HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 190-08City of Palo Alto
C ty Manager’s Report
TO:
FROM:
HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL
CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PLANNING AND
COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT
5
DATE:APRIL 14, 2008 CMR: 190:08
SUBJECT:PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE REPORT OF THE ADVISORY
BOARD FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008-09 IN CONNECTION WITH THE
PALO ALTO DOWNTOWN BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO LEVY AN
ASSESSMENT AGAINST BUSINESSES WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN
PALO ALTO BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FOR 2008-09 AND
SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON MAY
12, 2008 AT 7:00 PM OR THEREAFTER, IN THE CITY COUNCIL
CHAMBERS
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:
(a) Preliminarily approve the BID Advisory Board’s 2008-09 Budget Report for the Business
Improvement District (BID); and
(b) Adopt a Resolution of Intention to Levy Assessments in the Palo Alto Downtown Business
Improvement District for fiscal year 2008-09, setting a date and time for the public hearing on
the levy of the proposed assessments for May 12, 2008 at 7:00 p.m. or thereafter, in the City
Council Chambers (Attachment 3).
BACKGROUND
The Palo Alto Downtown Business Improvement District (BID) was established by the City
Council in 2004 pursuant to the California Parking and Business Improvement Area Law to
promote the economic revitalization and physical maintenance of the Palo Alto Downtown
business district. The Council appointed the Board of Directors of the Palo Alto Downtown
Business and Professional Association, a non-profit corporation, as the Advisory Board for the
BID. The Board’s purpose is to advise the Council on the method and basis for levy of
assessments in the BID and the expenditure of revenues derived from the assessments.
CMR: 190:08 Page 1 of 3
Pursuant to BID law, the Advisory Board must annually submit to the Council a report that
proposes a budget for the upcoming fiscal year for the BID. The report must: 1) propose any
boundary changes in the BID; 2) list the improvements and activities to be provided in the fiscal
year; 3) estimate the cost to provide the improvements and activities; 4) set forth the method and
basis for levy of assessments; 5) identify surplus or deficit revenues carried over from the prior
fiscal year; and 6) identify amounts of contributions from sources other than assessments.
The Council must then: 1) review the report and preliminarily approve it as proposed or as
changed by the Council; 2) adopt a resolution of intention to levy the assessments for the
upcoming fiscal year; and 3) set a date and time for the public hearing on the levy of assessments
in the BID. Absent a majority protest at the public hearing on May 12, 2008, at the conclusion of
the public hearing, the Council may adopt a resolution confirming the report for Fiscal Year
2008-09 as filed or as modified by the Council. The adoption of the resolution constitutes the
levying of the BID assessments for fiscal year 2008-09.
DISCUSSION
The Advisory Board has prepared a report (Attachment 1) for the Council’s consideration which
includes the proposed budget for the Palo Alto Downtown BID for fiscal year 2008-09. As
required by BID law, the report has been filed with the City Clerk and contains a list of the
improvements, activities, and associated costs proposed in the BID for fiscal year 2008-09. The
Advisory Board has recommended no change in the BID boundaries or the method and basis for
levying assessments. Many of the activities and improvements are an extension of those initiated
last year.
A map of the BID is attached (Attachment 2). The proposed assessments in the BID for fiscal
year 2008-09 are the same as the assessments in fiscal year 2007-08. No increases are proposed.
The budget report for fiscal year 2008-09 was reviewed and approved by the Palo Alto
Downtown Business and Professional Association at its board meeting on March 19, 2008
(Attachment 1).
RESOURCE IMPACT
Adoption of the proposed BID budget does not directly impact City revenue. BID assessments
are restricted for use exclusively by the BID. It is anticipated that a healthy BID will encourage
growth of the retail community and consequently result in additional sales tax revenue for the
City. Some staff effort is expended annually to administer the collection of the BID.
Staff will continue to monitor staff administrative time devoted to the collection of BID
assessments. If costs significantly exceed the estimated $16,000 estimate of administering
assessments, staff will consider an administrative charge to the Palo Alto Downtown Business
and Professional Association who administer the BID, as allowed for under the contract, to offset
these costs.
CMR: 190:08 Page 2 of 3
The Attorney’s Office will continue to provide legal oversight to the BID during the annual
reauthorization process. Administrative Services staff provides assistance in the collection of
BID assessments. The Economic Development Manager will continue to provide oversight to
the BID and will prepare the annual reauthorization.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This action by the City Council does not meet the definition of a project under Section 21065 of
the California Environmental Quality Act, and therefore no environmental assessment is
necessary.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1 :
Attachment 2:
Attachment 3:
Report of the Advisory Board with Regard to the Reauthorization of the
Downtown Palo Alto Business Improvement District for Fiscal Year
2008-09.
