HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023-02-28 Parks & Recreation Commission Agenda PacketPARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
Regular Meeting
Tuesday, February 28, 2023
Council Chambers & Hybrid
7:00 PM
Pursuant to AB 361 Palo Alto City Council meetings will be held as “hybrid” meetings with the
option to attend by teleconference/video conference or in person. To maximize public safety
while still maintaining transparency and public access, members of the public can choose to
participate from home or attend in person. Information on how the public may observe and
participate in the meeting is located at the end of the agenda. Masks are strongly encouraged if
attending in person. The meeting will be broadcast on Cable TV Channel 26, live on
YouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/cityofpaloalto, and streamed to Midpen Media
Center https://midpenmedia.org. Commissioner names, biographies, and archived agendas and
report are available at https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/Community‐Services/Other‐
Services/Commissions/Parks‐and‐Recreation‐Commission.
VIRTUAL PARTICIPATION CLICK HERE TO JOIN (https://cityofpaloalto.zoom.us/j/99937899745)
Meeting ID: 999 3789 9745 Phone: 1(669)900‐6833
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Public comments will be accepted both in person and via Zoom for up to three minutes or an
amount of time determined by the Chair. All requests to speak will be taken until 5 minutes
after the staff’s presentation. Written public comments can be submitted in advance to
ParkRec.commission@cityofpaloalto.org and will be provided to the Council and available for
inspection on the City’s website. Please clearly indicate which agenda item you are referencing
in your subject line.
PowerPoints, videos, or other media to be presented during public comment are accepted only
by email to ParkRec.commission@cityofpaloalto.org at least 24 hours prior to the meeting.
Once received, the Clerk will have them shared at public comment for the specified item. To
uphold strong cybersecurity management practices, USB’s or other physical electronic storage
devices are not accepted.
CALL TO ORDER & ROLL CALL
BUSINESS
1.Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing Use of Teleconfrencing for Parks and Recreation
Commission Meeting During COVID‐19 State of Emergency – Action – (5 min)
PUBLIC COMMENT
Members of the public wishing to address the Board on matters within the jurisdiction of the City, but not on this agenda, may
do so during the Public Comment period for up to three (3) minutes.
AGENDA CHANGES, ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS
This is the point in the meeting where a vote may be taken to add or change the order of the agenda to improve meeting management.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
2.Approval of the draft minutes from the January 24th, 2023 Parks and Recreation
Commission Meeting – Action – (5 min)
CITY OFFICIAL REPORTS
Members of the public may not speak to the item(s)
3.Department Report – (20 min)
BUSINESS
4.Sewer Line Rehabilitation Project – James Allen– Discussion – Attachment – (45 Min)
5.Commission Attendance Policy – Tim Shimizu ‐ Action – Attachment – (30 Min)
6.Park Improvement Ordinance (PIO) for 2850 W. Bayshore Development Project – Garrett
Sauls – Action – Attachment – (45 Min)
7.Ad Hoc Committees and Liaison Updates – Discussion – (15 min)
COMMISSIONER/BOARD MEMBER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, ANNOUNCEMENTS, OR FUTURE
MEETINGS AND AGENDAS
Members of the public may not speak to the item(s)
ADJOURNMENT
PUBLIC COMMENT INSTRUCTIONS
Members of the Public may provide public comments to teleconference meetings via email,
teleconference, or by phone.
1. Written public comments m a y b e s u b m i t t e d b y e m a i l t o
ParkRec.Commission@cityofpaloalto.org.
2. Spoken public comments using a computer will be accepted through the
teleconference meeting. To address the Council, click on the link below to access a Zoom‐
based meeting. Please read the following instructions carefully.
You may download the Zoom client or connect to the meeting in‐ browser. If using
your browser, make sure you are using a current, up‐to‐date browser: Chrome 30 ,
Firefox 27 , Microsoft Edge 12 , Safari 7 . Certain functionality may be disabled in
older browsers including Internet Explorer.
You may be asked to enter an email address and name. We request that you
identify yourself by name as this will be visible online and will be used to notify you
that it is your turn to speak.
When you wish to speak on an Agenda Item, click on “raise hand.” The Clerk will
activate and unmute speakers in turn. Speakers will be notified shortly before they
are called to speak.
When called, please limit your remarks to the time limit allotted. A timer will be
shown on the computer to help keep track of your comments.
3. Spoken public comments using a smart phone will be accepted through the
teleconference meeting. To address the Council, download the Zoom application onto
your phone from the Apple App Store or Google Play Store and enter the Meeting ID
below. Please follow the instructions B‐E above.
4. Spoken public comments using a phone use the telephone number listed below. When
you wish to speak on an agenda item hit *9 on your phone so we know that you wish to
speak. You will be asked to provide your first and last name before addressing the
Council. You will be advised how long you have to speak. When called please limit your
remarks to the agenda item and time limit allotted.
CLICK HERE TO JOIN Meeting ID: 999 3789 9745 Phone:1‐669‐900‐6833
Americans with Disability Act (ADA) It is the policy of the City of Palo Alto to offer its public
programs, services and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to all. Persons with
disabilities who require materials in an appropriate alternative format or who require auxiliary
aids to access City meetings, programs, or services may contact the City’s ADA Coordinator at
(650) 329‐2550 (voice) or by emailing ada@cityofpaloalto.org. Requests for assistance or
accommodations must be submitted at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting, program, or
service.
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSIONRegular MeetingTuesday, February 28, 2023Council Chambers & Hybrid7:00 PMPursuant to AB 361 Palo Alto City Council meetings will be held as “hybrid” meetings with theoption to attend by teleconference/video conference or in person. To maximize public safetywhile still maintaining transparency and public access, members of the public can choose toparticipate from home or attend in person. Information on how the public may observe andparticipate in the meeting is located at the end of the agenda. Masks are strongly encouraged ifattending in person. The meeting will be broadcast on Cable TV Channel 26, live onYouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/cityofpaloalto, and streamed to Midpen MediaCenter https://midpenmedia.org. Commissioner names, biographies, and archived agendas andreport are available at https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/Community‐Services/Other‐Services/Commissions/Parks‐and‐Recreation‐Commission.VIRTUAL PARTICIPATION CLICK HERE TO JOIN (https://cityofpaloalto.zoom.us/j/99937899745)Meeting ID: 999 3789 9745 Phone: 1(669)900‐6833PUBLIC COMMENTSPublic comments will be accepted both in person and via Zoom for up to three minutes or anamount of time determined by the Chair. All requests to speak will be taken until 5 minutesafter the staff’s presentation. Written public comments can be submitted in advance toParkRec.commission@cityofpaloalto.org and will be provided to the Council and available forinspection on the City’s website. Please clearly indicate which agenda item you are referencingin your subject line.
PowerPoints, videos, or other media to be presented during public comment are accepted only
by email to ParkRec.commission@cityofpaloalto.org at least 24 hours prior to the meeting.
Once received, the Clerk will have them shared at public comment for the specified item. To
uphold strong cybersecurity management practices, USB’s or other physical electronic storage
devices are not accepted.
CALL TO ORDER & ROLL CALL
BUSINESS
1.Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing Use of Teleconfrencing for Parks and Recreation
Commission Meeting During COVID‐19 State of Emergency – Action – (5 min)
PUBLIC COMMENT
Members of the public wishing to address the Board on matters within the jurisdiction of the City, but not on this agenda, may
do so during the Public Comment period for up to three (3) minutes.
AGENDA CHANGES, ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS
This is the point in the meeting where a vote may be taken to add or change the order of the agenda to improve meeting management.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
2.Approval of the draft minutes from the January 24th, 2023 Parks and Recreation
Commission Meeting – Action – (5 min)
CITY OFFICIAL REPORTS
Members of the public may not speak to the item(s)
3.Department Report – (20 min)
BUSINESS
4.Sewer Line Rehabilitation Project – James Allen– Discussion – Attachment – (45 Min)
5.Commission Attendance Policy – Tim Shimizu ‐ Action – Attachment – (30 Min)
6.Park Improvement Ordinance (PIO) for 2850 W. Bayshore Development Project – Garrett
Sauls – Action – Attachment – (45 Min)
7.Ad Hoc Committees and Liaison Updates – Discussion – (15 min)
COMMISSIONER/BOARD MEMBER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, ANNOUNCEMENTS, OR FUTURE
MEETINGS AND AGENDAS
Members of the public may not speak to the item(s)
ADJOURNMENT
PUBLIC COMMENT INSTRUCTIONS
Members of the Public may provide public comments to teleconference meetings via email,
teleconference, or by phone.
1. Written public comments m a y b e s u b m i t t e d b y e m a i l t o
ParkRec.Commission@cityofpaloalto.org.
2. Spoken public comments using a computer will be accepted through the
teleconference meeting. To address the Council, click on the link below to access a Zoom‐
based meeting. Please read the following instructions carefully.
You may download the Zoom client or connect to the meeting in‐ browser. If using
your browser, make sure you are using a current, up‐to‐date browser: Chrome 30 ,
Firefox 27 , Microsoft Edge 12 , Safari 7 . Certain functionality may be disabled in
older browsers including Internet Explorer.
You may be asked to enter an email address and name. We request that you
identify yourself by name as this will be visible online and will be used to notify you
that it is your turn to speak.
When you wish to speak on an Agenda Item, click on “raise hand.” The Clerk will
activate and unmute speakers in turn. Speakers will be notified shortly before they
are called to speak.
When called, please limit your remarks to the time limit allotted. A timer will be
shown on the computer to help keep track of your comments.
3. Spoken public comments using a smart phone will be accepted through the
teleconference meeting. To address the Council, download the Zoom application onto
your phone from the Apple App Store or Google Play Store and enter the Meeting ID
below. Please follow the instructions B‐E above.
4. Spoken public comments using a phone use the telephone number listed below. When
you wish to speak on an agenda item hit *9 on your phone so we know that you wish to
speak. You will be asked to provide your first and last name before addressing the
Council. You will be advised how long you have to speak. When called please limit your
remarks to the agenda item and time limit allotted.
