HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 422-10TO: HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL 12
FROM: CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS
DATE: NOVEMBER 22, 2010 CMR:422:10
REPORT TYPE: CONSENT
SUBJECT: Adoption of a Budget Amendment Ordinance to Create Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) ProjectVR-ll000 (Scheduled Vehicle and
Equipment Replacements) and Transfer the Remaining Unused
Appropriation from CIP Projects VR-07S00 anel VR-OSOOO to VR-
110000 in the Total Amount of $222,205 and Approval of a Purchas~
Order with Downtown Ford Sales in an Amount Not. to Exceed
$152,030 for the Purchase of Six Police Patrol Vehicles
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that Council:
1. Adopt the attached Budget Amendment Ordinance (BAO) to create CIP Project VR-
11000 (Scheduled Vehicle and Equipment Replacements) and transfer the remaining
unused appropriation from CIP Projects VR ... 07800 and VR-08000 in the amount of
$222,205 in order to provide initial funding to CIP VR-ll 000.
2. Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute a purchase order with Downtown
Ford Sales in the amount of $152,030 for the purchase of six police patrol vehicles.
DISCUSSION
The vehicle and equipment replacement policy described in City Policy and Procedures 4-1
(Vehicle and Equipment Use, Maintenance, and Replacement), provides for the on-going
replacement of City fleet vehicles and equipment. Replacements are scheduled using guidelines
. based on age, mileage accumulation, and obsolescence.
The City's fleet currently includes 27 police patrol vehicles (25 Ford Crown Victoria sedans, one
Chevrolet Tahoe and one Ford Expedition). Policy 4-1 prescribes a replacement interval for
patrol vehicles of four (4) years or 85,000 miles. In an effort to reduce ongoing costs, Equipment
Management has extended this replacement interval to 100,000 miles. The extended interval has
not dramatically increased maintenance costs, and the vehicles have remained safe and reliable.
However, due to the severe service that patrol vehicles experience (continuous stop-and-go
driving; aggressive acceleration and braking; extended idling) it is not recommended that patrol
vehicles be kept beyond 100,000 miles as there is a significantly increased risk for high' cost
repairs after that point, such as engine or transmission replacements. In addition to wear and tear
on the powertrain components, the continuous heavy use of these vehicles places a great deal of
wear and tear on the body and interior of the vehicle. As the vehicles age, this deterioration
CMR:422:10 Page 10f4
results in an increasing frequency of failures, and escalates vehicle. downtime. The increased
downtime has the potential to compromise the Police Department's ability to respond to calls for
service.
There are currently six patrol vehicles at or near replacement mileage. These vehicles are listed
in the table below:
Unit Year Description Current Mileage
5224 2007 Ford Crown Victoria Sedan 91,552
5229 2005 Ford Crown Victoria Sedan 95,195
5234 2005 Ford Crown Victoria Sedan 94,199
5236 2005 Ford Crown Victoria Sedan 104,236
5237 2005 Ford Crown Victoria Sedan 99,445
5239 2005 Ford Crown Victoria Sedan 95,721
The anticipated in-service date of these new vehicles is May 2011. At that time all it is
anticipated that the vehicles in thetable will have exceeded 100,000 miles.
Audit of Vehicle Utilization and Replacement
This purchase is being conducted with full consideration for the recent Audit of Vehicle
Utilization and Replacement. The audit did not include a review of the City's inventory of
emergency vehicles, and emergency vehicles are generally exempt from minimum utilization
requirements. The vehicles being replaced through this purchase have, on average, greatly
exceeded the minimum mileage accumulation of 2,500 miles annually. The Fleet Review
Committee (FRC) reviewed and ultimately approved the replacem~nt of these vehicles on
October 20, 2010, in accordance with the audit recommendations. The approval was based on:
.• An examination of each vehicle's current usage;
• An analysis of each vehicle's operating and replacement costs;
• A comparison of the age, mileage, operating cost and performance of each
vehicle with others in the class.
