HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 111-10TO:
FROM:
DATE:
HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL
CITY MANAGER
JANUARY 25, 2010
DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES
AND PUBLIC WORKS
CMR: 111:10
REPORT TYPE: CONSENT
SUBJECT: Utilities Advisory Commission Recommendation to Adopt a Resolution
Establishing a Salinity Reduction Policy for Recycled Water
RECOMMENDATION
Staff and the Utilities Advisory Commission recommend that the Council adopt a resolution
approving the proposed Recycled Water Salinity Reduction Policy (Salinity Policy).
BACKGROUND
Recycling treated wastewater is increasing in the arid West as a response to the fact that
populations are increasing and fresh water supplies are not. Palo Alto and other communities are
using treated wastewater for landscape irrigation and that use is expected to grow dramatically in
the future. Salts accumulate in water when it is used by people and industrial processes. To
maximize the use of recycled water for irrigation on the widest variety of green plants, the
recycled water's salt content (salinity) needs to be minimized. The issue of salinity of recycled
water was raised by Canopy and the Stanford Real Estate office when they reviewed the recycled
water project's draft environmental document. The purpose of this policy is to ensure that the
City is taking all practical steps to reduce salinity in recycled water.
DISCUSSION
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) is a common measure of the salinity in a water system. In general,
the higher the TDS, the more soil, plant, and irrigation management will be required when using
recycled water for landscape irrigation. The total amount of TDS in recycled water depends on a
variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the TDS levels of the potable source water, the
level of industrial/commercial inflow into the system, water softener use, and infiltration into the
sewer collection system from highly saline groundwater areas. Throughout California, different
recycled water retailers produce recycled water with a wide range of TDS levels (as shown in
Chart I below). The City of San Diego produces recycled water with a TDS level approaching
1000 parts per million (PPM), compared to a potable source water level of approximately 500
PPM. In northern California, the South Bay Water Recycling system has a TDS level of700-750
PPM, compared to a source water concentration of approximately 300 PPM.
CMR: 111:10 Page 1 of6
Chart I: TDS level comparison in potable and recycled water supplies in California
i"
Q.
~
II
15
i!
"'" CI
~
1200,.---------------------------,
1000+------------------------~
800
600
400
200
o
C~y of San Diego South 8ay Water
recycling
Redwood C~y C~y of Palo Ano
~ Recycled Water
TDS level
I!l Potable Source
Water TDS level
The Regional Water Quality Control Plant (RWQCP) serves the cities of Palo Alto, Los Altos,
and Mountain View, the East Palo Alto Sanitary District, the town of Los Altos Hills and
Stanford University. The TDS levels in the recycled water from the RWQCP currently are in the
850 to 900 PPM range, however the TDS level of influent into the RWQCP from the partner
agencies varies considerably. Considering the high quality of the potable water source for most
of the RWQCP partners, the current TDS levels are higher than expected. There are several
reasons for the elevated TDS levels, but the primary controllable source is infiltration into the
wastewater collection system in the Baylands area where the groundwater salinity level is high.
The RWQCP's partners' influent TDS levels are depicted in Chart II below and demonstrate the
TDS variations between the different partners.
CMR: 111:10 Page 2 of6
Chart II: RWQCP Partner TDS concentrations and Total Recycled Water TDS levels
-E a. a.
VI
S
cu
til)
RI
~ cu
~
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
Existing lOS Concentration: Partners and Recycled Water
(Oct 2007 -Nov 2008)
EPASD los Altos Mountain Palo Alto Stanford Recycled
View Water
Staff is recommending that a Recycled Water Salinity Reduction Policy be adopted to facilitate a
focused effort to reduce TDS levels over time. The proposed Salinity Policy will provide a basis
to implement activities to achieve those results. Based on the existing TDS levels and
comparisons with other recycled water providers, it is apparent that there is an opportunity to
further reduce the TDS levels of the recycled water from the RWQCP by working with
individual RWQCP partners.
Regulatory limits for TDS for landscaping do not exist because landscape requirements are
driven by individual site soil conditions. However, the establishment of a quantitative goal based
on elimination of infiltration will assist the R WQCP partners and the City in efforts to reduce the
TDS levels to a level one would expect given the source water for the service area of the
R WQCP. The Salinity Policy contains a TDS goal of 600 PPM. Staff has estimated that this
level can be achieved without modifying normal human or industrial activities, but rather by
controlling saline groundwater infiltration.
