESDAY AFTER THE
GENERAL MUNICIPAL
ELECTION
NO LIMIT
$924
Health = City pays
full premium
amount for
medical; City pays
$188.20 for dental;
City pays $23.92
for vision;
Retirement = PERS
participation;
member pays
6.25%‐8%
No; just increased
Nov 2013
CITY OF CUPERTINO
60,009 NO 5 COMMENCES ON THE
NEXT REGULAR COUNCIL
MEETING AFTER THE
CANVASS BY THE COUNTY
2 TERMS $730.24
Health = City
contribution of
$714/mo for
medical; City
No
ATTACHMENT B
SURVEY OF CITIES IN SAN MATEO AND SANTA CLARA COUNTY
4
11/12/14
CITY/COUNTY POPULATION CHARTER CITY
YES/NO
# OF COUNCIL
SEATS
COMMENCEMENT DATE
OF TERM
TERM LIMITS SALARIES
(MONTHLY)
Benefits
(Monthly)
BALLOT
MEASURE?
(USUALLY WITHIN 28
DAYS OF THE ELECTION)
contribution of
$78.26 for Dental;
City contribution of
$14.94/mo for
Vision
Life insurance =
City contribution of
$3.84/mo ($16,000
flat coverage)
HRA = City
contribution of
$163/mo
MISC = iPAD
$15/mo; Internet
Allowance $30/mo;
Cell phone
reimbursement
Retirement = PERS
participation; pre
12/29/12 (2.7% @
55) City
contribution of 3%
of EE contribution,
member
contribution of 5%;
post 12/29/12 (2%
@ 62) member
pays full $6.25%
ATTACHMENT B
SURVEY OF CITIES IN SAN MATEO AND SANTA CLARA COUNTY
5
11/12/14
CITY/COUNTY POPULATION CHARTER CITY
YES/NO
# OF COUNCIL
SEATS
COMMENCEMENT DATE
OF TERM
TERM LIMITS SALARIES
(MONTHLY)
Benefits
(Monthly)
BALLOT
MEASURE?
CITY OF DALY CITY 103,690 NO 5 COMMENCES IN
DECEMBER ‐ 30 DAYS
AFTER GENERAL ELECTION
IN NOVEMBER
NO LIMIT $1,414
Health = $1105
monthly allowance
for purchase of
mandated benefits
(life insurance and
dental); remainder
can be used to
purchase medical
insurance through
CalPERS
Retirement =
optional PERS
participation
No
CITY OF EAST PALO
ALTO
28,867 NO 5 COMMENCES THE FIRST
TUESDAY SUCCEEDING
THE ELECTION
NO LIMIT $370
Health = $855/mo;
City pays Dental for
member only
Retirement = none
No
CITY OF FOSTER
CITY
32,129 NO 5 USUALLY COMMENCES
THE FIRST COUNCIL
MEETING IN DECEMBER.
ELECTIONS ARE ON ODD
YEARS
2 TERMS $496 +
$30/meeting max 3
paid meetings
*Council tied to
management for
health benefits
Health = City pays
up to $1605 for EE
+ 2 for medical;
City pays up to
$135 for EE + 2 for
Dental; City pays
up to $22.50 for
EE+2 for Vision
No
ATTACHMENT B
SURVEY OF CITIES IN SAN MATEO AND SANTA CLARA COUNTY
6
11/12/14
CITY/COUNTY POPULATION CHARTER CITY
YES/NO
# OF COUNCIL
SEATS
COMMENCEMENT DATE
OF TERM
TERM LIMITS SALARIES
(MONTHLY)
Benefits
(Monthly)
BALLOT
MEASURE?
