Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2025-07-22 Parks & Recreation Commission Agenda Packet
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Regular Meeting Tuesday, July 22, 2025 Council Chambers & Hybrid 7:00 PM Parks and Recreation Commission meetings will be held as “hybrid” meetings with the option to attend by teleconference/video conference or in person. To maximize public safety while still maintaining transparency and public access, members of the public can choose to participate from home or attend in person. Information on how the public may observe and participate in the meeting is located at the end of the agenda. Masks are strongly encouraged if attending in person. The meeting will be broadcast on Cable TV Channel 26, live on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/cityofpaloalto, and streamed to Midpen Media Center https://midpenmedia.org. Commissioner names, biographies, and archived agendas and report are available at https://www.paloalto.gov/Departments/Community-Services/Other- Services/Commissions/Parks-and-Recreation-Commission. VIRTUAL PARTICIPATION CLICK HERE TO JOIN (https://cityofpaloalto.zoom.us/j/99937899745 ) Meeting ID: 999 3789 9745 Phone: 1(669)900-6833 PUBLIC COMMENTS Public comments will be accepted both in person and via Zoom for up to three minutes or an amount of time determined by the Chair. All requests to speak will be taken until 5 minutes after the staff’s presentation. Written public comments can be submitted in advance to ParkRec.commission@paloalto.gov and will be provided to the Council and available for inspection on the City’s website. Please clearly indicate which agenda item you are referencing in your subject line. PowerPoints, videos, or other media to be presented during public comment are accepted only by email to ParkRec.commission@paloalto.gov at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Once received, the Clerk will have them shared at public comment for the specified item. To uphold strong cybersecurity management practices, USB’s or other physical electronic storage devices are not accepted. Signs and symbolic materials less than 2 feet by 3 feet are permitted provided that: (1) sticks, posts, poles or similar/other type of handle objects are strictly prohibited; (2) the items do not create a facility, fire, or safety hazard; and (3) persons with such items remain seated when displaying them and must not raise the items above shoulder level, obstruct the view or passage of other attendees, or otherwise disturb the business of the meeting. CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMENT Members of the public may speak to any item NOT on the agenda. AGENDA CHANGES, ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS The Chair or Commission majority may modify the agenda order to improve meeting management. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1.Approval of Minutes from May 27, 2025 and June 24, 2025 Meetings CITY OFFICIAL REPORTS Members of the public may not speak to the item(s) 2.Council Liaison Report – 5 minutes 3.Department Report – 20 minutes Staff Presentation BUSINESS ITEMS 4.Informational Update from Grassroots Ecology – 30 Minutes Presentation 5.Informational Update on Evaluation of the City of Palo Alto Middle School Athletics Program – 45 minutes Staff Presentation 6.Informational Update on Parkland Dedication Efforts – 45 Minutes Staff Presentation COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, ANNOUNCEMENTS OR FUTURE MEETINGS AND AGENDAS Members of the public may not speak to the item(s) 7.Ad Hoc Committees and Liaison Updates (Discussion) – 15 minutes ADJOURNMENT OTHER INFORMATION A.Public Comments PUBLIC COMMENT INSTRUCTIONS Members of the Public may provide public comments to teleconference meetings via email, teleconference, or by phone. 1.Written public comments may be submitted by email to ParkRec.Commission@paloalto.gov. 2.Spoken public comments using a computer will be accepted through the teleconference meeting. To address the Council, click on the link below to access a Zoom-based meeting. Please read the following instructions carefully. ◦You may download the Zoom client or connect to the meeting in- browser. If using your browser, make sure you are using a current, up-to-date browser: Chrome 30 , Firefox 27 , Microsoft Edge 12 , Safari 7 . Certain functionality may be disabled in older browsers including Internet Explorer. ◦You may be asked to enter an email address and name. We request that you identify yourself by name as this will be visible online and will be used to notify you that it is your turn to speak. ◦When you wish to speak on an Agenda Item, click on “raise hand.” The Clerk will activate and unmute speakers in turn. Speakers will be notified shortly before they are called to speak. ◦When called, please limit your remarks to the time limit allotted. A timer will be shown on the computer to help keep track of your comments. 3.Spoken public comments using a smart phone will be accepted through the teleconference meeting. To address the Council, download the Zoom application onto your phone from the Apple App Store or Google Play Store and enter the Meeting ID below. Please follow the instructions B-E above. 4.Spoken public comments using a phone use the telephone number listed below. When you wish to speak on an agenda item hit *9 on your phone so we know that you wish to speak. You will be asked to provide your first and last name before addressing the Council. You will be advised how long you have to speak. When called please limit your remarks to the agenda item and time limit allotted. CLICK HERE TO JOIN Meeting ID: 999 3789 9745 Phone:1-669-900-6833 Americans with Disability Act (ADA) It is the policy of the City of Palo Alto to offer its public programs, services and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to all. Persons with disabilities who require materials in an appropriate alternative format or who require auxiliary aids to access City meetings, programs, or services may contact the City’s ADA Coordinator at (650) 329-2550 (voice) or by emailing ada@paloalto.gov. Requests for assistance or accommodations must be submitted at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting, program, or service. Parks and Recreation Commission Staff Report From: Community Services Meeting Date: July 22, 2025 Report #: 2507-4963 TITLE Approval of Minutes from May 27, 2025 and June 24, 2025 Meetings RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council review and approve the minutes. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: June 24, 2025 Draft Summary Minutes Attachment B: May 27, 2025 Draft Summary Minutes Item 1 Item 1 Staff Report Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 1 Packet Pg. 5 of 245 1 MINUTES 2 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION 3 REGULAR MEETING 4 May 27, 2025 5 In-Person & Virtual Conference 6 Palo Alto, California 7 8 Commissioners Present In-Person: Jeff Greenfield, Amanda Brown, Shani Kleinhaus, Anne Warner 9 Cribbs, Yudy Deng 10 Commissioners Present Virtually:Nellis Freeman, Bing Wei 11 Commissioners Absent:None 12 Others Present:Kevin Springer, Matt Molloy, George Maxe 13 Staff Present: Sarah Robustelli, Kristen O’Kane, Lam Do, Charlie Coles, Sylvia Star- 14 Lack 15 CALL TO ORDER & ROLL CALL 16 Meeting was called to order at 7 p.m. 17 PUBLIC COMMENT 18 None 19 AGENDA CHANGES, ADDITIONS, AND DELETIONS 20 The Council Liaison Report will not take place this evening due to an ongoing Council meeting. 21 APPROVAL OF MINUTES 22 1. Approval of Draft Minutes from the April 11, 2025, Parks and Recreation Commission 23 Annual Retreat 24 MOTION: Commissioner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Greenfield to approve the 25 draft minutes from the April 11, 2025 annual retreat. 26 MOTION PASSED: 7-0-0 27 2. Approval of Draft Minutes from the April 22, 2025, Parks and Recreation Commission 28 Regular Meeting 29 Chair Freeman wanted to change Commissioner Kleinhaus’ wording from “fun” to “found” on 30 line 108 to 109. Item 1 May 27, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 2 Packet Pg. 6 of 245 31 MOTION: Vice Chair Greenfield moved, seconded by Commissioner Cribbs to approve the draft 32 minutes from the April 22, 2025 Parks and Recreation Regular Meeting with Chair Freeman’s 33 change. 34 MOTION PASSED: 6-0-1, Commissioner Brown abstained. 35 CITY OFFICIAL REPORTS 36 3. Department Report 37 Sarah Robustelli, Division Manager, recapped the Earth Day and May Fete Parade and Fair 38 events and highlighted upcoming events such as Twilight Concert Series, Family Movie Nights, 39 and the 4th of July Summer Festival & Chili Cookoff. The Fred Eyerly Tower Well Park dedication 40 and Fire Station Open House will take place on June 18 at 4 p.m. Ms. Robustelli noted there will 41 be a second community meeting on June 12 for the Cubberley Community Center project. 42 Kristen O’Kane, Director of Community Services, added that Council will present the results of 43 the community poll at the June 9 meeting. 44 Ms. Robustelli said a valley oak tree was planted after losing one in Ramos Park. The Heritage 45 Park site amenities CIP will be completed this year. The replacement of the tree root structure at 46 Heritage Park was completed last week. The Mitchell Park restrooms were refreshed with new 47 paint, epoxy floors, and other reconditioning. The Friends of the Palo Alto Parks installed Port-o- 48 potties near the pickleball and Magical Bridge. Ms. Robustelli noted the Public Works 49 Engineering team was working on a solution to add another set of bathrooms, which is an 50 upcoming CIP. Demolition is underway for the Greer Park project, which will include replacing 51 basketball hoops, expanding the smaller court, and resurfacing, and is anticipated to reopen at 52 the end of June. Boulware Park is fully reopened. The restrooms at Cubberley Field were 53 completed and set to open June 2. The project also included a new sewer pump station and 54 repaving the bike path from the adjacent restroom to Nelson Drive. 55 Vice Chair Greenfield was happy to have 4 units for the Cubberley restrooms. Vice Chair 56 Greenfield asked about the time of the Fred Eyerly Tower Well Park dedication and when the 57 Mitchell Park restrooms will be delivered and available. Vice Chair Greenfield clarified the 58 buildings were not on order yet and expected to be a year out. 59 Commissioner Cribbs asked if there was a timeline for the community meetings for the Mitchell 60 Park restrooms. 61 Ms. Robustelli reiterated the dedication started at 4 p.m. and would last until about 4:30 and 62 that there would be refreshments at the fire station open house. Ms. Robustelli said there was 63 no timeline for the Mitchell Park restrooms, but noted it was the next project the Public Works 64 and Engineering team would be working on. Ms. Robustelli confirmed the buildings were not on 65 order and the fabrication of the building is dependent on community meetings and agreed it 66 would be about a year out. 67 Commissioner Deng asked for updates on the Eleanor Pardee Park restroom and if the Mitchell 68 Park pickleball would be addressed first. Item 1 May 27, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 3 Packet Pg. 7 of 245 69 Commissioner Wei asked if there was a specific timeline to finish Mitchell Park and start the 70 Eleanor Pardee Park restrooms. 71 Vice Chair Greenfield asked if the Eleanor Pardee restrooms was still under review and if it was 72 subject to community outreach if approved in the budget. 73 Ms. Robustelli confirmed the work for Eleanor Pardee Park will begin after Mitchell Park. Ms. 74 Robustelli said the results of the community outreach will dictate the timeline and agreed to 75 give updates to the Commission. Ms. Robustelli explained if it is adopted in the FY 2026 budget, 76 the plan is to move forward, with the next step being community outreach, which is a standard 77 part of the CIP process. 78 Commissioner Kleinhaus cautioned against losing trees or vegetation in either park due to the 79 addition of restrooms. Commissioner Kleinhaus queried if staff was involved in the foothills of 80 Arastradero fire plan and if it was coming to the Commission, opining that it should because it 81 impacts the parks. 82 Ms. Robustelli noted the foothills fire plan was internally reviewed by staff but the project 83 manager was not planning to bring it to the Commission due to it being out of the PRC’s 84 purview. The Commission was sent an email for comments. 85 Ms. O’Kane proposed tabling the fire plan discussion because it was not an agenda item. 86 Chair Freeman asked if there was an increase in the number of entrants to the July 4 Cookoff 87 compared to last year. Chair Freeman wondered how the word gets out, noting people from 88 multiple cities attend. Chair Freeman questioned who was responsible for maintenance of the 89 portable restrooms in Mitchell Park. 90 Ms. Robustelli noted 12 teams signed up last year and 10 signed up this year, 4 returning and 6 91 new. The event coordinator mentioned potentially extending the time for signups. Ms. 92 Robustelli remarked that there was a meeting that will take place with staff to outline the next 93 steps and procedures. Ms. Robustelli said word is getting out through all typical avenues. 94 Maintenance of the portable restrooms was handled by a vendor through payment made by the 95 Friends of the Palo Alto Parks. 96 BUSINESS ITEMS 97 4. Baylands Golf Links Update 98 Superintendent of Community Services Lam Do presented updates on Baylands Golf Links, which 99 included operations and financial performance. Kevin Springer and George Maxe were present 100 to answer questions. 101 Mr. Do explained that the Palo Alto Municipal Golf Course closed for 2 years to be reconfigured 102 into a links-style course and reopened in 2018 as Baylands Golf Links. The links-style course 103 offers contours, rolling elevation, integration with wetlands, and more challenging course play. 104 Paspalum grass was chosen due to its salt resistance and ability to be irrigated with recycled 105 water. Baylands Golf Links is owned by the City of Palo Alto and operated by OB Sports under a Item 1 May 27, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 4 Packet Pg. 8 of 245 106 course management contract. OB Sports oversees all aspects of golf operations, including course 107 maintenance, play, and practice; merchandise sales; and food and beverage services. 108 A table was shown reflecting financial performance and course play each fiscal year since 2018. 109 Mr. Do noted losses of $0.3M in 2019 due to 2 debt service repayments and $0.7M in 2020 due 110 to closure and limited play because of COVID-19. The golf course had an annual positive 111 contribution of over $1M towards the City’s General Fund for fiscal years 2021 through 2023. A 112 decrease to $0.5M in 2024 was associated with a water meter and billing error which is being 113 corrected and should be reflected in FY 2025’s reconciliation. 114 Director Sarah Robustelli presented on wetland mitigation and monitoring. Ms. Robustelli said 115 City staff continues to coordinate with the State Water Board to ensure compliance with 116 mitigation requirements. The City submitted a current conditions report in August 2024 which 117 determined the current coverage of wetland areas and made recommendations on next steps 118 towards meeting the requirements. In December 2024, the City notified the State Water Board 119 of the intent to conduct a jurisdictional wetland delineation, which began in February 2025 and 120 is anticipated to be completed in July 2025. It will inform if any hydrological modifications are 121 necessary to ensure wetland success and will outline the current existent acreage of wetlands. 122 Ms. Robustelli noted that staff has been coordinating with the golf course operator for 123 maintenance. Additional protective measures were implemented in and around the mitigation 124 areas, including installing more split rail fencing, improving signage, additional educational 125 materials, and implementing a local rule for stroke relief to discourage entry into sensitive 126 habitat areas. 127 Mr. Do stated that the City has either cosponsored or partnered with First Tee Silicon Valley or 128 its predecessors since 2009. The City and First Tee have a short-term agreement in place that 129 allows First Tee access to teaching facilities including practice putting greens, driving ranges, a 130 portion of the Youth Practice Area, and on-course. First Tee teaches 4 seasons a year in 8-week 131 sessions primarily in the late afternoon. The program involves boys and girls from 2nd grade 132 through high school and provides scholarships to participants when needed. The City and First 133 Tee are reviewing a draft term sheet to develop a long-term partnership which would expand 134 First Tee programming, allow additional access times and locations, and further facilitate youth 135 development. 136 Staff is reengaging with the National Golf Foundation on a second deck driving range study. It 137 will evaluate the potential to construct a double deck driving range and includes looking at 138 financial feasibility and leveraging technology enhancements to attract more golf patrons. A 139 draft report is being updated with current golf market analysis. Utilization models and financial 140 projections are being updated. Mr. Do said the study will come back to the Commission. 141 Senior Vice President for OB Sports Matt Molloy presented on course operations. Mr. Molloy 142 revisited the financial performance table, highlighting the dollars per paid round. A lesser rate in 143 2024 was attributed to the change of time people played but has seen a rebound this year. Mr. 144 Molloy projected over $90 per round due to dynamic pricing and the Links Card loyalty program. 145 Mr. Molloy acknowledged the paspalum grass requires a high level of aerification on fairways 146 and tees and hopes to begin a top-dressing program this year. New equipment was received in Item 1 May 27, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 5 Packet Pg. 9 of 245 147 2024. The first step of the Audubon certification was completed, and a couple case studies are 148 ongoing. Native areas are flourishing due to maintenance practices. 149 Mr. Molloy spoke about utilizing occupancy-based dynamic pricing to drive revenue, which 150 offers scaled rates dependent on the time of day and the day of week. A high-end daily fee 151 service level is used to improve guest experience. Mr. Molloy mentioned a quarterly secret 152 shopper program that gives a 90-point evaluation to identify missed service standards. A Google 153 review tracker is used to manage all social media reviews. Mr. Molloy considered scaling rates 154 seasonally in the coming years due to the dormant grass type. 155 The Links Card is a buy-in loyalty program that gives discounted rates and a shorter window to 156 book tee times, has over 1,400 participants, and makes up 37 percent of rounds. Troon Rewards 157 allows golfers to earn points through Links Cards which can be redeemed at other Troon- 158 managed courses. The membership program, Troon Access, is used to drive additional rounds to 159 clubs, which includes Tee Time alerts. A new app was launched with a new tee time system. Mr. 160 Molloy talked about golfer development programs, which include junior camps, hosting Paly and 161 Gunn boys and girls school golf teams, participating in Youth on Course, and offering individual 162 golf instruction. Mr. Molloy noted there were over 4,000 junior rounds in 2024. 163 PUBLIC COMMENT 164 1. Lynn C. expressed concern about the drop in revenue from $1M to $0.5M and wanted to know 165 what the net was for the year with all expenses and revenue accounted for. Lynn C. was curious 166 if the sales inside of clothes generated money for the City and if the City rents the restaurant 167 space. Lynn C. believed a consultant was being hired and asked if that was coming out of the 168 City of Palo Alto General Fund. Lynn C. questioned who was responsible for the landscaping and 169 design and noted having seen people take shortcuts through the designated natural areas and 170 asked if that had been remedied. Lynn C. asked if the current number of rounds exceed what it 171 was before 2016. 172 2. Karen P. was concerned about the proximity of the golf course to the Palo Alto Airport, noting 173 approximately half of one side is less than 200 feet from the runway. Karen P. said the airport 174 has an average of 160,000 operations annually, the majority of aircraft using the airport run on 175 leaded fuel, and that no unleaded fuel has been sold by the airport this year. Karen P. was 176 concerned about the risks of lead emission exposure on the adults and children who use the golf 177 course. In 2022, the California Public Department of Health released a handout on steps those 178 near airports should take to protect themselves from lead emissions. Karen P. asked if the 179 Commission would encourage the City to distribute the notice to everyone who uses the golf 180 course and erect signs in prominent locations around the course displaying the risk of lead 181 emission exposure. 182 Chair Freeman asked for more detail on the long-term partnership between First Tee and the 183 City, when the agreement is expected to be signed, and if there are any potential issues that 184 may prevent that from progressing. Chair Freeman questioned if there has been an increase in 185 youth participation in golf over the past few years and how Palo Alto compared to other 186 communities. Chair Freeman asked about the $3.8M in expenses in 2023 and the higher 187 expenses in 2024. Item 1 May 27, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 6 Packet Pg. 10 of 245 188 Mr. Do said the short-term agreement runs through February 2026 and the intent is to have the 189 long-term partnership in place prior to then. Mr. Do clarified that First Tee is one of the 190 programs for the introduction and inclusion of youth in golf. The Youth on Course program had 191 over 1,800 players last year which accounted for roughly 3 percent of rounds. Mr. Do reiterated 192 that the higher expenses in 2024 were due to the potable water usage cost and that a billing 193 reconciliation is necessary. Mr. Do agreed to get back to the Commission with more information 194 regarding the 2023 expenses. 195 President and CEO of First Tee Silicon Valley George Maxe explained that the long-term 196 agreement would be tied to the development of the youth area between Embarcadero Road 197 and the driving range. Mr. Maxe said that things were steady because of the fixed capacity but 198 classes were filled every season. Mr. Maxe noted about a 10 percent growth in demand per year 199 in the rest of Silicon Valley. 200 Mr. Molloy commented that the golf course is busy with both adults and juniors more than 201 other facilities throughout the country. 202 Commissioner Cribbs asked what could be done to facilitate the long-term agreement with First 203 Tee and was concerned that some youth were unable to participate because the agreements 204 were not yet in place. Commissioner Cribbs wanted to know more about the golf clubs and 205 asked if resident fees had been extended to East Palo Alto or if that was part of this year’s 206 budget discussion. 207 Mr. Do recognized the process had been slower than anticipated but believed both parties are 208 close to reaching an agreement, citing the current term sheet being reviewed. Mr. Do 209 acknowledged the work with clubs is ongoing. Mr. Do said that extending resident fees was part 210 of the upcoming FY 2026 operating budget. 211 Mr. Maxe said there are waiting lists every season for specific classes. Full capacity is 512 212 registrations annually, and though the report showed 460, any given class could have a waiting 213 list of up to 10 to 15 children. 214 General Manager for OB Sports Kevin Springer noted the men’s club has almost 500 members 215 and a significant waiting list. The 9-hole women’s group increased by almost 50 percent 216 compared to 3 years ago, and there is an 18-hole women’s group as well. Instructors were 217 added to staff and the clinics opened were well attended by women. Mr. Springer felt that all 218 the clubs were strong due to the value players get and that there has been an increase in 219 demand. 220 Mr. Molloy said that women are the largest growth segment coming out of COVID-19 with no 221 close second. Mr. Molloy believes a contributor to growth at Baylands is the playability of the 222 course. 223 Commissioner Brown asked for comments on the regional Topgolf and golf simulator rooms and 224 said that industry professionals opine it does not take away market share but drives more 225 people to golf courses. 226 Mr. Molloy said Topgolf is an entertainment product and believes it does bring people to golf, 227 but the crossover is negligible. Mr. Molloy said off-course growth in golf has increased since Item 1 May 27, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 7 Packet Pg. 11 of 245 228 COVID-19, but programs such as First Tee and other core-specific junior programs are what help 229 introduce youth to golf. 230 Commissioner Kleinhaus queried if the funds for consultants and mitigation efforts would come 231 from the golf course fund or the City’s General Fund. Commissioner Kleinhaus questioned if the 232 budgeting for consultants and mitigation work was included in the calculation of how much 233 money the golf course generates versus how much is used. Commissioner Kleinhaus asked if the 234 $0.5M positive revenue was before or after the mitigation and consultant fees and any other 235 related expenses. Commissioner Kleinhaus wanted to know if there was less than $0.5M left 236 after everything was taken into account and if there were other similar costs not included in the 237 information provided. Commissioner Kleinhaus felt the budget was not transparent and asked if, 238 taking all things into account, the golf course was making or losing money, or neither. 239 Mr. Do explained that the expenditures for consultants are paid out of the golf course fund and 240 that the golf course’s operating budget falls under the City’s General Fund. All revenue from the 241 golf course goes back to the General Fund. Mr. Do said the revenue presented was before those 242 expenses. The mitigation-related elements are currently funded through a capital program, 243 which is also funded through the City’s General Fund. Mr. Do clarified that if everything else, 244 including operations, was taken into account, then there could be less than $0.5M, and that 245 there were no other similar costs not included at present. Mr. Do confirmed that the golf course 246 has operated in the black since 2001. 247 Ms. Robustelli explained that the operating budget is what was presented today, and any capital 248 expenses would come out of the capital improvement fund and would not be included. Ms. 249 Robustelli noted that a current CIP, which was part of the reconfiguration of the golf course, 250 addresses the mitigation expense and is capitalized. 251 Commissioner Kleinhaus asked if there was any monitoring of how well the City’s goal of making 252 the golf course a habitat-friendly area was working, noting there were no replacements of trees 253 that had died. Commissioner Kleinhaus was concerned there was no monitoring independent of 254 the Water Board requirements. Commissioner Kleinhaus acknowledged that things were 255 planted and there was some maintenance but felt the habitat was not sufficiently improved. 256 Commissioner Kleinhaus mentioned having asked about burrowing owls and other species and 257 asked for more investment in the ecology. Commissioner Kleinhaus questioned what was done 258 about squirrels, if CO2 was used, and if it was ensured no burrowing owls were present prior to 259 usage. Commissioner Kleinhaus had noticed the paspalum encroaching into native wetlands 260 years ago and assumed it will be removed during the mitigation work. Commissioner Kleinhaus 261 wanted to know if the paspalum was invading the baylands and if that was being monitored. 262 Ms. Robustelli said according to the existing conditions report, the 5-year monitoring period will 263 not begin until any corrective actions are taken. 264 Mr. Do acknowledged there were separate requirements that the regulatory agencies required, 265 primarily having to do with wetland plant species and survival rates. Mr. Do highlighted the 266 City’s efforts on-course, off-course, and off-site to create an environment for wildlife through 267 the planting of more vegetation off-site and by leaving fallen trees to create snags. Mr. Do said 268 monitoring would be part of the overall stewardship of Open Space areas. Nontoxic wildlife pest 269 management methods were utilized in correlation to a pest management plan, but verification Item 1 May 27, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 8 Packet Pg. 12 of 245 270 was needed on CO2 usage and the presence of burrowing owls. Mr. Do was not aware of 271 whether the grass had spread throughout the baylands. 272 Mr. Springer mentioned looking for paspalum regularly while walking the trail and had not 273 noticed it, noting it is easy to recognize. Mr. Springer agreed to the importance and necessity of 274 monitoring the spread of the grass. 275 Commissioner Deng asked about the percentage of revenue from golf versus the restaurant and 276 if it was substantial. 277 Mr. Do explained the food and beverage service is provided by OB Sports under a license 278 agreement. There was no expenditure or revenue related to the restaurant reflected on the 279 financial figures shown except for a rent revenue and utilities payment factor, which was not 280 substantial compared to the $5M revenue. Mr. Do said operators were asked to provide various 281 models and the model chosen was for the current operator to provide all services and take on 282 food and beverage as a separate business. 283 Commissioner Wei asked if the new signage would include multiple languages. Commissioner 284 Wei suggested adding Spanish and Simplified Chinese Mandarin to better serve the diverse 285 community, which includes about 35 percent Asians and 10 percent Latinos, and offered to help 286 bring translators if needed. 287 Mr. Do noted the signs were in English at present but agreed to take that into consideration. 288 Mr. Springer did not believe the issue would have a large impact on the budget and agreed it 289 could be done quickly and easily. 290 Commissioner Kleinhaus wanted to know how valuable the Audubon certification was aside 291 from a business perspective. Commissioner Kleinhaus asked for an update about the plan to 292 bring a sewer line from East Palo Alto and opined it was beneficial for the Community Service 293 staff to review because it would go through the golf course. Commissioner Kleinhaus agreed to 294 look it up and send it to Kristen. 295 Mr. Do said the Community Service staff was not aware of that plan and not involved in that 296 project. 297 Vice Chair Greenfield requested a summary of the golf course’s net profit with the numbers 298 presented and any related CIPs taken into consideration and believed it would help for full 299 transparency. Vice Chair Greenfield questioned if there were 2 CIPs, 1 for infrastructure and 1 300 for environmental mitigation. Vice Chair Greenfield asked for an explanation of the process of 301 retrieving golf balls hit out of bounds. Vice Chair Greenfield wanted more clarification for the 302 year’s high expenses and low profit and asked if things would look better when balanced over 2 303 years. Vice Chair Greenfield wanted comments on the Audubon certification and asked what 304 percentage of golf courses carry that distinction. 305 Ms. Robustelli said it was typical to look at operating expenses when there was an operator. The 306 City owns the land and takes ownership of capital improvements. Ms. Robustelli agreed to 307 discuss the issue internally and get back to the Commission. Ms. Robustelli said there is a CIP 308 that addresses the mitigation and monitoring line item and was willing to send the Commission Item 1 May 27, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 9 Packet Pg. 13 of 245 309 a link to the page to view funding. Ms. Robustelli reiterated that there was a meter error from 310 utilities, the issue was being rectified, and a refund will be granted. 311 Commissioner Brown asked why that information was being requested for golf and not for other 312 areas. 313 Mr. Molloy said that talking about how to proceed in environmentally sensitive areas is part of 314 the welcome. Players are allowed to retrieve the ball and are asked to return to the fairway to 315 play the next shot with no penalty. The area around hole No. 6 was graded and soil was added 316 because there was a high propensity for balls to run off the fairway. The area has since been 317 revitalized, and native growth is returning. Mr. Molloy noted an ongoing case study related to 318 owls and bird boxes throughout the native areas in the golf course and native flowers. The 319 Audubon has stringent criteria and it can take 3 to 5 years to get certified. Mr. Molloy believed 320 the benefits were both public relations and the monitoring of different species throughout non- 321 golf areas. Mr. Molloy agreed to get back to the Commission on the percentage of certified 322 courses. 323 Commissioner Kleinhaus asked if the adjustments to the course changed the hydrology so that 324 water would not flow into the wetlands. 325 Mr. Molloy explained the grade was not changed and a berm was built so the hydrology was not 326 affected. 327 Commissioner Cribbs asked how well the restaurant was doing and if the dining area and 328 conference space would be redeveloped in the future. 329 Mr. Springer said the restaurant was a semi-profitable enterprise and attributed that to the 330 continuity of staff and management. The restaurant caters to golfers and businesses in the 331 surrounding area. Mr. Springer thought the addition of a banquet center would be a good 332 revenue source for the City and that a lot of people inquire about it. 333 Mr. Molloy believed the consistency of food and service draws customers from businesses on 334 Embarcadero. There is a banquet meeting event business, but the small room and limited 335 parking are restrictive. Mr. Molloy agreed there is a good market and noted some golf courses 336 do 50 to 100 weddings per year. 337 Chair Freeman asked for elaboration on the student waitlist for First Tee and if those on the 338 waitlist get into the program. Chair Freeman wondered if the long-term agreement would solve 339 the problem of Saturday programming. 340 Mr. Maxe said there were 8 classes, 2 per day, Tuesday through Friday and the waitlists are per 341 class. Waitlisted children get first priority for the next season via early registration. The biggest 342 demand throughout all Silicon Valley is on Saturdays. Baylands has no Saturday programming 343 but a youth area would allow the program to expand. Mr. Maxe confirmed the long-term 344 agreement would solve that problem. The point of the youth area is to provide space for youth 345 programming without affecting the other golf operations. 346 5. South Palo Alto Bike/Ped Connectivity: Provide Feedback on Initial Crossing Opportunity 347 Locations and Draft Design Priorities and Evaluation Criteria Item 1 May 27, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 10 Packet Pg. 14 of 245 348 Division Manager Sarah Robustelli was joined by Charlie Coles and Sylvia Star-Lack from the 349 Office of Transportation. 350 Senior Transportation Planner Charlie Coles presented a slideshow on the South Palo Alto 351 Bike/Ped Connectivity. Mr. Coles emphasized the PRC is 1 of 6 Committees identified as being 352 most relevant to engage with during the first phase of the project because some potential 353 crossings could connect with existing parks and the PRC advises on recreational activities and 354 active transportation. 355 The purpose of the project is to improve bicycle and pedestrian access across the rail corridor in 356 the southern portion of the City. The goal is to identify 2 locally preferred locations and design 357 concepts for additional grade-separated crossings of the Caltrain corridor. The concepts would 358 then be developed into 15 percent designs. An implementation plan and funding strategy would 359 be developed. Funding would then be applied for and secured for the next steps, which would 360 include environmental review, the final design, and construction. Mr. Coles noted this was the 361 conceptual planning phase of the project. 362 A map was shown of the project study area that included current crossing locations, suggested 363 walking and cycling routes, and labeled parks. Mr. Coles defined the southern part of the City as 364 south of Page Mill Road or Oregon Expressway. Current crossings include the California Avenue 365 bike/ped underpass, the crossings at Meadow and Charleston, and an underpass at the San 366 Antonio Caltrain Station in Mountain View. Mr. Coles noted the Oregon Expressway and San 367 Antonio Road crossings are primarily for vehicles. 