Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 183-05parcels along Ramona Street north of Channing Avenue, and including the three parcels between High Street and Alma Street located within 100 feet north of Forest Avenue, and the first three parcels along Alma Street south of Channing Avenue (See Attachment B). Part of the SOFA CAP Phase 2 adoption included the rezoning of 66 parcels zoned Commercial Downtown (CD) to Residential Transition (RT) Districts. The rezoning removed approximately 330,000 square feet of gross floor area out of the Commercial Downtown zoning designation. The rezoned area will continue to be tracked and reported in the the Commercial Downtown Annual Monitoring and will be identified as part of the SOFA CAP Phase 2. Non-Residential Development Activity The Downtown Study incorporated a growth limit of 350,000 square feet of additional floor area above the total floor area existing in 1986, and provides for a re-evaluation of the CD regulations when new development reaches 235,000 square feet. Since 1986, a total of 103,293 square feet of non-residential uses have been added in the Downtown area. This includes the net reduction of non-residential floor area of approximately 15,700 square feet at 80Q High Street. This allows an additional 131,707 square feet of new non-residential development to occur before are-evaluation of the CD regulations is necessary. Demonstrating Special Public Benefits The Downtown Study reserved 100,000 square feet of the 350,000 square foot cap to be used for projects demonstrating special public benefits. Since 1986, nine projects in the downtown area have utilized the Planned Community zoning that requires a finding of public benefit. Five of the projects exceeded the non-residential floor area that would otherwise be allowed under zoning by. a total of34,378 square feet. The total of these projects is shown in the 4th column of Attachment C; all the projects were approved before August 31, 1998. The remaining four projects were mixed-use projects that did not exceed allowed non-residential floor areas. All of the projects either provided parking or paid a fee in-lieu of providing parking. . Projects Qualifying for Seismic, Historic or Minor Expansion Exemptions The Downtown Study set aside 75,000 square feet of the 350,000 square foot cap for projects that qualify for seismic, historic or minor expansion exemptions in order to encourage these upgrades. Since 1986,60,561 square feet have been added in this category. These projects are shown in the 5th column of Attachment C. Parking Inventory At the time of the Dowritown Study, performance measures were established that specify that new development in the Downtown should not increase the total parking deficit beyond that expected from development that was existing or approved through May 1986, or 1,601 spaces. At the end of the 2003 monitoring period, the City determined a re-evaluation of the parking exemption, regulations would be done when the unmet parking demand resulting from exemptions reaches a cumulative 450 spaces after the City opened two new parking structures, one located on 528 High Street the other at 445 Bryant Street, effectively decreasing the original 1986 deficit by almost half to 836 spaces. Attachment D is a chart of the CD parking deficit. Through various projects, the actual parking deficit has been significantly reduced. CMR:183:05 Page 2 Most notable are: 1) the two-floor addition to the Cowper/Webster Garage, 2) significant restriping of on-street parking spaces by the City's Transportation Division resulting in 96 additional spaces, and 3) the construction of two parking structures located on 528 High Street and 445 Bryant Street. Vacancy Rate for Ground Floor (GF) Combining District The Ground Floor Combining District (GF) was created to encourage active pedestrian uses in the downtown area. Uses other than retail, eating and drinking, personal services and a few conditional uses may be allowed through an exception process. One of the requirements for making the exception is that the GF vacancy rate must be greater than 5 percent. In October 2004, / . there were approximately 624,330 square feet of GF area. In the staff survey of Downtown vacancies in October 2004, there were 7 properties, totaling 22,291 square feet, which met the requirements for vacant and available ground floor area. They were: Vacant Square Address Feet 525 Alma 6400 529 Alma 6000 536 Ramona 1700 174 University 2300 250 University 1791 432 University 3500 530 University . 