Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 7699 City of Palo Alto (ID # 7699) City Council Staff Report Report Type: Informational Report Meeting Date: 2/6/2017 City of Palo Alto Page 1 Summary Title: Facility Concept/Master Planning for Animal Shelter Title: Update on Negotiations With Pets In Need Regarding Animal Care Services and Intention to Advance Prior City Council Direction Regarding Facility Construction or Rehabilitation From: City Manager Lead Department: City Manager Background In 2012 City Council directed staff to explore various cost savings strategies for providing animal services for the City of Palo Alto. This directive was the result of the loss of the City’s largest partner, the City of Mountain View, who chose to purchase its services from Silicon Valley Animal Control Authority. This departure precipitated discussion of the services and shelter condition of the Palo Alto Animal Shelter and its cost effectiveness. The City Council directed staff to pursue reductions in the level of subsidy to the shelter and potential service improvements. Despite an initial reduction in subsidy level, over recent years funding has grown, relying on approximately $800,000 of subsidy, per year, from the City’s General Fund. Currently, animal services are provided by City staff at a municipal facility at 3281 E. Bayshore Road in Palo Alto. The facility, which operates 6.5 hours per day, six days a week, was built in 1972 and has been identified as inadequate to meet current needs and requires modernization. After an extensive Request for Proposal process conducted over many months, City Council directed staff in September 2016 to proceed with exclusive negotiations with a nonprofit organization, Pets In Need, to operate the City’s animal care services and address facility needs. City Council authorized up to $250,000 for transition-related costs. Additional background information can be found in the attached staff report. Furthermore the City has established a dedicated website with previous staff reports and documents related to this project: www.cityofpaloalto.org/animalservicesassessment. Discussion Since receiving City Council direction in September 2016, staff is continuing to actively negotiate with Pets In Need to achieve an agreement that meets the needs of the parties. To City of Palo Alto Page 2 date, negotiations have focused on identifying service levels, cost of services, specifying transition issues and discussing facility needs. A term sheet approved by City Council in September 2016 between the City and Pets In Need states that within one year of commencing operations Pets In Need will lead a capital campaign to fundraise for facility improvements. At this point in the negotiations, further information is needed to determine the extent of facility improvements and options that may be needed and the level of fundraising that will be required. To obtain the necessary information, up to $50,000 of the pre-authorized $250,000 in transition funding will be used for schematic concept designs. The City will contract with Pets In Need to hire an architecture firm that specializes in animal facility development. Pets In Need has experience with animal shelter development, staff resources to dedicate to the study, and the ability to quickly bring on a consultant. Pets In Need will work on the City’s behalf and closely with City staff. The design results will assist the City and Pets In Need in identifying the costs associated with the facility. We expect that some level of City investment in the capital costs of improvements to the shelter may be requested to assist with the fundraising campaign. The facility planning effort will also comply with the City Auditor’s recommendation to “…assess the feasibility of obtaining sufficient funding through fundraising, public/private partnerships, general fund subsidies, or a bond initiative, to build a new animal shelter that meets modern- day standards for animal care and safety.” It is anticipated that the options and costs will be presented to Council within a timeframe that aligns with the City’s fiscal year budget process, with a target of May 2017. Resource Impact The funds are budgeted in the City Manager’s Office, dedicated to Animal Services Assessment activities and within the City Manager’s authority to execute. Staff resources from various departments will continue to be dedicated to this project with coordination from the City Manager’s Office. Attachments:  Attachment A: 9-6-16 Staff Report City of Palo Alto (ID # 7259) City Council Staff Report Report Type: Action Items Meeting Date: 9/6/2016 City of Palo Alto Page 1 Summary Title: Animal Services