368 Several citywide plans and studies have identified a need for additional grade-separated 369 crossings. The project is implementing the recommendations of previous plans and work by 370 addressing mobility gaps and barriers to walking and biking, which is in support of the City’s 371 mobility and sustainability goals. Mr. Coles referenced other ongoing projects in the area. 372 A slide was shown explaining the project timeline. A review of existing conditions had been 373 completed. The project was currently in Phase 1 of community engagement to establish design 374 priorities for crossing alternatives. Phase 2 will include developing crossing alternatives and 375 designs to share with the community for feedback, which is set to occur in the fall of 2025. 376 Phase 3 will involve refining the alternatives and releasing a public draft report for review and 377 comments. Phase 4 will be to obtain Council adoption of the final plan and pursue funding 378 opportunities. 379 Mr. Coles presented a slide showcasing various ways the community has been engaged 380 throughout Phase 1. The purpose of the Existing Conditions Report, which was provided this 381 evening, was to establish a detailed and accurate baseline. The report included a detailed review 382 of existing conditions data, previous plans and studies, right-of-way constraints, and field visits 383 and on-site assessments. Mr. Coles emphasized the potential crossing opportunity locations at 384 the end of the report and expressed a desire for feedback. There were 6 locations identified and 385 labeled A through F. Location A is near Colorado Avenue and Page Mill Road. Location B is a 386 larger segment from El Dorado Avenue to Loma Verde Avenue that had been identified in 387 previous plans as having high opportunity for bike/ped connectivity. Location C is near Barron 388 Creek and El Verano Avenue. Location D is between Meadow Drive and Charleston Road with a 389 potential connection from Lindero Drive to Robles Park adjacent to Park Boulevard. Location E is Item 1 May 27, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 11 Packet Pg. 15 of 245 390 near Adobe Creek with a potential connection to Ely Place and Greenmeadow Way. Location F is 391 the San Antonio Road interchange, which could include a future connection at the adjacent San 392 Antonio Avenue or modification of the existing overpass structure. 393 There were 5 draft design priorities: to improve mobility, enhance user experience, maximize 394 ease of construction, enhance visual appeal, and minimize community impacts. The priorities 395 were based on project needs, goals, benefits, and themes documented in other plans and 396 studies prepared by the City. Mr. Coles wanted to know which priorities the Commission would 397 suggest as most or least important and why. 398 A slide showed a table of the evaluation criteria metrics for each of the 5 major design priorities. 399 Mr. Coles stated those will be how future crossings are compared against each other. Mr. Coles 400 said the goal is to put together a packet of information the community will use to make a 401 decision about which 2 crossings to move forward with. Mr. Coles asked for feedback on the 402 metrics, if any should be revised, or if anything was missing. 403 Public Comment: None. 404 Vice Chair Greenfield asked if the project will be returning to the PRC during Phase 2 for more 405 feedback. Vice Chair Greenfield clarified that there are 8 alternatives with only 6 identified sites 406 because there are multiple approaches to some sites. 407 Chair Freeman asked if the project will return to the PRC once meetings have occurred with all 5 408 Committees and Council even if the 2 proposed locations do not involve a park. 409 Mr. Coles said that was to be determined and would depend on which locations more forward. 410 The 8 crossing alternatives identified for Phase 1 will move through an alternative evaluation. 411 The project will likely return to the PRC if a location involves a park. Mr. Coles believed the City 412 Council would be the key decision-making body and as such would receive the information and 413 feedback from the 5 Committees. 414 Commissioner Kleinhaus commented that the draft priorities were good but wanted to include 415 minimizing impacts to parklands. 416 Commissioner Brown felt the accompanying pictures on page 72 of Attachment A were helpful. 417 Commissioner Brown opined the Colorado Avenue and Page Mill Road location offered the most 418 value for money, especially when considering connectivity to trains and potential to connect to 419 California Avenue and Park Boulevard. Commissioner Brown noted a park was near that 420 location. Commissioner Brown thought the constructability, whether it is feasible and cost- 421 effective and able to be completed in a timely manner, was a top priority. 422 Vice Chair Greenfield felt the biggest connection gap was the El Dorado and Loma Verde 423 location. Vice Chair Greenfield thought the proximity of the Page Mill location to the California 424 Avenue tunnel could diminish the priority of that location. Vice Chair Greenfield opined it was 425 difficult to proceed with the Charleston and E Meadow location without knowing what the rail 426 crossing would look like and thought that neighborhood would be significantly impacted by the 427 rail crossing work. Vice Chair Greenfield felt it would be difficult to garner public support for 428 adding a bike lane to the existing overpass at San Antonio Road. Vice Chair Greenfield believed it 429 would be helpful for the Commission to have more information on the rail crossings and Item 1 May 27, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 12 Packet Pg. 16 of 245 430 impacts. Vice Chair Greenfield mentioned the length of the crossing could impact how much it 431 gets used. 432 Mr. Coles noted that options would be further looked at in Phase 2. The project team had been 433 exploring a variety of options for crossings, either over or under. Mr. Coles believed the project 434 team will rule out an overcrossing with the exception of the San Antonio Road overpass because 435 of the height of the Caltrain electrical lines, which are in excess of 20 to 30 feet. Mr. Coles 436 thought the majority of options expected in Phase 2 would be a variety of tunnel combinations. 437 There could be a separated, protected bike lane going down the center of the San Antonio Road 438 overpass. 439 Chair Freeman believed overcrossings would be cheaper and more expedient and asked if that 440 possibility would be eliminated for all locations. Chair Freeman questioned what methods were 441 in place to reach the large number of non-English speaking residents in order to ensure their 442 understanding and input. Chair Freeman queried how the project team will get feedback from 443 and address the high-injury corridors such as Oregon Expressway and El Camino Real. 444 Mr. Coles said the project team would consider all possible locations, not just the opportunity 445 locations. The project team was looking for consensus, input, and feedback from the 446 community, especially if a potential location was missed. There was an online survey that was 447 able to be translated. Attendees at Council meetings could receive translations in real time. 448 Other forms of outreach included social media posts, posts through Uplift Local, and sending out 449 over 1,500 mailers within a block of the rail corridor. Mr. Coles acknowledged most 450 communication was in English and expressed a willingness to speak with the consultant team on 451 identifying ways non-English speakers can contribute going forward. Mr. Coles said crossing 452 designs and a series of network improvements, some extending blocks away from the rail 453 corridor, will be put forward in the next phase. 454 Vice Chair Greenfield wanted to add route convenience as a sub-priority and felt safety was a 455 top priority. Vice Chair Greenfield highlighted the Stanford Mayfield playing fields as a busy 456 corridor for bicyclists and felt the community would like to avoid impacting existing parcels. Vice 457 Chair Greenfield was open to using a park area for an ingress or egress point for added 458 convenience if it is a more acceptable alternative to the community. 459 Commissioner Brown left the meeting at 9:39 p.m. 460 6. Approval of the Parks and Recreation Commission Workplan 461 Division Manager Sarah Robustelli suggested showing a working document of the workplan to 462 help facilitate discussion. 463 Vice Chair Greenfield asked for staff input on the suggestion to focus on creating an ad hoc for 464 Cubberley and tabling the rest of the discussion for the next meeting. 465 Director of Community Services Kristen O’Kane asked if there was interest in assigning ad hoc 466 members to Cubberley. 467 Ms. Robustelli noted Commissioner Wei and Commissioner Brown had left. The approach 468 previously discussed was to make edits to the workplan. Ms. Robustelli said if the Item 1 May 27, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 13 Packet Pg. 17 of 245 469 Commissioners still present could reach a consensus on the plan and on adding a Cubberley ad 470 hoc, it would be agendized as an action item for June’s meeting. 471 Chair Freeman said if it was decided Cubberley would be a separate ad hoc, it could be revisited 472 at the June meeting to discuss topics brought up at the retreat. Chair Freeman mentioned 473 reviewing the goals, objectives, and timelines from the consolidated document staff put 474 together and the potential at the next meeting for Commissioners to move from one ad hoc to 475 another. 476 Commissioner Kleinhaus asked about the potential overlap between the Cubberley ad hoc and 477 the gym. Commissioner Kleinhaus was concerned that, if the same people that serve on the 478 board of another group outside the forum that promotes the Wellness Center are on the ad hoc 479 for Cubberley, it would appear the ad hoc is prioritizing one element over potential others. 480 Ms. O’Kane mentioned combining the Recreation & Wellness Center and Cubberley since they 481 are part of the Cubberley masterplan. Ms. O’Kane suggested having 2 separate ad hoc as a 482 potential solution. 483 Chair Freeman believed the current Cubberley liaison would go away and become part of the ad 484 hoc presentation, which would provide input as to what is happening for Cubberley and the Palo 485 Alto Wellness Center, which includes the gym. Chair Freeman was willing to move off a couple 486 ad hoc. 487 Vice Chair Greenfield was concerned that 3 members of the Wellness Center ad hoc are part of 488 the nonprofit that is working on the Wellness Center. Vice Chair Greenfield felt there would be a 489 perception that support would be weighted towards the Wellness Center over other potential 490 considerations at Cubberley. Vice Chair Greenfield mentioned it was already agreed that there 491 were too many ad hoc for staff and the Commission. 492 Commissioner Kleinhaus asked what staff expected an additional ad hoc for Cubberley would 493 contribute to the process. 494 Ms. O’Kane had discussed with the City Manager about having joint meetings with the Council 495 ad hoc when appropriate and beneficial. Ms. O’Kane believed the PRC ad hoc would be helpful 496 once the operating model for the Community Center moves forward. Ms. O’Kane clarified the 497 operating model referred to how spaces are utilized and shared, what types of spaces are 498 available for nonprofits, and hourly versus long-term rentals. 499 Chair Freeman asked if that would lend itself to being a liaison as opposed to an ad hoc. 500 Ms. O’Kane said she believed it was more than a liaison. 501 Commissioner Kleinhaus opined there was time to look at operating model and voiced concern 502 over the potential for a small pool for a second ad hoc. 503 Commissioner Cribbs felt the Commission should do whatever possible to support Cubberley, 504 move it forward, and ensure it represents the needs of the community. Commissioner Cribbs 505 noted the Wellness Center arose from the need to have an indoor gym in Palo Alto but it did not 506 need to be at Cubberley. Commissioner Cribbs and Vice Chair Greenfield’s terms expire in Item 1 May 27, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 14 Packet Pg. 18 of 245 507 November. Commissioner Cribbs opined it was important to make a decision regarding the ad 508 hoc to encourage support. 509 Vice Chair Greenfield agreed an ad hoc was more appropriate than a liaison. Vice Chair 510 Greenfield suggested standardizing the terminology for the workplan timeline to ensure 511 consistency but was hesitant to make changes and discuss workplan items with the limited 512 group present. Vice Chair Greenfield felt the workplan was partially based on members of the ad 513 hoc working on the item and noted uncertainty regarding who will work on which ad hoc and 514 wondered if it was possible to create an ad hoc without assigning people to it. 515 Ms. Robustelli mentioned adjusting the workplan to create an ad hoc next month. Ms. Robustelli 516 felt there was support to add a Cubberley ad hoc separate from the Recreation & Wellness 517 Center, add some content from Director O’Kane, and bring it back to the June meeting for 518 approval of the workplan and creating an additional ad hoc. 519 Commissioner Kleinhaus suggested that staff give a comparison of the pros and cons of having 1 520 or 2 ad hoc for Cubberley and the Wellness Center. 521 Vice Chair Greenfield suggested Chair and Vice Chair meet with staff before the next meeting 522 and put together a skeleton draft workplan for what the Cubberley ad hoc would be doing with 523 options for uncertainties and look at refining other current ad hoc. 524 Commissioner Cribbs wanted to make sure the Commission had an opportunity to be involved in 525 what will happen at Cubberley. Commissioner Cribbs asked if there were any ad hoc not needed 526 for the coming year. 527 Vice Chair Greenfield agreed the Commission has been waiting to be asked to help with 528 Cubberley and felt it was the top priority. 529 Ms. O’Kane agreed to meet with the Chair and Vice Chair to come up with a more detailed 530 workplan to be reviewed at next month’s meeting. 531 Commissioner Kleinhaus had the impression that the Cubberley process was moving very fast 532 and Council was working with the consultants and wondered how much influence a PRC ad hoc 533 would have or if presentations would be more impactful. 534 Vice Chair Greenfield felt a key goal when drafting the workplan should be to answer that 535 question. 536 Ms. Robustelli summarized the decision to not fully hear the item this evening, have a staff 537 meeting with Chair and Vice Chair to create a draft workplan for the Cubberley ad hoc in 538 addition to Recreation Wellness Center, and to put the item earlier on the June agenda. The 539 current June agenda includes adopted budget, Cubberley update, and park dedication of FY26. 540 Chair Freeman proposed making this the number 1 agenda item but felt having 4 items would 541 not be too time consuming. Chair Freeman felt it was important for the PRC goals and objectives 542 to be included in the Cubberley project. 543 Vice Chair Greenfield suggested hearing the Cubberley update first and then discussing the 544 workplan at the June meeting. Item 1 May 27, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 15 Packet Pg. 19 of 245 545 Commissioner Kleinhaus asked who would be giving the Cubberley presentation and if the 546 presentation will be of 1 or 2 ad hoc or include alternatives. Commissioner Kleinhaus wanted 547 information on both options. 548 Ms. O’Kane said it will likely be a combination of staff and consultants. 549 Ms. Robustelli said the information could be outlined in a staff report. 550 Commissioner Cribbs clarified there was no ad hoc report tonight. 551 COMMISSIONER/BOARD MEMBER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, ANNOUNCEMENTS OR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS 552 Vice Chair Greenfield suggested adding ad hoc and liaison reports as the last business item on 553 the agenda. 554 Commissioner Cribbs to give ad hoc report in June. 555 ADJOURNMENT 556 Meeting adjourned at 10:07 p.m. Item 1 May 27, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 16 Packet Pg. 20 of 245 1 MINUTES 2 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION 3 REGULAR MEETING 4 June 24, 2025 5 In-Person & Virtual Conference 6 Palo Alto, California 7 8 Commissioners Present In-Person:Jeff Greenfield, Amanda Brown, Anne Warner Cribbs, Yudy Deng, 9 Nellis Brown, Bing Wei 10 Commissioners Present Virtually:None 11 Commissioners Absent:Shani Kleinhaus 12 Others Present:None 13 Staff Present:Sarah Robustelli, Kristen O’Kane, Amanda Deml, Chrisine Paras 14 CALL TO ORDER & ROLL CALL 15 Meeting was called to order at 7:08 p.m. 16 PUBLIC COMMENT 17 1. Minxia Zhang did not present a comment but passed out documentation for the Commission to 18 read. 19 2. Ron G., Founder of Moodfit, highlighted the wellness benefits of pickleball which aligned with 20 Council’s goal of increasing well-being and community belonging. Ron G. quoted 2-time Surgeon 21 General Vivek Murthy regarding the negative health consequences of loneliness and need to 22 prioritize social connection. The repurposing of 2 under-utilized tennis courts into 8 new 23 pickleball courts is being considered. The Palo Alto Pickleball Club proposed paying for the court 24 expansion. Palo Alto has 240 percent more tennis courts than pickleball courts, while pickleball 25 can generate 32 times more player games. Ron G. agreed that concerns such as parking must be 26 addressed but said the Pickleball Club has a track record of working closely with the City. 27 3. David S., president of the Palo Alto Pickleball Club, highlighted the comments in the packet that 28 said pickleball courts were overcrowded and wait times were unacceptable. One comment 29 mentioned how 60 people were playing and 100 people were waiting. David S. felt the new 30 courts would absorb the waiting players and therefore may not impact parking but agreed more 31 parking would be welcome during peak evening and weekend times. The Pickleball Club secured 32 an additional 35 parking places via an agreement with the closest neighbor to be available 33 during peak times. There are 51 tennis courts in Palo Alto and 15 pickleball courts. The Palo Alto 34 Tennis Club has 125 members and the Pickleball Club had 1,500 members at the end of 2024, 35 with about 900 being residents. The beneficiaries of the Mitchell Park courts are those who live 36 or work in Palo Alto. Pickleball is inclusive by age, ability level, gender, socioeconomic position, 37 and place of residence. David S. agreed pickleball was louder than tennis but opined the 38 comments alleging that neighbors, the closest being 450 feet away, could hear the play were Item 1 June 24, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 17 Packet Pg. 21 of 245 39 exaggerated. David S. encouraged Commissioners to walk the neighborhood and listen for 40 themselves. Building new pickleball courts would cost millions of dollars, impact green space, 41 and take years. Converting tennis courts would cost about $100,000 and the Pickleball Club and 42 donors would cover the cost. The Pickleball Club suggested an expansion plan and hoped the 43 City would consider it. 44 AGENDA CHANGES, ADDITIONS, AND DELETIONS 45 Chair Freeman suggested moving up Item 2, the Cubberley presentation, to Item 1 because 46 there was information in the presentation that could help decide whether Cubberley should be 47 an ad hoc and what to do with the Wellness Center. 48 Division Manager Sarah Robustelli clarified the suggestion was to swap Item 3, the workplan, 49 with Item 4. 50 Vice Chair Greenfield was concerned members of the public may tune in too late to hear the 51 Cubberley discussion if it was moved up but agreed that hearing the presentation first may be 52 beneficial. 53 Commissioner Brown suggested moving Item 5 up to allow time for people to tune in and 54 reverse the order of the agenda. 55 Ms. Robustelli said last month the workplan was last and everyone had wanted to hear that 56 item first in today’s meeting. 57 Chair Freeman assumed the Commissioners had read the packet and understood the content of 58 the Cubberley presentation and agreed to leave it as is. 59 The Council Liaison Report will not take place until August. 60 APPROVAL OF MINUTES 61 1. Previous month’s minutes not in packet. 62 The Commission will not vote on the May meeting minutes until July’s meeting. 63 CITY OFFICIAL REPORTS 64 2. Department Report 65 Division Manager Sarah Robustelli highlighted upcoming events such as the Summer Movie 66 Night series at Mitchell Park, the 4th of July Summer Festival & Chili Cookoff at Mitchell Park 67 with Commissioners invited to be judges, and the Municipal Service Center Open House. Last 68 Friday’s summer movie night drew 250 attendees, less than normal, which staff believed was 69 due to the high winds. Ms. Robustelli thanked the Commission for attending the Fred Eyerly 70 Tower Well Park dedication on June 18, which included a ribbon cutting and the unveiling of a 71 newly designed park sign. The woodworking special interest camp held in Mitchell Park sold out 72 for both weeks with a maximum of 22 campers. 73 At the Rinconada Pool, weekly lap swim visits were around 900, an increase of 100 from last Item 1 June 24, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 18 Packet Pg. 22 of 245 74 year. Weekly recreational swim visits were around 2,675 which was an increase of over 300 75 from last year due to increased hours of operation. Total weekly visits were up 550 from last 76 year with an average of 4,500 visits. Recent site amenity upgrades included new ADA benches 77 and expanded picnic tables. 78 Open Space had been discing and mowing for fire fuel mitigation. The third community meeting 79 for the Cubberley Community Center is scheduled for September 17, 2025. 80 A slide showed the estimated project schedule for the ongoing turf study with stars denoting 81 PRC involvement, including focus groups in July and feedback on the draft report in August. A 82 report and presentation to City Council is scheduled for October 20, 2025. Ms. Robustelli 83 recapped the Greer Park basketball project which included resurfacing and expanding the 84 smaller court with a plan to reopen mid-July. The Heritage Park restroom was open to the 85 public. 86 Vice Chair Greenfield asked for elaboration on discing and if it was done to create a fire break. 87 Vice Chair Greenfield wondered if there was a schedule for the Mayfield turf replacement. 88 Ms. Robustelli confirmed discing creates a fire break by turning up soil along the outer edges of 89 the preserve, which provides protection to other infrastructure outside of the Open Space. 90 Council approved the construction contract for the Stanford/Palo Alto Playing Fields on June 9, 91 2025. There is no schedule and the pre-construction meeting has not taken place, but a 3-month 92 construction window is anticipated and the Commission will be updated at the next meeting. 93 Commissioner Cribbs asked if there had been any scholarship requests for summer programs or 94 swim lessons and wondered how long the Team Sheeper contract extends. 95 Director Kristen O’Kane explained that camps qualify for a fee reduction program through the 96 City but swim camps and classes go through Palo Alto Swim & Sport. Ms. O’Kane did not know 97 the number of requests. Ms. O’Kane believed the Team Sheeper contract went until 2027. 98 Commissioner Wei asked how the turf study and basketball resurfacing align. Commissioner Wei 99 questioned what material was used for the Greer Park resurfacing and what the timeline was. 100 Ms. Robustelli said the turf study will look at natural, synthetic, and hybrid turfs but did not go 101 into detail with other surfacing. Council directed the focus area was at El Camino Park. The CIP 102 funded a replacement for El Camino Park this year which had been deferred due to the turf 103 study. The resurfacing at Greer Park was grind down, then pave, then acrylic surfacing on top 104 similar to tennis courts. Ms. Robustelli confirmed clay court material was not used. Signs were 105 posted at Greer Park indicating the reopening will be either July 11 or July 18. 106 Commissioner Deng congratulated staff for opening the 4-stall restroom at Cubberley track and 107 heard great feedback. Commissioner Deng wondered how much the new benches at Rinconada 108 cost. Commissioner Deng asked if the vegetation fire near El Camino impacted the parks. 109 Vice Chair Greenfield believed the foothills were closed due to the vegetation fire. 110 Ms. Robustelli said the 8 blue benches at Rinconada were purchased for about $9,000. The ADA 111 benches were extra from Boulware Park and were repurposed for use at Rinconada. There had Item 1 June 24, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 19 Packet Pg. 23 of 245 112 been 2 recent fires. Ms. Robustelli was not aware of impacts to Open Space parks from the 113 vegetation fire last week, but the other fire had rangers deployed but was outside City limits. 114 Chair Freeman asked how the waitlist for summer camps compared to past years and what was 115 being done to reduce it. Chair Freeman wondered what the top 3 classes are and why. Chair 116 Freeman questioned if the increase in swim visits at Rinconada was solely due to the extended 117 hours of operation. Chair Freeman asked what the hours are for the restroom at Heritage Park 118 and how that information was communicated to the public. Chair Freeman wondered if there 119 were updates with First Tee. 120 Ms. Robustelli mentioned new special interest classes such as woodworking which took place in 121 the bowl in the outside space at Mitchell Park to address space limitations. Staff is working on a 122 portion of the procurement process. Ms. Robustelli confirmed the 550 more weekly visits at 123 Rinconada was due to the extended hours of operation. The Heritage Park restroom is directly in 124 the line of sight from the playground area and there is signage, however the Roth building is not 125 completely open yet so there is a phased approach. There were no major updates on First Tee. 126 Ms. O’Kane said camps at the art center, junior museum, and zoo tend to fill up due to space. 127 Commissioner Brown confirmed the restroom at Heritage Park was clearly open, accessible, and 128 heavily used. 129 BUSINESS ITEMS 130 3. Establish a Cubberley Ad Hoc; and Amend and Approval of the Parks and Recreation 131 Commission 2025 Workplan; and Assign Commission Ad Hoc and liaison roles 132 Division Manager Sarah Robustelli pulled up a draft workplan and thought the best approach 133 was to go through project by project. The establishment of the ad hoc was noted at the end of 134 the workplan. 135 Chair Freeman suggested addressing ad hoc membership after the workplan was approved. The 136 document pulled up showed items previously reviewed and approved at the retreat. Chair 137 Freeman asked if any Commissioners wanted to update the goals or timeline. 138 Vice Chair Greenfield wanted to standardize the timeline for consistency. 139 Commissioner Cribbs felt the number of ad hoc committees, 8 or 9, was overwhelming and 140 mentioned difficulty for staff and Commissioners to get things done. Commissioner Cribbs 141 expressed an openness to determining if an ad hoc was critical. 142 Chair Freeman suggested going through each project to determine if it should remain as ad hoc, 143 move down as a liaison, or be combined. Chair Freeman was concerned whether the timeline 144 for the CIP Review project was realistic when staff may be working on other items and 145 suggested deferring back to staff. Chair Freeman asked if FY26 would only go out to Q1. 146 Vice Chair Greenfield wanted staff input on the suggestion to change the timeline for the CIP 147 Review and confirmed the timeframe covered by the workplan was FY25 and FY26 Q1 and Q2, 6 Item 1 June 24, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 20 Packet Pg. 24 of 245 148 quarters total, with the CIP work done in Q2. Vice Chair Greenfield questioned whether to spell 149 out “fiscal year” and wanted consistency. 150 Director Kristen O’Kane explained the workplan goes through the end of calendar year 2025 151 because of the change in recruitment for new Commissioners. All CSD’s Commissions and the 152 Stormwater Committee were on a different schedule and would likely be presented to Council. 153 The new workplan, in the Commission handbook, is around the March 2026 timeframe. Ms. 154 O’Kane said FY26 would go to Q2 because the fiscal year starts July 1. 155 Chair Freeman clarified that the change would be FY25-26 and Q2. 156 Commissioner Brown felt the CIP workplan would be best as a liaison role because it is seasonal 157 but repeated annually and there were a lot of questions about CIP projects throughout the year. 158 Vice Chair Greenfield suggested a 2-person liaison role for the CIP project. 159 Chair Freeman agreed to move the CIP project to a liaison but asked if there were any 2-person 160 liaison roles. 161 Vice Chair Greenfield confirmed that currently 7 of 13 liaison roles were 2 Commissioners and 162 asked if the CIP workplan item was effective for FY25 and should say FY25 Q2. 163 Ms. O’Kane said staff was fine to move the CIP project to a liaison role. Ms. O’Kane said the item 164 would still be in the workplan with a liaison instead of an ad hoc. 165 Chair Freeman asked if the Park Dedication project was ongoing. 166 Ms. O’Kane confirmed 1 staff member had availability to work on the Park Dedication project 167 which would come to the Commission next month to present with the ad hoc. 168 Vice Chair Greenfield thought the timeline should read “FY25 Q1 through FY26 Q2” and 169 suggested “FY25/26” for the title. 170 Chair Freeman wanted to remove “FY26” from the project title because it was already defined 171 under the timeline. 172 Commissioner Cribbs felt the project was a regular function of the Commission as opposed to an 173 ad hoc and asked if there was another way to handle it. 174 Vice Chair Greenfield clarified it was not a standing committee but there were specific tasks for 175 the ad hoc to address within the period. 176 Commissioner Brown agreed the project was an ongoing function of the Commission and did 177 not fall into the definition of an ad hoc and suggested a liaison role or staff responsibility. 178 Commissioner Brown thought that, with Cubberley and other Council-directed items, the project 179 may get deprioritized so other time-sensitive projects could be elevated. 180 Chair Freeman thought this project may benefit from a 2-person liaison role and agreed it did 181 not meet the ad hoc rule of having an end. The liaison could work with staff once a month. Item 1 June 24, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 21 Packet Pg. 25 of 245 182 Commissioner Wei mentioned previous experience in the ad hoc and agreed the project was a 183 goal of the Commission. 184 Ms. Robustelli asked if any adjustments were needed on the workplan document. 185 Vice Chair Greenfield was in favor of keeping the ad hoc and was unsure how this project 186 differed from other continuous projects like the Recreation Wellness Center or the Middle 187 School Athletics. Vice Chair Greenfield felt removing the ad hoc was a drastic step. 188 Chair Freeman reiterated that an ad hoc has an endpoint and felt this project would be on the 189 workplan every year. Chair Freeman was in favor of moving it to a liaison role. 190 Commissioner Cribbs said the Mayor encouraged the Commission to find more parkland. The 2 191 people in the liaison role could give the Commission a monthly report and get staff involved if an 192 opportunity arose. Commissioner Cribbs reiterated the concern of limited staff time. 193 Commissioner Brown disagreed that an ad hoc was more important than a liaison, citing 194 aquatics, golf, and dog parks. Commissioner Brown felt if a specific opportunity with an 195 associated finite project warranted an ad hoc, it could be moved but that was not the case 196 currently. Commissioner Brown wanted the Commission to set up a workplan that set realistic 197 expectations for the public. 198 Vice Chair Greenfield clarified the reasons for removing the ad hoc and mentioned City Council 199 had approved the ad hoc for multiple years. Vice Chair Greenfield asked if there would still be a 200 workplan item for Park Dedication with a liaison role. 201 Ms. O’Kane was unclear about the difference between the current 2-person ad hoc and a 2- 202 person liaison role that meets monthly. 203 Chair Freeman asked if it made a difference to staff if it was an ad hoc or liaison. Chair Freeman 204 questioned what the ad hoc was specifically working on. 205 Commissioner Brown felt the project did not fit definition of an ad hoc due to lacking a clearly 206 defined start and end. Moving the project to a liaison role would not accomplish the task of 207 reducing staff workload. Commissioner Brown asked at what point the ad hoc work would be 208 complete. Commissioner Brown felt that ad hoc required specific tasks to be accomplished as 209 opposed to a time period associated with milestones. 210 Vice Chair Greenfield opined the project had a clear end, referencing the specific high-priority 211 task which had a start and end date. The ad hoc was reviewing 7 different sites that were 212 identified before the ad hoc was created and continued to work on identifying other locations. 213 The work of reviewing the listed sites would be completed at the end of the year. 214 Chair Freeman felt specific parks should be associated with the project and progress updates 215 given to the Commission. Chair Freeman clarified that, when reviewing the workplan at the next 216 retreat, those priorities would be replaced with new priorities. Chair Freeman asked if the 217 Commission would vote on changing to a liaison role. Item 1 June 24, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 22 Packet Pg. 26 of 245 218 Ms. O’Kane proposed changing the wording of the high priority item to include specific sites. By 219 the end of December, the assessment of the sites as they relate to parkland dedication would be 220 complete. If the Commission decided to put it back on the workplan, it could be discussed then. 221 Ms. O’Kane was willing to keep it as an ad hoc or switch to liaison work and stated the 222 Commission would vote on the workplan at the end. 223 Vice Chair Greenfield was unsure if the project would stay as a workplan item if it were moved 224 to a liaison role. Vice Chair Greenfield noted the CIP Review was completed and had an ad hoc 225 associated with it when it was ongoing, though it remained in the workplan as a liaison role. 226 Chair Freeman asked if the items defined as high priority could be completed. 227 Vice Chair Greenfield felt the workplan item could be completed with an active ad hoc but 228 questioned if it would stay on the workplan with a liaison role, opining that had not been done 229 with the first project. 230 Ms. O’Kane reiterated that, with the first project, the ad hoc was eliminated, a liaison extended, 231 and it was kept on the workplan to conclude in FY26 Q2. 232 Vice Chair Greenfield thought the timeline for the first project was only FY25 and not FY26. 233 Commissioner Brown was in favor of keeping projects 1 and 2 on the workplan and moving both 234 to liaison roles. 235 Chair Freeman supported keeping both projects on the workplan as liaison roles. 236 Vice Chair Greenfield asked if staff would clean up and reformat the timeline and if staff was on 237 board with how the workplan was listed. Vice Chair Greenfield questioned if there was a lot of 238 work around reviewing the status of CEQA for the BCCP project. 239 Ms. Robustelli agreed staff would reformat the timelines after the meeting and was looking for 240 substantial changes. Staff agreed to review the first portion of the BCCP high priority list. Ms. 241 Robustelli felt reviewing CEQA was ambitious to complete by the end of the calendar year. Staff 242 completed the first step and was working with the ad hoc to solicit input. Staff tried to complete 243 the first set of bullet points because it would impact the status of CEQA. 244 Chair Freeman felt this item could remain as an ad hoc and asked if FY26 was a realistic timeline. 245 Ms. O’Kane said the project will take at least through FY26 Q2 246 Commissioner Brown asked if it was more realistic to expect the first section to be completed 247 during the span of the current workplan and have the remaining items as future next steps. 248 Commissioner Brown was in favor of moving the other items to reduce expectations and wanted 249 to remove the funding for a consultant. 250 Ms. Robustelli agreed to have the remaining items listed as next steps and noted the first step 251 was on last year’s workplan. Item 1 June 24, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 23 Packet Pg. 27 of 245 252 Vice Chair Greenfield supported removing consultant funding and wondered if the CEQA review 253 and path forward high-priority items could be moved to low priority for tracking purposes. 