CLICK HERE TO JOIN Meeting ID: 999 3789 9745 Phone:1‐669‐900‐6833
Americans with Disability Act (ADA) It is the policy of the City of Palo Alto to offer its public
programs, services and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to all. Persons with
disabilities who require materials in an appropriate alternative format or who require auxiliary
aids to access City meetings, programs, or services may contact the City’s ADA Coordinator at
(650) 329‐2550 (voice) or by emailing ada@cityofpaloalto.org. Requests for assistance or
accommodations must be submitted at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting, program, or
service.
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSIONRegular MeetingTuesday, February 28, 2023Council Chambers & Hybrid7:00 PMPursuant to AB 361 Palo Alto City Council meetings will be held as “hybrid” meetings with theoption to attend by teleconference/video conference or in person. To maximize public safetywhile still maintaining transparency and public access, members of the public can choose toparticipate from home or attend in person. Information on how the public may observe andparticipate in the meeting is located at the end of the agenda. Masks are strongly encouraged ifattending in person. The meeting will be broadcast on Cable TV Channel 26, live onYouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/cityofpaloalto, and streamed to Midpen MediaCenter https://midpenmedia.org. Commissioner names, biographies, and archived agendas andreport are available at https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/Community‐Services/Other‐Services/Commissions/Parks‐and‐Recreation‐Commission.VIRTUAL PARTICIPATION CLICK HERE TO JOIN (https://cityofpaloalto.zoom.us/j/99937899745)Meeting ID: 999 3789 9745 Phone: 1(669)900‐6833PUBLIC COMMENTSPublic comments will be accepted both in person and via Zoom for up to three minutes or anamount of time determined by the Chair. All requests to speak will be taken until 5 minutesafter the staff’s presentation. Written public comments can be submitted in advance toParkRec.commission@cityofpaloalto.org and will be provided to the Council and available forinspection on the City’s website. Please clearly indicate which agenda item you are referencingin your subject line.PowerPoints, videos, or other media to be presented during public comment are accepted onlyby email to ParkRec.commission@cityofpaloalto.org at least 24 hours prior to the meeting.Once received, the Clerk will have them shared at public comment for the specified item. Touphold strong cybersecurity management practices, USB’s or other physical electronic storagedevices are not accepted.CALL TO ORDER & ROLL CALLBUSINESS1.Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing Use of Teleconfrencing for Parks and RecreationCommission Meeting During COVID‐19 State of Emergency – Action – (5 min)PUBLIC COMMENTMembers of the public wishing to address the Board on matters within the jurisdiction of the City, but not on this agenda, maydo so during the Public Comment period for up to three (3) minutes.AGENDA CHANGES, ADDITIONS AND DELETIONSThis is the point in the meeting where a vote may be taken to add or change the order of the agenda to improve meeting management.APPROVAL OF MINUTES2.Approval of the draft minutes from the January 24th, 2023 Parks and RecreationCommission Meeting – Action – (5 min)CITY OFFICIAL REPORTSMembers of the public may not speak to the item(s)3.Department Report – (20 min)BUSINESS4.Sewer Line Rehabilitation Project – James Allen– Discussion – Attachment – (45 Min)5.Commission Attendance Policy – Tim Shimizu ‐ Action – Attachment – (30 Min)6.Park Improvement Ordinance (PIO) for 2850 W. Bayshore Development Project – GarrettSauls – Action – Attachment – (45 Min)7.Ad Hoc Committees and Liaison Updates – Discussion – (15 min)COMMISSIONER/BOARD MEMBER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, ANNOUNCEMENTS, OR FUTUREMEETINGS AND AGENDAS
Members of the public may not speak to the item(s)
ADJOURNMENT
PUBLIC COMMENT INSTRUCTIONS
Members of the Public may provide public comments to teleconference meetings via email,
teleconference, or by phone.
1. Written public comments m a y b e s u b m i t t e d b y e m a i l t o
ParkRec.Commission@cityofpaloalto.org.
2. Spoken public comments using a computer will be accepted through the
teleconference meeting. To address the Council, click on the link below to access a Zoom‐
based meeting. Please read the following instructions carefully.
You may download the Zoom client or connect to the meeting in‐ browser. If using
your browser, make sure you are using a current, up‐to‐date browser: Chrome 30 ,
Firefox 27 , Microsoft Edge 12 , Safari 7 . Certain functionality may be disabled in
older browsers including Internet Explorer.
You may be asked to enter an email address and name. We request that you
identify yourself by name as this will be visible online and will be used to notify you
that it is your turn to speak.
When you wish to speak on an Agenda Item, click on “raise hand.” The Clerk will
activate and unmute speakers in turn. Speakers will be notified shortly before they
are called to speak.
When called, please limit your remarks to the time limit allotted. A timer will be
shown on the computer to help keep track of your comments.
3. Spoken public comments using a smart phone will be accepted through the
teleconference meeting. To address the Council, download the Zoom application onto
your phone from the Apple App Store or Google Play Store and enter the Meeting ID
below. Please follow the instructions B‐E above.
4. Spoken public comments using a phone use the telephone number listed below. When
you wish to speak on an agenda item hit *9 on your phone so we know that you wish to
speak. You will be asked to provide your first and last name before addressing the
Council. You will be advised how long you have to speak. When called please limit your
remarks to the agenda item and time limit allotted.
CLICK HERE TO JOIN Meeting ID: 999 3789 9745 Phone:1‐669‐900‐6833
Americans with Disability Act (ADA) It is the policy of the City of Palo Alto to offer its public
programs, services and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to all. Persons with
disabilities who require materials in an appropriate alternative format or who require auxiliary
aids to access City meetings, programs, or services may contact the City’s ADA Coordinator at
(650) 329‐2550 (voice) or by emailing ada@cityofpaloalto.org. Requests for assistance or
accommodations must be submitted at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting, program, or
service.
TO:
FROM:
DEPARTMENT:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
DAREN ANDERSON
COMMUNITY SERVICES
FEBRUARY 28, 2023
ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING USE OF
TELECONFERENCING FOR PARKS AND RECREATION
COMMISSION MEETINGS DURING COVID-19 STATE OF
EMERGENCY
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolution (Attachment A) authorizing the use of teleconferencing under Government
Code Section 54953(e) for meetings of the Parks and Recreation Commission and its committees
due to the Covid-19 declared state of emergency.
BACKGROUND
In February and March 2020, the state and the County declared a state of emergency due to the
Covid-19 pandemic. Both emergency declarations remain in effect.
On September 16, 2021, the Governor signed AB 361, a bill that amends the Brown Act,
effective October 1, 2021, to allow local policy bodies to continue to meet by
teleconferencing during a state of emergency without complying with restrictions in State
law that would otherwise apply, provided that the policy bodies make certain findings at
least once every 30 days.
AB 361, codified at California Government Code Section 54953(e), empowers local policy
bodies to convene by teleconferencing technology during a proclaimed state of emergency under
the State Emergency Services Act in any of the following circumstances:
(A) The legislative body holds a meeting during a proclaimed state of emergency, and
state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social
distancing.
(B)The legislative body holds a meeting during a proclaimed state of emergency for the
purpose of determining, by majority vote, whether as a result of the emergency,
meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees.
(C) The legislative body holds a meeting during a proclaimed state of emergency and has
determined, by majority vote, pursuant to subparagraph (B) (B), that, as a result of the
emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of
attendees. (Gov. Code § 54953(e)(1).)
1
Packet Pg. 4
In addition, Section 54953(e)(3) requires that policy bodies using teleconferencing reconsider the
state of emergency within 30 days of the first teleconferenced meeting after October 1, 2021, and
at least every 30 days thereafter, and find that one of the following circumstances exists:
1. The state of emergency continues to directly impact the ability of the
members to meet safely in person.
2.State or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to
promote social distancing.
DISCUSSION
At this time, the circumstances in Section 54953(e)( 1)(A) exist. The Santa Clara County Health
Officer continues to recommend measures to promote outdoor activity, physical distancing and
other social distancing measures, such as masking, in certain contexts. (See August 2, 2021
Order.) In addition, the California Department of Industrial Relations Division of Occupational
Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA) has promulgated Section 3205 of Title 8 of the California Code
of Regulations, which requires most employers in California, including in the City, to train and
instruct employees about measures that can decrease the spread of COVID-19, including
physical distancing and other social distancing measures.
Accordingly, Section 54953(e)(1)(A) authorizes the City to continue using teleconferencing for
public meetings of its policy bodies, provided that any and all members of the public who wish
to address the body or its committees have an opportunity to do so, and that the statutory and
constitutional rights of parties and the members of the public attending the meeting via
teleconferencing are protected.
To comply with public health directives and promote public safety, Palo Alto policy bodies
have been meeting via teleconference since March 2020. On September 27, 2021, the City
Council considered the format for future Council, committee, and Board and Commission
meetings. Council determined that beginning November 1, 2021, Council meetings would be
conducted using a hybrid format that allows Council Members and the public to decide
whether to attend in person, following masking and distancing protocols, or participate via
teleconference. Council directed that Council standing and ad-hoc committees and Boards and
Commissions would continue meeting via teleconference through January 2022.
Adoption of the Resolution at Attachment A will make the findings required by Section
54953(e)(3) to allow the continued use of teleconferencing for meetings of the Parks and
Recreation Commission and its committees.