Assessment and Possible New Service Model Title: Direct Staff to Proceed with Discussions with Pets In Need Regarding Animal Care Services and the Construction or Rehabilitation of the Animal Shelter Facility From: City Manager Lead Department: City Manager Recommendation Direct staff to proceed with exclusive negotiations with Pets In Need, a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization, to provide animal care services and develop a plan for animal shelter facility construction or rehabilitation, and to return to City Council by December 2016 with a recommended agreement. Background Following the Great Recession and withdrawal of an agency (City of Mountain View) previously receiving Animal services from Palo Alto, in May 2012 the City Council's Policy and Services Committee and Finance Committees discussed the City’s current service and revenue models. As a result, the City Council directed staff to take immediate steps to make the operation more self-sufficient to reduce reliance on the General Fund. After a series of subsequent actions and service changes, through Fiscal Year 2014 the goals of establishing sustainable service levels and expenses were not achieved. In fact, over time, the costs and general fund subsidy to shelter operations have increased. In June 2014, the City Council referred a Colleagues Memo regarding the Palo Alto Humane Society’s (PAHS) interest in partnering with the City to the Finance Committee. The City Auditor was then engaged, and in April 2015 the City Auditor presented an audit concluding that Animal Services could not become revenue neutral under its current financial model, and faced challenges that were unlikely to be resolved if it continued operating as solely a city-managed function without a significant increase in general fund subsidy, donations, and/or revenue- generating contracts. In approving the Fiscal Year 2016 budget, the City Council directed staff to pursue an alternative service model and allocated $250,000 to assist with possible transition costs. City of Palo Alto Page 2 During Fiscal Year 2016, the City Manager’s Office continued outreach and engagement with various community and City department stakeholders, including the Friends of the Palo Alto Animal Shelter (FoPAAS) and PAHS. With active participation from these stakeholders, staff conducted two Requests for Proposals (RFP) to assess the market for alternative services providers. Through the process of developing the first RFP and documenting the services and organizational support structure being sought, both FoPAAS and PAHS determined that they would not submit proposals. The first RFP was issued on October 15, 2015 and closed December 11, 2015 with one respondent, Pets In Need, a local animal rescue service provider located in Redwood City. Due to the low response rate and in accordance with procurement best practices, staff conducted debriefing sessions with local animal care providers who did not submit a response to better understand current market conditions. These included Peninsula Humane Society, Silicon Valley Animal Control Authority, Humane Society of Silicon Valley and the County of Santa Clara. The consistent feedback was that the initial RFP was too prescriptive and limited their abilities to apply existing business models and best practices. City staff met with community stakeholders and the Services Employees International Union (SEIU) about the feedback. In collaboration with the stakeholders, the City re-issued a revised RFP with a less strictly defined scope. The new RFP was issued on January 27, 2016 and after one extension, closed on March 18, 2016. The City received one proposal from Pets In Need, a letter from the County of Santa Clara and a letter from the Humane Society of Silicon Valley. Staff conducted an evaluation of the responses and has concluded that the proposal most advantageous to the City is from Pets In Need. Staff has therefore negotiated with Pets In Need to outline the terms of an agreement for animal care services. Recognizing that the City has multiple goals for animal care services, including the manner and level of care, improvement of the animal shelter, and community engagement, in addition to financial terms, staff is seeking City Council discussion and direction prior to finalizing an agreement for services. Staff also recognizes that as a nonprofit organization, Pets In Need is a prospective partner for whom this agreement represents a significant decision and commitment that must align with its mission and organizational capabilities. As has been demonstrated by the RFP process to date, there is not a robust marketplace of providers bidding for this