'. An analysis of alternatives to ownership, such as mileage reimbursement;
pooling/sharing; the reassignment of another underutilized vehicle, or renting.
The FRC determined that there are no alternatives to outright replacement. All of these vehicles
are used for specialized tasks, and are equipped with a considerable amount of emergency
equipment that renders them unsuitable for any purpose other than law enforcement. This
precludes their assignment to a motor pool, and rules out the use of a private vehicle with
mileage reimbursement. They are each used by a single employee on a continuous daily basis,
so there are no opportunities for sharing. There are no similar, underutilized vehicles available
to use as replacements for these vehicles. Because these vehicles are used continuously
throughout the year, renting them would not be a cost-effective option.
Post-Delivery Outfitting
Subsequent to ·delivery, each vehicle will need to be outfitted with standard and necessary
emergency equipment; including lights, sirens, two-way radio equipment, mobile data terminal,
prisoner cage, and nUmerous accessories. It is Equipment Management's intent to transfer as
CMR:422:10 Page 2 of4
much equipment as possible from the existing vehicles into the new vehicles; however, some
equipment may have to be purchased new to accommodate the change in model years. There is a
significant amount of labor associated with the outfitting of police vehicles. This work will be
contracted through a separate bid process, and is estimated to cost $47,400.
BIDDING AND SELECTION PROCESS
A Request for Quotation (RFQ) for police patrol vehicles was sent to seven vendors on
September 14, 2010. Bids were received from seven qualified vendors on October 5, 2010, as
listed on the attached bid summary (Attachment B). Bids ranged from a high of $206,987 to a
low bid of$182,316. The purchase order amount is lower than the bid amount because staff
determined that an order of six vehicles would be sufficient at this time. In addition, staff elected
not to purchase an optional wiring package that was included in the bid total.
Staffhas reviewed all bids submitted and recommends that the bid submitted by Downtown Ford
Sales be accepted and that Downtown Ford Sales be declared the lowest responsible bidder.
Staff has checked references supplied by the vendor for previous contracts and has found no
sIgnificant complaints: '
RESOURCE IMPACT
In fiscal years 2006-07 and 2007-08, Council approved the appropriation of funds to Vehicle
Replacement Fund CIP projects VR-07800 and VR-08000 (Scheduled Vehicle and Equipment
Replacements). The vehicle and replacements covered by these projects are complete, and there
is $222,205 in remaining funding available between the two of them. The attached Budget
Amendment Ordinance will provide for the transfer of funding from these CIP accounts into the
current year's Scheduled Vehicle and Equipment Replacement CIP (VR-llOOO). This
transaction has no impact on the Vehicle and Equipment Replacement Fund reserve balance.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
Authorization of the contract does not represent any change to the existing policy.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The vehicles being supplied are in conformance with all applicable emISSIons laws and
regulations. Accordingly, this purchase is exempt from the California Environmental Quality
Act under the CEQA guidelines (Section 15061).
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Budget Amendment Ordinance
Attachment B: Bid Summary
PREPARED BY:
Fleet Manager
CMR:422:10 Page 3 of4
DEPARTMENT HEAD:
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
CMR:422:10
J.MIC ARTOR
~~~ t:. / JAMES KEENE 'r/CitY Manager
Page 4 of4
Attachment A
ORDINANCE NO.
ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALO ALTO AMENDING
THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011 TO ESTABLISH CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT NUMBER VR-11000, SCHEDULED
VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT, AND TRANSFER THE REMAINING
UNUSED APPROPRIATION FROM CIP PROJECTS VR-07800 AND VR-08000
IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $222,205 TO VR-11000
The Council of the City of Palo Alto does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. The Council of the City of Palo Alto finds and
determines as follows:
A. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 12 of Article
III 'of the Charter of the City of Palo Alto, the Council on
JUIle.28, 2010 .. did adopt a budget for fiscal year :a011; and
B. City policy on vehicle and equipment replacement
provides for the on-going replacement of City fleet vehicles
and equipment. Specifically, Policy 4-1 prescribes a
replacement interval for police patrol vehicles of four years
or 85,000 miles. In an effort to reduce ongoing costs,
Equipment Management has extended this replacement interval to
100,000 miles; and
C. There are currently six patrol vehicles at or near
replacement mileage. The Fleet Review Committee (FRC) approved
the replacement of these vehicles on October 20, 2010, in
accordance with the audit recommendations; and
D. A Request for Quotation (RFQ) for police patrol
vehicles was sent to seven vendors on September 14, 2010.
