HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-02-13 Historic Resources Board Agenda PacketHISTORIC RESOURCES BOARD
Regular Meeting
Thursday, February 13, 2025
Council Chambers & Hybrid
8:30 AM
Historic Resources Board meetings will be held as “hybrid” meetings with the option to attend
by teleconference/video conference or in person. To maximize public safety while still
maintaining transparency and public access, members of the public can choose to participate
from home or attend in person. Information on how the public may observe and participate in the
meeting is located at the end of the agenda. Masks are strongly encouraged if attending in
person. T h e m e e t i n g w i l l b e b r o a d c a s t o n C a b l e T V C h a n n e l 2 6 , l i v e o n
YouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/cityofpaloalto, and streamed to Midpen Media
Center https://midpenmedia.org. Commissioner names, biographies, and archived agendas are
available at https://bitly.com/paloaltoHRB.
VIRTUAL PARTICIPATION CLICK HERE TO JOIN (https://cityofpaloalto.zoom.us/j/96800197512)
Meeting ID: 968 0019 7512 Phone: 1(669)900‐6833
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Public comments will be accepted both in person and via Zoom for up to three minutes or an
amount of time determined by the Chair. All requests to speak will be taken until 5 minutes
after the staff’s presentation. Written public comments can be submitted in advance to
hrb@cityofpaloalto.org and will be provided to the Board and available for inspection on the
City’s website. Please clearly indicate which agenda item you are referencing in your subject
line.
Spokespersons that are representing a group of five or more people who are identified as
present at the meeting at the time of the spokesperson's presentation will be allowed up to
fifteen (15) minutes at the discretion of the Chair, provided that the non‐speaking members
agree not to speak individually. The Chair may limit Public Comments to thirty (30) minutes for
all combined speakers. The Chair may reduce the allowed time to speak on Study Sessions and
Actions Items to two (2) minutes or less to accommodate a larger number of speakers.
PowerPoints, videos, or other media to be presented during public comment are accepted only
by email to hrb@cityofpaloalto.org at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Once received,
the Clerk will have them shared at public comment for the specified item. To uphold strong
cybersecurity management practices, USB’s or other physical electronic storage devices are not
accepted.
Signs and symbolic materials less than 2 feet by 3 feet are permitted provided that: (1) sticks,
posts, poles or similar/other type of handle objects are strictly prohibited; (2) the items do not
create a facility, fire, or safety hazard; and (3) persons with such items remain seated when
displaying them and must not raise the items above shoulder level, obstruct the view or
passage of other attendees, or otherwise disturb the business of the meeting.
CALL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALL
PUBLIC COMMENT
Members of the public may speak to any item NOT on the agenda. Three (3) minutes per speaker.
AGENDA CHANGES, ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS
The Chair or Board majority may modify the agenda order to improve meeting management.
CITY OFFICIAL REPORTS
1.Historic Resources Board Schedule of Meetings and Assignments
STUDY SESSION
Public Comment is Permitted. Three (3) minutes per speaker.
2.Historic Resources Board Discussion and Review of Certified Local Government (CLG)
Annual Report Covering the 2023‐2024 Reporting Period
3.Study Session to Discuss the HRB Awards and HRB Workplan Implementation
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Public Comment is Permitted. Three (3) minutes per speaker.
4.Approval of Historic Resources Board Draft Minutes of November 14, 2024
BOARD MEMBER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, ANNOUNCEMENTS OR FUTURE MEETINGS AND
AGENDAS
Members of the public may not speak to the item(s).
ADJOURNMENT
PUBLIC COMMENT INSTRUCTIONS
Members of the Public may provide public comments to teleconference meetings via email,
teleconference, or by phone.
1. Written public comments may be submitted by email to hrb@cityofpaloalto.org.
2. Spoken public comments using a computer will be accepted through the
teleconference meeting. To address the Board, click on the link below to access a Zoom‐
based meeting. Please read the following instructions carefully.
