Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 374-10City of Palo Alto City Manager's Report -.. -.. -----.. --.--.-----------=---'--=~-__lf======~:,:;,'1__ [j t.z,' TO: HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE DATE: OCTOBER 4, 2010 CMR: 374:10 REPORT TYPE: CONSENT SUBJECT: Adoption of Six Resolutions Addressing Fall 2010 Ballot Initiatives: (1) Resolution Supporting Measure E, Foothill-De Anza Community College District Educational Opportunity and Job Training Parcel Tax (2) Resolution Supporting Measure A, Parcel Tax for Healthy Kids Program ' (3) Resolution Supporting Measure B, Santa Clara County Valley Transportation Authority Vehicle Registration Fee (4) Resolution Supporting Measure C, Term Limits for Santa Clara Valley Water District (5) Resolution Supporting Proposition 25 Amending the California Constitution to Change the Legislative Vote Requirement to Pass the State Budget from Two-Thirds to a Simple Majority (6) Resolution Supporting Proposition 21 Establishing $18 Annual Vehicle License Surcharge to Fund State Parks and Wildlife Programs RECOMMENDATION Pursuant to Council direction at the September 27 meeting, staff is bringing forward six resolutions on fall ballot measures for Council adoption. The resolutions support the following ballot measures: State Propositions 21 and 25 and Regional Measures A, B, C and E. ' DISCUSSION , At the September 27 Council meeting, the Council directed staff to return with resolutions in support of State Propositions 21 and 25 as well as Regional Measures A, B, C and E. This report presents these six resolutions for Council consideration. Staff was able to prepare resolutions for Measures A and E, which are attached to this report. Staff will distribute the remaining resolutions to the Council on Monday prior to the meeting. Additionally, the Council requested that the Policy & Services Committee evaluate opposing Propositions 20 and 27 at the September 30 Committee meeting. A separate report on this evening's agenda brings forth resolutions on those two propositions. CMR: 374:10 Page 1 of3 Statewide Measures: Proposition 21 (Position -SUDDort): This measure would establish an $18 annual vehicle license surcharge to help fund state parks and wildlife programs. A new trust fund would be created for these funds and the funds would be used solely for the operation, maintenance and repair of state parks and to protect wildlife and natural resources. There would be no fiscal impact of this measure on local governments. The measure is anticipated to generate approximately $250 million annually for state parks and wildlife conservation. Proposition 25 (Position -SUDDort): This measure would change the legislative vote requirement to pass the State budget and budget-related legislation from two-thirds to a simple majority. Ifthe Legislature fails to pass a budget bill by June 15, all members would forfeit any reimbursement for salary and expenses for every day until the day they pass a budget bill. The lower vote requirement could affect the content of the budget and spending-related bills but there is no clear fiscal impact of this measure on local governments. Regional Measures: Measure A -Santa Clara County Children's Health Protection (Position -Support): This measure would enact a $29 annual parcel tax limited to 10 years. The measure is anticipated to generate $13-14 million annually and would create a source of funding to "protect and maintain children's health and prevent serious illnesses through regular medical checkups, immunizations, and early detection; to reduce costs from unnecessary emergency room use; and to prevent elimination of insurance coverage for low-income children of working families." The measure would provide funding for the Healthy Kids Program, which provides health care and medical insurance to approximately 8,400 children in the County. The program is run by the Santa Clara Family Health Plan, which is a public, not-for-profit health plan that operates solely in Santa Clara County. Attachment G provides a recent San Jose Mercury News article about the measure. Measure B -Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (position -Support): This measure would increase the motor vehicle registration fee (VRF) by $10 for each vehicle registered in Santa Clara County to relieve traffic congestion, improve streets and reduce polluted toxic roadway runoff. Approximately 80% of the revenues from the measure will go towards local road improvement and repair, 15% will go towards regional programs (leverage for other funds; regional intelligent transportation systems/technologies; county environmental mitigation for autos/trucks), and the remaining 5% will go towards program administration. The· measure is anticipated to generate approximately $14 million in revenues annually. Measure C -Santa Clara Valley Water District (Position -Support): This measure would limit Board members, whether elected or appointed, from serving more than three successive 4- year terms. The term limits would not be retroactive. Measure E -Foothill-De Anza Community College District (Position -Support): This measure would levy a $69 parcel tax annually for six years to provide additional revenues for operations at the Foothill-De Anza Community College District. The measure is anticipated to CMR: 374:10 Page 2 of3 generate approximately $7 million annually in revenues. Approximately 45,000 students attend either Foothill College in Los Altos Hills or De Anza College in Cupertino. Attachment H provides a San Jose Mercury News article with further information about the measure. RESOURCE IMPACT There is no incremental resource impact associated with adoption of resolutions supporting or opposing ballot initiatives. If any of the ballot initiatives were approved, cost and revenue impacts to Palo Alto would need to be considered at that time. POLICY IMPLICATIONS These recommendations are consistent with current Council legislative priorities and policy direction. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Adoption of these Resolutions does not meet the California Environmental Quality Act's definition of a project pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21065, and therefore, no environmental review is required. ATTACHMENTS A. Resolution of the City of Palo Alto Supporting Measure A Parcel Tax for Healthy Kids Program B. Resolution of the City of Palo Alto Supporting Measure E Foothill-De Anza Community College District Educational Opportunity and Job Training Parcel Tax C. Resolution Supporting Measure B Santa Clara County Valley Transportation Authority Vehicle Registration Fee (to be distributed Monday, October 4) D. Resolution Supporting Measure C Term Limits for Santa Clara Valley Water District (to be distributed Monday, October 4) E. Resolution S)lpporting Proposition 25 to Amend the California Constitution Amending the Legislative Vote Requirement to Pass the State Budget from Two-Thirds to a Simple Majority (to be distributed Monday, October 4) F. Resolution Supporting Proposition 21 Establishing $18 Annual Vehicle License Surcharge to Fund State Parks and Wildlife Programs (to be distributed Monday, October 4) PREPARED BY: CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: CMR: 374:10 KELLY MCADOO MORARIU Assistant to the City Manager JA Cit Page 3 of3 Attachment A **NOT YET APPROVED** Resolution No. ----,-- Resolution of the Council of the City Of Palo Alto Supporting Measure A, Parcel Tax for Healthy Kids Program WHEREAS, Measure A is a County initiative which if passed by voters in November 2010 would create a $29 tax on each parcel of land for 10 years beginning January 1,2011; and WHEREAS, Measure A would produce between $13 and $14 million annually to sustain the Healthy Kids Program in Santa Clara County; and WHERAS, the Healthy Kids Program provides medical, dental and vision benefits to all children up the age of 19 who are living in Santa Clara County, and whose families earn up to 300% of the Federal Poverty Level, and who are otherwise not eligible to obtain coverage; and WHEREAS, without the Healthy Kids program more than 10,000 children in Santa Clara County could lose their health insurance, and WHEREAS, the Palo Alto City Council supports the provision of health care to children whose families cannot otherwise afford it. SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Palo Alto by the adoption of this resolution hereby supports Measure A on the November 2,2010 ballot. II II II II II II II II II 100929 sh 8261433 1 **NOr YET APPROVED** SECTION 2. The Council finds that adoption of this resolution does not meet the California Environmental Quality Act's definition of a project pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21065, and therefore, no environmental impact assessment is necessary. INTRODUCED AND PASSED: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Manager Senior Deputy City Attorney Director of Administrative Services 100929 sh 8261433 2 Attachment B **NOT YET APPROVED** Resolution No. --- Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Supporting . Measure E Foothill-De Anza Community College District· Educational Opportunity and Job Training Parcel Tax WHEREAS, Foothill College and De Anza College rank among the best community colleges in the nation and our community relies on them for healthcare professionals to serve our aging population and for skilled workers to fuel our economy; and WHEREAS, for many local students, Foothill and De Anza are a stepping-stone to transfer to top universities; and WHEREAS, community colleges have never been so important or in demand as UC and CSU schools turn away more and more students and increase tuition, making Foothill and De Anza the only affordable and accessible college education options for many students in this community; and WHEREAS, Foothill and De Anza have experienced more than $20 million in budget cuts due to state funding. reductions, leading to the elimination of many courses along with hundreds of faculty and staff positions; and . WHEREAS, student demand for community college courses is increasing and this year thousands of local students were unable to get classes they needed; and WHEREAS, passing of Measure E will allow Foothill College and De Anza College to continue to provide the academic courses students need to transfer to four-year universities and compete for good careers in math, engineering, technology and science; and WHEREAS, Measure E will provide stable funding that the State cannot take away to help these institutions: • Maintain core academic classes including math, science and writing • Prepare students for careers in engineering, math and science • Help students transfer to four -year universities • Prepare students for healthcare careers like nursing and paramedics • Restore classes and labs to meet demand; and WHEREAS, every penny from this measure will benefit our local college, no funds can be taken by the State or used for administrator salaries, an independent oversight committee and annual audits will ensure funds are used properly, and the measure wil~ automatically expire in six years; and WHEREAS, local funding measures like this are the only way for community college districts to secure stable funding for programs and staff and reduce dependency on the State; and 100929 sh 8261434 1 **NOT YET APPROVED** WHEREAS, this measure requires support from 66.7% of voters to pass and our community must rally to support t~is measure to protect the quality, accessibility and affordability of local community college courses for our students; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Palo Alto does hereby RESOLVE as follows: SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Palo Alto by the adoption of this resolution hereby supports Measure E, the Foothill-De AnzaCommunity College District educational opportunity and job training parcel tax, on the November 2, 2010 ballot. SECTION 2. The Council finds that adoption of this resolution does not meet the California Environmental Quality Act's definition of a project pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21065, and therefore, no environmental impact assessment is necessary. INTRODUCED AND PASSED: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Manager Senior Deputy City Attorney Director of Administrative Services 100929 sh 8261434 2