1
Packet Pg. 5
NOT YET APPROVED
Resolution No. ____
Resolution Making Findings to Allow Teleconferenced Meetings Under California Government
Code Section 54953(e)
R E C I T A L S
A.California Government Code Section 54953(e) empowers local policy bodies to convene
by teleconferencing technology during a proclaimed state of emergency under the State Emergency
Services Act so long as certain conditions are met; and
B.In March 2020, the Governor of the State of California proclaimed a state of emergency
in California in connection with the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (“COVID-19”) pandemic, and that state
of emergency remains in effect; and
C. In February 2020, the Santa Clara County Director of Emergency Services and the
Santa Clara County Health Officer declared a local emergency, which declarations were
subsequently ratified and extended by the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors, and
those declarations also remain in effect; and
D.On September 16, 2021, the Governor signed AB 361, a bill that amends the Brown Act
to allow local policy bodies to continue to meet by teleconferencing during a state of emergency
without complying with restrictions in State law that would otherwise apply, provided that the
policy bodies make certain findings at least once every 30 days; and
E.While federal, State, and local health officials emphasize the critical importance of
vaccination and consistent mask-wearing to prevent the spread of COVID-19, the Santa Clara County
Health Officer has issued at least one order, on August 2, 2021 (available online at here), that continues
to recommend measures to promote outdoor activity, physical distancing and other social distancing
measures, such as masking, in certain contexts; and
F.The California Department of Industrial Relations Division of Occupational Safety and
Health (“Cal/OSHA”) has promulgated Section 3205 of Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations,
which requires most employers in California, including in the City, to train and instruct employees
about measures that can decrease the spread of COVID-19, including physical distancing and other
social distancing measures; and
G.The City’s Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC) has met remotely during the COVID-
19 pandemic and can continue to do so in a manner that allows public participation and
transparency while minimizing health risks to members, staff, and the public that would be present
with in-person meetings while this emergency continues; now, therefore,
1
Packet Pg. 6
NOT YET APPROVED
The Parks and Recreation Commission RESOLVES as follows:
1.As described above, the State of California remains in a state of emergency due to the
COVID-19 pandemic. At this meeting, PRC has considered the circumstances of the state of
emergency.
2.As described above, State and County officials continue to recommend measures
to promote physical distancing and other social distancing measures, in some
settings.
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That for at least the next 30 days, meetings of PRC will occur using
teleconferencing technology. Such meetings of PRC that occur using teleconferencing technology
will provide an opportunity for any and all members of the public who wish to address the body and
its committees and will otherwise occur in a manner that protects the statutory and constitutional
rights of parties and the members of the public attending the meeting via teleconferencing; and, be
it
FURTHER RESOLVED, That the PRC staff liaison is directed to place a resolution substantially similar to
this resolution on the agenda of a future meeting of PRC within the next 30 days. If PRC does not meet
under the Brown Act within the next 30 days, the staff liaison is directed to place a such resolution on
the agenda of the immediately following Brown Act meeting of PRC.
INTRODUCED AND PASSED:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
ATTEST:
PRC Staff Liaison Chair, Parks and Recreation Commission
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED:
Assistant City Attorney Director, Community Services
1
Packet Pg. 7
DRAFT
DRAFT 1
1
2
3
MINUTES 4
PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION 5
REGULAR MEETING 6
JANUARY 24, 2023 7
In-Person & Virtual Conference 8
Palo Alto, California 9
10
Commissioners Present: Chair Greenfield; Vice Chair LaMere; Commissioners 11
Amanda Brown, Anne Cribbs, Nellis Freeman, Shani 12
Kleinhaus, and Joy Oche 13
Commissioners Absent: 14
Others Present: Council Liaison: Vice Mayor Greer Stone 15
Staff Present: Daren Anderson, Lam Do, Javod Ghods 16
CALL TO ORDER & ROLL CALL 17
18
BUSINESS 19
1. Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing Use of Teleconferencing for 20
Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting During COVID-19 State 21
of Emergency 22
Commissioner Cribbs moved to adopt the Resolution. Seconded by 23
Commissioner Oche, the motion passed, 6-0, by roll call vote. 24
PUBLIC COMMENT 25
Herb Borock spoke about a couple of trees that had been marked to be cut 26
down last fall at Magic Forest. A two-week notice had been given at that 27
time but the trees have yet to be cut down. Mr. Borock asked the staff to 28
look into this. 29
Monica Williams gave an update on the Palo Alto Pickleball Club. The club 30
now has over 500 members who are Palo Alto residents. The pilot program 31
for court usage priority on the temporary pickleball courts has created the 32
opportunity to grow the youth pickleball program. 33
2
Packet Pg. 8
DRAFT
DRAFT 2
1
Yudy Deng, Palo Alto resident, announced her intention to apply for a 2
position on the Board in March-April. 3
AGENDA CHANGES, REQUESTS, DELETIONS 4
APPROVAL OF MINUTES 5
2. Approval of Draft Minutes from the November 22, 2022, Parks and 6
Recreation Commission Meeting 7
Commissioner Freeman moved to approve the minutes of the November 22, 8
2022, Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting. Seconded by 9
Commissioner Cribbs, the motion passed, 6-0 by roll call vote. 10
3. Approval of Draft Minutes from the December 13, 2022, Parks and 11
Recreation Commission Meeting 12
Commissioner Cribbs moved to approve the minutes of the December 13, 13
2022, Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting. Seconded by 14
Commissioner Oche, the motion passed, 6-0 by roll call vote. 15
CITY OFFICIAL REPORTS 16
4. Department Report 17
Daren Anderson, Community Services Department, gave updates on 18
impacts of the recent storm. There were flooding issues, landslides, trail 19
washouts and downed trees and limbs. In the Foothills, all trails are 20
currently open after having to be closed on multiple occasions for safety 21
reasons except for the eastern portion of Fern Loop Trail, which will remain 22
closed until the trail contractor determines needed repairs. In Pearson-23
Arastradero Preserve, all trails are now open except for the seasonal trails 24
due to the recent rain. The rangers will reanalyze them every three to four 25
days to determine when they can reopen. In the urban parks, a lot of tree 26
limbs and about 10 full trees came down in various locations. There were 27
flooding issues in several sites mostly due to clogged drains. Another impact 28
from the storm was a portion of fence blown over at the Cubberley Tennis 29
Courts. The repair is pending cost estimates in the next day or two and the 30
turf drying out in order to allow the heavy vehicles that will be needed for 31
the repairs. The infill replacement project at Mayfield Soccer Complex was 32
completed. The fields opened on December 20. The restrooms at Mitchell 33
Park near the tennis courts have been closed due to significant blockage in 34
2
Packet Pg. 9
DRAFT
DRAFT 3
the line but had been repaired the night before the meeting. The one-day 1
art project that was designed to engage the community about sea-level rise 2
at the Baylands was held on January 21. It was recently discovered that a 3
housing development at 2850 West Bayshore is needing to encroach into 4
Greer Park to connect their property’s new housing to the sanitary sewer 5
line. An easement was obtained to do so. The encroachment into the park 6
will impact the users of Greer Field 3. Planning, Public Works, Utilities and 7
the property owner are working on arranging the timing to minimize the 8
impact to the leagues using that field. Mr. Anderson shared the results of 9
the Annual Community Survey Report that had been presented at the City 10
Council meeting the night before. The Parks and Recreation Commission e-11
bike recommendation that was scheduled for the last City Council meeting 12
has been tentatively rescheduled for February 27. The Parks and Recreation 13
Commission recruitment deadline has changed to February 28. They are still 14
recruiting for a park maintenance position and will be interviewing for three 15
open space park technicians and a budget analyst. A new vendor, World Cup 16
Soccer Clinics and Camps, is coming in spring and will offer clinics to youth 17
ages 4-6 and 7-9 at Greer Park. The contract with Kids Love Soccer still 18
exists but another contractor was needed to alleviate the long waitlist. New 19
adult Salsa and ballroom dancing classes and street dancing for teens and 20
adults with disabilities will be held in the evenings at Lucie Stern Ballroom. 21
Descriptions of the classes can be found on the Enjoy! website. 22
Chair Greenfield questioned how the timing will be decided regarding the 23
encroachment into Greer 3 Playing Field. 24
Mr. Anderson answered that Planning will do the liaison work with the owner 25
and will reach out to multiple departments in order to understand 26
constraints. The timing will be built into the permit, which is still being 27
defined. 28
BUSINESS 29
5. Cubberley Community Center Playfields Restroom Addition 30
Project – Peter Jensen – Discussion 31
Peter Jensen, Public Works Engineering Landscape Architect, discussed the 32
Cubberley Field Restroom. The project has been ongoing since 2018. There 33
was a pause in the project due to COVID. He asked for input from the 34
Commission concerning the location of the restroom. He detailed the 35
proposed design and layout and the three possible locations along with their 36
pros and cons. He stated that a pump lift station would potentially be 37
required for locations one or three because they could not be tied into the 38
existing Cubberley sewer line. An online community survey was held 39
2
Packet Pg. 10
DRAFT
DRAFT 4
regarding the location of bathroom and the majority of the residents 1
preferred location one. There is consideration of increasing the size to a 4-2
stall restroom. The goal is to have the restroom installed by summer 2024. 3
Commissioner Freeman asked if the pump will be a different structure and if 4
there is a noise factor or environmental factor associated with it. 5
Mr. Jensen answered it is basically a 4 x 4, 6-8 feet deep pit next to the 6
restroom with a steel grate over it. There are no environmental factors 7
unless it fails or overflows and the noise is minimal. 8
Commissioner Kleinhaus questioned if there will be a way to lock the 9
restroom doors automatically in in the event of an outage shutting off power 10
to the pump and wanted to know where people currently go to use the 11
restroom. 12
Mr. Jensen stated automatic locks would probably be the preferred method 13
and there will be the option of having backup battery systems for the pump. 14
He answered the majority of people use the restroom in the central building 15
in Cubberley, a portable bathroom next to the track and field and at times 16
