Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 457-10TO: HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY SERVICES DATE: DECEMBER 13, 2010 CMR: 457:10 SUBJECT: California Avenue Fountain Update This is an informational report and no Council action is required. BACKGROUND The, Palo Alto Public Art Commission worked with artist Bruce Beasley to develop a proposal for a new fountain design for California Avenue near Park Boulevard beginning in 2005 and continuing through 2008. At the November 11, 2008 Council meeting in which the Art Commission proposed the Beasley fountain (CMR:428:08), there was some public opposition to the proposed fountain in favor of a repair or replacement of the existing damaged fountain. The Council asked the Public Art Commission to start over and work with key stakeholders to create a proposal for an improved artist-designed fountain and allow for public input to direct the final fountain design. The Public Art Commission held a community meeting in May of 2009 in which key elements for the replacement fountain were identified for inclusion in the Request For Proposal. The community requested that the fountain make, "a splashy water sound", that the design reflects the site-specific spirit of California A venue, and that the fountain not interfere with pedestrian and bike traffic flow on the median island. These requirements, among others, were included in the final Request for Proposals for a new California Avenue fountain, which was released in December 2009 with a budget of $50,000 from the Art Commission's ClP budget. Twenty-five proposals for new fountains were received in January 2010 and the Public Art Commission subcommittee selected five of those proposals to go forward to a selection panel. At that time, the project was put on hold for budgetary reasons. DISCUSSION The current fountain is in terrible disrepair and no longer functions. Given the sensitive nature of this site, The Public Art Commission is proceeding with the selection process and wishes to inform Council on the details of the fountain selection. A selection panel of stakeholders met November 4, 2010, to review the five fountain designs and select which of the five will go forward as finalists for public display and input. The panelists included the three Public Art Commissioners on the subcommittee (Ally Richter, Terry Acebo- CMR:457:10 Page 1 of3 Davis, and Douglass C. Brown), former Council Member Jack Morton, CAADA representative Feeta Bishop, community member Jan St. Peter, and California Avenue business employee Robert Syrett. Three artist finalists were selected. The Public Art Commission plans to use Open City Hall to solicit input on the three final designs for the new California Avenue Fountain during the period of January 5-18. The process is as follows: Notifications will be sent to residents within 600 feet of the fountain site notifying them of the opportunity to make their preference of design known. December utility bills and a sign at the fountain site will also announce the Open City Hall Fountain link. The artists are creating more detailed drawings which will go on public display late December on California Avenue, on the Civic Center bulletin board, at Lucie Stern, at the Art Center, and at Palo Alto libraries. The Public Art Commission is working with CAADA to secure places on California Avenue to display images of· the proposed fountains and provide flyers with the Open City Hall information. Weather permitting, the Public Art Commission has discussed having the images or models on display at the California Avenue farmer's market with a laptop available for people to make their choice or offer technical assistance to anyone who might need it. Because California Avenue caters to large populations of employees who may not be Palo Alto residents, but eat and shop in the area, the Public Art Commission feels it is important to include that population in the public input process. When the public logs into Open City Hall, they will see the three finalists' images, select their favorite, and may also send a message to the Public Art Commission at that time. Upon completion of the Open City Hall public input period, visitors will be able to see the breakdown of which fountain received the most votes, a breakdown of the voters by residency, as well as the ability to see if there is a difference in what Palo Altans chose versus residents of neighboring communities and beyond. Open City Hall offers the unique ability to have a controlled input process by which the Commission can evaluate the overall choice as well as the choice of Palo Alto residents before they make the final decision at their public meeting January 20th . The results of the Open City Hall information will be distributed to the Public Art Commissioners and available to the public at that meeting. The Public Art Commission created the Request for Proposals with input from the public and key stakeholders, narrowed the proposals to those which most closely fit the parameters set forward by the community, involved stakeholders in the finalist selection, and are soliciting public input on Open City Hall. The process has involved numerous public meetings, three staff liaisons, and an enormous effort to be inclusive and transparent while trying to respect the Public Art Commission's duty to make aesthetic decisions regarding Art in Public Places. The Public Art Commission is looking forward to finally bringing a new fountain to California Avenue. An updated City Manager's report will be prepared and circulated to you once a final design is chosen in January. RESOURCE IMPACT $50,000 from the California Avenue Streetscape CIP have been allocated to replace the existing pump, demolish and remove the exiting fountain, prepare the site for the new fountain, and repair or patch any areas of the median after the new fountain is installed. The Art Commission has dedicated $50,000 from their CIP budget to pay for the new artist-designed fountain. CMR:457:10 Page 2 of3 POLICY IMPLICATIONS The Palo Alto Art Commission's role in the selection of the final fountain design is consistent with it's role as defined in the Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan. This process is also consistent with policy G-2 of the Governance section, "Use advisory bodies and ad hoc committees to assist City staff and the City Council on policy issues". The use of Open City Hall is also supported by policy G-3 in the governance section, "Enhance communication between residents, organizations, and the City Council by providing access to information via electronic media and other methods." The expansion of art exhibitions into the public real are consistent with Community Services section policy C-23, "Explore a way to expand the space available in the community for art exhibitions, classes and other cultural activities." ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: . CMR457:09 PREPARED BY: ___ ~ __ --=-__ L_a_~ __ Do ___ _ Liaison to the Public Art Commission REVIEWED BY: ----~r--_f+--'=---~d_----- Director, Community Services CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: . 