service as defined. Discussion In consultation with Pets In Need, staff has developed the attached Term Sheet that outlines the substantive issues to be finalized in an agreement for services. City Council direction is recommended to finalize terms into a recommended contract and to return to City Council before the end of the calendar year for approval. The purpose of the Term Sheet is to identify the manner in which key policy issues are being addressed. These policy items are summarized below and further defined in the Term Sheet. The Term Sheet is nonbinding and presents the parameters for negotiations. City of Palo Alto Page 3 Why Pets In Need? Pets In Need was selected as providing the most advantageous proposal due to their commitment to retain the shelter in Palo Alto, to lead a fundraising campaign to remodel or build a new shelter, to work closely with the Friends of Palo Alto Animal Shelter and the Palo Alto Humane Society, and to provide the services in a cost effective manner. The County of Santa Clara’s letter was deemed not cost effective. Additionally, the County was not willing to contribute or fundraise in the same capacity as a nonprofit could to a new or remodeled facility. The Humane Society of Silicon Valley’s letter did not meet the City’s required level of service due to their recommendation to turn the Palo Alto shelter into a stray holding facility and to outsource services to Silicon Valley Animal Control Authority and Pets In Need. Facility Improvements As recommended in the audit and supported by the City Manager, the shelter is in need of a substantial remodel or possibly a new facility. The City and Pets In Need are committed to a partnership to develop a plan to remodel or rebuild a new shelter. The Term Sheet outlines initial commitments between the City and Pets In Need. To summarize: An initial needs assessment will be conducted to determine immediate improvements. The City and Pets In Need will ensure the facility is in a condition that meets the expectations of the new contract. Within one year of commencing operations, Pets In Need will finalize a plan and begin to lead a capital campaign to fundraise for facility improvements. Cost of Services The RFP requested potential service partners to provide: a two year financial plan with quarterly financial targets which includes earned income, fundraising and other revenue; direct labor rates for proposed staff; overhead rate and breakdown of overhead elements; sub- consultant billing rates and mark-up percentage for other direct costs; all reimbursable expenses; any other cost and price information; a not-to-exceed amount; bank and audit statements. Pets In Need was the only responsible bidder and provided the requested data. In discussions with animal care providers throughout the RFP process, and prior to that through various internal and external stakeholder engagement processes, it became apparent to staff that, in order to retain animal care services in Palo Alto, a certain level of General Fund subsidy would have to be provided for a defined set of shelter services and that a fully cost-recovery model with high service level expectations is not viable. Therefore, staff considered analogous public private partnerships and concluded that the ideal agreement would be a fee for service model where the City pays an annual management fee and provides a facility at minimal charge in return for services. This model provides a predictable subsidy level. In the preliminary discussions, Pets In Need requested that the City consider a fee for service model which is based on a $30 per animal per day cost with a cap of thirty days. Pets In Need would then be responsible for the ongoing cost after the thirty days. The attached Term Sheet adds additional parameters for this model. Recognizing that the details of the financial structure will need to be negotiated between the City and Pets In Need, Council approval of this report will direct staff to negotiate a fee structure with Pets In Need. The three-year average cost for shelter operations City of Palo Alto Page 4 is approximately $520,000. The City’s subsidy amount will stay at or below the three-year average cost. Staff will return to City Council for approval of an operating contract before the end of the calendar year. Types of Animals and Quantity of Animals Currently the Palo Alto Animal Shelter takes dogs, cats, rabbits, wildlife, chickens, horses, goats, and other animals. The City’s expects that Pets In Need will be responsible for intakes of all animals and maintain the same service levels as the City currently provides. In preliminary discussions Pets In Need has committed to maintaining