600 Total 22,291 This results in a vacancy rate of approximately 3.57 percent; therefore, exceptions will not be permitted for consideration. Vacancy Rate for Entire CD District For purposes of tracking the health of the Downtown area, the vacancy rate for the entire CD area is reported. This figure does not affect any of the exception or Downtown cap regulations. At the time of the October 2004 staff survey, the following were vacant and available: CMR:183:05 Page 3 TABLE 1: Commercial Downtown (CD) Vacant & Available Floor Area As of October, 2004 ' (Includes Upper Floor Office Space) Address Zoning District Vacant Square Feet 235 Alma CDNP 525 Alma CDCGFP 529 Alma CDCGFP 335 Bryant CDCP 514 Bryant CDCGFP 635 Bryant CDCP 540 Emerson CDCGFP 420 Florence CDCP 167 Hamilton CDCGFP 240 Hamilton CDCP 285 Hamilton CDCGFP 467 hamilton CDCP 505 Hamilton CDCP 777b* ) High RT35 440 Kipling CDCP 130 Lytton CDCP 325 Lytton CDCP CD -Commercial Downtown (C) -Commercial (N) -Neighborhood (S) -Service GF -Ground Floor Combining District P -Pedestrian Overlay RT -Residential Transition CMR:183:05 Page 4 600 6400 6000 10348 587 235 1,850 3885 9600 2000 9000 450 1600 800 3725 48000 3354 The entire CD area has approximately 3,750,000 gross square feet of floor area including approximately 330,000 square feet within the SOFA CAP Phase 2 area. About 375,000 square feet is used for religious or residential purposes or is vacant and not available for occupancy. Thus the net square footage of available commercial space is 3,375,000 square feet. With a total 3,375,000 square feet of commercial floor area available for occupancy, the vacant 204,900 square feet equals a rate of 6.07 percent. Trends in Use Composition The primary observation of change in the use composition of Downtown since the enactment of new CD zoning regulations in 1986 is that the total floor area devoted to certain higher-intensity commercial uses (office, retail, eating and drinking) has increased, while the total floor area in lower-intensity commercial uses (manufacturing, warehousing) has been reduced (see Table 2). This trend has continued in the past few years with an increase in higher intensity eating and drinking establishments. CMR:183:05 Page 6 7. Staff was directed to monitor the Downtown area in terms of development activity, vacancy rates, sales tax revenues, and commercial lease rates to facilitate evaluation of the effectiveness of the new regulations. 8. Staff was directed to undertake a site and feasibility study to evaluate an additional public parking structure elsewhere in the Downtown, to consider development of a parking facility on public lots S, Land F, and to explore the possibility of leasing or purchasing privately-owned vacant lots suitable as parking structure sites. 9. Policies and regulations were adopted which encourage Planned Community (PC) zoning for parking structures and limit underground parking to two levels below grade, unless there is proof that regular pumping of subsurface water will not be necessary. 10. A Twelve-Point Parking Program was adopted to increase the efficiency of existing parking. 11. Traffic policies were adopted which prohibit new traffic signals on portions of Alma Street and Middlefield Road, and prohibit a direct connection from Sand Hill Road to Palo Alto/Alma Street. In addition, new signs were approved directing through traffic offof University Avenue and onto Hamilton and Lytton Avenues~ 12. Staff and the Architectural Review Board (ARB) were directed to consider the possibility of an Urban Design Plan for Downtown and to develop design guidelines for commercial structures in neighborhood transition areas and for driveways which cross pedestrian walkways. 