Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2025-03-25 Parks & Recreation Commission Agenda Packet
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Regular Meeting Tuesday, March 25, 2025 Council Chambers & Hybrid 7:00 PM Amended Agenda Amended Agenda Items Appear Below in RED Parks and Recreation Commission meetings will be held as “hybrid” meetings with the option to attend by teleconference/video conference or in person. To maximize public safety while still maintaining transparency and public access, members of the public can choose to participate from home or attend in person. Information on how the public may observe and participate in the meeting is located at the end of the agenda. Masks are strongly encouraged if attending in person. T h e m e e t i n g w i l l b e b r o a d c a s t o n C a b l e T V C h a n n e l 3 0, l i v e o n YouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/cityofpaloalto, a n d s t r e a m e d t o M i d p e n M e d i a Center https://midpenmedia.org. Commissioner names, biographies, and archived agendas and report are available at https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/Community‐Services/Other‐Services/Commissions/Parks‐and‐Recreation‐Commission. VIRTUAL PARTICIPATION CLICK HERE TO JOIN (https://cityofpaloalto.zoom.us/j/99937899745) Meeting ID: 999 3789 9745 Phone: 1(669)900‐6833 PUBLIC COMMENTS Public comments will be accepted both in person and via Zoom for up to three minutes or an a mount of time determined by the Chair. All requests to speak will be taken until 5 minutes a fter the staff’s presentation. Written public comments can be submitted in advance to ParkRec.commission@cityofpaloalto.org a nd will be provided to the Council and availa ble for inspection on the City’s website. Please clearly indicate which agenda item you are referencing in your subject line. PowerPoints, videos, or other media to be presented during public comment are accepted only by email to ParkRec.commission@cityofpaloalto.org at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Once received, the Clerk will have them shared at public comment for the specified item. To uphold strong cybersecurity management practices, USB’s or other physical electronic storage devices are not accepted. Signs and symbolic materials less than 2 feet by 3 feet are permitted provided that: (1) sticks, posts, poles or similar/other type of handle objects are strictly prohibited; (2) the items do not create a facility, fire, or sa fety hazard; and (3) persons with such items remain seated when displaying them and must not raise the items above shoulder level, obstruct the view or passage of other attendees, or otherwise disturb the business of the meeting. 1.Approval of Draft Minutes from the February 25, 2025, Parks and Recreation Commission Regular Meeting CITY OFFICIAL REPORTS Members of the public may not speak to the item(s 2.Council Liaison Report – 5 minutes New Item Added 3.Department Report – 20 minutes BUSINESS ITEMS 4.Eleanor Pardee Park Restroom Survey Results and Next Steps – 60 minutes Supplemental Report 5.Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan (BPTP) Update: Provide Feedback on Draft Proposed Bicycle Network and Facilities, and Program and Policy Recommendations – 45 minutes 6.Informational Update on Arastradero Creek Stabilization and Utility Line Repair – 45 minutes COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, ANNOUNCEMENTS OR FUTURE MEETINGS AND AGENDAS Members of the public may not speak to the item(s) OTHER INFORMATION Public Comments ADJOURNMENT SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT: Eleanor Pardee Park Restroom Survey Results and Next Steps PUBLIC COMMENT INSTRUCTIONS Members of the Public may provide public comments to teleconference meetings via email, teleconference, or by phone. 1. W r i t t e n p u b l i c c o m m e n t s m a y b e s u b m i t t e d b y e m a i l t o ParkRec.Commission@cityofpaloalto.org. 2. Spoken public comments using a computer will be accepted through the teleconference meeting. To address the Council, click on the link below to access a Zoom‐ based meeting. Please read the following instructions carefully. You may download the Zoom client or connect to the meeting in‐ browser. If using your browser, make sure you are using a current, up‐to‐date browser: Chrome 30 , Firefox 27 , Microsoft Edge 12 , Safari 7 . Certain functionality may be disabled in older browsers including Internet Explorer. You may be asked to enter an email address and name. We request that you identify yourself by name as this will be visible online and will be used to notify you that it is your turn to speak. When you wish to speak on an Agenda Item, click on “raise hand.” The Clerk will activate and unmute speakers in turn. Speakers will be notified shortly before they are called to speak. When called, please limit your remarks to the time limit allotted. A timer will be shown on the computer to help keep track of your comments. 3. Spoken public comments using a smart phone will be accepted through the teleconference meeting. To address the Council, download the Zoom application onto your phone from the Apple App Store or Google Play Store and enter the Meeting ID below. Please follow the instructions B‐E above. 4. Spoken public comments using a phone use the telephone number listed below. When you wish to speak on an agenda item hit *9 on your phone so we know that you wish to speak. You will be asked to provide your first and last name before addressing the Council. You will be advised how long you have to speak. When called please limit your remarks to the agenda item and time limit allotted. CLICK HERE TO JOIN Meeting ID: 999 3789 9745 Phone:1‐669‐900‐6833 Americans with Disability Act (ADA) It is the policy of the City of Palo Alto to offer its public programs, services and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to all. Persons with disabilities who require materials in an appropriate alternative format or who require auxiliary aids to access City meetings, programs, or services may contact the City’s ADA Coordinator at (650) 329‐2550 (voice) or by emailing ada@cityofpaloalto.org. Requests for assistance or accommodations must be submitted at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting, program, or service. PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSIONRegular MeetingTuesday, March 25, 2025Council Chambers & Hybrid7:00 PMAmended AgendaAmended Agenda Items Appear Below in REDParks and Recreation Commission meetings will be held as “hybrid” meetings with the option to attend by teleconference/video conference or in person. To maximize public safety while still maintaining transparency and public access, members of the public can choose to participate from home or attend in person. Information on how the public may observe and participate in the meeting is located at the end of the agenda. Masks are strongly encouraged if attending in person. T h e m e e t i n g w i l l b e b r o a d c a s t o n C a b l e T V C h a n n e l 3 0, l i v e o n YouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/cityofpaloalto, a n d s t r e a m e d t o M i d p e n M e d i a Center https://midpenmedia.org. Commissioner names, biographies, and archived agendas and report are available at https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/Community‐Services/Other‐Services/Commissions/Parks‐and‐Recreation‐Commission.VIRTUAL PARTICIPATION CLICK HERE TO JOIN (https://cityofpaloalto.zoom.us/j/99937899745) Meeting ID: 999 3789 9745 Phone: 1(669)900‐6833PUBLIC COMMENTSPublic comments will be accepted both in person and via Zoom for up to three minutes or an a mount of time determined by the Chair. All requests to speak will be taken until 5 minutes a fter the staff’s presentation. Written public comments can be submitted in advance to ParkRec.commission@cityofpaloalto.org a nd will be provided to the Council and availa ble for inspection on the City’s website. Please clearly indicate which agenda item you are referencing in your subject line.PowerPoints, videos, or other media to be presented during public comment are accepted only by email to ParkRec.commission@cityofpaloalto.org at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Once received, the Clerk will have them shared at public comment for the specified item. To uphold strong cybersecurity management practices, USB’s or other physical electronic storage devices are not accepted.Signs and symbolic materials less than 2 feet by 3 feet are permitted provided that: (1) sticks, posts, poles or similar/other type of handle objects are strictly prohibited; (2) the items do not create a facility, fire, or sa fety hazard; and (3) persons with such items remain seated when displaying them and must not raise the items above shoulder level, obstruct the view or passage of other attendees, or otherwise disturb the business of the meeting. 1.Approval of Draft Minutes from the February 25, 2025, Parks and Recreation Commission Regular Meeting CITY OFFICIAL REPORTS Members of the public may not speak to the item(s 2.Council Liaison Report – 5 minutes New Item Added 3.Department Report – 20 minutes BUSINESS ITEMS 4.Eleanor Pardee Park Restroom Survey Results and Next Steps – 60 minutes Supplemental Report 5.Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan (BPTP) Update: Provide Feedback on Draft Proposed Bicycle Network and Facilities, and Program and Policy Recommendations – 45 minutes 6.Informational Update on Arastradero Creek Stabilization and Utility Line Repair – 45 minutes COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, ANNOUNCEMENTS OR FUTURE MEETINGS AND AGENDAS Members of the public may not speak to the item(s) OTHER INFORMATION Public Comments ADJOURNMENT SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT: Eleanor Pardee Park Restroom Survey Results and Next Steps PUBLIC COMMENT INSTRUCTIONS Members of the Public may provide public comments to teleconference meetings via email, teleconference, or by phone. 1. W r i t t e n p u b l i c c o m m e n t s m a y b e s u b m i t t e d b y e m a i l t o ParkRec.Commission@cityofpaloalto.org. 2. Spoken public comments using a computer will be accepted through the teleconference meeting. To address the Council, click on the link below to access a Zoom‐ based meeting. Please read the following instructions carefully. You may download the Zoom client or connect to the meeting in‐ browser. If using your browser, make sure you are using a current, up‐to‐date browser: Chrome 30 , Firefox 27 , Microsoft Edge 12 , Safari 7 . Certain functionality may be disabled in older browsers including Internet Explorer. You may be asked to enter an email address and name. We request that you identify yourself by name as this will be visible online and will be used to notify you that it is your turn to speak. When you wish to speak on an Agenda Item, click on “raise hand.” The Clerk will activate and unmute speakers in turn. Speakers will be notified shortly before they are called to speak. When called, please limit your remarks to the time limit allotted. A timer will be shown on the computer to help keep track of your comments. 3. Spoken public comments using a smart phone will be accepted through the teleconference meeting. To address the Council, download the Zoom application onto your phone from the Apple App Store or Google Play Store and enter the Meeting ID below. Please follow the instructions B‐E above. 4. Spoken public comments using a phone use the telephone number listed below. When you wish to speak on an agenda item hit *9 on your phone so we know that you wish to speak. You will be asked to provide your first and last name before addressing the Council. You will be advised how long you have to speak. When called please limit your remarks to the agenda item and time limit allotted. CLICK HERE TO JOIN Meeting ID: 999 3789 9745 Phone:1‐669‐900‐6833 Americans with Disability Act (ADA) It is the policy of the City of Palo Alto to offer its public programs, services and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to all. Persons with disabilities who require materials in an appropriate alternative format or who require auxiliary aids to access City meetings, programs, or services may contact the City’s ADA Coordinator at (650) 329‐2550 (voice) or by emailing ada@cityofpaloalto.org. Requests for assistance or accommodations must be submitted at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting, program, or service. PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSIONRegular MeetingTuesday, March 25, 2025Council Chambers & Hybrid7:00 PMAmended AgendaAmended Agenda Items Appear Below in REDParks and Recreation Commission meetings will be held as “hybrid” meetings with the option to attend by teleconference/video conference or in person. To maximize public safety while still maintaining transparency and public access, members of the public can choose to participate from home or attend in person. Information on how the public may observe and participate in the meeting is located at the end of the agenda. Masks are strongly encouraged if attending in person. T h e m e e t i n g w i l l b e b r o a d c a s t o n C a b l e T V C h a n n e l 3 0, l i v e o n YouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/cityofpaloalto, a n d s t r e a m e d t o M i d p e n M e d i a Center https://midpenmedia.org. Commissioner names, biographies, and archived agendas and report are available at https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/Community‐Services/Other‐Services/Commissions/Parks‐and‐Recreation‐Commission.VIRTUAL PARTICIPATION CLICK HERE TO JOIN (https://cityofpaloalto.zoom.us/j/99937899745) Meeting ID: 999 3789 9745 Phone: 1(669)900‐6833PUBLIC COMMENTSPublic comments will be accepted both in person and via Zoom for up to three minutes or an a mount of time determined by the Chair. All requests to speak will be taken until 5 minutes a fter the staff’s presentation. Written public comments can be submitted in advance to ParkRec.commission@cityofpaloalto.org a nd will be provided to the Council and availa ble for inspection on the City’s website. Please clearly indicate which agenda item you are referencing in your subject line.PowerPoints, videos, or other media to be presented during public comment are accepted only by email to ParkRec.commission@cityofpaloalto.org at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Once received, the Clerk will have them shared at public comment for the specified item. To uphold strong cybersecurity management practices, USB’s or other physical electronic storage devices are not accepted.Signs and symbolic materials less than 2 feet by 3 feet are permitted provided that: (1) sticks, posts, poles or similar/other type of handle objects are strictly prohibited; (2) the items do not create a facility, fire, or sa fety hazard; and (3) persons with such items remain seated when displaying them and must not raise the items above shoulder level, obstruct the view or passage of other attendees, or otherwise disturb the business of the meeting.1.Approval of Draft Minutes from the February 25, 2025, Parks and Recreation CommissionRegular MeetingCITY OFFICIAL REPORTSMembers of the public may not speak to the item(s2.Council Liaison Report – 5 minutes New Item Added3.Department Report – 20 minutesBUSINESS ITEMS4.Eleanor Pardee Park Restroom Survey Results and Next Steps – 60 minutes SupplementalReport5.Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan (BPTP) Update: Provide Feedback on DraftProposed Bicycle Network and Facilities, and Program and Policy Recommendations – 45minutes6.Informational Update on Arastradero Creek Stabilization and Utility Line Repair – 45minutesCOMMISSIONER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, ANNOUNCEMENTS OR FUTURE MEETINGS ANDAGENDASMembers of the public may not speak to the item(s)OTHER INFORMATIONPublic CommentsADJOURNMENT SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT: Eleanor Pardee Park Restroom Survey Results and Next Steps PUBLIC COMMENT INSTRUCTIONS Members of the Public may provide public comments to teleconference meetings via email, teleconference, or by phone. 1. W r i t t e n p u b l i c c o m m e n t s m a y b e s u b m i t t e d b y e m a i l t o ParkRec.Commission@cityofpaloalto.org. 2. Spoken public comments using a computer will be accepted through the teleconference meeting. To address the Council, click on the link below to access a Zoom‐ based meeting. Please read the following instructions carefully. You may download the Zoom client or connect to the meeting in‐ browser. If using your browser, make sure you are using a current, up‐to‐date browser: Chrome 30 , Firefox 27 , Microsoft Edge 12 , Safari 7 . Certain functionality may be disabled in older browsers including Internet Explorer. You may be asked to enter an email address and name. We request that you identify yourself by name as this will be visible online and will be used to notify you that it is your turn to speak. When you wish to speak on an Agenda Item, click on “raise hand.” The Clerk will activate and unmute speakers in turn. Speakers will be notified shortly before they are called to speak. When called, please limit your remarks to the time limit allotted. A timer will be shown on the computer to help keep track of your comments. 3. Spoken public comments using a smart phone will be accepted through the teleconference meeting. To address the Council, download the Zoom application onto your phone from the Apple App Store or Google Play Store and enter the Meeting ID below. Please follow the instructions B‐E above. 4. Spoken public comments using a phone use the telephone number listed below. When you wish to speak on an agenda item hit *9 on your phone so we know that you wish to speak. You will be asked to provide your first and last name before addressing the Council. You will be advised how long you have to speak. When called please limit your remarks to the agenda item and time limit allotted. CLICK HERE TO JOIN Meeting ID: 999 3789 9745 Phone:1‐669‐900‐6833 Americans with Disability Act (ADA) It is the policy of the City of Palo Alto to offer its public programs, services and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to all. Persons with disabilities who require materials in an appropriate alternative format or who require auxiliary aids to access City meetings, programs, or services may contact the City’s ADA Coordinator at (650) 329‐2550 (voice) or by emailing ada@cityofpaloalto.org. Requests for assistance or accommodations must be submitted at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting, program, or service. MINUTES PARKS & RECREATION Commission Regular meeting February 25, 2025 In-Person & Virtual Conference Palo Alto, California Page 1 of 12 Regular Meeting 1 2/25/2025 2 The Parks and Recreation Commission of the City of Palo Alto met on this date in the Council 3 Chambers and by virtual teleconference at 7:00 P.M. 4 Present In Person: Cribbs, Deng, Kleinhaus, Vice Chair Greenfield 5 Council Liaison: Lythcott-Haims 6 Present Remotely: Wei 7 Absent: Chair Freeman, Brown 8 9 Call To Order and Roll Call 10 Vice Chair Greenfield called the meeting to order and roll was taken. 11 Public Comment 12 1. Orit found the survey about adding a restroom at Eleanor Pardee Park biased and poorly 13 designed. She explained why she alleged the main question pushed responders to 14 provide a specific answer, the survey tracking mechanism was lacking and it should have 15 included some concerns. She asked that a well-designed survey be put together to 16 provide an opportunity for a fair, authentic and thoughtful perspective before making a 17 decision to invest in a restroom at Pardee Park. 18 2. Chris C. shared Orit’s sentiments about the survey regarding a restroom at Pardee Park. 19 He wanted to understand what the traffic implications would be and what they should 20 expect in terms of the service level agreement from the Parks Commission about how 21 the restrooms would be maintained. He talked about restrooms at other parks in the 22 community being in a state of disrepair. 23 3. Dashiell L., conservation coordinator for Sierra Club Loma Prieta Chapter, commented 24 about Staff slashing and hedging all the vegetation around the ponds at Emily Renzel. 25 They recommended Staff use a phased approach to manage those areas so they would 26 not all be managed at the same time in order to create habitat diversity so wildlife will 27 have habitat to forage, nest and find shelter. 28 Item 1 February 25, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 1 Packet Pg. 5 of 262 Agenda Changes, Additions and Deletions 29 None. 30 31 Approval of Minutes 32 1. Approval of December 18, 2024 and January 28, 2025 Parks and Recreation 33 Commission Draft Summary Minutes 34 Commissioner Cribbs asked for a correction on page 5, line 132 on the December 18, 2024, 35 Parks and Recreation Commission Draft Summary Minutes changing PASD to PAUSD. 36 MOTION: Commissioner Cribbs moved, seconded by Commissioner Kleinhaus to approve edits 37 to the Minutes from PASD to PAUSD on the December 18, 2024, Parks and Recreation 38 Commission Draft Summary Minutes. 39 MOTION PASSED: 5-2 40 MOTION: Commissioner Kleinhaus moved, seconded by Commissioner Cribbs to the January 41 38, 2025, Parks and Recreation Commission Draft Summary Minutes. 42 MOTION PASSED: 5-2 43 44 City Official Reports 45 2. Department Report 46 Assistant Community Services Director Steve Castile and Sarah Robustelli gave the department 47 report via slide presentation including the Hearts and Harmony Valentine’s Day dance, 48 upcoming special events, spring youth swim lessons at Rinconada Pool, Cubberley updates, 49 Esther Clark Park replanting, Briones Park slide replacement, capital improvements projects 50 construction at Ramos Park and completion of Cameron Park. Mr. Castile indicated they would 51 bring an action item on the Eleanor Pardee Park restroom survey the next month. 52 Commissioner Kleinhaus inquired if there was a follow up on how many of the acorns and 53 buckeye seeds germinated at Esther Clark Park as squirrels could eat them. She wanted to know 54 if oak trees could also be planted along with the buckeyes and big leaf maples. She encouraged 55 not waiting to plant more trees as five trees did not replace the lost trees fast enough. She 56 discussed the outcry about the use of plastic in parks and wanted to know if there was a policy 57 to look more natural. She thought it was unfortunate that petroleum-based rubberized material 58 continued to be used. She mentioned the comments about Emily Renzel and the vegetation 59 management. She hoped there would be more coordination between the department and 60 Item 1 February 25, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 2 Packet Pg. 6 of 262 Public Works in managing the Baylands in a way that is wildlife and habitat friendly so the 61 vegetation was not decimated again next year. 62 Mr. Castile replied that Grassroots would work with Staff to monitor the planted trees. Each 63 location was flagged and two to three acorns could be planted in anticipation of the potential 64 loss. He agreed to look into planting oaks. He indicated they had heard the concerns regarding 65 using the plastic in the parks. He said there was a study coming up with information so the 66 public could voice their concerns on March 17. 67 Commissioner Deng queried if the Cubberley Field restroom started on time and when it would 68 be completed. 69 It was Mr. Castile’s understanding that work on the Cubberley Field restroom had started and 70 would be completed in about three weeks. 71 Commissioner Cribbs wanted to know if there was an update on the First Tee agreement. 72 Mr. Castile answered they were still actively working on the First Tee agreement. Preliminary 73 work had been done looking at the heights of the netting and a trajectory study. That would 74 come into play working in collaboration with the First Tee. They intended to schedule a meeting 75 with First Tee within the next two weeks to keep that going. They were currently working on 76 the long-term agreement. 77 Commissioner Wei asked if they had the final results of the Santa Clara County report about 78 artificial turf and synthetic grass. 79 Mr. Castile answered that the next steps would be to present that to Council on March 17. They 80 would determine if a consultant could be brought on to help park staff come up with different 81 recommendations and fact finding on the health benefits and the concerns of the public. 82 Whether to convert it to natural or leave it synthetic would be yet to determined pending on 83 the study. 84 Commissioner Kleinhaus asked if there was an update on the Tide Gate and whether the flow to 85 the basin could be restored. She requested an update on how the Mitchell Dog Park was 86 working out. 87 Mr. Castile remarked the final application to US Fish and Wildlife had been submitted and was 88 in the phase of being under review. Once feedback from that was received, if they got a final 89 approval on that they could proceed with establishing the work to clean the gates. They were 90 already looking into a company that could do the work for them. He agreed to bring an update 91 on the Mitchell Dog Park to a future agenda. He stated the feedback indicated it had been well 92 received. 93 Item 1 February 25, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 3 Packet Pg. 7 of 262 Vice Chair Greenfield queried if the Briones Park slide replacement was a normal lifecycle 94 budgeted item. He asked if the synthetic field study had been approved by City Council. He 95 requested Staff follow up with the Open Space Preserve liaisons with more information about 96 the Renzel Pond vegetation management issue. He suggested arranging a meeting with the 97 Commission liaisons and Public Works engineering to further discuss the issue on site. He 98 advised that Staff include information about the status of the new restrooms at other parks. 99 Mr. Castile replied it was an unanticipated, proactive repair due to defects making the slides 100 unsafe and would come out of the emergency funds. He answered the synthetic field study was 101 pulled on the January agenda. It would go back in front of Council on March 17. 102 No Action 103 104 Business Items 105 3. Information Update on Byxbee Park Western Trail Temporary Closure from 3/03/2025 106 to 11/30/2025 for Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation 107 Michael Randall, Jacobs Engineering, and Sue Cheng, project engineer, provided a slide 108 presentation giving an update on the progress of the 72-inch joint intercepting sewer 109 rehabilitation project including existing pipe conditions, map of the portion of the sewer line 110 being rehabilitated, condition assessment video of the inside of the pipe, example of a large 111 diameter CIPP installation, Utilities Department experience with cured pipe in place, City of 112 Mountain View CIPP at Shoreline Park in March 2022, 72-inch joint intercepting sewer phase 113 (3/3/25 to 11/30/25), protection of public and environment, construction at park land, signage, 114 6 to 8-inch gap below fencing, site photos, light and noise level design guidelines, temporary 115 illumination locations inside the plant and at the trail (5/5/25 to 7/30/25) and trail closure 116 3/3/25 to 11/30/25. 117 Ms. Cheng commented that the project was scheduled to be complete by the end of October 118 but they requested to have the closure to November in case there was any construction delay. 119 Commissioner Kleinhaus wanted explanation about the 24/7 lighting. 120 Ms. Cheng clarified the lighting would not be on 24/7. Each station would have an on/off switch 121 and would only be turned on as needed. 122 Public Comments: 123 1. Dashiell L. reported that this project might potentially happen at the same time as the 124 construction of the Tide Gate structure by Valley Water, the Horizontal Levee project 125 and there may be additional projects that could overlap with this. He queried how these 126 projects were coordinated for the protection of natural resources and access. 127 Item 1 February 25, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 4 Packet Pg. 8 of 262 Commissioner Kleinhaus explained how locations of manholes 3 and 6 were important for 128 wildlife connectivity. She advised any pipes that were lying around should be inaccessible to 129 wildlife or be inspected for wildlife use before they were used. She wanted to be sure they 130 were paying attention to where manhole 3 went and make sure the pipes did not perforate one 131 another. She asked for explanation about the timing with other projects. She wanted an update 132 on what was happening with the Horizontal Levee. 133 Mr. Randall pointed out they would be below manhole 3 and would not physically excavate 134 down to the pipeline. He stated the Tide Gate project would commence in September and 135 proceed until March. There would be park rangers supervising to coordinate trail access with 136 each individual project. There would be ample notification. They intended to minimize the 137 inconvenience as much as possible with bypasses. He agreed to look at bringing an update on 138 the Horizontal Levee. 139 Ms. Cheng advised that to their knowledge the Horizontal Levee project had been postponed 140 and would not be concurrent with the sewer rehab project. The pipelining would be complete 141 by the end of July and site restorations and manhole rehab would occur between July and 142 October. 143 Vice Chair Greenfield questioned if a park improvement ordinance was required for the work to 144 be done. He said it would be good to understand what set the criteria for when a PIO was 145 required. He advised the Horizontal Levee update could be agendized for a future meeting. 146 Ms. Robustelli agreed to look into that and get back to the Commission on it but she did not 147 believe a park improvement ordinance went to City Council. 148 Commissioner Cribbs wanted a summary about the communication with the residents about 149 when and how things would be closed and what access there would be. She inquired how many 150 people would be working at the site at one time. 151 Ms. Cheng explained there would be signage posted at specific locations with a QR code and a 152 URL to the City website proving information and updates. They would coordinate with the park 153 rangers doing a walkthrough when fencing was installed to ensure site security. 154 Mr. Randall remarked there would be two people maintaining the bypass 24/7 the majority of 155 the time. Throughout the day when they were preparing for the work, there would be two 156 crews of about three individuals. When they get to the actual wetout, there would be five 157 people from SAK in addition to those watching the bypass depending on their staffing levels, 158 natures of their crews and who would be available. City staff would also be there while the 159 work activities were being performed. 160 Commissioner Wei expressed approval of the project. 161 Commissioner Deng wanted to understand the rationale behind the estimated percentage of 162 the cost to share between the six agencies and why Palo Alto accounts for that percentage. 163 Item 1 February 25, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 5 Packet Pg. 9 of 262 Ms. Cheng explained the sewer line flows from the City of Mountain View, Palo Alto, Los Altos 164 and Los Altos Hill. The percentage is based on the flow that is contributed by each of the cities 165 sewersheds. She stated flow meters tracked each partner’s flow. 166 Mr. Castile added it was a cost share between the different cities. 167 Vice Chair Greenfield wanted a review of the primary trail closure periods. He wanted 168 explanation of the service life. 169 Ms. Cheng replied it would be March 3 until October 30 of this year and potentially into 170 November to account for any potential delay. 171 Mr. Randall explained the rehabilitation of the pipeline itself would have a design life of 50 to 172 100 years. There would be other infrastructure along with it that would have a 20 to 50 year 173 range. 174 No Action 175 176 4. Informational Update from Canopy (45 Minutes) 177 JP Renaud, executive director of Canopy, and Evany Wang, community forestry coordinator for 178 Canopy, provided an informational update from Canopy via slide presentation including a 179 history, scope of services for this FY, tree walks and volunteer tree care workshops, FY24 180 Mayor’s Tree Planting and Arbor week celebrations and Palo Alto planting events. 181 Mr. Renaud provided context about Canopy’s services. He remarked that Canopy would plant 182 anywhere there was a spot for a tree and invited anyone to contact them at canopy.org if they 183 would like to have a tree planted. 184 Commissioner Wei wanted to know how they spread the word for the youth survey and if they 185 would be interested in presenting to the Youth Leadership Council possibly in March. She 186 queried on behalf of Neighbor’s Abroad who they would contact if they wanted to plant more 187 trees with different cities. 188 Ms. Wang explained their volunteer engagement manager had a great connection to a lot of 189 the school community. She reaches out to the school groups individually. They do a table at 190 some of the schools when invited. They start advertising opportunities for the Young Tree Care 191 Survey around early spring. She would be interested in further advertising for the Young Tree 192 Care Survey at any opportunity she was presented. She stated they would provide an email 193 where she could be contacted for that. 194 Mr. Castile agreed to look into who to contact to plant more trees with different cities. If they 195 had placed, they would work directly with Urban Forestry and potentially also collaborate with 196 Canopy depending on where they wanted to put trees. 197 Item 1 February 25, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 6 Packet Pg. 10 of 262 Vice Chair Greenfield described a Living Skills class in high school that requires volunteer hours 198 and advised Canopy was an organization that the high school youth could fulfill that 199 requirement. He asked for a description of a tree planting event. 200 Commissioner Deng asked if they had considered partnering with elementary schools. She 201 offered to pass along the information to all the PTA presidents if they reach out to her. 202 Ms. Wang remarked they had planted a few trees at Ohlone Elementary School in the last 203 couple of years and were scheduled to plant two more this year. She tried to work with 204 administration to see how many students they could get involved. They have a curriculum that 205 could be adapted to teach children how to plant. She described the events in the day of a tree 206 planting event. 207 Mr. Renaud talked about how schools are full of asphalt that absorb and emit heat. Planting 208 trees at schools allow mitigation for that. He described the process for planting trees at a 209 school. 210 Commissioner Kleinhaus inquired what tree care questions they got most frequently. She 211 queried if there were specific directions on how to water mature oak trees. She talked about 212 the importance of native oaks and providing instruction on caring for them. She asked what 213 species they plant, what percentage were locally native trees and how many of those were 214 locally native oaks. She wondered if any education was being provided about biodiversity in 215 general and habitat value of different trees. She thought native trees could belong everywhere. 216 Ms. Wang replied they got a lot of questions about watering and having the tree stakes 217 checked. They get questions about mature trees not planted by Canopy. Canopy does not have 218 the facilities to care for large trees past the five-year mark but they have an arborist list they 219 send to anyone who needs tree care help. Questions regarding mature trees include if they are 220 in danger of falling over in a wind storm. The water instructions for oak trees would depend on 221 the type of oak tree and the amount of water different oaks required. She advised their tree 222 library had a list of watering and care requirements for specific trees and could be accessed by 223 anyone on their website. She remarked the most common oaks they plant were the valley and 224 the coast live oak. She put more emphasis this year on offering locally native tree species. They 225 tried to focus more on trees, species that could become trees or that were available at the local 226 nurseries in tree form. She indicated that many of California’s native trees were not suitable for 227 urban spaces. 228 Mr. Renaud stated they were aligned with Commissioner Kleinhaus’ concerns. He explained 229 community forestry coordinators shared those values with residents but they needed 230 everyone’s partnership in making sure a tree survives. If a resident did not want the tree that 231 was native to that area prehistorically, they had to provide them with a climate resilient tree 232 appropriate to their environment and climate adaptive. Trees that survived there 100 years ago 233 struggle now with the changing climate and they had to think ahead about what trees would be 234 able to survive the unpredictability of the future. They do their best to educate people on the 235 value of native trees, what they bring as biodiversity and what they do to our environment and 236 try to convince people to accept one of those trees. 237 Item 1 February 25, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 7 Packet Pg. 11 of 262 Vice Chair Greenfield thought it might be worthwhile to look at the specific instructions 238 between what Canopy has and what is on the City website in terms of the care guidelines for 239 the protected species. He suggested the urban forester, Peter Gollinger, could look into that 240 along with Canopy and figure out the best way to have this information available and 241 discoverable for the local community. He wanted to hear more about the South Palo Alto Tree 242 Initiative. He asked what the Commission could do to help. 243 Ms. Wang described the process of the South Palo Alto Tree Initiative. When someone requests 244 a tree, she meets them where they want a tree. The purpose of the tree, personal preferences 245 and site conditions are taken into consideration in making suggestions. The resident is free to 246 choose their tree. They take care of the trees for threeish years. The planting date depends on 247 whether they can be put into a larger community planting and if not they get volunteers to 248 work on it on an off Wednesday or Thursday. 249 Mr. Renaud instructed saying yes to a tree was all that was needed and Canopy would do the 250 rest or look at their website or calendar for volunteer opportunities. 251 Commissioner Cribbs expressed appreciation for the efforts of Canopy. 252 253 5. FY2024 Urban Forestry Annual Report and Discussion of Draft Tree and Landscape 254 Technical Manual 255 Arborist Peter Gollinger provided the Urban Forestry annual update via a slide presentation 256 including key responsibilities of the section, Urban Forestry section staff, trees maintained, staff 257 development, Urban Forestry FY24 data, Urban Forestry FY24 accomplishments, Urban Forestry 258 program outputs, number of trees pruned (street and park) target 5218, FY24 Urban Forestry 259 challenges, Tree & Landscape Technical Manual, timeline of the TLTM, TLTM improvements, 260 new components in the TLTM, early TLTM feedback and how to provide feedback on the TLTM. 261 Vice Chair Greenfield noted the Parks and Rec Commission had been designated in the 262 Municipal Code with along with the major changes to the tree ordinance in 2023 as the official 263 community form for the Urban Forestry section. 264 Public Comment: 265 1. Winter D. expressed her approval of the updates to the TLTM. 266 2. Dashiell L., conservation coordinator for the Sierra Club Loma Prieta Chapter, stated the 267 organization believed the draft TLTM needed work to meet goal number two. They 268 hoped to see more attention to ecology and biodiversity. The right tree in the right place 269 principles needed to include habitat value or recommendations for plants specifically. 270 They wanted to see more information on native plants. He advised that the Mountain 271 View North Bayshore Precise Plant Palette might be useful as a model for how to direct 272 the right kinds of plantings for enhancing ecological value and biodiversity. 273 Item 1 February 25, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 8 Packet Pg. 12 of 262 3. Doria S., Planning and Transportation Commission, expressed her appreciation of the 274 updates to the TLTM. 275 4. Karen H. agreed with the other public comments made. She mentioned that the 276 underlay for artificial turf could be impermeable and not support plants that provide 277 cooling as well as habitat for animals critical to the ecosystem. She hoped to have some 278 attention given to the issue during the meeting. 279 Commissioner Cribbs questioned how many people take advantage of the opportunity to 280 communicate with Urban Forestry on the online forms. 281 Mr. Gollinger commented most of the arborist online forms were not live yet. They have had 282 actual field arborists test them out and give feedback. One issue they noticed was that while 283 the comments and conditions in a development plan may require a project arborist, oftentimes 284 the applicant was not actually contracting with an arborist. Regarding the TLTM, they had 285 received 10 or 12 comments via the form and approximately 20 comments via email. 286 Commissioner Kleinhaus queried if the data on how many trees were removed included 287 projects that did not go through the entire permitting process and if they knew how many 288 private trees were being lost. She urged them to add the ecology requirements to the training. 289 She wondered if they knew where there was saltwater intrusion and stated it was important in 290 determining which trees needed irrigation. She asked if a tree that just dies gets calculated into 291 a tree replacement requirement. She asked them to note there were a lot of trees that died on 292 the golf course in the past 10 years that did not get replaced. 293 Mr. Gollinger replied those trees listed were public trees. He explained they began tracking the 294 lost private trees about a year ago. They had not compiled any comprehensive data. They 295 planned to start reporting on it annually once they get it figured out. The ability to monitor the 296 private trees on private property long term was limited. A behind-the-scenes process had been 297 implemented where when one of the staff reviewed a project with a protected tree removal, a 298 tree permit was made behind the scenes to provide a record for it. He stated they had it 299 mapped where saltwater intrusion was most likely to occur based on groundwater intrusion 300 due to sea level rise. He did not know if there was actual date of any intrusion currently. He 301 explained if a protected tree dies, they would only have a requirement for replacement if they 302 were letting them know they were removing and replacing it. For commercial properties, it 303 would be a part of a landscape plan and they would need to submit a replacement because it 304 was part of an approved landscape plan. If it was in the open space, unless it was a hazard to a 305 trail or road or was a fire hazard, it would be left alone. If it was a City tree, they would remove 306 it as a hazard and replace if, if possible. If a resident or a property had a tree fall over from 307 storm damage, they would not be penalized. They would recommend replacement. If it was a 308 commercial landscape, they may require a one-to-one to keep the landscape plan current. City 309 trees would get replaced if there was not a conflict with utilities. 310 Commissioner Deng inquired how many of the City Staff were working on the TLTM for the next 311 four months. 312 Item 1 February 25, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 9 Packet Pg. 13 of 262 Mr. Gollinger answered it was mostly him. He was going to assign portions to a couple of the 313 project managers. They had a limited amount of funds available with the consultant that would 314 mostly be for final copy editing and printing preparation. 315 Vice Chair Greenfield queried if they had a breakdown on how many of the 151 tree permits 316 were for removal versus for just work. He advised tracking them in a separate bucket going 317 forward. He thought it would be helpful to add some scenario examples when talking about 318 going through the permitting process. He appreciated the comment about synthetic turf and its 319 place in the TLTM. 320 Mr. Gollinger did not have that information readily available. He stated they did issue permits 321 for private citizens to work on City trees in front of their homes. He thought out of those, 322 maybe 10 or less would be tree care permits. 323 Commissioner Wei asked if they would be doing in-person workshops in addition to the online 324 sessions and how they would distribute those menus. She also wanted to know if there was any 325 additional information about fire prevention. She suggested using the Enjoy! catalog for 326 outreach. 327 Vice Chair Greenfield suggested getting feedback from the staff on how the Enjoy! catalog could 328 be used in the future for a variety of different applications. He asked who the TLTM was written 329 for. 330 Mr. Gollinger replied once the document was finalized and approved by the city manager, the 331 intention was to hold both online and in-person. The document would be available prominently 332 on the website for download as a PDF. They were looking to secure a budget for printing paper 333 copies and have them available for purchase at the development center. He agreed to look into 334 the use of the Enjoy! catalog. He explained the fundamental purpose of the original tree 335 technical manual was for landscape and building professionals on how to preserve trees during 336 construction projects in addition to supporting the original Title VIII. The new document was 337 intended to follow in those footsteps but also try and provide information for the general public 338 and tree owners to help them comply with all the various regulations regarding water 339 efficiency. 340 Commissioner Kleinhaus suggested looking to explore if there would be a way to reduce the use 341 of petroleum-based materials to cover the earth in both the Urban Forest Master Plan and the 342 ordinance. She opined fire regulation was a moving target to try to capture. She advised 343 keeping some of the things that were dynamic as placeholders as an update but not necessarily 344 as part of the document because they could change so quickly. She opined examples of things 345 could be in the appendix. She agreed the issue of biodiversity was lacking and needed to be 346 embedded everywhere. She thought the species list from the North Bayshore Precise Plan 347 would be a good document to review and incorporate into the document. She mentioned the 348 ordinance to implement the Urban Forest Master Plan and inquired what the relationship was 349 between the three documents. She asked how they decided when to trim street trees. 350 Item 1 February 25, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 10 Packet Pg. 14 of 262 Mr. Gollinger explained the Tree Protection Ordinance governed what trees would be 351 protected. The Tree Ordinance came first and then the Master Plan happened. The ordinance 352 was updated to more reflect the Master Plan. The ordinance predated the Master Plan. During 353 the ordinance update, they looked at what could be done to put it more in line with the Master 354 Plan. They incorporated some of the ideas from the Master Plan into the updated ordinance. 355 This intention of this document was to help inform and fill in the regulation surrounding the 356 municipal code in the ordinance. The comments about making sure the document followed in 357 line with the priorities from the Master Plan were well received. He acknowledged there was 358 room for improvement. The timing of trimming street trees depended on the species. They 359 were scheduled to go through a geographic area every five to seven years for a major prune. If 360 a call was received for dead wood or a fallen limb, the tree would be inspected when they went 361 out and if dead limbs were seen on the interior, they would be removed which could present 362 the appearance of fewer branches. A lot of times, limbs will be removed down low to facilitate 363 vehicle access. He advised urban trees tend to interact more directly with their built 364 environment so there was often a need for some variety of maintenance. 365 No Action 366 367 COMMISSIONER/BOARD MEMBER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, ANNOUNCEMENTS OR FUTURE 368 AGENDA ITEMS 369 Commissioner Cribbs was interested in the official role the Parks and Recreation Commission 370 would have with the Cubberley development. She stressed the importance for the Commission 371 to have good communication with Concordia and moving forward. She stated the ad hoc 372 continued to meet and talk about different opportunities to extend the life of the tennis and 373 pickleball courts. The skate park would be meeting with a group of the Skate Park Advisory 374 Committee the following week. There was interest if the unallocated budget item in the new 375 finance report would have anything to do with the skate park but they did not think it did. She 376 asked if there was somebody that could step into the role of providing the design piece for the 377 skate park. 378 Ms. Robustelli reported a Cubberley update was tentatively taking place at the upcoming April 379 agenda. She said that filling the role of providing the design piece for the skate park would need 380 to go through the public process. The skate community was looking for a contractor and 381 specialized designer who had done skate parks before. Once funding was raised to go through 382 that purchasing process, they would make sure the scope of work highlighted that specialty. 383 Commissioner Kleinhaus reiterated that she would love to hear an update about what was 384 happening with funding for sea level rise. 385 Vice Chair Greenfield thought it would be good to add getting an update on sea level rise and 386 the Horizontal Levee projects to the list of potential future agenda items. He reported that the 387 Nature Preserve Access Policy ad hoc had a site tour the previous week at the Pearson-388 Arastradero Preserve. They looked to report back to the full Commission next month to present 389 Item 1 February 25, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 11 Packet Pg. 15 of 262 the findings and recommendations. The Baylands Comprehensive Conservation Plan ad hoc had 390 been working on a long project and looked to report back to the Commission soon. Future 391 agenda items for next month included the Eleanor Pardee Park survey results and next steps, 392 the Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan update, discussion items on Arastradero Creek 393 Restoration Project and the Nature Preserve Access Policy update. He announced Staff sent out 394 Doodle polls regarding scheduling the annual retreat. They were looking to get confirmation on 395 where they were going with the Work Plan and when it needed to be updated. 396 Commissioner Cribbs thought the Work Plan was going to Council soon. 397 Mr. Castile agreed to check on that. 398 399 Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at 10:10 P.M. 400 Item 1 February 25, 2025 Parks & Recreation Committee Draft Summary Minutes Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 12 Packet Pg. 16 of 262 Parks and Recreation Commission Staff Report From: Steve Castile, Assistant Director Community Services; Sarah Robustelli Meeting Date: March 25, 2025 Report #: 2503-4395 TITLE Eleanor Pardee Park Restroom Survey Results and Next Steps BACKGROUND RECOMMENDATION Discuss the Eleanor Pardee Park Restroom Survey Results and Next Steps. Eleanor Pardee Park is a 9.6-acre neighborhood park, making it the second-largest neighborhood park in Palo Alto (Bol Park is the largest). Approximately half of the park is developed with expansive turf, playgrounds, and picnic areas, while the other half remains undeveloped and is home to community gardens. The Park Restroom Installation (PG-19000) is a recurring Capital Improvement Program (CIP) project based on the Palo Alto Parks, Trails, Natural Open Space, and Recreation Master Plan, which was adopted by City Council in September 2017. Master Plan Policy 2.E states that the City will actively pursue adding restrooms in parks that: - Are approximately two acres or larger - Feature amenities that encourage visitors to stay - Have a high level of use - Lack nearby restroom facilities Additionally, Policy 2.E.2 identifies potential restroom locations, including: - Bol Park - Bowden Park - Eleanor Pardee Park - Johnson Park - Ramos Park - Robles Park - Terman Park In recent years, restrooms have been added at Ramos, Robles, and Rinconada Parks. The Item 4 Item 4 Staff Report Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 1 Packet Pg. 17 of 262 Cubberley restrooms are currently under construction and are expected to open in the coming weeks, weather permitting. This fiscal year, a restroom near the Magical Bridge Playground at Mitchell Park is funded for design and construction. Due to staff capacity constraints and a recent resignation in Public Works Engineering, the timeline for beginning this project is still being determined. Years ago, a restroom installation at Eleanor Pardee Park was considered, but the project faced significant neighborhood opposition. More recently, there has been increasing community interest in revisiting this discussion. During budget discussions last year City Council directed staff to engage with the community to explore the addition of a new public restroom at Eleanor Pardee Park. The purpose of the survey is to inform decision-making and ensure we prioritize accessibility, usability, and visitor experience. ANALYSIS Item 4 Item 4 Staff Report Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 2 Packet Pg. 18 of 262 - TBD – Community Meetings, Park Improvement Ordinance to PRC, City Council for approval, Design, and Installation Given the findings, staff will advance the project through the required approval processes while continuing to engage residents to address any concerns and ensure a successful implementation. FISCAL/RESOURCE IMPACT ATTACHMENTS Item 4 Item 4 Staff Report Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 3 Packet Pg. 19 of 262 Eleanor Pardee Park Restroom Survey 1. Are you a Palo Alto resident? 2. Do you live near Eleanor Pardee Park? 3. How often do you visit Eleanor Pardee Park? 4. How do you primarily use Eleanor Pardee Park? 5. Do you support adding a new public restroom at Eleanor Pardee Park? 6. To what extent do you agree with the following statement: Adding a public restroom would make the park more accessible for families, individuals with disabilities, and elderly individuals. A public restroom would enhnace the overall park experience for visitors and help encourage longer visits to the park. 7. Please share any additional thoughts or concerns. Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Walking Yes Strongly Agree We want a restroom prioritized to be installed in the 2026 calendar year. You should communicate that It is an automatically locking facili No No, I live in another neighborhood Weekly Community Garden,Gatherings Yes Strongly Agree Have to travel a couple of miles to use closest public bathrooms. Definitely a need for toilets in Pardee Park. Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Community Garden,Other: I am a Master Garden and work in Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Community Garden Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Community Garden Yes Strongly Agree I believe it is a health issue to have a bathroom installed. Currently people at the park who need to use a restroom either leave the park, No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Weekly Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree This park is heavily used by people of all ages. The restroom is absolutely impera ve to improve accessibility and overall experience of th Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Weekly Community Garden Yes Strongly Agree There is a dire need for a restroom in this park. Please expedite this project! Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Community Garden,Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree I have volunteered at the community garden for many years. It has been disappointing and embarassing to have to tell folks attending wo Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Weekly Community Garden,Other: UC Master Gardeners of Santa Cla Yes Strongly Agree It would be great to have the restrooms installed as soon as possible so that the Master Gardeners in the Palo Alto Demo Garden can pro No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Weekly Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Cuesta Park …my neighbourhood park has TWO public bathrooms…I love to use Eleanor Pardee park Please install a bathroom in 2026 or A No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Weekly Community Garden,Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree A public restroom would benefit people of all ages, however it will especially help children and seniors to improve accessibility, additionall Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Please build the restroom either this year (2025) or next (2026). Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Please it is so needed ‐ so many people have had to leave picnics, family gatherings and events because there hasn’t been a bathroom ava Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree It’s really needed for all users of the park. Yes Yes, within a short drive Rarely Recreation,Field Use,Gatherings,Walking,Other: Christmas an Yes Strongly Agree The toilet situation is real. This needs to be a modern toilet including a baby changing area Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Walking No Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Less frequently used parks have restroom, why Pardee Park has none?Would be great to build one between the park and the community Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree A restroom is long overdue ‐ please move this project to the top of the priority list! Thank you for your consideration. Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Walking Yes Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Playground Yes Agree Auto lock it at night to avoid homeless/drunk people using it. Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking No Strongly Disagree Our property directly backs up to the park, and we strongly oppose the addition of a bathroom there. The park is already frequented at all Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree A restroom is critically important for anyone with small kids. I've had more than one playdate disrupted by the lack of a restroom. I've or Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Gatherings,Playgro No Strongly Disagree I am strongly opposed to the addition of a restroom, as I am concerned about the sanitary standard of such a restroom that is used by so m Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree Long overdue IMHO Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Playground ,Walking No Strongly Disagree A bathroom could encourage homeless people residing on University Ave to loiter around the park. There have already been sightings of h Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Walking Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Community Garden,Walking Yes Neutral It is critical that it be kept clean and maintained and that it be locked after dark. Otherwise I do not support it. If it gets out of control it m Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree I support installing restrooms at Pardee park ASAP. Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Walking No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Field Use,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Soccer, baseball, kids parties, family gatherings—all need a place to pee! Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Gatherings,Playground Yes Strongly Agree My kids have been going to Pardee Park a lot since they were little and we've found what's missing there is the bathroom. When they nee Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Community Garden,Walking No Strongly Disagree Need a dog park more than a portapotty! Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Field Use,Gatherings,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Rarely Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree All parks in the city should have restrooms. Way over time to do so. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground Yes Strongly Agree My kids love the park. Please please please add a restroom to the park. Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Daily Community Garden,Walking,Other: Ia am a transplant to Cali Yes Strongly Agree After giving birth many women experience the need to be closer to a restroom. It feels somewhat discriminatory to women and those wh No Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree We lived a quarter mile from Pardee Park for 17 years and used it daily. Our kids had soccer prac ce there and each prac ce, one kid or t Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes! A restroom at this beautiful park is a must have. I couldn’t understand it didn’t have a restroom. Once I was with my little daughter pl Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Gatherings,Walking,Other: Visiting the Master's Gardeners d Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking,Other: PYes Strongly Agree I have found tp around bushes where it is clear that someone has needed to take a bush wee. It is a shame because among these bushes a Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Monthly Recreation,Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree having a porta potty while restroom is being built would be great Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking No Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking No Strongly Disagree Eleanor Pardee park is a neighborhood park. Not a regional park. We do not, I repeat not, need a restroom. A restroom will only encoura Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Daily Recreation Yes Strongly Agree Tired of having to go in the bushes! Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking No Strongly Disagree Restrooms are not needed at this park. This park has operated very well without rest rooms for many years. People come to this park for s Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree There is no reason NOT to have this long‐requested amenity. Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking No Strongly Disagree Restrooms are not needed at this park! There is no need to bring extra people and extra problems to this nice small neighborhood park. Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Playground ,Walking No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Gatherings,Playground ,Walking No Strongly Disagree The odor coming from the restrooms , clean up and an open invitation to homeless staying in the park. Pardee park is a lovely park no ne Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Gatherings,Playgro Yes Strongly Agree We need a restroom badly in the Parde park. My kids will thank you very much! Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Although I could walk to the park, it was a challenge with young grandchildren without restroom facilities. It concerned me that families n Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Restrooms at Eleanor Pardee Park are LONG overdue!! Please have them installed by 2026; make them a priority!! Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking,Other: UC Cooperative Extension Native Plant Garde Yes Strongly Agree I AM NOT A ROBOT. Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking,Other: Meeting & talking to friends Yes Strongly Agree Adding a restroom is critical. The lack of a restroom in the Park makes the park uninviting to seniors ‐ many of them can have urgent need Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Field Use,Walking,Other: Bicycle Yes Strongly Agree I think it makes sense to have a bathroom there. I can't think of any drawbacks. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking No Strongly Disagree I am strongly opposed to the addi on of a restroom in Eleanor Pardee Park. I believe it will become a financial burden on taxpayers like m Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Gatherings,Playgro Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking No Strongly Disagree Don’t spend our money this way!!! In addition to the one‐time construction cost, building a restroom creates an on‐going expense. We ne Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking No Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Gatherings,Playgro Yes Strongly Agree YES!!! Please! This is so desperately needed to keep the park accessible and clean :‐) Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Field Use No Strongly Disagree There are enough public parks in Palo Alto with restrooms already. No need to spend our limited resources where they are not needed. T Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Field Use No Disagree Adding restrooms to parks makes them "stay all day" parks. But this park does not have the parking to "stay all day" use work. This is not a Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Community Garden,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Kids’ teams practice there so a bathroom is very helpful. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation No Strongly Disagree Why? The park is perfect. Let’s address real problems. How about we keep university avenue downtown clean before spending money on Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Gatherings,Playgro Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Community Garden,Walking No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Field Use,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Please add the restrooms ASAP! Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree It’s ridiculous to have a park with playgrounds, sports fields, gardens and no restrooms. Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Gatherings,Playgro Yes Strongly Agree A restroom is a Must!!! No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Rarely Playground Yes Strongly Agree We don’t go often precisely because there are no bathrooms, so we end up choosing different parks. Although we are not city residents, w Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree We absolutely need a public restroom. What are kids playing soccer supposed to do? Go take a pee in the bushes? This is an embarrassm Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Aa rest room is long overdue. It is a basic amenity for any park where the room exists to build one.The city needs to find a way to broadly Yes Yes, within a short drive Rarely Community Garden Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground Yes Agree No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Rarely Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree I rarely take my daughter to this park because there are no restrooms. We would love to use the playground after school, but I end up dri Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Field Use,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Install restrooms AND more and larger compost, recycling and garbage bins. Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Please put a restroom in the park. It’s not easy to get home and I have a daughter with coli s and she needs to go o en. Thank you! Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation Yes Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Rarely Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Young and elders need access to a restroom as soon as possible. Doers the city and opposing neighbors expect everyone to pee in the bu Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Walking Yes Strongly Agree If I were confident there would ba a restroom, I would visit more often. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Monthly Recreation,Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Please install in 2025 or 2026 Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Recreation Yes Strongly Agree There has been talk of adding a restroom to this park for the entire 40 years I have lived in Crescent Park. I would have appreciated it wh Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Walking Yes Strongly Agree as long as it gets locked up at night Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree The park is popular and heavily used. It is inconceivable that restroom needs do not occur for both adults and children. Consequence, mo Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Field Use,Walking No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground ,Other: Running Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking Yes Strongly Agree We absolutely need a restroom in Eleanor Pardee Park asap and definitely by 2026 at the latest! Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking No Strongly Disagree Restrooms at Eleanor Park are not necessary and will bring problems. Please.. NO RESTROOMS AT THE PARK!!! Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree The lack of a public restroom at Eleanor Pardee Park is primitive, unhygienic, inconvenient, annoying, and an ongoing embarrassment to o Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Playground ,Walkin Yes Strongly Agree This is badly needed for al visitors to the park ‐ whether residents or visitors from outside the neighborhood. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Gatherings,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree We've lived in our home on Forest for 50 years, and used the park for parties and play for all the years. We know it would be a great help t Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Neutral As it is right now little kids are going in the bushes everywhere, I think a bathroom would be much more sanitary. Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree It would be a huge help for families and all!! Yes Yes, within a short drive Rarely Recreation,Gatherings,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Gatherings Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Gatherings,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Field Use,Gatherings,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Item 4 Attachment A - Survey Results Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 4 Packet Pg. 20 of 262 Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Older residents and families with young children need to have available restrooms in areas where they walk. It encourages more people t Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree I believe a restroom would add to its usability by folks in the neighborhood and the nearby Duveneck elementary school. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Neutral I’m concerned that a restroom would serve as a ‘safe’ place for the druggies to smoke in, especially at night. We smell pot emanating fro Yes Yes, within a short drive Daily Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Gatherings,Playgro Yes Strongly Agree Our kids loving play there and it is silly not to have a restroom where kids play. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Just about every weekend, I see someone either take their kid to pee on the plants or they have a portable mini potty and toss the pee/p Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Community Garden,Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree We have lived here for 20 years. I would have appreciated a bathroom as a parent to young children having a bathroom at the park. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Community Garden Yes Strongly Agree Most of us in the community garden are older adults or senior citizens and we are often desperate for relief. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation No Strongly Disagree It is a local park and residents live close enough to use their own restrooms. I don't want to attract a bigger crowd to the park. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree It’s a dream to have a bathroom! Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree It is very much overdue! Thank you for considering. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Community Garden,Gatherings,Playground ,Walki Yes Strongly Agree The sooner the better! Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Walking Yes Strongly Agree Although I rarely use the park, I think a rest room is appropriate for the many individuals (gardeners, children, walkers, sitters) who do enj Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree It’s usually my kids that have to go pee in the park. Without a bathroom they’re probably peeing in the bush because .. well they’re kids a Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Field Use,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Walking No Strongly Disagree This would be a negative addition to the park. Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Walking Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground Yes Strongly Agree It has been multiple time in the past that my kid wanted to go to restroom during the playdate and ended up going back home and came b Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Please make this happen sooner. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree No Yes, within a short drive Rarely Playground Yes Strongly Agree The reason I don’t go is because of the lack of restrooms. It would be an option my family and I would consider more often if there were r Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Walking Yes Strongly Agree If a park is going to have a playground and play field, it absolutely needs a restroom. Can't believe it didn't have one before now. No brain Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree I have brought my children here for years and participated in recreational sports at the park. I am always shocked by the lack of restroom Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking No Disagree Adding a restroom will make this park a destination for longer more elaborate gatherings that are not suitable for our small quiet neighbo Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Walking Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Gatherings,Playground ,Other: Biking around the pYes Strongly Agree My kids have peed in the bushes in the past. We’d much prefer a proper restroom! Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Adding restrooms here is a no‐brainer. I only wish there had been one here when my children were younger and using the playground dai Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Very important for community gatherings and hygiene Yes Yes, within a short drive Rarely Recreation,Gatherings Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree my kids are older now, but boy, would this have been helpful when they were younger! Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Recreation,Gatherings,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Walking,Other: DOGS Yes Strongly Agree At least one restaurant is long overdue at Eleanor Pardee Park. I lived near Hoover Park ‐‐ a much smaller park ‐‐ before moving to near P Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Gatherings,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Weekly Playground No Neutral Why ruin this park? It is among our best. Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Walking No Strongly Disagree A restroom would not be beneficial because it would increase traffic at the park. Additionally, park restrooms can be poorly maintained, l Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Walking Yes Agree While I’m fortunate to live close to the park and don’t need a restroom for myself, I definitely appreciate having restrooms when visiting o Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree I have lived near Eleanor Park for 40 years and have wanted a restroom there ever since I moved here. There has been a small but deter Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree It is about time. Yes Yes, within a short drive Daily Recreation,Gatherings,Walking No Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Eleano Pardee Park is a des na on for ball games, par es, and family ou ngs. These gatherings o en bring a need for a restroom. Now th Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree I reject the notion that this will attract homeless people to camp in the park. Also, as a community garden member I have come across hu Yes Yes, within a short drive Rarely Recreation,Field Use,Gatherings Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Neutral Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Monthly Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Playground ,Walkin Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Field Use,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Please install asap. We’ve been waiting a long time for this important feature in our park. Curious where it will be installed. Add a dog par Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Walking No Disagree Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Community Garden Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Playground No Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Field Use,Walking No Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Walking No Neutral This is a neighborhood park, unclear if adding this will create an issue with use. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree A restroom would greatly enhance my ability to work in my community garden plot. Please add a simple one such as the one recently ad Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree been here since 1983. would LOVE a bathroom, especially having kids now Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Community Garden Yes Strongly Agree I’m older, and often spend hours or all day weeding and planting my community garden plot and flower borders outside the fence. Not ha Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Community Garden Yes Strongly Agree As a senior citizen who has a plot at Eleanor Community Gardens, it would be a really nice convenience to have a public restroom nearby. Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Daily Community Garden Yes Strongly Agree Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Monthly Recreation,Community Garden No Strongly Disagree Drug use, assaults, vandalism, homelessness, increased costs due to maintenance, smell, environmental waste, and unsightliness make a r Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking Yes Strongly Agree I once had a bodily emergency while walking at this park. I had no choice but to use an out‐of‐the‐way spot, unpleasant in every way. I th Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree I have lived here over 60 years and know as a nurse and attorney that not having a restroom is a Public Health Disaster. Children reduced t Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Community Garden Yes Strongly Agree I find it astonishing that a City like Palo Alto does not provide a bathroom in a park that has so many group activities for different age grou Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Walking Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Parks all over other towns have them. Why do we not in Palo Alto. Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Now taking my grandson to the park previously enjoyed by his mom. A bathroom would be a godsend. Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree I want the restroom installed in 2026. Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Playground ,Walking No Disagree Eleanor Park has been in existence for over 60 years+ and has continued to thrive without a restroom. A restroom will just enable unsafe a Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Gatherings,Playgro No Strongly Disagree It is with the cost of the neighbors’ living experience. Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree We were at the playground daily when our kids were younger. It would enhance the experience to be able to use the restroom whenever Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree It's been needed for a very long time! Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Community Garden,Playground Yes Strongly Agree This is a no brainer. Concerns about a restroom at a local park should be alleviated by the fact that Rinconada has had bathrooms for year Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Walking Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Pls add the restroom in 2025. It's a lovely park and is being underused by the neighbors who actually live around there especially senior ci Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking No Neutral Only if there is continuous police patrol. There are already too many issues with people being in the park at night, and doing unsavory thi Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Recreation Yes Strongly Agree I myself visit rarely but my nearby family from outside Palo Alto and visitors from all over go there frequently. Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Community Garden,Gatherings,Playground ,Walki Yes Strongly Agree We absolutely love Pardee Park. We would go there much more and have many more gatherings there if there was a bathroom. Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking Yes Strongly Agree i think it is important to have a public restroom on a park as large as Eleanor Pardee as it is used so often for children's activities and it als Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Community Garden Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Gatherings Yes Strongly Agree I have friends who use the community gardens and are there for hours at a time and a restroom would be convenient. I also remember w Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Pardee Park has long needed a public restroom and for too long has the City of Palo Alto failed to provide one. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Community Garden,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Community Garden,Playground No Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Eleanor Pardee is a large park and it deserves a rest room. I'm a grand parent who takes my grand kids often to this park. It needs a rest r Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Community Garden,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree We also need a dog park at Pardee Park! There is tons of unused space and so many dog owners who live within walking distance Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Monthly Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Field Use,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Also need an area or ‘doggy social hour’ in Crescent Park for legal off leash dogs. Socializing over dog play is an excellent way to build co Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Neutral I support the addition of a bathroom ONLY if locked and unavailable when the park is closed. I also would like to understand the plan for m Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree It will provide an alternative to keep kids from pooping behind the bushes. Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Community Garden Yes Strongly Agree Without the addition of a bathroom, the CITY is inviting a major health risk as people are relieving themselves elsewhere in the park. Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree I have lived in PA since 1975. It is unacceptable that there has not been a bathroom for the needs of the many uses of this park: two child Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Community Garden Yes Strongly Agree Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Weekly Community Garden Yes Strongly Agree Given the number of people who spend time at the park and garden, a public restroom provides a more sanitary environment and would r No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Monthly Playground Yes Strongly Agree As a teenager, I used to babysit kids who I walked to the park, and I remember it being a traumatic experience when the 3 year old sudde Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking No Strongly Disagree Adding a bathroom would make the park more attractive to homeless and others who are not necessarily Palo Alto residents. Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking No Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree No No, I live in another neighborhood Monthly Recreation,Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree For all of the years I raised my family in Palo Alto, we lived 4‐8 blocks from Eleanor Pardee Park. Not having a public restroom was a majo Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree Item 4 Attachment A - Survey Results Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 5 Packet Pg. 21 of 262 Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking No Neutral Not every park in Palo Alto needs a permanent restroom.Eleanor Pardee Park is a small park that should retain its feeling of a small park. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Daily Walking No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree I have lived near Eleanor Park for almost 60 years. I have always hoped restrooms would be added ‐ especially all the years I had young ch Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Daily Recreation,Community Garden,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Walking,Other: Dog walking Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Toilets are a basic need, children especially can"t "wait" until they get home! Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Community Garden,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree It should lock at night, however. Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Field Use,Walking Yes Strongly Agree A restroom in Pardee Park is long overdue. Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Other: Dog walk No Strongly Disagree Why do we not have a dog run? More important! Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground No Strongly Disagree A bathroom will bring more traffic, and crime. I like it as a local park, if you need a back with a bathroom you can easily walk 4 block to Rin Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Gatherings Yes Strongly Agree My child goes to Duveneck Elementary School and we go to Eleanor Pardee from time to time, usually for short visit because there is no b Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree I would prefer a dog park near the community gardens — the ground there isn’t useable and there are too many dogs out running around Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree I live with toddlers down the street. A bathroom is an absolute necessity!!!! It is a wonderful park that desperately needs a public restroo Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Agree Thank you for considering the installation of a bathroom. Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Why are some residents in the immediate area opposed to a public restroom? Bearing in mind that people like myself can just go home to Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground Yes Strongly Agree I grew up in Crescent Park and went to Eleanor Pardee Park as a child, and I'm lucky to be able to take my children to the same park now. A Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Absolutely support this asap!! Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking,Other: OYes Strongly Agree Let's remove the need to urinate in the bushes for children who can't make it to a bathroom far away! Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree I’ve always wondered why there wasn’t one at pardee park. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Strongly recommend adding the much needed restroom Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground No Strongly Disagree This proposal comes with significant risks.This will encourage the use of the park for people who do not live near the park. We are very c Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Community Garden,Gatherings,Walking No Strongly Disagree This is a very bad idea. I have lived in Palo Alto many decades and remember many instances of (other) park restrooms being hangouts fo Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Long overdue!!! Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Field Use,Gatherings,Walking,Other: Walking my dNo Disagree Adding public restrooms invites the homeless population to squat and loiter in our neighborhood park. I've seen it at Peers Park, Mitchell P Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree Never have understood why we have public restrooms in Rinconada, but not Eleanor Pardee. It's a wonderful park for people of all ages. Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking No Strongly Disagree Bringing a public restroom will attract those to the park that has not intend to use the public free restroom. I.e. transients Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking No Strongly Disagree We have already witnessed a veritable invasion of non‐locals in the park, often younger people hanging out providing us with wafts of ma Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Walking No Strongly Agree While adding a bathroom could be useful for some, our worry is that it could increase homeless people around the parks. We don’t want h Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Playground ,Walking No Disagree This will encourage use by outsiders Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree This is of special importance to those who volunteer their time and talent to create and maintain the community gardens for all to learn a Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Neutral Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Playground ,Walking No Strongly Disagree In addition to the cost of building and maintaining the restroom, it also invites unhoused and teenager activity. Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Weekly Community Garden,Other: UCCE demonstration garden Yes Strongly Agree I'm elderly, use the park regularly and strongly encourage the city to expedite building a permanent restroom in 2026. It's hard to underst Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree We often take our grandchildren to the park and they often need to relieve themselves. It is very difficult to get home in time to satisfy th Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Recreation,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree It really makes sense to have a public bathroom at a place where so many kids gather and play. Pls kindly approve! Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Community Garden Yes Agree It seems logical that a park with daily visitors ‐ to access the play structures, walk, play organized sports or spend time in the community g Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking,Other: Running No Strongly Disagree I believe a Public Restroom would bring an unsavory component into this park. Until the city can peacefully remove squatters, I will never Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground No Neutral Not needed Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking No Strongly Disagree Because Palo Alto's many parks are easily accessible to the most local residents, restrooms are not necessary. Restrooms would, however, Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Walking Yes Strongly Agree There is a couple of times where my kid had to use restroom only not to find it unavailable. We had to walk back home. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree This is much needed. Other parks/public places have restroom. There should be no question of doing this. Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Walking Yes Strongly Agree Every public park must have an accessible all gender restroom. Yes Yes, within a short drive Never Gatherings Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Hopefully this can be done asap Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking No Disagree We are concerned about providing another venue for drug use or spillover from unhoused members of the overall Bay Area community. A Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Gatherings,Playground Yes Strongly Agree We used the park weekly when our children were young and still continue to visit it. It would be very helpful for families of all ages if ther Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree My disabled son asks for restroom at the very last moment and we had to rush back home for it so many times. I really believe the restro Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Community Garden,Gatherings Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking No Strongly Disagree Will allow for longer stays, homeless use and attract more parties to the park which isn’t fair for neighbors. Rinconada and Mitchell park a Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Gatherings,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Playground ,Walkin Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking Yes Agree As long as the public restroom and the park area around it are kept clean and functioning appropriately, I'll all for it. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Community Garden Yes Strongly Agree A garden would greatly enhance the usability of the park. All public parks should have one. Yes Yes, within a short drive Rarely Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Walking Yes Neutral Bring homeless Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree this is a huge park; yet no bathroom....insane.we have sports teams baseball, soccer and summer camps here and no bathrooms...we fre Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree It’s a no‐brainer! The park should have a restroom. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Walking No Strongly Disagree A restroom will bring unhoused individuals. Most users of pardee park can walk to the park and use their own bathrooms. Please NO bath Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Gatherings,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Rarely Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Kids, elderly parents, community gatherings and just a "on a bike" break ‐ all require a restroom presence to make them feasible! This is a Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Please add a public restroom as soon as possible, preferably in 2025. Thank you! Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Gatherings,Walking,Other: sitting on the benches Yes Strongly Agree I am 61 years old and live 4 blocks away. I run through Eleanor Pardee Park every morning and walk there in the evening with my husban Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Community Garden,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Please add a restroom asap!! Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Community Garden,Playground ,Walking No Strongly Disagree Adding a bathroom would invite unpleasant activities. Please do not add toilets here. The park is beautiful as it is. Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Having a restroom would be a lot more sanitary that what inevitably goes on in a park where people spend any time, especially with man Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree it is a shame that current park users, which includes small children and older adults, both of whom may need more frequent restroom visi Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree We should have had bathroom accommoda ons years ago. This is way overdue. I have enjoyed being in Eleanor Pardee Park for almost 3 Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking No Strongly Disagree We do not want to attracts homeless to hangout in the park Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Recreation,Field Use,Walking Yes Strongly Agree We live close to this park but rarely go since it does not have a bathroom. I believe a bathroom that is regularly maintained/cleaned and l Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree Please add a public restroom as soon as possible. My wife and I walk in this park, and exercise is a laxative. My wife and I would appreciat Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Walking Yes Strongly Agree No concerns. Thank you for your efforts to make this happen. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Gatherings,Walking,Other: I meet friends for walk Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Playground ,Walking No Strongly Disagree I think the nearby Rinconada public restrooms is close enough. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree emergency bathroom use in bushes is VERY common and unsanitary. There are NO local businesses for toilets and tiny children are forced Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Community Garden,Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree I strongly advocate for adding a public restroom to Eleanor Pardee Park. The numbers support this (it is one of the top two parks in Palo A Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Monthly Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Playground ,Walking No Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree This seems basic and there should be bathrooms and water fountains in every park. Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Walking Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree We have elderly parents who spend time in the park and would really love to have a restroom there. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree It should be completed as soon as possible as so many children and families enjoy the park. A restroom is needed and has been needed fo Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking No Neutral Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Neutral Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Other: Dog walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Daily Recreation,Community Garden,Walking,Other: Exercising my Yes Strongly Agree As a community gardener and a senior I am often at the park for several hours at a time and I am forced to leave early or hide in the bush Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree absolutely add a restroom. it's crazy that the park has a nice playground targeted for young children (which we used a lot when our kids w Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Field Use,Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Better than people going to the bathroom in the trees. Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Playground Yes Strongly Agree actually the reason we don't host birthday parties or gatherings in this park is due to the inconvenience caused by lack of bathroom Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Daily Community Garden Yes Strongly Agree On community garden workdays to weed and clean outside the fence, we find human poop. It is not safe for our volunteers to clean it up u Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree I'm a Crescent Park resident. I have a 6 year old son and a 2 year old daughter, and we frequently go to the park. A bathroom would be gr Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Field Use No Neutral Seems unnecessary. I don't have the sense that the waste problem is significant now. Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree I have lived near Eleanor Park for more than 43 years. A public restroom is long over due! Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Item 4 Attachment A - Survey Results Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 6 Packet Pg. 22 of 262 Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Rarely Recreation,Field Use,Gatherings,Playground Yes Strongly Agree I work with a group of young children who would love to come to the park more often during the school day, but it’s difficult to organize w No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Daily Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Monthly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree My family used the park more extensively when my kids were little, but I remember wishing that it had restrooms and hearing the same f Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Walking Yes Strongly Agree It is ridiculous not to have a restroom in such a large park. It should need installed years ago. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Daily Playground Yes Strongly Agree Palo Alto should have restrooms next to each playground and parks. Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree I have lived close to Eleanor Park since 1972 and have always wished there were bathrooms on site. I am strongly in favor of welcoming a Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Playground Yes Strongly Agree Looking forward to a restroom. Thanks! Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Weekly Recreation,Gatherings,Playground Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Restroom cleaning Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree The restrooms will be so help for stay more time at the park with the kids. Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Playground ,Walkin No Neutral Yes Yes, within a short drive Daily Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Restrooms are much needed Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Walking,Other: Walk my dogs Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Not just park goers, but community garden folks could really benefit from a restroom here. Even my husband and I, who are older and ta Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground No Strongly Disagree Most of the park users are living around it, and a public restroom wouldn't add anything but the opposite Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Never Other: Looking at it while I drive by No Strongly Agree Figure out the daily number of ppl visiting the park. Compare it to other places that have bathrooms. Does it make the cut? Spend mone Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree I hope a bathroom will be installed especially because people who work in the gardens don’t have to rush home to go to the bathroom an Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Playground ,Walking No Strongly Disagree This is a neighborhood park. Adding a restroom will cause heightened noise, over crowding, traffic, parking, litter in otherwise a quiet an Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Walking Yes Agree How to prevent homeless camping out at the restroom? Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Agree It is time to make it happen! Thank you! Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Gatherings,Playgro Yes Strongly Agree I would go more of there were restrooms,/bathrooms available Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground ,Walking Yes Agree They should of been a restroom in place a long time ago Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking No Strongly Disagree It’s a small park, I think funds should be used elsewhere. Also with it being a small park, not sure where a good place to put a bathroom w Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Gatherings,Walking No Strongly Disagree A restroom will attract homeless and out of area visitors after hours. Just witnessed this in Sunnyvale. Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Walking No Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree No restroom is a public health violation! Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Community Garden,Gatherings,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Is urgent to have a restroom No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Daily Recreation,Field Use,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree There are no toilets and it is highly inconvenient for kids and moms to have a play area without a bathroom Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree None, make it fast ASAP Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Daily Recreation No Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Playground ,Walking No Strongly Disagree Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Rarely Field Use Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Field Use,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Agree A restroom may result in a slight increase in usage of the park. I see no problem with this whatsoever. The park is intended to be used. A r Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Agree Rinconada Park has restrooms. Why is Pardee Park characterized as more problematic to host restrooms‐‐‐‐‐I don't see the distinction. Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Monthly Gatherings Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Add a dog park too! There's no good dog park within walking distance for Crescent Park, and I can't believe you city hall nimby idiots have Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking No Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Rarely Walking Yes Strongly Agree Restroom facilities are baselines needs for families and long overdue at this park Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Recreation,Gatherings No Disagree Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Weekly Field Use Yes Strongly Agree Kids athletic teams practice and play games here. Not having a restroom is very tricky!!! Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking No Strongly Disagree Too small a park to need one. Rinconada Library and park and Lucie Stern aren’t far away. If you build, should have limited hours and how Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Walking Yes Strongly Agree I strongly support the idea of adding public restrooms in general, however, I'm concerned about the cost being reasonable. I've read abou Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Rarely Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Community Garden,Playground ,Walking No Neutral No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Rarely Walking Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Field Use,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Weekly Field Use Yes Strongly Agree For families that are here on Saturdays for soccer, the absence of a bathroom is incredibly challenging. We have used a friends house aro Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Weekly Field Use,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Community Garden,Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree It's really hard to have young soccer games at a park with no restrooms. The kids, their siblings, parents and grandparents all have a pote Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking No Strongly Disagree I'm greatly concerned with use and possible mis‐use of public facilities, like a restroom or restrooms, where there's no adjoining City‐own Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Rarely Walking Yes Agree Since young children use the playground equipment at Eleanor Pardee Park, it seems important that a bathroom facility be available. Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Gatherings,Walking,Other: visit with grandchildren Yes Strongly Agree It was initially a neighborhood park, and became a park ;used by many outside the immediate neighborhood. Visitors squat behind bushe Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes to more clean & well‐kept public restrooms! :) Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Community Garden,Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Playground ,Walking No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Rarely Community Garden Yes Strongly Agree I live near Peers Park. There's a public restroom at the park and it's an importance service. The sentiment I read somewhere that 'boys co Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Rarely Playground Yes Strongly Agree We recently had a restroom added to our closest park‐Ramos Park. It has made such a huge posi ve difference. We feel comfortable hos Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree I would visit Pardee Park more if restrooms were available. I hope restrooms will be installed. Thanks. Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Playground Yes Strongly Agree ... it's about time !!! (been living here for 40 years and have seen many changes to Pardee Park ... I'd be happy to see a public restroom th Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Community Garden,Walking Yes Agree No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Monthly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Weekly Recreation Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Agree Gender‐neutral, single stalls would be preferred so that no person has to wait when one stall is available. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree I am a 99‐year‐old senior citizen, and I would very much appreciate a rest room at Eleanor Park. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree It is women who suffer from no bathroom boys and men just use the bushes. If there was a bathroom, more families would gather for cel Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Field Use,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Agree No restroom limits the length of time families from beyond the immediate neighborhood can stay at the park. Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Rarely Recreation,Gatherings Yes Strongly Agree It would be great to have a public restroom also at Johnston Park. People play and have picnics there but need to go to the restroom of a b Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Gatherings,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Adding a restroom would make the park more accessible and hygienic as folks are often seen urinating behind bushes around the perimet Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Community Garden Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Playground Yes Strongly Agree Families need bathrooms. Stainless, simple, open 7‐sunset or something. Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Isn't Eleanor Pardee Park the largest park in Palo Alto that doesn't have restrooms? Several smaller parks have them. Why is this even a q Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Recreation,Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Other: running Yes Neutral Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Monthly Community Garden,Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking Yes Agree Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Monthly Field Use,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Community Garden,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking Yes Strongly Agree This has been needed for many years. We once tried to have a picnic and my elderly father had to walk back to car and leave family gathe Yes Yes, within a short drive Rarely Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree My children are now 38, 35, and 23. All of them had soccer practices there. A bathroom would have been wonderful. Now as a senior I wo Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Other: excercise Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Walking Yes Strongly Agree This would be such a huge improvement and would encourage my whole family to spend more time at this lovely park! I believe the bene Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Gatherings,Playgro Yes Strongly Agree Our family loves this park. We had our son’s birthday party there last summer. Guests caravans to Starbucks to use a restroom because th Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Field Use,Walking No Strongly Disagree Leave as is, build better services like adding fire departments personnel so we don’t end up like LA… Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Weekly Field Use,Other: Soccer games Yes Strongly Agree And a regular cleaning schedule for the public restroom Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Monthly Community Garden,Walking Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Community Garden,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Field Use,Playground Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Gatherings,Other: enjoyment Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Walking Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Playground No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Gatherings Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree Please! Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Field Use,Walking No Strongly Agree No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Recreation,Walking Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Walking No Strongly Disagree I think a restroom would reduce safety in the park. The restrooms in Baylands and El Camino Park attract drug users and I have seen disca No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Rarely Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Daily Community Garden Yes Strongly Agree Many seniors work hours in community garden, need restroom. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation Yes Agree Before adding a restroom, the City needs to be sure it has the budget for maintenance of the restroom. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation No Strongly Disagree This is a local park with residents able to use their own bathrooms in their own homes. Pardee Park does not need the expense of installin No Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Our Monday morning Tai Chi group has been practicing at Eleanor Pardee Park for over 12 years. It is a much beloved park, filled with wal Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree My grandsons and I visit the park regularly. A public restroom would allow us to spend a longer time at the park and enjoy the field/playg Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking No Neutral *Take note of question bias. This question is worded in a way that nudges people toward a certain answer. Of course adding a bathroom w Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree I raised my kids ‐ now in there 30's ‐ at this park. It was extremely frustrating to have to run home for bathroom breaks back then! So har No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Daily Recreation,Community Garden,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree No Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Gatherings,Other: Tai chi class Yes Strongly Agree Our whole class is old and some of us are disabled. We have wanted on for a long time! No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree I work nearby and a restroom would be a welcome addition for walkers. :) Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree Adding a restroom is important for people with young children and for older folks with incontenent issues Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Community Garden,Walking Yes Agree Poor survey design. The wording for Ques on #6 all but ensures a posi ve response, showing bias. How could anyone disagree with that Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Gatherings,Walking,Other: tai chi practive on Mo Yes Strongly Agree For a year, I have been asking for bathrooms to be installed at the park and the very large area including a community garden. I have not s Yes Yes, within a short drive Rarely Walking Yes Strongly Agree Item 4 Attachment A - Survey Results Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 7 Packet Pg. 23 of 262 Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Monthly Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree A bathroom would be very useful and make me want to come to Pardee Park more. As someone with two young kids in the family, having Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Agree When we held our daughter's 16th birthday party at the park the biggest problem was no restroom. Luckily we live fairly close so for eme Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Weekly Recreation Yes Strongly Agree I attend a Tai Chi practice at the park three times a week for an hour. I can't believe there isn't a restroom, especially with all the gardener Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Community Garden,Gatherings,Walking No Strongly Disagree Our family really enjoys that Eleanor Pardee Park is a very quiet, neighborhood park. We always feel safe there. We believe adding a restr Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Walking Yes Strongly Agree I don’t have young children anymore but I used to pick parks based on restroom availability! It is too hard to deal with a child who needs Yes Yes, within a short drive Rarely Walking Yes Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree All public parks should have bathrooms! Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking No Strongly Disagree Foreseeing the community safety and sanitation problems, I strongly oppose adding a public restroom at Eleanor Pardee Park. A immedia Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Gatherings Yes Strongly Agree It is necessary Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree All you need is one unisex bathroom. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Very important to add a restroom for families, athletes and gardeners. People are already urinating in the bushes, so there should be a ba Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Community Garden Yes Strongly Agree No Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Gatherings,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Although we're not Palo Alto resident we live in the Willows in Menlo Park very close to Eleanor Pardee Park. We come to the park very o Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree Abuse and security are primary concerns. For example, we don't want a restroom that is unclean or unsightly, a hangout for homeless pe Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking Yes Agree I support a bathroom on if there will be ensure safety precautions like locks after dusk, and additional security Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Field Use Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking Yes Agree I live within walking distance for an adult. When my kids were little there was not time to walk home. So, bathroom or not they had to g Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking No Neutral Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking,Other: Dog. Walking Yes Strongly Agree All public parks an acre or greater in size should have restrooms. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Playground No Neutral Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Other: picnics with out of town guests Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree A restroom in the park would be great! My kids often need to use the bathroom when at the park. I often see toddlers using training potti Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree This is a great initiative thank you! Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Civilized countries and cities provide basic amenities for the people who use their facilities, regardless of where those people actually resi Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Rarely Walking Yes Strongly Agree Not having public restrooms in our parks leads to reduced use by families and others and bad behavior. Also, delivery drivers and other tr Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Gatherings,Walking Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Walking Yes Neutral Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Kids and adults currently urinate in the bushes. So a restroom would good. Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Walking No Agree Accessibility is one thing, BUT safety is another. I don’t want a public restroom as this park gets a huge number of visitors from outside th Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Little kids routinely pee in the bushes at Pardee because there isn’t a bathroom and they can’t hold it. A bathroom would help keep the p Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Field Use,Gatherings,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking No Neutral Facility must be locked from sunset to sunrise Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground Yes Strongly Agree I have been going to Pardee Park for soccer games and play dates every week since Covid. I have 3 kids. I would strongly prefer bathroo Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree Make sure the site for the restroom does NOT interfere with the site of a future dog park. This is very important. Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Playground No Strongly Disagree Providing restrooms in all public parks beyond what the city has done already is unnecessary as it has been for the last 70 years. Restroom Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Recreation,Community Garden,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Walking Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree This is an excellent, urgently needed amenity at the park. This is one of the most underused parks of those in residential areas in Palo Alto Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Please, please, please add a restroom. The new restrooms are safe, clean, self‐locking and a huge asset in a park like Pardee that has amp Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Gatherings,Playground Yes Strongly Agree This is so needed! Please fast‐track this project! Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree It’s ridiculous how many PA parks don’t have bathrooms. As the mom of 3 small kids it is hard to go to a playground without a bathroom! Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Community Garden,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes! Please build this as soon as possible! Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Would be incredibly helpful for kids and families!!! Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Community Garden,Walking No Neutral Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground Yes Strongly Agree My child regularly has play dates at the playground with friends. We avoid Eleanor Pardee and go to Rinconada Park for these hangouts s Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Ridiculous that it doesn’t have one. So difficult when we’re there with our little kids and they need to go. RWC has nice, clean restrooms e No Yes, within walking distance Weekly Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree "Public" does not mean just affluent neighbors. We should be hospitable to those who live nearby, but don't have yards and parks. They n Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Field Use Yes Strongly Agree No Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Gatherings,Playground Yes Agree Public bathrooms attract homeless people Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Gatherings Yes Strongly Agree Many people use this park‐‐families with small children; city garden workers. A rest room is needed!! No Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Field Use,Gatherings,Playground Yes Strongly Agree This is much needed! Elderly community members, kids, and all park users need this! Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Other: Dog walking Yes Agree I’m not sure it would encourage longer visits but better visit experience has people won’t be going to the bathroom in the bushes. Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree I have 3 toddlers. Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Gatherings,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Daily Other: Tai chi Yes Strongly Agree It’s the common sense thing to do Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation Yes Agree I feel it is appropriate for those of us who ‘need’ to & want to stay in the park & not rush home. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground ,Walking Yes Neutral Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Agree I am concerned the restroom would attract people late at night. The restroom should be locked early in the evening and opened each mo Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground ,Walking Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Otherwise I just let my kids pee by the tree which is not what residents want either No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Weekly Other: work in Palo Alto Demonstration Garden Yes Strongly Agree I was a Palo Alto resident for over 30 years, living near Eleanor Pardee park for 17 years. There is definitely a need for a restroom here. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Field Use,Playground Yes Strongly Agree New restroom at Rinconada has caused a large increase in that playground’s attendance. I believe adding restrooms at Pardee would bala Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree I missed having public bathrooms at Eleanor Patdee Park 30 years ago when my kids were young. I look forward to the facilities being avai Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Walking No Disagree This is a small park for neighborhood, I used to live walking distance, right now a bit further away, but still think that it should mostly focu Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree I come with my daughter and once she has the urge to use the restroom , we have to make our visit to the lake short and leave .. it’s hard t Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Playground Yes Neutral Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Walking Yes Strongly Agree The park has needed a toilet facility for decades, please build it ASAP. Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Gardeners desperately need a restroom! Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree No Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Monthly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Parks are public facilities. All our parks in Palo Alto should have restrooms. It is a health, safety and accessibility issue. Moreover, how c Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree As a pregnant woman, I would highly support having a bathroom at the park. It makes it challenging to visit the park with my other child o Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Rarely Recreation,Walking,Other: biking Yes Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Recreation,Walking,Other: I bring visiting friends to the garde Yes Agree A single‐stall restroom would be plenty. Please don't waste the resources to put in a whole building full of stalls. And it should obviously b Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking No Strongly Disagree This is a neighborhood park, not a large, major, regional destination park. There are homes in the immediate vicinity. A restroom will be a Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Monthly Recreation,Gatherings Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Never Walking No Neutral Please locate new restrooms where there is the greatest need, not the noisiest residents. Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Field Use,Gatherings,Playground Yes Strongly Agree I have three PAUSD school aged kids. This is the closest park to our house, but we don’t visit it as much as others. That would definitely ch No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree I work for City of Palo Alto and take walks here every weekday during my lunch break. Having public restrooms will make a big difference a Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking,Other: I like to go to see the water saving and native Yes Strongly Agree A restroom would make it easier to be at the park. Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Community Garden,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Pardee Park is one of the few parks in Palo Alto without a public restroom. This is the park closest to the house I grew up in and we have s Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Playground Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Neutral Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Other: Rarely if ever there Yes Strongly Agree Would be interested to know what the side that is not for adding a restroom is saying‐ what would be the downside? Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree The risk is attracting people that don’t have a home. Hopefully you can figure that out. Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Gatherings,Playgro Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Gatherings,Playgro Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree There are two wonderful playgrounds and no bathrooms, which does not make sense. I have seen pee behind the bushes. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Never Walking Yes Neutral No Yes, within a short drive Rarely Recreation,Community Garden,Gatherings,Walking Yes Agree Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Monthly Recreation,Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Rarely Recreation Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree It’s insane we’re even debating this. Redwood City parks have had well maintained bathrooms with no homeless issues for ages. Kids and p Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Please please add a restroom. This park is too used and too beau ful to not have a public restroom. It’s brutalFor kids and we only live 2 Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Would love to have access while I’m walking and running. Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree As a runner, I would greatly appreciate a public restroom at Pardee. The closest public restroom is at Rinconada. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree It would make it more conducive to gathering and spending time with kids at the park. Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Rarely Recreation Yes Strongly Agree I have young children and typically can only enjoy parks that have restrooms, primarily Mitchell, Peers, and Henry Seale. When there is a r No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Rarely Recreation,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Recreation,Community Garden,Other: Bicycling Yes Strongly Agree Every park and train station and transit center should have a public restroom. No Yes, within a short drive Monthly Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Playground Yes Strongly Agree Take grandchildren there to play ‐‐ wonderful park but use is limited by lack of bathroom Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree People with young children, or at soccer games and individuals and family’s enjoying the park would all benefit from a public restroom. Ri Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Field Use,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Especially if there are organized kids soccer leagues there, you need to have a bathroom. But even without those, it would improve the ex Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Field Use,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Item 4 Attachment A - Survey Results Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 8 Packet Pg. 24 of 262 Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Playground ,Walkin No Strongly Disagree Adding a public restroom will only encourage more people to come use the park from East Palo Alto. This park is a neighborhood park and Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking No Strongly Disagree The park already attracts many out‐of‐towners, which makes it crowded and less useful to residents. A bathroom will enhance the attracti Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Field Use,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Hello, When we first moved to the neighborhood four years ago, we thought that Pardee Park would be where we spent a lot of me wit Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Walking,Other: Meeting with friends Yes Strongly Agree My parents used to visit the park frequently. They loved the place. It used to be one of the things they looked forward to in the middle of t Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Walking Yes Neutral I suspect there is urination taking place at large events: picnics, soccer games, etc. By the same token, I am not sure I want more events w No Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree The parks has 2 kids playgrounds, but the absence of restrooms makes it very difficult to use. Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Field Use,Walking Yes Strongly Agree No No, I live in another neighborhood Monthly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree It’s always a pain to plan a visit to the park, because you need to make sure kids used restroom before arriving. No Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree What public space does not have a public restroom. That’s ridiculous!! it really limits the use, especially for young kids and older people. A Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground Yes Strongly Agree We would spend even more time in the park if there were Public restrooms there Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Gatherings,Walking No Disagree No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Rarely Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking No Strongly Disagree Not needed and will make park less safe. Richland’s and the library are both very close and provide the needed facilities. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground ,Walking No Neutral Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Walking No Disagree Please put spending on more important and necessary items. Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Playground Yes Strongly Agree Every park for children deserves a bathroom. Many of our children are either in diapers or are learning to toilet train in some capacity, an Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Rarely Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Disagree There are a lot of young children playing in the parkI don’t want homeless people loitering and using restrooms near the parkLocals are a No No, I live in another neighborhood Monthly Recreation,Community Garden Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Field Use,Walking Yes Strongly Agree I strongly support public restrooms at ALL city parks. It is wonderful to finally have one at Ramos after all these tears. No Yes, within walking distance Rarely Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Rarely Walking Yes Strongly Agree I was a parent of young children (now in college) and used this park at least twice a week‐ but only because a friend lived nearby and we c Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Community Garden,Walking No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Playground ,Other: Resting Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Community Garden,Field Use,Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Bathrooms are critical to the dignity of all residents, and because the park has capacity that smaller parks like Heritage and Johnson parks Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Gatherings,Walking No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Community Garden,Walking No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Community Garden,Walking No Disagree Adding public restroomWill a ract nega ve behaviors and is dangerous for young kids etc. please don’t add a restroom. Young kids can b Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree A beautiful park that would benefit from a bathroom. I bring my granddaughters here and we often have to leave early due to bathroom i Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Rarely Playground Yes Neutral Main concern is attracting homeless people. We live near Johnson Park and would NEVER advocate for a public restroom for that reason. O No Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Public restrooms are very useful for us, especially for those that use bicycles as transporta on, it is nice to have a place to stop quickly, g Yes Yes, within a short drive Rarely Recreation,Gatherings Yes Strongly Agree No Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree It's definitely been a missing feature to this park to meet with basic human needs, especially when offering 2 great playgrounds where a l Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Walking Yes Strongly Agree I think a bathroom would be a great addition. Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking,Other: Primarily wNo Disagree Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Playground No Strongly Disagree Adding bathroom is a good idea if the follow up maintenance, cleaning is in place. But that will add more expense for the City. Therefore Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree bro please put one there, the amount of times i peed my pants as a kid at pardee is insane 😭 Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Walking No Strongly Disagree A restroom would detract from the local park experience. Yes Yes, within a short drive Rarely Recreation,Gatherings,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Playground Yes Strongly Agree Kids need bathrooms! We’d use the park way more if my kids had a place to go Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking No Disagree Concerned about a public bathroom may be used for other unsafe activities if not staffed. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Eleanor Park is a real asset for Palo Alto. It is well used for all types of recreation and both playgrounds are usually crowded by children,. E Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking No Strongly Disagree The park is perfect as is. Those of us who live close by and visit it almost daily would prefer to have more green field for kids to play and th Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree it should not take 2 years to build this Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Community Garden,Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Esp impt for the children who use the park (AYSO and others) who are forced to go in the bushes. Its unhealthy, discriminatory and inhum Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Make restroom accessible to smaller kids as well Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Monthly Playground ,Walking Yes Agree Please set the restroom open hours the same as most open parks, i.e. closed at sunset. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Mothers with little kids need it. Otherwise you have to leave early! Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground ,Walking No Disagree No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Rarely Gatherings,Playground Yes Agree I commute from Fremont when I visit my in‐laws, and we come to this park because it is the closest one. The playground structures/faciliti Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree It needs to be self cleaning, and heaps filtered. Look at down town Napa’s bathroom as a recommendation. No Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Walking No Strongly Disagree Adding a park will not make the park more attractive to children or the elderly. It will attract homeless people and criminal elements, it w Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking No Strongly Disagree Please keep Elenor Pardee park a local community park which was designed as a small park for nearby residents. It was never meant to be Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Community Garden Yes Strongly Agree PLEASE add a restroom. I am tired of finding feces around the community vegetable garden. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground ,Walking No Strongly Disagree I have had multiple negative experiences safety wise at Pardee park. I feel a restroom would attract homeless visitors and loitering. Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Weekly Community Garden,Gatherings,Walking,Other: Work at PAD Yes Strongly Agree We’ve been in need for a long time and would like to see a bedroom installed as soon as possible. It will allow us to give classes to school c Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Weekly Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree I go on long runs throughout Palo Alto. Having public restrooms available makes for a more pleasant experience for all. I often stop at pee Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Weekly Community Garden,Other: Work at Master garden demo gar Yes Strongly Agree Having a bathroom is very important at this park. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree No No, I live in another neighborhood Weekly Walking,Other: Children’s playground Yes Strongly Agree A restroom with diaper changing Station would be wonderful, lots of adults and children visit the park regularly but have to leave due to r Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Rarely Recreation,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Public restrooms will provide much needed sanitation to a urine soaked park. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Playground ,Walking,Other: Spending time w the kYes Strongly Agree It’s hard spending quality time w the family w o a bathroom Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Thanks need bathroom for my wife !!!! Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree The alternative is an health hazard to humans and animals. I’m surprised that the city has not had restrooms in this park. Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree I and many of my friends have toddlers. There have been several instances when we visit the park where we've had to rush back home to Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Really need a public restroom at this busy park ‐ just like Mitchell Park! Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking No Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Concern about the cleanness of the toilet Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree It’s important and convenient to add a public restroom in the park. I bring kids to the park every day, and it is extremely inconvenient if th Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Weekly Other: Demonstration garden Yes Strongly Agree Embarrassing that it hasn’t happened yet after all these years. Kind of inhumane. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree I used to help coach soccer and the kids had nowhere to use the bathroom during practice. Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation Yes Strongly Agree Pardee Park should have a poblic restroom Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Weekly Walking,Other: Master Gardener Demonstration Garden ‐ ma Yes Strongly Agree I strongly urge Palo Alto to install bathrooms at Pardee Park as soon as possible. If there were bathrooms, master gardeners could provide Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Community Garden,Field Use,Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree How can we have a public park without a restroom? That just doesn’t make sense. Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree I do have some concern about this attracting homeless individuals. I would like for the city to consider that aspect and learn from experie No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Gatherings,Playgro Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Gatherings,Walking No Strongly Disagree I’m concerned that we would have a problem with vagrants if the public restrooms were added. Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Field Use,Walking,Other: Dog walking Yes Strongly Agree More importantly, a restroom would make the park more accommodating to individuals. I think mitigating predators in the restrooms is i Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree We really need restrooms on this park Yes Yes, within a short drive Rarely Playground Yes Strongly Agree One of the main reasons we don’t visit Eleanor Pardee park more often is its lack of public restroom. We have two kids who would love to Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Other: I play with my dog on the grass pet and walk them in t No Neutral Before building a permanent latrine I support and encourage using public funds for a dog park. As far as the latrine I would encourage use Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree We’ve been wanting this for years! I am strongly in favor of park restrooms. Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking,Other: Dog walking Yes Strongly Agree With playgrounds and youth soccer practices and games at the park, a on‐site restroom has been a necessity for decades. Funding, design Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking No Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground ,Walking No Strongly Disagree The restroom would a ract homeless and transients and cost the city more to maintain it. No Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Daily Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Gatherings,Playgro Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Field Use,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree This a family and friendly park that requires a restrooms for those who are visiting from the school down the street, it is only right to plac Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Weekly Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Gatherings,Playgro Yes Strongly Agree I’ve been going to this park since I was a kid now I’m 40 years old and I take my own kids here. Yes Yes, within a short drive Daily Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Gatherings,Playgro Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree No Yes, within a short drive Daily Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking,Other: SYes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking No Strongly Disagree Public restroom will attract homeless people, making the park unsafe for children. Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Field Use,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Playground Yes Strongly Agree I have moved here from southern Californians have been blown away that parks with playgrounds do not have restrooms available for kid Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Playground Yes Agree No Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation No Strongly Disagree Please don’t do this Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Playground Yes Strongly Agree As a mother of two elementary school children living in downtown Palo Alto, I think it's me for Palo Alto government to understand that Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Agree I walk my dog to the park in the morning and I’m not gonna lie sometimes when I get there I really have to poop so having a bathroom wo Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking No Disagree There are restrooms nearby at other parks. They are not needed here. Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Field Use Yes Strongly Agree It is so important for soccer Saturdays. Thanks for considering! Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree It would be great to have a restroom! Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Gatherings,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Playground Yes Agree will there be any systemic clean up as well as monitoring for cases of misuse? Is there a possibility to automatically lock or prevent access d Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree It is the one main thing missing to make the park experience feel complete and able to satisfy all basic requirements for enjoying it longer‐ Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking No Neutral Pardee Park gets its plenty of use, mostly by non‐residents. A bathroom would increase use by people from outside the neighborhood. Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground No Strongly Disagree We oppose adding public restrooms!And believe it will a ract people who don't live nearby to come And will turn our neighborhood par Yes Yes, within a short drive Rarely Playground Yes Strongly Agree I didn't use this park as often as other parks in the area solely because of the lack of a restroom Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Monthly Recreation,Gatherings Yes Strongly Agree Without a bathroom there will always be a contingency of individuals that just pee in the bushes. Gross. Also, a bathroom would be nice f Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Community Garden,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Item 4 Attachment A - Survey Results Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 9 Packet Pg. 25 of 262 No Yes, within a short drive Daily Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree We love the park! I live in Menlo Park and work as a nanny I . work as nanny in Palo Alto and trips to This park are daily and fun, except th Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Gatherings Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Playground ,Walking No Strongly Disagree We have been perfectly happy using this park for 20 years without a public restroom. Is this really a financial priority for Palo Alto? I thin Yes Yes, within a short drive Rarely Recreation,Field Use,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree I suspect the elderly do not frequent the park because of the lack of restrooms. Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Neutral I assume that a lot of park visitors live closer by, however, children and visitors from farther away and many of the people in cars that tak No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Weekly Walking Yes Agree I come from close by enough that a restroom would not affect my personal use of the park, but I have witnessed a parent letting their chil Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Community Garden,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Please provide shade for the play structure area. You chopped down the shade trees several years ago and now the structures get burnin Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree We’d like a bathroom at Pardee Park but please make sure it doesn’t get taken over by homeless people Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree Adding restrooms will make Eleanor Pardee Park much more useable for people of all ages. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Agree Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Rarely Community Garden Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Neutral Maybe a concern around loitering Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking No Neutral Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Community Garden,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Thank you for the survey. Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Gatherings,Playground Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking No Strongly Disagree Having a restroom would cost the city more money to maintain ! A restroom would invite homeless and invite crime private area for pred Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Please we urgently need this Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking,Other: Dogs Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Walking No Neutral This will make it even less of a neighborhood park. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Field Use,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree It happened many times my kids want to pee but no restroom here and we have to go home and pee and back to the park after. It will be Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Long waited Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree We've lived in this house for 50+ years. My little kids, my elderly dad who lived with us for a time, and now me...ALL needed/need a restr Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Community Garden,Playground ,Other: Los niños juegan aqui Yes Strongly Agree Un baño público en este parque es lo que siempre hemos deseado , eso ayudaría a que más personas vengan a disfrutar con su familia 👍 Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking Yes Strongly Agree People need a bathroom ‐ we either create the infrastructure or continue to suffer the consequences of toileting in our landscape. Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Agree Must be very clean. I suggest self cleaning restroom. Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree As a senior who has a community garden plot ,it would be wonderful to have a restroom close by. This Park hosts many sports, communi Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Community Garden,Playground Yes Strongly Agree A restroom at Eleanor Pardee park is long overdue. For years, Community gardeners and Master Gardeners have been forced to return ho Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking No Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Gatherings,Playground ,Walking No Neutral Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Playground Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Community Garden No Strongly Disagree Pls do not put a public toilet here. It will spoil the community park Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Weekly Gatherings,Walking Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Thank you for initiating this project. All parks especially designed with children playgrounds should have access to a restroom. Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Walking No Disagree The park has worked well for decades and we do NOT want to change it!! Adding bathrooms will make the park very crowded, destroying Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Having a restroom makes the park much more usable with younger kids Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking No Neutral No Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Agree No Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Recreation Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation Yes Strongly Agree Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Monthly Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree No No, I live in another neighborhood Weekly Playground Yes Strongly Agree No Yes, within a short drive Weekly Gatherings Yes Strongly Agree No Yes, within a short drive Weekly Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Gatherings,Playground ,Other: Running Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking No Disagree Im worried about more homeless people and people from outside Palo Alto congregating in the park. Most people who live nearby and us Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Field Use,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Agree I’m concerned about a bathroom a rac ng unhoused people to camp out there. Perhaps it could be locked at night to discourage that. I Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Playground ,Walkin Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Field Use,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Dear Palo Alto City Council Members,I support the installa on of a public restroom facility at Pardee Park and urge you to vote in favor. A No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Monthly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree A public restroom is essential to equitable and full beneficial use of this public park. Simply put, I cannot fully enjoy use of the park withou Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Agree I walk my dog there daily on leash. It is ,8 miles from my home and a restroom would be welcome on some ocasions. I’m a 71 year old m Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree It would be great to have public restrooms it will make it convent for people who really need to use the restroom Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Currently, park users are urinating and defecating in park shrubbery and along the fence. This is not acceptable. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree It's a civic disgrace that we do not have public restrooms at all of Palo Alto's parks and recreational areas. Eleanor Pardee Park especially n Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree A restroom has been needed for years. Tired of waiting… Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking,Other: Walk my dogs there Yes Strongly Agree When my kids were little we used to come here all the time to play ball on the grass or play on the playground. The only thing that put a d Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Playground No Agree Would like to keep our green space clear if excess structures. I agree it would be beneficial to people that live far away or have medical iss Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree I am pregnant and NEED a restroom! Please please add one!!! Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Community Garden Yes Strongly Agree I am a STRONG proponent of adding a restroom at Eleanor Pardee park. It is as community staple and would greatly improve the life of vis Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree My wife is pregnant and she needs the restroom every 5 minutes (or it feels like that). We've been having to go to a different park becaus Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Many families host kids' birthday parties there, but without a restroom, it's a lot harder. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Community Garden,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Eleanor park has been my families go to place to unwind. We have raised our kids as well as nieces and nephews there. Not having a restr Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Community Garden,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree We’ve been asking for a bathroom for decades! Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground No Strongly Disagree Crime, loitering, trash, cost Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking No Neutral While restrooms will bring convenience to park visitors, it will also attract an array of problems, especially around safety, over use, and cl Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Playground Yes Neutral Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Field Use,Playground No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Community Garden No Strongly Disagree How are we going to pay for this? This is a family park and the restroom will attract drug users and criminals and encourage loitering and t Yes Yes, within a short drive Daily Community Garden Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Community Garden,Gatherings,Playground ,Walki No Strongly Disagree There is a huge problem with over night parking along Center drive. Permit parking stops at Pitman so Pitman to Channing is used for over Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Walking Yes Strongly Agree It is such a well‐used, wonderful park and used by multiple community members and groups. It desperately needs a restroom to bring it i Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking No Strongly Disagree I think a restroom would only encourage the anti‐social behavior we already suffer from at the park. Undoubtedly it would be dirty and s Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Community Garden,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Daily Community Garden Yes Strongly Agree Do it for the women and children! Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Community Garden,Field Use,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Community Garden Yes Strongly Agree No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Rarely Field Use Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Walking Yes Strongly Agree I would be more likely to go to the park with my grandchildren if there were a bathroom. It’s the civilized thing to provide. Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Community Garden,Walking No Disagree This park is already used majority by people that do not live in our neighborhood. Adding a restroom would exacerbate this. We are also w Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Community Garden Yes Agree I am for a restroom as long as it is maintained and locked during the night/closing time for the park. Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Gatherings,Playgro Yes Strongly Agree My family are all heavy users of Pardee for walking, sports, and general recreation. We STRONGLY support adding a restroom. No Yes, within a short drive Monthly Walking Yes Strongly Agree My concern is not having the homeless use the restroom. Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Field Use,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Community Garden,Walking Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Community Garden,Walking No Strongly Disagree it is very crowd already. It is a neighborhood small park. Let us keep this way. Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Community Garden,Playground ,Walking No Strongly Disagree I live right next to the park, and have been living there for over 25 years now. The park is a lovely place for kids and gatherings. Let’s not r Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Field Use,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking No Strongly Disagree I live right behind the park. I’m concerned that adding restrooms to the park will promote usage of the park by large groups for longer ho Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Field Use,Playground ,Walking No Disagree We have enough problems with folks living in cars and vans along Center. Workmen and UPS drivers will use the outhouse more than chil Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Great idea! Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree It is a pity that such a beautiful park is used by only so few people. I would love to see you more crowded Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Gardeners spend hours taking care of their plants, and need a restroom. Further, kids as well as adults who use the park for recreation ne No Yes, within a short drive Weekly Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Walking No Strongly Disagree There have been times when there were issues with drug dealing happening at Parti Park. We saw some of these exchanges happen and t Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Community Garden,Playground Yes Agree If a restroom is installed it should be monitored somehow to make sure it is used as intended and not become a haven for drug dealing or No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Monthly Recreation,Field Use,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree The absence of a bathroom makes this park very difficult for adults, young children and people with disabilities. Children often have to pe Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Field Use,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Community Garden,Gatherings,Playground ,Walki No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree This park has needed a restroom so bad for so long and I’m glad this is being at least considered‐ it would really help out the community e Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Recreation,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Kids really need a bathroom. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Great plan to add restrooms Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Children regularly use the bushes here to relieve themselves. You have two playgrounds and a giant field here. It’s meant for kids. A bathr Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Field Use,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation Yes Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Item 4 Attachment A - Survey Results Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 10 Packet Pg. 26 of 262 Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Agree I can see no reason that a group of neighbors who fear “homeless people” should try to stop this restroom addition. Homeless people are Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Field Use,Walking Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Community Garden Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Playground ,Walking No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Field Use,Playground Yes Strongly Agree I don't see a reason why there shouldn't be a bathroom there, considering the number of people that use the park. It is inconvenient to h Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree This will reaffirm that we have a family friendly park Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Great idea Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree All public parks in Palo Alto should have a restroom. There should be surveillance cameras to prevent nefarious activities. They should be c Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Community Garden,Walking No Strongly Disagree I request to see the records of crime after a neighborhood park installed a restroom. Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Weekly Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Playground ,Walking No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Playground No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within a short drive Rarely Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Rarely Community Garden Yes Strongly Agree As a parent, when my child needed to use the bathroom and we were at a park, I often had to drive to the nearest fast food store, hoping Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Rarely Playground Yes Strongly Agree We used to visit it regularly because it was close to my son’s preschool. But we always had to leave because there was no bathroom. Eith Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree This is such a lovely park with picnic areas. A bathroom is essential! Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Field Use,Gatherings,Playground Yes Strongly Agree We have had birthday parties several times where one parent has to leave to take kids to the bathroom. Also during soccer season it is a c Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Rarely Walking Yes Strongly Agree Adding a public restroom is a great service for all. I visit Ramos Park every day and the addition of the restrooms has been a major step u Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Community Garden,Playground ,Walking Yes Agree A well‐maintained restroom would encourage more outdoor play No No, I live in another neighborhood Monthly Community Garden,Gatherings Yes Strongly Agree I often attend garden workshops and the lack of a restroom is a definite drawback Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Field Use,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Field Use No Strongly Disagree Parking, crime Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree When you're there with a child who has to go to the bathroom hopefully you have time to pack up and go and get somewhere else with a Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Field Use,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Gatherings,Playgro Yes Strongly Agree I have lived next to Pardee park for 15 years. The lack of public bathrooms has always brought me deep regret and embarrassment. That m Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Walking No Disagree Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Rarely Walking,Other: quiet place to sit and read outdoors Yes Agree Just biked past public bathroom adjacent to El Camino Park c. 9:30am Feb 2nd. It was at that time in my opinion an unusable health hazar Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Field Use,Playground Yes Strongly Agree I have a daughter who participates in AYSO soccer on Saturday mornings. The number of times a child has had to go to the bathroom in th No Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking,Other: Running Yes Strongly Agree I would love, love, love to have a public restroom. Even though I live nearby it would make it so much more convenient. Yes Yes, within a short drive Rarely Playground Yes Strongly Agree I am a grandmother. When I took care of my grandchild during the pandemic, we went to Eleanor Pardee park everyday. I had to leave t Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree There is so much to love about this small park but many do not use it for picnics or other family activities because of lack of restrooms. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Walking,Other: Arc Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree I am walking or running everyday in the park for at least an hour, I really need to use bathroom, sometimes, I go to library nearby during t Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree When my child was 6 and under the lack of a toilet at this park was a significant obstacle to our enjoying it. Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Gatherings,Playgro Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree I had my kids pee behind a tree multiple times because of the lack of bathrooms. This is ridiculous and very inconvenient to all the familie Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Agree Would love a security monitoring camera outside the restroom entrance to discourage vandals, crime, etc Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Monthly Community Garden,Playground ,Walking No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Gatherings,Playgro Yes Strongly Agree There are mul ple incidents my kids had to leave early due to bathroom urgencies. There might be concerns from other resident regardi Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Community Garden,Gatherings,Playground Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Gatherings,Playgro Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree I am concerned about safety, security, and maintenance of the bathrooms. Many children and families use the park. The restrooms must b No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Monthly Community Garden,Other: attending gardening classes Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree I have. Wanted restrooms for years Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Community Garden,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Please add a time based lock for the restroom that coincides with park hours. Thank you! Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Playground Yes Agree more likely to frequent the park if it had a restroom No Yes, within a short drive Monthly Playground Yes Strongly Agree Recently my wife organized an event at the park and invitees declined upon knowledge of the lack of restrooms Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Fuck these entitled neighbor pricks! Parks are for society it’s not your backyard! Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree I can only be there for a short amount of time before I have to take my toddler home to use the restroom so this will be very useful. Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Community Garden,Walking Yes Strongly Agree I have lived in this neighborhood for 47 years. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Community Garden,Gatherings,Walking No Neutral The park restrooms are not kept clean enough to make them desirable enough to use as a women. For men and children i understand th Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Walking,Other: Dog walk No Strongly Disagree No dog walk, no restroom Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Other: Dog play No Strongly Disagree No dog walk no restroom Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking No Strongly Disagree Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Weekly Community Garden Yes Agree The Master Gardeners work at the Master Gardener Demonstra on Garden two days a week. The Master Gardener shi s are at least 2 h Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree No Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking,Other: RUnning laps Yes Agree I can imagine this will be especially helpful for kids using the playbround Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Agree It should be locked from sunset to sunrise. Checked / maintained regularly and properly. In other words, it’s not just the building the facili Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Little kids tend to use the bathroom very often and it would definitely help us parents so that we don’t go back home. No Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking No Neutral Ques on 6 is biased. I'm not against bathrooms, but I am also not happy about encouraging longer visits to the park. I'm sure it would en Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Other: shortcut to Rinconada Library ‐ cut the corner Yes Strongly Agree No Yes, within a short drive Weekly Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Rarely Field Use,Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree yes is necessary to have a public restroom in the park Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree No Yes, within a short drive Weekly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Community Garden,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree It will be a BIG RELIEF. Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Community Garden,Field Use,Playground ,Walkin Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Playground ,Walking No Strongly Disagree No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Monthly Recreation,Playground Yes Strongly Agree No Yes, within walking distance Weekly Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Community Garden,Gatherings,Playground ,Walki Yes Strongly Agree Please add restroom Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Monthly Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Community Garden No Strongly Disagree No Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Walking No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within a short drive Monthly Recreation,Walking Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Neutral Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Playground ,Walking Yes Agree No Yes, within walking distance Weekly Field Use,Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within a short drive Weekly Recreation Yes Strongly Agree Filling this out to share my own humiliating personal experience. Yesterday while at the park, I was overcome with an urgent need to urin No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Monthly Recreation,Field Use,Walking,Other: Eating lunch Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking No Disagree Eleanor Pardee Park is safer and be er without a public restroom.. Public restroom invite homeless , that was what happened to Ramos P Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking No Disagree We don’t wish to have a public restroom in Eleanor Pardee Park. We do not need it and I fell safer not to have a public restroom there. P Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Gatherings,Walking No Disagree I do not feel a need for a public restroom in Eleanor park. It actually feel safer not to have a public restroom. City can use the money in o Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation,Gatherings,Walking No Strongly Disagree No need to add a public restroom in this park. It is nice and safer without a public restroom. I heard some neighborhood has homeless pe Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Gatherings,Walking No Strongly Disagree It is just fine now. No need to spend money on this issue. As a fact, this park is safer without a public restroom. No No, I live in another neighborhood Weekly Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Strongly Agree The restroom is near the playground is great idea!!! Yes Yes, within a short drive Daily Playground Yes Strongly Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Recreation No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Walking No Strongly Disagree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking No Strongly Disagree The park is already crowded with people from other areas (which is fine), but a restroom will draw people to stay much longer, and increa Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking No Strongly Disagree I feel that adding a restroom will incentivise vagrant activity, add more traffic ,and create a spot for homeless activity . Yes Yes, within walking distance Monthly Recreation,Field Use,Walking No Strongly Disagree I don’t support adding a restroom. The park is intended for neighborhood residents and not intended for long stays ‐ the city has Rincona Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Walking Yes Strongly Agree A bathroom is especially important for folks who stay a while, such as gardeners, picnickers, and game players. And for children and the e Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Gatherings,Playground ,Walking No Strongly Disagree I reconstructed my house near the park, during that period, many strangers trespassed on my property to use the porta‐potty. The tresp Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground ,Walking Yes Agree Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Recreation No Strongly Disagree This will a ract homeless and violent crimes do to a private area to commit rape etc.More cost to city for maintenance. Item 4 Attachment A - Survey Results Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 11 Packet Pg. 27 of 262 Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Community Garden,Field Use,Walking No Strongly Disagree There are other parks in the city that are wonderful and have bathrooms‐‐many of which are within walking distance of Eleanor Purdy Par Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking No Strongly Disagree This is a bad idea. A restroom facility, which it might seem like nice thing to do, would only create problems with no turning back. Parking, Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking No Strongly Disagree This is a small neighborhood park. Not a regional park. With restrooms there will be too many problems with parking, cleanliness, overus Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking No Strongly Disagree This is a small neighborhood part, not a regional park. Restrooms at Eleanor Park would create parking issues, health issues and safety iss Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking No Strongly Disagree No Restrooms! Not necessary! ONLY WILL CREATE PROBLEMS!! Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Walking No Strongly Disagree Based on what often occurs in other parks with restrooms, this is a bad idea. Restrooms provide a space for activity such as drug use and l Yes Yes, within walking distance Daily Community Garden,Walking,Other: When my kids were youn No Neutral Adding a new public restroom at Eleanor Pardee Park became a conversation that is brought up often in my community when I'm around t Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Monthly Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree The statement says everything I would have said! Yes Yes, within walking distance Weekly Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Yes No, I live in another neighborhood Weekly Recreation,Field Use,Playground Yes Strongly Agree No No, I live outside of Palo Alto Monthly Recreation,Gatherings,Walking Yes Strongly Agree Item 4 Attachment A - Survey Results Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 12 Packet Pg. 28 of 262 Eleanor Pardee Park Restroom Survey Statistics / Assessment Responses*Yes = Support Restroom Distance to/from Pardee Park Agreement / Disagreement with Question #6 No = Against Restroom Yes = Support Restroom Distance to/from Pardee Park No = Against Restroom Yes = Support Restroom No = Against Restroom Count Percentag Count Percentag Count Percentag Count Percentag Resident 1,087 93% Resident Yes 876 75% Resident, Yes, and Within walking distance 660 56% Resident, Yes, Within walking distance, and Strongly Agree 566 48% Non‐Residen 84 7% Resident N 211 18% Resident, Yes, and Within a short driv 160 14% Resident, Yes, Within walking distance, and Agre 75 6% Total 1,171 100% Non‐Resident Ye 84 7% Resident, Yes, and I live in another neighborhoo 56 5% Resident, Yes, Within walking distance, and Neutra 18 2% Non‐Resident N 0 0% Resident, No, and Within walking distanc 197 17% Resident, Yes, Within walking distance, and Disagre 0 0% Total 1,171 100% Resident, No, and Within a short drive 10 1% Resident, Yes, Within walking distance, and Strongly Disagre 1 0% Resident, No, and I live in another neighborhood 4 0% * 211 Respondents stated they use Pardee Park to "Garden"Non‐Resident, Yes, and Within walking distance 11 1% Resident , Yes, Within a short drive, and Strongly Agree 147 13% Non‐Resident, Yes, and Within a short drive 25 2% Resident , Yes, Within a short drive, and Agree 12 1% Non‐Resident, Yes, and I live outside of Palo Alto 40 3% Resident , Yes, Within a short drive, and Neutral 1 0% Non‐Resident, Yes, and I live in another neighborhoo 8 1% Resident , Yes, Within a short drive, and Disagre 0 0% Total 1,171 100% Resident , Yes, Within a short drive, and Strongly Disagree 0 0% Resident , Yes, I live in another neighborhood, and Strongly Agree 46 4% Resident , Yes, I live in another neighborhood, and Agree 10 1% Resident , Yes, I live in another neighborhood, and Neutral 0 0% Resident , Yes, I live in another neighborhood, and Disagree 0 0% Resident , Yes, I live in another neighborhood, and Strongly Disagree 0 0% Resident No, Within walking distance, and Strongly Agree 2 0% Resident No, Within walking distance, and Agree 2 0% Resident No, Within walking distance, and Neutral 22 2% Resident No, Within walking distance, and Disagree 24 2% Resident No, Within walking distance, and Strongly disagree 147 13% Resident No, Within a short drive, and Strongly Agree 1 0% Resident No, Within a short drive, and Agree 0 0% Resident No, Within a short drive, and Neutral 1 0% Resident No, Within a short drive, and Disagree 4 0% Resident No, Within a short drive, and Strongly disagree 4 0% Resident , No, I live in another neighborhood, and Strongly Agree 0 0% Resident , No, I live in another neighborhood, and Agree 0 0% Resident , No, I live in another neighborhood, and Neutral 1 0% Resident , No, I live in another neighborhood, and Disagree 1 0% Resident , No, I live in another neighborhood, and Strongly Disagree 2 0% Non‐Resident, Yes, Within walking distance, and Strongly Agree 11 1% Non‐Resident, Yes, Within walking distance, and Agree 0 0% Non‐Resident, Yes, Within walking distance, and Neutral 0 0% Non‐Resident, Yes, Within walking distance, and Disagree 0 0% Non‐Resident, Yes, Within walking distance, and Strongly disagree 0 0% Non‐Resident, Yes, Within a short drive, and Strongly Agree 23 2% Non‐Resident, Yes, Within a short drive, and Agree 2 0% Non‐Resident, Yes, Within a short drive, and Neutral 0 0% Non‐Resident, Yes, Within a short drive, and Disagree 0 0% Non‐Resident, Yes, Within a short drive, and Strongly Disagree 0 0% Non‐Resident , Yes, I live in another neighborhood, and Strongly Agree 8 1% Non‐Resident , Yes, I live in another neighborhood, and Agree 0 0% Non‐Resident , Yes, I live in another neighborhood, and Neutral 0 0% Non‐Resident , Yes, I live in another neighborhood, and Disagree 0 0% Non‐Resident , Yes, I live in another neighborhood, and Strongly Disagree 0 0% Non‐Resident, Yes, I live outside of Palo Alto, and Strongly Agree 35 3% Non‐Resident, Yes, I live outside of Palo Alto, and Agree 4 0% Non‐Resident, Yes, I live outside of Palo Alto, and Neutral 1 0% Non‐Resident, Yes, I live outside of Palo Alto, and Disagree 0 0% Non‐Resident, Yes, I live outside of Palo Alto, and Strongly Disagree 0 0% Total 1,171 100% Item 4 Attachment B - Survey Statistics Assessment Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 13 Packet Pg. 29 of 262 Eleanor Pardee Park Restroom / Statistic Count of Results by Question Number 1. Are you a Palo Alto 2. Do you live near Eleanor Pardee Park?3. How often do you visit Pardee Park? 4. How do you primarily use Eleanor Pardee Park? (Multiple allowed) 5. Do you support adding a public restroom at Pardee Park? 6. To what extent do you agree the following statement*: a public restroom would 7. Please share any additional or concerns. Count Percentage Count Percentage Count Percentage Count Percentage Count Percentage Count Percentage Count Percentage Resident ‐Resident 93% 7% 100% Yes, within walking distance within a short drive I live in another neighborhood I live outside of Palo Alto Daily 290 25%Walking Garden Use Dog activity UC Master Garden Demonstration Garden Running 854 33%Yes 960 211 1,171 Strongly Agree Disagree 839 Various Responses ** (No Response) 576 595 1,171 17% 6% 3% 100% Weekly 566 18% 100% 9% 4% 3% 12% 100% 51% 100% 39 142 1,1711,171 100%210 ** Refer to Survey results for Various Responses 6 * Statement: "Adding a public restroom make the park more accessible for individuals with disabilities, and individuals. A public restroom enhance the overall park experience visitors and help encourage longer visits the park." Other: Biking Other: Picnicking Tai Chi Class Meeting Organized sports Various viewing activities Reading Enjoyment School event Exercise Party Birding Archery Shortcut through park towards elsewhere Total 2,603 Item 4 Attachment C - Restroom Survey Response Courts by Question Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 14 Packet Pg. 30 of 262 Parks and Recreation Commission Staff Report From: Community Service Department Lead: Transporation Department Meeting Date: March 25, 2025 Report #: 2501-3969 TITLE Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan (BPTP) Update: Provide Feedback on Draft Proposed Bicycle Network and Facilities, and Program and Policy Recommendations. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City has developed a bicycle network over the past 40 years. The 2012 BPTP established the City’s current network plan, and since then, the City has advanced the plan through specific project development efforts, Safe Routes to School projects, new initiatives in developing areas, and emergency projects prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic. This report outlines the foundations for the development of the BPTP Update’s recommended bicycle network, an overview of the recommended network of bicycle facilities and Pedestrian District Guidelines, and introduces the project prioritization framework and projects list necessary for network completion. BACKGROUND The City’s existing 2012 BPTP is a critical planning, policy, and implementation document that supports efforts to improve the safety and attractiveness of walking, biking, and rolling as a means of transportation and recreation. The intent of the BPTP Update is to seek robust community feedback; reevaluate implementation progress from previous plans to adjust recommendations for new policies, facilities, and programs; and to determine appropriate criteria and metrics to prioritize recommendations and network routes. The BPTP Update will introduce a revised bicycle network, leverage existing planning foundations, address changes in context and needs since 2012, and integrate new ideas and innovations. The BPTP Update Draft Plan is anticipated for fall 2025. Project Kick-off, Existing Conditions Analysis, and Needs & Concerns On May 17, 2021, the City Council adopted a resolution supporting the City’s grant application for the State Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 Funds for the BPTP Update project. In September 2021, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) approved of Item 5 Item 2 Staff Report Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 1 Packet Pg. 31 of 262 the allocation of Transportation Development Act Article 3 (TDA3) funds to the City of Palo Alto in the amount of $334,852 for the purposes of updating the 2012 Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan. 1 2 The existing conditions technical analysis included information on the local Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress (LTS), safety and collisions, major barriers, e-bike and shared micromobility, and a bike parking inventory.3 4 Vision Statement & Objectives 5 While there was positive sentiment around the content of the initial draft vision statement, many people expressed an interest in shortening the statement, incorporating an educational element, and reducing redundancy while emphasizing the intent of the plan to create an “all ages and abilities” network. We envision a city where sustainable, safe, efficient, equitable, and enjoyable transportation thrives. Together, we will create a comfortable and 1 Palo Alto Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting January 23, 2024. Business: Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan (BPTP) Update: Introduction & Overview, Community Engagement, Context & Baseline Conditions, and Next Steps. https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Public/CompiledDocument?meetingTemplateId=14699&compileOutputType=1 2 Palo Alto Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting, March 26, 2024. Business: Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan (BPTP) Update: Share and confirm the vision statement and goals, share and receive feedback on the existing conditions technical analysis, and share and discuss upcoming engagement. https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Public/CompiledDocument?meetingTemplateId=14754&compileOutputType=1 3 City of Palo Alto, BPTP Update Existing Conditions Technical Analysis: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/Transportation/Bicycling- Walking/bikepedplan/BPTP-Update-Existing-Conditions-Analysis 4 Palo Alto City Council Special Meeting April 29, 2024. Study Session: Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan (BPTP) Update: Review and discuss the vision statement, objectives, performance measures, and share and obtain feedback on the existing conditions technical analysis. https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/api/compilemeetingattachmenthistory/historyattachment/?historyId=fcfab491-1dae-4afd-a309-be952790121e 5 Palo Alto Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting, March 26, 2024. Business: Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan (BPTP) Update: Share and confirm the vision statement and goals, share and receive feedback on the existing conditions technical analysis, and share and discuss upcoming engagement. https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Public/CompiledDocument?meetingTemplateId=14754&compileOutputType=1 Item 5 Item 2 Staff Report Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 2 Packet Pg. 32 of 262 connected street and trail network that supports walking, biking, and rolling for people of all ages and abilities. We continue to be a leader in Safe Routes to School and invest more in active transportation infrastructure, education, and encouragement programs. •Safe and Inclusive: Prioritizing safety for all transportation network users regardless of age and ability and ensuring equitable access to pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure across the community while reducing fatal and severe injury crashes. •Connected and Accessible: Featuring a convenient and interconnected network of sidewalks, bike lanes, and trails that provide efficient travel options and easy access to transit and important destinations, encouraging a shift away from driving and improving environmental health through lower vehicle miles traveled and greenhouse gas emissions. •Community-Led and Cooperative: Fostering community engagement and participation in promoting active transportation, supported by education, programming, and infrastructure investments, in a way that cultivates learning for all network users of all ages. •Comfortable and Enjoyable: Enhancing the comfort and enjoyment of walking and cycling through amenities such as shade, greenery, and well-designed streetscapes. •Integrated and Collaborative: Collaborating with neighboring cities to create a seamless, integrated, and efficient regional network of pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure. Performance Measures Recommended performance measures were developed, shaped around the BPTP Update’s five Objectives, and informed by a review of the 2012 BPTP and Bicycle Friendly Communities benchmarking. For each measure, guidance for tracking performance included a detailed description, reporting period, data needs and sources, methodology, and additional information to assist with applying the measure in the coming years. Eight performance measures were recommended by the project team, with another eight identified as potential performance measures pending City resources. The detailed performance measure matrices are included in Attachment D: Supplemental Materials: Recommended Performance Measures. ANALYSIS Bicycle Network Development & Recommended Network The Bicycle Network was revised using feedback from the community and working groups and by aligning with existing and planned facilities outlined in other plans. The Draft Network Corridor Criteria and Development Approach Memo (within Attachment D: Supplemental Item 5 Item 2 Staff Report Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 3 Packet Pg. 33 of 262 Materials) details the foundations for the development of the updated bicycle network, including: •2012 Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan •2024 Existing Bicycle Facilities Map •Palo Alto Bicycle Map (2021) •High Injury Network for Bicyclists •Bicycle Boulevard Planning (2016) •Bicycle Network Development Workshops (2024) •MTC Regional Active Transportation Plan (2023) •VTA Countywide Bicycle Plan (2018) •VTA Bicycle Superhighway Implementation Plan (2021) •Safe Routes to School Plans •Santa Clara County Active Transportation Plan (2025) •Palo Alto Housing Element (2024) •Community and Agency Feedback •2024 BPTP Level of Traffic Stress Analysis •2024 BPTP Origins and Destinations Bicycle Activity Analysis •2024 BPTP Major Barriers Analysis •Dutch Network Planning Principles •Bike/Ped Video Counts Primary Network Development Criteria These criteria are primary inputs into our network development process. The network is built on the 2012 BPTP and refined with recent planning efforts conducted since then in Palo Alto and the region. Table 1: Proposed Primary Network Development Criteria Attribute Source Criteria Rationale 2012 Plan Network Palo Alto Bicycle + Pedestrian Transportation Plan Map 6-1 Route included in the 2012 plan network Foundation of the plan update Existing Bicycle Facility 2024 Existing Bicycle Facilities map Route exists today as a formal bicycle facility Existing routes have value by virtue of their presence and current use Item 5 Item 2 Staff Report Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 4 Packet Pg. 34 of 262 Palo Alto Bicycle Map Palo Alto Bicycle Network Routes Map Route included in the City published user map User map published by the City of Palo Alto, identifying bike friendly routes today High Injury Network for Bicyclists 2024 High Injury Network for Bicyclists Route identified as a high injury network street in the 2024 BPTP Collision and Safety Analysis Route is a potential safety hazard today, may be enhanced to become an important or improved network link 2016 Bike Boulevard Improvements Project City of Palo Alto Bike Boulevards Improvements Project Route included in Bike Boulevard Improvement Project Detailed planning of future bicycle boulevard implementation offers a more recent vetting of viable routes Network Development Workshop 2024 Network Development Workshop Outcomes Route identified on the 2024 Network Development Workshops Network development workshops identified key destinations and potential direct routes between them Regional Active Transportation Plans MTC Regional Active Transportation Plan; VTA Bicycle Superhighway Implementation Plan Route identified as a part of the regional Active Transportation network or Bicycle Superhighway Plan Regionally significant connection between communities Safe Routes to School (SRTS) SRTS system route maps Route identified on the SRTS route system Important connection to schools as a priority destination This first round of network development identified: (1) a core network where these plans align and agree; and (2) street segments and routes with less planning consensus. Secondary Criteria for Network Refinement Where multiple routes options exist (less planning consensus), secondary criteria were used for route selection and refinement. The following advantages were used to make those selections: •Direct routing to community destinations. •Favorable existing conditions based on the traffic stress conditions identified in the 2024 LTS Analysis. •Direct alignment with routes in high demand with higher volumes of people moving. •Routes that overcome barriers identified in the 2024 BPTP Major Barriers Analysis. The result is an updated network map that shows a low-stress vision for the Palo Alto network, inclusive of bikeways and bicycle friendly zones to frame policy and influence trade-off decision-making (Attachment A: Bicycle Network Update Map). Updated Bicycle Facilities The BPTP Update proposes a simplified array of facility types designed to improve safety and Item 5 Item 2 Staff Report Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 5 Packet Pg. 35 of 262 embrace innovation. The facilities were selected to meet the goals and objectives of the BPTP Update. The proposed bicycle facilities fall into three categories: mixed traffic, visually separated, and physically separated. These three categories reflect the types of facilities and how they are designed. Image 1: Bicycle facilities for the updated bikeway network •Class I—Shared Use Path •Class IIa—Bike Lane •Class IIb—Buffered Bike Lane •Class IIIa—Advisory Bike Lane •Class IIIb—Bicycle Boulevard •Class IV—Protected Bike Lane Bicycle Facility Selection A simplified approach to select the different types of bicycle facilities was chosen for the updated bikeway network. The approach is informed by the Dutch CROW Design Manual for Bicycle Traffic,6 the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Bikeway Selection Guide,7 and the 6 CROW. Design Manual for Bicycle Traffic. CROW, 2023. https://www.crow.nl/publicaties/design-manual-for-bicycle-traffic. 7 Federal Highway Administration. Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Guide and Countermeasure Selection System: FHWA-SA-18-077. U.S. Department of Transportation, 2018. https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/ped_bike/tools_solve/docs/fhwasa18077.pdf. Visually Separated Item 5 Item 2 Staff Report Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 6 Packet Pg. 36 of 262 NACTO All Ages & Abilities Bikeways guidance.8 The bicycle facility selection first looked at road classification (local, collector, and arterial). Then traffic volumes followed by posted speeds were examined. The consultant team had limited access to traffic data and therefore relied on network criteria that was used to create the bikeway network, community input, and on-the- ground knowledge from staff and the in-person working session in April 2024. This approach was applied to each segment of the bikeway network, and the facilities were selected based on the approach but also considered in the greater network and whether they met the BPTP Update goals and objectives. The detailed facility selection approach is presented in Attachment D: Supplemental Materials: Draft Bicycle Network and Facilities Memo. Updated Bicycle Network with Facilities Identified Attachment B, Recommended Bicycle Facility Map, is the map of the recommended bicycle facilities for the BPTP Update applied to the recommended bikeway network, following the Bicycle Facility Selection process described above. The map displays existing facility types and proposes future facilities required to create more comfortable bicycling conditions. This map helps illustrate the level of change proposed in the plan. Bicycle Project List A complete list and maps of the projects proposed for the BPTP Update is provided in Attachment D: Supplemental Materials: Project List and Projects by Facility Types Maps. This list was developed through input from the City, in-person working sessions held in April 2024, and meetings with the consultant team. The complete list includes details such as the project number, project name, location (including the extent start and end), project length, existing facilities, proposed bicycle facilities, bikeway class, and a short project description. The project description provides a brief overview of the project as well as indicates different elements that should be given attention, such as intersections or projects that should be implemented alongside. Some larger projects have been proposed as individual segments to give the City the ability to install projects in a phased approach. Finally, notes about implementation are also provided including parking reconfiguration, lane reconfiguration, traffic calming, traffic filtering, wayfinding, civil construction, and whether the project is a quick-build candidate. In addition to corridor projects, the project list includes key crossing projects, special projects, and proposals for future studies. Project Prioritization The proposed factors and criteria for prioritizing projects are intended to align with the BPTP 8 National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO). "Choosing the Age and Ability of Bicycle Facility." NACTO, n.d., https://nacto.org/publication/urban-bikeway-design-guide/designing-ages-abilities-new/choosing-ages-abilities-bicycle-facility/. Item 5 Item 2 Staff Report Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 7 Packet Pg. 37 of 262 Update objectives and are informed by NCHRP Report 803: ActiveTrans Priority Tool,9 the result of a national research effort. Two factors (Safety and Connectivity) were identified for project prioritization, each with evaluation criteria and weights to be used in the process. The safety factor is weighed 70% and its criteria consider collision history and school routes; the connectivity factor is weighed 30%, and its criteria consider the current level of stress for bicyclists and proximity to transit. The detailed draft prioritization framework is included in Attachment D: Supplemental Materials: Draft Prioritization Framework. Pedestrian District Guidelines The Pedestrian District Guidelines provide a toolbox of treatments to enhance pedestrian safety and the overall walking experience in the city. These guidelines build on previous plans, incorporating new ideas and addressing changes since 2012. The toolbox includes infrastructure improvements like raised crossings and curb extensions, alongside aesthetic enhancements such as benches and street art, promoting safety, accessibility, and comfort. Priority pedestrian districts and neighborhood commercial centers were identified citywide as informed by the City’s 2023 Economic Development Strategic Plan, with area maps detailing the recommended application of these treatments to create inviting and enjoyable walking environments. These include University Avenue District, California Avenue District, Midtown District, and the Embarcadero and El Camino Real neighborhood commercial centers. The Pedestrian District Guidelines are presented in Attachment D: Supplemental Materials: Draft Bicycle Network and Facilities Memo. Programs, Policies, and Best Practices FISCAL/RESOURCE IMPACT 9 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Pedestrian and Bicycle Transportation Along Existing Roads—ActiveTrans Priority Tool Guidebook. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/22163 . Item 5 Item 2 Staff Report Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 8 Packet Pg. 38 of 262 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT Phase 2 Engagement Activities Engagement activities associated with Phase 2 Needs and Concerns occurred in spring 2024 and included a series of committee and working group meetings and a week-long series of events and workshops that included a bicycle network development workshop, a community walking tour, and a community cycle tour. Activities were promoted on the City’s website, social media channels, transportation mailing list, Uplift Local newsletter, and at the Committee and Working Group meetings. Themes heard during these outreach efforts included celebration of the best local bike routes; identification of infrastructure gaps; need for creating pedestrian friendly zones; and need for enhanced safety and comfort on specific streets. The summary of the key insights gathered from these Phase 2 engagement activities are presented in Attachment D: Supplemental Materials: Community Engagement Summary-Phase 2 Needs and Concerns (Draft). •Maintenance at Palo Alto Caltrain Station & Transit Center and sidewalk upheavals •Increased wayfinding at Palo Alto Caltrain Station and along University Ave that is clear and consistent •Providing continuous sidewalks at the Alma Interchange and along University Ave •Extending the main street feel beyond University Ave to the surrounding streets •Interest in implementing more car-free streets •Enhancing alleyways near Ramona Street and Lytton Plaza •Upgrades to existing infrastructure can make a large difference •Transition from arterial road to residential street can be often sudden and unclear – opportunity for continuous sidewalks •Connector bike paths are done really well and are integral part of the bike network •Clarity on bicycle boulevards needed •Interest in seeing more protected bicycle lanes Item 5 Item 2 Staff Report Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 9 Packet Pg. 39 of 262 Phase 3 Community Engagement Activities The current phase, Phase 3 (Present recommended Network, Facilities, Programs & Policies) engagement activities are planned to include a third series of committee and working group meetings, online & street-level engagement, and a community meeting. •Project website and interactive map. The project website can be accessed at: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/bikepedplan. The website will continue to be updated with relevant material and information. An interactive map will be hosted on the website where the community can provide the feedback on the proposed bicycle network and projects. •Committee and Working Group Meetings. The project team will engage the following committees and working groups at during Phase 3: o Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee (PABAC) (February 4, 2025) o Parent community focus group (February 25, 2025) o Planning and Transportation Commission (February 26, 2025) o Internal Staff Working Group (March 4, 2025) o Parks and Recreation Commission (March 25, 2025) o City Council (early summer 2025) •Community Workshop. The project team will host a joint community workshop with the South Palo Alto Bike/Ped Connectivity project on Wednesday, April 2, 2025 from 6:00- 7:30pm at Mitchell Park Community Center, El Palo Alto Room. •Street Level Engagement: The project team will lead and participate in street level engagement activities during Phase 3, such as tabling at local Farmer’s Markets. Following public, committee, commission, working group, and City Council review and input on the proposed draft bicycle network and facilities, Pedestrian District Guidelines, Program and Policy Recommendations, and the project prioritization framework, the project team will assess the feedback received and identify the network and priority projects, programs, and policies to advance into the Draft BPTP Update Plan. The Draft Plan is anticipated for fall 2025. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Bicycle Network Update Map Attachment B: Recommended Bicycle Facility Map Attachment C: Policy & Program Recommendations Attachment D: Supplemental Materials: Pedestrian District Guidelines Recommended Performance Measures Draft Network Corridor Criteria and Development Approach Memo Draft Bicycle Network and Facilities Memo Bicycle Network Change since 2012 Map Project List Item 5 Item 2 Staff Report Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 10 Packet Pg. 40 of 262 Draft Prioritization Framework Item 5 Item 2 Staff Report Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 11 Packet Pg. 41 of 262 __`101 §¨¦280 ∙þ82 Midd l e f i e l d R d Alma S t Brya n t S t Ham i l t o n A v e Univ e r s i t y A v e Lytt o n A v e Add i s o n A v e Ne w e l l R d Channing Ave San d H i l l R d Cow p e r S t Embarca d e r o R d Loui s R d Ore g o n E x p y Cali f o r n i a A v e Cal i f o r n i a A v e Pag e M i l l R d Color a d o A v e Lom a V e r d e A v e Mead o w D r Melv i l l e A v e Sea l e A v e El D o r a d o A v e Charl e s t o n R d Fa b i a n W y San Antonio Rd Bay s h o r e R d Gree r R d El Ca m i n o R e a l Los R o b l e s A v e Wilki e W y Ara s t r a d e r o R d Foot h i l l E x p y Han o v e r S t Hil l v i e w A v e Junipero Serra Blvd Sta n f o r d A v e Ross R d Mat a d e r o A v e May b e l l A v e Hom e r A v e Color a d o A v e El C a m i n o R e a l Mille r A v e EAST PALO ALTOMENLO PARK STANFORD UNIVERSITY LOS ALTOS MOUNTAIN VIEW LOS ALTOS HILLS Byxbee Park Mitchell Park Hoover Park Pearson-Arastradero Preserve Greer Park Eleanor Pardee Park Ramos Park Robles Park Bol Park Alta Mesa Memorial Park Palo Alto High School Gunn High School JLS Middle School Greene Middle School Fletcher Middle School Palo Alto Caltrain California Ave Caltrain San Antonio Caltrain Menlo Park Caltrain Palo Alto Airport Mata d e r o C r e e k Barr o n C r e e k Adobe C r e e k __`101 §¨¦280 ∙þ82 EAST PALO ALTO MENLO PARK STANFORD UNIVERSITY LOS ALTOS MOUNTAIN VIEW PALO ALTO PORTOLA VALLEY F Bicycle Network Bicycle District City of Palo Alto Park/Open Space School/University Commercial Center Community Center Library Caltrain Stop Railroad Data Sources: City of Palo Alto, MTC 0 1 2 Miles Bicycle Network Update 02/10/2025 Item 5 Attachment A - Bicycle Network Update Map Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 12 Packet Pg. 42 of 262 __`101 §¨¦280 ∙þ82 Midd l e f i e l d R d Alma S t Brya n t S t Ham i l t o n A v e Univ e r s i t y A v e Lyt t o n A v e Add i s o n A v e New e l l R d Channing Ave Sand H i l l R d Cow p e r S t Embarca d e r o R d Loui s R d Ore g o n E x p y Cali f o r n i a A v e Cal i f o r n i a A v e Pag e M i l l R d Color a d o A v e Lom a V e r d e A v e Mead o w D r Melv i l l e A v e Sea l e A v e El D o r a d o A v e Charl e s t o n R d Fa b i a n W y San Antonio Rd Bay s h o r e R d Gree r R d El Ca m i n o R e a l Los R o b l e s A v e Wilki e W y Ara s t r a d e r o R d Foot h i l l E x p y Han o v e r S t Hil l v i e w A v e Junipero Serra Blvd Sta n f o r d A v e Ross R d Mat a d e r o A v e May b e l l A v e Hom e r A v e Color a d o A v e El Ca m i n o R e a l Mille r A v e EAST PALO ALTOMENLO PARK STANFORD UNIVERSITY LOS ALTOS MOUNTAIN VIEW LOS ALTOS HILLS Byxbee Park Mitchell Park Hoover Park Pearson-Arastradero Preserve Greer Park Eleanor Pardee Park Ramos Park Robles Park Bol Park Alta Mesa Memorial Park Palo Alto High School Gunn High School JLS Middle School Greene Middle School Fletcher Middle School Palo Alto Caltrain California Ave Caltrain San Antonio Caltrain Menlo Park Caltrain Palo Alto Airport Mata d e r o C r e e k Barro n C r e e k Adobe C r e e k __`101 §¨¦280 ∙þ82 EAST PALO ALTO MENLO PARK STANFORD UNIVERSITY LOS ALTOS MOUNTAIN VIEW PALO ALTO PORTOLA VALLEY F Proposed Existing Class I - Shared Use Path; Trail Class IIa - Bike Lane Class IIb - Buffered Bike Lane Class IIIa - Bike Route Class IIIb - Bike Boulevard Class IV - Separated Bikeway City of Palo Alto Park/Open Space School/University Commercial Center Railroad Caltrain Stop Data Sources: City of Palo Alto, MTC 0 1 2 Miles Recommended Bicycle Facility Map 03/05/2025 Item 5 Attachment B - Bicycle Facility Map Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 13 Packet Pg. 43 of 262 Policy and Programs Objective Program/Policy/Practice Name Description Reason for Inclusion 2012 Plan Older Adult Mobility Program Support older adult mobility options, including a Trishaw Pilot via Cycling Without Age, to provide access to statistically low-risk transit, possibly operated by trained student and/or older adult volunteers along low volume residential streets. received via City/SRTS email Bike Parking Inventory & Usage Monitoring Program Conduct an inventory and monitor usage of bike parking at City properties and City right-of-way (such as sidewalks) and continue to provide sufficient supply. BFC benchmarking Bike Parking Requirements For New Development Regularly review the City's minimum short- and long-term bike parking requirements for new development projects and update requirements to reflect changes in parking demand. Update and maintain the City's list of approved bike parking designs to accommodate a variety of bicycle types such as e-bikes and cargo bikes.code review Walk & Bike Friendly Development Consider prioritizing or requiring certification that encourages bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly developments, such as LEED-ND. Encourage developments that limit vehicle parking.2012 Plan 2012 Plan (5.4.5-e, modified) Wayfinding Plan Develop a non-motorized wayfinding plan connecting bicycle and pedestrian facilities with key local and regional destinations such as trails, parks, and rail stations. Evaluate cut- throughs, short connections, ramp access, and ADA compliance. Continue to expand wayfinding facilities as the bicycle and pedestrian networks are implemented.literature review Bike Racks on Buses Work with Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) to monitor the use of bike racks on buses and determine if demand is being accommodated. TDM Ordinance Develop a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) ordinance and program for multi-family and non-residential development projects that includes active transportation strategies such as internal/external connectivity, bike repair stations, showers/lockers, and off-site improvements.2012 Plan 2012 Plan (5.4.3-c, modified) Crossing Guards Periodically evaluate school crossing guard locations to determine their appropriateness and evaluate opportunities for new locations. As part of the evaluations, consider factors such as the needs of younger bicyclists who may cross while walking, and incorporate collision and location data to assist in identifying opportunities for pilot locations that could increase the walk to school mode share. 2012 Plan; Safety Action Plan 2012 Plan (5.4.4-f, modified) Development Review Updates Development review and roadway design will be evaluated by metrics that focus on safety risk, user comfort, and access for all users including pedestrians and bicyclists such as kintetic energy risk, level of traffic stress, and travel time by mode Safety Action Plan; Safe System Staff Working Group Comfortable and Enjoyable: Enhancing the comfort and enjoyment of walking and cycling through amenities such as shade, greenery, and well- designed streetscapes. Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan Update Item 5 Attachment C - Policy and Programs Recommendations Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 14 Packet Pg. 44 of 262 Policy and Programs Objective Program/Policy/Practice Name Description Reason for Inclusion 2012 Plan Bicycle Lending Library Partner with the Palo Alto library and a local agency that has space, capacity and expertise to create a bicycle lending library that enables residents to check out different types of bicycles, supplies, including trailers, and educational materials, including bike blenders, bike trivia wheels, safety vests for events, helmets and more; consult with agencies that received via City/SRTS email TDM Pilot Program for City Employees Conduct a City of Palo Alto TDM pilot to improve facilities and encourage employee use of active transportation vehicles to reduce risk, given the high percentage of city vehicles that are used for <2 mile single occupant trips around town. Determine how best to pilot and incentivize trips to focus on both the right tool for the trip relative to the distance. Provide access to different types of bikes/trailers to support a wide range of users, access to an improved storage facility, conduct regular rides and safety trainings, ensure bicycles are regularly maintained and that there are risk management and anti-theft provisions to ensure safety and security. 2012 Plan; received via City/SRTS email 2012 Plan (5.4.3-c, modified) Long-Term Education Program Prioritize education of decision-makers and City staff on the Safey Systems approach. Safety Action Plan; Comprehensive Plan Bike Education Program BFC benchmarking Employee Education Program Encourage and fund the participation of employees in professional organizations and conferences (such as the Assocation of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals) in order stay Interactive Map Tool Update the City's website to enhance its static bicycle facility and Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Walk & Roll Suggested Route maps with a regularly-updated app-based portal, using free and accessible tools such as Plot a Route, Google Maps, Map My Run, or the City's ArcGIS online feature, or other tools. Work with PAUSD, PATMA, and other partners 2012 Plan; scope 2012 Plan (5.4.2-c, modified) Community Rides Program Partner with organizations such as SVBC to lead all ages and abilities bicycle rides throughout the calendar year, including rides that utilize recently-implemented projects. Scope Valet Parking Program for Events Partner with and budget for organizations such as SVBC to provide bike parking and/or bike valet services at City-sponsored or other large events. Scope Street Closures - Open/'Car-Free' Streets Prioritize street closures on areas located on the High Injury Network (identified in the Safe System Plan), and where high bicycle and pedestrian activity is expected, such as Pedestrian Districts identified in the BPTP Update Safety Action Plan; Comprehensive Plan Street Closures - School Streets School streets implement timed closures that prevent vehicles from entering the specified school zone. Restrictions are in place for approximately 15 to 90 minutes during drop- off and pick-up times and is enforced using signage and physical barrier(s). During this time, only pedestrians and cyclists can enter the School Street zone, aside from exempt vehicles (e.g. residents living in the zone). Identify schools for implementing a pilot program that can be used to gather data and outcomes that could then be applied to other Safety Action Plan; Safe System Staff Working Group Encourage PATMA to provide additional bicycle/scooter incentives and expand to employers outside the downtown area. Safe Routes to School Enhance and sustain the City/PAUSD/PTA/Youth community partnership to reduce risk to students en route to and from school, and encourage more families to choose healthy, active, sustainable alternatives to driving solo more often. Grow and strengthen community-wide support through the SRTS 6 E's (Education, Encouragement, Engineering, Engagement, Evaluation, and Equity) model for safe, active, healthy, sustainable, school commutes. Aim to: • Adopt and institutionalize key SRTS practices and policies and gather best practices. • Provide, expand, and enhance school and community-based SRTS education programs and materials. • Expand and enhance encourgagement programs to communicate the value of SRTS. • Gather data to assess and improve outcomes. • Engineer routes to develop a more safe and efficient network. • Deepen awareness and engagement with City staff and community representatives to advance and institutionalize SRTS. • Commit an equitable distribution of resources to encourage broad community participation. Scope Safe Routes to School Action Plan Continue to regularly update the City's Safe Routes to School Action Plan and documents in support of the plan such as the SRTS Partner Consensus Statement, Bylaws, TCP Community Partnerships Program Consider establishing or working with an existing advocacy group such as Bike Palo Alto to reach out to local businesses or groups to help support and promote walking and 2012 Plan 2012 Plan (5.4.3-a, Bike and Pedestrian Count Program transportation studies include bicyclist and pedestrian volumes. Utilize the counts collected in 2024 to establish a baseline for select locations. Enhance bicycle count efforts and collect more data to guide decisions by installing permanent automatic counters along key bikeways in representative locations. Using bike counters with displays along popular 2012 Plan; Community Input 2012 Plan (5.4.5-a, modified) Performance Reporting Program Collect data and conduct analysis as part of periodic status reports detailing the City's performance in relation to metrics recommended in this plan.2012 Plan 2012 Plan (5.4.5-a, Community-Led and Cooperative: Fostering community engagement and participation in promoting active transportation, supported by education, programming, and infrastructure investments, in a way that cultivates learning for all network users of all ages . Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan Update Community Feedback Program Expand survey efforts such as the Palo Alto Community Survey and the Performance Reports and National Citizen surveys to collect information related to walking and bicycling facility quality, Plan implementation, and programs.2012 Plan 2012 Plan (5.4.5-b, modified) Item 5 Attachment C - Policy and Programs Recommendations Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 15 Packet Pg. 45 of 262 Policy and Programs Objective Program/Policy/Practice Name Description Reason for Inclusion 2012 Plan Institutionalize Safety Commit to reducing traffic fatalities and serious injuries on the City's roadways. Institutionalize safety into all aspects of policies, planning, program, design, implementation, and Scope; Safety Speed Management Program Implement proactive speed management program following the FHWA Safe System Speed Management Framework to guide location specific interventions in all focus areas. Lower speed limits and design speeds on streets wtihin the bike network and without protected bikeways to 25 mph or lower.Safety Action Plan Systemic Uncontrolled Crosswalk Placement/Enhancement Program Guide for Improving Pedestrian Safety at Uncontrolled Locations. Proactively design proposed crossings to provide bicyclists and pedestrians with context-appropriate facilities such as marked crossings, bike boxes, bike signal heads, bike detection, and leading bicycle intervals (LBIs)/leading pedestrian intervals (LPIs), audible and/or countdown signals, Safety Action Plan; Comprehensive Plan; Scope Update Traffic Calming Program Systemically identify speed management needs and opportunities (such as speed humps and neighborhood traffic circle) and priorize into a yearly implementation program based on kinetic energy risk, equity, proximity to schools, community input, and similar factors. Most funds should be programmed proactively, but some can be reserved for quick response discretionary purposes. Implement speed management strategies to slow vehicles to a contextually appropriate target speed: AB 43, countermeasure toolbox, FHWA Safe System Approach for Speed Management. It is recommended that that the Traffic Control Maintainer II position in Public Works (eliminated during the pandemic) be restored, so City staff can respond more quickly to add, maintain, or repair roadway safety infrastructure such as delineators, bollards, signage, guardrails, crash attenuators, faded striping and curb paints, and other features. Safety Action Plan; Comprehensive Plan Near-Miss Reporting Program Utilize SafeTREC Street Story mapping portal to allow residents to provide information on near-misses and other safety information that would otherwise not be included in regularly-reported safety reports and statistics. 2012 Plan; literature review 2012 Plan (5.4.2-c, modified) Maintenance Request Program Utilize the City's 311 portal for residents to report active transportation infrastructure maintenance needs and related issues by expanding reporting categories for issues that may be faced such as faded or damaged bike lane striping, damaged bike parking, physical sidwalk blockages, or spills and other slip risks on sidewalks.BFC benchmarking The City's Office of Transportation Traffic Engineering Team Add or reallocate staff to administer quick build or traffic safety programs, including coordination, evaluation, planning, and engineering. Prioritize Maintenance of Bicycle and Incorporate and prioritize bicycle and pedestrian facility maintenance needs into the City's transportation maintance program standards and funding.Community Input Prioritize Bikeways in the Repaving Program Prioritize repaving of existing bikeways as part of the repaving program.Community Input Incorporate Pedestrian Improvements Into Repaving Program Change approach to repaving program to include pedestrian improvements including sidewalk widening and curb extensions. This would require additional funding and a change in City processes for completing road and sidewalk repairs or installations. Safety Action Plan; Safe Streets Staff Working Group Safe and Inclusive: Prioritizing safety for all transportation network users regardless of age and ability, and ensuring equitable access to pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure across the community while crashes . Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan Update Item 5 Attachment C - Policy and Programs Recommendations Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 16 Packet Pg. 46 of 262 Policy and Programs Objective Program/Policy/Practice Name Description Reason for Inclusion 2012 Plan Better Bikeways Incorporate best design practices and guidance, such as those outlined in the National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) Urban Bikeway Design Guide, when designing and implementing walking, biking, and rolling facilities to create a network that meets the needs of users of all ages and abilities; this includes guidance on recommended facility widths and low-stress intersection treatments. Design and implement safer roads to facilitate travel by vulnerable users through appropriate walking and biking facilities in the context of adjacent vehicle facilities, speeds, and volumes, including sufficient width and horizontal separation. Implement strategies to provide better bike crossings of major streets, such as daylighting, dedicated signals and phasing, pavement markings, and protected intersections. BFC benchmarking; scope Signal Modification Program Incorporate the crossing needs of bicyclists and pedestrians and encourage safe driver behavior when reviewing and adjusting signal timing at City traffic signals. Consider adding "Bicycle Detected" signal heads to recommended bike routes intersecting with arterials. Received via City/SRTS email; Scope Bicycle Detection Pilot Project Implement innovative "blue light" (or other) bicycle detection indicators and signs at complex bicycle crossings. Safe Routes to Work, Shopping, Downtown, Community Services, and Parks Where safe routes overlap with HIN, prioritize speed management and pedestrian/bicycle enhancements, especially at intersections: FHWA Guide for Improving Pedestrian Safety at Uncontrolled Crossing Locations, FHWA Improving Intersections for Pedestrians and Bicyclists, DIB 94, FHWA Safe System Approach for Speed Management. Establish non-HIN routes as primary access routes where possible and prioritize improvements on access routes with speeds over 25 mph: AB 43, countermeasure toolbox, DIB 94 Safety Action Plan; Comprehensive Plan Suggested Walk and Roll Maps Review & Update Regularly review the city's safe routes to school to proactively determine if traffic controls or other engineering modifications may be needed to improve student safety while walking, biking, and rolling to school. Update CIP Funding to Prioritize Bicycle and Pedestrian Access and Route Prioritize implementation of BPTP projects as part of the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Prioritize paving bike routes, streets on HIN, equity considerations: BPTP, HIN, East Palo Alto Walk and Roll Routes, Palo Alto Population Below Poverty, Palo Alto Transit Corridors. Ensure funding is allocated beyond signing/striping so intersections are also addressed through these projects: FHWA Guide for Improving Pedestrian Safety at Uncontrolled Crossing Locations, FHWA Improving Intersections for Pedestrians and Bicyclists. CIP Projects will align with Safe System Approach: FHWA Safe System Roadway Design Hierarchy, CIP Implementation Guidance Safety Action Plan; Comprehensive Plan Identify Funding Opportunities Continue to monitor federal, state, and regional funding opportunities to augment local funds to implement recommended walking, biking, and rolling improvements. Establish Dedicated Funding Source Establish dedicated funding for citywide walking and bicycling facilities and supporting infrastructure such as bike parking in the City's CIP. 2012 Plan 2012 Plan (5.4.1-b, modified) Quick-Build Program Implement quick-build pilot/trial projects of the Plan's walking and bicycling infrastructure recommendations. 2012 Plan 2012 Plan (5.4.1-d, modified) First/Last mile connection to Caltrain stations Implement bikeways with connections to Caltrain stations to promote access Existing Trail Access Improvements project Enhance on-street intersections along the existing trail network and key existing bridge/overpass approaches to improve ADA access, bikeway connectivity, and convenience for all users. Priority upgrades include: modifying or replacing substandard safety corrals with bollards and associated striping/signage; installing accessible curb ramps and regrading poor transitions; pedestrian-scaled lighting; installing high visibility crosswalks at key locations; and landscaping maintenance/removal. Construction Traffic Management Plan Create a Construction Traffic Management Plan to manage traffic and circulation while projects are under development. Reviewers will ensure that, to the extent possible, pedestrian and bicycle facilities are maintained during construction. Where this is not feasible, safe and alternative facilities should be temporarily implemented. These facilities will prioritize separation and follow the most direct path for pedestrians and bicyclists, and sight distance should be evaluated to improve visibility. Clear signage is important to communicate new traffic patterns to pedestrians, bicyclists, and drivers Safety Action Plan; Comprehensive Plan 2012 Plan (5.4.1-e, modified) Walk and Roll for Private Schools Encourage private schools to develop Walk and Roll Maps as part of Transportation Demand Management strategies to reduce vehicle trips. Evaluate locations near schools for potential quickbuild improvements. Consider partnering with Private Schools to develop Walk and Roll maps based on low stress streets. Safety Action Plan; Comprehensive Plan Connected and Accessible: Featuring a convenient and interconnected network of sidewalks, bike lanes, and trails that provide efficient travel options and easy access to transit and important destinations, encouraging a shift away from driving and improving environmental health through lower vehicle miles traveled and reduced greenhouse gas emissions . Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan Update Item 5 Attachment C - Policy and Programs Recommendations Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 17 Packet Pg. 47 of 262 Policy and Programs Objective Program/Policy/Practice Name Description Reason for Inclusion 2012 Plan Decriminalize Walking, Biking, and Rolling Review the City's municipal code and ordinances to remove language that can discourage walking, biking, and rolling (such requirements to cross at crosswalks and at a right angle, to report secondhand bike purchases to the police department, and for skateboarders to wear reflective devices while riding between sunset and sunrise). BFC benchmarking; code review Deprioritize Enforcement of Walking and Biking Infractions Work with Palo Alto Police Department to deprioritize enforcement of walking and bicycling infractions. BFC benchmarking; code review Regional Network Continue to consult with other agencies on bicycle and pedestrian improvement projects that abut or intersect jurisdictional boundaries to ensure consistency in facilities, including Cities (East Palo Alto, Menlo Park, Los Altos, and Mountain View), Counties (Santa Clara and San Mateo), Caltrans, and Caltrain. Partner with VTA and adjacent jurisdictions to develop a regional bicycle superhighway system. BFC benchmarking; MTC PBA 2050; VTA PABAC Membership Work with the Palo Alto Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee (PABAC) to discuss membership and the potential to include members and/or liaisons from local non-profit organizations, advocacy groups, transportation management associations, City committees, and other groups. Scope; Community Input E-Bike Ordinance Update the City's e-bike ordinance to govern the use of e-bikes in public right-of-way. Develop an e-bike ordinance that embraces e-bikes and e-scooters as emerging mobility options while establishing speed limits. Determine the level of e-bikes allowed in bike facilities. Reference available means-based e-bike subsidies. Pair ordinance with bicycle traffic calming on major bike corridors. Consider partnering with SVBC and SRTS to provide education on e-bike use: DIB 94, NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide, FHWA Safe System Roadway Design Hierarchy, FHWA Primer on Safe System Approach for Pedestrians and Bicyclists. Safety Action Plan; community input E-Bike Enforcement Strategy Work with Palo Alto Police Department to develop strategies to encourage the safe use of e-bikes on public roads. Discouraging Driver Speeding Work with Palo Alto Police Department and other partners when implementing and publicizing engineering, education, and enforcement efforts discouraging vehicle speeding near schools and high-injury locations.Scope Safe System Ordinance Develop and adopt a Palo Alto Vision Zero Ordinance to guide the City in its pursuit of zero fatalities and severe injuries on its roads, outlining its commitment to work with the community, local agencies, and other partners to achieve this goal.Scope Caltrans Coordination Work with Caltrans to streamline permitting and integrate connected bikeways into Caltrans projects. Improve bikeway design approaching and crossing Caltrans facilities. Community Input Implementation Updates Work with other jurisdictions and agencies to ensure that new or upgraded facilities are reflected in each agencies' respective bikeway maps and applications. 2012 Plan 2012 Plan (5.4.2-d, modified) Integrated and Collaborative: Collaborating with neighboring cities to create a seamless, integrated, and efficient regional network of pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure. Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan Update Item 5 Attachment C - Policy and Programs Recommendations Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 18 Packet Pg. 48 of 262 Palo Alto Parks & Recreation Commission February 25, 2025 Meeting Attachment D: Supplemental Materials • Recommended Performance Measures • Draft Network Corridor Criteria and Development Approach Memo • Draft Bicycle Network and Facilities Memo • Bicycle Network Change singe 2012 Map • Project List • Projects by Facility Types Maps • Draft Prioritization Framework • Community Engagement Summary—Phase 2 Needs and Concerns (Draft) • Pedestrian District Guidelines • Pedestrian Improvements Toolbox • Bicycle Facility Types Visual Item 5 Attachment D - Supplemental Materials Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 19 Packet Pg. 49 of 262 6 7 3 7 Parks and Recreation Commission Staff Report From: Community Services Department Lead: Utilities Department Meeting Date: March 25, 2025 Report #: 2503-4329 TITLE Informational Update on Arastradero Creek Permanent Restoration Project and Utility Line Repair RECOMMENDATION Receive and discuss the informational update on Arastradero Creek Permanent Restoration Project and utility line repair BACKGROUND In March 2023, a community member informed the City of Palo Alto Utilities (CPAU) Department about an exposed 8-inch steel natural gas pipeline in Arastradero Creek within the Pearson-Arastradero Preserve. The pipeline was previously inspected in May 2022, and no damage was reported at that time. However, a storm event in early 2023 caused significant erosion in Arastradero Creek, exposing the 8-inch high-pressure gas pipeline and threatened to expose a 18-inch potable water and 8-inch wastewater collection pipelines servicing the foothills. A Safety Related Condition Report was sent to the California Public Utilities Commission, as required by Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations Part 191.23, on March 31, 2023. The city contacted WRA, Inc. to assist with obtaining emergency permits and performing a creek design to temporarily stabilize the creek and protect the water, gas, and wastewater utility pipelines through the 2024 winter season. WRA, Inc. was issued an emergency contract due to extensive creek stabilization requirements required by the permitting agencies, which include the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (SFBRWQCB), California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), and United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The emergency contract, as defined in Palo Alto Municipal Code (PAMC) Section 2.30.160, was authorized by the City Manager, and later presented to City Council September 23, 20231, for 1 City Council, October 23, 2023; Item#: 7; SR#: 2309-2086 https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=82578&dbid=0&repo=PaloAlto Item 6 Item 3 Staff Report Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 1 Packet Pg. 50 of 262 6 7 3 7 additional design, biological monitoring, and creek restoration work. A Regional General Permit No. 5 was issued by the USACE to place fill material, including soil, cobbles, and boulder revetments, within Waters of the United States, for necessary repairs and protection measures. The fill provided temporary protection for the exposed gas pipeline and prevented additional erosion of the creek to protect the 18-inch potable water pipeline and 8-inch sewer collection pipeline upstream. Temporary restoration work started in September 2023 and was completed in November 2023. As part of the emergency permit, the city received a Notice of Applicability (NOA) from the SFBRWQCB, which listed regulatory requirements for the city to comply with. One of those requirements are for the city to remove the temporary stabilization fill and permanently stabilize the creek to provide long-term protection to the pipelines or relocate the pipelines. As part of the NOA, a civil liability of $5,000 per day could be imposed upon the City for failure to comply with these requirements. A preliminary project schedule was approved by SFBRWQCB to complete the permanent creek stabilization project or relocate the pipelines by October 2026. ANALYSIS •Option 1: Modifying Arastradero Lake; •Option 2: Lowering utility pipelines below the predicted equilibrium slope of the head cut; •Option 3 Implementing a larger stabilization design with multiple grade control features provided by the SFBRWQCB. Item 6 Item 3 Staff Report Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 2 Packet Pg. 51 of 262 6 7 3 7 In short, the City has developed the following five tasks for the Consultant to perform. o Task 1 – Assessing the creek’s condition, identifies causes of instability, and evaluating ecological importance. o Task 2 – Drafting project documents, coordinating with the City and permitting agencies, and ensuring the final design meets requirements. o Task 3 – Obtaining permits, preparing applications, and ensuring compliance. o Task 4 – Developing a plan to restore native plants, stabilize soil, and enhance habitat. o Task 5 – Supporting staff’s construction management, conducts biological monitoring, and completes necessary reporting, including two years of post- construction monitoring. After completion of Task 1 and staff proposes a preferred option, the Consultant will develop and submit the design and environmental permitting documents for proposed option to the appropriate regulatory permitting agencies for review and comment. The environmental determination and final design proposed by WRA must receive approval from City Staff, City Council, and/or regulatory agencies, as appropriate. WRA Inc. will complete Task 1 while staff is evaluating Option 2 – lowering the utility pipelines. If staff determines Option 2 to be the City’s preferred option, WRA Inc. would assist staff with design support, permitting, construction services support, revegetation plant plan, and post construction monitoring for the utility relocation work. Relocating the pipelines would result in a smaller creek restoration project. If Option 2 is the preferred option, staff anticipates that the full budget of this contract will not be needed to complete Tasks 2-5. FISCAL/RESOURCE IMPACT There is sufficient budget in FY 2025 in capital improvement project (GS-25001) Gas Line Repair at Arastradero Creek to fund this work Additional funds for the construction phase will be added in FY2026 budget cycle. The Water Fund and Wastewater Fund may contribute to the project and the allocation will be determined after the evaluation and design is complete. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Map Attachment B: Presentation Item 6 Item 3 Staff Report Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 3 Packet Pg. 52 of 262 Corte_ Madera _Booster 1691 1521 ARASTR A D E R O R O AD 85.4' 264.9' 112.8' 245.2' 348.1' 286.2' 85.4' 326.5' 127.3' 245.2' 417.7' 286.2' 866.7' 1296.1' .4' 153.6' 578.0' .7'.3' 381.3'381.3' .3' .7'.2' 652.5' 516.4' 1296.1' 866.7' 578.0' 153.6' .4' 516.4' 652.5' .2' 3" ABS GAS 3" ABS GAS 2" ABS GAS (ABAND.) 2" ABS GAS (ABAND.) 2" ABS GAS (ABAND.) 