HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 436-10TO: HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CITY MANAGER
DATE: DECEMBER 13, 2010
REPORT TYPE: CONSENT
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING AND
COlVIMUNITY ENVIRONMENT
CMR: 436:10
SUBJECT: Approval of a Final Map to Create Five Condominium Units on a
6,000 Square Foot Lot at 420 Cambridge A venue.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In 2008, the City Council approved a rezoning of 420 Cambridge Avenue to a Pedestrian Transit
Oriented Development (PTOD) zone to accommodate the mixed use project, which was then
approved through the Architectural Review Board (ARB) process on March 11, 2010. The
Vesting Tentative Map, proposed for condominium purposes, was approved by Council on June
14, 2010, to create four residential condominium units and one commercial condominium unit.
The Final Map proposal is consistent with the ARB approved project and Vesting Tentative
Map, and with all applicable regulations for subdivisions set forth in the Palo Alto Municipal
Code (PAMC).
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the proposed Final Map to create five
condominium units on a 6,000 square foot lot.
BACKGROUND
The project site is located in the California Avenue Shopping District and is one block north of
California Avenue. After Council approved the PTOD zoning ·for the site in 2008 (CMR:436:08),
the ARB reviewed the development plans and recommended approval by the Director of
Planning and Community Environment. The Director approved the ARB application March 11,
2010. The project was subject to appeal and no appeal was filed. The Vesting Tentative Map,
proposed for condominium purposes, after review and recommendation by the Planning and
Transportation Commission, was forwarded to and unanimously approved by Council on June
14, 2010, to create four residential condominium units and one commercial condominium unit as
described in CMR 274: 10 (Attachment C) .
The approved project includes 1,449 square feet of commercial space, residential parking,
storage, mechanical room, recycling/trash and residential entry lobby on the ground floor, and
CMR: 436:10 Page 1 of 3
four, three-story residential units (approximately 1,485 square feet each) on the upper floors.
The applicant's intention for condominiums has been clear throughout the process, but the City
requires the process to occur subsequent to ARB approval. Additional background information
related to the project's details and history is included in the Record of Land Use Action
(Attachment A).
DISCUSSION
The proposed Final Map is to subdivide one existing 6,000 square foot parcel to establish five
condominium units (four residential units and one commercial unit). The common areas of this
development include (1) the undesignated areas of the parking garage that include the
mechanical room, recycling/trash area, and access areas; (2) the open patio areas on the Plaza
level; and (3) the access bridges on the third level of the residential units. The private areas
include the individual units and the private patios directly adjacent to them, parking spaces
allotted to each unit, and designated storage units in the garage. The Covenants, Conditions and
Restrictions (CC&R's) for this development outline the responsible parties for maintenance and
general upkeep. The Final Map includes information on the existing parcels and onsite
conditions.
The Final Map and the Record of Land Use Action for the Tentative Map have been provided for
the Council's information. Staff of the Planning and Public Works Departments have reviewed
the Final Map and have deternlined that it is consistent with the approved Tentative Map and
satisfies all approval conditions for the Tentative Map. According to the State Subdivision Map
Act, the City Council must approve the Final Map if it complies with the approved Tentative
Map.
BOARD/COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC) reviewed and recommended the Vesting
Tentative Map prior to Council's approval on June 14, 2010. The PTC does not review Final
Maps.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
The proposed subdivision is consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
The residential and comnlercial uses of the development are consistent with the associated land
use designation of Regional/Community Commercial use and with the ARB approved plans.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project is subject to environmental review under provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). A Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted November
17, 2008 for this proposed project.
PREPARED BY:
CMR: 436:10
CLARE CAMPBELL
Planner
Page 2 of3
DEPARTMENT HEAD:
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
ATT ACHMENTS:
CURTIS WILLIAMS
Director of Planning and Community Environment
'~U)~±qJ
'-~AMES KEENE ¥ City Manager
Attachment A:
Attachment B:
Record of Land Use Action for Vesting Tentative Map, June 14, 2010
CMR 274:10, City Manager's Report on Vesting Tentative Map
Attachment C: Final Map* (Provided to Council Members, Libraries, Development Center,
and 5th floor of City Hall only)
*prepared by applicant
COlTRTESY COPIES
Nicole Gittleson, Clarum Homes [nicole@c1arum.coITI.]
CrvIR: 436: 10 Page 3 of3
/ ATTACHMENT A
ACTION NO. "2010-7
RECORD OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF PALO ALTO OF 'LAND USE ACTION
FOR' 420 CAMBRIDGE AVENUE: VESTING TENTATIVE MAP,,10PLN-00092
(CLARuM HOMES, APPLICANT)
, \
, I
On June 14, 2010, the City Council of the Gity of Palo Alto
'approved the Vesting Tentative Map to' subdi vide one parcel to
cre;ate five condominium units (four residential and.. one
commercial), making the following findings, determi,nation, and
declarations:
SEtTIO~ 1. Background.
