Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2022-01-12 Planning & transportation commission Agenda Packet
_______________________ 1. The Chair may limit Oral Communications to 30 minutes for all combined speakers. 2. Spokespersons that are representing a group of five or more people who are identified as present at the meeting at the time of the spokesperson’s presentation will be allowed up to ten (10) minutes at the discretion of the Chair, provided that the non-speaking members agree not to speak individually. 3. The Chair may reduce the allowed time to speak from five (5) to three (3) minutes to accommodate a larger number of speakers. Planning & Transportation Commission Regular Meeting Agenda: January 12, 2022 Virtual Meeting 6:00 PM ****BY VIRTUAL TELECONFERENCE ONLY*** https://zoom.us/join Meeting ID: 916 4155 9499 Phone number: 1 669 900 6833 To prevent the spread of Covid-19, this meeting will be held by virtual teleconference only, with no physical location. The meeting will be broadcast live on Cable TV and through Channel 26 of the Midpen Media Center at bit.ly/MidPenwatchnow. Members of the public may comment by sending an email to planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.org or by attending the Zoom virtual meeting to give live comments. Instructions for the Zoom meeting can be found on the last page of this agenda. Visit bit.ly/PApendingprojects to view project plans and details. Call to Order / Roll Call 6:00 PM-6:10 PM 1.Recognition of Commissioner Alcheck for his Service with the Planning and Transportation Commission Oral Communications The public may speak to any item not on the agenda. Three (3) minutes per speaker.1 Agenda Changes, Additions, and Deletions The Chair or Commission majority may modify the agenda order to improve meeting management. City Official Reports 6:10 PM-6:15 PM 2.Directors Report, Meeting Schedule and Assignments Study Session 6:15 PM-7:45 PM Public Comment is Permitted. Three (3) minutes per speaker.2,3 _______________________ 1. The Chair may limit Oral Communications to 30 minutes for all combined speakers. 2. Spokespersons that are representing a group of five or more people who are identified as present at the meeting at the time of the spokesperson’s presentation will be allowed up to ten (10) minutes at the discretion of the Chair, provided that the non-speaking members agree not to speak individually. 3. The Chair may reduce the allowed time to speak from five (5) to three (3) minutes to accommodate a larger number of speakers. 3.Study Session to Review the City’s 2023-31 Housing Element Update Progress Action Items 7:45 PM-9:15 PM Public Comment is Permitted. Applicants/Appellant Teams: Fifteen (15) minutes, plus three (3) minutes rebuttal. All others: Five (5) minutes per speaker.2,3 4.Consideration of Updates to Section 18.42.110 (Wireless Communication Facilities) of Chapter 18.42 (Standards for Special Uses) of Title 18 (Zoning) of the Palo Alto Municipal Code (PAMC). Environmental Assessment: Exempt per CEQA Guidelines Sections 15061(b)(3) and 15301, 15302, 15303 and 15305. Committee Items Election of Chair and Vice Chair 9:15 PM-10:00 PM Commissioner Questions, Comments, Announcements or Future Agenda Items Adjournment Commissioner Comments _______________________ 1. The Chair may limit Oral Communications to 30 minutes for all combined speakers. 2. Spokespersons that are representing a group of five or more people who are identified as present at the meeting at the time of the spokesperson’s presentation will be allowed up to ten (10) minutes at the discretion of the Chair, provided that the non-speaking members agree not to speak individually. 3. The Chair may reduce the allowed time to speak from five (5) to three (3) minutes to accommodate a larger number of speakers. Palo Alto Planning & Transportation Commission Commissioner Biographies, Present and Archived Agendas and Reports are available online: http://www.cityofpaloalto.org/gov/boards/ptc/default.asp. The PTC Commission members are: Chair Bart Hechtman Vice Chair Giselle Roohparvar Commissioner Michael Alcheck Commissioner Bryna Chang Commissioner Ed Lauing Commissioner Doria Summa Commissioner Carolyn Templeton Get Informed and Be Engaged! View online: http://midpenmedia.org/category/government/city-of-palo-alto/ or on Channel 26. Public comment is encouraged. Email the PTC at: Planning.Commission@CityofPaloAlto.org. Material related to an item on this agenda submitted to the PTC after distribution of the agenda packet is available for public inspection at the address above. Americans with Disability Act (ADA) It is the policy of the City of Palo Alto to offer its public programs, services and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to all. Persons with disabilities who require materials in an appropriate alternative format or who require auxiliary aids to access City meetings, programs, or services may contact the City’s ADA Coordinator at (650) 329-2550 (voice) or by emailing ada@cityofpaloalto.org. Requests for assistance or accommodations must be submitted at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting, program, or service. _______________________ 1. The Chair may limit Oral Communications to 30 minutes for all combined speakers. 2. Spokespersons that are representing a group of five or more people who are identified as present at the meeting at the time of the spokesperson’s presentation will be allowed up to ten (10) minutes at the discretion of the Chair, provided that the non-speaking members agree not to speak individually. 3. The Chair may reduce the allowed time to speak from five (5) to three (3) minutes to accommodate a larger number of speakers. Public Comment Instructions Members of the Public may provide public comments to teleconference meetings via email, teleconference, or by phone. 1. Written public comments may be submitted by email to planning.commission@CityofPaloAlto.org 2. Spoken public comments using a computer will be accepted through the teleconference meeting. To address the Board, click on the link below. Please read the following instructions carefully. • You may download the Zoom client or connect to the meeting in-browser. If using your browser, make sure you are using a current, up-to-date browser. • You will be asked to enter an email address and name. We request that you identify yourself by name as this will be visible online and will be used to notify you that it is your turn to speak. • When you wish to speak on an agenda item, click on “raise hand”. The moderator will activate and unmute attendees in turn. Speakers will be notified shortly before they are called to speak. The Zoom application will prompt you to unmute your microphone when it is your turn to speak. • When called, please limit your remarks to the time limit allotted. • A timer will be shown on the computer to help keep track of your comments. 3. Spoken public comments using a smart phone will be accepted through the teleconference meeting. To address the Council, download the Zoom application onto your phone from the Apple App Store or Google Play Store and enter the Meeting ID below. 4. Spoken public comments using a phone use the telephone number listed below. When you wish to speak on an agenda item hit *9 on your phone so we know that you wish to speak. When called please limit your remarks to the agenda item and time limit allotted. https://zoom.us/join Meeting ID: 916 4155 9499 Phone number: 1 669 900 6833 (you may need to exclude the initial “1” depending on your phone service) Planning & Transportation Commission Staff Report (ID # 13920) Report Type: City Official Reports Meeting Date: 1/12/2022 City of Palo Alto Planning & Development Services 250 Hamilton Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94301 (650) 329-2442 Summary Title: City Official Report Title: Directors Report, Meeting Schedule and Assignments From: Jonathan Lait Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC) review and comment as appropriate. Background This document includes the following items: • PTC Meeting Schedule • PTC Representative to City Council (Rotational Assignments) • Tentative Future Agenda Commissioners are encouraged to contact Madina Klicheva (Madina.Klicheva@CityofPaloAlto.org) of any planned absences one month in advance, if possible, to ensure availability of a PTC quorum. PTC Representative to City Council is a rotational assignment where the designated commissioner represents the PTC’s affirmative and dissenting perspectives to Council for quasi- judicial and legislative matters. Representatives are encouraged to review the City Council agendas (http://www.cityofpaloalto.org/gov/agendas/council.asp) for the months of their respective assignments to verify if attendance is needed or contact staff. Prior PTC meetings are available online at http://midpenmedia.org/category/government/city-of-palo-alto/boards- and-commissions/planning-and-transportation-commission. The Tentative Future Agenda provides a summary of upcoming projects or discussion items. Attachments: • Attachment A: January 12, 2021 PTC Meeting Schedule and Assignments (DOCX) 2 Packet Pg. 5 Planning & Transportation Commission 2022 Meeting Schedule & Assignments 2022 Schedule Meeting Dates Time Location Status Absences/Notes 01/12/2021 6:00 PM Virtual Meeting Regular 01/19/2021 6:00 PM Virtual Meeting Special 01/26/2021 6:00 PM Virtual Meeting Regular 02/09/2021 6:00 PM Virtual Meeting Regular 02/23/2021 6:00 PM Virtual Meeting Regular 03/09/2021 6:00 PM TBD Regular 03/30/2021 6:00 PM TBD Regular 04/13/2021 6:00 PM TBD Regular 04/27/2021 6:00 PM TBD Regular 05/11/2021 6:00 PM TBD Regular 05/25/2021 6:00 PM TBD Regular 06/08/2021 6:00 PM TBD Regular 06/29/2021 6:00 PM TBD Regular 07/13/2021 6:00 PM TBD Regular 07/27/2021 6:00 PM TBD Regular 08/10/2021 6:00 PM TBD Regular 08/31/2021 6:00 PM TBD Regular 09/14/2021 6:00 PM TBD Regular 09/28/2021 6:00 PM TBD Regular 10/12/2021 6:00 PM TBD Regular 10/26/2021 6:00 PM TBD Regular 11/09/2021 6:00 PM TBD Regular 11/30/2021 6:00 PM TBD Regular 12/14/2021 6:00 PM TBD Regular 12/28/2021 6:00 PM Cancelled Cancelled 3 Days Before NYE 2022 Assignments - Council Representation (primary/backup) January February March April May June Doria Summa Bryna Chang Bart Hechtman Ed Lauing Cari Templeton Giselle Roohparvar Giselle Roohparvar Cari Templeton Keith Reckdahl Giselle Roohparvar Doria Summa Bart Hechtman July August September October November December Bryna Chang Doria Summa Bart Hechtman Keith Reckdahl Cari Templeton Ed Lauing Ed Lauing Keith Reckdahl Cari Templeton Ed Lauing Bryna Chang Keith Reckdahl 2.a Packet Pg. 6 Planning & Transportation Commission 2022 Tentative Future Agenda The Following Items are Tentative and Subject to Change: Meeting Dates Topics January 19, 2022 • Castilleja Upcoming Items: Topics • Tenant Relocation Assistance • Senate Bill 9 Permanent Ordinance • ADU Code Changes to PAMC Chapter 18.09 • 985 Channing Avenue: Preliminary Parcel Map to Remove Height Restriction 2.a Packet Pg. 7 Planning & Transportation Commission Staff Report (ID # 13534) Report Type: Study Session Meeting Date: 1/12/2022 City of Palo Alto Planning & Development Services 250 Hamilton Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94301 (650) 329-2442 Summary Title: Housing Element Update - Progress Status Title: Study Session to Review the City’s 2023-31 Housing Element Update Progress From: Jonathan Lait Recommendation Staff recommends the Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC) take the following action: 1. Conduct a Study Session to review the City’s 2023-31 Housing Element Update progress. Report Summary The 6th Cycle Housing Element Update process kicked off in May 2021. Staff has met with the Housing Element Working Group monthly and the City Council Ad Hoc Committee bi-monthly to advance the Housing Element Update work program. At the time of this report preparation, sufficient potential housing sites have been identified to meet the required 6,086 units in the City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). This report provides the PTC with an update on the progress of the Housing Element update. Background Since 1969, the State has required all local jurisdictions to adequately plan to meet the housing needs of everyone in the community. Local jurisdictions meet this requirement by adopting housing elements as part of their “general plan” (or the Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan). The Comprehensive Plan serves as the City’s "blueprint" for how the city will grow and develop. State law mandates inclusion of eight elements in general plans: land use, transportation, conservation, noise, open space, safety, housing, and most recently, environmental justice. Jurisdictions may elect to include additional elements. The Housing Element is the City’s plan to provide housing for its current and future residents and is the only element that requires certification by the State. The Housing Element covers a period of eight years; the City is currently in the 5th Cycle of Housing Elements that covers the years between 2015 and 2023. The 6th Cycle will cover the eight years between 2023 and 2031. 3 Packet Pg. 8 City of Palo Alto Planning & Development Services Department Page 2 The deadline to receive State certification for the 6th Cycle Housing Element is January 31, 2023. For reference, please click here for a copy of the 5th Cycle Housing Element. In May 2021, the City Council held a joint study session with the PTC. The presentation outlined all the new requirements for the 6th Cycle Housing Element and showed a proposed schedule to receive certification by January 2023. For more details, please see the study session report. Discussion The Housing Element must accommodate the future housing needs of its community, as determined by the City’s RHNA. The City’s 6th Cycle RHNA of 6,086 units is more than three times its 5th Cycle RHNA of 1,988 units. This, coupled with the extensive new requirements enacted by the State, make meeting the City’s RHNA obligation much more challenging. To start the process, the City Council formed the Housing Element Working Group (Working Group) to assist the City in site identification and preparation of housing policies and programs. The Working Group has finalized its site selection process and has made formal recommendations to the PTC. The PTC is scheduled to formally review the Working Group’s proposed sites in early February 2022. Housing Element Working Group In April 2021, the Council appointed members to the Working Group. The Working Group is comprised of a cross section of community members including, as of January 2022, two members of the PTC. The Working Group has been meeting monthly since May 2021. This PTC update includes an overview of potential sites recommended by the Working Group; final site recommendations were concluded at the January 2022 meeting. In the new year, the Working Group will also begin preparing Housing Element policies and programs that will help incentivize housing production in the City. All the Working Group meetings and materials can be accessed on the City’s Housing Element Update website at www.paloaltohousingelement.com. Housing Element Ad Hoc Committee In addition to meeting with the Working Group, staff attends meetings with the Housing Element Ad Hoc Committee, comprised of three Council members (Dubois, Filseth and Stone). Staff has been presenting Working Group work product and progress to the Ad Hoc Committee on a bi-monthly basis. The committee has provided additional input and direction during the site selection process. All Ad Hoc Committee meetings and materials can be accessed on the City’s Housing Element Update website at www.paloaltohousingelement.com. HCD Site Selection Requirements The housing element must identify specific sites or parcels that are suitable and available for residential development to help meet the City’s RHNA. Land suitable for residential 3 Packet Pg. 9 City of Palo Alto Planning & Development Services Department Page 3 development must be appropriate and available for residential use in the eight-year planning period. Identified sites that require rezoning may be included on the list of potential housing sites, provided the housing element includes a program to accomplish the rezoning early within the planning period. Other characteristics to consider when evaluating the appropriateness of sites include physical features (e.g. susceptibility to flooding, slope instability or erosion, or environmental considerations) and location (proximity to transit, job centers, and public or community services). Land suitable for residential development includes the following types of sites: • Vacant sites • Underutilized sites zoned for residential development and capable of being developed at a higher density or with greater intensity • Sites not zoned for residential development, but can be redeveloped for, and/or rezoned for, residential use (via program actions) Any potential site would need to go through analysis with consideration as to: • General characteristics of the site • Each site’s appropriateness to accommodate low-income units • Methodology used to determine the number of units that can be reasonably developed • Determination as to whether sufficient sites exist to accommodate RHNA or if there is a shortfall Staff and the Working Group have been actively working on identifying sites through a set of preferred strategies established by the Working Group. The preferred strategies are discussed later in this report. Accommodating RHNA As mentioned, the City’s 6th Cycle RHNA is 6,086 units. The units are broken down into four income categories. They are as follows: 2023-31 Regional Housing Needs Allocation by Income Very Low Low Moderate Above Moderate Total 1,556 896 1,013 2,621 6,086 No Net Loss Buffer To ensure that jurisdictions have sufficient sites to meet their RHNA during the entire planning process, the State requires jurisdictions to plan for a “buffer” or surplus of additional sites that exceeds the required RHNA. The State does not require a specific number or percentage of buffer units. Since a 10% buffer was used in the current 5th Cycle Housing Element, the City will use the same 10% buffer for the 6th Cycle. Therefore, 609 additional units were added to the required RHNA of 6,086 units for a total of 6,695 units. 3 Packet Pg. 10 City of Palo Alto Planning & Development Services Department Page 4 Planned and Approved Units (Pipeline Units) [515 Units] Also known as “pipeline” units, these are the units for which permits (planning and building) have been approved or are in the review process of their submitted applications. Projects under construction or completed construction also qualify as pipeline units providing the project does not receive a Certificate of Occupancy prior to June 30, 2022. Currently, there are 515 units in the pipeline. Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) [512 Units] The City can apply future ADU production towards its RHNA. HCD allows the average of the past three complete years of ADU projection to be applied towards its future RHNA and multiply it by the number of years in the planning period (eight). Over the past three years (2018-2020), the City averaged 47 units permitted per year. However, in 2021, as to date, the City has permitted 87 ADUs. This would increase the 3-year average ADU production to 64 units per year or 512 units over the 8-year planning period. Staff will recalculate at the end of the year. Site Selection Strategies After applying the pipeline production and projected ADU production against the City’s RHNA, there was still a deficit of approximately 5,900 units. The following section describes the approaches taken to identify housing sites and increase development potential (density). Staff initially presented the Working Group with a set of site selection strategies for their consideration. The Working Group discussed and refined those strategies until it was able to select their preferred strategies. With those preferred strategies, staff was able to start identifying potential sites. For reference, the initial site strategies are included as Attachment A. Please note that all the strategy unit yields are based on the “realistic” capacity of the site. The realistic capacity of the sites is based on 80% of the max density of the site. For example, a 1.0- acre site, zoned at RM-30, would have a max capacity of 30 residential units. However, the realistic capacity would be 80% of the max capacity or 24 units. Multi-Family Allowed (MFA) Sites [461 Units] As one of the first steps in identifying more housing units, staff reviewed sites where multi- family residences were already permitted under the current zoning designations. Staff used the following HCD accepted criteria to identify additional sites that already allowed for residential uses (data based on County Assessor): • Improvements in sites are at least 20 years old • Parcels must be more than 10,000 sq. ft. in size • Sites with an I/V ratio of less than 1.5 o This ratio compares the assessed value of the improvements to the value of the land 3 Packet Pg. 11 City of Palo Alto Planning & Development Services Department Page 5 Working Group Preferred Strategies The following five strategies are the preferred strategies chosen by the Working Group to help meet the City’s RHNA. Strategy No. 1 – Upzone sites that allow multi-family use [1,657 Units] This approach aims to increase residential development by increasing the maximum allowable density on sites where residential development is currently allowed. Under this strategy, the zones that currently allow a maximum density of 20 dwellings per acre would be upzoned to allow a maximum of 30 dwelling units per acre. Zones with an allowable density of 30 dwelling units per acre would be upzoned to allow 40 dwelling units per acre. These targeted zones are medium to high density residential zones and commercial zones that allow for residential use. Please note that the difference between Strategy No. 1 and the MFA sites is that all the MFA sites are already at the max zoning density and do not need to be upzoned. Strategy No. 2 – Higher densities for sites within 0.5 miles of Caltrain stations [798 Units] This strategy primarily focuses on facilitating residential development within a ½ mile buffer of the University and California Avenue Caltrain stations. Densities in these areas will range between 40 and 50 dwelling units per acre, dependent upon the site’s distance from the station. Designated sites within ¼ mile of these stations will be re- zoned to allow for up to 50 dwelling units per acre, while sites ¼ - ½ mile from these stations will allow for 40 dwelling units per acre. Please note that this does not propose to include rezoning of any R-1 zoned properties. Strategy No. 3 – Increase densities along transit corridors [274 Units] Under this strategy, residential densities would be increased to 40 dwelling units per acre in areas located within walking distance of frequent bus and shuttle service stops. To further refine this strategy, the capacity analysis focuses on areas located within a half mile of VTA route 22, 522-El Camino Real, and VTA route 21 – San Antonio Ave., Middlefield Rd. and University Ave. Strategy No. 4 - Faith based parking lots larger than 0.5 acre for housing [148 Units] Additional residential units can be developed on underutilized portions of existing faith- based institutions. Underutilized areas include existing structures, parking lots, and vacant segments of the site. Staff specifically identified parking lots greater than 0.5 acres to achieve the estimated yield. Strategy No. 5 – Use of City owned parking lots for housing [168 Units] Large, City-owned parking lots could potentially help advance affordable and high- density housing in the Downtown core. At the September Working Group meeting, Architectural Review Board (ARB) members Peter Baltay and David Hirsch presented a conceptual rendering of converting the Hamilton Avenue public parking lot into a housing development to provide an illustrative example of potentially what could be done on City-owned parking lots. The Working Group was supportive of the 3 Packet Pg. 12 City of Palo Alto Planning & Development Services Department Page 6 concept/strategy. Staff has chosen six parking lots larger than 0.5 acres to achieve the estimated yield. Other Potential Housing Sites In addition to the preferred strategies, the Working Group viewed other strategies/approaches in identifying sites. Stanford University Properties [917 Units] Stanford University owns many properties within City boundaries. Approximately 93% of the properties are under long term leases, limiting/complicating development options on those sites. However, the University identified three properties that are under their direct control as potential housing sites. The three properties are as follows: 1. Pasteur Drive (currently a vacant lot) 2. Downtown Transit Center (27 University Ave.) 3. 3128 El Camino Real (currently occupied by McDonald’s) The University representatives gave a presentation to the Working Group about the three properties on October 21. Based on 75-foot (or taller) building height assumptions, relaxed parking requirements, and lot consolidation scenarios with adjacent properties, the estimated yield from the proposed properties ranged from 390-1,240 units. The Working Group approved the three sites with a total yield of 825 units. The Stanford property presentation is included as Attachment C. In addition, while not proposed by Stanford, staff included 3300 El Camino Real on this list since there was past developer interest on the site and it is owned by Stanford University. If calculated with a realistic capacity of 32 dwelling units per acre, that site would yield 92 units. Staff is also having ongoing talks with the leaseholder at Palo Alto Square about residential development. That could potentially yield an additional 300-400 units. GM/ROLM Zoned Properties [1,144 Units] The Working Group suggested additional sites for consideration in the East Meadow Circle/San Antonio area. The Working Group was supportive of allowing residential uses in the General Manufacturing (GM) and the Research, Office and Light Manufacturing (ROLM) zones; more specifically, in the East Meadow Circle area. Currently, residential uses are not allowed in the GM zone and are a conditional use in the ROLM. Residential uses were previously allowed in the GM zone where there was a ‘B’ overlay or combining district; however, the B overlay tool was deleted in the early 2000’s. The Working Group supported the inclusion of the GM/ROLM sites for the housing inventory at a density of 40 du/ac which yielded 1,144 units in the GM zone and 1,435 in the ROLM zone district. 3 Packet Pg. 13 City of Palo Alto Planning & Development Services Department Page 7 Staff Suggested Sites [116 Units] Staff introduced a short list of staff suggested sites. These sites were presented because there was a demonstrated interest in housing being developed on these parcels within the recent past. Applications were filed for Council Prescreening for project concepts with housing to determine the City interest on proposed projects; these were not formal project proposals. If it can be determined that a site has potential housing development interest, those sites can be used on the Housing Element site inventory. The calculation for the unit yields for these sites is based on 40 units per acre and yields 127 units. Below is Table 2 with the list of the staff suggested sites. Table 2: Staff Suggested Sites Address Acreage Max Density (40 du/ac) Realistic Capacity 300 Lambert Ave. 0.32 13 10 525 E. Charleston Rd. 0.78 31 25 955 Alma St. 0.24 10 8 660 University, 511 Byron St. 0.14 5 4 980 Middlefield Rd. 0.52 21 16 550 Hamilton Ave. 1.32 53 42 2951 El Camino Real 0.33 13 10 TOTAL 116 Proposed Reserve List With the inclusion of the additional Stanford and GM/ROLM sites, the potential unit yield exceeds the City’s RHNA requirement by approximately 2,300 units (see Table 3 under “WG Approved List” column). These additional sites are important to carry forward for the finalization of the site selection process. The Working Group recommendations will be forwarded to PTC and City Council for consideration and final adoption. This process may result in sites being removed, added, switched, etc. and having these additional sites to select from will streamline the process. However, once the site selection process is complete, the “extra” sites can be maintained as a reserve list. The reserve list would not be included or linked to the Housing Element. It would be used in case additional sites are needed to be added to the housing inventory list. It could also potentially be used as the basis for future housing elements sites list. Staff used the following criteria to shift sites to the reserve list: 1. Site has any historical resource designation including “deemed potentially historic.” 2. Site has an Improvement to Land Ratio (ILR) greater than 1.5. 3. Smaller sized sites that are not adjacent to other identified sites therefore not candidates for lot consolidation. 3 Packet Pg. 14 City of Palo Alto Planning & Development Services Department Page 8 Using these criteria, staff has initially identified 2,052 units from all strategies. Please see Attachment B for the most recent housing sites list for all the strategies including the proposed reserve list. Below is Table 3 which reflects the most recent proposed numbers from the various strategies in which the Working Group used to base their final recommendations. The table shows the refining of unit yields per strategy from the two most recent Working Group meetings as well as the proposed numbers to be placed on the reserve list. Table 3: Summary of Unit Yields with Reserve List, 12/02/2021 WG Approved List 11/18/21 Proposed WG List (Retain) 12/2/21 Proposed Reserve List 12/2/21 Notes RHNA Allocation 6,086 6,086 No Net Loss Buffer +609 +609 Total Units Required 6,695 6,695 Unit Yields Pipeline Units 405 515 Staff added another planning project with 110 units. ADUs 400 512 As of date, the City has permitted 87 ADU’s. Per HCD methodology, this increases the City’s 3- year average of ADU has increased to an average of 64 ADUs per year or 512 ADUs over the eight-year planning cycle. MFA 702 461 241 This increased by including 141 units of WG suggested MFA sites. Original figure was 561 units. Of the 141 units, 75 units were retained and 66 were placed on the Reserve list. #1 Upzone 2,093 1,657 436 Slight decrease (-5 units) in unit yields due to minor cleanup. Original figure was 2,098 units. #2 Caltrain Stations 1,354 798 556 11/18 list contained 5 sites that were removed (total of 61 units) since they were City Owned Parking Lots and not part of Strategy 9. Original figure was 1,415 units. #3 Transit Corridor 462 274 188 11/18 inventory included one of the Stanford Proposed sites (3128 ECR). It was removed to avoid double counting. Original figure was 499 units. #4 Faith Based Institutions 148 148 None NO CHANGE #5 Parking Lots 168 168 None NO CHANGE GM zoned sites 1,160 654 335 Slight increase (+16) in unit yields due to minor cleanup. Original figure was 1,144 units. Then subtracted 171 units per because of hazardous material buffer requirements. ROLM zoned sites 1,439 902 296 Slight increase (+4) in unit yields due to minor cleanup. Original figure was 1,435 units. Subtract 241 units for 5 recently improved Google sites. 3 Packet Pg. 15 City of Palo Alto Planning & Development Services Department Page 9 Next Steps After completing the site selection process in January, the Working Group will start discussing Housing Element policies and programs intended to help spur housing production. Some development standards such as height or parking standards may be addressed as part of the Working Group discussions. Future Working Group meetings will include a presentation from both affordable and market rate developers to gain their input to help educate the Working Group about housing development. Changes to Process Schedule At the April 2021 joint study session with the Council and PTC, staff presented a compact schedule to meet the January 2023 certification deadline. With the completion of the 2021 legislative session, several bills were adopted impacting the Housing Element update schedule. Newly added requirements have had a significant impact on the original work program schedule and are discussed in detail below. The new requirements, adding about six weeks to the process, could mean that the City may miss the January 2023 deadline. However, State law does give jurisdictions a post-deadline, 120-day grace period to complete the work, essentially extending the due date. Therefore, staff adjusted the schedule to incorporate the grace period in order to remain compliant with Housing Element law while working towards certification. Staff and the Working Group were on schedule when the State passed the new legislation. Now required is a 30-day public review of the administrative draft as well as a ten-business day post review timeframe prior to submittal for HCD’s initial 90-day review. The ten business days is to allow jurisdictions to address any public comment received during the public review. Any comments must be addressed prior to submitting to HCD. Previously, jurisdictions could submit their administrative draft for HCD review concurrent with the 30-day public review. Now it must be done consecutively. This new legislation effectively added six weeks to the schedule. In response to the new regulations, staff considered various schedule adjustments to accommodate the new requirement, including use of the grace period. One significant change with the adjusted schedule is the City would be working to achieve timely “substantial compliance” within the grace period. Substantial compliance is an HCD designation that Stanford Proposed Sites 645 825 None The Working Group “re-approved” inclusion of the Transit Center in the housing list and its projected 180 units at its December 2021 meeting. 3300 ECR 92 92 None Working Group will consider this strategy at its January 2022 meeting. Property owned by Stanford University. Staff Suggested Sites (proposed) 116 Working Group will consider this strategy at its January 2022 meeting Total Unit Yield 9,068 7,122 2,052 Difference (Unit Yield - Units Required) 2,372 427 3 Packet Pg. 16 City of Palo Alto Planning & Development Services Department Page 10 signifies that a jurisdiction’s Housing Element draft is in substantial compliance with Housing Element certification requirements if certain items in the Housing Element are addressed. If a jurisdiction receives HCD substantial compliance, it is allowed up to three years to complete its associated required rezones (due 2026). Staff anticipates receiving substantial compliance by May 2023 (within the grace period) and completion of required site rezoning by August 2023 (well before the 3-year allotted timeframe). If a jurisdiction does not receive substantial compliance by the end of the grace period, a consequence is a jurisdiction will only have one year from the January 2023 date to complete its proposed programs, such as rezones, instead of three years. Another consequence of not receiving substantial compliance would be that the City would not be eligible for State funding until it receives substantial compliance. The revised project schedule takes the worst-case scenario of non-compliance into consideration. If the City does not receive substantial compliance by the end of the grace period (June 2023), the updated workplan/schedule already includes completing the rezoning by August 2023, meeting the compressed due date of January 2024. In summary, due to the new requirement, staff has adjusted the schedule to receive substantial compliance by May 2023 to maintain consistency with Housing Element law. This provides the City three years (until January 2026) to rezone the needed sites to accommodate the RHNA. But as noted above, the anticipated time for completing the rezoning process ends August 2023. Environmental Review The subject project has been assessed in accordance with the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and the environmental regulations of the City. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to the subject matter of this staff report since it not considered a “project” under CEQA. Public Notification, Outreach & Comments The Palo Alto Municipal Code does not require notice of this item because it is a Study Session. However, a notice for a study session for this project was published in the Daily Post on December 24, which is 19 days in advance of the meeting. The Working Group as well as those on the Housing Element Update email list have been informed about the Study Session. The meeting is also included on the City’s Housing Element Update website at www.paloaltohousingelement.com. Timeline TIME TASK January 2022 - Council informational item about Housing Element update February 2022 - Formal PTC review of site selection 3 Packet Pg. 17 City of Palo Alto Planning & Development Services Department Page 11 April 2022 - Formal Council review of site selection - Formal PTC review of Housing Programs May 2022 June 2022 - Formal Council Review of Housing Programs - 30-day Public Review of Draft Housing Element August 2022 February 2023 - Submit Draft Housing Element for HCD initial 90-day review - Formal PTC review of Housing Element March 2023 - Council Adoption of Housing Element August 2023 - HCD Certification Report Author & Contact Information PTC1 Liaison & Contact Information Tim Wong, Senior Planner Rachael Tanner, Assistant Director (650) 329-2493 (650) 329-2167 tim.wong@cityofpaloalto.org rachael.tanner@cityofpaloalto.org Attachments: • Attachment A: List of Potential Site Strategies (PDF) • Attachment B: Palo Alto Full Sites Inventory - 12.02.21 (PDF) • Attachment C: Stanford University Presentation - 10.21.21 (PDF) 1 Emails may be sent directly to the PTC using the following address: planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.org 3 Packet Pg. 18 ATTACHMENT A Draft List of Potential Policy Strategies to Expand Your Site Inventory These are examples. Use this list to help identify which strategies are of greatest interest to your jurisdiction. Your priorities can include something from what's listed, a modification of what's listed, or something not currently on the list! Strategies that allow more housing on sites where housing is already allowed: 1. Increase heights and other standards (Floor Area Ratio) to allow taller buildings 2. Allow greater density (more units/acre) 3. Relax certain zoning standards (e.g., setbacks, FAR, parking standards, etc.) 4. Allow greater density where only single-family is currently allowed (this could be duplex, triplex, quadplex or other level) Understanding Palo Alto, where would you want to put future housing? 5. Near rail – continuation of pearls on a string 6. High capacity streets 7. Other transit corridors 8. Near Employment centers 9. Near Retail areas 10. Faith-based institutions Strategies that expand the inventory of sites where housing is not allowed: 11. Allow housing on land currently zoned for public use (i.e. parking garages, parks) 12. Allow housing on open space (i.e. Baylands, Palo Alto hills) 13. Allow mixed-use residential anywhere office is currently allowed 14. Allow mixed-use residential anywhere retail is currently allowed TOP TIER strategy priorities (ones you really want to explore) SECOND TIER strategy priorities (of interest, but...) NO INTEREST strategies (might be important to others, but not to you) 3.a Packet Pg. 19 DR A F T Project Name Zip Code APN Acres General Plan Zoning Max. Units Allowed Percent of Max. Density Very Low Low Moderate Above Moderate Units Achieved Status Notes 2755 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13236084 0.48 MISP PF N/A N/A 00057 57 ENTITLED PF does not allow for Resi. Redevelopment of a parking lot to residential. 565, 571 HAMILTON AVE and 542 WEBSTER 94301 12003062 0.52 CC CD‐C (P) and RM‐ 40 20 95% 000 19 19 ENTITLED Redevelopment. Lot consolidation. 3225 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13238042 0.68 CS CS 20 40% 000 8 8 ENTITLED Mixed‐use project. Redevlopment of commericial to residential. Potentially remove this project as unit yield is low and it brings down the density average. 3705‐3709 EL CAMINO REAL (Wilton Court)94306 13235045 0.46 CN CN 9 656%5800159 ENTITLED 100% affordable housing. Great example to show lower income can occur on small sites. 190 CHANNING AV 94301 12028051 0.18 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 9 44% 000 4 4 ENTITLED Redevelopment of commercial to residential. Mixed‐use project. RT‐35 doesn’t have a du/ac. Showing 50 du/ac per assumptions made on 5th Cycle HE. 3265 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13238020 0.17 CS CS 5 60%0003 3 ENTITLED Mixed‐use project. 3585 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13240058 0.14 CN CN 2 150%0003 3 ENTITLED Mixed‐use project. Redevelopment of commercial to residential. 4115 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13246100 0.35 CN CN 7 100%01067 ENTITLED Mixed‐use project. Redevelopment of commercial to residential. 788 ‐ 790 SAN ANTONIO AVE 94303 14703041 0.52 CS CS 15 680%0 0 16 86 102 ENTITLED Project density is way higher than max density allowed. 200 PORTAGE AVE 94306 13238071 4.86 RM‐30 145 63%0 0 14 77 91 UNDER REVIEW Redevelopment of commercial to residential. 2850 ‐ 2870 W BAYSHORE RD 94303 12701160 2.34 RO ROLM 70 69%0074148 UNDER REVIEW Redevelopment of existing uses to residential. 231 Grant 110 UNDER REVIEW County project for teachers and school employees 486 HAMILTON AVE 94301 12016008 0.12 CC CD‐C (P) 4 100% 0004 4 UNDER REVIEW CD‐C (P) doesn’t have a du/ac. Showing 40 du/ac per assumptions made on 5th Cycle HE 187%58 1 37 309 515 Pipeline Projects Pipeline ProjectsATTACHMENT B 3.b Packet Pg. 20 DR A F T Category/Strategy Site Address or Street Zip Code APN Acres General Plan Zoning Current Use Minimum Density Allowed (du/ac) Maximum Density Allowed (du/ac) Realistic Allowable Density (du/ac) Existing Units Maximum Capacity Realistic Capacity Potential Minus Existing Income Category Publicly Owned Included in 5th Cycle HE ILR Year Built Floodzone TCAC Opportunity Area WG Member Who Recommended Site Retail Preservation Within 150' Buffer Historic Resource Status Notes MFA 160 FOREST AV 94301 12027047 0.66 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story fitness center (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 50 40 0 32 26 26 Lower No 1.06 1926 X High Resource MFA ‐ Lower Income 0.66 26 MFA 624 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12003040 0.15 MF RM‐40 Two story office space (FAR: 0.6)31 40 32 0 5 4 4 Moderate No 0.33 1926 X;AH47 High Resource MFA 426 WAVERLEY ST 94301 12015039 0.12 CC CD‐C (P) Two story salon (FAR: 0.5)40 32 0 4 3 3 Moderate No 0.32 1920 X High Resource MFA 436 WAVERLEY ST 94301 12015040 0.10 CC CD‐C (P) One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 4 3 3 Moderate No 1.00 1951 X High Resource MFA 401 Waverley St 94301 12015007 0.22 CC CD‐C (P) One story convience store (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 8 7 7 Moderate Yes 1.09 1977X High Resource Yes MFA 425 WAVERLEY ST 94301 12015036 0.09 CC CD‐C (P) One story office space (FAR: 0.5)40 32 0 3 2 2 Moderate No 1.00 1908 X High Resource MFA 630 Cowper St 94301 12016011 0.34 CC CD‐C (P) One story office space (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 13 10 10 Moderate Yes 0.45 1956 X High Resource Yes MFA 330 LYTTON AV 94301 12015003 0.16 CC CD‐C (P) One story office space (FAR: 0.9)40 32 0 6 5 5 Moderate No 1.46 1957 X High Resource MFA 318 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12015058 0.18 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.8)40 32 0 7 5 5 Moderate No 0.53 1926 X High Resource Yes MFA 328 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12015059 0.18 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.8)40 32 0 7 5 5 Moderate No 0.53 1926 X High Resource Yes MFA 550 WAVERLEY ST 94301 12015084 0.14 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.9)40 32 0 5 4 4 Moderate No 0.91 1952 X High Resource MFA 560 WAVERLEY ST 94301 12015085 0.14 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.9)40 32 0 5 4 4 Moderate No 0.89 1938 X High Resource MFA 530 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12003031 0.11 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) One story salon (FAR: 0.9)40 32 0 4 3 3 Moderate No 0.69 1957 X High Resource MFA 546 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12003033 0.10 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.9)40 32 0 4 3 3 Moderate No 0.54 1955 X High Resource Yes MFA 635 Waverley St 94301 12016020 0.31 CC CD‐C (P) One story office space (FAR: 0.5)40 32 0 12 9 9 Moderate Yes 0.91 1966 X High Resource Yes MFA 130 Lytton Av 94301 12026002 0.34 CC CD‐C (P) Surface Parking 40 32 0 13 10 10 Moderate Yes 0.00 1984 X High Resource Yes MFA 654 HIGH ST 94301 12027037 0.19 CC CD‐C (P) Surface Parking 40 32 0 7 6 6 Moderate No 0.04 1900 X High Resource Yes MFA 435 TASSO ST 94301 12003025 0.33 CC CD‐C (P) Three story office space (FAR: 2.0)40 32 0 13 10 10 Moderate No 1.50 1984 X High Resource Yes MFA 555 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12003024 0.17 CC CD‐C (P) One story office space (FAR: 0.9)40 32 0 6 5 5 Moderate No 1.01 1970 X High Resource Yes MFA 439 HAMILTON AV 94301 12015078 0.11 CC CD‐C (P) One story cleaners (FAR: 0.9)40 32 0 4 3 3 Moderate No 1.07 0 X High Resource MFA 515 WAVERLEY ST 94301 12015081 0.18 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) Surface Parking 40 32 0 7 5 5 Moderate No 0.00 1900 X High Resource MFA 527 WAVERLEY ST 94301 12015080 0.16 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) Surface Parking 40 32 0 6 5 5 Moderate No 0.00 1900 X High Resource MFA 701 Emerson St 94301 12027049 0.22 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story spa (FAR: 0.2), surface parking 50 40 0 11 8 8 Moderate Yes 0.98 2003 X High Resource MFA 721 Emerson St 94301 12027072 0.12 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story office space (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 50 40 0 6 4 4 Moderate Yes 0.80 2003 X High Resource MFA 999 Alma St 94301 12028095 0.24 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story fitness center (FAR: 0.9)50 40 0 12 9 9 Moderate Yes 1.30 1952 X High Resource MFA 1015 ALMA ST 94301 12030049 0.12 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story preschool (FAR: 0.2)50 40 0 6 4 4 Moderate Yes 1.25 1955 X High Resource MFA 1027 Alma St 94301 12030048 0.12 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story office space (FAR: 0.2)50 40 0 6 4 4 Moderate Yes 0.79 1956 X High Resource MFA 718 Emerson St 94301 12027073 0.12 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story auto repair (FAR: 0.8)50 40 0 6 4 4 Moderate Yes 0.54 1950 X High Resource MFA 840 Emerson St 94301 12028037 0.48 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 Surface Parking 50 40 0 24 19 19 Moderate Yes 0.03 1959 X High Resource MFA 849 High St 94301 12028040 0.24 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story office space (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 50 40 0 12 9 9 Moderate Yes 1.49 1950 X High Resource MFA 926 Emerson St 94301 12028085 0.11 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 Two story office space, cleaners (FAR: 0.8) 50 40 0 5 4 4 Moderate Yes 0.34 1962 X High Resource MFA 901 High St 94301 12028050 0.32 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 Auto Storage 50 40 0 16 12 12 Moderate Yes 0.01 1900 X High Resource MFA 925 High St 94301 12028091 0.14 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 Auto Storage 50 40 0 7 5 5 Moderate Yes 0.01 0 X High Resource MFA 929 HIGH ST 94301 12028090 0.12 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story office space (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 50 40 0 6 4 4 Moderate Yes 0.20 1955 X High Resource MFA 975 HIGH ST 94301 12028089 0.35 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story office space (FAR: 0.5)50 40 0 17 14 14 Moderate Yes 0.47 1968 X High Resource MFA 940 High St 94301 12028092 0.18 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 Auto garage 50 40 0 9 7 7 Moderate Yes 0.63 1946 X High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998 MFA 960 High St 94301 12028093 0.12 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 Auto garage 50 40 0 6 4 4 Moderate Yes 0.59 1947 X High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998 MFA 190 CHANNING AV 94301 12028051 0.17 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 Auto garage 50 40 0 8 6 6 Moderate No 0.02 1900 X High Resource MFA 917 Alma St 94301 12028097 0.24 SOFA II CAP RT‐50 One story office space (FAR: 0.9)50 40 0 12 9 9 Moderate Yes 1.20 1929 X High Resource MFA 660 HIGH ST 94301 12027039 0.14 SOFA II CAP RT‐50 One story office space (FAR: 0.9)50 40 0 6 5 5 Moderate No 1.30 1946 X High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998 MFA 853 ALMA ST 94301 12028046 0.16 SOFA II CAP RT‐50 One story office space (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 50 40 0 8 6 6 Moderate No 0.11 1927 X High Resource MFA 875 ALMA ST 94301 12028045 0.32 SOFA II CAP RT‐50 One story retail (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 50 40 0 16 12 12 Moderate No 0.79 1949 X High Resource MFA 7.85 260 MFA 615 COLLEGE AV 94306 13701103 0.25 MF RMD Residential (1)17 13.6 1 4 3 2 Above Moderate No 0.29 1924 X High Resource MFA 546 OXFORD AV 94306 13701004 0.15 MF RMD One story office space (FAR: 0.6)17 13.6 0 2 2 2 Above Moderate No 0.40 1952 X High Resource MFA 444 GRANT AV 94306 12433035 0.19 MF RM‐40 Residential (1)31 40 32 1 7 5 4 Above Moderate No 0.31 1957 X High Resource MFA 466 GRANT AV 94306 12433037 0.19 MF RM‐40 Residential (1)31 40 32 1 7 5 4 Above Moderate No 0.02 1900 X High Resource MFA 573 LYTTON AV 94301 12010034 0.21 MF RM‐40 Residential (1)31 40 32 1 8 6 5 Above Moderate No 0.18 1960 X High Resource MFA 464 FOREST AV 94301 12016044 0.23 SOFA I CAP RM‐40 One story medical office (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 31 40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate No 0.39 1952 X High Resource MFA 609 COWPER ST 94301 12004001 0.11 CC CD‐C (P) One story office space (FAR: 0.8)40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate No 0.27 1921 X High Resource Yes MFA 486 HAMILTON AV 94301 12016008 0.12 CC CD‐C (P) One story retail and restaurant (FAR: 0.4)40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate