HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-08-09 City Council (9)City of Palo Alto
City Manager’s Report
TO:HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DATE:AUGUST 9, 2004 CMR:391:04
SUBJECT:SECOND TRIAL PLAN FOR DOWNTOWN NORTH TRAFFIC
CALMING PROJECT
This is an informational report and no Council action is required.
BACKGROUND
On March 29, 2004, Council directed staff to remove most elements of the first trial plan for
Downtown North Traffic Calming that was installed in June 2003, including six of the seven
street closures. Council directed staff to implement a modification of one of the staff-
prepared alternative traffic calming plans, the no closures plan, for a one-year trial period.
Council also approved Resolution 8415, as revised to reflect approval of the modified no
closures plan. Council asked staff to provide an informational report on various aspects of
the new plan.
Council approved implementation of the no closures plan with two modifications--(i) keep
the existing closure on Palo Alto Avenue at Middlefield, and (ii) add a speed table on Palo
Alto Avenue west of Bryant as a replacement for the removed street closure near Bryant
(Attachment A). Council also asked staff to consider adding up to two traffic circles to
Hawthorne and/or Everett. The Commission and some Council Members were concerned
about the impact of the Everett/High street closure (in the first trial plan) and the
Alma/Everett turn restriction (in the no closures and modified mixed measures plans) on the
retail business of Stanford Electric, but Council’s motion did not remove that turn restriction
from the plan. Staff believes it is important to maintain the turn restrictions at all four
locations in order to insure that neither Hawthorne nor Everett becomes the sole, unbalanced
access point for through traffic during the peak hours. If the Alma/Everett turn restriction
were to be removed in the future, staff would recommend adding a traffic circle at the
Everett/Bryant intersection in order to maintain some degree of balance in traffic calming
measures between the two streets.
At its March 29 meeting, Council also gave direction to staff direction to evaluate adding
either one or two additional traffic circles to the no closures plan (second trial plan) as
adopted by Council. Staff does not recommend adding either one or two additional traffic
CMR:391:04 Page 1 of 8
circles to the no closures plan since traffic circles additional to those shown il~ the no
closures plan would not add significantly to the volume or speed reduction effects of the
second trial plan.
Staff plans to locate the new speed table on Palo Alto Avenue to the west of Emerson, about
midway between Alma and Bryant, in order to impact the section of Palo Alto Avenue that
includes the Emerson to Alma travel route. In this section, it can be located approximately
midway between Alma and High, to the east of the 101 Alma building, on a location with
good sight distance and a straight alignment on the property line between two single family
houses.
DISCUSSION
An expedited implementation of the second trial plan will require two phases. The first
phase was completed with installation by April 23 of turn restriction signs along Alma and
Middlefield. The timeline for the second phase, installation of the second trial plan physical
measures, including traffic circles and speed tables, is presented below:
®
Construction of second trial plan will begin in mid-August 2004. It is expected that
construction will be completed no later than mid-September 2004. Every effort will be
made to minimize any disruption to traffic flow during construction.
One-year trial will begin mid-September 2004.
Trial evaluation will begin mid-February 2005 and continue for thi’ee months (including
data gathering, neighborhood meeting, and resident opinion survey).
.Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC) public hearing in June 2005
City Council meeting and decision regarding second Downtown North Traffic Calming
Trial, in September/October 2005.
New Performance Measures for Second Trial Plan
It is important to note that, due to the desire to expedite installation of the turn restrictions,
the Transportation Division was unable to collect new existing conditions data (post-closure
removal, but prior to installation of the turn restriction signs). There was some interest
expressed during recent public hearings at the Planning and Transportation Commission and
Council on the first traffic calming trial plan in an even more comprehensive and robust set
of such data than had been collected before and after installation of the first trial plan. Since
staff will be unable, because of too short a time window between barrier removal and
installation of the turn restriction signs, to collect a set of brand new data, the Transportation
Division will use a data set collected in February and March 2003, prior to installation in
June 2003 of the first Downtown North traffic calming trial plan (i.e. pre-project with no
traffic calming measures in place). Approximately five months after implementation of the
second trial plan, corresponding after data will be gathered. Most performance measures
will be evaluated by comparing the before and after data.
