Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCMR 280_09City of Palo Alto MEMORANDUM TO: City Council DATE: June 15,2009 SUBJECT: CMR:280:09 -Adoption of an Ordinance Adopting the Fiscal Years 2010 and 2011 Budget, Including the Fiscal Year 2010 Capital Improvement Program, Changes to the Municipal Fee Schedule, Utility Rates and Charges, Equity Transfer Methodology Change and Changes to Compensation Plans -(continued from 6/8/09) The attached CMR 280;09 is being provided in this packet with noted attachments. There have been three changes to the report since being distributed in the packet for June 8. On page 4, The General Fund financial impact summary has been changed to reflect rounding changes. On page 9, a summary of the Municipal Fee Schedule has been included to remove the proposed Foothills College parking fees at Cubberley Community Center. On page 9, a summary of the Equity Transfer Methodology change has been included. Additional information for this item can be found in CMR:260:09 (Attachment 12). BUDGET FY 2010 & FY 2011 TO; HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DATE: JUNE 15, 2009 CMR: 280:09 REPORT TYPE: Public Hearing SUBJECT: Adoption of an Ordinance Adopting the Fiscal Years 2010 and 2011 Budget, Including the Fiscal Year 2010 Capital Improvement Program, Changes to the Municipal Fee Schedule, Utility Rates and Charges, Equity Transfer Methodology Change and Changes To Compensation Plans· (continued from 6/8/09) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The documents attached outline the amendments to the City's Operating and Capital Fiscal Ycar 2010 and 2011 Proposed Budgets, Municipal Fee Schedule, Utility Rate changes, and amendments to two of the City's Compensation Plans. The City Council will first review these documents on June 8, 2009. The Public Hearing will be continued to June 15, at which point the Council will be asked to adopt the FY 2010 and 20 II budgets and other associated actions. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the following: 1. The Budget Adoption Ordinance (Attaclunent 1), which includes: a. The City Manager's Fiscal Years 2010 and 2011 Proposed Budget (Exhibit A • previously distributed) b. All changes detailed in the Amendments to the City Manager's Fiscal Years 2010 and 2011 Proposed Budget (Exhibit B) c. Fiscal Year 2010 Proposed MuniCipal Fec Schedule (Exhibit C -previously distributed) d. Revised pages to the Table of Organization (Exhibit D) e. Amendments to the Fiscal Year 2010 Proposed Municipal Fee Schedule (Exhibit E) 2. Resolution Amending Utility Rate Schedules for a Refuse Rate Increase (Attaclunent 2) 3. Resolution Amending Utility Rate Schedules for a Water Rate Inerease (Attachment 3) CMR:280:09 Page I ofl3 4. Resolution Amending Utility Rate Schedules for a Wastewater Colleetion Rate Increase (Attachment 4) 5. Resolution Amending Utility Rate Schedules for a Gas Rate Decrease (Attachment 5) 6. Resolution Amending Utility Rate Schedules for an Electric Rate Increase (Attachment 6) 7. Resolution Amending Utility Rate Schedules for Utility Service Rate changes (Attachment 7) 8. Resolution Amending Utility Rate Schedules for Fiber Optic Rate increases (Attachment 8) 9. Resolution Amending Utility Rate Schedules for the Residential Rate Assistance Program changes (Attachment 9) 10. Resolution Amending the Compensation Plan for Management and Professional Personnel and Conncil Appointed Officers (Attachment 10) 11. Resolution Amending the Compensation Plan for Service Employees International Union (SEIU)(Attachment 11) 12. Finance Committee Recommendation to Change the Methodology Used to Calculate the Equity Transfer from the Utility Funds to the General Fund to the Utilities Enterprise Methodology (Attachment 12) BACKGROUND The City Manager's Fiscal Years 2010 and 2011 Proposed Operating Budget and the Fiscal Years 2010 and 2011 Proposed Capital Budget was initially submitted to City Council on April 27, 2009. During the month of May, the Finance Committee held hearings and reviewed the Proposed Budget, including the General Fnnd, Enterprise Funds, Internal Service Funds, Capital Improvement Programs, and the Municipal