You may download the Zoom client or connect to the meeting in‐ browser. If using
your browser, make sure you are using a current, up‐to‐date browser: Chrome 30,
Firefox 27, Microsoft Edge 12, Safari 7. Certain functionality may be disabled in
older browsers including Internet Explorer.
You may be asked to enter an email address and name. We request that you
identify yourself by name as this will be visible online and will be used to notify you
that it is your turn to speak.
When you wish to speak on an Agenda Item, click on “raise hand.” The Clerk will
activate and unmute speakers in turn. Speakers will be notified shortly before they
are called to speak.
When called, please limit your remarks to the time limit allotted. A timer will be
shown on the computer to help keep track of your comments.
3. Spoken public comments using a smart phone will be accepted through the
teleconference meeting. To address the Board, download the Zoom application onto your
phone from the Apple App Store or Google Play Store and enter the Meeting ID below.
Please follow the instructions above.
4. Spoken public comments using a phone use the telephone number listed below. When
you wish to speak on an agenda item hit *9 on your phone so we know that you wish to
speak. You will be asked to provide your first and last name before addressing the Board.
You will be advised how long you have to speak. When called please limit your remarks to
the agenda item and time limit allotted.
CLICK HERE TO JOIN Meeting ID: 968 0019 7512 Phone:1‐669‐900‐6833
Americans with Disability Act (ADA) It is the policy of the City of Palo Alto to offer its public
programs, services and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to all. Persons with
disabilities who require materials in an appropriate alternative format or who require auxiliary
aids to access City meetings, programs, or services may contact the City’s ADA Coordinator at
(650) 329‐2550 (voice) or by emailing ada@cityofpaloalto.org. Requests for assistance or
accommodations must be submitted at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting, program, or
service.
1 Regular Meeting February 13, 2025
HISTORIC RESOURCES BOARDRegular MeetingThursday, February 13, 2025Council Chambers & Hybrid8:30 AMHistoric Resources Board meetings will be held as “hybrid” meetings with the option to attendby teleconference/video conference or in person. To maximize public safety while stillmaintaining transparency and public access, members of the public can choose to participatefrom home or attend in person. Information on how the public may observe and participate in themeeting is located at the end of the agenda. Masks are strongly encouraged if attending inperson. T h e m e e t i n g w i l l b e b r o a d c a s t o n C a b l e T V C h a n n e l 2 6 , l i v e o nYouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/cityofpaloalto, and streamed to Midpen MediaCenter https://midpenmedia.org. Commissioner names, biographies, and archived agendas areavailable at https://bitly.com/paloaltoHRB. VIRTUAL PARTICIPATION CLICK HERE TO JOIN (https://cityofpaloalto.zoom.us/j/96800197512)Meeting ID: 968 0019 7512 Phone: 1(669)900‐6833PUBLIC COMMENTSPublic comments will be accepted both in person and via Zoom for up to three minutes or anamount of time determined by the Chair. All requests to speak will be taken until 5 minutesafter the staff’s presentation. Written public comments can be submitted in advance tohrb@cityofpaloalto.org and will be provided to the Board and available for inspection on theCity’s website. Please clearly indicate which agenda item you are referencing in your subjectline.Spokespersons that are representing a group of five or more people who are identified aspresent at the meeting at the time of the spokesperson's presentation will be allowed up tofifteen (15) minutes at the discretion of the Chair, provided that the non‐speaking membersagree not to speak individually. The Chair may limit Public Comments to thirty (30) minutes forall combined speakers. The Chair may reduce the allowed time to speak on Study Sessions andActions Items to two (2) minutes or less to accommodate a larger number of speakers.PowerPoints, videos, or other media to be presented during public comment are accepted onlyby email to hrb@cityofpaloalto.org at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Once received,the Clerk will have them shared at public comment for the specified item. To uphold strongcybersecurity management practices, USB’s or other physical electronic storage devices are notaccepted.
Signs and symbolic materials less than 2 feet by 3 feet are permitted provided that: (1) sticks,
posts, poles or similar/other type of handle objects are strictly prohibited; (2) the items do not
create a facility, fire, or safety hazard; and (3) persons with such items remain seated when
displaying them and must not raise the items above shoulder level, obstruct the view or
passage of other attendees, or otherwise disturb the business of the meeting.