Downtown Palo Alto Business Improvement District Map
Resolution of the City Council of the City of Palo Alto Declaring its
Intention to Levy an Assessment Against Businesses Within the
Downtown Palo Alto Business Improvement District for Fiscal year
2008-09 and Setting a Time and Place for hearing Objections
Thereto
PREPARED BY:
DEPARTMENT HEAD:
S RNES
Economic Development Manager
$;fEVE EMio~IE "
Director Planning and Community Environment
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
EMILY (~I--AR~I S 0N
Assistant City Manager
CMR: 190:08 Pa=e .~ of 3
ATTACHMENT 1
PALO AL
Annual Report
2007-2008
Business Improvement District
Table of Contents Page
Introduction 1
I BID Boundaries and Map 2
II Improvements and Activities 3-6
III Expected Improvements and Activities 7
III Budget 8-9
IV Method and Basis of Levying the Assessment
Cost-Benefrt Analysis 10-11
V Revenue Surplus / Deficit 12
VI Non-Assessment Contributions 12
VII Advisory Board by Business Type 13
Attachments
1. Cost Benefit Analysis 14
2. Annual BID Assessments 16
As approved by the
PAD Advisory Board
on March 19, 2008
Introduction
This report from the Advisory Board of the Palo Alto Downtown Business &
Professional Association ("PAd") was prepared for City Council to review for
the annual reauthorization of the Downtown Palo Alto Business
Improvement District ("BID") pursuant to Section 36533 of the Parking and
Business Improvement Law of 1989 (Section 36500 and following of the
California Streets and Highways code) (the "Law"). This report is for the
proposed fiscal year for the BID commencing July 1, 2008 and ending June
30, 2009. ("Fiscal Year 2008-09").
As required by the Law, this report contains the following information:
Ill.
I.Any proposed changes in BID boundaries and benefit zones within
the BID;
II.The improvements and activities to be provided for Fiscal Year 2008-
O9;
An estimate of the cost of providing the improvements and the
activities for Fiscal Year 2008-09;
IV.The method and basis of levying the assessment in sufficient detail to
allow each business owner to estimate the amount of the assessment
to be levied against his or her business for Fiscal Year 2008-09.
V.The amount of any surplus or deficit revenues to be carried over from
a previous fiscal year.
VI.The amount of any contributions to be made from sources other than
assessments levied pursuant to the Law.
Submitted by Barbara Gross, Chair, on behalf of the Advisory Board
("Advisory Board") of the Palo Alto Downtown Business & Professional
Association ("PAd").
The Board approved this Report March 19, 2008 at a publicly noticed
meeting of the Advisory Board.
Received on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Palo Alto on
April 01,. 2008.
Section I: BID boundaries and Benefit Zones
There have been no changes in the BID boundaries or benefit zones within
the BID and no changes are proposed.
Zbne B
P;41o
Palo Alto Downtown
Business Improvement
District
2
Section II
Improvements and Activities Completed in 2007-08
Marketing and Events
Programs
Expanded the website that is more user friendly for members and consumers. :]:t
includes current activities, a comprehensive business directory, maps for parking
and directions, and other links. (www.paloaltodowntown.com). We track nearly
3000 unique hits on the site per month.
Members may advertise their businesses by posting a link to their website on the
"Home" page for a fee.
The "What’s Happening" page is updated daily with specific information including
merchant sales, specials and promotions.
Continuous updating of the database of all downtown businesses for display and
use via the website.
-Cross referenced & categorized comprehensive business sectors.
-Frequent email blasts to notify members of pertinent on goings in the downtown.
-Semi- annual e-newsletter distributed to members.
Events
The Dine Downtown event was launched in August ’05 and continues
successfully on a bi-annual basis and is well received by the restaurants and
their patrons. The number of participating restaurants ranges from 15-25 each
season.
-Through a collaboration and partnership with the City of Palo Alto, Stanford
University and the Chamber of Commerce, PAd participates in the promotion of
the Admit Week at Stanford University, through serving as Ambassadors and
promoting downtown Palo Alto as a destination.
PAd partnered with DPA in the promotion of the Tour of California, through the
in kind contribution of banner space on the three Avenues in the downtown.
Further outreach to members was made through a preliminary information
session, as well as personal visits to inform them of the upcoming event and
opportunities for participation and promotion.
PAd remains an active partner and contributing participant in the promotion of
Destination Palo Alto.