The City Council of the'City of Palo Alto ("CityC6~ncil") findsi'
determines, and declares as follows:
, A. On March 15, 2010, Clarum Romes applied fo~ a yesting
Tentative Map ~o subdivide one existing 6,OqO s~u~re ioot,pai6~~
for the development of five condominfum units comprised of 1,449
square feet of commercial space (,Personal Servic~)' and' residentiai'
parking on the ground' floor and' four three-story residential '~nits'
above, approximately 1,485 square feet each ('''the Project")':-"
B. 'Following staff review, the' "Planning and
Transportation Commission ("Conunission") revfewed, the 'Project· on
May 26, 2010 and voted [6-0-0-~] to recommend that Council approve
the project. The Commission's actions are contained in the CMR:
XXX: 10 .' ," -, -
c. The Ves,ting Tentative Map ,plan 's"et ',da:ted April 14,
2010 '(received April 15, 2010) includes information on'the ex~st-ing
parcels; and onsi te conditions. ' 'rhese drawings' are in complian:ce'
with the applicable provisions of the City's Stibdi~ision O~d{~ande:
These 'plans contain all information and notations required to be
shown on a Vesting Tent'ative Map (per PAMe Sections 21.12), as well
as the design requirements concerning the creation of 'lots,
streets, walkways, and similar feat~res (PAMe ?l.~O) .
SECTION 2 ~' Environmental Review.
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA" requires that "a
Lead Agency examine the potential environmental' impacts of the'
'whole of an action' ~hich has the potential, to physically change
the environment, directly or indirectly, and not just the act of
merely subdividing a parcel to create condominium units. In this
lease, the subdivision would ultimately facilitate the construction
of mixed use development which is" not exempt from CEQA
requirements.
An environmental impact assessment was prepared .for the project at
the time of the rezoning and architectural review, and it was
determined that, with the implementation of mitigations, no
Page 1 of5
,
potentially adverse impacts would result from the development and,
th.e,refore, the project woulct haye a less, than' significant i~pac.:t, on
the ~nvironI.U~,l)t." The ,Mitigated Negative Declaration ,was ~dopted
November 17, '2008 'in" aCGordange with th~, California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA). ,. ,
, SECTION 3. Tentative Map Findings~
A ,legislati,ve' body of a, city shall deny approval of a Vesting
Tentative Map, if it makes 'any of the following fin~ings
(California Government Code Section 6647~);
1. That' ~he proposed map is, not consistent wi th
applicab1.e ge;r;eral and specifi~ plans as specified in Section
65451:
This finding can not be made in the 'affirmative. The
site'does not lie within a spedific,plan are~ and is consistent
w;i th the provisions,', of the Comprehensi'Ve Plan. The land use
designation in the, area of the subdivision is 'Regional/~orrununi,ty
Commercial ',which' allows mix~d us~, development and the zoning
designa,tion ,is, PTOD. The proposed deve~'opment' is cO!lsistent with
the land use and zoning,designatiop~ 9f the site. '
2. Tha t the design or improvemen t of ithe proposed
sub~ivision is not consistent with applic~ble general and speci!ic
plan$ :,
This finding, can not be made in the affirmative. The
map is consistent with the following Comprehensive Plan policies!
(1) Policy L-l -Limiting future urban developm~nt to currently
d~veloped lands: within the urban service area; and (2)Policy L-6:
Where possible~ avoiq aprupt changes in scale and qensity between
r~si<;i,ential and, !l.on:-r,esidential areas and between residential' areas
of di~ferent densiti~s.
3" Tha t ,the s,i te. is not physically sui table for the type
of development:
This finding can not be made in the affirmative. The
site can accommodate the proposed development. The site is adjacent
to established commercial development and multi-family development.
The Site is relatively flat and regul~r in shape. The ,site is
close to the California 'Cal Train station' and is currently served
by water, gas, wastewater, electric, and communication services.
The site, also' has standard access for emergency service delivery.
4. That the si te is,· not physically sui ta,ble ,for the
proposed density of development:
This finding can not be made in the affirmative. The
subdivision'" would' be consistent with the site development'
regulations of' the PTOD zone district. The proposed density of
Page 2 of5
\
\
'. , ,
" \
development is not considered growth inducing as indica'ted in the
project'~ Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration.
