Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 473-09TO: HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER DATE: December 14, 2009 REPORT TYPE: INFORMATIONAL DEP ARTMENT:PLANNING AND COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT CMR: 473:09 SUBJECT: Commercial Downtown (CD) Monitoring Report for 2008/2009 This is an informational report and no Council action is required. BACKGROUND An annual monitoring report on the Commercial Downtown (CD) zoning area is mandated by Comprehensive Plan Programs L-8 and L-9. These programs require reporting of non-residential development activity and trends within the CD zone district. These reports are also required as a result of final action on the Downtown Study approved by the City Council on July 14, 1986. Attached is the Downtown Study Results Summary of the actions taken in 1986 (Attachment A) and a zone map of the CD districts (Attachment B). Staff regularly tracks vacancy rates, changes in floor area and parking in the CD district resulting from approved development. Staff completed field visits for this 2008/2009 monitoring period by mid-October 2009. Telephone interviews with leasing agents were completed in late October and early November 2009 to determine current vacancy rates and prevailing rents. This report also includes cumulative data from January 1987 through August 31, 2009 and has specific data and information for the September 1, 2008 to August 31, 2009 monitoring period. On November 9th 2009 the Council adopted zoning ordinance amendments to enhance protection of retail uses in downtown commercial districts that modified the monitoring program. The intent of the modifications is to assure that retail uses are retained and viability enhanced during this economic downturn and beyond. The revisions included strengthening and extending the "Ground Floor Retail" requirements downtown, reducing the extent of retail requirements at the perimeter of commercial areas, modifying the zoning map to extend or lessen the Ground Floor (GF) restrictions for specific properties and eliminating of the exception process if the GF vacancy rate is found to be greater than 5. % during the annual monitoring. A map of the subject area was included in the Council report (CMR 20:09), available on the City's website (Council agendas/minutes ). DISCUSSION Palo Alto's downtown has clearly been affected by the economic slowdown as reflected by higher vacancy rates within the Ground Floor Overlay District and the overall Commercial Downtown (CD) zoning district compared to the last monitoring cycle. The rental rates for both CMR:473:09 Page 1 of27 retail and office have also decreased during the 2008-2009 monitoring period, attributable to the higher vacancy rates. N on-Residehtial Development Activity The Downtown Study incorporated a growth limit of 350,000 square feet of additional floor area above the total floor area existing in 1986, and provided for a re-evaluation of the CD regulations when net new development reaches 235,000 square feet. Since 1986, a total of 138,708 square feet of non-residential uses have been added in the Downtown area. In 2007-2008 monitoring cycle, 7,481 net new square feet at 310 University Avenue (Walgreens Building) was added. In the current monitoring cycle, 25,280 net new square feet has been added within three contributing projects: 317-323 University Avenue, 325 Lytton Avenue and 564 University Avenue. Based on this recent monitoring, an additional 96,292 square feet of new non-residential development can be built before the 350,000 square feet growth limit is reached. Demonstrating Special Public Benefits The Downtown Study reserved 100,000 square feet of the 350,000 square foot growth limit to be used for projects demonstrating special public benefits. Since 1986, ten projects in the Downtown area have