No 1.00 1956 X High Resource MFA 440 KIPLING ST 94301 12015027 0.11 CC CD‐C (P) One story salon (FAR: 0.9)40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate No 0.62 1946 X High Resource MFA 439 WAVERLEY ST 94301 12015034 0.10 CC CD‐C (P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.9)40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate No 0.66 1949 X High Resource MFA 543 COWPER ST 94301 12003067 0.23 CC CD‐C (P) One story office space (FAR: 0.9)40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate Yes 1.47 1978 X High Resource MFA 525 ALMA ST 94301 12026109 0.25 CC CD‐C (P) One story retail (FAR: 1.0)40 32 0 10 8 8 Above Moderate Yes 1.39 1948 X High Resource MFA 654 GILMAN ST 94301 12016032 0.12 CC CD‐C (P) One story office space (FAR: 0.6)40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate No 0.24 1950 X High Resource MFA 550 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12003035 0.10 CC CD‐C (P) One story office space (FAR: 0.9)40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate No 0.97 1955 X High Resource Yes MFA 628 WAVERLEY ST 94301 12016021 0.12 CC CD‐C (P) One story office space (FAR: 0.9)40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate No 0.22 1904 X High Resource Yes MFA 821 EMERSON ST 94301 12028036 0.12 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story vacant office space (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 50 40 0 6 4 4 Above Moderate Yes 0.32 1966 X High Resource MFA 829 Emerson St 94301 12028099 0.19 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story fitness center (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 50 40 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate Yes 0.90 1962 X High Resource MFA 839 Emerson St 94301 12028033 0.12 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story office space (FAR: 0.2), surface parking 50 40 0 6 4 4 Above Moderate Yes 0.03 1959 X High Resource MFA 847 EMERSON ST 94301 12028032 0.08 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story retail (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 50 40 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate No 0.05 1924 X High Resource MFA 160 Homer Av 94301 12028004 0.12 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 Surface Parking 50 40 0 6 4 4 Above Moderate Yes 0.05 1900 X High Resource MFA HIGH ST 94301 12028042 0.16 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 Surface Parking 50 40 0 8 6 6 Above Moderate No 0.03 1900 X High Resource MFA 933 EMERSON ST 94301 12028081 0.11 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story salon (FAR: 0.8)50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate Yes 0.59 1950 X High Resource MFA 943 Emerson St 94301 12028080 0.11 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story office space (FAR: 0.8)50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate Yes 1.05 1902 X High Resource MFA 444 COWPER ST 94301 12015014 0.14 CC CD‐C (P) Surface Parking 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.04 1900 X High Resource MFA 3.63 100 MFA ‐ Total 12.14 386 Multifamily Allowed Sites ATTACHMENT B 3.b Packet Pg. 21 DR A F T Category/Strategy Site Address or Street Zip Code APN Acres General Plan Zoning Current Use Minimum Density Allowed (du/ac) Maximum Density Allowed (du/ac) Realistic Allowable Density (du/ac) Existing Units Maximum Capacity Realistic Capacity Potential Minus Existing Income Category Publicly Owned Included in 5th Cycle HE ILR Year Built Floodzone TCAC Opportunity Area WG Member Who Recommended Site Retail Preservation Within 150' Buffer Historic Resource Status Notes WG Suggestions 3877 EL CAMINO REA 94303 13241091 0.75 MF;CS RM‐30; CS Vacant 31 40 32 0 30 24 24 Lower No 0.36 1920 X High Resource Keith Reckdahl WG Suggestions Leghorn St 94303 14705012 0.85 CS CS Auto storage 40 32 0 33 27 27 Lower No 0 1900 X High Resource Keith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (No Rezone)‐ Lower Income 1.60 51 WG Suggestions 2011 El Camino Real 94306 12431024 0.20 CN CN One story retail (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 20 16 0 3 3 3 Moderate No 0.62 1930 X High Resource Keith Reckdahl WG Suggestions 2905 El Camino Real 94306 13237033 0.33 CS CS One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 30 24 0 9 7 7 Moderate No 0.18 1950 X High Resource Keith Reckdahl Yes WG Suggestions (No Rezone)‐ Moderate Income 0.53 10 WG Suggestions 2098 El Camino Real 94306 13701112 0.10 CN CN One story retail (FAR: 1.0)20 16 0 2 1 1 Above Moderate No 0.94 1952 X High Resource Keith Reckdahl WG Suggestions 1955 El Camino Real 94306 12430016 0.12 CN CN One story retail (FAR: 0.8)20 16 0 2 1 1 Above Moderate No 0.96 1951 X High Resource Keith Reckdahl WG Suggestions 163 EVERETT AV 94301 12025042 0.19 CN CD‐N One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 20 16 0 3 3 3 Above Moderate No 0.70 1951 X High Resource Rahsan Hosgur Karahan WG Suggestions El Camino Real 94306 14220080 0.11 CS CS Surface parking 30 24 0 3 2 2 Above Moderate No 0 N/A X High Resource Keith Reckdahl Yes WG Suggestions 2227 El Camino Real 94306 12432071 0.10 CC CC (2)One story retail (FAR: 0.7)40 32 0 3 3 3 Above Moderate No 0.92 1946 X High Resource Keith Reckdahl WG Suggestions 929 EMERSON ST 94301 12028082 0.12SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.02 1912 X High Resource Rahsan Hosgur Karahan WG Suggestions (No Rezone) ‐ Above Moderate Income 0.74 14 WG Suggestions (No Rezone) ‐ Total 2.87 75 Additional MFA Sites ATTACHMENT B 3.b Packet Pg. 22 DR A F T Category/Strategy Site Address or Street Zip Code APN Acres General Plan Zoning Current Use Minimum Density Allowed (du/ac) Maximum Density Allowed (du/ac) Realistic Allowable Density (du/ac) Existing Units Maximum Capacity Realistic Capacity Potential Minus Existing Income Category Publicly Owned Included in 5th Cycle HE ILR Year Built Floodzone TCAC Opportunity Area WG Member Who Recommended Site Retail Preservation Within 150' Buffer Historic Resource Status Notes Upzone 850 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94301 12005011 0.66 MF RM‐20 One story medical offices (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 8 30 24 0 19 15 15 Lower No 0.47 1955 X High Resource Upzone 652 HOMER AV 94301 12005008 0.64 MF RM‐20 One story medical offices (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 8 30 24 0 19 15 15 Lower No 0.36 1956 X High Resource Upzone 4146 El Camino Real 94301 13724034 0.77 MF RM‐20 Vacant 8 30 24 0 23 18 18 Lower Yes 0.00 X High Resource Upzone 1681 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 12425044 0.91 MF RM‐20 One story medical offices (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 8 30 24 0 27 21 21 Lower No 0.11 1939 X High Resource Upzone 853 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94301 00332094 0.80 MF RM‐20 One story medical offices (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 8 30 24 0 24 19 19 Lower No 0.57 1952 X High Resource Upzone 4151 Middlefield Rd 94301 12715023 0.93 MF RM‐20 Two story office space (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 8 30 24 0 27 22 22 Lower Yes 1.26 1961 X High Resource Upzone 3606 El Camino Real 94301 13708080 0.65 CN CN Vacant 30 24 0 19 15 15 Lower Yes 0.00 X High Resource Yes Upzone 4085 El Camino Wy 94306 13243153 0.71 CN CN One story retail (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 30 24 0 21 17 17 Lower Yes 0.71 1985 X High Resource Yes Upzone 4113 EL CAMINO WY 94306 13244022 0.64 CN CN One story preshcool (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 30 24 0 19 15 15 Lower Yes 0.75 1955 X High Resource Yes Upzone VENTURA AV 94306 13242051 0.72 CN CN Community center (FAR: 0.5), vacant 30 24 0 21 17 17 Lower No 0.71 1985 X High Resource Yes Upzone 2754 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94306 13255029 0.55 CN CN (GF/P) One story Retail (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 30 24 0 16 13 13 Lower No 0.61 1952 X High Resource Yes Upzone 2811 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94306 12734098 1.74 CN CN (GF/P) Supermarket (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 30 24 0 52 41 41 Lower No 0.10 1964 X High Resource Yes Upzone 3902 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94303 14708048 4.26 CN CN (GF/P) One story strip mall (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 30 24 0 127 102 102 Lower No 0.08 0 X High Resource Yes Upzone 3901 El Camino Real 94301 13242073 1.10 MF RM‐30 One story Hotel (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 16 40 32 0 44 35 35 Lower Yes 1.09 1956 X High Resource Upzone EL CAMINO REAL 94301 13238072 1.11 MF;CS RM‐30 Surface parking 16 40 32 0 44 35 35 Lower No 0.00 0 X High Resource Yes Upzone 320 SAN ANTONIO RD 94306 14709069 0.76 MF;RO RM‐30 Vacant 16 40 32 0 30 24 24 Lower No 0.00 0 X High Resource Yes Upzone 3375 EL CAMINO REAL 94301 13239088 0.74 CS;CN CS One story restaurant (FAR: 0.2), surface parking 40 32 0 29 23 23 Lower Yes 0.30 1971 X High Resource Yes Yes Upzone 4224 EL CAMINO REAL 94301 16708037 0.63 CS CS One story restaurant (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 25 20 20 Lower Yes 0.41 1946 X High Resource Yes Yes Upzone 4230 El Camino Real 94301 16708030 0.52 CS CS One story car rental (FAR: 0.4), Surface parking 40 32 0 20 16 16 Lower Yes 0.05 1950 X High Resource Yes Yes Upzone 3903 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13242072 0.53 CS CS One story bank (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 21 16 16 Lower No 1.06 1997 X High Resource Yes Yes Upzone 3200 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 14220037 0.61 CS CS Two story lodging (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 24 19 19 Lower No 0.32 1947 X High Resource Yes Upzone 4238 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 16708031 0.65 CS CS Two story lodging (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 26 20 20 Lower No 0.37 1953 X High Resource Yes Yes Upzone 4256 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 16708042 0.60 CS CS One story restaurant (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 24 19 19 Lower No 0.09 1964 X High Resource Yes Yes Upzone 4279 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 14801016 0.80 CS CS Two story lodging (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 0 32 25 25 Lower No 0.52 1961 X;ACr High Resource Yes Yes Upzone 4345 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 14809011 0.95 CS CS Two story lodging (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 38 30 30 Lower No 0.38 1953 X High Resource Yes Yes Upzone 760 San Antonio Ave 94303 14705091 0.65 CS CS One story retail (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 26 20 20 Lower Yes 0.49 1975 X High Resource Yes Upzone 87 ENCINA AV 94301 12033001 0.57 CS CS Two story office space (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 22 18 18 Lower No 1.27 1947 X High Resource Upzone 4291 El Camino Real 94301 14809014 1.16 CS CS Two story bank (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 40 32 0 46 37 37 Lower Yes 0.33 1957 X High Resource Yes Yes Upzone 720 SAN ANTONIO RD 94303 14705087 1.36 CS CS One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 54 43 43 Lower Yes 0.44 1965 X High Resource Yes Upzone 841 El Camino Real 94301 12034001 0.64 CS CS One story car wash (FAR: 0.2), surface parking 40 32 0 25 20 20 Lower Yes 0.00 1973 X High Resource Yes Upzone 788 SAN ANTONIO AV 94303 14703041 0.58 CS CS One story substandard office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 23 18 18 Lower No 0.82 1953 X High Resource Yes Upzone 27.94 768 Upzone 884 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94301 12005012 0.23 MF RM‐20 One story medical offices (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 8 30 24 0 6 5 5 Moderate No 0.69 1953 X High Resource Upzone 655 HOMER AV 94301 12004057 0.29 MF RM‐20 One story medical offices (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 8 30 24 0 8 7 7 Moderate No 0.13 1956 X High Resource Upzone 744 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94301 12004053 0.37 MF RM‐20 One story medical offices (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 8 30 24 0 11 8 8 Moderate No 0.69 1956 X High Resource Upzone 702 CLARA DR 94303 12735023 0.29 MF RM‐20 Residential (1)8 30 24 1 8 7 6 Moderate No 0.30 1954 X High Resource Upzone 116 COLERIDGE AV 94301 12417003 0.23 MF RM‐20 Residential (1)8 30 24 1 6 5 4 Moderate No 0.09 1952 X High Resource Upzone 3400 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13708006 0.23 MF RM‐20 Residential (1)8 30 24 1 6 5 4 Moderate No 1.28 1953 X High Resource Upzone 649 FOREST AV 94301 12004019 0.29 MF RM‐20 Residential (1)8 30 24 1 8 7 6 Moderate No 0.13 1918 AH43.5 High Resource Upzone 427 HAWTHORNE AV 94301 12009036 0.20 MF RM‐20 Residential (1)8 30 24 1 6 4 3 Moderate No 0.33 1968 X High Resource Upzone 453 HAWTHORNE AV 94301 12009034 0.21 MF RM‐20 Residential (1)8 30 24 1 6 5 4 Moderate No 0.97 1958 X High Resource Upzone 660 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94301 12004017 0.29 MF RM‐20 One story medical offices (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 8 30 24 0 8 7 7 Moderate No 0.29 1951 AH42.8 High Resource Upzone 741 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94301 00332040 0.23 MF RM‐20 Residential (1)8 30 24 1 6 5 4 Moderate No 0.83 1952 X High Resource Upzone 827 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94301 00332064 0.23 MF RM‐20 Residential (1)8 30 24 1 6 5 4 Moderate No 0.21 1926 X High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998 Upzone 905 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94301 00333013 0.27 MF RM‐20 One story medical offices (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 8 30 24 0 8 6 6 Moderate No 0.31 1952 X High Resource Upzone 3200 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94306 13210148 0.37 MF RM‐20 One story medical offices (FAR: 0.5)8 30 24 0 11 8 8 Moderate No 0.68 1957 X High Resource Upzone 127 RINCONADA AV 94301 12418095 0.23 MF RM‐20 Residential (1)8 30 24 1 6 5 4 Moderate No 0.14 1932 X High Resource Upzone 114 SEALE AV 94301 12418050 0.23 MF RM‐20 Residential (1)8 30 24 1 6 5 4 Moderate No 0.55 1962 X High Resource Upzone 119 SEALE AV 94301 12418045 0.23 MF RM‐20 Residential (1)8 30 24 1 6 5 4 Moderate No 0.53 1966 X High Resource Upzone 125 SEALE AV 94301 12418044 0.21 MF RM‐20 Residential (1)8 30 24 1 6 5 4 Moderate No 0.25 1962 X High Resource Upzone 424 SENECA ST 94301 00303013 0.28 MF RM‐20 Residential (1)8 30 24 1 8 6 5 Moderate No 0.15 1903 A High Resource Upzone 660 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12003043 0.20 MF RM‐20 Surface Parking 8 30 24 0 6 4 4 Moderate No 0.01 1900 AH46.9 High Resource Upzone 680 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12003044 0.22 MF RM‐20 One story medical offices (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 8 30 24 0 6 5 5 Moderate No 1.13 1952 AH46.9 High Resource Upzone 116 EMERSON ST 94301 12024019 0.24 MF RM‐20 Residential (1)8 30 24 1 7 5 4 Moderate No 0.92 1922 X High Resource Upzone 124 EMERSON ST 94301 12024020 0.24 MF RM‐20 Residential (1)8 30 24 1 7 5 4 Moderate No 0.35 1926 X High Resource Upzone 2741 MIDDLEFIELD AV 94306 12734095 0.22 CN CN (GF/P) One story office space (FAR: 0.5)30 24 0 6 5 5 Moderate No 1.43 1956 X High Resource Yes Upzone 3900 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94303 14708049 0.29 CN CN (GF/P) One story cleaners (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 30 24 0 8 6 6 Moderate No 0.07 1958 X High Resource Yes Upzone 720 Cowper St 94301 12016046 0.23 MF RM‐30 One story medical office (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 16 40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate Yes 0.49 1973 X High Resource Upzone 575 Middlefield Rd 94301 00302043 0.28 MF RM‐30 Two story medical office (FAR: 1.5)16 40 32 0 11 8 8 Moderate Yes 0.41 1963 AH45.3 High Resource Upzone 720 University Av 94301 00302047 0.41 MF RM‐30 One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 16 40 32 0 16 13 13 Moderate Yes 0.37 1954 AH46.6 High Resource Upzone 417 COLLEGE AV 94306 12432026 0.20 MF RM‐30 Residential (1)16 40 32 1 8 6 5 Moderate No 0.60 1948 X High Resource Upzone 747 COLORADO AV 94303 12734100 0.27 MF RM‐30 Residential (1)16 40 32 1 10 8 7 Moderate No 0.58 1965 X High Resource Upzone 744 COWPER ST 94301 12016049 0.20 MF RM‐30 Residential (1)16 40 32 1 8 6 5 Moderate No 0.31 1920 X High Resource Upzone 245 EL CARMELO AV 94306 13219063 0.24 MF RM‐30 Residential (1)16 40 32 1 9 7 6 Moderate No 0.38 1953 X High Resource Upzone 463 LYTTON AV 94301 12014062 0.23 MF RM‐30 Residential (1)16 40 32 1 9 7 6 Moderate No 0.57 1938 X High Resource Upzone 227 RAMONA ST 94301 12025014 0.16 MF RM‐30 Residential (1)16 40 32 1 6 5 4 Moderate No 0.70 1961 X High Resource Upzone 827 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 00303018 0.37 MF RM‐30 Residential (1)16 40 32 1 14 11 10 Moderate No 0.10 1955 AH45.5 High Resource Upzone 447 LELAND AV 94306 12430018 0.23 MF RM‐30 Residential (1)16 40 32 1 9 7 6 Moderate No 0.75 1924 X High Resource Upzone 701 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 00302022 0.25 MF RM‐30 One story medical office (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 16 40 32 0 10 8 8 Moderate Yes 0.12 1959 AH48 High Resource Upzone 725 University Av 94301 00302021 0.25 MF RM‐30 One story medical office (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 16 40 32 0 10 8 8 Moderate Yes 0.41 1954 AH47.9 High Resource Upzone 435 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94301 00302023 0.23 MF RM‐30 One story medical office (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 16 40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate No 0.91 1961 AH48.1 High Resource Upzone 2181 PARK BL 94306 12427038 0.25 MF RM‐30 Two story office space (FAR: 1.2), surface parking 16 40 32 0 10 8 8 Moderate Yes 1.07 1957 X High Resource Upzone 3691 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13240062 0.25 CN CN One story restaurant (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 30 24 0 7 6 6 Moderate Yes 0.92 1946 X High Resource Yes Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998 Upzone 3636 El Camino Real 94301 13708078 0.25 CN CN One story restaurant (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 30 24 0 7 6 6 Moderate Yes 0.09 1953 X High Resource Yes Upzone 3666 El Camino Real 94301 13708097 0.25 CN CN One story office space (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 30 24 0 7 6 6 Moderate Yes 0.46 1931 X High Resource Yes Upzone 3773 EL CAMINO REAL 94301 13241083 0.42 CN CN One story multiple retail (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 30 24 0 12 10 10 Moderate Yes 1.33 1949 X High Resource Yes Upzone 3630 El Camino Real 94301 13708081 0.37 CN CN Two story office space (FAR 0.6), surface parking 30 24 0 11 8 8 Moderate Yes 1.39 1963 X High Resource Yes Upzone 2127 EL CAMINO REAL 94301 12431059 0.25 CN CN One story restaurant and office space (0.6), surface parking 30 24 0 7 6 6 Moderate Yes 0.91 1940 X High Resource Yes Upzone 2137 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 12431058 0.32 CN CN Surface Parking 30 24 0 9 7 7 Moderate No 0.01 1900 X High Resource Yes Upzone 3601 EL CAMINO REAL 94301 13240059 0.42 CN CN One story restaurant (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 30 24 0 12 10 10 Moderate Yes 0.00 1966 X High Resource Yes Upzone 1921 El Camino Real 94301 12430017 0.43 CN CN One story restaurant (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 30 24 0 12 10 10 Moderate Yes 0.98 1945 X High Resource Yes Upzone 2280 El Camino Real 94301 13701113 0.43 CN CN Fast food restaurant (FAR: 0.2), surface parking 30 24 0 12 10 10 Moderate Yes 0.07 1969 X High Resource Upzone 3700 El Camino Real 94301 13711078 0.36 CN CN One story retail (FAR: 0.2), surface parking 30 24 0 10 8 8 Moderate Yes 0.01 1953 X High Resource Yes Upzone Sites ATTACHMENT B 3.b Packet Pg. 23 DR A F T Upzone 4127 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13246104 0.45 CN CN Two story restaurant and office space (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 30 24 0 13 10 10 Moderate Yes 0.14 1963 X High Resource Yes Upzone 2080 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13701132 0.31 CN CN One story retail (FAR: 0.9)30 24 0 9 7 7 Moderate No 1.18 1961 X High Resource Yes Upzone 4335 El Camino Real 94301 14809010 0.40 CS CS Two story spa (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 0 16 12 12 Moderate Yes 1.21 1966 X High Resource Yes Yes Upzone 268 Lambert Av 94306 13238048 0.35 CS CS One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 14 11 11 Moderate Yes 0.65 1963 X High Resource Yes Upzone 320 Lambert Av 94306 13238058 0.28 CS CS One story vacant retail (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 11 8 8 Moderate Yes 0.42 1978 X High Resource Yes Upzone 4201 Middlefield 94301 14705086 0.32 CS CS One story auto‐repair (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 40 32 0 12 10 10 Moderate Yes 1.09 1992 X High Resource Yes Upzone 780 San Antonio Ave 94303 14705092 0.42 CS CS One story auto‐repair (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 40 32 0 16 13 13 Moderate Yes 0.14 1988 X High Resource Yes Upzone 3508 El Camino Real 94301 13708088 0.24 CS CS One story auto‐repair (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate Yes 0.16 1950 X High Resource Yes Yes Upzone 16.65 398 Upzone 111 LOWELL AV 94301 12417034 0.23 MF RM‐20 Residential (1)8 30 24 1 6 5 4 Above Moderate No 0.45 1922 X High Resource Upzone 121 LOWELL AV 94301 12417033 0.23 MF RM‐20 Residential (1)8 30 24 1 6 5 4 Above Moderate No 0.18 1932 X High Resource Upzone 2225 ALMA ST 94301 12420001 0.16 MF RM‐20 Residential (1)8 30 24 1 4 3 2 Above Moderate No 0.11 1954 X High Resource Upzone 103 TENNYSON AV 94301 12417077 0.25 MF RM‐20 Residential (1)8 30 24 1 7 6 5 Above Moderate No 0.11 1970 X High Resource Upzone 111 TENNYSON AV 94301 12417076 0.25 MF RM‐20 Residential (1)8 30 24 1 7 6 5 Above Moderate No 0.13 1953 X High Resource Upzone 122 RINCONADA AV 94301 12419003 0.23 MF RM‐20 Residential (1)8 30 24 1 6 5 4 Above Moderate No 0.78 1925 X High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998 Upzone 652 HAMILTON AV 94301 12004010 0.31 MF RM‐20 Residential (1)8 30 24 1 9 7 6 Above Moderate No 0.33 1941 AH44.7 High Resource Upzone MIDDLEFIELD RD 94301 12003046 0.13 MF RM‐20 Surface Parking 8 30 24 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate No 0.02 1900 AH46.1 High Resource Upzone EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13239075 0.18 CN CN Surface Parking 30 24 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.00 0 X High Resource Yes Upzone KENDALL AV 94306 13708033 0.13 CN CN Vacant 30 24 0 3 3 3 Above Moderate No 0.00 0 X High Resource Yes Upzone 564 COLLEGE AV 94306 13701036 0.13 CN CN One story office space (FAR: 0.5)30 24 0 3 3 3 Above Moderate No 0.47 1949 X High Resource Yes Upzone 3972 El Camino Real 94301 13711091 0.25 CN CN One story auto repair (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 30 24 0 7 6 6 Above Moderate Yes 0.27 1959 X High Resource Yes Upzone 706 COLORADO AV 94306 12734092 0.18 CN CN (GF/P) One story retail/restaurant (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 30 24 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 1.27 1954 X High Resource Yes Upzone 708 COLORADO AV 94306 12734054 0.13 CN CN (GF/P) One story convience store (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 30 24 0 3 3 3 Above Moderate No 1.14 1968 X High Resource Yes Upzone 2801 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94306 12734052 0.17 CN CN (GF/P) Two story office space (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 30 24 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 1.00 1986 X High Resource Upzone 740 WEBSTER ST 94301 12004071 0.15 MF RM‐30 Residential (1)16 40 32 1 5 4 3 Above Moderate No 0.11 1921 X High Resource Upzone 750 WEBSTER ST 94301 12004072 0.15 MF RM‐30 Residential (1)16 40 32 1 5 4 3 Above Moderate No 0.25 1974 X High Resource Upzone 397 Curtner Ave.94306 13241025 0.19 MF RM‐30 Residential (2)16 40 32 2 7 6 4 Above Moderate Yes 0.73 1954 X High Resource Upzone 202 BRYANT ST 94301 12025159 0.16 MF RM‐30 Residential (1)16 40 32 1 6 5 4 Above Moderate No 0.61 1918 X High Resource Upzone 122 COLORADO AV 94301 13225049 0.15 MF RM‐30 Residential (1)16 40 32 1 5 4 3 Above Moderate No 0.20 1951 X High Resource Upzone 343 COWPER ST 94301 12010044 0.19 MF RM‐30 Two story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 16 40 32 0 7 5 5 Above Moderate No 0.13 1907 X High Resource Upzone 262 HAWTHORNE AV 94301 12025158 0.16 MF RM‐30 Residential (1)16 40 32 1 6 5 4 Above Moderate No 0.97 1918 X High Resource Upzone 636 WEBSTER ST 94301 12004027 0.19 MF RM‐30 Residential (1)16 40 32 1 7 5 4 Above Moderate No 0.40 1909 X High Resource Upzone 727 WEBSTER ST 94301 12004066 0.14 MF RM‐30 Residential (1)16 40 32 1 5 4 3 Above Moderate No 1.00 1993 X High Resource Upzone 590 FOREST ST 94301 12004043 0.22 MF RM‐30 One story medical office (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 16 40 32 0 8 7 7 Above Moderate Yes 0.67 1949 X High Resource Upzone 305 COLLEGE AV 94306 12428015 0.20 MF RM‐30 Residential (1)16 40 32 1 8 6 5 Above Moderate No 0.54 1968 X High Resource Upzone 325 COLLEGE AV 94306 12428013 0.20 MF RM‐30 Residential (1)16 40 32 1 8 6 5 Above Moderate No 0.23 1938 X High Resource Upzone 718A WEBSTER ST 94301 12004068 0.15 MF RM‐30 Residential (1)16 40 32 1 5 4 3 Above Moderate No 0.47 1900 X High Resource Upzone 730 WEBSTER ST 94301 12004069 0.15 MF RM‐30 Residential (1)16 40 32 1 5 4 3 Above Moderate No 0.33 1900 X High Resource Upzone 371 COLLEGE AV 94306 12432031 0.20 MF RM‐30 Residential (1)16 40 32 1 8 6 5 Above Moderate No 0.08 1949 X High Resource Upzone 383 COLLEGE AV 94306 12432030 0.20 MF RM‐30 Residential (1)16 40 32 1 8 6 5 Above Moderate No 0.01 1931 X High Resource Upzone 634 HAMILTON AV 94301 12004009 0.29 MF RM‐30 Residential (1)16 40 32 1 11 9 8 Above Moderate No 0.95 1960 AH44.7 High Resource Upzone 643 WEBSTER ST 94301 12004022 0.23 MF RM‐30 Residential (1)16 40 32 1 9 7 6 Above Moderate No 0.03 1903 AH43.6 High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998 Upzone 746 BRYANT ST 94301 12027056 0.16SOFA I CAP RM‐30 Residential (1)16 40 32 1 6 5 4 Above Moderate No 0.73 1934 X High Resource Upzone 727 RAMONA ST 94301 12027064 0.12SOFA I CAP RM‐30 Surface parking 16 40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate No 0.00 1900 X High Resource Upzone 3337 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13239005 0.17 CS CS One story vacant office space (FAR: 0.9)40 32 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate No 0.72 1938 X High Resource Yes Upzone 3839 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13241089 0.17 CS CS One story auto repair (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate No 0.68 1947 X High Resource Yes Yes Upzone 3929 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13242068 0.17 CS CS One story retail (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate No 0.49 1948 X High Resource Yes Yes Upzone 3939 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13242070 0.17 CS CS One story retail (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate No 0.70 1948 X High Resource Yes Yes Upzone 75 ENCINA AV 94301 12033003 0.13 CS CS One story office space (FAR: 1.0)40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.44 1958 X High Resource Upzone 411 LAMBERT AV 94306 13239017 0.16 CS CS Two story gym (FAR: 0.6), vacant 40 32 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate No 0.00 1900 X High Resource Upzone MATADERO AV 94306 13708016 0.11 CS CS Surface parking 40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate No 0.00 0 X High Resource Yes Upzone 3260 Ash St 94306 13238047 0.22 CS CS One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 8 7 7 Above Moderate Yes 0.49 1998 X High Resource Yes Upzone 460 Lambert Av 94306 13238017 0.22 CS CS Surface parking 40 32 0 8 7 7 Above Moderate Yes 0.08 1937 X High Resource Upzone 814 SAN ANTONIO AV 94303 14703043 0.43 CS CS One story office space (FAR: 0.4), Surface parking 40 32 0 17 13 13 Above Moderate Yes 0.42 1956 X High Resource Upzone 816‐814 San Antonio Ave 94303 14703039 0.44 CS CS One story office space (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 0 17 14 14 Above Moderate Yes 0.38 1956 X High Resource Upzone 824 San Antonio Ave 94303 14703040 0.44 CS CS Two story office space (FAR 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 17 14 14 Above Moderate Yes 1.00 1986 X High Resource Upzone 840 San Antonio Ave 94303 14703064 0.49 CS CS auto repair (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 40 32 0 19 15 15 Above Moderate Yes 0.12 1962 AE10.5 High Resource Upzone ENCINA AV 94301 12034004 0.13 CC CC Surface parking 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.00 0 X High Resource Upzone ENCINA AV 94301 12034005 0.13 CC CC Surface parking 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.00 0 X High Resource Upzone ENCINA AV 94301 12034006 0.13 CC CC Surface parking 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.04 0 X High Resource Upzone ENCINA AV 94301 12034007 0.13 CC CC Surface parking 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.04 0 X High Resource Upzone ENCINA AV 94301 12034008 0.13 CC CC Surface parking 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.00 0 X High Resource Upzone ENCINA AV 94301 12034009 0.13 CC CC Surface parking 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.00 0 X High Resource Upzone ENCINA AV 94301 12034010 0.13 CC CC Surface parking 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.00 0 X High Resource Upzone 44 ENCINA AV 94301 12034002 0.18 CC CC Surface parking 40 32 0 7 5 5 Above Moderate No 0.00 1949 X High Resource Upzone 2290 BIRCH ST 94306 12432002 0.11 CC CC (2)(R) One story medical office (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate No 1.17 1957 X High Resource Yes Upzone 400 Cambridge Av 94306 12432006 0.11 CC CC (2)(R) Two story office space (FAR: 1.0)40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate No 1.21 1971 X High Resource Yes Upzone 430 Cambridge Av 94306 12432009 0.14 CC CC (2)(R) One story office space (FAR: 1.0)40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 1.33 1958 X High Resource Yes Upzone 456 Cambridge Av 94306 12432012 0.16 CC CC (2)(R) One story retail (FAR: 1.0)40 32 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate No 0.82 1951 X High Resource Yes Upzone 310 N CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12432034 0.27 CC CC (2)(R)(P) Two story office space (FAR: 2.0)40 32 0 10 8 8 Above Moderate Yes 0.74 1945 X High Resource Upzone 3516 El Camino Real 94301 13708079 0.23 CS CS One story office space (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate Yes 0.10 1946 X High Resource Yes Yes Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998 Upzone 4191 EL CAMINO REAL 94301 13246120 0.36 CS CS One story dentist and fitness center (FAR: 0.4), Surface parking 40 32 0 14 11 11 Above Moderate Yes 0.56 1966 X High Resource Yes Yes Upzone 4195 El Camino Real 94301 13246119 0.35 CS CS One story auto‐repair (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 40 32 0 14 11 11 Above Moderate Yes 0.89 1989 X High Resource Yes Yes Upzone 4232 El Camino Real 94301 16708036 0.43 CS CS One story preschool (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 17 13 13 Above Moderate Yes 1.08 1954 X High Resource Yes Yes Upzone 805 EL CAMINO REAL 94301 12033012 0.24 CS CS One story medcial offices (FAR: 0.5)40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate No 0.56 1940 X High Resource Yes Upzone 825 EL CAMINO REAL 94301 12033011 0.20 CS CS One story medcial offices (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 8 6 6 Above Moderate No 0.37 1955 X High Resource Yes Upzone 3339 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13239074 0.36 CS CS One story lodging (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 14 11 11 Above Moderate No 0.75 1955 X High Resource Yes Yes Upzone 3345 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13239080 0.22 CS CS One story restaurant (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 8 7 7 Above Moderate No 0.37 1968 X High Resource Yes Yes Upzone 3825 EL CAMINO REAL 94301 13241088 0.35 CS CS One story physical therapy (FAR: 0.4), Surface parking 40 32 0 14 11 11 Above Moderate Yes 0.20 1963 X High Resource Yes Yes Upzone 455 Lambert Av 94306 13239087 0.32 CS CS One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 12 10 10 Above Moderate Yes 0.57 1965 X High Resource Upzone 3200 Ash St 94306 13238045 0.39 CS CS One story office space FAR: 0.6)40 32 0 15 12 12 Above Moderate Yes 1.20 1975 X High Resource Yes Upzone 425 Portage Av 94306 13238068 0.40 CS CS One story fitness center (FAR: 0.8)40 32 0 16 12 12 Above Moderate Yes 0.12 1951 X High Resource Yes Upzone 27 ENCINA AV 94301 12033010 0.16 CS CS Surface parking 40 32 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate No 0.00 1900 X High Resource Upzone 414 California Av 94306 12432040 0.37 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story Bank (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 14 11 11 Above Moderate Yes 0.34 1958 X High Resource Upzone 910 Charleston Rd 94303 14703065 0.48 CS CS One story Restaurant (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 40 32 0 19 15 15 Above Moderate Yes 0.33 1978 AE10.5 High Resource Upzone 63 ENCINA AV 94301 12033004 0.27 CS CS One story office space (FAR: 1.0)40 32 0 10 8 8 Above Moderate Yes 1.17 1941 X High Resource ATTACHMENT B 3.b Packet Pg. 24 DR A F T Upzone 2401 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 12433061 0.24 CC CC One story Bank (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate Yes 0.56 1975 X High Resource Upzone 855 EL CAMINO REAL 94301 12034014 0.44 CC CC Surface parking 40 32 0 17 14 14 Above Moderate Yes 0.00 1958 X High Resource Upzone ENCINA AV 94301 12034003 0.25 CC CC Surface parking 40 32 0 10 8 8 Above Moderate No 0.00 0 X High Resource Upzone 17.80 491 Upzone ‐ Total 62.40 1657 ATTACHMENT B 3.b Packet Pg. 25 DR A F T Category/Strategy Site Address or Street Zip Code APN Acres General Plan Zoning Current Use Minimum Density Allowed (du/ac) Maximum Density Allowed (du/ac) Realistic Allowable Density (du/ac) Existing Units Maximum Capacity Realistic Capacity Potential Minus Existing Income Category Publicly Owned Included in 5th Cycle HE ILR Year Built Floodzone TCAC Opportunity Area WG Member Who Recommended Site Retail Preservation Within 150' Buffer Historic Resource Status Notes Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station PARK BL 9430613232043 1.38 MF RM‐30 Surface Parking 16 40 32 0 55 44 44 Lower No 1950 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2400 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 14220012 0.75 CS CS (AS1) One story bank (FAR: 0.2), surface parking 40 32 0 30 24 24 Lower No 1.01 0 High Resource Yes Yes Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2673 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13236077 0.64 CN CN One story restaurant and retail (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 40 32 0 25 20 20 Lower Yes 0.59 1970 High Resource Yes Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2310 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13701129 0.76 CN CN One story restaurant (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 30 24 24 Lower Yes 1.39 1924 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 300 HAMILTON AV 94301 12016096 0.75 CC CD‐C (P); PF Five story office building (FAR: 1.2), surface parking 40 32 0 30 24 24 Lower No 1.49 0 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 530 LYTTON AV 94301 12003070 0.67 CC CD‐C (P) Four story office building (FAR: 0.8) 40 32 0 26 21 21 Lower No 1906 High Resource Yes Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station Cambridge ave 94306 12432050 0.65 CC PF(R) Parking structure 40 32 0 25 20 20 Lower No 1910 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 3197 PARK BL 94306 13226076 0.59 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 40 32 0 23 18 18 Lower No 1.43 0 High Resource Yes 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 156 N CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12428045 1.14 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story grocery store (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 50 40 0 57 45 45 Lower Yes 0.30 1950 High Resource Yes 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 150 GRANT AV 94306 12429020 0.60 CC CC (2)(R) One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 50 40 0 29 23 23 Lower No 0.23 1979 High Resource Yes 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station NITA AV 94306 14709056 1.25 RO ROLM Surface Parking 50 40 0 62 50 50 Lower No 0 High Resource Yes Caltrain Station ‐ Lower Income 9.18 313 Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 360 FOREST AV 94301 12016070 0.23 MF RM‐40 Residential (2)31 40 32 2 9 7 5 Moderate No 1.04 0 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station PARK BL 94306 13232042 0.28 MF RM‐30 Surface Parking 16 40 32 0 11 8 8 Moderate No 1961 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2805 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13237067 0.39 CS CS One story retail (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 15 12 12 Moderate No 0.92 1946 High Resource Yes Yes Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2951 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13237052 0.33 CS CS One story office space (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 40 32 0 13 10 10 Moderate No 0.63 0 High Resource Yes Yes Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 1885 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 12430060 0.13 CN CN Two story office space (FAR: 1.0), surface parking 40 32 0 5 4 4 Moderate No 1.50 0 High Resource Yes Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 1895 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 12430061 0.16 CN CN Two story office space (FAR: 0.4)40 32 0 6 5 5 Moderate No 1.49 0 High Resource Yes Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 305 LYTTON AV 94301 12014101 0.23 CC CD‐C (P) Two story office space (FAR: 1.2), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate No 1.14 1980 High Resource Yes Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 321 HAMILTON AV 94301 12015090 0.23 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) One story restaurant and retail (FAR: 1.0)40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate No 0.75 1947 High Resource Yes Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 490 CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12432046 0.33 CC CC (2)(R)(P) Three store office space and retail (FAR: 1.2)40 32 0 13 10 10 Moderate No 1.30 1955 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 447 N CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12433016 0.13 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 5 4 4 Moderate No 0.57 1900 High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998 Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 451 N CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12433015 0.11 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 4 3 3 Moderate No 0.45 1962 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 441 N CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12433017 0.14 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 5 4 4 Moderate No 0.95 1954 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 445 SHERMAN AV 94306 12433043 0.28 CC CC (2) Two story office space (FAR: 1.0)40 32 0 11 8 8 Moderate No 0.61 1975 High Resource Yes Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2455 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 12433008 0.38 CC CC (2) Two story lodging (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 0 15 12 12 Moderate No 0.10 1970 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station YALE ST 94306 13701078 0.14 CN CN Surface Parking 40 32 0 5 4 4 Moderate No 1958 High Resource Yes Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 577 COLLEGE AV 94306 13701125 0.44 CN CN Two story office space (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 17 13 13 Moderate Yes 1.24 1958 High Resource Yes Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2200 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13701070 0.41 CN CN Gas station and convience store (FAR: 0.2), surface parking 40 32 0 16 13 13 Moderate Yes 0.19 1990 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 555 COLLEGE AV 94306 13701069 0.48 CN CN Single story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 19 15 15 Moderate Yes 0.57 1958 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2000 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13701116 0.27 CN CN One story restaurant (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 10 8 8 Moderate Yes 1.14 0 High Resource Yes Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 1963 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 12430015 0.28 CN CN Gas station and convience store (FAR: 0.5)40 32 0 11 9 9 Moderate Yes 0.05 1950 High Resource Yes Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 3241 PARK BL 94306 13226078 0.43 LI GM Gas station and convience store (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 40 32 0 17 13 13 Moderate No 0.03 1951 High Resource Yes Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 100 ADDISON AV 94301 12030050 0.24 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story preschool (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate No 1980 High Resource 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2041 ALMA ST 94301 12419054 0.20 MF RM‐20 Residential (2)8 50 40 2 10 8 6 Moderate No 0.90 1954 High Resource 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 324 EMERSON ST 94301 12025094 0.13 MF RM‐30 Residential (1)16 50 40 1 6 5 4 Moderate No 0.43 1911 High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 318 EMERSON ST 94301 12025093 0.13 MF RM‐30 Residential (1)16 50 40 1 6 5 4 Moderate No 0.97 1900 High Resource 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2151 PARK BL 94306 12427039 0.26 MF RM‐30 Two story office building (FAR: 1.2), surface parking 16 50 40 0 12 10 10 Moderate Yes 1.05 1958 High Resource 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2211 PARK BL 94306 12428043 0.35 MF RM‐30 One stury office building (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 16 50 40 0 17 13 13 Moderate Yes 0.33 1956 High Resource Caltrain Station ‐ Moderate Income 7.11 218 Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 221 BRYANT ST 94301 12014011 0.13 MF RM‐20 Residential (1)8 40 32 1 5 4 3 Above Moderate No 0.08 1928 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 197 BRYANT ST 94301 12012022 0.17 MF RM‐20 Residential (2)8 40 32 2 6 5 3 Above Moderate No 1.49 0 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 343 HAWTHORNE AV 94301 12012019 0.25 MF RM‐20 Residential (2)8 40 32 2 10 8 6 Above Moderate No 1.35 1959 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2861 ALMA ST 94306 13226023 0.19 MF RM‐20 Residential (2)8 40 32 2 7 5 3 Above Moderate No 0.78 1956 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 733 RAMONA ST 94301 12027063 0.10 MF RM‐30 Vacant 16 40 32 0 3 3 3 Above Moderate No 1906 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station Ash St 94306 13236024 0.10 MF RM‐40 Surface Parking 31 40 32 0 3 3 3 Above Moderate No 0 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station ENCINA AV 94301 12034013 0.09 CC CC Surface Parking 40 32 0 3 2 2 Above Moderate No 1947 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 425 N CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12433019 0.14 CC CC (2)(R)(P) Two story retail (FAR: 1.0)40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.15 0 High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998 Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2305 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 12432049 0.11 CC CC (2)(R) One story retail (FAR: 1.0)40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate No 1.34 1951 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 463 CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12433013 0.13 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.5)40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.02 1953 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 461 N CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12433014 0.13 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.5)40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.83 1953 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 415 CAMBRIDGE AV 94306 12432052 0.13 CC CC (2)(R) Two story vacant office building (FAR: 0.8)40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.87 0 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 440 N CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12432041 0.14 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story retail (FAR: 0.9)40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.22 1959 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 576 CAMBRIDGE AV 94306 13701075 0.19 CN CN Two store office space (FAR: 0.8)40 32 0 7 6 6 Above Moderate No 1.21 1958 High Resource Yes Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2001 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 12431025 0.18 CN CN One story retail (FAR: 0.4)40 32 0 7 5 5 Above Moderate No 0.18 1953 High Resource Yes Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 280 LAMBERT AV 94306 13238043 0.09 CS CS Surface Parking 40 32 0 3 2 2 Above Moderate No 0 High Resource Yes Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2904 ASH ST 94306 13237041 0.18 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 7 5 5 Above Moderate No 0.73 1998 High Resource Yes Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 160 HOMER AV 94301 12028005 0.14 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 Surface Parking 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.03 1961 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 145 ADDISON AV 94301 12028094 0.18 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story office space (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 7 5 5 Above Moderate No 0.77 1950 High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998 Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 828 BRYANT ST 94301 12028018 0.13 SOFA I CAP AMF One story office space (FAR: 0.4)40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.72 1900 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 3040 PARK BL 94306 13232036 0.17 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.4)40 32 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate No 0.90 1953 High Resource Yes 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 170 EMERSON ST 94301 12024025 0.13 MF RM‐20 Residential (2)8 50 40 2 6 5 3 Above Moderate No 0.72 1912 High Resource 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2233 ALMA ST 94301 12420037 0.25 MF RM‐20 One story office space (FAR: 0.4)8 50 40 0 12 9 9 Above Moderate No 0.26 1956 High Resource 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 106 RINCONADA AV 94301 12419001 0.11 MF RM‐20 Residential (1)8 50 40 1 5 4 3 Above Moderate No 0.06 1925 High Resource 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 114 RINCONADA AV 94301 12419002 0.11 MF RM‐20 Residential (1)8 50 40 1 5 4 3 Above Moderate No 0.40 1925 High Resource 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 230 EMERSON ST 94301 12025036 0.13 MF RM‐20 Residential (1)8 50 40 1 6 5 4 Above Moderate No 0.39 1901 High Resource 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2155 ALMA ST 94301 12419108 0.13 MF RM‐20 Residential (2)8 50 40 2 6 5 3 Above Moderate No 0.29 1948 High Resource 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 326 BRYANT ST 94301 12025070 0.12 MF RM‐30 One story office space (FAR: 0.7)16 50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.63 1946 High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 330 BRYANT ST 94301 12065002 0.13 MF RM‐30 Residential (2)16 50 40 2 6 5 3 Above Moderate No 1.00 1982 High Resource 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 345 HIGH ST 94301 12025100 0.13 MF RM‐30 Residential (1)16 50 40 1 6 5 4 Above Moderate No 1.08 1990 High Resource 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 102 COLORADO AV 94301 13225047 0.17 MF RM‐30 Residential (2)16 50 40 2 8 6 4 Above Moderate No 1.13 1953 High Resource 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 255 COLLEGE AV 94306 12428021 0.11 MF RM‐30 Residential (1)16 50 40 1 5 4 3 Above Moderate No 0.11 1920 High Resource 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 267 COLLEGE AV 94306 12428019 0.11 MF RM‐30 Residential (1)16 50 40 1 5 4 3 Above Moderate No 1.07 1967 High Resource 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 355 COLLEGE AV 94306 12432001 0.15 MF RM‐30 Residential (1)16 50 40 1 7 6 5 Above Moderate No 0.07 1928 High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 404 SHERIDAN AV 94306 13236025 0.11 MF RM‐40 Surface Parking 31 50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0 High Resource 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 240 N CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12428031 0.16 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story office space (FAR: 0.3)50 40 0 7 6 6 Above Moderate No 0.76 1962 High Resource 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 209 N CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12429001 0.12 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 1.0)50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 1.50 1951 High Resource 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 265 N CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12429021 0.14 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story retail (FAR: 1.0)50 40 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate No 1.00 1951 High Resource 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 239 N CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12429007 0.26 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.9)50 40 0 13 10 10 Above Moderate Yes 1.20 1951 High Resource 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 