Fee Schedule. A total of seven public hearings were held on May 5, 7,12,13,19,26 and 28 during which the Committee reviewed and discussed the City's operating and capital expenditures for the next two years. As a result of the hearings, the Finance Committee and staff have recommended changes to the Proposed Budget as detailed in Exhibit B. It is important to note that the Fiscal Year 2011 budget is adopted "in-conccpt" with the attached ordinance (Attachment I). The Fiscal Year 20 II spending plan will be reviewed and modified as necessary during the interim budget cycle next year. DISCUSSION This staff report focuses primarily on the financial changes recommended by the Finance Committee during the public hearing process and the budget adjustments proposed by staff following submission ofthe original proposed budget. Certain key non-financial changes are also highlighted in this rep0l1. All other non-financial recommended changes to the proposed budget CMR:280:09 Page 2 of 13 are described in Appendix 4, which was distributed to the Finance Committee on May 26, and will be incorporated into the Fiscal Years 2010 and 2011 Adopted Budget document. Included in the City Manager's FY 2010 Proposed Budget is a $3 million placeholder credit for anticipated employee compensation reductions. The Palo Alto Police Officers Association (P APOA) has agreed to defer its previously negotiated 6 percent salary increase for one year. This results in an expenditure reduction of $ 794,068 which reduces the placeholder credit to $2.2 million. These changes have been noted in the Exhibit B attachment. The International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF) has proposed a similar reduction; however it has not been finalized at this time. Staff will continue negotiations and discussions with the Service Employee International Union (SEIU) and ManagementiProfessionallabor groups post budget adoption. Additionally, the Finance Committee directed staff to report back during Fiscal Year 2010 on the following issues: • Evaluation of the future organization of the Office of Emergency Services (OES), including consolidation and coordination • Regionalization options for Public Safety functions • A review of the Capital Improvement Plan review and selection process and to incorporate input from the Planning and Transportation Commission and public • Encourage staff to request price discounts on contacts • Staff to return with Police and Fire Overtime trends and incorporation information into quarterly financlial reports. The five-year trend information that was requested by the Finance Committee has been included at the end of this report • Staff to provide Planning and Transportation Commission with quarterly overtime reports as it relates to PTC meeting coverage by non-exempt staff • City Manager to review General Fund training budgets and reduce by 10 percent for discretionary training where possible • 'City Manager to review Enterprise Fund training and travel budgets and reduce by 10 percent for discretionary training where possible CMR:280:09 Page 3 of 13 The following table summarizes the financial impacts to the General Fund due to the changes presented in this memorandum: General Fund FY 2010 FY 2011 ;I!j)gillnin2 balance $571,000 ($3,082,000) Chan!!cs to Revenue Remove New Parking Revenue for Foothills Pk. ($150,000) ($150,000) Increase Golf Course Revenue $148,170 J148,170 ----Restore BLS Program Revenue $236,000 $236,000 Net Changes to Revenue -Increase $234,170 $234,170 Chanl!es to Expenditures Increase to City Council Contingency ** $43,000 $43,000 ~:ManagCr Contingency ** $84,100 $84,100 f .5 FTE from PWD to CIP** ($46,160) ($46,160) ... _-- • Remove Asst. Direetor of Planning ($236,280) ($236,280) ! ................... • Inerease to City Manager Budget -Sustainability $32,000 $32,000 • Remove eost increase for CAO evaluator $11,000) ($11,000) Restore Funding for Twilight Concerts $41,000 $41,000 "- Decrease Golf C()urse Expenses ($11,099) ($11,099) Restore BLS Program Expense $108,000 $108,000 Yo Estimated savings for sustainability efforts ($132,182) ... _--_ ... _ .. ($132,I821 I ~Qp~:r\)1;lnt travel reduction $35,500) ($35,500) Miscellaneous (rounding) $6,709) ($ 6,709) Reduce GF transfer to Capital Fund (additional) $1,000,000 ! Net Changes to Expenditures -Decrease $1,170,830 ($170,830) I Ntl~Gltan2e $1,405,000 .