-PAd produced the University Avenue Promenade in .July 2007, promoting
downtown Palo Alto as a destination. The span of University Avenue was closed
from Cowper to Emerson streets. The Promenade of Film and Music provided live
music and movie screening. PAd obtained a blanket encroachment permit, and
many restaurants participated through outdoor dining, and retailers were able to
set up sidewalk sales.
Plans are under consideration for the re-creation of the summer promenade on
University Avenue or select side streets to encourage a pedestrian friendly
environment.
PAd will hold it’s 2ne breakfast Eoundtable discussion, hosted by the Garden
Court Hotel, on April 04, 2008 on Downtown :Improvements. The panel of
speakers include community relations and transportation officer, Lt. Sandra
3
Brown. Gayle Likens of the transportation department will discuss parking in the
downtown, new signage and will offer details on the new "Luke" pay and stay
machines. Further discussions regarding the need for an additional parking
structure in the downtown will be encouraged. Annette Puskarich, will unveil
plans on the promotion of reusable shopping bags. Members will be updated on
the plans and progress of the private/public partnership for the renovation of
Lytton Plaza.
PAd intends to hold these roundtable community/town hall discussions quarterly
to encourage member attendance and participation on topics of importance
within the district.
Downtown Streets
The Downtown Streets Team was founded in May 2005, by the PAd after its
initial survey to business owners. The survey was sent to all B]:D constituents to
better understand how it could serve its members. Overwhelmingly,
homelessness and cleanliness of the downtown area were the issue of most
concern.
The program participants clean the streets of downtown for food and shelter and
is a platform for many formerly homeless to find jobs and housing.
This highly successful program was spun off as it’s own non-profit entity in 2006.
PAd supported the program through joint promotions and fund raising efforts, as
well as a financial pledge of $10,000 to help ensure it’s continued success.
To further the ongoing partnership and continuity, the President of the DST is
a voting member of the Board of Directors of the PAd.
The program has built successful working relationships with ]:nnvision, The
Opportunity Center, Catholic Charities, Alliance for Community Care, City
Council, PAPD, City Management, The Emergency Housing Consortium, and now
holds a place on the Steering Committee for the County’s 10- year plan to end
homelessness.
The program has received funding and is expecting continued funding from
the City of Palo Alto, in both HSRAP and contracts for cleaning, EHC and
]:nnvision contracts, foundation grants and local businesses and residents.
The B:I:D/PAd will continue to make quarterly financial contributions of $1250 in
fiscal 2008-09 to the DST.
Environmental/Marketing
Created the Streets Task Force to further address the issue of
panhandling and homelessness in the downtown. PAd initiated and was
instrumental in the expansion of the sit/lie ordinance through the district=
Key areas were identified and plans are underway to address upgrading the
alleyways, increase plantings, and signage and installation of directories in
certain areas of the district.
PAd initiated the resurrection of plans for the upgrading and renovation of
4
Lytton Plaza through a private/public partnership. PAd and the City are working
on the renovation of Lytton Plaza. While the discussions of a Public/Private
partnership are in the formative stages, preliminary plans for the Plaza’s
rehabilitation have been drawn which include new landscaping, a water feature
and community gathering facilities which recognize and respect this location’s
importance as a center of community dialogue and free speech. Future steps
include developing plans and cost estimates which will enable the City Council to
evaluate its participation in the partnership.
PAd invested $4000 to have LED lighting installed at City Hall Plaza. Brightening
up the Plaza expands the surrounding area that suffers from poor lighting. The
Plaza was selected because of existing available electricity.
PAd meets quarterly and works closely with City of Palo Alto Departments to
address necessary improvements within the district.
Through a partnership with the City of Palo Alto, PAd produces and installs
quarterly banners on the three Avenues in the district. The intent is to dress up
the downtown and promote the district.
PAd created and installed flags and banners along Bryant Street and University
Avenue, post the Walgreen’s fire to promote the area. PAd participated in
recovery efforts, and helped coordinate solutions with property owners and
managers, as well as the PAPD, and economic development officials at the City,
to assist in maintaining traffic and flow to the affected area.
Parking
Representatives from PAd attend the Palo Alto Chamber of Commerce’s parking
committee to learn of programs underway and contribute the downtown
business perspective.
PAd conducted a parking survey to determine the needs of the business
community.
PAd has compiled a matrix on the maintenance and cleanliness schedule and
guidelines within the district. This matrix was recently presented to the City and
formal discussions have begun as to future implementation and investment.
Executive Committee
Created a budget for Fiscal Year 2008-09.
Completed the 2007-08 Annual Report
-Created an Advocacy team to address issues on behalf of downtown businesses.
-Hosted a Community/Town Hall meeting on the district improvement projects.