been developed under the Planned Community zoning that requires a finding of public benefit. Five of the projects exceeded the non-residential floor area that would otherwise be allowed under zoning by a total of 34,378 square feet. The total changes in square footage of these projects are shown in the fourth column of Attachment C. The remaining five projects were mixed-use projects that did not exceed allowable non-residential floor areas. All of the projects either provided parking or paid a fee in lieu of providing parking. Projects Qualifying for Seismic, Historic or Minor Expansion Exemptions The Downtown Study set aside 75,000 square feet of the 350,000 square foot cap for projects that qualify for seismic, historic or minor expansion exemptions in order to encourage these upgrades. Since 1986, 77,736 square feet have been added in this category. These projects are shown in the 5th column of Attachment C. Parking Inventory At the time of the Downtown Study, performance measures were established that specify that new development in the Downtown should not increase the total parking deficit beyond that expected from development that was existing or approved through May 1986, or 1,601 spaces. In 2003, the City opened two new parking structures: one located on 528 High Street and the other at 445 Bryant Street adding a total of 713 parking spaces. This decreased the original 1986 deficit by almost half, to approximately 836 spaces. At the end of the 2003 monitoring period, the City determined a re-evaluation of the parking exemption regulations would be done when the unmet parking demand resulting from exemptions reaches a cumulative 450 spaces. Currently, the unmet parking demand resulting from exemptions is 277 parking spaces. Through various projects, the total cumulative parking deficit has been significantly reduced from 1,601 in 1986 to 808 in 2009. Most notable reasons for the reduction are: 1) the two-floor addition to the Cowper/Webster Garage; 2) significant restriping of on-street parking spaces by the City's Transportation Division resulting in 96 additional spaces; and 3) the construction of the two previously mentioned parking structures located on 528 High Street and 445 Bryant Street. Attachment D is a chart of the CD (Commercial Downtown) parking deficit. CMR:473:09 Page 2 of27 Vacancy Rate for Ground Floor (GF) Combining District The Ground Floor Combining District (GF) was created to encourage active pedestrian uses in the Downtown area such as retail, eating and drinking and personal services. In February 2009, there was approximately 624,330 square feet of GF area. In the staff survey of Downtown vacancies in October 2009, there were 16 properties, totaling 56,109 square feet, which met the requirements for vacant and available ground floor area. Vacant or Available Property Listings for (GF) Combining District Vacant Square Address Feet 526 Bryant 2,600 540 Bryant 2,500 543 Bryant 2,622 535-539 Bryant 1,750 530 Emerson 2,500 540 Emerson 1,850 201 Hamilton 7,735 315 Hamilton 474 158 University 1,750 174 University 2,300 222 University 2,540 340 University 16,700 360 University 7,000 382 University 1,983 435 University 1,450 540 University 400 Total (GF) Vacancy 56,109 This results in a GF vacancy rate of approximately 9 percent, which is significantly higher than last year's vacancy rate. In comparison, last year's ground floor vacant square footage was far lower at 4.2 percent or 26,294 square feet. CMR:473:09 Page 3 of27 Vacancy Rate for Entire CD District For purposes of tracking the economic viability of the Downtown area, the vacancy rate for the entire CD area is reported annually. Staff conducted a field survey in early October and communicated with local real estate agents during the same time to assess overall vacancies in the downtown area. The listing