HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-07-19 City Council (8)City of Palo Alto
City Manager’s Report
TO:HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATIVE
SERVICES
DATE:
SUBJECT:
JULY 19, 2004 CMR: 358:04
CITY OF PALO ALTO’S INVESTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT
FOR THE FOURTH QUARTER, FISCAL YEAR 2003-04
This is an information report and no Council action is required.
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this report is to inform Council of the status of the City’s investment portfolio
as of the end of the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2003-04. The City’s investment policy
requires that staff report to Council on the City’s: portfolio composition compared to
Council-adopted policy, portfolio performance, and other key investment and cash flow
information.
DISCUSSION
Investment Portfolio as of June 30, 2004
The City’s investment portfolio is detailed in Attachment B. It is grouped by investment type
and includes the investment issuer, date of maturity, current market value, the book and face
(par) value, and the weighted average maturity of each type of investment and of the entire
portfolio as of June 30, 2004.
The par value of the City’s portfolio is $368.9 million; in comparison, last quarter it was
$357.8 million and at the end of last fiscal year it was 351.3 million. Growth in the portfolio
ors 11.1 million since the last quarter is from a combination of lower utility power costs and
the City’s continued efforts to constrain expenditures.
The portfolio consists of $25.4 million in liquid accounts and $343.5 million in U. S.
govermnent treasury and agency securities. The $343.5 million includes $111.8 million in
investments maturing in less than two years, comprising 32.5 percent of the City’s investment
in notes and securities. The current market value of the portfolio is 100.7 percent of the book
value. Because the City’s practice is to hold securities until they mature, changes in market
CMR: 358:04 Page 1 of 4
price do not affect the City’s investment principal. The market valuation is provided by
Union Bank of California, which is the City’s safekeeping agent. The average life to maturity
of the investment portfolio is 2.90 years. At the end of last fiscal year, the average life to
maturity was 2.82 years.
Investments Made During the Fourth Quarter
During the fourth quarter, $26.1 million of government agency securities with an average
yield of 4.9 percent matured. During the same period, government securities totaling $32.8
million with an average yield of 4.2 percent were purchased. The City’s short-term money
market and pool account increased by $4.4 million or 21.0 percent compared to the third
quarter of 2003-04. Investment staff continually monitors the City’s short-term cash flow
needs and adjust liquid funds to meet those needs and to take advantage of investment
opportunities.
Availability of Funds for the Next Six Months
The normal flow of revenues from the City’s utility billings and general fund sources is
sufficient to provide funds for ongoing expenditures. Projections indicate receipts will be
$145.7 million and expenditures will be $142.9 million over the next six months, indicating
an overall growth of theportfolio of about $2.8 million.
As of June 30, 2004, the City had $25.4 million deposited in the Local Agency Investment
Fund (LAIF) and a money market account that could be withdrawn on a daily basis. In
addition, securities totaling $24.7 million will mature between July 1, 2004 and December
31, 2004. On the basis of the above projections, staff is confident that the City will have
more than sufficient funds to meet expenditure requirements for the next six lnonths.
Compliance with City Investment Policy
During the fourth quarter of 2003-04, staff complied with all aspects of the investment
policy. Attaclvnent C lists the restrictions in the City’s investment policy compared with the
portfolio’s actual compliance.
Investment Yields
Interest income on an accrual basis for the fourth quarter of 2003-04 was $4.0 million while
the total for the fiscal year was $16.3 million. This total is 6.3 percent less than what the City
received last fiscal year even though the portfolio has increased by 5.0 percent. The decline
in interest earnings results from interest rate declines over the past year. As of June 30, 2004,
the yield to maturity of the City’s portfolio was 4.29 percent. This compares to a yield of
4.36 percent in the third quarter of 2003-04 and 4.75 percent as of June 30, 2003. Even
though interest rates are slowly increasing, the City’s portfolio yield will decrease further in
the first quarter of 2004-05 as a result of continued reinvestment of maturing securities at
lower interest rates. The City’s portfolio yield of 4.29 percent compares to LAIF’s average
yield for the quarter of 1.44 percent and an average yield on the two-year and five-year
ClVIR: 358:04 Page 2 of 4
five-year Treasury bond during the fourth quarter of approximately 2.74 percent and 3.92
percent, respectively.
Yield Trends
The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) increased the federal funds rate by 25 basis
points to 1.25 percent in June 2004. This was the first rate increase in the last four years.
At its June 2004 meeting, the FOMC continued to maintain a "balanced" outlook on the
economy. This outlook reveals an expectation that the upside and downside risks associated
-with economic growth remain equal. The FOMC is expected to slowly increase the federal
funds rate over the next few years. While the City can expect declining yields on its portfolio
in the near future, it can expect yields to increase gradually if the FOMC continues to raise
interest rates.