10" ACP WATER ABM#429C Nov-1962 16" ACP WATER ABM#663 Feb-1969 16" ACP WATER ABM#429C Nov-1962 16" ACP WATER ABM#429C Nov-1962 10" 6" 10" 12" 6" 18" CCP WATER ABM# 404 SEP-1960 18" CCP WATER ABM# 404 SEP-1960 18" CCP WATER ABM# 404 SEP-1960 18" CCP WATER ABM# 404 SEP-1960 18" CCP WATER ABM# 404 SEP-1960 50' CONCRETE ENCASED 7501 4" PE GAS ABM# 1287 Oct-2013 4" PE GAS ABM# 1287 Oct-2013 4" PE GAS ABM# 1287 Oct-2013 4" PE GAS ABM#1237 Jun-2005 8" BWP GAS 8" BWP GAS 3" TEE & VALVE 8" BWP GAS 6" PE GAS ABM#1287 Oct-2013 10" VCP SAN SEWER ABM# 404 NOV-1961 10" VCP SAN SEWER ABM# 404 NOV-1961 10" VCP SAN SEWER ABM# 404 NOV-1961 10" VCP SAN SEWER ABM# 404 NOV-1961 10" VCP SAN SEWER 10" VCP SAN SEWER ABM# 404 NOV-1961 10" VCP SAN SEWER ABM# 404 NOV-1961 10" VCP SAN SEWER ABM# 404 NOV-1961 10" VCP SAN SEWER ABM# 404 NOV-1961 10" VCP SAN SEWER ABM# 404 NOV-1961 S85-6-3 S 85-6-2 S85-6-1 S85-5-4 S 85-5-5 S 85-5-3 S83-6-3 S85-5-2 S85-5-1 S83-6-2 Item 6 Attachment A - Map Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 4 Packet Pg. 53 of 262 ARASTRADERO CREEK REHABILITATION PROJECT PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATION March 25, 2025 www.cityofpaloalto.org Item 6 Attachment B - Presentation Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 5 Packet Pg. 54 of 262 1 AGENDA •Exposed Natural Gas Pipeline •Temporary Repair of Arastradero Creek •Arastradero Creek Permanent Repair - Design •Arastradero Creek Permanent Repair - Construction •Arastradero Creek Post Construction Monitoring Item 6 Attachment B - Presentation Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 6 Packet Pg. 55 of 262 2 EXPOSED NATURAL GAS PIPELINE March 28, 2023 •Utilities notified of exposed natural gas pipeline in Arastradero Preserve •1200’ upstream of Arastradero Lake •Adjacent utilities – 18”CCP (Potable Water) & 10”VCP (Sanitary Sewer) •Safety Related Condition Report filed with the Pipeline Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) •Onboard a consultant to design a permanent repair to cover the pipeline Item 6 Attachment B - Presentation Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 7 Packet Pg. 56 of 262 3 EXPOSED NATURAL GAS PIPELINE •9/1/2023 - Design was submitted to permitting agencies (USACE, DFW, Water Board) for a Regional General Permit No. 5 •9/22/2023 – RGP No. 5 was issued by USACE for placement of temporary fill to protect existing gas pipeline from future damage and protect the water and wastewater pipelines from being exposed Item 6 Attachment B - Presentation Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 8 Packet Pg. 57 of 262 4 TEMPORARY REPAIR OF ARASTRADERO CREEK •10/15/2023 – Utility crews completed the installation of fill, cobble, and rip- rap to stabilize the channel and protect the pipeline in upcoming winter storms •11/15/2023- Erosion mitigation measures were installed and surrounding area was reseeded •1/5/2024 – Filed notice of completion with Water Board on Conditions of Authorization 4 & 5 of the RGP5 permit •Monitoring of interim stabilization project is required Item 6 Attachment B - Presentation Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 9 Packet Pg. 58 of 262 5 ARASTRADERO CREEK PERMANENT REPAIR DESIGN •12/19/2024 – Issued NTP to design Consultant (WRA) •3/2025 – Data gathering and coordination meetings completed •*5/2025 – Alternatives Evaluation (Utility Relocation or Full Creek Restoration) •5/2026 – Permitting & CEQA completed Item 6 Attachment B - Presentation Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 10 Packet Pg. 59 of 262 6 ARASTRADERO CREEK PERMANENT REPAIR CONSTRUCTION •3/2026 through 9/2026 – Pre- construction documents for bid •10/2026 through 1/2027* – Construction •Earthwork •Rock Placement •Log Structures •Erosion Control •Revegetation •Consultant will provide construction field management support to City •Develop as-built record drawings Item 6 Attachment B - Presentation Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 11 Packet Pg. 60 of 262 7 ARASTRADERO CREEK POST CONSTRUCTION MONITORING •1/2027* through 1/2029* – Consultant will provide biological compliance and post- construction monitoring and reporting required by permitting agencies •Geomorphologist/Engineer – Review channel stability annually and >20-year rainfall events •Ecologist – Review vegetation success criteria and weed management •Annual reports will be prepared and submitted to permitting agencies Item 6 Attachment B - Presentation Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 12 Packet Pg. 61 of 262 7 QUESTIONS?? Item 6 Attachment B - Presentation Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 13 Packet Pg. 62 of 262 From:Aram James To:Veenker, Vicki Cc:Reckdahl, Keith; Ed Lauing; Gennady Sheyner; Dave Price; EPA Today; Diana Diamond; Josh Becker; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; bos@smcgov.org; Jay Boyarsky; Jeff Rosen; Jeff Conrad; Jeff Hayden; Rodriguez, Miguel; Damon Silver; Yolanda Conaway; dennis burns; Reifschneider, James; Binder, Andrew; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; Dennis Upton; Don Austin; Dennis Upton; Human Relations Commission; planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.0rg; ParkRec Commission; Steve Wagstaffe; Bill Newell; Lotus Fong; Gardener, Liz; Liz Kniss; Tim James; Cait James; Marina Lopez; Doug Minkler; Baker, Rob; Zelkha, Mila; Friends of Cubberley; Shikada, Ed; editor@almanacnews.com; Nicole Chiu-Wang; Donna Wallach; h.etzko@gmail.com; Kaloma Smith; Perron, Zachary; Gerry Gras; Anna Griffin; Sean Allen; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; Burt, Patrick; Palo Alto Free Press; Patrice Ventresca; Pat M; yolanda; sharon jackson; Supervisor Susan Ellenberg; Supervisor Otto Lee; BoardOperations; board@valleywater.org; Templeton, Cari; Cribbs, Anne; Angel, David; Enberg, Nicholas; Barberini, Christopher; chuck jagoda; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Wagner, April; Afanasiev, Alex; cromero@cityofepa.org; Lee, Craig; rabrica@cityofepa.org; Vara Ramakrishnan; Rose Lynn; Emily Mibach; Daniel Kottke; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; Foley, Michael; Figueroa, Eric; Jensen, Eric Subject:The Last Time Pro-Palestinian Activists Faced Deportation Mahmoud Khalil’s case is eerily similar to that of the L.A. Eight, in which a group of students were targeted, not because of any criminal activity but because of their speech. By David Cole Mar... Date:Tuesday, March 18, 2025 2:16:20 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. The Last Time Pro-PalestinianActivists Faced Deportation Mahmoud Khalil’s case is eerily similar to that of the L.A. Eight, in which a group of students were targeted, not because of any criminal activity but because of their speech. By David ColeMarch 18, 2025 https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-lede/mahmoud-khalil-and-the-last-time-pro-palestinian- activists-faced-deportation Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 1 Packet Pg. 63 of 262 From:Aram James To:Veenker, Vicki Cc:Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; Ed Lauing; h.etzko@gmail.com; Josh Becker; board@pausd.org; Don Austin; Yolanda Conaway; Sean Allen; Bains, Paul; Pat M; Dave Price; Gennady Sheyner; Diana Diamond; EPA Today; Emily Mibach; Zelkha, Mila; Binder, Andrew; Reifschneider, James; Barberini, Christopher; Nicole Chiu-Wang; sharon jackson; Doug Minkler; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.0rg; ParkRec Commission; Kaloma Smith; Cait James; Tim James; Marina Lopez; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan; marsha childs; Anna Griffin; Gardener, Liz; Liz Kniss; Council, City; Salem Ajluni; Jeff Hayden; Jeff Rosen; Jeff Conrad; Jay Boyarsky; Baker, Rob; Angel, David; dennis burns; Rodriguez, Miguel; Damon Silver; Perron, Zachary; Burt, Patrick; Mickie Winkler; John Burt; Lori Meyers; Sheree Roth; Roberta Ahlquist; Rose Lynn; Supervisor Susan Ellenberg; board@valleywater.org; BoardOperations; Friends of Cubberley; Freddie.Quintana@sen.ca.gov; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; Roberta Roth; Robert.Jonson@shf.sccgov.org; Bill Newell; Cecilia Taylor; GRP-City Council; DuJuan Green; Gerry Gras; Dennis Upton; Enberg, Nicholas; chuck jagoda; Rowena Chiu; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Lotus Fong; Palo Alto Free Press; Patrice Ventresca Subject:What Ceasefire? Trump Helps Netanyahu Kill Over 400 Palestinians in Gaza The Trump administration backs war against Palestine abroad and repression against supporters of Palestine at home. SPENCER ACKERMAN MAR 18, 2025 ∙ PAID Date:Tuesday, March 18, 2025 12:36:23 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. What Ceasefire? Trump Helps Netanyahu Kill Over 400 Palestinians in Gaza The Trump administration backs war against Palestine abroad and repression against supporters of Palestine at home. SPENCER ACKERMAN MAR 18, 2025 ∙ PAID https://zeteo.com/p/what-ceasefire-trump-helps-netanyahu? publication_id=2325511&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=email- share&triggerShare=true&r=fjmzt Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 2 Packet Pg. 64 of 262 From:Light As Air Boats To:ParkRec Commission The Highest Quality Inflatable Canoes! Date:Tuesday, March 18, 2025 9:30:31 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of openingattachments and clicking on links. i SHOP NOW Hi there, Your guests are waiting! Check out these inflatable canoes. Made in the Czech Republic.♂ This message needs your attention You've never replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 3 Packet Pg. 65 of 262 Use PROMO CODE [CANUCANOE] to get $100 OFF your new Gumotex boat! Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 4 Packet Pg. 66 of 262 Use PROMO CODE [CANUCANOE] to get $100 OFF your new Gumotex boat! Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 5 Packet Pg. 67 of 262 Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 6 Packet Pg. 68 of 262 Use PROMO CODE [CANUCANOE] to get $100 OFF your new Gumotex boat! EXPLORE GUMOTEX CANOES & KAYAKS HERE! For Quantity Discounts or Questions, Call Andi. "Tel:706.619.6670" andi@lightasairboats.com Yours in Wind, Water, and Waves, - The Light As Air Boats Team Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 7 Packet Pg. 69 of 262 Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 8 Packet Pg. 70 of 262 We don’t want to spam you. If you're no longer interested in enjoying adventures out on the water Unsubscribe here. Light As Air Boats 13801 Walsingham Rd. Suite A-116 Largo, Florida 33774 Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 9 Packet Pg. 71 of 262 From:Motorola Solutions To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Get help securing grants for a safer tomorrow Date:Tuesday, March 18, 2025 8:11:36 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious ofopening attachments and clicking on links. --> Motorola Solutions Grants HubView Online Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 10 Packet Pg. 72 of 262 Access free grant resources and assistance programs Grants Hub When it comes to grants, don’t let limited time or resources prevent you from securing funding. Whether you’re looking for radios, body cameras, LPR, or software, we have programs available to help you find and apply for grants to help fund essential safety and security technology. Visit our Grants Hub to learn more about our grant assistance programs, plus download free tools and resources. Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 11 Packet Pg. 73 of 262 Visit Grants Hub Solving for safer > | Manage preferences | Unsubscribe | Privacy policy | Terms of use | Privacy inbox © 2025 Motorola Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. 500 W. Monroe, Chicago, IL USA 60661 Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 12 Packet Pg. 74 of 262 From:Nancy Kawakita To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Eleanor Pardee Park restroom urgent funding for the May Finance CIP review Date:Tuesday, March 18, 2025 8:00:42 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. To: Parks and Recreation Commissioners and City Parks liaisons, Thank you for installing restrooms at NINE Palo Alto Parks/fields. Thank you for completing the City survey for the Eleanor Pardee Park restroom in mid- February. We look forward to hearing the survey results on March 25, the proposed restroom location within the park, and immediate next steps. We request the "outreach" process be on track to confirm that Eleanor Pardee Park is named as the FY2026-27 restroom funded in the Park Restroom Installation (PG-19000) 2026-27 CIP. We request that Pardee Park secure this funding and be approved by the Finance committee in May 2025 and City Council in June 2025. Hopefully, you do not need to have the City Council step in to fund Pardee Park's restroom again, in order to support public health and the public good. In June 2024 City Council agreed Pardee Park's restroom was prioritized with urgency. Like the City did for Cuberley's restroom process in 2023, you could offer a follow-on online survey to ask for feedback on a reasonable location of the Pardee restroom (away from the fence line shared by residents) in April. Then you could review the results in the April Parks Commission meeting for final approval to add Pardee to the May CIP review in the City Council Finance Committee meeting. Or ideally to streamline the process, since there is a 9 month wait time for a pre-fab restroom, you could order it now in 2025 based on the survey results and install it in 2026. We strongly urge you to listen to ALL the Eleanor Pardee Park users regardless of where they live as we are talking about a PUBLIC park. There are over 90 community garden plots that the City offers to ALL Palo Alto residents, fields used by AYSO youth ages 5-10 years old and other athletic groups, 2 children's playgrounds, summer youth camps and dog walkers, runners and a tai-chi class. At the Community Garden, there is a UC Extension Waterwise and Edible Demonstration Garden that offers adult classes with volunteers who spend 2000 hours per year with 400+ class attendees and visitors from Santa Clara County per year. Where do all these park users go when nature calls as normal human beings? There is ugly evidence in the Park's tanbark and shrubs! Not having a restroom in a popular large park is a public health issue and this is why it is an urgent need. A restroom cannot be canceled because of some residents' fears. There are NINE Palo Alto Parks/fields with restrooms. No Palo Alto Park restroom has been removed due to issues raised by restroom dissenters. Thank you for keeping the Pardee restroom on track for funding this year. Nancy Kawakita Crescent Park resident and part of the Eleanor Pardee Park community garden Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 13 Packet Pg. 75 of 262 Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 14 Packet Pg. 76 of 262 From:Francisco Valenzuela To:Francisco Valenzuela Subject:Register & Please Share - "Legislative Advocacy 101: Understanding Public Policy and How to Interact with Legislators" on April 3rd Date:Monday, March 17, 2025 11:39:54 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. I will be presenting my "Legislative Advocacy 101: Understanding Public Policy and How to Interact with Legislators" on Wednesday, April 3rd during TASH’s 2025 Webinar Series. I am inviting advocates of all platforms, disability advocates, families, service providers, non-profit organizations, stakeholders, individuals with disabilities, and others to be part of my Webinar on April 3rd. My presentation will apply to any group or issue because Legislative Advocacy applies the same way when meeting with an elected official. I will share some key points on “How to Build Relationships with Elected Officials and their Staff”, “Managing a Legislative Meeting”, the Do’s and Don’ts when Meeting with Elected Officials, and How to Maximize your time in a meeting. These along with other Key Points will be shared during the webinar. The presentation will also include a few testimonies from individuals who have participated in meetings with elected officials. These are some trying times impacting our local communities and country where interaction with legislators is key to understanding their point of views and the concerns of their constituents. Understanding legislators’ views on issues while asking for their support on key policy matters can have a positive impact if those meetings have positive outcomes. For additional information about my TASH Webinar Presentation, Go Here: TASH 2025 Webinar Series - Tash.org Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 15 Packet Pg. 77 of 262 TASH's 2025 Webinar Series TASH's 2025 Webinar Series gets underway in three short weeks. We will be starting off with Francisco Valenzuela's timely presentation, "Legislative Advocacy 101: Understanding Public Policy and How to Interact with Legislators" on April 3rd, then moving on to the complex and critical issue of "Supporting Students with Aggressive Behaviors" with Kayla Coburn one week later. Weekly episodes through June will address AI, ridesharing technology, IEPs, teacher preparedness and more. Check out the full schedule of sessions and presenters, and instructions for participation, at the 2025 TASH Webinar Series main page. Schedule of Presentations Legislative Advocacy 101: Understanding Public Policy and How to Interact with Legislators Francisco Valenzuela 2025 TASH Webinar Series main page. Learn More and Register TASH advances equity, opportunity and inclusion for people with disabilities, with a focus on those with the most significant support needs, in the areas of education, employment and Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 16 Packet Pg. 78 of 262 community living through advocacy, research and practice. More information about TASH can be found at www.tash.org. TASH 1201 15th Street NW, Suite 400, Washington, D.C. 20005 | (202) 808-8148 | info@tash.org Copyright © 2025 TASH, All rights reserved. You are receiving this e-mail because you are or were a TASH member, attended a TASH event, or signed up to receive TASH newsletters. Want to change how you receive these emails? Unsubscribe from this List Donate to TASH | Become a Member View this E-Mail in Your Browser Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 17 Packet Pg. 79 of 262 From:Jake Thompson To:ParkRec Commission Subject:follow up Date:Monday, March 17, 2025 5:32:32 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious ofopening attachments and clicking on links. Hi Friend, Just a quick reminder—CPRS kicks off tomorrow! Be sure to stop by Booth #403 to check out our line marking robot, grab some cool merch, and learn about our new pricing model. Join the 4,000+ organizations already saving time and labor costs with Turf Tank, including: Sacramento County Parks and Recreation Oxnard Parks and Recreation Templeton Parks and Recreation Jurupa Area Recreation Park District La Puente Parks and Recreation Looking forward to seeing you there! JAKE THOMPSON Sales Development Representative m:+1 402-499-2416 e:Jake.Thompson@turftank.com w:www.turftank.com a:North America Turf Tank, 1110 Allgood Industrial Ct, Marietta, Georgia 30062, United States, 877-396-4094 Unsubscribe Manage preferences Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 18 Packet Pg. 80 of 262 Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 19 Packet Pg. 81 of 262 From:Aram James To:Veenker, Vicki Cc:h.etzko@gmail.com; Council, City; Reckdahl, Keith; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; Ed Lauing; Kaloma Smith; Supervisor Susan Ellenberg; Lori Meyers; Sheree Roth; Josh Becker; board@pausd.org; Jay Boyarsky; Jeff Conrad; Jeff Rosen; Jeff Hayden; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Foley, Michael; Barberini, Christopher; Nicole Chiu-Wang; Enberg, Nicholas; Binder, Andrew; Lee, Craig; cromero@cityofepa.org; Anna Griffin; Angel, David; Cribbs, Anne; Cait James; planning.commision@cityofpaloalto.org; ParkRec Commission; Dave Price; Emily Mibach; Braden Cartwright; Bill Newell; Salem Ajluni; Sean Allen; Jack Ajluni; Yolanda Conaway; Don Austin; board@valleywater.org; BoardOperations; boardfeedback@smcgov.org; GRP-City Council; Gerry Gras; Lotus Fong; Palo Alto Free Press; Diana Diamond; EPA Today; Cecilia Taylor; Templeton, Cari Subject:I Am a Jewish Student at Columbia. Mahmoud Khalil Is One of the Most Upstanding People I Have Ever Met Date:Sunday, March 16, 2025 3:06:57 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more I Am a Jewish Student at Columbia.Mahmoud Khalil Is One of the Most Upstanding People I Have Ever Met We cannot allow fascists to use the pretext of Jewish safety to attack our communities. JONATHAN BEN-MENACHEM MAR 16 ∙PREVIEW ∙GUEST POST READ IN APP Protesters rally in Foley Square in Lower Manhattan on March 10, 2025, to demand the release of Mahmoud Khalil. Photo by Michael Nigro/Pacific Press/LightRocket via Getty Images Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 20 Packet Pg. 82 of 262 As a Jewish student at Columbia University, I was disgusted by the White House’s cynical, smirking claim that it is acting in the interests of Jewish safety in detaining my Palestinian comrade, Mahmoud Khalil, last weekend. To announce Mahmoud’s abduction, the White House pushed social media posts reading “SHALOM, MAHMOUD.” The Christian fascists are gleefully, wickedly invoking the Hebrew goodbye as they terrorize us. Upgrade to paid Mahmoud is one of the most upstanding people I have ever met. Alongside other Jewish student activists, I only ever felt Mahmoud’s respect, solidarity, and strength. As Mahmoud told CNN last spring, “I believe that the liberation of the Palestinian people and the Jewish people are intertwined and go hand-by-hand, and you cannot achieve one without the other.” Anyone who has met Mahmoud knows that the White House’s smear campaign is just a shallow pretext to unleash state violence against student activists and further divide already traumatized communities. Who Will Be Left to Fight With Us?... Subscribe to Zeteo to unlock the rest. Become a paying subscriber of Zeteo to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content. Upgrade to paid A subscription gets you: Support Mehdi’s brand of accountability journalism Unlimited access to all exclusive content (shows, podcasts, newsletters) Live Q&As with Mehdi + more! Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 21 Packet Pg. 83 of 262 LIKE COMMENT RESTACK © 2025 Zeteo1640 Boro Place 4th floor, McLean, VA 22102 Unsubscribe Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 22 Packet Pg. 84 of 262 From:Rimi Smith To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Cityofpaloalto Date:Friday, March 14, 2025 6:58:06 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Hi Cityofpaloalto, I'm following up if you're interested to get the Distribution / Members List * Almond Board of California 2025 ( California, USA ) * 1,000+ Contacts I’m waiting for your response so i can let you know the cost & more details. Looking forward to your feedback. Regards, Rimi – Business Executive Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 23 Packet Pg. 85 of 262 From:Raymond Goins via Alignable To:ParkRec Commission Subject:City Of Palo Alto Date:Thursday, March 13, 2025 11:30:37 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious ofopening attachments and clicking on links. Hi Park Rec, It’s Raymond from Raymond Goins LLC in San Mateo. I’d like to be able to refer customers to you, so I’ve added you to my network on Alignable, a site exclusively for business owners to network with each other. Accept my invitation (Note: this invite expires in 24 hours) If you no longer wish to receive this type of emails, you can unsubscribe Alignable PO Box 1666 North Falmouth MA 02556 Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 24 Packet Pg. 86 of 262 From:Aram James To:Veenker, Vicki Cc:Ed Lauing; Reckdahl, Keith; h.etzko@gmail.com; Foley, Michael; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Cribbs, Anne; Anna Griffin; board@pausd.org; Yolanda Conaway; dennis burns; Don Austin; Kaloma Smith; Council, City; board@valleywater.org; BoardOperations; Pat M; Sean Allen; Gennady Sheyner; sharon jackson; Dave Price; Emily Mibach; EPA Today; Diana Diamond; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; Jeff Rosen; Jeff Conrad; Jeff Hayden; Bill Newell; Human Relations Commission; planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.0rg; ParkRec Commission; city.council@menlopark.gov; GRP-City Council; Perron, Zachary; Binder, Andrew; Baker, Rob; Robert.Jonson@shf.sccgov.org; Templeton, Cari; Angel, David; Dennis Upton; Damon Silver; Rodriguez, Miguel; Reifschneider, James; Roberta Ahlquist Subject:Israel carried out "genocidal acts" against Palestinians by systematically destroying women"s healthcare facilities during the conflict in Gaza, and used sexual… Date:Thursday, March 13, 2025 9:00:43 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. UN experts accuse Israel of genocidal acts and sexual violence in Gaza Israel carried out "genocidal acts" against Palestinians by systematically destroying women's healthcare facilities during the conflict in Gaza, and used sexual… Source: Reuters https://search.app/uXCKeyjUWyD8prpP9 Shared via the Google app Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 25 Packet Pg. 87 of 262 From:Light As Air Boats To:ParkRec Commission Be guest ready! Date:Thursday, March 13, 2025 7:33:16 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of openingattachments and clicking on links. i SHOP NOW Hi there, Summer feels! Be Summer Ready! Your guests will love you!! This message needs your attention You've never replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 26 Packet Pg. 88 of 262 Designs available: Swan, Duck, Blue Herron, Pink Flamingo, Pelican, Dragon/Dinosaur, Pirate Ship, African Queen boat, Venetian Gondola. SEE ALL PEDAL BOATS HERE Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 27 Packet Pg. 89 of 262 Refresh or create your splash park! Explore the best interactive aquatic structure designs for splash pads & spray parks! SEE SPLASH PADS & WATER FEATURES HERE Explore portable lifeguard chairs with Spectrum! SEE ALL LIFEGUARD CHAIRS HERE Give swimmers an extra boost on starts! Used in many competition and recreational pools SEE ALL STARTING BLOCKS HERE For Quantity Discounts or Questions, Call Andi. "Tel:706.619.6670" andi@lightasairboats.com Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 28 Packet Pg. 90 of 262 Check out our Parks & Camps Catalog here! Wishing you sunny days and cool waves, - The Light As Air Boats Team Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 29 Packet Pg. 91 of 262 We don’t want to spam you. If you're no longer interested in enjoying adventures out on the water Unsubscribe here. Light As Air Boats 13801 Walsingham Rd. Suite A-116 Largo, Florida 33774 Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 30 Packet Pg. 92 of 262 From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You have new held messages Date:Thursday, March 13, 2025 7:16:37 AM Logo You have new held messages You can release all of your held messages and permit or block future emails from the senders, or manage messages individually. Release all Permit all Block all You can also manage held messages in your Personal Portal. Spam Policy watertechsh@notify.heruiexpo.com Future-Proof Water Management with Global Ideas 2025-03-13 02:09 Release Permit Block Release all Permit all Block all © 2019 Mimecast Services Limited. Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 31 Packet Pg. 93 of 262 Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 32 Packet Pg. 94 of 262 From:Aram James To:Barberini, Christopher Cc:Enberg, Nicholas; Afanasiev, Alex; Binder, Andrew; Sean Allen; Pat M; Kaloma Smith; Sheriff Transparency; EPA Today; city.council@menlopark.gov; Council, City; GRP-City Council; Perron, Zachary; Reifschneider, James; Jay Boyarsky; Figueroa, Eric; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Anna Griffin; Planning Commission; ParkRec Commission; Human Relations Commission; h.etzko@gmail.com; cromero@cityofepa.org; rabrica@cityofepa.org; Lee, Craig; Jensen, Eric; Gardener, Liz; Gerry Gras; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan; Templeton, Cari; Josh Becker; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Bill Newell; dennis burns; DuJuan Green; Dave Price; Diana Diamond; Emily Mibach; Gennady Sheyner; Bains, Paul; Burt, Patrick; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; Roberta Ahlquist; Rodriguez, Miguel; Damon Silver Subject:Fate of ex-Antioch K9 cop accused of plotting to brutalize residents now in jury’s hands Date:Wednesday, March 12, 2025 6:51:13 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Fate of ex-Antioch K9 cop accused of plotting to brutalize residents now in jury’s hands https://www.mercurynews.com/2025/03/12/fate-of-ex-antioch-k9-cop-accused-of-plotting-to- brutalize-residents-now-in-jurys-hands/ Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 33 Packet Pg. 95 of 262 From:Aram James To:Veenker, Vicki; Dave Price; Diana Diamond; EPA Today; Pat M; Sean Allen; Gennady Sheyner; sharon jackson; Marina Lopez Cc:Kaloma Smith; Reckdahl, Keith; Gerry Gras; Lu, George; Bains, Paul; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; Sheree Roth; Lori Meyers; Josh Becker; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Mickie Winkler; h.etzko@gmail.com; Emily Mibach; Braden Cartwright; Don Austin; Yolanda Conaway; Human Relations Commission; josh@joshsalcman.com; board@pausd.org; Jay Boyarsky; Jeff Rosen; Jeff Conrad; Jeff Hayden; Bill Newell; Rose Lynn; Roberta Roth; Roberta Ahlquist; Binder, Andrew; Baker, Rob; Robert.Jonson@shf.sccgov.org; Reifschneider, James; Wagner, April; Barberini, Christopher; chuck jagoda; Lotus Fong; Templeton, Cari; Anna Griffin; Cribbs, Anne; Karen Holman; Tom DuBois; planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.0rg; ParkRec Commission; Nicole Chiu-Wang; Vara Ramakrishnan; Gardener, Liz; Linda Jolley; dennis burns; DuJuan Green; Tim James; Lewis James; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Ed Lauing; Daniel Kottke; Dennis Upton; Doug Minkler; Friends of Cubberley; Palo Alto Free Press; yolanda; editor@paweekly.com; Enberg, Nicholas; Afanasiev, Alex; cromero@cityofepa.org; Lee, Craig; rabrica@cityofepa.org; Cecilia Taylor; city.council@menlopark.gov; GRP-City Council; citycouncil@mountainview.gov Subject:Biggest assault on free speech since Red Scare Date:Wednesday, March 12, 2025 6:10:39 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Biggest assault on free speech since Red Scare Biggest assault on free speech since Red Scare https://edition.pagesuite.com/popovers/dynamic_article_popover.aspx?guid=f8197fa5-60a6- 48f1-9825-dab45f36dea2&appcode=SAN252&eguid=e926b84b-29a4-47fa-b2fc- 5a20c3e587d9&pnum=33# For more great content like this subscribe to the The Mercury News e-edition app here: Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 34 Packet Pg. 96 of 262 From:Aram James To:Veenker, Vicki Cc:Ed Lauing; Reckdahl, Keith; Josh Becker; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Council, City; BoardOperations; board@valleywater.org; board@pausd.org; Jay Boyarsky; Jeff Rosen; Bill Newell; h.etzko@gmail.com; Dave Price; Sean Allen; Pat M; Salem Ajluni; Jax Ajluni; Friends of Cubberley; GRP-City Council; citycouncil@mountainview.gov; city.council@menlopark.gov; Steve Wagstaffe; Sarah Wright; Gennady Sheyner; Kaloma Smith; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.0rg; ParkRec Commission; Supervisor Susan Ellenberg; Damon Silver; Gerry Gras; Lotus Fong; frances.Rothschild@jud.ca.gov; Burt, Patrick; Palo Alto Free Press; Gardener, Liz Subject:face of Trump’s crackdown on campus protests Date:Wednesday, March 12, 2025 1:41:34 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. face of Trump’s crackdown on campus protests https://apnews.com/article/columbia-university-protester-mahmoud-khalil-immigration-arrest- 5ae6eeb3ac95f190a505abebc4ee0944 Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 35 Packet Pg. 97 of 262 From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You have new held messages Date:Wednesday, March 12, 2025 12:24:06 PM Logo You have new held messages You can release all of your held messages and permit or block future emails from the senders, or manage messages individually. Release all Permit all Block all You can also manage held messages in your Personal Portal. Spam Policy manuelminzer@yahoo.com Youth enrichment programs 2025-03-12 10:16 Release Permit Block Release all Permit all Block all © 2019 Mimecast Services Limited. Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 36 Packet Pg. 98 of 262 Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 37 Packet Pg. 99 of 262 From:Online Masterclasses To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Inbound leads on LinkedIn Date:Wednesday, March 12, 2025 7:21:04 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious ofopening attachments and clicking on links. Unlock the LinkedIn Lead Generation System LIVE ONLINE MASTERCLASS | APRIL 15TH Are you a sales professional, consultant, or entrepreneur who wants to: Stop chasing leads and have them chase you instead? Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 38 Packet Pg. 100 of 262 Build a predictable pipeline without cold outreach? Position yourself as the go-to expert in your industry? In this game-changing 90-minute masterclass, you'll discover the exact system I've used to generate consistent revenue purely through strategic LinkedIn positioning. What You'll Learn... Develop a personal brand that turns profile visitors into prospects Implement a repeatable system for consistent inbound leads Transform your LinkedIn presence from networking to revenue This isn't another theory-based webinar, this is a tactical, step-by-step blueprint. Limited to 20 seats - Save Your Seat Below Tuesday, April 15, 2025 11:00 AM How to get Inbound Leads on LinkedIn Register Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 39 Packet Pg. 101 of 262 MavX Masterclasses 6001 W Parmer Lane Ste 370 #510, Texas, Texas 78727 US Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 40 Packet Pg. 102 of 262 From:Aram James To:Veenker, Vicki Cc:Reckdahl, Keith; Ed Lauing; Josh Becker; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Council, City; Gardener, Liz; Liz Kniss; board@pausd.org; board@valleywater.org; BoardOperations; planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.0rg; ParkRec Commission; Gennady Sheyner; EPA Today; DuJuan Green; Yolanda Conaway; Don Austin; Sean Allen; Pat M Subject:Let"s be clear: The First Amendment does not allow the government to retaliate against anyone for their speech. The Trump administration can"t use ICE to punish speech the government doesn"t like, and we must all speak out loudly NOW: Tell ICE: Free Ma... Date:Tuesday, March 11, 2025 9:02:55 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Let's be clear: The First Amendment does not allow the government to retaliate against anyone for their speech. The Trump administration can't use ICE to punish speech the government doesn't like, and we must all speak out loudly NOW: Tell ICE: Free Mahmoud Khalil. ACLU's logo Aram, this past weekend, ICE detained Mahmoud Khalil, a lawful permanent resident and recent graduate of Columbia University, and threatened to revoke his green card and deport him in direct retaliation for his advocacy in support of Palestinian rights. We just joined our New York affiliate and partners in suing for his release – but we need you with us to make sure no one else's rights are violated. Let's be clear: The First Amendment does not allow the government to retaliate against anyone for their speech. The Trump administration can't use ICE to punish speech the government doesn't like, and we must all speak out loudly NOW: Tell ICE: Free Mahmoud Khalil. Here's what happened: FIRST: On Saturday night, ICE detained Mahmoud Khalil in New York City Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 41 Packet Pg. 103 of 262 THEN: They claimed the State Department had revoked Mr. Khalil's student visa. When they learned that Mr. Khalil is a lawful permanent resident, they said the White House had revoked his green card as well. He was then put on a plane to a detention facility in Louisiana without any notice to his pregnant wife or his legal team. NOW: Despite immediate outcry, the Trump administration has only doubled down on this chilling policy. They are now trying to silence anyone with opposing political beliefs – threatening to revoke green cards and deport people regardless of their deep and long-standing ties to the U.S. We're suing to stop this from happening to anyone else. Aram, ripping a graduate from their home, challenging their immigration status, and detaining them solely based on political viewpoint is a clear attempt by the Trump administration to silence dissent. This is a watershed moment for the right to speak truth to power and a massive violation of the First Amendment. Tell ICE: The government must immediately release Mr. Khalil and reverse course on this discriminatory policy. Together, we must act to free Mahmoud Khalil and stop this extreme assault on our rights. Thank you for taking action, Ben Wizner Pronouns: He, him, his Director, ACLU's Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project DONATE NOW This email was sent to: abjpd1@gmail.com You are receiving this message because you signed up to receive emails from the American Civil Liberties Union. Sign up for ACLU texts | Unsubscribe Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 42 Packet Pg. 104 of 262 Please note: If you forward or distribute, the links will open a page with your information filled in. We respect your right to privacy – view our policy. This email was sent by: ACLU 125 Broad St. New York, NY 10004 Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 43 Packet Pg. 105 of 262 From:Light As Air Boats To:ParkRec Commission Launch In a Clean & Dry Kayaks! Date:Tuesday, March 11, 2025 7:31:50 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of openingattachments and clicking on links. i SHOP NOW Hi there! Store kayak, canoes & SUPs safely and get if off the dock. This message needs your attention You've never replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 44 Packet Pg. 106 of 262 SEE PARKS & CAMPS CATALOG HERE Seahorse Docking FLOATING DOCK SEAHORSE LAUNCH & STOW Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 45 Packet Pg. 107 of 262 Attaches to almost all floating docks! Our cradle system makes it very easy for you to get in and out of kayaks or paddle boards. When our launch and stow is in the stow position it safely and securely holds your light craft out of the water. Seahorse Docking FIXED DOCK SEAHORSE LAUNCH & STOW Seahorse Launch and Stow lifts your kayak and other craft up to 36" wide out of the water including the access ladder. Built for one or two light crafts, our launch and stow remains virtually barnacle free! EXPLORE ALL KAYAK DOCKS HERE For Questions or a Quote, Call Dave. "Tel: 864.367.6161" dave@lightasairboats.com SEE PARKS & CAMPS CATALOG HERE Yours in Wind, Water, and Waves, - The Light As Air Boats Team Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 46 Packet Pg. 108 of 262 Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 47 Packet Pg. 109 of 262 We don’t want to spam you. If you're no longer interested in enjoying adventures out on the water Unsubscribe here. Light As Air Boats 13801 Walsingham Rd. Suite A-116 Largo, Florida 33774 Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 48 Packet Pg. 110 of 262 From:Jake Thompson To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Friend, let"s connect at CPRS Conference Date:Tuesday, March 11, 2025 7:04:30 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious ofopening attachments and clicking on links. Hi Friend, Are you heading to the CPRS Conference & Expo? If so, stop by Booth #403 to discover how Turf Tank’s autonomous line marking robot is helping many Parks & Rec teams save both on labor costs and time. Plus, grab some awesome merch while you're there! More than 4,000 organizations trust Turf Tank, including: Sacramento County Parks and Recreation Oxnard Parks and Recreation Templeton Parks and Recreation Jurupa Area Recreation Park District La Puente Parks and Recreation Our Regional Territory Managers, Randy and Mason, will be at booth #403 to personally answer your questions, share insights, and discuss how Turf Tank can benefit your team. Swing by for a quick chat and set up a live demo! JAKE THOMPSON Sales Development Representative m:+1 402-499-2416 e:Jake.Thompson@turftank.com w:www.turftank.com a:North America Turf Tank, 1110 Allgood Industrial Ct, Marietta, Georgia 30062, United States, 877-396-4094 Unsubscribe Manage preferences Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 49 Packet Pg. 111 of 262 Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 50 Packet Pg. 112 of 262 From:Aram James To:Reckdahl, Keith; Supervisor Susan Ellenberg; kenneth.Binder@shf.sccgov.org; Reckdahl, Keith; Vicki Veenker; Veenker, Vicki; Ed Lauing; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23 Cc:Josh Becker; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Doug Minkler; Zelkha, Mila; Arthur Millman; Sean Allen; Pat M; Dave Price; Braden Cartwright; EPA Today; Human Relations Commission; Kaloma Smith; Holman, Karen (external); Tom DuBois; DuJuan Green; Dennis Upton; dennis burns; Nicole Chiu-Wang; chuck jagoda; Supervisor Otto Lee; District2@bos.sccgov.org; district1@bos.sccgov.org; Henry Etzkowitz; Burt, Patrick; Gerry Gras; Dana St. George; Jeff Conrad; Jeff Rosen; Jeff Hayden; Don Austin; Damon Silver; Gardener, Liz; Lotus Fong; Patrice Ventresca; Bains, Paul; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; Roberta Ahlquist; Enberg, Nicholas; Reifschneider, James; Figueroa, Eric; Jensen, Eric; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Nicole Chiu-Wang; Mickie Winkler; gstone22@gmail.com; Templeton, Cari; Cribbs, Anne; Angel, David; h.etzko@gmail.com; Anna Griffin; Greg Tanaka; Lydia Kou; Freddie.Quintana@sen.ca.gov; Stump, Molly; planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.0rg; ParkRec Commission; Salem Ajluni; Sarah Wright; Jack Ajluni; Roberta Ahlquist; Cecilia Taylor; Steve Wagstaffe; Yolanda Conaway; Doria Summa; Rodriguez, Miguel; Rose Lynn; Palo Alto Free Press Subject:Demand the Immediate Release of Palestinian Student Activist Mahmoud Khalil from DHS detention Date:Monday, March 10, 2025 10:47:35 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Demand the Immediate Release of Palestinian Student Activist Mahmoud Khalil from DHS detention https://actionnetwork.org/letters/demand-the-immediate-release-of-columbia-student-pro- palestine-advocate-mahmoud-khalil-from-dhs-detention?source=direct_link& Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 51 Packet Pg. 113 of 262 From:Aram James To:Perron, Zachary Cc:Binder, Andrew; Reifschneider, James; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Enberg, Nicholas; Foley, Michael; Council, City; Ed Lauing; editor@paweekly.com; Dave Price; Braden Cartwright; Kallas, Emily; Emily Mibach; Vara Ramakrishnan; dennis burns; DuJuan Green; Bains, Paul; Kaloma Smith; board@pausd.org; Jay Boyarsky; board@valleywater.org; bos@smcgov.org; Bill Newell; BoardOperations; Gardener, Liz; Gerry Gras; Dana St. George; Don Austin; Yolanda Conaway; planning.commision@cityofpaloalto.org; ParkRec Commission; Veenker, Vicki; Sean Allen; Pat M; sharon jackson; Stump, Molly; Steve Wagstaffe Subject:Secret recordings reveal LAPD cops spewing racist and sexist comments, complaint alleges Date:Monday, March 10, 2025 4:15:47 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Secret recordings reveal LAPD cops spewing racist and sexist comments, complaint alleges https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2025-03-10/lapd-racist-sexist-homophobic-secret- recordings-comments Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 52 Packet Pg. 114 of 262 From:Aram James To:Veenker, Vicki Cc:bos@smcgov.org; board@pausd.org; board@valleywater.org; BoardOperations; Council, City; Josh Becker; Ed Lauing; kenneth.Binder@shf.sccgov.org; Jeff Conrad; Jeff Rosen; Jay Boyarsky; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; GRP-City Council; Gerry Gras; Gardener, Liz; Liz Kniss; Dana St. George; Dave Price; Emily Mibach; Braden Cartwright; Tim James; Marina Lopez; EPA Today; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan; Friends of Cubberley; planning.commision@cityofpaloalto.org; ParkRec Commission; Arthur Millman; h.etzko@gmail.com; Kaloma Smith; Human Relations Commission; Bill Newell; Baker, Rob; Rodriguez, Miguel; Damon Silver; Yolanda Conaway; Don Austin; Diana Diamond; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; cromero@cityofepa.org; Reifschneider, James; dennis burns; DuJuan Green; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Foley, Michael Subject:Columbia Is Doing the Bidding of Israel, and Trump’ - Says Former Professor Date:Monday, March 10, 2025 9:31:08 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 53 Packet Pg. 115 of 262 Prem-Columbia-TownHall-Substack.mp4 Watch now ‘Columbia Is Doing the Bidding of Israel, and Trump’ - Says FormerProfessor Katherine Franke and Prem Thakker discuss the suppression of free speech on college campuses, plus the latest student protests and arrests at Columbia and Barnard. TEAM ZETEO AND PREM THAKKER Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 54 Packet Pg. 116 of 262 MAR 10 ∙PREVIEW READ IN APP “These disciplinary cases are designed to distract us from what the real issue is which is a genocide, and a growing form of authoritarianism in Washington.” - Katherine Franke, Former Columbia Law Professor Columbia University is once again at the center of debate on free speech related to Israel and Palestine. On Friday, Trump pulled a massive $400 million of federal funding from Columbia University, citing the university’s alleged harassment of Jewish students. This comes despite the university’s repeated crackdown on pro-Palestine speech, including the violent suppression of student protesters, and most recently, the pushing out of their very own professors. Upgrade to paid In an exclusive Zeteo Town Hall, Ex-Columbia Law Professor Katherine Franke joined Zeteo Political Correspondent Prem Thakker to discuss how she was pushed out by the university after standing up for pro-Palestine students and how free speech continues to be suppressed on campus. “What happened to me is not about me,” Franke tells Prem. “What happened to me is a system. It's a systematic way in which universities have been deployed as a test case to see how we are going to punish and terrify people who speak out on particular issues.” Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 55 Packet Pg. 117 of 262 Last year, Professor Franke raised concerns on “Democracy Now!” about some Israeli students coming to Columbia “right out of their military service,” after a few Israeli students – who had recently served in the Israeli military – allegedly sprayed student protesters with a smelly substance. “I mentioned on the show that there had been a pattern of this problem of students who were pro-Palestinian experiencing serious harassment from students who were pro-Israeli, and that the university basically hadn't done anything about it,” Franke tells Prem. Upgrade to paid After her comments, two of Professor Franke’s colleagues filed a complaint against her at the university, accusing her of being anti-Israeli. “I had colleagues screaming things at me about how I've supported Hamas, that I didn't care that there were anti-Semitic attacks against these colleagues, children, or their families – which of course isn’t true,” Franke tells Prem. “…I just thought, ‘I don't know how I can be part of this community anymore.’ ” If you are a paid subscriber, watch the full interview above to hear the rest of Professor Franke’s story on how she was pushed into an early retirement with no benefits. Franke also discusses how Columbia’s approach to free speech has transformed since she was a student, the double standards when it comes to how pro-Israel speech is treated, and Trump’s attempts to crackdown on protests at universities. Free subscribers can watch the first 9 minutes of the interview. If you’d like to watch the full video, consider upgrading to a paid subscription. NOTE: This timely discussion was recorded on Friday, before the arrest of Mahmoud Khalil. You can read more about that story below: BREAKING: DHS Detains PalestinianStudent from Columbia Encampment, Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 56 Packet Pg. 118 of 262 Advocates Say PREM THAKKER ·MAR 9 On Saturday, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officers detained Mahmoud Khalil – a recent Columbia University graduate who helped lead the Gaza solidarity encampment – at his New York City home, an apartment building owned … Read full story Subscribe to Zeteo to unlock the rest. Become a paying subscriber of Zeteo to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content. Upgrade to paid A subscription gets you: Support Mehdi’s brand of accountability journalism Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 57 Packet Pg. 119 of 262 Live Q&As with Mehdi + more! LIKE COMMENT RESTACK © 2025 Zeteo1640 Boro Place 4th floor, McLean, VA 22102 Unsubscribe Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 58 Packet Pg. 120 of 262 From:Aram James To:board@pausd.org; Jay Boyarsky; h.etzko@gmail.com; Linda Jolley; josh@joshsalcman.com; Yolanda Conaway; Veenker, Vicki; Lotus Fong; Dave Price; Emily Mibach; Braden Cartwright; Bill Newell; Zahra Billoo; Perron, Zachary; Binder, Andrew; Roberta Roth; Roberta Ahlquist; Baker, Rob; Nicole Chiu-Wang; Enberg, Nicholas; Damon Silver; Dana St. George; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Rodriguez, Miguel; Supervisor Susan Ellenberg; Supervisor Otto Lee; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan; sharon jackson; Diana Diamond; Gardener, Liz; Gennady Sheyner; Doug Minkler; Sean Allen; Pat M; Stump, Molly; Wagner, April; Sarah Wright; Ed Lauing; Reckdahl, Keith; Lu, George; DuJuan Green; Dennis Upton; dennis burns; Human Relations Commission; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Palo Alto Free Press; Kaloma Smith; Tim James; Cait James; Freddie.Quintana@sen.ca.gov; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; Patrice Ventresca; Templeton, Cari; EPA Today; Anna Griffin; Cribbs, Anne; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Mickie Winkler; Donna Wallach; Steve Wagstaffe; planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.0rg; ParkRec Commission; Jeff Conrad; city.council@menlopark.gov; citycouncil@mountainview.gov; GRP-City Council; board@valleywater.org; BoardOperations; Marina Lopez; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com Subject:Columbia Bent Over Backward to Appease Right-Wing, Pro-Israel Attacks — And Trump Still Cut Federal Funding Date:Sunday, March 9, 2025 8:04:25 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Columbiaboard Bent Over Backward to Appease Right-Wing, Pro-Israel Attacks — And Trump Still Cut Federal Funding Columbia BeFunding Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 59 Packet Pg. 121 of 262 https://theintercept.com/2025/03/08/columbia-trump-funding-gaza-israel/ Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 60 Packet Pg. 122 of 262 From:Aram James To:Martin Wasserman Cc:Reckdahl, Keith; Ed Lauing; Supervisor Susan Ellenberg; Josh Becker; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Zelkha, Mila; Burt, Patrick; gstone22@gmail.com; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; Dave Price; Gardener, Liz; Liz Kniss; EPA Today; Sarah Wright; Salem Ajluni; Gerry Gras; Dana St. George; Rodriguez, Miguel; Don Austin; Yolanda Conaway; Emily Mibach; Roberta Ahlquist; Mickie Winkler; h.etzko@gmail.com; Cait James; Tim James; Marina Lopez; Doug Minkler; Gennady Sheyner; sharon jackson; Supervisor Otto Lee; Jay Boyarsky; Jeff Conrad; Templeton, Cari; Braden Cartwright; dennis burns; Diana Diamond; Bill Newell; ladoris cordell; Figueroa, Eric; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Friends of Cubberley; Palo Alto Free Press; Lu, George; Bains, Paul; paul@peaceandjustice.org; Vara Ramakrishnan; boardfeedback@smcgov.org; board@pausd.org; board@valleywater.org; BoardOperations; yolanda; Baker, Rob; Roberta Roth; Roberta Ahlquist; Wagner, April; Binder, Andrew; Robert.Jonson@shf.sccgov.org; Council, City; GRP-City Council; citycouncil@mountainview.gov; Perron, Zachary; Zahra Billoo; Stump, Molly; editor@paweekly.com; editor@almanacnews.com; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan; city.council@menlopark.gov; Jensen, Eric; Enberg, Nicholas; Afanasiev, Alex; cromero@cityofepa.org; Anna Griffin; Angel, David; Reifschneider, James; Jeff Hayden; Human Relations Commission; Daniel Kottke; planning.commision@cityofpaloalto.org; ParkRec Commission; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; Patrice Ventresca; frances.Rothschild@jud.ca.gov; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Cecilia Taylor; Freddie.Quintana@sen.ca.gov; Barberini, Christopher; Foley, Michael; Rose Lynn; Nicole Chiu-Wang; Steve Wagstaffe; Ellen Fox; Lori Meyers; Sheree Roth; Donna Wallach; Linda Jolley; josh@joshsalcman.com; Jose Valle; Jennifer Morrow San José Spotlight; Damon Silver; Rowena Chiu; Pat M; Lotus Fong; Kaloma Smith Subject:Re: Shame on you, Berkeley!" Peace Groups to Call Out Berkeley for Failure to Acknowledge Genocide in Gaza Date:Saturday, March 8, 2025 9:56:28 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Israel must comply with key ICJ ruling ordering it do all in its power to prevent genocide against Palestinians in Gaza Today’s decision by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to order provisional measures in response to South Africa’s genocide case against Israel is an important step that could help protect the Palestinian people in the occupied Gaza Strip from further suffering and irreparable harm, said Amnesty International today. An immediate ceasefire by all parties remains essential and – although not ordered by the Court – is the most effective condition to implement the provisional measures and end unprecedented civilian suffering. Agnès Callamard, Secretary General of Amnesty International The ruling issued by the ICJ ordered six provisional measures including for Israel to refrain from acts under the Genocide convention, prevent and punish the direct and public incitement to genocide, and take immediate and effective measures to ensure the provision of humanitarian assistance to civilians in Gaza. Crucially, the Court also ordered Israel to preserve evidence of genocide and to submit a report to the Court, within one month, of all measures taken in line with its order. “Today’s decision is an authoritative reminder of the crucial role of international law in Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 61 Packet Pg. 123 of 262 the world will not stand by in silence as Israel pursues a ruthless military campaign to decimate the population of the Gaza Strip and unleash death, horror and suffering against Palestinians on an unprecedented scale,” said Agnès Callamard, Secretary General of Amnesty International. “However, the ICJ decision alone cannot put an end to the atrocities and devastation Gazans are witnessing. Alarming signs of genocide in Gaza, and Israel’s flagrant disregard for international law highlight the urgent need for effective, unified pressure on Israel to stop its onslaught against Palestinians. An immediate ceasefire by all parties remains essential and – although not ordered by the Court – is the most effective condition to implement the provisional measures and end unprecedented civilian suffering. ©Mahmud Hams/AFP via Getty Images A man carries a propane gas cylinder on his back while walking through debris and destruction littering a street in the Jabalia camp for Palestinian refugees in Gaza City on October 11, 2023. Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 62 Packet Pg. 124 of 262 “The stakes could not be higher – the ICJ’s provisional measures indicate that in the Court’s view the survival of Palestinians in Gaza is at risk. The Israeli government must comply with the ICJ’s ruling immediately. All states – including those who were critical of or opposed South Africa’s submission of the genocide case – have a clear duty to ensure these measures are implemented. World leaders from the USA, UK, Germany and other EU states must signal their respect for the Court’s legally binding decision and do everything in their power to uphold their obligation to prevent genocide. Failure to do so would be a grave blow to the credibility and trust in the international legal order.” States must also take urgent steps to prevent ongoing international crimes, including by imposing a comprehensive arms embargo against Israel and Palestinian armed groups. The USA, UK, Germany and other EU states must signal their respect for the Court’s legally binding decision and do everything in their power to uphold their obligation to prevent genocide. Agnès Callamard, Secretary General of Amnesty International Amnesty International has warned of the risk of genocide in Gaza due to the shockingly high death toll among Palestinians, the widespread destruction caused by Israel’s relentless bombardment and the deliberate denial of humanitarian aid as part of the ongoing illegal blockade which are all inflicting horrifying levels of suffering on Gaza’s civilian population. Other warning signs include the increase in racist and dehumanizing rhetoric by some Israeli government officials, including Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and Israel’s history of oppressing and discriminating against Palestinians under its system of apartheid. In the face of a serious risk of genocide, all states are under an obligation under international law to act to prevent the commission of genocide. More than 26,000 Palestinians, mostly civilians, have been killed in Israel’s unrelenting bombardment of Gaza with some 10,000 believed to be still missing under the rubble. At least 1.8 million Palestinians have been internally displaced and are deprived of access to adequate food, water, shelter, sanitation, and medical assistance. Amnesty International calls on Israel, Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups to immediately suspend all military operations in Gaza. Israel must lift its illegal and inhuman siege and allow the unhindered and unconditional flow of desperately needed humanitarian aid to Palestinians, who are suffering from a deliberately engineered famine. We urge Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups to release all remaining civilian hostages. Background On 29 December 2023, South Africa brought a case against Israel at the ICJ under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide over allegations of genocide against the Palestinian people in the wake of the attacks on 7 October 2023 by Hamas and other armed groups, in which nearly 1,200 people, mostly civilians, in Israel were killed and some 240 were taken hostage. Hearings on South Africa’s request for provisional Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 63 Packet Pg. 125 of 262 measures took place in The Hague on 11 and 12 January 2024. The 84-page filing by South Africa accuses Israel of acts and omissions “genocidal in character, as they are committed with the requisite specific intent … to destroy Palestinians in Gaza as a part of the broader Palestinian national, racial and ethnical group.” The International Court of Justice is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations (UN). It does not pursue individual criminal responsibility, rather the Court’s role is to settle, in accordance with international law, legal disputes submitted to it by States, including those relating to the interpretation, application or fulfilment of the Genocide Convention and the responsibility of a State for genocide. Article 94 of the UN Charter provides that judgments of the ICJ are binding on the parties to the dispute and that, if they are not implemented, then recourse is to be had to the Security Council, which may make recommendations or decide upon measures to be taken to give effect to the judgment. AFRICA ARMED CONFLICT On Sat, Mar 8, 2025 at 9:36 PM Martin Wasserman <deeperlook@aol.com> wrote:The Jewish prophets predicted a time when all the nations would gather together against Israel, and the Almighty would then render His judgments and exact His retribution upon those nations. The fact that tiny Israel has been so successful at fending off powers much larger than itself shows that these prophecies have already begun to manifest. Martin Wasserman On Mar 8, 2025, at 9:03 PM, Aram James <abjpd1@gmail.com> wrote: Israel a Vile Terrorist State Since 1948 Israel has a U.S. sponsored/paid for army, navy, air-force and nuclear weapons. Palestine no institutional military only their spirit of resistance and resilience. Hamas are not terrorists but freedom fighters of the first order. Israel an apartheid state has maintained a concentration camp called Gaza for decades. Israel is a rogue outlaw nation. A second genocide is now occurring in the West Bank with full U.S. support. Israel condemned by the majority of the world’s nations and by the International Criminal Court and by the UN’s International Court of Justice. Israel must be eliminated. A one-state and a one-person vote true democracy is the only viable road to peace. Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 64 Packet Pg. 126 of 262 Avram Finkelstein Amnesty International July 2024 Israel’s occupation and annexation of the Palestinian territories are unlawful. Source: Amnesty International https://search.app/4h3oHkneZLPjCrzZ6 ICJ opinion declaring Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territories unlawful is a historic vindication of Palestinians’ rights Responding to the historic advisory opinion delivered today by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on the legality of Israel’s policies and practices in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT) and the consequences of Israel’s conduct for other states and the UN, Erika Guevara Rosas, Amnesty International’s Senior Director for Research, Advocacy, Policy and Campaigns, said: “The International Court of Justice has issued its opinion and the conclusion is loud and clear: Israel’s occupation and annexation of the Palestinian territories are unlawful, and its discriminatory laws and policies against Palestinians violate the prohibition on racial segregation and apartheid. “This is a historic vindication of the rights of Palestinians who have endured decades of cruelty and systematic human rights violations stemming from Israel’s unlawful occupation. “The occupation is a key pillar of the system of apartheid that Israel uses to dominate and oppress Palestinians, and which has caused suffering on a mass scale. Palestinians have witnessed their homes Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 65 Packet Pg. 127 of 262 being demolished, their lands expropriated to build and expand settlements, and have faced suffocating restrictions disrupting every aspect of their daily lives, from family separation and restrictions on freedom of movement to denial of access to land, water and natural resources. “The ICJ opinion comes at a time when Israel has been flagrantly flouting international humanitarian law on a cataclysmic scale for the past nine months, carrying out deadly and unlawful attacks during its onslaught in the occupied Gaza Strip that have claimed an unprecedented toll on civilians. It has also been escalating illegal land grabs in the occupied West Bank, and authorizing the construction of more and more settlement units in occupied and illegally annexed East Jerusalem, all but entrenching and perpetuating the unlawful occupation. Israeli authorities have also consistently failed to comply with the provisional measures ordered by the ICJ to prevent genocide in Gaza. Israel must not be allowed to trample on international law any longer. “The international community, and in particular Israel’s allies, must now take unequivocal action to ensure Israel ends its unlawful occupation, starting with the immediate halting of the expansion of Israeli settlements and reversing the annexation of Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem, and dismantling its brutal system of apartheid against Palestinians. Ending the occupation is crucial in order to stop the recurrent pattern of human rights violations across Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories. “Israel must withdraw its forces from all parts of the occupied territories, including the Gaza Strip and remove all settlers from the West Bank, including from the illegally annexed East Jerusalem. Israel must also relinquish control over all aspects of Palestinians’ lives, as well as ceding control of borders, natural resources, air space and territorial waters of the occupied territory. This means lifting the illegal blockade of Gaza and allowing Palestinians to travel freely between Gaza and the West Bank.” On Sat, Mar 8, 2025 at 6:24 PM Martin Wasserman <deeperlook@aol.com> wrote:Repeating a lie over and over again doesn't make it true. Every day Israel’s enemies falsely accuse it of genocide, while totally ignoring Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 66 Packet Pg. 128 of 262 the actual genocidal intentions of Hamas. The best way to stop the fighting in Gaza is for Hamas to release all of the hostages unconditionally. If Israel's enemies really cared about the Gazans, they would be demanding that Hamas release the hostages rather than trying to put all the blame on Israel. Martin Wasserman On Mar 8, 2025, at 5:37 PM, Aram James <abjpd1@gmail.com> wrote: Subject: Date: From: To: 1. 