Retirement =
optional PERS
participation
(currently no
members utilize)
CITY OF FREMONT 221,986 No 5 2 TERMS Mayor = $2,211
Council = $1,407
Health = monthly
allowance of $450
to put towards
medical, dental,
and vision plans
MISC = Life
insurance up to
$50,000
Retirement =
optional PERS;
member pays EE
contribution
No
CITY OF GILROY 50,665 YES 7 COMMENCES ON THE
FIRST REGULAR MEETING
FOLLOWING THE
CERTIFICATION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL ELECTION
BY THE DULY
AUTHORIZED ELECTION
OFFICIAL
NO LIMIT Mayor = $1,120
Council = $746
Health = City
contribution of
$1679.02/mo for
medical and
dental; Waiver =
$300‐400/mo if
waive
Retirement = PERS
participation; 2.5%
@55 City pays both
employer and
employee
No; frozen since
2009
ATTACHMENT B
SURVEY OF CITIES IN SAN MATEO AND SANTA CLARA COUNTY
7
11/12/14
CITY/COUNTY POPULATION CHARTER CITY
YES/NO
# OF COUNCIL
SEATS
COMMENCEMENT DATE
OF TERM
TERM LIMITS SALARIES
(MONTHLY)
Benefits
(Monthly)
BALLOT
MEASURE?
contributions;
PEPREA = City pays
50%
CITY OF HALF
MOON BAY
11,653 NO 5 COMMENCES ON THE
FIRST REGULAR MEETING
AFTER THE COUNTY
CERTIFIES THE ELECTION
RESULTS (TYPICALLY THE
FIRST MEETING IN
DECEMBER)
NO LIMIT $300
Health = NONE
Retirement =
NONE
MISC = Portable
devices =
$100/mo; Data
plan = $60/mo; Cell
Phone = $60/mo;
Internet Allowance
= $50/mo; Auto
Allowance =
$100/mo
No; there has been
talk about an
increase but no
action taken
CITY OF HAYWARD 149,392 YES 7 Mayor = $3,333.20
Council =
$2,081.73
Health = PERS
medical plans, City
contributes
maximum of
$1,390.91 for
member +
dependents (up to
70% Blue Shield
Bay Area); City
pays 50% of dental;
City pays 100% of
vision
MISC = Life
insurance up to 1X
No
ATTACHMENT B
SURVEY OF CITIES IN SAN MATEO AND SANTA CLARA COUNTY
8
11/12/14
CITY/COUNTY POPULATION CHARTER CITY
YES/NO
# OF COUNCIL
SEATS
COMMENCEMENT DATE
OF TERM
TERM LIMITS SALARIES
(MONTHLY)
Benefits
(Monthly)
BALLOT
MEASURE?
annual salary
Retirement = PERS
participation; City
pays both member
and employer rates
for classic; for
PEPRA member
pays 6.25%
Retiree Medical =
$237.31/mo
CITY OF LOS ALTOS 29,929 5 COMMENCES ON THE
FIRST TUESDAY AFTER THE
FIRST MONDAY IN
NOVEMBER OF EACH
EVEN‐NUMBERED YEAR
2 TERMS $300
Health = member
only medical and
dental paid by City
Retirement =
NONE
No
CITY OF MENLO
PARK
32,881 NO 5 COMMENCES ON THE
FIRST COUNCIL MEETING
IN DECEMBER (THEIR
REORGANIZATION
MEETING) OF EACH YEAR
NO LIMIT $640
Health = fully paid
by City
Retirement =
optional PERS
participation; City
pays both City and
member
contributions
No
eaCITY OF
MILLBRAE
22,078 NO 5 COMMENCES IN
DECEMBER AFTER
2 TERMS $345
Health = allowance
of $1,385.62/mo;
No
ATTACHMENT B
SURVEY OF CITIES IN SAN MATEO AND SANTA CLARA COUNTY
9
11/12/14
CITY/COUNTY POPULATION CHARTER CITY
YES/NO
# OF COUNCIL
SEATS
COMMENCEMENT DATE
OF TERM
TERM LIMITS SALARIES
(MONTHLY)
Benefits
(Monthly)
BALLOT
MEASURE?
GENERAL MUNICIPAL
ELECTIONS HELD ON THE
FIRST TUESDAY AFTER THE
FIRST MONDAY IN
NOVEMBER OF ODD‐
NUMBERED YEARS
vision member
pays 50%; dental
fully reimbursed by
City
MISC = Life
insurance up to
$100,000; LTD paid
by City
Retirement = City
pays both member
and ER PERS
contributions
*Council members
receive retiree
health if elected
prior to June 2013
up to
$1,385.62/mo
CITY OF MILPITAS 68,800 NO 5 COMMENCES 28 DAYS
AFTER THE ELECTION AND
THEY RECEIVE
CERTIFICATION FROM THE
COUNTY, WHICH IS
USUALLY THE FIRST
MEETING IN DECEMBER.