people use the perimeter of the field and bushes, which is another reason 17
for building a new bathroom. 18
Commissioner Freeman questioned if doubling the size of the restroom to 19
four stalls will increase the size of the pump and what the track record on 20
reliability of other cities using the pump. 21
Mr. Jensen explained the pump usually lasts between 5 to 15 years and the 22
pump will be larger if the size of the bathroom is increased. 23
Chair Greenfield asked about the budget implications for a four-stall 24
restroom and if the delivery and installation time would be extended. He 25
questioned if there is any other option on the Cubberley site besides the 26
proposed second location where a lift station would not be needed. 27
Mr. Jensen stated the construction and delivery would take the same 28
amount of time as a two-stall restroom. The cost of the four-stall restroom 29
will be roughly 50% more than a two-stall. He said there is currently no 30
other option within the Cubberley site where a lift station would not be 31
needed besides location two. 32
Ken Knox, President of the Greenmeadow Community Association, 33
summarized that the Greenmeadow residents support the construction of 34
the restroom but at a location further away from Nelson due to concerns 35
2
Packet Pg. 11
DRAFT
DRAFT 5
with location number two being very close to their homes causing additional 1
traffic and potential odor. He suggested locations closer to the parking lot 2
and asked that city engineers investigate those suggested locations. 3
Sonya Bradski, resident on Nelson next to Cubberley, expressed concern 4
that location two would attract homeless people to her neighborhood. She 5
suggested the location of the current Porta Potty would be more convenient 6
for the soccer people. She concluded that the sewer line in her 7
neighborhood is old and troublesome and would not be ideal for the new 8
bathroom. 9
Gary Bradski concurred that he is not happy with location two. He believed 10
the survey was biased and should be disregarded. He stated the current 11
Cubberley bathroom location is adequate. He said there are already issues 12
with homeless people in their neighborhood and expressed concern that the 13
location two bathroom would increase that. 14
Heidi Voltmer, Greenmeadow resident, believed location one would be the 15
most convenient spot for the bathroom because that is where the soccer 16
field users park. 17
Elizabeth Alexis, Greenmeadow resident, questioned the possibility of 18
connecting location three the Cubberley sewage similar to the facility the 19
school district just put into the parking lot. She wondered if an arrangement 20
could be made with the school district to open that facility on the weekend 21
during the time of the construction of the new bathroom since the teachers 22
would not be using it at that time. She objected to site number two because 23
the pathway to that location is extremely dark at night and would have to 24
be lighted adding to the cost. 25
Penny Ellson, Greenmeadow resident, expressed that long-term neglect of 26
Cubberley has led to expensive, suboptimal, one-off repeated solutions to 27
problems. She agreed with the suggestion to lift the building to eliminate 28
the need for a pump and wanted to hear from staff regarding this. She had 29
concern about location two attracting traffic to the neighborhood school 30
route. She agreed having the bathroom near the parking area would be 31
most convenient. She questioned how many trees would have to be taken 32
out to fit the four-toilet facility next to Nelson Drive and asked staff to 33
reconsider the location to location one. 34
Rebecca Marasco, Greenmeadow resident, highlighted there is already 35
excessive traffic on Nelson and felt putting the restroom closer to Nelson 36
would encourage more people to park there. She suggested putting the 37
2
Packet Pg. 12
DRAFT
DRAFT 6
restroom closer to the parking lot would encourage people to park there 1
instead. 2
Samuel Kempton emphasized the raised platform idea eliminating the need 3
for a pump making future maintenance easier and achieve the desired 4
location closer to the field entry. He was also in favor of the 4 x 4 5
bathrooms. 6
Commissioner Cribbs commented she was in favor of the location of the 7
current Porta Potty. She suggested keeping the bathrooms at the Pavilion 8
open on the weekend, pulling in more Porta Potties or doing a deal with the 9
school district to use theirs could alleviate the situation in the meantime. 10
Commissioner Oche wondered if increasing the frequency of cleaning or 11
adding more portable restrooms in the meantime would add or alleviate the 12
problem they are facing of people using the bushes. She did not support the 13
Nelson Drive location due to the residents’ concerns. 14
Commissioner Kleinhaus stated she did not support the Nelson Drive 15
location and asked for more information about creating an elevation to avoid 16
a pump. 17
Mr. Jensen answered that lifting the structure would not be a viable option. 18
Commissioner Freeman supported the four-stall bathroom and location one. 19
He asked for more detail about the maintenance requirements with the four 20
stalls and if the proposed $250K more cost would cover the increased size of 21
the pumps. He asked how successful locking the doors automatically at 10 22
p.m. have been in other locations and if the locks would be tamper proof. 23
He asked how much city staff involvement would be required for the 24
maintenance. 25
Mr. Jensen stated that the majority of the $250K is the cost of the larger 26
structure itself and would range between $20K to $30K more for the design 27
and implementation for the larger restroom. The portable restroom is rented 28
from someone who is responsible for the cleaning. The park restrooms are 29
cleaned every evening. He said that the locks have proven to be successful. 30
The lighting on the inside comes on if someone goes in the bathroom. The 31
restrooms would be cleaned every night. 32
Commissioner Brown expressed her support for the four-stall option away 33
from the residential neighborhood. 34
2
Packet Pg. 13
DRAFT
DRAFT 7
Vice Chair LaMere inquired about problems that have been experienced with 1
restrooms at other neighborhood parks. 2
Mr. Anderson answered there have been issues including vandalism or 3
extreme damage in some of the public restrooms and that it is location 4
dependent. 5
Vice Chair LaMere supported a four-stall restroom at location one. He 6
echoed the comment made about the suboptimal and inefficient solutions 7
that result from inability of the city and school district to get together on 8
solutions for Cubberley. 9
Chair Greenfield questioned if the situation would be much different if the 10
city and school district had been able to move forward with a redevelopment 11
plan for Cubberley given the field areas would not be redeveloped as part of 12
the plan and inquired about the time horizon of the pump situation. 13
Mr. Jensen answered that an extensive renovation of the Cubberley site will 14
be implemented in the future including upgrades of all the utilities on site 15
and possibly rerouting the sewer system to connect to the new 16
infrastructure eliminating the pump and possibly removing the restroom 17
itself and having a restroom in a building. 18
Chair Greenfield commented he would appreciate the Commission getting 19
more directly looped into the process moving forward. He believed everyone 20
agreed that a less expensive, lower maintenance gravity flow solution would 21
be preferred but the site near Nelson is not appropriate. He was in favor of 22
location number one. He asked for clarification on the budget implications 23
with respect to timing on moving forward with the four-stall option or if that 24
will result in a delay. He inquired about any downsides going with the four-25
unit restroom voicing support of the larger bathroom if it does not change 26
the timeline. 27
Mr. Jensen stated he would have to get back to him on the budget 28
implications. The requested additional $250K had been requested in the 29
next fiscal year budget but has not been approved yet. He did not think 30
there would be a delay. He did not know of any downsides going with the 31
four-unit restroom and that the capacity of the field warrants the extra cost 32
of the larger restroom. 33
Commissioner Freeman added the bigger facility would be better because 34
the visitor capacity is potentially going to grow because they are 35
encouraging the residents to take advantage of the facility. 36
2
Packet Pg. 14
DRAFT
DRAFT 8
6. Aquatics Annual Report – Sharon Eva – Discussion 1
Tim Sheeper, Tim Sheeper, Inc. and Palo Alto Swim and Sport, gave the 2
Aquatics Annual Report in Sharon Eva’s place. He described 2022 as a 3
rebuilding to baseline year. They had high satisfactions from the patrons as 4
far as baseline operations such as safety, administration, communications, 5
water quality and facility cleanliness. They had great success returning to 6
baseline in the lap swimming program and summer camps. They had 7
moderate success returning to baseline with open swim and masters 8
swimming. They had minimal success returning to baseline with youth swim 9
lessons. The goals in 2023 will be focused on increasing staff numbers. 10
Increasing lifeguard staff numbers will relate to increasing the amount of 11
open swim hours they can have during spring, summer and early fall. 12
Focusing on swim instructor numbers will translate into increasing swim 13
lesson offerings. They have hired new leadership staff, restructured 14
programming and content and are training instructors for the spring when 15
the pool will be refurbished and reopened, focusing on a strong summer 16
offering. 17
Commissioner Cribbs asked if scholarships will be needed for any children or 18
adults who want swim lessons and about the cost of senior lap swim. She 19
inquired if there is opportunity to shave a couple of inches off the pool while 20
it is closed for renovation. The touch pads of the pool make the pool too 21
short for the new equipment U.S. Swimming requires to break a record. 22
Correcting this would bring more swim meets to the pool. 23
Mr. Sheeper answered there is a foundation in place to cover any swim 24
scholarships needed in the community. Their challenge is in finding the 25
instructors to give the lessons. Increasing their pay has allowed them to 26
round of a team of instructors. Senior fees for lap swimming will be reduced 27
in the monthly membership for the resident senior lap swimmers. He stated 28
the walls have already been shaved and any more would destruct the 29
integrity of the wall. 30
Commissioner Brown asked for details about staffing and recruitment efforts 31
that have been made. 32
Mr. Sheeper answered raising entry-level salary for all lifeguards and swim 33
instructors has allowed them to provide the needed staff. They are sending 34
them through a training program. Lessons will be given year round. They 35
are going to share the swim instructors with Rinconada pool when they open 36
in spring and summer. They have increased the entry compensation for 37
lifeguards, as well. 38
2
Packet Pg. 15
DRAFT
DRAFT 9
Vice Chair LaMere asked for information about the Masters swim program. 1
Mr. Sheeper stated the issue in the past was increasing the safety aspects 2
of the Rinconada Masters and introducing safety factors that were void 3
which raised issues with the team. The leadership of that program retired 4
leaving them the responsibility of hiring training coaches and operating the 5