-Enforce a partnership with the Palo Alto Chamber of Commerce. The Chamber
CEO remains a voting member of the Board of Directors of the PAd.
Outreach to the PA Police Department to improve communications and build a
strong working relationship.
Advocacy
PAd will listen to find out what is on business mind.
5
-Speak with prospective tenants and work closely with property owners and
managers to ensure the maintenance of a balanced retail mix in the district.
-Represented at the GAC and DPA meetings.
-Involved in upcoming plans for the Stanford Shopping Center expansion and
it’s effect on the downtown district.
Nominating
Recruited new members to the Advisory Board to ensure all business sectors
are represented.
Coordinated the annual member meetings and election of directors of PAd.
Finance
-Maintain accounting systems for PAd bookkeeping.
-Assisted in the billing of annual fee assessments.
-Improved the invoicing process.
-Planned and implemented delinquent member collections.
-Completed year-end tax filing.
-Annual Audit completed through June 30, 2007 and submitted to the City.
6
Section II
Expected Improvements and Activities for 2008-09
Marketing and Events
Programs
Maintain and grow website aimed for consumer and member use and for cross
promotion of downtown businesses. ]:t will include current activities, a
comprehensive business directory, maps for parking and directions, and other
links. The website (www.paloaltodowntown.com) provides opportunities for
members to self promote on the website through advertising.
Create a property owners Bulletin Board listing downtown vacancies/leases
E-newsletter will be prepared and distributed quarterly.
Events
Dine Downtown will produce its programs in August ’08 & .January ’09.
PAd will continue to produce venues that include music, performers, and artists
through out the year.
PAD will continue to produce banners for the Avenues and additional marketing
pieces on the bridges and side streets.
PAD will co-market events with Destination Palo Alto to accommodate the influx
of visitors to Stanford events and local business.
PAd will work with the City to promote a pedestrian friendly environment through
events that will feature entertainment and a draw to the downtown.
Downtown Streets
Downtown Streets Team
PAd will continue it’s support of the program financially with a pledge of $5000
for the year, as well as event promotions.
Environmental
Seasonal banners featuring business promotion will be designed and displayed.
Renovation of Lytton Plaza will be pursued. PAd has pledged $5000 to the
project.
Through assistance from the City’s Planning & Public Works Departments,
additional lighting will be installed in the downtown.
Removal and or replacement of benches will be recommended.
Certain key areas will be identified for landscaping. Hanging baskets or potted
plants will be considered.
Continued efforts through the partnership between the Streets Task Force and
PAPD to monitor panhandling and enforcement of the sit/lie ordinance.
Parking
Education and outreach programs will be put in place to inform business owners
and managers of the parking options.
Continue to advocate for transferable business parking permits.
Outreach programs will be used to educate public of the ample free parking.
Survey results will be evaluated and implemented.
Security enforcement in the parking structures will be addressed. PAd will support
the use of the DST for ongoing maintenance/graffiti removal within the
structures.
7
PAd will encourage City contracts with the DST to provide additional maintenance
in the district.
Executive Committee
-Continue to refine PAd structure and organizational development,
-Continue to update and refine information provided to Advisory Board Members,
-Continue to advocate on behalf of downtown businesses.
-Hold quarterly roundtable discussions.
-Create visibility within the business community.
-Begin Urban Planning initiative for the downtown area.
-Work closely with Destination Palo Alto to increase tourism.
-Continue to partner with property owners and leasing agents to ensure a good
retail mix in the district.
Nominating
-Continue to recruit effective, active members to the Advisory Board.
-Manage the annual election notification and voting process.
Finance
Oversee the filing of year end tax return
Oversee the filing of the Annual Audit
Review and advise on annual budget and explore income/fundraising
opportunities.
Section I~’I; Budget for 2008=09
The total funds available for activities for this fiscal year are estimated to be $125,000.
