Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-11-08 City Council (9)City of Palo Alto City Manager’s Report TO:HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL FROM:CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES DATE: SUBJECT: NOVEMBER 8, 2004 CMR:424:04 ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALO ALTO APPROVING THE LONG-TERM POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENT (WIND POWER) WITH PPM ENERGY, INC. FOR THE PURCHASE OF ELECTRICITY GENERATED BY A WIND ELECTRIC GENERATING FACILITY FOR A TERM OF 23 YEARS AND SEVEN MONTHS AND A CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $78.4 MILLION RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Council adopt the attached Resolution approving a Long-Terln Power Purchase Agreement ("contract") with PPM Energy, Inc. ("PPM") for a 20 MW share of the 162 MW rated capacity of the High Winds wind generating facility located in Solano County, California for atema of 23 years, 7 naonths, and an estimated total cost of $78.4 million ($3.33 million per year). The Resolution authorizes the City Manager tO sign the, contract on behalf of the City. BACKGROUND On October 2!, 2002, the City Council approved the Long-Term Electric Acquisition Plan ("LEAP") Guidelines (CMR:398:02). The Finance Conmaittee reviewed the implementation parameters of LEAP Guideline #6: Renewable Portfolio Investments on October 1, 2002, reconamending renewable energy targets of 10% of the City’s annual electric load by 2008 and 20% by 2015, and within the system average rate impact limit of ½ C/kWh. The Finance Conmaittee recommendation was approved by Council as part CMR:424:04 Page 1 of 5 of the overall LEAP Guidelines. On August 4, 2003, Council approved the LEAP Inaplementation Plan (CMR:354:03), Task #1 of which is to acquire renewable energy resources to lneet LEAP Guideline #6. On January 14, 2004, staff presented the Utilities Renewable Energy Supply Implementation Plan (the Plan) to the Utilities Advisory Commission (UAC). The UAC report, presentation and surrounding discussion SUlnn’tary were provided to Council as information on March 1, 2004 (CMR:168:04). The Plan has two tiers: (1) power purchase agreements (PPAs) for the near term (2005-2008) to meet the 10% renewable investment target by 2008, and (2) exploring new resource development opportunities for the longer term (2009-2015) to meet the 20% renewable investmem goal by 2015. Resources being pursued for the near term are 15-30 MW of wh~d energy from Solano County with deliveries beginning in 2005, and 3-10 MW of electricity from landfill gas from various locations in and around the Bay Area, with deliveries expected to ramp up from late 2005 to 2007. The proposed projects were selected by means of the NCPA Renewable Energy RFP, described in detail in the previous staff reports. Staff provided a progress repoi-t to Council in August 2004 (CMR: 370:04), which included a UAC Report from July 2004 that describes the basic tenets of the renewable energy contracts. DISCUSSION Staff is recomlnending that Council adopt a Resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute the contract with PPM for a 20 MW share of the 162 MW rated capacity of the High Winds wind generating facility located in Solano County, California for a terln of 23 years and 7 months, at an estilnated total cost of $78.4 million ($3.33 million per year). On March 15, 2004, (CMR:174:04) Council approved Second Phase and Third Phase Member Agreements with NCPA to facilitate completing renewable energy supply contracts with three vendors. The contract is the result of those efforts, representing the first step in implementing Tier 1 of the Renewable Energy Supply hnplementation Plan. The contract was developed in cooperation with NCPA and Alameda Power & Telecom ("APT"). APT is also purchasing a share of the High Winds energy (a 10 MW share). NCPA will serve as the scheduling coordinator, managing the day-to-day balancing activities within the NCPA pool; verifying deliveries; monitoring supplier compliance with contractual obligations; and managing invoicing and payment. Negotiations are CMR:424:04 Page 2 of 5 being completed for additional renewable energy resources, and staff expects to bring the resulting contracts to Council for approval as they are completed. A copy of the contract is attached for Council and available to the public on file with the City Clerk. The key terms of the contract are as follows: Term: 23 years, 7 months, with deliveries beginning December 2004 and continuing through June 2028. Quanti _ty: 20 MW share of the 162 MW rated capacity of the High Winds facility. (12.35%). CPAU’s share of.the expected animal output is 58,000 MWh, or approximately 6% of Palo Alto’s annual electric retail load. The contract includes a right to purchase the output from additions to the facility at a price set at the time, subject to Council approval. Product: Day-ahead hourly firm, which lneans that PPM will guarantee each day the hourly output for the following day. This day-ahead finning provides the ability to allocate other supply resources cost-effectively. The contract includes an option to change to a product that is only guaranteed one hour ahead (hour-ahead firm), which CPAU may choose to use if other resources such as Calaveras could be used as a firming resource instead, with a price reduction of $2iMWh. Price: $57.60/MWh, for a total contract amount of $78.4 million ($3.3 million per year) based on estimated generation. Credit: PPM is backed by Pacificorp Holdings, Inc. (PHI), who is providing a corporate guarantee. PHI is cmTently rated A- (stable outlook) by Standard and Poor’s, and is owned by Scottish Power. The contract includes provisions to provide collateral if needed in order to maintain adequate credit status during the course of the contract term. Off-Ramps: Eitherl party may terminate the contract if the other pal~:y does not meet its obligations under the contract, which include performance, payment, and adequate credit status. Should the contract be terminated due to default, any damages, that may be incurred such as wind energy replacement cost are only due to the non-defaulting party. Other customers of the High Winds facility include the Sacramento Municipal Utility District, the cities of Pasadena, Colton, Glendale, Anah.eim, Azusa, and the Modesto Irrigation District. CMR:424:04 