"5. That the design of the subdivision or the j;iroposed
improvements is likely to cause substantial env~ronmental qamage' or'
substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their
ha,bitat: ' " ,
This finding can not be made in' the 'affirmative. The'
project is an infill site surrounded by development and in a
commercial shopping district. The project's Initial Study and
Mitigated Negative peclaration state that 'there are no significant
impacts to ,existing sensitive wildlife and plants'.
6. That 'the' design' of the' ~UbdivisJonor tyPe of
imprqvements is likely to cause serious :public p:ealth 'problems: '
This finding can not be' 'made' in t~'e affirmative. rhe
subdivision will not cause 'ser1ous public health' problems ~ The
resul ting mi'xed use development will' not cause a public' health'
proble!O in that ',it is designed to pr'ovide 'access" for em,ergency
services, will supply necessary, utility services, such as
sani tation, and is designed, per City' and State starida':tds fo ensure
public safety.
} ,
7, That the design of the subdi vision o'r the type of
improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the 'public
at lartJ.e I for access through or use of, property ,wi tnin "the
proposed subdivision.. In this connection, the governing body'may
approve a map if it finds that alternate e~sem~nts~'" fo~' a,cQess or
for use, will be provided, and that these :will be :subst,antially
equivalent to ones previously ~cquired by, the ,public~' This
subsection shall apply only to easements 9frecord or' 'to easements
established by juqgment of a court of competent jurJsd~'.ct~pn and no
authority is hereby granted to a legi$lative body to deter~~ne, that
the public a t large has acquired easements for access th'rough or
use of property within the proposed subdiv~sion. .
The subdivision of the existing"parcel will not
conflict with easements of any type, in that the subdivision is
compatible with the emergency vehicle access and any utility
easements that would be required to serve the proposed
developments. .1
\,
SECTION 4. Approval of Tentative Map.
vesting Tentative Map approval is granted by the City COl:lnc~l under
Palo Alto Municipal Code (",PAMC") Sections 21.,'13 and 2.1.20 and the
Cali fornia Government Code Section 664,74 I, s,ubj ect to, ,the ,con$1i tions
of approval in Section 7 of this Record." , ,
Page 3 of5
SECTION 5. Final Map Approval.
The Final Map submitted for review 'and approval by the 'City Council
of the City of Palo Alto s1)a1.1 be in substantial conformance with
the Vesting Tent~tive,Map p~epared by,Giuli~ni,~ Kull, Ipc,titled
"Ve$ting , Tentati ve Map for 'Condominium Purposes Tract No. fI '
consisting of one page, dated April 14, 2010 (received 'Apr{l 15,
20~0), except ?s modified to incorporate the conditions of approva'i
in Se6tion 6. '
A copy ,of this ,.Tentative Map is on fil~ in the' De'part~ent,
of P~anning and Community Environment, Curren .. t Planning, Division,;
Wi thin two years, of the approval ,date of the Vesting
Tentative ~ap, ~h~, ,subdiv~der shall ca'use the subdivisi .. ,?n or any
part thereof to be surveyed, and, a Final Map, as specified in
Chapter 21. 0,8, to be p~epared, in conformqnge with the Vesting
Tentative Map as conditionally approved, and in compliance with the
provisions of the Subdivision 'Map Act a,nd PAMC 'Section 21 ~ 1.6" an'd
submi tted to the City," Engineer (PAMC, Section 21.16.010 [a) ). .. " : '
t ~ '. • ~
SECTION 6'. Conditions of Approval.
Department of Planninq and Community Environment
Plann~ng Divisio~
1. A Final Map, in conformance with the approyed ve~s'1:ing,
Tentative Map, '" all requi'rements o.f, 'th~ Subdivision Ordinqrlc.e
(,PAMe Section 21.16) I and to the' satisfaction of the.~ity,
Engineer, shall b~ filed with the,Plahning Div~sion and th~
Public Works Engineering Division within two years of the,'
T~ntati ve Map ~pprova'l dat'e (PAMC 21.13« 020 [c] ) . . ' '
2. 'The proj ect "shall comply, wi til the previous' (.!ondi tion"s" of
Approval as~ociated with the r~zoning and archite'ctural r~vie,w
approvals (08PLN-00020 and 09PLN-00064) .
3. Maintenance of common areas shall be addressed to the
satisfaction of the City,Attorney in the Covenants, Conditions
and Restrictions for the subdivision.
SECTION 7. 'Term of Approval.
Tentative Map; All conditions of approval of the Tentative
Map shall be fulfilled prior to approval of a Final Map (PAMC
Section 21.16.010[c]). . ~ .