CALL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALL
PUBLIC COMMENT
Members of the public may speak to any item NOT on the agenda. Three (3) minutes per speaker.
AGENDA CHANGES, ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS
The Chair or Board majority may modify the agenda order to improve meeting management.
CITY OFFICIAL REPORTS
1.Historic Resources Board Schedule of Meetings and Assignments
STUDY SESSION
Public Comment is Permitted. Three (3) minutes per speaker.
2.Historic Resources Board Discussion and Review of Certified Local Government (CLG)
Annual Report Covering the 2023‐2024 Reporting Period
3.Study Session to Discuss the HRB Awards and HRB Workplan Implementation
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Public Comment is Permitted. Three (3) minutes per speaker.
4.Approval of Historic Resources Board Draft Minutes of November 14, 2024
BOARD MEMBER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, ANNOUNCEMENTS OR FUTURE MEETINGS AND
AGENDAS
Members of the public may not speak to the item(s).
ADJOURNMENT
PUBLIC COMMENT INSTRUCTIONS
Members of the Public may provide public comments to teleconference meetings via email,
teleconference, or by phone.
1. Written public comments may be submitted by email to hrb@cityofpaloalto.org.
2. Spoken public comments using a computer will be accepted through the
teleconference meeting. To address the Board, click on the link below to access a Zoom‐
based meeting. Please read the following instructions carefully.
You may download the Zoom client or connect to the meeting in‐ browser. If using
your browser, make sure you are using a current, up‐to‐date browser: Chrome 30,
Firefox 27, Microsoft Edge 12, Safari 7. Certain functionality may be disabled in
older browsers including Internet Explorer.
You may be asked to enter an email address and name. We request that you
identify yourself by name as this will be visible online and will be used to notify you
that it is your turn to speak.
When you wish to speak on an Agenda Item, click on “raise hand.” The Clerk will
activate and unmute speakers in turn. Speakers will be notified shortly before they
are called to speak.
When called, please limit your remarks to the time limit allotted. A timer will be
shown on the computer to help keep track of your comments.
3. Spoken public comments using a smart phone will be accepted through the
teleconference meeting. To address the Board, download the Zoom application onto your
phone from the Apple App Store or Google Play Store and enter the Meeting ID below.
Please follow the instructions above.
4. Spoken public comments using a phone use the telephone number listed below. When
you wish to speak on an agenda item hit *9 on your phone so we know that you wish to
speak. You will be asked to provide your first and last name before addressing the Board.
You will be advised how long you have to speak. When called please limit your remarks to
the agenda item and time limit allotted.
CLICK HERE TO JOIN Meeting ID: 968 0019 7512 Phone:1‐669‐900‐6833
Americans with Disability Act (ADA) It is the policy of the City of Palo Alto to offer its public
programs, services and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to all. Persons with
disabilities who require materials in an appropriate alternative format or who require auxiliary
aids to access City meetings, programs, or services may contact the City’s ADA Coordinator at
(650) 329‐2550 (voice) or by emailing ada@cityofpaloalto.org. Requests for assistance or
accommodations must be submitted at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting, program, or
service.