13. A temporary Design and Amenities Committee was created and charged with developing an incentive program (including FAR increases of up to 1.5) to encourage private development to provide a variety of public amenities in the Downtown area. 14. Staff was directed to study possible restrictions on the splitting and merging of parcels as well as the establishment of minimum lot sizes in the new CD district. * * * Page 2 Attachment C CD NON-RESIDENTIAL CHANGE IN SQUARE FOOTAGE 09/01/86 TO 08/31/04 Public Benefit Seismic, Historic, Net change in Bonus Non Project Address Zoning Date Approved Residential or Minor Bonus non-Residential Square Footage Square Footage Floor Area 520 Ramona Street A CDCGFP 11/20/84 -400 +400 220 University Avenue CDCGFP 2/5/87 -65 +65 151 Homer Avenue CDSP 3/17/88 ---9,750 314 Lytton Avenue CDCP 5/5/88 ---713 247-275 Alma Street CDNP 8/4/88 --+1,150 700 Emerson Street CDSP 9/15/88 ----+4,000 431 Florence Street CDCP 9/15/88 -2,500 +2,500 156 University Avenue CDCGFP 12/15/88 -4,958 +4,958 401 Florence Street CDCP 3/2/89 --2,407 +2,407 619 Cowper Street CDCP 5/6/89 --+2,208 250 University Avenue PC-3872 5/15/89 11,0008 300 +20,300 550 University Avenue CDCP 6/1/89 ---371 Page 1 Public Benefit Seismic, Historic, Net change in Bonus Non Project Address Zoning Date Approved Residential or Minor Bonus non-Residential Square Footage Square Footage Floor Area 529 Bryant Street PC-3974 5/3/90 2,491 c 2,491 +2,491 305 Lytton Avenue COCP 9/28/90 -200 +200 .550 Lytton AvenueDE COCP 10/22/90 --+4,845 531 Cowper Street PC-4052 5/21/91 9,000 475 +9,475 I I 540 Bryant Street COCGFP 3/24/92 -404 +404 5301534 Bryant Street COCGFP 4/15/93 -432 +432 555 Waverley Streetl425 Hamilton COCP 9/21193 --+2,064 AvenueE 201 University Avenue COCGFP 11/18/93 -2,450 +2,450 Page 2 Public Benefit Seismic, Historic, Net change in Bonus Non Project Address Zoning Date Approved Residential or Minor Bonus non/Residential Square Footage Square Footage Floor Area 518 Bryant Street CDCGFP 3/3/94 -180 +180 245 Lytton Avenue CDCP 7/21/94 ---21,320 400 Emerson StreetEF PC-4283 9/19/94 -200 +4,715 443 Emerson Street CDCGFP 1/5/95 -26 +26 420 Emerson Street CDCP 3/16/95 -125 +125 340 University Avenue CDCGFP 4/6/95 ---402 --281 University Avenue CDCGFP 4/20/95 -2,500 456 University Avenue CDCGFP 5/18/95 -7,486 +7,486 536 Ramona Street CDCGFP 7/11/95 -134 +134 -725n53 Alma Street PC-4283 7/17/95 --1,038 552 Emerson Street CDCGFP 7/18/95 -177 +177 483 University Avenue G PC-4296 10/2/95 3,467c 2,789 +7,289 424 University Avenue CDCGFP 9/21/95 -2,803 +2,803 Page 3 Public Benefit Seismic, Historic, Net change in Bonus Non Project Address Zoning Date Approved Residential or Minor Bonus non/Residential Square Footage Square Footage Floor Area 901/909 Alma Street E,F PC-4389 8/1/96 --+4,425 171 University Avenue CD-C(GF)(P) 9/19/96 -1,853 +1,853 401 High Street CD-C(P) 10/3/96 -350 +350 430 Kipling Street D,H CD-C(P) 10/22/96 -200 +1,412 460-476 University CD-C(GF)(P) 3/20/97 -1,775 +1,775 Avenue 400 Emerson Street D PC-4238 3/21/97 --+2,227 275 Alma Street CD-N(P) 7/8/97 -200 +3,207 390 Lytton Avenue PC-4436 7/14/97 8,420c 689 +17,815 411 High Street H CDCP 12/18/97 -2,771 +2,771 530 Ramona CDCGFP OS/20/99 -2852 +2852 705 Alma St CDSP 09/21/99 -2814 +2814 200 Hamilton Ave CDCP 10/21/99 -10913 +10913 -------------- Page 4 A: Project approved during the Downtown Moratorium (9/84 to 9/86), but was not included in the Downtown EIR's "pipeline projects." As a result, the project is counted among the CD District's nonresidential development approvals since the enactment of the Downtown Study Policies in 1986 B: Through Assessment District project provided additional 64 public parking spaces as part of public benefit instead of required 44 private spaces C: Project exceeded square footage otherwise allowed by zoning D: Project converted residential space to non-residential space. Net non-residential space counts toward the 350,000 square foot limit E: Project included covered parking that counts as floor area but not counted 350,000 square foot limit F: Project was approved pursuant to PAMC Sections 18.83.120 or 18.83.130 which allow