below is based on staff conducted field work, different real estate websites and responses received from local downtown real estate agents. At the time of the October 2009 staff survey, the following properties were vacant and available: TABLE 1: Vacant or Available Property Listings for Rest of Commercial Downtown (CD) As of October, 2009 (Includes Upper Floor Office Space) Address I Zoning District Vacant Square Feet 514 Bryant CD-C (GF)(P) 1,003 518 Bryant CD-C (GF)(P) 2,775 541 Cowper CD-C (P) 4,481 500 Emerson CD-C (GF)(P) 12,637 542 Emerson CD-C (GF)(P) 1,850 644 Emerson CD-C (P) 3,912 418 Florence CD-C (P) 1,915 420 Florence CD-C (P) 4,300 385 Forest CD-C (P) SQFT Vacant Unknown 164 Hamilton CD-C (P) 10,395 167 Hamilton CD-C (P) 3,708 228 Hamilton CD-C (P) 3,650 261 Hamilton CD-C (P) 797 400 Hamilton CD-C (P) 9,320 459 Hamilton CD-C (P) 1,119 525 Hamilton CD-C (P) 3,246 575 High CD-C (GF)(P) 3,363 181 Lytton CD-C (P) 21,267 265 Lytton CD-C (P) SQFT Vacant Unknown 314 Lytton CD-C (P) 8,522 CMR:473:09 Page 4 of27 325 Lytton CD-C (P) 23,000 Address Zonin2 District Vacant Square Feet 480 Lytton CD-C (P) 410 530 Lytton CD-C (P) 4,900 (available next year) 435 Tasso CD-C (P) 5,499 101 University & 444 High CD-C (P) 6,491 125 University CD-C (GF)(P) 3,553 151 University CD-C (GF)(P) 3,060 235 University CD-C (GF)(P) SQFT Vacant Unknown 380 University CD-C (GF)(P) 2,078 382A University CD-C (GF)(P) 1,619 370-374 University CD-C (GF)(P) SQFT Vacant Unknown 416-424 Waverley CD-C (P) 1,510 558-560 Waverley CD-C (GF)(P) 5,700 Total Rest ofeD Vacancy 156,080 CD -Commercial Downtown, (C) -Commercial, (N) -Neighborhood, (S) -Service, GF -Ground Floor Combining District, P -Pedestrian Overlay The entire CD area has approximately 3,850,000 gross square feet of floor area, including approximately 330,000 square feet within the SOFA CAP Phase 2 area. About 525,000 square feet is used for religious or residential purposes or is vacant and not available for occupancy. Thus, the net square footage of available commercial space is approximately 3,325,000 square feet. With a total 3,325,000 square feet of commercial floor area available for occupancy, the total vacant 212,189 square feet equals a rate of 6.4 percent compared to 2.8 percent in last year's monitoring report. Trends in Use Composition The primary observation of change in the use composition of Downtown since the enactment of new CD zoning regulations in 1986 is that the total floor area devoted to certain higher-intensity commercial uses (office, retail, eating and drinking) and housing has increased, while the total floor area in lower-intensity commercial uses (manufacturing, warehousing) has been reduced (see Attachment E). This trend has increased in the past few years with development of additional multi-family housing and eating and drinking establishments. CMR:473:09 Page 5 of27 Retail Rents According to the data gathered from the October 2009 staff survey of commercial real estate agents offering properties for lease in Downtown, rents for retail space are generally ranging from· $2.50 to $4.50 per square foot triple net (i.e. rent plus tenant assumption of insurance, janitorial services and taxes) compared to $3.00 to $4.50 in last year's monitoring report. The lower end of this range is generally for spaces in older buildings and away from University Avenue. Also some listed vacancies have rates listed as negotiable, because of higher rates of vacancies. Office Rents According to the data gathered from the October 2009 staff survey of commercial real estate agents offering properties for lease in Downtown, rents for Class A Downtown office space (i.e. newer and/or larger buildings on University Avenue and Lytton Avenues) and Class B office space (i.e. older and/or smaller buildings further from University Avenue) are ranging from $2.50 to $4.50 per square foot triple net compared to $2.50 to $6.60 per square foot triple net in last year's monitoring report. POLICY IMPLICATIONS This report on the Commercial Downtown (CD) zoning area is mandated by Comprehensive Plan Programs L-8 and L-9 and by the Downtown Study approved by the City Council on July 14, 1986. RESOURCE IMPACT This report has no impact on resources. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW This is an informational report only and is exempted from CEQA review. ATTACHMENTS A. Downtown Study Results Summary (1986) B. Zone Map exhibit of the Commercial Downtown (CD) Zone District C. Table: CD Non-Residential Change in Square Footage D. Table: CD Parking Deficit E. Table: Commercial Downtown (CD) and SOFA 2 CAP Floor Area by Use Category PREPARED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD: CMR:473:09 CHITRA MOITRA p/"C We f\ Director of PlannIng and Community Environment Page 6 of27 CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: cc: Architectural Review Board Palo Alto Chamber of Commerce Palo Alto Board of Realtors Downtown North Neighborhood Association University Park Neighborhood Association CMR:473:09 Page 7 of27 ATTACHMENT A DOWNTOWN STUDY RESULTS SUMMARY (July 1986) The following are the primary measures adopted as a result of the study: 1. A new Commercial Downtown (CD) zoning district, including three sub districts (CD-C, CD-S and CD-N), was created and applied to most of the Downtown area previously zoned Community Commercial (CC) or Service Commercial (CS). The basic provisions of the CD district include floor area ratios (F ARs) that are more restrictive than in the previous CC and CS zones, limits to project size and to the overall amount of future development, and special development regulations for sites adjacent to residential zones. 2. Growth limits were applied to the CD district restricting future development to a total of 350,000 square feet beyond what was existing or approved in May 1986 and providing for a re-evaluation of the CD regulations when new development reaches 235,000 square feet. In addition, 100,000 square feet of the total new floor area was reserved for projects demonstrating special public benefits and 75,000 square feet for projects which qualify for seismic, historic or minor expansion exemptions. 3. Exemptions to the floor area ratio restrictions of the CD zone were established for certain building expansions involving historic structures, seismic rehabilitation, provision of required handicapped access, or one-time additions of 200 square feet or less. 4. New parking regulations were established for the University Avenue Parking Assessment District that requires new non- residential development to provide parking at a rate of one space per 250 square feet of floor area. Exemptions to this requirement are provided for certain increases in floor area related to provision of handicapped access, seismic or historic rehabilitation, one-time minor additions (200 square feet or less) and development of vacant land previously assessed for parking. The regulations also permit, in certain instances, off-site parking and parking fees in lieu of on-site parking. 5. Performance measures were established that specify that new development in the Downtown should not increase the total parking deficit beyond that expected from development that was existing or approved through May, 1986 (1600 spaces) and that call for re-evaluation of the parking exemption regulations when the unmet parking demand, resulting from exemptions, reaches one half (225 parking spaces) of the minimum 450 parking spaces deemed necessary for construction of a new public parking structure. Staff was directed to monitor the parking deficit. 