. Unless a Final Map is filed~ arid all conditions of" approval
are fulfilled within a two-year period from the d~t~ of Tentative
Map approval, or such extension as may be granted, ~he Tentative
Map shall expire and all proceedings shall terminate. Thereafter,'
no Final Map shall be filed without 'first processing a Tentative
Map (PAMe Section 21.16.010[d]).
Page4of5
PASSED: 9-0
AYES: Burt, Espinosa, Holman, Klei'n,' Price, Scharff, Schmid,
Sheph~rd, 'Yeh.
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTENTIONS: None
TO FORM:
City Attorney
PLANS AND DRAWINGS REFERENCED:
Director of Planning and
Community Environment
Those plans prepared' by Giuliani & Kull, Inc ti tIed "Vesting
Tentative Map for Condominium Purposes Tract No. , __ " consisting
of one page, dated April 14, 2010 (received' April 15, 2010).
Page 5 ofS
TO: HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CITY MANAGER
DATE: JUNE 14,2010
REPORT TYPE: ACTION
ATTACHMENT B
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING AND
COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT
CMR: 274:10
SUBJECT: Approval of a Vesting Tentative Map and Record of Land Use Action
to Create Five Condominium Units on a 6,000 Square Foot Lot at 420
Cambridge Avenue
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In 2008, the City Council had approved a rezoning to Pedestrian Transit Oriented Development
(PTOD) zone to accommodate the mixed use project at 420 Cambridge Avenue, which was then
approved through the Architect\lral Review Board (ARB) process on March 11, 2010. This
Vesting Tentative Map is proposed for condominium purposes. The proposal is consistent with
the ARB approved project and with all applicable regulations for subdivisions per the Palo Alto
Municipal Code (P AMC). The findings for. subdivision approval are phrased in the negative,
such that if they are made affirmatively, the subdivision can be denied. The Planning and
Transportation Commission has unanimously recommended approval of the map. Council's
review authority is limited to making the same subdivision findings. Council reviewed and
approved the site layout in the PTOD zoning in 2008.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff and the Planning and Transportation Commission recommend that the City Council
approve the proposed Vesting Tentative Map and adopt the findings and conditions contained
within the Record of Land Use Action (Attachment A).
BACKGROUND
The project site is located in the California Avenue Shopping District and is one block north of
. California Avenue. After Council· approved the PTOD zoning for the site in 2008 (CMR:436:08),
the ARB reviewed the development plans and recommended approval by the Director of
Planning and Community Environment The Director approved the ARB applicati<?n March 11,
2010. The project was subject to appeal and none was filed. The approved project includes
1,449 square feet of commercial space, residential' parking, storage, mechanical room,
recycling/trash and residential entry lobby on the ground floor, and four, three-story residential
units (approximately 1,485 square feet each) above. The applicant's intention for condominiums
CMR: 274:10 Page 1 of3
has been clear throughout the process, but the City requires the process to occur subsequent to
ARB approval. Additional background information related to the project's details-and history are
included in the Record of Land Use Action, and in the Applicant's Project Description
(Attachment C). '
Vesting Tentative Map regulations are set forth in PAMC Chapter 21.13. Vesting Tentative
Maps confer a vested right to proceed with development in substantial compliance with the
ordinances, policies and standards in effect at the time that an application is determined to be
complete by the City, provided that any fees required as a condition of approval of a vesting
tentative map, unless otherwise specified, shall be payable at the rates in effect at the time
building permits are issued.
DISCUSSION
The proposed Vesting Tentative Map is to subdivide one existing 6,000 square foot parcel to
establish five condominium units (four residential units and one commercial unit). The common
areas of this development include (1) the undesignated areas of the parking garage that include
the mechanical roonl, recycling/trash area, and access areas; (2) the open patio areas on the Plaza
level; and (3) the access bridges on the third level of the residential units~ The private areas
include the individual units and the private patios directly adj acent to them, parking spaces
allotted to each unit, and designated storage units in the garage. The Covenants, Conditions and
Restrictions (CC&R's) for this development outline the responsible parties for maintenance and
general upkeep. The Vesting Tentative Map includes information on the existing parcels and
onsite conditions.
City staff has determined that the Vesting Tentative Map application is in compliance with
zoning, subdivision, and other codes and ordinances. The map contains all information and
notations required to be shown on a Ves~ng Tentative Map (per PAMC Sections 21.12.040 and
21.14.020). The required findings are included in the Record of Land Use Action (Attachment
A). Pursuant to the State Subdivision Map Act, the required findings are stated in ·the negative
such that if any of the findings are made the map shall be denied. Staff believes none of the
fmdings can be made to require denial of the map:
COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS
On May 26, 2010, the Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC) conducted a public
hearing and recommended (6-0-0-1) that the City Council approve the Vesting Tentative Map.