The TDS goal of 600 PPM was derived, in part, by starting with the aggregate source water for
the RWQCP partner agencies, which has a TDS of about 100 PPM. Unavoidable, normal human
activities typically add about 350-400 PPM to the source water. Another 100-150 PPM was
added as a buffer since it is impossible to completely stop all intrusion of saline groundwater into
the wastewater collection systems, for a total of 600 PPM.
CMR: 111:10 Page 3 of6
The 600 PPM TDS goal was developed based upon what should be achievable, employing best
engineering practices. It is not based on the requirements of living plants for irrigation. As
stated above, the variability and importance of soil conditions and individual plant types have
prevented resource agencies from establishing such standards for irrigation. However, the 600
PPM TDS goal is slightly less than the 640 PPM level recommended by the Stanford Real Estate
Office (REO) in their November 24, 2009 comments to the City. While staff cannot establish
standards for irrigation, it appears that a 600 PPM TDS goal is consistent with recommendation
of the Stanford REO, despite their different basis. When reviewed by the Utilities Advisory
Commission at its December 2, 2009 meeting, the Stanford REO indicated that it supported the
establishment of a 600 PPM TDS goal, while pointing out that other constituents (components of
TDS such as Sodium) must also be addressed (see Attachment D). Staff will address these other
constituents in the future. For now, the critical action is to establish a goal and begin to take
action toward that goal. The goal can be amended in the future as more information and analysis
becomes available.
The R WQCP has already identified a preliminary list of efforts that can be implemented or that
are in the process of implementation in support of the Salinity Policy. Notable examples include:
• The City of Mountain View has just eliminated the sewer discharge of 3 saline wells in
the north of Bayshore area. This action alone should reduce the TDS to 800 PPM.
• The RWQCP will continue to monitor potential saltwater intrusion "hotspots" and
communicate the results to the relevant RWQCP partners.
• The RWQCP will develop a database to track salinity data and other investigative work
• Utilities will coordinate implementation of the recently approved Sanitary Sewer
Management Plan (CMR: 303:09) to manage the Palo Alto wastewater collection system
and identify inflow and infiltration reduction actions.
• The R WQCP will develop a groundwater management plan to coordinate salinity
reduction activities with the R WQCP partners and prepare for expanded recycled water
application. This groundwater management plan will be coordinated with the Santa Clara
Valley Water District, which has jurisdiction over the groundwater basins in Santa Clara
County.
The benefits of achieving the TDS goal in the Salinity Policy include greater acceptance of the
use of recycled water. Recycled water is currently blended with potable water when used on the
Municipal Golf Course and at Greer Park. It is expected that reducing the salinity of the water
will enable a greater fraction of recycled water to be used by these existing recycled water
customers. These efforts and the efforts to expand the recycled water system to serve new
customers will help the City reduce its consumption of potable water and reduce treated effluent
flow to the Bay.
COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The proposed Salinity Policy was presented to the UAC at its meeting on December 2, 2009.
The UAC discussed what establishing this goal and adopting this policy means since there is no
enforcement provision. Staff responded that adopting the policy is a first step to addressing
recycled water salinity and that additional steps may have to be taken if the policy is ineffective.
The UAC also questioned what Palo Alto would have to do since it appears to have influent
below the goal level. Staff added that Utilities wastewater collection system Capital
CMR: 111:10 Page 4 of6
Improvement Projects (CIPs) already address repairs and replacements of the pipes and will
continue to do so.
The Stanford Real Estate Office provided comments on the proposed policy stating that it
supported the policy, but noted that there are other constituents besides TDS that may be a
concern. The UAC asked if staff plans to address these other recycled water quality components.
Staff stated that additional constituents would be addressed in the environmental document for
the Palo Alto Recycled Water Project and that it may propose policies for additional constituents
in the future.