6. A new Ground Floor (GF) Combining District was created and applied to the area along University Avenue and portions of the major side streets between Lytton and Hamilton Avenues, in order to restrict the amount of ground floor area devoted to uses other than retail, eating and drinking or personal service. Page 1 7. Staff was directed to monitor the Downtown area in terms of development activity, vacancy rates, sales tax revenues, and commercial lease rates to facilitate evaluation of the effectiveness of the new regulations. 8. Staff was directed to undertake a site and feasibility study to evaluate an additional public parking structure elsewhere in the Downtown, to consider development of a parking facility on public lots S, L and F, and to explore the possibility of leasing or purchasing privately-owned vacant lots suitable as parking structure sites. 9. Policies and regulations were adopted which encourage Planned Community (PC) zoning for parking structures and limit underground parking to two levels below grade, unless there is proof that regular pumping of subsurface water will not be necessary . . 10. A Twelve-Point Parking Program was adopted to increase the efficiency of existing parking. 11. Traffic policies were adopted which prohibit new traffic signals on portions of Alma Street and Middlefield Road, and prohibit a direct connection from Sand Hill Road to Palo Alto/Alma Street. In addition, new signs were approved directing through traffic off of University Avenue and onto Hamilton and Lytton Avenues. 12. Staff and the Architectural Review Board (ARB) were directed to consider the possibility of an Urban Design Plan for Downtown and to develop design guidelines for commercial structures in neighborhood transition areas and for driveways which cross pedestrian walkways. 13. A temporary Design and Amenities Committee was created and charged with developing an incentive program (including FAR increases of up to 1.5) to encourage private development to provide a variety of public amenities in the Downtown area. 14. Staff was directed to study possible restrictions on the splitting and merging of parcels as well as the establishment of minimum lot sizes in the new CD district. Page 2 Commercial Downtown Monitoring 2008 Index Map Attachnlent B ATTACHMENT C CD NON-RESIDENTIAL CHANGE IN SQUARE FOOTAGE 09/01/86 TO 08/31/09 Public Benefit Seismic, Historic, or Net change in non-Bonus Non Project Address Zoning Date Approved Residential Square Minor Bonus Residential Floor Footage Square Footage Area 520 Ramona Street A CDCGFP 11/20/84 -400 +400 220 University Avenue CDCGFP 2/5/87 -65 +65 151 Homer Avenue CDSP 3/17/88 ---9,750 314 Lytton Avenue CDCP 5/5/88 ---713 247-275 Alma Street CDNP 8/4/88 --+ 1,150 700 Emerson Street CDSP 9/15/88 --+4,000 431 Florence Street CDCP 9/15/88 -2,500 +2,500 156 University Avenue CDCGFP 12/15/88 -4,958 +4,958 401 Florence Street CDCP 3/2/89 -2,407 +2,407 619 Cowper Street CDCP 5/6/89 --+2,208 250 University Avenue PC-3872 5/15/89 11,000B 300 +20,300 550 University Avenue CDCP 6/1/89 ---371 ---- Page 4 Public Benefit Seismic, Historic, or Net change in non-Bonus Non Project Address Zoning Date Approved Residential Square Minor Bonus Residential Floor Footage Square Footage Area 529 Bryant Street PC-3974 5/3/90 2,491 c 2,491 +2,491 305 Lytton Avenue CDCP 9/28/90 -200 +200 550 Lytton AvenueDE CDCP 10/22/90 --+4,845 I I 531 Cowper Street PC-4052 5/21191 9,000 475 +9,475 540 Bryant Street CDCGFP 3/24/92 -404 +404 530/534 Bryant Street CDCGFP 4/15/93 -432 +432 555 Waverley Street/425 CDCP 9/21193 +2,064 Hamilton A venueE -- 201 University Avenue CDCGFP 11118/93 -2,450 +2,450 I Page 5 : Public Benefit Seismic, Historic, or Net change in I Bonus Non Project Address Zoning Date Approved Residential Square Minor Bonus nonlResidential Footage Square Footage Floor Area 518 Bryant Street CDCGFP 3/3/94 -180 +180 245 Lytton Avenue CDCP 7/21194 ---21,320 400 