HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 191-09
TO: HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PLANNING AND
COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT
DATE: MARCH 30, 2009 CMR: 191:09
REPORT TYPE: STUDY SESSION
SUBJECT: Continuation of a Study Session to Review the Community Benefits
Proposed for Negotiations Regarding the Stanford University Medical
Center and Stanford Shopping Center.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council continue their review of the Community Benefits list and
provide input regarding priority items to be included in the Community Benefits being
considered for Development Agreement negotiations with the Stanford University Medical
Center and Simon Property Group.
BACKGROUND
The Stanford University Medical Center Facilities Renewal and Replacement Project (SUMC)
and the Simon Property Group’s Stanford Shopping Center Expansion Project (Shopping Center)
are being evaluated in a joint Environmental Impact report (EIR) as well as various entitlements,
including a Development Agreement for each project.
The City Council reviewed the Community Benefits proposed for negotiations regarding the
Stanford University Medical Center and Stanford Shopping Center at a special Study Session on
March 14, 2009. At that meeting Council gave input and requested that the item be continued for
further discussion focusing on prioritization.
1
DISCUSSION
The SUMC Project Sponsors have applied for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, rezoning,
architectural review, annexation of a small piece of land adjacent to the School of Medicine, and
a development agreement. The Shopping Center Project Sponsor has applied for Comprehensive
Plan and Zoning Code amendment, a Design Enhancement exception, preliminary architectural
review, and a development agreement.
Community Benefits
A Draft Issues List for both the SUMC and Shopping Center Projects was compiled by City staff
based on aggregated comments from Council and Planning and Transportation Commission,
members of the public, other City staff, and the applicants. The working list represented a record
of a broad spectrum of thoughts about what should be considered in the review and evaluation of
these projects and during the development agreement negotiations and EIR preparation. A
preliminary version of the Draft Issues List was first presented to the Council for input at a
public hearing held on November 26, 2007. An updated Issues List was presented to the Council
at a special Saturday Study Session on March 14, 2009.
The list distributed for the March 14 Study Session has been further refined based on Council
input. For organizational purposes, the items designated as zoning ordinance components or
conditions of approval have been removed from the list. As the City has independent police
power to impose those items it is not necessary to include them as community benefits in a
Development Agreement. The items that have been removed from the original list appear as
Attachment A and will continue to be tracked by Staff as the projects move through the zoning
and entitlement phase. It is important to note that Attachment A is not an exhaustive list of
zoning requirements or conditions of approval. Instead, this list only represents those items that
were originally identified as possible community benefits at the beginning of the community
process and which upon further staff analysis have been determined to be more appropriately
designated as land use requirements.
Attachment B contains the remaining items which are more appropriately categorized as
community benefits under the Development Agreement as they do not have the same level of
2
nexus to the projects as the items included on Attachment A. At Council’s direction, staff has
added some additional information to the Community Benefits chart.
Staff has identified which project will be responsible for providing the benefit (see responsible
party column) and has attempted to provide a qualitative assessment of relative cost and
community benefit for each item. Staff and its consultants are in the process of providing more
quantitative cost data which will be summarized in the final Fiscal Impact Reports for the
projects.
The items that have a low to moderate cost and a high community benefit will be key focus areas
for negotiation. In addition, staff is seeking Council input on staff’s relative benefit weighting for
each item. In addition to the low cost/high benefit items on the list, staff will also focus its
negotiations on the items with high community benefit.
Finally, at the March 14 Study Session, several new items were proposed by the public and
council members. Based on feedback one additional item was added to the community benefit
list – provision of world class hospital for the region. While this benefit has always been implicit,
it has now been added formally. There were some additional items raised by council members,
but based on discussion there did not appear to be a consensus to add them at this point. In
addition, there were several councilmember comments that helped clarify some of the more
broadly framed items and those clarifications have been noted by staff, but not included on the
revised summary list.
NEXT STEPS
Staff and the project applicant will continue discussions on the Community Benefits List. Staff
expects to provide status updates to both the Stanford Ad-Hoc Committee as well as the full City
Council. Draft Development Agreements for each project are expected to be released at about the
same time as the Draft EIR is circulated for public review.
The City Council will review the Water Supply Assessment on April 6, 2009. Adoption of the
WSA is required prior to the release of the Draft EIR.
3
4
The City’s EIR consultant PBS&J is preparing the Draft EIR for release in April/May 2009.
Once released, a public hearing will be scheduled with the Planning and Transportation
Commission to allow for Commission and community member comments.
PREPARED BY: __________________________________
STEVEN TURNER
Senior Planner
DEPARTMENT HEAD: __________________________________
CURTIS WILLIAMS
Interim Director
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: __________________________________
JAMES KEENE
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Zoning Requirements and Conditions of Approval Tracking Chart
Attachment B: Community Benefits Tracking Chart