THIS YEAR IT WILL BE
DECEMBER 2, 2014
3 TERMS (4
TERMS IF
ELECTED
MAYOR)
Mayor = $1,076.92
Council = $861.29
Health = medical
allowance of
$1,931/mo; City
pays vision and
dental
MISC = City pays
Life insurance and
LTD
Retirement = 2.7%
@55; City pays
ATTACHMENT B
SURVEY OF CITIES IN SAN MATEO AND SANTA CLARA COUNTY
10
11/12/14
CITY/COUNTY POPULATION CHARTER CITY
YES/NO
# OF COUNCIL
SEATS
COMMENCEMENT DATE
OF TERM
TERM LIMITS SALARIES
(MONTHLY)
Benefits
(Monthly)
BALLOT
MEASURE?
both member and
ER contributions
CITY OF MONTE
SERENO
3,464 NO 5 COMMENCES FROM AND
AFTER THE FIRST
MEETING AT WHICH THE
RESULTS OF THE CANVASS
OF THE ELECTION ARE
DECLARED AND THE
PERSON IS SWORN INTO
OFFICE. CITY COUNCIL
ELECTIONS ARE HELD THE
FIRST TUESDAY OF
NOVEMBER IN EVEN
NUMBERED YEARS
2 TERMS
$0
Health = NONE
Retirement =
NONE
No
CITY OF MOUNTAIN
VIEW
74,066 YES 7 COMMENCES AFTER FIRST
MEETING IN JANUARY
FOLLOWING THEIR
ELECTION AND
CONTINUING UNTIL THEIR
RESPECTIVE SUCCESSORS
QUALIFY
2 TERMS Mayor = $750
Council = $600
Health = City pays
City pays $1,776.58
monthly max for
medical; City pays
max $214.06/mo
for Dental
Retirement = PERS
participation;
member pays
employee
contribution of
6.25%
MISC = EAP City
pays $2.77 per
employee/mo; City
Yes; proposed
increase to $1,000
on November 4,
2014 ballot ‐
APPROVED
ATTACHMENT B
SURVEY OF CITIES IN SAN MATEO AND SANTA CLARA COUNTY
11
11/12/14
CITY/COUNTY POPULATION CHARTER CITY
YES/NO
# OF COUNCIL
SEATS
COMMENCEMENT DATE
OF TERM
TERM LIMITS SALARIES
(MONTHLY)
Benefits
(Monthly)
BALLOT
MEASURE?
pays City‐paid
premium for Life
Insurance and
AD&D (mandatory
council
participation):
Life‐$.085/$1K
AD&D‐$.025/$1K
Total‐$.11/$1K;
Tuition
reimbursement up
to $2,000 annually
CITY OF PACIFICA 38,189 NO 5 COMMENCES ON THE
FIRST TUESDAY
FOLLOWING THE
GENERAL MUNICIPAL
ELECTION IN NOVEMBER
2 TERMS $700
Health = $920/mo
for cafeteria
(medical, vision,
dental)
Retirement = none
No
CITY OF REDWOOD
CITY
79,009 YES 7 COMMENCES FROM AND
AFTER THE FIRST
REGULAR MEETING OF
THE COUNCIL FOLLOWING
THE CANVASS OF THE
RETURNS OF THE
ELECTION AND THE
DECLARATION OF THE
RESULTS BY THE AGENCY
OR OFFICER SO
EMPOWERED. COUNCIL
MEMBERS SHALL HOLD
OFFICE UNTIL
SUCCESSORS ARE
ELECTED AND QUALIFIED
4 TERMS
$750
Health = City pays
90% of premiums
up to
$1,630.86/mo
medical; City pays
vision and dental
Retirement = PERS
participation;
members pays EE
contribution
*Council members
receive full retiree
medical paid by
No
ATTACHMENT B
SURVEY OF CITIES IN SAN MATEO AND SANTA CLARA COUNTY
12
11/12/14
CITY/COUNTY POPULATION CHARTER CITY
YES/NO
# OF COUNCIL
SEATS
COMMENCEMENT DATE
OF TERM
TERM LIMITS SALARIES
(MONTHLY)
Benefits
(Monthly)
BALLOT
MEASURE?