Commissioner Waldfogel said that he was not convinced that any extra money should be spent
on fixing wastewater collection system pipes since no data was presented that showed the
relationship between TDS levels and potential recycled water use. He stated that the real goal is
to reduce potable water usage and that staff should determine how much more recycled water
would be used if TDS levels were reduced to 600 PPM. In addition, staff did not state how much
money may be spent to achieve the 600 PPM goal. Staff responded that the Utilities CIP budget
for its wastewater collection enterprise is very predictable and funds in addition to the already
planned CIPs are not anticipated to be necessary for Palo Alto. Staff has no plans to conduct an
analysis of the relationship between TDS levels and expected recycled water use. The
assessment of recycled water use assumes that the recycled water will be of acceptable water
quality to end users.
The UAC voted to recommend that the Council adopt the proposed Salinity Policy by a vote of
4-1 with Commissioner Waldfogel voting no. Commissioner Arneri recused himself from the
discussion and vote and Commissioner Berry was absent. The notes from the UAC meeting are
provided as Attachment C.
RESOURCE IMPACT
The City of Palo Alto has an aggressive wastewater collection system Capital Improvement
Program (CIP) which identifies and evaluates issue areas and prioritizes projects to manage
available funding. By its very nature the CIP has inherent TDS reduction benefits, as
demonstrated by the City's current TDS levels entering the RWQCP. Staff does not anticipate
any additional CIP cost or structural changes are needed at this time to accommodate the Salinity
Policy.
The City will coordinate implementation of the Salinity Policy with the other RWQCP partners.
It is unknown at this time what additional costs could be borne by the other RWQCP partners
towards achieving this policy goal.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
Continuing the exploration of expanding the use of recycled water in Palo Alto is consistent with
Council policy. The Council has supported this goal through approval of the Water Integrated
Resources Plan (WIRP) Guidelines in December 2003 [CMR:547:03], specifically, WIRP
Guideline #3: Actively participate in development of cost-effective regional recycled water
plans. Council also approved ordinance No. 5002 in May 2008 [CMR:203:08] adding Chapter
CMR: 111:10 Page 5 of6
16.12 to Title 16 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code to require the use of recycled water for
irrigation, toilet and urinal flushing and trap priming.
The City's Sustainability Policy supports the development of recycled water, specifically in the
policy's statement to "reduce resource use and pollution in a cost-effective manner while striving
to protect and enhance the quality of the air, water, land, and other natural resources."
The City'S Comprehensive Plan contains Natural Environment Goal N-4: Water resources that
are prudently managed to sustain plant and animal life, support urban activities and protect
public health and safety. Specifically, Program N-26 addresses the use of recycled water:
Implement incentives for the use of drought-tolerant landscaping and recycled water for
landscape irrigation.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Approval of the Recycled Water Salinity Reduction Policy is not a "project" under the California
Environmental Quality Act, because the Salinity Policy does not involve any commitment to a
specific project with may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment,
as contemplated by Title 14, California Code of Regulations, Section 15378(b)(4).
ATTACHMENTS
A. Resolution
B. Proposed Recycled Water Salinity Reduction Policy
C. Excerpts -Draft Minutes from the December 2, 2009 UAC meeting
D. Stanford Real Estate Office Testimony at the December 2,2009 UAC meeting
PREPARED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
DEPARTMENT APPROVAL:
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
CMR: 111:10
W_ NICOLAS PROCOS
~ Senior Resource Planner
c1iPHIL BOBEL
Environmental Compliance Manager
~ANE O. RATCHYE o Utilities Assistant Director, Resource Management
Page 6 of6
NOT YET APPROVED ATTACHMENT A
Resolution No.
Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Establishing
a Salinity Reduction Policy for Recycled Water
WHEREAS, the Regional Water Quality Control Plant (RWQCP) serves the Cities
of Palo Alto, Los Altos, and Mountain View, the East Palo Alto Sanitary District, the Town of
Los Altos Hills and Stanford University; and
WHEREAS, the City of Palo Alto currently uses tertiary treated wastewater from the
RWQCP to irrigate the Palo Alto Municipal Golf Course, Greer Park, the Emily Renzel Marsh
and portions of the Palo Alto Duck Pond; and
WHEREAS, the City of Mountain View, a RWQCP partner, will begin delivering
recycled water from the RWQCP to end users in Mountain View in Summer 2010; and
WHEREAS, the City of Palo Alto is investigating an expansion of the recycled water
delivery system to serve predominantly irrigation customers within the Stanford Research Park;
and
WHEREAS, although regulatory limits for Total Dissolved Solids (TDS, a common
measure of the salinity in a water system) do not exist, recycled water from the RWQCP contains
higher than expected TDS levels compared to the average potable source water concentrations of
the R WQCP partners; and
WHEREAS, the establishment of a quantitative TDS goal based on elimination of
saltwater infiltration from the Baylands will assist the RWQCP's efforts to reduce the TDS level
to a level one would expect given the RWQCP partners' source water; and
WHEREAS, City of Palo Alto, as managing partner of the RWQCP and in
partnership with the other R WQCP partners, has developed a Recycled Water Salinity Reduction
Policy to identify and pursue all cost effective measures to reduce the salinity of the recycled
water over time.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Palo Alto does hereby
RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Council approves the Recycled Water Salinity Reduction Policy,
attached as Exhibit A.
SECTION 2. The Council authorizes City Utilities Department and RWQCP staff to
coordinate implementation of the Recycled Water Salinity Policy with the RWQCP partners
1
100112 syn 6051045
NOT YET APPROVED
SECTION 3. The Council directs City staff to submit biannual progress reports to
Council on the effort to reduce the Total Dissolved Solids levels in the RWQCP's recycled
water.
SECTION 4. In compliance with the CEQA, Council finds that the approval of
the Salinity Reduction Policy is not a "project" under CEQA, because the Policy does not
involve any commitment to a specific project which may result in a potentially significant
physical impact on the environment, as contemplated by Title 14, California Code of
Regulations, Section 15378(b)(4).
INTRODUCED AND PASSED:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
ATTEST: APPROVED:
City Clerk Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Deputy City Attorney City Manager
2
100112 syn 6051045
ATTACHMENT B
CITY OF PALO ALTO
RECYCLED WATER SALINITY REDUCTION POLICY
POLICY STATEMENT
Recycling treated wastewater is increasing in the arid West as a response to the fact that
populations are increasing and fresh water supplies are not. Palo Alto and other communities are
using treated wastewater for landscape irrigation and that use is expected to grow dramatically in
the future. Salts accumulate in water when it is used by people and industrial processes. To
maximize the use of recycled water on the widest variety of green plants, the salt content
(salinity) needs to be minimized. The purpose of this policy is to ensure that the City is taking
all practical steps to reduce salinity in recycled water.
Therefore, it shall be the policy of Palo Alto to prevent unnecessary additions of salt to the sewer
system, with a goal of lowering the Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) in the recycled water to less
than 600 parts per million (PPM).
Applicability of this Policy
Palo Alto shall utilize this policy and its 600 PPM Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) goal to develop
salinity control measures. Palo Alto owns and operates the Regional Water Quality Control
Plant (RWQCP), which treats wastewater from Palo Alto and five other communities. The
RWQCP Partners, including Palo Alto, will be asked to identify controllable salt inputs to
wastewater from their communities and to implement control measures.
PROCEDURES
Staff estimates that the wastewater TDS can be reduced to 600 PPM without modifying normal
human use or industrial activities. The major way in which salts can be reduced is by controlling
the infiltration of saline groundwater which is currently entering sewer pipes through cracks and
problem areas in those pipes as they cross saline areas near San Francisco Bay. Other sources of
controllable salt must also be explored.
The activities that will be completed to implement this policy include:
1. Determine the salinity levels for each entity whose wastewater is treated by the RWQCP.
2. Identify the sources of salinity.
3. Develop alternatives for reducing the salinity levels.
4. Identity the actions that can be implemented to meet the TDS goal.
5. Prepare Salinity Reduction Plan.
6. Monitor TDS and report to Council semi-annually on progress towards meeting the TDS
goal.
Note: Questions and/or clarifications of this policy should be directed to the Public Works
Department.