Emerson StreetEF PC-4238 9/19/94 -200 +4,715 443 Emerson Street CDCGFP 115/95 -26 +26 420 Emerson Street CDCP 3/16/95 -125 +125 --340 University Avenue CDCGFP 4/6/95 -402 --281 University Avenue CDCGFP 4/20/95 -2,500 - 456 University Avenue CDCGFP 5/18/95 -7,486 +7,486 536 Ramona Street CDCGFP 7/11/95 -134 +134 725/753 Alma Street PC-4283 7/17/95 --1,038 - 552 Emerson Street CDCGFP 7/18/95 -177 +177 483 University Avenue G PC-4296 10/2/95 3,467c 2,789 +7,289 424 University Avenue CDCGFP 9/21195 -2,803 +2,803 -- Page 6 Public Benefit Seismic, Historic, or Net change in Bonus Non Project Address Zoning Date Approved Residential Square Minor Bonus nonlResidential Footage Square Footage Floor Area 901/909 Alma Street E,P PC-4389 8/1196 --+4,425 171 University Avenue CD-C(GF)(P) 9/19/96 -1,853 + 1,853 401 High Street CD-C(P) 10/3/96 -350 +350 430 Kipling Street D,H CD-C(P) 10/22/96 -200 + 1,412 460-476 University CD-C(GF)(P) 3/20/97 -1,775 + 1,775 Avenue 400 Emerson Street D PC-4238 3/21197 --+2,227 275 Alma Street CD-N(P) 7/8/97 -200 +3,207 I 390 Lytton Avenue PC-4436 7/14/97 8,420c 689 +17,815 411 High Street H CDCP 12/18/97 -2,771 +2,771 530 Ramona CDCGFP OS/20/99 -2852 +2852 705 Alma St CDSP 09/21199 -2814 +2814 200 Hamilton Ave CDCP 10/21/99 -10913 +10913 550 Lytton Ave CDCP 08/11/00 --+93 Page 7 Public Benefit Seismic, Historic, or Net change in Non Bonus Non i Project Address Zoning Date Approved Residential Square Minor Bonus Residential Floor Footage Square Footage Area 437 Kipling St CDCGFP 02/01101 --+945 701 Emerson St CDSP 05/29/01 --+434 723 Emerson St CDSP 05/29/01 --+400 880 -884 Emerson St CDSP 05/29/01 --+312 539 Alma St CDCGFP 10/23/01 -2,500 +2,500 270 University Ave CDCGFP 11101101 -2,642 +2,642 901 High St. E, F CDSP 12/12/02 --+12,063 800 High St. I PC-4779 02/03/03 ---15,700 164 Hamilton Ave CDCP 01113/05 -2,799 335 University Ave CDCGFP 08/10105 -4,500J +5,249 382 University Ave CDCGFP 07/27/06 -194 +194 102 University Ave CDCGFP 10/10/2006 +8 -- 310 University Ave CDCGFP 07/3112008 7,481 +7,481 317-323 University Ave CDCGFP 0112008 2,500 +3,290 Page 8 Public Benefit Seismic, Historic, or Net change in Non Bonus Non Project Address Zoning Date Approved Residential Square Minor Bonus Residential Floor Footage Square Footage Area 564 University Ave CDCP 7/2008 2,500 +4,475 325 Lytton Ave CDCP 5/2006 + 17,515 Totals 1986-2009 34,378 77,736 138,706 A: Project approved during the Downtown Moratorium (9/84 to 9/86), but was not included in the Downtown EIR's "pipeline projects." As a result, the project is counted among the CD District's nonresid~ntial development approvals since the enactment of the Downtown Study Policies in 1986 B: Through Assessment District project provided additional 64 public parking spaces as part of public benefit instead of required 44 private spaces C: Project exceeded square footage otherwise allowed by zoning D: Project converted residential space to non-residential space. Net non-residential space counts toward the 350,000 square foot limit E: Project included covered parking that counts as floor area but not counted 350,000 square foot limit F: Project was approved pursuant to P AMC Sections 18.83.120 or 18.83.130 which allow for a reduction in the number required parking spaces for shared parking facilities, joint use parking facilities, or substitution of 8 bike parking spaces for one vehicle space. G. In addition, project paid in-lieu fee for loss of2 on-site parking spaces H: In addition, projects paid in-lieu fee for loss of 4 on-site spaces I: Part of the SOFA 2 CAP J: Transfer of Development Right (TDR) agreement with 230 and 232 Homer Avenue. 