2 Regular Meeting February 13, 2025
HISTORIC RESOURCES BOARDRegular MeetingThursday, February 13, 2025Council Chambers & Hybrid8:30 AMHistoric Resources Board meetings will be held as “hybrid” meetings with the option to attendby teleconference/video conference or in person. To maximize public safety while stillmaintaining transparency and public access, members of the public can choose to participatefrom home or attend in person. Information on how the public may observe and participate in themeeting is located at the end of the agenda. Masks are strongly encouraged if attending inperson. T h e m e e t i n g w i l l b e b r o a d c a s t o n C a b l e T V C h a n n e l 2 6 , l i v e o nYouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/cityofpaloalto, and streamed to Midpen MediaCenter https://midpenmedia.org. Commissioner names, biographies, and archived agendas areavailable at https://bitly.com/paloaltoHRB. VIRTUAL PARTICIPATION CLICK HERE TO JOIN (https://cityofpaloalto.zoom.us/j/96800197512)Meeting ID: 968 0019 7512 Phone: 1(669)900‐6833PUBLIC COMMENTSPublic comments will be accepted both in person and via Zoom for up to three minutes or anamount of time determined by the Chair. All requests to speak will be taken until 5 minutesafter the staff’s presentation. Written public comments can be submitted in advance tohrb@cityofpaloalto.org and will be provided to the Board and available for inspection on theCity’s website. Please clearly indicate which agenda item you are referencing in your subjectline.Spokespersons that are representing a group of five or more people who are identified aspresent at the meeting at the time of the spokesperson's presentation will be allowed up tofifteen (15) minutes at the discretion of the Chair, provided that the non‐speaking membersagree not to speak individually. The Chair may limit Public Comments to thirty (30) minutes forall combined speakers. The Chair may reduce the allowed time to speak on Study Sessions andActions Items to two (2) minutes or less to accommodate a larger number of speakers.PowerPoints, videos, or other media to be presented during public comment are accepted onlyby email to hrb@cityofpaloalto.org at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Once received,the Clerk will have them shared at public comment for the specified item. To uphold strongcybersecurity management practices, USB’s or other physical electronic storage devices are notaccepted.Signs and symbolic materials less than 2 feet by 3 feet are permitted provided that: (1) sticks,posts, poles or similar/other type of handle objects are strictly prohibited; (2) the items do notcreate a facility, fire, or safety hazard; and (3) persons with such items remain seated whendisplaying them and must not raise the items above shoulder level, obstruct the view orpassage of other attendees, or otherwise disturb the business of the meeting.CALL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALLPUBLIC COMMENT Members of the public may speak to any item NOT on the agenda. Three (3) minutes per speaker.AGENDA CHANGES, ADDITIONS AND DELETIONSThe Chair or Board majority may modify the agenda order to improve meeting management.CITY OFFICIAL REPORTS1.Historic Resources Board Schedule of Meetings and AssignmentsSTUDY SESSIONPublic Comment is Permitted. Three (3) minutes per speaker.2.Historic Resources Board Discussion and Review of Certified Local Government (CLG)Annual Report Covering the 2023‐2024 Reporting Period3.Study Session to Discuss the HRB Awards and HRB Workplan ImplementationAPPROVAL OF MINUTESPublic Comment is Permitted. Three (3) minutes per speaker.4.Approval of Historic Resources Board Draft Minutes of November 14, 2024BOARD MEMBER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, ANNOUNCEMENTS OR FUTURE MEETINGS ANDAGENDASMembers of the public may not speak to the item(s).
ADJOURNMENT
PUBLIC COMMENT INSTRUCTIONS
Members of the Public may provide public comments to teleconference meetings via email,
teleconference, or by phone.
1. Written public comments may be submitted by email to hrb@cityofpaloalto.org.
2. Spoken public comments using a computer will be accepted through the
teleconference meeting. To address the Board, click on the link below to access a Zoom‐
based meeting. Please read the following instructions carefully.
You may download the Zoom client or connect to the meeting in‐ browser. If using
your browser, make sure you are using a current, up‐to‐date browser: Chrome 30,
Firefox 27, Microsoft Edge 12, Safari 7. Certain functionality may be disabled in
older browsers including Internet Explorer.
You may be asked to enter an email address and name. We request that you
identify yourself by name as this will be visible online and will be used to notify you
that it is your turn to speak.
When you wish to speak on an Agenda Item, click on “raise hand.” The Clerk will
activate and unmute speakers in turn. Speakers will be notified shortly before they
are called to speak.
When called, please limit your remarks to the time limit allotted. A timer will be
shown on the computer to help keep track of your comments.
3. Spoken public comments using a smart phone will be accepted through the
teleconference meeting. To address the Board, download the Zoom application onto your
phone from the Apple App Store or Google Play Store and enter the Meeting ID below.