the City
CITY OF SARATOGA 29,926
NO 5 COMMENCES THE NIGHT
OF THE COUNCIL
REORGANIZATION –
USUALLY THE FIRST
TUESDAY OR WEDNESDAY
OF DECEMBER
NO LIMIT $250
Health = optional,
cost paid by
member, must join
PERS
Retirement =
optional PERS
participation and
member pays 7%;
may join to
participate in
health plans, cost
paid by member
No
CITY OF SAN BRUNO 42,165 NO 5 COMMENCES ON THE
NEXT TUESDAY
SUCCEEDING THE DATE
OF EACH GENERAL OR
SPECIAL MUNICIPAL
ELECTION
NO LIMIT $487
Health = medical
only; City pays up
to $1,709 (single)
or $1,679
(+dependents)
MISC = Life
insurance $10,000
Retirement = PERS;
member pays
elected official rate
No
CITY OF SAN
CARLOS
29,092 NO 5 COMMENCES ON THE
TUESDAY SUCCEEDING
THE ELECTION
NO LIMIT $300
*Council members
tied to
management
group
Health = City pays
medical
No
ATTACHMENT B
SURVEY OF CITIES IN SAN MATEO AND SANTA CLARA COUNTY
13
11/12/14
CITY/COUNTY POPULATION CHARTER CITY
YES/NO
# OF COUNCIL
SEATS
COMMENCEMENT DATE
OF TERM
TERM LIMITS SALARIES
(MONTHLY)
Benefits
(Monthly)
BALLOT
MEASURE?
contribution up to
$1427.97 for
member and
family; City pays
dental and vision
premiums
Retirement =
optional PERS
participation;
member
contribution of
6.5%‐8%
CITY OF SAN JOSE
982,765 YES 11 COMMENCES ON THE
FIRST DAY OF JANUARY
NEXT FOLLOWING, AND
END ON THE LAST DAY OF
DECEMBER IN THE
FOURTH CALENDAR YEAR
SUCCEEDING, THE DATE
OF THE MEMBER’S
ELECTION
2 TERMS Mayor = $9,500
Council = $6,750
*Council tied to
Unit 99
management
employees
Health = City pays
85% of lowest cost
HMO and EE pays
difference; fully
paid dental
Life insurance =
City pays premium
for up to 2 times
EE’s annual salary
Retirement =
Optional PERS or
PTC 457 defined
No; Salary Setting
Commission
recommended
increase in 2012
but Council
declined
ATTACHMENT B
SURVEY OF CITIES IN SAN MATEO AND SANTA CLARA COUNTY
14
11/12/14
CITY/COUNTY POPULATION CHARTER CITY
YES/NO
# OF COUNCIL
SEATS
COMMENCEMENT DATE
OF TERM
TERM LIMITS SALARIES
(MONTHLY)
Benefits
(Monthly)
BALLOT
MEASURE?
contribution plan.
*Note: currently
under review for
whether to be
continued
CITY OF SAN MATEO 99,670 YES 5 COMMENCES ON THE
FIRST REGULAR COUNCIL
MEETING IN DECEMBER
AND UNTIL THE GENERAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION THE
FOUR YEAR THEREAFTER
AND THE ELECTION AND
QUALIFICATION OF THEIR
SUCCESSORS
3 TERMS $601.47
Health=PERS
participation
required; City pays
up to family
coverage for least
expensive HMO
plan or $100 FSA;
City pays Vision
and Dental
premiums
MISC = Life
insurance City pays
premiums for Life
Insurance and
Accidental Death
and
Dismemberment
Retirement =
optional PERS
participation;
member pays 7%
No
CITY OF SANTA
CLARA
119,311 YES 7 COMMENCES ON THE
DATE THE CITY COUNCIL
CERTIFIES THE CANVASS
2 TERMS Mayor = $1,352.82
Council= $811.68
Health = NONE
Retirement =
No; CPI increase
annually
ATTACHMENT B
SURVEY OF CITIES IN SAN MATEO AND SANTA CLARA COUNTY
15
11/12/14
CITY/COUNTY POPULATION CHARTER CITY
YES/NO
# OF COUNCIL
SEATS
COMMENCEMENT DATE
OF TERM
TERM LIMITS SALARIES
(MONTHLY)
Benefits
(Monthly)
BALLOT
MEASURE?