~405,000 Reduetion of Bridge (one-time) options ($1,900,000) Endin2 Balance $76,000 ($2,677,000) Staff RecommendatlOns* * Finance Committee-Recommended Changes to the City Manager's Proposed Budget The Finance Committee recommends the following changes based on new information following submittal of the original proposed budget. General Fund Office of the City Manager • Increase budget by $32,000 for both Fiscal Years 2010 and 2011 for the Sustainability Program. The Finance Committee recommended the ongoing increase instead of a onc- time transfer from the Council contingency account. City Council • Remove cost increase for outside CAO evaluator contract, results in an expense reduction of ($11 ,000). The Finance Committee indicated that this expense should come out of the CMR:280:09 Page 4 of 13 Council contingency account, if the Council moves forward with hiring an outside evaluator, Community Services Department • Restore salary and benefit funding of $95,941 for 1.0 FTE Coordinator Recreational Programs for the Family Resomces Program, This includes a Fiscal Year 20 I 0 one-time revenue reimbursement of$95,941 from the Family Resomces Foundation, In addition, if the Foundation is unable to meet the annual reimbursement expense, the difference would be considered a loan for the next fiscal year, • Restore the funding for the Twilight Concert Series in the amount of $41 ,000. • Remove the recommended parking fee revenue for the Baylands and Foothills Park, resulting in a ($150,000) decrease in revenue, • Recommend an increase to revenue and/or reduce expenditures at the Golf Course to bring it to a break-even point, resulting in a revenue increase of $148,170 and an expense reduction of ($11 ,099), Fire Department • Restore revenue and expense for Basic Life Support (BLS) program, This results in a net change of $108,000 which is comprised of a revenue increase of $236,000 and an expense increase of $108,000. This includes the elimination of 3 EMT Basic/BLS Transport FTE, with the on-going program staffed with temporary positions. Planning and Community Environment Department • Eliminate Assistant Director of Planning position, resulting in salary and benefit expense reduction of$236,280. Non-Departmental • Include one-half of the estimated utility savings related to the General Fund for sustainability efforts in the budget, resulting in an expense reduction of ($132,182). Allocation to departments to be determined by the City Manager. • Reduce travel expenditures by 20 percent resulting in an expenditure reduction of ($35,500). Allocation to departments to be determined by the City Manager. • Reduce the General Fund transfer to the Infrastructure Reserve by an addition ($1 million). This anticipates cost savings or timing adjustments in capital programs resulting in potential savings. • In FY 2010, reduce the budgeted one-time bridging options credit of$3.1 million by ($1 million). This is based on savings in the previous bulleted item. • Move $794,068 out of the budgeted $3 million placeholder for employee compensation reductions out of non-departmental and in to the Police Department. This is to recognize PAPOA's approved deferral of their FY 2010 negotiated salary increase of 6 percent. Capital Projects Fund -Infrastructure/CIP • Increase funding for the Highway 101 PedestrianlBicycle Overpass/Underpass project (CIP PL-ll 000) in Fiscal Year 2010 by $100,000 and decrease funding for this project by $100,000 in Fiscal Year 2011. CMR:280:09 Page 5 ofJ3 • Reduce the Infrastructure Reserve transfer from the General Fund transfer by an additional $1 million. Enterprise Funds • Include one-half of the estimated utility savings related to the Enterprise Funds for sustainability efforts into the budget, resulting in an expense reduction of $202,609. Allocation to Funds to be determined by the City Manager. • Include one-half of the estimated City-wide utility savings for sustainability efforts into the budget, resulting in a revenue