5000 total sq ft ofTDR but only 4,500 sq. ft used for Non Residential Floor Area. Page 9 ATTACHMENT D CD PARKING DEFICIT 9/1/86 to 8/31/09 NET CHANGE NET PARKING NET TOTAL ADDED PROJECT IN NON/ PARKING ADDED EXEMPTIONS DEFICIT CUMULATIVE ZONING PARKING PER 18.49.060 ADDRESS RESIDENTIAL REQUIRED CHANGE DEFICIT FLOOR AREA SPACES OFPAMC 1986 deficit 1,601 520 Ramona CDCGFP +400 2 0 0 +2 1,603 StreetA 220 University CDCGFP +65 0 0 0 0 1,603 Avenue 151 Homer CDSP -9,750 0 11 0 -50 1,553 Avenue 314 Lytton CDCP -713 0 0 0 -3 1,550 Avenue 247-275 Alma CDNP +1,150 5 5 0 0 1,550 Street 700 Emerson CDSP +4,000 16 16 0 0 1,550 Street Page 1 NET CHANGE ADDED NET PARKING NET TOTAL PROJECT IN NONI PARKING ADDED EXEMPTIONS DEFICIT CUMULATIVE ZONING PARKING PER 18.49.060 ADDRESS RESIDENTIAL REQUIRED CHANGE DEFICIT FLOOR AREA SPACES OFPAMC 431 Florence St CDCP +2,500 10 0 10 +10 1,560 156 University CDCGFP +4,958 20 0 20 +20 1,580 Avenue 401 Florence CDCP +2,407 10 0 10 +10 1,590 Street 619 Cowper CDCP +2,208 9 9 0 0 1,590 Street 250 University PC-3872 +20,300 103 131B 0 -28 1,562 Avenue 550 University -371 I CDCP 0 0 0 -1 1,561 I Avenue 529 Bryant PC-3974 +2,491 10 0 10 +10 1,571 Street I 520 Webster PC-3499 0 0 163 0 -163 1,408 I StreetC I 305 Lytton Ave CDCP +200 1 0 1 +1 1,409 I Page 2 NET CHANGE ADDED NET PARKING NET TOTAL PROJECT IN NONI ADDED EXEMPTIONS ADDRESS ZONING RESIDENTIAL PARKING PARKING PER 18.49.060 DEFICIT CUMULATIVE FLOOR AREA REQUIRED SPACES OFPAMC CHANGE DEFICIT 550 Lytton CDCP +4,845 19 19 0 0 1,409 Avenue Downtown Extensive restriping by Transportation Division of on and off/street parking -96 1,313 531 Cowper PC-4052 +9,475 38 0 2 +38 1,351 Street 540 Bryant CDCGFP +404 2 0 2 +2 1,353 Street : , 530/534 Bryant CDCGFP +432 2 0 2 +2 1,355 Street 555 Waverley Street/425 CDCP +2,064 8 0 0 +8 1,363 Hamilton AvenueD 201 University CDCGFP +2,450 10 0 10 +10 1,373 Avenue 518 Bryant CDCGFP +180 1 0 1 +1 1,374 Street 245 Lytton Ave CDCP -21,320 90 149 0 -59 1,315 400 Emerson PC-4238 +4,715 18 5 1 +14 1,329 Page 3 NET CHANGE NET PARKING NET TOTAL ADDED EXEMPTIONS PROJECT IN NONI PARKING ADDED DEFICIT CUMULATIVE ZONING ADDRESS RESIDENTIAL REQUIRED PARKING PER 18.49.060 CHANGE DEFICIT FLOOR AREA SPACES OFPAMC StreetU 443 Emerson CDCGFP +26 0 0 0 0 1,329 Street Downtown Restriping to add handicap accessible spaces to downtown lots +6 1,335 420 Emerson CDCP +125 1 0 1 +1 1,336 Street 340 University CDCGFP -402 0 0 0 -2 1,334 Avenue 281 University CDCGFP -2,500 0 0 0 -10 1,324 Avenue 456 University CDCGFP +7,486 30 0 30 +30 1,354 Avenue 536 Ramona CDCGFP +134 1 0 1 +1 1,355 Street 725-753 Alma PC-4283 -1,038 7 7 0 -11 1,344 Street 552 Emerson CDCGFP +177 1 0 1 +1 1,345 Street Page 4 NET CHANGE ADDED NET PARKING NET TOTAL PROJECT IN NONI ADDED EXEMPTIONS ZONING PARKING DEFICIT CUMULATIVE ADDRESS RESIDENTIAL REQUIRED PARKING PER 18.49.060 CHANGE DEFICIT FLOOR AREA SPACES OFPAMC 483 University PC-4296 +7,289 29 _2b 11 +31 1,376 Avenue 424 University CDCGFP +2,803 11 0 11 +11 1,387 Avenue 901/909 Alma PC-4389 +4,425 18 18 0 0 1,387 StreetD 171 University CDCGFP +1,853 7 0 7 +7 1,394 Avenue 401 High Street CDCP +350 1 0 1 +1 1,395 430 Kipling CDCP +1,412 5 _4E 1 +10 1,405 Street 460/476 University CDCGFP +1,775 7 0 7 +7 1,412 Avenue 400 Emerson PC-4238 +2,227 9 0 0 +9 1,421 Street 275 Alma CDNP +3,207 0 0 1 +1 1,422 StreetF --,----- Page 5 NET CHANGE ADDED NET PARKING NET TOTAL PROJECT IN NONI ADDED EXEMPTIONS ADDRESS ZONING RESIDENTIAL PARKING PARKING PER 18.49.060 DEFICIT CUMULATIVE REQUIRED CHANGE DEFICIT FLOOR AREA SPACES OFPAMC 390 Lytton PC-4436 +17,815 74 50 3 +27 1,449 Avenue 411 High Street CDCP +2,771 0 _4E 11 +15 1,464 530 Ramona CDCGFP 2852 11 0 11 +11 1475 '. 