261 N CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12429022 0.13 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story retail (FAR: 1.0)50 40 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate No 1.02 1951 High Resource 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2453 ASH ST 94306 12433027 0.11 CC CC (2)(R)(P) Two story retail (FAR: 1.0)50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.11 1958 High Resource 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 407 N CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12433022 0.10 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.9)50 40 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate No 1.18 1902 High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2501 PARK BL 94306 12429012 0.12 CC CC (2)(R) Two story office building (FAR: 1.0)50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.93 1947 High Resource Yes 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station PARK BL 94306 12428003 0.29 CC CC (2)(R) Surface Parking 50 40 0 14 11 11 Above Moderate Yes 1900 High Resource Yes 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 360 N CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12432036 0.15 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story retail (FAR: 1.0)50 40 0 7 5 5 Above Moderate No 1.30 1953 High Resource 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 405 HIGH ST 94301 12026003 0.10 CC CD‐C (P) Multi‐story office space (FAR: 0.9) 50 40 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate No 1.30 1998 High Resource Yes 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 424 EMERSON ST 94301 12026025 0.09 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.9)50 40 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate No 1.05 1951 High Resource 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 227 FOREST AV 94301 12027017 0.12 CC CD‐C (P) Two story office space (1.0)50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 1.32 1965 High Resource Yes Caltrain Station Sites ATTACHMENT B 3.b Packet Pg. 26 DR A F T 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 420 RAMONA ST 94301 12026013 0.10 CC CD‐C (P) One story bank (FAR: 1.0)50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 1.50 1951 High Resource 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 640 RAMONA ST 94301 12027015 0.12 CC CD‐C (P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.9)50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 1.00 1910 High Resource 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 635 HIGH ST 94301 12027034 0.12 CC CD‐C (P) One story office space (FAR: 0.8)50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.08 1946 High Resource Yes 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 203 FOREST AV 94301 12027018 0.11 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.8)50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.30 1958 High Resource Yes 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 647 EMERSON ST 94301 12027019 0.11 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.8)50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.35 1920 High Resource Yes 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 644 EMERSON ST 94301 12027027 0.11 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) Two story office space (FAR: 1.0)50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 1.12 1962 High Resource 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 532 BRYANT ST 94301 12026062 0.11 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) One story retail (FAR: 0.9)50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 1.24 1950 High Resource 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 117 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12026039 0.10 CC CD‐C (P) Two story office space (FAR: 1.0)50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.38 1928 High Resource Yes 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 412 EMERSON ST 94301 12026106 0.15 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.9)50 40 0 7 6 6 Above Moderate No 0.50 1958 High Resource 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 291 ALMA ST 94301 12025056 0.13 CC CD‐N (P) One story office building (FAR: 0.5) 50 40 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate No 0.01 1959 High Resource 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 247 HIGH ST 94301 12025044 0.09 CC CD‐N (P) One story dentist office (FAR: 0.8) 50 40 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate No 1.37 1915 High Resource Yes 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 251 HIGH ST 94301 12025043 0.19 CC CD‐N (P) One story office building (FAR: 0.8) 50 40 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate No 1.32 1956 High Resource Yes 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 328 HIGH ST 94301 12025106 0.13 CC CD‐N (P) Two story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 50 40 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate No 0.03 1936 High Resource Yes Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 316 HIGH ST 94301 12025105 0.13 CC CD‐N (P) Surface Parking 50 40 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate No 0.04 1900 High Resource Yes Caltrain Station ‐ Above Moderate Income 8.54 267 Caltrain Station ‐ Total 24.83 798 ATTACHMENT B 3.b Packet Pg. 27 DR A F T Category/Strategy Site Address or Street Zip Code APN Acres General Plan Zoning Current Use Minimum Density Allowed (du/ac) Maximum Density Allowed (du/ac) Realistic Allowable Density (du/ac) Existing Units Maximum Capacity Realistic Capacity Potential Minus Existing Income Category Publicly Owned Included in 5th Cycle HE ILR Year Built Floodzone TCAC Opportunity Area WG Member Who Recommended Site Retail Preservat ion Within 150' Buffer Historic Resource Status Notes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes MAYBELL AV 94306 13724045 0.56 CN RM‐20 Surface parking 8 40 32 0 22 17 17 Lower No 0.02 High Resource 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 561 VISTA AV 94306 13737004 0.65 MF RM‐30 Faith‐based insitution 16 40 32 0 25 20 20 Lower No 0.03 1975 High Resource 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 4170 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13724046 1.01 CS CS One story grocery store (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 40 32 32 Lower No 1.01 1996 High Resource Yes Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3150 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 14220054 0.75 CS CS One story Restaurant (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 40 32 0 30 24 24 Lower No 0.65 1969 High Resource Yes Frequent Bus Routes ‐ Lower Income 2.97 93 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 126 LOWELL AV 94301 12417042 0.17 MF RM‐20 Residential (1)8 40 32 1 6 5 4 Moderate No 0.13 1994 High Resource 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 120 LOWELL AV 94301 12417041 0.17 MF RM‐20 Residential (1)8 40 32 1 6 5 4 Moderate No 0.42 1988 High Resource 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 114 LOWELL AV 94301 12417040 0.17 MF RM‐20 Residential (1)8 40 32 1 6 5 4 Moderate No 0.45 1985 High Resource 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes ARASTRADERO RD 94306 13724019 0.23 CS CS (AD) One story auto dealership (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate No High Resource Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes EL CAMINO REAL 94304 14220079 0.19 CS CS Vacant 40 32 0 7 6 6 Moderate No High Resource Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3265 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13238020 0.17 CS CS Surface parking, vacant 40 32 0 6 5 5 Moderate No 0.00 1960 High Resource Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3160 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 14220055 0.29 CS CS Residential (2)40 32 2 11 9 7 Moderate No 0.15 1950 High Resource Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3780 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13711098 0.24 CN CN One story retail (FAR: 0.4)40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate Yes 0.13 1950 High Resource Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 4113 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13246116 0.21 CN CN One story restaurant (FAR: 0.4)40 32 0 8 6 6 Moderate No 1.09 1990 High Resource Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 4115 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13246100 0.35 CN CN Vacant 40 32 0 14 11 11 Moderate No 1.04 1965 High Resource Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3585 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13240058 0.14 CN CN Misc. use 40 32 0 5 4 4 Moderate No 0.32 1946 High Resource Yes Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3960 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13711080 0.11 CN CN One story office space (FAR: 0.8)40 32 0 4 3 3 Moderate No 0.62 1952 High Resource Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3924 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13711084 0.16 CN CN Commercial (FAR: 0.98) office space 40 32 0 6 5 5 Moderate No 0.57 1934 High Resource Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3916 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13711087 0.16 CN CN Auto dealership (0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 6 5 5 Moderate No 0.34 1963 High Resource Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3878 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13711082 0.11 CN CN One story restaurant (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 4 3 3 Moderate No 0.85 1940 High Resource Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3876 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13711081 0.11 CN CN One story retail (FAR: 0.8)40 32 0 4 3 3 Moderate No 1.18 1960 High Resource Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3870 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13711077 0.12 CN CN One story retail (FAR: 0.8)40 32 0 4 3 3 Moderate No 0.93 1963 High Resource Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3864 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13711089 0.18 CN CN One story restaurant (FAR: 0.5)40 32 0 7 5 5 Moderate No 1.19 1956 High Resource Yes Frequent Bus Routes ‐ Moderate Income 3.31 92 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 4101 WISTERIA LN 94306 13737031 0.10 MF RM‐20 Residential (1)8 40 32 1 3 3 2 Above Moderate No 1.25 1999 High Resource 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 16 CHURCHILL AV 94306 12424026 0.14 MF RM‐20 Residential (1)8 40 32 1 5 4 3 Above Moderate No 0.20 1945 High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 12 CHURCHILL AV 94306 12424025 0.14 MF RM‐20 Residential (2)8 40 32 2 5 4 2 Above Moderate No 0.09 1945 High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 22 CHURCHILL AV 94306 12424027 0.14 MF RM‐20 Residential (1)8 40 32 1 5 4 3 Above Moderate No 0.73 1945 High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 211 MANZANITA AV 94306 12424008 0.14 MF RM‐20 Residential (1)8 40 32 1 5 4 3 Above Moderate No 0.99 1937 High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 105 LOWELL AV 94301 12417035 0.11 MF RM‐20 Residential (1)8 40 32 1 4 3 2 Above Moderate No 0.11 1948 High Resource 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes Lambert Avenue 94306 13238018 0.23 CS CS Surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate No 0.03 1955 High Resource Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3897 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13241086 0.36 CS CS One story car wash (FAR: 0.2)40 32 0 14 11 11 Above Moderate No 0.52 2000 High Resource Yes Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 4143 EL CAMINO WY 94306 13246077 0.11 CN CN Residential (1)40 32 1 4 3 2 Above Moderate No 0.88 1940 High Resource Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13711074 0.12 CN CN Surface parking 40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate No High Resource Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3760 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13711079 0.12 CN CN Surface parking 40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate No 0.04 High Resource Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3505 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13240060 0.14 CN CN Two story office space (FAR: 0.3)40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 1.26 1950 High Resource Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3545 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13240063 0.14 CN CN One story retail (FAR: 0.4)40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 1.34 1969 High Resource Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 4117 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13246105 0.16 CN CN One story office space (FAR: 0.2), surface parking 40 32 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate No 0.85 1983 High Resource Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 4131 EL CAMINO WY 94306 13244010 0.16 CN CN One story restaurant (FAR: 0.4) surface parking 40 32 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate No 0.43 1956 High Resource Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 4125 EL CAMINO WY 94306 13244012 0.18 CN CN One story art school (FAR: 0.7)40 32 0 7 5 5 Above Moderate No 1.11 1955 High Resource Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes EL CAMINO WY 94306 13244090 0.09 CN CN Surface parking 40 32 0 3 2 2 Above Moderate No 1900 High Resource Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3487 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13239078 0.20 CN CN Two story retail (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 7 6 6 Above Moderate No 0.60 1963 High Resource Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3457 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13239077 0.15 CN CN One story retail (FAR: 0.6)40 32 0 6 4 4 Above Moderate No 1.11 1950 High Resource Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3944 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13711085 0.22 CN CN Two story office space (FAR: 0.5) 40 32 0 8 7 7 Above Moderate No 0.49 1987 High Resource Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 4123 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13246103 0.20 CN CN One story restaurant (FAR: 0.3)surface parking 40 32 0 8 6 6 Above Moderate No 0.64 1960 High Resource Yes Frequent Bus Routes ‐ Above Moderate Income 3.36 89 Frequent Bus Routes ‐ Total 9.64 274 Transit Corridor Sites ATTACHMENT B 3.b Packet Pg. 28 DR A F T Category/Strategy Site Address or Street Zip Code APN Acres General Plan Zoning Current Use Minimum Density Allowed (du/ac) Maximum Density Allowed (du/ac) Realistic Allowable Density (du/ac) Existing Units Maximum Capacity Realistic Capacity Potential Minus Existing Income Category Publicly Owned Included in 5th Cycle HE ILR Year Built Floodzone TCAC Opportun ity Area WG Member Who Recommended Site Retail Preservation Within 150' Buffer Historic Resource Status Notes Faith‐Based Institutions (surface parking/vacant space) 1985 Louis Rd 94303 00350022 1.09 SF R‐1 Faith‐based insitution 30 24 0 32 26 26 Lower No High Resource Yes Faith‐Based Institutions (surface parking/vacant space) 1140 Cowper St 94301 12018048 0.61 SF R‐1 Faith‐based insitution 30 24 0 18 14 14 Lower No High Resource Yes Category 2; Professorville (Designation applies to 457 building only) Faith‐Based Institutions (surface parking/vacant space) 2890 Middlefield Rd 94306 13203193 0.76 SF R‐1 Faith‐based insitution 30 24 0 22 18 18 Lower No High Resource Yes Faith‐Based Institutions (surface parking/vacant space)3149 Waverley St 94306 13220161 0.69 SF R‐1 Faith‐based insitution 30 24 0 20 16 16 Lower No High Resource Yes Faith‐Based Institutions (surface parking/vacant space) 3505 Middlefield Rd 94306 12747042 1.50 SF R‐1 Faith‐based insitution 30 24 0 45 36 36 Lower No High Resource Yes Faith‐Based Institutions ‐ Lower Income 4.65 110 Faith‐Based Institutions (surface parking/vacant space) 625 Hamilton Ave 94301 12003056 0.21 MF RM‐40 Faith‐based insitution 31 30 24 0 6 5 5 Moderate No High Resource Yes Faith‐Based Institutions (surface parking/vacant space) 2490 Middlefield Rd 94301 13201083 0.46 SF R‐1 Faith‐based insitution 30 24 0 13 11 11 Moderate No High Resource Yes Faith‐Based Institutions (surface parking/vacant space)687 Arastradero Rd 94306 16704013 0.26 SF R‐1 Faith‐based insitution 30 24 0 7 6 6 Moderate No High Resource Yes Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998 Faith‐Based Institutions (surface parking/vacant space) 865 Stanford Ave 94306 13702088 0.46 SF R‐1 Faith‐based insitution 30 24 0 13 11 11 Moderate No High Resource Yes Faith‐Based Institutions (surface parking/vacant space) 1611 Standford Ave 94306 13707040 0.21 SF R‐1 Faith‐based insitution 30 24 0 6 5 5 Moderate No High Resource Yes Faith‐Based Institutions ‐ Moderate Income 1.60 38 Frequent Bus Routes ‐ Total 6.25 148 FFaith Based Institution Sites ATTACHMENT B 3.b Packet Pg. 29 DR A F T Category/Strategy Site Address or Street Zip Code APN Acres General Plan Zoning Current Use Minimum Density Allowed (du/ac) Maximum Density Allowed (du/ac) Realistic Allowable Density (du/ac) Existing Units Maximum Capacity Realistic Capacity Potential Minus Existing Income Category Publicly Owned Included in 5th Cycle HE ILR Year Built Floodzone TCAC Opportunity Area WG Member Who Recommended Site Retail Preservation Within 150' Buffer Historic Resource Status Notes Downtown City Parking Lot HIGH ST 94301 12026027 0.54 CC PF Surface parking 50 40 0 27 21 21 Lower City Owned No High Resource Downtown City Parking Lot LYTTON AVE 94301 12014088 0.85 CC PF Surface parking 50 40 0 42 34 34 Lower City Owned No High Resource Downtown City Parking Lot HAMILTON AVE 94301 12015086 0.64 CC PF Surface parking 50 40 0 32 25 25 Lower City Owned No High Resource Downtown City Parking Lot COWPER ST 94301 12015073 0.67 CC PF Surface parking 50 40 0 33 26 26 Lower City Owned No High Resource California Ave. City Parking Lot SHERMAN AVE 94301 12433007 1.00 CC PF Surface parking 50 40 0 50 40 40 Lower City Owned No High Resource California Ave. City Parking Lot CAMBRIDGE AVE 94301 12432055 0.56 CC PF(R) Surface parking 50 40 0 28 22 22 Lower City Owned No High Resource City Owned Parking Lots ‐ Lower Income 4.26 168 City Owned Parking Lot Sites ATTACHMENT B 3.b Packet Pg. 30 DR A F T Category/Strategy Site Address or Street Zip Code APN Acres General Plan Zoning Current Use Minimum Density Allowed (du/ac) Maximum Density Allowed (du/ac) Realistic Allowable Density (du/ac) Existing Units Maximum Capacity Realistic Capacity Potential Minus Existing Income Category Publicly Owned Included in 5th Cycle HE ILR Year Built Floodzone TCAC Opportunity Area WG Member Who Recommended Site Retail Preservation Within 150' Buffer Historic Resource Status Notes WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)950 INDUSTRIAL ST 94303 14701061 0.54 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 40 32 0 21 17 17 Lower No 0.37 1972 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl, Arthur Keller WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)923 INDUSTRIAL AV 94303 14701048 0.60 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 24 19 19 Lower No 1.16 1956 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl, Arthur Keller WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)937 INDUSTRIAL AV 94303 14701086 0.57 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.0), surface parking 40 32 0 22 18 18 Lower No 0.21 1957 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl, Arthur Keller WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)990 COMMERCIAL ST 94303 14701041 0.79 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 31 25 25 Lower No 1.00 1999 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl, Arthur Keller WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)4030 FABIAN WY 94303 12715010 0.55 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.2), surface parking 40 32 0 22 17 17 Lower No 0.93 1959 X High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)TRANSPORT ST 94303 14702017 0.66 LI GM Surface parking 40 32 0 26 21 21 Lower No 0.00 N/A AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)1001 San Antonio Rd 94303 98486003 1.84 LI GM Garden retail 40 32 0 73 58 58 Lower No 0.00 N/A X High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)3940 Fabian Wy 94303 12737023 1.27 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 50 40 40 Lower No 0.51 1991 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)3960 Fabian Wy 94303 12737019 0.68 LI GM One story vacant office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 27 21 21 Lower No 0.45 1995 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)3980 Fabian Wy 94303 12737018 0.69 LI GM One story vacant office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 27 22 22 Lower No 1.01 1995 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)811 E Charleston Rd 94303 12737016 0.54 LI GM One story auto repair (FAR: 0.2), surface parking 40 32 0 21 17 17 Lower No 0.21 1972 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)4045 TRANSPORT ST 94303 14701070 0.54 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 21 17 17 Lower No 1.26 1957 AE10.6 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)4007 TRANSPORT ST 94303 14701097 0.54 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 21 17 17 Lower No 1.26 1957 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)4083 TRANSPORT ST 94303 14701116 0.51 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.0), surface parking 40 32 0 20 16 16 Lower No 1.50 1980 AE10.5 Keith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)1035 E Meadow Circle 94303 12710056 1.00 RO ROLM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 40 32 32 Lower No 0.54 2014 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)1051 E Meadow Circle 94303 12710082 1.07 RO ROLM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 42 34 34 Lower No 0.42 2014 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)1053 E MEADOW CL 94303 12710081 1.60 RO ROLM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 64 51 51 Lower No 0.42 1970 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)1085 E Meadow Circle 94303 12710110 1.43 RO ROLM One story office space (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 57 45 45 Lower No 0.28 1975 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)3600 W Bayshore Rd 94303 12710076 2.08 RO ROLM Two story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 83 66 66 Lower No 1.12 1990 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)3500 W Bayshore Rd 94303 12736031 1.40 RO ROLM Two story office space (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 56 44 44 Lower No 0.84 1980 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)3460 W Bayshore Rd 94303 12736029 1.49 RO ROLM Two story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 59 47 47 Lower No 1.00 1970 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)3350 W Bayshore Rd 94303 12736040 3.96 RO ROLM Two story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking, vacant 40 32 0 158 126 126 Lower No 0.67 1983 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)1020 E Meadow Circle 94303 12710103 2.50 RO ROLM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 99 79 79 Lower No 0.40 1975 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)1036 E Meadow Circle 94303 12710094 3.06 RO ROLM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 122 97 97 Lower No 0.58 1965 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)1050 E Meadow Circle 94303 12710099 2.62 RO ROLM Two story office space (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 104 83 83 Lower No 0.44 1968 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)1052 E Meadow Circle 94303 12710084 0.94 RO ROLM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 37 30 30 Lower No 0.48 1969 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)1060 E Meadow Circle 94303 12710049 1.13 RO ROLM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 45 36 36 Lower No 0.77 1964 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)1066 E Meadow Circle 94303 12710050 2.15 RO ROLM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 85 68 68 Lower No 0.89 1976 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)1068 E Meadow Circle 94303 12710051 1.00 RO ROLM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 40 32 32 Lower No 0.60 1974 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)1076 E Meadow Circle 94303 12710072 1.00 RO ROLM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 40 32 32 Lower No 0.71 1961 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM) ‐ Lower Income 38.74 1227 WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)951 Commercial St 94303 14701095 0.50 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 20 16 16 Moderate No 0.72 1957 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)937 Commercial St 94303 14701023 0.32 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 12 10 10 Moderate No 1.00 1956 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)895 Commercial St 94303 14701025 0.28 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 11 8 8 Moderate No 1.06 1956 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)855 Commercial St 94303 14701101 0.31 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 12 9 9 Moderate No 0.31 1955 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)845 Commercial St 94303 14701102 0.24 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate No 0.78 1959 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)998 SAN ANTONIO RD 94303 14701011 0.23 LI GM Faith based institution 40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate No 0.64 1979 AE10.5 High ResourceArthur Keller WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)916 SAN ANTONIO AV 94303 14701008 0.33 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 13 10 10 Moderate No 0.91 1974 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)900 SAN ANTONIO AV 94303 14701118 0.46 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 0.9), surface parking 40 32 0 18 14 14 Moderate No 0.94 1986 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)864 SAN ANTONIO RD 94303 14701104 0.36 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 14 11 11 Moderate No 0.29 1955 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)856 SAN ANTONIO RD 94303 14701113 0.22 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 0.9), surface parking 40 32 0 8 7 7 Moderate No 0.61 1957 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)850 SAN ANTONIO RD 94303 14701112 0.45 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.8), surface parking 40 32 0 17 14 14 Moderate No 1.13 1954 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)Fabian Wy 94303 12737007 0.45 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.0), surface parking 40 32 0 18 14 14 Moderate No 0.00 N/A AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)Fabian Wy 94303 12737005 0.40 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 16 12 12 Moderate No 0.00 N/A AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)3997 Fabian Wy 94303 12737003 0.28 LI GM Surface parking 40 32 0 11 8 8 Moderate No 0.00 N/A AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)E Charleston Rd 94303 12737002 0.22 LI GM Surface parking 40 32 0 8 7 7 Moderate No 0.00 N/A AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)849 E Charleston Rd 94303 12737001 0.23 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate No 0.47 1959 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)830 E Charleston Rd 94303 12715049 0.27 LI GM One story auto repair (FAR: 0.2), surface parking 40 32 0 10 8 8 Moderate No 0.25 1961 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)860 E Charleston Rd 94303 12715002 0.23 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate No 1.11 1956 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)4055 Fabian Wy 94303 12715006 0.23 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate No 0.69 1957 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)870 E Charleston Rd 94303 12715003 0.46 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.2), surface parking 40 32 0 18 14 14 Moderate No 0.77 2005 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)835 San Antonio Rd 94303 12715004 0.40 LI GM Gas station (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 15 12 12 Moderate No 0.05 1968 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)825 San Antonio Rd #A 94303 12715005 0.21 LI GM Two story vacant office space (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 8 6 6 Moderate No 1.17 1958 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)821 San Antonio Rd 94303 12715046 0.32 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.4), surface parking 40 32 0 12 10 10 Moderate No 1.20 1955 X High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)809 SAN ANTONIO RD 94303 12715050 0.37 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.4), surface parking 40 32 0 14 11 11 Moderate No 0.89 1956 X High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)801 San Antonio Rd 94303 12715041 0.20 LI GM Faith‐based insitution (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 40 32 0 7 6 6 Moderate No 1.43 1957 X High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)799 San Antonio Rd 94303 12715042 0.23 LI GM One story restaurant (FAR: 0.2), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate No 0.76 1960 X High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)797 San Antonio Rd 94303 12715043 0.23 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate No 1.43 1962 X High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM) ‐ Moderate Income 8.42 256 WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)San Antonio Rd 94303 14701105 0.10 LI GM Vacant 40 32 0 3 3 3 Above Moderate No 0.00 N/A AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)4075 TRANSPORT ST 94303 14701079 0.16 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate No 0.39 1957 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)989 Commercial St 94303 14701016 0.19 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 0 7 6 6 Above Moderate No 1.13 1958 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl, Arthur Keller WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)977 Commercial St 94303 14701018 0.19 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 0 7 6 6 Above Moderate No 1.46 1957 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl, Arthur Keller WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)876 SAN ANTONIO AV 94303 14701005 0.17 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate No 1.00 1955 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)4067 Transport St 94303 14701099 0.25 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 0 10 8 8 Above Moderate No 1.08 1959 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)4051 TRANSPORT ST 94303 14701068 0.26 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.4), surface parking 40 32 0 10 8 8 Above Moderate No 0.77 1957 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)4047 TRANSPORT ST 94303 14701069 0.25 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate No 0.48 1956 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)4039 TRANSPORT ST 94303 14701072 0.23 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate No 0.33 1959 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)4035 TRANSPORT ST 94303 14701073 0.23 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate No 0.63 1958 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)4019 TRANSPORT ST 94303 14701096 0.31 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.2), surface parking 40 32 0 12 9 9 Above Moderate No 0.35 1958 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)4030 TRANSPORT ST 94303 14701013 0.45 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.2), surface parking 40 32 0 17 14 14 Above Moderate No 1.13 1954 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)999 Commercial St 94303 14701122 0.30 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 0.9), surface parking 40 32 0 11 9 9 Above Moderate No 1.00 1966 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl, Arthur Keller WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)991 Commercial St 94303 14701123 0.35 LI GM One story preschool (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 14 11 11 Above Moderate No 0.79 2005 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl, Arthur Keller WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)4041 TRANSPORT ST 94303 14701071 0.23 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate No 1.50 1959 AE10.5 Keith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)2490 E CHARLESTON RD 94303 14701052 0.41 LI GM One story auto repair (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 40 32 0 16 13 13 Above Moderate No 0.00 1956 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl, Arthur Keller WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)904 INDUSTRIAL AV 94303 14701053 0.32 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.0), surface parking 40 32 0 12 10 10 Above Moderate No 0.50 1959 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl, Arthur Keller WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)918 INDUSTRIAL AV 94303 14701098 0.41 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.0), surface parking 40 32 0 16 13 13 Above Moderate No 1.20 1959 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl, Arthur Keller WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)936 INDUSTRIAL AV 94303 14701059 0.24 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.0), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate No 0.86 1957 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl, Arthur Keller GM and ROLM Sites ATTACHMENT B 3.b Packet Pg. 31 DR A F T WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)940 INDUSTRIAL AV 94303 14701060 0.24 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.0), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate No 0.50 1958 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl, Arthur Keller WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)919 INDUSTRIAL AV 94303 14701087 0.24 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate No 1.02 1957 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl, Arthur Keller WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)947 INDUSTRIAL AV 94303 14701085 0.24 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate No 0.75 1957 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl, Arthur Keller WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)949 INDUSTRIAL AV 94303 14701043 0.24 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate No 0.84 1957 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl, Arthur Keller WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)974 COMMERCIAL ST 94303 14701040 0.35 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 14 11 11 Above Moderate No 0.10 1959 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl, Arthur Keller WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)966 COMMERCIAL ST 94303 14701039 0.24 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate No 1.06 1956 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl, Arthur Keller WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)952 COMMERCIAL ST 94303 14701038 0.30 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 12 9 9 Above Moderate No 1.36 1957 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl, Arthur Keller WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)936 COMMERCIAL ST 94303 14701077 0.26 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.2), surface parking 40 32 0 10 8 8 Above Moderate No 0.40 1957 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl, Arthur Keller WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)COMMERCIAL ST 94303 14701114 0.24 LI GM Surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate No 0.00 N/A AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl, Arthur Keller WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)892 COMMERCIAL ST 94303 14701032 0.24 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate No 1.12 1955 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl, Arthur Keller WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)882 COMMERCIAL ST 94303 14701030 0.40 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 16 12 12 Above Moderate No 1.10 1999 AE10.5 High ResourceKeith Reckdahl, Arthur Keller WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)‐ Above Moderate Income 8.04 244 WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM) ‐ Total 55.19 1727 ATTACHMENT B 3.b Packet Pg. 32 DR A F T Category/Strategy Site Address or Street Zip Code APN Acres General Plan Zoning Current Use Minimum Density Allowed (du/ac) Maximum Density Allowed (du/ac) Realistic Allowabl e Density (du/ac) Existing Units Maximu m Capacity Realistic Capacity Potential Minus Existing Income Category Publicly Owned Included in 5th Cycle HE ILR Year Built Floodzone TCAC Opportu nity Area WG Member Who Recommended Site Retail Preservation Within 150' Buffer Historic Resource Status Notes Stanford Sites Pasteur Drive + 1100 Welch Road 14223026 2.30 MISP;MF RM‐40 Portable structures, surface parking 31 40 32 0 425 Above Moderate No X Stanford Sites Palo Alto Transit Center 12031021, 12031010 4.50 MISP PF Transit center & hisotric building (MacArthur Park)30 24 0 180 Above Moderate No X Category 1Currently not being considered Stanford Sites 3128 El Camino Real 94306 14220035, 1.23 CS CS One story fast food restaurant (FAR: 0.2), surface parking 30 24 0 220 Above Moderate Yes 0.94 1974 X Stanford Sites 3300 El Camino Real 2.88 40 32 92 Stanford Sites‐ Above Moderate Income 8.03 917 Stanford Sites ‐ Total 8.03 917 Stanford University Sites ATTACHMENT B 3.b Packet Pg. 33 DR A F T Category/Strategy Site Address or Street Acres General Plan Zoning Current Use Minimum Density Allowed (du/ac) Maximum Density Allowed (du/ac) Realistic Allowable Density (du/ac) Existing Units Maximum Capacity Realistic Capacity Potential Minus Existing Income Category Publicly Owned Included in 5th Cycle HE ILR Year Built Floodzone TCAC Opportunity Area WG Member Who Recommended Site Retail Preservat ion Within 150' Buffer Historic Resource Status Notes Staff Suggested Sites 2951 EL CAMINO REAL 0.33 CS CS One story office space (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 13 11 0.63 1975 X Staff Suggested Sites 300 LAMBERT AV 0.32 CS CS One story auto repair (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 13 10 0.94 1970 X Staff Suggested Sites 525 CHARLESTON Rd.0.78 MISP PF One story office space (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 40 32 31 25 X Staff Suggested Sites 955 ALMA ST 0.24 SOFA II CART‐35 Vacant one story office space (FAR: 0.8)40 32 10 8 1.65 1947 X Staff Suggested Sites 660 University, 511 Byron St. 0.14 MF RM‐15 Two story office space (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 6 4 2.6 1950 X Staff Suggested Sites 980 Middlefield 0.51 MF PC‐2152 One story office space (FAR: 0.8)40 32 20 16 1951 X Staff Suggested Sites 550 Hamilton 1.32 CC PC‐2545 three story office space (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 53 42 0.85 1971 X Staff Suggested Sites ‐ Above Moderate Income 116 0 Staff Suggested Sites ‐ Total 0 Staff Suggested Sites ATTACHMENT B 3.b Packet Pg. 34 DR A F T Category/Strategy Site Address or Street Zip Code APN Consolidated Acres Potential Minus Existing Income Category Publicly Owned Included in 5th Cycle HE ILR Year Built Floodzone TCAC Opportunity Area WG Member Who Recommended Site Retail Preservation Within 150' Buffer Historic Resource Status Notes MFA 411 FOREST AV 94301 12016017 JJ 0.20 5 Lower No 0.50 1905 X High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 MFA 421 FOREST AV 94301 12016016 JJ 0.31 8 Lower No 0.45 1939 X High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 MFA 654 HIGH ST 94301 12027038 PPP 0.32 10 Lower Yes 1.89 1958 X High Resource Yes MFA 420 Cowper St 94301 12015013 DD 0.25 8 Lower Yes 6.80 1952 X High Resource Yes MFA 469 University Av 94301 12015015 DD 0.34 10 Lower Yes 1.71 1946 X High Resource MFA 882 Emerson St 94301 12028038 JJJ 0.25 10 Lower Yes 8.86 1960 X High Resource MFA 728 EMERSON ST 94301 12027074 HHH 0.16 6 Lower No 0.77 1924 X High Resource SOFA II Potential Historic Resource; Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 MFA 700 Emerson St 94301 12027048 HHH 0.24 9 Lower Yes 1.55 1989 X High Resource MFA 774 Emerson St 94301 12027075 HHH 0.48 19 Lower Yes 1.76 1947 X High Resource MFA 930 Emerson St 94301 12028086 KKK 0.25 10 Lower Yes 2.05 1963 X High Resource MFA ‐ Lower Income 2.80 95 MFA 330 WAVERLEY ST 94301 12014087 0.17 2 Moderate No 0.25 1902 X High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 MFA 2110 YALE ST 94306 13701064 0.32 3 Moderate No 0.32 1916 X High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 MFA 616 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12003039 Q 0.07 2 Moderate No 0.24 1938 AH47 High Resource MFA 600 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12003038 Q 0.22 7 Moderate Yes 0.22 1932 AH47 High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 MFA 542 WEBSTER ST 94301 12003060 Z 0.11 2 Moderate No 0.21 1924 AH46 High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 MFA 523 WEBSTER ST 94301 12003057 0.17 4 Moderate No 0.18 1918 AH46.3 High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 MFA 419 WAVERLEY ST 94301 12015037 EE 0.09 2 Moderate No 0.35 1908 X High Resource Yes Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 MFA 565 HAMILTON AV 94301 12003062 Z 0.17 4 Moderate No 0.01 1904 AH45.9 High Resource Yes Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 MFA 512 HAMILTON AV 94301 12004002 AA 0.10 3 Moderate No 0.03 1921 X High Resource Yes Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 MFA 518 HAMILTON AV 94301 12004003 AA 0.10 2 Moderate No 0.04 1921 X High Resource Yes Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 MFA 610 COWPER ST 94301 12016009 II 0.17 5 Moderate No 0.63 1898 X High Resource Yes Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 MFA 525 HAMILTON AV 94301 12003065 0.13 4 Moderate No 1.32 1898 X High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 MFA 352 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12015103 0.34 10 Moderate Yes 2.50 1949 X High Resource Yes MFA 568 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12003037 0.22 7 Moderate Yes 3.45 1961 X High Resource Yes MFA 150 FOREST AV 94301 12027046 0.37 14 Moderate Yes 1.64 1929 X High Resource MFA 831 HIGH ST 94301 12028041 JJJ 0.12 4 Moderate No 1.38 1947 X High Resource SOFA II Potential Historic Resource; Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 MFA 801 HIGH ST 94301 12028003 JJJ 0.13 5 Moderate Yes 1.55 1935 X High Resource MFA ‐ Moderate Income 3.01 80 MFA ‐ Total 5.80 175 WG Suggestions 762 San Antonio Rd 94303 14705102 0.93 22 Lower No 2.95 1989 X High Resource Keith Reckdahl WG ‐ Lower Income 0.93 22 WG Suggestions 2045 El Camino Real 94306 12431022 0.07 1 Moderate No 1.81 1955 X High Resource Keith Reckdahl WG Suggestions 461 Page Mill Rd 94306 13237015 0.15 2 Moderate No 2.62 1972 X High Resource Keith Reckdahl WG Suggestions 560 College Av 94306 13701035 0.07 1 Moderate No 0.18 1910 X High Resource Keith Reckdahl WG Suggestions 2086 El Camino Real 94306 13701024 0.07 1 Moderate No 0.96 1928 X High Resource Keith Reckdahl WG Suggestions 790 SAN ANTONIO AV 94303 14703042 0.49 11 Moderate No 1.96 1967 X High Resource Keith Reckdahl WG Suggestions 2999 El Camino Real 94306 13237030 0.16 3 Moderate No 3.93 1992 X High Resource Keith Reckdahl Yes WG Suggestions 1707 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 12425052 0.26 8 Moderate No 4.40 1994 X High Resource Keith Reckdahl WG Suggestions 2325 El Camino Real 94306 12432048 E 0.09 2 Moderate No 1.76 1949 X High Resource Keith Reckdahl WG Suggestions 2335 El Camino Real 94306 12432047 E 0.12 3 Moderate No 1.29 1964 X High Resource Keith Reckdahl WG Suggestions 151 HOMER AV 94301 12027076 0.30 12 Moderate No 2.08 1988 X High Resource Rahsan Hosgur Karahan WG ‐ Above Moderate Income 1.79 44 WG ‐ Total 2.71 66 Upzone 3400 El Camino Real 94301 13708083 0.96 23 Lower Yes 3.11 1957 X High Resource Yes Yes Upzone 132 EMERSON ST 94301 12024021 CCC 0.24 4 Lower No 0.01 1926 X High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone 657 HOMER AV 94301 12004056 U 0.23 4 Lower No 0.17 1900 X High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone 4119 El Camino Wy 94306 13246106 RRRRR 0.25 6 Lower Yes 2.42 1953 X High Resource Yes Upzone 4139 El Camino Wy 94306 13244100 SSSSS 0.75 18 Lower Yes 5.24 1967 X High Resource Yes Upzone 3886 EL CAMINO REAL 94301 13711083 PPPPP 0.32 7 Lower Yes 1.54 1956 X High Resource Yes Upzone 315 COLLEGE AV 94306 12428014 NNNN 0.20 5 Lower No 0.34 1938 X High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone 628 HAMILTON AV 94301 12004008 T 0.29 8 Lower No 0.20 1939 AH44.7 High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone 543 HOMER AV 94301 12004076 CC 0.31 8 Lower No 0.02 1901 X High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone 563 HOMER AV 94301 12004075 CC 0.29 8 Lower No 0.29 1918 X High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone 569 HOMER AV 94301 12004074 CC 0.23 6 Lower No 0.00 1895 X High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone 450 STANFORD AV 94306 12430014 FFFF 0.23 6 Lower No 0.50 1910 X High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone 729 WAVERLEY ST 94301 12016059 KK 0.23 6 Lower No 0.53 1904 X High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone 627 WEBSTER ST 94301 12004024 T 0.23 6 Lower No 0.09 1903 AH44.1 High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone 635 WEBSTER ST 94301 12004023 T 0.23 6 Lower No 0.12 1903 AH43.8 High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone 531 Stanford Av 94306 13701121 HHHH 0.40 12 Lower Yes 2.73 1955 X High Resource Upzone 400 Forest Av 94301 12016041 KK 0.45 14 Lower Yes 1.61 1975 X High Resource Upzone 3885 El Camino Real 94301 13241096 NNNNN 0.47 15 Lower Yes 3.51 1966 X High Resource Yes Yes Upzone 415 Lambert Av 94306 13239090 GGGGG 0.51 16 Lower Yes 3.44 1977 X High Resource Yes Upzone 430 Lambert Av 94306 13238056 FFFFF 1.03 32 Lower Yes 4.49 1961 X High Resource Yes Upzone 435/455 Portage Av 94306 13238067 FFFFF 0.45 14 Lower Yes 6.79 2013 X High Resource Yes Upzone 435 Acacia Av 94306 13238062 DDDDD 0.62 19 Lower Yes 7.47 1956 X High Resource Yes Upzone 800‐802 San Antonio Ave 94303 14703038 XXXXX 0.43 13 Lower Yes 1.64 1960 X High Resource MFA Sites (No‐Rezone) Rezone Sites Proposed Reserve List of Sites ATTACHMENT B 3.b Packet Pg. 35 DR A F T Upzone 445 Lambert Av 94306 13239071 GGGGG 0.45 14 Lower Yes 0.24 1960 X High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone 3250 Ash St 94306 13238046 FFFFF 0.38 12 Lower Yes 0.38 1940 X High Resource Yes Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone ‐ Lower Income 10.17 282 Upzone 177 BRYANT ST 94301 12012027 0.35 7 Moderate No 0.29 1913 X High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone 185 BRYANT ST 94301 12012025 0.23 4 Moderate No 0.37 1922 X High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone 109 COLERIDGE AV 94301 12416085 0.28 5 Moderate No 0.35 1925 X High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone 326 HAWTHORNE AV 94301 12014132 0.29 6 Moderate No 0.15 1922 X High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone 342 HAWTHORNE AV 94301 12014128 0.21 4 Moderate No 0.41 1926 X High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone 1502 MADRONO AV 94306 12424029 0.20 3 Moderate No 0.75 1945 X High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone 126 SEALE AV 94301 12418052 0.23 4 Moderate No 0.08 1965 X High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone 102 TENNYSON AV 94301 12418001 0.23 4 Moderate No 0.11 1923 X High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone 149 ALMA ST 94301 12024013 0.23 6 Moderate No 0.22 1917 X High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone 121 EMERSON ST 94301 12024029 0.23 6 Moderate No 0.13 1912 X High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone 521 EVERETT AV 94301 12002048 0.23 6 Moderate No 0.40 1932 AH53.6 High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone 620 HOMER AV 94301 12005099 0.21 5 Moderate No 0.66 1928 X High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone 415 OXFORD AV 94306 12431065 0.23 6 Moderate No 0.75 1924 X High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone 235 RAMONA ST 94301 12025013 SS 0.16 4 Moderate No 0.82 1922 X High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone 275 COWPER ST 94301 12002050 0.15 3 Moderate No 0.92 1904 X High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone 759 COWPER ST 94301 12004080 0.15 3 Moderate No 0.55 1923 X High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone 205 EVERETT AV 94301 12025024 WW 0.13 3 Moderate No 1.00 1921 X High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone 271 EVERETT AV 94301 12025008 0.15 3 Moderate No 0.69 1938 X High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone 609 HOMER AV 94301 12004062 V 0.16 4 Moderate No 0.91 1919 X High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone 319 RAMONA ST 94301 12025083 0.16 4 Moderate No 0.10 1918 X High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone 601 WEBSTER ST 94301 12004006 S 0.17 4 Moderate No 0.35 1901 AH44.7 High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone 611 WEBSTER ST 94301 12004026 S 0.16 4 Moderate No 0.35 1906 AH44.5 High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone 751 WEBSTER ST 94301 12004063 V 0.16 4 Moderate No 0.07 1903 X High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone 617 HOMER AV 94301 12004061 V 0.13 3 Moderate No 0.31 1926 X High Resource Considered for the NRHP in 1998‐evaluation details on DPR form; Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone 425 HOMER AV 94301 12016055 0.29 8 Moderate No 0.28 1900 X High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone 3275 Ash St 94306 13238011 0.27 8 Moderate Yes 2.48 1900 X;ACr High Resource Yes Upzone 4200 El Camino Real 94301 16708035 0.48 15 Moderate Yes 2.22 1981 X High