254 Commissioner Cribbs felt it was important for the public to know how long the project had been 255 going on for and agreed to remove the funding item. Commissioner Cribbs suggested adding a 256 date of when the project was first established. 257 Vice Chair Greenfield said the current draft BCCP had a date that could be added onto the high 258 priority item. 259 Chair Freeman asked if the Nature Preserve Access Policy project was getting wrapped up. 260 Vice Chair Greenfield said the ad hoc would present to the Commission soon. Work would wrap 261 up and the ad hoc would convert to liaison roles to likely be covered by Open Space Reserve 262 liaisons. The ad hoc met with staff within the past month for a site visit and the strategy was 263 discussed then. The timeline was accurately reflected on the workplan. 264 Chair Freeman wanted to move the Recreation Wellness Center to a liaison and move the 265 Cubberley liaison to an ad hoc in its place. Chair Freeman said partnerships had been formed 266 and a letter of intent had been done. A charter was received from City Council to investigate 267 spaces for potential locations. 268 Commissioner Cribbs agreed to move the Cubberley liaison to an ad hoc and downgrade the 269 Recreation Wellness Center, stating the ad hoc should address the wholeness of Cubberley. 270 Commissioner Cribbs noted the importance of community and Commission support and felt the 271 Cubberley ad hoc could ensure that recreation needs were reflected as much as possible. 272 Vice Chair Greenfield asked if the workplan item would remain open for the rest of the calendar 273 year and proposed adjusting the measure of success to be something accomplishable within the 274 timeline of the ad hoc. Vice Chair Greenfield felt completing the facility would not occur within 275 the year and proposed the measure of success to be the completion of the high priority items. 276 Ms. O’Kane asked if the project would remain on the workplan and if it was necessary to adjust 277 the measure of success if not. 278 Chair Freeman said the intent was to move the project off the workplan. Chair Freeman clarified 279 that the plan was to adjust the statement of success, close the item, and move it to a liaison. 280 Vice Chair Greenfield opined that, since the project is being removed from the workplan, the 281 timeline would be changed to FY25 and the item would effectively be completed. 282 Commissioner Cribbs asked if it would be more useful to look at the Cubberley ad hoc to see 283 what its goals and objectives are and then incorporate the Recreation Wellness Center if 284 necessary. 285 Commissioner Brown clarified that the item would get deleted off the workplan, folded into 286 Cubberley, and then become a liaison role. Item 1 June 24, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 24 Packet Pg. 28 of 245 287 Vice Chair Greenfield suggested not deleting it off the workplan but setting the timeline for FY25 288 so it would be a completed workplan item. 289 Ms. O’Kane proposed the specific tasks Council identified regarding the Wellness Center be the 290 measure of success. 291 Chair Freeman agreed to replace the measure of success with the language from Council. 292 Regarding the Playing Fields project, Vice Chair Greenfield suggested editing the measure of 293 success wording to remove contingency because the CIP funding had been approved. Vice Chair 294 Greenfield asked if there was a possibility that the El Camino turf replacement could occur 295 within the calendar year since that was the end date of the ad hoc. 296 Ms. Robustelli said the funding was in relation to El Camino Park so it was still funded for FY26, 297 which starts in July. Staff would work with the ad hoc in July and the turf study would come to 298 the Commission for feedback in August, which would be reflected in the final report to City 299 Council in October. Decisions within the report would impact El Camino. The El Camino turf 300 replacement would not be completed by the end of the year. 301 Chair Freeman asked if the turf replacement would be in progress by the end of the year and 302 what the end date of the turf study was. Chair Freeman proposed adding Mayfield in the first 303 measure of success item and starting a new line for the turf study portion. 304 Ms. Robustelli said the turf replacement depended on the findings of the turf study which would 305 be presented to City Council in October. 306 Vice Chair Greenfield suggested adding the forwarding of the turf study to City Council for 307 approval or consideration as a measure of success. 308 Ms. O’Kane asked if a date for forwarding to City Council should be added. 309 Vice Chair Greenfield felt the date should be the end of the calendar year but did not feel it was 310 necessary. The timeline was correct as listed. Regarding the Conservation Plan project, the date 311 for the BCCP current draft plan was May 2022. 312 Chair Freeman hoped the Racquet Courts Policy would be presented at the August meeting but 313 thought portions had to go to City Council in either October or November. 314 Vice Chair Greenfield felt City Council work should not be reflected on the timeline but 315 suggested keeping it open through the end of the calendar year. 316 Commissioner Brown suggested changing wording in the title to “Racquet Courts Policy 317 Update.” 318 Chair Freeman agreed to add “update” to the title and to take out the “if warranted” wording 319 under the measure of success. 320 Vice Chair Greenfield wanted to add “to City Council” under the measure of success if Council 321 needed to approve the policy update but remove the timeframe for the recommendation. Item 1 June 24, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 25 Packet Pg. 29 of 245 322 Ms. O’Kane said the City Council has approved recommendations in the past. 323 Vice Chair Greenfield asked if the timeline for the Middle School Athletics project needed to be 324 adjusted and if so, to when. 325 Commissioner Cribbs thought the goal was supposed to be more than a discussion by August 326 but did not feel that would happen. 327 Chair Freeman asked if the goal could be met by the end of the year or FY26 Q2. 328 Commissioner Brown suggested reaching the goals by the end of 2025. 329 Vice Chair Greenfield said the timeline was FY25 Q1 to FY26 Q2 and felt that the action items 330 under the timeline section should be included in the priorities or measures of success section. 331 Commissioner Deng had received emails from Greene Middle School about a free contractor 332 after school program offered by the YMCA and did not know if that was related to the Middle 333 School Athletics project. Commissioner Deng suggested reaching out to Adam for clarification. 334 Ms. O’Kane suggested starting at “FY25” and removing everything after “Q2” for the timeline. 335 Vice Chair Greenfield wondered if feeling confident about the program moving forward was a 336 measurable standard for success and suggested changing the wording. Vice Chair Greenfield 337 asked if there could be more detail describing the recommendation. 338 Chair Freeman asked who was on the ad hoc for the Middle School Athletics project. 339 Commissioner Brown, Commissioner Cribbs, and Commissioner Deng were on the ad hoc. 340 Commissioner Brown proposed striking that portion of the measure of success and keeping 341 “forward recommendations to City Council” if the other ad hoc members were in agreement. 342 Commissioner Brown felt leaving the recommendation generic was fine. 343 Regarding the Cubberley project, Ms. O’Kane said that a master plan would be completed by the 344 end of the calendar year to be presented to Council in December. The plan would not go to 345 Council for final adoption until March 2026 to align with CEQA. 346 Vice Chair Greenfield said recommended moving the goal from the timeline section to the 347 measure of success section. 348 Chair Freeman wanted clarification on what having a complete vision of the facility meant. 349 Ms. O’Kane said the wording could be changed to “complete master plan.” Staff would likely ask 350 the PRC to make the recommendation to City Council. 351 Vice Chair Greenfield asked if it should read “master plan recommendation forwarded to City 352 Council for approval or consideration.” 353 Commissioner Cribbs wanted to move “support ongoing community engagement” to the high 354 priority list and thought the Commission had a role in encouraging the opportunity. Item 1 June 24, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 26 Packet Pg. 30 of 245 355 Commissioner Deng asked if engaging with Concordia should be moved to the high priority list. 356 Ms. O’Kane felt engaging Concordia was part of ongoing community engagement efforts and 357 asked if the Commission wanted to reference the Recreation Wellness Center. 358 Commissioner Deng felt it would not hurt to include the Recreation Wellness Center if it was 359 going to be taken off workplan. 360 Chair Freeman suggested leaving the wording as is, noting no other groups were specifically 361 mentioned. 362 Vice Chair Greenfield said the liaison and ad hoc assignments would be approved at the same 363 time as a single action. Vice Chair Greenfield suggested updating the list of ad hoc before 364 reviewing ad hoc members. 365 A document listing the PRC FY26 ad hoc committees and liaisons was pulled up for review. Ms. 366 Robustelli confirmed the CIP Review, Park Dedication, and Recreation Wellness Center projects 367 were moved to liaisons. The Cubberley project was added as an ad hoc. Project titles were 368 reviewed and updated to align with the workplan. 369 Commissioner Cribbs and Chair Freeman offered to step down from the Cubberley ad hoc. 370 Commissioner Deng offered to join the Cubberley ad hoc. 371 Vice Chair Greenfield was concerned about having 3 Commissioners on the ad hoc that were 372 board members of the Wellness Center. Vice Chair Greenfield explained the perception could be 373 that the members on the Cubberley ad hoc could unduly lean towards the Wellness Center or 374 give it priority, though did not suggest that was happening. 375 Chair Freeman thought that objection was not a reasonable conflict of interest and noted that it 376 has been that way for the past 3 years. 377 Vice Chair Greenfield said the previous ad hoc was for the Wellness Center but now the focus of 378 the ad hoc had expanded beyond that. 379 Ms. O’Kane wondered if Commissioner Kleinhaus, being absent, would want to be on the ad 380 hoc. 381 There was discussion about Commissioner Cribbs and/or Chair Freeman going off the ad hoc. 382 Vice Chair Greenfield said Commissioner Cribbs going off the ad hoc did not address the 383 concern, which was the potential perception of a lack of diverse opinion from a Commissioner 384 not on the nonprofit board for the Wellness Center. Vice Chair Greenfield asked for staff input. 385 Commissioner Cribbs wanted the Cubberley project to be successful and proposed Vice Chair 386 Greenfield be on the ad hoc until 2 new Commissioners could step into that role in October. 387 Chair Freeman proposed stepping down from the ad hoc with Commissioner Cribbs and 388 Commissioner Deng and asked if Commissioner Kleinhaus was willing to be a member of the ad 389 hoc or was willing to give 2 new members an opportunity to join in December. Item 1 June 24, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 27 Packet Pg. 31 of 245 390 Vice Chair Greenfield clarified the concern was that the ad hoc should not exclusively be 391 members of the nonprofit board. Vice Chair Greenfield did not volunteer to be on the ad hoc. 392 Commissioner Brown felt that standard had not been applied to any other ad hoc or liaison and 393 cited a lack of diversity of viewpoints on other projects. 394 Ms. O’Kane suggested assigning Commissioner Kleinhaus to the Cubberley ad hoc and revisit if 395 there was opposition. 396 Commissioner Cribbs was removed from the Cubberley ad hoc. Chair Freeman remained and 397 Commissioner Kleinhaus and Commissioner Deng were added on the Cubberley ad hoc. 398 Commissioner Wei and Commissioner Deng asked to be removed from the Playing Fields ad hoc. 399 Commissioner Cribbs joined the Playing Fields ad hoc. 400 There were no member changes to the Racquet Courts Policy Update or Middle School Athletics 401 ad hoc. 402 The liaison list was reviewed. Chair Freeman asked for elaboration of the Palo Alto Unified 403 School District liaison and felt it was important to keep. 404 Ms. O’Kane explained that Commissioners have attended City/School Liaison Committee 405 meetings in the past to observe but noted related items, such as Youth and Fields, were 406 represented elsewhere. 407 Commissioner Cribbs felt the PAUSD liaison role was an important function to facilitate 408 discussions with the School District about an increase in sharing facilities or working on current 409 arrangements so things move smoothly. 410 Vice Chair Greenfield thought this topic was discussed at the retreat with a suggestion for Ms. 411 O’Kane to review the agendas and notify the liaison if the meeting was appropriate to attend. 412 Ms. O’Kane stated the PAUSD had not met in several months with the next meeting in August. 413 Chair Freeman agreed to stay on the PAUSD/City liaison and asked if anyone wanted to be 414 added to other liaisons. Chair Freeman was removed from Recreation Wellness Center liaison. 415 Vice Chair Greenfield suggested a maximum of 2 people per liaison role. Vice Chair Greenfield 416 felt it was important for the Chair to be a part of the CIP Review liaison. 417 Ms. Robustelli recommended Commissioner Kleinhaus be removed from the CIP Review due to 418 being added to the Cubberley ad hoc and a mentioned lack of desire to stay on it. 419 Commissioner Cribbs observed it was good for there to be 2 Commissioners on the liaisons with 420 a Commissioner leaving in the fall so that information could be shared. 421 Vice Chair Greenfield agreed and noted an open position on the Safe Routes liaison, which acts 422 as a liaison to the Office of Transportation in general as it applies to PRC items. Item 1 June 24, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 28 Packet Pg. 32 of 245 423 Chair Freeman said one of the new members will likely be assigned to the Safe Routes liaison. 424 Public Comment: None. 425 There was discussion around the proper procedure for addressing a split motion. 426 SPLIT MOTION: Chair Freeman moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown, to establish a 427 Cubberley ad hoc; approve the Parks and Recreation Commission 2025 Workplan; and Assign 428 Commission Ad Hoc and liaison roles as presented except for moving the Park Dedication from 429 an ad hoc to a liaison role. 430 MOTION PASSED: 6-0-1, Commissioner Kleinhaus absent. 431 Move Park Dedication from an ad hoc to a liaison role. 432 MOTION PASSED: 5-1-1, Vice Chair Greenfield voted no, Commissioner Kleinhaus absent. 433 4. Receive an informational update on the Cubberley Community Center Project, including 434 Summary of Community Meeting #2; and Provide Feedback on Conceptual Designs; and 435 Receive results of Community Poll #1; and Provide Feedback on Cubberley Strategic 436 Activation Plan; and Provide Feedback on Cubberley Project Workplan Updates 437 The Commission took an 8-minute break. 438 Amanda Deml, the Assistant Director of Community Services, presented on the Cubberley 439 Community Center Project. Staff met with the PRC regarding Cubberley on April 22, 2025, which 440 is when the first community poll was released. The poll results were reviewed with City Council 441 on June 9. The second community meeting was held on June 12. Staff met with the Public Art 442 Commission regarding the Strategic Activation Plan on June 19. Staff will meet with the Planning 443 and Transportation Commission on July 9 and the Architectural Review Board on July 17. Staff 444 will go to full City Council on August 18. The third community meeting will be on September 17 445 and staff will meet with the PRC again on September 23. 446 Chrisine Paras, the Assistant Director of Administrative Services, stated the first poll was a 447 critical planning tool to inform upcoming community meetings, serve as foundation for 448 development of the master plan, and to provide insight into the potential success of a ballot 449 measure. Staff partnered with FM3 to design the poll with input from the Cubberley ad hoc and 450 City Council. The poll was to survey voter input of goals and future of the Cubberley site and 451 examine possible support for a tax or bond measure. The poll surveyed 437 voters from April 28 452 to May 7. The results were reviewed by the ad hoc committee on May 16 and with City Council 453 on June 9. Detailed results can be found under the meeting materials from the June 9 Council 454 meeting. A second poll is scheduled to launch in the fall of 2025 to test a refined concept plan, 455 possible phased approach to the site, and tax characteristics and bond sizing. A third poll is 456 scheduled for the spring of 2026 to test voter support of ballot measure language. 457 The 3 most important priorities to voters were the efficient use of taxpayer dollars; basic 458 building improvements such as electrical, plumbing, and earthquake retrofitting; and green 459 space. Persuasive messages focused on basic repairs and safety improvements as well as 460 providing on-site childcare and affordable recreation opportunities. Less important issues were Item 1 June 24, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 29 Packet Pg. 33 of 245 461 pickleball, tennis courts, and dog parks, with athletics and adult education also being lower 462 priorities. A strong majority of voters were willing to pay up to $250 per year per household for 463 the project. Some were willing to pay up to $500 per year, however that level fell below the 2/3 464 threshold required to pass a parcel tax measure or bond measure. 465 Ms. Deml gave an overview of the second community meeting facilitated by Concordia. About 466 130 community members attended. The revised vision statement, developed using input from 467 the first community meeting on March 19, was shared. The revised vision statement reflected 468 community priorities such as adaptability and connection while staying true to Council’s original 469 vision. At the second meeting, Concordia presented 3 conceptual plans, each with an A, B, and C 470 variation that explored different building configurations, new construction versus renovation, 471 green space, bike and pedestrian circulation, and above or below ground parking. Participants 472 then completed 2 activities. First, each table of up to 8 shared feedback on liked and disliked 473 aspects by placing 18 stickers, 9 red and 9 green, on the concept plans and expanded in writing. 474 Second, individual participants reviewed key design elements across 6 categories: arrival and 475 parking, pedestrian circulation, building scale and physical space organization, landscape and 476 greenspace organization, balance of building and green space, and being a good neighbor. A full 477 summary report being compiled by Concordia should be completed within a few weeks. 478 Ms. Deml referenced Attachment B in the packet which showed the 3 conceptual designs for the 479 Cubberley site. The buildings were constructed between 1945 and 1968, which predates the 480 ADA and code updates. In 2022, a facilities assessment found that in 3 years (2025), most of the 481 Cubberley buildings will be near the end of useful life and within 10 to 20 years, all buildings 482 would be at end of life. All buildings have code, maintenance, and facility deficiencies. The 483 existing site has 250,000 square feet of outdoor space, 184,000 square feet of indoor space, and 484 121,000 square feet of parking. The proposed sites’ outdoor space would increase to 335,000 485 square feet, the indoor space to 280,000 square feet, and parking to 210,000 square feet. 486 Each of the 3 designs showed key features including building layouts, greenspace, promenades, 487 and pedestrian and bike circulation. The underground parking runs parallel to Middlefield Road. 488 A slide showed Diagonal Concept 1A, which had all new construction and buildings organized in 489 a diagonal shape. The layout created a larger space along Middlefield Road and had 3 large 490 green spaces. All green spaces could become any outdoor activity including remaining as grass, 491 outdoor gardens, sport courts, a pool, or amphitheater. The Diagonal Concept had the most 492 direct bike crossing, with the bike promenade highlighted in orange and the pedestrian paths in 493 yellow. It offered a Middlefield and diagonal promenade and assumed underground parking. A 494 slide showed the same design in 3D. There were 2 mobility hubs on either end for pickup and 495 drop off locations, which were included in each concept plan. Another slide showed Diagonal 496 Concept 1B in which the Pavilion, theater, and the I Building were kept and renovated. A slide 497 depicted Diagonal Concept 1C which included a 4-story, above-ground parking structure in the 498 upper left-hand corner of the site. 499 A slide showed Grid Concept 2A, which included all new construction with buildings organized in 500 a grid shape. The layout included 1 enclosed courtyard and 4 medium green spaces. It offered a 501 perpendicular bike flow, a Middlefield promenade, internal parallel promenade, and internal 502 perpendicular promenade. It assumed underground parking. The concept was shown in 3D. 503 Another slide showed Grid Concept 2B in which the Pavilion, theater, and the I Building were Item 1 June 24, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 30 Packet Pg. 34 of 245 504 kept and renovated. A slide depicted Grid Concept 2C which included a 4-story, above-ground 505 parking structure in the upper left-hand corner of the site. 506 A slide showed Linear Concept 3A, which included all new construction and a layout that created 507 a large central open space. It offered 3 large green spaces and perpendicular bike flow with a 508 circular option. It featured a Middlefield promenade and 2 perpendicular promenades with 509 landscape mall. It assumed underground parking. The concept was shown in 3D. Another slide 510 showed Linear Concept 3B in which the Pavilion, theater, and the I Building were kept and 511 renovated. A slide depicted Linear Concept 3C which included a 4-story, above-ground parking 512 structure in the upper left-hand corner of the site. 513 Ms. Deml summarized that the diagonal layout offered quick bike and pedestrian flow, the grid 514 layout had more but smaller green spaces, and the linear layout showcased a large central open 515 space. 516 The next steps in the master planning process include collecting and analyzing feedback from 517 this PRC meeting and the June 12 community meeting. The final master plan will be presented 518 to the community and City Council on December 8, 2025, to include the proposed master plan, 519 cost estimates, and phasing scenarios. 520 Attachment C in the packet was the Strategic Activation Plan. In coordination with the City 521 Council Cubberley ad hoc committee, staff decided it would be beneficial to enhance and 522 activate the Cubberley site in the near-term in order to generate community awareness and 523 excitement, draw public interest, and build momentum leading up to the 2026 ballot initiative. 524 The Strategic Activation Plan intentionally aligned with the 3 broader project phases of master 525 planning, community engagement and polling, and anticipated the November 2026 ballot 526 initiative. The phased approach supports resource allocation, balances staff capacity, and 527 maintains strategic alignment across all project stages. 528 Staff was seeking input from the PRC on the draft plan, which outlined a variety of potential 529 strategies to build community excitement and momentum for the project during the master 530 planning phase. The current concepts include physical enhancements to the site, community 531 events, and temporary art installations and performances supported through the Public Art 532 Program’s upcoming 2026 ArtLift Community Grants. The Strategic Activation Plan will circulate 533 to the Cubberley ad hoc, Public Art Commission, PRC, Cubberley Users, PRC ad hoc committee, 534 and the City Council for review, feedback, and recommendations. The final plan will be reviewed 535 by City Council on August 18. 536 Staff requested feedback regarding the 3 Cubberley conceptual designs and Commission 537 support/participation for near-term activation. 538 Vice Chair Greenfield asked if green space was equivalent to any outdoor space, such as sports 539 courts, and how to interpret the polling results regarding green space in terms of the priorities. 540 Vice Chair Greenfield hoped the next poll would more clearly delineate different types of 541 outdoor space. Vice Chair Greenfield asked what the total outreach was and if the process 542 utilized multi-modal contact per person and if each person was reached via all 3 platforms. 543 Ms. Paras said green outdoor space was an unspecific concept but noted that preserving trees 544 and green space was the component the community reacted to. Sports courts were more tied to Item 1 June 24, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 31 Packet Pg. 35 of 245 545 athletics, which voters ranked as a lower priority. Ms. Paras did not know the total number of 546 those reached but confirmed there were 437 respondents. Ms. Paras was unsure if the process 547 was multi-modal but said it was multi-platform, including email, phone, and text message. 548 Ms. Deml said, anecdotally, people were reached via one method and agreed to follow up with 549 more information. 550 Commissioner Cribbs felt it was important to understand how the polling was done and how the 551 recipients were chosen and asked for elaboration on how the company conducted the poll. 552 Ms. Paras believed the company used a list of registered voters as a contact list, which was 553 random, and decided whether to contact via email, phone, or text. 554 Commissioner Brown referenced a similar survey done in a different jurisdiction. The firm 555 ensured it reached out to a statistically significant number of people that was stratified to be 556 representative of the community. Commissioner Brown presumed this firm did something 557 similar since it is well known. 558 Chair Freeman referenced the presentation in April that detailed the survey results and the 559 methods used to conduct outreach, saying it covered a large demographic area. Chair Freeman 560 clarified there were 2 community meetings that were open to everyone. Chair Freeman gave 561 anecdotal evidence to support his concern that few people know about the Cubberley project 562 and wanted to help figure out how to expand that reach to get more engagement. 563 Ms. Deml confirmed the 2 meetings were open to everyone and that mailers had been sent to 564 every home. 565 Public Comment: None. 566 Commissioner Wei asked if there had been any voting on the preferred concept design at the 567 community meeting. Commissioner Wei asked how to navigate the combination of bike and 568 pedestrian flow and green space. 569 Ms. Deml said there would be a version of the in-person meeting on the website. The goal of the 570 meeting was to provide feedback on which components were best liked, which Concordia will 571 then take to create one refined plan to be presented on September 17. Certain elements from 572 each design plan were highlighted as opposed to a singular plan. Each design had different 573 configurations of the bike/pedestrian path that cut through the space. The square footage of 574 green space was equivalent across all 3 plans. The configuration is what was open to feedback. 575 Commissioner Cribbs wanted to emphasize the analysis and poor condition of the buildings. 576 Commissioner Cribbs was hopeful that there would be more about the opportunity in future 577 presentations. Commissioner Cribbs suggested hosting a fun event such as painting a mural or 578 doorway or putting up a sign for near-term activation. The bond issue and amount of money 579 required was not insignificant. 580 Ms. Deml highlighted the community was happy with programming and agreed the buildings 581 needed to be updated. Item 1 June 24, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 32 Packet Pg. 36 of 245 582 Commissioner Brown complimented the project outreach and felt it was well framed to capture 583 what was most important. Commissioner Brown felt pedestrian access was an important feature 584 and dovetailed well with other ongoing City bike/pedestrian plans. 585 Vice Chair Greenfield opined the community and polling process got the top 3 priorities right but 586 felt the bond would be a considerable challenge. The City would own most of the existing 587 building space at Cubberley while PAUSD would retain ownership of the playing fields. Vice 588 Chair Greenfield was concerned what would happen to the playing field space if the PAUSD 589 needed to open another high school. Vice Chair Greenfield heard comments from the 590 community wanting to have a large, contiguous green space. Vice Chair Greenfield asked 591 whether the Nelson Drive road access would remain as is, being bike/pedestrian entrances and 592 open to emergency vehicles but closed to vehicular traffic. Cubberley currently has a covered 593 breezeway through all campus buildings which did not appear to be preserved or considered in 594 the current design proposals. Vice Chair Greenfield asked if there would be bike lanes in the 595 underground parking. Vice Chair Greenfield queried if the gym design would include 596 indoor/outdoor access similar to the large Mitchell Park conference room. Vice Chair Greenfield 597 questioned if underground parking would properly support large canopy trees above it and was 598 interested in reviewing a map of protected trees. 599 Vice Chair Greenfield preferred the diagonal design concept due to the optimized bike paths and 600 felt it was the most interesting. Vice Chair Greenfield opined the grand promenade had appeal 601 depending on the elevation and landscaping of the middle. Vice Chair Greenfield thought some 602 questions, such as being a good neighbor and balancing building and green space, were difficult 603 to answer because the designs in those areas were very similar. The structured parking location 604 appeared to take out one of the existing structures. Vice Chair Greenfield thought that 605 maintaining existing structures was environmentally beneficial and cost effective. The 606 community desired the quality and experience level of the preserved facilities to be consistent 607 with the new facilities. Vice Chair Greenfield thought the project specifics, which were the 608 focused agenda of the third community meeting, would drive public interest and wanted to 609 figure out how to leverage that within the activation process. 610 Director Kristen O’Kane hoped that the City would work with the School District to ensure the 611 best use of both sites if that scenario happened but there was currently no guarantee with the 612 fields. 613 Ms. Deml had heard similar feedback regarding a large, contiguous green space during the last 614 meeting. There was discussion around having green space in place of some buildings on the left 615 side. That feedback may alter the plans that come back, which could include buildings being 616 moved or removed to accommodate the larger green space. Ms. Deml confirmed that the 617 Nelson Drive access would remain as is. The proposed plans did not indicate a breezeway 618 because staff was not currently working with that level of detail. Underground bike paths had 619 not been discussed although there would be walkways. Staff had been working with the Friends 620 of the Wellness & Recreation Center. There was thought for a 4-court gymnasium, 2 bottom 621 courts and 2 top courts, with the possibility of doors that could open to be indoor/outdoor as 622 well as the potential for outdoor courts. Ms. Deml was unsure if the parking structure could 623 support trees. Item 1 June 24, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 33 Packet Pg. 37 of 245 624 Commissioner Deng thanked staff for the presentation and felt that sending the online version 625 of the community meeting was critical. 626 Chair Freeman appreciated that the 3 concept designs focused on retaining greenery and 627 reiterated that the Cubberley buildings were antiquated and the infrastructure was not up to 628 code. Chair Freeman thought highlighting those issues could help the public understand why 629 renovating would not be the best option. Chair Freeman liked the idea of scheduling more 630 events at Cubberley and proposed signage that showcased the concept designs to help people 631 visualize future plans. Chair Freeman suggested having food trucks with music and thought 632 Cubberley would be a good platform for summer programs. Chair Freeman emphasized the 633 PRCs commitment to the project. 634 Vice Chair Greenfield asked if a hybrid parking model with some underground and some above 635 ground was considered. Vice Chair Greenfield wondered what level of plan detail would be 636 completed prior to the ballot initiative. Vice Chair Greenfield encouraged staff to share the fine 637 details with the PRC and other commissions after the ballot measure passes. 638 Ms. Deml confirmed a hybrid structure was being considered and had positive feedback. A 639 hybrid structure would be more cost effective than a fully underground structure. The master 640 plan would be completed when people voted on the 2026 ballot initiative but would be more 641 detailed than what was presented this evening. After that, an architect would be hired to 642 complete more detailed plans. Ms. Deml felt the PRC would be heavily involved in future steps. 643 5. Informational Update: FY2026 Budget Summary in the Areas of Parks, Open Space, Golf, 644 and Recreation 645 Division Manager Sarah Robustelli presented on the approved FY2026 budget. Every fiscal year, 646 the City develops a budget for operating and capital improvements that support the delivery of 647 programs and services that align with Council priorities and community needs. The City Council 648 passed the proposed FY26 budget on June 16, 2025. Within the CSD budget there were 85.27 649 full-time and 53.08 hourly positions for a total of 138 positions. The proposed operating budget 650 with CSD expenditures is $43.4M and community services revenues are $15.6M. 651 A slide showed the FY26 Capital Improvement Fund expenditures by category, which totaled 652 approximately $98.1M. The largest allocation was for buildings and facilities at $36M, which 653 included recreation facilities like Lucie Stern. Parks and Open Space accounted for $12M. The 654 CIP budgets were reviewed in December and January. 655 The FY26 proposed budget reallocated staffing for more resources for summer programs at the 656 Foothills Nature Preserve and Mitchell Park with a net zero impact. That action recognized 657 higher camp revenue. The budget expanded staffing, contract, and supplies funding to improve 658 accessibility and ADA compliance in recreation programs for individuals with disabilities, which 659 was supported in part by external grant funding. A $100,000 increase in rental and reservation 660 fees was recognized due to higher fees and an uptick in rentals. 661 A series of meetings with the Finance Committee took place in May. The Finance Committee 662 recommended combining the uncertainty reserve and budget stabilization reserve, achieving 663 18.5 percent or $60M in FY27, and reducing ongoing budget deficits. Staff was given direction to 664 return on August 19, 2025, for review. Staff was working to come up with a $6M operating Item 1 June 24, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 34 Packet Pg. 38 of 245 665 budget savings with a minimum of $2M ongoing and $4M one-time savings. City Council will 666 review and approve in September 2025. 667 Public Comment: None. 668 Vice Chair Greenfield asked if the requested budget reductions were from the approved budget 669 and if that included the entire budget or impacted the capital budget. Vice Chair Greenfield 670 questioned if the capital budget was considered part of the operating budget. Vice Chair 671 Greenfield queried if the $2M ongoing reduction would apply to the operating budget and if the 672 capital budget reductions were in addition to the $6M. Vice Chair Greenfield asked if there were 673 numerical goals or guidance for the capital budget reduction. 674 Chair Freeman asked if the $6M reduction would impact things like parks, open space, and golf. 675 Chair Freeman questioned when the PRC would know what the cuts and impacts would be and 676 what the criteria was that would guide decisions on potential deferrals or reductions. 