705 Alma St CDSP 2814 11 0 11 +11 1486 I 200 Hamilton 3E i Ave CDCP 10,913 44 35 +41 1527 550 Lytton Ave CDCP 93 0 0 0 0 1527 528 High St PF 0 0 138 G 0 -138 1389 445 Bryant PF 0 0 575 G 0 -575 814 437 Kipling St CDCGFP 945 4 OE 2 +4 818 701 Emerson St CDSP 434 2 1 1 +1 819 Page 6 NET CHANGE ADDED NET PARKING NET TOTAL PROJECT IN NONI ADDED EXEMPTIONS ADDRESS ZONING PARKING PARKING PER 18.49.060 DEFICIT CUMULATIVE RESIDENTIAL REQUIRED CHANGE DEFICIT FLOOR AREA SPACES OFPAMC 723 Emerson 8t CD8P 400 2 2 0 0 819 880 I 884 CD8P 312 2 5 0 -3 816 Emerson 8t 539 Alma 8t CDCGFP 2,500 10 0 10 +10 826 270 University CDCGFP 2,642 11 OE 11 +11 837 Ave SUBTOTAL 106,930 672 1297 236 -764 837 86-02 901 High 81. CD8P 12,063 59D 60 0 -1 836 800 High 81. H PC-4779 -15,700 0 63 0 -63 773 164 Hamilton CDCP -2499 0 0 0 0 773 Ave 335 University AveI CDCGFP 5,249 0 0 0 0 773 Page 7 NET CHANGE ADDED NET PARKING NET TOTAL PROJECT IN NONI PARKING ADDED EXEMPTIONS DEFICIT CUMULATIVE ZONING PARKING PER 18.49.060 ADDRESS RESIDENTIAL REQUIRED CHANGE DEFICIT FLOOR AREA SPACES OFPAMC 382 University CDCGFP 194 0 0 1 +1 774 Ave 102 University CDCGFP 8 0 0 0 0 774 Ave 310 University CDCGFP 7,481 30 0 30 +30 804 Ave 317-323 CDCGFP 3,290 0 0 0 0 804 University Ave 564 University CDCP 4,475 10 0 10 +10 814 Ave 325 Lytton Ave CDCP 17,515 110 6 0 -6 808 TOTAL 138,706 751 1363 277 -801 808 A: Project approved during the Downtown Moratorium (9/84 to 9/86, but was not included in the Downtown EIR's "pipeline projects.") As a result, the project is counted among the CD District's nonresidential development approvals since the enactment of the Downtown Study Policies in 1986 B: Through Assessment District project provided additional 64 public parking spaces as part of public benefit C: Addition of2 levels of parking to Cowper/Webster garage D: Project was approved pursuant to PAMC Sections 18.83.120 or 18.83.130 which allow for a reduction in the number required parking spaces for shared parking facilities, joint use parking facilities, or substitution of 8 bike parking spaces for one vehicle space. E. Project removed existing on-site spaces or met required parking by paying in-lieu fee Page 8 F: Site had existing parking sufficient to allow expansion G: Construction of2 city parking lots. 528 High completed on Aug. 2003 and 445 Bryant completed on Nov. 2003 H: Part of the SOFA 2 CAP I: As per PAMC 18.87.055, the TDR area transferred to the site does not increase the number of automobile parking spaces required for the additional floor area. Page 9 ATTACHMENT E Commercial Downtown (CD) and SOFA 2 CAP Floor Area by Use Category Use Category (10/86) (10/09) (10/86-010/09) l. Offices 1,100,000 1,300,000 18.18% 2. Retail 500,000 625,000 25.00% 3. Eating & Drinking 150,000 275,000 83.33% 4. Financial Services 200,000 200,000 0.00% 5. Business Services 150,000 175,000 16.67% 6. Basement Storage 175,000 100,000 -42.86% 7. Hotels 100,000 150,000 50.00% 8. Personal Services 75,000 125,000 66.67% 9. Utility Facility 150,000 100,000 -33.33% 10. Public Facilities 50,000 75,000 50.00% 11. Automotive Services 150,000 50,000 -66.67% 12. Recreation/Private Club 25,000 50,000 100.00% -13. Theaters 50,000 25,000 -50.00% 14. Warehousing & 50,000 25,000 Distribution -50.00% 15. Manufacturing 50,000 ° -100.00% 16. Religious Institutions 50,000 50,000 0.00% 17. Multi-FamilY Residential 250,_000 400,000 50.00% 18. Single Family 50,000 25,000 Residential -50.00% 19. Vacant & Under 150,000 50,000 -66.66% Construction 20. Vacant & For Sale ° ° 21. Vacant & Available 150,000 100,000 -33.33% Total 3,625,000 3,850,000 5.52% ADJUSTED TOTAL: (Deduct 3,125,000 3,325,000 residential uses, religious institutions, vacant & for sale and vacant & under construction. ) (Rounded to the nearest 25,000 square feet) * The above table is rounded to the nearest 25,000 square feet and was based on a table originally prepared in 1986. Over the years, because of the rounding to 25,000 square foot increments, the table has had a greater margin of error. Staff attempted to update the table from the beginning in 1998; therefore the numbers may not compare directly to tables prepared prior to the 1998 report. Page 11