services levels and meeting the community expectations. As discussions continue between the City and Pets In Need, adjustments may be required to service levels based on the negotiated fee structure and facility’s capacity. Moreover, Pets In Need has a “no kill” philosophy which is a fundamental principle of the organization. Staff will need to work with Pets in Need to evaluate their ability, given the facility constraints, to continue current service levels as a “no kill” shelter operation. Contracts with Los Altos and Los Altos Hills Partner agencies agreements make up of 15% of the City’s total annual Animal Shelter and Animal Control costs, 11% from Los Altos and 4% from Los Altos Hills. The partner agencies are billed annually, during the summer months, by calculating previous year costs with projected upcoming year forecasts. For the purposes of a partnership with Pets In Need we do not recommend disrupting the agreements with Los Altos or Los Altos Hills. Both agencies are aware of our RFP and City Council direction. If the City enters into a contract with Pets In Need, the contract will impact the City’s budget for Fiscal Year 2017. This impact could be positive or negative depending on the contract’s start date and transition issues as finalized. Staff expects that a contract with Pets In Need can be finalized before beginning discussions with partner agencies about service changes. In the short term, service levels for Los Altos and Los Altos Hills will be held constant. City Staff and Ongoing Staffing Currently, the City’s budget includes staffing for 10.66 FTE’s (Full-Time Equivalent positions) in the Animal Services program. Of the budgeted positions, 4 FTE’s are dedicated to Animal Control (including 1 Lead Animal Control Officer and 3 Animal Control Officers). As always planned, the 4 Animal Control positions will remain budgeted with the City and will not be included in the transition to Pets In Need. As such, the 4 Animal Control positions would remain represented by SEIU. Additionally, 2 FTE’s (Veterinarian Technician and Superintendent of Animal Services) are currently vacant. The Animal Shelter contract to be negotiated between the City and Pets In Need will outline the proposed staffing levels, exclusive of Animal Control. The City will strive to minimize the negative impacts to current City employees. Any impacts to union-represented employees resulting from a future transfer of services will be identified and discussed with SEIU. The City is committed to meeting any obligations related to collective bargaining and the City’s Merit Rules. City of Palo Alto Page 5 Ongoing City Support Currently the Animal Services is a division of the Police Department. The City Manager’s Office, working closely with the department, has been leading the assessment process. Under the proposed model, the Police Department will retain the Animal Control functions. As a non- profit partnership, however, shelter operations through the Pets in Need contract is expected to be managed of the Community Services Department. When the item returns to City Council, staff will provide a recommendation and resource needs to manage the contract. Resource Impact The Animal Services budget was approved by City Council on June 13, 2016. Funding is in place to continue operations through June 30, 2017. Additionally, City Council in the Fiscal Year 2016 budget process allocated $250,000 for transition costs. This funding was not expended in Fiscal Year 2016 and was reappropriated to Fiscal Year 2017. As noted in the Cost of Services section, discussions need to continue with Pets In Need with regards to the City’s ongoing General Fund subsidy and fee for services model. Any necessary adjustment to the Fiscal Year 2017 budget will be proposed to City Council at the time of contract approval. Attachments:  Attachment A: Term Sheet - City and Pets In Need (PDF)  Attachment B: Pets In Need Letter and Narrative (PDF)  Attachment C: County of Santa Clara Letter (PDF)  Attachment D: Humane Society of Silicon Valley Letter (PDF)  Attachment E: Blank (PDF) Term Sheet  Framework between the City of Palo Alto and Pets in Need    This Term Sheet provides a summary of key business terms to be addressed in a Contract for Animal Care  Services (Contract) between Pets in Need (PIN) and the City of Palo Alto (City).  This non‐binding term sheet  provides the foundation for negotiation and definition of a full Agreement for Services to be recommended for  approval by the Palo Alto City Council and the Pets In Need Board of Directors.    1. Term of Agreement.  