OF THE ELECTION
RETURNS
Optional
PERS/PARS
participation,
member pays EE
contribution (PERS
8%, PARS 7.5%)
CITY OF SOUTH SAN
FRANCISCO
65,547 NO 5 COMMENCES IN
NOVEMBER OF ODD
NUMBERED YEARS
NO LIMIT $500
Health = City pays
up to HMO family
rate for Medical;
Dental buy up plan
and member pays
difference; City
pays Vision
MISC = City pays
$550/mo to 457
plan if member has
alternate insurance
Retirement =
optional PERS, City
pays both member
and ER
contributions; If no
PERS, placed in a
3121 457 plan
No
CITY OF SUNNYVALE 146,197 YES 7 COMMENCES ON THE
FIRST REGULAR MEETING
IN JANUARY
2 TERMS
Mayor = $2,925.83
Council =
$2,194.33
Health = member
must enroll in
PERS; City pays full
medical for
member + family;
City pays dental
and vision for
No
ATTACHMENT B
SURVEY OF CITIES IN SAN MATEO AND SANTA CLARA COUNTY
16
11/12/14
CITY/COUNTY POPULATION CHARTER CITY
YES/NO
# OF COUNCIL
SEATS
COMMENCEMENT DATE
OF TERM
TERM LIMITS SALARIES
(MONTHLY)
Benefits
(Monthly)
BALLOT
MEASURE?
member only
Retirement =
optional PERS
(must enroll for
benefits); City pays
both EE and ER
contribution
Retiree Medical =
$119/mo
TOWN OF
HILLSBOROUGH
11,144 NO 5 COMMENCES ON THE
FIRST REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL
HELD IN DECEMBER (THAT
BEING THE MONTH
FOLLOWING THE MONTH
IN WHICH THE ELECTION
FOR CITY COUNCIL
MEMBERS IS HELD)
NO LIMIT $0
Health = City pays
coverage up to
Blue Shield 3 party
rate (approx.
$1,830.43/mo)
Retirement =
NONE
No
TOWN OF LOS
ALTOS HILLS
8,000 NO 5 COMMENCES AT THE
DECEMBER MEETING
2 TERMS $250
Health = $743/mo
for member only
Retirement =
NONE
No
TOWN OF LOS
GATOS
30,141 NO 5 COMMENCES ONCE
COUNCIL CERTIFIES THE
ELECTION RESULTS (28
DAYS AFTER ELECTION)
AND THE SWEARING IN
CEREMONY TAKES PLACE.
NORMALLY THIS IS THE
SECOND MONDAY IN
NO LIMIT $150
No Response No
ATTACHMENT B
SURVEY OF CITIES IN SAN MATEO AND SANTA CLARA COUNTY
17
11/12/14
CITY/COUNTY POPULATION CHARTER CITY
YES/NO
# OF COUNCIL
SEATS
COMMENCEMENT DATE
OF TERM
TERM LIMITS SALARIES
(MONTHLY)
Benefits
(Monthly)
BALLOT
MEASURE?