2. PRESS RELEASES PALESTINE "Shame on you, Berkeley!" Peace Groups to Call Out Berkeley for Failure to Acknowledge Genocide in Gaza Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 67 Packet Pg. 129 of 262 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 6, 2025 MEDIA CONTACT: Melissa Garriga | melissa@codepink.org Bay Area CODEPINK to Hold Press Conference at 3/11 Berkeley City Council Meeting "SHAME ON YOU FOR YOUR SILENCE ON GENOCIDE IN GAZA!" Berkeley, CA – CODEPINK will hold a press conference on March 11 at 5:30 PM PT at the Berkeley City Council meeting, 1231 Addison Street, Berkeley, to demand that the Berkeley City Council take action in recognizing the genocide in Gaza. Participants will stand in silence with blood-red hands and banners displaying the names of children murdered by Israeli forces using U.S. weapons. The group’s message is clear: "SHAME ON YOU FOR YOUR SILENCE ON GENOCIDE IN GAZA!" . They will publicly shame the Council for its failure to vote on a resolution condemning the Israeli genocide Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 68 Packet Pg. 130 of 262 in Gaza, as well as its refusal to call for a ceasefire and an end to the violence and starvation in Gaza. The Berkeley Peace and Justice Commission passed a Ceasefire Resolution in October 2024 that former P&J Commissioner George Lippman said focuses “on what must happen right now to end the death and destruction,” recommending that the City Council discuss and vote on it. However, the City Council has ignored the Commission's request, refusing to take any action. CODEPINK is demanding that the Berkeley City Council agendize and vote on the Resolution so that Berkeley can show it cares about a genocide being funded with U.S. taxes, joining cities surrounding Berkeley – San Francisco, Richmond, Oakland, and Hayward– who have all gone on record in favor of a permanent ceasefire. EVENT DETAILS: Date: March 11, 2025 Time: 5:30 PM PT Location: 1231 Addison Street, Berkeley, CA "The Berkeley City Council’s inaction and silence regarding the genocide in Gaza is unacceptable," said CODEPINK organizer Cynthia Papermaster. "We are spending billions of U.S. tax dollars on weapons killing children, and given Israel’s human rights violations, that funding is illegal under U.S. and international law. We desperately need funds in Berkeley to address so many issues– affordable housing, healthcare, clean energy, education. If the City Council can’t oppose the genocide on moral grounds, they should at least care about our community’s needs. It’s difficult to understand the Council’s inaction; we know that the majority of Berkeley voters, like those nationwide, overwhelmingly want a permanent ceasefire and end to arming Israel. We are pleading with the Council to uphold Berkeley’s social justice reputation, take a stand, and act by putting the recommended resolution on their agenda and voting on it." CODEPINK urges all concerned citizens to join the press conference on March 11 to stand silently with us. Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 69 Packet Pg. 131 of 262 From:Martin Wasserman To:Aram James Cc:Reckdahl, Keith; Ed Lauing; Supervisor Susan Ellenberg; Josh Becker; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Zelkha, Mila; Burt, Patrick; gstone22@gmail.com; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; Dave Price; Gardener, Liz; Liz Kniss; EPA Today; Sarah Wright; Salem Ajluni; Gerry Gras; Dana St. George; Rodriguez, Miguel; Don Austin; Yolanda Conaway; Emily Mibach; Roberta Ahlquist; Mickie Winkler; h.etzko@gmail.com; Cait James; Tim James; Marina Lopez; Doug Minkler; Gennady Sheyner; sharon jackson; Supervisor Otto Lee; Jay Boyarsky; Jeff Conrad; Templeton, Cari; Braden Cartwright; dennis burns; Diana Diamond; Bill Newell; ladoris cordell; Figueroa, Eric; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Friends of Cubberley; Palo Alto Free Press; Lu, George; Bains, Paul; paul@peaceandjustice.org; Vara Ramakrishnan; boardfeedback@smcgov.org; board@pausd.org; board@valleywater.org; BoardOperations; yolanda; Baker, Rob; Roberta Roth; Roberta Ahlquist; Wagner, April; Binder, Andrew; Robert.Jonson@shf.sccgov.org; Council, City; GRP-City Council; citycouncil@mountainview.gov; Perron, Zachary; Zahra Billoo; Stump, Molly; editor@paweekly.com; editor@almanacnews.com; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan; city.council@menlopark.gov; Jensen, Eric; Enberg, Nicholas; Afanasiev, Alex; cromero@cityofepa.org; Anna Griffin; Angel, David; Reifschneider, James; Jeff Hayden; Human Relations Commission; Daniel Kottke; planning.commision@cityofpaloalto.org; ParkRec Commission; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; Patrice Ventresca; frances.Rothschild@jud.ca.gov; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Cecilia Taylor; Freddie.Quintana@sen.ca.gov; Barberini, Christopher; Foley, Michael; Rose Lynn; Nicole Chiu-Wang; Steve Wagstaffe; Ellen Fox; Lori Meyers; Sheree Roth; Donna Wallach; Linda Jolley; josh@joshsalcman.com; Jose Valle; Jennifer Morrow San José Spotlight; Damon Silver; Rowena Chiu; Pat M; Lotus Fong; Kaloma Smith Subject:Re: Shame on you, Berkeley!" Peace Groups to Call Out Berkeley for Failure to Acknowledge Genocide in Gaza Date:Saturday, March 8, 2025 9:36:44 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. The Jewish prophets predicted a time when all the nations would gather together against Israel, and the Almighty would then render His judgments and exact His retribution upon those nations. The fact that tiny Israel has been so successful at fending off powers much larger than itself shows that these prophecies have already begun to manifest. Martin Wasserman On Mar 8, 2025, at 9:03 PM, Aram James <abjpd1@gmail.com> wrote: Israel a Vile Terrorist State Since 1948 Israel has a U.S. sponsored/paid for army, navy, air-force and nuclear weapons. Palestine no institutional military only their spirit of resistance and resilience. Hamas are not terrorists but freedom fighters of the first order. Israel an apartheid state has maintained a concentration camp called Gaza for decades. Israel is a rogue outlaw nation. A second genocide is now occurring in the West Bank with full U.S. support. Israel condemned by the majority of the world’s nations and by the International Criminal Court and by the UN’s International Court of Justice. Israel must be eliminated. A one-state and a one-person vote true democracy is the only viable road to peace. Avram Finkelstein Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 70 Packet Pg. 132 of 262 Amnesty International July 2024 Israel’s occupation and annexation of the Palestinian territories are unlawful. Source: Amnesty International https://search.app/4h3oHkneZLPjCrzZ6 ICJ opinion declaring Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territories unlawful is a historic vindication of Palestinians’ rights Responding to the historic advisory opinion delivered today by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on the legality of Israel’s policies and practices in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT) and the consequences of Israel’s conduct for other states and the UN, Erika Guevara Rosas, Amnesty International’s Senior Director for Research, Advocacy, Policy and Campaigns, said: “The International Court of Justice has issued its opinion and the conclusion is loud and clear: Israel’s occupation and annexation of the Palestinian territories are unlawful, and its discriminatory laws and policies against Palestinians violate the prohibition on racial segregation and apartheid. “This is a historic vindication of the rights of Palestinians who have endured decades of cruelty and systematic human rights violations stemming from Israel’s unlawful occupation. “The occupation is a key pillar of the system of apartheid that Israel uses to dominate and oppress Palestinians, and which has caused suffering on a mass scale. Palestinians have witnessed their homes being demolished, their lands expropriated to build and expand settlements, and have faced suffocating restrictions disrupting every aspect of their daily lives, from family separation and restrictions on freedom of movement to denial of access to land, water and natural resources. Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 71 Packet Pg. 133 of 262 “The ICJ opinion comes at a time when Israel has been flagrantly flouting international humanitarian law on a cataclysmic scale for the past nine months, carrying out deadly and unlawful attacks during its onslaught in the occupied Gaza Strip that have claimed an unprecedented toll on civilians. It has also been escalating illegal land grabs in the occupied West Bank, and authorizing the construction of more and more settlement units in occupied and illegally annexed East Jerusalem, all but entrenching and perpetuating the unlawful occupation. Israeli authorities have also consistently failed to comply with the provisional measures ordered by the ICJ to prevent genocide in Gaza. Israel must not be allowed to trample on international law any longer. “The international community, and in particular Israel’s allies, must now take unequivocal action to ensure Israel ends its unlawful occupation, starting with the immediate halting of the expansion of Israeli settlements and reversing the annexation of Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem, and dismantling its brutal system of apartheid against Palestinians. Ending the occupation is crucial in order to stop the recurrent pattern of human rights violations across Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories. “Israel must withdraw its forces from all parts of the occupied territories, including the Gaza Strip and remove all settlers from the West Bank, including from the illegally annexed East Jerusalem. Israel must also relinquish control over all aspects of Palestinians’ lives, as well as ceding control of borders, natural resources, air space and territorial waters of the occupied territory. This means lifting the illegal blockade of Gaza and allowing Palestinians to travel freely between Gaza and the West Bank.” On Sat, Mar 8, 2025 at 6:24 PM Martin Wasserman <deeperlook@aol.com> wrote:Repeating a lie over and over again doesn't make it true. Every day Israel’s enemies falsely accuse it of genocide, while totally ignoring the actual genocidal intentions of Hamas. The best way to stop the fighting in Gaza is for Hamas to release all of the hostages unconditionally. If Israel's enemies really cared about the Gazans, they would be demanding that Hamas release the hostages rather than trying to put all the blame on Israel. Martin Wasserman Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 72 Packet Pg. 134 of 262 On Mar 8, 2025, at 5:37 PM, Aram James <abjpd1@gmail.com> wrote: Subject: Date: From: To: 1. 2. PRESS RELEASES PALESTINE "Shame on you, Berkeley!" Peace Groups to Call Out Berkeley for Failure to Acknowledge Genocide in Gaza Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 73 Packet Pg. 135 of 262 March 6, 2025 MEDIA CONTACT: Melissa Garriga | melissa@codepink.org Bay Area CODEPINK to Hold Press Conference at 3/11 Berkeley City Council Meeting "SHAME ON YOU FOR YOUR SILENCE ON GENOCIDE IN GAZA!" Berkeley, CA – CODEPINK will hold a press conference on March 11 at 5:30 PM PT at the Berkeley City Council meeting, 1231 Addison Street, Berkeley, to demand that the Berkeley City Council take action in recognizing the genocide in Gaza. Participants will stand in silence with blood-red hands and banners displaying the names of children murdered by Israeli forces using U.S. weapons. The group’s message is clear: "SHAME ON YOU FOR YOUR SILENCE ON GENOCIDE IN GAZA!" . They will publicly shame the Council for its failure to vote on a resolution condemning the Israeli genocide in Gaza, as well as its refusal to call for a ceasefire and an end to the violence and starvation in Gaza. The Berkeley Peace and Justice Commission passed a Ceasefire Resolution in October 2024 that former P&J Commissioner George Lippman said focuses “on what must happen right now to end the death and destruction,” recommending that the City Council discuss and vote on it. However, the City Council has ignored the Commission's request, refusing to take any action. CODEPINK is demanding that the Berkeley City Council agendize and vote on the Resolution so that Berkeley can show it cares about a genocide being funded with U.S. taxes, joining cities surrounding Berkeley – San Francisco, Richmond, Oakland, and Hayward– who have all gone on record in favor of a permanent ceasefire. EVENT DETAILS: Date: March 11, 2025 Time: 5:30 PM PT Location: 1231 Addison Street, Berkeley, CA "The Berkeley City Council’s inaction and silence regarding the genocide in Gaza is unacceptable," said CODEPINK organizer Cynthia Papermaster. "We are spending billions of U.S. tax dollars on weapons killing Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 74 Packet Pg. 136 of 262 children, and given Israel’s human rights violations, that funding is illegal under U.S. and international law. We desperately need funds in Berkeley to address so many issues– affordable housing, healthcare, clean energy, education. If the City Council can’t oppose the genocide on moral grounds, they should at least care about our community’s needs. It’s difficult to understand the Council’s inaction; we know that the majority of Berkeley voters, like those nationwide, overwhelmingly want a permanent ceasefire and end to arming Israel. We are pleading with the Council to uphold Berkeley’s social justice reputation, take a stand, and act by putting the recommended resolution on their agenda and voting on it." CODEPINK urges all concerned citizens to join the press conference on March 11 to stand silently with us. Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 75 Packet Pg. 137 of 262 From:Aram James Cc:Reckdahl, Keith; Ed Lauing; Supervisor Susan Ellenberg; Josh Becker; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Zelkha, Mila; Burt, Patrick; gstone22@gmail.com; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; Dave Price; Gardener, Liz; Liz Kniss; EPA Today; Sarah Wright; Salem Ajluni; Gerry Gras; Dana St. George; Rodriguez, Miguel; Don Austin; Yolanda Conaway; Emily Mibach; Roberta Ahlquist; Mickie Winkler; h.etzko@gmail.com; Cait James; Tim James; Marina Lopez; Doug Minkler; Gennady Sheyner; sharon jackson; Supervisor Otto Lee; Jay Boyarsky; Jeff Conrad; Templeton, Cari; Braden Cartwright; dennis burns; Diana Diamond; Bill Newell; ladoris cordell; Figueroa, Eric; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Friends of Cubberley; Palo Alto Free Press; Lu, George; Bains, Paul; paul@peaceandjustice.org; Vara Ramakrishnan; boardfeedback@smcgov.org; board@pausd.org; board@valleywater.org; BoardOperations; yolanda; Baker, Rob; Roberta Roth; Roberta Ahlquist; Wagner, April; Binder, Andrew; Robert.Jonson@shf.sccgov.org; Council, City; GRP-City Council; citycouncil@mountainview.gov; Perron, Zachary; Zahra Billoo; Stump, Molly; editor@paweekly.com; editor@almanacnews.com; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan; city.council@menlopark.gov; Jensen, Eric; Enberg, Nicholas; Afanasiev, Alex; cromero@cityofepa.org; Anna Griffin; Angel, David; Reifschneider, James; Jeff Hayden; Human Relations Commission; Daniel Kottke; planning.commision@cityofpaloalto.org; ParkRec Commission; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; Patrice Ventresca; frances.Rothschild@jud.ca.gov; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Cecilia Taylor; Freddie.Quintana@sen.ca.gov; Barberini, Christopher; Foley, Michael; Rose Lynn; Nicole Chiu-Wang; Steve Wagstaffe; Ellen Fox; Lori Meyers; Sheree Roth; Donna Wallach; Linda Jolley; josh@joshsalcman.com; Jose Valle; Jennifer Morrow San José Spotlight; Damon Silver; Rowena Chiu; Marty Wasserman; Pat M; Lotus Fong; Kaloma Smith Subject:Re: Shame on you, Berkeley!" Peace Groups to Call Out Berkeley for Failure to Acknowledge Genocide in Gaza Date:Saturday, March 8, 2025 9:06:45 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Israel a Vile Terrorist State Since 1948 Israel has a U.S. sponsored/paid for army, navy, air-force and nuclear weapons. Palestine no institutional military only their spirit of resistance and resilience. Hamas are not terrorists but freedom fighters of the first order. Israel an apartheid state has maintained a concentration camp called Gaza for decades. Israel is a rogue outlaw nation. A second genocide is now occurring in the West Bank with full U.S. support. Israel condemned by the majority of the world’s nations and by the International Criminal Court and by the UN’s International Court of Justice. Israel must be eliminated. A one-state and a one-person vote true democracy is the only viable road to peace. Avram Finkelstein Amnesty International July 2024 Israel’s occupation and annexation of the Palestinian territories are unlawful. Source: Amnesty International https://search.app/4h3oHkneZLPjCrzZ6 ICJ opinion declaring Israel’s Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 76 Packet Pg. 138 of 262 occupation of Palestinian territories unlawful is a historic vindication of Palestinians’ rights Responding to the historic advisory opinion delivered today by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on the legality of Israel’s policies and practices in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT) and the consequences of Israel’s conduct for other states and the UN, Erika Guevara Rosas, Amnesty International’s Senior Director for Research, Advocacy, Policy and Campaigns, said: “The International Court of Justice has issued its opinion and the conclusion is loud and clear: Israel’s occupation and annexation of the Palestinian territories are unlawful, and its discriminatory laws and policies against Palestinians violate the prohibition on racial segregation and apartheid. “This is a historic vindication of the rights of Palestinians who have endured decades of cruelty and systematic human rights violations stemming from Israel’s unlawful occupation. “The occupation is a key pillar of the system of apartheid that Israel uses to dominate and oppress Palestinians, and which has caused suffering on a mass scale. Palestinians have witnessed their homes being demolished, their lands expropriated to build and expand settlements, and have faced suffocating restrictions disrupting every aspect of their daily lives, from family separation and restrictions on freedom of movement to denial of access to land, water and natural resources. “The ICJ opinion comes at a time when Israel has been flagrantly flouting international humanitarian law on a cataclysmic scale for the past nine months, carrying out deadly and unlawful attacks during its onslaught in the occupied Gaza Strip that have claimed an unprecedented toll on civilians. It has also been escalating illegal land grabs in the occupied West Bank, and authorizing the construction of more and more settlement units in occupied and illegally annexed East Jerusalem, all but entrenching and perpetuating the unlawful occupation. Israeli authorities have also consistently failed to comply with the provisional measures ordered by the ICJ to prevent genocide in Gaza. Israel must not be allowed to trample on international law any longer. “The international community, and in particular Israel’s allies, must now take unequivocal action to ensure Israel ends its unlawful occupation, starting with the immediate halting of the expansion of Israeli settlements and reversing the annexation of Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem, and dismantling its brutal system of apartheid against Palestinians. Ending the occupation is crucial in Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 77 Packet Pg. 139 of 262 order to stop the recurrent pattern of human rights violations across Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories. “Israel must withdraw its forces from all parts of the occupied territories, including the Gaza Strip and remove all settlers from the West Bank, including from the illegally annexed East Jerusalem. Israel must also relinquish control over all aspects of Palestinians’ lives, as well as ceding control of borders, natural resources, air space and territorial waters of the occupied territory. This means lifting the illegal blockade of Gaza and allowing Palestinians to travel freely between Gaza and the West Bank.” On Sat, Mar 8, 2025 at 6:24 PM Martin Wasserman <deeperlook@aol.com> wrote:Repeating a lie over and over again doesn't make it true. Every day Israel’s enemies falsely accuse it of genocide, while totally ignoring the actual genocidal intentions of Hamas. The best way to stop the fighting in Gaza is for Hamas to release all of the hostages unconditionally. If Israel's enemies really cared about the Gazans, they would be demanding that Hamas release the hostages rather than trying to put all the blame on Israel. Martin Wasserman On Mar 8, 2025, at 5:37 PM, Aram James <abjpd1@gmail.com> wrote: Subject: Date: From: To: 1. 2. PRESS RELEASES PALESTINE "Shame on you, Berkeley!" Peace Groups to Call Out Berkeley for Failure to Acknowledge Genocide in Gaza Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 78 Packet Pg. 140 of 262 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 6, 2025 MEDIA CONTACT: Melissa Garriga | melissa@codepink.org Bay Area CODEPINK to Hold Press Conference at 3/11 Berkeley City Council Meeting "SHAME ON YOU FOR YOUR SILENCE ON GENOCIDE IN GAZA!" Berkeley, CA – CODEPINK will hold a press conference on March 11 at 5:30 PM PT at the Berkeley City Council meeting, 1231 Addison Street, Berkeley, to demand that the Berkeley City Council take action in recognizing the genocide in Gaza. Participants will stand in silence with blood-red hands and banners displaying the names of children murdered by Israeli forces using U.S. weapons. The group’s message is clear: "SHAME ON YOU FOR YOUR SILENCE ON GENOCIDE IN GAZA!" . They will publicly shame the Council for its failure to vote on a resolution condemning Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 79 Packet Pg. 141 of 262 the Israeli genocide in Gaza, as well as its refusal to call for a ceasefire and an end to the violence and starvation in Gaza. The Berkeley Peace and Justice Commission passed a Ceasefire Resolution in October 2024 that former P&J Commissioner George Lippman said focuses “on what must happen right now to end the death and destruction,” recommending that the City Council discuss and vote on it. However, the City Council has ignored the Commission's request, refusing to take any action. CODEPINK is demanding that the Berkeley City Council agendize and vote on the Resolution so that Berkeley can show it cares about a genocide being funded with U.S. taxes, joining cities surrounding Berkeley – San Francisco, Richmond, Oakland, and Hayward– who have all gone on record in favor of a permanent ceasefire. EVENT DETAILS: Date: March 11, 2025 Time: 5:30 PM PT Location: 1231 Addison Street, Berkeley, CA "The Berkeley City Council’s inaction and silence regarding the genocide in Gaza is unacceptable," said CODEPINK organizer Cynthia Papermaster. "We are spending billions of U.S. tax dollars on weapons killing children, and given Israel’s human rights violations, that funding is illegal under U.S. and international law. We desperately need funds in Berkeley to address so many issues– affordable housing, healthcare, clean energy, education. If the City Council can’t oppose the genocide on moral grounds, they should at least care about our community’s needs. It’s difficult to understand the Council’s inaction; we know that the majority of Berkeley voters, like those nationwide, overwhelmingly want a permanent ceasefire and end to arming Israel. We are pleading with the Council to uphold Berkeley’s social justice reputation, take a stand, and act by putting the recommended resolution on their agenda and voting on it." CODEPINK urges all concerned citizens to join the press conference on March 11 to stand silently with us. Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 80 Packet Pg. 142 of 262 From:Martin Wasserman To:Aram James Cc:Reckdahl, Keith; Ed Lauing; Supervisor Susan Ellenberg; Josh Becker; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Zelkha, Mila; Burt, Patrick; gstone22@gmail.com; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; Dave Price; Gardener, Liz; Liz Kniss; EPA Today; Sarah Wright; Salem Ajluni; Gerry Gras; Dana St. George; Michelle; Rodriguez, Miguel; Don Austin; Yolanda Conaway; Emily Mibach; Roberta Ahlquist; Mickie Winkler; h.etzko@gmail.com; Cait James; Tim James; Marina Lopez; Doug Minkler; Gennady Sheyner; sharon jackson; Supervisor Otto Lee; Jay Boyarsky; Jeff Conrad; Templeton, Cari; Braden Cartwright; dennis burns; Diana Diamond; Bill Newell; ladoris cordell; Figueroa, Eric; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Friends of Cubberley; Palo Alto Free Press; Lu, George; Bains, Paul; paul@peaceandjustice.org; Vara Ramakrishnan; boardfeedback@smcgov.org; board@pausd.org; board@valleywater.org; BoardOperations; yolanda; Baker, Rob; Roberta Roth; Roberta Ahlquist; Wagner, April; Binder, Andrew; Robert.Jonson@shf.sccgov.org; Council, City; GRP-City Council; citycouncil@mountainview.gov; Perron, Zachary; Zahra Billoo; Stump, Molly; editor@paweekly.com; editor@almanacnews.com; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan; city.council@menlopark.gov; Jensen, Eric; Enberg, Nicholas; Afanasiev, Alex; cromero@cityofepa.org; Anna Griffin; Angel, David; Reifschneider, James; Jeff Hayden; Human Relations Commission; Daniel Kottke; planning.commision@cityofpaloalto.org; ParkRec Commission; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; Patrice Ventresca; frances.Rothschild@jud.ca.gov; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Cecilia Taylor; Freddie.Quintana@sen.ca.gov; Barberini, Christopher; Foley, Michael; Rose Lynn; Nicole Chiu-Wang; Steve Wagstaffe; Ellen Fox; Lori Meyers; Sheree Roth Subject:Re: Shame on you, Berkeley!" Peace Groups to Call Out Berkeley for Failure to Acknowledge Genocide in Gaza Date:Saturday, March 8, 2025 6:24:58 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Repeating a lie over and over again doesn't make it true. Every day Israel’s enemies falsely accuse it of genocide, while totally ignoring the actual genocidal intentions of Hamas. The best way to stop the fighting in Gaza is for Hamas to release all of the hostages unconditionally. If Israel's enemies really cared about the Gazans, they would be demanding that Hamas release the hostages rather than trying to put all the blame on Israel. Martin Wasserman On Mar 8, 2025, at 5:37 PM, Aram James <abjpd1@gmail.com> wrote: Subject: Date: From: To: This message needs your attention Some Recipients have never replied to this person. This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 81 Packet Pg. 143 of 262 1. 2. PRESS RELEASES PALESTINE "Shame on you, Berkeley!" Peace Groups to Call Out Berkeley for Failure to Acknowledge Genocide in Gaza FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 6, 2025 MEDIA CONTACT: Melissa Garriga | melissa@codepink.org Bay Area CODEPINK to Hold Press Conference at 3/11 Berkeley City Council Meeting Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 82 Packet Pg. 144 of 262 "SHAME ON YOU FOR YOUR SILENCE ON GENOCIDE IN GAZA!" Berkeley, CA – CODEPINK will hold a press conference on March 11 at 5:30 PM PT at the Berkeley City Council meeting, 1231 Addison Street, Berkeley, to demand that the Berkeley City Council take action in recognizing the genocide in Gaza. Participants will stand in silence with blood-red hands and banners displaying the names of children murdered by Israeli forces using U.S. weapons. The group’s message is clear: "SHAME ON YOU FOR YOUR SILENCE ON GENOCIDE IN GAZA!" . They will publicly shame the Council for its failure to vote on a resolution condemning the Israeli genocide in Gaza, as well as its refusal to call for a ceasefire and an end to the violence and starvation in Gaza. The Berkeley Peace and Justice Commission passed a Ceasefire Resolution in October 2024 that former P&J Commissioner George Lippman said focuses “on what must happen right now to end the death and destruction,” recommending that the City Council discuss and vote on it. However, the City Council has ignored the Commission's request, refusing to take any action. CODEPINK is demanding that the Berkeley City Council agendize and vote on the Resolution so that Berkeley can show it cares about a genocide being funded with U.S. taxes, joining cities surrounding Berkeley – San Francisco, Richmond, Oakland, and Hayward– who have all gone on record in favor of a permanent ceasefire. EVENT DETAILS: Date: March 11, 2025 Time: 5:30 PM PT Location: 1231 Addison Street, Berkeley, CA "The Berkeley City Council’s inaction and silence regarding the genocide in Gaza is unacceptable," said CODEPINK organizer Cynthia Papermaster. "We are spending billions of U.S. tax dollars on weapons killing children, and given Israel’s human rights violations, that funding is illegal under U.S. and international law. We desperately need funds in Berkeley to address so many issues– affordable housing, healthcare, clean energy, education. If the City Council can’t oppose the genocide on moral grounds, they should at least care about our community’s needs. It’s difficult to understand the Council’s inaction; we know that the majority of Berkeley voters, like those nationwide, overwhelmingly want a permanent ceasefire and end to arming Israel. We are pleading with the Council to uphold Berkeley’s social justice reputation, take a stand, and act by putting the recommended resolution on their agenda and voting on it." CODEPINK urges all concerned citizens to join the press conference on March 11 to stand silently with us. Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 83 Packet Pg. 145 of 262 Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 84 Packet Pg. 146 of 262 From:Aram James To:Reckdahl, Keith; Ed Lauing; Supervisor Susan Ellenberg; Josh Becker; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Zelkha, Mila Cc:Burt, Patrick; gstone22@gmail.com; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; Dave Price; Gardener, Liz; Liz Kniss; EPA Today; Sarah Wright; Salem Ajluni; Gerry Gras; Dana St. George; Michelle; Rodriguez, Miguel; Don Austin; Yolanda Conaway; Emily Mibach; Roberta Ahlquist; Mickie Winkler; h.etzko@gmail.com; Marty Wasserman; Cait James; Tim James; Marina Lopez; Doug Minkler; Gennady Sheyner; sharon jackson; Supervisor Otto Lee; Jay Boyarsky; Jeff Conrad; Templeton, Cari; Braden Cartwright; dennis burns; Diana Diamond; Bill Newell; ladoris cordell; Figueroa, Eric; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Friends of Cubberley; Palo Alto Free Press; Lu, George; Bains, Paul; Paul George @ PPJC; Vara Ramakrishnan; boardfeedback@smcgov.org; board@pausd.org; board@valleywater.org; BoardOperations; yolanda; Baker, Rob; Roberta Roth; Roberta Ahlquist; Wagner, April; Binder, Andrew; Robert.Jonson@shf.sccgov.org; Council, City; GRP-City Council; citycouncil@mountainview.gov; Perron, Zachary; Zahra Billoo; Stump, Molly; editor@paweekly.com; editor@almanacnews.com; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan; city.council@menlopark.gov; Jensen, Eric; Enberg, Nicholas; Afanasiev, Alex; cromero@cityofepa.org; Anna Griffin; Angel, David; Reifschneider, James; Jeff Hayden; Human Relations Commission; Daniel Kottke; planning.commision@cityofpaloalto.org; ParkRec Commission; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; Patrice Ventresca; frances.Rothschild@jud.ca.gov; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Cecilia Taylor; Freddie.Quintana@sen.ca.gov; Barberini, Christopher; Foley, Michael; Rose Lynn; Nicole Chiu-Wang; Steve Wagstaffe Subject:Re: Shame on you, Berkeley!" Peace Groups to Call Out Berkeley for Failure to Acknowledge Genocide in Gaza Date:Saturday, March 8, 2025 5:38:07 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Subject: Date: From: To: 1. 2. PRESS RELEASES PALESTINE "Shame on you, Berkeley!" Peace Groups to Call Out Berkeley for Failure to Acknowledge Genocide in Gaza Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 85 Packet Pg. 147 of 262 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 6, 2025 MEDIA CONTACT: Melissa Garriga | melissa@codepink.org Bay Area CODEPINK to Hold Press Conference at 3/11 Berkeley City Council Meeting "SHAME ON YOU FOR YOUR SILENCE ON GENOCIDE IN GAZA!" Berkeley, CA – CODEPINK will hold a press conference on March 11 at 5:30 PM PT at the Berkeley City Council meeting, 1231 Addison Street, Berkeley, to demand that the Berkeley City Council take action in recognizing the genocide in Gaza. Participants will stand in silence with blood-red hands and banners displaying the names of children murdered by Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 86 Packet Pg. 148 of 262 Israeli forces using U.S. weapons. The group’s message is clear: "SHAME ON YOU FOR YOUR SILENCE ON GENOCIDE IN GAZA!" . They will publicly shame the Council for its failure to vote on a resolution condemning the Israeli genocide in Gaza, as well as its refusal to call for a ceasefire and an end to the violence and starvation in Gaza. The Berkeley Peace and Justice Commission passed a Ceasefire Resolution in October 2024 that former P&J Commissioner George Lippman said focuses “on what must happen right now to end the death and destruction,” recommending that the City Council discuss and vote on it. However, the City Council has ignored the Commission's request, refusing to take any action. CODEPINK is demanding that the Berkeley City Council agendize and vote on the Resolution so that Berkeley can show it cares about a genocide being funded with U.S. taxes, joining cities surrounding Berkeley – San Francisco, Richmond, Oakland, and Hayward– who have all gone on record in favor of a permanent ceasefire. EVENT DETAILS: Date: March 11, 2025 Time: 5:30 PM PT Location: 1231 Addison Street, Berkeley, CA "The Berkeley City Council’s inaction and silence regarding the genocide in Gaza is unacceptable," said CODEPINK organizer Cynthia Papermaster. "We are spending billions of U.S. tax dollars on weapons killing children, and given Israel’s human rights violations, that funding is illegal under U.S. and international law. We desperately need funds in Berkeley to address so many issues– affordable housing, healthcare, clean energy, education. If the City Council can’t oppose the genocide on moral grounds, they should at least care about our community’s needs. It’s difficult to understand the Council’s inaction; we know that the majority of Berkeley voters, like those nationwide, overwhelmingly want a permanent ceasefire and end to arming Israel. We are pleading with the Council to uphold Berkeley’s social justice reputation, take a stand, and act by putting the recommended resolution on their agenda and voting on it." CODEPINK urges all concerned citizens to join the press conference on March 11 to stand silently with us. Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 87 Packet Pg. 149 of 262 From:Aram James To:Perron, Zachary Cc:Binder, Andrew; Reifschneider, James; Wagner, April; Afanasiev, Alex; Lee, Craig; Rodriguez, Miguel; Don Austin; Yolanda Conaway; Barberini, Christopher; Enberg, Nicholas; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; board@pausd.org; Jay Boyarsky; Jose Valle; Sean Allen; Pat M; sharon jackson; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Foley, Michael; Figueroa, Eric; Jensen, Eric; Dave Price; Braden Cartwright; Emily Mibach; Diana Diamond; GRP-City Council; Gerry Gras; Dana St. George; Roberta Ahlquist; Bill Newell; editor@paweekly.com; Gennady Sheyner; Council, City; DuJuan Green; dennis burns; BoardOperations; Robert.Jonson@shf.sccgov.org; Sheriff Transparency; EPA Today; planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.0rg; ParkRec Commission; boardfeedback@smcgov.org; board@valleywater.org; Sarah Wright; Stump, Molly; Damon Silver; h.etzko@gmail.com; Mickie Winkler; cromero@cityofepa.org; Cribbs, Anne; Baker, Rob; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Nicole Chiu-Wang; Templeton, Cari; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan Subject:Ex-Antioch cop takes the witness stand, says he and colleagues hurt people because they enjoyed it Date:Thursday, March 6, 2025 11:33:59 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Ex-Antioch cop takes the witness stand, says he and colleagues hurt people because they enjoyed it https://www.mercurynews.com/2025/03/06/ex-antioch-cop-takes-the-witness-stand-says-he- and-colleagues-hurt-people-because-they-enjoyed-it/ Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 88 Packet Pg. 150 of 262 From:Light As Air Boats To:ParkRec Commission Refresh Or Create Your Splash Park This Summer Date:Thursday, March 6, 2025 7:35:24 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of openingattachments and clicking on links. i SHOP NOW Hello there, Be guest ready! Explore the best interactive aquatic structure designs for splash pads & spray parks! This message needs your attention You've never replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 89 Packet Pg. 151 of 262 Explore Empex Water Toys! Explore Rain Drop Products! Maximizing the sensory experience for people of ALL abilities For Questions or a quote, call an expert! "Tel: 864.367.6161" dave@lightasairboats.com Explore PARKS & CAMPS Catalog here! Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 90 Packet Pg. 152 of 262 Splashes and Dreams, Yours in Wind, Water, and Waves, - The Light As Air Boats Team Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 91 Packet Pg. 153 of 262 We don’t want to spam you. If you're no longer interested in enjoying adventures out on the water Unsubscribe here. Light As Air Boats 13801 Walsingham Rd. Suite A-116 Largo, Florida 33774 Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 92 Packet Pg. 154 of 262 From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You have new held messages Date:Wednesday, March 5, 2025 12:24:06 PM Logo You have new held messages You can release all of your held messages and permit or block future emails from the senders, or manage messages individually. Release all Permit all Block all You can also manage held messages in your Personal Portal. Spam Policy rajni000123@outlook.com Website Details! 2025-03-05 08:43 Release Permit Block Release all Permit all Block all © 2019 Mimecast Services Limited. Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 93 Packet Pg. 155 of 262 Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 94 Packet Pg. 156 of 262 From:Andi Van Airsdale To:ParkRec Commission Subject:More Info. On Our Lifeguard Platforms Date:Wednesday, March 5, 2025 5:29:07 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Hi, It seems you may be looking to add one or more lifeguard chairs this year. I just wanted to provide some information and links to make searching easier for you. I work with our municipalities and parks and recreation departments helping them get what they need to make summer fun and safe for guests. We have discounts available for our municipal friends. For a quick overview - Our Parks & Camps Catalog Here Lifeguard Chairs Here Pool Climbing Walls Here Starting Blocks Here Water Slides Here Group SUPs Here Row Boats Here Dinghies Here Banana Boats Here Towable Tubes Here Docks Here Please let me know if I can help with any questions you or your team may have. I'm happy to provide you with a quote as well. Kindest Regards, Andi Direct Line: 706.619.6670 andi@lightasairboats.com Phone: +1 (833) 582 6287 Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 95 Packet Pg. 157 of 262 From:Aram James To:Lythcott-Haims, Julie; Gerry Gras; Dana St. George; h.etzko@gmail.com; Human Relations Commission; Jeff Rosen; Jay Boyarsky; Cait James; Tim James; Marina Lopez; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Kaloma Smith; planning.commision@cityofpaloalto.org; ParkRec Commission; Josh Becker; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; Gardener, Liz; Lotus Fong; Stump, Molly; Sarah Wright; Jeff Conrad; Jeff Hayden; Dave Price; Pat M; Sean Allen; Ed Lauing; Binder, Andrew; Rodriguez, Miguel; Baker, Rob; Bill Newell; Mickie Winkler; Lu, George; GRP-City Council; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Emily Mibach; Doug Minkler; Yolanda Conaway; Don Austin; Doria Summa; Templeton, Cari; EPA Today; Diana Diamond; board@pausd.org; board@valleywater.org; BoardOperations; boardfeedback@smcgov.org; Vicki Veenker; Vara Ramakrishnan; Palo Alto Free Press; Reifschneider, James; Anna Griffin; dennis burns; DuJuan Green; Tom DuBois; Holman, Karen (external); Dennis Upton Subject:Archiving Gaza: The Race to Save Evidence of War Crimes and Mass Destruction Date:Tuesday, March 4, 2025 10:02:50 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more Archiving Gaza: The Race to SaveEvidence of War Crimes and MassDestruction Inside the dangerous effort to dodge censorship and document the horrors of Israel's war against Gaza. LILA HASSAN MAR 4 ∙GUEST POST READ IN APP For 17 months, the world has stood by as Palestinians in Gaza have documented, largely on social media, a war of annihilation being waged against them by Israel with the full backing of the U.S. government and most Western nations. More than 200 media workers have been killed since October 7, almost all of them Palestinians. Israel has blocked unembedded journalists from entering the besieged Strip. As the people of Gaza have fought against insurmountable challenges in their effort to document and broadcast the horrors to the world, they have faced not Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 96 Packet Pg. 158 of 262 only bombs and bullets, but pervasive censorship by social media companies resulting in the erasure of their documentation of this war. Despite these challenges —and the sporadic and unreliable access to the internet in a Gaza under siege— Palestinian archivists, media workers, historians, and others have fought diligently to not only store vital evidence but to preserve memory. And they do so while trapped in a killing cage. Lila Hassan—an independent journalist whose awards include the Pulitzer Prize and the George Polk Award—came to Drop Site with the gripping story of Palestinians in Gaza who have risked their lives on a mission to thoroughly document the horrors and vast destruction unleashed by Israel over the past 17 months. The archivists abroad who have stepped in to preserve their work risk arrest and intimidation, and have no international support. This story is a long read, but one we believe is well worth your time. Drop Site News is able to bring you these stories, as well as on-the-ground reports from inside Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon, and elsewhere because of the support of our paid subscribers. We have a commitment to ensuring that our journalism is not locked behind a paywall. But the only way we can sustain this is through the voluntary support of our community of readers. If you are a free subscriber and you support our work, please consider upgrading to a paid subscription or gifting one to a friend or family member. You can also make a 501(c)(3) tax-deductible donation to support our work. If you do not have the means to support our work financially, you can do your part by sharing our work on social media and by forwarding this email to your network of contacts. Upgrade to paid —Jeremy Scahill Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 97 Packet Pg. 159 of 262 Tents atop rubble in Jabalia in northern Gaza, February 18, 2025. Photo by OMAR AL-QATTAA/AFP via Getty Images. Story By Lila Hassan Since October 7, 2023, Soliman Hijjy, a 37-year-old freelance visual journalist, has regularly spent hours trekking through the bombed-out landscape of the Gaza Strip, carrying a black safe of hard drives. The drives contain drone footage, photography, videos, and voice recordings that capture the horror Israel unleashed in his native Palestine. The documentation— including evidence of possible war crimes—he’s compiled is extensive. Aerial photos, taken with his own drone, show the decimation of hospitals, mosques, and town squares. Videos and photos show barefoot people in the winter cold Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 98 Packet Pg. 160 of 262 struggling to salvage tents that are collapsing under rainwater; children crying as they suffer from skin disease without medication, due to Israel’s blockade of aid; and children playing with dolls pulled from rubble. He’s filmed interviews with witnesses to attacks on civilians. As a journalist, he has also contributed to The New York Times’s coverage of Gaza. All of his material is obsessively filed away using an archival system he invented on the fly. Hijjy’s archive shows the history of a place that is no more—and the process of its destruction in the deadliest war in the 21st century. If he died, he said, he didn’t want the memories he’d preserved to die with him. Some hard drives he left behind on a private plot of land, under the care of one of its residents. He locked others he couldn’t bear to part with in the small safe, trekking with it through multiple displacements. “The main goal of this,” Hijjy told Drop Site News in November, “is to remember details of history you’d expect to be erased.” Soliman Hijjy working from the trunk of a car. Photo courtesy of Hijjy. Hijjy was posting some material on Instagram and X. But there was no guarantee it would remain online amid ongoing takedowns of Palestinian content. War-time Gaza’s tenuous internet, meanwhile, meant he couldn’t post much of what he collected. He put some files on Google Drive for safekeeping, but a communications blackout imposed by Israel—which often forced him to rely on e- SIM cards from abroad and 2G internet—left him unable to upload most of what he had. So he transferred what he considered his most important files to the external hard drives and categorized them, filling more than a dozen. Over the course of the 15-month war, which came to a tenuous ceasefire on January 19, Israel, along with Egypt, have imposed a total ban on the entry of unembedded international journalists and investigators into Gaza—a ban that remains in effect. Meanwhile, Instagram, X, and Facebook have frequently removed and shadow-banned posts from Gaza—part of a wider pattern of censoring Palestinian content globally. The companies have often said they Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 99 Packet Pg. 161 of 262 remove posts that violate community guidelines or standards, such as promoting graphic content or expressing support for terrorism, but these rules are applied overly broadly and erroneously. Meta, which owns Instagram, has continuously changed its guidelines for Gaza, even retroactively deleting photos and videos posted by journalists and activists. In addition to what Palestinian journalists have published in the international press, photos and videos posted on social media have comprised nearly all of the war- time evidence to emerge from inside Gaza. People and organizations across the world have stepped in to help preserve this genocide’s history. They have been scraping, verifying, and storing information from social media before it can be removed; working on technological solutions for long-term search and storage; collecting witness testimony and other information from inside Gaza for submission to international courts; creating open-source tools to document civilian casualties by Israeli airstrikes; and compiling potentially incriminating statements made by Israeli political and military officials. Their efforts are loosely organized, under-resourced, and often not connected with one another. As Palestinians return to what’s left of their homes under the fragile ceasefire deal, they are searching for those who have been trapped under rubble for months, many reduced to bones. The war has left more than 48,000 Palestinians dead, per the health ministry in Gaza local officials’ count, not including the estimated many thousands of people who are missing. Half of them are women, children, and the elderly, according to Palestinian health authorities, and the true number is widely believed to be higher. Critical infrastructure has been annihilated, and the United Nations estimates that 90% of Gaza’s prewar population has been internally displaced. Documenters inside and outside of Gaza have worked to preserve the details of this carnage. Hijjy, who has been displaced seven times amid unrelenting airstrikes, said he hoped his files will eventually be incorporated into a larger documentation project. He has spent his adult life dedicated to his journalism work in Gaza, which to him is more than a profession. “The process of caring for and preserving the history and archive of your work,” he said, “is very similar to a father’s care for his only son.” Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 100 Packet Pg. 162 of 262 solimanhijjy A post shared by @solimanhijjy solimanhijjy A post shared by @solimanhijjy Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 101 Packet Pg. 163 of 262 Examples of archival work, posted to Instagram, by Hijjy. The Challenge of Documenting War Crimes When Fred Abrahams, now an author and professor, traveled to war-torn Kosovo as a Human Rights Watch researcher in 1998, he found villages still smoldering from fires set by Serbian and Yugoslav forces, and forcibly displaced ethnic Albanians fleeing by foot. When he saw dead bodies lying in a gully, including women and children, he photographed them and immediately began to search for their names. He interviewed surviving witnesses of other Serbian massacres, and his colleagues also visited libraries to scour military and police magazines for evidence of operations, which he dubbed “old school open-source work.” When former Yugoslav President Slobodan Milošević was tried for these war crimes in The Hague, Abrahams joined the prosecution as a witness. On the stand, he addressed Milošević directly: “Our evidence is overwhelming that the forces of the Serbian police and the Yugoslav Army did not adequately minimize damage and killing of civilians, and in many cases targeted them.” Drop Site News is a reader-supported publication. Consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Upgrade to paid Abrahams, who has spent nearly three decades conducting human-rights research and specializes in digital investigations, told Drop Site it’s essential to preserve war-time evidence quickly before it’s lost or destroyed. “The urgency is high,” he said. Accountability requires evidence of crimes that are authenticated and properly stored. The U.N. has a range of guidelines on how to preserve evidence, including digital, that can be admissible in courts. “Courts are relying more and more on digital evidence,” Abrahams said. “If that evidence is being lost, then we’re losing important material to promote justice in the long run.” Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 102 Packet Pg. 164 of 262 Legal repercussions for committing war crimes can be elusive, but for many who work on documentation efforts, the goal is not just legal accountability, but to preserve things for the historical record. An archive ensures events aren’t eliminated from memory. The manpower and resources required for a comprehensive archive is vast and expensive, Ahmad Obada, a coordinator with the Syria Justice and Accountability Center (SJAC), told Drop Site. SJAC was formed in 2012 to collect, authenticate, corroborate, and store social media posts showing the aftermath of airstrikes against civilians by the now-ousted Bashar al-Assad government. Their documentation has supported legal accountability and been cited by local and international media. SJAC has around 60 people working on legal cases, documentation, missing persons, analysis, and investigations. It is funded in part by the U.S. State Department, and paused many of its operations when the State Department froze “non-essential” funding under President Donald Trump. SJAC’s investigation of a gravesite in Syria. Photo: SJAC’s report on “The ISIS Prison at Mansura Dam.” SJAC built its own open-source technology to store the information it collects. The database has Excel-like rows of incidents with evidence for each airstrike or alleged war crime: text and voice interviews with victims and witnesses, government documents, and videos, including those posted on YouTube. Incidents are tagged and searchable for words like “explosion” and “barrel bomb,” available in English and Arabic, and display a chain of custody for each piece of information. Over 10 years, SJAC has verified half a million out of the two million incidents it has collected. “We’ve been working for years and we are only 30% done,” Obada said. After October 7, he added, he spoke with a Palestinian rights organization interested in replicating SJAC’s open-source database. But he worried that the intensity of Gaza’s war meant it could take even longer for researchers to adequately archive it. “The data from there is never ending.” Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 103 Packet Pg. 165 of 262 The Palestinian Centre for Human Rights Documenters work with no protections in Gaza. The Palestinian Centre for Human Rights (PCHR), a well-known nonprofit established in 1995, has spent years contributing research and documentation to international inquiries into Israeli conduct in Gaza. Its founder, Raji Sourani, has been a recipient of the Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights Award. But Israel has often subjected Palestinian research groups and their staff to allegations of terrorism. The PCHR’s headquarters was bombed early in the war. Bassil Sourani, Raji’s 30-year-old son and the PCHR’s international advocacy officer, was also personally targeted. The Israeli military recorded and posted a phone call between Sourani and a friend, which it used to accuse each of being a “Hamas operative.” Two hours later, an Israeli airstrike hit his house. Sourani and his parents were in a hallway when the bomb struck another part of the house, sparing them from the blast. “If we [were] in any area in the house other than we were in, we should have been dead or critically injured,” he told Drop Site. “At the end of the day, they can reach anyone, everywhere.” Sourani called the months since October 7 the most grueling and dangerous the organization has faced. A PCHR lawyer, Dana Yaghi, and documenter, Nour Naser Abu Nour, were killed by airstrikes on their homes in February 2024, three days apart, along with members of their families. One-third of the organization’s staff left Gaza, and those who remained had resorted to working from makeshift offices. Sourani fled to Cairo in December 2023. “The amount of strikes compared to previous wars and offensives, and no electricity or water, all prevented us from working properly,” he said. In response to queries about the targeting of PCHR staff, the Israeli military and defense ministry replied with a blanket statement denying that it targets civilians or journalists. “Given the ongoing exchanges of fire, remaining in an active combat zone has inherent risks,” an unnamed spokesperson said via email. Sourani said PCHR also lost funding from the German and Swiss governments after October 7, without being given reasons why. The German government told Drop Site it pulled planned funding from a PCHR project after the organization Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 104 Packet Pg. 166 of 262 made a statement in which it “condoned armed resistance against Israel.” When asked for the statement, it did not provide one, saying it had been taken offline. The Swiss government said it did not renew funding to PCHR in December 2023, saying that the group was out of compliance with its “code of conduct and anti- discrimination clause.” PCHR isn’t the only organization struggling to keep funding for Palestinian documentation work—a stark contrast with other recent conflicts. Western governments, including the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and the Netherlands, along with foundations and individual donors poured resources into documentation efforts in and outside of Syria, and in Ukraine. “Depending on the conflict, the alignment with the foreign policy goals have to be here,” John Jaeger, a former State Department official tasked with conflict stabilization and co-founder of Hala, a project that curbed civilian harm by offering advance warning with information from thousands of audio files of Syrian government and foreign pilots discussing hits. Jaeger went on to preserve, verify, translate, and store this data, and even expanded the documentation project to Yemen. Hala has shared its findings with the United Nations and other accountability forums for use in trials and reports. When asked if the same support was supplied to preserving content from Gaza, Jaeger recounted a story with a government he did not name: “I walked through what we do and our methodology. I said I think we’re able to place IDF [Israeli Defense Forces] soldiers where atrocities were committed that they later denied, and it got real quiet.” The conversation awkwardly ended there. “Without saying it explicitly, they were like ‘no way.’” And while PCHR researchers have scaled back its exhaustive documentation work into sampling, its efforts on the ground continue. Rahim (we’re not using his real name to avoid retaliation), a 38-year-old native of Gaza City is one of them. He lost his home and around 60 members of his extended family in the war. Although his wife and children managed to evacuate Gaza after eight months, he remained in Gaza to archive the conflict. “Moving forward is the only option,” he told Drop Site on WhatsApp in November. More than a dozen PCHR field researchers like Rahim have kept up the work of Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 105 Packet Pg. 167 of 262 troops, forced starvation, and the targeting of medical facilities and civil defense services. They’ve prioritized evidence to provide directly to the International Criminal Court and International Court of Justice (ICJ), which have opened cases accusing Israel, respectively, of war crimes and genocide. The senior Sourani is a lawyer and member of the South African delegation at the ICJ, and PCHR has assisted with ICC investigations into prior Israeli offensives and other human rights violations committed by Israel in Gaza since 2015, when Palestine became a member. A PCHR researcher captured the destruction of Rafah a day after the ceasefire came into effect. Courtesy of “Rahim.” Before the ceasefire, Rahim was living in a shelter in the center of Gaza and cramming himself into crowded vans, which operated on limited fuel, to get to and from sites of incidents he was investigating. “If there’s an airstrike on a civilian house, I’ll go speak to witnesses, count victims, take pictures of the destruction,” he said. He collected his evidence first on paper, then took photos of his notes on his phone. Then he walked for hours from his shelter in the south through destroyed streets and demolished houses to Deir al-Balah in central Gaza, where there were solar-powered charging stations for his devices and a stronger internet connection. From there, he sent his files—painstakingly, over the still-sluggish connection—to his manager, also based in Gaza. The manager would review the material and send it to the PCHR team based in other countries. That external PCHR team collaborates with other Palestinian rights organizations to submit verified research to the ICC. PCHR has also worked directly with the legal team from South Africa that initiated the ICJ’s genocide case in December 2023, providing evidence, including on-the-ground testimony, for dozens of cases of alleged war crimes. “You use your entire existence,” Sourani said, “to convey the picture of what’s happening.” Digital Archives Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 106 Packet Pg. 168 of 262 Scores of Palestinians within Israel have been arrested for sharing content online deemed “incitement,” highlighting the risk to locals of posting information about the war. The Committee to Protect Journalists has documented 70 arrests of journalists by Israel across the Palestinian territories since October 7—some held without charge, and some subjected to mistreatment and even torture. The Israeli military denied it was arresting journalists for their work, saying it had detained “individuals suspected of involvement in terrorist activity.” Archival efforts based outside of Palestine, meanwhile, have stepped in to help. One is Mnemonic, a Germany-based organization specialized in creating archives that preserve vulnerable digital evidence in conflict zones. Its databases for Ukraine, Syria, Yemen, and Sudan are all posted on its website. But Mnemonic has kept its Gaza archive private due to concerns that added attention could result in “digital or physical attacks,” Hadi Al Khatib, its managing director, told Drop Site. “We want to do it low-profile,” he said. Whereas the information that Rahim collects for PCHR is narrowed down into what can be submitted to international courts, Mnemonic scrapes social media to collect all potential violations of international law that it can find. It aims to centralize the evidence collected by Palestinian organizations, journalists like Hijjy, and regular civilians, as well as the work of other international NGOs. Al Khatib and one other researcher have scraped over 4 million data points from social media since October 2023. “There is a lot happening every hour,” he said. “It needs a team of 200 people looking into this.” Share While it compiles this database, Al Khatib said, Mnemonic is also working on the most crucial step in the archival process: verification. It has collaborated with Palestinian organizations like PCHR to add witness statements, photo and video, and doctor’s notes for some of the incidents it scraped from social media. But professional documenters like Rahim inside Gaza have spent the war overwhelmed and facing nearly impossible conditions, making them largely unavailable to support outside archive efforts. So Mnemonic has thoroughly Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 107 Packet Pg. 169 of 262 verified only a small portion of the cases they’ve collected. It has prioritized getting verified information into legal cases against perpetrators of war crimes in a variety of countries and is working with Global Rights Compliance, a nonprofit that provides support to investigators and prosecutors working on international criminal cases. Last October in Belgium, authorities launched an investigation into a Belgian- Israeli soldier who is part of a sniper unit accused of shootings of unarmed civilians. In January, an Israeli reservist vacationing in Brazil fled the country in the middle of the night, with the help of Israeli authorities, after a judge ordered police to conduct an investigation for war crimes based on evidence provided by the Hind Rajab Foundation, a Belgium-based Palestinian rights organization. HRF had submitted a complaint of war crimes to the ICC accusing 1,000 members of the Israeli military of carrying out a variety of war crimes, including looting, destruction of property, and attacks against civilians. The Israeli military told Drop Site that it “examines reports of videos posted on social media and handles them with command and disciplinary measures,” adding that cases where soldiers’ expression or behavior were found “inappropriate” were “handled appropriately.” All digital archive efforts also face the risk of being corrupted over time. If copies aren’t made and refreshed to keep up with advancing operating systems and equipment, content can degrade to the point where it’s no longer accessible or usable. In short, digitization does not equal preservation. Just like perishable food needs to be sealed airtight so as not to spoil, digital material also needs to be stored and vacuumed or zipped so that original metadata—where something was taken, posted, or what it shows—is preserved, even if the original source disappears. Another grassroots documentation effort, the Accountability Archive, created a storage system to prevent the loss of the information they collect. The archive gathers and preserves statements by politicians and other public figures that it determines to have expressed support for mass killings in Gaza. “We need to have a record of what people have said and how they justified violence on a massive scale,” Alex Foley, one of the group’s founders, told Drop Site, explaining the impetus for starting the archive. Since the crime of genocide must include intent, Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 108 Packet Pg. 170 of 262 Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and scholars of genocide have used statements by Israeli officials similar to the ones collected by the Accountability Archive to determine that Israel is committing genocide and other crimes against humanity. A volunteer effort with a core team based in the United Kingdom, the five-person project consists of three researchers, a developer, and an analyst. It has an advisory board of about a dozen more people. They started by circulating a Google form, Foley said. But the team feared that Google could delete it, or that it could be lost to a virus or spyware. They now use a form—posted to their website—to which crowdsourced contributors can upload links to relevant statements. The form automatically creates an archived copy, while the team stores the information on private servers and back-up hard drives. By January, they’d stored over 53,000 data points. “I start my day job and at 5, I do this until 10,” said Foley, who was working in the charity sector at the time he was interviewed by Drop Site. “It’s becoming a second full-time job.” Accidental Archives Incident date: October 28–29, 2024 Location: Beit Lahia, North Gaza Strike type: Airstrike Infrastructure: Apartment Building, Residential Civilians reported killed: 129–254 (42–60 children, 28–37 women, 29–38 men) Known belligerent: Israeli Military For more than a decade, the U.K.