program. During the pandemic, the team expanded up to a little over 100 6
swimmers because they took over a lot of swimmers who were at Stanford 7
and their pool was not operational. As Stanford came back online, swimmers 8
went back to their home pool and they ended up with 50 to 60 swimmers. 9
They have had a number of coaching changes as they attempt to find the 10
right mix of coaching staff. They have been able to share pool time with the 11
lap swimmers in the mornings and afternoons rather than have blocked 12
swim time just for Masters or just for lap swimmers. The shared time will 13
allow the program to expand. 14
Commissioner Oche asks what the number of respondents were for page 4 15
and what the residents responded to on page 7. 16
Mr. Sheeper answered the total respondents was 196. The residents want 17
more time, more space and time in the evening. The two obstacles with 18
these requests are the youth swimming program use the pool from 4 p.m. 19
until the evening and the requirement of a whole new staff in the evening. 20
Chair Greenfield inquired what the impact to the pool staff will be during the 21
renovation time and if it is common to close this long for a renovation. He 22
asked for elaboration on the fee structure modifications and what the 23
percentage of the difference will be in rate for residents versus 24
nonresidents. 25
Mr. Sheeper answered the 45-day minimum closure is tough on the staff 26
and the operation and is not common but the repairs are mandatory. Some 27
of the staff will be able to move over to the pool in Menlo Park but they are 28
not able to provide hours for the entire staff. They are in discussions with 29
city staff for options. They will be returning to the pre-pandemic fee 30
structure. There will be a reduced fee for resident seniors for lap swimming. 31
The difference in rates for residents versus nonresidents will be in the 20% 32
range. 33
7. Golf Annual Report– Lam Do – Discussion 34
Lam Do, Superintendent for Open Space Parks and Golf, gave a brief 35
presentation to supplement the staff report on the financial and operations 36
performance on the golf course. The former Palo Alto Municipal Golf Course 37
2
Packet Pg. 16
DRAFT
DRAFT 10
closed in fiscal year 2017 and 2018 for course reconfiguration. The redesign 1
encompassed all 18 holes. The course reopened in May 2018 as the 2
Baylands Golf Links. The redesign was initiated for environmental flood 3
control needs. Seven acres of the former Palo Alto Municipal Golf Course 4
was transferred to the Joint Powers Authority implementing the flood control 5
measures. Improvements were focused on course play addressing turf, 6
drainage and irrigation needs. The grass chosen for the fairway turf allowed 7
for use of recycled water addressing environmental needs. At the time of 8
reopening, a service agreement was entered into with OB Sports to be a full 9
service course management company focusing on customer and player 10
experience providing practice facilities, course maintenance, merchandise 11
sales and food and beverage. Previously there were three vendors and it 12
was difficult to coordinate services. With a single operator, the golf course is 13
doing well financially. The first full fiscal year showed an equilibrium 14
between revenue and expenses. They were able to reattract prior players 15
and bring new players in. In fiscal year 2020, there were setbacks. At the 16
end of 2019, there was wildfire impact on air quality impacting golf play. In 17
the spring, the COVID-19 shelter-in-place order shut down the golf course 18
resulting in loss of revenue. In the past two years, the course has exceeded 19
$5m in revenue with $4m expenses. Annual rounds of golf play continues to 20
increase. This is reflective of demand during the COVID-19 pandemic and 21
the quality of the course play and customer experience the course operator 22
provides. When the course reopened, they wanted to attract players from 23
Palo Alto and ensure the golf course success by attracting players regionally. 24
The past three years, Palo Alto resident players has increased from 29% to 25
39% and about 46% of the players are from other parts of Santa Clara 26
County and San Mateo County. They increased overall Palo Alto residency 27
play and attracted regional players because Palo Alto support alone could 28
not support the golf course. He shared some awards and recognitions the 29
course has received over the years. He addressed updates on 30
communication with the State Water Board who have given direction to be 31
in compliance with mitigation monitoring. An inventory was sent to them of 32
the current conditions and are awaiting their review. They will then work on 33
initiating and continuing mitigation monitoring of the golf course. 34
Chair Greenfield queried about the appropriateness of speaking about 35
mitigations to the natural environment that are part of the golf course. 36
Mr. Do answered it is best to discuss the operational and financial 37
performance of the golf course. General overall questions about the 38
environment and mitigation monitoring could be answered on a cursory 39
level. For a detailed discussion, it should be added to the agenda. 40
2
Packet Pg. 17
DRAFT
DRAFT 11
Commissioner Kleinhaus understood there has been no response from the 1
Water Board but mitigation costs money and will affect the finances next 2
year. She thought this report should include the environmental issues of the 3
golf course, how the mitigations are advancing and how much they are 4
going to cost. She stated the mitigation issue needed to be addressed in the 5
reports in the future as it was a legal requirement to have been done five 6
years ago and separating it from the costs they are being given makes the 7
presentation inaccurate. She expressed confusion why mitigation goes to 8
capital rather than the golf course budget. 9
Mr. Do stated the cost of the mitigation would be brought up as part of the 10
budget process for the future fiscal years presented to Council to be 11
reviewed and adopted. The mitigation and monitoring is presently funded 12
through a capital improvement project for which the funding is requested 13
annually. He agreed the mitigation needs to be done and that the capital 14
improvement project is the mechanism to request and receive funding. 15
Commissioner Freeman asked for background information about the 16
increase in revenue and the number of Palo Alto residents using the facility. 17
Mr. Do answered the overall rounds of golf play have gone up after the lull 18
from the COVID shutdown. Golf professionals predict there will be a slight 19
downturn but that most of the uptick will remain. 20
David Hall agreed that COVID and a combination of the excitement of the 21
renovations caused the uptick in golf play. He states it is expected to come 22
down a little bit. 23
Commissioner Cribbs asked if there will be conversation about programs for 24
youth and the progress on the First Tee in the future. She inquired if there 25
has been discussion among them about improvements to the clubhouse and 26
restaurant facility. 27
Mr. Hall noted there will be a second stage in the master plan to upgrade 28
the food and beverage and the offices. 29
Mr. Do commented that the improvements will need to be considered by the 30
city and he has had some discussions with the city’s facilities team about 31
the improvements. A near future expansion is not on the horizon at this 32
time due to availability of funds but may be considered in future years. He 33
added the First Tee program uses the golf course as a teaching facility and 34
there is a youth program. They have an agreement in process with First Tee 35
to work on establishing and finalizing a long-term partnership where they 36
will facilitate and raise funds to improve practice facilities. 37
2
Packet Pg. 18
DRAFT
DRAFT 12
Mr. Hall commented the Youth on Course program is administered by the 1
Northern California Golf Association. It provides discounted rates for junior 2
golfers. In 2022, there were 1100 rounds generated from the program. In 3
addition to that, there were another 2500 rounds paying the junior rate so 4
there were about 3600 rounds of junior play. They also had the First Tee of 5
Silicon Valley which were eight-week programs in each season for a total of 6
258 participants. There were five separate one-week session of junior golf 7
camps with a total of 100 kids. A spring break junior golf camp is planned 8
April 3 through 7. Individual golf lessons with 3400 hours of instruction were 9
provided in the past year. 10
Vice Chair LaMere asked for an update on the performance of the golf shop 11
and restaurant. 12
Mr. Do commented the first full FY19, the golf shop revenue lost was not 13
from lack of golf play but from lack of sales from the pro shop. This was due 14
to competition from online retailers. OB Sports has branded itself at 15
Baylands Golf Links to address sales of soft goods to create loyalty to garner 16
retail sales at the pro shop which has produced some success but continues 17
to be a struggle. 18
Mr. Hall agreed that the retail sales continue to be a struggle. He stated 19
their success is more in golf balls, gloves and headwear. Equipment and 20
clothing sales are a struggle. They are moving away from stocking hard 21
goods and moving more toward fitting days where 90% of those being fit 22
purchase equipment. The restaurant has been a break even due to lack of 23
activity. 24
Vice Chair LaMere inquired about the net fiscal impact for the city in terms 25
of direct revenue from golf play and sales and what the general fund paid in 26
the last fiscal year. 27
Mr. Do answered the revenue is one side of the equation and the other side 28
is what the city pays to operate the golf course and for the payments the 29
city make annually for taking on debt to renovate the golf course. The last 30
two years they have operated in the black. The golf course is part of the 31
general fund which benefits if the golf course operates in the black or 32
absorbs the loss if not. The last fiscal year, $5.3M went to the general fund 33
and $4.2M in expenses came from the general fund. There was a net profit 34
of $1.1M to the general fund. The compensation to OB Sports is within the 35
expense category. 36
2
Packet Pg. 19
DRAFT
DRAFT 13
Vice Chair LaMere asked what high schools the course has relationships with 1
in terms of their golf teams using the course and what fees they pay to use 2
the course. 3
Mr. Do answered they have active participation with Gunn High School and 4
Palo Alto High School. A large percentage of them are part of Youth on 5
Course program and pay $5 and the others pay $10. 6
Commissioner Oche questioned where the information could be found for 7
the spring young golfers program that was mentioned as she did not see it 8
in the Enjoy! Catalog. 9
Mr. Do stated seasonal courses are offered through the First Tee of Silicon 10
Valley who facilitates their own program. The golf course provides the 11
facility for them; however, they do the marketing, advertising and 12
registrations of the participants. The website for First Tee is 13
firstteesiliconvalley.org. 14
Mr. Hall stated once the plans for the spring break camp have been 15
complete it will be in the city communication. 16
Chair Greenfield commented that the report indicated that the actual 17
revenue of $5.3M was 32% above the target revenue. A year ago in FY21, 18
the actual revenue was $5.1M. He asked why the target revenue was so 19
much lower than the preceding year’s actual revenue and what the target 20