Resource Yes Yes Upzone 81 ENCINA AV 94301 12033002 UUU 0.13 4 Moderate No 0.80 1947 X High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Upzone 410 Sherman Av 94306 12433005 VVVV 0.24 7 Moderate Yes 4.17 1956 X High Resource Upzone 470 Cambridge Av 94306 12432013 KKKK 0.23 7 Moderate Yes 1.65 0 X High Resource Yes Upzone ‐ Moderate Income 6.47 154 Upzone ‐ Total 16.64 436 Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San A101 FERNE AV 94306 14732050 1.20 37 Lower No 2.70 0 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San A425 SHERMAN AV 94306 12433065 BBBBB 0.23 7 Lower No 14.09 1962 High Resource Yes Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San A451 SHERMAN AV 94306 12433042 BBBBB 0.28 8 Lower No 4.67 1900 High Resource Yes Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San A429 ACACIA AV 94306 13238069 DDDDD 0.31 9 Lower No 4.30 1956 High Resource Yes Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San A3127 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13238070 DDDDD 1.60 51 Lower No 6.23 1951 High Resource Yes Yes Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San A550 CALIFORNIA AV 94306 13701130 TTTT 0.72 22 Lower No 2.04 1970 High Resource Yes 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 4243 ALMA ST 94306 14732015 0.62 24 Lower No 15.41 0 High Resource 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 145 N CALIFORNIA AV 94301 12420036 BBBB 0.22 8 Lower No 2.05 1955 High Resource 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 240 CAMBRIDGE AV 94306 12428004 PPPP 0.09 3 Lower No 0.99 1947 High Resource Yes 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2460 PARK BL 94306 12429002 AAAAA 0.14 5 Lower No 2.75 1953 High Resource 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 419 HIGH ST 94301 12026034 GGG 0.18 7 Lower No 24.26 1999 High Resource Yes 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 127 LYTTON AV 94301 12025110 NNN 0.11 4 Lower No 2.97 1946 High Resource Yes Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 131 LYTTON AV 94301 12025109 NNN 0.13 5 Lower No 3.62 1950 High Resource Yes 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 181 LYTTON AV 94301 12025132 FFF 0.35 13 Lower No 2.31 1981 High Resource Yes 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 130 LYTTON AV 94301 12026101 NNN 0.36 14 Lower No 2.37 1982 High Resource Yes 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 247 ALMA ST 94301 12025153 LLL 0.58 23 Lower No 28.67 1967 High Resource Yes Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998 Caltrain Station ‐ Lower Income 7.12 240 Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 327 HAWTHORNE AV 94301 12012020 LL 0.25 5 Moderate No 0.85 0 High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 250 EMERSON ST 94301 12025038 DDD 0.11 2 Moderate No 1.06 1911 High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 158 EMERSON ST 94301 12024024 DDD 0.13 3 Moderate No 0.15 1926 High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 213 EMERSON ST 94301 12025029 VV 0.13 3 Moderate No 0.98 1900 High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 205 EMERSON ST 94301 12025030 VV 0.13 3 Moderate No 0.14 1900 High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 (Demolished) 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 312 EMERSON ST 94301 12025092 EEE 0.13 3 Moderate No 0.34 1903 High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 340 BRYANT ST 94301 12025072 TT 0.13 3 Moderate No 1.24 1920 High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 235 EMERSON ST 94301 12025027 0.13 3 Moderate No 0.53 1905 High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 207 HAWTHORNE 94301 12024004 0.15 2 Moderate No 0.99 1902 High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 333 HIGH ST 94301 12025101 FFF 0.13 3 Moderate No 0.62 1999 High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 (Possibly demolished) Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San A531 STANFORD AV 94306 13701003 HHHH 0.16 5 Moderate No 3.51 0 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San A531 STANFORD AV 94306 13701002 HHHH 0.16 5 Moderate No 3.51 1910 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San A 211 LAMBERT AV 94306 13233024 0.13 4 Moderate No 2.29 1951 High Resource Yes Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San A430 SHERMAN AV 94306 12433006 VVVV 0.10 3 Moderate No 2.32 1926 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San A480 N CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12432045 SSSS 0.21 6 Moderate No 2.43 1967 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San A460 N CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12432044 SSSS 0.11 3 Moderate No 2.79 1928 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 544 COWPER ST 94301 12015074 HH 0.10 3 Moderate No 3.59 1963 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 459 HAMILTON AV 94301 12015077 HH 0.11 3 Moderate No 3.50 1912 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 361 LYTTON AV 94301 12014092 0.13 4 Moderate No 2.69 0 High Resource Yes Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 355 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12015045 0.31 9 Moderate No 2.95 0 High Resource ATTACHMENT B 3.b Packet Pg. 36 DR A F T Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 337 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12015050 0.17 5 Moderate No 2.64 1982 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 405 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12015032 0.11 3 Moderate No 2.66 1900 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San A550 COLLEGE AV 94306 13701034 0.14 4 Moderate No 2.20 1947 High Resource Yes Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 375 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12015043 0.15 4 Moderate No 17.23 1928 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San A221 LAMBERT AV 94306 13233023 0.13 4 Moderate No 10.89 1951 High Resource Yes Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 314 LYTTON AV 94301 12015002 NN 0.11 3 Moderate No 4.86 1973 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 335 BRYANT ST 94301 12014110 0.13 4 Moderate No 4.20 1962 High Resource Yes Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 895 EMERSON ST 94301 12028031 AAA 0.23 7 Moderate No 4.65 1959 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 540 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12003032 Y 0.11 3 Moderate No 5.24 1926 High Resource Yes Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San A438 CAMBRIDGE AV 94306 12432010 LLLL 0.11 3 Moderate No 4.60 1924 High Resource Yes Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San A580 COLLEGE AV 94306 13701037 IIII 0.13 4 Moderate No 4.53 1970 High Resource Yes Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 200 CHANNING AV 94301 12028100 0.37 9 Moderate No 1.69 1920 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San A1865 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 12430059 EEEE 0.12 3 Moderate No 1.58 1999 High Resource Yes Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 955 ALMA ST 94301 12028096 QQQ 0.24 7 Moderate No 1.65 1962 High Resource SOFA II Potential Historic Resource; Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 467 HAMILTON AV 94301 12015076 HH 0.11 3 Moderate No 1.83 1980 High Resource Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 422 WAVERLEY ST 94301 12015038 OO 0.12 3 Moderate No 1.57 1999 High Resource 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 430 EMERSON ST 94301 12026026 GGG 0.13 4 Moderate No 0.24 1946 High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 120 HAMILTON AV 94301 12027002 PPP 0.17 5 Moderate No 0.39 1976 High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 235 ALMA ST 94301 12025058 LLL 0.13 4 Moderate No 0.11 1911 High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 235 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12026018 0.11 3 Moderate No 1.00 1920 High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 158 HAMILTON AV 94301 12027005 0.10 3 Moderate No 0.56 1926 High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 842 RAMONA ST 94301 12028029 AAA 0.13 3 Moderate No 0.09 0 High Resource 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 143 SANTA RITA AV 94301 12419047 0.23 6 Moderate No 0.39 1937 High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 251 EMERSON ST 94301 12025025 WW 0.13 3 Moderate No 2.52 1906 High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 151 COLORADO AV 94301 13217076 0.13 3 Moderate No 2.24 1960 High Resource 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 261 COLLEGE AV 94306 12428020 OOOO 0.11 3 Moderate No 2.90 1924 High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 365 COLLEGE AV 94306 12432032 MMMM 0.15 5 Moderate No 0.31 1924 High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 277 COLLEGE AV 94306 12428018 OOOO 0.11 3 Moderate No 0.17 1924 High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 335 COLLEGE AV 94306 12428012 NNNN 0.15 5 Moderate No 0.39 1910 High Resource Considered for the NRHP in 1998‐evaluation details on DPR form; Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 344 EMERSON ST 94301 12025096 FFF 0.13 4 Moderate No 0.57 1912 High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2313 BIRCH ST 94306 12428036 0.21 8 Moderate No 2.80 1950 High Resource 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 200 N CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12428027 QQQQ 0.14 5 Moderate No 2.06 1960 High Resource Yes 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 366 N CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12432037 RRRR 0.14 5 Moderate No 3.21 1970 High Resource 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 393 N CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12433028 0.15 5 Moderate No 2.83 1948 High Resource 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 407 SHERMAN AV 94306 12433047 0.09 3 Moderate No 3.75 1962 High Resource Yes 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 151 LYTTON AV 94301 12025099 FFF 0.13 5 Moderate No 2.74 1962 High Resource Yes 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 616 RAMONA ST 94301 12027012 0.12 4 Moderate No 4.00 1962 High Resource 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 185 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12026028 GGG 0.11 4 Moderate No 2.74 1970 High Resource 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 222 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12026054 0.11 4 Moderate No 3.71 1920 High Resource 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 261 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12026010 0.11 4 Moderate No 2.39 1910 High Resource 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2250 PARK BL 94306 12428002 PPPP 0.14 5 Moderate No 1.56 1906 High Resource Yes 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 318 CAMBRIDGE AV 94306 12428010 NNNN 0.11 4 Moderate No 1.87 1950 High Resource Yes 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 375 CAMBRIDGE AV 94306 12432056 0.13 5 Moderate No 4.37 1958 High Resource 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 230 N CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12428030 QQQQ 0.11 4 Moderate No 1.75 1962 High Resource 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 220 N CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12428029 QQQQ 0.11 4 Moderate No 1.75 1962 High Resource 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 206 N CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12428028 QQQQ 0.14 5 Moderate No 1.72 1961 High Resource 1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 350 N CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12432035 RRRR 0.27 10 Moderate No 0.75 1946 High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 447 ALMA ST 94301 12026102 OOO 0.32 12 Moderate No 4.69 1982 High Resource Yes 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 636 RAMONA ST 94301 12027014 XX 0.12 4 Moderate No 1.81 1960 High Resource 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 217 ALMA ST 94301 12025059 LLL 0.26 10 Moderate No 0.96 1946 High Resource Yes Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 329 ALMA ST 94301 12025113 MMM 0.10 3 Moderate No 0.39 1937 High Resource Yes Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 744 HIGH ST 94301 12027077 III 0.13 5 Moderate No 3.56 1924 High Resource SOFA II Potential Historic Resource; Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Caltrain Station ‐ Moderate Income 10.62 316 Caltrain Station ‐ Total 17.74 556 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 775 PAGE MILL EX 94304 14220057 0.56 18 Lower No 13.89 1997 High Resource 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 845 PAGE MILL EX 94304 14220023 0.50 16 Lower No 20.58 2000 High Resource Frequent Bus Routes ‐ Lower Income 1.07 34 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 106 KELLOGG AV 94301 12416001 0.10 2 Moderate No 0.22 1922 High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 104 MELVILLE AV 94301 12415019 0.17 4 Moderate No 0.36 1922 High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3398 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13708098 1.38 44 Moderate No 2.28 1970 High Resource Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 1215 ALMA ST 94301 12415034 VVV 0.09 1 Moderate No 0.08 1927 High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 102 KINGSLEY AV 94301 12415035 VVV 0.09 1 Moderate No 0.01 1927 High Resource Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 1425 ALMA ST 94301 12416046 0.23 5 Moderate No 2.55 1922 High Resource 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 401 LAMBERT AV 94306 13239018 GGGGG 0.12 3 Moderate No 19.43 1986 High Resource 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3941 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13242067 QQQQQ 0.36 11 Moderate No 2.03 1964 High Resource Yes Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 4260 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 16708043 WWWWW 0.17 5 Moderate No 2.33 1987 High Resource Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 4234 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 16708032 VVVVV 0.49 15 Moderate No 1.69 1961 High Resource Yes Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3255 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13238021 FFFFF 0.34 11 Moderate No 1.60 1953 High Resource Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3305 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13239059 GGGGG 0.52 16 Moderate No 2.00 1956 High Resource Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3295 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13238019 FFFFF 0.17 5 Moderate No 1.56 1976 High Resource Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 4141 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13246102 0.12 3 Moderate No 2.38 1940 High Resource Yes Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3727 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13241084 MMMMM 0.21 6 Moderate No 2.00 1954 High Resource Yes ATTACHMENT B 3.b Packet Pg. 37 DR A F T 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3401 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13239079 HHHHH 0.21 6 Moderate No 1.60 1998 High Resource Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3850 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13711075 OOOOO 0.12 3 Moderate No 2.00 1968 High Resource Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3740 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13711093 OOOOO 0.12 3 Moderate No 1.60 1967 High Resource Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3569 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13240061 IIIII 0.14 4 Moderate No 1.91 1959 High Resource Yes 1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 4111 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13246115 RRRRR 0.19 6 Moderate No 0.25 1934 High Resource Yes Deemed potentially eligible for the CRHR in 1998 Frequent Bus Routes ‐ Moderate Income 5.34 154 Frequent Bus Routes ‐ Total 6.41 188 WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)908 INDUSTRIAL AV 94303 14701054 A 0.32 10 Lower No 1.91 1960 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur Keller WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)924 INDUSTRIAL AV 94303 14701057 A 0.24 7 Lower No 1.59 1959 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur Keller WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)930 INDUSTRIAL AV 94303 14701058 A 0.24 7 Lower No 3.20 1957 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur Keller WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)911 INDUSTRIAL AV 94303 14701088 B 0.40 12 Lower No 2.03 1956 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur Keller WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)935 INDUSTRIAL AV 94303 14701047 B 0.24 7 Lower No 2.50 1960 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur Keller WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)953 INDUSTRIAL ST 94303 14701042 B 0.49 15 Lower No 2.79 1985 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur Keller WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)930 COMMERCIAL ST 94303 14701115 B 0.24 7 Lower No 2.52 1973 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur Keller WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)920 COMMERCIAL ST 94303 14701034 B 0.24 7 Lower No 2.31 1956 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur Keller WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)890 COMMERCIAL ST 94303 14701031 B 0.25 8 Lower No 3.13 1955 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur Keller WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)961 E CHARLESTON RD 94303 14701051 B 0.70 22 Lower No 1.68 1956 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur Keller WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)942 COMMERCIAL ST 94303 14701091 B 0.45 14 Lower No 1.56 1960 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur Keller WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)916 COMMERCIAL ST 94303 14701033 B 0.24 7 Lower No 1.97 1956 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur Keller WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)941 E CHARLESTON RD 94303 14701029 B 0.20 6 Lower No 1.58 1958 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur Keller WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)996 SAN ANTONIO AV 94303 14701121 C 0.82 26 Lower No 4.29 1980 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)971 COMMERCIAL ST 94303 14701094 C 0.29 9 Lower No 2.02 1956 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur Keller WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)925 Commercial St 94303 14701117 C 0.40 12 Lower No 2.17 1986 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)883 COMMERCIAL ST 94303 14701026 C 0.24 7 Lower No 3.00 1956 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)960 SAN ANTONIO RD 94303 14701106 C 0.69 22 Lower No 2.68 2002 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)981 Commercial St 94303 14701017 C 0.19 6 Lower No 2.08 1958 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur Keller WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)4022 TRANSPORT ST 94303 14701012 C 0.20 6 Lower No 2.16 1956 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)4061 TRANSPORT ST 94303 14701067 C 0.25 8 Lower No 2.41 1957 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)931 COMMERCIAL ST 94303 14701024 C 0.29 9 Lower No 1.64 1956 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)910 SAN ANTONIO AV 94303 14701007 C 0.30 9 Lower No 1.95 1956 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)870 SAN ANTONIO RD 94303 14701004 C 0.35 11 Lower No 1.59 1958 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)3963 Fabian Wy 94303 12737006 H 0.42 13 Lower No 6.01 1960 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)3977 Fabian Wy 94303 12737004 H 0.39 12 Lower No 4.92 1959 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)801 E Charleston Rd 94303 12737014 I 0.26 8 Lower No 3.50 1961 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)4015 Fabian Wy 94303 12715048 J 0.35 11 Lower No 4.23 1961 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)795 San Antonio Rd 94303 12715044 K 0.38 12 Lower No 5.89 1967 X High Resource Keith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)4020 Fabian Wy 94303 12715009 K 0.47 14 Lower No 2.00 1957 X High Resource Keith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)3430 W Bayshore Rd 94303 12736026 L 1.17 37 Lower No 3.06 1996 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)3400 W Bayshore Rd 94303 12736025 L 1.49 47 Lower No 3.86 1970 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)3160 W Bayshore Rd 94303 12736030 L 3.20 102 Lower No 2.97 1974 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)925 E Meadow Dr 94303 12710032 M 1.01 32 Lower No 4.40 2010 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)1070 E MEADOW CL 94303 12710071 M 1.00 31 Lower No 3.36 1960 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)1069 E Meadow Circle 94303 12710054 N 1.48 47 Lower No 4.53 1962 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM) ‐ Lower Income 19.89 620 WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM)411 Page Mill Rd 94306 13237064 0.36 11 Moderate No 7.02 2004 X Keith Reckdahl WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM) ‐ Moderate Income 0.36 11 WG Suggestions (GM & ROLM) ‐ Total 20.25 631 ATTACHMENT B 3.b Packet Pg. 38 October 21, 2021 Palo Alto Housing Element: Working Group Meeting Three prospective housing sites on Stanford land 3.c Packet Pg. 39 Three Sites on Stanford Land Pasteur Drive/Sand Hill Road 27 University 3128 El Camino – Research Park 3.c Packet Pg. 40 Pasteur Drive 3.c Packet Pg. 41 Pasteur Drive: Overview •2.3 acres •Zoned “RM-40” •In previous Housing Element •100% vacant site but existing site constraints •No existing leases •Gateway to medical center •Consider combining with adjacent property at 1100 Welch Road STANFORD SHOPPING CENTER STANFORD HOSPITALS & CLINICS STANFORD WEST APARTMENTS SOUND & SUSTAINABLE PLANNING ACCESSIBLE & AFFORDABLE COLLABORATIVE PARTNERSHIP ECONOMIC VITALITY 3.c Packet Pg. 42 Pasteur Drive: Context & Alignment walk/bike to campus jobs WELCH ROAD APARTMENTS STANFORD HOSPITALS & CLINICS STANFORD WEST APARTMENTS New Stanford Hospital -131’ OAK CREEK APARTMENTS 3.c Packet Pg. 43 Pasteur Drive:Capacity Analysis Minimum of 5 stories in all cases Above-grade parking critical to feasibility Pasteur site is highly constrained: heritage trees, storm easement Combining Pasteur and Welch Road Apartments enables site efficiencies and more units per acre Infeasible to include Welch Road without substantial gain in unit count Higher unit counts in the range rely on higher height and FAR Parking ratio reduction also enables higher unit count and a higher number of affordable units Given location, housing to be Stanford-affiliate rental housing (discounted to market) Options Net New Unit Counts Pasteur alone 120 -145 Pasteur + Welch Road Apartments 265 -425 Key ConsiderationsCapacity Ranges 3.c Packet Pg. 44 Palo Alto Transit Center 3.c Packet Pg. 45 Palo Alto Transit Center: Overview STANFORD SHOPPING CENTER STANFORD UNIVERSITY CAMPUS STANFORD HOSPITAL AND CLINICS DOWNTOWN PALO ALTO Palo Alto Train Station SOUND & SUSTAINABLE PLANNING ACCESSIBLE & AFFORDABLE COLLABORATIVE PARTNERSHIP ECONOMIC VITALITY •~4.5 acres •Critical multi-modal transit center use (many transit agency stakeholders) •Historic building (MacArthur Park) •No existing long-term leases •Includes small area of underutilized, underimproved park area 3.c Packet Pg. 46 Palo Alto Transit Center: Context & Alignment Alma Tower -137’ DOWNTOWN PALO ALTO Hoover Pavilion -105’ STANFORD UNIVERSITY CAMPUS Transit Hub STANFORD SHOPPING CENTER pedestrian/bike connection to SSC & med center walk/bike connections to jobs STANFORD HOSPITALS & CLINICS 3.c Packet Pg. 47 Palo Alto Transit Center: Capacity Analysis Options Unit Count Minimum 5-story over 2-story at– grade parking (75-85’) 180 -270 At height of Hoover Pavilion (105’) 360 –425 At height of Alma Tower (137’)465 -530 Minimum 5 stories of housing over 2-story at- grade parking “Transit first” perspective Investment in transit resources and mobility enabled by addition of other uses, including some new commercial and office Optimal location for height and density Reduction in parking requirements could enable higher unit count (appropriate location for lower parking ratios due to transit location and walkability to jobs, retail and services) Opportunity to create a vibrant mix of uses and grander public connection through site between Downtown Palo Alto and Stanford Shopping and Medical Center Capacity Ranges Key Considerations 3.c Packet Pg. 48 Stanford Research Park – 3128 El Camino Real 3.c Packet Pg. 49 •1.4 acres •Short-term lease to McDonald’s •Comp Plan alignment CAL AVE RETAIL AND BUSINESS DISTRICT STANFORD UNIVERSITY CAMPUS STANFORD RESEARCH PARK EMPLOYMENT DISTRICT 3128 El Camino Real: Overview SOUND & SUSTAINABLE PLANNING ACCESSIBLE & AFFORDABLE COLLABORATIVE PARTNERSHIP ECONOMIC VITALITY 3.c Packet Pg. 50 3128 El Camino Real: Context & Alignment Palo Alto Square –127’ Nearby residential neighborhood CAL AVE RETAIL AND BUSINESS DISTRICT STANFORD UNIVERSITY CAMPUS STANFORD RESEARCH PARK EMPLOYMENT DISTRICT Cal. Ave Train Station Currently McDonald’s 3.c Packet Pg. 51 3128 El Camino Real: Capacity Analysis Options Unit Count 3128 ECR site only 90 -125 3128 ECR + adjacent site assemblage (+doubling size of site) 220 -315 Adjacency to Palo Alto Square towers support higher height Minimum 5 stories of residential over 2 levels of above-grade parking Assembling sites enables higher unit production but depends upon willingness of adjacent landholders Parking ratio appropriate for job-and transit-oriented housing could enable higher unit counts Capacity Ranges Key Considerations 3.c Packet Pg. 52 Thank you! Questions? 3.c Packet Pg. 53 Planning & Transportation Commission Staff Report (ID # 13813) Report Type: Action Items Meeting Date: 1/12/2022 City of Palo Alto Planning & Development Services 250 Hamilton Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94301 (650) 329-2442 Summary Title: Amendments to 18.42.110 (Wireless Communication Facilities) Title: Consideration of Updates to Section 18.42.110 (Wireless Communication Facilities) of Chapter 18.42 (Standards for Special Uses) of Title 18 (Zoning) of the Palo Alto Municipal Code (PAMC). Environmental Assessment: Exempt per CEQA Guidelines Sections 15061(b)(3) and 15301, 15302, 15303 and 15305. From: Jonathan Lait Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC): 1. Discuss modifications to Palo Alto Municipal Code Chapter 18.42.110 contained in the draft ordinance (Attachment A); 2. Provide feedback and recommendations to staff on items to include in the draft ordinance for future consideration; and 3. Hear public testimony and close the public hearing to re-notice for a future hearing. Report Summary The topics covered in this report are wide ranging and complex. Staff hopes PTC may, through one or more motions, identify where proposed modifications are generally supported by Commissioners, and provide direction and affirm items that should be further discussed. Based on this feedback, a modified draft ordinance will return for future action when appropriate. This staff report contains information to support a PTC discussion on proposed draft amendments to the Palo Alto Municipal Code (PAMC) Section 18.42.110, Wireless Communication Facilities (WCF). This staff report builds upon the City’s significant wireless policy discussions. These include the: • wireless policy updates in 2019, • previous February 12, 2020 PTC wireless ordinance discussion and motion, 4 Packet Pg. 54 City of Palo Alto Planning & Development Services Department Page 2 • City Council discussions on wireless application appeals, and • November 15, 2021 Study Session discussion on wireless legal updates and proposed work plan held by City Council with the Architectural Review Board (ARB) and the PTC. The wireless ordinance update amendments are primarily responsive to the original 2019 Council direction to: (1) conduct a staff review of the effectiveness of the existing wireless ordinance; (2) maintain the wireless ordinance in compliance with Federal and State regulatory requirements; and (3) respond to previous Council and community member ideas and concerns shared at public hearings and through correspondence. The primary goals for the PTC meeting are: • To follow up with additional discussion on proposed updates reflected in this draft wireless ordinance amendment, as requested by the PTC on February 12, 2020. • To highlight incorporation of Federal and State regulatory requirements and recent legal developments into this draft ordinance. • To reintroduce the initial Council, PTC, public, and carrier feedback received on the February 2020 draft wireless ordinance. • To encourage input from carriers and members of the public prior to presentation of a final draft ordinance amendment and PTC recommendation to City Council. As mentioned at the November 15, 2021 Joint Study Session, the City’s wireless work program calls for a PTC hearing on December 15, 2021 focusing on proposed ordinance revisions. This will be followed by an ARB hearing on proposed revisions to the City’s Design and Location Criteria for Wireless Communication Facilities (objective administrative wireless aesthetic standards formerly known as ‘Objective (Wireless) Standards’) in early 2022. Staff will take all feedback received and return to the PTC for formal recommendations prior to presenting the updated wireless ordinance and revised “Design and Location Criteria for WCFs” to City Council. Background The City significantly revised its wireless policies in 2019 and adopted the existing wireless ordinance1 and objective administrative wireless aesthetic standards (objective standards)2. Council motions included direction to staff for further wireless ordinance analysis. Following Council direction, staff presented draft ordinance amendments to the PTC on February 12, 20203. The PTC requested further staff consideration of specific topics and asked 1 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/paloalto/latest/paloalto_ca/0-0-0-80615#JD_18.42.110 2 https://cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?t=75074.3&BlobID=74989 3 February 12, 2020 PTC Staff Report: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=75238 February 12, 2020 PTC meeting minutes: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/documents/76399 4 Packet Pg. 55 City of Palo Alto Planning & Development Services Department Page 3 staff to return with further refinements to the draft wireless ordinance and/or further discussion in a staff report. Based on the PTC’s discussion, the topics to be examined included: • Reconsideration of: • The phrasing in the new subsection pertaining to noise. • The purpose and need of the formerly proposed new subsection “Incomplete Applications and Applications Deemed Denied”. • The phrasing of some sentences in the new subsection “Independent Experts”. • The circumstances under which WCF applications would be referred to the ARB and/or PTC. • Circumstances under which WCF applications would include an alternatives analysis. • Description of: • Figures used by staff for analysis of distances between WCF on poles in the right of way and structures, including residences, as well as a description of the process for Council to adjust those distances. • Where Director’s Decisions are listed and publicized. • Minor typographical clarifications regarding section references and capitalization of terms. • Minor adjustments to the text location for the discussion of the thresholds of substantial change. Staff continued to keep track of the changes in the regulatory context for wireless communications facilities. Over the past year, staff sought feedback from carriers and members of the public. During this time, staff also continued to process WCF applications. The Council provided feedback on wireless policy via the discussion of WCF application appeals. Staff also brought in outside counsel that specializes in wireless telecommunications law to help prepare the attached draft wireless ordinance amendments. On November 15, 20214, the City Council, PTC, and ARB held a Joint Study Session regarding updates to the Federal and State regulatory landscape and an overview of Planning’s workplan to update the City’s WCF ordinance. Wireless carriers and members of the community submitted public testimony at this Study Session. In summary, the comments described a need for updates to the wireless ordinance and standards to ensure compliance with the Ninth Circuit’s decision. That court decision vacated portions of the FCC Small Cell Order that had required aesthetic criteria to be “objective” and “no more burdensome than those applied to other types of infrastructure deployments”, considerations for post-installation (maintenance 4 November 15, 2021 Joint Session Staff Report: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/agendas- minutes-reports/agendas-minutes/city-council-agendas-minutes/2021/11-november/20211115/20211115pccsm- amended.pdf#page=12 4 Packet Pg. 56 City of Palo Alto Planning & Development Services Department Page 4 and removal bonds), and increased certainty in the project review process. The comments from the Council, PTC, and ARB included striking a balance between acknowledging the increasing demand for wireless technology with the community’s interests. The community seeks robust aesthetic standards, with clear preferences for locations, and community outreach for increased public input. The primary focus of the PTC’s discussion is the proposal for ordinance revisions. Staff anticipates presenting revisions to the City’s aesthetic standards for WCFs in the public rights- of-way in early 2022. Therefore, WCF topics that are related to design and aesthetic standards are not presented in detail here, though the PTC may comment or provide direction on those topics as well. The report contains some key terms. They are consolidated here for reference. Italicized terms are defined in the draft ordinance. “FCC” means the Federal Communications Commission or successor agency. “WCF” or "Wireless Communications Facility" means any Associated Equipment and other facilities or developments constructed, installed or operated for the transmission or receipt of wireless signals at a fixed location including but not limited to a Base Station, Small Wireless Facility, Transmission Equipment and Towers or similar support structures, accessory parking areas, and other accessory development, but does not include amateur station, portable radios, facilities owned and operated by government agency or emergency medical care provider. “Tier 1 WCF Entitlement” is required for a facility defined as an Eligible Facilities Request. “Tier 2 WCF Entitlement” is required for: (I) any modification of an Eligible Support Structure including the collocation of new equipment that constitutes a substantial change to the physical dimensions of the Eligible Support Structure making it ineligible for a Tier 1 WCF entitlement; or (II) Any Collocation of a WCF, including a Small Wireless Facility, that is not eligible for a Tier 1 WCF Entitlement; or (III) Any placement of a Small Wireless Facility on a new utility pole or streetlight pole in the public right-of-way that is proposed to replace an existing pole of the same type which will be removed, and that will be located within a five-foot radius of the location of such existing pole. “Tier 3 WCF Entitlement” is required for the siting of any WCF, including a Small Wireless Facility, that is not subject to a Tier 1 or 2 WCF Entitlement. “RF” means radio frequency on the radio spectrum. Discussion 4 Packet Pg. 57 City of Palo Alto Planning & Development Services Department Page 5 Overview of Existing Available Tools for Review of WCFs Cities are not allowed to prohibit or adopt regulations or decisions that have the effect of prohibiting an entity’s ability to provide telecommunications service. However, communities may establish WCF processing procedures, standards, and other tools that reflect local values. Palo Alto uses the following tools to guide the review and processing of WCF applications: • PAMC Section 18.42.110 Wireless Communication Facilities o PAMC Section 18.42.110, as amended in 2019, provides the overall WCF regulatory framework for wireless facilities in the City (Attachment B). These code requirements were established through Council adoption of an ordinance. Revisions to the ordinance require a recommendation from the PTC before adoption by the City Council. • Aesthetic Design Standards for WCFs in the Public Rights of Way o Council adopted a resolution with detailed WCF objective standards for proposed WCF installations in the public rights of way (Attachment C). Given the Ninth Circuit Court’s 2020 decision striking the prior FCC requirement that localities maintain objective standards, these standards will now be called “Design and Location Criteria for WCFs”. The City’s current practice of having these criteria in a resolution separate from the PAMC allows for more expeditious adoption of refinements and clarifications to the standards. The process for Council to adopt a resolution is faster than the process to revise the municipal code. Note that aesthetic standards adopted by resolution carry the same weight of Council authority as requirements contained within the PAMC. • WCF Permit Application Checklists o Palo Alto’s comprehensive WCF application checklists require detailed information to effectively evaluate application requests. The checklists inform the applicant regarding the minimum information necessary to process an application. The checklist forms the basis for determining a WCF application’s completeness. The Planning and Development Services Director (Director) can update checklists periodically. o The WCF application checklist for WCF applications are included for reference as Attachment D. • Design and Construction Standards o Palo Alto has published design and construction standards, including those issued by the Public Works and Utilities Departments. These standards are applicable to all projects proposed within the right-of-way or on private property and are not specific to WCF projects. Periodically, these standards are updated by the departments. • Master License Agreements for Use of City-Owned Poles in the Public Rights of Way o The City of Palo Alto operates its own utility services; therefore, the City has established a master license agreement with providers seeking to locate their equipment on the City’s streetlight and wood utility poles. These agreements are approved by the City 4 Packet Pg. 58 City of Palo Alto Planning & Development Services Department Page 6 Council. The agreements specify essential terms and conditions governing the use of space on City poles for deployment of WCFs. They offer somewhat greater control for the City compared with some other jurisdictions, where poles are owned by investor- owned utilities. Summary of Proposed Wireless Ordinance Amendments The proposed amendments reflect an effort by an internal working group comprised of different City departments (Planning, Utilities, City Attorney’s Office, & Public Works). The proposed revisions to the draft ordinance: • respond to current wireless communication facility trends, • respond to updates in laws and regulations, • clarify the City’s review procedures and information necessary to analyze wireless applications, • clarify generally applicable development standards, and other matters to interpreting the City’s Comprehensive Plan, • improve the effectiveness of the City’s regulations, and • reflect the values of the City. In reviewing and considering feedback and examples from other cities’ WCF regulations throughout the region, staff understood each community has unique values, characteristics, 4 Packet Pg. 59 City of Palo Alto Planning & Development Services Department Page 7 and wireless needs. Palo Alto’s WCF regulations must be tailored to our community’s unique circumstances. In some instances, the proposed amendments are consistent with, or go further than, other surrounding communities’ regulations. Where the proposed amendments are less stringent, it is generally based on a staff perspective that a different threshold would: • (1) Subject the City to undue legal risk of claims by carriers that the requirements violate state or federal law, based on the City’s distribution of land uses and technical feasibility, or • (2) Create an unnecessary layer of additional exceptions for the applicant to request and the City to process. Some of the proposed amendments are located within existing PAMC Section 18.42.110 subsections, whereas others appear in new subsections; this necessitates some subsection renumbering. Staff prepared these draft update amendments for the purpose of facilitating discussion. Staff welcomes feedback on the entire wireless ordinance and seeks feedback on key topics discussed later in the analysis section of this report. Staff will take this feedback to find balance among competing interests. Updates to the WCF Ordinance Reflecting Changes in Federal/State Law The November 15, 2021, Joint Session Staff Report5 contains a full summary of the federal and state regulatory framework that covers the siting of WCFs. Since 2019, there have been developments in federal and state laws that impact the City’s ability to regulate wireless installations. Notably, on August 12, 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit entered its decision6 on five consolidated cases challenging the FCC Orders preempting many aspects of local government regulation of small wireless facilities. The decision upheld the Moratoria Order (prohibiting local moratoria on processing small cell applications) and significant portions of the Small Cell Order, including the shorter shot clocks, remedies for failing to meet a shot clock, the new effective prohibition test, and fee limitations. The decision reversed the FCC's order requiring aesthetic standards to be objective and no more burdensome than those applied to other types of infrastructure deployments, but upheld FCC requirements that localities adopt reasonable (feasible) aesthetic criteria and publish them in advance. 5 November 15, 2021 Joint Session Staff Report: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/agendas- minutes-reports/agendas-minutes/city-council-agendas-minutes/2021/11-november/20211115/20211115pccsm- amended.pdf#page=12 6 City of Portland v. United States, 969 F.3d 1020 (9th Cir. 2020) 4 Packet Pg. 60 City of Palo Alto Planning & Development Services Department Page 8 In June 2020 and October 2020, the FCC adopted Orders loosened the criteria used to determine if proposed modifications to existing WCFs qualify as eligible facilities requests, a category of applications with strictly limited local review, in which qualifying applications must be approved. There are also two recent State laws that affect WCF applications: • In January 2021, Assembly Bill 2421 took effect and will remain in effect until 2024. The law requires that applications for qualifying backup generators on macro sites be approved within a 60-day deadline. An application is deemed approved if not acted upon in a timely manner. This law does not apply to rooftop, small wireless facilities, or outdoor/indoor distributed antenna system sites. • Senate Bill 537 goes into effect in January 2022 and provides a deemed granted remedy for small wireless facility applications. As a result, all types of wireless applications with FCC shot clocks have a deemed granted remedy either in state or federal law. The proposed wireless ordinance updates propose amendments that are consistent with current Federal and State laws and recent court decisions affecting FCC Orders. In the future, if there are further changes to Federal or State laws, Staff will prepare further proposed revisions as needed. Analysis7 The following includes discussion on topics relevant to the WCF regulations update. Attachment A includes a draft of the updated ordinance for reference. Staff acknowledge that the revised ordinance is a working draft to facilitate discussion. The draft ordinance attempts to find balance between acknowledging the increasing demand for wireless technology, while setting up a process to locate WCFs in a way that does not contribute to visual clutter but preserves the City’s mainly residential character. The proposed revisions to the ordinance strive to provide clarity and certainty to the process. Staff seeks PTC direction and input on some selected topics as discussed in this section to further refine the draft Ordinance before it is presented for adoption by Council. Additionally, for reference, the adopted Objective Standards (now Design and Location Criteria for WCFs) for WCF in the public rights of way, and the current application checklists are included as attachments. Other attachments for reference include applicable Comprehensive Plan goals and policies and recent carrier feedback. Sample ordinances provided by the community (Ithaca, NY8 and Aspen, CO9) are included as links for reference. 7 The information provided in this section is based on analysis prepared by the report author prior to the public hearing. The Planning and Transportation Commission in its review of the administrative record and based on public testimony may reach a different conclusion from that presented in this report and may choose to take an action that is different than the recommended action. 8 City of Ithaca, NY Wireless Communications Ordinances: https://ecode360.com/8388240#8388240 , https://ecode360.com/8388683#8388683 , https://ecode360.com/8394650 4 Packet Pg. 61 City of Palo Alto Planning & Development Services Department Page 9 Staff addressed prior PTC comments from February 2020 related to this draft ordinance, as further discussed below. To reiterate, WCF topics that are related to design and aesthetic standards are not presented in detail here, though the PTC may comment or provide direction on those topics as well. Incomplete Applications and Applications Denied Due to Inactivity WCF applications are subject to unique processing requirements such as “shot clocks” limiting the City’s review period. If these shot clocks are not complied with a WCF may be “deemed granted” or approved by operation of applicable state and/or federal law. The shot clocks may be paused or tolled only by a timely notice of incompleteness or with the consent of the applicant (which may or may not be forthcoming). Resubmittals must be reviewed within a 10- day period. An important aspect of processing WCF applications is keeping track of applications in the pipeline to ensure the very short deadlines for review and action on the applications are met. In staff’s experience, many incomplete applications are submitted and there can be large gaps in time between incompleteness notices and resubmittals making it difficult to efficiently track and process applications. Staff proposes clarifications regarding the applicability of the wireless ordinance to pipeline WCF applications, as well as procedures that could be utilized to terminate WCF applications that remain incomplete for an extended period. These clarifications respond to staff experience with WCF applications that have remained on file with no substantive activity for long periods of time (in some cases two to four years). The changes also acknowledge the rapid pace of regulatory changes in the wireless area, considering the FCC’s requirement that any local review requirements be published in advance. Staff recommends that, whenever an applicant fails to provide a substantive response to the City within 90 days after a notice of incomplete, the application can be denied without prejudice. This means that the applicant can decide to refile a new application after the denial for the same site(s) (18.42.110(f), Page 11 & 12 of draft ordinance). In effect this would restart the process and the shot clock. Alternatives and Feasibility for Exceptions Despite the establishment of aesthetic standards and ordinance requirements, the City Council and community can expect some WCF applications may include requests for exceptions from these standards. The proposed amendments include a new application requirement for Tier 2 and Tier 3 WCFs of a comparative analysis that describes feasibility (Page 11 of the draft ordinance 18.42.110(e)(11), (12) and (13)). The following is from the draft ordinance: 9 City of Aspen, CO Wireless Communications Facilities and Equipment Ordinance: https://library.municode.com/co/aspen/codes/municipal_code?nodeId=TIT26LAUSRE_PT500SURE_CH26.505WIC OFAEQ 4 Packet Pg. 62 City of Palo Alto Planning & Development Services Department Page 10 (11) For Tier 2 and Tier 3 WCF Entitlements, the applicant shall identify the proposed WCF’s primary location and provide an alternatives analysis. If the applicant changes the primary location before the application is deemed complete, it will be considered a new application. (12) For Tier 2 and Tier 3 WCF Entitlements for WCF that include requests for exception(s) to the specific standards or any other provision of PAMC Section 18.42.110, the alternatives analysis above shall compare the exception(s) required for feasible operations at the primary location(s) with the exception(s) required for feasible operations at the alternative location(s). (13) The applicant’s assertions of feasibility and infeasibility, and the exceptions, if any, needed to ensure a location or design is feasible may be demonstrated using site-specific physical, public safety, regulatory, WCF engineering and/or other technical constraints. The goal is to obtain sufficient information to understand the pros and cons of the primary location and its feasible alternatives. The specifics regarding alternatives analysis would be addressed in the Application Checklist staff creates. Having the checklist outside the ordinance enables staff to amend it from time to time, rather than returning to the PTC and Council to amend the ordinance. Another aspect of these revisions is that if an applicant changes the primary location before the project is deemed complete, staff can require the applicant to submit a new application—thereby resetting the shot clock. Noise Council requested staff consider noise impacts as a potential addition to the ordinance. The proposed amendments include a new application requirement; the applicant must submit a noise report, which serves to codify the existing application checklist item and the existing noise analysis procedures. The proposed amendments also: • include a new noise-related condition of approval and • address noise impacts in the generally applicable development standards. The City’s Comprehensive Plan includes policies for new permanent noise sources (N-6.5 through N-6.10). These policies provide direction on reducing noise impacts from new development on existing properties. PAMC Chapter 9.1010 implements the Comprehensive Plan policies by including standards to control the effects of adverse noise sources in the City. Furthermore, the design and location criteria for WCFs consolidate the regulations in one place. The PAMC regulations for noise provide specific thresholds and ways to measure noise to ensure compliance. These standards are published in advance and are quantifiable. An acoustic engineer would be able to produce a report that satisfies the requirements. The applicants also 10 PAMC Chapter 9.10 Noise: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/paloalto/latest/paloalto_ca/0-0-0-66179 4 Packet Pg. 63 City of Palo Alto Planning & Development Services Department Page 11 have the option of providing manufacturer documentation that demonstrate a silent installation. In practice, applications have included more silent installations. Location and Design Preferences Location Preferences Some communities have included detailed WCF location and design preferences within their wireless ordinances. The current ordinance includes this preference for building-mounted and collocation facilities in the Purpose and Interpretation section (18.42.110(a) and not included in its own subsection. Staff proposes to create a new subsection that clarifies the City’s location and design preferences (18.42.110(k), Page 14 of the draft Ordinance). The following is from the draft ordinance: (k) Location Preferences (1) Building-mounted and collocation at existing facilities of WCFs are preferred and encouraged, subject to all other provisions of this Section. (2) Location preferences approved by Council by resolution. The above revision calls out the City’s overall preference for new WCFs to be placed on buildings or at existing WCF locations. It also incorporates by reference the location and design preferences for WCF proposed for the public rights of way that are outlined in the current objective standards adopted by Council on December 16, 2019. Design Preferences Based on FCC Orders and case law, aesthetic requirements (and undergrounding and spacing) are allowed if they are reasonable and published in advance. Aesthetic requirements are reasonable if they are technically feasible and reasonably directed to avoiding or remedying the intangible public harm of unsightly or out-of-character deployments. Undergrounding City Council requested an analysis of whether to include a requirement for the WCF underground design to be mandated in residential districts. Presently, any WCF proposed within a residential district requires an exception. If a WCF was to be proposed in the public right-of-way of a residential district, our design standards (Attachment C) include a preference for underground design. The issues staff identified thus far for this design are: • these vaults could conflict with tree roots, • the installation could require cooling fans, • there is diminishing sustainability of equipment when placed in a vault, and • the location poses a safety issue for maintenance crews. 