DRAFT
UTILITIES ADVISORY COMMISSION
EXCERPT MINUTES OF DECEMBER 2, 2009
ATTACHMENTC
ITEM 1: ACTION ITEM: Recommendation to Approve Recycled Water Salinity Reduction Policy
When the item was announced, Commissioner Ameri indicated that he would recuse himself from
the discussion of this water related issue since he works for a water agency in the East Bay that
receives water from the same supplier as Palo Alto. He explained that there was no financial
conflict of interest, but since there could be a perception of a conflict, he has chosen to not
participate in the discussion. He left the room for the item.
Senior Resource Planner Nicolas Procos provided a presentation to the commission summarizing
the written report. Environmental Compliance Manager for the Regional Water Quality Control
Plant (RWQCP), Phil Bobel, also contributed to the report and was available for questions. He
briefly reminded the Commission about the Palo Alto Phase 3 project that would provide about 900
acre-feet per year to the Stanford Research Park. The recycled water quality is a concern with
respect to the use of recycled water for irrigation of landscaping, especially certain salt-sensitive
species such as redwoods. Palo Alto's recycled water has a higher content of Total Dissolved
Solids (TDS), a salinity indicator, than would be expected given the extremely low TDS in the
source potable water in the service area of the RWQCP. The plant partner making the biggest
contribution of salt to the plant is Mountain View. It is the only partner whose influent to the plant
has a TDS of above 6'50 parts per million (PPM).
Procos explained that the proposed Recycled Water Salinity Reduction Policy establishes a TDS
goal for recycled water produced by the plant of 600 PPM. This goal was developed using the
following assumptions:
• The source water for the different agencies has very low TDS levels (-100 PPM in aggregate)
• Normal, unavoidable, human activities will contribute an additional 350-400 PPM to the total
TDS levels
• A buffer of 100-200 PPM is needed as it is impossible to completely eliminate saline
groundwater infiltration.
Procos further explained that the policy does not have an enforcement mechanism, although that
could be a future feature. The policy does not provide, nor is it based on, an assessment of what
number represents a suitable TDS level for irrigation purposes. This issue will be addressed in the
near future during the environmental review phase for the Palo Alto Recycled Water (Phase 3)
Project. In addition, the policy does not establish a firm "delivery guarantee" for future recycled
water users.
Public comment on Item #1 :
Jim Inglis, Director of Design and Construction for the Stanford Real Estate Office read prepared
comments on the proposed Recycled Water Salinity Reduction Policy and provided the comments
in writing:
• "It is positive that the City is promoting a policy to minimize salinity in its recycled water. The
proposed salinity reduction policy is an important first step, and as we support efforts by Palo
Alto to take the lead and coordinate with the communities served by the Regional Water
Quality Control Plant to identify salt inputs to their wastewater and to develop an implement
concrete measures to control salinity.
• "We realize that tonight the UAC is not addressing the specific issues associated with
managing the use of recycled water for landscape irrigation. However, we want to present our
concerns to the UAC, so that it is aware of the issues that may arise as the City moves forward
with its recycled water program.
• "The City is considering potential future use of recycled water to irrigate landscaping at the
Stanford Research Park, which contains many salt-sensitive plantings and soils with poor
drainage. We understand that the City intends at some point in the future to reinitiate the
environmental review process for such use, and we understand that, as part of the process,
the City will examine and consider the deleterious salinity impacts to plants and trees such as
coastal redwoods.
• "As reflected in the Recycled Water Guidelines prepared by HortScience that we have
submitted to the City, we believe it is essential that potential future use of recycled water for
landscape irrigation include appropriate mitigation and management measures. These
measures, when they are ultimately adopted by the City, should include enforceable limits for
all of the relevant constituents of concern for salinity, as identified in HortScience's Guidelines,
and not just a single constituent such as total dissolved solids. There measures should also
recognize that recycled water failing to meet the appropriate limits for salinity should not be
used to irrigate salt-sensitive landscaping."
Herb Borock, Palo Alto resident, commented that when the recycled water project has been
presented by staff in the past, the price and fee schedule for the recycled water does not cover the
cost of the project. Staff has compared the cost of the project to the wholesale cost of water, but it
should have been compared to the retail rates, which are four times the wholesale rate. Staff
should look at all costs of recycled water when establishing prices for recycled water to avoid
potable water users subsidizing those who use recycled water.