Funds Held by the Ci_ty or Managed Under Contract
Attachment A is a consolidated report of all City investment funds, including those not held
directly in the investment portfolio. These include cash in the City’s regular bank account
with Bank of America. The bond proceeds, bond reserves, and debt service payments being
held by the City’s fiscal agents are subject to the requirements of .the underlying debt
indenture. The trustees for the bond funds are U.S. Bank and California Asset Management
Progrmn (CAMP). Bond funds with U.S. Bank are invested in lnoney market mutual funds
that consist exclusively of U.S. Treasury securities. Bond funds in CAMP are invested in
banker’s acceptance notes, certificates of deposit, colnmercial paper, federal agency
securities, and repurchase agreements. The most recent data on funds held by the fiscal agent
is as of June 30, 2004.
ATTACHMENTS:
A)Consolidated Report of Cash and Investments
B)Investment PortfoliO, as of June 30, 2004
C)Investment Policy Colnpliance
PREPARED BY:
TAR~~RAYAN
Senior Financial Analyst
~CMR: 358:04 Page 3 of 4
DEPARTMENT HEAD APPROVAL:
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
CARE YEATS /
Director, Adm?istrative Services
....... --E@LY HARRISON
Assistant City Manager
CMR: 358:04 Page 4 of 4
Attachment A
Consolidated Report
City of Palo Alto Cash and Investments
Fourth Quarter, Fiscal Year 2003-04
Book Value Market Value
$377,027,463 $379,548,849City Investment Portfolio (see Attachment B)
Other Funds Held by the City
Cash with Bank of America
(includes general, imprest, and other accounts)
California Asset Management Program (CAMP)
University Ave. Special Maintenance/CIP Funds
Petty/Working Cash (as of 06/30/04)
Total - Other Funds Held By City
Funds Under Management of Third Party Trustees *
(Debt Service Funds and Reserves)
1,848,858 .1,848,858
500,029 500,029
11,695 11,695
2,360,582 2,360,582
US Bank Trust Services **
Golf Course Certificates of Participation
Construction Fund & Lease Payment Fund
2002 Civic Cen~er Certificates of Participation
Lease Payment Fund, Reserve Fund, & Cost of Issuance
2002 Downtown Parking Impvt. Certificates of Participation
hnpvt. Fund, Cost of Issuance, Reserve Fund
1999 Utility Revenue Bonds
Construction Fund
2002 Utility Revenue Bonds
Debt Service Account
1995 Utility Revenue Bonds
Debt Service Account
California Asset Management Program (CAMP) ***
Golf Course Certificates of Participation
Reserve Fund
2001 University Ave. Parking Bonds
Impvt. Fund, Cost of Issuance, Reserve Fund
2002 University Ave. Parking Bonds
Impvt. Fund, Cost of Issuance, Reserve Fund
2002 Utility Revenue Bonds
Construction Funds and Reserve Fund
Total Under Trustee Management
GRAND TOTAL
14,008 14,008
350,788 350,788
1,361,804 1,361,804
164,154 164,154
18,026 18,026
66 66
716,264 716,264
933,077 933,077
8,086,357 8,086,357
11,571,437 11,571,437
23,215,982 23,215,982
$ 402,604,027 $ 405,125,413
*These funds are subject to the requirements of the underlying debt indenture.
** U.S. Bank investments are in money market mutual funds that exclusively invest in U.S. Treasury securities.
*** CAMP investments are in money market mutual fund which invest in bankers acceptance, Certificate of deposit,
commercial paper, federal agency securities, and repurchase agreements.
~ o
0
0n
ATTACHMENT B
oo o o o oo o o ooSS o o o o So o o oooo o
o~oooooo~£~oo~oo
ooooooooo
o o o o o o o o 6 5 ~ 5 5 6 ~ 6 d d ~ 5 5 d 5 5 d 5
qqqq£qqqqqo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
~dddJddd~ddd~dd~d~ddd~d
o ~#n ~
L~
00000000000000000000~0000~O0 O0
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo o o o o o £ o q q q o q ~ q q q q £ q £ q £ q q q q q q £ ~ £ q
ooooooooooooooooooooooooo~ooooooo~ooooooooooooooooo~°°°°°°
0 --
o
oo o o ooooo
ooooooooooooo
o o o o o o o o o o o o o d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d dooooooooooooooo
oooooooo~oooooooo
oooooooo oooooooooooooooooooo
888888888888888888888888888
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
.o ~ ~
n~
ooooooooooooooo
oooooooooooooo~ooooooooooooooooooqqqqq~qqqqqqqqooooooooooooooooooo
o o o o o o o oo o o o o ~~~~~ooooooooooooo~ooooooo~oooooooooo~oooooooo~ooooooo~ooo~ooooooooo~
oo
oo ooooooo
oooooooooooooooooooo
.R .R .R .R .R .~ .~ .R .R .~ .R .R .R .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .R
Investment Policy Compliance
As of June 30, 2004
Attachment C
General Investment Guidelines:
a) Beg. FY 00-01, the max. stated final maturity of individual securities in the portfolio should be 10 years.