No members of the public gave testimony at the hearing. Draft minutes from the PTC hearing are
included in Attachment E.
RESOURCE IMPACTS
As reported in CMR: 436:08 for the PTOD rezoning, the project is expected to result in $5,600
in annual property and utility user tax revenue for the City. Since the commercial floor area will
likely consist of a personal service use, there will be no sales tax revenue. Once the four
residential units are sold, an estimated $10,600 in one-time documentary taxes will be realized.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
The proposed subdivision is consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
The residential and "Personal Service" commercial use of the development are consistent with
CMR: 274:10 Page 2 of3
the associated land use designation of Regiona1/ColllJl1unity 'Commercial use and with the ARB
approved plans.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The prop()sed project is subject to environmental review under provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). A Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted November
17, 2008 for .this proposed project.
PREPARED BY:
CLARE CAMPBELL
Planner
DEPARTMENT HEAD:
CURTIS WILLIAMS
Director of Planning and Community Environment
·CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A:
Attachment B:
Attachment C:
Attachment D:
Attachment E:
Attachment F:
Attachment G:
Draft Record of Land Use Action
Location Map
Applicant's Project Description and Supplemental Information*
May 26, 2010 Planning and Transportation Commission Staff Report (w/o
attachments)
May 26, 2010 Planning and Transportation Commission Excerpt Minutes
ARB Plan Sheets; for Information bill; (provided to Council Members,
Libraries, Development Center, and 5 floor of City Hall oilly)
Vesting Tentative Map* (provided to Council Members, Libraries,
Development Center, and 5th floor of City Hall only)
*prepared by applicant
COURTESY COPIES
Nicole Gittleson, Clarum Homes [nicole@clarum.com]
CMR: 274:10 Page 3 of3
Special Meeting
June 14, 2010
The City Council of the City of Palo Alto met on this date in the Council
Chambers at 7:38 p.m.
Present: Burt, Espinosa, Holman, Klein, Price, Scharff, Schrrlid, Shepherd,
Yeh arrived @ 7:49 p.m.
Absent:
SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY
1. Resolution 9060 entitled "Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo
Alto Expressing Appreciation to Mark S. Herrera Upon His Retirement."
Council Member Scharff read the Proclamation expressing appreciation to
Mark S. Herrera for outstanding public service.
MOTION: Council Member Scharff moved, seconded by Vice Mayor
Espinosa to adopt the resolution expressing appreciation to Mark S. Herrera
upon his retirement.
MOTION PASSED: 8-0 Yeh absent
2. Resolution 9061 entitled "Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo
Alto Expressing Appreciation to Gary R. Brooks Upon His Retirement."
Council Member Klein read the Proclamation expressing appreciation to Gary
R. Brooks for outstanding public service.
MOTION: Council Member Klein moved, seconded by Council Member
Schmid to adopt the resolution expressing appreciation to Gary R. Brooks
upon his retirement.
1 06/14/10
Mayor Burt stated the City Engineer had prepared and filed with the City
Clerk a report providing for the levying of special assessments within the
Parking Assessment Districts created and established for the projects and
under the Resolution of Intent. The report sets forth the amounts of
assessments proposed to be levied for the Fiscal Year 2010. The
assessments will be used to pay principal and interest on the Bonds issued in
the various projects. The report has been open for public inspection. The
purpose of the Public Hearing was to allow the City Council to hear all
persons having an interest in any real property within the Parking
Assessment Districts, take and receive oral and documentary evidence
pertaining to matters contained in the filed report, and to remedy, correct or
amend the report. He inquired whether the City Clerk had received any
written communications from such interested persons.
City Clerk, Donna Grider stated no written communications had been
received.
Public hearing opened and closed without public comment at 9:22 p.m.
MOTION: Council Member Shepherd moved, seconded by Council Member
Klein to adopt the Resolution confirming the Engineer's Report and
Assessment Roll for California Avenue District, Project No~ 92-13 and
levying assessments for FY-2011.
MOTION PASSED: 9-0
12. Public Hearing: Adoption of an Ordinance of the Council of the City of
Palo Alto Amending Section 18.28.050 (Site Development Standards)
to Chapter 18.28 Special Purpose Districts (PF, OS, AC) of Title 18
(Zoning) of the Palo Alto Municipal Code to add a Maximum House Size
Limit to the Open Space Zone District. (Staff requests item to be continued
by Council Motion to 10/04/10).
MOTION: Council Member Yeh moved, seconded by Council Member
Scharff to continue Agenda Item No. 12 to October 4, 2010.