DECEMBER
TOWN OF PORTOLA
VALLEY
4,490 NO 5 COMMENCES WHEN
ELECTIONS ARE HELD
FIRST MEETING IN
DECEMBER WHERE AT
THAT TIME NEWLY
ELECTED COUNCIL IS
SWORN INTO OFFICE
NO LIMIT $0
Health = NONE
Retirement =
NONE
No
TOWN OF
WOODSIDE
5,287 NO 7 COMMENCES FROM THE
SPECIAL ELECTION SHALL
BE HELD ON THE DATE OF
THE NEXT REGULARLY
ESTABLISHED ELECTION,
OR REGULARLY
ESTABLISHED GENERAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO
BE HELD THROUGHOUT
THE TOWN, NOT LESS
THAN 114 DAYS FROM
THE CALL OF THE SPECIAL
ELECTION
NO LIMIT $0
Health = NONE
Retirement =
NONE
No
COUNTY OF SAN
MATEO
739,311 N/A 5 BOARD OF
SUPERVISOR
MEMBERS
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
TERM COMMENCES ON
EITHER JANUARY 1, APRIL
1, JULY 1 OR OCTOBER 1ST
3 TERMS N/A N/A
COUNTY OF SANTA
CLARA
1.838 million N/A 5 BOARD OF
SUPERVISOR
MEMBERS
COMMENCES AT NOON
ON THE FIRST MONDAY
OF JANUARY
3 TERMS N/A N/A
ATTACHMENT B
ATTACHMENT C NOT YET ADOPTED
1
Ordinance No. ____
Ordinance of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Amending Chapter 2.04 of the Palo Alto
Municipal Code to Increase the Salary of Council Members Effective January 2017 and to Clarify
Council Expense Allowances
The Council of the City of Palo Alto does ORDAIN as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings and Declarations. The City Council finds and declares as follows:
A. Article III, Section 17 of the Charter of the City of Palo Alto provides that
compensation may be paid to council members in amounts not to exceed those provided by general
law.
B. Council member salaries were last set in 2001 by Ordinance No. 4692 in the
amount of six hundred dollars ($600) per month.
C. General law permits salaries to be increased at a rate not to exceed 5% for each
calendar year from the operative date of the last salary adjustment. The increase permitted under state
law for an effective date of January 1, 2017 is four hundred fifty dollars ($450) per month, for a
maximum permissible compensation of one thousand fifty dollars ($1,050) per month.
D. From time to time, the Council adopts by resolution a travel and expense policy
for council members, including expense reimbursement limits for the Mayor and Vice Mayor.
SECTION 2. Section 2.04.350 (Expense allowance for council members) of Chapter 2.04 (Council
Organization and Procedure) of Title 2 (Administrative Code) of the Palo Alto Municipal Code is hereby
amended to read as follows:
“Section 2.04.350 Expense allowance for council members
The council may by resolution adopt a travel and expense policy providing a schedule
for expense allowances for its members and an amount shall be included in the council
budget to reimburse members of the council for expenses incurred in their service as
members of the council. Notwithstanding the above, the mayor shall receive $200.00
per month for expenses and the vice‐mayor shall receive $50.00 per month for expenses
incurred in filling these offices.”
SECTION 3. Section 2.04.360 (Salary of council members) of Chapter 2.04 (Council
Organization and Procedure) of Title 2 (Administrative Code) of the Palo Alto Municipal Code is hereby
amended to read as follows:
“Section 2.04.360 Salary of council members
The salary of the council members shall be $600.00 per month. Effective January 1,
2017, the salary of the council members shall be $1,000 per month.
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any
reason declared invalid, such declaration shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion or
sections of the Ordinance. The Council hereby declares that it should have adopted the
Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the
ATTACHMENT C NOT YET ADOPTED
2
fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared
invalid.
SECTION 5. This ordinance shall be effective on the thirty‐first day after the date of its
adoption.
SECTION 6. The Council of the City of Palo Alto hereby finds that this is not a project under
the California Environmental Quality Act and, therefore, no environmental impact assessment is
necessary.
INTRODUCED:
PASSED:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
ATTEST:
___________________________ ____________________________
City Clerk Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED:
____________________________ ____________________________
Deputy City Attorney City Manager
____________________________
Director of Administrative Services
MINUTES
Mr. Alaee stated after review of the Council Calendar it appeared the best
option.
Mr. Keene stated that was too long, all that was needed was the outreach
portion.
Council Member Scharff stated the City Manager and the Mayor should
determine the date. The question was when Staff could have the information
ready.
Council Member Klein believed the outreach was a courtesy and he noted the
industry did not have veto power over the decision.
2. Discussion and Recommendation to Council Regarding Potential
Ordinance Making Changes to Council Compensation.