4 Packet Pg. 64 City of Palo Alto Planning & Development Services Department Page 12 The secondary option for WCFs is a top-mounted design. Recent changes in technology have resulted in top-mounted designs that include smaller profiles than previously available, making them less visually intrusive. Staff will provide additional analysis on this item in the future. Removing Obsolete References to Objective Standards As noted, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision reversed the portions of the FCC's ruling requiring aesthetic standards for small wireless facilities to be objective and no more burdensome than those applied to other types of infrastructure deployments, but it upheld the requirement for reasonable aesthetic criteria. This court decision directly affects the existing Resolution which was adopted when objective standards were required. As part of this update process, staff anticipates revisiting the Resolution and revising the aesthetic standards. Staff will work with the ARB on those criteria updates and return to the PTC for recommendation. As it relates to the ordinance, PAMC 18.42.110(l) includes the Generally Applicable Development Standards. At this time, only clarifying revisions are included. Referrals for Tier 2 WCF Applications Presently, the Director of Planning and Development Services (Director) has the sole discretion to refer applications to the ARB for Tier 2 WCF applications. In response to the PTC comment, staff recommends that the Director could also refer the application to the PTC. This is like the process for Tier 3 WCF applications. This recognizes some of the focus that either the ARB and/or PTC may have on an application. This may come up when an application includes exceptions to location and design preferences. The ARB may be more appropriate for design preference review while the PTC may be more appropriate for location preference review. Staff does want to note that these referrals need to respect the time limits set forth with the shot clock. It becomes time intensive and unlikely to expect that both the ARB and PTC would evaluate the same application. Any referral to either the ARB or the PTC would likely not be for a complete application, but for only the initial submittal. Staff would also like the PTC to consider an option that the Director could refer the decision straight to the City Council. Additional Topics Staff included new application requirements in the revisions. These codify some of the existing application checklist items. One such checklist item is applicant-prepared radio frequency (RF) reports; these confirm project compliance with RF emissions. Other requirements are applicant- prepared reports providing details to meet acoustic regulations, and visual simulations. These additions respond to community member requests for more assurance regarding staff analysis of WCF applications. Staff included these requirements to clarify expectations for applicants and provide certainty for what is required of applicants. Not all the checklist items are proposed to be codified; staff seeks flexibility in the checklist to allow staff to respond to the changing technology and regulatory landscape. The checklist is widely available and published in advance. 4 Packet Pg. 65 City of Palo Alto Planning & Development Services Department Page 13 Staff proposes additions to the generally applicable development standards section of the ordinance, to include provisions that have been used as project conditions of approval. These additions also respond to community member requests for more assurance regarding staff analysis of WCF applications. These generally applicable development standards serve as findings for WCF approval. Conditions of Approval Staff proposes new and modified conditions of approval within the WCF ordinance. These additions allow staff greater code enforcement ability and establish greater operational accountability. All WCF entitlements are subject to conditions of approval stated in PAMC 18.42.110(m) (pages 15 – 19 of the draft ordinance). Staff proposes to revise current conditions of approval to provide clarifying detail. Staff also proposes adding new conditions of approval in the ordinance, to provide clarity to applicants. These revisions are proposed because of staff’s experience from processing past applications and needing to ensure ongoing compliance with regulations post-installation. Items that Remain Unchanged The draft updates include numerous revisions responsive to prior direction and consistent with state and federal law. However, staff does not propose substantial changes to many aspects of the current wireless ordinance. This includes (1) the types of WCF entitlements required; and (2) many of the generally applicable development standards, which remain unchanged. Additionally, staff does not propose changing the exceptions process or the requirement for the City to notify residents and property owners within 600 feet of a proposed WCF. PTC members asked staff to clarify how community members received notification of Director’s Decisions on wireless applications. Public noticing of decisions regarding Tier 2 and 3 applications occurs within 600 feet of parcel boundaries or node location when located within public right-of-way. The City does not send notices for Tier 1 decisions, since those decisions are non-discretionary and not appealable. Staff posts approvals on the City’s website11. The appeal process for WCF applications also remains unchanged. Tier 1 decisions cannot be appealed, while Tier 2 and Tier 3 decisions by the Director may be appealed to the City Council pursuant to PAMC Section 18.77.070(f). Resource Impacts Adoption of the proposed amendments is unlikely to result in any direct financial resource impact. Staff and consultant work on WCF policy analysis is absorbed through existing department budgets. Review of WCF applications is on a cost recovery basis. 11 https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Current-Planning/Pending-and- Approved-Projects/Approved-Projects 4 Packet Pg. 66 City of Palo Alto Planning & Development Services Department Page 14 In the last five years, staff received 70 WCF applications. Most of these were considered Tier 1 applications; others were Tier 2 applications for public right-of-way locations. We would expect the workload to continue at the same level, as technology advances, and while there is more demand for wireless services provided by the carriers. Staff anticipates the need to evaluate one or more exception requests per WCF application and this will place a significant additional burden on staff resources across many City departments. There are already demands on staff to comprehensively evaluate applications within a limited timeframe, to adhere to federally mandated processing timelines. The proposed amendments may place further demands on staff and City departments involved in the WCF review, including Planning, Public Works, Utilities, and the City Attorney’s Office. The more complicated the City’s application review process, the more time is needed and spent to process those WCF applications. Staff seeks to lessen impacts on staff resources, ensure compliance with mandated processing timelines, and reduce the risk that applicants will invoke deemed granted remedies. Therefore, the proposed changes to the WCF ordinance set expectations for application submittals and clarify procedures for staff and the public, to streamline the overall workload and process. Environmental Review Any future adoption of proposed amendments would be exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guideline sections 15061(b)(3) and 15301, 15302 and 15305 because the wireless ordinance represents part of a comprehensive regulatory scheme governing minor alterations to existing facilities or small structures. The update amendments would not authorize the construction of Wireless Communication Facilities in any locations where such facilities are not already permitted; therefore, it could be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the ordinance would have a significant effect on the environment. Public Notification, Outreach & Comments Notification to the Daily Post newspaper occurred on December 3, 2021 for this meeting. This meeting was also announced at the November 15, 2021 Joint Study Session. Previously in 2020, staff met with a few residents and a representative from the Palo Alto Unified School District School Board to learn more about their interests and concerns regarding the City’s wireless regulations and policies. Staff met with wireless carriers in March 2020 and provided outreach to obtain feedback on the City’s wireless ordinance update process. While not all the expressed concerns are recommended for inclusion in the draft update amendments, many of the key concepts have been incorporated. Staff held several meetings with City department representatives to further refine the draft update amendments. Attachment F contains recently received carrier feedback. Next Steps 4 Packet Pg. 67 City of Palo Alto Planning & Development Services Department Page 15 Staff plans to return to the PTC in the Spring to request a formal recommendation on proposed wireless ordinance update amendments. Staff will present revisions to the design and location criteria to the Architectural Review Board in early 2022. Staff anticipates returning to City Council in June 2022. At that time, the Council will have the opportunity to act on the proposed wireless ordinance amendments, revisions based on ARB review to the design and location criteria, and updates on additional items requested in Council’s 2019 motions. Report Author & Contact Information PTC12 Liaison & Contact Information Sheldon S. Ah Sing, AICP Principal Planner Rachael Tanner Assistant Director of Planning and Development Services (650) 838-2821 (650) 329-2167 sheldon.ahsing@cityofpaloalto.org rachael.tanner@cityofpaloalto.org Attachments: • Attachment A - Redline - Existing Wireless Provisions vs All Revisions To-Date (PDF) • Attachment B - PAMC 18.42.110 Existing Regulations (PDF) • Attachment C - City Council Reso 9873 WCF Objective Standards Update (12-16-2019) (PDF) • Attachment D - WCF Application Checklists (PDF) • Attachment E - Utilities and Infrastructure Comp Plan Policies (PDF) • Attachment F - Verizon Wireless Letter 12.02.21 (PDF) 12 Emails may be sent directly to the PTC using the following address: planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.org 4 Packet Pg. 68 Ordinance No. _____ Ordinance of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Amending Section 18.42.110 (Wireless Communication Facilities) of Chapter 18.42 (Standards for Special Uses) of Title 18 (Zoning) of the Palo Alto Municipal Code to Update the Code Regarding Wireless Communication Facilities The Council of the City of Palo Alto ORDAINS as follows: SECTION 1. Findings and Declarations. The City Council finds and declares as follows: A.The tremendous growth in personal wireless services has created an increased demand for new wireless antennas and equipment. Wireless service providers are increasingly seeking to utilize public rights of way to deploy small wireless facilities to improve and expand coverage. The public right of way is a uniquely valuable public resource, closely linked to the urban design and aesthetic character of Palo Alto neighborhoods. B.The unregulated installation of wireless facilities, including small cell antennas, in public rights-of-way and in other locations, poses a threat to the public health, safety and welfare, including: traffic and pedestrian safety hazards due to unsafe siting; negative and irreversible impacts to trees, landscaping, and infrastructure; noise concerns; and visual and aesthetic blight due to excessive height and lack of camouflaging, negatively impacting the unique character of the City. C.The reasonably regulated and orderly deployment of wireless telecommunications facilities is desirable, and unregulated or disorderly deployment represents a threat to the health, welfare and safety of the community. D.Local jurisdictions must reasonably allow wireless telecommunication facilities to locate in public rights-of-way and elsewhere in the City, but may impose regulations based on published aesthetic, location, noise, public welfare, and safety standards to the extent not preempted by state or federal law. E.The regulations of wireless installations are necessary to protect and preserve the aesthetic character of the community and to ensure that all wireless telecommunications facilities are installed using the least intrusive means possible. F.The City Council has adopted a Wireless Communication Facilities (WCFs) code to regulate the various health, welfare, and safety impacts presented by the proliferation of WCFs and to balance these impacts with the interests of consumers in receiving the benefits of wireless technologies. 1 CLEAN DRAFT 11-19-21 4.a Packet Pg. 69 G.Federal and state law, including various Federal Communications Commission (FCC) orders and regulations, place significant procedural and substantive limits on the City’s exercise of local control over WCF matters. H.The purpose of this Section is to establish comprehensive standards and regulations regarding the siting, development, and operation of wireless telecommunication facilities within the City in a manner consistent with State and Federal law. I.This Section was last amended by the City Council in 2019 (Ord. No. 5465) to address changes in federal law embodied in the FCC’s Small Cell Order (FCC 18-133). Since that time, there have been court decisions with respect to the FCC Small Cell Order, as well as further changes to FCC wireless regulations and state law affecting local wireless siting authority. J.The proposed revisions to this Section respond to current wireless communication facility trends, respond to updates in laws and regulations, clarify the City’s review procedures and information necessary to analyze wireless applications, clarify generally applicable development standards, and other matters to interpreting the City’s Comprehensive Plan, improve the effectiveness of the City’s regulations, and reflect the values of the City. SECTION 2. Section 18.42.110 of Chapter 18.42 is hereby amended to read as follows: 18.42.110 Wireless Communication Facilities (a) Purpose and Interpretation The purpose of this sectionSection is two-fold: (A) to implement within the jurisdictional boundaries of the cityCity the applicable zoning, land use and other laws, rules, regulations and policies and procedures applicable to siting applications filed with the cityCity by wireless communications facilities infrastructure owners and operators and wireless communications service providers, which seek to install or attach their facilities at locations in Palo Alto; and (B) to accommodate new wireless technologies and continued improvements to existing wireless communications facilities while minimizing their adverse visual and structural health and safety impacts. Consistent with that purpose, the provisions of this sectionSection are to be construed in a manner that is consistent with (1) the interest of consumers in receiving the benefits of the deployment of ultra-high-speed and -capacity broadband wireless communication facilities technology and innovations and the delivery of ultra-high-speed and - capacity broadband wireless communications facilities services, (2) the interest in safeguarding the environment, preserving historic properties, and addressing aesthetics and other local values, and (3) the interest in promoting the public health, safety and welfare in Palo Alto. Although this sectionSection implements and references provisions of preemptive state and 2 CLEAN DRAFT 11-19-21 4.a Packet Pg. 70 federal law, nothing in this sectionSection shall be interpreted to create an independent source of the rights provided an applicant by such state or federal law. A wireless communications facilityWireless Communications Facility (WCF) is permitted to be sited in Palo Alto subject to compliance with applicable requirements imposed by this chapter. TheseSection. The processes set forth are intended to permit wireless communications facilities thatWCFs that are stealthed to the extent possible so they blend in with their existing surroundings and do not negatively impact the environment, historic properties, or public safety. The procedures prescribed by this sectionSection are tailored to the type of wireless communication facilityWCF that is sought. Building- mounted wireless communications facilities and collocation of facilities are preferred and encouraged, subject to all other provisions of this section. (b) Definitions The following abbreviations, phrases, terms and words shall have the meanings assigned in this sectionSection or, as appropriate, in Section 18.04.030 18.04.030 and Section 1.04.050 1.04.050 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code, as may be amended from time to time, unless the context indicates otherwise. Words that are not defined in this sectionSection or other chapters or sections of the Palo Alto Municipal Code shall have the meanings as set forth in Chapter 6Sections 153 and 1401 of Title 47 of the United States Code, and Part 1, Subpart U of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations, and, if not defined therein, their common and ordinary meaning. Where this Section sets forth definitions that are from federal or state laws or regulations, the current text of the source law or regulation as of the time of enactment is set forth for the purpose of convenience only, but the source definition, which later may be amended, controls in the event of a conflict: (1) "Antenna" means that part of a wireless communications facilityWCF designed to radiate or receive radio frequency signals or electromagnetic waves for the provision of personal wireless services, as defined in 4247 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(C)(i). This definition does not include antennasAntennas designed for amateur or household use. (2) "Associated equipment" means any and all on-site equipment, including, without limitation, back-up batteries, generators and power supply units, cabinets, shelters, equipment buildings, coaxial and fiber optic cables, connections, shelters, radio transceivers, regular power supply units, and wiring, to which a wireless antennaan Antenna is attached in order to facilitate mobile broadband service and personal wireless service delivered onto mobile broadband devices. (3) "Base Station" means the same as defined by the FCC at 47 C.F.R. § 1.6100(b), as it may be amended from time to time. For the purpose of convenience only, this definition is stated as follows: a structure or equipment at a fixed location that enables FCC- licensed or authorized wireless communications between user equipment and a communications network. The term does not encompass a towerTower as defined herein or any equipment associated with a towerTower. Base Station includes, without limitation: 3 CLEAN DRAFT 11-19-21 4.a Packet Pg. 71 A. a. Equipment associated with wireless communications services such as private, broadcast, and public safety services, as well as unlicensed wireless services and fixed wireless services such as microwave backhaul. B. b. Radio transceivers, antennasAntennas, coaxial or fiber- optic cable, regular and backup power supplies, and comparable equipment, regardless of technological configuration (including Distributed Antenna Systems ("DAS") and small-cell networks). C.c. Any structure other than a towerTower that, at the time the relevant application is filed with the cityCity under this sectionSection, supports or houses equipment described in paragraphs (ia)-(iib) above and has been previously reviewed and approved by the cityCity. (4) "Collocation" means the same as defined by the FCC: a. When used in the context of an Eligible Facilities Request, the definition in 47 C.F.R. § 1.6100(b), as may be amended from time to time, applies For the purpose of convenience only, the definition is stated as follows: the mounting or installation of Transmission Equipment on an Eligible Support Structure for the purpose of transmitting and/or receiving radio frequency signals for communications purposes. (4) "Collocation" means the same as defined in valid regulations promulgated by the FCC, includingb. When not used in the context of an Eligible Facilities Request, the definition in 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.6002(g) or 1.6100(b), as those sections may be amended from time to time, applies. For the purpose of convenience only, the definition provided in 47 C.F.R. § 1.6100(b), for eligible facilities requests, is stated as follows: the(1) mounting or installation of transmission equipment on an eligible supportinstalling an antenna facility on a pre-existing structure; and/or (2) modifying a structure for the purpose of transmitting and/or receiving radio frequency signals for communications purposesmounting or installing an antenna facility on that structure. (5) "Eligible Facilities Request" (EFR) means the same as defined by the FCC at 47 C.F.R. § 1.6100(b), as it may be amended from time to time. For the purpose of convenience only, this definition is stated as follows: any request for modification of an existing tower or base stationExisting Tower or Base Station that, within the meaning of the Spectrum Act, does not substantially change the physical dimensions of that tower or base stationTower or Base Station, and involves (a) the collocation of new transmission equipmentCollocation of new Transmission Equipment, (b) the removal of transmission equipmentTransmission Equipment, or (c) the replacement of transmission equipmentTransmission Equipment. (6) "Eligible Support Structure" means the same as defined by the FCC at 47 C.F.R. § 1.6100(b), as it may be amended from time to time. For the purpose of convenience only, this definition is stated as follows: any existing tower or base stationExisting Tower or Base Station that exists at the time the application is filed with the cityCity. 4 CLEAN DRAFT 11-19-21 4.a Packet Pg. 72 (7) "Existing" means the same as defined by the FCC at 47 C.F.R. § 1.6100(b), as it may be amended from time to time. For the purpose of convenience only, this definition is stated as follows: a constructed tower or base stationTower or Base Station is existing for purposes of an eligible facilities requestEligible Facilities Request if has been previously reviewed and approved under the applicable cityCity zoning or siting process, or under another applicable state or local regulatory review process, provided that a towerTower that has not been reviewed and approved because it was not in a zoned area when it was built, but was lawfully constructed, is "Existing" for purposes of this definition. (8) "FCC" means the Federal Communications Commission or successor agency. (9) "Project" means a WCF to be located in Palo Alto for which a permit is required by the cityCity. (10) "RF" means radio frequency on the radio spectrum. (11) “Site” means the same as defined by the FCC at 47 C.F.R. § 1.6100(b), as it may be amended from time to time. For the purpose of convenience only, this definition is stated as follows: For Towers other than Towers in the public rights-of-way, the current boundaries of the leased or owned property surrounding the Tower and any access or utility easements currently related to the site, and, for other Eligible Support Structures, further restricted to the area in proximity to the structure and to other Transmission Equipment already deployed on the ground. The current boundaries of a site are the boundaries that existed as of the date that the original support structure or a modification to that structure was last reviewed and approved by a State or local government, if the approval of the modification occurred prior to the Spectrum Act or otherwise outside of the Section 6409(a) process. (1112) "Spectrum Act" means Section 6409(a) of the Middle Class Tax Relief Act and Job Creation Act of 2012, 47 U.S.C. § 1455(a) (providing, in part, "… a State or local government may not deny, and shall approve, any Eligible Facilities Request for a modification of any existingExisting wireless Tower or Base Station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such Tower or Base Station."). (1213) "Small Wireless Facility," means the same as defined in any valid regulations adopted by the FCC. For purposes of convenience only, the definition provided at 47 C.F.R. Section 1.13121.6002(el)(2), as it may be amended from time to time. For purposes of convenience only, this definition is stated here as follows: a facility that meets each of the following conditions: A a. The structure on which antennaAntenna facilities are mounted: i.(I) Is 50 feet or less in height, including their Antennas; or ii.(II) Is no more than 10 percent taller than other adjacent structures,; or 5 CLEAN DRAFT 11-19-21 4.a Packet Pg. 73 iii.(III) Is not extended to a height of more than 50 feet or by more than 10 percent above its preexisting height as a result of the collocation of new antenna facilities, whichever is greater; and Bb. Each antennaAntenna (excluding associated antennaAntenna equipment) is no more than three cubic feet in volume; and Cc. All antennaAntenna equipment associated with the facility (excluding antennas) are cumulatively no more than 28 cubic feet in volume; and Dd. The facility does not require antennaAntenna structure registration under 47 C.F.R. Section 17; and Ee. The facility is not located on Tribal lands, as defined under 36 C.F.R. § 800.16(x); and Ff. The facility does not result in human exposure to radiofrequency radiation in excess of the applicable safety standards specified by the FCC. (14) “Stealth” means designed to look like something other than a WCF. (13) "Substantially Changes15) "Substantial Change" means the same as defined by the FCC at 47 C.F.R. § 1.6100(b), as it may be amended from time to time. For the purpose of convenience only, this definition is stated as follows: in the context of an eligible support structure, a modification of an existing tower or base station where any ofsubstantially changes the physical dimensions of an Eligible Support Structure if it meets the following criteria is met: A a. For a towerTower not located in the public rights-of-way: i.(I) The height of the towerTower is increased by (Ii) more than ten (10) percent, or (IIii) by the height of one additional antenna array with separation from the nearest existing antennaExisting Antenna not to exceed twenty (20) feet, whichever is greater; or ii.(II) There is added an appurtenance to the body of the towerTower that would protrude from the edge of the towerTower by (Ii) more than twenty (20) feet, or (IIii) more than the width of the towerTower at the level of the appurtenance, whichever is greater. Bb. For a towerTower located in the public rights-of-way and for all base stations Base Stations: i.(I) The height of the tower or base stationTower or Base Station is increased by more than ten (10) percent or ten (10) feet, whichever is greater; or 6 CLEAN DRAFT 11-19-21 4.a Packet Pg. 74 ii.(II) There is added an appurtenance to the body of that structure that would protrude from the edge of that structure by more than six (6) feet; or iii.(III) It involves the installation of ground cabinets that are more than ten (10) percent larger in height or overall volume than any other ground cabinets associated with the structure; or iv.(IV) It involves the installation of any new equipment cabinets on the ground if there is no pre-existing ground cabinet associated with that structure. C c. For any eligible support structureEligible Support Structure: i.(I) It involves the installation of more than the standard number of new equipment cabinets for the technology involved, but not to exceed four (4) cabinets; or ii. There is entailed in the proposed modification any excavation or deployment outside of the current site of the tower or base station; or (II) The proposed modification entails any excavation or deployment outside of the current Site, except that for Towers not in the public rights-of-way, it entails any excavation or deployment of Transmission Equipment outside of the current Site by more than 30 feet in any direction. The Site boundary from which the 30 feet is measured excludes any access or utility easements currently related to the Site; or iii.(III) The proposed modification would causedefeat the concealment/camouflage elements of the tower or base station to be defeatedEligible Support Structure; or iv.(IV) The proposed modification would not comply with the conditions associated with the prior siting approval of construction or modification of the tower or base stationEligible Support Structure or Base Station, unless the non-compliance is due to an increase in height, increase in width, addition of cabinets, or new excavation that does not exceed the corresponding thresholds in this sectionSection. Dd. To measure changes in height for the purposes of this sectionSection, the baseline is: i.(I) For deployments that are or will be separated horizontally, such as on buildings’ rooftops, measured from the original support structure; ii.(II) For all others, measured from the dimensions of the tower or base stationTower or Base Station, inclusive of originally approved appurtenances and any modifications that were approved by the cityCity prior to February 22, 2012. E. To measure changes for the purposes of this section, the baseline is the dimensions that were approved by the city prior to February 22, 2012. 7 CLEAN DRAFT 11-19-21 4.a Packet Pg. 75 (14) "Tower" means any structure built for the sole or primary purpose of supporting any FCC-licensed or -authorized antennaAntenna, including any structure that is constructed for wireless communications service. This term does not include a base stationBase Station. (15) "Transmission Equipment" means the same as defined by the FCC at 47 C.F.R. § 1.6100(b), as it may be amended from time to time. For the purpose of convenience only, this definition is stated as follows: equipment that facilitates transmission of any FCC- licensed or authorized wireless communication service. (16) "Wireless Communications Facility" or "WCF" means any antenna, associated equipment, base station, small wireless facility, tower, and/or transmission equipment located in Palo AltoAntennas , Associated Equipment and other facilities or developments constructed, installed or operated for the transmission or receipt of wireless signals at a fixed location including but not limited to a Base Station, Small Wireless Facility, Transmission Equipment and Towers or similar support structures, accessory parking areas, and other accessory development, but does not include: a. A. A facility that qualifies as an amateur station as defined by the FCC, 47 C.F.R. Part 97, or its successor regulation; b. B. An antennaAntenna facility that is subject to the FCC Over-The-Air-Receiving Devices rule, 47 C.F.R. Section 1.4000, or any successor regulation; c. C. Portable radios and devices including, but not limited to, hand-held, vehicular, or other portable receivers, transmitters or transceivers, cellular phones, CB radios, and emergency services radioradios; d. D. Mobile services providing public information coverage of news events of a temporary nature;. e. E. Telecommunications facilities owned and operated by any government agency or emergency medical care provider. (c) Applicability (1) This Section applies to all WCFs as follows: All facilities shall be subject immediately to the provisions of this Section; provided, however, that in the event a condition of approval previously issued conflicts with a provision of this Section, the condition of approval shall control unless and until the permit is amended or no longer valid. (cd) Types of WCF PermitsEntitlements Required 8 CLEAN DRAFT 11-19-21 4.a Packet Pg. 76 (1) An entitlement is required in all cases to locate or modify any WCF within the City, as follows: (1)a. A Tier 1 WCF PermitEntitlement shall be required for an eligible facilities requestEFR, as defined in this sectionSection. (2)b. A Tier 2 WCF PermitEntitlement shall be required for: A.(I) Any modification of an eligible support structureEligible Support Structure, including the collocationCollocation of new equipment, that substantially changesconstitutes a Substantial Change to the physical dimensions of the eligible support structure on which it is mountedEligible Support Structure making it ineligible for a Tier 1 WCF Entitlement; or (II) Any Collocation of a WCF, including a Small Wireless Facility, that is not eligible for a Tier 1 WCF Entitlement; or (III) Any placement of a Small Wireless Facility on a new utility pole or streetlight pole in the public right-of-way that is proposed to replace an existing pole of the same type which will be removed, and that will be located within a five-foot radius of the location of such existing pole. B. Any collocation of a small wireless facility; or C. Any collocation not eligible for a Tier 1 WCF Permit. (3)c. A Tier 3 WCF PermitEntitlement shall be required for the siting of any WCF, including a small wireless facilitySmall Wireless Facility, that is not a collocation subject to a Tier 1 or 2 WCF Permit. An application shall not require a Tier 3 WCF Permit solely because it proposes the replacement in-place of an existing streetlight or wood utility poleEntitlement. (2) The thresholds for a Substantial Change outlined above are disjunctive. The failure to meet any one or more of the applicable thresholds means that a Substantial Change would occur. The thresholds for height increases are cumulative limits. (de) WCF Application Requirements All applications for a WCF PermitEntitlement shall include the following items: (1) Any applicant for a WCF Permit shall participate in an intake meetingEntitlement shall submit an application in conformance with the Planning and Community EnvironmentDevelopment Services Department when filing an applicationprocedures; (2) The applicant must specify in writing whether the applicant believes the application is for an eligible facilities requestEligible Facilities Request subject to the Spectrum Act, and if so, provide a detailed written explanation as to why the applicant believes that the application qualifies as an eligible facilities requestEligible Facilities Request; 9 CLEAN DRAFT 11-19-21 4.a Packet Pg. 77 (3) The applicant shall submit a signed, complete the city'sCity's standard application form, as may be amended from time to time; (4) The applicant shall include a completed and signed application checklist available from the city, includingsubmit all information required by the application checklist and submit the full signed and completed application checklist required by the Planning and Development Services Department Director (Director), as publicly stated in the application checklist; (5) Payment of the fee prescribed by the Municipal Fee Schedule; (6) The WCF Entitlement application must be accompanied by all permit applications with all required application materials for each separate permit required by the cityCity for the proposed WCF, including, but not limited to, a building permit (if applicable), an encroachment permit (if applicable) and an electrical permit (if applicable);. If a complete required permit application is not submitted at the same time as the WCF Entitlement application, the City may determine the application to be incomplete and/or any deadlines for action on any such permit application will run from the date that permit application is first submitted, and not from the date of the WCF Entitlement application; (7) The application must be accompanied by a report prepared by a radio engineer that demonstrates that it would meet the FCC standards for Occupational and Uncontrolled/General exposure operating at maximum power densities at all relevant frequencies, when operating individually and in combination with other Existing or approved facilities which could be measured at the location. (8) The application must be accompanied by a report prepared by an acoustic engineer that demonstrates that the anticipated noise levels of all equipment operating within the WCF, based upon manufacturer’s specifications, meet the standards set forth in Palo Alto Municipal Code (PAMC) Chapter 9.10 and Comprehensive Plan noise-related policies, when operating individually and in combination with other Existing or approved facilities which could be measured at the location. In lieu of a report, the applicant may submit evidence from the equipment manufacturer that the WCF equipment will not generate noise. (9) The application must be accompanied by a visual analysis of the WCF in context, which shall include, at minimum, visual simulations rendered to scale. (710) For Tier 2 and 3 WCF PermitsEntitlements, the applicant must host a community meeting at a time and location designed to maximize attendance by persons receiving notice under this subparagraph to provide outreach to the neighborhood around the project siteproposed WCF’s primary location. The applicant shall give notice of the community meeting to all residents and property owners within 600 feet of the project site proposed WCF’s primary location at least 14 days in advance of the community meeting. Applicants are encouraged to host the meeting before submitting an application. Before an application may be approved, the applicant shall provide a proof of notice affidavit to the cityCity that contains: 10 CLEAN DRAFT 11-19-21 4.a Packet Pg. 78 Aa. Proof that the applicant noticed and hosted the community meeting no later than 15 days after filing the application; and Bb. A summary of comments received at the community meeting and what, if any, changes were made to the application as a result of the meeting;. (11) For Tier 2 and Tier 3 WCF Entitlements, the applicant shall identify the proposed WCF’s primary location and provide an alternatives analysis. If the applicant changes the primary location before the application is deemed complete, it will be considered a new application. (12) For Tier 2 and Tier 3 WCF Entitlements for WCF that include requests for exception(s) to the specific standards or any other provision of PAMC Section 18.42.110, the alternatives analysis above shall compare the exception(s) required for feasible operations at the primary location(s) with the exception(s) required for feasible operations at the alternative location(s). (13) The applicant’s assertions of feasibility and infeasibility, and the exceptions, if any, needed to ensure a location or design is feasible may be demonstrated using site-specific physical, public safety, regulatory, WCF engineering and/or other technical constraints. (814) For Tier 3 WCF PermitsEntitlements, the plans shall include a scaled depiction of the maximum increase in the physical dimensions of the proposed project that would be feasible and permitted by the Spectrum Act, using the proposed project as a baseline; and. (9) Satisfy other such requirements as may be, from time to time, required by the Planning and Community Environment Department Director ("Director"), as publically stated in the application checklist. (f) Incomplete Applications and Applications Deemed Denied (e) Permit Review ("Shot Clock") Time Periods. The city shall review and act upon application materialsWCF applications will be processed, and notices of incompleteness provided, in a manner consistent with any timeframes provided in controlling state or federal law, including valid regulations and orders promulgated by the FCC. If the City determines an application is incomplete, the City at its option may take any of the following actions at any time within the period for the City’s review: (1) The City may provide applicant a written notice specifying the material omitted from the application, or (2) To promote efficient review and timely decisions, the City may, at its option, deny an application without prejudice to the applicant and require refiling as a new application, whenever the applicant fails to provide a substantive response to the City within ninety (90) calendar days after the City deems the application incomplete in a written notice to the applicant., or 11 CLEAN DRAFT 11-19-21 4.a Packet Pg. 79 (3) The City may deny the application without prejudice to a future new application, if the City determines that any substantive response(s) to any incomplete item(s) or other resubmittal change the application materials to a such degree as to constitute a new application when received, such as, but not limited to, in the event that the applicant failed to identify all requests for exceptions at the time of application filing, or (4) The City may mutually agree in writing with the applicant to toll the period in which the City is required to act on that application. (g) Independent Expert (1) The Director is authorized to retain on behalf of the City an independent, qualified consultant(s) to review the technical aspects of any WCF Entitlement application, which may include, but are not limited to, the following matters: a. The accuracy, adequacy, and completeness of application materials; b. Compliance with applicable radio frequency emission standards, applicable electrical codes and fire codes, and best practices for fire and electrical safety; c. An assessment of any potential impacts a proposed installation presents to surrounding vegetation and structures. d. An engineering and seismic assessment of the proposed installation to ensure that the proposed location is structurally adequate to support the proposed installation, in accordance with applicable safety standards. e. The preparation of appropriate environmental documents consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (2) Consistent with applicable law, the cost of this review shall be paid by the applicant, including the contract price of the independent consultant(s) and applicable fees. (fh) Tier 1 WCF PermitEntitlement Process and Findings (1) A Tier 1 WCF PermitEntitlement shall be reviewed by the Director. The Director's decision shall be final and shall not be appealable; (2) The Director shall grant a Tier 1 WCF PermitEntitlement provided that the Director finds that the applicant proposes an eligible facilities requestapplication qualifies as an EFR and that the proposed facility will comply with all generally-applicable laws; (3) The Director shall impose the following conditions on the grant of a Tier 1 WCF PermitEntitlement, together with any other conditions deemed necessary: A a. The proposed collocation or modification shall not defeat any existing concealment elements of the support structure; and 12 CLEAN DRAFT 11-19-21 4.a Packet Pg. 80 B b. The applicable conditions of approval in Section 18.42.11018.42.110(jo). (gi) Tier 2 WCF PermitEntitlement Process and Findings (1) A Tier 2 WCF PermitEntitlement shall be reviewed by the Director, who may, in his or her sole discretion, refer an application to the Architectural Review Board and/or Planning and Transportation Commission. The Director's decision shall be appealable directly to the City Council. An appeal may be set for hearing before the City Council or may be placed on the Council's consent calendar, pursuant to the process for appeal of architectural review set forth in Section 18.77.07018.77.070(f). (2) The Director, or Council on appeal, shall grant a Tier 2 WCF PermitEntitlement provided the proposed WCF complies with the conditions of approval in Section 18.42.11018.42.110(jo) and all objectivespecific standards adopted and amended from time to time by resolution of the City Council or, where either the specific standards do not apply or the City approves an exception, the proposed WCF complies with the development standards in Section 18.42.110(in). If such objectivespecific standards are repealed, an application shall not be granted unless, in addition to the development standards in Section 18.42.110(n) and other requirements of this sectionSection, all of the architectural review findings in Section 18.76.02018.76.020(d) can be made. (3) The Director, or Council on appeal, shall deny a Tier 2 WCF PermitEntitlement if the above findings cannot be made. (hj) Tier 3 WCF PermitEntitlement Process and Findings (1) A Tier 3 WCF PermitEntitlement shall be reviewed by the Director, who may, in his or her sole discretion, refer an application to the Architectural Review Board and/or Planning and Transportation Commission. The Director's decision shall be appealable directly to the City Council. An appeal may be set for hearing before the City Council or may be placed on the Council's consent calendar, pursuant to the process for appeal of architectural review set forth in Section 18.77.07018.77.070(f). (2) The Director or Council on appeal shall grant a Tier 3 WCF PermitEntitlement provided the conditional use permit findings in Section 18.76.01018.76.010(c) can be made and the proposed WCF complies with the conditions of approval in Section 18.42.11018.42.110(jo), and all objectivespecific standards adopted and amended from time to time by resolution of the City Council or, where either the specific standards do not apply or the City approves an exception, the proposed WCF complies with the development standards in Section 18.42.110(in). If the City Council repeals all objectivesuch specific standards are repealed, an application shall not be granted unless, in addition to the development standards in Section 18.42.110(n) and other requirements of this sectionSection, all of the architectural review findings in Section 18.76.02018.76.020(d) can be made. 13 CLEAN DRAFT 11-19-21 4.a Packet Pg. 81 (3) The Director, or Council on appeal, shall deny a Tier 3 WCF PermitEntitlement if the above findings cannot be made. (k) Location Preferences (1) Building-mounted and collocation at existing facilities of WCFs are preferred and encouraged, subject to all other provisions of this Section. (2) Location preferences approved by Council by resolution. (il) Generally Applicable Development Standards Unless the City Council has adopted more specific standards, and except as otherwise provided in this sectionSection, a proposed WCF Project shall comply with the following standards: (1) Shall utilize the smallest antennaeAntenna, radio, and associatedother equipment, as measured by volume, technically feasible to achieve a network objective; (2) Shall be screened from public view; (3) When attached to an existing or a new structure, shall be compact and shrouded or screened using materials or colors found on the existing or new structure so as to be Stealthed; (4) Shall be placed at a location that would not require the removal of any required landscaping or would reduce the quantity of landscaping to a level of noncompliance with the Zoning Code; (5) An antenna, base station, or tower shall be of a "camouflaged" or "stealth"Antenna, Base Station, or Tower shall be of a Stealth design, including concealment, screening, and other techniques to hide or blend the antenna, base station, or towerAntenna and other WCF equipment, Base Station, or Tower into the surrounding area, such as the use of a monopine design; (6) Shall not be attached on a historic structure/site, as designated by PAMC Chapter 16.49; (7) Except as otherwise permitted by the Spectrum Act, aA building-mounted WCF may extend no more than fifteen (15) feet beyond the permitted height of the building in the zone district; (8) Except as otherwise permitted by the Spectrum Act, a towerA Tower or other stand-alone Tier 3 WCF Project shall not exceedextend beyond sixty-five (65) feet in height; and (9) A towerTower or other stand-alone Tier 3 WCF may encroach into the interior/street side and rear setback. 