Please follow the instructions above.
4. Spoken public comments using a phone use the telephone number listed below. When
you wish to speak on an agenda item hit *9 on your phone so we know that you wish to
speak. You will be asked to provide your first and last name before addressing the Board.
You will be advised how long you have to speak. When called please limit your remarks to
the agenda item and time limit allotted.
CLICK HERE TO JOIN Meeting ID: 968 0019 7512 Phone:1‐669‐900‐6833
Americans with Disability Act (ADA) It is the policy of the City of Palo Alto to offer its public
programs, services and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to all. Persons with
disabilities who require materials in an appropriate alternative format or who require auxiliary
aids to access City meetings, programs, or services may contact the City’s ADA Coordinator at
(650) 329‐2550 (voice) or by emailing ada@cityofpaloalto.org. Requests for assistance or
accommodations must be submitted at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting, program, or
service.
3 Regular Meeting February 13, 2025
Item No. 1. Page 1 of 1
Historic Resources Board
Staff Report
From: Planning and Development Services Director
Lead Department: Planning and Development Services
Meeting Date: February 13, 2025
Report #: 2501-4009
TITLE
Historic Resources Board Schedule of Meetings and Assignments
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Historic Resources Board (HRB) review and comment as appropriate.
BACKGROUND
Attached is the HRB meeting schedule and attendance record for the calendar year. This is
provided for informational purposes. If individual Boardmembers anticipate being absent from
a future meeting, it is requested that it be brought to staff’s attention when considering this
item.
No action is required by the HRB for this item.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: 2025 HRB Meeting Schedule & Assignments
AUTHOR/TITLE:
Steven Switzer, Historic Preservation Planner
Item 1
Staff Report
Packet Pg. 4
Historic Resources Board
2025 Meeting Schedule & Assignments
2025 Meeting Schedule
Meeting Dates Time Location Status Planned Absences
1/9/2025 8:30 AM Hybrid Canceled
2/13/2025 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular
3/13/2025 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular
4/10/2025 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular
5/8/2025 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular
6/12/2025 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular
7/10/2025 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular
8/14/2025 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular
9/11/2025 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular
10/9/2025 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular
11/13/2025 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular
12/11/2025 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular
2025 Subcommittee Assignments
January February March April May June
July August September October November December
Item 1
Attachment A: 2025 HRB
Meeting Schedule &
Assignments
Packet Pg. 5
Item No. 2. Page 1 of 3
Historic Resources Board
Staff Report
From: Planning and Development Services Director
Lead Department: Planning and Development Services
Meeting Date: February 13, 2025
Report #: 2501-3972
TITLE
Historic Resources Board Discussion and Review of Certified Local Government (CLG) Annual
Report Covering the 2023-2024 Reporting Period
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Historic Resources Board (HRB) receive the Certified Local Government
(CLG) annual report (Attachment A) for October 2023 - September 2024
BACKGROUND
The 1980 amendments to the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 established the CLG
program to involve local governments in identifying, evaluating, and preserving historic
properties. Through the certification process, jurisdictions make a commitment to national
historic preservation standards. This commitment is key to America's ability to preserve,
protect, and increase awareness of our unique cultural heritage found across the country.
Palo Alto has been a CLG since February 11, 1992. The Annual Report is for the period from
October 1, 2023, to September 30, 2024. The submittal deadline is March 28, 2025. To qualify
for the upcoming CLG grant cycle, the report must be received by the Office of Historic
Preservation (OHP) before the grant application deadline, which has not yet been published.
Though the HRB is not required to approve the CLG report, members are asked to provide a
summary of the trainings they received for insertion into the report. CLG rules require that all
commissioners and commission staff attend at least one relevant training each year, with the
CLG determining the relevancy of the training. The CLG annual report template notes that
“Pursuant to the CLG Agreement, the Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) must have the
opportunity to review and comment on ordinance changes prior to adoption. Please
communicate directly with the OHP Local Government Unit staff to coordinate the review.