The Agreement for services will commence on a date to be mutually agreed upon  by the parties, but no sooner than January 1, 2017 and no later than July 1, 2017 for a five year period;  and will extend for a period mutually determined by PIN and the City. The option to extend the  Contract will be exercised no less than one year in advance of the expiration of the Contract.    2. Scope of Services. PIN will provide animal care services within Palo Alto and other communities under  contract (Los Altos and Los Altos Hills). These services will be acceptance and care of animals, owner  redemptions, veterinary care, spaying/neutering, vaccinations, adoptions, partnerships, foster care,  marketing, community education and ongoing work with local stakeholder’s groups.  a. Relationship to Animal Control Services: Animal Control will be provided by the City. These  field services involved with responding to animal‐related issues are not included in the Scope  of Services, except where interfacing with Animal Care at the shelter.    b. Commitment to operation in Palo Alto: PIN understands that maintaining a local animal shelter  is critically important to the City and will operate a shelter in Palo Alto except as may be  necessary to accommodate renovations, new construction or unanticipated circumstances.  c. PIN and the City will mutually draft policies and procedures that may limit the intake of  animals for the purpose of improving animal care and to operate the shelter as a “No Kill”  shelter, a fundamental principle of PIN.   d. PIN and the City will mutually draft performance metrics and measures for services along with  rewards for exceeding and consequences for not meeting expectations.  e. The City will finalize the reporting relationship of PIN with a City department before the  agreement is finalized. Currently, Animal Services is a division with the Palo Alto Police  Department. PIN understands that the City may transition the reporting relationship of PIN to  the Community Services Department with Police retaining the Animal Control unit.    3. Costs of Services. PIN has proposed a fee structure based on the number and duration of stray of  animals brought into the shelter by Animal Care Officers and through owner surrenders.  The parties  will negotiate and finalize contract terms to address maximum and minimum fees to be paid to PIN.  Additionally, the Contract will itemize the revenues that will be collected by PIN and those to be  retained by the City. The Contract will also finalize whether PIN will act as the fiscal agent for the City  on revenues collected to offset Animal Control costs.     4. Transition Issues.  Prior to execution of the Agreement:  a. The City will satisfy its remaining obligations, if any, with applicable employee bargaining units.  b. PIN will meet with current City employees at the Animal Shelter to discuss employment  opportunities with PIN, but PIN is under no obligation to retain current shelter staff.  c. PIN and the City will conduct an assessment of the physical condition, inventory and  equipment at the shelter to determine which items will be allocated to PIN and Animal Control  and what will need to be replaced.    5. Animal Shelter Facility Improvements.  Prior to the execution of the Agreement, PIN will engage an  architect for the purpose of assessing repairs and improvements needed to be made to the Palo Alto  Animal Shelter facility.    a. The City and PIN will agree upon the cost and responsibilities of any immediate facility  improvements needed for PIN to begin operation at the shelter, the amount of which is to be  approved by City Council upon approval of the Contract.   b. Upon mutual agreement, PIN will operate the current shelter while renovations and facility  upgrades are being performed.  c. PIN will operate the facility in will maintain the facility in good working condition during the  term of the Contract.  d. PIN will be responsible for all ongoing operations and routine facility maintenance costs,  except as noted in the Contract.  e. The City will provide the use of the existing facility at no lease cost to PIN, and as part of  discussions associated with fees for service will evaluate providing utilities such as electricity,  gas, water, and Internet connectivity at no cost to PIN during the duration of this Contract.  f. Within one year of commencement of services, PIN will begin consultation with the City and  community stakeholders on more comprehensive facility improvements. It is the intent of the  parties that, either through remodeling of the current building or construction of a new  building the shelter will meet industry and community standards.  g. The City will continue to own the land, facility and all improvements.    