reduction of $334,926. Staff-Recommended Changes to the City Manager's Proposed Budget Staff recommends the following changes based on new information following submittal of the original proposed budget. General Fund City Council Contingency • Proposed $43,000 increase in Fiscal Years 2010 and 2011 to the City Council Contingency account to last year's level. City Council Contingency Account Status FY 2010 FY2011 Beginning balance $207,000 $207,000 Increase to Contingency base budget $43,000 $43,000 Ending Balance $250,000 $250,000 City Manager Contingency • The City Manager's Contingency Account will be increased $84,100 in Fiscal Years 2010 and 2011 to last year's level. City Manager's Contingency Account Status FY 2010 FY2011 Bel!inninl! balance $165,900 $165,900 Increase to Contingency base budget $84,100 $84,100 Ending Balance $250,000 $250,000 Public Works Department • Reallocate 0.5 FTE Administrative Associate III to the Capital Fund, resulting in an expense decrease of $46, 160 to the General Fund Public Works Operating budget. Budget Process -Finance Committee "Parking Lot" Issues • During the Finance Committee's review of the Proposed Budget, items or ideas for further budget changes were placed in a "parking lot" if two or more committee members agreed. Parking lot items that received a majority vote were moved into the Finance Committee recommended changes to the Proposed Budget and incorporated into the table above. Other items were either withdrawn by the maker, or did not receive a majority of CMR:280:09 Page 6 of 13 votes to become permanent reductions. Those items left in the parking lot are described below. o Review reducing I Attorney and I Support Staff from the Attorney's Office - Withdrawn o Reduce the Police Department expenditures by $500,000 (flat amount) -Defer review until first quarter financial results o Reduce the Police Department expenditures by $492,000 (specific changes) - Defer review until first quarter financial results o Plauning department to return with the impact of removing two planners in current plauning Did not receive a m!\iority of votes o Eliminate reduction for Comprehensive Plan extension incorporated into the budget Did not receive a majority of votes o Defer Storm Drainage Fund FY 20 I 0 short-term loan repayment to the General Fund -Withdrawn Capital Project Fund -Infrastructure/CIP • The following items were presented to the Finance Committee with the May 19, 2009 "at-places" memo: o New CIP Project Highway 101 Pedestrian/Bicycle Overpass/Underpass Project (PL-IIOOO): Funding of $1 00,000 will be provided by infrastructure reserve. o Additional funding of $300,000 to the Mobile Command Vehicle Project (PD- 07000) from Federal and Local agency grants. o Additional funding of $135,513 to the Street Maintenance CIP Project (PE- 86070) from State Proposition 42 funds. o Change to the Drying Beds, Material Storage and Transfer Area CIP Project (RF- 10003): Project start date is moved to FY 2011 from FY 2010 and funding is now split between the Refuse and Wastewater Collection Fund. The Storm Drainage Fund will not provide funding for this project. o Increase funding for AS-I0000 (Salary and Benefits project) to reflect the reallocation of 0.5 FTE Administrative Associate III from the General Fund, $46,160 • Summary of Sources of Funding detailed above: Infrastructure Reserve $146,160; Other Agencies/Outside funding $435,513 Enterprise Funds Electric Fund • Increase Other Income $100,000 in FY 2010 and $400,000 in FY 2011 to correct the Central Valley Loan Repayment amount. • Increase Utility Purchases $100,000 in FY 2010 and $400,000 in FY 2011 to correct the Central Valley Loan Repayment amount. • Increase Net Sales $2.5 million in FY 20 II due to an inadvertent omission. Net Change to the Electric Fund: FY 2010 $0.00 FY 2011 $2.5 million increase in revenue CMR:280:09 Page 7 of 13 Gas Fund • Increase Net Sales $142,000 in FY 2010 and FY 2011 • Increase Demand-side program expenditures $135,700 in FY 2010 and $146,440 in FY 2011 Net Change to the Gas Fund: FY 2010 $6,300 FY 2011 ($4,440) Water Fund • Increase Demand-side program expenditures $45,300 in FY 2010 and $80,279 in