Investment exceeding 10 years maturity that were authorized under investment policies Wior to FY 00-01.
b) A max. of 30 percent of the par value of the portfolio shall be invested in securities with maturities
beyond 5 years.
c) The City shall maintain a minimum of one month’s cash needs in short term investments.
d) At least $50 million shall be maintained in securities maturing in less than 2 years.
Plus two managed pool accounts which provide instant liquidity:
-Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) -maximum investment limit is $40 million
-Fidelity Investments
e) Market value of the portfolio will exceed 95 percent of the amortized cost basis of the portfolio.
d) Commitments to purchase securities newly introduced on the market shall be made no more than three (3)
working days before pricing.
f) Whenever possible, the City, will obtain three or more quotations on the purchase or sale of
comparable securities (excludes new issues, LAIF, City of Palo Alto bonds, money market
accounts, and mutual funds).
U.S. Government Securities:
a) There is no limit on purchase of these securities.
b) Securities will not exceed 10 years maturity.
U.S. Government Agency Securities:
a) There is no limit on purchase of these securities except for:
Callable and Multi-step-up securities provided that:
-The potential call dates are known at the time of purchase;
- the interest rates at Which they "step-up" are known at the time of purchase; and
- the entire face value of the security, is redeemed at the call date.
-No more than 20 percent of the par value of portfolio.
b) Beginning FY 00-01, securities will not exceed 10 years maturity.
Investment exceeding 10 years maturity,. Authorized under investme~t policies prior to FY 00-01.
Certificates of Depositi
a) May not exceed 20 percent of the par value of the portfolio;
b) No more than 10 percent of the par value of the portfolio in collateralized CDs in any institution.
c) Purchase collateralized deposits only from federally, insured large banks that are rated by
Moody’s or Standard & Poors.
d) For non-rated banks, deposit should be limited to amounts federally insured (FDIC)
e) Rollovers are not permitted without specific instruction from authorized City, staff.
Banker’s Acceptance Notes:
a) No more than 30 percent of the par value of the portfolio.
b) Not to exceed 180 days maturity.
c). No more than $5 million with any one institution.
Commercial Paper:
a) No more than 15 percent of the par value of the portfolio.
b) Having highest letter or numerical rating from Moody’s or Standard and Poor’s.
c) Not to exceed 180 days maturity.
d) No more than $3 million with any, one institution.
Full Colnpliance
0.01%
14.64%
Full Compliance
$111.8 million
$24.6 million
$0.8 million
1 O0.66%
Full Compliance
Full Compliance
Full Compliance
Full Compliance
Full Compliance
Full Compliance
Full Compliance
18.79%
0.01%
None Held
None Held
None Held
Investment Policy Compliance
As of June 30, 2004
Attachment
lO
ll
12
Short-Term Repurchase Agreement (REPO):
a) Not to exceed 1 year.
b) Market value of securities that underlay a repurchase agreement shall be valued at 102 percent or
greater of the funds borrowed against those securities.
Mutual Funds:
a) No more than 20 percent of the par value of the portfolio.
b) No more than 10 percent of the par value with any one institution.
Negotiable Certificates of Deposit (NCD):
a) No more than 10 percent of the par value of the portfolio.
b) No more than $5 million in any one institution.
Medium-Term Corporate Notes:
a) No more than 10 percent of the par value of the portfolio.
b) Not to exceed 5 years maturity.
c) Securities eligible for investment shall have a minimum rating of AA from Mood’s and/or Standard & Poor’s.
d) No more than $5 million of the par value may be invested in securities of any singl.e issuer, other
than the U.S. Government, its agencies and instrumentality.
e) If securities owned by the City are downgraded by either rating agencies to a level below AA it
shall be the City’s policy to review the credit situation and make a determination as to whether
to sell or retain such securities.
Prohibited Investments:
a) Reverse Repurchase Agreements
b) Derivatives as defined in Appendix B of the Investment Policy
All securities shall be delivered to the City’s safekeeping custodian, and held in the name of the
City, with the exception of :
-Certificates of Deposit, Mutual Funds, and LAIF
None Held
Full Compliance
None Held
None Held
Full Compliance
None Held
Full Compliance