677 Ms. Robustelli confirmed the budget reductions applied to the approved budget and said the 678 reductions were in terms of the operating budget with potential impacts to the capital budget 679 with one-time reductions and potential deferrals. The capital and operating budgets were 680 separate. Ms. Robustelli believed the $6M was for the operating budget but deferrals for capital 681 budget reductions were being considered. Staff would know more by August 19. The impacts 682 would be citywide and the PRC would be updated if there were impacts to parks. There will be a 683 presentation on August 19 to the Finance Committee to discuss scenarios and potential impacts 684 that will go to the full Council for review in September. Some deferrals discussed with the 685 Finance Committee involved prioritizing public safety and risk mitigation over aesthetics. Ms. 686 Robustelli believed the $2M ongoing reductions applied to the operating budget and the one- 687 time potential deferrals was the $4M reduction of the capital budget. 688 Commissioner Cribbs asked if the reductions would impact staff positions. 689 Commissioner Deng asked if the $6M operating budget reduction could come out of the $43M 690 expenditure and if the $98.1M was for Parks and Open Space or the overall capital for the city. 691 Ms. Robustelli did not know if the reductions would impact staff positions. The $98.1M was for 692 the overall budget. 693 Chair Freeman asked how to get the community to understand how budgeted projects might be 694 affected by the cuts. Chair Freeman felt that each department would start to think about what 695 projects within their portfolio were candidates for possible deferrals. Chair Freeman asked if any 696 information that affected the PRC would return to the Commission. 697 Ms. Robustelli explained that an approved budget was needed to give staff time to think 698 through the potential impacts and that all things would be considered. The plan is to go to the 699 Finance Committee and then to Council. The PRC would be kept updated throughout the 700 process. 701 Director Kristen O’Kane encouraged Commissioners to watch the August Finance Committee 702 meeting and suggested viewing the previous Finance Committee and Council discussions to 703 learn more information. Item 1 June 24, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 35 Packet Pg. 39 of 245 704 Vice Chair Greenfield reviewed notes from last year’s presentation and asked about the status 705 of the 445 Bryant Street Community Center. 706 Ms. O’Kane noted improvements to the space, such as replacing the HVAC system, and finalizing 707 an agreement with La Comida to use the downstairs space. La Comida would be open in the fall 708 of 2025. 709 Ms. Robustelli confirmed roughly $4M deferrals for the CIP as well as a $2M operating budget 710 reduction. 711 6. Ad Hoc Committees and Liaison Updates 712 The Nature Preserve Access Policy was on the agenda for July. Chair Freeman recognized Eric as 713 the new community gardens liaison. Plot assignments for 2025 opened on June 13. Chair 714 Freeman noted there was work to fill vacancies and reengage waitlisted gardeners across all 715 sites. The Eleanor Pardee and Johnson parks were the most popular, being 94.5 percent and 716 97.4 percent filled respectively. 717 COMMISSIONER/BOARD MEMBER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, ANNOUNCEMENTS OR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS 718 There are 4 items on the agenda for July: grassroots ecology, Park Dedication, Open Space 719 update, and the Nature Access Policy ad hoc. 720 ADJOURNMENT 721 Meeting was adjourned at 11:03 p.m. Item 1 June 24, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 36 Packet Pg. 40 of 245 PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION DEPARTMENT REPORT July 22, 2025 www.paloalto.gov Item 3 item 3 Staff Presentation Item 3: Staff Report Pg. 1 Packet Pg. 41 of 245 UPCOMING SPECIAL EVENTS Item 3 item 3 Staff Presentation Item 3: Staff Report Pg. 2 Packet Pg. 42 of 245 SPECIAL EVENTS: Summer Festival and Chili Cookoff Item 3 item 3 Staff Presentation Item 3: Staff Report Pg. 3 Packet Pg. 43 of 245 CUBBERLEY UPDATES Project Webpage: www.PaloAlto.gov/CubberleyProject Scan the QR Code to sign -up for the project newsletter Community Meeting #3: September 17, 2025 Program Organization, Circulation, & Greenspace Item 3 item 3 Staff Presentation Item 3: Staff Report Pg. 4 Packet Pg. 44 of 245 TURF STUDY Project Webpage: www.PaloAlto.gov/TurfStudy Estimated Project Schedule: June 2025: Project Launch July 2025: Focus Groups with Park and Recreation Commission Playing Field Ad Hoc, Field Users, and Sierra Club August 11, 2025: Draft Report Released August 11 - 31, 2025: Community Engagement Comment Period on Draft Report August 26, 2025: Parks & Recreation Commission Meeting October 20, 2025: Report and Presentation to City Council Item 3 item 3 Staff Presentation Item 3: Staff Report Pg. 5 Packet Pg. 45 of 245 RINCONADA COMMUNITY GARDEN: Eagle Scout Project Plot Signage Traffic Garden Example Item 3 item 3 Staff Presentation Item 3: Staff Report Pg. 6 Packet Pg. 46 of 245 MITCHELL PARK: Splash Pad and Area Refresh Item 3 item 3 Staff Presentation Item 3: Staff Report Pg. 7 Packet Pg. 47 of 245 BAYLANDS AUTOMATIC ENTRANCE GATE Item 3 item 3 Staff Presentation Item 3: Staff Report Pg. 8 Packet Pg. 48 of 245 JLS PROJECT: Regional Water Quality Treatment Plants and Baylands Traffic Garden Example Item 3 item 3 Staff Presentation Item 3: Staff Report Pg. 9 Packet Pg. 49 of 245 Stanford Palo Alto Community Playing Fields Turf Replacement Traffic Garden Example Item 3 item 3 Staff Presentation Item 3: Staff Report Pg. 10 Packet Pg. 50 of 245 Item 3 item 3 Staff Presentation Item 3: Staff Report Pg. 11 Packet Pg. 51 of 245 Parks and Recreation Commission Staff Report From: Community Services Meeting Date: July 22, 2025 Report #: 2507-4957 TITLE Informational Update from Grassroots Ecology RECOMMENDATION Received the informational update from Grassroots Ecology. BACKGROUND Grassroots Ecology’s first roots were formed in 1997 when Bay Area Action (which would later become Acterra) created the Arastradero Stewardship Program. Over the next two decades, this small program grew to engage and educate thousands of people annually at outdoor sites across the Bay Area Peninsula and South Bay region, ultimately branching off to form Grassroots Ecology, an independent 501(c)(3) nonprofit, in 2016. Grassroots Ecology organization is dedicated to caring for public lands and waters across Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties. In collaboration with public landowners, governments, schools, corporations, and other nonprofits, each year they engage thousands of people in hands-on education and service that improves our local environment. The City of Palo Alto partners with them for work in our Parks and Open Spaces. Grassroots Ecology last provided an update to the Parks and Recreation Commission on March 22, 2022. ANALYSIS Grassroots Ecology continues to be a valuable partner to the City of Palo Alto, playing a vital role in advancing habitat restoration and community stewardship across multiple park and open spaces. Their efforts directly support the City’s goals around sustainability, climate resilience, and community engagement. Over the past year, Grassroots Ecology has provided ecological restoration services across key areas including the Pearson-Arastradero Preserve, Esther Clark, and Foothills Nature Preserve. Item 4 Item 4 Staff Report Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 1 Packet Pg. 52 of 245 Their work includes native plant propagation, invasive species removal, trash removal, tree planting, and long-term ecological monitoring. Equally important is their community-based approach. Grassroots Ecology consistently mobilizes and trains a diverse base of volunteers including students, families, corporate groups, and residents fostering environmental literacy and stewardship within the community. Their programs offer hands on learning experiences and are aligned with the City's values of inclusive and equitable access to nature. In attachment A, please find Grassroots Ecology’s presentation that highlights their background, mission, annual impact, restoration sites, native plant nursery, and the measurable impact of their work. ATTACHMENT Attachment A: Grassroots Ecology Presentation Item 4 Item 4 Staff Report Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 2 Packet Pg. 53 of 245 Presentation to the Palo Alto Parks and Recreation Commission July 2025 Item 4 Attachment A - Grassroots Ecology Presentation Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 3 Packet Pg. 54 of 245 Grassroots Ecology’s mission is to engage and educate the public to restore local ecosystems. Item 4 Attachment A - Grassroots Ecology Presentation Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 4 Packet Pg. 55 of 245 Grassroots Ecology reduces the impact of climate change on our region through a strategy of increasing biodiversity, making creeks and wetlands more resilient, and by providing opportunities for people to take part. GRASSROOTS ECOLOGY About our organization Item 4 Attachment A - Grassroots Ecology Presentation Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 5 Packet Pg. 56 of 245 Core Programs Annual Impact Land Stewardship Native Plant Nursery Volunteer Workdays and Community Events Youth Stewards AmeriCorps Host Site + Habitat Restoration Internships Naturalist Education 7,250 volunteers - 67% youth, 25% return volunteers 17,300 volunteer hours 29 AmeriCorps and Interns hosted 2,300 acres of land managed 22,000 native plants grown Item 4 Attachment A - Grassroots Ecology Presentation Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 6 Packet Pg. 57 of 245 GRASSROOTS ECOLOGY Where we work Public open spaces, creeks and parks in San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties Variety of ecosystems including baylands, riparian (creek), grassland, oak woodland, chaparral, urban Item 4 Attachment A - Grassroots Ecology Presentation Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 7 Packet Pg. 58 of 245 Where we work Palo Alto Restoration Sites Foothills Nature Preserve Enid-Pearson Arastradero Preserve Native Plant Nursery Other Palo Alto sites ●San Francisquito Creek ●Southgate neighborhood ●Adobe Creek pedestrian bridge ●Bol Park Item 4 Attachment A - Grassroots Ecology Presentation Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 8 Packet Pg. 59 of 245 Foothills Nature Preserve Stewarding the preserve since 2013 Managing invasive plants to improve biodiversity and reduce risk from wildfire. Focus Areas include: -Las Trampas Valley -Wildhorse Valley -Vista Hill -Boronda Lake Dam Installing native plants in Las Trampas Valley. Over 900 plants were installed between November 2024 and March 2025. Item 4 Attachment A - Grassroots Ecology Presentation Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 9 Packet Pg. 60 of 245 Foothills Nature Preserve Providing volunteer and environmental education opportunities for community groups. Monitoring human impact following the preserve opening in 2020 by mapping rare plant species and conducting trail surveys Between July 2024 and today, hosted 626 volunteers across 29 volunteer events. Item 4 Attachment A - Grassroots Ecology Presentation Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 10 Packet Pg. 61 of 245 Foothills Nature Preserve: Restoration Highlight Lawn Replacement Project Established in 2013, replacing the border of the lawn and Buckeye Creek with native plants to provide better erosion control, water retention, and increase biodiversity. Wildlife regularly uses established areas for food sources, hunting ground, and nesting habitat. Item 4 Attachment A - Grassroots Ecology Presentation Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 11 Packet Pg. 62 of 245 Enid-Pearson Arastradero Preserve Stewarding the preserve since 1996 Managing invasive plants to improve biodiversity and reduce risk from wildfire Planting native plants grown from local seed Providing volunteer opportunities and environmental education programs for students and community Item 4 Attachment A - Grassroots Ecology Presentation Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 12 Packet Pg. 63 of 245 Enid-Pearson Arastradero Preserve: Community engagement Regular Community Volunteer Workdays Winter and summer sessions of Youth Stewards Quarterly Naturalist Walks Partnerships with schools, scouts, faith based orgs, POST, corporations and more Item 4 Attachment A - Grassroots Ecology Presentation Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 13 Packet Pg. 64 of 245 Enid-Pearson Arastradero Preserve: Managing medusahead Item 4 Attachment A - Grassroots Ecology Presentation Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 14 Packet Pg. 65 of 245 Enid-Pearson Arastradero Preserve: the importance of managing invasive plants Item 4 Attachment A - Grassroots Ecology Presentation Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 15 Packet Pg. 66 of 245 Enid-Pearson Arastradero Preserve: Teasel patch before & after Item 4 Attachment A - Grassroots Ecology Presentation Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 16 Packet Pg. 67 of 245 Enid-Pearson Arastradero Preserve: the Gateway Garden Item 4 Attachment A - Grassroots Ecology Presentation Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 17 Packet Pg. 68 of 245 Native Plant Nursery Growing genetically diverse and hyper local native plants for restoration purposes Training young professionals about native plant propagation Educating the community about the benefits of native plants Improving the area around the nursery by providing high quality habitat for wildlife Item 4 Attachment A - Grassroots Ecology Presentation Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 18 Packet Pg. 69 of 245 Locally sourced native plants Locally sourced native plants are adapted to local conditions sarahepierce, iNaturalist, CC-BY-NC Hank Raizen, iNaturalist, CC-BY-NC Russian Ridge SAN MATEO COUNTY Sunol ALAMEDA COUNTY Blue-eyed grass Sisyrinchium bellum Native Plant Nursery Item 4 Attachment A - Grassroots Ecology Presentation Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 19 Packet Pg. 70 of 245 Nursery history Backyard nursery 1996 Move to Foothills Nature Preserve 2003 New phytosanitary practices 2016 Native Plant Nursery Item 4 Attachment A - Grassroots Ecology Presentation Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 20 Packet Pg. 71 of 245 Other Palo Alto sites: San Francisquito Creek Watershed Picking up trash in the creek Removing high priority invasive plants, such as cape ivy Planting native plants Leading Youth Stewards events to teach students about riparian ecology Item 4 Attachment A - Grassroots Ecology Presentation Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 21 Packet Pg. 72 of 245 Other Palo Alto sites: Southgate Neighborhood Retrofitting bioswales to manage stormwater while also providing better habitat for pollinating insects Planting native plants Supporting Green Street Stewards program to train neighbors to identify any issues and alert city Observed 16x more pollinators in retrofitted plots compared to control plots Item 4 Attachment A - Grassroots Ecology Presentation Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 22 Packet Pg. 73 of 245 Other Palo Alto sites: Adobe Creek Pedestrian Bridge Plantings Maintaining native plants that were installed at the pedestrian bridge landing site Managing invasive plants as appropriate Picking up trash and reporting dumping Item 4 Attachment A - Grassroots Ecology Presentation Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 23 Packet Pg. 74 of 245 Coming Soon: Esther Clark Direct sowing of buckeyes and acorns last winter Planting and maintaining 15 large native trees in two separate habitat islands upcoming this winter Supported by private donor with some irrigation support from the Rangers Item 4 Attachment A - Grassroots Ecology Presentation Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 24 Packet Pg. 75 of 245 Metrics Site/Program Palo Alto Contribution Other funds Grassroots Ecology raised Volunteers Value of Volunteer hours Pearson – Arastradero Preserve $115,475 $72,525 651 $68,840 Foothills Nature Preserve $75,681 $25,319 626 $50,556 San Francisquito Creek Restoration, GSI retrofits, Bol Park garden $1,250 $63,750 310 $25,088 Adobe Bridge Maintenance $17,100 $0 15 $1,606 Nursery $0 39 $4,817 Total $209,506 $161,594 1,641 $150,906 Inc/Dec over previous year -11%34%25%25% Grassroots Ecology engaged 1,640 volunteers at 105 events at Palo Alto parks and open spaces last year. With the $209,500 paid for Grassroots Ecology staff time, supplies and plants, the City received an additional $312,500 in value from funds that Grassroots Ecology raised as well as the value of the volunteer labor. Preliminary numbers Item 4 Attachment A - Grassroots Ecology Presentation Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 25 Packet Pg. 76 of 245 QUESTIONS?? Chorus frog at the nursery Item 4 Attachment A - Grassroots Ecology Presentation Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 26 Packet Pg. 77 of 245 Parks and Recreation Commission Staff Report From: Community Services Meeting Date: July 22, 2025 Report #: 2507-4960 TITLE Informational Update on Evaluation of the City of Palo Alto Middle School Athletics Program RECOMMENDATION Receive the informational update on Middle School Athletics program and provide feedback regarding next steps. BACKGROUND The City of Palo Alto (City) became involved in the Middle School Athletics (MSA) after-school program in 1997, following its prior operation by the Palo Alto Unified School District (PAUSD). At that time, the City hired part-time coaches, PAUSD employed Athletic Directors, and equipment costs and revenue were shared between both entities. Beginning in 2009–2010 season, the City assumed full responsibility for the program, including staffing, associated costs, and revenue management. PAUSD continues to provide school facilities for practices and games. Currently, the Recreation Division within the Community Services Department of the City of Palo Alto operates the Middle School Athletics afterschool program at three public middle schools: Greene, Fletcher, and J.L. Stanford. The program is divided into three athletic seasons: Fall Sports (Late August -Early November) Girls Volleyball Boys Flag Football Girls Flag Football (new) Co-ed Cross Country Winter Sports (Mid November – Late January) Girls Basketball Boys Basketball Item 5 Item 5 Staff Report Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 1 Packet Pg. 78 of 245 provide approaches to align the program with universal student access for students and applicable state laws, as well as to explore the feasibility of transferring program management to local non-profit organizations. The following criteria have been identified to assist in evaluating potential future models for the Middle School Athletics (MSA) program: compliance with applicable laws, participation and revenue, program accessibility, regional best practices, cost implications, and partnership potential. These factors serve as a framework for analyzing current operations and assessing the feasibility of alternate program delivery models. Compliance with State Law State law generally disallows a school district from charging fees for participating in afterschool athletics3; however, since the MSA program is run directly by the City as one of its recreational programs, fees are assessed to participants. Participation and Revenue The MSA program receives approximately 1,200 registrations annually. A flat registration fee of $335 per sport helps offset staff salaries, league fees, referees, uniforms, and equipment. Staff salaries account for more than 80% of total program expenses. The consistent fee structure supports equity across sports and allows for equal access for all participants. The program is structured to recover 75% of its operating costs. Program Accessibility Program Fees: Although strong demand indicates that the current registration fee does not significantly deter participation, it may still present a barrier for some families. In the 2024 to 2025 school year, 83 registrants utilized the City’s fee reduction program, which offers up to a 50 percent discount on the registration cost. However, staff currently do not have a mechanism to collect data on families who opt out due to financial constraints. Continued outreach is planned to increase awareness of available financial support. Program Capacity: Demand regularly exceeds program capacity, resulting in waitlists, especially for sports constrained by space or team sizes. While some sports such as Cross Country and Track and Field can accommodate more participants, others are limited by facility availability and coaching. To address equity concerns related to first-come, first-served registration, the City implemented a lottery-based enrollment system for the 2024 to 2025 school year. Families enter during an open registration window, and participants are selected randomly. Although this improves fairness, students placed on waitlists still face limited access. Staff continue their efforts to recruit additional coaches and explore new sports offerings to expand capacity. 3 See Education Code section 49011. Item 5 Item 5 Staff Report Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 3 Packet Pg. 80 of 245 Regional Program Models To inform its analysis, staff reviewed middle school athletics programs in nearby jurisdictions. Three general operational models were identified: School District Operated: Programs operated directly by the local school and school district, as is currently practiced in many surrounding cities. Third-Party Nonprofit Model: Programs operated by community-based nonprofit organizations, which may offer lower overhead costs and greater flexibility. Private Contractor Model: Programs fully managed by a for-profit provider, which may reduce public costs and assume all program responsibilities. Exploration of Alternative Models In July 2025, the City issued a formal Request for Information (RFI) to assess interest from third- party organizations in operating the Middle School Athletics Program. An RFI is used to gather general feedback and explore potential models from interested parties within the community. In response, the City received two proposals, each outlining a distinct approach to managing the program. Partial Program Management: The Palo Alto Middle School Athletics Community Organization, a local nonprofit entity, proposed operating Cross Country and Track and Field. Their model includes a lower registration fee of $200 per student, free access for income-qualified families, higher coaching compensation at $50 per hour, and customized jerseys for participants to keep. Full Program Management: Rising Stars LLC, a private vendor, proposed assuming full responsibility for the entire MSA program, with a fee of $225 per student. Rising Stars Table #2: Regional Program Models Model Community Operator Fee Structure Additional Notes Contracted Program Operations San Carlos Legarza Sports (for-profit)$355 per sport Serves 3 middle schools Half Moon Bay Boys & Girls Club + Athletic Boosters $150 per sport + $45 annual club membership Boosters cover uniforms and equipment School District-Run Programs Ralston (Belmont-Redwood Shores), San Mateo, Foster City School District + Booster Club support Varies by school; voluntary contributions Public school-run with non-profit support Parent-Led Non- Profit Model Las Lomitas (Menlo Park)Parent-led volunteer non- profit $225 per sport ($250 if late) Smaller scale than Palo Alto’s program Item 5 Item 5 Staff Report Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 4 Packet Pg. 81 of 245 emphasized its experience in afterschool programming and staff recruitment as key qualifications. Upon review of the proposals by the MSA Ad Hoc Committee, both models presented provide opportunities and challenges. A partial management approach could lower costs for participants in the sports not managed by the City, but may lead to higher registration fees for the remaining sports, as many fixed costs would still need to be covered. The full management model would reduce the City’s financial commitment to the Middle School Athletics program, but it could also limit capacity if external organizations are less committed to universal access, including coaching quality and offering a broad range of sports. If the Commission or Council wishes to further explore a public private partnership for the MSA program, staff recommend selecting one model for a more detailed evaluation—focusing on long-term cost implications, operational efficiencies, and potential impacts on equity. While only two responses were received to the initial RFI, additional organizations may express interest if a formal request for management of the MSA program is issued with a more clearly defined model. It’s also possible that the groups who responded to the RFI could revise their proposals to align with a more specific scope. Tiered Fee Structure Staff also explored the option of implementing a tiered fee structure based on the actual cost of each sport. While this approach could reduce costs for some offerings, it would increase fees for others and potentially create new barriers to access. Without additional financial support, a tiered model may not align with the City’s goals of equity and inclusion. Potential for Nonprofit Fundraising Partnerships Programs affiliated with nonprofit organizations often provide lower fees and enhanced access due to their ability to engage in fundraising and community partnerships. A new nonprofit entity could be established to manage or support middle school athletics, possibly in collaboration with the Palo Alto Recreation Foundation. This structure could expand fundraising capacity, enhance financial aid, and improve access for more families. The Middle School Athletics program seeks to balance affordability, equity, and operational sustainability. While universal access remains a challenge, staff continue to pursue improvements through increased coach recruitment, expanded sport offerings, and inclusive registration processes. Future decisions regarding program structure, whether maintaining City operations, establishing nonprofit partnerships, or outsourcing to private entities, should be guided by long-term goals related to equity, fiscal responsibility, and community alignment. Next Steps Item 5 Item 5 Staff Report Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 5 Packet Pg. 82 of 245 Staff is seeking feedback from the Parks and Recreation Commission on the different operating models for expanding accessibility, current interest in exploring public private partnerships, potential fee structure adjustments, and additional areas of improvement for further study. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Palo Alto Middle School Athletics Community Organization RFI Attachment B: Rising Stars LLC RFI Item 5 Item 5 Staff Report Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 6 Packet Pg. 83 of 245 City of Palo Alto Purchasing and Contract Administration Cecilia Magana, Chief Procurement Officer 250 Hamilton Avenue, Palo Alto, CA 94301 [PALO ALTO MIDDLE SCHOOL ATHLETICS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT Solicitation No. RFI194876 Middle School Athletics Program/Request for Information RESPONSE DEADLINE: July 14, 2025 at 5:00 pm Report Generated: Tuesday, July 15, 2025 Palo Alto Middle School Athletics Community Organization Response CONTACT INFORMATION Company: Palo Alto Middle School Athletics Community Organization Email: tomhaxton@gmail.com Contact: Tom Haxton Address: 3357 Cowper St. Palo Alto, CA 94306 Phone: (267) 251-3669 Website: pamsaco.org Submission Date: Jul 14, 2025 12:27 PM (Pacific Time) Item 5 Attachment A - Palo Alto Middle School Athletics Community Organization RFI Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 7 Packet Pg. 84 of 245 [PALO ALTO MIDDLE SCHOOL ATHLETICS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT Solicitation No. RFI194876 Middle School Athletics Program/Request for Information [PALO ALTO MIDDLE SCHOOL ATHLETICS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT undefined - Middle School Athletics Program/Request for Information Page 2 ADDENDA CONFIRMATION No addenda issued QUESTIONNAIRE 1. Statement of Interest: Respondents should describe their interest in the project, and their understanding of the project objectives.* Pass The Palo Alto Middle School Athletics Community Organization (PAMSACO) is pleased to express our interest in managing the sports of cross country and track and field under this project as soon as feasible. We are also open to managing additional sports i n the future. PAMSACO is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit founded to support PAUSD middle school athletics by using registration fees efficiently and transparently to fund coaching, equipment, and other direct services for student athletes. Our successful 2024 pilot program and related advocacy contributed to the City Council’s decision to explore nonprofit partnerships for middle school athletics. In fall 2024, we piloted a cross country program at JLS Middle School. Despite being unable to advertise through official channels or participate in league competitions, we: • Recruited five qualified coaches, including three former collegiate athletes • Enrolled 62 students—more than the prior year’s City-run team • Delivered a successful season with strong positive feedback from families We are encouraged to see that the City's project goals align closely with our values: affordability, accessibility, inclusivity, equity, and sustainability. Our pilot demonstrated that: • We can substantially reduce overhead ($0.64 per registered student vs. $205 in the City program) Item 5 Attachment A - Palo Alto Middle School Athletics Community Organization RFI Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 8 Packet Pg. 85 of 245 [PALO ALTO MIDDLE SCHOOL ATHLETICS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT Solicitation No. RFI194876 Middle School Athletics Program/Request for Information [PALO ALTO MIDDLE SCHOOL ATHLETICS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT undefined - Middle School Athletics Program/Request for Information Page 3 • We can pay market-competitive coaching rates ($50/hour vs. $19.12–$23.48), enabling us to recruit and retain enough qualified coaches to ensure participation for all interested students This model addresses a major challenge in the City’s program: staffing shortages that have led to lottery-based admission and under- coached teams. We also improve affordability and equity: • Registration fees: $200 in our pilot vs. $335 in the City program • Low-income support: Free registration vs. a 50% fee reduction Finally, we have demonstrated financial and operational sustainability: our 2024 pilot ran a small surplus, and our organization is governed by a functioning board under clear bylaws. 2. Statement of Experience: All responding organizations should address the following:* Pass • Indication of interest in administering the entire program or a specific subset • Organizational philosophy and mission • Business model, including proposed cost per participant, staffing and hiring practices, and leadership structure (This is not an RFP, and any cost estimates offered are not binding on either party) • Relevant experience in managing youth sports programs, including contract oversight and community engagement • Long-term sustainability plan • Financial model: Currently, the City charges $335 per student and offers a financial assistance program that provides up to a 50% fee reduction for eligible families. City typically gets around 1,300 registrations. Scope We are interested in managing the sports of cross country and track and field under this project as soon as feasible, and we are open to managing additional sports in the future. Organizational mission Item 5 Attachment A - Palo Alto Middle School Athletics Community Organization RFI Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 9 Packet Pg. 86 of 245 [PALO ALTO MIDDLE SCHOOL ATHLETICS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT Solicitation No. RFI194876 Middle School Athletics Program/Request for Information [PALO ALTO MIDDLE SCHOOL ATHLETICS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT undefined - Middle School Athletics Program/Request for Information Page 4 PAMSACO’s mission is to support PAUSD middle school athletics by spending registration f ees efficiently and transparently on services that support our student athletes. Organizational philosophy We believe that middle school sports provide critical opportunities for physical development, teamwork, and belonging. Our philosophy centers on: • Providing access to all students interested in participation • Lowering financial barriers to participation • Minimizing overhead costs • Paying coaches fairly to ensure consistent, high-quality instruction that supports participation of all interested students • Providing an inclusive and supportive team environment for all students Business model We prototyped our model in the fall 2024 pilot: • Registration fee: $200 per student (vs. $335 in the City program) • Coach compensation: $50/hour (vs. $19.12–$23.48/hour) • Overhead cost: $0.64 per student (vs. $205 in the City program) Our program was staffed with 2–3 coaches per practice for a team of ~60 athletes. For track and field, we plan to staff 4–5 coaches per practice to cover distinct event groups (sprints, jumps, throws, distance) for ~90 athletes. We hire coaches with sport -specific expertise, experience working with youth, and a commitment to positive coaching. Our organization is governed by a three-member board (Tom Haxton, Ginnie Noh, and Scott Paterson) and structured to minimize administrative burden while ensuring operational integrity. Relevant experience Item 5 Attachment A - Palo Alto Middle School Athletics Community Organization RFI Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 10 Packet Pg. 87 of 245 [PALO ALTO MIDDLE SCHOOL ATHLETICS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT Solicitation No. RFI194876 Middle School Athletics Program/Request for Information [PALO ALTO MIDDLE SCHOOL ATHLETICS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT undefined - Middle School Athletics Program/Request for Information Page 5 In our fall 2024 pilot, we managed all aspects of the Program identified in the Project Description, with the exception of league fees, which were not applicable at the time. We would be happy to pay our share of the $2,400/year league fees (approximately $2 per registration). Our experience includes: • Registration and fee collection: We used Google Forms and Square to collect payments and manage rosters efficiently. • Insurance coverage: We maintained $1M per occurrence liability insurance and obtained additional endorsements for PAUSD, Palo Alto, and Menlo Park. • Recruitment, hiring, and management of coaches o We were fully staffed with five coaches, three of them former collegiate athletes, with two to three coaches staffed per practice. o Coaches took mandated reporter and concussion training, which the city does not require. o We have preliminary approval to run Livescan fingerprint-based background checks, an improvement on the City’s non- fingerprint-based approach. We expect full approval before the fall 2025 season. • Equipment management: Students received custom dri-fit shirts in their sizes, which they used as both jerseys and practice gear. This was an improvement on the jerseys issued by the city MSA program, which are often not in the appropriate size. • Communications: Families consistently praised our clear and timely communication. We also developed community engagement experience: • We actively solicited feedback from families during and after the season • We participated in advocacy efforts that helped launch this Project • We collaborated with Run Club Menlo Park to organize a cross country meet Long-term sustainability plan Our organization is designed to be financially and operationally sustainable: • Our fall 2024 pilot ran at a small surplus (revenue: $11,900; expenses: $10,855.05) Item 5 Attachment A - Palo Alto Middle School Athletics Community Organization RFI Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 11 Packet Pg. 88 of 245 [PALO ALTO MIDDLE SCHOOL ATHLETICS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT Solicitation No. RFI194876 Middle School Athletics Program/Request for Information [PALO ALTO MIDDLE SCHOOL ATHLETICS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT undefined - Middle School Athletics Program/Request for Information Page 6 • Our low-overhead structure ensures that the majority of fees go directly to programming • We are a 501(c)(3) with a functioning board and clear bylaws, ensuring continuity, governance, and accountability Financial model Our innovative financial model allows us to offer a program that is more affordable, inclusive, equitable, and sustai nable than the current City model: • Low overhead allows us to redirect funding to high-impact services • Higher coach pay improves recruitment and retention, supporting full participation for all interested students • Lower registration fees and free registration for low-income families (compared to a 50% discount for the City program) increase accessibility and equity Item 5 Attachment A - Palo Alto Middle School Athletics Community Organization RFI Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 12 Packet Pg. 89 of 245 City of Palo Alto Purchasing and Contract Administration Cecilia Magana, Chief Procurement Officer 250 Hamilton Avenue, Palo Alto, CA 94301 [RISING STARS LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT Solicitation No. RFI194876 Middle School Athletics Program/Request for Information RESPONSE DEADLINE: July 14, 2025 at 5:00 pm Report Generated: Tuesday, July 15, 2025 Rising Stars LLC Response CONTACT INFORMATION Company: Rising Stars LLC Email: alina@risingstarsprograms.com Contact: Alina Kratova Address: 15 MacArthur Pl, 506 Santa Ana, CA 92707 Phone: N/A Website: http://risingstarsprograms.com Submission Date: Jul 13, 2025 1:11 AM (Pacific Time) Item 5 Attachment B - Rising Stars LLC RFI Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 13 Packet Pg. 90 of 245 [RISING STARS LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT Solicitation No. RFI194876 Middle School Athletics Program/Request for Information [RISING STARS LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT undefined - Middle School Athletics Program/Request for Information Page 2 ADDENDA CONFIRMATION No addenda issued QUESTIONNAIRE 1. Statement of Interest: Respondents should describe their interest in the project, and their understanding of the project objectives.