Molly Stump, City Attorney, stated the current Council was compensated
consistent with the General Law at $600 per month. The General Law
allowed room for compensation levels to be increased by way of an
Ordinance approved by the majority of Council or the Council could place the
matter before the voters. She noted any change to Council compensation
would go into effect with the beginning of new Council terms; for Palo Alto
that would be January 2015.
Council Member Scharff asked if the 2014 voting Council Members who were
not up for re-election could vote and have the increase if applicable applied
to their compensation in January of 2015.
Ms. Stump replied yes.
Council Member Scharff believed any vote could not apply to oneself.
Ms. Stump stated at least one member of the body had to have stood for
election in order for the new compensation level to apply to the entire body.
Meggan Casas, Senior Human Resources Administrator, reviewed the
benchmark data on surrounding cities in Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties for a total of 26 cities. The highest monthly Council salary was the
City of San Jose at $6,750. The average monthly salary throughout the
remaining cities was $759.40. The City of Santa Clara received an annual
Consumer Price Index (CPI) increase of 5 percent. The City of Mountain View
has a proposed measure for November 2014 to increase compensation from
$600 to $1,000 monthly.
Page 10 of 12
Policy and Services Committee Special Meeting Minutes 6/17/14
MINUTES
Council Member Scharff asked for the average salary.
Ms. Casas stated $759.40.
Council Member Scharff asked if the average was based on all of the cities
even though some were paid $0 and San Jose was $80,000 annually.
Ms. Casas said yes. San Jose Council Members were full time employees but
they were Council Members so their salary was included.
Council Member Scharff did not feel the average was helpful because the
monthly amounts were all over the chart.
James Keene, City Manager, wished to speak to the average but in contrast
the City was in the median at $600.
Chair Price acknowledged different cities paid different amounts but she felt
the issue should be based on the amount of work performed not the
numbers. She asked what the parameters were per the Ordinance that could
be used to make annual salary adjustments.
Ms. Stump stated the General Law allowed the Council to add 5 percent each
year since the last date of increase which was 2001. She noted the 5 percent
could not be compounding.
Chair Price said the Staff Report calculated the amount to just under $1,000.
Mr. Keene agreed and stated there could be a perspective 5 percent increase
moving forward.
Ms. Stump clarified if the Committee was interested in the maximum amount
of increase Staff would need to review the calendar and count days from the last increase in 2001 to January 1, 2105.
Herb Borock read portions of the General Law where the 5 percent was
indeterminate based on the benefits received. Some cities did not provide
medical benefits to their Council. He felt the only benefit the City Council should receive was salary and not medical benefits because the position was
not employment but volunteer.
Council Member Scharff recalled in 2010 there was a Motion to reduce
Council salary which failed by a 5 to 4 vote. Historically when financial times
were low cities did not provide salary increases but when the economy rose
Page 11 of 12
Policy and Services Committee Special Meeting Minutes 6/17/14
MINUTES
salaries increased and long-term projects were taken on. He believed
Council needed to take a leadership role and just because the economy was
good Council should not be the first in line to benefit. Palo Alto Council
salaries were in the median and he was satisfied with that.
MOTION: Council Member Klein moved, seconded by Chair Price to
recommend to the City Council that salaries be increased to $1,000 per
month effective January 1, 2017.
Council Member Klein felt the reason for an increased salary was it had been
13 years since the last increase. There was a decline in Council candidates in
their middle years and although you were not on the Council to become
wealthy there was an increase in workload and time away from family. He
chose the effective date as not to benefit seated Council Members.
Chair Price mentioned the current seated Council came from a variety of
economic status. There were Council Members who used personal choice to
not accept any monthly pay and some chose not to accept health benefits.
Those options were a personal choice and providing an increase in salary
was not meant to discourage or encourage candidates.
MOTION PASSED: 2-1 Scharff no, Schmid absent
Chair Price asked when Staff would bring the item forward to the full
Council.
Ms. Stump stated Staff would work toward an August return.
ADJOURNMENT: Meeting adjourned at 7:38 P.M.
Page 12 of 12
Policy and Services Committee Special Meeting Minutes 6/17/14