Commissioner Foster asked about the status of Palo Alto's recycled water project. Procos replied
that the planning has been completed, including development of a cost estimate of about $33
million. Foster asked if the project will address the concerns raised about recycled water quality.
Procos confirmed that the environmental document would address that issue.
Commissioner Eglash asked why staff said that there would be no cost to Palo Alto to implement
the policy. Procos responded that Palo Alto's wastewater collection system CIPs are doing the job
well of repairing leaks, which reduces the introduction of saline groundwater into the wastewater
collection system. Bobel added that the partners also understand the problem and Mountain View
is moving forward to repair or modify its systems.
Commissioner Eglash noted that the approach was not to set a goal at a level to meet irrigation
needs, but to see what is reasonable based on source water quality and what is achievable.
Procos confirmed that this was correct. Bobel added that it's very difficult to establish an
acceptable level for irrigation needs since it depends on many factors such as soil types, drainage
conditions, and plant materials. Eglash asked how staff plans to address the other constituents
besides TDS. Bobel responded that they will be addressed in the environmental document.
Commissioner Keller asked what adopting this goals means since it is not enforceable. Fong
stated that it was important to establish a goal as a first step. Bobel added that enforcement may
need to be added in the future, but it may not be easy as there are many contracts that govern
operations of the plant and responsibilities of the plant and the partner agencies. These contracts
cannot be unilaterally changed by Palo Alto. Keller asked how motivated the partners are to adopt
such a policy. Bobel responded that Mountain View is motivated since it is using the recycled
water now. Keller asked about the timeline for achieving the goal. Bobel said that it relates to how
fast Mountain View can respond by re-directing its CIPs or spending more on the repairs or taking
a longer time to complete them. Keller asked if goals would be established for other constituents.
Bobel said that that plant is working on this now and installing improved monitoring to track these
constituents and determine where they are coming from and the impacts of the treatment process
on them.
Commissioner Waldfogel stated that the overall objective of the policy is to reduce the potable
water use. He wanted to see how much more recycled water could be used by achieving the goal.
Procos said that this analysis has not been done, but that lower TDS will make the water more
acceptable and make the exemption process in the Recycled Water Mandatory Use Ordinance
less likely to be needed to protect certain landscaped areas. Waldfogel questioned whether
reducing TDS would increase usage of recycled water. Bobel said that if we wait to agree on a
magic number, work will never get started.
Council Member Yeh stated that if there were no enforcement mechanism, why call it a policy,
rather than a goal or a target. Since it is presented as a policy, he suspects that Council may ask
questions about the costs, benefits and environmental impacts of implementing the policy. Bobel
noted that policies are the tool that Council uses for these types of actions and that staff can use
them to show Council support for programs. Assistant Director Jane Ratchye also stated that the
RWQCP has successfully used this mechanism in the past on several occasions, but that they
hadn't gone through the UAC and that it was possible that Council Member Yeh had not see such
a policy in his tenure on the Council. Bobel confirmed that the plant has used the policy
mechanism where Palo Alto first adopts a policy developed by RWQCP staff and then the policies
are adopted by the other plant partners. He cited examples of using the policy mechanism to
reduce mercury and pesticides, but acknowledged that it was before Yeh was on the Council and
that, since they are related to wastewater, and not recycled water, the policies had not been
considered by the UAC.
Council Member Yeh questioned whether the goal of 600 PPM would have cost implications and
whether an environmental review should be completed first. He asked if the environmental
analysis that will be completed for the recycled water project will show the relationship between the
amount of water used and TDS values of 400,500,600,700, etc. PPM. Bobel stated that the goal
of 600 PPM was arrived at in two ways: One method was to add allowances for human activity
and for the fact that one can't stop all infiltration to the TDS of the aggregate source water; the
second method was to determine the outcome if Mountain View fixed the problems that have been
identified.
Chair Melton asked the Commission to stay focused on this policy and noted that the
environmental document is not being considered at this time. He added that the Stanford Real
Estate Office has indicated support for the policy and has indicated an acceptable TDS value that
is in line with the goal in the policy. He indicated that he supports Palo Alto taking the lead and
hopes that the other partners will follow suit.