MOTION PASSED: 9-0
13. Public Hearing: To Consider Approval of a Vesting Tentative Map and a
Record of Land Use Action to Subdivide the Existing Parcel into Five
Separate Condominium Parcels for Four Residential Units and One
Commercial Unit at 420 Cambridge Avenue.
Program Assistant II, Amy Johnson stated the proposed Vesting Tentative
Map was to subdivide one existing 6,000 square foot parcel to establish five
condominium units with an approved rnixed-use development. The project's
design, in the California Avenue Shopping District, was approved via the
6 06/14/10
Architectural Review Board process after the City Council approved the
rezoning of the Pedestrian Transit Oriented Development. Staff determined
that the Vesting Tentative Map application was in compliance with zoning,
subdivision, and other codes and Ordinances, and pursuant to the State
Subdivision Map Act. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's)
for this' development outlined the responsible parties for maintenance and
general upkeep. To ensure ongoing maintenance provisions within the
CC&R's, Staff suggested the City Council add a third Condition of Approval to
Section 6, of the Record of Land Use Action, stating the maintenance of
common areas shall be addressed to the satisfaction of the City Attorney.
The final CC&R's would be submitted in conjunction with the Final Map.
Council Member Schmid inquired whether the condominiums were
advantageous from a budgetary perspective.
Ms. Johnson stated title transfers would yield income to the City.
Public hearing opened and closed without public comment at 9:27 p.m.
MOTION: Council Member Holman moved, seconded by Council Member
Scharff to: 1) approve the Vesting Tentative Map. 2) adopt the findings and
conditions contained within the Record of Land Use Action, and 3) add a
third condition to Section 5 of the Conditions of Approval of the Record of
Land Use Action that maintenance of common areas shall be addressed to
the satisfaction of the City Attorney in the Covenants, Conditions and
Restrictions, for the subdivision.
Council Member Holman stated her support for the additional condition
within the CC&R's.
MOTION PASSED: 9-0
14. Public Hearing: Stanford University Medical Center Facilities Renewal
and Replacement Project Meeting to Receive Comments on the
Stanford University Medical Center Facilities Renewal and Replacement
Project Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR), Including
Comments Focused on: A) the Project Description, Land Use,
Population & Housing, and Public Services Chapters of the Draft EIR
(continued from June 7, 2010); and B) Visual Quality, Biological
Resources and Cultural Resources Chapters of the Draft EIR.
Council Member Klein advised he would not be participating in this Agenda
Item as his wife was on faculty at Stanford University. He left the meeting at
9:29 p.m.
7 06/14/10
OWNER'S STATEMENT
TIlE UNDERSIGNED IlERfBY STATE TllAT TIlEY ARE TIlE 0W'ER5 OF OR UAVE SOME RIGHT,
TIill OR INTERE5T IN TIlE REAl.. I'I!lCf'ERTY INCUJDED HITIlIN THIS SUBDIVISION: TllAT
TIlEY IlERfBY CONSENT TO TIlE PREPARATION AND RECORDATION OF THIS MAP: TllAT
EA5EMENrS FOR AND AREAS AfPI.IRTENANT TO PAACELS DEPICTED ON TIllS MAP WILL BE
CONVEYED AS 5HI:»IN HEREON:
UlCCO INCORPORATED,
A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
BY, ______ _
J:)HN SUPPES
I'RESlDENT
OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT
STATE OF CAlIFORN'A
COONTY OF SANTA CI..ARA
ON , 2010, BEFORE ME, A NOTARY
PUBUC,
PERSONALLY APPEARED J:)HN SUPPES,
HIlO PROVED TO ME ON TIlE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE, TO BE TIlE PERSON(S) WHOSE
NAME(S) ISIARE SUBSCRISED TO TIlE WITIlIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWlEDGED TO ME TllAT
HEI$IlEI'IllEY EXECUTED TIlE SAME IN HISMERI1lIJ!lR AUTHORIZED CAPAClTY(IES), AND TllAT
BY H1S1HER11l1J!1R 5IGNAllJRE(S) ON TIllS INSTRUMENT TIlE PERSON(S), OR TIlE ENTITY IJI"ON
BSlAU' OF 14I1C11 TIlE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED TIlE INSTlWI'1ENT. WITNESS MY HAND
AND OFFICIAL SEAL.
I CERTIFY UNDER PElW..TY OF PER..lJRY UNDER TIlE LAWS OF TIlE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TllAT
TIlE F'ORGOING PAAAGRAPIl IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
WITNESS MY UAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.
5IGNAnR~E ________ _
NOTARY NAME,,· _________ _
MY PRINCIPLE PLACE OF BUSINESS IS IN TIlE CQUNTY OF _____ _
MY CCIM'1ISSION EXPIRES
FLOOD ZONE NOTE
TIlE PROFERTr LIES WITHIN FLQOD ZONE X, BASED ON COMI"lINIl"l' PANEL NI.!I1BeR 0II003A& OOOS E,
DATED .JJNE 2, JCIqq.