14 CLEAN DRAFT 11-19-21 4.a Packet Pg. 82 (10) Shall at all times comply with the City’s Comprehensive Plan goals and policies and PAMC Chapter 9.10 pertaining to noise when operating individually and in combination with other Existing or approved facilities which could be measured at the location or closest adjacent property lines, when located on private property. (12) Shall not interfere with the use of the public right-of-way, existing subterranean infrastructure, or the City’s plans for modification or use of such location and infrastructure. (13) Shall be designed to be easily maintained and shall be designed to be resistant to, and minimize opportunities for, unauthorized access, climbing, vandalism, graffiti, and other conditions that would result in hazardous situations, visual blight, or attractive nuisances. (14) Shall comply with all applicable federal and state laws (including without limitation, the building code, electrical code, fire code, and other public safety requirements, as well as the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) standards, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements, the Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA), and the California Endangered Species Act (CESA). (jm) Conditions of Approval In addition to any other conditions of approval permitted under federal and state law and this Code that the Director deems appropriate or required under this Code, all WCF Projects approved under this chapterSection, whether approved by the Director or deemed granted by operation of law, shall be subject to the following conditions of approval, unless modified by the Director, or Council on appeal: (1) PermitEntitlement conditions. The grant or approval of a WCF Tier 1 PermitEntitlement shall be subject to the conditions of approval of the underlying permit, except as may be preempted by the Spectrum Act and implementing FCC regulations. (2) As-built plans. The applicantpermittee shall submit to the Director an as- built set of plans and photographs depicting the entire WCF as modified, including all transmission equipmentTransmission Equipment and all utilities, within ninety (90) days after the completion of constructionprior to City’s final inspection approval. (3) ApplicantPost-installation report. Permittee shall hire a radio engineer licensed by the State of California to measure the actual radio frequency emissionemissions of the WCF and determine if it meets FCC's standardsdemonstrate that the WCF meets the FCC standards for Occupational and Uncontrolled/General exposure at the maximum power operating at maximum power densities at all relevant frequencies when operating individually and in combination with other Existing or approved facilities which could be measured at that location. A report, certified by the engineer, ofshall include all calculations, required measurements, and the engineer's findings with respect to compliance with the FCC's radio frequency emission standards. This report shall be submitted to the Planning Division within one year of commencement of operation.Director after commencement of WCF operation 15 CLEAN DRAFT 11-19-21 4.a Packet Pg. 83 and prior to City issuance of final inspection approval. The report, shall also include, but not be limited to, the following: a. a methodology section outlining instrumentation, measurement direction, heights and distances, and other protocols outlined in FCC Bulletin OET 65; b. a list and identification of any nearby RF sources, nearby reflecting surface or conductive objects that could produce regions of field intensification; c. antenna gain and vertical and horizontal radiation patterns, type of modulation at the site, polarization and emissions orientation(s) of the antenna(s); d. a log of all equipment used; e. a map and list of all locations measured indicating the maximum power observed; and f. the percentage of the FCC Occupational and Uncontrolled/General guidelines at the measurement location. At the applicant’s expense, the City may elect to have a City-staff observer during the measurements, may elect to receive raw test measurements by location provided in electronic format to the observer, and may elect to have the report independently peer reviewed prior to report acceptance. Applicant may be required to submit these reports periodically as determined by the Director whenever the Transmission Equipment is damaged, modified or replaced, or repaired for the life of the WCF Entitlement, as determined by the Director. (4) Indemnification. To the extent permitted by law, the applicantpermittee shall indemnify and hold harmless the cityCity, its City Council, its officers, employees and agents (the "indemnified parties") from and against any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party against the indemnified parties and the applicant to attack, set aside or void, any permit or approval authorized hereby for the Project, including (without limitation) reimbursing the cityCity for its actual attorneys' fees and costs incurred in defense of the litigation. The cityCity may, in its sole discretion and at Applicant's expense, elect to defend any such action with attorneys of its own choice. (5) Compliance with applicable laws. The applicantpermittee shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Code, any permit issued under this Code, and all other applicable federal, state and local laws (including without limitation allthe building code, electrical code, fire code, and other public safety requirements, as well as the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Federal Communications Commission (FCC) standards, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements, Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA), and the California Endangered Species Act (CESA). Any failure by the City to enforce compliance with any applicable laws shall not relieve any applicant of its obligations under this code, any permit issued under this code, or all other applicable laws and regulations. 16 CLEAN DRAFT 11-19-21 4.a Packet Pg. 84 (6) Compliance with conditions of approval and approved plans. The proposed ProjectWCF shall be built and operate in compliance with the conditions of approval and the approved plans on file with the Planning DivisionDirector. (7) Subject to city usesCity Uses. Any permit to install or utilize poles or conduit in the public rights- of-wayrights of way is subject to the city’sCity’s prior right to use, maintain, expand, replace or remove from use such facilities in the reasonable exercise of its governmental or proprietary powers. Such permit is further subject to the city’sCity’s right to construction, maintain, and modify streets, sidewalks, and other improvements in the public rights-of-wayrights of way. The cityCity, in its sole discretion, may require removal or relocation of a permittee’s equipment, at permittee’s sole cost and expense, if necessary to accommodate a cityCity use. (8) City Access and No Interference. The permittee shall not place any facilities that will deny access to, or otherwise interfere with, any public utility, easement, or right-of- way located on the site. The permittee shall allow the City reasonable access to, and maintenance of, all utilities and existing public improvements within or adjacent to the site, including, but not limited to, pavement, trees, public utilities, lighting and public signage. (89) Replacement. Where feasible, as new technology becomes available, the applicantpermittee shall place above-ground equipment below ground and replace equipment remaining above-ground with smaller equipment, as determined by volume. The applicant shall obtain all necessary permits and approvals for such replacement. (9) Permit length. WCFs permits shall be valid for the time provided in Section 18.42.110(n), except that a permit shall automatically expire after twelve months from the date of approval if within such twelve month period, the applicant has not obtained all necessary permits to commence construction. The director may, without a hearing, extend such time for a maximum period of twelve additional months only, upon application filed with him or her before the expiration of the twelve-month limit. (10) Build-out period for WCF Entitlement. Prior to vesting, a WCF Entitlement and associated construction permits shall automatically expire in accordance with Section 18.77.090. The Director at his or her discretion will determine whether or not to exercise the optional extension provision in Section 18.77.090 for WCF Entitlements. (11) Permit Duration. WCF Entitlements shall be valid for the time provided in Section 18.42.110(s). (12) Noise. At all times, the WCF shall comply with the City’s Comprehensive Plan goals and policies and PAMC Chapter 9.10 pertaining to noise when operating individually and in combination with other Existing or approved facilities which could be measured at the location. (13) Signage. At all times, all required notices and signs shall be posted on the site as required by the FCC and California Public Utilities Commission, and as approved by the 17 CLEAN DRAFT 11-19-21 4.a Packet Pg. 85 City. The sign bearing the contact name and the 24-hour live local or toll free and telephone number shall be posted at the location pursuant to the approved plans. (14) Maintenance. The permittee, at no cost to the City, shall regularly maintain the WCF, including in regard to signage, noise, debris, and damage, including vandalism. The permittee shall repair any deficiency at the site within 48 hours after the permittee receives notice or otherwise becomes aware of the occurrence. (15) Insurance. The permittee shall obtain and maintain insurance on the WCF for the coverages and in the amounts reasonably specified by the City. (16) Liability. The permittee shall assume full liability for damage or injury caused to any property or person by the WCF. (17) Performance Bond. The permittee shall pay for and provide a performance bond, which shall be in effect until the facilities are fully and completely removed and the site reasonably returned to its original condition, to cover the permittee’s obligations under these conditions of approval and the Palo Alto Municipal Code. The bond coverage shall include, but not be limited to, removal of the facility and maintenance obligations. The amount of the performance bond shall be set by the Director in an amount rationally related to the obligations covered by the bond or shall be set in accordance with the provisions of any applicable Master License Agreement. (18) Post-Installation Annual Certification Report. Each year on or before July 1, the permittee shall submit a WCF status report, with an affidavit signed by the permittee’s current WCF representative, that lists by location, site numbers, and coordinates, all WCF the permittee owns and/or operates within the City. These reports shall be reviewed by City staff or an independent consultant at the expense of the permittee. The report shall: a. Certify that each WCF remains in use and remains covered by insurance; b. Include the permittee’s contact information for each WCF, including the name, title, email address, mailing address, and 24-hour local or toll-free contact phone number of the permittee, the owner, the operator, and the agent or person responsible for maintenance of the WCF; c. Identify the date of entitlement for each WCF and the number of years left in the entitlement in accordance with PAMC Section 18.42.110(s). (19) Record Retention. The permittee must maintain complete and accurate copies of all permits and other regulatory approvals issued in connection with the WCF, which includes without limitation this approval, the approved plans and photo simulations incorporated into this approval, all conditions associated with this approval and any ministerial permits or approvals issued in connection with this approval. In the event that the permittee does not maintain such records as required in this condition, any ambiguities or uncertainties 18 CLEAN DRAFT 11-19-21 4.a Packet Pg. 86 that would be resolved through an inspection of the missing records will be construed against the permittee. (20) Binding on Successors. The WCF conditions of approval are binding upon the permittee and all successors in interest to the permittee. (21) Non-exclusive Grant. This approval does not confer any exclusive right, privilege, license, or franchise to occupy or use the public right-of-way of the City for delivery of telecommunications services or any other purposes. Further, this approval shall not be construed as any warranty of title. (kn) Exceptions (1) The decision-making authority may grant one or more exceptions to objectivespecific standards adopted by City Council resolution or any provision of this Section 18.42.110, upon finding that: Aa. The proposed WCF complies with the requirements of this Section 18.42.110 and any other requirements adopted by the City Council to the greatest extent feasible; and either b. Either: B.(I) As applied to a proposed WCF, the provision(s) from which exception is sought would deprive the applicant of rights guaranteed by federal law, state law, or both; or C.(II) Denial of the application as proposed would violate federal law, state law, or both. (2) An applicant must request an exception at the time an application is initially submitted for a WCF permitEntitlement under this Section 18.42.110. The request must include both the specific provision(s) from which exception is sought and the basis of the request, including all supporting evidence on which the applicant relies, as specified in the City’s checklist, as may be amended from time to time. Any request for exception after the City has deemed an application complete constitutes a material change to the proposed WCF and shall be considered a new application. (3) If the applicant seeks an exception from objectivespecific standards adopted by City Council resolution or from the generally applicable development standards, the Director may refer the application to the Architectural Review Board for recommendation on whether the application complies with such standards to the greatest extent feasible. (4) The applicant shall have the burden of proving that federal law, state law, or both compel the decision-making authority to grant the requested exception(s), using the evidentiary standards applicable to the law at issue. The cityCity shall have the right to hire independent consultants, at the applicant’s expense, to evaluate the issues raised by the exception request and to submit rebuttal evidence where applicable. 19 CLEAN DRAFT 11-19-21 4.a Packet Pg. 87 (lo) Removal of Abandoned Equipment A WCF (Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3) or a component of that WCF that ceases to be in use for more than ninety (90) days shall be removed by the applicantpermittee, wireless communications service provider, or property owner within ninety (90) days of the cessation of use of that WCF. A new WCF permitEntitlement shall not be issued to an owner or operator of a WCF or a wireless communications service provider until the abandoned WCF or its component is removed. (mp) Revocation The Director may revoke any WCF PermitEntitlement if the permit holder fails to comply with any condition of the permit. The Director's decision to revoke a Permit shall be appealable pursuant to the process applicable to issuance of the Permit, as provided in subdivisions (fh), (gi), and (hj) of this sectionSection. (nq) Expiration of Constructed WCF Entitlement Except as otherwise provided in the permitWCF Entitlement or in a lease or license agreement with the City of Palo Alto, constructed WCF permitsEntitlements shall be valid for a period of ten years from the date of approval of the planning entitlement. An applicant may seek extensions of an approved WCF permitrenewal of a constructed WCF Entitlement in increments of no more than ten years and no sooner than twelve months prior to the expiration of the permitplanning entitlement. The Director shall approve an extension request upon finding that that applicant has complied with all conditions of approval for the WCF permitEntitlement and will comply with all other requirements applicable to WCFs at the time the extension is granted. Prior to issuing a decision on an extension request, the Director may seek additional studies and information to be prepared at the applicantspermittee’s expense. (Ord. 5465 § 2, 2019: Ord. 5432 § 12, 2018: Ord. 5340 § 1 (part), 2015) (r) Emergency Deployment In the event of a declared federal, state, or local emergency, or when otherwise warranted by conditions that the Director deems to constitute an emergency, the City may approve the installation and operation of a temporary WCF (e.g. a cell on wheels or “COW”), which is subject to such reasonable conditions that the Director deems necessary. SECTION 3. All applications for Wireless Communications Facilities which were not subject to final action by City prior to the effective date of this Ordinance shall be subject to and comply with all provisions of this Section, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law. SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion or sections of the Ordinance. The Council hereby declares that it should have adopted the Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. 20 CLEAN DRAFT 11-19-21 4.a Packet Pg. 88 SECTION 5. The Council finds that this ordinance is exempt from environmental review under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, because it does not authorize the construction of Wireless Communication Facilities in any locations where such facilities are not already permitted; therefore it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment. The ordinance is further exempt under CEQA Guidelines sections 15301, 15302, 15303 and 15305 because it simply provides a comprehensive permitting scheme governing minor alterations to existing facilities or small structures. SECTION 6. This ordinance shall be effective on the thirty-first day after the date of its adoption. INTRODUCED: PASSED: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: ATTEST: ________________________________________________________ City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: ____________________________________________________________ Deputy City Attorney City Manager _______________________________ Director of Planning and Development Services 21 CLEAN DRAFT 11-19-21 4.a Packet Pg. 89 420 Delete Style name: Default Style 287 Move From 0 Move To Intelligent Table Comparison: Active 0 Table Insert 0 Table Delete Original filename: paloalto-ca-18.42.110 Wireless.DOCX 0 Table moves to 0 Table moves from Modified filename: 11-19 CLEAN UPDATED BBK edit Wireless Ordinance Update.DOCX 0 Embedded Graphics (Visio, ChemDraw, Images etc.) 0 Summary report: Litera® Change-Pro for Word 10.8.2.11 Document comparison done on 11/19/2021 12:26:06 PM Embedded Excel Changes: 0 Format changes 0 Total Changes: Add 707 4.a Packet Pg. 90 18.42.110 Wireless Communication Facilities (a) Purpose and Interpretation The purpose of this section is two-fold: (A) to implement within the jurisdictional boundaries of the city the applicable zoning, land use and other laws, rules, regulations and policies and procedures applicable to siting applications filed with the city by wireless communications facilities infrastructure owners and operators and wireless communications service providers, which seek to install or attach their facilities at locations in Palo Alto; and (B) to accommodate new wireless technologies and continued improvements to existing wireless communications facilities while minimizing their adverse visual and structural health and safety impacts. Consistent with that purpose, the provisions of this section are to be construed in a manner that is consistent with (1) the interest of consumers in receiving the benefits of the deployment of ultra-high-speed and -capacity broadband wireless communication facilities technology and innovations and the delivery of ultra-high-speed and -capacity broadband wireless communications facilities services, (2) the interest in safeguarding the environment, preserving historic properties, and addressing aesthetics and other local values, and (3) the interest in promoting the public health, safety and welfare in Palo Alto. Although this section implements and references provisions of preemptive state and federal law, nothing in this section shall be interpreted to create an independent source of the rights provided an applicant by such state or federal law. A wireless communications facility is permitted to be sited in Palo Alto subject to applicable requirements imposed by this chapter. These processes are intended to permit wireless communications facilities that blend with their existing surroundings and do not negatively impact the environment, historic properties, or public safety. The procedures prescribed by this section are tailored to the type of wireless communication facility that is sought. Building-mounted wireless communications facilities and collocation of facilities are preferred and encouraged, subject to all other provisions of this section. (b) Definitions The following abbreviations, phrases, terms and words shall have the meanings assigned in this section or, as appropriate, in Section 18.04.030 and Section 1.04.050 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code, as may be amended from time to time, unless the context indicates otherwise. Words that are not defined in this section or other chapters or sections of the Palo Alto Municipal Code shall have the meanings as set forth in Chapter 6 of Title 47 of the United States Code, Part 1 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations, and, if not defined therein, their common and ordinary meaning. (1) "Antenna" means that part of a wireless communications facility designed to radiate or receive radio frequency signals or electromagnetic waves for the provision of personal wireless services, as defined in 42 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(C)(i). This definition does not include antennas designed for amateur or household use. (2) "Associated equipment" means any and all on-site equipment, including, without limitation, back-up generators and power supply units, cabinets, coaxial and fiber optic cables, connections, shelters, radio transceivers, regular power supply units, and wiring, to which a wireless antenna is attached in order to facilitate mobile broadband service and personal wireless service delivered on mobile broadband devices. (3) "Base Station" means the same as defined by the FCC at 47 C.F.R. § 1.6100(b), as it may be amended from time to time. For the purpose of convenience only, this definition is stated as follows: a structure or equipment at a fixed location that enables FCC-licensed or authorized wireless communications between user equipment and a communications network. The term does not encompass a tower as defined herein or any equipment associated with a tower. Base Station includes, without limitation: A. Equipment associated with wireless communications services such as private, broadcast, and public safety services, as well as unlicensed wireless services and fixed wireless services such as microwave backhaul. B. Radio transceivers, antennas, coaxial or fiber-optic cable, regular and backup power supplies, and comparable equipment, regardless of technological configuration (including Distributed Antenna Systems ("DAS") and small-cell networks). C. Any structure other than a tower that, at the time the relevant application is filed with the city under this section, supports or houses equipment described in paragraphs (i)-(ii) above and has been previously reviewed and approved by the city. (4) "Collocation" means the same as defined in valid regulations promulgated by the FCC, including 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.6002(g) or 1.6100(b), as those sections may be amended from time to time. For the purpose of convenience only, the definition provided in 47 C.F.R. § 1.6100(b), for eligible facilities requests, is stated as follows: the mounting or installation of transmission equipment on an eligible support structure for the purpose of transmitting and/or receiving radio frequency signals for communications purposes. (5) "Eligible Facilities Request" means the same as defined by the FCC at 47 C.F.R. § 1.6100(b), as it may be amended from time to time. For the purpose of convenience only, this definition is stated as follows: any request for modification of an existing tower or base station that, within the meaning of the Spectrum Act, does not substantially change the physical dimensions of that tower or base station, and involves (a) the collocation of new transmission equipment, (b) the removal of transmission equipment, or (c) the replacement of transmission equipment. (6) "Eligible Support Structure" means the same as defined by the FCC at 47 C.F.R. § 1.6100(b), as it may be amended from time to time. For the purpose of convenience only, this definition is stated as follows: any existing tower or base station that exists at the time the application is filed with the city. 4.b Packet Pg. 91 (7) "Existing" means the same as defined by the FCC at 47 C.F.R. § 1.6100(b), as it may be amended from time to time. For the purpose of convenience only, this definition is stated as follows: a constructed tower or base station is existing for purposes of an eligible facilities request if has been previously reviewed and approved under the applicable city zoning or siting process, or under another applicable state or local regulatory review process, provided that a tower that has not been reviewed and approved because it was not in a zoned area when it was built, but was lawfully constructed, is "Existing" for purposes of this definition. (8) "FCC" means the Federal Communications Commission or successor agency. (9) "Project" means a WCF to be located in Palo Alto for which a permit is required by the city. (10) "RF" means radio frequency on the radio spectrum. (11) "Spectrum Act" means Section 6409(a) of the Middle Class Tax Relief Act and Job Creation Act of 2012, 47 U.S.C. § 1455(a) (providing, in part, "… a State or local government may not deny, and shall approve, any Eligible Facilities Request for a modification of any existing wireless Tower or Base Station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such Tower or Base Station."). (12) "Small Wireless Facility" means the same as defined in any valid regulations adopted by the FCC. For purposes of convenience only, the definition provided at 47 C.F.R. Section 1.1312(e)(2) is stated here as follows: a facility that meets each of the following conditions: A. The structure on which antenna facilities are mounted: i. Is 50 feet or less in height, or ii. Is no more than 10 percent taller than other adjacent structures, or iii. Is not extended to a height of more than 10 percent above its preexisting height as a result of the collocation of new antenna facilities; and B. Each antenna (excluding associated antenna equipment) is no more than three cubic feet in volume; and C. All antenna equipment associated with the facility (excluding antennas) are cumulatively no more than 28 cubic feet in volume; and D. The facility does not require antenna structure registration under 47 C.F.R. Section 17; and E. The facility is not located on Tribal lands, as defined under 36 C.F.R. § 800.16(x); and F. The facility does not result in human exposure to radiofrequency radiation in excess of the applicable safety standards specified by the FCC. (13) "Substantially Changes" means the same as defined by the FCC at 47 C.F.R. § 1.6100(b), as it may be amended from time to time. For the purpose of convenience only, this definition is stated as follows: in the context of an eligible support structure, a modification of an existing tower or base station where any of the following criteria is met: A. For a tower not located in the public rights-of-way: i. The height of the tower is increased by (I) more than ten (10) percent, or (II) by the height of one additional antenna array with separation from the nearest existing antenna not to exceed twenty (20) feet, whichever is greater; or ii. There is added an appurtenance to the body of the tower that would protrude from the edge of the tower by (I) more than twenty (20) feet, or (II) more than the width of the tower at the level of the appurtenance, whichever is greater. B. For a tower located in the public rights-of-way and for all base stations: i. The height of the tower or base station is increased by more than ten (10) percent or ten (10) feet, whichever is greater; or ii. There is added an appurtenance to the body of that structure that would protrude from the edge of that structure by more than six (6) feet; or iii. It involves the installation of ground cabinets that are more than ten (10) percent larger in height or overall volume than any other ground cabinets associated with the structure; or iv. It involves the installation of any new equipment cabinets on the ground if there is no pre-existing ground cabinet associated with that structure. C. For any eligible support structure: i. It involves the installation of more than the standard number of new equipment cabinets for the technology involved, but not to exceed four (4) cabinets; or ii. There is entailed in the proposed modification any excavation or deployment outside of the current site of the tower or base station; or iii. The proposed modification would cause the concealment/camouflage elements of the tower or base station to be 4.b Packet Pg. 92 defeated; or iv. The proposed modification would not comply with the conditions associated with the prior siting approval of construction or modification of the tower or base station, unless the non-compliance is due to an increase in height, increase in width, addition of cabinets, or new excavation that does not exceed the corresponding thresholds in this section. D. To measure changes in height for the purposes of this section, the baseline is: i. For deployments that are or will be separated horizontally, measured from the original support structure; ii. For all others, measured from the dimensions of the tower or base station, inclusive of originally approved appurtenances and any modifications that were approved by the city prior to February 22, 2012. E. To measure changes for the purposes of this section, the baseline is the dimensions that were approved by the city prior to February 22, 2012. (14) "Tower" means any structure built for the sole or primary purpose of supporting any FCC-licensed or -authorized antenna, including any structure that is constructed for wireless communications service. This term does not include a base station. (15) "Transmission Equipment" means the same as defined by the FCC at 47 C.F.R. § 1.6100(b), as it may be amended from time to time. For the purpose of convenience only, this definition is stated as follows: equipment that facilitates transmission of any FCC-licensed or authorized wireless communication service. (16) "Wireless Communications Facility" or "WCF" means any antenna, associated equipment, base station, small wireless facility, tower, and/or transmission equipment located in Palo Alto, but does not include: A. A facility that qualifies as an amateur station as defined by the FCC, 47 C.F.R. Part 97, or its successor regulation; B. An antenna facility that is subject to the FCC Over-The-Air-Receiving Devices rule, 47 C.F.R. Section 1.4000, or any successor regulation; C. Portable radios and devices including, but not limited to, hand-held, vehicular, or other portable receivers, transmitters or transceivers, cellular phones, CB radios, emergency services radio; D. Mobile services providing public information coverage of news events of a temporary nature; E. Telecommunications facilities owned and operated by any government agency or emergency medical care provider. (c) Types of WCF Permits Required (1) A Tier 1 WCF Permit shall be required for an eligible facilities request, as defined in this section. (2) A Tier 2 WCF Permit shall be required for: A. Any modification of an eligible support structure, including the collocation of new equipment, that substantially changes the physical dimensions of the eligible support structure on which it is mounted; or B. Any collocation of a small wireless facility; or C. Any collocation not eligible for a Tier 1 WCF Permit. (3) A Tier 3 WCF Permit shall be required for the siting of any WCF, including a small wireless facility, that is not a collocation subject to a Tier 1 or 2 WCF Permit. An application shall not require a Tier 3 WCF Permit solely because it proposes the replacement in-place of an existing streetlight or wood utility pole. (d) WCF Application Requirements All applications for a WCF Permit shall include the following items: (1) Any applicant for a WCF Permit shall participate in an intake meeting with the Planning and Community Environment Department when filing an application; (2) The applicant must specify in writing whether the applicant believes the application is for an eligible facilities request subject to the Spectrum Act, and if so, provide a detailed written explanation as to why the applicant believes that the application qualifies as an eligible facilities request; (3) The applicant shall complete the city's standard application form, as may be amended from time to time; (4) The applicant shall include a completed and signed application checklist available from the city, including all information required by the application checklist; (5) Payment of the fee prescribed by the Municipal Fee Schedule; (6) The application must be accompanied by all permit applications with all required application materials for each separate permit required by the city for the proposed WCF, including a building permit, an encroachment permit (if applicable) and an electrical permit (if applicable); 4.b Packet Pg. 93 (7) For Tier 2 and 3 WCF Permits, the applicant must host a community meeting at a time and location designed to maximize attendance by persons receiving notice under this subparagraph to provide outreach to the neighborhood around the project site. The applicant shall give notice of the community meeting to all residents and property owners within 600 feet of the project site at least 14 days in advance of the community meeting. Applicants are encouraged to host the meeting before submitting an application. Before an application may be approved, the applicant shall provide a proof of notice affidavit to the city that contains: A. Proof that the applicant noticed and hosted the community meeting no later than 15 days after filing the application; B. A summary of comments received at the community meeting and what, if any, changes were made to the application as a result of the meeting; (8) For Tier 3 WCF Permits, the plans shall include a scaled depiction of the maximum increase in the physical dimensions of the proposed project that would be feasible and permitted by the Spectrum Act, using the proposed project as a baseline; and (9) Satisfy other such requirements as may be, from time to time, required by the Planning and Community Environment Department Director ("Director"), as publically stated in the application checklist. (e) Permit Review ("Shot Clock") Time Periods. The city shall review and act upon application materials in a manner consistent with any timeframes provided in controlling state or federal law, including valid regulations and orders promulgated by the FCC. (f) Tier 1 WCF Permit Process and Findings (1) A Tier 1 WCF Permit shall be reviewed by the Director. The Director's decision shall be final and shall not be appealable; (2) The Director shall grant a Tier 1 WCF Permit provided that the Director finds that the applicant proposes an eligible facilities request; (3) The Director shall impose the following conditions on the grant of a Tier 1 WCF Permit: A. The proposed collocation or modification shall not defeat any existing concealment elements of the support structure; and B. The conditions of approval in Section 18.42.110(j). (g) Tier 2 WCF Permit Process and Findings (1) A Tier 2 WCF Permit shall be reviewed by the Director, who may, in his or her sole discretion, refer an application to the Architectural Review Board. The Director's decision shall be appealable directly to the City Council. An appeal may be set for hearing before the City Council or may be placed on the Council's consent calendar, pursuant to the process for appeal of architectural review set forth in Section 18.77.070(f). (2) The Director, or Council on appeal, shall grant a Tier 2 WCF Permit provided the proposed WCF complies with the conditions of approval in Section 18.42.110(j) and all objective standards adopted and amended from time to time by resolution of the City Council or the development standards in Section 18.42.110(i). If such objective standards are repealed, an application shall not be granted unless, in addition to the other requirements of this section, all of the architectural review findings in Section 18.76.020(d) can be made. (3) The Director, or Council on appeal, shall deny a Tier 2 WCF Permit if the above findings cannot be made. (h) Tier 3 WCF Permit Process and Findings (1) A Tier 3 WCF Permit shall be reviewed by the Director, who may, in his or her sole discretion, refer an application to the Architectural Review Board and/or Planning and Transportation Commission. The Director's decision shall be appealable directly to the City Council. An appeal may be set for hearing before the City Council or may be placed on the Council's consent calendar, pursuant to the process for appeal of architectural review set forth in Section 18.77.070(f). (2) The Director or Council on appeal shall grant a Tier 3 WCF Permit provided the conditional use permit findings in Section 18.76.010(c) can be made and the proposed WCF complies with the conditions of approval in Section 18.42.110(j), and all objective standards adopted and amended from time to time by resolution of the City Council or the development standards in Section 18.42.110(i). If the City Council repeals all objective standards, an application shall not be granted unless, in addition to the other requirements of this section, all of the architectural review findings in Section 18.76.020(d) can be made. (3) The Director, or Council on appeal, shall deny a Tier 3 WCF Permit if the above findings cannot be made. (i) Generally Applicable Development Standards Unless the City Council has adopted more specific standards, and except as otherwise provided in this section, a proposed WCF Project shall comply with the following standards: (1) Shall utilize the smallest antennae, radio, and associated equipment, as measured by volume, technically feasible 4.b Packet Pg. 94 to achieve a network objective; (2) Shall be screened from public view; (3) When attached to an existing structure, shall be shrouded or screened using materials or colors found on existing structure; (4) Shall be placed at a location that would not require the removal of any required landscaping or would reduce the quantity of landscaping to a level of noncompliance with the Zoning Code; (5) An antenna, base station, or tower shall be of a "camouflaged" or "stealth" design, including concealment, screening, and other techniques to hide or blend the antenna, base station, or tower into the surrounding area, such as the use of a monopine design; (6) Shall not be attached on a historic structure/site, as designated by Chapter 16.49; (7) Except as otherwise permitted by the Spectrum Act, a building-mounted WCF may extend no more than fifteen (15) feet beyond the permitted height of the building in the zone district; (8) Except as otherwise permitted by the Spectrum Act, a tower or other stand-alone Tier 3 WCF Project shall not exceed beyond sixty-five (65) feet in height; and (9) A tower or other stand-alone Tier 3 WCF may encroach into the interior/street side and rear setback. (j) Conditions of Approval In addition to any other conditions of approval permitted under federal and state law and this Code that the Director deems appropriate or required under this Code, all WCF Projects approved under this chapter, whether approved by the Director or deemed granted by operation of law, shall be subject to the following conditions of approval: (1) Permit conditions. The grant or approval of a WCF Tier 1 Permit shall be subject to the conditions of approval of the underlying permit, except as may be preempted by the Spectrum Act. (2) As-built plans. The applicant shall submit to the Director an as-built set of plans and photographs depicting the entire WCF as modified, including all transmission equipment and all utilities, within ninety (90) days after the completion of construction. (3) Applicant shall hire a radio engineer licensed by the State of California to measure the actual radio frequency emission of the WCF and determine if it meets FCC's standards. A report, certified by the engineer, of all calculations, required measurements, and the engineer's findings with respect to compliance with the FCC's radio frequency emission standards shall be submitted to the Planning Division within one year of commencement of operation. (4) Indemnification. To the extent permitted by law, the applicant shall indemnify and hold harmless the city, its City Council, its officers, employees and agents (the "indemnified parties") from and against any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party against the indemnified parties and the applicant to attack, set aside or void, any permit or approval authorized hereby for the Project, including (without limitation) reimbursing the city for its actual attorneys' fees and costs incurred in defense of the litigation. The city may, in its sole discretion and at Applicant's expense, elect to defend any such action with attorneys of its own choice. (5) Compliance with applicable laws. The applicant shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Code, any permit issued under this Code, and all other applicable federal, state and local laws (including without limitation all building code, electrical code and other public safety requirements). Any failure by the City to enforce compliance with any applicable laws shall not relieve any applicant of its obligations under this code, any permit issued under this code, or all other applicable laws and regulations. (6) Compliance with approved plans. The proposed Project shall be built in compliance with the approved plans on file with the Planning Division. (7) Subject to city uses. Any permit to install or utilize poles or conduit in the public rights- of-way is subject to the city’s prior right to use, maintain, expand, replace or remove from use such facilities in the reasonable exercise of its governmental or proprietary powers. Such permit is further subject to the city’s right to construction, maintain, and modify streets, sidewalks, and other improvements in the public rights-of-way. The city, in its sole discretion, may require removal or relocation of a permittee’s equipment, at permittee’s sole cost and expense, if necessary to accommodate a city use. (8) Replacement. Where feasible, as new technology becomes available, the applicant shall place above-ground equipment below ground and replace equipment remaining above-ground with smaller equipment, as determined by volume. The applicant shall obtain all necessary permits and approvals for such replacement. (9) Permit length. WCFs permits shall be valid for the time provided in Section 18.42.110(n), except that a permit shall automatically expire after twelve months from the date of approval if within such twelve month period, the applicant has not obtained all necessary permits to commence construction. The director may, without a hearing, extend such time for a maximum period of twelve additional months only, upon application filed with him or her before the expiration of the twelve- month limit. (k) Exceptions 4.b Packet Pg. 95 (1) The decision-making authority may grant exceptions to objective standards adopted by City Council resolution or any provision of this Section 18.42.110, upon finding that: A. The proposed WCF complies with the requirements of this Section 18.42.110 and any other requirements adopted by the City Council to the greatest extent feasible; and either B. As applied to a proposed WCF, the provision(s) from which exception is sought would deprive the applicant of rights guaranteed by federal law, state law, or both; or C. Denial of the application as proposed would violate federal law, state law, or both. (2) An applicant must request an exception at the time an application is initially submitted for a WCF permit under this Section 18.42.110. The request must include both the specific provision(s) from which exception is sought and the basis of the request, including all supporting evidence on which the applicant relies. Any request for exception after the City has deemed an application complete constitutes a material change to the proposed WCF and shall be considered a new application. (3) If the applicant seeks an exception from objective standards adopted by City Council resolution or generally applicable development standards, the Director may refer the application to the Architectural Review Board for recommendation on whether the application complies with such standards to the greatest extent feasible. (4) The applicant shall have the burden of proving that federal law, state law, or both compel the decision-making authority to grant the requested exception(s), using the evidentiary standards applicable to the law at issue. The city shall have the right to hire independent consultants, at the applicant’s expense, to evaluate the issues raised by the exception request and to submit rebuttal evidence where applicable. (l) Removal of Abandoned Equipment A WCF (Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3) or a component of that WCF that ceases to be in use for more than ninety (90) days shall be removed by the applicant, wireless communications service provider, or property owner within ninety (90) days of the cessation of use of that WCF. A new WCF permit shall not be issued to an owner or operator of a WCF or a wireless communications service provider until the abandoned WCF or its component is removed. (m) Revocation The Director may revoke any WCF Permit if the permit holder fails to comply with any condition of the permit. The Director's decision to revoke a Permit shall be appealable pursuant to the process applicable to issuance of the Permit, as provided in subdivisions (f), (g), and (h) of this section. (n) Expiration Except as otherwise provided in the permit or in a lease or license agreement with the City of Palo Alto, WCF permits shall be valid for a period of ten years from the date of approval. An applicant may seek extensions of an approved WCF permit in increments of no more than ten years and no sooner than twelve months prior to the expiration of the permit. The Director shall approve an extension request upon finding that that applicant has complied with all conditions of approval for the WCF permit and will comply with all other requirements applicable to WCFs at the time the extension is granted. Prior to issuing a decision on an extension request, the Director may seek additional studies and information to be prepared at the applicants expense. (Ord. 5465 § 2, 2019: Ord. 5432 § 12, 2018: Ord. 5340 § 1 (part), 2015) 4.b Packet Pg. 96 1 Resolution No. 9873 Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Amending Objective Aesthetic, Noise, and Related Standards for Wireless Communication Facilities in the Public Rights of Way The Council of the City of Palo Alto RESOLVES as follows: SECTION 1. Findings and Declarations. a. On April 15, 2019, the City Council adopted Resolution 9825, establishing objective aesthetic, noise, and related standards for Wireless Communication Facilities (WCFs) on Streetlight and Wood Utility Poles in the Public Rights-of-Way. b. On June 17, 2019, the City Council adopted Resolution 9847, amending the standards to delete inadvertently added language, clarify existing standards, and adopt an interim setback from public schools. c. On August 12, 2019, the City Council adopted Resolution 9855, amending the standards to address a conflict with other City standards and to clarify the allowable height for WCFs on Streetlights and Wood Utility Poles. d. The City Council wishes to consolidate the existing objective standards previously described in Resolution 9855 for clarity and update the objective standards in order to address Council specified location, design, and other preferences in the City for WCF on Streetlight Poles and Wood Utility Poles. SECTION 2. Objective Standards for WCFs on Streetlight Poles and Wood Utility Poles in the Public Rights-of-Way Amended. The City Council hereby adopts the objective standards in Exhibit 1, attached to and incorporated into this resolution, for Wireless Communication Facilities in the Public Rights of Way on Streetlight Poles and Wood Utility Poles. The City Council hereby adopts Exhibit 2 that illustrates the Residential Zone of Exclusion and Exhibit 3 that illustrates the City of Palo Alto roadway network and locations of special setbacks relative to generalized zoning designations for the sole purpose of supplementing the objective standards in Exhibit 1. SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, clause or phrase of this resolution or the attached standards is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion or sections of the resolution and exhibits. The Council hereby declares that it should have DocuSign Envelope ID: ECCACC0E-18AC-4D5E-9AEE-0C930810BD0A 4.c Packet Pg. 97 2 adopted the resolution and exhibits, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. SECTION 4. Environmental Review. The Council finds that this resolution is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), pursuant to Section 15061 of the CEQA Guidelines, because it does not authorize the construction of Wireless Communication Facilities in any locations where such facilities are not already permitted; therefore it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment. The resolution is further exempt under CEQA Guidelines sections 15301, 15302, 15303 and 15305 because it represents part of a comprehensive regulatory scheme governing minor alterations to existing facilities or small structures. INTRODUCED AND PASSED: December 16, 2019 AYES: CORMACK, DUBOIS, FILSETH, KNISS, KOU, TANAKA NOES: FINE ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED: Deputy City Attorney City Manager Director of Planning and Development Services DocuSign Envelope ID: ECCACC0E-18AC-4D5E-9AEE-0C930810BD0A 4.c Packet Pg. 98 3 Exhibit 1 Objective Standards for Wireless Communication Facilities in the Public Rights of Way on Streetlight Poles and Wood Utility Poles A Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) proposed for the public right of way must comply with the applicable provisions of the City’s Municipal Code and all of the following objective standards. In each instance where a proposed facility is unable to comply with the City’s objective standards, a WCF Exception may be requested and evaluated in accordance with this resolution and PAMC Section 18.42.110(k).1The following standards apply to both streetlight poles and wood utility poles, unless otherwise noted. WCF SITING STANDARDS Permitted Zoning Districts WCF placement is permitted in non-residential zoning districts. Public School Boundary A WCF shall not be placed within 600 feet of a parcel containing a public school. No WCF Exception shall be granted allowing a WCF to be placed closer than 300 feet to a parcel containing a public school. Residential Zone of Exclusion (this standard applies to WCF Exception requests to locate in residential districts) No WCF shall be placed within the public right of way in the area between the street centerline and the central fifty percent (50%) of the immediately adjacent parcel’s front lot line. The central fifty percent standard shall be based on the parcel’s lot width2. For corner lots, the central fifty percent standard along the street lot line3 shall be based on the parcel’s lot depth4. Exhibit 2 illustrates this requirement. Residential Roadways (this standard applies to WCF Exception requests to locate in residential districts) Any request for a WCF Exception involving placement of a WCF within a residential zoning district shall prioritize WCF placement on the following roadway types (See Exhibit 3): Expressways Arterials Residential Arterials Roadways identified with a Special Setback (including collector and local streets). 