Commissioner Keller asked if the there is a Plan B if the policy doesn't work. Bobel responded that
the plant will continue to assist the partners in finding problem areas that need to be fixed. Keller
added that she has heard about many issues with the use of recycled water and knows that Palo
Alto has been using recycled water on the Municipal Golf Course and at Greer Park. She asked if
we are doing baseline studies prior to the application of recycled water. Bobel responded that
there are baseline studies being done in Mountain View to monitor selected locations that will
receive recycled water. This will need to be done in the Stanford Research Park as well. Procos
added that the environmental document will have to address this, too.
Commissioner Waldfogel commented that the goal was good, but that he has trouble since no
analysis was provided about how much money may be spent to achieve the goal and how much
additional potable water would be saved by achieving the goal. He also noted that the policy
seems to not require Palo Alto to go anything, but it may obligate others (i.e. Mountain View) to
spend millions of dollars. Commissioner Eglash added that he was concerned that some partners
might be expected to reduce further and that Palo Alto should not have to do anything. He would
much rather see a policy that conveys that Mountain View is the problem.
Commissioner Foster asked if Palo Alto should be the first to adopt the policy, or whether Mountain
View should go first. Bobel said that Palo Alto, as the operating partner of the RWQCP, always
leads. This has been the practice in the past on many policies of this type.
Council Member Yeh expressed concern about the lack of enforcement for the policy and
wondered what has been done in the rest of the country. Bobel said that he was not aware of any
such policy for TDS for any other wastewater treatment plant. Council Member Yeh also
suggested that staff delay taking the policy to the Council to provide him/others some time to do
outreach to Mountain View to assess its Council's willingness to also adopt such a policy.
Chair Melton noted that the protocol in the past is that Palo Alto initiates and then the other plant
partners follow.
Commissioner Eglash asked why the goal was put on the recycled water output rather than on the
plant influent. Bobel said that this is in the spirit of cooperation and not to complicate it since each
partner has a slightly different water supply source mix.
Commissioner Eglash stated that if staff thinks that the policy would be a useful tool to get partners
to act, he is supportive of it.
Commissioner Waldfogel asked if the best way to achieve the goal is to adopt this policy. He
questioned whether it would be productive to show how Palo Alto is doing well, but that Mountain
View is not.
ACTION: Commissioner Eglash made a motion that the UAC recommend that the Council adopt
the proposed Recycled Water Salinity Reduction Policy. Chair Melton seconded the motion. The
motion passed (4-1) with Commissioner Waldfogel voting NO.
After the item was completed, Commissioner Ameri returned to the meeting.
Jim Inglis
Director of Design & Construction
Stanford University -Office of Real Estate
Stanford University's Comments on
City of Palo Alto's Proposed Recycled Water Salinity Reduction Policy
• Brief introduction
Utilities Advisory Commission Meeting
Wednesday, December 2,2009
ATTACHMENT D
• It is positive that the City is promoting a policy to minimize salinity in its recycled water.
The proposed salinity reduction policy is an important first step, and we support efforts
by Palo Alto to take the lead and coordinate with tl?e communities served by the Regional
Water Quality Control Plant to identify salt inputs to their wastewater and to develop and
implement concrete measures to control salinity.
• We realize that tonight the UAC is not addressing the specific issues associated with
managing the use of recycled water for landscape irrigation. However, we want to
present our concerns to the UAC, so that it is aware of the issues that may arise as the
City moves forward with its recycled water program.
• The City is considering potential future use of recycled water to irrigate landscaping at
the Stanford Research Park, which contains many salt-sensitive plantings and soils with
poor drainage. We understand that the City intends at some point in the future to
reinitiate the environmental review process for such use, and we understand that, as part
of that process, the City will examine and consider the deleterious salinity impacts to
plants and trees such as coastal redwoods.
• As reflected in the Recycled Water Gtlidelines prepared by HortScience that we have
submitted to the City, we believe it is essential that potential future use of recycled water
for landscape irrigation include appropriate mitigation and management measures. These
measures, when they are ultimately adopted by the City, should include enforceable
limits for all of the relevant constituents of concern for salinity, as identified in
HortScience's Guidelines, and not just a single constituent such as total dissolved solids.
These measures should also recognize that recycled water failing to meet the appropriate
limits for salinity should not be used to irrigate salt-sensitive landscaping.