The budget for providing the activities is set forth as follows:
BID 2008109 Budget
INCOHE
Assessments
Uncollectible Fees
Total Assessments
Income/Fundraising
$135,000
$(34,000)
$101,000
$ 14,000 $14,000
TOTAL INCOME $ 115,000
EXPENSES
Operating Expenses
Staff Salaries
Expenses Income
8
Executive Director Salary
Support Staff Salary
Payroll taxes
Office Supplies & Expenses
Bookkeeping
:interne~Website Maintenance
Telephone
Rent
Audit
Legal
:Insurance- Liability
-Workman’s Comp
Nominating
Contingencies
Total Operating Expenses
Harketing and Events
Programs & Member Outreach
Member Communications
Banners
Roundtable
Environmental/Beautification
Events & Fundraising
Dine Downtown
Events
Promotional Sales/Fundraising
Permit Fees
Total Harketing/Events
Contributions
DST
Lytton Plaza
Total Contributions
Total Expenses/Zncome
$60,000
$o
$6,000
$66,000
$1,000
$1,000
$5oo
$1,ooo
3,000
2,5oo
1,000
1,000
1,000
2,000
1,000
81,000
$1,000
$5,ooo
$3,500
$2,000
(donation)
$ 3,000
$4,000 $4,000
$5,ooo $5,ooo
$2,000 $ 2,000
$1,500
$24,000 $11,000
$5,000
$5,ooo
$ i0,000
$115,000 $ 14,000
Section IV: Method and Basis of Levying the Assessment
9
Cost Benefit Analysis / Bid Assessments
The method and basis of levying the assessment is provided sufficient detail to allow each
business owner to estimate the amount of the assessment to be levied against his or her
business for Fiscal Year 2008-09 and is not changed from the FY 2006-07 assessment.
There have been no changes made to the Cost-Benefit Analysis or to the BID Assessments
since they were approved by City Council on February 2, 2004.
The method of calculation used to determine the cost and benefit to each business located
in the BID is described below. The BID assessments are based on three criteria: the type
of business, the location of the business and the size of the business.
It has been consistently demonstrated that the typical BID program places a higher
priority on activities such as commercial marketing. As a result, the retail and restaurant
establishments in the BID are assessed more than service and professional businesses in
the district.
While service-oriented businesses benefit from a BID less than retailers and restaurateurs,
they benefit more than professional businesses such as medical, dental, architectural,
consultant and legal offices with their minimal advertising and promotion needs.
For these reasons, various business types are assessed according to the benefit that they
receive from the BID, as follows:
>Retail and Restaurant 100% of base amount
>Service 75% of base amount
>Professional 50% of base amount
Exceptions to this rule include financial institutions that are traditionally charged a flat
rate regardless of location or size and lodging businesses that are typically charged by
total rooms.
The location of a business also determines the degree of benefit that accrues to that
business. Centrally located businesses tend to benefit more, as do businesses located on
the ground floor.
For this reason, A and B benefit zones have been identified for the BID.
In Palo Alto, Zone A benefit businesses are assessed 100% of the base benefit
assessment while Zone B businesses are assessed 75%.
A third criterion is used in the BID to determine benefit. This criterion, the size of the
business, takes into consideration the number of full time employees employed by the
business. Please refer to Attachment I for a more complete understanding of the
application of these three variables to establish BID benefit.
Attachment 2 is the BID assessment for each business located within the BID boundaries.
Applying the criteria identified in Attachment 1, a summary of the assessment that applies
to each business by size, type and location is outlined. In addition to the Cost-Benefit
Analysis, the assessments include the following criteria:
An exemption for "single person professional businesses" that have 25% or fewer full
time equivalent ("FTE"), including the business owner. This covers employees who
10
work less than 10 hours a week (based on a 40 hour work week (A full FTE equals
approximately 2000 hours annually)
An assessment specifically for "single person businesses" that have 26% FTE to 1
FTE in the professional business category of the BID (A full FTE equals approximately
2000 hours annually)
The tiring of other professional businesses by size based (according to benefit) on
the "single person business" criteria
This outline provides information by which a business can determine its annual
assessment based on objective criteria.
Except where otherwise defined, all terms shall have the meanings identified below:
Definitions of Business Types in the Downtown Business Improvement District
Retailers and Restaurants: Businesses that buy or resell goods such as clothing stores,
shoe stores, office supplies as well as businesses that sell prepared food and drink.
Service Businesses: Businesses that sell services such as beauty or barber shops, repair
shops, most automotive businesses, dry cleaners, art and dance studios, printing firms,
film processing companies, travel agencies, entertainment businesses such as theatres,
etc.
Hotel and Lodging: These include businesses that have as their main business the lodging
of customers. This is restricted to residential businesses that provide lodging services to
customers for less than 30 days.
ProFessional Businesses: Businesses that require advanced and/or specialized licenses or
academic degrees such as architects, engineers, attorneys, chiropractors, dentists,
doctors, accountants, optometrists, realtors, insurance brokers, venture capital firms,
consultants, advertising and marketing professionals and mortgage brokers and similar
professions.
Financial Institutions: Includes banking, savings and loan institutions and credit unions.
Additional clarification on business definitions will be defined according to Section
::[8.04.030 (Definitions) of the Palo Alto Municipal Code.