1 The City may hire an independent consultant to evaluate WCF Exceptions at applicant’s expense. 2 Palo Alto Municipal Code Section 18.04.030(a)(93) 3 Palo Alto Municipal Code Section 18.04.030(a)(91)(E) 4 Palo Alto Municipal Code Section 18.04.030(a)(87) DocuSign Envelope ID: ECCACC0E-18AC-4D5E-9AEE-0C930810BD0A 4.c Packet Pg. 99 4 In each instance above, the priority shall be for placement of a WCF most distant from residential property. An additional WCF Exception request must be made to place a WCF on a collector or a local roadway that does not have an identified special setback. Building or Structure Setback A WCF shall not be placed closer than 20 feet from any building used for occupancy in any zoning district. Distance Between WCFs A WCF shall not be placed less than 600 feet away from another WCF. This requirement does not preclude WCFs collocating on the same structure where otherwise allowed. Intersection Corners5 A WCF shall not be placed less than 20 feet away from any roadway intersection. An intersection is measured from the start of the curb radius. Scenic Routes6 A WCF shall not be placed along an identified scenic route. Historic Districts, Sites, and Structures A WCF shall not be placed within a listed historic district, nor immediately adjacent to a parcel with an historic structure, nor immediately adjacent to an historic site, as those terms are defined by PAMC Section 16.49.020. A WCF shall not be placed in a potential historic district, or immediately adjacent to a potential historic structure or site, where the application for historic designation was filed with the City prior to the filing of a WCF application, until a final decision has been made regarding that pending historic designation. WCF DESIGN STANDARDS Underground Design (Preferred Option) Radio equipment shall be placed in an underground vault. The associated antenna(s) shall be placed in a shroud at the top of a nearby pole. Underground vaults shall be the minimum volume necessary to house WCF equipment and include information detailing why the proposed dimensions are required. Maximum vault size shall not exceed 5 feet 8-inches x 8 feet 2-inches x 5 feet 7-inches or 260 cubic feet, excluding space required for ventilation or sump pump equipment. 5 Gateway intersections are identified on Map L-4 in the Comprehensive Plan. 6 Scenic routes are identified in Policy L-9.1 in the Comprehensive Plan. DocuSign Envelope ID: ECCACC0E-18AC-4D5E-9AEE-0C930810BD0A 4.c Packet Pg. 100 5 Top-Mounted Design (Secondary Option) Radio equipment and the associated antenna(s) shall be enclosed within a shroud at the top of the pole. Minimal Sunshield Design Use of this design requires a WCF Exception Radio equipment shall be enclosed within one or two sunshields not exceeding 8 inches wide nor 0.75 cubic feet in volume each, mounted directly to the side of the pole. The associated antenna(s) shall be placed in a shroud at the top of the pole. Sunshields shall be attached at least 12 feet above ground level and, when located on wood utility poles, shall not interfere with the identified communication space. Existing Signage Design Use of this design requires a WCF Exception Radio equipment shall be attached to a pole behind existing signage under the following conditions: i) Radio equipment shall be placed within a shroud that does not exceed the dimensions of the sign in height and width, nor 4 inches in depth, including any required mounting bracket. ii) In no event shall WCF equipment obscure or interfere with the visibility or functioning of the signage. The associated antenna(s) shall be placed in a shroud at the top of the pole. WCF Antenna and Shroud Dimensions (Diameter / Height) Antennas shall have the smallest size possible to achieve the coverage objective. The diameter of the antenna and shroud shall not exceed 15 inches at their widest. For Streetlight Poles: The maximum WCF height shall not exceed 3 feet (or 5.5 feet for top-mounted designs) from the top of the streetlight pole that meets the City standards for the proposed location. The associated “antenna skirt” shall taper to meet the pole above the mast arm. For Wood Utility Poles: In no circumstance shall the total height of a pole and all WCF equipment exceed 55 feet. For wood utility poles carrying power lines, replacement poles shall be the minimum height necessary to provide GO 95 mandated clearance between WC equipment and power lines. For wood utility poles without power lines, any WCF equipment shall not increase the height of the pole by 5.5 feet when compared with the height of the existing pole. DocuSign Envelope ID: ECCACC0E-18AC-4D5E-9AEE-0C930810BD0A 4.c Packet Pg. 101 6 The associated “antenna skirt” shall taper to meet the top of the pole if wider than the pole. WCF Design Quality Antennas and/or equipment at the top of the pole shall be covered by a single integrated shroud and “antenna skirt” designed without gaps between materials or sky visible between component surfaces and between the shroud or skirt and the top of the pole. All components external to the pole shall have an integral color or shall be painted to match the color and/or materials of the pole. Equipment shall be oriented to face in either of the directions of travel in the right of way and shall not face or extend toward private property or the curb line. WCF Equipment Adjustment For Streetlight Poles: Equipment that cannot propagate an adequate signal within the shrouding required by the standard designs shall be attached to a streetlight pole at a height of 2 feet below the light mast or higher. Each instance of such equipment shall not exceed 0.85 cubic feet, nor shall the total volume of such equipment and any shrouding exceed 2.6 cubic feet per streetlight pole. For Wood Utility Poles: Equipment that cannot propagate an adequate signal within the shrouding required by the standard designs shall be attached to the top of the pole or on a cross arm or brace protruding from the pole the minimum extent necessary to comply with safety standards, including GO 95. Such cross arm shall be placed as high on the pole as technically feasible. Each instance of such equipment shall not exceed 0.85 cubic feet nor shall the total volume of such equipment exceed 2.6 cubic feet per wood utility pole. Curb Clearances Any WCF attachments placed below 16 feet above ground level shall not be placed closer than 18 inches to the curb, nor shall they extend over the sidewalk (Caltrans Highway Design Manual Section 309). All WCF equipment shall maintain at least 3 feet from any curb cut. WCF Wires and Cabling For Streetlight Poles: All wires and cabling shall be routed entirely underground and within the pole and any attached shroud. For Wood Utility Poles: All wires and cabling to equipment shall be within the shroud or shall be within conduit. All conduit shall be mounted flush to the pole. DocuSign Envelope ID: ECCACC0E-18AC-4D5E-9AEE-0C930810BD0A 4.c Packet Pg. 102 7 Safety Signs Safety signs shall be the smallest size possible to accomplish its purpose. Power Disconnects For Streetlight Poles: Power disconnects shall be labeled and placed in a vault near the base of the pole. For Wood Utility Poles: Power disconnects shall be labeled and placed on the wood pole or in a vault near the base of the pole. Ground Mounted Equipment Except as provided in these standards, no equipment cabinets may be placed at grade. Existing Pole Locations A WCF shall utilize an existing streetlight pole or wood utility pole location. Any new pole locations are prohibited unless approved through a City Public Works/Utilities pole placement application. WCF PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Pole Replacement For Streetlight Poles: An existing streetlight pole proposed for a WCF installation shall be replaced with a new pole.7 For Wood Utility Poles: An existing wood utility pole proposed for a WCF installation shall be replaced with a new pole.8 Landscaping Replacement Any existing landscaping removed or damaged by installation shall be replaced in kind. Landscape Screening A WCF shall be placed where existing street tree foliage or new street tree or amenity tree foliage within 35 feet of the WCF provides interruption of direct views of the WCF. 7 Replacement streetlight poles must meet the currently applicable City standards for the pole, including foundation and bolt designs, conduit separation, aluminum material, color, width, height, light mast characteristics (examples: orientation, design, height, color temperature and photometrics), and the presence/absence of decorative features. Replacement poles will conform to Public Works Department (PWD) style guidelines and Utilities-Electrical (CPAU) standards where the City has adopted standards and will match the pole being replaced where no standards exist. Standard specifications for streetlight poles in the City can be obtained from the Utilities-Electrical (CPAU) and Public Works (PWD) Departments. 8 Replacement wood utility poles must meet the currently applicable City standards for the pole, including width, height, color, material, structural capacity, and GO 95 compliance. Replacement poles shall be no greater in diameter or other cross-sectional dimension than is necessary for the proper functioning of the pole with all attachments. Existing pole functionality shall be maintained, such as in regard to electrical lines, climbing space, light masts (examples: orientation, design, height, color temperature and photometrics), and provision of communication space, unless existing functionality, such as transformers, can be relocated with the approval of the Utilities-Electrical Department (CPAU). Standard specifications for pole replacement in the City can be obtained from CPAU. For wood utility poles carrying power lines, replacement poles shall be the minimum height necessary to provide GO-95 mandated clearance between WCF equipment and power lines. DocuSign Envelope ID: ECCACC0E-18AC-4D5E-9AEE-0C930810BD0A 4.c Packet Pg. 103 8 Noise9 Noise from a WCF shall comply with PAMC Chapter 9.10 and shall be consistent with noise-related Comprehensive Plan goals and policies. City Marketing Banners WCF installations shall not require any changes in the City’s existing banner marketing program. WCF EXCEPTIONS A WCF applicant may file an application(s) containing a request for one or more WCF Exceptions to the objective standards set forth in this resolution or any other provision of PAMC Section 18.42.110. The request for a WCF Exception(s) does not exempt a WCF from complying with other objective wireless administrative standards adopted by City Council resolution or any other provision of PAMC Section 18.42.110. Each WCF Exception request must be made at the time an application is submitted and must include both the specific provision(s) from which the exception is sought and the basis of the request, including all supporting evidence on which the applicant relies. The applicant has the burden of proving that federal law, state law, or both, compel the decision-making authority to grant the requested exception(s). The WCF Exception must satisfy the requirements of PAMC Section 18.42.110(k) and demonstrate why the standard is infeasible. Failure to identify all required WCF Exceptions upon application submittal may result in application denial. No WCF Exception may be granted that allows a WCF to be placed: 1) within 300 feet of a parcel containing a public school, 2) within 20 feet of a habitable residential building in a residential zoning district, 3) on wood utility poles within the Residential Zone of Exclusion described in this resolution, or 4) in an alley within a residential zoning district. 9 In residential areas with an average 24-hour noise level (Ldn) at or below 60 decibels (dB), noise generated by WCF equipment shall not cause the Ldn to exceed 60dB or to increase by 5.0 dB or more, even if the resulting Ldn would remain below 60 dB. In residential areas with a Ldn above 60 dB, noise generated by WCF equipment shall not cause the average to increase by 3.0 dB or more. DocuSign Envelope ID: ECCACC0E-18AC-4D5E-9AEE-0C930810BD0A 4.c Packet Pg. 104 144.2' ' 100.1' 70.0' 144.2' 60.0' 100.1' 30.0' 100.1' 60.0'160.0' 139.1' 160.0' 7' ' '64.9' 100.0' 100.0' 64.9' 100.0' This map is a product of the City of Palo Alto GIS This document is a graphic representation only of best available sources. Legend 0'53' Ex h i b i t 2 WC F RZO E D I A G R A M CITY O F PALO A L TO IN C O R P O R ATE D C ALIFOR N IA P a l o A l t oT h e C i t y o f A P RIL 16 1894 The City of Palo Alto assumes no responsibility for any errors. ©1989 to 2016 City of Palo Alto rrivera, 2019-11-25 17:25:35 (\\cc-maps\Encompass\Admin\Personal\rrivera.mdb) ROAD CENTERLINE RZOE - central 50% of parcel's lot width 50% of 139.1 lot width = 69.55 ft RZOE - central 50%of parcel's lot width RZOE - central 50%of parcel's lot width RZOE - central 50%of parcel's lot depth 35 f t 50% of 70 ft lot width = 35 ft ROAD CENTERLINE CURB LIP PARCEL/PROPERTY LINE 30 f t 30.0' 30 f t 30 f t RZO E - c e n t r a l 50 % o f pa r c e l ' s l o t wid t h RZO E - c e n t r a l 50 % o f pa r c e l ' s l o t wi d t h RZO E - c e n t r a l 50 % o f pa r c e l ' s l o t wi d t h RO A D CE N T E R L I N E RZO E - c e n t r a l 50 % o f pa r c e l ' s l o t wi d t h Residential Zone of Exclusion (RZOE) (this standard applies to WCF Exception requests to locate in residential districts) No WCF shall be placed within the public right of way in the area between the street centerline and the central fifty percent (50%) of the immediately adjacent parcel’s front lot line. The central fifty percent standard shall be based on the parcel’s lot width. For corner lots, the central fifty percent standard along the street lot line shall be based on the parcel’s lot depth. Fr o n t S e t b a c k L i n e 139.1'100.1' 60 . 0 ' 60 . 0 ' 60 . 0 ' 70.0' 64.9'64.9' 30 . 2 4 ft 32.44 ft 50.05 ft32.45 ft 30 . 2 4 ft 35 . 0 7 ft 69.38 ft 30 . 2 4 ft 50.39 ft32.44 ft 32.45 ft 69.55 ft DocuSign Envelope ID: ECCACC0E-18AC-4D5E-9AEE-0C930810BD0A 4.c Packet Pg. 105 24 24 2424 2424 24 24 2424 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 2424 24 24 24 24 24 2424 24 2424 24 24 15 24 24 1010101010 24 20 10 151515 15 15 10 10 10 1524 15 1515 15 15 24 24 24 24 20 242 4 50 30 30 50 50 24 24 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 50 24 24 24 50 24 50 50 50 50 30 50 50 50 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 24 24 50 50 5050 50 50 50 50 50 242424 24 24 24 24 25 25 25 25 25 24 24 24 2424 30 25 50 24 24 24 24 24 77 77 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 77 77 77 77 77 24 25 6 24 24 2424 2424 24 2424 24 24 24 24 24 2424 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 2424 3535 35 10 10 24 10 53 204 418 20103510 35 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 2424 24 24 24 30 7 7 7 17 24 30 24 24 24 30 177 7 17 7 17 30 242424 24 24 24 24 24 30 24 24 24 24 24 24 40 40 24 24 24 24 24 24 40 40 40 24 24 2424 24 24 4040 40 40 4 0 40 4040 4040 40 40 2424 24 2424 24 2424 2424242424 24 24 24 24 24 6 0 6 0 60 30 30 40 30 24 24 24 24 24 24 30 6060 6060 5050 40 40 24 24 24 24 24 242424 24 24 24 30 24 2424 24 2 4 24 24 24 30 24 24 24 30 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 2424 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 2424 24 24 24 24 24 2430 30 24 24 168 24 16 8 16 2 4 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 15 30 24 20 25 24 24 24 24 2424 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 30 24 24 20 20 24 25 25 25 25 2525 252020 25 25 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 2424 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 2424 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 2424 2424 24 24 24 2424 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 5050 5050 24 24 Special ConditionsSpe cial C onditi o ns Sp ecia l Co ndi t io ns ACK_FOR_MIXED d e las Pulg a s n d H i l l R o a d J u n i p e r o S e r r a B o u lev a r d P a ge M i l l Road A r a s t r a d e r o R o a d E l C a m i n o R e a l S a n Ant on i o A v e n u e C h a r l e s t o n R o a d O r e g o n E x p r e s s w a y M i d d l e f i e l d R o a d University Av enue e e w a y 1 0 1 A l m a S t r e e t El Camino Real A l p i n e R o a d F o o t h i l l Ex p r e s s w a y H i g h H i l l v i e w E ast B ayshor e W est B aysho re Fabian Central Expressway Sand Hill R oad E m b a r c a d e r o R o a d Fa b i a n W a y Newell Rd California St Latham St Cl Pu Middle Ave W elch Coyote H i l l Rd Hansen Way Matadero Ave Lo m a V erde A ve C olorado Ave Park Blvd Birch N. California Ave Amaranta El Ca m in o W a y Lytton Ave Hamilton Ave Homer Ave Channing Ave Channing Ave Guinda Stanford Av e Waverley St. Churchill Ave tPeer C ou t ts S e r r a S t Arboretum Galvez P a r k B lvd Amphi thea t r e P k w y Charleston RdAl ma St Los A ltos A ve Hil lvi ew Ave Old Page Mi ll R d o l d e n O va ntesR d This map is a product of the City of Palo Alto GIS This document is a graphic representation only of best available sources. Legend Residential Zone Districts Non- Residential Zone Districts Public Facilities/Open Space Zone Districts Special Setback Frontages Local Collector Residential Arterial Arterial Expressway City Jurisdictional Limits 0'2670' Ex h i b i t 3 Ro a d N e t w o r k a n d S p e c i a l S e t b a c k s wi t h R e s i d e n t i a l , C o m m e r c i a l , an d Pu b l i c F a c i l i t i e s Z o n i n g D i s t r i c t s v. 2 0 1 9 1 1 2 5 CITY O F PALO A L TO IN C O R P O R ATE D C ALIFOR N IA P a l o A l t oT h e C i t y o f A P RIL 16 1894 The City of Palo Alto assumes no responsibility for any errors. ©1989 to 2016 City of Palo Alto rrivera, 2019-11-25 13:00:40 (\\cc-maps\Encompass\Admin\Personal\rrivera.mdb) DocuSign Envelope ID: ECCACC0E-18AC-4D5E-9AEE-0C930810BD0A 4.c Packet Pg. 106 Certificate Of Completion Envelope Id: ECCACC0E18AC4D5E9AEE0C930810BD0A Status: Completed Subject: Please DocuSign: RESO 9873 WCF Resolution with Exhibit 1.docx, RESO 9872 Exhibit 2.pdf, RESO 98... Source Envelope: Document Pages: 10 Signatures: 5 Envelope Originator: Certificate Pages: 2 Initials: 0 Kim Lunt AutoNav: Enabled EnvelopeId Stamping: Enabled Time Zone: (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada) 250 Hamilton Ave Palo Alto , CA 94301 kimberly.lunt@cityofpaloalto.org IP Address: 199.33.32.254 Record Tracking Status: Original 1/7/2020 1:32:22 PM Holder: Kim Lunt kimberly.lunt@cityofpaloalto.org Location: DocuSign Security Appliance Status: Connected Pool: StateLocal Storage Appliance Status: Connected Pool: City of Palo Alto Location: DocuSign Signer Events Signature Timestamp Aylin Bilir Aylin.Bilir@CityofPaloAlto.org Deputy City Attorney Security Level: Email, Account Authentication (None)Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style Using IP Address: 199.33.32.254 Sent: 1/7/2020 1:36:35 PM Viewed: 1/7/2020 1:40:55 PM Signed: 1/7/2020 4:08:48 PM Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure: Not Offered via DocuSign Jonathan Lait Jonathan.Lait@CityofPaloAlto.org Interim Director Planning and Community Environment City of Palo Alto Security Level: Email, Account Authentication (None) Signature Adoption: Uploaded Signature Image Using IP Address: 199.33.32.254 Sent: 1/7/2020 4:08:51 PM Resent: 1/13/2020 8:54:57 AM Resent: 1/15/2020 8:58:56 AM Resent: 1/16/2020 11:39:30 AM Viewed: 1/16/2020 12:31:49 PM Signed: 1/16/2020 12:32:05 PM Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure: Not Offered via DocuSign Ed Shikada ed.shikada@cityofpaloalto.org Ed Shikada, City Manager City of Palo Alto Security Level: Email, Account Authentication (None) Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style Using IP Address: 199.33.32.254 Sent: 1/16/2020 12:32:09 PM Viewed: 1/16/2020 5:51:30 PM Signed: 1/16/2020 5:51:37 PM Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure: Not Offered via DocuSign Eric Filseth eric.filseth@cityofpaloalto.org Mayor Security Level: Email, Account Authentication (None)Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style Using IP Address: 108.169.4.229 Sent: 1/16/2020 5:51:41 PM Viewed: 1/16/2020 11:04:09 PM Signed: 1/16/2020 11:04:20 PM Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure: Not Offered via DocuSign 4.c Packet Pg. 107 Signer Events Signature Timestamp Beth Minor Beth.Minor@CityofPaloAlto.org City Clerk City of Palo Alto Security Level: Email, Account Authentication (None) Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style Using IP Address: 199.33.32.254 Sent: 1/16/2020 11:04:23 PM Viewed: 1/17/2020 7:52:37 AM Signed: 1/17/2020 7:52:54 AM Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure: Not Offered via DocuSign In Person Signer Events Signature Timestamp Editor Delivery Events Status Timestamp Agent Delivery Events Status Timestamp Intermediary Delivery Events Status Timestamp Certified Delivery Events Status Timestamp Carbon Copy Events Status Timestamp Witness Events Signature Timestamp Notary Events Signature Timestamp Envelope Summary Events Status Timestamps Envelope Sent Hashed/Encrypted 1/16/2020 11:04:23 PM Certified Delivered Security Checked 1/17/2020 7:52:37 AM Signing Complete Security Checked 1/17/2020 7:52:54 AM Completed Security Checked 1/17/2020 7:52:54 AM Payment Events Status Timestamps 4.c Packet Pg. 108 Tier 1 WCF Checklist March 2016 (CF) Page 1 of 4 WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIIES SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST TIER 1 PROJECT The following information is required for the review of proposed Tier 1 wireless communications facilities. Tier 1 wireless communications facilities are eligible facilities requests within the meaning of 47 U.S.C. §1455(a), 47 CFR § 1.40001, and Palo Alto Municipal Code 18.42.110. Instructions: Complete all sections applicable to the project. If an item does not apply to the particular project, write “N/A” (not applicable). Where noted, provide information about the particular project and provide supporting documentation on separate sheets of paper where required or as is otherwise necessary. In planning a project and filling out this checklist: Measure a change in height: (a) for deployments that are or will be separated horizontally, from the original support structure; and (b) for all others, from the dimensions of the tower or base station, inclusive of originally approved appurtenances and any modifications that were approved prior to February 22, 2012. The baseline against which to measure or compare any changes is the dimensions that were approved prior to February 22, 2012. The information identified below must be provided in order to accept the application for review. The submission of an incomplete application may result in rejection of the application or a delay in processing the application. Project Address: Project Description: Pre-Submittal Requirements The applicant shall meet with City staff to review the project details to confirm application type and review process. Please call the Planning Division at 650-329-2442 to request a meeting with a Planner. Application Requirements Project is an Eligible Facilities Request as defined in 18.42.110(b)(5). For a collocation on a tower not located in the public rights-of-way: The height of the tower will increase by _______________ (must be less than (1) 10%, or (2) the height of one additional antenna array with separation from the nearest existing antenna not to exceed 20 feet (whichever is greater)). Any added appurtenance to the body of the tower will protrude from the edge of the tower by _______________ (must be less than (1) 20 feet, or (2) the width of the tower at the level of the 4.d Packet Pg. 109 Tier 1 WCF Checklist March 2016 (CF) Page 2 of 4 appurtenance (whichever is greater)). For a collocation on a tower located in the public rights-of-way or on a base station: The height of the tower or base station will increase by _______________ (must be less than 10% or 10 feet (whichever is greater)). Any added appurtenance to the body of the tower or base station will protrude from the edge of that structure by _______________ (must be less than 6 feet). Any ground cabinets to be installed are _______________ in size (must be less than 10% larger in height or overall volume than any other ground cabinets associated with the tower or base station). Provide cabinet dimensions on plans. There will be _____ new equipment cabinets installed on the ground (if there is no pre-existing ground cabinet associated with the tower or base station, no new equipment cabinets may be installed on the ground). Provide cabinet dimensions on plans. For all applications: The number of equipment cabinets for the technology involved is ____ (must not exceed the standard number of new equipment cabinets for the technology involved or be more than 4 cabinets). There is no excavation or deployment outside of the current site of the tower or base station. The proposed modification does not defeat the preexisting concealment/camouflage elements of the tower or base station. The proposed modification complies with the conditions associated with the prior siting approval of construction or modification of the tower or base station (unless the non- compliance is due to an increase in height, increase in width, addition of cabinets, or new excavation that is otherwise in compliance with Section 18.42.110). Submittal Requirements Planning Application Form. Items 1-5 completed and property owner has signed form. Seven copies of reduced-size (maximum 18” x 24”) plan set, which includes but not limited to: Detailed Site Plan of Project Area: showing existing conditions and proposed changes ___ Show property line / entire parcel ___ Scale (1/8 inch minimum) ___ North arrow (orient all sheets in the same directions) ___ Dimensioned property lines ___ Any underlining lot lines ___ Footprint of all buildings and structures on the site ___ Dimensioned parking area, driveways, and sidewalks ___ Zoning setback lines (including Stanford setback lines if applicable) ___ Existing and proposed signs ___ Light fixtures, bicycle parking, trash and recycling (including proposed containers or related equipment), enclosures, fences ___ Improvements in the public right-of-way, including streets, curbs, sidewalks and street trees within 30 feet of the property ___ Underground utilities (sewer, gas, electric, water) 4.d Packet Pg. 110 Tier 1 WCF Checklist March 2016 (CF) Page 3 of 4 ___ Location of backflow preventers, above-ground electrical utilities, boxes, transformers, meter mains, fire standpipes, etc. ___ Any easements or encumbrances across the property ___ Creeks or waterways on or adjacent to the property, indicate ‘top of bank’. ___ Tree location, species, size, dripline area, including trees located on neighboring property that overhang the project site, consistent with the city Tree Technical Manual, Section 1.28 Building/ Project Elevations: show existing conditions to remain and proposed changes ___ Elevations of all sides of the buildings/ project ___ Outlines of adjacent buildings/ project ___ Height limit, daylight plane of the buildings/ project ___ All window, door, eaves, skylights, chimneys, rain water leaders, roof equipment and screens, and other appurtenances on the building exterior ___ Type, finish, material, and color of all surfaces ___ All signs and lighting on the building Sections: ___ Provide illustrative wall section from parapet to foundation showing foundation, wall, windows, and doors, parapet, cornice, eave, roof (drawing should be at a minimum ½” = 1’ scale) ___ Provide other details as needed Landscape Plan: ___ Statement of Design Intent: written statement outlining the concept of the landscape design ___ Show common usable open space and private open space dimensioned ___ Schematic Landscape Plan a. Trees and vegetation to be removed, retained, and planted b. Location, species, quantities, and size of all proposed plant materials (plant list) ___ Tentative plant list ___ Fences, trellises, pots, etc. ___ Trash enclosures, bicycle enclosures, etc. (must be screened with shrubbery) ___ Location of backflow preventers, electrical utilities, etc ___ Drainage plan to conform with the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), (contact Public Works Engineering (650) 329-2151 for requirements) (The final planting and irrigation plan must be approved by Planning and Utilities Marketing prior to building permit approval) Schematic details: Appropriate architectural details to indicate the quality and nature of the design, including: ___ Details showing how adjacent, dissimilar materials connect. Examples include: siding to windows, siding to roofs and parapets, eaves, railings, corners, connections to existing structures ___ Details showing attachments to buildings, when these occur (such as railings and awnings) ___ Details of proposed landscape elements (fences, trellises, trash enclosures, bicycle enclosures, etc.). Photo Simulation: showing project with existing context and site condition 3-Dimensional images: massing model, axonometric or perspective drawings from the most visible locations. 3D images may be physical models, hand drawings, or computer 4.d Packet Pg. 111 Tier 1 WCF Checklist March 2016 (CF) Page 4 of 4 generated. USB flash drive or CD-ROM containing proposed site plan, elevations and perspectives. The plans shall be PDF format for posting on the City’s website. The file should be generally 4-6 pages in total, and optimized for printing to 11 inch by 17 inch paper. Revised and final electronic plan sets shall be provided as needed. Two copies of Radio Frequency Report, prepared by a professional engineer, which discusses and confirms the project's compliance with the FCC regulations. The City may elect to have an outside consultant perform a peer review of this report at the applicant's expense. Two copies of the completed FCC – Local and State Government Advisory Committee "Optional Checklist for Local Governments To Determine Whether a Facility is Categorically Excluded" form (Fire Department shall review). Seven copies of Detailed Statement describing: The scope of work to be done; The justification of how the project is qualified as a Tier 1 project; The existing and proposed use; The purpose of the proposed changes; The measures taken to minimize visual impacts of the project (e.g. substantial setback from major roads, trees, stealth design, slim line monopole). Include other proposed site enhancements that will benefit the project site. Two copies of Hazardous Materials Disclosure Checklist. Applicable fee. The project’s associated Building Permit, Street Work Permit, Utility Permit and/or Public Works Encroachment Permit must be filed prior to the submittal of the Tier 1 planning application. List the permit numbers for these permits: ______________________________________________________________________ If this project is an amendment of existing planning entitlement(s), provide existing application(s) numbers: _________________________________________________________ Certification Under Penalty of Perjury I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date) at (location), California. Name (print): Signature: Relationship to the Applicant of Record: ______________ Appointments are required to submit all applications. Please call the Planning Division at (650) 329-2442 to make your submittal appointment. 4.d Packet Pg. 112 Revision Date: 03/2016 Department of Planning & Development Services Planning Division, 250 Hamilton Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94301 (650) 329-2441 www.cityofpaloalto.org ADDITIONAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES The following information is required for the review of wireless communications facilities (WCF) in addition to the Architectural Review and/or Conditional Use Permit requirements. See Palo Alto Municipal Code 18.42.110 for additional information. *** For projects subject to Staff Level Architectural Review only that are located within 150’ of a residential use or zone, a corresponding 150' radius public notice of the tentative Director’s Decision will be mailed out by staff. Applicable fees apply. Prior to application submittal, the applicant shall meet with City staff to review the project details, subject to applicable fees. Additional pre-application meetings may be required. Prior to the application submittal, a noticed Community Meeting shall be hosted by the applicant to provide outreach to the neighborhood around the project site; all residents and property owners within 600' of the project site shall be notified of the meeting. Please discuss meeting logistics with planning staff. The community meeting may be waived by the Planning Director based on the project scope. Detailed statement, including correspondence, documenting efforts to negotiate collocation with existing wireless facilities in the area. Detailed statement documenting the consideration of alternative project locations. Detailed statement justifying the need for the tower and/or antenna site, including information such as network design, search ring, and specific site selection criteria. Radio Frequency Report, prepared by a professional engineer, which discusses and confirms the project's compliance with the FCC regulations. The City may elect to have an outside consultant to perform a peer review of this report at the applicant's expense. Color copies (three) of service coverage maps with legend and other necessary graphics that demonstrate the need for the proposed tower site (additional copies may be requested). List of all existing or approved future antenna locations, including the street address, within the City limits. Each site listed should include the type of installation (e.g. roof-mounted, mono-pole, faux tree, etc.). Submit two copies of the completed "Optional Checklist for Local Governments To Determine Whether a Facility is Categorically Excluded" form (Fire Department shall review). Statement describing the measures taken to minimize visual impacts of the project (e.g. substantial setback from major roads, trees, stealth design, slim line monopole). Include other proposed site enhancements that the project site will benefit from. Identify on a location map the distance and location of the nearest residence(s) within 600 feet from the proposed tower or antenna site. The project’s associated Building Permit, Street Work Permit, Utility Permit and/or Public Works Encroachment Permit must be filed prior to the submittal of the WCF planning application. List the permit numbers for these permits: ______________________________________ The information identified above must be provided in order to accept the application for review. Additional information may be required upon review of the submitted materials. 4.d Packet Pg. 113 TIER 2 WCF PROPOSED FOR THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST April 2019 Page 1 of 7 TIER 2 WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIIES PROPOSED FOR THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST In-person appointments are required to submit all applications. Appointments can be scheduled by calling the Planning Division at (650) 329-2442 or scheduled in-person at the City‘s Development Center, located at 285 Hamilton Avenue. The following information is required for the review of Tier 2 Wireless Communications Facilities (WCF) as defined in Palo Alto Municipal Code 18.42.110 and proposed for location in the public right-of-way. Instructions: Complete and submit all items listed in the checklist below that are applicable to the application. The information identified below must be provided in order to accept the application as complete for review. If an item does not apply, write “N/A” (not applicable). The Planning Department is available to answer applicant questions in advance of application submittal and can be contacted at 650- 329-2442. Project Location(s)/Address(es): Project Description (include Applicant name and Carrier name): Application Basic Information (Please circle the applicable response): Y, N, or N/A Materials contain more than one wireless communication facility and the applications are batched. Y, N, or N/A Materials show one or more wireless communication facility designs that meet all of the City’s rules, regulations, and Objective Standards (Refer to City Council Action on December 16, 2019). Y, N, or N/A Materials request one or more WCF exception requests to the City’s rules, regulations, or Objective Standards. Y, N, or N/A Materials show one or more wireless communication facilities that qualify as a “small wireless facility,” as defined by any valid regulations adopted by the FCC. Y, N, or N/A Materials show one or more wireless communication facilities that do not qualify as a “small wireless facility,” as defined by any valid regulations adopted by the FCC. Y, N, or N/A Materials show one or more wireless communication facilities that are subject to the applicant’s Master License Agreement. Y, N, or N/A Materials show one or more wireless communication facilities that are not subject to a Master License Agreement. Application Submittal Requirements: Additional copies of application materials may be required if the application is referred after intake for review by the Architectural Review Board, City Council, Responsible Agency, or other reviewing body. Application Forms. Per PAMC Section 18.42.110(d) and PAMC Section 18.42.110(e), all required application forms and required application materials necessary to initiate and process all entitlement and all permit reviews and decisions shall be submitted so that they can be processed concurrently. Application forms include the Planning Application with original wet signatures of the applicant and property owner(s). The Planning Application Number will be assigned at application intake. Copies of completed additional application forms are also required, as applicable, including but not limited to: Building Permit Application, Excavating and Grading Permit Application, Electrical or Other Utilities Permit Application, Street Work Permit Application, 4.d Packet Pg. 114 TIER 2 WCF PROPOSED FOR THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST December 2019 Page 2 of 7 Insurance Certificate, and/or an Encroachment Permit Application. A Master License Agreement Exhibit (commonly referred to as Exhibit G) and a Utility Map Request will have likely been submitted to the City’s Utilities Department as part of the applicant team gathering information necessary to investigate siting and prepare project plans and do not constitute entitlement or permit filing. List the numbers and dates submitted for each applicable application and permit: •Planning Application Number & Date Submitted: ____________________________________ •Building Permit Application Number & Date Submitted: ______________________________ •Excavation and Grading Permit Application Number & Date Submitted: __________________ •Street Work Permit Application Number & Date Submitted: ___________________________ •Encroachment Permit Application Number & Date Submitted: _________________________ •Insurance Certificate Submittal Information & Date Submitted: ________________________ •Electrical Permit Application Number & Date Submitted: _____________________________ •Other Application Number(s) & Date(s) Submitted: __________________________________ •Master License Agreement Exhibit Tracking Information & Date Submitted: ______________ •Utility Map Request Form Tracking Information & Date Submitted: _____________________ One (1) hardcopy of this TIER 2 WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIIES PROPOSED FOR THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST completed and signed. One (1) hardcopy of the Cost Recovery Form with original wet signature of applicant. A signed cost recovery agreement may substitute for the cost recovery form. Application Fees/Deposits. Application submittal fees/deposits shall be invoiced and submitted during application intake. For batched applications, an invoice shall be prepared and the fees/deposits paid for each proposed location, unless the applicant coordinates with the City to prepare a mutually agreed upon separate cost recovery agreement. Consistent with the City’s Municipal Fee Schedule, a separate deposit(s) may also be necessary to submit after application intake to cover the cost of the City’s use of consultants to conduct independent review of application material(s) and/or serve as an extension of staff to conduct application reviews. Application numbers for any existing and/or approved wireless communication facilities at the proposed location and/or within 1,500 feet of the proposed WCF location on either public or private property: _______________________________________________________________________ One (1) electronic copy of all application materials listed in this checklist. Three (3) hardcopies of a Radio Frequency Report, prepared by a professional engineer, that discusses and confirms the wireless communication facility planned compliance with the FCC regulations. The report shall include a list of the proposed equipment models, frequency bands, power, azimuths, minimum and maximum downtilts, distances to ground and adjacent single and multiple-story buildings, clarification if there are any other nearby wireless facilities considered as part of the analysis of cumulative conditions, a description of the standards, equations, and other methodology utilized, color maps and/or statements of distances and zones for public and occupational exclusion and/or exposure limits, and required signage and any other measures necessary for the facility to operate in compliance with FCC standards. The City may elect to have an outside consultant to perform a peer review of this report at the applicant's expense. One (1) hardcopy of the manufacturer’s specifications for proposed equipment, including power operations and noise generation information. Three (3) color hardcopies of existing and proposed coverage and capacity maps with a legend and other graphics that describe the goals for the proposed wireless communication facility. Three (3) hardcopies of the completed “A Local Government Official’s Guide to Transmitting Antenna RF Emission Safety: Rules, Procedures, and Practical Guidance - APPENDIX A Optional 4.d Packet Pg. 115 TIER 2 WCF PROPOSED FOR THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST December 2019 Page 3 of 7 Checklist for Local Government To Determine Whether a Facility is Categorically Excluded” form. Three (3) hardcopies of the completed “HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DISCLOSURE CHECKLIST” form. Three (3) hardcopies of the completed “ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ACCESSMENT WORKSHEET” form. One (1) hardcopy of a list of all of the carrier’s existing or entitled antenna locations, including the street address and latitude/longitude coordinates, within the City limits. Each site listed should include the type of installation (e.g. roof-mounted, monopole, faux tree, etc.). One (1) color hardcopy of the location map from the project plans printed on 11” x 17” paper. One (1) color and materials board including samples of actual colors and materials mounted on 8” x 14” foam board to be retained by the city as part of the permanent file. Three (3) hardcopies of a Tree Protection Report (TPR) and arborist assessment. Report shall be required for any new facility or construction within the tree protection zone (TPZ) of a protected and/or designated tree, and may be required for others, including street trees as deemed necessary by the City Arborist. The report shall be consistent with the City Tree Technical Manual and shall be prepared by an ISA certified Arborist. See Overview of Regulated Trees. If required, this report shall also be incorporated into the project plans. Twelve (12) color hardcopies of a project description that includes the following information, at minimum: • the existing and proposed use at the proposed location, • the proposed wireless carrier, • the purpose and goals for the wireless facility (e.g. network design, frequency bands, new technology use), • the proposed scope of work, including work above and below ground, • the dimensions and volume of the antenna and the dimensions and volume of other additional equipment and the overall facility, • the efforts taken to minimize visual impacts of the proposed design (e.g. substantial setback from major roads, presence of trees, stealth design, slim line monopole, reducing the number of proposed facilities, increasing distances from nearby windows and other openings; placing some equipment in an underground vault, avoidance of scenic corridors or gateways, avoidance of nearby historic buildings), • map and the pole numbers for the alternative project locations considered, including in regard to network design, search ring/polygons, and specific site selection criteria, as well as a description of the reasons why these alternatives were not selected as the WCF proposed, • graphic portrayal and description of the proposed design and the alternative designs considered, • the efforts to locate at existing wireless facilities, • the basis of how the project qualifies as a Tier 2 WCF under PAMC Section 18.42.110, • identification of the underlying Master License Agreement, if any, • statement that clarifies if the application materials contain more than one wireless communication facility, • statement that clarifies that either the application materials show one or more wireless communication facilities that meet all of the City’s rules, regulations, and Objective Standards or a detailed statement detailing any and all requested WCF exceptions to any of the City’s rules, regulations, or Objective Standards (See PAMC Section 18.42.110(k) for more information on requesting exceptions. The WCF exception(s) must satisfy the requirements of PAMC Section 18.42.110(k) and demonstrate why the rule, regulation, or Objective Standard is infeasible), 4.d Packet Pg. 116 TIER 2 WCF PROPOSED FOR THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST December 2019 Page 4 of 7 • clarification of the materials, colors, and construction methods to be used, • clarification if one or more wireless communication facilities will generate any noise, • clarification on how any future expansion, including the addition of 5G equipment if not currently proposed, would be designed in accordance with applicable laws and the City’s Objective Standards, • list of all wireless communication facilities proposed in application, including the applicant site identification number, closest adjacent APN, address of closest adjacent APN, existing zoning district, existing underground utility district number (if any), existing pole number, existing pole height, proposed pole height with facility, and proposed color of facility. Twelve (12) hardcopies of a reduced-size (minimum of 11” x 17” and maximum 18” x 24”) set of bound project plans that include a north arrow, a graphic scale, and a notation of the drawing scale as either at 1/8” or 1/4” scale. All sheets shall be oriented in the same direction. Plans shall be legible and internally consistent. Plans shall include all information necessary for permitting and construction, as they will be the same plans submitted for Electrical permits, Street Work Permits, and/or Encroachment Permits. Applicants are encouraged to provide additional information where helpful. Project data and site information listing the wireless communication facility(ties) proposed in the application, applicant site identification number(s), latitude/longitude coordinates, elevation(s), closest adjacent parcels, address(es) of closest adjacent parcels, historic status of closest adjacent parcels, roadway type at the proposed location (expressway, arterial, residential arterial, collector, or local roadway), existing