CMR:391:04 Page 2 of 8
The Transportation Division assembled an informal group of twenty-two stakeholders,
approximately evenly divided between proponents and opponents of the first Downtown
North traffic calming trial to review staff proposals for assessment of the second Downtown
North traffic calming trial. The, or "Roundtable" as it came to be called, met three times.
Staff, in dialog with the roundtable members, defined the "roundtable" purpose as being to
"discuss with the Transportation Division assessment measures to employ for the second
Downtown North traffic calming trial that the Palo Alto City Council directed the
Transportation Division to implement, as well as to discuss the impact and effectiveness of
the Trial." The "Roundtable" reviewed, discussed, and made suggested revisions to
statements of purpose and needs both for the group itself and for the project. "Roundtable"
members agreed to re-convene after the construction of the traffic circles and speed table
called for in the second Downtown North traffic cahning trial to discuss its effects and the
evaluation process.
Second Downtown North Traffic Calming Trial
The goal of the second Downtown North traffic calming trial project is "to reduce cut-
through vehicular traffic in accordance with the second Downtown North traffic calming
plan directed by City Council, without diminishing traffic safety for all modes of travel on
any Palo Alto street."
Evaluation Methods and Metrics
Reduction in Downtown North Cut-Through Traffic (Target Measure). The proposed
target: "Cut-through" traffic should be reduced by 20 percent compared to the before
condition, as measured in February-March 2003 traffic volume (24-hour) counts. This
reduction in cut-through traffic is equivalent to a 9 percent reduction in before (i.e.
February-March 2003) traffic count data for traffic count locations on the first (or
gateway) block from Alma, Lytton, and Middlefield compared to February-March 2005
after data. Traffic count locations will be in the first blocks of the following Downtown
North streets:
(a)Everett (between Middlefield and Byron to the east and between Alma and High to
the west),
(b)Hawthorne(between Middle field and Byron to the east and between Alma and
High to the west)~
(c)Palo Alto Avenue (between Alma and Emerson), High (between Lytton and
Everett),
(d)Emerson (between Lytton and Everett),
(e)Ramona (between Lytton and Everett),
(f)Bryant (between Lytton and Everett),
(g)Waverley (between Lytton and Everett),
(h)Kipling (between Lytton and Everett),
CMR:391:04 Page 3 of 8
o
(i)Cowper (between Lytton and Everett),
(j)Webster (between Lytton and Everett), and
(k)Byron (between Lytton and Everett).
This method is an acceptable alternative to best practice, which is to conduct an
expensive, labor-intensive origin and destination study using license plate matching
methodology such as was conducted in 1999, prior to development of the first
Downtown North Traffic Calming Plan.
Diversion to Local Streets: No more than a 25 percent increase in before-after traffic on
any residential street having less than one standard deviation below the mean value of
traffic counts for Palo Alto residential streets in each of the three street classifications in
the Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan.
Diversion to Local Streets >one standard deviation from the mean." No more than a 10
percent increase in before-after traffic on any residential street having more than one
standard deviation above the mean value of traffic counts on for Palo Alto residential
streets in each of the three street classifications in the Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan.
4.The traffic shift thresholds for streets with base (pre-project) traffic volumes on streets
between the 10 percent and 25 percent thresholds above will be determined by
increasing the threshold byl percent for each 1/15 increment in base traffic volume.
°
°
Arterial Intersection Level of Service (LOS)." The AM and PM peak hour level of service
(LOS) at the Lytton/Alma, LyttoniMiddlefield, Lytton/Cowper and Lytton/Emerson
intersections will not degrade to less than LOS D, which is the minimum acceptable
LOS in Palo Alto. Only "after" measurements of the second trial plan are required for
this measure, since the impact measure is whether or not the threshold value (LOS D)
has been exceeded, not whether there has been a change in LOS.