The Advisory Board recommends that the following businesses be exempt from the BfD
assessment:
New businesses established in the BID area following the annual assessment
for the year in which they locate in the BID area
Non-profit organizations
Newspapers
"Single person professional businesses" that have 25% or less full time
equivalent (FTE), including the business owner
The Assessment calculated shall be paid to the City no later 30 days after receipt of the
invoice with the amount of the annual assessment sent by the City. A second notice will
be mailed as a reminder to businesses that have not remitted payment by that date. Late
payment will be subject to a 10% late fee.
Section V: Revenue Surplus or Deficit
11
It is not expected that any funds will be carried over from the FY 07-08 budget. This is
based on the revenue balance on 3/31/08 as $000000. Expected expenses for the
remainder of FY 07-08 are as follows:
Current revenue balance $ 8423
Expected expenses for remaining FY
Staff Salaries
Elections and Annual Report
Office + operating expenses
Outside Audit
Website/newsletter
Total expected expenses
$13,800
$2,000
$1,000
$2,500
$ 5oo
$19,800
Expected carry-over <$11,377>
Section VI: Non-assessment Income
It is estimated that $14,000 will be raised in fundraising, and sponsor support.
Additionally, anticipate in kind contribution towards expenses for Fiscal Year 2008-09.
Projected Income for Fiscal Year 08-09
Events & Marketing
- Dine Downtown
- Events
- Promotional Sales/Fundraising
Rent (donation)
Total
$4,000
$5,000
$2,000
$3,ooo
$ 14,000
12
Section VII: PAD Board of Directors by Business Type
Retailers and Restaurants
Claudia Cornejo, Caffe del Doge
Ashwani Dharwan Mantra Restaurant & Lounge
Georgie Gleirn, Gleirn Jewelers
Phil Lonardo, Whole Foods Market
Hotel and Lodging
Barbara Gross, Garden Court Hotel
Professional Businesses
Sunny Dykwel, Alain Pinel Realtors
Brannan Vaughan, Morgan Stanley
Service Businesses
Stacey Yates, Skin Spirit
Financial Institutions
Deborah Pappas, Borel Bank
Chamber of Commerce
Sandra Lonnquist
Downtown Streets Team
Eileen Richardson
13
ATTACHHENT 1
A General Statement Reqardinq Cost-Benefit Analysis For
BID Businesses Using The Traditional Three Criteria Formula
Criteria 1) Type of Business:
Statement Concerning Cost-Benefit Formula For BID Businesses Regarding Type
Of Business:
In a review of 200 California Business Improvement Districts, it is consistently
demonstrated that the typical BID Program places a higher priority on Commercial
Marketing Programs than on Civic Beautification and Commercial Recruitment Programs.
With that trend in mind, retail and restaurant businesses, with their emphasis on, and
need for, commercial marketing, are traditionally assessed more than less marketing-
sensitive service-oriented or professional-oriented businesses.
However, while service-oriented businesses benefit from a BID less than retailers and
restaurateurs, they benefit more, (from commercial marketing programs), than
professional businesses such as medical, dental and legal offices with their minimal
advertising and promotion needs.
Therefore, set forth below, is an example of how various business types might be
considered regarding the computation of the annual benefit assessment.
Retail and Restaurant:
Service:
Professional:
100% of base amount
75% of base amount
50% of base amount
Exceptions to this rule include financial institutions that are traditionally charged a flat
rate regardless of location or size and lodging businesses that are typically charged by
total rooms. Lodging businesses are assessed based on the total number of rooms
because it is a more equitable manner of determining size. Many lodging businesses have
many part time employees, but revenues are based on the room occupancies of the hotel,
not the goods sold or serviced provided by employees.
Criteria 2) Location of Business:
Statement Concerning Cost-Benefit Formula For BID Businesses Regarding
Location of Business:
It has also been consistently demonstrated that the more centrally located businesses
tend to benefit from BID activities and services to a greater degree than businesses
located toward the periphery of the proposed BID boundaries. Events and activities tend
to originate in the central core of the downtown area and spread benefit to the outer
areas with diminishing energy and impact, much like the ripple effect of a stone tossed
into a body of calm water.
Furthermore, ground floor businesses tend to benefit to a greater degree than businesses
located in upper floors. Therefore, in some cases, a new BID’s annual benefit assessment
formula also takes these street level criteria into account.
14
As mentioned above, special events, fairs, festivals and other activities tend to take place
within, or along, the Main Street core rather than in the areas at the periphery of the
downtown core. Additionally, BID-sponsored seasonal decorations, public art projects,
street banners and street furniture tend to be located within the immediate core area.
Therefore, businesses located within the most central area of the proposed BID are
considered to be within "Zone A" which should be considered the primary benefit zone.
There is typically a "secondary zone" or "Zone B" within most proposed BID areas. This
area receives less benefit than Zone A and should be assessed accordingly.