8 ,JAMES KEENE . ~ City Manager CMR:457:10 Page 3 of3 Attachment A TO: HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: CITYMANAGER DATE: DECEMBER 7,2009 CMR: 457:09 REPORT TYPE: INFORMATIONAL SUBJECT: Update on California Avenue Phase II Improvements and Fountain Selection Process This is an informational report and no Council action is required. The purpose of the report is to provide the Council with an update on the Phase II improvements for California A venue and the replacement fountain selection process that is currently underway. ' BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION At the November 11, 2008 City Council meeting, staff brought forward a proposal from the Public Art Commission to replace the fountain at California A venue with a fountain designed by artist Bruce Beasley. The Commission had worked with the artist over approximately three years to develop this proposal to replace the fountain at California Avenue. At the meeting, there was some public opposition to the Beasley fountain proposal in favor of keeping and repairing/replacing the existing fountain. The Council voted to have staff evaluate the placement of a Beasley piece at Mitchell Park as part of the new library and community center bond measure project and to have the Public Art Commission work with California Avenue Area Development Association (CAADA) and neighborhoods to develop a proposal for an improved fountain. The Council also· directed that the· Public Art Commission create a fountain design with input from the public through a process. similar to the selection process for the Michael Szabo piece at Mitchell Park. Based on the Council's direction, the Commission held a subcommittee meeting in May 2009 to discuss the new fountain proposal and to hear input from the California A venue community before developing a new Request for Art Proposals (RFP). The meeting was well attended by key community stakeholders concerned about the fountain proposal. At the meeting, the subcommittee also discussed the public input process that would occur prior to the final selection of a new fountain. Based on this discussion and input, the Commission has worked to develop a new RFP that incorporates the community's input and also outlines the community engagement process that will occur during the selection of the final fountain. CMR: 457:09 Page I of3 The new RFP will be distributed and made available to the public on December 4, 2009. Proposals are due Tuesday, January 12, 2010. The Commission has budgeted $50,000 for this fountain. In the scope of services for the RFP, it has been identified as essential that the new fountain make a "splashing water sound" and that the design "reflect the site-specific spirit of California Avenue." The design of the fountain must fit within the existing fountain footprint. As identified in the RFP, artist finalists will be selected by the Public Art Commission. The finalist selection panel may also include staff members from Community Services and Public Works, the landscape architect working on the California Avenue improvements and selected community members. Members of the broader community will then be invited to provide feedback on preferences for the final design options. The Commission may also hold a public meeting where each of the artist finalists would be given the opportunity to make a presentation about their proposal. Additionally, given the strong initial community input on this fountain proposal, the City Manager has suggested that an option for a more traditional fountain be included with·the other . design options for community input. If the community preference is for the more traditional option, the funding for this option would come from the California Avenue capital improvement project budget and not the Public Art Commission budget. That said, the City Manager also affirms the importance and great value of public art and the role and expertise of the Public Art Commission. Their selfless contribution deserves our respect. Based on the current schedule, the community input process for the fountain would occur from January 29 through February 8. The final artist would be selected by the Public Art Commission after weighing the community's preference in the final design option. This process is consistent with the community input and artist selection process that was utilized for selecting Michael Szabo as the artist for the Mitchell Park sculpture. The Art Commission has worked diligently to address the initial concerns raised by community members about a replacement fountain. Hopefully, the incorporation of public input in the review and selection process will be inclusive enough to create a win-win situation for the much­ needed replacement of this fountain on California A venue. In order to keep the public informed on the project, staff will be creating and posting a sign at the fountain site with the anticipated schedule and a web address for community members to look up additional information. As was mentioned above, staff in Community Services are working closely with Public Works staff to ensure iliat the design and construction of the fountain integrates well with the Phase II improvements planned for California A venue. The landscape architect will· be 'a key partner on the project team. The Phase II California Avenue Streetscape Improvements will include new trees, benches, kiosks, street resurfacing, possible planters and possible lane configuration and addition of enhanced (colored) crosswalks. These improvements will be coordinated during the fountain design and construction phases. The landscape architect will review the selected artist's fountain concepts and complement the fountain with the new bench seating and landscaping to ensure the fountain is a focal point of the plaza area. The Phase II project will undergo design, community outreach and board/commission approvals this spring with the anticipation of construction beginning in summer or fall 2010 pending City Council approval. CMR: 457:09 Page 2 of3 TIMELINE December 4, 2009 January 12,2010 January 29,2010 January 29-February 8, 2010 February 4,2010 February 18,2010 Spring Spring SummerlFall RESOURCE IMPACT Fountain RFP released Fountain proposals due Public Art Commission selection of finalists Community input on finalists Artist Presentations Finalist approved by Public Art Commission Begin Fountain Concept Design and Phase II Final Design Board/Commission Approvals of Phase II Improvements Begin Fountain Construction and Phase II Improvements The Public Art Commission has budgeted $50,000 in public art funds to put towards the design and construction of a new fountain at California Avenue. POLICY IMPLICATIONS This report is consistent with prior Council direction on this issue. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW I . The actions in this report do not constitute a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines; therefore, no environmental assessment is required. PREPARED BY: DEPARTMENT APPROVAL: CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: CMR: 457:09 l~ KELLY MORARIU Assistant to the City ManagerlInterim Division Mana er, Arts & Sciences ETTS Interim Community Services Director ~-. ..,...-\..., Page 3 of3