HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 8226
City of Palo Alto (ID # 8226)
City Council Staff Report
Report Type: Study Session Meeting Date: 8/28/2017
City of Palo Alto Page 1
Summary Title: Historic Resources Board and Council Joint Study Session
Title: Study Session: Joint Meeting of HRB and Council
From: City Manager
Lead Department: Planning and Community Environment
Recommendation
Staff recommends that Council conduct a joint meeting with the Historic Resources
Board (HRB).
Below are the potential topics of discussion for the joint meeting with the Historic
Resources Board.
I. Overview/Update
a. Introduction to the HRB by staff
b. HRB presentation on recent accomplishments and proposed work program
additions
II. Council Questions and Comments/Discussion
Background
The last time Council met with the HRB was May 6, 2015. Council and HRB members
provided comments and recommendations on matters related to Palo Alto’s historic
preservation work program and activities. No actions were taken. A recording of that
meeting can be found at http://midpenmedia.org/city-council-special-meeting-3/.
HRB Responsibilities
The HRB is tasked with responsibilities set forth in Palo Alto Municipal Code Chapter
16.49 to carry out the Historic Preservation program for Palo Alto, which is a Certified
Local Government (CLG). Staff submits an annual report to the Office of Historic
Preservation (OHP) each year, to summarize the activities, meeting attendance, and
annual required training of HRB members, in accordance with CLG guidelines.
2016-2017
This year, staff provided training on how moving of homes on a property comports with
City of Palo Alto Page 2
the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation. Staff also provided the HRB
members with an update on state law regarding Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), and
the City’s response. Also during the past year, the historic preservation team reviewed
several notable development projects, including the Avenidas building expansion and
Junior Museum and Zoo. In addition, the HRB reviewed Guidelines projects, such as the
Professorville Guidelines (adopted by Council in October 2016). In the fall of 2016, the
HRB reviewed a bulletin intended to aid staff and applicants by providing a summary of
the City review process for modifications to historic resources and potential historic
resources. Improvements to the Historic Preservation Program website are underway.
The HRB has also formed subcommittees this year to explore specific topics. One
subcommittee was regarding Governance, and explored the HRB’s role in relationship to
the Architectural Review Board and PCE Director. Another subcommittee formed to
consider potential features of a new Mills Act program for Palo Alto.
Eichler Guidelines Project
Historic preservation staff began work with the consultant, Page and Turnbull, in early
2017. After two successful workshops to gather input from Eichler owners in the spring
2017, staff has been working on a walking tour brochure for the two National Register
District Eichler neighborhoods. Staff also orchestrated the recent Eichler Memory
Event. The Draft Eichler Design Guidelines are tentatively scheduled for formal
presentation to the HRB in September 2017. Staff anticipates bringing these Guidelines
and potential code changes to Council for consideration in early 2018, following review
by the HRB and Planning and Transportation Commission.
Discussion
There are two additional projects that members of the HRB are interested in adding to
the Department’s work program:
1. Modern Age Context
The HRB is interested in developing a Modern Age Context Statement for Palo
Alto. A context statement can provide the foundation for preservation planning,
to describe the broad patterns of historical development of a community
represented by the physical development and character of the building
environment. A context statement, typically developed during the early stages of
survey planning, can be developed as a separate activity from a survey and can
identify important property types and establish eligibility criteria and integrity
thresholds. A context based survey can allow the city to evaluate resources for
land use planning purposes without needing to research each individual property.
The OHP offers guidance in developing these statements. Staff had prepared a
draft Certified Local Government (CLG) grant proposal for development of a
Modern Age Context Statement in 2016, but has not had resources to focus on
this effort. If the Council is amenable, staff could submit the grant proposal to
the Office of Historic Preservation in 2018 following completion of the Eichler
Guidelines project.
City of Palo Alto Page 3
2. Mills Act Program
The Mills Act allows local jurisdictions to enter into contracts with property
owners of historic properties much like the Williamson Act allows jurisdictions to
enter into contracts with owners of agricultural properties. In both cases, the
contract requires preservation of the resource in exchange for a property tax
adjustment. The City of Palo Alto has one Mills Act contract, but has never
crafted a Mills Act program to incentivize historic preservation. In the next
month or so, the Council will see an amendment to an existing Mills Act contract
for the Squire House on their consent agenda. From time to time, other
property owners have expressed interest in entering into a Mills Act contract and
the HRB held three sessions to discuss establishment of a program, beginning
with April 27, 2017. The April 27th report recalled the May 6, 2015 HRB-Council
meeting suggestion that the HRB discuss possible parameters for an updated
Mills Act application, and how to strike a balance for the right amount of
incentive for preservation without taking too much revenue away from the
schools. Links to the three HRB reports on the Mills Act are here:
April 27th report:
http://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/documents/57244
May 25th report:
http://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/documents/57907
June 8th report:
https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/documents/58117. Minutes
of the June 8th meeting are found at:
https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/documents/58351.
Councilmember input on these potential additions to staff’s work program would be
appreciated. Given limited staffing for the historic preservation program, both projects
would have to be completed as time permits.