FY 2011 Wastewater Collection Fund • Increase Net Sales $20,000 in FY 201 0 • Decrease Operating Transfers to the Refuse Fund in FY 20 I 0 by $250,000 and Increase Operating Transfers from the Refuse Fund in FY 2011 by $375,000. The stali date for CIP RF-10003 (Drying Beds, Material Storage and Transfer Area) has been moved from FY 2010 to FY 2011 and the funding for the project has changed from one-third to one- half for the Wastewater Collection Fund. Storm Drainage Fund • Decrease Operating Transfers from the Refuse Fund in FY 2010 by $250,000. This results from changes to CIP RF-10003. The Storm Drainage fund will not be providing funding for this project. Refuse Fund • Decrease Operating Transfers from the Wastewater Collection Fund in FY 2010 by $250,000 and Increase Operating Transfers from the Wastewater Collection Fund in FY 2011 by $375,000. The start date for CIP RF-10003 has been moved from FY 2010 to FY 2011 and the funding for the project has changed from one-third to one-half for the Wastewater Collection Fund. The Storm Drainage Fund will no longer provide funding for this project. Wastewater Treatment Fund • Decrease allocated charges $3.8 million in the FY 2007-08 "Actuals" column on page 335 due to a posting omission. Special Revenue Funds Developer's Impact Fees • Correction to the presentation of Community Development Funds CIP transfer. The funding allocation for CIP PE-06007 Park Restroom Installation was deferred to FY 2011 and the funding allocation for CIP PE-07007 Cubberley was moved forward to FY 2009 during the FY 2009 midyear process. Housing In-Lieu • Allocate budget for affordable housing projects to be determined in FY 2010, $100,000. CMR:280:09 Page 8 of 13 Compensation Plans Five classification and two compensation changes are proposed in the Management and Confidential and Service Employees' International Union (SEIU) Compensation Plans. New or changed classifications are included, along with the accompanying resolutions in Attachments 10 and II. Table of Organization Amended pages to the Fiscal Years 2010 and 2011 Table of Organization are included with this report (Exhibit D). The table has been revised to reflect the staffing changes presented in this report. Changes reflected in the Table of Organization will be incorporated into the relevant department organization charts and the revised organization charts will be published in the adopted budget. Contraets Greater Than $85,000 On May 26, 2009, the Finance Committee approved the Fiscal Year 20 I 0 contract scopes of professional services agreements greater than $85,000 (CMR 248:09). Municipal Fee Schedule The Community Services Department has removed the proposed Daily Fee and Term Pass for Foothills College Parking at Cubberley Community Center. Equity Transfer Methodology Change Based on a 4-0 vote, the Finance Committee recommended that Council change the methodology used to calculate the Equity Transfer from the Utility Funds to the General Fund. On March 31, 2009 staff presented to the Finance committee recommendations for changes to the calculation methodology for the Utility Equity Transfer to the General Fund (CMR: 190:09) using the Utilities Enterprise Methodology (UEM). The Finance Committee approved staffs recommendation in concept, and in addition requested staff to return with answers to additional questions during the budget hearings. Staff returned on May 26, 2009 with responses (CMR:260:09, Attachment 12) and the Committee voted 4-0 to recommend the Council approve the UEM methodology ehange. The UEM recommended by staff and consultant R.W. Beck, is a return on rate base methodology. This requires a annual calculation of the rate base for the Electric and Gas Funds. The rate base is then multiplied by an appropriate rate of return on equity to calculate the equity transfer. R.W. Beck recommends using PG&E's approved rate of return on equity as a base, with two adjustments for tax and risk to account for the differences between an investor owned utility and a municipally owned utility. An investor in City bonds would not be taxed on the interest earnings nor experience a higher rate of return due to the higher risk of default