zoning district(s), existing underground utility district number (if any), existing pole number(s), and a brief description of work. Vicinity map showing the location of the proposed wireless communication facility within the City of Palo Alto. Location map showing north arrow, scale, parcel lines, and the distance and location of scenic routes, residence(s), schools, and other WCF facilities within 600 feet of the proposed wireless communication facility. Stamped and signed site survey of the wireless communication facility site area and pole completed within the last 12 months serving as the basis for other plan sheets. Stamped and signed structural/loading calculations completed for the proposed wireless communication facility design. Separate and detailed existing and proposed site/landscape/utility plans of the wireless communication facility site area including the following information: • North arrow (orient all sheets in the same direction), • Scale (1/8 minimum), • Dimensioned property lines and location of the right of way, including streets, paths, curb lines, sidewalks, planting strips, driveways, curb cuts, and utility lines, • Dimensioned residential zone of exclusion area, if the WCF is proposed in a residential zoning district, • Existing and proposed above ground and underground site improvements in the right-of- way within 50 feet of the proposed wireless communication facility, including signs, light fixtures, bicycle parking, trash and recycling (including proposed containers or related equipment), enclosures, fences, backflow preventers, above-ground electrical utilities, 4.d Packet Pg. 117 TIER 2 WCF PROPOSED FOR THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST December 2019 Page 5 of 7 boxes, transformers, meter mains, fire standpipes, vaults, underground utilities (sewer, gas, electric, water), communication facilities (fiber optic, conduit and any other facilities), and similar. (Applicants must submit a Utility Map Request form in order to receive existing underground utilities information), • Easements, encumbrances, and/or roadway special setback lines, • Proposed species and size for any new trees and the location, species, size, dripline area, and any necessary tree protection zone (TPZ) for all existing trees within 50 feet of the site area, including trees on neighboring properties that overhang the wireless communication facility site area. Dimension the distance from trees to the work area when the tree is located closer than 10’ to proposed construction, • Footprint of all buildings and structures on adjacent parcels with distances from the proposed WCF indicated, • Creeks or waterways on or adjacent to the site, • Azimuth direction(s), • Distance to closest habitable/occupied structure for each azimuth proposed or distance to closest habitable/occupied structures in each direction if an omni-directional antenna is proposed, • Pole quadrants showing proposed and existing risers, location of climbing space and/or working space and location of proposed and existing attached equipment, • Single line diagram, equipment grounding diagrams, and panel schedule, • Plan showing all proposed conduits or substructures, location of directional bores, receiving and exit pits indicated, size(s) of bore pits, boring profiles at utility crossings, location, size and extent of trenching, location and size of potholing, and volume of soil to be disturbed in cubic feet. Additional information to include in project plans: • Information necessary to determine GO 95 compliance, • Model number and manufacturer dimensioned diagrams of proposed equipment, mounting brackets, shrouding, underground vaults and associated equipment, • Manufacturer’s pole specifications, decorative features (if any) and details, • Equipment volume information summary with dimensioned front and side elevations that can be used to confirm equipment volume. Project elevations, sections, and schematic details: • Elevations showing all existing conditions, including all existing pole features and attachments and all proposed pole features and attachments. Elevations shall include all sides of the wireless communication facility, all existing and proposed signage and lighting, notation of grade elevation from where the maximum height is measured, notations of the type, colors, materials and finish for all project elements, notations of the height and dimensions for all project elements, and notations of the point of service for power, fiber, and similar, • Illustrative vertical section including foundation to maximum height in context with surrounding site features, such as curb lines, sidewalks, electrical lines, communication lines, landscaping features, trees, and underground structures (drawing should be at a minimum of ½” = 1’ scale), • Illustrative horizontal section(s) showing the attachments and clearances for equipment and conduit mounted to pole(s), • Schematic details demonstrating the quality and nature of the wireless communication facility design and code compliance of the design, including details of structural 4.d Packet Pg. 118 TIER 2 WCF PROPOSED FOR THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST December 2019 Page 6 of 7 connections and attachments and the aesthetic details of how adjacent, dissimilar materials connect. Examples include: mounting of the equipment to poles and wires and cabling behind shrouds or internal to the pole, • Details, colors, and text of all new safety, power disconnect, and other signage and location/method of attachment. Color photographs: Photos of the existing site showing the relationship of the proposed wireless communication facility to adjacent buildings and to the neighborhood. Color visual simulation(s): Visual simulations prepared to scale comparing existing and proposed conditions and context utilizing views consistent with the existing and proposed elevations. Lighting plan (if any changes to existing lighting are proposed or required) showing photometric drawings including foot-candle numbers and catalog cut sheets of proposed exterior fixtures. Urban Forestry Division Standard Tree Protection Plan Sheet (T-1) filled out and signed by the property owner or applicant. When required, include completed Tree Protection Report(s) as Sheet T-2 and T-3. Current City Standard Specifications sheets: DWGs 401, 402, 403, 404, and 405. Standard Public Works Engineering Services Standard Sheets (Stormwater Pollution Prevention and Standard Conditions). Traffic Logistics and Control Plan. Does Applicant seek an exception from any of the City’s rules, regulations, or Objective Standards applicable to the application? Yes No (If “Yes,” provide a description of the specific exceptions sought and the manner in which the application complies with all applicable rules, regulations, and Objective Standards to the greatest extent feasible.) Does Applicant allege that strict application on a City rule, regulation, or Objective Standard or failure to approve this application will violate preemptive state or federal law? Yes No (If “Yes,” provide all documentation to support allegation.) Certification under Penalty of Perjury I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date) at (location), California. Name (print): Signature: Relationship to the Applicant of Record: 4.d Packet Pg. 119 TIER 2 WCF PROPOSED FOR THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST December 2019 Page 7 of 7 Please coordinate with Planning staff regarding the following items: • One (1) hardcopy and one (1) electronic copy of a Community Meeting notice and affidavit containing proof that the applicant noticed and hosted the community meeting and a summary of comments received at the community meeting and what, if any, changes were made to the application as a result of the meeting, per PAMC Section 18.42.100(d)(7). This item may be submitted up to 15 days after initial application submittal. • One (1) electronic copy of photos showing notice board sign installation. During the intake appointment, the applicant will receive a notice board sign from the City for each proposed wireless communication facility location. The applicant shall affix a site plan, elevation, and streetscape image of the proposed wireless facility design to the notice board sign. The notice board sign shall be prominently displayed so that it can be viewed from the sidewalk or elsewhere in the public right of way and shall remain in place until any entitlement decision is effective. Photographs of the notice board sign installed at the proposed location shall be submitted to the City within three (3) days of application submittal. 4.d Packet Pg. 120 Comprehensive Plan Policies UTILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE Policy L-9.10 Design public infrastructure, including paving, signs, utility structures, parking garages and parking lots to meet high-quality urban design standards and embrace technological advances. Look for opportunities to use art and artists in the design of public infrastructure. Remove or mitigate elements of existing infrastructure that are unsightly or visually disruptive. Program L9.10.1 Continue the citywide undergrounding of utility wires. Minimize the impacts of undergrounding on street tree root systems and planting areas. Program L9.10.2 Encourage the use of compact and well-designed utility elements, such as transformers, switching devices, backflow preventers and telecommunications infrastructure. Place these elements in locations that will minimize their visual intrusion. Policy L-9.11 Provide utilities and service systems to serve all urbanized areas of Palo Alto and plan infrastructure maintenance and improvements to adequately serve existing and planned development. Program L9.11.1 Implement the findings of the City’s Infrastructure Blue Ribbon Committee and its emphasis for rebuilding our civic spaces. Program L9.11.2 Identify City-owned properties where combinations of wireless facilities can be co-located, assuming appropriate lease agreements are in place. 4.e Packet Pg. 121 MACKENZIE & ALBRITTON LLP 155 SANSOME STREET, SUITE 800 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94104 TELEPHONE 415 / 288-4000 FACSIMILE 415 / 288-4010 December 2, 2021 VIA EMAIL Molly Stump, Esq. City Attorney City of Palo Alto 250 Hamilton Avenue Palo Alto, California 94301 Gail Karish, Esq. Partner Best Best & Krieger 300 South Grand Avenue, 25th Floor Los Angeles, California 90071 Re: Palo Alto Wireless Facility Ordinance and Objective Standards Dear Molly and Gail: We write on behalf of Verizon Wireless to propose revisions to Palo Alto’s wireless facilities ordinance and the Objective Standards for right-of-way facilities. In our November 15 letter to the City Council, we offered three general suggestions to streamline permitting of small cells and ensure that the City’s wireless regulations comply with federal and state law. Small cell design standards should be “reasonable” and technically feasible, so applicants do not need to apply for numerous, problematic exceptions. The City should adopt location preferences qualified by a reasonable search distance, instead of imposing prohibitions on numerous locations. Staff should issue any notice of incomplete application for a small cell proposal within 10 days of filing, consolidating comments from all departments and referencing specific City regulations. To assist with implementing these suggestions, and to remedy a few other legal conflicts, we have attached redlines of our suggested revisions to both Code Section 18.42.110 and the Objective Standards. Below, we describe our suggested revisions and explain how they ensure compliance with federal and state law. The City also may consider exempting facilities on City-owned poles under a license agreement from the requirement for a land use permit. This could be accomplished by adding an exemption or applicability clause to Code Section 18.42.110. As pole owner, the City has considerable control over facility location and design in its proprietary capacity. With a license agreement, the City exercises subjective control in advance through a collaborative process. At the same time, each carrier can confirm that small cell location and design criteria are reasonable by agreement. A license agreement offers the same flexibility to update design criteria as the Objective Standards which are adopted by resolution. 4.f Packet Pg. 122 Palo Alto City Council December 2, 2021 Page 2 of 5 Code § 18.42.110 – Wireless Communication Facilities (c)(1). Types of WCF permits required – Tier 1. For the administrative Tier 1 approval process, we added “small wireless facilities that comply with the Objective Standards.” This will streamline permitting of small cells to meet the 60- and 90-day Shot Clock timelines required by the Federal Communications Commission (the “FCC”). 47 C.F.R. § 1.6003(c). Expedited permitting is appropriate for small cells that satisfy the reasonable aesthetic standards that the City must adopt per the FCC’s 2018 Infrastructure Order. See Accelerating Wireless Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment, Declaratory Ruling and Third Report and Order, 33 FCC Rcd. 9088, ¶¶ 86-87 (September 27, 2018). (d)(6). Submittal of all applications at same time. We added a site license agreement (if applicable) to the list of applications that must be submitted along with the land use permit application. The FCC determined that all authorizations required by a city for a new wireless facility must be reviewed within the same “Shot Clock” period. Infrastructure Order, ¶¶ 132-33. (d)(8). Tier 3, depiction of maximum dimensions permitted by Spectrum Act. We deleted this submittal requirement for hypothetical information that is not pertinent to a pending wireless facility application. Each Tier 3 application should be evaluated on its own merits, not on speculation over future expansion that may never occur. (f)(1). Tier 1 WFC permit process and findings. We clarified that small wireless facilities should be approved if they comply with the Objective Standards. We also added requirements for a notice of incomplete application because the City’s current process led to hundreds of comments on Verizon Wireless’s recent applications. Many comments were vague, based on misinterpretations of the Code or standards, or contradicted by later staff comments. To halt the Shot Clock for a small cell application, the City must issue a first notice of incomplete application (“NOI”) within 10 days after the filing date. 47 C.F.R. § 1.6003(d)(1). Each NOI comment or request for information must cite “the specific rule or regulation creating this obligation.” 47 C.F.R. § 1.6003(d)(2)(i). Subsequent NOIs do not pause the clock if they request new information not clearly and specifically identified in the first NOI. 47 C.F.R. § 1.6003(d)(3)(i). (j)(1). Permit conditions for Tier 1. This minor change clarifies the conditions applicable to eligible facilities requests under the Spectrum Act. (j)(8). Replacement with new technology as available. We deleted this condition that would violate the vested rights of wireless carriers who built their facilities in reliance on approved plans and standards applicable at the time. This also would violate Government Code Section 65964(b) that generally requires a minimum 10-year term for wireless facility permits. 4.f Packet Pg. 123 Palo Alto City Council December 2, 2021 Page 3 of 5 (j)(9). Permit length. We extended the “build-out” period from 12 to 24 months. For Verizon Wireless’s recent permit approvals, the City has delayed issuance of encroachment permits due to staff’s changing requirements. (k). Exceptions (severability). We removed the exception process, and replaced it with a severability clause that would allow the City—or a federal or state court—to find that certain standards are preempted or invalid, and therefore inapplicable to a particular application. The FCC emphasized that the it is the City’s responsibility to adopt “reasonable” and technically feasible aesthetic standards for small cells that are published in advance. Infrastructure Order, ¶ 86. It is not the responsibility of applicants to prove that City standards are unreasonable or otherwise “materially inhibit” service. The exception process requires quasi-judicial findings regarding federal or state law that are not aesthetic in nature. Verizon Wireless’s recent applications for typical small cells installed in many other cities required numerous exceptions in Palo Alto, and future proposals for identical designs would require the same exceptions over and over, confirming that that many current City standards are unreasonable. Objective Standards for Wireless Communication Facilities in the Public Rights of Way on Streetlight Poles and Wood Utility Poles WCF Siting Standards We deleted unreasonable location restrictions requiring an exception for residential zones, and prohibiting facilities near schools, the “residential zone of exclusion,” or 20 feet from occupied structures or intersections. These restrictions “materially inhibit” service improvements and effectively prohibit service in violation of the Telecommunications Act. Infrastructure Order, ¶¶ 35-37. Instead, we added five reasonable location preferences, favoring the various non-residential zones over residential zones, while preserving the current hierarchy of preferred streets within residential zones. We also converted the bans on scenic routes and historic sites to preferences, making them the least-favored option. We added a 200-foot search distance for any feasible, preferred option to avoid steering a small cell too far from its target service area, which will avoid a prohibition of service. We retained the 600-foot facility separation, but specified that it applies to facilities of the same carrier. We also inserted new structure preferences, favoring use of existing poles while allowing an applicant to place a new pole if there is no feasible existing option with 200 feet. The FCC considered new poles for small cells in part by specifying distinct fees and Shot Clocks. Infrastructure Order, ¶ 79; 47 C.F.R. § 1.6003(c)(1)(iii). California Public Utilities Code Section 7901 grants telephone corporations a statewide right to place their equipment along any right-of-way, including new poles. WCF Design Standards We kept the current design configurations, but deleted language preferring any particular design and converting all designs to options. This avoids imposing standards that may be 4.f Packet Pg. 124 Palo Alto City Council December 2, 2021 Page 4 of 5 technically infeasible for particular carriers. We added a fifth option for integrated antennas, based on Verizon Wireless’s recently-approved and planned small cells, shown in the attached photosimulations. WCF antenna and shroud dimensions (diameter/height). We deleted inexact language requiring the smallest antenna to achieve a coverage objective. This impermissibly dictates the technology to be used by wireless providers. See New York SMSA Ltd. Partnership v. Town of Clarkstown, 612 F.3d 97, 105-106 (2nd Cir. 2010). The FCC defined “small wireless facility” to include antennas up to three cubic feet each. 47 C.F.R. § 1.6002(l). By adding the word “any,” we clarified that not all antennas will be shrouded, as explained below. WCF design quality. We added an exemption to shrouding requirements for integrated antennas, which Verizon Wireless uses for frequencies that are impeded by shrouds, and which would be technically infeasible in that circumstance. WCF equipment adjustment. We deleted this section, which one planner thought required an exception and not an allowed “adjustment.” This provision is unnecessary because the height limit standards constrain overall facility size. The severe limits on antenna size contradict the FCC’s volume allowance of three cubic feet, and would discriminate against some technologies in conflict with new Government Code Section 65964.1(h) (effective January 1, 2022). Existing pole locations. We deleted this section that generally prohibits new poles, and we included new poles as the less-favored option in the new “structure preferences” described above. WCF Performance Standards Pole replacement. For Footnotes 7 and 8, we added the qualifier “to the extent technically feasible” as well as language allowing deviations from standards to accommodate structural requirements. Requiring that replacement poles exactly match City standards led to numerous NOI comments and exception requirements for Verizon Wireless’s recent applications, as well as delay of encroachment permit applications. Because replacement streetlight poles increased in height, Verizon Wireless could not satisfy some of the City’s specifications. For example, the manufacturer Valmont could not offer a clam shell base for a taller pole of the exact dimension that the City required, so the City’s standard was technically infeasible and unreasonable. Landscape screening. We deleted this requirement regarding existing and new street trees, which led to numerous rounds of confusing staff comments on Verizon Wireless’s recent applications. New trees are beyond the scope of a “small wireless facility” as defined by the FCC. Requiring such an off-site improvement is excessive and bears no nexus to a small wireless facility, which poses minimal visual impact because of the size constraints imposed by the FCC’s definition. 4.f Packet Pg. 125 Palo Alto City Council December 2, 2021 Page 5 of 5 Exceptions (Severability) Consistent with our suggested Code revision, we deleted the exception process and inserted a severability clause. We also deleted the prohibitive language barring exceptions for certain locations, such as 300 feet from a school. We included residential alleys in the new location preference list described above. Our suggested revisions to the Code and Objective Standards are informed by Verizon Wireless’s experience over the last year-and-a-half working with City staff to secure approval of land use permits for three small cells and the ongoing work to obtain encroachment permits. We believe that these revisions will eliminate unlawful, onerous requirements while providing a clear, streamlined process for applicants and staff alike. We would be pleased to review a draft ordinance and revised standards prior to their introduction. Very truly yours, Paul B. Albritton Attachments cc: Aylin Bilir, Esq. Jonathan Lait Ed Shikada 4.f Packet Pg. 126 Palo Alto Municipal Code Verizon Wireless Suggested Revisions December 2, 2021 Verizon Wireless suggests revisions to certain provisions of the Palo Alto Municipal Code, but does not comment on every provision. The absence of comment on a specific provision does not represent a waiver by Verizon Wireless of its right challenge any such provision in the future. 18.42.110 Wireless Communication Facilities … (c) Types of WCF Permits Required (1) A Tier 1 WCF Permit shall be required for: A. Any eligible facilities request, as defined in this section; or B. Any application for a Small Wireless Facility that complies with the Objective Standards. (2) A Tier 2 WCF Permit shall be required for: A. Any modification of an eligible support structure, including the collocation of new equipment, that substantially changes the physical dimensions of the eligible support structure on which it is mounted; or B. Any collocation of a small wireless facility that does not comply with the Objective Standards; or C. Any collocation not eligible for a Tier 1 WCF Permit. (3) A Tier 3 WCF Permit shall be required for the siting of any WCF, including a small wireless facility that does not comply with the Objective Standards, that is not a collocation subject to a Tier 1 or 2 WCF Permit. An application shall not require a Tier 3 WCF Permit solely because it proposes the replacement in-place of an existing streetlight or wood utility pole. (d) WCF Application Requirements All applications for a WCF Permit shall include the following items: (1) Any applicant for a WCF Permit shall participate in an intake meeting with the Planning and Community Environment Department when filing an application; (2) The applicant must specify in writing whether the applicant believes the application is for an eligible facilities request subject to the Spectrum Act, and if so, provide a detailed written explanation as to why the applicant believes that the application qualifies as an eligible facilities request; (3) The applicant shall complete the city's standard application form, as may be amended from time to time; (4) The applicant shall include a completed and signed application checklist available from the city, including all information required by the application checklist; (5) Payment of the fee prescribed by the Municipal Fee Schedule; (6) The application must be accompanied by all permit applications with all required application materials for each separate permit required by the city for the 4.f Packet Pg. 127 proposed WCF, including a building permit, an encroachment permit (if applicable), and an electrical permit (if applicable), and a site license agreement (if applicable); (7) For Tier 2 and 3 WCF Permits, the applicant must host a community meeting at a time and location designed to maximize attendance by persons receiving notice under this subparagraph to provide outreach to the neighborhood around the project site. The applicant shall give notice of the community meeting to all residents and property owners within 600 feet of the project site at least 14 days in advance of the community meeting. Applicants are encouraged to host the meeting before submitting an application. Before an application may be approved, the applicant shall provide a proof of notice affidavit to the city that contains: A. Proof that the applicant noticed and hosted the community meeting no later than 15 days after filing the application; B. A summary of comments received at the community meeting and what, if any, changes were made to the application as a result of the meeting; (8) For Tier 3 WCF Permits, the plans shall include a scaled depiction of the maximum increase in the physical dimensions of the proposed project that would be feasible and permitted by the Spectrum Act, using the proposed project as a baseline; and (9) Satisfy other such requirements as may be, from time to time, required by the Planning and Community Environment Department Director ("Director"), as publically stated in the application checklist. … (f) Tier 1 WCF Permit Process and Findings (1) A Tier 1 WCF Permit shall be reviewed by the Director. The Director's decision shall be final and shall not be appealable; (2) The Director shall grant a Tier 1 WCF Permit provided that the Director finds that the applicant proposes an eligible facilities request, or that the applicant proposes a Small Wireless Facility that complies with the Objective Standards; (3) The Director shall impose the following conditions on the grant of a Tier 1 WCF Permit: A. For an eligible facilities request, Tthe proposed collocation or modification shall not defeat any existing concealment elements of the support structure; and B. The conditions of approval in Section 18.42.110(j). (4). For an application for a Small Wireless Facility, the Director shall issue any notice of incomplete application within 10 days after the filing date, including comments from all City departments providing input. Each comment shall clearly specify the City rule or regulation that requires the information requested. Subsequent notices of incomplete application may not request additional information not identified in the initial notice. … 4.f Packet Pg. 128 (j) Conditions of Approval In addition to any other conditions of approval permitted under federal and state law and this Code that the Director deems appropriate or required under this Code, all WCF Projects approved under this chapter, whether approved by the Director or deemed granted by operation of law, shall be subject to the following conditions of approval: (1) Permit conditions. The grant or approval of a WCF Tier 1 Permit for an eligible facilities request shall be subject to the conditions of approval of the underlying permit, except as may be preempted by the Spectrum Act. (2) As-built plans. The applicant shall submit to the Director an as-built set of plans and photographs depicting the entire WCF as modified, including all transmission equipment and all utilities, within ninety (90) days after the completion of construction. (3) Applicant shall hire a radio engineer licensed by the State of California to measure the actual radio frequency emission of the WCF and determine if it meets FCC's standards. A report, certified by the engineer, of all calculations, required measurements, and the engineer's findings with respect to compliance with the FCC's radio frequency emission standards shall be submitted to the Planning Division within one year of commencement of operation. (4) Indemnification. To the extent permitted by law, the applicant shall indemnify and hold harmless the city, its City Council, its officers, employees and agents (the "indemnified parties") from and against any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party against the indemnified parties and the applicant to attack, set aside or void, any permit or approval authorized hereby for the Project, including (without limitation) reimbursing the city for its actual attorneys' fees and costs incurred in defense of the litigation. The city may, in its sole discretion and at Applicant's expense, elect to defend any such action with attorneys of its own choice. (5) Compliance with applicable laws. The applicant shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Code, any permit issued under this Code, and all other applicable federal, state and local laws (including without limitation all building code, electrical code and other public safety requirements). Any failure by the City to enforce compliance with any applicable laws shall not relieve any applicant of its obligations under this code, any permit issued under this code, or all other applicable laws and regulations. (6) Compliance with approved plans. The proposed Project shall be built in compliance with the approved plans on file with the Planning Division. (7) Subject to city uses. Any permit to install or utilize poles or conduit in the public rights- of-way is subject to the city’s prior right to use, maintain, expand, replace or remove from use such facilities in the reasonable exercise of its governmental or proprietary powers. Such permit is further subject to the city’s right to construction, maintain, and modify streets, sidewalks, and other improvements in the public rights-of- way. The city, in its sole discretion, may require removal or relocation of a permittee’s equipment, at permittee’s sole cost and expense, if necessary to accommodate a city use. (8) Replacement. Where feasible, as new technology becomes available, the applicant shall place above-ground equipment below ground and replace equipment remaining above-ground with smaller equipment, as determined by volume. The applicant shall obtain all necessary permits and approvals for such replacement. 4.f Packet Pg. 129 (9) Permit length. WCFs permits shall be valid for the time provided in Section 18.42.110(n), except that a permit shall automatically expire after twelve 24 months from the date of approval if within such twelve 24 month period, the applicant has not obtained all necessary permits to commence construction. The director may, without a hearing, extend such time for a maximum period of twelve additional months only, upon application filed with him or her before the expiration of the twelve-month limit. (k) Severability If any provision of this Section or the application thereof to any circumstance or permit application is found to be preempted or invalid, that provision shall be severed from this Section or inapplicable to a permit application, and shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions. (k) Exceptions (1) The decision-making authority may grant exceptions to objective standards adopted by City Council resolution or any provision of this Section 18.42.110, upon finding that: A. The proposed WCF complies with the requirements of this Section 18.42.110 and any other requirements adopted by the City Council to the greatest extent feasible; and either B. As applied to a proposed WCF, the provision(s) from which exception is sought would deprive the applicant of rights guaranteed by federal law, state law, or both; or C. Denial of the application as proposed would violate federal law, state law, or both. (2) An applicant must request an exception at the time an application is initially submitted for a WCF permit under this Section 18.42.110. The request must include both the specific provision(s) from which exception is sought and the basis of the request, including all supporting evidence on which the applicant relies. Any request for exception after the City has deemed an application complete constitutes a material change to the proposed WCF and shall be considered a new application. (3) If the applicant seeks an exception from objective standards adopted by City Council resolution or generally applicable development standards, the Director may refer the application to the Architectural Review Board for recommendation on whether the application complies with such standards to the greatest extent feasible. (4) The applicant shall have the burden of proving that federal law, state law, or both compel the decision-making authority to grant the requested exception(s), using the evidentiary standards applicable to the law at issue. The city shall have the right to hire independent consultants, at the applicant’s expense, to evaluate the issues raised by the exception request and to submit rebuttal evidence where applicable. … 4.f Packet Pg. 130 1 of 7 Palo Alto Objective Standards Verizon Wireless Suggested Revisions December 2, 2021 Verizon Wireless suggests revisions to certain provisions of the Objective Standards, but does not comment on every provision. The absence of comment on a specific provision does not represent a waiver by Verizon Wireless of its right challenge any such provision in the future. Objective Standards for Wireless Communication Facilities in the Public Rights of Way on Streetlight Poles and Wood Utility Poles A Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) proposed for the public right of way must comply with the applicable provisions of the City’s Municipal Code and all of the following objective standards. In each instance where a proposed facility is unable to comply with the City’s objective standards, a WCF Exception may be requested and evaluated in accordance with this resolution and PAMC Section 18.42.110(k).1The following standards apply to both streetlight poles and wood utility poles, unless otherwise noted. WCF SITING STANDARDS Permitted Zoning Districts WCF placement is permitted in non-residential zoning districts. Public School Boundary A WCF shall not be placed within 600 feet of a parcel containing a public school. No WCF Exception shall be granted allowing a WCF to be placed closer than 300 feet to a parcel containing a public school. Residential Zone of Exclusion (this standard applies to WCF Exception requests to locate in residential districts) No WCF shall be placed within the public right of way in the area between the street centerline and the central fifty percent (50%) of the immediately adjacent parcel’s front lot line. The central fifty percent standard shall be based on the parcel’s lot width2. For corner lots, the central fifty percent standard along the street lot line3 shall be based on the parcel’s lot depth4. Exhibit 2 illustrates this requirement. Location Preferences Residential Roadways (this standard applies to WCF Exception requests to locate in residential districts) Applicants must place facilities according to the following location preferences. An applicant may use a less-preferred location if there is no preferred option that is available and technically feasible within 200 feet along the subject right-of-way. 1. Office, research and manufacturing districts 2. Commercial districts 3. Special purpose districts 4. Residential districts, along the following streets in order of preference: • Expressways • Arterials 4.f Packet Pg. 131 2 of 7 • Residential Arterials • Roadways identified with a Special Setback (including cCollector and local streets). • Alleys 5. Identified scenic routes, within a listed historic district, or within 100 feet of a parcel with an historic structure or a historic site, as those terms are defined by PAMC Section 16.49.020. Any request for a WCF Exception involving placement of a WCF within a residential zoning district shall prioritize WCF placement on the following roadway types (See Exhibit 3): In each instance above, the priority shall be for placement of a WCF most distant from residential property. An additional WCF Exception request must be made to place a WCF on a collector or a local roadway that does not have an identified special setback. Structure Preferences The City prefers applicants to use existing pole locations in the right- of-way. An applicant may place and own a new pole if there is no existing pole location that is available and technically feasible within 200 feet along the subject right-of-way. Building or Structure Setback A WCF shall not be placed closer than 20 feet from any building used for occupancy in any zoning district. Distance Between WCFs A WCF shall not be placed less than 600 feet away from another WCF of the same company. This requirement does not preclude WCFs collocating on the same structure where otherwise allowed. Intersection Corners5 A WCF shall not be placed less than 20 feet away from any roadway intersection. An intersection is measured from the start of the curb radius. Scenic Routes6 A WCF shall not be placed along an identified scenic route. Historic Districts, Sites, and Structures A WCF shall not be placed within a listed historic district, nor immediately adjacent to a parcel with an historic structure, nor immediately adjacent to an historic site, as those terms are defined by PAMC Section 16.49.020. A WCF shall not be placed in a potential historic district, or immediately adjacent to a potential historic structure or site, where the application for historic designation was filed with the City prior to the filing of a WCF application, until a final decision has been made regarding that pending historic designation. 4.f Packet Pg. 132 3 of 7 WCF DESIGN STANDARDS Following are allowed options for placement of antennas and associated equipment. Underground Design (Preferred Option) Radio equipment shall be placed in an underground vault. The associated antenna(s) shall be placed in a shroud at the top of a nearby pole. Underground vaults shall be the minimum volume necessary to house WCF equipment and include information detailing why the proposed dimensions are required. Maximum vault size shall not exceed 5 feet 8-inches x 8 feet 2-inches x 5 feet 7-inches or 260 cubic feet, excluding space required for ventilation or sump pump equipment. Top-Mounted Design (Secondary Option) Radio equipment and the associated antenna(s) shall be enclosed within a shroud at the top of the pole. Minimal Sunshield Design Use of this design requires a WCF Exception Radio equipment shall be enclosed within one or two sunshields not exceeding 8 inches wide nor 0.75 cubic feet in volume each, mounted directly to the side of the pole. The associated antenna(s) shall be placed in a shroud at the top of the pole. Sunshields shall be attached at least 12 feet above ground level and, when located on wood utility poles, shall not interfere with the identified communication space. Existing Signage Design Use of this design requires a WCF Exception Radio equipment shall be attached to a pole behind existing signage under the following conditions: i) Radio equipment shall be placed within a shroud that does not exceed the dimensions of the sign in height and width, nor 4 inches in depth, including any required mounting bracket. ii) In no event shall WCF equipment obscure or interfere with the visibility or functioning of the signage. The associated antenna(s) shall be placed in a shroud at the top of the pole. Integrated Antenna Design Antennas with integrated radios shall be attached at the same centerline and flush-mounted to the top of a streetlight pole, or mounted on a stand-off arm and bracket to the side of a utility pole the minimum distance to comply with General Order 95 Rule 94.4. Approved examples of antennas integrated with radios are attached. 4.f Packet Pg. 133 4 of 7 WCF Antenna and Shroud Dimensions (Diameter / Height) Antennas shall have the smallest size possible to achieve the coverage objective. The diameter of the antenna and any shroud shall not exceed 15 inches at their widest. For Streetlight Poles: The maximum WCF height shall not exceed 3 feet (or 5.5 feet for top-mounted designs) from the top of the streetlight pole that meets the City standards for the proposed location. The associated “antenna skirt” shall taper to meet the pole above the mast arm. For Wood Utility Poles: In no circumstance shall the total height of a pole and all WCF equipment exceed 55 feet. For wood utility poles carrying power lines, replacement poles shall be the minimum height necessary to provide GO 95 mandated clearance between WC equipment and power lines. For wood utility poles without power lines, any WCF equipment shall not increase the height of the pole by 5.5 feet when compared with the height of the existing pole. The associated “antenna skirt” shall taper to meet the top of the pole if wider than the pole. 4.f Packet Pg. 134 5 of 7 WCF Design Quality Antennas and/or equipment at the top of the pole, except antennas with integrated radios, shall be covered by a single integrated shroud and “antenna skirt” designed without gaps between materials or sky visible between component surfaces and between the shroud or skirt and the top of the pole. All components external to the pole shall have an integral color or shall be painted to match the color and/or materials of the pole. Associated Eequipment shall be oriented to face in either of the directions of travel in the right of way and shall not face or extend toward private property or the curb line. WCF Equipment Adjustment For Streetlight Poles: Equipment that cannot propagate an adequate signal within the shrouding required by the standard designs shall be attached to a streetlight pole at a height of 2 feet below the light mast or higher. Each instance of such equipment shall not exceed 0.85 cubic feet, nor shall the total volume of such equipment and any shrouding exceed 2.6 cubic feet per streetlight pole. For Wood Utility Poles: Equipment that cannot propagate an adequate signal within the shrouding required by the standard designs shall be attached to the top of the pole or on a cross arm or brace protruding from the pole the minimum extent necessary to comply with safety standards, including GO 95. Such cross arm shall be placed as high on the pole as technically feasible. Each instance of such equipment shall not exceed 0.85 cubic feet nor shall the total volume of such equipment exceed 2.6 cubic feet per wood utility pole. Curb Clearances Any WCF attachments placed below 16 feet above ground level shall not be placed closer than 18 inches to the curb, nor shall they extend over the sidewalk (Caltrans Highway Design Manual Section 309). All WCF equipment shall maintain at least 3 feet from any curb cut. WCF Wires and Cabling For Streetlight Poles: All wires and cabling shall be routed entirely underground and within the pole and any attached shroud. For Wood Utility Poles: All wires and cabling to equipment shall be within the shroud or shall be within conduit. All conduit shall be mounted flush to the pole. 4.f Packet Pg. 135 6 of 7 Safety Signs Safety signs shall be the smallest size possible to accomplish its purpose. Power Disconnects For Streetlight Poles: Power disconnects shall be labeled and placed in a vault near the base of the pole. For Wood Utility Poles: Power disconnects shall be labeled and placed on the wood pole or in a vault near the base of the pole. Ground Mounted Equipment Except as provided in these standards, no equipment cabinets may be placed at grade. Existing Pole Locations A WCF shall utilize an existing streetlight pole or wood utility pole location. Any new pole locations are prohibited unless approved through a City Public Works/Utilities pole placement application. WCF PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Pole Replacement For Streetlight Poles: An existing streetlight pole proposed for a WCF installation shall be replaced with a new pole.7 For Wood Utility Poles: An existing wood utility pole proposed for a WCF installation shall be replaced with a new pole.8 Landscaping Replacement Any existing landscaping removed or damaged by installation shall be replaced in kind. Landscape Screening A WCF shall be placed where existing street tree foliage or new street tree or amenity tree foliage within 35 feet of the WCF provides interruption of direct views of the WCF. 7 Replacement streetlight poles must meet the currently applicable City standards for the pole to the extent technically feasible, including foundation and bolt designs, conduit separation, aluminum material, color, width, height, light mast characteristics (examples: orientation, design, height, color temperature and photometrics), and the presence/absence of decorative features. To the extent technically feasible, Rreplacement poles will conform to Public Works Department (PWD) style guidelines and Utilities-Electrical (CPAU) standards where the City has adopted standards and will match the pole being replaced where no standards exist. Standard specifications for streetlight poles in the City can be obtained from the Utilities-Electrical (CPAU) and Public Works (PWD) Departments. Deviations from the standards shall be allowed to accommodate structural requirements resulting from required pole replacement. 8 Replacement wood utility poles must meet the currently applicable City standards for the pole to the extent technically feasible, including width, height, color, material, structural capacity, and GO 95 compliance. Replacement poles shall be no greater in diameter or other cross-sectional dimension than is necessary for the proper functioning of the pole with all attachments. Existing pole functionality shall be maintained, such as in regard to electrical lines, climbing space, light masts (examples: orientation, design, height, color temperature and photometrics), and provision of communication space, unless existing functionality, such as transformers, can be relocated with the approval of the Utilities-Electrical Department (CPAU). Standard specifications for pole replacement in the City can be obtained from CPAU. For wood utility poles carrying power 4.f Packet Pg. 136 7 of 7 lines, replacement poles shall be the minimum height necessary to provide GO-95 mandated clearance between WCF equipment and power lines. Deviations from the standards shall be allowed to accommodate structural requirements resulting from required pole replacement. Noise9 Noise from a WCF shall comply with PAMC Chapter 9.10 and shall be consistent with noise-related Comprehensive Plan goals and policies. City Marketing Banners WCF installations shall not require any changes in the City’s existing banner marketing program. SEVERABILITY If any provision of these Objective Standards or the application thereof to any circumstance or permit application is found to be preempted or invalid, that provision shall be severed from the Objective Standards or inapplicable to a permit application, and shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions. WCF EXCEPTIONS A WCF applicant may file an application(s) containing a request for one or more WCF Exceptions to the objective standards set forth in this resolution or any other provision of PAMC Section 18.42.110. The request for a WCF Exception(s) does not exempt a WCF from complying with other objective wireless administrative standards adopted by City Council resolution or any other provision of PAMC Section 18.42.110. Each WCF Exception request must be made at the time an application is submitted and must include both the specific provision(s) from which the exception is sought and the basis of the request, including ll supporting evidence on which the applicant relies. The applicant has the burden of proving that federal law, state law, or both, compel the decision-making authority to grant the requested exception(s). The WCF Exception must satisfy the requirements of PAMC Section 18.42.110(k) and demonstrate why the standard is infeasible. Failure to identify all required WCF Exceptions upon application submittal may result in application denial. No WCF Exception may be granted that allows a WCF to be placed: 1) within 300 feet of a parcel containing a public school, 2) within 20 feet of a habitable residential building in a residential zoning district, 3) on wood utility poles within the Residential Zone of Exclusion described in this resolution, or 4) in an alley within a residential zoning district. 4.f Packet Pg. 137 verizon✓ 7/26/21 SF Palo Alto 061 Adjacent to 1221 Middlefield Road Palo Alto, CA Looking Northeast from Middlefield Road View#1 Applied Imagination 51 o 914-0500 Palo Alto Approved Design 4.f Packet Pg. 138 5555 Central Ave, Suite 100 • Boulder, CO. 80301www.comptektechnologies.com • P 303-531-5758 F 303-531-5595 30749 8.625IN SUPPORT POLE, C-BAND SHROUDS ABOVE LUMINAIRE PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL: This document, and the information it contains, including the principles of design, is the exclusive property of Comptek and is confidential. Accordingly, this information is submitted to you with the agreement that it is not to be reproduced, copied, or loaned in part or in whole, nor is the information to be relayed to any other individual or company except as Comptek first authorizes in writing. Acceptance of this document constitutes agreement to these restrictions. Oval Antenna Shrouds 4.f Packet Pg. 139 Accuracy of photo simulation based upon information provided by project applicant. ©2020 Google MapsLocation Existing Looking east from Deanna WayProposed View 1 proposed pull boxes proposed rf sign proposed meter/disconnect combination unit proposed replacement light standard with panel antennas IFO 4609 Barry Street Bakersfield CA 93307 CA_BAK_WHITELANE_049 "Exhibit G1d" Unshrouded Antennas 4.f Packet Pg. 140 Narrow Vertical Antenna Shroud 4.f Packet Pg. 141 Textured Cylindrical Antenna Shroud 4.f Packet Pg. 142