revenue is for FY23. He asked if there is an impact of having a budget 21
projection that is off by 32%. He recommended considering not including 22
outlier data years to reduce the impact. He asked how much of the golf 23
course’s budget is made transparent and what percentage of the overall 24
expense is the debt service. 25
Mr. Do stated the city’s combination of projections, budgeting and funding 26
are multiple factors in play. It is a discussion with the course operator, OB 27
Sports, a third party financial portfolio performed for the golf course to get 28
future year projections and internal discussions looking beyond the 29
performer and recommendation with OB Sports. The city preferred to look 30
at three-year trends instead of assuming an uptick will be in place. He has 31
been in discussions with their budget office manager on how to project the 32
future fiscal year. They have not finalized what that revenue target will be. 33
He stated that the actual revenue being 30% higher than the projection, 34
perhaps the projection needs to be adjusted but the final number of the 35
actuals is more important in regard to what the projection is compared to 36
the actual expenses. He agreed there would be a benefit in tightening up 37
and having a golf projection closer to what the actuals have been. He 38
2
Packet Pg. 20
DRAFT
DRAFT 14
further agreed with the recommendation to not include outlier years for 1
COVID. He explained the golf course’s budget is reviewed as it’s own page 2
in the department proposal, which includes the date from the previous four 3
fiscal years. The percentage of the debt service in FY22 was $4.2M in 4
expenses and $370K+ was debt service. The debt service changes annually 5
based on the payment schedule but is fairly consistent. 6
Chair Greenfield expressed disappointment in the lack of details in the 7
annual report. He requested a follow up summary of the numbers of the 8
youth program provided by Mr. Hall for their records. He added the bigger 9
picture in terms of environment mitigations of the golf course should be 10
discussed. He encouraged staff to work directly with the Commission Golf 11
Liaison and the Golf Liaison to review the information going into the report 12
before it gets agendized to provide feedback to make sure a more complete 13
story is being provided to the Commission. He requested to prioritize getting 14
the natural environment mitigations to the Commission as a separate item 15
in the early part of this year and including an annual follow-up on that at 16
the same time as the business and financial operations report. 17
8. Ad Hoc Committees and Liaison Updates – Discussion 18
Commissioner Freeman addressed a meeting scheduled the following 19
Thursday morning to go over concerns regarding the condition of the Hoover 20
baseball field. City staff will meet with stakeholders in the baseball 21
community to determine short-term solutions and look at long-term 22
solutions going forward. He reported the soccer fields are back in operation 23
and he will be reaching out to be sure the fields are being maintained. 24
Commissioner Cribbs expressed appreciation of pushing off the discussion 25
on the Recreation Wellness Center allowing time to gather more information 26
and do more research. A presentation will be made in March. 27
Chair Greenfield stated the e-bike recommendation will be taken up by City 28
Council in late February. He thought it was appropriate for the e-bike Ad 29
Hoc to wait for a response from City Council and asked if there is a need for 30
that group to convene. 31
Mr. Anderson answered reconvening and preparing the presentation and 32
helpful key points is a good next step. 33
Commissioner Brown commented on ongoing conversations with the group 34
from Barron Park on dog parks and continuing to work with staff on the 35
North Palo Alto options there. She pointed out that the Pearce Dog Park has 36
a bunch of mulch and fared well with the storm. She stated the 37
2
Packet Pg. 21
DRAFT
DRAFT 15
superintendent sent out a weekly email update noting that conversations 1
are resuming between the city and the school district on Cubberley. 2
Chair Greenfield inquired if the action the Commission took regarding the 3
Mitchell Park Dog Park has gone to City Council for approval yet. 4
Mr. Anderson answered it has gone to Council, was approved and is now in 5
the purchasing process to go out to bid. There has been a backlog of 6
projects and it is in the queue. 7
COMMISSIONER/BOARD MEMBER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, 8
ANNOUNCEMENTS OR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS 9
10
Vice Mayor Stone stated there a retreat will be held at Mitchell Park Library 11
at 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. the following Saturday to discuss goals and priorities for 12
the year and encouraged the Commissioners to. 13
14
Mr. Anderson brought up the Commission Attendance Policy to be addressed 15
in February. 16
17
Chair Greenfield stated the Wellness Center Gym is on the agenda for 18
March. City Council has asked them to review the update to the Tree 19
Ordinance six or nine months after it was passed. He asked about the status 20
of the natural environment mitigations for the golf course and when it is 21
appropriate for that to come to the Commission. 22
23
Mr. Anderson stated the next step is hearing back from the State Water 24
Board who needs more time to review it. 25
26
ADJOURNMENT 27
28
Meeting adjourned at 10:20 P.M. 29
2
Packet Pg. 22
72-INCH JOINT INTERCEPTING SEWER REHABILITATION
PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATION
FEBRUARY 28, 2023 www.cityofpaloalto.org
4
Packet Pg. 23
2
72‐INCH JOINT INTERCEPTING SEWER REHABILITATION PROJECT
•Pipeline was built in 1970 using open cut construction method
•Pipe is 60” and 72” diameter reinforced concrete pipe at about 25 feet below ground
•9,050 linear feet of pipe flows by gravity from a metering station at San Antonio Road,
under the flood basin, under Adobe and Matadero Creeks, adjacent to the landfill and
salt water marsh, and to the headworks and raw sewage lift station of the City’s
wastewater treatment plant
•The 2,400 linear feet nearest the wastewater plant is 72” diameter, severely corroded
and needs rehabilitation
4
Packet Pg. 24
3
72‐INCH JOINT INTERCEPTING SEWER ALIGNMENT
2,400 feet (0.45 mile) of severely corroded pipe that will be
rehab. as part of the Phase 1 Project
6,650 feet (1.26 mile) of pipe rehab. is
expected to need relining 10 years or
later from today
4
Packet Pg. 25
4
INSIDE VIEW OF THE PIPE
4
Packet Pg. 26
5
CURED IN PLACE PIPE (CIPP)
•Engineering Consultant performed alternative analysis on different pipe rehabilitation
methods; CIPP was determined to the most cost effective with minimal site disturbances
& no open cut trench.
•Rehabilitation method is lining pipe interior with cured in place pipe (aka, CIPP).
BEFORE AFTER
4
Packet Pg. 27
6
EXAMPLES OF LARGE DIAMETER CIPP INSTALLATION
4
Packet Pg. 28
7
EXAMPLES OF CIPP INSTALLATION
The resin-impregnated liner is fed into the existing pipe
4
Packet Pg. 29
8
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT EXPERIENCE W/ CURED IN PLACE PIPE
Up to January 2023
•CPAU installed 4.36 miles of CIPP
ranging in size from 6” to 42”,
including East Bay Shore and
Embarcadero Rd. (Harbor Rd.)
4
Packet Pg. 30
9
CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW CIPP AT SHORELINE PARK, MARCH 2022
•Construction activities stayed within paved parking lot &
minimal grassy area where manhole is located.
•Close coordination with Shoreline Park / golf course staff
to minimize impacts to park users.
•Set up one‐way burrow doors and fence to cordon off
sensitive areas.
•Noise <86 decibels at 50 feet from source.
Pumps w/ Sound Attenuation Enclosure
CIPP Equipment & Fencing
4
Packet Pg. 31
10
72” JOINT INTERCEPTING SEWER PROJECT DETAILS
•Project details
•Inspect & clean existing pipe (2,400 linear feet from Manhole (MH) #4 to WQCP)
•CIPP lining of the pipe from MH #4 to WQCP
•Sewage bypass pumping from MH #5 to WQCP’s headworks
•Timeline
3 to 5 months field construction (dry weather April to October 2024)
8 to 16 weeks of sewage bypassing
•Work activities 30% inside the plant / 70% outside the plant
•Construction traffic for material & fuel deliveries
•Cost approximately $5.2 million
•Informing & coordinating with landfill and park staff throughout design & construction
4
Packet Pg. 32
11
PROTECTION OF PUBLIC AND ENVIRONMENT
•Expect CEQA Categorical Exemption or Mitigated Negative Declaration
Biological surveys underway
•Minimize natural habitat disturbance by:
Performing construction activities during daytime only
Limiting construction activities within developed area / gravel roads
Will have personnel onsite 24/7 to monitor the bypass pumping system.
Provide 6” to 8” clearance below fence to allow wildlife to pass through the area
•Protect public by:
Posting information & detour signs on trails
Setting up fences to isolate construction boundary
Provide traffic control flaggers ahead & behind trucks when construction vehicle
traveling outside of fenced work area
4
Packet Pg. 33
12
72” JIS REHAB: TRAIL DETOUR AND SIGNAGE
Detour Route
Closure
Sewer MH
Sewer Rehab
Existing Sewer
BYXBEE PARK
REGIONAL
WATER QUALITY
CONTROL
PLANT
(Land Use Designation: Public Parks)
4
Packet Pg. 34
13
SITE PHOTOS
MH-05
MH-04
Detour
Temporary
closure for
construction
4
Packet Pg. 35
14
CONSTRUCTION BOUNDARY
BYXBEE PARK
REGIONAL WATER
QUALITY CONTROL
PLANT
Temp Bypass Line
Temp Leachate Line
Temp Fencing
Work Limits
Sewer MH
Sewer Rehab
Existing Sewer
Project Limits
4
Packet Pg. 36
15
CONSTRUCTION BOUNDARY WITHIN THE PARK
BYXBEE PARK
REGIONAL
WATER QUALITY
CONTROL PLANT
Temp Bypass Line
Temp Leachate Line
Temp Fencing
Work Limits
Sewer MH
Sewer Rehab
Existing Sewer
Project Limits
4
Packet Pg. 37
16
CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS AT MH 3
Temp Bypass Line
Temp Fencing
Sewer MH
Sewer Rehab
Existing Sewer
Project Limits
BYXBEE PARK
REGIONAL WATER
QUALITY CONTROL
PLANT
4
Packet Pg. 38
17
QUESTIONS?
Note to Jacobs: can you remove the callouts &
boxes for sheet numbers?
4
Packet Pg. 39
72-INCH JOINT
INTERCEPTING SEWER
REHABILITATION
FINAL SLIDE
PARKS & RECREATION
COMMISSION
PRESENTATION
FEBRUARY 28, 2023 www.cityofpaloalto.org
4
Packet Pg. 40
February 2023 www.cityofpaloalto.org
Brown Act Update
Virtual Attendance
at Public Meetings
5
Packet Pg. 41
ATTENDANCE
POST‐COVID‐19 STATE OF EMERGENCY
www.cityofpaloalto.org
5
Packet Pg. 42
3
California’s State of Emergency related to COVID‐19 will end on
February 28, 2023
Under the COVID State of Emergency, the Brown Act allowed
remote attendance with fewer requirements than pre‐COVID
Going forward, in‐person attendance is the default rule
Use of remote attendance will be more limited compared to
during the State of Emergency
End of the State of Emergency
5
Packet Pg. 43
4
Once the COVID‐19 State of Emergency ends (March 1), there
will be two ways to attend a meeting remotely under the Brown
Act:
1.Standard Remote Attendance
2.AB 2449 Remote Attendance (“Just Cause” and “Emergency
Circumstances”)
REMOTE ATTENDANCE ‐ OVERVIEW
5
Packet Pg. 44
5
In general, if a BCC member wishes to attend a public meeting
remotely starting March 1, 2023, they must ensure that:
That meeting’s agenda identifies the remote location,
The meeting agenda is posted at the remote location
24h/day for 72 hours prior to the meeting,
The remote location is open, free to enter without ID, and
fully accessible to the public,
Members of the public who attend the meeting at the
remote location can address the entire body,
And more.