SUBDIVISION NOTE
TIllS SUBDIVISION IS TRANSFERABLE SUBJECT TO A SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT WHIC11 IS ON fiLE WITIl
TIlE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND al1MUNITY ENVIRDNMENT, orr OF PALO ALTO.
rtK1tz:!:!!:!!a!!:2t Inc.
500 Wall Street. Suite A. Auburn. CA 95603
(530) 885-5107 Fax (530) 885-5157
Auburn • San Jose • Oakdale
APPROVAL Of "II CQUUNCIL
I, I orr CI..ERK OF TIlE OTY OF PALO ALTO, SANTA CI..ARA
C(IUNTY, CALIFORNIA IlERfBY CERTIFY TIlE TIlE CITY C(IUNCIL OF SAID CITY OF PALO ALTO
BY M0110N OF ACTION ADOPTED AT A REGULAR MEET1NG OF SAID CQUNClL IlEIJ) ON
TIlE _ DAY OF _ 2010, DID DULY APPROVE TIlE Aal1PANYING MAP.
DATE DONNA J. GRIDER
CI.ERK OF TIlE CITY OF PALO ALTO
DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND COMMUNIII ENViRONMENT
STATEMENT
THIS MAP UAS BeEN EXAMINED TIllS _ DAY OF AUGUST 2010 AND fOUNI) TO CONfORM HITIl
TIlE APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP.
DATE CURTIS WILLIAMS
DIRECTOR OF PLANNING • CGlMMUNIl"l'
ENVIRONMENT
RECORDERIS STATEMENT
FIl..ED 11115 ___ ,DAY OF , :2010 AT _. _, -'1.
IN BOOK ___ OF PARCs.. MAPS AT PAGE---, AT 11IE REQUEST OF
GIULIANI • J::ULL, INC.
FILE NO. ______ _
BY"-RfGI--NA-ALCOM--EN":""DRAS---
SANTA CLARA COUNTY CLfK-RfCORDER
Fe, ____________ ___
CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT
HEREBY STATE TllAT I UAVE EXAMINED TIllS MAP, TllAT TIllS MAP IS SUBSTANTIALLY TIlE
SAME AS IT APPEARED ON TIlE APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP, TllAT ALL PROVISIONS OF TIlE
SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LDCAL ORDlHANCES APPLICABLE AT TIlE TIME OF APPROVAL OF TIlE
TENTATIVE MAP UAVE BeEN al1PILEO W1T1l AND TllAT I AM SATISFIED THIS MAP 15
TECHNICALLY CORRECT.
DATE
CIII SURvEYOR 'S STATEMENT
J. MICIIAEL SARTOR
RCE $4l1
INTERIM DIRECTOR OF I'IJ8LlC WORII:S UCENSE EXPIRES _____ _
I, , A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR FOR TIlE CITY OF PALO ALTO,
SANTA CLARA cauNTY, CALIFORNIA, 00 HEREBY STATE TllAT 1 UAVE EXAMINED TIlE HITHIN MAP,
AND I AM SATISFIED TllAT TIllS MAP IS TECIINICALLY CORRECT.
NAME DATE
LS No. EXPIRES
BOOK ___ OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE __ _
SURvEYOR'S STATEMENT
nus MAP HAS PREPARfO BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND 15 BASED
UPON A FlaD SURVEY IN CONF<JIia1ANCE HI1ll 11IE REQUIREMENTS OF 11IE
SUBDIVISION MAP N:.T AND LOCAl.. ORDINANCJE AT 11IE REQUEST OF UJCCO
CORI'ORATION, AUGUST 2010.
I j.lERfB'( STATE 1lIAT 11115 FINAL MAP 5IJBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO 11IE
APPROVED OR CONDITIONAI.J..Y APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP, IF ANY: 1lIAT ALL
t1CiNI.JMENTS ARE OF 11IE CI-IARACrI:R AND 0CCUFr 11IE POSlnONS INDICATED
THAT 11IE MONUMENTS ARE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE 1111' SURVEY TO Be
RETRACED.