Changes that do not meet the CLG requirements could affect certification status.” This is
important to remember when contemplating any revisions to the City’s historic preservation
ordinance. The annual report template also notes that under California Government Code §
Item 2
Staff Report
Packet Pg. 6
Item No. 2. Page 2 of 3
27288.2, “The county recorder shall record a certified resolution establishing any historical
resources designation issued by the State Historical Resources Commission or a local agency, or
unit thereof.”
The annual report allows the OHP to gather data on how respective CLGs are working. The
National Parks Service (NPS) collects “products,” such as the number of properties designated,
and the OHP sends these annual reports to the NPS on behalf of the CLGs. Filing the report
maintains the City’s CLG status and eligibility for OHP grants to support historic preservation
programs. Notably, Palo Alto received a small grant from the OHP in 2022, which helped offset
some consultant costs related to the 2023 Reconnaissance Survey effort.
ANALYSIS
The CLG annual report, to be submitted on or before March 28, 2025, is provided as
Attachment A for the HRB’s review. During the reporting period (October 2023 through
September 2024) there were 13 HRB meetings in total, and eight HRB members that served
(given a member departure and replacement member). During that period, the board was also
reduced from seven to five members. Staff recorded the trainings HRB members reported via
email. If members have additional trainings to report to before March 28th, staff can update
the CLG report. Staff also includes board member bios on the HRB webpage as well as the
number of properties found eligible and ineligible for the California Register during the review
period.
As noted, timely submission of the CLG annual report is required for grant eligibility, though the
deadline for the 2024-2025 grant cycle had not been published at the time of this report. The
last grant cycle the City applied for was a non-competitive process, where all applicants
received a small grant to support ongoing administration of their historic preservation program.
In 2017, Palo Alto prepared a grant application for developing a Midcentury Context Statement.
At that time, due to the two Eichler tracts being National Register Historic Districts, the City’s
historic program staff focused on completing the Eichler Neighborhood Design Guidelines
(adopted by City Council April 2, 2018). The grant application was not submitted to OHP due to
limited staff resources following the historic planner position vacancy in March 2018, which
remained unfilled for six years, and the shift toward implementing historic preservation policies
in the Comprehensive Plan adopted in late 2017. Potentially, the grant application could be
updated and submitted in response to a future solicitation.
FISCAL/RESOURCE IMPACT
The annual CLG report was prepared by the Historic Preservation Planner as part of the HRB
staff liaison role. The annual anticipated workload of preparing the CLG report is addressed
with existing staff resources.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The CLG annual report preparation involves basic data collection and resource evaluation,
which do not significantly impact the environment. Per California Public Resources Code,
Item 2
Staff Report
Packet Pg. 7
Item No. 2. Page 3 of 3
§21065 the annual report is not a project and therefore not subject to environmental review
under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: DRAFT CLG Annual Report for October 2023 - September 2024
AUTHOR/TITLE:
Steven Switzer, Historic Preservation Planner
Item 2
Staff Report
Packet Pg. 8
Certified Local Government Program -- 2023-2024 Annual Report
(Reporting period is from October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024)
1
Complete Se
Name of CLG
Palo Alto
Report Prepared by: Date of commission/board review:
Steven Switzer February 13, 2025
INSERT MEETING LINK
MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTIFICATION
I. Enforce Appropriate State or Local Legislation for the Designation and Protection of Historic Properties.
A. Preservation Laws
1. Are you considering amending or revising your certified ordinance this year?
REMINDER: Pursuant to the CLG Agreement, the Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) must have the opportunity to
review and comment on ordinance changes prior to adoption. Please communicate directly with the OHP Local
Government Unit staff to coordinate the review. Changes that do not meet the CLG requirements could affect certification
status.
Palo Alto did not change preservation laws during the reporting period. If City Council directs staff and the HRB to revise
the City’s historic preservation ordinance, the OHP will be provided a copy of any such revisions prior to adoption.
INSTRUCTIONS: This a Word form with expanding text fields and check boxes. It will probably open as Read-Only. Save it to your
computer before you begin entering data. This form can be saved and reopened.