associated with an investment in a corporate bond. The reeommended tax rate adjustment is 30 percent, and the recommended risk adjustment is 15 percent. The current FY 2009 Equity Transfers equal $15.17 million. The staff and R.W. Beck recommended Electric and Gas Fund transfers for FY 2010 with a tax adjustment of 30 percent and a risk adjustment of 15 percent, result in a transfer of $16.42 million, an increase of $1.35 million. CMR:280:09 Page 9 of 13 RESOURCE IMP ACT The Fiscal Years 2010 and 2011 Proposed Budget as submitted to the Finance Committee resulted in an increase to the General Fund Budget Stabilization Reserve (BSR) of $0.6 million in Fiscal Year 20 I 0 and a $3.1 million decrease in Fiscal Year 2011. The changes resulting from the Finance Committee hearings and staff recommendations resulted in a $1.9 million reduction to the Bridge ( one-time) options in Fiscal Year 2010 and an $0.4 million increase to BSR funding in Fiscal Year 2011 (Appendix 1). The projected ending balances for the BSR in Fiscal Year 2010 and 2011 are $22.8 million and $20.1 million, respectively. As a result of the changes to the capital budget, the projected ending balances in the Infrastructure Reserve (IR) for Fiscal Year 2010 and 2011 are $5.2 million and $1.6 million, respectively. Additional changes to the Enterprise Funds result in an approximate $0.6 million increase in reserve balances in Fiscal Year 2010 and a $1.6 million increase in Fiscal Year 2011 from the proposed document (Appendix 2). POLICY IMPLICATIONS These recommendations are consistent with existing City policies. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Adoption of the budget does not represent a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). ATTACHMENTS Attachment I: Exhibit A: Exhibit B: Exhibit C: Exhibit D: Exhibit E: Attachment 2: Attachment 3: Attachment 4: Attachment 5: CMR:280:09 Budget Adoption Ordinance with the following Exhibits: City Manager's Fiscal Years 2010 and 2011 Proposed Budget Amendments to the City Manager's Fiscal Years 2010 and 2011 Proposed Budget Fiscal Year 2010 Proposed Municipal Fee Schedule Revised Pages in the Fiscal Years 2010 and 2011 Table of Organization Amendments to the Fiscal Year 2010 Proposed Municipal Fee Schedule Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Amending Utility Rate Schedules R-I, R-2, and R-3 of the City of Palo Alto Utilities Rates and Charges Pertaining to Refuse Rates Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Amending Utility Rate Schedules W-I, W-4, and W-7 of the City of Palo Alto Utilities Rates and Charges Pertaining to Water Rates Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Amending Utility Rate Schedules S-I and S-2 of the City of Palo Alto Utilities Rates and Charges Pertaining to Wastewater Collection Rates Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Amending City of Palo Alto Utility Rate Schedules G-I, G-2, G-3, G-4, G-6, G-IO-, G-II, AND Page 10 ofl3 Attachment 6: Attachment 7: Attachment 8: Attachment 9: Attachment 10: Exhibit A: Attachment II: Attachment 12: Exhibit A: Appendix I: Appendix 2: CMR:280:09 G-12 of the City of Palo Alto Utilities Rates and Charges Pertaining to Gas Rates Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Amending City of Palo Alto Utility Rate Schedules E-I, E-I-G, E-2, E-2-G, E-4, E-4-TOU, E-4- G, E-7, E-7-TOU, E-7-G, E-14, E-18, AND E-18-G of the City of Palo Alto Utilities Rates and Charges Pertaining to Electric Rates. Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Amending City of Palo Alto Utility Rate Schedules C-I, E-16 and W -2 of the City of Palo Alto Utilities Rates and Charges Pertaining to Utility Service Rates. Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Amending City of Palo Alto Utility Rate Schedules EDF-I and EDF-2 of the City of Palo Alto Utilities Rates and Charges Pertaining to Fiber Optic Rates. Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Amending City of Palo Alto Utility Rate Schedule C-4 of the City of Palo Alto Utilities Rates and Charges Pertaining to the Residential Rate Assistance Program Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Amending the Compensation Plan for Management and Professional Personnel and Council Appointees Adopted by Resolution No. 8844 to Change the Title of One Classification. Fiscal Year 20 I 0 Compensation Plan Changes for Management and Professional Personnel -related to Attachment 10 Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Amending the Compensation Plan for Classified Personnel (SEIU) Adopted by Resolution No. 8658 to Add Five New Classifications and Change the Compensation for Two Existing SEIU Classifications ( CMR:260:09 Recommendation to City Council to Change the Methodology Used to Calculate the Equity Transfer from the Utility Funds to the General Fund Fiscal Year 20 I 0 SEIU Compensation Plan Changes -related to Attachment II Fiscal Years 2010 and 2011 General Fund Summary and Reserve Balances Fiscal Years 20 I 0 and 20 II Enterprise Fund Summary and Reserve Balances Page 11 of 13 Appendix 3: Appendix 4: Appendix 5: Appendix 6: Appendix 7: Related Staff Reports: CMR:280:09 Fiscal Years 2009-2014 Capital Improvement Fund Summaries and Amended Projects Fiscal Years 2010 and 201 I Special Revenue Funds Summaries May 26, 2009 Memorandum to Finance Committee detailing ehanges to Fiscal Years 2010 and 201 I City Manager's Proposed Budget to date Memorandums distributed "at-places" during the Finance Committee budget hearings Budget Hearing Presentation Slides distributed during the Finance Committee budget hearings CMR:160:09; CMR:J82:09; CMR: I 87:09; CMR:J90:09; CMR:206:09; CMR:248:09; CMR:161:09; CMR:185:09; CMR:188:09; CMR: 199:09; CMR:209:09; CMR:260:09; CMR: 180:09; CMR:186:09; CMR:189:09; CMR:205:09; CMR:232:09; CMR:261:09 Page 12 of 13 PREPARED BY: ARONBOZMAN Budget Manager -==?f-~ DEPAKIMENT HEAD APPROVAL: ----'::=::::::::'=====------- LALOPEREZ Director of Administrative Services CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: City Manager CMR;280:09 Page 13 ofl3 Class II-Governmental Agency and City-Sponsored Activities: No charge for facility rental for events or activities. however. for attendants. equipment rental. and special uses may apply. (Note: City facility use for City co-sponsored groups will be ICOlllsirien,d on a case by case basis.) III -Non-Profi! Organizations: IRS recognized non-profit organizations may receive a 50 percent reduction on basic facility rates upon verification. Only facility rental rates may be reduced and an other fees, such as staffing and equtpmentt are Icbar,:ed at the full rate. Non-profit organizations cbarging or collecting fees or raising funds are not eligible for reduced rates and fees will apply. This does not apply to class registration fees. IV· Individuals, Groups, Organilr.ations, and Businesses not ehargbag fees: Basic rental fees apply. Upon verification, Alto residents, gronps, organizations, and businesses may receive a 33 percent disconnt on basic facility ren!al rates. facility rental rates may be reduced and all olber fees, snch as staffing and equipment, are charged at the full rate. V -Business or Commere!al Use: Individuals, groups, organizations, and businesses charging. collecting. or raising funds rent facilities and equipment at the basic rate plus 75 percent. The Art Center is not available for CLASS V usage. Reservations are set by facility managers at respectivejacilities, The Director o/Community Services or designee, may lalJ!th(lri,;e hourly facility rental discounts up to 25 percellt. City of Palo Alto 2009-10 Proposed Municipal Fee Schedule 8·1 Attacmnent 1 *** NOT YET APPROVED *** ORDINANCE NO. ____ __ ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALO ALTO ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEARS 2010 AND 2011 SECTION 1. The Council of the City of Palo Alto finds and determines as follows: A. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 6(g) of Article IV of the Charter of the City of Palo Alto and Chapter 2.28 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code, the City Manager has prepared and submitted to the City Council, by letter of transmittal, a budget proposal for Fiscal Years 2010 and 2011; and B. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 12 of Article III of the Charter, the Council did, on June 8 and 15, 2009, hold public hearings on the budget after publication of notice in accordance with Section 2.28.070 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code; and C. In accordance with the provisions of Chapter 8 of Division 1, of Title 7, commencing with Section 66016 of the Government Code, as applicable, the Council did on June 8 and 15, 2009, hold a public hearings on the proposed amendments to the Municipal Fee Schedule, after publication of notice and after availability of the data supporting the amendments was made available to the public at least 10 days prior to the hearing. SECTION 2. Pursuant to Chapter 2.28 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code, the following documents , collectively referred to as "the budget" are hereby approved and adopted for Fiscal Years 2010 and 2011 : (a) The budget document (Exhibit "A") containing the proposed operating and capital budgets submitted on or about April 27, 2009, by the City Manager for Fiscal Years 2010 and 2011, entitled "City of Palo Alto -City Manager's Fiscal Years 2010 and 2011 Proposed Budget" covering General Government Funds, Enterprise Funds and Internal Service Funds, a copy of which is on file in the Department of Administrative Services, to which copy reference is hereby made concerning the full particulars thereof, and by such reference is made a part hereof; and 1 (b) The Amendments to the City Manager's Fiscal Years 2010 and 2011 Proposed Budget, attached hereto as Exhibit "B," and made a part hereof; and (c) The document entitled "Fiscal Year 2010 Proposed Municipal Fee Schedule," attached hereto as Exhibit "C," and made a part hereof; and (d) Changes and revised pages in the Table of Organization, attached hereto as Exhibit "D," and made a part hereof; and (e) Amendments to the "Fiscal Year 2010 Proposed Municipal Fee Schedule," attached hereto as Exhibit "E," and made a part hereof; and SECTION 3. The sums set forth in the budget for the various departments of the City, as herein amended, are hereby appropriated to the uses and purposes set forth therein. SECTION 4. All expenditures made on behalf of the City, directly or through any agency, except those required by state law, shall be made in accordance with the authorization contained in this ordinance and the budget as herein amended. SECTION 5. Appropriations for the Fiscal Year 2009 that are encumbered by approved purchase orders and contracts for which goods or services have not been received or contract completed, and/or for which all payments have not been made, by the last day of the Fiscal Year 2009 shall be carried forward and added to the fund or department appropriations for Fiscal Year 2010. , SECTION 6. The City Manager is authorized and directed to make changes in the department and fund totals and summary pages of the budget necessary to reflect the amendments enumerated and aggregated in the budget as shown in Exhibit B and the Fiscal Year 2009 appropriations carried forward as provided in Section 5. SECTION 7. As specified in Section 2.04.320 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code, a majority vote of the City Council is required to adopt this ordinance. SECTION 8. As specified in Section 2.28.140(b) of the Palo Alto Municipal Code, the Council of the City of Palo Alto hereby delegates the authority to invest the City's funds to the Director of Administrative Services, as Treasurer, in accordance with the City's Investment Policy for Fiscal Year 2010. 2 SECTION 9. The Council of the City of Palo Alto hereby finds that this is not a proj ect under the California Environmental Quality Act and, therefore, no environmental impact assessment is necessary. SECTION 10. As provided in Section 2.04.330 (a) (3) of the Palo Alto Municipal Code, this ordinance shall become effective upon adoption; provided that all new increases in Planning Department fees, more specifically described in Exhibit "C," shall become effective sixty (60) days from the date of adoption. INTRODUCED AND PASSED: AYES: NOES: ABSTENTIONS: ABSENT: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney 3 Mayor APPROVED: City Manager Director Services of Administrative