You must begin working with your Staff Liaison on this at least
five days before the agenda is published for that meeting.
STANDARD REMOTE ATTENDANCE
5
Packet Pg. 45
6
STANDARD REMOTE ATTENDANCE
5
Packet Pg. 46
7
AB 2449 only applies in the following two circumstances:
When a BCC member has “just cause” to attend remotely,
which is defined as:
A caregiving need of a family member,
A contagious illness,
An unaccommodated disability‐related need, or
Travel while on business of a state or local agency.
When a physical or family medical emergency (“emergency
circumstances”) prevents the BCC member from attending
in person.
AB 2449 allows attendance without making the remote location
open to the public
AB 2449 REMOTE ATTENDANCE – NEW
5
Packet Pg. 47
8
To attend remotely for “just cause,” a BCC member must:
Notify the BCC at the earliest opportunity of the need for
remote participation and
Provide a general description of the circumstances
justifying remote participation.
No commission “action” required
AB 2449 REMOTE ATTENDANCE ‐ Process
5
Packet Pg. 48
9
To attend remotely due to “emergency circumstances,” a BCC
member must:
Make a request to the body to allow the member to meet
remotely due to an emergency circumstance as soon as
possible,
Provide a general description of the circumstance, and
Receive approval via a BCC action at the start of the
meeting.
BCC approval action required
If time allows, this should be agendized as a proposed
action item.
Otherwise, this must be done at the start of the meeting.
AB 2449 REMOTE ATTENDANCE ‐ Process
5
Packet Pg. 49
10
AB 2449 REMOTE ATTENDANCE ‐ Compared
Just Cause Emergency Circumstances
When (A) A childcare or caregiving
(B) A contagious illness
(C) A need related to certain
physical or mental disability
(D) Travel while on official business
of the legislative body or another
state or local agency.
A physical or family medical
emergency that prevents a
member from attending in
person
Commissioner
process
Commissioner gives notice, up to
the start of the meeting
Commissioner makes request,
up to the start of the meeting.
Commission
process
Receive notice Commission must ask for
general description (20 words)
and take action to approve
remote attendance
Result Can participate. Remote location does not need to allow for public
participation.
5
Packet Pg. 50
11
At least a quorum of BCC members must attend from a singular,
in‐person location.
Before any action is taken during the meeting, the remote BCC
member must disclose whether any other individuals 18 years
or older are present in the room with the member, and the
general nature of the member’s relationship with such persons.
A member of the legislative body participating from a remote
location must participate through both audio and visual
technology. No action can be taken if not working.
ADDITIONAL AB 2449 REQUIREMENTS
5
Packet Pg. 51
12
The BCC must indicate on the agenda how the public may
access the meeting and offer comment.
The agenda must identify and include an opportunity for all
persons to attend via a call‐in option, an internet‐based service
option, and at the in‐person location of the meeting.
The BCC cannot require public comments to be submitted in
advance of the meeting; comments must be accepted in real‐
time.
If broadcasting is disrupted, no further action may be taken
until access is restored.
ADDITIONAL AB 2449 REQUIREMENTS
5
Packet Pg. 52
13
A BCC member may not use AB 2449 Remote Attendance to
attend more than 20% of their body’s regular meetings
remotely, or more than 2 meetings if the body meets less than
10 times per calendar year.
For bodies that have ≤14 regular meetings in a calendar
year, AB 2449 Remote Attendance is available only twice
per calendar year.
AB 2449 REMOTE ATTENDANCE – LIMITS
5
Packet Pg. 53
14
•“Due to emergency circumstances, I request to attend this
meeting remotely under AB 2449. I have not attended a meeting
remotely due to just cause or emergency circumstances more
than [once] this calendar year. I will participate with both audio
and video turned on throughout the meeting, and specifically
whenever action is taken. The [PHYSICAL OR FAMILY] medical
emergency I am facing requires my remote attendance because
[BRIEF DESCRIPTION: 20 words, exact diagnosis not required].”
•“In this room, I am accompanied by…
•“…no one over the age of 18.”
•“…one or more individuals over the age of 18. They are
my [RELATION (e.g., spouse, coworker, medical provider)].”
AB 2449 EXAMPLE SCRIPT – Emergency
5
Packet Pg. 54
15
Inform your staff liaison as soon as you know that you will
need to attend a meeting remotely.
Consult with your BCC's remote attendance policy and confirm
with your staff liaison that you are eligible for the type of
remote attendance you would like to use.
Commission will have to keep track of remote attendance
usage under AB 2449.
REMOTE ATTENDANCE – FIRST STEPS
5
Packet Pg. 55
QUESTIONS?
www.cityofpaloalto.org
5
Packet Pg. 56
1
TO: PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
FROM: GARRETT SAULS
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING AND COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT
DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 2023
SUBJECT: PARK IMPROVEMENT ORDINANCE FOR 2850 W. BAYSHORE
DEVEOPMENT SEWER LINE CONNECTION IN GREER PARK
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC) recommend that City Council
adopt a Park Improvement Ordinance (Attachment A) at Greer Park for the sewer line connection
associated with the 2850 W. Bayshore Road development project.
BACKGROUND
On June 20, 2022, the City Council approved a Major Architectural Review and Vesting Tentative
Map application at 2850 West Bayshore Road to replace the existing 30,000+ square foot office
building with a 48-unit townhome project proposed by SummerHill Homes. The proposal included
modifications to the property to build the 48-unit project, modification to landscaping abutting the
shared property line between 2800 and 2850 West Bayshore Road and Greer Park, and
modification of the sewer line within the existing easement shared by both Bayshore Road
properties that runs through Greer Park.
DISCUSSION
Through discussions with the applicant during the Final Map application, the applicant noted
significant work would need to be done to modify the existing sewer line which runs through Greer
Park. A Final Map application is a follow-up subdivision application to the Tentative Map
subdivision application intended to record division of land for the purposes of selling, or
conveying, them separately from each other. In this instance, the property itself is not being split,
but new condominium parcels are being created on site for 48 new units that will be built on 2850
West Bayshore Road. This will allow the developer to sell each of the units separately.
Attachments B and C show the existing easement which runs through Greer Park Field
3 (highlighted in blue) and the work associated with installing the new sewer line via trenching or
boring. Staff noted that both designs would cause serious impacts to the ability to use the fields
for baseball and soccer. In addition, due to changes in the building code since the easement was
established, a manhole would need to be introduced at the bend in the sewer line and every 500
feet. Based on the existing layout, placing a manhole in Field 3 would permanently impact it such
that it could no longer be used for the City’s typical recreation programs.
The applicant has proposed to realign the sewer easement and line for both West
Bayshore properties as shown in Attachment D (highlighted in blue). Realigning the easement to
the edge of Field 3 will eliminate the need to install a new manhole in the middle of the Field 3.
Realigning the easement will also help to limit the area of impact from future modifications to the
sewer line
6
Packet Pg. 57
2
should any regular or emergency maintenance need to occur. The easement process is separate
from whether this Park Improvement Ordinance is granted, and its issuance will require the owners
of 2800 W. Bayshore and 2850 W. Bayshore to vacate their existing sewer easement.
The alternative easement alignment allows the construction activity associated with the sewer
connection to occur outside the field of play for Field 3. The alternative easement doesn’t require
the removal of any park trees. The project construction work will be contained within the shaded
area in Attachment E. The sewer line will be installed in sections; each day the
applicant’s utility contractor will dig a section of trench, install a section of sewer pipe and then
backfill the trench. At the end of each work day the trench will be closed, avoiding the need
for overnight construction security fencing that would damage the field. During construction
activities, the utility contractor will use flaggers, cones and caution tape as needed to keep
park users away from the construction area.
Equipment and materials for the installation of the sewer line will be stored at 2850 W. Bayshore
and brought to the park each day as needed. The utility contractor will access Greer Park from the
property at 2850 W. Bayshore, entering through the fence at the rear of the property. There are
some weeds and volunteer shrubs along the fence line (approximately 15’) that will be removed
to allow access (See Attachment F for photographs.) SummerHill will replace the shrubs
with native species (species to be provided by Parks staff). To install the section of the sewer line
that crosses the dog park, the utility contractor needs to temporarily remove two sections
of the fence that encloses the dog park. The sections of fence will be replaced after the sewer
line has been installed. The dog park will be closed for approximately t wo to three days.
SummerHill indicated that there would be approximately two weeks of construction activity in the
park. In addition to the two weeks of construction, there would also be six to eight weeks of closure
of the impacted area for decompaction, seeding, and reestablishing the turf. These areas are outside
the field of play for the Greer Park athletic fields.
There are soccer and Little League baseball activities permitted for use on Greer Field 3 through
May 22, 2023. The soccer activity is for weekend use of the field. The construction activity will
not impact th e soccer use of Field 3. Little League baseball activity is on weekdays in the
afternoon. The construction activity will not impact Little League baseball use of Field 3.
The contractor will restore all areas of Greer Park that are impacted by the project to the same or
better condition as prior to the project:
•The dog park (surfacing and fencing)
•All park pathways
•All turf areas (decompaction, seeding, fertilization details to be provided by the City to
SummerHill)
•Replanting at the point of entry between the 2850 W. Bayshore property and the park
TIMELINE
•March 2023—New easement to City Council for approval
6
Packet Pg. 58
3
•March 6, 2023 –Park Improvement Ordinance (PIO) to City Council
•March 20, 2023--Second reading of the PIO
•April 20, 2023—PIO becomes effective, and construction may begin (assuming all other
requirements met)
6
Packet Pg. 59
NOT YET ADOPTED
1
264_20230221_ts24
ORDINANCE NO. _____
Ordinance of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Approving and
Adopting a Plan for Sewer Line Replacement at Greer Park
The Council of the City of Palo Alto does ORDAIN as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings and Improvements. The City Council finds and declares that:
(a)Article VIII of the Charter of the City of Palo Alto and section 22.08.005 of the Palo
Alto Municipal Code require that, before any substantial building, construction,
reconstruction or development is commenced or approved, upon or with respect
to any land held by the City for park purposes, the Council shall first cause to be
prepared and by ordinance approve and adopt a plan therefor.