Because this is a WORD form, it will behave generally like a regular Word document except that the font, size, and color are set by
the text field.
•Start typing where indicated to provide the requested information.
•Click on the check box to mark either yes or no.
•To enter more than one item in a particular text box, just insert an extra line (Enter) between the items.
Save completed form and email as an attachment to info.calshpo@parks.ca.gov. You can also convert it to a PDF and send as an
email attachment. Use the Acrobat tab in WORD and select Create and Attach to Email. You can then attach the required
documents to that email. If the attachments are too large (greater than10mb total), you will need to send them in a second or third
email.
Item 2
Attachment A: Draft CLG Annual
Report Palo Alto 23-24
Packet Pg. 9
Certified Local Government Program -- 2023-2024 Annual Report
(Reporting period is from October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024)
2
2. Provide an electronic link to your ordinance or appropriate section(s) of the municipal/zoning code.
Follow the link to view Palo Alto Municipal Code (PAMC) Chapter 16.49 Historic Preservation:
https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/paloalto/latest/paloalto_ca/0-0-0-74404
B. New Local Landmark Designations (Comprehensive list of properties/districts designated during the reporting.)
1. During the reporting period, October 1, 2023 – September 30, 2024, what properties/districts have been locally
designated?
A total of 21 properties were newly designated on the Palo Alto Historic Inventory, and 5 existing properties were
upgraded.
Property Name/Address Date Designated If a district, number of
contributors
Date Recorded by County
Recorder
731 Emerson Street:
Category 2 resource, under
Local Criteria 2 and 5
April 22, 2024 N/A Not yet recorded.
243-245 Webster Street:
Category 2 resource, under
Local Criterion 2
April 22, 2024 N/A Not yet recorded.
330 Cowper Street:
Category 2 resource, under
Local Criterion 1
April 22, 2024 N/A Not yet recorded.
541 E Crescent Drive:
Category 2 resource, under
Local Criteria 2, 5, and 6
April 22, 2024 N/A Not yet recorded.
421 California Avenue:
Category 2 resource, under
Local Criteria 2 and 5
April 22, 2024 N/A Not yet recorded.
1401 Edgewood Drive:
Category 2 resource, under
Local Criteria 1, 2, and 5
April 22, 2024 N/A Not yet recorded.
Item 2
Attachment A: Draft CLG Annual
Report Palo Alto 23-24
Packet Pg. 10
Certified Local Government Program -- 2023-2024 Annual Report
(Reporting period is from October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024)
3
1474 Edgewood Drive:
Category 2 resource, under
Local Criteria 2 and 5
April 22, 2024 N/A Not yet recorded.
2340 Tasso Street:
Category 2 resource, under
Local Criteria 2 and 5
April 22, 2024 N/A Not yet recorded.
311 El Carmelo Avenue:
Category 2 resource, under
Local Criterion 2
April 22, 2024 N/A Not yet recorded.
541 Bryant Street:
Category 2 resource, under
Local Criteria 2, 5, and 6
April 22, 2024 N/A Not yet recorded.
437 Kipling Street:
Category 2 resource, under
Local Criteria 1, 2, and 4
April 22, 2024 N/A Not yet recorded.
1275 Dana Avenue:
Category 1 resource, under
Local Criteria 5 and 6
April 22, 2024 N/A Not yet recorded.
832 Kipling Street:
Category 2 resource, under
Local Criterion 2
April 22, 2024 N/A Not yet recorded.
NW of Palo Alto Avenue & Hale
Street (Cistern and Pump
House):
Category 2 resource under
Local Criteria 1 and 2
April 22, 2024 N/A Not yet recorded.
201 Alma Street (Water Tower
site):
Category 1 resource under
Local Criteria 1, 4, and 5
April 22, 2024 N/A Not yet recorded.
2601 East Bayshore Road (The
Federal Telegraph Company –
Marsh Station):
Category 1 resource under
Local Criteria 1, 4, and 5.