6. Volunteer Engagement. PIN will develop a volunteer development program as described in its proposal  and will consult with the City before making substantive change in the City’s existing volunteer  engagement programs.    7. Termination.  Either party may terminate the Agreement with at least twelve months written notice  based upon terms to be mutually determined by the City and PIN.    8. Insurance and Indemnification: The Contract, at minimum, will include the City’s standard liability  language. The City currently requires $1 million dollar liability coverage. PIN and the City will discuss  additional liability insurance.   Pal   I. Org II. Qu   Alth vol effo mo inco sev   lo Alto Ani ganizational p  Pets In N  Pets In N  PIN is a   Our ope  We have  Our Red for 160   In 2015,  We are   We offe 1,426 fr  We have includin   alifications an 1. Pets In N 2. Our med 15% of a 3. We have shelter i 4. We can  develop 5. Pets In N 6. We have 7. We have 2013 to  8. We have 9. We are  10. We have hough Pets In unteer netwo orts, we have obile surgical v ome commun veral rescue g imal Shelte profile  Need was est Need’s missio 501 (c) 3 non erating budge e an endowm dwood City fa animals and i , we successfu governed by  er free spaying ee surgeries a e rescued ani g the followin nd Certificatio Need was the dical operatio animal shelte e animal shel in 2008 into a bring “econo pment, financ Need has had e a vibrant vo e a cost‐effec a projected t e an excellent a member of e relationship n Need’s facil ork, a visible s e been able to van to travel  nities with ch groups that br er RFP (#1 ablished in 19 on is to rescue n‐profit suppo et (FY 2016) is ment fund wit cility, refurbi is operated w ully complete a volunteer b g/neutering f at our Redwo imals and per ng cities: Mod ons  e first no‐kill a on is fully acc ers in the U.S. ter construct a LEED certifie omies of scale e and animal d balanced bu olunteer prog ctive fundrais total of $825, t reputation w f the WeCare  ps with Friend ity’s capacity  social media  o increase ado throughout N ronic pet hom ring animals t   161631A) r 965 as North e dogs and ca orted through s $1.4M and w h a current va shed in 2008  with a staff of  ed 627 adopti board compri for the pets o ood City facilit rformed surge desto, Los Ba animal shelte redited by th  have achieve tion and desig ed [silver leve e” opportunit  care staff an udgets for the gram, includin ing program t ,000 at the co within the an Alliance (com ds of Palo Alto is limited (ap presence and options and s Northern CA t melessness p to our shelter   response fr ern California ats and find th h private gifts we expect to  alue of $5M. at a cost of a 20.  ions, up from sed of 13 com of all CA reside ty and throug eries through nos, Vallejo,  r in Northern e American A ed this distinc gn experience el] facility)   ties in using P nd resources e last several y ng a foster fam that has grow onclusion of F nimal welfare  mprised of she o Animal She pproximately  d aggressive m surgeries ove to perform fr roblems. We  r for free spay rom Pets I a’s first no‐kil hem safe, lov s, adoption an end the year approximately m 462 in 2014  mmunity and  ents. In 2015 gh our mobile hout Northern Hollister, Mil n California  Animal Hospit ction)  e (having reno Pets In Need’s years.  mily network wn from $597 FY 2016 (April community  elters in Sant elter and the P 160 animals) marketing and r the last two ee spay/neut also work ex ying/neuterin n Need (P ll animal shelt ving homes.  nd program fe  with a surplu y $6M, has ca and 399 in 2 business lead  we complete e surgical van n California,  pitas and San tal Associatio ovated our ex s medical, ken   7,000 raised i l 30, 2016).  ta Clara Count PA Humane S ), through a s d advertising  o years. We u ter surgeries  xtensively wit ng and medic IN)  ter.   ees.   us.  apacity  013.   ders.   ed  n.   n Jose.  on (only  xisting  nnel,  n FY  ty)  Society  trong  se our  in low‐ h  al care.  Our Executive Director, Al Mollica, came to PIN in June 2014. Al has a master’s degree in education,  a Certified Fund Raising Executive (CFRE) credential and more than 37 years of experience in the  non‐profit sector. Prior to coming to PIN, Al was executive director of a financially solvent and well‐ respected statewide no‐kill and open access animal shelter with two locations, statewide law  enforcement responsibilities and an animal control contract with a metropolitan city.   Al’s experience as a director of a major animal shelter, his track record at Pets In Need and his  extensive experience in leadership positions in the non‐profit sector make him uniquely qualified to  manage the operations of multiple shelters. Al’s depth of experience in fundraising and business  management, including direction of several successful capital campaigns, make him ideally suited  to manage the development, marketing and business operations of PAAS.    