An example of how different zones might be treated regarding the computation of the
annual benefit assessment is as follows.
¯Zone A: 100% of base benefit assessment
o Zone B: 75% of base benefit assessment
:In the case of Downtown Palo Alto, it is recommended that all Zone A upper floor
businesses, as well as any other businesses located at the periphery of the proposed BID,
be considered as Zone B businesses. Please refer to the map in Attachment I.
Criteria 3) Size of Business:
Statement Concerning Cost-Benefit Formula For BID Businesses Regarding Size
of Business:
In approximately 50% of newly established BIDs, a third assessment criterion is used.
This criterion involves the size of each individual business that is based upon the
businesses’ total number of full-time employees. Full-time employees are those working a
total of 2,000 hours per year. Part-time employees are grouped into full-time job
positions, i.e., two half-time employees total one full-time. Fractions are rounded down to
the nearest whole number with no less than one person as a minimum for business.
An example of how various business sizes might be treated regarding the computation of
the annual benefit assessment is as follows:
o
o
o
Retail/Restaurants Service Businesses
Small:50% of base assessment under 6 FTE*under 4 FTE*
Medium:75% of base assessment 6-under 11 FTE*4 to under 7 FTE*
Large:100% of base assessment 11+ FTE*7+ FTE*
* Full-time employees (FTE)
Additionally, an exemption was established for "single person professional businesses"
that have 25% or less full time equivalent (FTE), including the business owner. This
covers employees who work less 10 hours a week (based on a 40 hour work week)
Since "single person businesses" that have 26% FTE to 1 FTE in the professional business
category of the BID benefit the very least from the assessment, their assessments have
been tiered by size based (according to benefit) on the new "single person business"
criteria.
A TTACHIVlENT 1, page 2
15
ATTACHHENT 2
Downto~vn Palo Alto Business Improvement District
Annual BID Assessments
Retailers
and Restaurants
(_~ 00%)
ZONE A ZONE B
(75%)
$225.00 (Under 6 FTE employees) (50%)
$340.00 (6 to under 11 FTE employees) (75%)
$450.00 (11+ FTE employees) (100%)
$170.00
$260.00
$340.00
Service
Businesses
(75%)
$170.00 (Under 4 FTE employees) (50%)
$260.00 (4 to under 7 FTE employees) (75%)
$340.00 (7+ FTE employees) (100%)
$130.00
$200.00
$260.00
Professional
Businesses
(50%)
EXEMPT (25% or fewer FTE employees, including the business owner)
$ 60.00 (26% to under 1 FTE employees) (25%)$ 50.00
$110.00 (2 to 4 FTE employees) (50%)$ 90.00
$170.00 (5 to 9 FTE employees) (75%)$130.00
$225.00 (10+ FTE employees) (100%)$170.00
Lodging
Businesses
(~00%)
$225.00 (up to 20 rooms) (50%)
$340.00 (21 to 40 rooms) (75%)
$450.00 (41+ rooms) (100%)
$170.00
$260.00
$340.00
Financial
Institutions $500.00 $500.00
Note 1: For retail, restaurant, service, and professional businesses, size will be determined by
number of employees either fu!l-time or equivalent (FTE) made up of multiples of part-time
employees. A full FTE equals approximately 2000 hours annually. Lodging facilities will be
charged by number of rooms available and financial institutions will be charged a flat fee.
Note 2: Second floor (and higher) businesses located within Zone A, will be assessed the same
as similar street-level businesses located within Zone B.
Note 3: Assessment amounts are rounded to the nearest ten dollars. The minimum assessment
will be $50.00.
ATTACHMENT 2
@
The City of
Palo Alto
Downtown Palo Alto
Business Improvement District
This map is a product of the
City of Palo Alto GIS
NOT YET APPROVED
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALO ALTO
DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AN ASSESSMENT
AGAINST BUSINESSES WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN PALO ALTO
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008-
2009 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR MAY 12, 2008 FOR
HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALO ALTO DOES HEREBY FIND,
DECLARE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of 1989 (the
"Law"), California Streets and Highways Code Sections 36500 et sect., authorizes the City
Council to levy an assessment against businesses within a parking and business improvement
area which is in addition to any assessments, fees, charges, or taxes imposed in the City.
SECTION 2. Pursuant to the Law, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 4819
establishing the Downtown Palo Alto Business Improvement District (the "District") in the City
of Palo Alto.
SECTION 3. The City Council, by Resolution No. 8416, appointed the Board of
Directors of the Palo Alto Downtown Business & Professional Association, a California
nonprofit mutual benefit corporation, to serve as the Advisory Board for the District (the
"Advisory Board").