-based nonprofit Airwars has been creating online entries like the one above to document civilian harm from airstrikes across the world. It has compiled archives for Syria, Iraq, Somalia, Libya, Yemen, and Ukraine. For Gaza, a team of 10, supported by 30 volunteers, has collected over 9,000 incidents, verifying close to 1,000. But funding remains the biggest obstacle —and an anomaly in Airwars’ history, Emily Tripp, its director, told Drop Site. “I’ve had conversations with foundations where publicly they’re very supportive of the cause, and then internally the politics of it means that they don’t invest, they don’t touch it,” she said. Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 109 Packet Pg. 171 of 262 “We saw how easy it was for those funders to mobilize around Ukraine,” she added. But when it came to Gaza, “suddenly all of them were hand-wringing and going through internal strategic conversations and deciding whether or not this was important.” Tripp also emphasized how integral social media is to their work. “You have, on any given strike, a [member of the] Palestinian diaspora saying, ‘My relative was killed’; local journalists on the scene; family Facebook pages,” Tripp explained. “We’re deliberately looking for quite specific things.” This information, which lives on social media, is essential to triangulating their sources and establishing the facts of what happened on the ground. “Social media companies need to start seeing themselves as accidental archives,” Tripp said. “You have tech companies who are willy-nilly in how they will regulate or not their own content, and they’re also not seeing themselves as holders of this incredibly important, valuable information for humanity.” Companies like X have changed a lot in the years after the Syrian war. It used to be easy to pull large amounts of data from the site using search terms or other systems, like browser extensions and independent software that automatically scrape information. But since Elon Musk’s takeover and business restructure, X has put limitations on how much content researchers can access at a large scale, which is a baseline requirement for an archive. X’s strict anti-scraping measures block IP addresses attempting to pull data en masse and make mass information only available for purchase. In 2021, Facebook implemented AI machine learning tools, enabling it to quickly identify and block any type of scraping from its platforms, significantly slowing down the work of archivists. Meanwhile, X suspended hundreds of accounts that it alleged to have been pushing hate speech, drawing critiques from digital rights groups that the platform had targeted accounts sharing important information about Israeli attacks. Within three months of the start of the war, according to Human Rights Watch, Meta was systematically censoring and suppressing Palestine-related content as well, tallying at least 1,050 takedowns from across 60 countries. In some cases, Meta alleged certain instances represented support for “terrorist groups” Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 110 Packet Pg. 172 of 262 (Meta relies on the U.S. State Department, which designates Hamas as such, to make these calls). But Human Rights Watch found these posts did not even praise or support Hamas, but “instead were aimed at giving people context and information to understand the escalation in violence.” In other cases, without giving a reason, Meta took down prominent Palestinian accounts, including those of journalists. Among them is a Palestinian news agency, Al Quds News Network, whose Facebook page was permanently deleted and whose Instagram was temporarily suspended. Meta has also retroactively deleted content posted by journalists in Gaza. Most famously, photography by Motaz Azaiza that documented the immediate aftermath of airstrikes with images of dead children’s limbs was found to go against guidelines of “sexual activity or nudity,” and even “pornography,” according to an AJ+ investigation, resulting in the takedown of dozens of his posts. In December 2023, Meta’s independent Oversight Board criticized the company’s automated takedown policy for Instagram posts with references to Hamas—a U.S.-designated terrorist organization, and also the local governance of Gaza. One post reinstated by the Oversight Board after being labeled as “hate speech” included videos of people killed and injured after an airstrike on a hospital. Meta’s takedown of Palestinian content has continued through evolving policies, such as targeting keywords like “Zionist”—which Meta says can be a proxy for hate speech—that often appears alongside content with information about civilian harm from Israeli strikes. Hijjy, who has 165,000 followers on Instagram and 1,400 on X, said his posts were blocked or throttled because they contained images of bodies mangled by Israeli strikes; sometimes, his content was deemed “political” and in violation of Meta’s community guidelines. “I would avoid certain words like ‘attack’ and ‘Palestine’ out of precaution to ensure my posts wouldn’t be taken down,” he said. X, meanwhile, was purging dormant accounts. Hijjy wondered what would happen to his accounts if he joined the more than 200 journalists to be killed in the conflict. To avoid triggering a takedown, activists have encouraged the use of coded language —spelling Palestine as Pale$tine, for example. As a consequence, search functions cannot yield productive results, because straightforward terms such as Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 111 Packet Pg. 173 of 262 platforms, if it still exists. Even emojis such as the Palestinian flag and the red triangle, which is associated with the Qassam Brigades, are now subjected to takedown or shadowbanning (limiting the reach of any given post). Meta and X did not respond to requests for comment from Drop Site. mahmudhams A post shared by @mahmudhams Meta and X also don’t offer added protections to accounts of journalists in Palestine or others serving a public information role in this conflict. Mahmud Hams, 44, is a photojournalist from Gaza with the French wire agency Agence France-Presse. He used to hold live broadcasts from his Instagram account that had 40,000 followers, showing the aftermath of airstrikes, or his team running from Israeli drone strikes, or children suffering from skin diseases. He’d stream from tents from Rafah to Nasser Hospital, and he’d convert those broadcasts into videos—a function offered and done wholly on Instagram—for users to share. But in January, his account was hacked, the username changed, and all of the videos were deleted. He enlisted support from colleagues at AFP to help restore his account, but with no success. “I kept all of my work on this page so people Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 112 Packet Pg. 174 of 262 would know what was happening in Gaza,” Hams told Drop Site. He managed to find some of the live broadcasts he’d converted into video reels saved on his phone. But as for the rest: “We’ve lost it.” Gaza as It Was Up until the ceasefire, Hijjy spent countless days alternating his focus between work and survival. When he wasn’t researching and recording, he was looking for a meal. “Life here isn’t stable,” he told Drop Site in December. After the ceasefire, Hijjy finally returned home to Gaza City to find his house still standing—but no electricity, water, or internet, prompting him to return to Deir al- Balah, where utilities were more available, if unreliable. The pause in airstrikes has made movement easier and safer, and people are more reachable than before. But rebuilding Gaza’s destroyed infrastructure will be slow. Internet access remains shaky, because 75% of cell towers have been bombed, and there is a shortage of fuel to power those that remain operational. The leveled landscape hinders travel, and many people are expected to remain in tents or otherwise displaced possibly for years, meaning that witnesses to past crimes would remain difficult to reach for documenters even with an end to the bombardment. Rebuilding efforts, such as clearing rubble, meanwhile, could result in lost evidence, while surveillance footage from facilities like hospitals and schools must be collected before it’s deleted or lost. At the same time, documentation is competing with the desire to return home, learn the fates of loved ones, and mourn. After visiting Rafah the day after the ceasefire came into effect, Rahim, the PCHR researcher, told Drop Site, “The extent of the destruction in the city is staggering.” In the 20 years Hijjy spent reporting on Gaza before October 7, he captured and preserved images of Gaza’s sea line, busy roundabouts, and streets stretching for miles. That Gaza is gone: the streets turned to rubble, the destroyed infrastructure leaving trash and sewage to collect along the coast. He sees the full scope of his work as one that also shows people what Gaza was like before. “I want people to know what life was like here for many years before this great devastation obscured the beauty, stories, and daily life of this beautiful spot on Earth and its Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 113 Packet Pg. 175 of 262 residents,” he said. Leave a comment < Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 114 Packet Pg. 176 of 262 From:Aram James To:Robert.Jonson@shf.sccgov.org; Rodriguez, Miguel; Binder, Andrew; Dave Price; Don Austin; Yolanda Conaway; Sean Allen; Pat M; Barberini, Christopher; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Ed Lauing; Gardener, Liz; Bill Newell; Figueroa, Eric; Foley, Michael; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Afanasiev, Alex; Perron, Zachary; Gennady Sheyner; Sarah Wright; Stump, Molly; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; Jeff Rosen; Reifschneider, James; Jay Boyarsky; board@pausd.org; BoardOperations; boardfeedback@smcgov.org; GRP-City Council; Gerry Gras; Dana St. George; Sheriff Transparency; sharon jackson; ladoris cordell; Sameena@Secure-Justice.org; Lythcott-Haims, Julie; Veenker, Vicki; Lu, George; Reckdahl, Keith; Diana Diamond; Doug Minkler; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; cromero@cityofepa.org; planning.commision@cityofpaloalto.org; ParkRec Commission; Lotus Fong; Roberta Ahlquist; Michelle; yolanda; Kaloma Smith; Steve Wagstaffe; jay.boyarsky@da.sccgov.org; Rose Lynn; Baker, Rob; Damon Silver; Angel, David; Palo Alto Free Press; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; frances.Rothschild@jud.ca.gov; Roberta Roth; h.etzko@gmail.com; Enberg, Nicholas; Emily Mibach; Vara Ramakrishnan; Human Relations Commission; Jeff Hayden; Jeff Conrad; dennis burns; Roberta Ahlquist; Mickie Winkler; Nicole Chiu-Wang; Daniel Kottke; planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.0rg; Patrice Ventresca Subject:Under Pressure, Cuyahoga County Releases Video of Teen’s Shooting by Deputy Date:Tuesday, March 4, 2025 9:46:04 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Under Pressure, Cuyahoga County Releases Video of Teen’s Shooting by Deputy https://www.themarshallproject.org/2025/02/05/police-body-cam-cleveland-cuyahoga-sheriff Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 115 Packet Pg. 177 of 262 From:Light As Air Boats To:ParkRec Commission Poolside Slides Make for the Biggest Splash! Date:Tuesday, March 4, 2025 7:36:33 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of openingattachments and clicking on links. SHOP NOW Hi there, Check out these Pool Slides, Climbing Walls, Starting Blocks, & Lifeguard Chairs—designed for safety, durability, and endless fun in your pool! Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 116 Packet Pg. 178 of 262 Pool Slides, Climbing Walls, Starting Blocks & Lifeguard Chairs SPECTRUM AQUATICS - The choice for parks around the country! Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 117 Packet Pg. 179 of 262 Kesplash Climbing Walls are available in clear, blue, and green translucent panels. And 2, 3, and 4 panel heights, they are modular to fit any space and deck configuration Give swimmers an extra boost on starts! Used in many competition and recreational pools Explore portable lifeguard chairs with Spectrum! ALL POOL EQUIPMENT HERE "For Questions or a Quote, Call Dave. "Tel:864.367.6161"dave@lightasairboats.com Yours in Wind, Water, and Waves, Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 118 Packet Pg. 180 of 262 - The Light As Air Boats Team We don’t want to spam you. If you're no longer interested in enjoying adventures out on the water Unsubscribe here. Light As Air Boats 13801 Walsingham Rd. Suite A-116 Largo, Florida 33774 Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 119 Packet Pg. 181 of 262 From:Aram James To:Perron, Zachary Cc:Jay Boyarsky; Binder, Andrew; Barberini, Christopher; Enberg, Nicholas; Afanasiev, Alex; DuJuan Green; dennis burns; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; district1@bos.sccgov.org; Council, City; Dave Price; EPA Today; Diana Diamond; Jeff Conrad; Jeff Rosen; Jeff Hayden; Bill Newell; Rodriguez, Miguel; Reifschneider, James; Wagner, April; Human Relations Commission; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Lotus Fong; Roberta Ahlquist; Vara Ramakrishnan; Ed Lauing; h.etzko@gmail.com; Figueroa, Eric; Jensen, Eric; Veenker, Vicki; Julie Lythcott-Haims; Palo Alto Free Press; Kaloma Smith; Friends of Cubberley; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; frances.Rothschild@jud.ca.gov; Baker, Rob; Robert.Jonson@shf.sccgov.org; planning.commision@cityofpaloalto.org; ParkRec Commission; Foley, Michael; GRP-City Council; citycouncil@mountainview.gov; Gerry Gras; Dana St. George; Don Austin; Yolanda Conaway; Doug Minkler; Stump, Molly; Sarah Wright; Salem Ajluni; Reckdahl, Keith Subject:Feds say ex-Antioch cops plotted to violently oppress residents. They were doing their job, defense says Date:Monday, March 3, 2025 1:11:47 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Feds say ex-Antioch cops plotted to violently oppress residents. They were doing their job, defense says Feds say ex-Antioch cops plotted to violently oppress residents. They were doing their job, defense says https://www.mercurynews.com/2025/03/03/feds-say-ex-antioch-cops-plotted-to-violently- oppress-residents-they-were-doing-their-job-defense-says/ Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 120 Packet Pg. 182 of 262 From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You have new held messages Date:Monday, March 3, 2025 7:16:01 AM Logo You have new held messages You can release all of your held messages and permit or block future emails from the senders, or manage messages individually. Release all Permit all Block all You can also manage held messages in your Personal Portal. Spam Policy nora.henderson@educateandmore.com RE: School Districts Contacts 2025 2025-03-03 04:01 Release Permit Block Release all Permit all Block all © 2019 Mimecast Services Limited. Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 121 Packet Pg. 183 of 262 Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 122 Packet Pg. 184 of 262 From:Aram James To:Sean Allen; Pat M; sharon jackson; Rose Lynn; Don Austin; Yolanda Conaway; board@pausd.org; Kaloma Smith; Jeff Conrad; Jeff Rosen; Jay Boyarsky; Perron, Zachary; Reifschneider, James; Binder, Andrew; Dave Price; EPA Today; Gennady Sheyner; h.etzko@gmail.com; Tim James; caitlin.a.james@gnail.com; Marina Lopez; Josie James-Le; Diana Diamond; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Rodriguez, Miguel; Cecilia Taylor; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan; Lotus Fong; Lydia Kou; Gardener, Liz; Liz Kniss; Stump, Molly; Steve Wagstaffe; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; board@valleywater.org; BoardOperations; Bill Newell; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Mickie Winkler; Emily Mibach; editor@paweekly.com; Ed Lauing; Reckdahl, Keith; Gerry Gras; Dana St. George; Josh Becker; Jose Valle; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Doug Minkler; Zelkha, Mila; Vara Ramakrishnan; Baker, Rob; Roberta Roth; Roberta Ahlquist; Sheriff Transparency; Nicole Chiu-Wang; planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.0rg; ParkRec Commission; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; cromero@cityofepa.org; Anna Griffin; Angel, David; Cribbs, Anne; Templeton, Cari; Braden Cartwright; chuck jagoda; Barberini, Christopher; Rowena Chiu; josh@joshsalcman.com; Sarah Wright; Salem Ajluni; Rosen, Jeff; DuJuan Green; dennis burns; Dennis Upton; Donna Wallach; Enberg, Nicholas; Afanasiev, Alex; Henry Etzkowitz; Figueroa, Eric; Jensen, Eric; Burt, Patrick; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; frances.Rothschild@jud.ca.gov; yolanda; Friends of Cubberley; Foley, Michael Subject:dredging-up-the-ghostly-secrets-of-slave-ships Date:Sunday, March 2, 2025 10:35:17 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. . dredging-up-the-ghostly-secrets-of-slave-ships https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2025/03/03/dredging-up-the-ghostly-secrets-of-slave- ships Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 123 Packet Pg. 185 of 262 From:Aram James To:Perron, Zachary; Reifschneider, James; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Foley, Michael; h.etzko@gmail.com; Human Relations Commission; Binder, Andrew; Sean Allen; Pat M; Kaloma Smith; Burt, Patrick; Lythcott-Haims, Julie; Vicki Veenker; Reckdahl, Keith; Lu, George; Dana St. George; Gerry Gras; Don Austin; Yolanda Conaway; Bill Newell; Rose Lynn; Jeff Rosen; Jeff Conrad; Jeff Hayden; Jay Boyarsky; Jose Valle; board@pausd.org; board@valleywater.org; BoardOperations; boardfeedback@smcgov.org; Steve Wagstaffe; Dave Price; Emily Mibach; Cecilia Taylor; Sheriff Transparency; Gennady Sheyner; EPA Today; cromero@cityofepa.org; planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.0rg; ParkRec Commission; sharon jackson; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; editor@paweekly.com; Ed Lauing; editor@almanacnews.com; Dennis Upton; Rodriguez, Miguel; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; Damon Silver; jay.boyarsky@da.sccgov.org; Rowena Chiu; Baker, Rob; Roberta Ahlquist; Roberta Ahlquist; Vara Ramakrishnan; Doug Minkler; Holman, Karen (external); Tom DuBois; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Nicole Chiu-Wang; Wagner, April; Barberini, Christopher; chuck jagoda; Cait James; Tim James; GRP-City Council; Council, City; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; Mickie Winkler; Sarah Wright; Diana Diamond Subject:Watch "Black Man Brutalized For 30 MINUTES By Man With ‘Hate’ Tattoo, No One Intervenes" on YouTube Date:Sunday, March 2, 2025 7:52:23 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. https://youtu.be/BPaImVi43ZA?si=FjsoJBSZ217gWs1h Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 124 Packet Pg. 186 of 262 From:Aram James To:Binder, Andrew; Reifschneider, James; Perron, Zachary; Ed Lauing; Shikada, Ed; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Rodriguez, Miguel; Damon Silver; Cecilia Taylor; Sean Allen; Pat M; Robert.Jonson@shf.sccgov.org; Barberini, Christopher; board@valleywater.org; board@pausd.org; BoardOperations; dennis burns; DuJuan Green; Sarah Wright; Stump, Molly; Bill Newell; Jensen, Eric; Figueroa, Eric; cromero@cityofepa.org; rabrica@cityofepa.org; Jose Valle; Council, City; Gerry Gras; Dana St. George; h.etzko@gmail.com; Dave Price; Braden Cartwright; Emily Mibach; EPA Today; Diana Diamond; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; Human Relations Commission; planning.commision@cityofpaloalto.org; ParkRec Commission; Cribbs, Anne; Anna Griffin; Templeton, Cari; Gardener, Liz; Lotus Fong; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan; Sheriff Transparency; Gennady Sheyner; sharon jackson; Lee, Craig; Zelkha, Mila; Mickie Winkler; Kaloma Smith; Jeff Conrad; Jeff Rosen; Jeff Hayden; Don Austin; Yolanda Conaway; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Josh Becker; jay.boyarsky@da.sccgov.org; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Enberg, Nicholas; Nicole Chiu-Wang; Friends of Cubberley; Roberta Ahlquist; Foley, Michael; George for Palo Alto; Vara Ramakrishnan; Veenker, Vicki; Burt, Patrick; Patrice Ventresca; Donna Wallach; Palo Alto Free Press; Freddie.Quintana@sen.ca.gov; frances.Rothschild@jud.ca.gov; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; Doria Summa; Supervisor Susan Ellenberg; Supervisor Otto Lee; Wagner, April; Steve Wagstaffe; Gennady Sheyner; GRP-City Council; Stone, Greer; Greg Tanaka; Lydia Kou; ladoris cordell; Holman, Karen (external); Tom DuBois; Jack Ajluni; Salem Ajluni; San José Spotlight; Jennifer Morrow San José Spotlight; Jay Boyarsky; Daniel Kottke; Reckdahl, Keith; Roberta Ahlquist; Cait James; Tim James; editor@paweekly.com; Marina Lopez Subject:Chaos in policing only grows under Trump admin Date:Saturday, March 1, 2025 10:01:06 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachmentsand clicking on links. Closing Argument This week's art is by BingGuan. Full work below.BY JAMILES LARTEY A community in Alabama may soon be forced to close its local police department. Last week, a grand jury recommended disbanding the Hanceville Police Department, concluding that it “recently operated as more of a criminal enterprise than a law enforcement agency.” City officials have said they are considering the recommendation, but for now, the department is, in effect, shuttered. Five officers have been arrested, and the entire force has been placed on leave. One state away, a former Rankin County sheriff’s deputy came clean to Mississippi Today this week about his role in a two-decade reign of terror by the department’s “Goon Squad.” The former deputy, Christian Dedmon, said that he and his colleagues regularly brutalized and humiliated suspects, lied in official reports, and frequently seized and destroyed evidence without a warrant during drug raids. Dedmon, like several former deputies from Rankin County, is serving prison time after being convicted last year in the brutal assault and torture of two Black men. Neither case will be shocking to regular readers of this newsletter. Previous editions have highlighted similarly extreme — even cartoonish — instances of police misconduct, corruption and brutality. We have also covered how some of those cases have triggered efforts at reform and accountability. But as the federal government, and to a lesser extent, public opinion, increasingly turns away from concerns over policing — more than four years since protests over police violence overtook the national discourse — the future of police accountability looks uncertain. DONATE Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 125 Packet Pg. 187 of 262 Deadly police violence has increased slightly since 2020. Statistics on police killings per capita show a slight but durable increase since the pandemic and George Floyd protests, according to a Marshall Project analysis of the Mapping Police Database. Numbers released this week suggest this trend continued through 2024, even as violent crime rates have largely returned to pre-pandemic levels. Under the Trump administration, the Department of Justice has insinuated that it will no longer pursue the kinds of federal investigations that regularly followed high profile acts of police violence during the Obama and Biden era. President Trump also rescinded an executive order signed by former President Biden in 2022 that established use-of-force restrictions for federal law enforcement and created a national database for tracking misconduct, which all federal law enforcement agencies were required to submit to. Earlier this month, the Trump administration took that database offline, The Washington Post reported. Because of its short lifespan, it’s difficult to assess how effective the database was, or could have been, at its stated goal: preventing officers with a history of serious misconduct from finding new jobs in law enforcement. The single report released about the database in December of last year found that despite nearly 10,000 queries run by officials in the first eight months of 2024, only 25 searches were made by Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 126 Packet Pg. 188 of 262 The vast majority of misconduct incidents captured in the database were generated by border enforcement agents and corrections officers in federal prisons, The Appeal reported on Thursday. The executive branch isn’t the only part of the federal government to sidestep a role in police a role in police accountability. This week, the Supreme Court declined to hear a case that could have increased the legal responsibility police have to ensure they have the correct address when conducting raids on the homes of crime suspects. These “wrong home” raids can create lasting trauma for the people they ensnare. A lawsuit filed on Tuesday in Denver, for example, alleged that police looking for a man in apartment 307, instead raided apartment 306, and wound up locking a mother and her 5- and 6-year-old daughters in a police car for an hour. In Chicago this month, Anjanette Young is marking the six-year anniversary of a wrong-home raid that made national news. Young was handcuffed and left naked despite explaining to officers that they were in the wrong place. She has since become an advocate for changing the way police approach these kinds of arrests. “Six years since I stood before officers — crying, pleading, afraid — only to be ignored,” Young said at a news conference outside City Hall last week, WBEZ Chicago reported. “And yet I stand here again, afraid and demanding for justice, accountability, still demanding that those in power would keep their promise.” Beyond changes in how law enforcement is (and isn’t) subject to oversight and accountability, developments in recent weeks have also raised some questions about who enters the profession and how they are trained. In New York City, the NYPD announced that it’s lowering its educational hiring standards in response to what officials describe as a recruitment crisis. With new applications down by more than half since 2017, the department is reducing its college credit requirements from 60 to 24 credits — while also reinstating a timed 1.5-mile run requirement that the department dropped in 2023, partly based on the belief it would help more women meet the qualifications. The return of that requirement comes just days after The Associated Press published an investigation which found that at least 29 police recruits have died in training over the past decade, often from heatstroke, excessive physical stress, or underlying medical conditions that were exacerbated by training activities. A disproportionate number of the deaths occurred in Black trainees with the sickle cell trait, a genetic condition which can cause fatal complications under high physical stress in otherwise healthy people. Want more people to know about this? Tell your network. SHARE ON FACEBOOK SHARE ON TWITTER FORWARD TO A FRIEND THE BEST OF THE MARSHALL PROJECT “Tell us something.” Texas plans to execute David Wood on March 13, despite his longstanding innocence claims and new evidence that key witnesses in his trial may have lied under police pressure. One man, who police tried to convince to testify, described that pressure to my colleague Maurice Chammah like this: “David Wood is our suspect,” he recalls the detectives saying. “It’d be best if you tell Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 127 Packet Pg. 189 of 262 Update. On Monday, a U.S. District Judge ordered the Bureau of Prisons not to transfer nine transgender women to men’s prisons. Previously, several transgender women in federal prisons — including a few who have already had gender confirmation surgery — had received word that they would be moved to men’s facilities. My colleague Beth Schwartzapfel has the story. “In your mind, you have to find your freedom.” Jon-Adrian “JJ” Velazquez spent nearly 24 years in prison for a murder he did not commit. But he found a lifeline through acting after joining a theater program at Sing Sing Correctional Facility, the basis of the Oscar-nominated film, “Sing Sing.” Now an activist on the outside, also starring in the film, Velazquez tells my colleague Aala Abdullahi how the power of storytelling helped him survive — and why he’s using his platform to help others do the same. Corrections Officer Paul Hoover, left,and Robert “Double-R” Rother, playchess at Boonville CorrectionalCenter in Boonville, Missouri, in 2019. Each week, Closing Argumenthighlights the work of an artist withan interest in the criminal justice system. This piece is by Bing Guan. Jamiles Lartey is a New Orleans-based staff writer for The Marshall Project. Previously, he worked as a reporter for the Guardian covering issues of criminal justice, race and policing. Jamiles was a member of the team behind the award-winning online database “The Counted,” tracking police violence in 2015 and 2016. In 2016, he was named “Michael J. Feeney Emerging Journalist of the Year” by the National Association of Black Journalists. Want fewer emails, or to change which newsletters you're subscribed to? Adjust the email you receive from us by updating your preferences. If you want to stop getting any email from The Marshall Project at all, unsubscribe at any time. Have Feedback? Reply to this email with your thoughts. Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 128 Packet Pg. 190 of 262 This email was sent to abjpd1@gmail.com why did I get this? unsubscribe from this list update subscription preferences The Marshall Project · 156 West 56th Street · Studio, 3rd Floor · New York, NY 10019 · USA Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 129 Packet Pg. 191 of 262 From:Office of Supervisor Otto Lee To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Invitation to the State Of The County 2025 Address Date:Friday, February 28, 2025 5:33:50 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious ofopening attachments and clicking on links. STATE OF THE COUNTY 2025 ADDRESS INVITATION Friends & Neighbors - County of Santa Clara Board President Otto Lee will deliver the State Of The County 2025 Address on Friday, March 14 at Board Chambers, County Government Center, 70 West Hedding Street, San José, CA 95110. Event registration will open at 5:30 PM, with the program to start shortly thereafter. We hope you can join us for this special event. The address will be livestreamed online, and childcare will be available. Please RSVP online - Click HERE for more information. [LINK] Thank you! Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 130 Packet Pg. 192 of 262 RSVP - State Of The County 2025 - LINK Invitación especial de Otto Lee, Presidente de la Junta de Supervisores del Condado de Santa Clara, para asistir al informe anual sobre el Estado del Condado. Otto Lee, Presidente de la Junta de Supervisores, presentará el informe anual sobre el Estado del Condado de Santa Clara el viernes 14 de marzo de 2025. El discurso comenzará a las 5:30 pm en la cámara de supervisores ubicada en el 70 West Hedding Street, San José, CA 95110. Por favor, acompáñenos a este evento especial. El discurso también será transmitido en directo en línea. Para más información presione este [ENLACE] ¡Gracias! Thiệp Mời đặc biệt để tham dự Buổi Phát Biểu của Quận Hạt 2025 do Chủ Tịch Hội Đồng Quản Trị Otto Lee Chủ Tịch Hội Đồng Quản Trị Quận Hạt Otto Lee Phát Biểu năm 2025. Thứ Sáu, Ngày 14 tháng 3 năm 2025, Bắt đầu lúc 5:30pm chiều. Tại Phòng Hội Đồng Quản Trị, Trung Tâm Chính Quyền Quận Hạt, 70 West Hedding Street, San José, CA 95110. Hãy cùng chúng tôi tham gia chương trình đặc biệt này. Sẽ có địa chỉ trang mạng để xem trực tiếp. Xin bấm vào [LINK] này để biết thêm thông tin. Xin cám ơn. Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 131 Packet Pg. 193 of 262 2025 年縣情咨文特別邀請 聖塔克拉拉縣縣政委員會主席李洲曉將於2025 年 3 月 14 日 (星期五) 發表 2025 年縣情咨文 活動時間於下午5:30 開始 活動地點位於縣政府 大樓一樓的縣政委員會會議廳，70 West Hedding Street, San José, CA 95110. 誠摯邀請您參加此特別活動 活動當天提供線上 直播 點擊鏈結了解更多信息，謝謝 [LINK] Language Assistance and Disability Assistance available. There will be a reception outside of Board Chambers at the conclusion of the address. It's an honor to serve our community, please contact us anytime at Supervisor.Lee@bos.sccgov.org. Thank you. Warm regards, Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 132 Packet Pg. 194 of 262 Supervisor Otto Lee Santa Clara County, District 3 SupervisorLee.org Supervisor.Lee@bos.sccgov.org P.S. - Upcoming Events Unhoused Women & Girls and County Support Services Forum - March 10 [LINK] Commission On The Status of Women is hosting a conversation on the challenges unhoused women and girls face in our community and explore solutions Monday, March 10, 2025 from 6:00 - 8:00 PM - INS Auditorium & Zoom Link -Online & In-person at: 70 West Hedding Street, San José, CA 95110 D3 Community Roundtable - Thur. March 20, 7:00 PM - Online [LINK] Join us for our monthly District 3 community advisory group to share updates from the County and more. Click HERE to learn more about the D3CRT, including video of previous meetings. SAVE THE DATE(s) County Acquisition of Regional Medical Center Community Listening Sessions Friday, March 21, 2025 from 6:00 - 7:30 PM - Educational Park Branch Library -1772 Educational Park Dr, San José, CA 95133 Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 133 Packet Pg. 195 of 262 Wednesday, March 26, 2025 from 6:00 - 7:30 PM - Community Room, Milpitas Library -160 North Main Street Milpitas, CA 95035 We'll share more details as they become available - Follow us on social media for updates Video 70 West Hedding 10th Floor Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 134 Packet Pg. 196 of 262 San José, CA 95110 (408) 299-5030 Email Supervisor Lee District 3 Website Unsubscribe from future messages. Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 135 Packet Pg. 197 of 262 From:Martin Wasserman To:Aram James Cc:Veenker, Vicki; Gennady Sheyner; Gerry Gras; Don Austin; Dana St. George; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; Dave Price; Binder, Andrew; EPA Today; Michelle; Emily Mibach; Mickie Winkler; Doug Minkler; Templeton, Cari; Gardener, Liz; Lotus Fong; Council, City; board@pausd.org; Jay Boyarsky; board@valleywater.org; John Burt; BoardOperations; Palo Alto Free Press; Friends of Cubberley; ladoris cordell; Rodriguez, Miguel; Damon Silver; Kaloma Smith; Henry Etzkowitz; h.etzko@gmail.com; editor@paweekly.com; Nicole Chiu-Wang; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Sarah Wright; Sean Allen; Pat M; sharon jackson; Ed Lauing; Reckdahl, Keith; GRP-City Council; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Zelkha, Mila; Josh Becker; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Bill Newell; Jessica Speiser; Roberta Ahlquist; Steve Wagstaffe; Cait James; Tim James; Wagner, April; Lewis James; Reifschneider, James; Diana Diamond; ParkRec Commission; Human Relations Commission; Enberg, Nicholas; Barberini, Christopher; Afanasiev, Alex; frances.Rothschild@jud.ca.gov; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; Stump, Molly; Daniel Kottke; Anna Griffin; DuJuan Green; Dennis Upton; dennis burns; Roberta Roth; Salem Ajluni; Jack Ajluni; Foley, Michael; Marina Lopez; planning.commision@cityofpaloalto.org; Patrice Ventresca; Lu, George; chuck jagoda; Rowena Chiu; Jeff Conrad; Jeff Rosen; Jeff Hayden; jay.boyarsky@da.sccgov.org; josh@joshsalcman.com; Linda Jolley; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan; Ellen Fox Subject:Re: Questions for Martin & Vicki et al Date:Friday, February 28, 2025 9:25:45 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Are they restricting people from speaking, or from violently disrupting the lives of other students? On Feb 27, 2025, at 10:49 PM, Aram James <abjpd1@gmail.com> wrote: Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 136 Packet Pg. 198 of 262 Above poster hot off the press. Produced by Internationally acclaimed political poster maker Doug Minkler ( co-produced by Gail Wiley). Doug Minkler Gunn HS Grad-class of 1967 Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 137 Packet Pg. 199 of 262 On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 8:26 PM Martin Wasserman <deeperlook@aol.com> wrote: Aram, The key insight of Judaism is that the world is governed by God, not man. Regarding the land of Israel, it belongs to the Almighty, and He gives it to whomever He pleases. At this time in history, He is taking it away from the Arabs and returning it to the Jews in fulfillment of the promise He made to them many centuries ago. Regarding “Palestine,” the idea of Palestinian Arabs as a distinct national group with a legitimate claim to the land of Israel is a bogus myth fabricated in the 1960s for the sole purpose of undermining the legitimate Jewish claim. Having summed up my position, I'll now attempt to address your questions. 1. If Jews have influence in the media, they've earned it by ability and hard work. Such success should be a source of pride, not embarrassment. 2. The issues of US aid to Israel and supporting underserved communities at home are totally separate and should not be conflated. 3. Honest criticism of Israel is legitimate, slanderous falsehoods of the type you engage in are not. 4. People who have dual citizenship with Israel should come under no more suspicion than people who have dual citizenship with any other country. 5. I would characterize Hamas as a murder-suicide cult that cares nothing for human lives, including their own. They believe that killing Jews will guarantee them entrance into heaven. The Almighty will be the final judge of that, but they're certainly not fighting for anybody's freedom and they've certainly shown no interest in improving the lives of the people they rule. 6. Flying the Palestinian flag is equivalent to calling for the destruction of Israel, since the entire basis of Palestinian nationalism is opposition to Israel’s existence. 7. International organizations that judge Israel by very harsh standards and judge Israel’s enemies by very lenient standards definitely lack credibility. 8. First, Palestine isn't a nation. Second, Israel is an ally of the US, while the Palestinians are declared enemies of the US. The US should support its friends and oppose its enemies. 9. Israel stole nothing from the Palestinians because the Palestinians never owned it. There was never any Palestinian political entity that governed the land. It was always a backwater province of larger empires until the Jews finally returned and reestablished their ancient nation there. Also, you seem to be advocating ethnic cleansing of Jews, which you would surely denounce as a war crime if it were carried out against Palestinians. 10. Israel owes nothing to the Palestinians, who have continued to insist on war, even though Israel has offered very generous terms for peace. Also, your reference to "vile settlers" is what a psychologist would call “projection,” transferring your own vileness to the ones you hate. 11. Israel is not a member of the ICC and has no reason to accept its judgments, especially since many of its members have clear ideological biases. 12. See answer to #11. Sincerely, Martin Wasserman On Feb 27, 2025, at 3:35 PM, Aram James <abjpd1@gmail.com> wrote: Martin & Vicki, Please consider trying your hand at answering a few of the questions I drafted today. Anyone else who feels so moved feel free to do the same. Avram Finkelstein aka Aram James 2/27/2025 1. Is U.S. mainstream media under the influence of Israeli interests? Is it influenced by the Jewish lobby? Yes or No? Please provide your reasoning. 2. Should the billions in U.S. military aid sent to Israel each year instead be used to support our underserved communities? Yes or No? Please provide your reasoning. 3. Is criticism of the state of Israel, which some label as a terrorist state, a form of antisemitism? Yes or No? Please provide your reasoning. 4. Should political leaders, including city council members, who hold dual citizenship in the U.S. and Israel be questioned about whether their primary loyalty lies with Israel or the U.S.? Yes or No? Please provide your reasoning. Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 138 Packet Pg. 200 of 262 5. Would it be fair to characterize Hamas as freedom fighters? Yes or No? Please provide your reasoning. 6. Is proudly flying the Palestinian flag an act of antisemitism? Yes or No? Please provide your reasoning. 7. Do all international human rights organizations and nations that condemn Israel as war criminals lack credibility? Are they all antisemitic or Israel haters? Yes or No? Please provide your reasoning. 8. Given that U.S. Billions have Allowed Israel to have nuclear weapons, a robust army, navy and Airforce would it make sense for the U.S. To Now Pour Billions into the nation of Palestine to fund Palestine with an army, Navy, airforce and nuclear weapons? Wouldn’t arming the Palestinians in this fashion act to deter Israel from its Terrorist ways? Yes, No. Your reasoning. 9. While Israel takes responsibility by way of reparations to rebuild Gaza would it only be appropriate for Israelis to live in Gaza and in exchange, until Gaza is rebuilt, require Israelis to abandon the entirety of the land that Israel stole from the Palestinians in 1948? In other words, deport all Israelis to Gaza until it is rebuilt to the liking of Palestinian people. The Palestinians would, at least until rebuilding is complete, if not permanently, occupy Tel Aviv and the remainder of the land now called Israel ? Yes, No. Your reasoning. 10. Agree that in a showing of good faith Israel must immediately leave, permanently, the West Bank, abandon all settlements, and replace all Palestinian housing destroyed by the vile settlers and IOF, the Israeli Occupying Forces? Yes, No. Your reasoning 11. Turn over all accused IOF ( Israel Occupying Forces) war criminals, to the ICC ( International Criminal Court) for war crimes trials. Yes, No. Your reasoning. 12. Turn over all accused Israeli war criminals, politicans and military leaders to the ICC for trial. Yes, No. Reasoning. Sincerely, Avram Finkelstein aka Aram James On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 8:52 PM Martin Wasserman <deeperlook@aol.com> wrote: Aram, I see you’re continuing your habit of slandering Israel with false accusations in every public forum you can find. If you're so dead set against genocide, why do you never criticize Hamas, which has an explicit policy of genocide against Jews? The fact that you’ve consistently evaded direct questions that I put to you tells me that you know your positions are indefensible, and that your vendetta against Israel has more to do with personal reasons than with any honest evaluation of the conflict. Anytime you want to discuss with me or debate with me which side in this conflict favors life and which side favors death, I'll be happy to oblige. Martin Wasserman On Feb 26, 2025, at 5:45 PM, Aram James <abjpd1@gmail.com> wrote: 2/27/2025 Hi Vicki, I’m sure I'm the last person you might want to speak with right now. I get that. That is your choice, nor will I argue with you. You well know my position on your obligation as a political leader, attorney and as a human being to speak out against the genocide in Gaza and the West Bank and the Trump administration’s proposed ethic cleansing of Gaza to develop a Mediterranean Rivera. I ask you to watch the below Youtube video that I first sent around last night. Please consider breaking your silence on the ongoing genocide in Palestine. Sincerely, Aram P.S. Also, I stand by my comments made last Monday( February 24, 2025) at our city council meeting regarding item # 8. https://youtu.be/FVEjv6L9jtI?si=X95SUceKCIRma56f Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 139 Packet Pg. 201 of 262 From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You have new held messages Date:Friday, February 28, 2025 7:19:10 AM Logo You have new held messages You can release all of your held messages and permit or block future emails from the senders, or manage messages individually. Release all Permit all Block all You can also manage held messages in your Personal Portal. Spam Policy jafzavideoconpro2@gmail.com Thank you for having contacted us 2025-02-27 19:13 Release Permit Block Release all Permit all Block all © 2019 Mimecast Services Limited. Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 140 Packet Pg. 202 of 262 Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 141 Packet Pg. 203 of 262 From:Aram James To:Martin Wasserman Cc:Veenker, Vicki; Gennady Sheyner; Gerry Gras; Don Austin; Dana St. George; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; Dave Price; Binder, Andrew; EPA Today; Michelle; Emily Mibach; Mickie Winkler; Doug Minkler; Templeton, Cari; Gardener, Liz; Lotus Fong; Council, City; board@pausd.org; Jay Boyarsky; board@valleywater.org; John Burt; BoardOperations; Palo Alto Free Press; Friends of Cubberley; ladoris cordell; Rodriguez, Miguel; Damon Silver; Kaloma Smith; Henry Etzkowitz; h.etzko@gmail.com; editor@paweekly.com; Nicole Chiu-Wang; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Sarah Wright; Sean Allen; Pat M; sharon jackson; Ed Lauing; Reckdahl, Keith; GRP-City Council; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Zelkha, Mila; Josh Becker; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Bill Newell; Jessica Speiser; Roberta Ahlquist; Steve Wagstaffe; Cait James; Tim James; Wagner, April; Lewis James; Reifschneider, James; Diana Diamond; ParkRec Commission; Human Relations Commission; Enberg, Nicholas; Barberini, Christopher; Afanasiev, Alex; frances.Rothschild@jud.ca.gov; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; Stump, Molly; Daniel Kottke; Anna Griffin; DuJuan Green; Dennis Upton; dennis burns; Roberta Roth; Salem Ajluni; Jack Ajluni; Foley, Michael; Marina Lopez; planning.commision@cityofpaloalto.org; Patrice Ventresca; Lu, George; chuck jagoda; Rowena Chiu; Jeff Conrad; Jeff Rosen; Jeff Hayden; jay.boyarsky@da.sccgov.org; josh@joshsalcman.com; Linda Jolley; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan; Ellen Fox Subject:Re: Questions for Martin & Vicki et al Date:Thursday, February 27, 2025 10:50:16 PM Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 142 Packet Pg. 204 of 262 Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 143 Packet Pg. 205 of 262 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Above poster hot off the press. Produced by Internationally acclaimed political poster maker Doug Minkler ( co-produced by Gail Wiley). Doug Minkler Gunn HS Grad-class of 1967 On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 8:26 PM Martin Wasserman <deeperlook@aol.com> wrote: Aram, The key insight of Judaism is that the world is governed by God, not man. Regarding the land of Israel, it belongs to the Almighty, and He gives it to whomever He pleases. At this time in history, He is taking it away from the Arabs and returning it to the Jews in fulfillment of the promise He made to them many centuries ago. Regarding “Palestine,” the idea of Palestinian Arabs as a distinct national group with a legitimate claim to the land of Israel is a bogus myth fabricated in the 1960s for the sole purpose of undermining the legitimate Jewish claim. Having summed up my position, I'll now attempt to address your questions. 1. If Jews have influence in the media, they've earned it by ability and hard work. Such success should be a source of pride, not embarrassment. 2. The issues of US aid to Israel and supporting underserved communities at home are totally separate and should not be conflated. 3. Honest criticism of Israel is legitimate, slanderous falsehoods of the type you engage in are not. 4. People who have dual citizenship with Israel should come under no more suspicion than people who have dual citizenship with any other country. 5. I would characterize Hamas as a murder-suicide cult that cares nothing for human lives, including their own. They believe that killing Jews will guarantee them entrance into heaven. The Almighty will be the final judge of that, but they're certainly not fighting for anybody's freedom and they've certainly shown no interest in improving the lives of the people they rule. 6. Flying the Palestinian flag is equivalent to calling for the destruction of Israel, since the entire basis of Palestinian nationalism is opposition to Israel’s existence. 7. International organizations that judge Israel by very harsh standards and judge Israel’s enemies by very lenient standards definitely lack credibility. 8. First, Palestine isn't a nation. Second, Israel is an ally of the US, while the Palestinians are Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 144 Packet Pg. 206 of 262 declared enemies of the US. The US should support its friends and oppose its enemies. 9. Israel stole nothing from the Palestinians because the Palestinians never owned it. There was never any Palestinian political entity that governed the land. It was always a backwater province of larger empires until the Jews finally returned and reestablished their ancient nation there. Also, you seem to be advocating ethnic cleansing of Jews, which you would surely denounce as a war crime if it were carried out against Palestinians. 10. Israel owes nothing to the Palestinians, who have continued to insist on war, even though Israel has offered very generous terms for peace. Also, your reference to "vile settlers" is what a psychologist would call “projection,” transferring your own vileness to the ones you hate. 11. Israel is not a member of the ICC and has no reason to accept its judgments, especially since many of its members have clear ideological biases. 12. See answer to #11. Sincerely, Martin Wasserman On Feb 27, 2025, at 3:35 PM, Aram James <abjpd1@gmail.com> wrote: Martin & Vicki, Please consider trying your hand at answering a few of the questions I drafted today. Anyone else who feels so moved feel free to do the same. Avram Finkelstein aka Aram James 2/27/2025 1. Is U.S. mainstream media under the influence of Israeli interests? Is it influenced by the Jewish lobby? Yes or No? Please provide your reasoning. 2. Should the billions in U.S. military aid sent to Israel each year instead be used to support our underserved communities? Yes or No? Please provide your reasoning. 3. Is criticism of the state of Israel, which some label as a terrorist state, a form of antisemitism? Yes or No? Please provide your reasoning. 4. Should political leaders, including city council members, who hold dual citizenship in the U.S. and Israel be Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 145 Packet Pg. 207 of 262 questioned about whether their primary loyalty lies with Israel or the U.S.? Yes or No? Please provide your reasoning. 5. Would it be fair to characterize Hamas as freedom fighters? Yes or No? Please provide your reasoning. 6. Is proudly flying the Palestinian flag an act of antisemitism? Yes or No? Please provide your reasoning. 7. Do all international human rights organizations and nations that condemn Israel as war criminals lack credibility? Are they all antisemitic or Israel haters? Yes or No? Please provide your reasoning. 8. Given that U.S. Billions have Allowed Israel to have nuclear weapons, a robust army, navy and Airforce would it make sense for the U.S. To Now Pour Billions into the nation of Palestine to fund Palestine with an army, Navy, airforce and nuclear weapons? Wouldn’t arming the Palestinians in this fashion act to deter Israel from its Terrorist ways? Yes, No. Your reasoning. 9. While Israel takes responsibility by way of reparations to rebuild Gaza would it only be appropriate for Israelis to live in Gaza and in exchange, until Gaza is rebuilt, require Israelis to abandon the entirety of the land that Israel stole from the Palestinians in 1948? In other words, deport all Israelis to Gaza until it is rebuilt to the liking of Palestinian people. The Palestinians would, at least until rebuilding is complete, if not permanently, occupy Tel Aviv and the remainder of the land now called Israel ? Yes, No. Your reasoning. 10. Agree that in a showing of good faith Israel must immediately leave, permanently, the West Bank, abandon all settlements, and replace all Palestinian housing destroyed by the vile settlers and IOF, the Israeli Occupying Forces? Yes, No. Your reasoning 11. Turn over all accused IOF ( Israel Occupying Forces) war criminals, to the ICC ( International Criminal Court) for war crimes trials. Yes, No. Your reasoning. 12. Turn over all accused Israeli war criminals, politicans and military leaders to the ICC for trial. Yes, No. Reasoning. Sincerely, Avram Finkelstein aka Aram James Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 146 Packet Pg. 208 of 262 On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 8:52 PM Martin Wasserman <deeperlook@aol.com> wrote: Aram, I see you’re continuing your habit of slandering Israel with false accusations in every public forum you can find. If you're so dead set against genocide, why do you never criticize Hamas, which has an explicit policy of genocide against Jews? The fact that you’ve consistently evaded direct questions that I put to you tells me that you know your positions are indefensible, and that your vendetta against Israel has more to do with personal reasons than with any honest evaluation of the conflict. Anytime you want to discuss with me or debate with me which side in this conflict favors life and which side favors death, I'll be happy to oblige. Martin Wasserman On Feb 26, 2025, at 5:45 PM, Aram James <abjpd1@gmail.com> wrote: 2/27/2025 Hi Vicki, I’m sure I'm the last person you might want to speak with right now. I get that. That is your choice, nor will I argue with you. You well know my position on your obligation as a political leader, attorney and as a human being to speak out against the genocide in Gaza and the West Bank and the Trump administration’s proposed ethic cleansing of Gaza to develop a Mediterranean Rivera. I ask you to watch the below Youtube video that I first sent around last night. Please consider breaking your silence on the ongoing genocide in Palestine. Sincerely, Aram P.S. Also, I stand by my comments made last Monday( February 24, 2025) at our city council meeting regarding item # 8. https://youtu.be/FVEjv6L9jtI?si=X95SUceKCIRma56f Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 147 Packet Pg. 209 of 262 From:Aram James To:Stump, Molly; Ed Lauing; Reckdahl, Keith; h.etzko@gmail.com; Marty Wasserman; Templeton, Cari; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan; Council, City; GRP-City Council; citycouncil@mountainview.gov; city.council@menlopark.gov; Doug Minkler; Zahra Billoo; Bill Newell; Jennifer Morrow San José Spotlight; Holman, Karen (external); Drekmeier, Peter; Tom DuBois; EPA Today; cromero@cityofepa.org; Cribbs, Anne; Braden Cartwright; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; ladoris cordell Cc:Figueroa, Eric; Jensen, Eric; Roberta Ahlquist; Lee, Craig; Shikada, Ed; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; Pat M; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; Roberta Roth; frances.Rothschild@jud.ca.gov; Emily Mibach Subject:The FBI, ICE, and the IDF collaborate to conduct suveillance of pro-Palestinian activists. Date:Thursday, February 27, 2025 10:05:16 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Campus Police Are Using Israeli Spy Tech to Crack Down on Student Protes https://truthout.org/articles/campus-police-are-using-israeli-spy-tech-to-crack-down-on- student-protest/ Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 148 Packet Pg. 210 of 262 From:Martin Wasserman To:Aram James Cc:Veenker, Vicki; Gennady Sheyner; Gerry Gras; Don Austin; Dana St. George; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; Dave Price; Binder, Andrew; EPA Today; Michelle; Emily Mibach; Mickie Winkler; Doug Minkler; Templeton, Cari; Gardener, Liz; Lotus Fong; Council, City; board@pausd.org; Jay Boyarsky; board@valleywater.org; John Burt; BoardOperations; Palo Alto Free Press; Friends of Cubberley; ladoris cordell; Rodriguez, Miguel; Damon Silver; Kaloma Smith; Henry Etzkowitz; h.etzko@gmail.com; editor@paweekly.com; Nicole Chiu-Wang; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Sarah Wright; Sean Allen; Pat M; sharon jackson; Ed Lauing; Reckdahl, Keith; GRP-City Council; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Zelkha, Mila; Josh Becker; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Bill Newell; Jessica Speiser; Roberta Ahlquist; Steve Wagstaffe; Cait James; Tim James; Wagner, April; Lewis James; Reifschneider, James; Diana Diamond; ParkRec Commission; Human Relations Commission; Enberg, Nicholas; Barberini, Christopher; Afanasiev, Alex; frances.Rothschild@jud.ca.gov; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; Stump, Molly; Daniel Kottke; Anna Griffin; DuJuan Green; Dennis Upton; dennis burns; Roberta Roth; Salem Ajluni; Jack Ajluni; Foley, Michael; Marina Lopez; planning.commision@cityofpaloalto.org; Patrice Ventresca; Lu, George; chuck jagoda; Rowena Chiu; Jeff Conrad; Jeff Rosen; Jeff Hayden; jay.boyarsky@da.sccgov.org; josh@joshsalcman.com; Linda Jolley; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan; Ellen Fox Subject:Re: Questions for Martin & Vicki et al Date:Thursday, February 27, 2025 8:28:40 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Aram, The key insight of Judaism is that the world is governed by God, not man. Regarding the land of Israel, it belongs to the Almighty, and He gives it to whomever He pleases. At this time in history, He is taking it away from the Arabs and returning it to the Jews in fulfillment of the promise He made to them many centuries ago. Regarding “Palestine,” the idea of Palestinian Arabs as a distinct national group with a legitimate claim to the land of Israel is a bogus myth fabricated in the 1960s for the sole purpose of undermining the legitimate Jewish claim. Having summed up my position, I'll now attempt to address your questions. 1. If Jews have influence in the media, they've earned it by ability and hard work. Such success should be a source of pride, not embarrassment. 2. The issues of US aid to Israel and supporting underserved communities at home are totally separate and should not be conflated. 3. Honest criticism of Israel is legitimate, slanderous falsehoods of the type you engage in are not. 4. People who have dual citizenship with Israel should come under no more suspicion than people who have dual citizenship with any other country. 