(b)Greer Park (the “Park”) is dedicated to park purposes. (See Municipal Code section
22.08.010)
(c)The City intends to authorize a sewer replacement that runs underneath Greer
Park as part of the private development project at 2850 W. Bayshore Road.
(d)The developer of 2850 W. Bayshore will be responsible for the plan of construction
below.
(e)The plan of construction shall comprise as follows:
(1)Install a new sewer line in the location specified in Exhibit A.
(2)Shrubs along the fence line between the W. Bayshore parcels and Greer
Park will be removed and replaced with native species.
(3)Sections of the dog park fence will be temporarily removed and replaced.
(4)Turf affected by the construction will be replaced.
(5)Park pathways will be replaced or rehabilitated.
(f)This plan is an alternative to replacing the existing sewer line which runs under
Field 3 in Greer Park in an existing easement. Replacing the existing sewer line in
its existing configuration would create more impacts to Field 3, both during
construction and after construction is over, including the need for a ground-level
manhole cover in Field 3. This alternative eliminates the manhole cover
altogether and reduces construction impacts to existing users of Field 3.
(g)The City Council desires to approve the plan of improvements described above.
SECTION 2. The City Council hereby approves the plan of improvements in the Park
described in this ordinance.
6
Packet Pg. 60
NOT YET ADOPTED
2
264_20230221_ts24
SECTION 3. This ordinance serves only to satisfy the requirement in PAMC section
22.08.005 (Ordinance required for substantial building, construction, etc.) and its related
provision in Article VIII (Parks) of the City Charter. This ordinance does not itself create, substitute
for, or waive any requirement to secure an easement, land use approval, building permit,
encroachment permit, or any other land use entitlement or permit.
SECTION 4. The City Council has found this project exempt under the Class 32
categorical exemption under CEQA on June 20, 2022.
SECTION 5. This ordinance shall be effective on the thirty-first day after the date of its
adoption.
INTRODUCED:
PASSED:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
ATTEST:
City Clerk Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED:
Assistant City Attorney City Manager
Director of Community Services
6
Packet Pg. 61
NOT YET ADOPTED
3
264_20230221_ts24
Exhibit A
(see next page)
6
Packet Pg. 62
OHW
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
O
OHW
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
SI
M
K
I
N
S
C
O
U
R
T
SCALE:
OFFSITE SANITARY SEWER-PARK (STA 10+00 TO END)
1" = 20'
SEE SHEET 3
JOB NUMBER
SHEET NUMBER
OF
3341-000
CI
T
Y
O
F
P
A
L
O
A
L
T
O
CA
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
BA
Y
H
S
H
O
R
E
28
5
0
W
E
S
T
B
A
Y
S
H
O
R
E
R
O
A
D
6
DR
A
W
N
B
Y
:
DA
T
E
:
AL
M
PR
O
J
.
E
N
G
R
:
PR
O
J
.
M
G
R
:
RT
H
FE
B
2
0
2
3
MJ
L
F:\3341-000\ACAD\IP\OFFSITE SEWER\SS IP04.DWG
C
I
V
I
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
S
S
U
R
V
E
Y
O
R
S
P
L
A
N
N
E
R
S
S
A
N
R
A
M
O
N
W
W
W
.
C
B
A
N
D
G
.
C
O
M
R
O
S
E
V
I
L
L
E
(9
2
5
)
8
6
6
-
0
3
2
2
(9
1
6
)
7
8
8
-
4
4
5
6
GRAPHIC SCALE
0'40'20'10'20'0'
OF
F
S
I
T
E
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
S
E
W
E
R
-
P
A
R
K
(
S
T
A
1
0
+
0
0
T
O
E
N
D
)
OF
F
S
I
T
E
S
E
W
E
R
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
S
4
SEE
S
H
E
E
T
3
6
Packet Pg. 63
OHW
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
O
OHW
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
SI
M
K
I
N
S
C
O
U
R
T
SCALE:
OFFSITE SANITARY SEWER-PARK (STA 10+00 TO END)
1" = 20'
SEE SHEET 3
JOB NUMBER
SHEET NUMBER
OF
3341-000
CI
T
Y
O
F
P
A
L
O
A
L
T
O
CA
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
BA
Y
H
S
H
O
R
E
28
5
0
W
E
S
T
B
A
Y
S
H
O
R
E
R
O
A
D
6
DR
A
W
N
B
Y
:
DA
T
E
:
AL
M
PR
O
J
.
E
N
G
R
:
PR
O
J
.
M
G
R
:
RT
H
FE
B
2
0
2
3
MJ
L
F:\3341-000\ACAD\IP\OFFSITE SEWER\SS IP04.DWG
C
I
V
I
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
S
S
U
R
V
E
Y
O
R
S
P
L
A
N
N
E
R
S
S
A
N
R
A
M
O
N
W
W
W
.
C
B
A
N
D
G
.
C
O
M
R
O
S
E
V
I
L
L
E
(9
2
5
)
8
6
6
-
0
3
2
2
(9
1
6
)
7
8
8
-
4
4
5
6
GRAPHIC SCALE
0'40'20'10'20'0'
OF
F
S
I
T
E
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
S
E
W
E
R
-
P
A
R
K
(
S
T
A
1
0
+
0
0
T
O
E
N
D
)
OF
F
S
I
T
E
S
E
W
E
R
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
S
4
SEE
S
H
E
E
T
3
Exhibit B - Existing Sewer Alignment 6
Packet Pg. 64
SIMKINS
COURT
W
E
S
T
B
A
Y
S
H
O
R
E
R
O
A
D
HI
G
H
W
A
Y
1
0
1
2850 WEST BAYSHORE ROAD
Exhibit C
6
Packet Pg. 65
SIMKINS
COURT
W
E
S
T
B
A
Y
S
H
O
R
E
R
O
A
D
HI
G
H
W
A
Y
1
0
1
2850 WEST BAYSHORE ROAD
Exhibit C
6
Packet Pg. 66
OHW
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
O
OHW
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
SI
M
K
I
N
S
C
O
U
R
T
SCALE:
OFFSITE SANITARY SEWER-PARK (STA 10+00 TO END)
1" = 20'
SEE SHEET 3
JOB NUMBER
SHEET NUMBER
OF
3341-000
CI
T
Y
O
F
P
A
L
O
A
L
T
O
CA
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
BA
Y
H
S
H
O
R
E
28
5
0
W
E
S
T
B
A
Y
S
H
O
R
E
R
O
A
D
6
DR
A
W
N
B
Y
:
DA
T
E
:
AL
M
PR
O
J
.
E
N
G
R
:
PR
O
J
.
M
G
R
:
RT
H
FE
B
2
0
2
3
MJ
L
F:\3341-000\ACAD\IP\OFFSITE SEWER\SS IP04.DWG
C
I
V
I
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
S
S
U
R
V
E
Y
O
R
S
P
L
A
N
N
E
R
S
S
A
N
R
A
M
O
N
W
W
W
.
C
B
A
N
D
G
.
C
O
M
R
O
S
E
V
I
L
L
E
(9
2
5
)
8
6
6
-
0
3
2
2
(9
1
6
)
7
8
8
-
4
4
5
6
GRAPHIC SCALE
0'40'20'10'20'0'
OF
F
S
I
T
E
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
S
E
W
E
R
-
P
A
R
K
(
S
T
A
1
0
+
0
0
T
O
E
N
D
)
OF
F
S
I
T
E
S
E
W
E
R
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
S
4
SEE
S
H
E
E
T
3
Exhibit D - Alternative Sewer Alignment 6
Packet Pg. 67
OHW
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
O
OHW
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
O
H
W
SI
M
K
I
N
S
C
O
U
R
T
SCALE:
OFFSITE SANITARY SEWER-PARK (STA 10+00 TO END)
1" = 20'
SEE SHEET 3
JOB NUMBER
SHEET NUMBER
OF
3341-000
CI
T
Y
O
F
P
A
L
O
A
L
T
O
CA
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
BA
Y
H
S
H
O
R
E
28
5
0
W
E
S
T
B
A
Y
S
H
O
R
E
R
O
A
D
6
DR
A
W
N
B
Y
:
DA
T
E
:
AL
M
PR
O
J
.
E
N
G
R
:
PR
O
J
.
M
G
R
:
RT
H
FE
B
2
0
2
3
MJ
L
F:\3341-000\ACAD\IP\OFFSITE SEWER\SS IP04.DWG
C
I
V
I
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
S
S
U
R
V
E
Y
O
R
S
P
L
A
N
N
E
R
S
S
A
N
R
A
M
O
N
W
W
W
.
C
B
A
N
D
G
.
C
O
M
R
O
S
E
V
I
L
L
E
(9
2
5
)
8
6
6
-
0
3
2
2
(9
1
6
)
7
8
8
-
4
4
5
6
GRAPHIC SCALE
0'40'20'10'20'0'
OF
F
S
I
T
E
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
S
E
W
E
R
-
P
A
R
K
(
S
T
A
1
0
+
0
0
T
O
E
N
D
)
OF
F
S
I
T
E
S
E
W
E
R
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
S
4
SEE
S
H
E
E
T
3
Exhibit E - Constriction Area 6
Packet Pg. 68
9
ATTACHMENT F
PHOTOS OF CONSTRUCTION ACCESS ROUTE
1. Access route for equipment and materials, as viewed from Greer Park. Par Course sign to be
removed and replaced as needed to provide 10’- to 15’-wide access route.
6
Packet Pg. 69
10
2. Close-up of access route for equipment and materials. Shrubs and fencing to be removed or
pruned as needed to provide 10’- to 15’-wide access route.
6
Packet Pg. 70