Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 317-05a non-profit housing organization for development of affordable housing. However, because the parcel's small size would accommodate only one or two units, staff believes a better use of the property would be for the City to sell the property and use the proceeds to offset the costs of an atIordable housing project on a larger site, such as the proposed Alma Street substation site. The parcel is 5,413 square feet in area, with 50-feet of street frontage on High Street. Staff looked into the possibility of increasing the size of the City parcel by acquiring the two small adjacent County-owned pareels; however, the County did not want to dispose of its parcels. Due to its size, rezoning the parcel to RM-15 (Low Density Multiple-Family Residential) or RM-30 (Medium Density Multiple-Family Residential) to conform to the adjacent zoning would allow development with only one residential unit. Under RMD (Two Unit Multiple Family Residence) zoning, the parcel would meet the minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet, and either one or two units would be permitted, provided that in the case of two units, both are under the saine ownership. Therefore, following Council approval declaring the parcel surplus, staff proposes to process an application to rezone the property to RMD in order to permit two units and to produce the maximum return for the City. In accordance with Government Code Section 54222, which requires the City to notify certain public agencies of its intent to dispose of surplus property, staff has notified the following agencies about the High Street property: Palo Alto Unified School District; Housing Authority of Santa Clara County; Santa Clara County Parks and Recreation Department; Mid Peninsula Open Space District; and the Palo Alto Housing Corporation. No agency has responded that it had any need for the land. Based on its underutilization and its potential to produce a return for the City, staff is recommending that Council declare the High Street parcel surplus and direct staff to proceed with the necessary steps to sell the parcel. Funds from the sale will be used towards the cost of the development of the Alma Street Substation site. RESOURCE IMPACT . When it returns to Council with the Request for Bid Proposals, staff will recommend a minimum bid for the High Street parcel based on an appraisal of its market value as a multi-family residential lot. Staff estimates a minimum bid of approximately $450,000. Oral bidding will begin at 5 percent above the highest written bid received. If approved by Council, the net sales proceeds from the sale could be deposited in the Residential Housing Fund to be used to offset the costs of the proposed development of the Alma Street Substation site for affordable housing. POLICY IMPLICATIONS In accordance with the City'S Asset Management policy, staff periodically reviews City-owned property to assure it is being utilized to its highest return and to identify potential surplus property no longer needed for City/public use. Once declared surplus, property is disposed of in accordance with the City policy for sale of real property, the general steps of which are outlined below. In accordance with Government Code Section 54222, staff has notified the required' agencies of the High Street property. CMR:149:05 Page 2 of3 \ ATTACHMENT 2 Tuesday, June 7, 2005 Bill, We have had no luck in contacting the owners of the two apartment buildings adjacent to the City owned piece of land' at Colorado and High. We even asked Keith Suddjian, a broker at Cornish and Carey Commercial that we have worked with in the past, to try to get some response. He was not successful either. He did advise that the going rate to purchase the properties, given a willing seller, would be about $1.7 million and $1.4 million with a range for both between $2.8 and 3.2 million. We find that to be an excessive amount to pay for properties that we would eventually wish to demolish in order to have land for new construction. The location is not desirable in its present neighborhood state. Winning financing competitions requires neighborhood amenities that are not present there. We feel that the small City parcel would be the tail wagging the dog and not enough of an incentive make it work. I believe there are other opportunities out there that would be more productive to pursue. Let me know if you wish more analysis or something for your report back to the Council Finance Committee. Marlene H. Prendergast Executive Director, Palo Alto Housing Corporation 650-321-9709 x13 650-321-4341 FAX mprendergast@paloaltohousingcorp. org ATTACHMENT 3 Thursday, June 30, 2005 Bill: After a careful evaluation of the maps you sent out the Housing Authority has concluded that it is not feasible to develop an affordable housing project on the sites in question for the following reasons: 1. The lots are very small for any type of meaningful affordable housing project with a unit count that permits economies of scale in development 2. Combining the lots will result in a narrow and fragmented parcel (especially taking into account the required setbacks per code) posing a constraint on efficient design and site planning. Only the City site has street frontage that allows for access to the combined sites. 4. The shape of the combined lot will also pose layout challenges 3 .. Parking will be an issue· 4. The site is not located within convenient walking distance to amenities 5. Not enough area for construction staging. For all of the above reasons we do not believe these sites are amenable for an affordable housing development. As an aside, the Opportunity Center site at 150·ft. x 120 ft. is in itself a very tight and difficult site to develop with significant construction staging challenges. As you know, we are building a 5 storey. structure with two additional levels of underground parking for a total of 89 units. The time and effort required to piece together financing for a very small site that may be able to house 10 to 15 units at best is not feasible. Please call me if you have any questions. Thanks Smitha Seshadri Housing Authority, County of Santa Clara