III. Work Plan  Animals collected by PAAS animal control officers will be delivered to the Palo Alto shelter (or to  Pets In Need’s facility in Redwood City if a shelter does not exist in Palo Alto). Processing will occur  in accordance with PIN intake procedures (Manuals describing intake procedures in detail are  available upon request). Animals will be examined, behaviorally assessed by trained staff and  treated for any medical problems. Assuming a facility remains in Palo Alto, animals collected will be  kept in Palo Alto to make it easier for residents to collect lost animals. If a facility does not remain  in Palo Alto, intake, adoptions and returns will occur out of our Redwood City shelter.    The staff structure at PAAS (again, assuming a facility remains in PA) will be similar to what  currently exists at PIN. Staff would consist of medical, animal care, kennel and administrative  teams. The current intake and processing procedures at Pets In Need are well‐honed and efficient.  We would anticipate a comparable structure at PAAS, which would include twice‐daily feeding and  kennel/cage cleaning, twice‐daily outdoor time, and extensive socializing by volunteers (a more  detailed explanation of shelter operations and procedures is available upon request).    We propose to handle owner‐requested euthanasia requests in accordance with standard practices  for no‐kill shelters. Our protocol will involve a careful assessment by our medical staff and shelter  manager of all animals surrendered, including those from owners requesting euthanasia. No animal  will be euthanized unless, in the professional opinion of our veterinarian, certified vet tech and  shelter manager, the animal poses a risk to staff, other animals, the general public, or is so  physically disabled that there is no other viable alternative.     Under the model we are proposing, PAAS will be financially self‐sufficient within the first year of  operations. Revenue will be generated through payments from the City of Palo Alto for each animal  collected within the PAAS service area, private sector fundraising and adoption, licensing and  program fees. Included in the array of program fees that would provide revenue would be income  from a humane education program that will be developed and implemented in cooperation with  Friends of the Palo Alto Shelter and the Palo Alto Humane Society. Programming for youth through  summer camps, local schools and libraries, and the general public will be offered.    IV. Proposed innovations  1. There is precedent that having a no‐kill and open access shelter is possible. Long‐term success  in operating the Palo Alto Animal Shelter as a no‐kill/open access facility will validate the no‐kill  movement, enhance the reputation of PAAS and the City, establish PAAS as an important  community resource, and increase fundraising opportunities.      2. Pets In Need provides free spaying/neutering at our Redwood City facility and via a mobile  surgical van that travels to communities throughout the Bay Area with the most chronic pet  homelessness problems. We believe that reducing the flow of animals into the pipeline is the  most effective way to impact the number of homeless, neglected and abused animals that  enter shelters. Fewer animals entering the system will drive down operational costs. We would  propose continuing this popular and effective program. Pets In Need will provide free  spay/neuter services at our Redwood City facility, in Palo Alto and through our mobile van.     3. PIN proposes to implement a humane education program, in cooperation with the local  volunteer groups, that will generate revenue, educate the public and engage the community in  the life of the shelter. Pets In Need currently has relationships with several local schools (e.g.,  Everett High School and Summit Charter School), the Redwood City library, Girl Scouts troops  from Atherton and Menlo Park, and a number of Redwood City‐based senior and community  centers. Youth visit our Redwood City shelter to learn about animal care as part of internship  programs and spring break and summer camp programs. The humane education program will  include summer camps and volunteer opportunities for older youth.     4. Finally, an immediate priority would be for PIN staff and volunteers to work with Palo Alto City  officials and local volunteers to assess options and address the functional shortcomings with  the current facility. At some point, assuming the decision is made to retain a shelter in Palo  Alto, there will need to be a feasibility study conducted as a precursor to a campaign to raise  funds to renovate PAAS or construct a new shelter.     