HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 175-10TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REPORT TYPE:
SUBJECT:
HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL
CITY MANAGER
MARCH 22, 2010
INFORMATIONAL
DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES
CMR: 175:10
Update on City's Cross Connection Control Program Compliance
Efforts and Potential Water Service Interruption for Non -Compliant
Customers
This is an informational report and no Council action is required.
BACKGROUND
On October 15, 2008, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), Division of Drinking
Water and Environmental Management, performed a sanitary survey of the City's water
distribution system. CDPH found the City's water system facilities to be in satisfactory
condition, and noted several actions for the City to complete over the next two years to ensure
water system safety. One of CDPH's requirements was that the City must ensure that all
customers needing Backflow Prevention Devices (BPDs) had them installed.
The purpose of the City' s backflow prevention or Cross Connection Control Program is to
preclude contaminated water from entering the City's distribution system and contaminating the
water supply. This program is mainly focused on commercial or industrial customers who
conduct processes on their premises, or have connections to the water system that have the
potential of allowing harmful agents to enter the system. Some examples of activities that
require BPDs are: dry cleaning, metal plating, hospitals, medical, dental services, golf courses
and the city's landscaping strips. Customers who have pressurized water systems or alternate
water sources such as wells are also subject to this program. These may include residential
customers.
Section 7584, Title 17, California Code of Regulations lists the following required elements of
the City's Cross Connection Control Program.
(a) The adoption of operating rules or ordinances to implement the cross -connection control
program,
(b) The conducting of surveys to identify water user premises where cross -connections are
likely to occur,
(c) The provisions of backflow protection by the water user at the user's connection or
within the user's premises or both,
(d) The provision of at least one person trained in cross -connection control to carry out the
cross -connection control program,
(e) The establishment of a procedure or system for testing backflow preventers, and
(f) The maintenance of records of locations, tests, and repairs of backflow preventers.
U,Al.n 1 of 2
CDPH has mandated that all water systems in the City be in compliance with all cross
connection regulations, including Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations and Utility Rule
and Regulation 21(D), by December 15, 2010. The City reports on its progress towards this goal
by submitting quarterly Program progress reports.
In order to ensure compliance with these regulations, the City has sent a series of letters to water
customers to assess the customer's property, identify BPD sites, and inform customers when
BPD testing or installation is required. Many, but not all, customers have complied with
applicable regulations.
This informational report provides a summary of actions taken to date and potential future
actions the City may need to take to ensure the safety of the City's potable water distribution
system. As we proceed with Program enforcement, customer complaints may escalate. This
may be an unavoidable consequence.
DISCUSSION
In April 2009, the City sent out a "Level of Hazard" survey to residential, industrial and
commercial water customers. The "Level of Hazard" survey assesses potential hazards to the
water system from operations on the customer's property and identifies sites where BPDs are
already installed. The City sent the survey to 2,453 water customers and received 1,132
responses. However, 879 customers did not respond, and 442 surveys were returned unopened.
FOLLOW-UP TO RESPONDENTS
In June 2009, the City sent a series of letters to customers who had responded to the April 2009
letter but reported that they had potentially untested BPDs on their premises.
Staff also sent a second letter to customers who had completed the survey and indicated that they
had BPDs on site. This second letter informed them of the need to submit annual test results to
the City to document the proper operation of their BPD.
Lastly, staff sent a third letter to customers who had completed the survey and identified hazards
on their properties that could contaminate the water system, yet who reported no existing BPDs.
This letter informed these customers that they had to install a BPD within 90 days to be in
compliance with Utility Rule and Regulation 21(D)(2)(E). In February 2010, a reminder letter
was sent to the 189 customers who still had not installed a BPD. This letter required the
customers to install the required BPDs by April 30, 2010 or risk service interruption.
In February 2010, the City also sent a second notification to water customers with existing BPDs
that have not provided a current test certification, giving them 30 days to provide a test report. If
customers do not respond by the deadline, the City will have a contractor complete the testing
and charge the customer for the expense.
FOLLOW-UP TO 442 RETURNED UNOPENED SURVEYS
Staff re -sent the survey letter to the 442 customers whose survey packages were returned
unopened. This letter advised customers of the requirement to complete the survey.
FOLLOW-UP TO 879 CUSTOMERS WHO FAILED TO RESPOND
In April 2010, the City will send out a final survey request to the remaining 879 commercial
water customers who have failed to respond to previous mailings. This letter requires non -
responders to complete the survey within one month of the date the letter is received. If they do
!`t\AD • 11 • 1 n
Page 2 of 3
not complete the final survey, the City will hire a contractor to visit the properties and perform
the survey at the customer's expense. If a BPD is required, the City will notify customers of this
requirement with an additional letter indicating that they have 90 days to install a BPD. If they
fail to do so within the allowed timeframe, water service to non -compliant customers will be
interrupted until the BPD is installed and verified.
RESOURCE IMPACT
Existing staffing will be diverted to interrupt services for non -compliant customers and to turn
services back on once the customer(s) is(are) in compliance, and manage the contracts for the
survey and the testing.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
This report is consistent with the Council's policy and program direction provided to staff
regarding cross connection control and Strategy No. 7, "Implement programs that improve the
quality of the environment".
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The actions summarized in this report do not meet the definition of a "project" pursuant to
California Public Resources Code section 21065, thus no California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) review is required.
ATTACHMENT
None.
PREPARED BY:
APPROVED BY:
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
ROLAND EKSTRAND
Senior Project Engineer
JOHN REINERT
Water Distribution Supervisor
MELISSA SMART
Program Assistant
GREG SCOBY
WGW Engineering Manager
OMM MARSHALL
sistant Director, Utilities Engineering
VALE
Director, 'Ctilities Departm
JAMEKEENE
City anager
CMR: 175:10 Page 3 of 3