Queue Length at Lytton/Middlefield: The change in maximum and average stopped
vehicle queue lengths during AM and PM peak hours on all four legs of this intersection
will be measured through observation. Queue lengths will be estimated in early August,
just prior to construction of the traffic circles in mid-August 2004 and again in Mid-
February 2005 as part of the broad assessment of the second Downtown North traffic
calming trial. Queue lengths were not estimated as part of the February-March 2003
"base condition+" data collection prior to installation of the Downtown North first traffic
calming trial plan.
Speed Reduction: Speeds will be evaluated at 6-8 mid-block locations on the interior
Downtown North streets where speed tables and traffic circles are located. This will
provide a gauge of the effectiveness of these measures at reducing speeds in their.
vicinity. Little change in speed is expected at locations that are over 200 feet away from
CMR:391:04 Page 4 of 8
speed tables or traffic circles. Staff will compare these after data with such before data as
may be available. Since some before volume counts (hence also speed, since counting
tubes are deployed in pairs allowing for simultaneous recording of both vehicle volumes
and speeds) will not have been taken within 200 feet of the new speed table or traffic
circle locations, staff will not have an identical set of before and after speed data.
Crashes Due to Traffic Cahning Measures: There will be no reported crashes directly
attributable to the traffic calming plan elements in the Downtown North neighborhood
during the trial period. Any crashes so attributable will result in such changes in traffic
calming device design and location (including removal with or without re-location) as
may be required. The following crashes and!or primary causal factors will not be
considered in evaluating this measure: property damage 0nly, driving under the
influence, failure to obey rules of the road (California Vehicle Code violation) or
mechanical failure. Careful assessment must be made with respect to attribution of crash
causation.]
Fire and Police Responses: The travel times for Fire and Police Department calls within
and near the Downtown North neighborhood will not exceed the Departments, mission
goals for travel times of 4 minutes for 90 percent of fire and basic medical responses, 6
minutes for 90 percent of advanced medical responses (Paramedics), and 3 minutes t~or
police calls. Fire and police response time goals within and to the boundaries of the
primary service are of Fire Station 1 (located at Alma, Everett and High) will continue to
be met after installation of the Downtown North Second Traffic Calming trial measures.
The methodology of response time measurement will be determined by the Fire
Department and Police Depamnent.
Fire Department Access to Lytton Gardens and Webster House." Fire Department access
to Lytton Gardens and Webster House will not be impeded due to implementation of the
second Downtown North traffic calming trial project. The Fire Department will evaluate
the impact of the traffic calming project on access to these facilities with respect to
increased traffic congestion on Lytton and Middl~efield or any other aspect of the traffic
calming plan.
10.Turn Restriction Compliance: Staff will evaluate compliance with turn restrictions
though a representative sample visual survey during turn-restricted hours. This report
will document non-compliance since the extent of compliance of those who would
otherwise have made the banned turns cannot be visually observed.
11. hnpacts on Service Providers: Impacts attributable to the traffic calming plan as reported
by City departments, PASCO, the US Postal Service, or any other public agencies
serving the neighborhood (including bordering arterials) will be documented and
reported.
CMR:391:04 Page 5 of 8
12.Neighborhood Acceptance." Residents’ acceptance will be detenr~ined through a
household-based and business address-based advisory survey of Downtown North and
environs. Non-resident property owners will be included in the survey. The survey will
take place within an area bounded on the north by Menlo Park, the west by Alma, the
east by Chaucer (both sides), the southeast by University Avenue (both sides) and the
northeast by Lytton (both sides). Staff will report results for the following sub-areas: (a)
Downtown North interior streets (bounded by - but not including - Alma, Lytton, and
Middlefield), (b) the Lytton Neighborhood, (c) Middle field Avenue between Menlo Park
and University Avenue, (d) Lytton Avenue between Alma and Middlefield, (e)
University Avenue between Chaucer and Middlefield, and (f) Alma between Palo Alto
Avenue and Lytton. In addition, staff will report survey results for (g) the area survey
before the first Downtown North traffic calming trial project, which included the interior
streets of Downtown North as well as the west side of Middlefield, the east side of Alma,
and the north side of Lytton. Interpretation of advisory survey results will be up to the
Planning and Transportation Commission and Council. No target percentage of advisory
survey results will be set a priori.