Bids were received from seven qualified vendors on October 5,
2010 and Downtown Ford Sales was declared the lowest
responsible bidder; and
E. Subsequent to delivery, each vehicle will need to be
outfitted with emergency equipment; including lights, sirens,
two-way radio equipment, mobile data terminal, prisoner cage,
and numerous accessories; and
F. An estimated amount of $197,430 is needed to purchase
and outfit the six police patrol vehicles. The funds needed by
this project will be provided by a transfer of appropriations
from existing but completed CIP projects as follows; and
Project Number aud Name Amount of
Transfer
VR-07800 -Scheduled Vehicle and $43,700
Equipment Replacement (FY 2007-08)
VR-08000 -Scheduled Vehicl~ and $178,505
Equipment Replacement (FY 2008-09)
Total $222,205
G. City Council authorization is needed to amend the 2011
budget as hereinafter set forth.
SECTION 2. Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project
Number VR-11000, Scheduled Vehicle and Equipment Replacement
is hereby created.
SECTION 3. The -sum of Two Hurtdred Twenty Two Thousand '!'wo
Hundred Five Dollars ($222,205) is hereby appropriated to CIP
Project Number VR-11000.
SECTION 4. The appropriation for CIP Project VR-07800,
Sch~duled Vehicle and Equipment Replacement is hereby reduced
by Forty Three Thousand Seven Hundred Dollars ($43,700).
SECTION 5. The appropriation for CIP Project VR-08000,
Scheduled Vehicle and Equipment Replacement is hereby reduced
by One Hundred Seventy Eight Thousand Fi ve Hundred Fi ve
Dollars ($178,505).
SECTION 6. The transactions above will have no impact on
the Vehicle and Equipment Replacement Fund reserve balance.
SECTION 7. As specified in Section 2.28.080(a) of the
Palo Alto Municipal Code, a two-thirds vote of the City
Council is required to adopt this ordinance.
SECTION 8. As provided in Section 2.04.330 of the Palo
Alto Municipal Code, this ordinance shall become effective
upon adoption.
SECTION 9. The vehicles being purchased are in compliance
with all applicable emissions laws and regulations.
Accordingly, this purchase is exempt from ,the California
Environmental Quality Act under the CEQA guidelines (Section
15061) .
INTRODUCED AND PASSED:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTENTIONS:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
APPROVED:
Mayor
City Manager
Director of Public Works
Director of Administrative
Services
ATTACHMENT B
City of Palo Alto Bid Summary Request for Ouotatig
QUOTATION NUMBER: 138678 BID DUE DATE: October 5,2010 !
ITEM QTY UIM DESCRIPTION Downtown San Francisco Albany Ford Hansel Ford Folsom Wondries Theodore
Ford Ford Lincoln Lake Ford Fleet Group Robins Ford
1. 7 Ea New, 2011 model Ford Crown $162,295.00 $162,638.00 $162,567.23 $162,645.00 $166,243.00 $167,706.00 $184,190.51
Victoria Police Interceptor
3. Sales Tax @ 9.25 $15,012.29 $15,044.02 $15,037.47 $15,044.67 $15,377.48 $15,512.81 $17,037.63
4. 7 Ea Tire tax $61.25 $61.25 $61.25 $61.25 $61.25 $61.25 $61.25
Total $177,368.54 $177,743.27 $177,665.95 $177,750.92 $181,681.73 $183,280.06 $201,289.39
.or