V. Project staffing  Pets In Need processes approximately 650 animals per year, roughly the same number of animals  processed by PAAS. We operate our shelter with a staff of 20 – nine full‐time and 11 part‐time.  Assuming there is a facility in Palo Alto, we would propose the following staff structure for PAAS:      FTE Position         1 – veterinarian (FT)        1 – Registered Veterinary Technician (FT)        2 –  vet assistants (FT)        1 –  lead kennel attendant (FT)       1 –  volunteer and adoption manager (FT)      1 –  administrative assistant (FT)      4 –  kennel staff (eight part‐time staff working 25 to 35 hrs. per week)   11 FTE             VI. Proposal cost sheet and rates  See attachments for proposed cost breakdown and budget.   County of Santa Clara Department of Agriculture and Environmental Management Animal Care and Control Division Licensing/Field Services 80 W. Highland Ave., Bldg. K San Martin, CA95046 (408) 201-0660 Fax (408) 683-4247 Animal Shelter 12370 Murphy Ave. San Martin, CA 95046 (408) 686-3900 Fax (408) 683-2776 San Jose Office 1553 Berger Dr., Bldg. I San Jose, CA95ll2 (408) 918-4600 (408)286-2460 http ://www. sccountypets.org February 17,2016 City of Palo Alto Purchasing and Contract Administration 250 Hamilton Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94301 Letter of Interest: Palo Alto Animal Shelter Operations Re: RFP NO. 1616314 City of Palo Alto Purchasing and Contract Administration: The County of Santa CIara desires to express interest in submitting a bid to provide professional services for animal care operations at the Palo Alto Animal Shelter. The County of Santa Clara currently operates a shelter with an intake of approximately 3,000 dogs/cats annually. Our shelter has maintained a live-release rate of over 90Yo since 2012. We pride ourselves on excellent care of animals, great customer service and a wonderful reputation in our community. ,. Our proposal for staffrng would include oversight by the Animal Control Program Manager ,.' 1 (existing) as well as recruitment, supervision and training of a Shelter Supervisor, 4 full-time Kennel Attendants, Veterinarian, Veterinarian Assistant and an Office Specialist III. These new positions would be supported by existing administrative "County" staff. Our estimate also includes supplies and materials related to care and keep of shelter animals, clerical duties, adoptions, veterinary care, spaylneuter services, record keeping, computer services, euthanasia and return-to-owner. As our estimate is based on cost-recovery only, we would anticipate use of existing supplies and materials within the shelter. Below is an itemized estimate of the yearly costs associated with operating a full service animal shelter; these costs are based on costs we incur at the County animal shelter. This cost estimate does not include oversight of development of a new shelter facility. Additional costs would apply if the City desired County staff involvement in that endeavor. Personnel: Uniforms/Safety Shoes : Communications/Telephone Services : FeedlBedding/Litter: Veterinary Supplies TrainingÆducation Emergency/Specialty Medical Services I)ata Processing Services $1,4020828.91$ 3,396.00 s 1,626.49 $ 3,896.43 s 35,307.77$ 1,oo7.oo $ 38,349.64 $ 20,184.00 Board of Supervisors: Mike Wasserman, Cindy Chavez, Dave Cortese, Ken Yeager, S. Joseph Simitian County Executive: Jeffrey V. Smith Janitorial/Landscape Services Disposal Services Small ToolsÆquipment TraveUMileage Misc. Supplies Facility Maintenance $ 1,134.84$ 2,864.33$ 319.72 $ 1,717.97 $ 6,630.22 $ 8.676.51 $ 1,527,939.83 The County of Santa Clara proposes integrating on-call duties with City of Palo Animal Control so that officers from both agencies benefit. Animal Control Officers could divide rotational duties so that each individual officer would serve less. When ACOs serve on-call, they would respond to both City of Palo Alto and Unincorporated Santa Clara County. This letter does not constitute an official offer. We are interested in engaging in an interactive process with the City of Palo Alto to clarify the deliverables and finalize our bid. We look forward to hearing from you. Please forward inquiries to: Lisa Jenkins Interim Program Manager, Animal Care and Control (408) 201-0661 Lisa. j enkins@cep. sccgov.org Y, "il^C,t Lisa Program Manager Animal Care and Control County of Santa Claru Cc : Christopher Anastole, Contract Administrator Khashayar "Cash" Alaee, Sr. Management Analyst