RESOURCE IMPACT
The Second Trial Plan as approved by Council will cost approximately $72,000, including
$15,000 for removal of the first trial plan elements (already accomplished), $8,000 for new
before and after data, and $49,000 for installation of the second trial plan elements. There is
$85,000 in the Transportation Division FY 2003/04 operating budget for this project, which
would need to be carried over to FY 2004/05. The estimated cost for Public Works
Operations to maintain the traffic calming measures in the second trial plan is not
significant. The on-going installation of traffic calming measures is incrementally adding to
maintenance costs, and these extra maintenance requirements are not funded. In the near
future, when the PTC and Council consider staff’s proposed revisions to the Neighborhood
Traffic Calming Program, staff will propose that funding for annual maintenance of new
traffic calming measures be taken from the Traffic Calming Program CIP.
Any possible future changes to the second trial plan are not included in these estimates. If
the plan is successful and remains permanently, an additional $12,000 would be required to
fill the three traffic circles with decomposed granite, similar to the fill used in the now-
removed street closures. Additional funds would have to be secured for this work, or for any
future changes to the plan.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
This traffic calming plan is consistent with Comprehensive Plan policies and programs
relating to neighborhood streets, including the following:
Policy T-32: "Design and maintain the City street network to provide a variety of alternate
routes, so that the traffic loads on any one street are minimized." "
CMR:391:04 Page 6 of 8
Policy T-33: ’°Keep all neighborhood streets open unless there is a demonstrated safety or
overwhelming through traffic problem and there are no acceptable alternatives, or unless a
closure would increase the use of alternative transportation modes."
Policy T-34: Implement traffic calming measures to slow traffic on local and collector
residential streets and prioritize these measures over congestion management. Include traffic
circles and other traffic calming devices among these measures."
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
A mitigated negative declaration was approved by the Council for the Modified Mixed
Measures Plan, which included plans with similar or less impact, such as the Second Trial
Plan.
ATTACHMENTS
A, Downtown North Second Traffic Calming Trial Map
PREPARED BY:
DEPARTMENT HEAD:
JOSEPH KOTT (e~
Official
/STEVE EMSLIEC.
Director of Planning and
Community Environment
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:~ "~"~MILY HARRISON
Assistant City Manager
cc:DTNNA representatives (Dan Lorimer, Chas Pavlovic, Mike Liveright, Josh Mogal)
Unblock representatives (Joe Durand, Dana DeNault, Pat Markevitch, Steve Kutner)
Downtown North Roundtable Members
Lytton neighborhood representatives (Alan and Bonnie Luntz)
Palo Bicycle Advisory Committee Members
City of Menlo Park Transportation Division
CMR:391:04 Page 7 of 8
ATTACHMENT A
MIDDLEFIELD ROAD
¯7-10 A[7-10 AN
Existing Closure ~
Bike Bridge
WEBSTER STREET
KEY
Existing Stop Sign
Gateway
Bulbout Pair
(~) Traffic Circle
Note: the gotewoys,
bulbout ond traffic
circles ollow foil lwo-woy
troffic occess,
WEBSTER STREET
Johnson
Park
BRYANT STREET ’ BRYANT STREET
BYRON STREET
WEBSTER STREET
COWPI { STREET
L
WAVERLEY STREET
BRYANT STREET
E .MERSON STREET
Install New
Speed
Table at
Existing Gateway
EMERSON STREET
RAMONASTREET
EMERSON STREET
[.Electric
Station
! "
NO CLOSURES
PLAN
¯ DOWNTOWN
NORTH TRAFFIC
CALMING PROJECT
HIGII STREET
ALMA STREET ALMA STREET AL~/~t~ STREET
~
.,~ I.
I~L~~SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD
Existing 7-10 AM :
3-6 PM .....