EDHARD M. GIULIANI, P.L.S. No. 5<107
LICENSE EXPIRES, De:::. 31, 2010
TRACT NO. 10068
CAMBRIDGE PLAZA
FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES
SCALIE. AUGUST, :2010
BEING A RE5U6D1VISION OF LOT 11
AND LOT 15 AND A PORTION OF LOT ", I!lI..OCK 15
AS SHOHN ON 11IE MAP ENTITLED 'MAP OF EVERGREEN P~'
RECORDED IN BOOK F-3 OF MAPS AT PAGE 'fl
CITY OF PALO ALTO
SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
514EET I OF 2
~
~ n
:J: s: m z
-I
n
-===~==~=--==-~~=================,:~~
BOOK ___ OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE __ _
GRAPHIC SCALE
20 0 1020 .olD ~-a-" !
I INCH -20 FEET
""" ~
,g.>
~/
I~
/ ~
~
/
~,$~ V /
"c;y. I
~
~
~.s1'~ / ' '\~.c5). ~ I
~ '" 1'>' / ~ \ ""'" "---/
\ " ~
~ ~ X
'''''t(
/ '
X
I
/
I
"'"
'"
~
0-;;J ~
~ \
I", ~ "
""
""
" "
, .... "
',fit "'I.t.,. (j~((). ~.,.~,
q,-.:rr;y.y ",
""
"
/ ',.<t ~ Q.,"r:("',}\
/ ~ ~
~
~
/ ~ ~
~
"
Y
/ / rtK ii!!2!::::!,! :'!:l~.i Ine.
500 Wall Street. Suite A, Auburn. CA 95603
(530) 885-5107 Fax (530) 885-5157
Auburn • San Jose • Oakdale
I
/
if
" 0)
" 0 " Q.,0 I'l; "'~"r:( /
" ~ " "I \y /J" II
" ",
'~( /1
l~ I~ ~~# I!F~
Iii
" Iv
/'" <>,
/ 1
/
I
/
/
/
I
/
/
/
/
~
X "
/
(
~
• FOUND BUILDING ~ER
)( F<lUND PI< NAIL
o DlMESIal POINT (NCJTI.lING F~D OR SET)
(I) eca.:: F-3 MAPS PAGE ~
(I) eca.:: 351 MAPS PAGE 35
EXTERIOR BOUNDARY
ADJACENT BOUNDARY
CENTERLINE
BASIS Of BEARINGS
nIE MERIDIAN OF nilS SURVEY 15 IDENTICAL TO 1lIAT
USED FOR nlE RECORD OF SURVEY FILED IN eca.:: 351
OF MAPS AT PAGE 35, SANTA CLARA COUNTY RECORDS.
~
I. 5OIJRC.E OF MEETS AND eouND5 15 DOC. 110. ~
RfCORDEI) IN BOOK 1$17 AT PAGE 13'1, SANTA CLARA
CCUNT'r CIfFICIAL RfCORDS.
2. MAIHTEHANCE OF DRAINAGE AND CDITICIN AREA 15 er THE
CAMeRlOGf PI.AZA (WIERS ASSOCIATION.
3. THE PROf'ERT'( SI4C»tI ~eRON 15 50BJECT TO THE
COVENANTS, CONDITtae, AND RESTRICTIONS AS RfCORDED
~ ..IAIVARl' 2'1, 1'114 IN BOOK.412 AT PAGE 301, AND AS
RfCORDEI) ~ FEl!RlJAAY 'I, 1'lI5 IN BOOK 2150 AT PAGE
255, AND AS RfCORDEI) ~ APRIl. II, 1'141 IN BOOK 1030 AT
PAGE 410, SANTA CLARA CI:lUNiY OFFICIAL RfCORDS.
4. COVENANTS, CONDITiae AND RESTRICTIONS AFFl!Cl1NG
THIS PAAC£I. ARE eEING RfCORDED COIICURRENTL.Y
~ERfWITH IN DOC# 2010-___ AND STIl'Ul.ATES THAT
THE CAMeRlOGf PI.AZA OWNERS ASSOCIATION, THE FIVE
~ OF THE CONDOMINIUM UNITS, WIU-OWN 'PAAca A"
AS TENANTS-1II-«n1ON. ~ RE5I"GtlSIeIUTY
f(IR ALI. SUII.OOlGi AND PRCIPERTY MAlNT AlIIEIICS ue WITH
THE THE OWNERS OF "PARCEL A", EITHER JOINTLY,
INDlVIDUALl.Y OR IN ANY CQ1BlNATI~.
TRACT NO. 10068
CAMBRIDGE PLAZA
FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES
SCALE. AUGUST, 2010
BEING A RESUeDIVISlON OF LOT 17
AND LOT IS AND A PORTION OF LOT 16, BLOCK 15
AS SUOWN ON nIE MAP ENTlTLED "MAP OF EVERGREEN PARK'
RECORDED IN eca.:: F-!\ OF MAPS AT PAGE ~
CITY OF PALO ALTO
SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
SHEET 2 OF 2