* Rising Stars is deeply interested in partnering with the City of Palo Alto to operate the Middle School Athletics Program. We strongly align with the City’s vision of providing inclusive, accessible, and high-quality athletic opportunities to all middle school students. We are particularly inspired by the program’s commitment to a no-cut policy and a focus on participation, teamwork, and personal development over competition—values that mirror our own. Since 2019, we’ve impacted over 5,000 of students and partnered with 150+ schools in California where we offer a wide range o f services, including Before, During, and After-School Enrichment Programs, Structured Recess, Summer and Out-of-School Camps, and AM/PM Enrichment. With our proven track record of delivering high-quality after-school and expanded learning programs, we are confident in our ability to administer the full Middle School Athletics Program or a specific subset, ensuring equity across all three participating schools: Fletcher, Greene, and JLS. Our expertise includes — Innovative Sports & Physical Fitness Programs – Engaging students in structured athletics and recreational sports that focus on SEL and emphasize teamwork, leadership, and personal development while building physical health of the students. Why Rising Stars? ✅ Proven Experience in Expanded & Summer Learning Programs • Successfully implemented after-school enrichment and summer camp programs across multiple school districts, including Cupertino USD, Castro Valley USD, Moreland USD, Campbell USD, Los Gatos Saratoga Recreation Department, Mill Valley Recreation Department, and others. • Experience facilitating structured sports and athletic programs. Item 5 Attachment B - Rising Stars LLC RFI Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 14 Packet Pg. 91 of 245 [RISING STARS LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT Solicitation No. RFI194876 Middle School Athletics Program/Request for Information [RISING STARS LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT undefined - Middle School Athletics Program/Request for Information Page 3 ✅ Comprehensive Program Implementation We provide a turnkey solution that includes: • Full facilitation of athletic programming, including enrollment, attendance tracking, parent communication, and district collaboration. • Trained and vetted instructors specializing in sports. • Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports approach, aligning with CDE Expanded Learning Quality Standards. • Culminating sports games/league to showcase student work and celebrate learning achievements. ✅ Balanced Approach: Physical Activity + Student Engagement + Sportsmanship and SEL activities • Physical Activity & Wellness – Daily structured sports/athletic practices to enhance student well-being. • Leadership & Collaboration – Focus on teamwork, sportsmanship, leadership, resilience and important SEL skills. We are particularly excited about our vision to create a supportive environment where every student, regardless of skill leve l, can thrive. Our team is prepared to collaborate closely with the City of Palo Alto Recreation Division, adhering to all City policies, providing transparent registration systems, and ensuring fair play and participant safety. Rising Stars is confident that our programs will enhance the recreational landscape of Palo Alto, fostering teamwork, confidence, and lifelong memories for participants. We view this opportunity not simply as a contract but as a mission-aligned partnership to uplift youth through athletics, movement, mentorship, and meaningful engagement. Our organization is ready to bring innovation, operational excellence, and a strong community focus to support the long-term success and sustainability of Palo Alto’s Middle School Athletics Program. 2. Statement of Experience: All responding organizations should address the following:* • Indication of interest in administering the entire program or a specific subset • Organizational philosophy and mission • Business model, including proposed cost per participant, staffing and hiring practices, and leadership structure (This is not an RFP, and any cost estimates offered are not binding on either party) • Relevant experience in managing youth sports programs, including contract oversight and community engagement Item 5 Attachment B - Rising Stars LLC RFI Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 15 Packet Pg. 92 of 245 [RISING STARS LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT Solicitation No. RFI194876 Middle School Athletics Program/Request for Information [RISING STARS LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT undefined - Middle School Athletics Program/Request for Information Page 4 • Long-term sustainability plan • Financial model: Currently, the City charges $335 per student and offers a financial assistance program that provides up to a 50% fee reduction for eligible families. City typically gets around 1,300 registrations. Indication of Interest: Rising Stars is enthusiastic about the opportunity to partner with the City of Palo Alto to administer the entire Middle School Athletics Program across Fletcher, Greene, and JLS Middle Schools. We are also open to managing a specific subset of sports if t he City deems that more appropriate. Our organization will deliver exceptional Flag Football, Basketball, Track and Field, Tennis, Volleyball, Soccer, and Multi-Sports programs, providing a safe, fun, and supportive environment where children of all skill levels can grow, learn, and thrive. We are committed to promoting fair play, community engagement. Organizational Philosophy and Mission:Rising Stars is a mission-driven organization committed to supporting youth development through high-quality, inclusive enrichment programming. Through wellness practices and our programming, we empower students to unlock their full potential, build confidence, and bec ome future-ready leaders. Program Philosophy and Approach: Our programs are designed to promote youth development through positive sports experiences. We focus on teaching fundamental skills, encouraging teamwork, building self-confidence, and fostering a lifelong love of physical activity. Each program will be led by experienced, background-checked instructors dedicated to providing safe, inclusive, and engaging environments for children of all skill levels. Programs are structured to ensure affordability, accessibility, and alignment with the City’s recreational priorities. Business Model:We operate a sustainable model funded through program fees, district and city contracts, and philanthropic partnerships. 1. Proposed Cost: Estimated at Movement/Wellness Programs (Sports) $225/hour per instructor, inclusive of coaching, administration, equipment, and insurance. 2. Staffing and Hiring: We recruit and train local, experienced coaches and staff who reflect the diversity of the communities we serve. All staff, including Site Coordinators and support personnel, must meet the following minimum requirements: • Age and Authorization: At least 18 years old and authorized to work in the U.S. Item 5 Attachment B - Rising Stars LLC RFI Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 16 Packet Pg. 93 of 245 [RISING STARS LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT Solicitation No. RFI194876 Middle School Athletics Program/Request for Information [RISING STARS LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT undefined - Middle School Athletics Program/Request for Information Page 5 • Experience: Minimum one year of experience working with children in educational or recreational settings; CPR/First Aid certified • Background Checks: Clear FBI/DOJ fingerprinting with no serious or violent felony convictions, per Education Code Section 45125.1 and RFP requirements. • Health: Tuberculosis (TB) clearance prior to employment, updated regularly, per Education Code Section 49406 and RFP requirements. • Skills: Strong communication, teamwork, behavior management, and a commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion. Professional Development All of our instructors are required to complete our onboarding training that includes safety training, positive coaching training, an overview of the instructor role, SEL training, classroom management training, curriculum training, and also attend monthly / quart erly training sessions. In addition to that, all instructors have frequent check-ins with the curriculum team and their Program Manager. The following chart reflects our Professional Development plan: All instructors assigned to the Sports Programs will be highly experienced in youth athletics and child development. Our coaching team includes individuals who have: • Prior experience coaching or instructing youth sports (minimum 1 year experience) Item 5 Attachment B - Rising Stars LLC RFI Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 17 Packet Pg. 94 of 245 [RISING STARS LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT Solicitation No. RFI194876 Middle School Athletics Program/Request for Information [RISING STARS LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT undefined - Middle School Athletics Program/Request for Information Page 6 • Certifications in CPR and First Aid (current and valid) • Specialized knowledge of their sport (e.g., USA Football Certification, US Soccer Grassroots Certification, or equivalent experience) • Strong understanding of positive coaching methods, sportsmanship development, and age-appropriate skill-building techniques • Experience working with diverse groups of youth, including beginners and advanced players • Commitment to fostering an inclusive, encouraging, and respectful learning environment 3. Leadership Structure: Our leadership team comprises experienced professionals with specialized roles to manage all aspects of the Middle School Athletics Program: • Program Director: Oversees strategic planning, program operations, and stakeholder coordination, ensuring alignment with City objectives. The Director will manage partnerships with schools and leagues, handle registration, and ensure compliance with legal requirements, such as coach background checks. Manages logistics, including equipment procurement, inventory management, and facility coordination, ensuring seamless delivery of sports seasons. • Training & Quality Control Director: Professional development and training for the team/instructors; Instructor Coaching; Curriculum Development; Development of evaluation metrics and assessment reports, Site observations. • Chief Finance Officer: Financial Planning & Budgeting; Financial Reporting; Tax Management. Relevant Experience: Rising Stars has managed large-scale youth enrichment and athletic programs in 150+ schools in California including Cupertino USD, Castro Valley USD, Moreland USD, Campbell USD, Los Gatos Saratoga Recreation Department, Mill Valley Recreation Department, and others. We currently oversee youth sports programming including sports clinics, after-school athletics, and summer camps. Our team has experience with enrollment, contract oversight, parent engagement, compliance, and community outreach. We also opera te in partnership with school districts to ensure alignment with academic calendars, equity standards, and student development goal s. Why School Districts Partner with Rising Stars: • Proven Experience: Successful operation of after-school and summer programs at over 150 California school sites, serving 3,500+ students annually. Item 5 Attachment B - Rising Stars LLC RFI Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 18 Packet Pg. 95 of 245 [RISING STARS LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT Solicitation No. RFI194876 Middle School Athletics Program/Request for Information [RISING STARS LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT undefined - Middle School Athletics Program/Request for Information Page 7 • Student-Centered, Customized Programs: Enrichment programs tailored to align with district goals and diverse student needs. • Operational Excellence: Efficient program management focused on safety, engagement, and high-quality instruction. • Turnkey Implementation: Rising Stars manages full program delivery—including instructor training, enrollment, communication, and reporting. Long-Term Sustainability Plan:Our sustainability strategy includes: • Diversified Funding: We leverage grants, sponsorships, and district partnerships to reduce reliance on participant fees. • Staff Retention: Through competitive pay, ongoing training, and a mission-driven culture, we maintain strong staff retention across seasons. • Community Integration: We build long-term relationships with families, school staff, and community organizations to ensure continuity, feedback-driven improvement, and alignment with local needs. • Scalability: Our flexible program model and administrative infrastructure allow us to expand or tailor services to meet demand without compromising quality or access. Item 5 Attachment B - Rising Stars LLC RFI Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 19 Packet Pg. 96 of 245 PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Middle School Athletics July 22, 2025 www.paloalto.gov Item 5 Item 5 Staff Presentation Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 20 Packet Pg. 97 of 245 RECOMMENDATION •Receive Middle School Athletics (MSA) update •Provide feedback on next steps Item 5 Item 5 Staff Presentation Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 21 Packet Pg. 98 of 245 BACKGROUND •1997 – City of Palo Alto and Palo Alto Unified School District partnership •2009/2010 – City takes on full responsibility •October 7th, 2024- City Council asks Palo Alto Parks and Recreation Commission to review Middle School Athletics Program Item 5 Item 5 Staff Presentation Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 22 Packet Pg. 99 of 245 BACKGROUND City Council Request •Provide approaches to align the program with universal student access for students and applicable state laws, as well as to explore the feasibility of outsourcing program operations to local non-profit organizations. Item 5 Item 5 Staff Presentation Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 23 Packet Pg. 100 of 245 CURRENT MSA PROGRAM •Current MSA program run by the Recreation Division •Program operates at each of the three public middle schools; Greene, Fletcher and J.L Stanford (JLS) •Each sport has a registration fee of $335 •Fee reduction of up to 50% off available •24/25 school year - 1,230 registrations with 62 on the waitlisted Item 5 Item 5 Staff Presentation Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 24 Packet Pg. 101 of 245 CURRENT MSA PROGRAM: Offerings by Season Fall Sports (Late August -Early November) Girls Volleyball Boys Flag Football Girls Flag Football (new) Co -ed Cross Country Winter Sports (Mid November – Late January) Girls Basketball Boys Basketball Spring Sports (February – End of March) Boys Volleyball Co -ed Track and Field Co -ed Wrestling Co -ed Tennis Ultimate Frisbee (Palo Alto only) Item 5 Item 5 Staff Presentation Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 25 Packet Pg. 102 of 245 CURRENT MSA PROGRAM: City Staffing Site/Role City Staffing MSA Coordinator (Recreation Coordinator) JLS Athletic Director (Rec Leader III) 10–15 Seasonal Coaches Rec Leaders I or II Greene Athletic Director (Rec Leader III) 10–15 Seasonal Coaches Rec Leaders I or II Fletcher Athletic Director (Rec Leader III) 10–15 Seasonal Coaches Rec Leaders I or II City Staffing for Middle School Athletics Item 5 Item 5 Staff Presentation Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 26 Packet Pg. 103 of 245 CURRENT MSA PROGRAM: Participation and Fees •~1,200 registrations each year •Registration fee is $335 dollars per sport played •Registration fees pay for •Staffing (hourly and full time) •League fees •Referees •Uniforms •Equipment •Staffing costs represent over 80% of expenses •Single registration fee across all sports to ensure equal access for all Item 5 Item 5 Staff Presentation Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 27 Packet Pg. 104 of 245 ANALYSIS: Criteria for Evaluation In evaluating the MSA program and any future models we will look at the following criteria: •Compliance with state law •Participation and expenses •Program accessibility •Program capacity Item 5 Item 5 Staff Presentation Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 28 Packet Pg. 105 of 245 COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW •Extracurricular activities offered by school districts must be offered free of cost. •City run programming is allowed to assess fees for its programing. Item 5 Item 5 Staff Presentation Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 29 Packet Pg. 106 of 245 PROGRAM ACCESSIBILITY: Fees •With current fees, program demand reminds high •Fees could be a barrier for families •24/25 school year, 83 registrations utilized fee reduction program •Staff don’t have a mechanism to collecting data on families that can’t participate due to fees. Item 5 Item 5 Staff Presentation Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 30 Packet Pg. 107 of 245 PROGRAM ACCESSIBILITY: Capacity •Demand regularly exceeds program capacity •Staff tries to reduce or eliminated waitlists wherever possible •Capacity is limited by •Coaching availability •Team sizes •Facility space •Registration was a first come first serve model, but has been updated to provide a more equitable experience •Open registration periods •Random selection into program •doesn't reduce possibility of waitlists Item 5 Item 5 Staff Presentation Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 31 Packet Pg. 108 of 245 ALTERATIVE MODELS: Regional Program Models Regional Program Models Model Community Operator Fee Structure Additional Notes Contracted Program Operations San Carlos Legarza Sports (for-profit)$355 per sport Serves 3 middle schools Half Moon Bay Boys & Girls Club + Athletic Boosters $150 per sport + $45 annual club membership Boosters cover uniforms and equipment School District-Run Programs Ralston (Belmont-Redwood Shores), San Mateo, Foster City School District + Booster Club support Varies by school; voluntary contributions Public school-run with non-profit support Parent-Led Non- Profit Model Las Lomitas (Menlo Park)Parent-led volunteer non- profit $225 per sport ($250 if late) Smaller scale than Palo Alto’s program Item 5 Item 5 Staff Presentation Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 32 Packet Pg. 109 of 245 ALTERATIVE PROGRAM MANAGMENT: Exploration In preparation of reviewing possible changes to the MSA management model, staff put out a Request for Information. •RFI received two responses, each outlining a distinct approach to managing the program •Partial program management, focused on individual sports •Full program management, focused on assuming full program responsibility. Item 5 Item 5 Staff Presentation Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 33 Packet Pg. 110 of 245 ALTERATIVE: Partial Program Management •Provided by Palo Alto Middle School Athletics Community Organization, a local nonprofit. •Proposed to operate Cross Country and Track and Field •Model offers lower registration fees -$200 per student •Free access for income-qualified families •Higher coaching compensation $50 per hour •Customized jerseys •Points to positive experience operating Cross Country model Item 5 Item 5 Staff Presentation Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 34 Packet Pg. 111 of 245 ALTERATIVE: Full Program Management •Provided by Rising Stars LLC •Proposed operating full program or subset of program •Model offered a fee of $225 per student •Pointed to experience in afterschool programing and staff recruitment at key qualifications. Item 5 Item 5 Staff Presentation Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 35 Packet Pg. 112 of 245 ALTERATIVE: Program Management Both program management alternatives offer lowers costs to participants but also come with challenges. •Partial program management may lead to higher registrations costs for the sports remaining, as many fixed costs would remain. •Full Program Management could reduce capacity if external organization is less committed to universal access. Item 5 Item 5 Staff Presentation Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 36 Packet Pg. 113 of 245 ALTERATIVE: Tiered Fee Structure •Create a tiered fee structure based on costs of running each sport •This would decrease the costs of some sports while increasing the costs of others •While this would make some sports more accessible for some, the increase in costs to other sports could create additional barriers to access. Item 5 Item 5 Staff Presentation Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 37 Packet Pg. 114 of 245 ALTERATIVE: Partnership with Non-Profit Partnership with nonprofit fundraising support •Nonprofit could engage in fundraising and community partnership •Focus on reducing costs or increasing financial assistance •Possible focus of Palo Alto Recreation Foundation, who currently support Recreation Programing. Item 5 Item 5 Staff Presentation Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 38 Packet Pg. 115 of 245 NEXT STEPS Middle School Athletics Program seeks to balance affordability, equity, and operational sustainability. Staff continue to pursue improvements through •Increased coaching recruitment and retention •Expanded sports offerings •Inclusive registration processes •Promotion of fee reduction program Staff is seeking Parks and Recreation Commission feedback on the following: •Current interest in exploring Public/Private partnership •Feedback on preferred models •Interest in fee structure adjustments •Focus on partnership with non-profit •Additional suggested areas of study for improvement. Item 5 Item 5 Staff Presentation Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 39 Packet Pg. 116 of 245 Presented by: Adam Howard, Senior Community Services Manager Item 5 Item 5 Staff Presentation Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 40 Packet Pg. 117 of 245 Parks and Recreation Commission Staff Report From: Community Services Meeting Date: July 22, 2025 Report #: 2506-4770 TITLE Informational Update on Parkland Dedication Efforts RECOMMENDATION Receive the informational update on Parkland Dedication efforts and provide feedback on site locations BACKGROUND The City of Palo Alto’s Parks, Trails, Natural Open Space, and Recreation Master Plan1 includes a policy focused on parkland inventory. Policy 1.B states, “Expand parkland inventory using the National Recreation and Park Association standard as a guide for park development in Palo Alto’s Urban Service Areas. New parkland should be added to meet and maintain the standard of 4 acres per 1,000 residents. Parkland should expand with population, be well distributed across the community and be of sufficient size to meet the varied needs of neighborhoods and the broader community. Maximum service area should be ½ mile.” An Ad Hoc of the Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC) was created to assist in identifying and advancing parkland dedications. In the last few years, the PRC has recommended, and the City Council has adopted ordinances to dedicate two properties as parkland. Boulware Park Addition The City of Palo Alto purchased a 0.64-acre parcel across a public street from Boulware Park in 2019 for the purpose of expanding Boulware Park. An ordinance was adopted by the City Council on April 11, 2022 to dedicate the 0.64-acre property as parkland. The first reading of the ordinance occurred on February 10, 2020. Since that time, the new parkland area has been developed as a neighborhood park and opened to the community in early 2025. Fred Eyerly Tower Well Park 1 Palo Alto Parks, Trails, Natural Open Space, and Recreation Master Plan, 2017, https://www.paloalto.gov/Departments/Public-Works/Engineering-Services/Parks-Master-Plan Item 6 Item 6 Staff Report Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 1 Packet Pg. 118 of 245 the RWQCP for the next 50 years. The LRFP Update includes a Biosolids Facilities Plan (BFP) Update, which will evaluate near-term and long-term biosolids management strategies and assess potential facility siting options within the existing plant boundary, the 2.3-acre portion of the Measure E site, or offsite treatment alternatives. The LRFP Update will also include analysis of the feasibility of a proposed wildlife corridor buffer area. The biosolids planning process has required careful consideration due to the rapid evolution of regulations and treatment technologies, requiring careful evaluation to identify the most appropriate and feasible solution before finalizing recommendations. Most recently, staff hosted a Biosolids Input Workshop on May 20, 2025, inviting community members to learn about biosolids management alternatives, provide feedback on technology evaluations, and actively participate in shaping the upcoming BFP Update. A second workshop covering the same material was held on July 1, 2025, to ensure additional opportunities for community participation. Staff expect to bring forward a preliminary recommendation on biosolids management alternatives by fall 2025, with the full LRFP Update anticipated for completion in 2027. The outcomes of these planning efforts will guide whether an environmental facility is necessary and appropriately located on the Measure E site. Further consideration of converting all or part of the site to dedicated parkland will follow completion of the LRFP and BFP Updates, which will clarify long-term facility needs and land use options. Figure 1: Location of the Measure E Site (in blue) Item 6 Item 6 Staff Report Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 3 Packet Pg. 120 of 245 Rinconada Community Gardens The area of land known as the Rinconada Community Gardens is approximately 2.5 acres and is currently not dedicated as parkland. A portion of the garden area is a potential site for the Utilities Department to expand the footprint of the existing groundwater well located in the northwest corner of the gardens. It is possible that a portion of the community garden area could be dedicated while the area that could potentially be needed for future utilities needs remain undedicated. The area that could be dedicated in the near-term is approximately two acres. This would require a land survey of the area to be dedicated, Parks and Recreation Commission review and recommendation, and an ordinance to be adopted by the City Council. Figure 2: Rinconada Community Gardens (General area that could be dedicated outlined in black) Item 6 Item 6 Staff Report Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 4 Packet Pg. 121 of 245 340 Portage Avenue (Former Fry’s Electronics Site) As part of the development at the former Fry’s Electronics site, a 2.25-acre area will be dedicated to the City for park land. Pre-planning work is underway and transfer of the land to the City would occur in Fall 2025. The transfer of land and subsequent dedication as parkland does not include design and construction of park amenities. Park development would be the responsibility of the City and would require a new Capital Improvement Project for park design and construction. Figure 3 shows the location of the future park dedication area (in green), and approximate area of future below market rate (BMR) housing that will be part of the site development is indicated with a blue circle. Figure 3: Location of future park at 340 Portage Avenue (General area of dedication in green) San Antonio Road Area Plan The City is currently undergoing a planning effort for a 275.3-acre area along the San Antonio Road corridor. The San Antonio Road Area Plan will establish a vision for the planning area and detail policies and strategies that will address land use, housing, mobility and interconnectivity, urban design and placemaking, community services and facilities, and explore the financial Item 6 Item 6 Staff Report Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 5 Packet Pg. 122 of 245 feasibility of the recommendations made. As part of this project, areas for future parkland will need to be identified and established, providing opportunities for the City to add dedicated parkland to its existing inventory. A Community Advisory Group has been established that will include the Chair of the Parks and Recreation Commission, and a Technical Advisory Group will include several representatives of the Community Services Department. The area plan project is scheduled to be completed by June of 2028. More information can be found on the project website9. Additional city-owned properties that have been reviewed but are not being considered are described below. San Antonio Avenue at Ponce Drive The area outlined below was identified as a potential area for a future mini park or dog park. This area is not being pursued due to unknowns related to future development and transportation projects in this area. Figure 4: Location of proposed mini park at San Antonio Avenue at Ponce Drive (General area outlined in black) 9 San Antonio Road Area Plan Project Webpage; https://www.paloalto.gov/Departments/Planning-Development- Services/Housing-Policies-Projects/San-Antonio-Road-Area-Plan Item 6 Item 6 Staff Report Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 6 Packet Pg. 123 of 245 Northern portion of Former Los Altos Treatment Plant Site The former Los Altos Treatment Plant (LATP) site is a nearly 14-acre land area that was previously a treatment facility for the City of Los Altos. The northern third of the site is approximately 4 acres of conservation land that is not currently dedicated parkland. This area is a potential site for a regional water purification facility so should not be dedicated at this time, however; if this location is no longer considered as a viable location for a purification facility or other uses it could be considered for park dedication. Figure 5: Former Los Altos Treatment Plant site (approximate area of conservation land shown in yellow) Item 6 Item 6 Staff Report Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 7 Packet Pg. 124 of 245 PARKLAND DEDICATIONProgress Report JULY 22, 2025 www.paloalto.gov Item 6 Item 6 Staff Presentation Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 8 Packet Pg. 125 of 245 4 BACKGROUND •Palo Alto Municipal Code Section 22.08 defines dedicated parkland. •The National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) has previously provided guidance on the number of acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. •The 2024-2025 and 2025-2026 PRC workplans include a goal to “Pursue and evaluate top priority potential sites and identify potential new sites to recommend dedicating as parkland within our community.” •A PRC Ad Hoc was created to assist staff with this work. Item 6 Item 6 Staff Presentation Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 9 Packet Pg. 126 of 245 2 PARKLAND STANDARDS Palo Alto Parks, Trails, Natural Open Space, and Recreation Master Plan, 2017 Policy 1.B - Expand parkland inventory using the NRPA standard as a guide for park development in Palo Alto’s Urban Service Areas. New parkland should be added to meet and maintain the standard of 4 acres per 1,000 residents. Parkland should expand with population, be well distributed across the community and be of sufficient size to meet the varied needs of neighborhoods and the broader community. Maximum service area should be ½ mile. Item 6 Item 6 Staff Presentation Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 10 Packet Pg. 127 of 245 3 PARKLAND STANDARDS City of Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan 2030 Policy C-4.6 - Use the NRPA Standards as guidelines for locating and developing new parks. These guidelines are as follows: •Neighborhood parks should be at least two (2) acres in size, although sites as small as ½-acre may be needed as supplementary facilities. -The maximum service area radius should be ½-mile. -Two acres of neighborhood park land should be provided for each 1,000 people. •District parks should be at least five (5) acres in size. -The maximum service area radius should be one (1) mile. -Two acres of district park land should be provided for each 1,000 people. Item 6 Item 6 Staff Presentation Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 11 Packet Pg. 128 of 245 4 CURRENT PARKLAND INVENTORY Dedicated parkland: •34 city parks totaling 175 acres • 4 open space preserves totaling 4,030 acres Many other outdoor areas exist that are not currently dedicated parkland but function as community space for recreational purposes. Item 6 Item 6 Staff Presentation Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 12 Packet Pg. 129 of 245 5 RECENT ADDITIONS Fred Eyerly Tower Well Park •New park dedication in downtown Palo Alto •Added 0.2 ac parkland •Pathway, native plantings, interpretive signage Boulware Park •Expanded park by 0.64 acres •Added several amenities including a new dog park, basketball courts, playground, and other features. •Expansion opened in April 2025 Item 6 Item 6 Staff Presentation Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 13 Packet Pg. 130 of 245 1 SITES REVIEWED FOR POTENTIAL DEDICATION Location Size Status Measure E Site Up to 10 acres Pending feasibility of the site for a potential biosolids processing facility. Rinconada Community Gardens 2 acres 2 acres of the 2.5 -acre site could be dedicated in the near term. San Antonio Ave at Ponce Drive <1 acre Potential need for transportation projects in this area. Portion of LATP Site 4 acres Pending decision on location of a future regional water purification facility. Item 6 Item 6 Staff Presentation Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 14 Packet Pg. 131 of 245 1 FUTURE DEDICATION OPPORTUNITIES 340 Portage Avenue (Former Fry’s Site) •2.25 acres will be dedicated for parkland •Would require a new CIP to design and construct the site •No timeframe set for design/construction San Antonio Road Area Plan •Planning effort underway for a 275.3-acre area along the San Antonio Road corridor •Will address land use, housing, mobility, community services and facilities, among other policies and strategies. •Areas for future parkland will need to be identified and established. •A Community Advisory Group and Technical Advisory Group have been created to assist with the effort. Item 6 Item 6 Staff Presentation Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 15 Packet Pg. 132 of 245 KRISTEN O’KANE Director Community Services Kristen.o’kane@paloalto.gov 650-463-4908 Item 6 Item 6 Staff Presentation Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 16 Packet Pg. 133 of 245 From:Billy Wahng To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Support of Pickleball Expansion in Mitchell Park Date:Wednesday, July 16, 2025 2:33:36 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clickingon links. i Hi there, I saw a post on nextdoor that highlights residents opposing expansion of pickleball court. I want to voice my support in the expansion of these pickleball courts. My wife and I moved to Palo Alto three years back and live very close by to Mitchell park (767 Montrose). Palo Alto Pickleball courts are quite famous, even known outside the country. The people are nice, the courts are great, it's a big community. It's a shame that people have to wait so long, while the tennis courts are hardly used. We have to go outside of Palo Alto to play pickleball and that hardly seems fair to us. I do have one request/suggestion that we have a booking system to smooth things out and prioritize for residents. Many cities have a booking system and would definitely cut down the traffic if at least some of the courts are reservation based and would alleviate the concerns of flooding. Reference: https://nextdoor.com/p/KY9BQt5CZgHR? utm_source=share&extras=MjcyMjM5MjE%3D&ne_link_preview_links=&utm_campaign=1752700253853&share_action_id=9eaaf305- 382b-4dff-8c4b-10f8df698aed This message needs your attention This is a personal email address. This is their first email to your company. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 1 Packet Pg. 134 of 245 From:Cecilia Brunelle To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Southwest Chapter AAAE Annual Conference Date:Tuesday, July 15, 2025 11:47:23 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Hi Cityofpaloalto, I'm following up if you're interested to get the Registrants/Attendees List. · Southwest Chapter AAAE Annual Conference ( Newport Beach, USA, 20 - 23 Jul 2025) · 1,000+ Attendees I'm waiting for your response so I can let you know the costs and more information. Regards, Cecilia – Business Executive This message needs your attention You've never replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 2 Packet Pg. 135 of 245 From:Aram James To:Jeff Rosen; Jay Boyarsky; Veenker, Vicki; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23 Cc:board@pausd.org; board@valleywater.org; boardfeedback@smcgov.org; BoardOperations; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Josh Becker; Council, City; GRP-City Council; city.council@menlopark.gov; Nash, Betsy; dcombs@menlopark.gov; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; Dave Price; Emily Mibach; EPA Today; Diana Diamond; Stump, Molly; Figueroa, Eric; Sean Allen; Pat M; Raymond Goins; Gardener, Liz; Lotus Fong; h.etzko@gmail.com; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Binder, Andrew; Baker, Rob; Robert Salonga; Rowena Chiu; Vara Ramakrishnan; Gennady Sheyner; Salem Ajluni; PD Kristina Bell; Reifschneider, James; james pitkin; Steve Wagstaffe; Wagner, April; Foley, Michael; Friends of Cubberley; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Zelkha, Mila; Rodriguez, Miguel; Human Relations Commission; planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.0rg; ParkRec Commission; Don Austin; Yolanda Conaway Subject:In Colombia, The Hague Group Charges Israel With Genocide Date:Tuesday, July 15, 2025 3:37:09 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i In Colombia, The Hague Group Charges Israel With Genocide https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/israel-genocide-united-states-the-hague-group-colombia- international-law-united-nations?publication_id=2510348&utm_campaign=email-post- title&r=fjmzt&utm_medium=email This message needs your attention Some Recipients have never replied to this person. This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 3 Packet Pg. 136 of 245 From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You have new held messages Date:Tuesday, July 15, 2025 12:12:02 PM Logo You have new held messages You can release all of your held messages and permit or block future emails from the senders, or manage messages individually. Release all Permit all Block all You can also manage held messages in your Personal Portal. Spam Policy hello@lightasairboats.com Surfacing For Playgrounds, Rooftops, Gyms & More! 2025-07-15 07:31 Release Permit Block Spam Policy info-friendsjmz.org@shared1.ccsend.com Who's New in the Zoo? 2025-07-15 10:08 Release Permit Block Release all Permit all Block all © 2019 Mimecast Services Limited. Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 4 Packet Pg. 137 of 245 From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You have new held messages Date:Monday, July 14, 2025 12:22:08 PM Logo You have new held messages You can release all of your held messages and permit or block future emails from the senders, or manage messages individually. Release all Permit all Block all You can also manage held messages in your Personal Portal. Spam Policy acterra@mailman.bloomerang-mail.com Speak Out This Summer, Remembering a Dear Friend, Green Homeowners Needed! 2025-07-14 09:34 Release Permit Block Release all Permit all Block all © 2019 Mimecast Services Limited. Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 5 Packet Pg. 138 of 245 From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You have new held messages Date:Monday, July 14, 2025 7:27:08 AM Logo You have new held messages You can release all of your held messages and permit or block future emails from the senders, or manage messages individually. Release all Permit all Block all You can also manage held messages in your Personal Portal. Spam Policy jake.gentile@turftank-usa.com Re: Palo Alto Parks and Recreation / Turf Tank 2025-07-14 05:05 Release Permit Block Release all Permit all Block all © 2019 Mimecast Services Limited. Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 6 Packet Pg. 139 of 245 Dear Goncalo,, This winter, give your guests an experience they’ll never forget with a synthetic ice rink from Holiday Light Show. Our rinks look and feel similar to real ice but don’t require refrigeration or freezing temperatures, making them easy to install in any climate! Whether you're planning a holiday light show, winter festival, or a winter community celebration, our synthetic ice rinks add fun and excitement that guests of all ages will enjoy! Ready to make your winter event truly stand out? Click here to learn more and reserve your rink! Click here to unsubscribe From:Matthew Glaser To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Add the Magic of Ice Skating to Your Winter Festivities! Date:Monday, July 14, 2025 6:21:08 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious ofopening attachments and clicking on links. i Mailin This message needs your attention No employee in your company has ever replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 7 Packet Pg. 140 of 245 From:Aram James To:Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; PD Kristina Bell; city.council@menlopark.gov; Yolanda Conaway; Don Austin; planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.0rg; ParkRec Commission; GRP-City Council; Gardener, Liz; Reifschneider, James Subject:Aram James (DJ-1-12-18) (00000003) Date:Sunday, July 13, 2025 9:03:37 PM Attachments:Aram James (DJ-1-12-18) (00000003).pdf CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i This message needs your attention Some Recipients have never replied to this person. This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 8 Packet Pg. 141 of 245 From:Aram James To:Jeff Rosen; Jay Boyarsky; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Josh Becker; planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.0rg; ParkRec Commission; board@pausd.org; Perron, Zachary; board@valleywater.org; John Burt; Zelkha, Mila; Nicole Chiu-Wang; Rowena Chiu; BoardOperations; boardfeedback@smcgov.org; GRP-City Council; Shikada, Ed; Lauing, Ed; Nash, Betsy; dcombs@menlopark.gov; city.council@menlopark.gov; citycouncil@mountainview.gov; City Attorney; Emily Mibach; Stump, Molly; Dave Price; Bryan Gobin; h.etzko@gmail.com; EPA Today; Freddie.Quintana@sen.ca.gov; Sheree Roth; Lori Meyers; Gerry Gras; Gennady Sheyner; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Blackshire, Geoffrey; Jasso, Tamara; Clerk, City; Jeff Conrad; Jensen, Eric; Foley, Michael; Mickie Winkler; Figueroa, Eric; cromero@cityofepa.org; Rose Lynn; Ruth Silver Taube; Wagner, April; Steve Wagstaffe; qy2103@columbia.edu; Burt, Patrick; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov Cc:Reckdahl, Keith; Dana St. George; Jeff Hayden; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; james pitkin; Reifschneider, James; Baker, Rob; roberta ahlquist; Robert. Jonsen; Raymond Goins; Vara Ramakrishnan; Cribbs, Anne; Lee, Craig; Diana Diamond Subject:Netanyahu Says It"s Antisemitic For Israeli Soldiers To Describe Their Own Atrocities Date:Sunday, July 13, 2025 8:44:48 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Netanyahu Says It's Antisemitic For Israeli Soldiers To Describe Their Own Atrocities https://www.caitlinjohnst.one/p/netanyahu-says-its-antisemitic-for? utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web This message needs your attention Some Recipients have never replied to this person. This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 9 Packet Pg. 142 of 245 From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You have new held messages Date:Sunday, July 13, 2025 12:14:06 PM Logo You have new held messages You can release all of your held messages and permit or block future emails from the senders, or manage messages individually. Release all Permit all Block all You can also manage held messages in your Personal Portal. Spam Policy hello@lightasairboats.com Giant Inflatables Await! Jump into Giant-Sized Fun! 2025-07-13 07:30 Release Permit Block Release all Permit all Block all © 2019 Mimecast Services Limited. Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 10 Packet Pg. 143 of 245 From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You have new held messages Date:Friday, July 11, 2025 12:18:10 PM Logo You have new held messages You can release all of your held messages and permit or block future emails from the senders, or manage messages individually. Release all Permit all Block all You can also manage held messages in your Personal Portal. Spam Policy nora.claire@sparkexpozone.live Visitor List of TheFitExpo Anaheim 2025-07-11 11:55 Release Permit Block Release all Permit all Block all © 2019 Mimecast Services Limited. Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 11 Packet Pg. 144 of 245 From:Aram James To:Jeff Rosen; Jay Boyarsky; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; Josh Becker; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Lauing, Ed; Vicki Veenker; Reckdahl, Keith; Liz Kniss; Emily Mibach; Gennady Sheyner; h.etzko@gmail.com Cc:Lythcott-Haims, Julie; Yolanda Conaway; Don Austin; Doug Minkler; Cribbs, Anne; planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.0rg; ParkRec Commission; Paul George @ PPJC; Salem Ajluni; PD Kristina Bell; Angel, David; Binder, Andrew; Reifschneider, James; Tim James; Ruth Silver Taube; Raymond Goins; Rowena Chiu; Nicole Chiu-Wang; Vara Ramakrishnan; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Rodriguez, Miguel; Zelkha, Mila; Figueroa, Eric; Palo Alto Free Press; Lotus Fong; Friends of Cubberley; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan; Diana Diamond; board@pausd.org; BoardOperations; board@valleywater.org; GRP-City Council; Raymond Goins; james pitkin; EPA Today; Dave Price; Greg Tanaka; Sean Allen; sharon jackson; Perron, Zachary; Wagner, April; Baker, Rob; roberta ahlquist; Dana St. George; Gardener, Liz; Lu, George; Blackshire, Geoffrey; Jasso, Tamara; Shikada, Ed; editor@paweekly.com; city.council@menlopark.gov; Nash, Betsy; dcombs@menlopark.gov; Foley, Michael; Councilmember Chappie Jones; Barberini, Christopher; Enberg, Nicholas; Steve Wagstaffe; dennis burns; DuJuan Green; Tom DuBois; Holman, Karen (external); Supervisor Susan Ellenberg; Jeff Conrad; Stump, Molly; Quyen Vuong; Nious, Kevin (NBCUniversal); jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; Lori Meyers; Sheree Roth; Pat M; Marina Lopez; Freddie.Quintana@sen.ca.gov Subject:UN Special Rapporteur Albanese says dozens of companies play a role in ‘sustaining Israel’s settler-colonial project’. Date:Thursday, July 10, 2025 3:44:08 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i UN Special Rapporteur Albanese says dozens of companies play a role in ‘sustaining Israel’s settler-colonial project’. Source: Al Jazeera https://share.google/VD7QWxhK9QH0h3BWO This message needs your attention Some Recipients have never replied to this person. This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 12 Packet Pg. 145 of 245 From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You have new held messages Date:Thursday, July 10, 2025 12:23:07 PM Logo You have new held messages You can release all of your held messages and permit or block future emails from the senders, or manage messages individually. Release all Permit all Block all You can also manage held messages in your Personal Portal. Spam Policy hello@lightasairboats.com Effortless Exploration with Electric SUPs & Water Bikes 2025-07-10 07:31 Release Permit Block Release all Permit all Block all © 2019 Mimecast Services Limited. Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 13 Packet Pg. 146 of 245 From:Aram James To:editor@paweekly.com; Shikada, Ed; Lait, Jonathan; Bill Johnson; Wagner, April; Dana St. George; Lu, George; Paul George @ PPJC; Nicole Chiu-Wang; Rowena Chiu; Perron, Zachary; Bil Barber; Lotus Fong; Yolanda Conaway; Don Austin; Freddie.Quintana@sen.ca.gov; Kaloma Smith; Tom DuBois; Daniel Kottke; PD Kristina Bell; Foley, Michael; Mickie Winkler Cc:Cribbs, Anne; planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.0rg; ParkRec Commission; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan; editor@almanacnews.com; eddie.aubrey@sanjoseca.gov; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; Bryan Gobin; Friends of Cubberley; GRP-City Council; Jeff Conrad; city.council@menlopark.gov; Zelkha, Mila Subject:Re: There’s No Excuse For Tasers In Our Jails -from the archives of Richard Konda & Aram James Date:Thursday, July 10, 2025 11:16:50 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 10:14 AM Aram James <abjpd1@gmail.com> wrote: This message needs your attention Some Recipients have never replied to this person. This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 14 Packet Pg. 147 of 245 From:Aram James To:editor@paweekly.com; Shikada, Ed; Lait, Jonathan; Bill Johnson; Wagner, April; Dana St. George; Lu, George; Paul George @ PPJC; Nicole Chiu-Wang; Rowena Chiu; Perron, Zachary; Bil Barber; Lotus Fong; Yolanda Conaway; Don Austin; Freddie.Quintana@sen.ca.gov; Kaloma Smith; Tom DuBois; Daniel Kottke; PD Kristina Bell; Foley, Michael; Mickie Winkler Cc:Cribbs, Anne; planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.0rg; ParkRec Commission; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan; editor@almanacnews.com; eddie.aubrey@sanjoseca.gov; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; Bryan Gobin; Friends of Cubberley; GRP-City Council; Jeff Conrad; city.council@menlopark.gov; Zelkha, Mila Subject:Re: There’s No Excuse For Tasers In Our Jails -from the archives of Richard Konda & Aram James Date:Thursday, July 10, 2025 11:16:48 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 11:14 AM Aram James <abjpd1@gmail.com> wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 10:14 AM Aram James <abjpd1@gmail.com> wrote: This message needs your attention Some Recipients have never replied to this person. This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 15 Packet Pg. 148 of 245 From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You have new held messages Date:Thursday, July 10, 2025 7:23:53 AM Logo You have new held messages You can release all of your held messages and permit or block future emails from the senders, or manage messages individually. Release all Permit all Block all You can also manage held messages in your Personal Portal. Spam Policy jake.gentile@turftank-usa.com Re: Palo Alto Parks and Recreation / Turf Tank 2025-07-10 05:03 Release Permit Block Release all Permit all Block all © 2019 Mimecast Services Limited. Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 16 Packet Pg. 149 of 245 From:Lisa Adaboina To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Streamline and simplify all recreational activities of City Of Palo Alto Date:Wednesday, July 9, 2025 8:11:03 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Hi City, Managing registrations, facility bookings, payments, and coordinating schedules—it’s a lot. What if one platform could take all of that off your plate? Meet SportsPlus: A powerful, all-in-one platform built for recreation departments like City Of Palo Alto, helping you: Streamline registrations and payments Automate scheduling and team management Open online facility booking Communicate with everyone instantly SportsPlus will simplify and centralize all recreational activities for City Of Palo Alto, so you can focus on your community—not spreadsheets. Let’s show you what SportsPlus can do for you: Book a Personal Demo Looking forward, Lisa Adaboina, Your recreation technology consultant. If you don't want to receive this type of email in the future, please unsubscribe. Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 17 Packet Pg. 150 of 245 From:nathan.cllara@gmail.com To:ParkRec Commission Subject:TheFitExpo Anaheim Visitor List Date:Wednesday, July 9, 2025 6:09:53 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Hi, We are pleased to inform you that the attendee list of The FitExpo Anaheim 2025 02 - 03 Aug 2025 Anaheim Convention Center, Anaheim, USA The list contains 12,743 pre-registered attendees with email addresses, contact numbers, and more in an Excel format. We do charge for our services; would you like to See What is the price? Regards, Nathan Clara Marketing Analyst opt Out To Reply in Subject Line This message needs your attention No employee in your company has ever replied to this person. This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 18 Packet Pg. 151 of 245 From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You have new held messages Date:Monday, July 7, 2025 12:24:11 PM Logo You have new held messages You can release all of your held messages and permit or block future emails from the senders, or manage messages individually. Release all Permit all Block all You can also manage held messages in your Personal Portal. Spam Policy 18217@urrw.ac.th annual interest rate of 3% 2025-07-07 07:44 Release Permit Block Release all Permit all Block all © 2019 Mimecast Services Limited. Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 19 Packet Pg. 152 of 245 From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You have new held messages Date:Monday, July 7, 2025 7:14:16 AM Logo You have new held messages You can release all of your held messages and permit or block future emails from the senders, or manage messages individually. Release all Permit all Block all You can also manage held messages in your Personal Portal. Spam Policy jake.gentile@turftank-usa.com Re: Palo Alto Parks and Recreation / Turf Tank 2025-07-07 05:16 Release Permit Block Release all Permit all Block all © 2019 Mimecast Services Limited. Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 20 Packet Pg. 153 of 245 From:Aram James To:Jeff Rosen Cc:Ed Lauing; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; Josh Becker; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; h.etzko@gmail.com; Lythcott-Haims, Julie; Raymond Goins; Lori Meyers; Sheree Roth; ladoris cordell; Reckdahl, Keith; Gennady Sheyner; Paul George @ PPJC; Dana St. George; Gerry Gras; Jeff Conrad; Jay Boyarsky; Zelkha, Mila; Binder, Andrew; dennis burns; DuJuan Green; Sean Allen; Gennady Sheyner; Diana Diamond; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan; Councilmember Chappie Jones; District9@sanjoseca.gov; District2@sanjoseca.gov; San José Spotlight; Jensen, Eric; Jessica Speiser; Jennifer Morrow San José Spotlight; board@valleywater.org; board@pausd.org; BoardOperations; John Burt; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Foley, Michael; Emily Mibach; Braden Cartwright; EPA Today; Cribbs, Anne; planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.0rg; ParkRec Commission; Steve Wagstaffe; Baker, Rob; Human Relations Commission; Burt, Patrick; Council, City; city.council@menlopark.gov; Nash, Betsy; dcombs@menlopark.gov; Don Austin; Rowena Chiu; Reifschneider, James; Donna Wallach; Raj Jayadev; Patrice Ventresca; Vara Ramakrishnan; Karen Holman; Tom DuBois; Lu, George; Jasso, Tamara; Yolanda Conaway; yolanda; Supervisor Susan Ellenberg; Supervisor Otto Lee; sharon jackson; Stump, Molly; editor@paweekly.com; Shikada, Ed; Wagner, April; Bryan Gobin; james pitkin; Freddie.Quintana@sen.ca.gov; frances.Rothschild@jud.ca.gov Subject:Re: Dolores Carr full of it ( see her op-ed in today’s Mercury News) Date:Thursday, July 3, 2025 1:36:30 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Subject: Support for Ending the Death Penalty Hi Jeff, Thank you for your continued efforts to end the racist and unjust death penalty. While we may disagree on the issues surrounding Israel—I support the elimination of Israel and advocate for a one-state solution—I commend your courageous stance against the death penalty. I also want to reiterate my suggestion that your office consider recusing itself from the Stanford 12 case. As I mentioned before, the optics of your office's involvement in that case are concerning. If you were required to argue for a recusal, I believe an honest evaluation— given both your conscious and unconscious biases and the significant influence of your upbringing as a Zionist—would lead you to conclude that recusing yourself is the right decision. As the outstanding lawyer that you are, making this choice should be straightforward. Please do the right thing. Best, Aram This message needs your attention Some Recipients have never replied to this person. This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 21 Packet Pg. 154 of 245 From:Office of Supervisor Otto Lee To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Fourth of July: Where to see fireworks, how to be safe Date:Thursday, July 3, 2025 10:54:22 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious ofopening attachments and clicking on links. i Hello, It's almost time to celebrate our country'sindependence this Fourth of July, to allow ourresidents unalienable rights that include life,liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. As we prepare for the forthcoming federalholiday this Friday, there are a few things that Iwould encourage our District 3 residents andCounty at large to keep in mind to have the bestholiday possible! Fourth of July events throughout the county This message needs your attention You've never replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 22 Packet Pg. 155 of 245 Where to watch fireworks countywide Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 23 Packet Pg. 156 of 245 How to stay safe around fireworks Many thanks to all of our partners countywide-- Santa Clara County Fire Department, City ofSunnyvale, City of Milpitas, City of San Jose,and all of our fire agencies -- for ensuring asafe and enjoyable holiday ahead. Enjoy your time off with your loved ones, andwe look forward to seeing you out there! Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 24 Packet Pg. 157 of 245 Sincerely, Otto Lee Board President Santa Clara County Supervisor, District 3 SupervisorLee.org 70 West Hedding 10th Floor San José, CA 95110 (408) 299-5030 Email Supervisor Lee District 3 Website Unsubscribe from future messages. Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 25 Packet Pg. 158 of 245 From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You have new held messages Date:Thursday, July 3, 2025 7:13:47 AM Logo You have new held messages You can release all of your held messages and permit or block future emails from the senders, or manage messages individually. Release all Permit all Block all You can also manage held messages in your Personal Portal. Spam Policy hello@lightasairboats.com The 4th of July Sale is here! 2025-07-03 06:31 Release Permit Block Release all Permit all Block all © 2019 Mimecast Services Limited. Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 26 Packet Pg. 159 of 245 From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You have new held messages Date:Tuesday, July 1, 2025 7:26:28 AM Logo You have new held messages You can release all of your held messages and permit or block future emails from the senders, or manage messages individually. Release all Permit all Block all You can also manage held messages in your Personal Portal. Spam Policy jake.gentile@turftank-usa.com Palo Alto Parks and Recreation / Turf Tank 2025-07-01 05:06 Release Permit Block Release all Permit all Block all © 2019 Mimecast Services Limited. Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 27 Packet Pg. 160 of 245 From:Light As Air Boats To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Wnat to Impress Your Guests This Summer? Date:Tuesday, July 1, 2025 6:31:30 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of openingattachments and clicking on links. i SHOP NOW Hi there! Whether you're helping to make memories at your resort or delivering pristine yacht excitement, we’ve got everything you need to upgrade your space. ♀ This message needs your attention No employee in your company has ever replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 28 Packet Pg. 161 of 245 The best in Water Leisure & Luxury! For Quantity Discounts or Questions, call Andi Tel:706.619.6670 andi@lightasairboats.com SEE ALL YACHT PACKAGES HERE Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 29 Packet Pg. 162 of 245 From:Aram James To:Jeff Rosen; Jay Boyarsky; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Josh Becker; Council, City; Supervisor Susan Ellenberg; board@pausd.org; h.etzko@gmail.com; Ed Lauing; Veenker, Vicki; city.council@menlopark.gov; Binder, Andrew; Baker, Rob; Robert. Jonsen; planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.0rg; ParkRec Commission; Raymond Goins; Liz Kniss; Gardener, Liz; Dave Price; Emily Mibach; Diana Diamond; Perron, Zachary; Wagner, April; Reifschneider, James; Rowena Chiu; board@valleywater.org; BoardOperations Subject:Re: Leaked Chats Show Pro-Israel Extremist Group Betar Organizing Street Confrontations Date:Sunday, June 29, 2025 9:06:09 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Please respond in a timely fashion. Thanks, Aram Jay, I’m particularly interested on your thoughts about this article's comments about the ADL given your past volunteer work for the organization. If anything I’ve said about your past association with the ADL is in error please correct me. Best- Aram On Sun, Jun 29, 2025 at 12:22 PM Aram James <abjpd1@gmail.com> wrote: Leaked Chats Show Pro-Israel Extremist Group Betar Organizing Street Confrontations Jeff & Jay: Please provide additional information on Betar if you are willing. Thanks, Aram The group’s incitement earned them an “extremism” label by the ADL, a fellow pro-Israel organization with a separate history of targeting pro-Palestine activists Leaked Chats Show Pro-Israel Extremist This message needs your attention Some Recipients have never replied to this person. This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 30 Packet Pg. 163 of 245 Group Betar Organizing Street Confrontations https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/betar-protests-zionism-fascism-palestine? publication_id=2510348&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=fjmzt&utm_medium=email Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 31 Packet Pg. 164 of 245 From:Lauren Weston, Acterra To:ParkRec Commission Subject:What"s happening with AB 306? and more advocacy updates Date:Sunday, June 29, 2025 7:35:38 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious ofopening attachments and clicking on links. i acterra logo Advocacy Special Update from Acterra * * Action Alert * * Rally for BART and Caltrain in San Mateo County Bay Area transit faces dire cuts without San Mateo County's support for a regional funding measure. Join a rally at Millbrae Station (100 Serre Ave) from 5:30 - 6:30 PM on July 1. The transportation sector makes up the biggest share of the Bay Area's GHG emissions, and public transit is a critical climate solution. You can uplift the urgent message to local leaders to fund public transit and prevent service collapse. Sign Up for 7/1 Rally Legislative Updates This message needs your attention You've never replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 32 Packet Pg. 165 of 245 AB 306 Placed in Budget Trailer Bill Items in budget trailer bills receive a single up or down vote, letting lawmakers avoid the normal policy committee approval process. In an end-run maneuver, AB 306 (Schultz, Rivas) is now included in the budget trailer bill AB 130 (Gabriel) and is being heard by the Senate Budget Committee, with voting happening on Monday, June 30. The sprawling housing trailer bill includes a number of good things, including a total of $1.85B for Bay Area public transit as well as AB 609 (Wicks) speeding up the infill multifamily housing development process. However, Acterra and coalition partners like NRDC and Menlo Spark are asking that the AB 306 sections (29-31 and 37-42) be stricken from the trailer bill and instead go through careful consideration within the standard committee process (the Senate Housing and Local Government Committees, specifically). If passed, AB 306 would bar any changes to California’s building codes until 2031, depriving local governments of the ability to pass pro- electrification policies or energy-efficient standards that exceed state requirements. AB 306 might even interfere with cities’ abilities to implement the already-approved 2025 energy code. Speak up about this problematic bill by contacting your State legislators before it’s too late — especially if your Senator is on the Budget Committee (Bay Area members include Scott Wiener, Chair (D11); Christopher Cabaldon (D3); John Laird (D17); Jerry McNerney (D5); and Aisha Wahab (D10). You can use the "lookup tool" to identify your California elected officials. If you are in Sacramento, the hearing will be Monday, June 30 at 12:00 PM at 1021 O Street, Room 1200. (There is no virtual participation option.) Support for AB 1167, AB 524, and SB 332 AB 1167 (Berman and Addis) further restricts investor-owned utilities from using rate-payer funds for “political influence activities” and promotional advertising.” It will be heard in both Senate Judiciary and Energy. AB 524 (Wilson), the Farmland Access and Conservation for Thriving Communities Act, passed the Senate Natural Resources & Water Committee and heads to Senate Agriculture next. This bill is a first-of-its-kind leg up for beginning and underserved farmers who lack access to land. SB 332 (Wahab), the Investor-Owned Utility Accountability Act, calls for a comparative analysis of transition from an IOU model to public benefit corporation, development of a best value infrastructure procurement model and executive compensation structure, perform triennial equipment audits and post-wildfire infrastructure analysis, and post data on consumer account terminations and disconnections. SB 332 is under consideration in the Assembly Energy Committee. Opposition to AB 737 and AB 942 AB 737 (Quirk-Silva) seeks to add gas utilities to the administration of statewide decarbonization programs, which would be similar to making foxes managers of hen house energy performance. It is currently before the Senate Energy Committee, which includes some Bay Area members. It is notable that AB 737 seeks to substantially rewrite Energy Chair Becker’s 2022 decarbonization law SB 1112 to favor gas utilities. AB 942 (Calderon) attacks and imposes new costs to residential solar, ripping up existing 20- year Net Energy Meeting agreements and preventing new property owners from “inheriting” the Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 33 Packet Pg. 166 of 245 existing property’s NEM agreement. The fact that the bill sponsor is a 25-year SoCal Edison employee is not a coincidence. AB 942 is in Senate Energy. Governor Newsom Responds to Proposed Cuts to SNAP-Ed As this goes to press, the U.S. Senate plans to vote tonight (Sunday) on the domestic policy bill that will eliminate the entire budget of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Education (SNAP-Ed). This vital program helps low-income families make healthy food choices and lead active lives by supporting households in finding, purchasing, and preparing fresh, healthy foods on a limited budget. It's cost-effective: for every $1 invested in SNAP-Ed, more than $9 can be saved in future healthcare costs. Here in California, SNAP-Ed is known as CalFresh Healthy Living. Newsom said, "Hundreds of thousands of Californians who need food assistance will be at risk of losing it, and it will punish working people by ending their eligibility." Read the press release from the Governor's office. Read The next tragic—absurd—budget cut: SNAP-ED, by Marion Nestle, Food Politics blog, and the advocacy site Save SNAP-Ed, for more background on the issue Upcoming Events July 10 — Join Acterra's Green@Home Sustainable Living Showcase: Tour the Bell-Brown Home. These monthly tours occur at 6:30 PM on the second Thursday of the month through August. View these electric upgrades: two-bedroom all-electric ADU (exterior only), induction cooktop, heat pump HVAC, heat pump water heater, EV charger, and extra water- and energy- saving features. You’ll have the chance to ask questions, hear firsthand how the family made their sustainable choices, and get tips on contractors, rebates, and more. Register for location. July 12 — Food Insecurity: Update and Hunger at Home Presentation hosted by Valley Verde. 1:00 PM – 3:00 PM, 691 W San Carlos St, San Jose, CA 95126. Register here. July 22 — Zoom Workshop: Draft Strategies for Regional Climate Action - Bay Area Regional Climate Action Plan Public Workshop #3, from 6:00 – 7:30 PM PT. Register here. News and Media Governor Newsom signs executive order doubling down on state’s commitment to clean cars and trucks (source: Governor's press room). Federal judge orders release of EV charger funds in Advanced Clean Tech News This Oakland block tried to quit fossil fuels. Here's what they learned, from KQED. Harnessing the Power of Electric Vehicles Integrating Light-Duty EVs with the Grid in California. (Union of Concerned Scientists report, 2025). Support strong policy advocacy today. Your donation can help expand our impact on policy for decarbonization, sustainable food systems, and Bay Area climate action. Thank you for your support! Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 34 Packet Pg. 167 of 245 Donate Our Contact Information Acterra 3921 E Bayshore Rd Suite 210 Palo Alto, CA 94303 650.962.9876 https://www.acterra.org Unsubscribe | Manage email preferences Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 35 Packet Pg. 168 of 245 From:Robustelli, Sarah To:John Zeisler Cc:Open Space; friends@friendsofpaparks.org; Gollinger, Peter; Kleinhaus, Shani; Gary Hedden; ParkRec Commission; jeanpaul@canopy.org Subject:RE: Reforestation plan for Esther Clark Park? Date:Saturday, June 28, 2025 9:19:16 AM Attachments:image001.png image002.png image004.png image005.png image006.png image007.png image008.png Dear Mr. Zeisler, Thank you for reaching out and for your continued engagement with Esther Clark Preserve. We appreciate you taking the time to share your observations and questions regarding the tree removal and replanting efforts in the preserve. Staff has coordinated with Grassroots Ecology, and planted five native trees: three California Buckeyes, and two Big Leaf Maples in March 2025. These five-gallon trees were planted on the upper bank of the creek near the southern acorn planting site and are currently being watered and monitored by City staff. As the weather warms, watering frequency will increase per Grassroots Ecology’s recommendations. In addition to these trees, Grassroots Ecology also planted approximately 96–147 native seeds (acorns and buckeye) across two areas of the preserve in November 2024. While acorn and seed plantings are a common method of ecological restoration, we understand that early growth may not be visible to the public and that this approach may not meet everyone's expectations for more immediate reforestation. To respond to your specific questions: Future Tree Removals and Fire Mitigation: There are no immediate plans to remove additional eucalyptus trees in the preserve. The stumps left behind are being monitored, and staff may address regrowth in coordination with fire mitigation protocols. Fire mitigation for surrounding areas including public and private parcels, falls under separate jurisdiction and coordination, particularly in Los Altos Hills, though we are actively engaged in regional fire safety discussions. Replanting and Budget: At present, there is no separate replanting budget beyond the existing ecological restoration efforts. However, we are leveraging staff and nonprofit partnerships to support reforestation. We will continue to evaluate planting needs and opportunities in the coming seasons. Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 36 Packet Pg. 169 of 245 Offer for Water Access: Thank you for your generous offer to provide well water for tree irrigation. While this was noted during prior conversations, I will follow up with staff to revisit the feasibility of utilizing that resource, particularly if we pursue more mature tree plantings in future phases. Donations and Community Support: Yes, community donation, whether in the form of funding, in-kind resources, or partnerships can positively influence project scope. If you or others are interested in contributing, we would be happy to explore a coordinated effort, including what would be needed to support permitting, planting, and long-term maintenance. Finally, I want to reiterate that the City is committed to balancing fire safety, ecological restoration, and public interest. Your feedback helps us improve transparency and identify where we can do better. Sarah SARAH ROBUSTELLI Division Manager Open Space, Parks, and Golf Community Services Department (650) 617-3518 | sarah.robustelli@paloalto.gov www.paloalto.gov From: John Zeisler <z@zeisler.