for a reduction in the number required parking spaces for shared parking facilities, joint use parking facilities, or substitution of 8 bike parking spaces for one vehicle space. G. In addition, project paid in-lieu fee for loss of2 on-site parking spaces H: In addition, projects paid in-lieu fee for loss of 4 on-site spaces I: Part of the SOFA 2 CAP Page 6 -, NET CHANGE ADDED NET PARKING NET TOTAL PROJECT IN NONI ADDED EXEMPTIONS ZONING PARKING DEFICIT CUMULATIVE ADDRESS RESIDENTIAL REQUIRED PARKING PER 18.49.060 CHANGE DEFICIT FLOOR AREA SPACES OFPAMC 619 Cowper Street CDCP +2,208 9 9 0 0 1,590 250 University PC-3872 +20,300 103 131 8 0 -28 1,562 Avenue 550 University CDCP -371 0 0 0 -1 1,561 Avenue 529 Bryant Street PC-3974 +2,491 10 0 10 +10 1,571 520 Webster StreetC PC-3499 0 0 163 0 -163 1,408 305 Lytton Avenue CDCP +200 1 0 1 +1 1,409 550 Lytton Avenue CDCP +4,845 19 19 0 0 1,409 Downtown Extensive restriping by Transportation Division of on and off/street parking -96 1,313 531 Cowper Street PC-4052 +9,475 38 0 2 +38 1,351 540 Bryant Street CDCGFP +404 2 0 2 +2 1,353 530/534 Bryant CDCGFP +432 2 0 2 +2 1,355' Street 555 Waverley CDCP +2,064 8 0 0 +8 1,363 . Page 2 ! NET CHANGE ADDED NET PARKING NET . TOTAL PROJECT IN NONI ADDED EXEMPTIONS ZONING PARKING DEFICIT CUMULATIVE ADDRESS RESIDENTIAL REQUIRED PARKING PER 18.49.060 CHANGE DEFICIT FLOOR AREA SPACES OFPAMC 536 Ramona Street +134 1 0 1 +1 1,355 725-753 Alma Street PC-4283 -1,038 7 7 0 -11 1,344 552 Emerson Street CDCGFP +177 1 0 1 +1 1,345 483 University PC-4296 +7,289 29 _2E 11 +31 1,376 Avenue 424 University CDCGFP +2,803 11 0 11 +11 1,387 Avenue 901/909 Alma PC-4389 +4,425 18 18 0 0 1,387 StreetD 171 University CDCGFP +1,853 7 0 7 +7 1,394 Avenue 401 High Street CDCP +350 1 0 1 +1 1,395 430 Kipling Street CDCP +1,412 5 _4E 1 +10 1,405 460/476 University CDCGFP +1,775 7 Avenue , 0 7 +7 1,412 400 Emerson Street PC-4238 +2,227 9 0 0 +9 1,421 -------- Page 4 '( , NET CHANGE ADDED NET PARKING NET TOTAL PROJECT IN NONr ADDED EXEMPTIONS ADDRESS ZONING RESIDENTIAL PARKING PARKING PER 18.49.060 DEFICIT CUMULATIVE FLOOR AREA REQUIRED SPACES OFPAMC CHANGE DEFICIT 275 Alma Stree( CDNP +3,207 o· 0 1 +1 1,422 ~ 390 Lytton Avenue PC-4436 +17,815 74 50 3 +27 1,449 411 High Street CDCP +2,771 0 _4E 11 +15 1,464 530 Ramona CDCGFP 2852 11 0 11 +11 1475 705 Alma St CDSP 2814 11 0 11 +11 1486 200 Hamilton Ave CDCP 10,913 44 3E 35 +41 1527 550 Lytton Ave CDCP 93 0 0 0 0 1527 528 High St PF 0 0 138 G 0 -138 1389 445 Bryant PF 0 0 575 G 0 -575 814 437 Kipling St CDCGFP 945 4 OE 2 +4 818 701 Emerson St CDSP 434 2 1 1 +1 819 . 723 Emerson St CDSP 400 2 2 0 0 819 880 I 884 Emerson St CDSP 312 2 5 0 -3 816 Pages NET CHANGE ADDED NET PARKING NET TOTAL PROJECT IN NONI ADDED EXEMPTIONS ZONING PARKING DEFICIT CUMULATIVE ADDRESS RESIDENTIAL REQUIRED PARKING PER 18.49.060 CHANGE DEFICIT FLOOR AREA SPACES OFPAMC 539 Alma St CDCGFP 2,500 10 0 10 +10 826 270 University Ave CDCGFP 2,642 11 Ot: 11 +11 837 SUBTOTAL 86/02 106,930 672 1297 236 -764 837 901 High St. CDSP 12,063 59u 60 0 -1 836 800 High St. t1 PC-4779 -15,700 0 63 0 -63 773 TOTAL 118,993 731 1357 236 -828 773 A: Project approved during the Downtown Moratorium (9/84 to 9/86, but was not included in the Downtown EIR's "pipeline projects." As a result, the project is counted among the CD District's nonresidential development approvals since the enactment ofthe Downtown Study Policies in 1986 B: Through Assessment District project provided additional 64 public parking spaces as part of public benefit C: Addition of21evels of parking to Cowper/Webster garage D: Project was approved pursuant to PAMC Sections 18.83.120 or 18.83.130 which allow for a reduction in the number required parking spaces for shared parking facilities, joint use parking facilities, or substitution of 8 bike parking spaces for one vehicle space. E. Project removed existing on-site spaces or met required parking ~y paying in-lieu fee F: Site had existing parking sufficient to allow expansion G: Construction of2 city parking lots. 528 High completed on Aug. 2003 and 445 Bryant completed on Nov. 2003 H: Part of the SOFA 2 CAP Page 6