Page 3 of 5 RESOURCE IMPACT The estimated $3.33 million animal cost is included in the cm~’ent year’s budget, and will be included in furore budget year proposals. Annual costs 1Tlay fluctuate due to unpredictable nature of wind availability, but are expected to be within 5% of the estimated cost. The 23.6-year fixed, price of $57.60/MWh is about $5/MWh above the cun’ent fo~wvard .price for base load electricity for the next four years, meaning that there could be a fairly modest short-term rate premium of approximately 0.03C/kWh. Electricity prices more than ten years in the furore range from $65-75/MWh: at a market price of $70/MWh, long-tema rates would be lower by approximately 0.07C/kWh relative to buying the same quantity of energy from the electric market. The levelized long-term rate impact is negligible, approximately 0.008 C/kWh favoi’able, based on a first year market price of $48.00/MWh increasing at 2.5% per year. The contract facilitates meeting the Renewable Energy Supply Implementation Plan goals with a rate impact well below the ½C/kWh limit recomlnended by the Finance Committee and approved by Council. POLICY IMPLICATIONS The proposed contract is a key element of the Utilities Renewable Energy Supply Implementation Plan (CMR:168:04), and supports the Council-approved Utilities Strategic Plan (CMR 432:02) and Utilities Strategic Implementation Plan (CMR:223:01). Renewable energy supplies are required to meet the targets established by Council in LEAP Guideline #6 (Renewable Portfolio Investments) and also support LEAP Guideline #2 (Hydro Risk Management) and #3 (Market Risk Management) by diversifying Pato Alto"s resources. LEAP Guideline #6: Renewable Portfolio Investments: The City shall continue to offer a renewable resource-based retail rate for all custolners who want to voluntarily select an increased content of renewable energy. In addition to the voluntal-y program, the City shall invest in new renewable resources tO meet the City’s sustainability goals while ensuring that the retail rate impact does not exceed 0.5C/kWh on average. Pursue a target level of new renewable purchases of 10% of the expected portfolio load by 2008 and move to a 20% target by 2015, contingent on economic viability. The contracts for investment in renewable resources are not to exceed 30 years in term. CMR:424:04 Page 4 of 5 hnplementing LEAP Renewable Portfolio Investments also supports City’s Sustainability Policy Statement, adopted April 2, 2001 (CMR 175:01.), the Green Government Pledge, adopted July 19, 1999 (CMR 284:99) and elelnents of the Comprehensive Plan, specifically: 1. GOAL N-9: A clean, efficient, competitively-priced energy supply that makes use of cost-effective renewable resources, and Policies 2. POLICY N-44: Maimain Palo Alto’s long-term supply of electricity and natural gas while addressing environmental and economic concerns. 3. POLICY N-48: Encourage the appropriate use of alternative energy teclmologies. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Execution of the Agreement does not constitute a project .for the purposes California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). ATTACHMENTS of the A:Resolution approving the long-term power purchase agreement (wind power) with PPM Energy, Inc. for the purchase of electrical power. B:Long-term power purchase agreement (wind power) made between PPM Energy, Inc., as Seller and the City of Palo Alto, as Purchaser. Attachment B is included as an attachment in Council member packets and available for review by the public in the City Clerk’s Office. -KARL E. KNXISP ,’ , Senior Resource Plam~er DEPARTMENT HEAD: CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: of Utilities ttARRISON Assistant City Manager CMR:424:04 Page 5 of 5 YET APPROVED RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALO ALTO APPROVING THE LONG-TERH POWER PURCHASE AGREEHENT (WIND POWER) WITH PPH ENERGY, INC. FOR THE PURCHASE OF ELECTRICITY GENERATED BY A WIND ELECTRIC GENERATING FACILITY WHEREAS, the City of Pa!o Alto ("City"), a municipal utility and a chartered city, is a member of the Northern California Power Agency ("NCPA"); WHEREAS, on October 21, 2002, the City approved seven electric portfolio planning and management guidelines to guide the development and management of the City’s long-term electricity acquisition plan; one of the guidelines is to pursue target levels of new renewable energy purchases equal to ten percent and twenty percent of the City’s expected energy load by 2008 and 2015, respectively; WHEREAS, the City is interested in purchasing power generation from renewable resources for the benefit of its electric customers; WHEREAS, by purchasing these sources of renewable energy, the City will help reduce the production of greenhouse gases and assist in reducing volatile organic compound emissions; WHEREAS, PPH Energy, Inc. was selected through a competitive solicitation process, to provide renewable power generated by the "High Winds" wind electric generating facility owned and operated by FPL Energy, L.L.C., a subsidiary of the FPL Group, Inc.; NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Palo Alto " hereby RESOLVE as f’ollows: . SECTION 1. The Council hereby approves the City’s execution of the Long-Term Power Purchase Agreement (Wind Power) made between PPH Energy, Inc., as Seller, and the City of Pa!o Alto, as Purchaser. The term of the contract shall be 23 years and 7 months, commencing as of December 1, 2004. The delivery of electricity will begin December 1, 2004 and continue through June 30, 2028. Quantity shall consist of a 20 HW share of the 162 HW rated capacity (12.35%) of the High Winds wind electric generating facility. Spending authority under the contract shall be seventy-eight million, four hundred thousand dollars ($78,400,000). The City Hanager or his designee is hereby authorized to sign the contract with PPH Energy, Inc. on behalf of the City. O~’IO1S cl 0072441 ~NOT YET APPROVED*~ SECTION 2. The Council finds that the adoption of this resolution does not constitute a project under the California Environmental Quality Act and no environmental assessment is required. INTRODUCED AND PASSED: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: ATTEST: City Clerk Hayor APPROVED: APPROVED AS TO FORM:City Manager Senior Asst. City Attorney Director of Administrative Services Director of Utilities 041018 cl 0072441 2