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2025 2:22 PM To: Robustelli, Sarah <Sarah.Robustelli@paloalto.gov> Cc: Open Space <Open.Space@PaloAlto.gov>; friends@friendsofpaparks.org; Gollinger, Peter <Peter.Gollinger@paloalto.gov>; Kleinhaus, Shani <shani@scvas.org>; Gary Hedden <gary@greentownlosaltos.org>; ParkRec Commission <parkrec.commission@PaloAlto.gov>; jeanpaul@canopy.org Subject: Reforestation plan for Esther Clark Park? CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Hi Ms Robustelli- I am a property owner on Robb Road, overlooking Esther Clark Park, a wonderful hidden Palo Alto preserve bounded by homeowners in Palo Alto and Los Altos Hills. I am writing to re-open my discussion that was underway with Steve Castile regarding replacement tree Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 37 Packet Pg. 170 of 245 ! This message could be suspicious The sender's email address couldn't be verified. No employee in your company has ever replied to this person. Mark Safe Report CGBANNERINDICATOR Hi Ms Robustelli- I am a property owner on Robb Road, overlooking Esther Clark Park, a wonderful hidden Palo Alto preserve bounded by homeowners in Palo Alto and Los Altos Hills. I am writing to re-open my discussion that was underway with Steve Castile regarding replacement tree planting in Esther Clark Park. As you may know, 38 mature eucalyptus trees up to 100’ tall were removed last fall for fire mitigation purposes with minimal neighborhood notice, only leaving unsightly stumps in their place. BTW, several of those stumps have already begun to sprout further eucalyptus saplings again. Apparently there was no wildlife mitigation plan. Hundreds of nesting birds occupied those trees including hawks and owls, and the preserve’s many forest canopies further provided shelter for deer, coyote, turkeys, bobcat and a dozen other smaller bird species including finches, swallows, jays and hummingbirds. The plan for reforestation is unclear at best. At the request of the local Audobon chapter, two eucalyptus trees were left in place at the last minute for a “Habitat Bridge” according to Michael Warner, Supervising Ranger. Replanting was begun shortly thereafter, and to date it has only consisted of acorns. Seriously. Not oak seedlings. Not oak saplings. Not more established oaks. Just acorns. And several of those plantings are in areas that are within the disc line for grass fire abatement. See enclosed example of replanting. It appears there was significantly more planning around deforestation than reforestation. So I have the following questions: - Will the remaining eucalyptus trees or other species be removed for the park? What about the remaining stumps? What fire mitigation measures are being taken for the adjacent eucalyptus trees in the surrounding public and private property? - What has the City done thus far to replace the trees? Is there a budgeted planting plan beyond acorns, to provide more habitat, shade and protection for the birds and other wildlife? Powered by Mimecast Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 38 Packet Pg. 171 of 245 - I offered the City fresh water access from the well on my property to allow more mature native trees to be replanted without concern for irrigation access in the field. My offer was met with indifference and “no budget”. Has this offer fallen on deaf ears? - Would a donation from members of the local community or the local Palo Alto and Los Altos Hills public-private partnerships influence the outcome? I hope to attend the Palo Alto neighborhood town hall tonight and am happy to share my comments there as well. Thanks, John Zeisler z@zeisler.com m: 650-743-6192 esther-clark-euc-restoration- ver013025 PDF Document · 7.4 MB Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 39 Packet Pg. 172 of 245 From:Cecilia Brunelle To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Southwest Chapter AAAE Annual Conference Date:Friday, June 27, 2025 12:09:56 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Hi Cityofpaloalto, I'm following up if you're interested to get the Registrants/Attendees List. · Southwest Chapter AAAE Annual Conference ( Newport Beach, USA, 20 - 23 Jul 2025) · 1,000+ Attendees I'm waiting for your response so I can let you know the costs and more information. Regards, Cecilia – Business Executive This message needs your attention You've never replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 40 Packet Pg. 173 of 245 From:Acterra"s EcoHappenings News To:ParkRec Commission Subject:NEW Green@Home Mini-Tour, Take Action to Save Local Transit, $10k Gift Match Ends Soon! Date:Thursday, June 26, 2025 7:30:44 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of openingattachments and clicking on links. EcoHappenings Newsletter 26 June 2025 Meet Greg (and Ember!), hosts of the NEW Green@Home Mini-Tour. We're excited to announce that Greg, one of our Green@Home Tour Hosts, is now leading monthly mini-tours of his home and ADU upgrades! These are intimate, small-group gatherings where you can see firsthand the upgrades Greg has made, and get your electrification questions answered. → Watch this 30-second video to learn more. → Register for the next tour on July 10 - spots are limited! We recently caught up with Greg at his Palo Alto home as he previewed some of the features he’ll be showcasing at the upcoming Green@Home Mini-Tour. Not to brag (okay, maybe just a little bit...), but his electric bill is $10 a month! Greg not only walked us through the energy-efficient upgrades he’s made to his primary home (if you go, see if you can spot the hidden EV charger in the driveway!), he also shared the process of building a fully electric, two-bedroom ADU on his property. On this preview tour, he showed us how quiet his heat pump water heater and HVAC system run (we were able to film right alongside them!) and explained the simple tweaks he made during installation that reduced noise even further. He walked us through his low-maintenance mulched lawn and showed us how the water from his washing machine irrigates his trees! We learned about EV chargers, electrical panels (no upgrades needed!), Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 41 Packet Pg. 174 of 245 and sprinkler systems that check the weather before they run. We looked at how motion-sensor bulbs can be energy-efficient and felt how energy recovery ventilators can keep you cool and breathing fresh air, even on a hot day. This tour truly has everything. Greg has tips for homeowners and renters alike, from how to optimize insulation to how to keep critters from chewing on your EV wires. We left the tour brimming with ideas to implement in our own homes (and apartments!), and we know you will too. Join us! Date: July 10, Aug. 14, Sept. 11 Location: Palo Alto Register soon - spots fill up quickly! Find Out More & Register Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 42 Packet Pg. 175 of 245 Announcements We're almost at our match goal! Help us get there. Thanks to your generosity, we are just 10% away from meeting our spring matching challenge. There are just FOUR DAYS LEFT to help us unlock the $10,000 full match! Every dollar you give today will be doubled to support critical, community-based climate solutions. This matching offer ends June 30. Double your impact today. Help Us Get the Match! Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 43 Packet Pg. 176 of 245 Join Acterra's Hackathon Woodside Electric Garden Voucher Program “Thank you for this voucher. It completes a set including a string trimmer, blower, pole saw, and chainsaw - ALL electric!” Go Green with the Woodside Electric Garden Voucher Program! Eligible Woodside residents, businesses, and gardening professionals can now take advantage of vouchers for eco-friendly electric garden tools! Woodside residents can receive up to $250 to cover the purchase of electric gardening equipment. Non-gardening businesses are eligible for a $250 rebate for an electric leaf blower. Professional gardeners, landscapers, and property owners with parcels of 5 acres or more can get up to $1,000 to purchase electric gardening tools. Vouchers cover up to 100% of the purchase price, with a cap per address/business per year. Remember, funds are limited and awarded on a first-come, first-served basis! Check eligibility & apply today! Induction Cooktop Loan Program Let's get cooking! With our Induction Cooktop Loan Program, we're offering you the opportunity to borrow an induction cooking kit for 14 days - completely free of charge. Each Induction Lending Kit includes: A portable induction cooktop and a compatible pan Operating instructions Delicious recipes A convenient carrying bag Discover the benefits of induction cooking: precise temperature control, faster heating, easy cleanup, and improved safety for homes with kids or pets. Plus, it’s an energy-efficient and eco-friendly alternative to gas and electric stovetops. Learn more and apply today! Join Acterra's Hackathon EVENT RECAPS Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 44 Packet Pg. 177 of 245 East Bay Green@Home Tour "The tour was great. Each home was clearly marked and the hosts were wonderful and knowledgeable. My husband and I were able to visit 4 homes, and learned a LOT. Thank you so much!" On June 7, over 200 participants toured 18 homes across Oakland, Berkeley, Alameda, Piedmont, Albany, El Cerrito, Martinez and Benicia. With the support of our incredible hosts, attendees explored electrification projects from heat pump HVAC systems to induction stoves and native gardens. Guests walked away with practical knowledge about appliances, contractors, permits, and more, empowering them to take the next step toward a cleaner, all-electric future. Missed this one? We’ve got more coming soon! A Marin tour is on the horizon for September, plus our new Palo Alto Mini-Tour! Two volunteers working in a green garden Electrify Your Life: Soaking Up Solar Benefits On Monday, June 23, Acterra staff members Genevieve Lucas-Conwell and Dennis Murphy joined Acterra Green@Home Ambassador Indra Ghosh for a talk on solar and battery projects, including Sunnyvale’s new all-electric LEED Platinum City Hall! Couldn't make it? We've got a recording on our YouTube channel. This talk was part of the City of Sunnyvale Library’s Electrify Your Life series. Special thanks to Sunnyvale Sustainability Librarian Jack Niggli! Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 45 Packet Pg. 178 of 245 Take Action with Acterra Breaking News on AB 306 In an end-run maneuver, AB 306 (Schultz, Rivas) is now included in sections of the budget trailer bill AB 130 (Gabriel) and is being heard by both the Senate and Assembly Budget Committees, with voting imminent. This sprawling bill includes a number of good things, like a total of $1.85B for Bay Area public transit as well as AB 609 (Wicks) speeding up the infill multifamily housing development process. However, Acterra and coalition partners like NRDC and Menlo Spark are asking that the AB 306 sections (29-31 and 37-42) be stricken from the trailer bill and instead go through careful consideration within the standard committee process (up until this week, by the Senate Housing and Local Government Committees, specifically). If passed, AB 306 would bar any changes to California’s building codes until 2031, depriving local governments of the ability to pass pro- electrification policies or energy-efficient standards that exceed state requirements. AB 306 might even interfere with cities’ abilities to implement the already-approved 2025 energy code. Speak up about this problematic bill by contacting your State legislators before it’s too late — especially if your Senator is on the Budget Committee (Bay Area members include Scott Wiener, Chair (D11); Christopher Cabaldon (D3); John Laird (D17); Jerry McNerney (D5); and Aisha Wahab (D10). Stay tuned for a fuller recap of State legislative highlights coming in our next edition of EcoHappenings. Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 46 Packet Pg. 179 of 245 Endorsed Events Comment on the Climate Smart San José 2025 Update Deadline: June 30. Link. Bay Area Youth Climate Summit (BAYCS) - Application to join closing soon! Deadline: July 2. Link. Rally for BART and Caltrain in San Mateo County July 1, from 5:30 – 6:30 PM at Millbrae Station (100 Serre Avenue). Link. Workshop: Draft Strategies for Regional Climate Action - Bay Area Regional Climate Action Plan Public Workshop #3 July 22, from 6 – 7:30 PM. Link. Acterra has newsletters for everyone. Our offerings include sustainable food, electric vehicles, EV charging equity, young professionals, and more. Click the "Subscribe to our Newsletters" link below and make sure to select each one you want to receive, even if you are already subscribed! Subscribe to our Newsletters Sign up for the Climate Action Now app (Group 24) and take action every day. DONATE - Your Gift Makes a Difference! Our Contact Information Acterra 3921 E Bayshore Rd Suite 210 Palo Alto, CA 94303 650.962.9876 https://www.acterra.org Unsubscribe | Manage email preferences Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 47 Packet Pg. 180 of 245 From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You have new held messages Date:Thursday, June 26, 2025 12:16:26 PM Logo You have new held messages You can release all of your held messages and permit or block future emails from the senders, or manage messages individually. Release all Permit all Block all You can also manage held messages in your Personal Portal. Spam Policy webdevelopment333@outlook.com Re: Site Issue ? 2025-06-26 08:11 Release Permit Block Release all Permit all Block all © 2019 Mimecast Services Limited. Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 48 Packet Pg. 181 of 245 From:Isabella Lee To:ParkRec Commission Subject:POST hosting FREE Webinar - Fire in Bay Area Forests: Friend, Foe, or Frenemy? Date:Thursday, June 26, 2025 12:09:23 PM Attachments:Fire Webinar Flyer.pdf CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Dear Friends and Families of the Palo Alto Department of Parks and Rec, Isabella with POST here reaching out to invite you and your community to attend our free online webinar event Fire in Bay Area Forests: Friend, Foe, or Frenemy? on Thursday, July 24th, from 7 PM – 8 PM. Join POST and Brian Homberger—a certified ISA arborist, active EMT, and volunteer firefighter with Santa Cruz County for the past six years to learn about the relationship between wildfires and forest health in the Bay Area and Beyond. Premiering live on July 24th at 7 PM. Don’t miss tuning in live to participate in the interactive quiz and ask your questions directly to our wildfire expert! You can expect to learn about: The rich history of California’s forests and their natural fire cycles Traditional ecological knowledge and fire management practices This message needs your attention You've never replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 49 Packet Pg. 182 of 245 Understanding “good fire”: prescribed burns and other fuel reduction methods Climate change impacts and POST’s conservation and restoration approaches Practical actions and resources for community protection Don’t miss this opportunity to learn how organizations like POST are working to build healthier, more resilient forests in the Bay Area. You’ll learn about climate resilience initiatives and receive actionable resources for staying prepared and supporting healthy forests. Register now for this free event and participate in this interactive conversation about protecting our local forests while acknowledging the very real impacts of wildfire on Bay Area communities. Thanks! Please print the attached flyer and display or forward this to any other listservs that might be interested in this event. Hope to see you there! Isabella Lee Community Engagement Intern Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 50 Packet Pg. 183 of 245 From:Aram James To:Sean Allen; Pat M; ladoris cordell; Binder, Andrew; Barberini, Christopher; Enberg, Nicholas; DuJuan Green; dennis burns; Robert. Jonsen; Afanasiev, Alex; cromero@cityofepa.org; Lee, Craig; Raymond Goins; Raj Jayadev; Richard Konda; Jeff Rosen; Rose Lynn; Rodriguez, Miguel; Damon Silver; Doug Minkler; Dave Price; Emily Mibach; Salem Ajluni; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Josh Becker; Lotus Fong; Foley, Michael; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Nash, Betsy; Bill Newell; Bil Barber; Dana St. George; Gerry Gras; Bains, Paul; Paul Joseph; Paul George @ PPJC; eddie.aubrey@sanjoseca.gov; Don Austin; yolanda; Yolanda Conaway; Perron, Zachary; Reifschneider, James; Wagner, April; Palo Alto Free Press; Diana Diamond; Zelkha, Mila; planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.0rg; Steve Wagstaffe; Khalia Parish ( Homeless Advocate); ParkRec Commission; Council, City; Veenker, Vicki; Lythcott-Haims, Julie; Lauing, Ed; Reckdahl, Keith; KEVIN JENSEN; Nious, Kevin (NBCUniversal); GRP-City Council; Bill James; Zahra Billoo Cc:EPA Today; board@pausd.org; board@valleywater.org; BoardOperations; Jay Boyarsky; Jeff Conrad; Jeff Hayden; frances.Rothschild@jud.ca.gov; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Burt, Patrick; Carla Torres; sharon jackson Subject:"We"re not feeling protected. We"re feeling hunted": Community calls for changes to SDPD K-9 policy Date:Thursday, June 26, 2025 10:24:02 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i 'We're not feeling protected. We're feeling hunted': Community calls for changes to SDPD K-9 policy By Katie Hyson / Racial Justice and Social Equity ReporterContributors: Carlos Castillo / Video Journalist 'We're not feeling protected. We're feeling hunted': Community calls for changes to SDPD K-9 policy | KPBS Public Media https://www.kpbs.org/news/racial-justice-social-equity/2024/12/06/were-not-feeling- protected-were-feeling-hunted-community-calls-for-changes-to-sdpd-k-9-policy This message needs your attention Some Recipients have never replied to this person. This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 51 Packet Pg. 184 of 245 From:Light As Air Boats To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Ready for Water Fun? Join the Pirates! Date:Thursday, June 26, 2025 6:34:59 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of openingattachments and clicking on links. i SHOP NOW Hi there! Designed for all age groups — The Pirates Rock & Pirates Tower deliver big time excitement! This message needs your attention No employee in your company has ever replied to this person. The subject has non-English characters. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 52 Packet Pg. 185 of 245 $200 Off Spinera Pirates Rock & Pirates Tower! Use Code [SUMMER200] Parks & Camps Catalog Resorts Catalog Bring Adventure Aboard: Rule the sea with the Pirates Rock & Tower Loved by kids, teens, and adults alike Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 53 Packet Pg. 186 of 245 Compact yet bursting with adventure, Pirates Rock combines jumping, climbing, and sliding into one all-in-one module. Perfect for Yachts & Beach resorts Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 54 Packet Pg. 187 of 245 $200 Off Spinera Pirates Rock & Pirates Tower! Use Code [SUMMER200] Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 55 Packet Pg. 188 of 245 Dream big with Pirates Tower — offering multiple jumping levels and varied sliding options for the ultimate adrenaline rush. Whether it’s placed right behind your yacht or used as a standalone showstopper in a lake or beachfront, this module is guaranteed to be a crowd favorite. Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 56 Packet Pg. 189 of 245 $200 Off Spinera Pirates Rock & Pirates Tower! Use Code [SUMMER200] For Quantity Discounts or Questions, Call Andi. Tel:706.619.6670 andi@lightasairboats.com Parks & Camps Catalog Resorts Catalog Yours in Wind, Water, and Waves, - The Light As Air Boats Team Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 57 Packet Pg. 190 of 245 We don’t want to spam you. If you're no longer interested in enjoying adventures out on the water Unsubscribe here. Light As Air Boats 13801 Walsingham Rd. Suite A-116 Largo, Florida 33774 Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 58 Packet Pg. 191 of 245 From:Aram James To:Jeff Rosen; Jay Boyarsky; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; Josh Becker; board@pausd.org; board@valleywater.org; BoardOperations; Marty Wasserman; h.etzko@gmail.com; Council, City; Lauing, Ed; Reckdahl, Keith; Jeff Hayden; planning.commision@cityofpaloalto.org; ParkRec Commission; GRP-City Council; Nash, Betsy; dcombs@menlopark.gov; city.council@menlopark.gov; Friends of Cubberley; Sheree Roth; Lori Meyers; Sean Allen; Bill Newell; Pat M; Rose Lynn; Gardener, Liz; Liz Kniss; Linda Jolley; John Burt; Zelkha, Mila; Mickie Winkler; Freddie.Quintana@sen.ca.gov; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; frances.Rothschild@jud.ca.gov; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; Human Relations Commission; Dave Price; Emily Chapman; Braden Cartwright; EPA Today; Diana Diamond; Doug Minkler; Emily Mibach Subject:NYTimes: Mamdani’s Success Spotlights a Deepening Rupture Among U.S. Jews Date:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 10:12:55 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani’s success in the city with the largest Jewish population in the world offered the starkest evidence yet that outspoken opposition to Israel and its government — and even questioning its existence as a Jewish state — is increasingly acceptable to broader swaths of the party, even in areas where pro-Israel Jews have long been a bedrock part of the Democratic coalition. NYTimes: Mamdani’s Success Spotlights a Deepening Rupture Among U.S. Jews https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/25/us/politics/zohran-mamdani-jewish-voters.html? smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare This message needs your attention Some Recipients have never replied to this person. This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 59 Packet Pg. 192 of 245 From:Aram James To:Binder, Andrew; Council, City; Sean Allen; Enberg, Nicholas; Barberini, Christopher; Perron, Zachary; Reifschneider, James; Wagner, April; Afanasiev, Alex; h.etzko@gmail.com; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; Lythcott-Haims, Julie; Vicki Veenker; Reckdahl, Keith; Baker, Rob; roberta ahlquist; Robert. Jonsen; Gardener, Liz; Raymond Goins; Dave Price; Emily Mibach; Braden Cartwright; cromero@cityofepa.org; rabrica@cityofepa.org; Human Relations Commission; Supervisor Susan Ellenberg; board@pausd.org; boardfeedback@smcgov.org; Bill Newell; Steve Wagstaffe; GRP-City Council; GRP- City Clerk; Mickie Winkler; Rowena Chiu; Rodriguez, Miguel; Damon Silver; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Freddie.Quintana@sen.ca.gov; Dana St. George; Sheree Roth; Gerry Gras; Figueroa, Eric; Jensen, Eric; Foley, Michael; Pat M; Jeff Rosen; Rose Lynn; Friends of Cubberley; Palo Alto Free Press; Holman, Karen (external); Tom DuBois; Salem Ajluni; San José Spotlight; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; Diana Diamond; EPA Today; Bains, Paul; planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.0rg; ParkRec Commission; Nash, Betsy; dcombs@menlopark.gov; city.council@menlopark.gov; citycouncil@mountainview.gov; Clerk, City; City Attorney; Nicole Chiu-Wang; Josh Becker; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Patrice Ventresca Subject:Officer Sentenced To 7 Years In Prison After Setting K-9 On Cyclist, Faking College Degree Date:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 5:34:30 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Officer Sentenced To 7 Years In Prison After Setting K-9 On Cyclist, Faking College Degree Police Officer Sentenced To 7 Years In Federal Prison After Setting K-9 On Bicyclist, Faking College Degree | Concord, CA Patch https://patch.com/california/concord-ca/police-officer-sentenced-7-years-federal-prison-after- setting-k-9-bicyclist This message needs your attention Some Recipients have never replied to this person. This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 60 Packet Pg. 193 of 245 From:Jenny Lewis To:ParkRec Commission Subject:A new line of outdoor fitness Date:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 5:20:03 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious ofopening attachments and clicking on links. i Outdoor-Fit This message needs your attention No employee in your company has ever replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 61 Packet Pg. 194 of 245 image OUTDOOR-FIT INTRODUCES THE CALI-LINE MODULAR. COMPATIBLE. STATIC. CUSTOM The Cali-Line was created to bring together thoughtful design, durability, and adaptability to the outdoor fitness world like never before. Our design and engineering team has designed and tested every station and part to comply with ASTM F3101. All products also prioritize biomechanically correct design, along with compatibility between all stations and components to provide unique and custom exercise systems for parks of all shapes and sizes. Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 62 Packet Pg. 195 of 245 The Cali-Line is divided into three categories: Singles, Rigs, and Customs. Singles: These are all single-user stations, with 21 options available. All of our rigs consist of these single stations. Rigs: There are 44 Rigs that range from single-post to 16-post systems. All rigs have a minimum of a two-user capacity. Customs: Don't see a Cali-Rig that fits your particular project? Collaborate with our engineering team to design a customized configuration that aligns with your specific space and goals. Download The Cali-Line Catalog Request a Quote Key features of the Cali-Line: 65 New Products: With 65 new options, there is a range of products to meet many different project types. ADA-Compatible Options: Several Cali-Singles and Cali-Rigs are ADA- compliant or offer ADA upgrades as an option. ADA products are marked in the catalog. Wildly Overbuilt: Using only heavy-gauge, thick-plated steel and stainless steel, every Cali-Line product is built to last. Weatherproof & Tamperproof: Continuing the Outdoor-Fit standard, all Cali-Line products are powder-coated and have no removable parts. No Fall Height: Many Cali-Line products don't have a fall height, eliminating the need for protective surfacing. This simplifies project planning and helps keep project costs low. Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 63 Packet Pg. 196 of 245 Cali-Rig 01 CALI-RIG 01 Vertical Knee Raise + Calf Raise Step Plyo Box Cali-Rig 14 CALI-RIG 14 84" Straight Pull- Up Bar Sit-Up Bench Plyo Box (2) Cali-Rig 19 CALI-RIG 19 84" Multi-Grip Pull-Up Bar Multi-Grip Push- Up Bench ADA (66") Straight Pull-Up Bar 36" Straight Pull- Up Bar Outdoor-Fit Exercise Systems Inc., 95 Simmonds Drive, Dartmouth, NS B3B 1N7, 1-877-760-6337 Unsubscribe Manage preferences Outdoor-Fit Exercise Systems Inc., 95 Simmonds Drive, Dartmouth, NS B3B 1N7, 1-877-760- 6337 Unsubscribe Manage preferences Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 64 Packet Pg. 197 of 245 From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You can now download your file Date:Tuesday, June 24, 2025 9:29:34 PM Logo Your file has been security checked You can download it now. File 01JVW5J7KJE7910K6E3DBK5SS6_28 Message Details From hello@lightasairboats.com Subject Discover Your Ideal Docking Solution Link https://ctrk.klclick.com/l/01JVW5J7KJE7910K6E3DBK5SS6_28 Download File © 2017 - 2025 Mimecast Services Limited and affiliates. Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 65 Packet Pg. 198 of 245 From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You can now download your file Date:Tuesday, June 24, 2025 9:28:38 PM Logo Your file has been security checked You can download it now. File 01JXJ7X3WSDRR1VV6VYQC1Q19N_1 Message Details From hello@lightasairboats.com Subject Best In Class Inflatable Kayaks, Boats & Canoes! Link https://ctrk.klclick.com/l/01JXJ7X3WSDRR1VV6VYQC1Q19N_1 Download File © 2017 - 2025 Mimecast Services Limited and affiliates. Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 66 Packet Pg. 199 of 245 From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You can now download your file Date:Tuesday, June 24, 2025 9:28:21 PM Logo Your file has been security checked You can download it now. File 01JXZ3WTKWP7NHP67MR8ZQ4Z2F_22 Message Details From hello@lightasairboats.com Subject HUGE SUPs for Huge Fun! Link https://ctrk.klclick.com/l/01JXZ3WTKWP7NHP67MR8ZQ4Z2F_22 Download File © 2017 - 2025 Mimecast Services Limited and affiliates. Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 67 Packet Pg. 200 of 245 From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You can now download your file Date:Tuesday, June 24, 2025 9:28:19 PM Logo Your file has been security checked You can download it now. File 01JW91HT37VGDY6PSBPVM3F3KY_3 Message Details From hello@lightasairboats.com Subject Water Experiences Your Competitors Don't Have Link https://ctrk.klclick.com/l/01JW91HT37VGDY6PSBPVM3F3KY_3 Download File © 2017 - 2025 Mimecast Services Limited and affiliates. Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 68 Packet Pg. 201 of 245 From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You can now download your file Date:Tuesday, June 24, 2025 9:28:07 PM Logo Your file has been security checked You can download it now. File 01JWV2BVPEZKNX5T691HNNJ67X_37 Message Details From hello@lightasairboats.com Subject Exciting Spins Await Your Guests! Link https://ctrk.klclick.com/l/01JWV2BVPEZKNX5T691HNNJ67X_37 Download File © 2017 - 2025 Mimecast Services Limited and affiliates. Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 69 Packet Pg. 202 of 245 From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You can now download your file Date:Tuesday, June 24, 2025 9:26:53 PM Logo Your file has been security checked You can download it now. File click?upn=u001.hqwlbaToI8-2Bf5Ne5pgUItuUdRhRPkkGuBLg0xieWqQwMqNEsj- 2BGUph4lQNFRKGKAipcHGD7f21opn4lmJ0XhgINkzssC8Oh3FRhFVP2FCSeQ4hfJPFjRF4i0xt3hO5yAhwc1OBOCrgpuAe9UlrmNi- 2BKIFiCG0OXBtCdmZ7haYrU-2BG1L6mpotyxE4m2p6UafXeVlc_11eNILhQMlLirc06p6YqvoSygY7uBNsSo0ESDi- 2B33bxfddxdPinxSfvo-2FEDW7IUYleSBde31zvr4VV5I2L23rHBEXWMqBebpxWgSOokyfTZUPxUkjqHSPRLG9b0- 2BzWhZtm5PDizHLpmjwvEjizhJ5BTCx2TnGBJs6voJfsF4qoyELd8JsGpXVAllkgoA9RwlA0c-2F0L1qeAXcR4GffKub0Q9X- 2BJk1mRMRpyMZyjCDFEEOH5j32YTqzLqbSe3ifqk-2F5vtVk48IYgTI-2Bx0N2AP7wk3niOnHcjcj4ZdcioL8Wgr5k3gs- 2BZPxmFiB7P4B4D4DXwTRFpbXTQHGRGBMAvnnnsNqpD6kkbjyAEtzqt2A1TkwUskvh2ydYwfiMMhpK7mz Message Details From acterra@mailman.bloomerang-mail.com Subject June Eco-events, The Fight for Clean Air, and a BIG Thank You! Link https://u13680431.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=u001.hqwlbaToI8-2Bf5Ne5pgUItuUdRhRPkkGuBLg0xieWqQwMqNEsj- 2BGUph4lQNFRKGKAipcHGD7f21opn4lmJ0XhgINkzssC8Oh3FRhFVP2FCSeQ4hfJPFjRF4i0xt3hO5yAhwc1OBOCrgpuAe9UlrmNi- 2BKIFiCG0OXBtCdmZ7haYrU-2BG1L6mpotyxE4m2p6UafXeVlc_11eNILhQMlLirc06p6YqvoSygY7uBNsSo0ESDi-2B33bxfddxdPinxSfvo- 2FEDW7IUYleSBde31zvr4VV5I2L23rHBEXWMqBebpxWgSOokyfTZUPxUkjqHSPRLG9b0- 2BzWhZtm5PDizHLpmjwvEjizhJ5BTCx2TnGBJs6voJfsF4qoyELd8JsGpXVAllkgoA9RwlA0c-2F0L1qeAXcR4GffKub0Q9X- 2BJk1mRMRpyMZyjCDFEEOH5j32YTqzLqbSe3ifqk-2F5vtVk48IYgTI-2Bx0N2AP7wk3niOnHcjcj4ZdcioL8Wgr5k3gs- 2BZPxmFiB7P4B4D4DXwTRFpbXTQHGRGBMAvnnnsNqpD6kkbjyAEtzqt2A1TkwUskvh2ydYwfiMMhpK7mz Download File © 2017 - 2025 Mimecast Services Limited and affiliates. Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 70 Packet Pg. 203 of 245 From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You can now download your file Date:Tuesday, June 24, 2025 9:26:04 PM Logo Your file has been security checked You can download it now. File 01JWV2BVPEZKNX5T691HNNJ67X_34 Message Details From hello@lightasairboats.com Subject Exciting Spins Await Your Guests! Link https://ctrk.klclick.com/l/01JWV2BVPEZKNX5T691HNNJ67X_34 Download File © 2017 - 2025 Mimecast Services Limited and affiliates. Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 71 Packet Pg. 204 of 245 From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You can now download your file Date:Tuesday, June 24, 2025 9:25:07 PM Logo Your file has been security checked You can download it now. File 01JWV2BVPEZKNX5T691HNNJ67X_23 Message Details From hello@lightasairboats.com Subject Exciting Spins Await Your Guests! Link https://ctrk.klclick.com/l/01JWV2BVPEZKNX5T691HNNJ67X_23 Download File © 2017 - 2025 Mimecast Services Limited and affiliates. Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 72 Packet Pg. 205 of 245 From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You can now download your file Date:Tuesday, June 24, 2025 9:25:07 PM Logo Your file has been security checked You can download it now. File 01JW43KPT8C5KH3PB395GH44K2_19 Message Details From hello@lightasairboats.com Subject Rowing Season is Just Around the Bend! Link https://ctrk.klclick.com/l/01JW43KPT8C5KH3PB395GH44K2_19 Download File © 2017 - 2025 Mimecast Services Limited and affiliates. Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 73 Packet Pg. 206 of 245 From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You can now download your file Date:Tuesday, June 24, 2025 9:25:06 PM Logo Your file has been security checked You can download it now. File 360927bb-8989-436d-8698-8d8ed3344915? j=eyJ1IjoiZmptenQifQ.4xD0LsthnDcmb7pO4iRL_oRhCDZCMJeQJzZjtGnA0as Message Details From abjpd1@gmail.com Subject BREAKING: Israeli Forces Board Gaza Aid Flotilla and Detain 12 Crew Members Link https://substack.com/redirect/360927bb-8989-436d-8698-8d8ed3344915? j=eyJ1IjoiZmptenQifQ.4xD0LsthnDcmb7pO4iRL_oRhCDZCMJeQJzZjtGnA0as Download File © 2017 - 2025 Mimecast Services Limited and affiliates. Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 74 Packet Pg. 207 of 245 From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You can now download your file Date:Tuesday, June 24, 2025 9:25:05 PM Logo Your file has been security checked You can download it now. File UZpeatIP5QugXD4K6 Message Details From abjpd1@gmail.com Subject Re: A series on the damage police dogs inflict on Americans, published in collaboration with AL.com, IndyStar and the Invisible Institute. Link https://share.google/UZpeatIP5QugXD4K6 Download File © 2017 - 2025 Mimecast Services Limited and affiliates. Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 75 Packet Pg. 208 of 245 From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You can now download your file Date:Tuesday, June 24, 2025 9:25:05 PM Logo Your file has been security checked You can download it now. File qgR3X4aSNPYy Message Details From frank.durant@9092584.brevosend.com Subject Bring Dazzling Holiday Cheer to Your Town! Link https://g43as.r.ag.d.sendibm3.com/mk/mr/sh/1t6AVsd2XFnIGBr2NFqFFKjgBSarTV/qgR3X4aSNPYy Download File © 2017 - 2025 Mimecast Services Limited and affiliates. Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 76 Packet Pg. 209 of 245 Dear , I hope this message finds you well. I wanted to introduce you to an exciting opportunity to elevate your venue's appeal and generate additional revenue during the holiday season. Holiday Light Show, a BOLD Media brand, specializes in creating immersive, musically synchronized light displays that captivate audiences of all ages. Our turnkey solutions are designed to fit venues of various sizes and budgets, making it easy for you to host a memorable event without the hassle. Here's what sets our light shows apart: Musically Synchronized Displays: Lights that dance in harmony with seasonal music, creating a symphony of light and sound. Epic Light Tunnels: Mesmerizing gateways that envelop visitors in a canopy of synchronized lights. Flexible Configurations: Choose between drive-thru or walk-thru setups to best suit your venue and audience. Larger-Than-Life Displays: Towering wire-frame installations adaptable to various seasonal themes. Comprehensive Support: From hands-on training for your crew to marketing, website, and ticketing assistance, we provide end-to-end support to ensure your event's success. By hosting a Holiday Light Show, you not only create a festive tradition for your community but also unlock a new source of seasonal revenue. I'd love to discuss how we can bring this enchanting experience to your venue. Are you available for a quick introductory call this week? From:Frank Durant To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Transform Your Venue into a Seasonal Spectacle with Holiday Light Show Date:Tuesday, June 24, 2025 10:58:47 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious ofopening attachments and clicking on links. i This message needs your attention No employee in your company has ever replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 77 Packet Pg. 210 of 245 Looking forward to connecting with you. Best regards, Frank Click here to unsubscribe Mailin Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 78 Packet Pg. 211 of 245 From:Light As Air Boats To:ParkRec Commission Subject:These Make a Splash! Date:Tuesday, June 24, 2025 7:38:27 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious ofopening attachments and clicking on links. i SHOP NOW Hi there, Inflatable slides for lakes & yachts! Kids looking for fun or teens looking for big air, they are going to love these slides! This message needs your attention No employee in your company has ever replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 79 Packet Pg. 212 of 245 SEE ALL INFLATABLE SLIDES HERE SEE ALL MINI PARKS HERE For Quantity Discounts or Questions, Call Andi. Tel:706.619.6670 andi@lightasairboats.com Yours in Wind, Water, and Waves, - The Light As Air Boats Team Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 80 Packet Pg. 213 of 245 We don’t want to spam you. If you're no longer interested in enjoying adventures out on the water Unsubscribe here. Light As Air Boats 13801 Walsingham Rd. Suite A-116 Largo, Florida 33774 Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 81 Packet Pg. 214 of 245 From:Aram James To:Jeff Rosen Cc:Jay Boyarsky; Gennady Sheyner; Council, City; Supervisor Susan Ellenberg; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; Gardener, Liz; Noel Sanborn; Lotus Fong; Roberta Ahlquist; San José Spotlight; Salem Ajluni; Sean Allen; Pat M; board@pausd.org; BoardOperations; board@valleywater.org; Yolanda Conaway; Emily Mibach; Dana St. George; Gerry Gras; Josh Becker; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Doug Minkler; Zelkha, Mila; Lori Meyers; Sheree Roth; sharon jackson; Rose Lynn; Karen Holman; Drekmeier, Peter; Veenker, Vicki; Lythcott-Haims, Julie; Raymond Goins; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; Dave Price; editor@paweekly.com; Lauing, Ed; Reckdahl, Keith; Perron, Zachary; planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.0rg; ParkRec Commission; Human Relations Commission; Friends of Cubberley; Burt, Patrick; DuJuan Green; dennis burns; h.etzko@gmail.com; Sameena Usman; Robert Salonga; Raj Jayadev; chuck jagoda; Charlotte Casey; Rodriguez, Miguel; Daniel Barton; Don Austin; yolanda; Diana Diamond; Dennis Upton; Bill Newell; Tom DuBois; Hans-Peter Tiemann; Nious, Kevin (NBCUniversal); Binder, Andrew; Robert Handa; Reifschneider, James; Barberini, Christopher; city.council@menlopark.gov; citycouncil@mountainview.gov; Clerk, City; Palo Alto Free Press; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; Baker, Rob; Jay Boyarsky; EPA Today; cromero@cityofepa.org; Cribbs, Anne; Angel, David; Templeton, Cari; Braden Cartwright; Ed Lauing; Shikada, Ed; Stump, Molly; Freddie.Quintana@sen.ca.gov; Roberta Ahlquist; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Linda Jolley; Tim James; Marina Lopez; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Foley, Michael; Figueroa, Eric; Jensen, Eric; Afanasiev, Alex; Lee, Craig; Nicole Chiu-Wang; Rowena Chiu; Patrice Ventresca; Damon Silver; Steve Wagstaffe; Anna Griffin; boardfeedback@smcgov.org; John Burt; henry etzkowitz; Gennady Sheyner; Henry Riggs; Rowena Chiu; raj@siliconvalleyde-bug.org; roberta ahlquist Subject:Re: Should DA Jeff Rosen recuse his office from the Stanford 12 Case?You be the judge? Date:Monday, June 23, 2025 10:29:59 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i June 23, 2025 Hi Jeff, I still wish to discuss the recusal issue with you when you have a free minute. You might want to add to the mix your visit to Israel in January 2024, where you apparently spent time mixing it up with the IDF ( Israeli Military). I know you have a strong affinity for Israel and that is absolutely your right. But after reading the linked material at the bottom of this letter it becomes beyond dispute that it would be extremely problematic if your office did not seriously consider recusal in this matter. Best regards, Aram On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 10:09 AM Aram James <abjpd1@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Jeff, This message needs your attention Some Recipients have never replied to this person. This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 82 Packet Pg. 215 of 245 Aram here. I hope you and your family are doing well. I will write more later. Given your long history of advocacy for the State of Israel, your Israeli citizenship, your recent handshake with Bibi, and your apparent antipathy towards the Palestinian people and their struggle for liberation, I believe it would be wise for you to recuse yourself and your office from the Stanford 12 Case. The optics of this situation are problematic for you. I agree with you that non-violent protest is protected by the First Amendment, and I also recognize that vandalism can be a crime. However, when property damage occurs, even if it is substantial, to prevent a greater crime—such as genocide or the destruction of a culture— this vandalism may be excused. We can certainly debate this matter, but I believe you are an honorable person, and with a bit of self-reflection, you will do the right thing. Please feel free to call me at any time to discuss this most critical matter. Best regards, Aram James P.S. Please correct me if I have any factual inaccuracies. If you are not an Israeli citizen, please inform me. Additionally, if you did not shake Bibi's hand during his recent visit to the Bay Area, kindly clarify that as well. “We felt like we couldn’t be anywhere else,” shared Hausner alumna Rachel Rosen (Class of 2013) in describing her family’s visit to Israel in January. Best regards, Aram https://share.google/9SlM3r4qyrVkmyA4W Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 83 Packet Pg. 216 of 245 From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You have new held messages Date:Monday, June 23, 2025 4:04:06 PM Logo You have new held messages You can release all of your held messages and permit or block future emails from the senders, or manage messages individually. Release all Permit all Block all You can also manage held messages in your Personal Portal. Spam Policy waldmba@gmail.com important message - please do take the time to read 2025-06-23 13:39 Release Permit Block Spam Policy waldmba@gmail.com important message - please do take the time to read 2025-06-23 14:52 Release Permit Block Release all Permit all Block all © 2019 Mimecast Services Limited. Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 84 Packet Pg. 217 of 245 From:Robustelli, Sarah To:Lynn Chiapella; ParkRec Commission Subject:RE: Golf finances Date:Monday, June 23, 2025 3:36:15 PM Attachments:fy-2026-proposed-operating-budget.pdf image001.png image002.png image004.png image005.png image006.png image007.png Hi Lynn, Attached please find pages from the FY26 Proposed operating budget that outlines CSD Golf Course Financials. This includes staff costs, debt service payments, etc. The bottom line is on the second page, which is projecting a net income of $962,238 for FY25 and $735,632 for FY26. The operating budget does not include capital expense; those can be found in the capital budget. This page is also available online PDF page 230 or Budget book page 222: Palo Alto Operating Budget Book.book Thank you, Sarah SARAH ROBUSTELLI Division Manager Open Space, Parks, and Golf Community Services Department (650) 617-3518 | sarah.robustelli@paloalto.gov www.paloalto.gov From: Lynn Chiapella <lchiapella@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2025 6:47 PM To: Robustelli, Sarah <Sarah.Robustelli@paloalto.gov>; ParkRec Commission <parkrec.commission@PaloAlto.gov> Subject: Golf finances CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious ofopening attachments and clicking on links. Thank you for your response concerning the CIPs relating to the Palo Alto Golf Course and also info on Live in Peace. If the golfcourse were a for profit business, would it be fair to say that it would have a net profit of approximately $650,000, not including CPA staff time and Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 85 Packet Pg. 218 of 245 i This message needs your attention This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report CGBANNERINDICATOR Thank you for your response concerning the CIPs relating to the Palo Alto Golf Course and also info on Live in Peace. If the golf course were a for profit business, would it be fair to say that it would have a net profit of approximately $650,000, not including CPA staff time and costs? With the budget concerns it would be helpful to see how much each of the City's ventures require subsidies and which are self supporting. Sincerely, Lynn Chiapella Powered by Mimecast Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 86 Packet Pg. 219 of 245 From:Aram James To:Doug Minkler; Binder, Andrew; Jeff Rosen; Jay Boyarsky; Emily Mibach; Raymond Goins; Gerry Gras; Steve Wagstaffe; Baker, Rob; Rowena Chiu; Friends of Cubberley; planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.0rg; Perron, Zachary; ParkRec Commission; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; cromero@cityofepa.org; rabrica@cityofepa.org; Gardener, Liz; Salem Ajluni Subject:Re: Citizens request for emergency council meeting Date:Sunday, June 22, 2025 11:41:46 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 8:46 PM Aram James <abjpd1@gmail.com> wrote: Martin, You are so full of Israel shit! Israel is a vile genocidal state and the historical record is indisputable in that regard. Israel will soon end up in the dustbin of history a failed state that but for U.S. support would have been eliminated decades ago. Martin, your Zionist training has taught you to have bloodlust for all things Palestinian. You are a disgrace to the principles of Judaism. Avram “Eliminate Israel Now” Finkelstein On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 7:39 PM Martin Wasserman <deeperlook@aol.com> wrote: Israel did not "impel" Iran to develop nuclear weapons. It never threatened Iran or sought to do it harm. It was the government of Iran that relentlessly sought, and continues to seek, the annihilation of the Jewish state, forcing Israel to fight back and defend itself, which it’s done very effectively,. The only "threat" Israel ever posed to Iran was to Iran’s ambition to be the sole hegemonic power in the Middle East. Martin Wasserman On Jun 22, 2025, at 5:43 PM, Henry Etzkowitz <h.etzko@gmail.com> wrote: These propositions deserve a closer look. Arguably Israel has placed itself at existential risk by impelling Iran to achieve a weapon Israel gained in the 60’s indeed; it is a measure of Iran’s restraint that it had not yet caught up, if This message needs your attention Some Recipients have never replied to this person. This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 87 Packet Pg. 220 of 245 indeed it hasn’t. In any event President Trump’s real target was the American public in a pre-emptive strike to take out a nascent anti-war movement, more focused on celebrating community than levitating the Pentagon. As a well known public discussion leader in north Palo Alto expect you will endorse the city council/town meeting mooted above. On Jun 22, 2025, at 2:26 PM, Martin Wasserman <deeperlook@aol.com> wrote: Dear All, The US action dealt a severe setback to Iran’s plan to develop nuclear weapons, and in so doing, made the world a safer place. True, there was no formal declaration of war, but there's ample precedent for this type of action. In recent decades, the US has bombed many foreign targets with no formal declaration, most recently in Yemen. In this case timing and surprise were essential, and that would have been impossible if we had to wait for Congress to debate the issue. We could also say that the US and Iran have been in a de facto, if not a de jure state of war since 1979, based on the Iranian government's hostile declarations and actions against the US, and the US has a right to strike any time it detects a serious threat, such as Iran being on the verge of having nukes. Sincerely, Martin Wasserman On Jun 21, 2025, at 11:15 PM, Henry Etzkowitz <h.etzko@gmail.com> wrote: Please forward to neighbors and friends On Jun 21, 2025, at 11:04 PM, Henry Etzkowitz <H.Etzko@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Mayor Laing and Council members As a supporter of the decision to abjure from involvement in international Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 88 Packet Pg. 221 of 245 issues, excepting a very few issues directly affecting us and on which we can have an impact. President Trump’s kingly decision to bomb Iran without congressional declaration of war Passed that bar Respectfully ask mayor Laing call a special meeting this Monday or Tuesday evening to consider how to follow up council’s support of the recent “no kings “ action An initial idea; a resolution Requesting Congressperson Sam Liccardo to support Representative Massie’s statement on unconstitutionality of the attack on Iran. Our representative declined the invitation made to him at the rinconado kings event to take leadership and introduce a resolution of impeachment for high crime, misdemeanors and inducement of bribe. In the light of subsequent events, we should request him to de minimus follow the lead of the Republican representative The special meeting should take the format of a town meeting with resolutions emanating from the floor as well as Council. Sincerely Henry Etxkowitz 2024 city council candidate Co-founder, Neighbors for Environmental and Social Justice www.triplehelix.net Ps support neighbors lawsuit against Tesla/Musk for unpermitted pour of toxic chemicals into Matadero Creek 10am Friday 27 June San Jose Superior Court, 2nd floor Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 89 Packet Pg. 222 of 245 From:Aram James To:h.etzko@gmail.com; Marty Wasserman; Dave Price; Council, City; GRP-City Council; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Roberta Ahlquist; Braden Cartwright; Friends of Cubberley; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; John Burt; dcombs@menlopark.gov; Nash, Betsy; city.council@menlopark.gov; Perron, Zachary; citycouncil@mountainview.gov; Holman, Karen (external); Gardener, Liz; Liz Kniss; Linda Jolley; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Josh Becker; EPA Today; Foley, Michael; Palo Alto Free Press; Tom DuBois; GRP-City Clerk; Bill Newell; Salem Ajluni; Zelkha, Mila; Human Relations Commission; planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.0rg; ParkRec Commission; Patrice Ventresca; Pat M; Sean Allen; Sameena@Secure-Justice.org; Raymond Goins; board@pausd.org; board@valleywater.org; BoardOperations; Lotus Fong Subject:https://url.usb.m.mimecastprotect.com/s/thXsC8Xyq2fjJk2qfnfOhySXwz?domain=fb.watch Date:Sunday, June 22, 2025 8:58:50 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i https://fb.watch/AoygPpF6a7/?mibextid=wwXIfr&fs=e This message needs your attention Some Recipients have never replied to this person. This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 90 Packet Pg. 223 of 245 From:Lynn Chiapella To:Robustelli, Sarah; ParkRec Commission Subject:Golf finances Date:Sunday, June 22, 2025 6:48:13 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Thank you for your response concerning the CIPs relating to the Palo Alto Golf Course and also info on Live in Peace. If the golf course were a for profit business, would it be fair to say that it would have a net profit of approximately $650,000, not including CPA staff time and costs? With the budget concerns it would be helpful to see how much each of the City's ventures require subsidies and which are self supporting. Sincerely, Lynn Chiapella This message needs your attention This is a personal email address. This is their first mail to some recipients. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 91 Packet Pg. 224 of 245 From:Aram James To:Vicki Veenker Cc:Council, City; Binder, Andrew; Lauing, Ed; board@pausd.org; Jeff Rosen; Jay Boyarsky; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Josh Becker; board@valleywater.org; boardfeedback@smcgov.org; BoardOperations; Templeton, Cari; planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.0rg; ParkRec Commission; h.etzko@gmail.com; Sean Allen; Rose Lynn; Carla Torres; dennis burns; DuJuan Green; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; Zelkha, Mila; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Lotus Fong; Roberta Ahlquist; Dave Price; Gennady Sheyner; EPA Today; Emily Mibach; Braden Cartwright; MGR-Melissa Stevenson Diaz; Diana Diamond; Rodriguez, Miguel; Perron, Zachary; Palo Alto Free Press; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan; District2@sanjoseca.gov; Councilmember Chappie Jones; District10@sanjoseca.gov; District3@sanjoseca.gov; District9@sanjoseca.gov; Yolanda trevino; Yolanda Conaway; Don Austin; Patrice Ventresca; Bryan Gobin; Brandon Pho; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; Sheree Roth; ladoris cordell; Lori Meyers; GRP-City Council; city.council@menlopark.gov; Nash, Betsy; Bill Newell; City Attorney; Reifschneider, James; Foley, Michael; Baker, Rob; Robert. Jonsen Subject:"Ran Into a Buzz Saw Blues"--Notes to Palo Alto Vice Mayor Vicki Veenker-( June 17, 2025 City Council Meeting) from Avram Finkelstein aka Aram James Date:Sunday, June 22, 2025 11:54:58 AM Attachments:ran into a buzz saw blues lol.docx CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i This message needs your attention Some Recipients have never replied to this person. This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 92 Packet Pg. 225 of 245 From:Francisco Valenzuela To:Francisco Valenzuela Subject:Register Before Link Closes - San Andreas Regional Center"s Superhero Summer Festivals Date:Friday, June 20, 2025 12:56:45 PM Attachments:Salinas Festival June 28th.pdf Hollister Festival July 12th.pdf Santa Cruz Festival July 19th.pdf San Jose Festival July 26th.pdf CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Dear Friends, Once again, San Andreas Regional Center will be hosting our 9th Annual Superhero Summer Festival in Salinas, Santa Cruz, and San Jose. This year for the first time, we are hosting our signature Superhero Summer Festival at Santana Ranch Park in Hollister. Service providers / Organizations who would like to “Table” to share information about services offered during the Resource Fair can Register Here: Organizations_Register_Here Our festivals have been held to give families and individuals with special needs the opportunity to be part of an inclusive festival hosted for them. Everyone in the community is invited to our festivals but the goal is to provide the opportunity for those with intellectual disabilities and their families to be part of a family friendly event. At each festival kids and young adults with intellectual developmental disabilities, family members, community-based organizations, service provider staff, and the community at large will dress up in their favorite superhero costume to enjoy our family friendly event. The festival also offers families the opportunity to get information from community-based organizations who will be sharing information about services offered. Organizations already registered to host a Resource Table during the Summer Festival: Organizations Registered for June 28th in Salinas 24 Hour Home Care Add On Support Services Art Abilities This message needs your attention You've never replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 93 Packet Pg. 226 of 245 Aveanna Healthcare Bloch Care Breathe California of the Bay Area CAPSLO Caretaker Management Services LLC, DBA Comforcare Catholic Charities of Monterey Central Coast ABA Central Coast Center for Independent Living (CCCIL) CIWP Crisis Response Project Gateway Center of Monterey County INC Hope Services Housing Choices JMM Dance Co. 510(c)(3) Medi-Cal Dental (Smile CA) NCI Affiliates Inc. Office of Clients' Rights Advocacy/Disability Rights California Positive Discipline Community Resources PRAGNYA Project Food Box Social Vocational Services Special Kids Connect Spread Your Wings Stable Life Services Stars Therapy Services Tucci Learning Solutions, Inc. Organizations Registered for July 12th in Hollister 24 Hour Home Care CASA of San Benito County Catholic Charities of Monterey Central Coast Center for Independent Living (CCCIL) ComForCare Home Care Central San Jose Community Action Partnership of San Luis Obispo: Migrant Seasonal Head Start Community Food Bank of San Benito County Crisis Response Project First 5 San Benito GYMGUYZ Hollister grocery outlet Hope Services Housing Choices JMM Dance Co. 510(c)(3) Martha's Kitchen Office of Clients' Rights Advocacy/Disability Rights California Parents Helping Parents Project Food Box San Benito County Community Services Workforce Development Agency San Benito County Health and Human Services Agency San Benito County Office of Education - Early Childhood Education Center Social Vocational Services Special parents information Network Spread Your Wings Stars Therapy Services State Council on Developmental Disabilities Teen Kitchen Project The New Hope Band Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 94 Packet Pg. 227 of 245 YMCA of San Benito County Youth Recovery Connections Organizations Registered for July 19th in Santa Cruz Add On Support Services Bloch Care Bloch Care CA Adult Day Program Caretaker Management Services LLC, DBA Comforcare Catholic Charities of Monterey Central Coast Center for Independent Living (CCCIL) CIWP Community Action Board of Santa Cruz County Crisis Response Project Encompass Head Start Hope Services Housing Choices Housing Choices If I Need Help JMM Dance Co. 510(c)(3) Maxima Therapy Inc. Maxima Therapy Inc. Office of Clients' Rights Advocacy/Disability Rights California Parents Helping Parents PRAGNYA Project Food Box Racies Y Carino Shared Adventures Social Vocational Services SPIN Special Parents Information Network Spread Your Wings Stable Life Services Stars Therapy Services State Council on Developmental Disabilities Teen Kitchen Project Thrive Therapy and Social Center Organizations Registered for July 26th in San Jose 24 Hour Home Care 9th Annual Superhero Summer Festival AbilityPath Add On Support Services Advocating by Ashley AIM HIGHER INC San Jose Aveanna Healthcare Bay Area Behavioral Connection Bay Area Community Health Bloch Care CA Adult Day Program CA Carelink Support Services LLC California Community Opportunities (CCO) Canine Companions Therapy Dog Program CIWP Cogleap Center for Achievement College of Adaptive Arts Colorful Minds ComForCare Home Care Central San Jose Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 95 Packet Pg. 228 of 245 County of Santa Clara Office of Emergency Management County of Santa Clara Registrar of Voters Crisis Support Services Dept of Family Children Services Friends of Children with Special Needs (FCSN) Fran Gelb & Company Gardner Health Services Gardner WIC Global Financial Impact GYMGUYZ Housing Choices IHSS Public Authority & Advisory Board Inclusive World JMM Dance Co. Joni and Friends Joy & Laughter Developmental Therapy Kinship Academy KIPP Public Schools Life Services Alternatives Maxima Therapy Inc. NAMI SCC (National Alliance on Mental Illness - Santa Clara County) Nurse Next Door Home Care Services Office of Clients' Rights Advocacy/Disability Rights California Options For All Pacific Autism Center for Education Parents Helping Parents PRAGNYA Project Food Box Quality Respite and Home Care Inc Rebuilding Together Silicon Valley Ricky Huynh Roots Community Health San José Public Library San Jose Barracuda Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority Sasaki Behavioral Group SJB Child Development Centers Social Vocational Services Spread Your Wings Stable Life Services Stars Therapy Services State Council on Developmental Disabilities SYNERGY HomeCare of South San Jose The New Hope Band Thrive Therapy and Social Center Trusted Response Urgent Support Team (TRUST) VTA Access Paratransit Eligibility YAI CA START Thank you for your support and looking forward to having our community partners at of our Superhero Summer Festivals. Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 96 Packet Pg. 229 of 245 Francisco Valenzuela Government Affairs / Community Relations San Andreas Regional Center Mobile: 408-210-5663 Office: 408-341-3809 Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 97 Packet Pg. 230 of 245 From:Cecilia Brunelle To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Southwest Chapter AAAE Annual Conference Date:Friday, June 20, 2025 12:16:00 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Hi Cityofpaloalto, I'm following up if you're interested to get the Registrants/Attendees List. · Southwest Chapter AAAE Annual Conference ( Newport Beach, USA, 20 - 23 Jul 2025) · 1,000+ Attendees I'm waiting for your response so I can let you know the costs and more information. Regards, Cecilia – Business Executive This message needs your attention This is their first email to you. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 98 Packet Pg. 231 of 245 From:Pat Roberts To:ParkRec Commission Cc:Robustelli, Sarah Subject:Ramos Park Date:Friday, June 20, 2025 11:03:01 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Parks and Recreation Commission, The Ramos Park is looking great! The beautiful children’s area is newly renovated and restrooms have been added for the first time. I think the walking path would be even better if it was extended through the picnic area. The result would be a smooth surface on the entire walking path. This would improve access for all people especially those who have mobility challenges. Thank you for all of the good work of the Parks and Recreation Commission! Congratulations on the brand new Fred Eyerly Water Tower Park! Patrick Roberts Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 99 Packet Pg. 232 of 245 Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 100 Packet Pg. 233 of 245 Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 101 Packet Pg. 234 of 245 From:Square To:ParkRec Commission Subject:A Small verification needed from Square Date:Thursday, June 19, 2025 4:25:03 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious ofopening attachments and clicking on links. i Your favorite businesses may send you messages and rewards via Square like the one below. Learn more and update your preferences. Have questions? Reply to this email and we’ll respond as soon as possible. Square Hello there We’ve reviewed your account and we’re sorry to inform you that we’re no longer able to support processing your payments. Starting today, your account with Square will be deactivated as a customer has reported your business being fraudulent. What does this mean? If you think there was a mistake, You can send us your information by following the steps below: 1 Sign into your Square Dashboard to access the information request form. 2 This message needs your attention No employee in your company has ever replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 102 Packet Pg. 235 of 245 Answer our questions Please provide as much detail as you can. 3 Look out for our emailed response We’ll get back to you within 2 business days. But you will not be able to process new transactions using Square. Any funds currently in your account balance will be held for a period of 90 days, and are due to be released to you within two business days after July 06, 2025. Please note that the release date and amount available for release are subject to change based on any additional activity, including chargebacks or bank returns that occur. If there are any chargebacks, they will be covered using the funds held in your Square account. If the held funds are not sufficient, your linked bank account may also be debited. If you have a payment that hasn’t yet been deposited, please see our support article on issuing credit card refunds to your customer and accepting an alternative payment method. Customers who paid via bank transfer must initiate a return directly with their bank. Thank you for choosing Square. We understand that this decision may cause changes in how you run your business and did not make it lightly. For more information about our policies, please review the Square Payment Terms. We appreciate you considering Square for your processing needs. Sincerely, Square Account Services Square 1955 Broadway, Suite 600 Oakland, CA 94612 Square Privacy Policy Square 3439 Lorna LN, Hoover, AL, 35216 Unsubscribe or Manage Preferences Square Buyer Features Privacy Policy Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 103 Packet Pg. 236 of 245 From:Howard, Adam To:srinath.kalluri@ieee.org Cc:city.council@cityofplaoalto.org; ParkRec Commission Subject:RE: Tennis court contensions Date:Thursday, June 19, 2025 9:48:23 AM Attachments:image001.png image004.png image005.png image007.png image008.png image009.png Good Morning Srinath, Thank you for your email and for sharing your experience at the Rinconada Courts. We appreciate you taking the time to reach out. City staff, along with the Parks and Recreation Commission, are currently reviewing court usage and related policies to address concerns raised by residents regarding access to courts in Palo Alto. USTA rentals will be an important part of these discussions, along with other potential policy changes aimed at ensuring that our residents are able to make the best possible use of our public courts. I will include your contact information on our communications list so that you can be informed as these discussions progress and have the opportunity to provide any further feedback. Thank you Adam Howard Sr. Community Services Manager, Recreation City of Palo Alto Phone: 650-329-2192 E-mail: adam.howard@paloalto.gov www.PaloAlto.gov Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 104 Packet Pg. 237 of 245 Please think of the environment before printing this email – Thank you! From: Srinath Kalluri <srinath.kalluri@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2025 7:38 PM To: Howard, Adam <Adam.Howard@paloalto.gov> Cc: city.council@cityofplaoalto.org; parkrec.comission@cityofpaloalto.org Subject: Tennis court contensions CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Hi Adam I am a long-time resident of Palo Alto and have found it very difficult to get access to the Rinconada tennis courts over the last few months - especially under the lights. The first three courts are always reserved for USTA matches whilethe other two have city sponsored i This message needs your attention This is a personal email address. This is their first email to your company. Mark Safe Report CGBANNERINDICATOR Hi Adam I am a long-time resident of Palo Alto and have found it very difficult to get access to the Rinconada tennis courts over the last few months - especially under the lights. The first three courts are always reserved for USTA matches while the other two have city sponsored lessons up to 9pm. Last week, I went to the courts with my son several days after work and found them all occupied in this way. Finally, I asked the folks who reserved the courts if they were Palo Alto residents, and other than one individual they were all from out of town. There were also people sitting in the stands who subbed in as soon as a match was done. I have spoken to other casual tennis players (ones who don't play USTA), and know that this is a challenge many are experiencing. Other cities such as Menlo Park either have keys for residents to access the courts or provide means for city residents to reserve at least some of the courts for a nominal fee. Are there any such provisions for city residents not on USTA teams? I understand from a notice I see posted on the courts that the city is considering this problem. Have any solutions been discussed? For example, there should, at a minimum, be a way for city residents to reserve courts. Powered by Mimecast Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 105 Packet Pg. 238 of 245 Regards Srinath Kalluri 2246 Saint Francis Drive Palo Alto, CA 94303 (650) 799 1597 Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 106 Packet Pg. 239 of 245 From:Kathy Fan To:Council, City; ParkRec Commission Subject:Petition of no new pickleball courts in Mitchell Park Date:Wednesday, June 18, 2025 8:55:50 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Dear City Council Members and Commissioners, This is Kathy Fan, a Palo Alto resident living near the Mitchell Park area and also an active tennis player. I recently started a petition to urge the City to stop the proposed addition of new pickleball courts at Mitchell Park. Within just 24 hours, the petition has received over 100 signatures from concerned community members. Here is the link to the petition: https://chng.it/xvbxPcb4dp Many residents are concerned about the potential impacts of this proposal, including the loss of existing tennis court availability, increased noise levels, and parking congestion. While we respect the growing interest in pickleball, we believe the proposal does not adequately consider the needs of the broader community and the importance of maintaining balance and fairness for all park users. We kindly ask the City Council and relevant departments to pause any further action on this proposal until a more comprehensive and transparent public consultation process can take place. We hope for a solution that accommodates both sports without sacrificing the quality of life and recreational opportunities for residents. Thank you for your attention and for your continued service to our community. Sincerely, Kathy Fan Palo Alto Resident This message needs your attention This is a personal email address. This is their first mail to some recipients. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 107 Packet Pg. 240 of 245 From:Vikram Shrivastava To:ParkRec Commission Cc:Council, City Subject:Vote on more Pickleball at Mitchell Park Date:Wednesday, June 18, 2025 8:48:33 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Hello, I am writing based on an article I read on Nextdoor to convert #3,#4 tennis courts int more Pickleball. I am against this decision. 4 tennis courts is already too little as so many time during the week the Courts #1, #2 are used by coaches teaching kids. This leads to almost everyone lining up on #3,#4 and the waits times to get a tennis game are way too long. I also think that the current Pickleball capacity has already pushed the parking issue at Mitchell Park to hard over the weekends. During soccer/little league baseball season this gets even worse. Given what I read adding 8 more courts to make Palo Alto a PickleBall heaven is not a goal for the City to strive to. I think it already has that status given the crowsd it draws and the much lower capacity in neighboring cities. I will urge the council not make this decision and kill Palo Alto Tennis. Regards, Vikram (Fairmeadow/Circles resident) Get Outlook for iOS This message needs your attention This is a personal email address. This is their first email to your company. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 108 Packet Pg. 241 of 245 From:San Mateo County Transportation Authority To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Peninsula Moves: Summer 2025 Date:Tuesday, June 17, 2025 8:46:26 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious ofopening attachments and clicking on links. i • Summer 2025 | View online • This message needs your attention This is their first email to you. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 109 Packet Pg. 242 of 245 TA Board backs vision for transportation solutions The TA Board adopted a $187.1 million annual budget to fund transit, bike and pedestrian upgrades, highway congestion relief, and grade‑separation projects across San Mateo County. See the details Funding on the way for enhanced regional mobility The TA Board approved more than $83 million to fund local shuttles and regional transit projects that improve first- and last- mile connections across San Mateo County. Learn more Help shape local transportation decisions You’re invited to help prioritize how Measure A and W funds are spent on transportation investments throughout the county. Join the conversation Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 110 Packet Pg. 243 of 245 • • • Get Peninsula Moves | Subscribe • • • New strategic plan is in place This year, the TA began executing its new five‑year Strategic Plan, which guides Measures A and W investments by streamlining project delivery, enhancing technical support, and prioritizing congestion relief and multimodal connections. Read our plan The 101/92 Express Lanes connectors project explained The proposal aims to address an issue that’s causing freeway congestion and cut-through traffic on local streets. Check out the options Other 101/92 improvements already in the works This project will bring several upgrades to make getting around safer and more efficient. The improvements include redesigned ramps, better merging areas and Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 111 Packet Pg. 244 of 245 clearer lane markings. Find out more Forward Peninsula Moves to your friends, so they can subscribe too! Editor: Randol White WhiteR@SamTrans.com Copyright (C) 2025 San Mateo County Transit District. All rights reserved. Our mailing address is: 1250 San Carlos Ave. San Carlos, CA 94070 Want to change how you receive these emails? You can update your preferences or unsubscribe Item A Public Comments 6.17.25 - 7.16.25 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 112 Packet Pg. 245 of 245