5. I would characterize Hamas as a murder-suicide cult that cares nothing for human lives, including their own. They believe that killing Jews will guarantee them entrance into heaven. The Almighty will be the final judge of that, but they're certainly not fighting for anybody's freedom and they've certainly shown no interest in improving the lives of the people they rule. 6. Flying the Palestinian flag is equivalent to calling for the destruction of Israel, since the entire basis of Palestinian nationalism is opposition to Israel’s existence. 7. International organizations that judge Israel by very harsh standards and judge Israel’s enemies by very lenient standards definitely lack credibility. Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 149 Packet Pg. 211 of 262 8. First, Palestine isn't a nation. Second, Israel is an ally of the US, while the Palestinians are declared enemies of the US. The US should support its friends and oppose its enemies. 9. Israel stole nothing from the Palestinians because the Palestinians never owned it. There was never any Palestinian political entity that governed the land. It was always a backwater province of larger empires until the Jews finally returned and reestablished their ancient nation there. Also, you seem to be advocating ethnic cleansing of Jews, which you would surely denounce as a war crime if it were carried out against Palestinians. 10. Israel owes nothing to the Palestinians, who have continued to insist on war, even though Israel has offered very generous terms for peace. Also, your reference to "vile settlers" is what a psychologist would call “projection,” transferring your own vileness to the ones you hate. 11. Israel is not a member of the ICC and has no reason to accept its judgments, especially since many of its members have clear ideological biases. 12. See answer to #11. Sincerely, Martin Wasserman On Feb 27, 2025, at 3:35 PM, Aram James <abjpd1@gmail.com> wrote: Martin & Vicki, Please consider trying your hand at answering a few of the questions I drafted today. Anyone else who feels so moved feel free to do the same. Avram Finkelstein aka Aram James 2/27/2025 1. Is U.S. mainstream media under the influence of Israeli interests? Is it influenced by the Jewish lobby? Yes or No? Please provide your reasoning. 2. Should the billions in U.S. military aid sent to Israel each year instead be used to support our underserved communities? Yes or No? Please provide your reasoning. 3. Is criticism of the state of Israel, which some label as a terrorist state, a form of antisemitism? Yes or No? Please provide your reasoning. 4. Should political leaders, including city council members, who hold dual citizenship in the U.S. and Israel be Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 150 Packet Pg. 212 of 262 questioned about whether their primary loyalty lies with Israel or the U.S.? Yes or No? Please provide your reasoning. 5. Would it be fair to characterize Hamas as freedom fighters? Yes or No? Please provide your reasoning. 6. Is proudly flying the Palestinian flag an act of antisemitism? Yes or No? Please provide your reasoning. 7. Do all international human rights organizations and nations that condemn Israel as war criminals lack credibility? Are they all antisemitic or Israel haters? Yes or No? Please provide your reasoning. 8. Given that U.S. Billions have Allowed Israel to have nuclear weapons, a robust army, navy and Airforce would it make sense for the U.S. To Now Pour Billions into the nation of Palestine to fund Palestine with an army, Navy, airforce and nuclear weapons? Wouldn’t arming the Palestinians in this fashion act to deter Israel from its Terrorist ways? Yes, No. Your reasoning. 9. While Israel takes responsibility by way of reparations to rebuild Gaza would it only be appropriate for Israelis to live in Gaza and in exchange, until Gaza is rebuilt, require Israelis to abandon the entirety of the land that Israel stole from the Palestinians in 1948? In other words, deport all Israelis to Gaza until it is rebuilt to the liking of Palestinian people. The Palestinians would, at least until rebuilding is complete, if not permanently, occupy Tel Aviv and the remainder of the land now called Israel ? Yes, No. Your reasoning. 10. Agree that in a showing of good faith Israel must immediately leave, permanently, the West Bank, abandon all settlements, and replace all Palestinian housing destroyed by the vile settlers and IOF, the Israeli Occupying Forces? Yes, No. Your reasoning 11. Turn over all accused IOF ( Israel Occupying Forces) war criminals, to the ICC ( International Criminal Court) for war crimes trials. Yes, No. Your reasoning. 12. Turn over all accused Israeli war criminals, politicans and military leaders to the ICC for trial. Yes, No. Reasoning. Sincerely, Avram Finkelstein aka Aram James Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 151 Packet Pg. 213 of 262 On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 8:52 PM Martin Wasserman <deeperlook@aol.com> wrote: Aram, I see you’re continuing your habit of slandering Israel with false accusations in every public forum you can find. If you're so dead set against genocide, why do you never criticize Hamas, which has an explicit policy of genocide against Jews? The fact that you’ve consistently evaded direct questions that I put to you tells me that you know your positions are indefensible, and that your vendetta against Israel has more to do with personal reasons than with any honest evaluation of the conflict. Anytime you want to discuss with me or debate with me which side in this conflict favors life and which side favors death, I'll be happy to oblige. Martin Wasserman On Feb 26, 2025, at 5:45 PM, Aram James <abjpd1@gmail.com> wrote: 2/27/2025 Hi Vicki, I’m sure I'm the last person you might want to speak with right now. I get that. That is your choice, nor will I argue with you. You well know my position on your obligation as a political leader, attorney and as a human being to speak out against the genocide in Gaza and the West Bank and the Trump administration’s proposed ethic cleansing of Gaza to develop a Mediterranean Rivera. I ask you to watch the below Youtube video that I first sent around last night. Please consider breaking your silence on the ongoing genocide in Palestine. Sincerely, Aram P.S. Also, I stand by my comments made last Monday( February 24, 2025) at our city council meeting regarding item # 8. https://youtu.be/FVEjv6L9jtI?si=X95SUceKCIRma56f Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 152 Packet Pg. 214 of 262 From:Aram James To:Martin Wasserman Cc:Veenker, Vicki; Gennady Sheyner; Gerry Gras; Don Austin; Dana St. George; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; Dave Price; Binder, Andrew; EPA Today; Michelle; Emily Mibach; Mickie Winkler; Doug Minkler; Templeton, Cari; Gardener, Liz; Lotus Fong; Council, City; board@pausd.org; Jay Boyarsky; board@valleywater.org; John Burt; BoardOperations; Palo Alto Free Press; Friends of Cubberley; ladoris cordell; Rodriguez, Miguel; Damon Silver; Kaloma Smith; Henry Etzkowitz; h.etzko@gmail.com; editor@paweekly.com; Nicole Chiu-Wang; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Sarah Wright; Sean Allen; Pat M; sharon jackson; Ed Lauing; Reckdahl, Keith; GRP-City Council; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Zelkha, Mila; Josh Becker; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Bill Newell; Jessica Speiser; Roberta Ahlquist; Steve Wagstaffe; Cait James; Tim James; Wagner, April; Lewis James; Reifschneider, James; Diana Diamond; ParkRec Commission; Human Relations Commission; Enberg, Nicholas; Barberini, Christopher; Afanasiev, Alex; frances.Rothschild@jud.ca.gov; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; Stump, Molly; Daniel Kottke; Anna Griffin; DuJuan Green; Dennis Upton; dennis burns; Roberta Roth; Salem Ajluni; Jack Ajluni; Foley, Michael; Marina Lopez; planning.commision@cityofpaloalto.org; Patrice Ventresca; Lu, George; chuck jagoda; Rowena Chiu; Jeff Conrad; Jeff Rosen; Jeff Hayden; jay.boyarsky@da.sccgov.org; josh@joshsalcman.com; Linda Jolley; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan; Ellen Fox; Donna Wallach; Raymond Goins; rabrica@cityofepa.org; cromero@cityofepa.org; Raj Jayadev; Jennifer Morrow San José Spotlight; Cecilia Taylor; GRP-City Clerk; city.council@menlopark.gov; Braden Cartwright Subject:Re: Questions for Martin & Vicki et al Date:Thursday, February 27, 2025 4:49:54 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 3:35 PM Aram James <abjpd1@gmail.com> wrote: Martin & Vicki, Please consider trying your hand at answering a few of the questions I drafted today. Anyone else who feels so moved feel free to do the same. Avram Finkelstein aka Aram James 2/27/2025 1. Is U.S. mainstream media under the influence of Israeli interests? Is it influenced by the Jewish lobby? Yes or No? Please provide your reasoning. 2. Should the billions in U.S. military aid sent to Israel each year instead be used to support our underserved communities? Yes or No? Please provide your reasoning. 3. Is criticism of the state of Israel, which some label as a terrorist state, a form of antisemitism? Yes or No? Please provide your reasoning. 4. Should political leaders, including city council members, who hold dual citizenship in the U.S. and Israel be questioned about whether their primary loyalty lies with Israel or the U.S.? Yes or No? Please provide your reasoning. 5. Would it be fair to characterize Hamas as freedom fighters? Yes or No? Please provide your reasoning. Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 153 Packet Pg. 215 of 262 6. Is proudly flying the Palestinian flag an act of antisemitism? Yes or No? Please provide your reasoning. 7. Do all international human rights organizations and nations that condemn Israel as war criminals lack credibility? Are they all antisemitic or Israel haters? Yes or No? Please provide your reasoning. 8. Given that U.S. Billions have Allowed Israel to have nuclear weapons, a robust army, navy and Airforce would it make sense for the U.S. To Now Pour Billions into the nation of Palestine to fund Palestine with an army, Navy, airforce and nuclear weapons? Wouldn’t arming the Palestinians in this fashion act to deter Israel from its Terrorist ways? Yes, No. Your reasoning. 9. While Israel takes responsibility by way of reparations to rebuild Gaza would it only be appropriate for Israelis to live in Gaza and in exchange, until Gaza is rebuilt, require Israelis to abandon the entirety of the land that Israel stole from the Palestinians in 1948? In other words, deport all Israelis to Gaza until it is rebuilt to the liking of Palestinian people. The Palestinians would, at least until rebuilding is complete, if not permanently, occupy Tel Aviv and the remainder of the land now called Israel ? Yes, No. Your reasoning. 10. Agree that in a showing of good faith Israel must immediately leave, permanently, the West Bank, abandon all settlements, and replace all Palestinian housing destroyed by the vile settlers and IOF, the Israeli Occupying Forces? Yes, No. Your reasoning 11. Turn over all accused IOF ( Israel Occupying Forces) war criminals, to the ICC ( International Criminal Court) for war crimes trials. Yes, No. Your reasoning. 12. Turn over all accused Israeli war criminals, politicans and military leaders to the ICC for trial. Yes, No. Reasoning. Sincerely, Avram Finkelstein aka Aram James On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 8:52 PM Martin Wasserman <deeperlook@aol.com> wrote: Aram, I see you’re continuing your habit of slandering Israel with false accusations in every public forum you can find. If you're so dead set against genocide, why do you never criticize Hamas, which has an explicit policy of genocide against Jews? The fact that you’ve consistently evaded direct questions that I put to you tells me that you know your positions are indefensible, and that your vendetta against Israel has more to do with personal reasons than with any honest evaluation of the conflict. Anytime you want to Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 154 Packet Pg. 216 of 262 discuss with me or debate with me which side in this conflict favors life and which side favors death, I'll be happy to oblige. Martin Wasserman On Feb 26, 2025, at 5:45 PM, Aram James <abjpd1@gmail.com> wrote: 2/27/2025 Hi Vicki, I’m sure I'm the last person you might want to speak with right now. I get that. That is your choice, nor will I argue with you. You well know my position on your obligation as a political leader, attorney and as a human being to speak out against the genocide in Gaza and the West Bank and the Trump administration’s proposed ethic cleansing of Gaza to develop a Mediterranean Rivera. I ask you to watch the below Youtube video that I first sent around last night. Please consider breaking your silence on the ongoing genocide in Palestine. Sincerely, Aram P.S. Also, I stand by my comments made last Monday( February 24, 2025) at our city council meeting regarding item # 8. https://youtu.be/FVEjv6L9jtI?si=X95SUceKCIRma56f Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 155 Packet Pg. 217 of 262 From:Aram James To:Martin Wasserman Cc:Veenker, Vicki; Gennady Sheyner; Gerry Gras; Don Austin; Dana St. George; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; Dave Price; Binder, Andrew; EPA Today; Michelle; Emily Mibach; Mickie Winkler; Doug Minkler; Templeton, Cari; Gardener, Liz; Lotus Fong; Council, City; board@pausd.org; Jay Boyarsky; board@valleywater.org; John Burt; BoardOperations; Palo Alto Free Press; Friends of Cubberley; ladoris cordell; Rodriguez, Miguel; Damon Silver; Kaloma Smith; Henry Etzkowitz; h.etzko@gmail.com; editor@paweekly.com; Nicole Chiu-Wang; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Sarah Wright; Sean Allen; Pat M; sharon jackson; Ed Lauing; Reckdahl, Keith; GRP-City Council; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Zelkha, Mila; Josh Becker; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Bill Newell; Jessica Speiser; Roberta Ahlquist; Steve Wagstaffe; Cait James; Tim James; Wagner, April; Lewis James; Reifschneider, James; Diana Diamond; ParkRec Commission; Human Relations Commission; Enberg, Nicholas; Barberini, Christopher; Afanasiev, Alex; frances.Rothschild@jud.ca.gov; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; Stump, Molly; Daniel Kottke; Anna Griffin; DuJuan Green; Dennis Upton; dennis burns; Roberta Roth; Salem Ajluni; Jack Ajluni; Foley, Michael; Marina Lopez; planning.commision@cityofpaloalto.org; Patrice Ventresca; Lu, George; chuck jagoda; Rowena Chiu; Jeff Conrad; Jeff Rosen; Jeff Hayden; jay.boyarsky@da.sccgov.org; josh@joshsalcman.com; Linda Jolley; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan; Ellen Fox Subject:Questions for Martin & Vicki et al Date:Thursday, February 27, 2025 3:36:15 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Martin & Vicki, Please consider trying your hand at answering a few of the questions I drafted today. Anyone else who feels so moved feel free to do the same. Avram Finkelstein aka Aram James 2/27/2025 1. Is U.S. mainstream media under the influence of Israeli interests? Is it influenced by the Jewish lobby? Yes or No? Please provide your reasoning. 2. Should the billions in U.S. military aid sent to Israel each year instead be used to support our underserved communities? Yes or No? Please provide your reasoning. 3. Is criticism of the state of Israel, which some label as a terrorist state, a form of antisemitism? Yes or No? Please provide your reasoning. 4. Should political leaders, including city council members, who hold dual citizenship in the U.S. and Israel be questioned about whether their primary loyalty lies with Israel or the U.S.? Yes or No? Please provide your reasoning. 5. Would it be fair to characterize Hamas as freedom fighters? Yes or No? Please provide your reasoning. 6. Is proudly flying the Palestinian flag an act of antisemitism? Yes or No? Please provide your reasoning. Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 156 Packet Pg. 218 of 262 7. Do all international human rights organizations and nations that condemn Israel as war criminals lack credibility? Are they all antisemitic or Israel haters? Yes or No? Please provide your reasoning. 8. Given that U.S. Billions have Allowed Israel to have nuclear weapons, a robust army, navy and Airforce would it make sense for the U.S. To Now Pour Billions into the nation of Palestine to fund Palestine with an army, Navy, airforce and nuclear weapons? Wouldn’t arming the Palestinians in this fashion act to deter Israel from its Terrorist ways? Yes, No. Your reasoning. 9. While Israel takes responsibility by way of reparations to rebuild Gaza would it only be appropriate for Israelis to live in Gaza and in exchange, until Gaza is rebuilt, require Israelis to abandon the entirety of the land that Israel stole from the Palestinians in 1948? In other words, deport all Israelis to Gaza until it is rebuilt to the liking of Palestinian people. The Palestinians would, at least until rebuilding is complete, if not permanently, occupy Tel Aviv and the remainder of the land now called Israel ? Yes, No. Your reasoning. 10. Agree that in a showing of good faith Israel must immediately leave, permanently, the West Bank, abandon all settlements, and replace all Palestinian housing destroyed by the vile settlers and IOF, the Israeli Occupying Forces? Yes, No. Your reasoning 11. Turn over all accused IOF ( Israel Occupying Forces) war criminals, to the ICC ( International Criminal Court) for war crimes trials. Yes, No. Your reasoning. 12. Turn over all accused Israeli war criminals, politicans and military leaders to the ICC for trial. Yes, No. Reasoning. Sincerely, Avram Finkelstein aka Aram James On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 8:52 PM Martin Wasserman <deeperlook@aol.com> wrote: Aram, I see you’re continuing your habit of slandering Israel with false accusations in every public forum you can find. If you're so dead set against genocide, why do you never criticize Hamas, which has an explicit policy of genocide against Jews? The fact that you’ve consistently evaded direct questions that I put to you tells me that you know your positions are indefensible, and that your vendetta against Israel has more to do with personal reasons than with any honest evaluation of the conflict. Anytime you want to discuss with me or debate with me which side in this conflict favors life and which side favors death, I'll be happy to oblige. Martin Wasserman Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 157 Packet Pg. 219 of 262 On Feb 26, 2025, at 5:45 PM, Aram James <abjpd1@gmail.com> wrote: 2/27/2025 Hi Vicki, I’m sure I'm the last person you might want to speak with right now. I get that. That is your choice, nor will I argue with you. You well know my position on your obligation as a political leader, attorney and as a human being to speak out against the genocide in Gaza and the West Bank and the Trump administration’s proposed ethic cleansing of Gaza to develop a Mediterranean Rivera. I ask you to watch the below Youtube video that I first sent around last night. Please consider breaking your silence on the ongoing genocide in Palestine. Sincerely, Aram P.S. Also, I stand by my comments made last Monday( February 24, 2025) at our city council meeting regarding item # 8. https://youtu.be/FVEjv6L9jtI?si=X95SUceKCIRma56f Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 158 Packet Pg. 220 of 262 From:Light As Air Boats To:ParkRec Commission Get Your Guest"s Ready for Water Adventure! Date:Thursday, February 27, 2025 7:32:08 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of openingattachments and clicking on links. SHOP NOW Hi there, Come on summer! Prepare for sunny days and water adventures! Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 159 Packet Pg. 221 of 262 Check out our Parks & Camps Catalog here! Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 160 Packet Pg. 222 of 262 We've got everything you need to make a splash this summer! Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 161 Packet Pg. 223 of 262 For Quantity Discounts or Questions, Call Andi. "Tel:706.619.6670" andi@lightasairboats.com EXPLORE OUR FIBERGLASS PADDLE BOAT COLLECTION Wishing you sunny days and cool waves, - The Light As Air Boats Team Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 162 Packet Pg. 224 of 262 We don’t want to spam you. If you're no longer interested in enjoying adventures out on the water Unsubscribe here. Light As Air Boats 13801 Walsingham Rd. Suite A-116 Largo, Florida 33774 Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 163 Packet Pg. 225 of 262 From:Martin Wasserman To:Aram James Cc:Veenker, Vicki; Gennady Sheyner; Gerry Gras; Don Austin; Dana St. George; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; Dave Price; Binder, Andrew; EPA Today; Michelle; Emily Mibach; Mickie Winkler; Doug Minkler; Templeton, Cari; Gardener, Liz; Lotus Fong; Council, City; board@pausd.org; Jay Boyarsky; board@valleywater.org; John Burt; BoardOperations; Palo Alto Free Press; Friends of Cubberley; ladoris cordell; Rodriguez, Miguel; Damon Silver; Kaloma Smith; Henry Etzkowitz; h.etzko@gmail.com; editor@paweekly.com; Nicole Chiu-Wang; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Sarah Wright; Sean Allen; Pat M; sharon jackson; Ed Lauing; Reckdahl, Keith; GRP-City Council; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Zelkha, Mila; Josh Becker; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Bill Newell; Jessica Speiser; Roberta Ahlquist; Steve Wagstaffe; Cait James; Tim James; Wagner, April; Lewis James; Reifschneider, James; Diana Diamond; ParkRec Commission; Human Relations Commission; Enberg, Nicholas; Barberini, Christopher; Afanasiev, Alex; frances.Rothschild@jud.ca.gov; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; Stump, Molly; Daniel Kottke; Anna Griffin; DuJuan Green; Dennis Upton; dennis burns; Roberta Roth; Salem Ajluni; Jack Ajluni; Foley, Michael; Marina Lopez; planning.commision@cityofpaloalto.org; Patrice Ventresca; Lu, George; chuck jagoda; Rowena Chiu; Jeff Conrad; Jeff Rosen; Jeff Hayden; jay.boyarsky@da.sccgov.org; josh@joshsalcman.com; Linda Jolley; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan; Ellen Fox Subject:Re: Watch "Why Are Soldiers Mass Resigning from U.S. Military Over Israel?" on YouTube Date:Wednesday, February 26, 2025 8:54:16 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Aram, I see you’re continuing your habit of slandering Israel with false accusations in every public forum you can find. If you're so dead set against genocide, why do you never criticize Hamas, which has an explicit policy of genocide against Jews? The fact that you’ve consistently evaded direct questions that I put to you tells me that you know your positions are indefensible, and that your vendetta against Israel has more to do with personal reasons than with any honest evaluation of the conflict. Anytime you want to discuss with me or debate with me which side in this conflict favors life and which side favors death, I'll be happy to oblige. Martin Wasserman On Feb 26, 2025, at 5:45 PM, Aram James <abjpd1@gmail.com> wrote: 2/27/2025 Hi Vicki, I’m sure I'm the last person you might want to speak with right now. I get that. That is your choice, nor will I argue with you. You well know my position on your obligation as a political leader, attorney and as a human being to speak out against the genocide in Gaza and the West Bank and the Trump administration’s proposed ethic cleansing of Gaza to develop a Mediterranean Rivera. I ask you to watch the below Youtube video that I first sent around last night. Please consider breaking your silence on the ongoing genocide in Palestine. Sincerely, Aram Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 164 Packet Pg. 226 of 262 P.S. Also, I stand by my comments made last Monday( February 24, 2025) at our city council meeting regarding item # 8. https://youtu.be/FVEjv6L9jtI?si=X95SUceKCIRma56f Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 165 Packet Pg. 227 of 262 From:Aram James To:Veenker, Vicki Cc:Gennady Sheyner; Gerry Gras; Don Austin; Dana St. George; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; Dave Price; Binder, Andrew; EPA Today; Michelle; Emily Mibach; Mickie Winkler; Doug Minkler; Templeton, Cari; Gardener, Liz; Lotus Fong; Council, City; board@pausd.org; Jay Boyarsky; board@valleywater.org; John Burt; BoardOperations; Palo Alto Free Press; Friends of Cubberley; ladoris cordell; Rodriguez, Miguel; Damon Silver; Kaloma Smith; Henry Etzkowitz; h.etzko@gmail.com; editor@paweekly.com; Nicole Chiu-Wang; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Sarah Wright; Sean Allen; Pat M; sharon jackson; Ed Lauing; Reckdahl, Keith; GRP-City Council; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Zelkha, Mila; Josh Becker; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Bill Newell; Jessica Speiser; Roberta Ahlquist; Steve Wagstaffe; Cait James; Tim James; Wagner, April; Lewis James; Reifschneider, James; Diana Diamond; planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.0rg; ParkRec Commission; Human Relations Commission; Enberg, Nicholas; Barberini, Christopher; Afanasiev, Alex; frances.Rothschild@jud.ca.gov; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; Stump, Molly; Daniel Kottke; Anna Griffin; DuJuan Green; Dennis Upton; dennis burns; Roberta Roth; Salem Ajluni; Jack Ajluni; Foley, Michael; Marina Lopez; planning.commision@cityofpaloalto.org; Patrice Ventresca; Lu, George; chuck jagoda; Rowena Chiu; Jeff Conrad; Jeff Rosen; Jeff Hayden; jay.boyarsky@da.sccgov.org; josh@joshsalcman.com; Linda Jolley; Marty Wasserman; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan Subject:Watch "Why Are Soldiers Mass Resigning from U.S. Military Over Israel?" on YouTube Date:Wednesday, February 26, 2025 5:46:02 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. 2/27/2025 Hi Vicki, I’m sure I'm the last person you might want to speak with right now. I get that. That is your choice, nor will I argue with you. You well know my position on your obligation as a political leader, attorney and as a human being to speak out against the genocide in Gaza and the West Bank and the Trump administration’s proposed ethic cleansing of Gaza to develop a Mediterranean Rivera. I ask you to watch the below Youtube video that I first sent around last night. Please consider breaking your silence on the ongoing genocide in Palestine. Sincerely, Aram P.S. Also, I stand by my comments made last Monday( February 24, 2025) at our city council meeting regarding item # 8. https://youtu.be/FVEjv6L9jtI?si=X95SUceKCIRma56f Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 166 Packet Pg. 228 of 262 From:Robustelli, Sarah To:ParkRec Commission Subject:FW: Positive Feedback on Mitchell Dog Park Improvements Date:Wednesday, February 26, 2025 10:01:06 AM Attachments:image002.png image003.png image005.png image006.png image007.png image008.png Please see feedback on the Mitchell Dog Park Improvements. SARAH ROBUSTELLI Division Manager Open Space, Parks, and Golf Community Services Department (650) 617-3518 | Sarah.Robustelli@CityofPaloAlto.org www.cityofpaloalto.org From: Robustelli, Sarah Sent: Friday, January 31, 2025 3:42 PM To: Castile, Steve <Steve.Castile@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Do, Lam <Lam.Do@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Ribeiro, Mark <Mark.Ribeiro@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Chacon, Miguel <miguel.chacon@cityofpaloalto.org>; Serna, Jeanette <Jeanette.Serna@CityofPaloAlto.org> Cc: O'Kane, Kristen <Kristen.O'Kane@CityofPaloAlto.org> Subject: Positive Feedback on Mitchell Dog Park Improvements Hi Team, Miguel and I were out at Mitchell Dog Park and wanted to share some positive feedback. Residents Frank and Judy were thrilled with the improvements—and so was their dog (see below)! They asked us to pass along their thanks to the team for the huge improvement. Additionally, a JLS student also complimented us on the upgrades. Great work, everyone! Sarah Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 167 Packet Pg. 229 of 262 SARAH ROBUSTELLI Division Manager Open Space, Parks, and Golf Community Services Department (650) 617-3518 | Sarah.Robustelli@CityofPaloAlto.org www.cityofpaloalto.org Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 168 Packet Pg. 230 of 262 Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 169 Packet Pg. 231 of 262 From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You have new held messages Date:Wednesday, February 26, 2025 7:11:51 AM Logo You have new held messages You can release all of your held messages and permit or block future emails from the senders, or manage messages individually. Release all Permit all Block all You can also manage held messages in your Personal Portal. Spam Policy mobileapps7@outlook.com Re: Issue on Site – Urgent Fix" 2025-02-26 05:12 Release Permit Block Release all Permit all Block all © 2019 Mimecast Services Limited. Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 170 Packet Pg. 232 of 262 Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 171 Packet Pg. 233 of 262 From:Tom Haxton To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Urgent: Progress on Middle School Athletics Evaluation Date:Tuesday, February 25, 2025 8:00:43 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Dear Commissioners Brown, Cribbs, and Dang, My name is Tom Haxton, and I’m the president of the Palo Alto Middle School Athletics Community Organization, a nonprofit organization created to demonstrate a better way to operate middle school athletics in Palo Alto. I’m reaching out to follow up on the progress of the ad-hoc committee’s evaluation of outsourcing middle school athletics to local nonprofits, a process initiated following our advocacy work and the City Council’s October 7th vote. Thank you for serving on this committee and for taking on this work in addition to your other commitments. I want to urge you to please pursue this evaluation with more urgency. This ad-hoc committee was formed as a result of advocacy efforts that began in June 2024. Our nonprofit successfully operated a cross-country team for JLS Middle School in the fall, demonstrating that we can provide a better experience for student- athletes while improving equity by reducing registration fees. Given this success, the City Council voted unanimously to evaluate outsourcing middle school athletics. However, 4.5 months have passed since that vote, and I am not aware of any progress from the ad-hoc committee. The committee was formed on December 18th, and I emailed on December 29th offering to discuss our initiative, answer questions, and learn about the evaluation process, but I have not heard back. I assume the committee would be interested in learning directly from organizations like ours that have motivated this evaluation. If that’s the case, I would appreciate the opportunity to engage in a discussion as soon as possible. There are only three months left in the fiscal year, and about a thousand students who could benefit from your work. It would be ideal if the City developed a plan before the fall season starts in August (assuming it is too late for the spring season in March). Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 172 Packet Pg. 234 of 262 challenges we have faced that may be relevant to your evaluation. Our initiative has faced challenges in working with city staff, including actions that are not in the best interest of student athletes. I have also taken legal action regarding one such incident. I hope these issues are not negatively impacting your committee’s evaluation. I would appreciate the opportunity to learn about your evaluation process, discuss our nonprofit, and answer any questions that may assist in your evaluation. Thank you again for your time and service to this important effort. I look forward to your response. Best regards, Tom Haxton Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 173 Packet Pg. 235 of 262 From:Sharon Jackson To:Aram James Cc:Veenker, Vicki; Ed Lauing; Keith Reckdahl; josh@joshsalcman.com; Josh Becker; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Jessica Speiser; Jeff Rosen; Jay Boyarsky; Tim James; Cait James; Marina Lopez; Lythcott-Haims, Julie; Michelle; Sean Allen; Pat M; Vara Ramakrishnan; Rodriguez, Miguel; Damon Silver; Sarah Wright; EPA Today; Diana Diamond; Bill Newell; bos@smcgov.org; board@pausd.org; board@valleywater.org; BoardOperations; boardfeedback@smcgov.org; Burt, Patrick; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; Patrice Ventresca; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Steve Wagstaffe; swright@embarcaderopublishing.com; Lewis James; Zelkha, Mila; Human Relations Commission; Freddie.Quintana@sen.ca.gov; Dave Price; Braden Cartwright; Emily Mibach; Mickie Winkler; Marty Wasserman; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan; h.etzko@gmail.com; Nicole Chiu-Wang; Palo Alto Free Press; Roberta Ahlquist; Roberta Ahlquist; Salem Ajluni; Jack Ajluni; Wagner, April; Stump, Molly; Yolanda Conaway; Don Austin; Jeff Conrad; Jeff Hayden; Perron, Zachary; Binder, Andrew; Reifschneider, James; Afanasiev, Alex; MGR-Melissa Stevenson Diaz; editor@paweekly.com; Friends of Cubberley; Figueroa, Eric; Jensen, Eric; Cribbs, Anne; Templeton, Cari; planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.0rg; ParkRec Commission; Sheriff Transparency; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Supervisor Otto Lee; Doria Summa; Supervisor Susan Ellenberg; marsha childs; Foley, Michael; Barberini, Christopher; chuck jagoda; Chris Colohan; Cecilia Taylor Subject:Re: One Day, Everyone Will Have Always Been Against This’ Date:Tuesday, February 25, 2025 8:42:16 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious ofopening attachments and clicking on links. “If I saw a picture of a smiling Palestinian kid, it was probably because that kid has just been killed”that hit me all kind of wrong Sharon Jackson CEO/ Founder Mama D 2nd Chance Non-Profit AASA African American Student Advocate Eastside Union Highschool District Silicon Valley 411 Cafe Executive Chair NAACP Every child deserves a second chance On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 7:33 AM Aram James <abjpd1@gmail.com> wrote: One Day, Everyone Will Have Always Been Against This’ Mehdi talks to award-winning novelist Omar El Akkad on his new book about Gaza - and how so many have shamelessly looked away. https://zeteo.com/p/one-day-everyone-will-have-always? Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 174 Packet Pg. 236 of 262 From:Aram James To:Veenker, Vicki Cc:Ed Lauing; Keith Reckdahl; josh@joshsalcman.com; Josh Becker; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Jessica Speiser; Jeff Rosen; Jay Boyarsky; Tim James; Cait James; Marina Lopez; Lythcott-Haims, Julie; Michelle; Sean Allen; Pat M; sharon jackson; Vara Ramakrishnan; Rodriguez, Miguel; Damon Silver; Sarah Wright; EPA Today; Diana Diamond; Bill Newell; bos@smcgov.org; board@pausd.org; board@valleywater.org; BoardOperations; boardfeedback@smcgov.org; Burt, Patrick; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; Patrice Ventresca; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Steve Wagstaffe; swright@embarcaderopublishing.com; Lewis James; Zelkha, Mila; Human Relations Commission; Freddie.Quintana@sen.ca.gov; Dave Price; Braden Cartwright; Emily Mibach; Mickie Winkler; Marty Wasserman; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan; h.etzko@gmail.com; Nicole Chiu-Wang; Palo Alto Free Press; Roberta Ahlquist; Roberta Ahlquist; Salem Ajluni; Jack Ajluni; Wagner, April; Stump, Molly; Yolanda Conaway; Don Austin; Jeff Conrad; Jeff Hayden; Perron, Zachary; Binder, Andrew; Reifschneider, James; Afanasiev, Alex; MGR-Melissa Stevenson Diaz; editor@paweekly.com; Friends of Cubberley; Figueroa, Eric; Jensen, Eric; Cribbs, Anne; Templeton, Cari; planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.0rg; ParkRec Commission; Sheriff Transparency; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Supervisor Otto Lee; Doria Summa; Supervisor Susan Ellenberg; marsha childs; Foley, Michael; Barberini, Christopher; chuck jagoda; Chris Colohan; Cecilia Taylor Subject:Re: One Day, Everyone Will Have Always Been Against This’ Date:Tuesday, February 25, 2025 7:33:26 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. One Day, Everyone Will Have Always Been Against This’ Mehdi talks to award-winning novelist Omar El Akkad on his new book about Gaza - and how so many have shamelessly looked away. https://zeteo.com/p/one-day-everyone-will-have-always? Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 175 Packet Pg. 237 of 262 From:Aram James To:Veenker, Vicki Cc:Ed Lauing; Keith Reckdahl; josh@joshsalcman.com; Josh Becker; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Jessica Speiser; Jeff Rosen; Jay Boyarsky; Tim James; Cait James; Marina Lopez; Lythcott-Haims, Julie; Michelle; Sean Allen; Pat M; sharon jackson; Vara Ramakrishnan; Rodriguez, Miguel; Damon Silver; Sarah Wright; EPA Today; Diana Diamond; Bill Newell; bos@smcgov.org; board@pausd.org; board@valleywater.org; BoardOperations; boardfeedback@smcgov.org; Burt, Patrick; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; Patrice Ventresca; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Steve Wagstaffe; swright@embarcaderopublishing.com; Lewis James; Zelkha, Mila; Human Relations Commission; Freddie.Quintana@sen.ca.gov; Dave Price; Braden Cartwright; Emily Mibach; Mickie Winkler; Marty Wasserman; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan; h.etzko@gmail.com; Nicole Chiu-Wang; Palo Alto Free Press; Roberta Ahlquist; Roberta Ahlquist; Salem Ajluni; Jack Ajluni; Wagner, April; Stump, Molly; Yolanda Conaway; Don Austin; Jeff Conrad; Jeff Hayden; Perron, Zachary; Binder, Andrew; Reifschneider, James; Afanasiev, Alex; MGR-Melissa Stevenson Diaz; editor@paweekly.com; Friends of Cubberley; Figueroa, Eric; Jensen, Eric; Cribbs, Anne; Templeton, Cari; planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.0rg; ParkRec Commission; Sheriff Transparency; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Supervisor Otto Lee; Doria Summa; Supervisor Susan Ellenberg; marsha childs; Foley, Michael; Barberini, Christopher; chuck jagoda; Chris Colohan; Cecilia Taylor Subject:One Day, Everyone Will Have Always Been Against This’ Date:Tuesday, February 25, 2025 7:00:47 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. One Day, Everyone Will Have Always Been Against This’ https://zeteo.com/p/one-day-everyone-will-have-always? Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 176 Packet Pg. 238 of 262 From:Aram James To:Ed Lauing; Reckdahl, Keith; Josh Becker; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Supervisor Susan Ellenberg; Zelkha, Mila Cc:Veenker, Vicki; Lythcott-Haims, Julie; Dave Price; Emily Mibach; Braden Cartwright; EPA Today; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; Yolanda Conaway; Don Austin; bos@smcgov.org; board@valleywater.org; board@pausd.org; Sean Allen; Pat M; Council, City; Friends of Cubberley; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Palo Alto Free Press; Dana St. George; Gerry Gras; Binder, Andrew; Reifschneider, James; Cait James; Tim James; Marina Lopez; Afanasiev, Alex; Nicole Chiu-Wang; Barberini, Christopher; cromero@cityofepa.org; Jeff Conrad; Jeff Rosen; Jay Boyarsky; Raj Jayadev; Jose Valle; Gardener, Liz; Lotus Fong; Figueroa, Eric; Kaloma Smith; Burt, Patrick; Gennady Sheyner; Diana Diamond; Human Relations Commission; planning.commision@cityofpaloalto.org; ParkRec Commission; Marty Wasserman; editor@paweekly.com; City Attorney; Stump, Molly; Patrice Ventresca; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; frances.Rothschild@jud.ca.gov; Bill Newell; Damon Silver; Rodriguez, Miguel; Vara Ramakrishnan; Baker, Rob; Roberta Ahlquist; Robert. Jonsen; Steve Wagstaffe; Nicole Chiu-Wang; Enberg, Nicholas; Rowena Chiu; Freddie.Quintana@sen.ca.gov; Van Le; Mickie Winkler; Wagner, April; yolanda; Perron, Zachary; Cribbs, Anne; Templeton, Cari; Michelle; Dennis Upton; chuck jagoda; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan; GRP-City Council; citycouncil@mountainview.gov; Anna Griffin; DuJuan Green; dennis burns Subject:AB 1468: The California Jewish Legislative Caucus Introduces an Ethnic Studies Bill to Censor Public Education on Israel and Palestine Once again, a new proposed California law aims to protect Israel’s complete impunity within U.S. society and public e... Date:Monday, February 24, 2025 11:20:17 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. AB 1468: The California Jewish Legislative Caucus Introduces an Ethnic Studies Bill to Censor Public Education on Israel and Palestine Once again, a new proposed California law aims to protect Israel’s complete impunity within U.S. society and public education. https://open.substack.com/pub/nadiarahman/p/ab-1468-the-california-jewish-legislative? utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 177 Packet Pg. 239 of 262 From:Aram James To:Perron, Zachary; Binder, Andrew; Dave Price; EPA Today; Aram James; Tim James; h.etzko@gmail.com; Sean Allen; Pat M; Council, City; Jeff Conrad; Jeff Rosen; Dana St. George; Gerry Gras; board@pausd.org; Don Austin; Yolanda Conaway; board@valleywater.org; BoardOperations; Bill Newell; ladoris cordell; Vara Ramakrishnan; Rodriguez, Miguel; Ed Lauing; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Foley, Michael; Emily Mibach; Jensen, Eric; Figueroa, Eric; Lythcott-Haims, Julie; Veenker, Vicki; Lu, George; Reckdahl, Keith; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; Braden Cartwright; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Roberta Ahlquist; Human Relations Commission; planning.commision@cityofpaloalto.org; ParkRec Commission; Cecilia Taylor; Sheriff Transparency; Gennady Sheyner; Jay Boyarsky; Robert. Jonsen; Robert.Jonson@shf.sccgov.org; Baker, Rob Subject:Watch "WATCH: Viral Judge Shuts Down RIDICULOUS Case Against Black Man" on YouTube Date:Monday, February 24, 2025 4:37:28 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. More walking while black cases Mhttps://youtu.be/02AS3AOYeag?si=pr9sM4RjachTTYzx Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 178 Packet Pg. 240 of 262 From:Aram James To:Ed Lauing; Reckdahl, Keith; George for Palo Alto; Human Relations Commission; planning.commision@cityofpaloalto.org; ParkRec Commission; Friends of Cubberley Subject:Watch "Tasers Forum Aram James" on YouTube Date:Monday, February 24, 2025 3:03:02 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. https://youtu.be/zxRyBZjY46s?si=xr3ydEs6vpihDoIx Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 179 Packet Pg. 241 of 262 From:Aram James To:Reckdahl, Keith; Ed Lauing; h.etzko@gmail.com; Diana Diamond; EPA Today; Braden Cartwright; Don Austin; Yolanda Conaway; bos@smcgov.org; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Binder, Andrew; Reifschneider, James; Afanasiev, Alex; Human Relations Commission; Kaloma Smith; George for Palo Alto; board@valleywater.org; Barberini, Christopher; Enberg, Nicholas; Dave Price; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; editor@paweekly.com; editor@almanacnews.com; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; Shikada, Ed; planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.0rg; ParkRec Commission; Cribbs, Anne; Templeton, Cari; Pat M; Steve Wagstaffe; frances.Rothschild@jud.ca.gov; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; Council, City; BoardOperations; boardfeedback@smcgov.org Subject:New America Media, News Analysis, Paul Kleyman, Posted: Dec 11, 2015 SAN FRANCISCO--In the wake of public outcry over the latest police shooting of an unarmed A… Date:Monday, February 24, 2025 2:50:49 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. FYI: From the archives of aram james -Ban Tasers says expert!!! 2015 New America Media, News Analysis, Paul Kleyman, Posted: Dec 11, 2015 SAN FRANCISCO--In the wake of public outcry over the latest police shooting of an unarmed A… Source: The Contra Costa Pulse | Community news and youth voices for Contra Costa County Expert: Stun-Guns Far From ‘Nonlethal’ Alternative to Bullets | The Contra Costa Pulse https://search.app/9ubRbswVr9TqY5pR9 Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 180 Packet Pg. 242 of 262 From:Aram James To:Barberini, Christopher; Enberg, Nicholas; Binder, Andrew; Reifschneider, James; h.etzko@gmail.com; Gerry Gras; Dana St. George; Julie Lythcott-Haims; Bill Newell; Steve Wagstaffe; Sarah Wright; Dave Price; Ed Lauing; Council, City; Daniel Kottke; Reckdahl, Keith; Doug Minkler; Templeton, Cari; bos@smcgov.org; board@valleywater.org; BoardOperations; swright@embarcaderopublishing.com; Jeff Conrad; Jeff Rosen; Rodriguez, Miguel; Damon Silver; Don Austin; Yolanda Conaway; board@pausd.org; Vara Ramakrishnan; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Nicole Chiu-Wang; Pat M; Sean Allen; Lotus Fong; Gardener, Liz; Cait James; Tim James; Lewis james; Marina Lopez; Kaloma Smith; Human Relations Commission; Burt, Patrick; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; frances.Rothschild@jud.ca.gov; Stump, Molly; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Jessica Speiser; Josh Becker; Jose Valle; Linda Jolley; Mickie Winkler; Emily Mibach; EPA Today; Braden Cartwright; Robert. Jonsen; Roberta Ahlquist; editor@paweekly.com; Figueroa, Eric; Afanasiev, Alex; cromero@cityofepa.org; Cribbs, Anne; rabrica@cityofepa.org; Lee, Craig; Palo Alto Free Press; planning.commision@cityofpaloalto.org; ParkRec Commission; yolanda; Sheriff Transparency Subject:Re: The Truth About Police K-9s Date:Monday, February 24, 2025 10:52:35 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 10:38 AM Aram James <abjpd1@gmail.com> wrote: From the archive of Aram James The Truth About Police K-9s https://youtu.be/cSbEj6RIoDE Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 181 Packet Pg. 243 of 262 From:Aydin Karadeniz To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Inquiry About Turf Installation Company in Palo Alto Parks Date:Sunday, February 23, 2025 10:02:29 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Hi, I hope you’re doing well. As a resident of Palo Alto, I am considering replacing the grass in my backyard with turf and would like to work with a reputable company that has experience in our area. I’ve noticed that several parks in Palo Alto have turf fields, and I was wondering if you could share the name of the company the city worked with for those installations. I’d love to explore working with them for myproject, given their experience with local conditions and city-approved materials. I appreciate any information you can provide. Thank you for your time! Aydin Karadeniz Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 182 Packet Pg. 244 of 262 From:Aram James To:Ed Lauing; Reckdahl, Keith; Lythcott-Haims, Julie Cc:Council, City; Josh Becker; Jeff Rosen; h.etzko@gmail.com; Marty Wasserman; Pat M; Sean Allen; board@valleywater.org; BoardOperations; Bill Newell; boardfeedback@smcgov.org; Dave Price; Emily Mibach; Braden Cartwright; EPA Today; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; Doria Summa; Veenker, Vicki; planning.commision@cityofpaloalto.org; ParkRec Commission; Human Relations Commission; Friends of Cubberley; Cribbs, Anne; cromero@cityofepa.org; Templeton, Cari; Cait James; Tim James; Marina Lopez; Lewis james; Dana St. George; Palo Alto Free Press; Lotus Fong; Gardener, Liz; Steve Wagstaffe; Linda Jolley; Gerry Gras; GRP-City Council; Perron, Zachary; citycouncil@mountainview.gov; Binder, Andrew; Robert.Jonson@shf.sccgov.org; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Lewis James; Diana Diamond; Damon Silver; Rodriguez, Miguel; Michelle Subject:Watch "Jewish Comedians Destroy Israel and Zionism [Hilarious]" on YouTube Date:Sunday, February 23, 2025 7:41:20 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. https://youtu.be/vporw__qaaA?si=2gpvC9M_wtMVy2Go Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 183 Packet Pg. 245 of 262 From:Aram James To:Ed Lauing; Reckdahl, Keith Cc:Vicki Veenker; Gerry Gras; h.etzko@gmail.com; board@valleywater.org; board@pausd.org; Bill Newell; Jay Boyarsky; BoardOperations; boardfeedback@smcgov.org; Sean Allen; Pat M; EPA Today; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; Council, City; Josh Becker; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Jessica Speiser; Vara Ramakrishnan; Jeff Rosen; Jeff Conrad; Jeff Hayden; Michelle; Mickie Winkler; Rodriguez, Miguel; Damon Silver; Sarah Wright; Nicole Chiu-Wang; Enberg, Nicholas; Binder, Andrew; Reifschneider, James; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Foley, Michael; Figueroa, Eric; Jensen, Eric; Friends of Cubberley; Palo Alto Free Press; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Lotus Fong; Gardener, Liz; Roberta Ahlquist; Lu, George; Freddie.Quintana@sen.ca.gov; frances.Rothschild@jud.ca.gov; Burt, Patrick; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; Patrice Ventresca; Steve Wagstaffe; Wagner, April; Dave Price; Emily Mibach; Braden Cartwright; planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.0rg; ParkRec Commission; Stump, Molly; Van Le; Kaloma Smith; Don Austin; Yolanda Conaway; editor@paweekly.com; Gennady Sheyner; Templeton, Cari; Cribbs, Anne; Anna Griffin; yolanda; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan Subject:Germany"s Obsession With Defending Israel and Criminalizing Speech Aided AfD"s Rise Date:Saturday, February 22, 2025 11:44:55 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. https://open.substack.com/pub/dropsitenews/p/germany-election-afd-israel-palestine-free- speech?r=fjmzt&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 184 Packet Pg. 246 of 262 From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You have new held messages Date:Thursday, February 20, 2025 4:13:07 PM Logo You have new held messages You can release all of your held messages and permit or block future emails from the senders, or manage messages individually. Release all Permit all Block all You can also manage held messages in your Personal Portal. Spam Policy jc@csgeneralestimation.com Estimate & Takeoff 2025-02-20 15:38 Release Permit Block Release all Permit all Block all © 2019 Mimecast Services Limited. Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 185 Packet Pg. 247 of 262 Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 186 Packet Pg. 248 of 262 From:Light As Air Boats To:ParkRec Commission Paddleboarding just got even bigger! Date:Thursday, February 20, 2025 7:31:44 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious ofopening attachments and clicking on links. SHOP NOW Hi ! Get ahead of the wave with our Pre-Season SALE. Grab the biggest SUPs for the Ultimnate Fun! Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 187 Packet Pg. 249 of 262 Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 188 Packet Pg. 250 of 262 Use Promo Code [SAVE100] to Get $100 OFF of your BIG SUP order! Use Promo Code [SAVE100] to Get $100 OFF of your BIG SUP order! Use Promo Code [SAVE100] to Get $100 OFF of your BIG SUP order! For Quantity Discounts or Questions, Call Andi! "Tel:706.619.6670" andi@lightasairboats.com EXPLORE ALL OF OUR MULTI PERSON SUPS HERE See PARKS & CAMPS CATALOG here! ⭐ Yours in Wind, Water, and Waves, - The Light As Air Boats Team Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 189 Packet Pg. 251 of 262 Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 190 Packet Pg. 252 of 262 We don’t want to spam you. If you're no longer interested in enjoying adventures out on the water Unsubscribe here. Light As Air Boats 13801 Walsingham Rd. Suite A-116 Largo, Florida 33774 Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 191 Packet Pg. 253 of 262 From:Aram James To:Reckdahl, Keith; Lythcott-Haims, Julie Cc:Ed Lauing; Veenker, Vicki; Raymond Goins; Dave Price; Council, City; board@pausd.org; board@valleywater.org; boardfeedback@smcgov.org; Jay Boyarsky; Jeff Rosen; Jeff Hayden; Cait James; Tim James; h.etzko@gmail.com; George for Palo Alto; Vara Ramakrishnan; Sean Allen; rabrica@cityofepa.org; Raj Jayadev; Raymond Goins; Michelle; Doug Minkler; Sarah Wright; Gennady Sheyner; Braden Cartwright; Bill Newell; Josh Becker; Senator Becker; Diana Diamond; Emily Mibach; Mickie Winkler; Linda Jolley; Josie James-Le; Perron, Zachary; Rodriguez, Miguel; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Don Austin; Yolanda Conaway; Human Relations Commission; ladoris cordell; planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.0rg; ParkRec Commission; EPA Today; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Steve Wagstaffe; editor@paweekly.com; Friends of Cubberley; Lotus Fong; Marina Lopez Subject:CAIR labels Stanford a "hostile campus" for stance on pro-Palestinian protests Date:Wednesday, February 19, 2025 9:59:52 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. CAIR labels Stanford a 'hostile campus' for stance on pro-Palestinian protests Source: ABC7 News Bay Area https://share.newsbreak.com/bmaj40zv?s=i0 Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 192 Packet Pg. 254 of 262 From:Jenny Lewis To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Outdoor-Fit done in four unique ways Date:Wednesday, February 19, 2025 6:20:14 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious ofopening attachments and clicking on links. Professional LinkedIn Banner (3) Gear Up for Warmer Weather with Your Choice of Four Outdoor Fitness Packages Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 193 Packet Pg. 255 of 262 Something for every space, budget, and user. As we dream about warmer weather, now is the perfect time to start thinking about enhancing your parks and community spaces with outdoor fitness! We’re offering four turnkey fitness packages tailored to meet the needs of projects big and small - we're talking budgets and space! ASTM Compliant: Safe and inclusive designs for all ages and abilities 15-Year Warranty: Weatherproof, tamperproof, and low- maintenance Real Exercise Biomechanics: Supports community wellness and active lifestyles From pocket parks to large recreation areas, we have a solution for your space and budget. Choose your package and click the link below to learn more about your fitness package of choice. Let’s work together to bring high-quality fitness opportunities to your community! 3-Feb-18-2025-07-47-04-4599-PM Premium fitness package Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 194 Packet Pg. 256 of 262 Starter Fitness Package Premium Fitness Package Pro Fitness Package Pro Fitness Package Ultimate Fitness Package Ultimate Fitness Package Outdoor-Fit Exercise Systems Inc., 95 Simmonds Drive, Dartmouth, NS B3B 1N7, 1-877-760- 6337 Unsubscribe Manage preferences Item {{item.number}} Public Comment Packet 2.19.25 to 3.18.25 Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 195 Packet Pg. 257 of 262 Parks and Recreation Commission Supplemental Report From: Community Services Department Meeting Date: March 25, 2025 Report #: 2503-4411 TITLE SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT: Eleanor Pardee Park Restroom Survey Results and Next Steps BACKGROUND An updated version of the Staff Report and Attachment C - Restroom Survey Response Counts by Question that correct clerical errors are attached. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Revised Staff Report Attachment B: Revised Restroom Survey Response Counts by Question Item {{item.number}}: Staff Report Pg. 1 Packet Pg. 258 of 262 Item 4 Item 4 Supplemental Report Parks and Recreation Commission Staff Report From: Community Services Department Meeting Date: March 25, 2025 TITLE Eleanor Pardee Park Restroom Survey Results and Next Steps RECOMMENDATION Discuss the Eleanor Pardee Park Restroom Survey Results and Next Steps. BACKGROUND Eleanor Pardee Park is a 9.6-acre neighborhood park, making it the second-largest neighborhood park in Palo Alto (Bol Park is the largest). Approximately half of the park is developed with expansive turf, playgrounds, and picnic areas, while the other half remains undeveloped and is home to community gardens. The Park Restroom Installation (PG-19000) is a recurring Capital Improvement Program (CIP) project based on the Palo Alto Parks, Trails, Natural Open Space, and Recreation Master Plan, which was adopted by City Council in September 2017. Master Plan Policy 2.E states that the City will actively pursue adding restrooms in parks that: - Are approximately two acres or larger - Feature amenities that encourage visitors to stay - Have a high level of use - Lack nearby restroom facilities Additionally, Policy 2.E.2 identifies potential restroom locations, including: - Bol Park - Bowden Park - Eleanor Pardee Park Item 4 Item 4 Supplemental Report Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 2 - Johnson Park - Ramos Park - Robles Park - Terman Park In recent years, restrooms have been added at Ramos, Robles, and Rinconada Parks. The Cubberley restrooms are currently under construction and are expected to open in the coming weeks, weather permitting. This fiscal year, a restroom near the Magical Bridge Playground at Mitchell Park is funded for design and construction. Due to staff capacity constraints and a recent resignation in Public Works Engineering, the timeline for beginning this project is still being determined. Years ago, a restroom installation at Eleanor Pardee Park was considered, but the project faced significant neighborhood opposition. More recently, there has been increasing community interest in revisiting this discussion. During budget discussions last year City Council directed staff to engage with the community to explore the addition of a new public restroom at Eleanor Pardee Park. The purpose of the survey is to inform decision-making and ensure we prioritize accessibility, usability, and visitor experience. ANALYSIS The survey results indicate strong overall support for the installation of a restroom at Pardee Park, found in attachment A. Of the 1,171 respondents, 82% expressed support for the project, while 18% were opposed. A significant majority (75%) of residents living within walking distance of the park support the addition of a restroom, while 17% of this group oppose it, see attachment B. Notably, non-residents who participated in the survey universally supported the project, with no recorded opposition. The highest level of support comes from residents who live near the park, demonstrating those who engaged in the survey a clear local demand for improved restroom facilities. Among supporters within walking distance, nearly half (48%) strongly agreed that the restroom is necessary. Opposition to the project is concentrated within a smaller subset (18%) of respondents, mainly nearby residents, though only 13% strongly opposed the project. Minimal opposition was observed among those who supported the restroom, indicating a strong consensus among advocates. To proceed with the installation, a Park Improvement Ordinance is required. This ordinance will be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Commission, which will provide a recommendation before the item is forwarded to the City Council for adoption. The commission’s review process will allow for additional public input and further refinement of the project scope. Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 3 Item 4 Item 4 Supplemental Report Should community interest remain strong, the City’s capital improvement process would incorporate further public engagement to finalize the design and location of the restroom facility. Staff recommends including funding for the project in the FY 2026 budget cycle. This timeline allows for adequate planning, community feedback, and coordination with relevant stakeholders. Proposed Timeline: - June 2025 – Budget Adoption with proposed funding for Eleanor Pardee Park Restroom - FY 2026 – Restroom Funded - TBD – Community Meetings, Park Improvement Ordinance to PRC, City Council for approval, Design, and Installation Given the findings, staff will advance the project through the required approval processes while continuing to engage residents to address any concerns and ensure a successful implementation. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT The survey was presented at the January 28, 2025, Parks and Recreation Commission during the Departmental Report. The City’s communications team also completed a news story that links to existing pages on the city’s website, share via OpenGov Open Town Hall email list, posted on social media including Nextdoor, include the a in the City Managers Comments, blog post, Uplift Local, sent to the Council to share with their networks, and was sent to the Palo Alto Neighbor outreach. Additionally, three signs were placed at the park in various locations. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Survey Results Attachment B: Survey Statistic Assessment Attachment C: Pardee Restroom Survey Response Counts by Question Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 4 Item 4 Item 4 Supplemental Report Eleanor Pardee Park Restroom Survey / Statistic Count of Results by Question Number Count Percentage Count Percentage Count Percentage Count Percentage Count Percentage Count Percentage Count Percentage Resident 1,087 93%Yes, within walking distance 868 74%Daily 290 25%Walking 854 33%Yes 960 82%Strongly Agree 839 72% Other: Dog activity 17 1% Other: UC Master Garden 7 0% Other: Demonstration Garden 6 0% Other: Running 6 0% Other: Biking 6 0% Other: Picnicking 3 0% Other: Tai Chi Class 3 0% Other: Meeting 2 0% Other: Organized sports 2 0% Other: Various viewing activities 2 0% Other: Reading 2 0% Other: Enjoyment 1 0% Other: School event 1 0% Other: Exercise 1 0% Other: Party 1 0% Other: Birding 1 0% Other: Archery 1 0% 7. Please share any additional thoughts or concerns. "Adding a public restroom would make the park more accessible for families, individuals with disabilities, and elderly individuals. A public restroom would enhance the overall park experience for visitors and help encourage longer visits to the park." 1. Are you a Palo Alto resident?Eleanor Pardee Park?selection allowed)new public restroom at with the following statement*: Item 4 Item 4 Supplemental Report Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 5