SECTION 4. In accordance with Section 36533 of the law, the Advisory Board
prepared and filed with the City Clerk a report entitled "Downtown Palo Alto Business
Improvement District, Annual Report 2008-2009" (the "Report). The City council hereby
preliminarily approved the report.
SECTION 5. The boundaries of the District are within the City limits of the City
of Palo Alto (the "City") and encompass the greater downtown area of the City, generally
extending from E1 Camino Real to the East, Webster Street to the West, Lytton Avenue to the
North and Addison Avenue to the South (east of Emerson Street, the boundaries extend only to
Forest Avenue to the South). Reference is hereby made to the map of the District attached hereto
as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference for a complete description of the boundaries
of the District.
SECTION 6. The City Council hereby declares its intention, in addition to any
assessments, fees, charges or taxes imposed by the City, to levy and collect an assessment
against businesses within the District for fiscal year 2008-2009 (July 1, 2008 to June 30, 2009).
Such assessment is not proposed to increase from the assessment levied and collected for fiscal
year 2005-2006. The method and basis of levying the assessment is set forth in Exhibit "B"
attached hereto, and incorporated herein by reference.
080401jb 0130297
NOT YET APPROVED
SECTION 7. The types of improvements to be funded by the levy of an
assessment against businesses within the District are the acquisition, construction, installation or
maintenance of any tangible property with an estimated useful life of five years or more. The
types of activities to be funded by the levy of an assessment against businesses within the
District are the promotion of public events which benefit businesses in the area and which take
place on or in public places within the District; the furnishing of music in any public place in the
District; and activities which benefit businesses located and operating in the District.
SECTION 8. New businesses established in the District after the beginning of
any fiscal year shall be exempt from the levy of the assessment for that fiscal year. In addition,
non-profit organizations, newspapers and professional "single-person businesses," defined as
those businesses which have 25% or less full time equivalent employees, including the business
owner, shall be exempt from the assessment.
SECTION 9. The City Council hereby fixes the time and place for a public
hearing on the proposed levy of an assessment against businesses within the District for fiscal
year 2008-2009 as follows:
TIME:7:00 p.m.
DATE:Monday, May 12, 2008
PLACE:City Council Chambers
250 Hamilton Avenue
Palo Alto, California 94301
At the public heating, the testimony of all interested persons regarding the levy of an
assessment against businesses within the District for fiscal year 2008-2009 shall be heard. A
protest may be made orally or in writing by any interested person.
Any protest pertaining to the regularity or sufficiency of the proceedings must be in
writing and shall clearly set forth the irregularity or defect to which the objection is made.
Every written protest must be filed with the City Clerk at or before the time fixed for
the public hearing. The City Council may waive any irregularity in the form or content of any
written protest and at the public heating may correct minor defects in the proceedings. A written
protest may be withdrawn in writing at any time before the conclusion of the public hearing.
Each written protest must contain a description of the business in which the person
subscribing the protest is interested sufficient to identify the business and, if a person subscribing
is not shown on the official records of the City as the owner of the business, the protest shall
contain or be accompanied by written evidence that the person subscribing is the owner of the
business. A written protest which does not comply with the requirements set forth in this
paragraph will not be counted in determining a majority protest (as defined below).
080401jb 0130297
NOT YET APPROVED
If, at the conclusion of the public hearing, written protests are received from the
owners of businesses in the District which will pay 50 percent or more of the assessments
proposed to be levied and protests are not withdrawn so as to reduce the protests to less than that
50 percent (i.e., there is a majority protest), no further proceedings to levy the proposed
assessment, as contained in this resolution of intention, shall be taken for a period of one year
from the date of the finding of a majority protest by the City Council.
If the majority protest is only against the furnishing of a specified type or types of
improvement or activity within the District, those types of improvements or activities shall be
eliminated.
SECTION 10. For a full and detailed description of the improvements and
activities to be provided for fiscal year 2008-2009, the boundaries of the District and the
proposed assessments to be levied against the businesses within the District for fiscal year 2008-
2009, reference is hereby made to the Report of the Advisory Board. The Report is on file with
the City Clerk and open to public inspection.
SECTION 11. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to provide notice
of the public hearing in accordance with law.
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
080401jb 0130297
NOT YET APPROVED
SECTION 12. The Council finds that the adoption of this resolution does not
meet the definition of a project under Section 21065 of the California Environmental Quality Act
and, therefore, no environmental impact assessment is necessary.
INTRODUCED AND PASSED:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Mayor
APPROVED:
Assistant City Attorney City Manager
Director of Administrative
Services
Director of Planning and
Community Environment
080401jb 0130297
4