April 22, 2024 N/A Not yet recorded.
Item 2
Attachment A: Draft CLG Annual
Report Palo Alto 23-24
Packet Pg. 11
Certified Local Government Program -- 2023-2024 Annual Report
(Reporting period is from October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024)
4
Reminder: Pursuant to California Government Code § 27288.2, “the county recorder shall record a certified resolution establishing
an historical resources designation issued by the State Historical Resources Commission or a local agency, or unit thereof.”
211 Quarry Road:
Category 1 resource, under
Local Criteria 1, 2, and 5
August 19, 2024 N/A Not yet recorded.
825 Kipling Street:
Category 2 resource, under
Local Criteria 2 and 6
August 19, 2024 N/A Not yet recorded.
1215 Emerson Street:
Category 2 resource, under
Local Criterion 1
August 19, 2024 N/A Not yet recorded.
904 Bryant Street:
Category 2 resource, under
Local Criteria 2 and 3
August 19, 2024 N/A Not yet recorded.
751 Channing Avenue:
Category 2 resource, under
Local Criterion 2
August 19, 2024 N/A Not yet recorded.
261 Hamilton Avenue:
Upgraded from Category 3 to
Category 1 resource, under
Local Criteria 1, 2, 5, and 6.
April 22, 2024 Contributor to the Ramona Street
Architectural District
Not yet recorded.
271 University Avenue:
Upgraded from Category 3 to
Category 2 resource, under
Local Criteria 2, 5, and 6.
February 7, 2024 N/A Not yet recorded.
411 Kipling Street:
Upgraded from Category 4 to
Category 2 resource, under
Local Criteria 2, 5, and 6.
February 6, 2024 N/A Not yet recorded.
431 Kipling Street:
Upgraded from Category 4 to
Category 2 resource, under
Local Criteria 2, 5, and 6.
September 9, 2024 N/A Not yet recorded.
Item 2
Attachment A: Draft CLG Annual
Report Palo Alto 23-24
Packet Pg. 12
Certified Local Government Program -- 2023-2024 Annual Report
(Reporting period is from October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024)
5
2. What properties/districts have been de-designated this past year? For districts, include the total number of resource
contributors.
No properties or districts were de-designated during the review period.
Property Name/Address Date Removed Reason
NONE N/A N/A
C. Historic Preservation Element/Plan
1. Do you address historic preservation in your general plan?☐ No
☐ Yes, in a separate historic preservation element. ☒ Yes, it is included in another element.
Provide an electronic link to the historic preservation section(s) of the General Plan or to the separate historic preservation
element.
https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/planning-amp-development-services/file-migration/historic/long-range-
planning/resources/2030-comp-plan-2-land-use-june-21.pdf
D. Review Responsibilities
1. Who takes responsibility for design review or Certificates of Appropriateness?
☐ All projects subject to design review go the commission.
☒ Some projects are reviewed at the staff level without commission review.
What is the threshold between staff-only review and full-commission review?
Minor alterations versus major alterations. Per Palo Alto Municipal Code (PAMC) 16.49.050 (a)(1) item (B), the HRB
reviews single-family and duplex residences which are historic structures/sites in the Downtown area or which are
significant buildings elsewhere in the city and “Compliance of the property owner with the recommendations shall be
voluntary, not mandatory.” Per item (C) the planning staff may review and approve minor exterior alterations pursuant
to guidelines which the HRB may adopt. Minor exterior alterations are those alterations which the director of planning
and development services or his/her designee determines will not adversely affect the exterior architectural
characteristics nor the historical or aesthetic value of the historic structure, its site or surroundings.” Staff is assisted in
Item 2
Attachment A: Draft CLG Annual
Report Palo Alto 23-24
Packet Pg. 13
Certified Local Government Program -- 2023-2024 Annual Report
(Reporting period is from October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024)
6
all reviews of projects set forth in PAMC 16.49.050 item (a) by professional historic preservation consulting firms to
perform Secretary of Interior’s Standards reviews (building permits and discretionary reviews). The HRB reviews
projects in Professorville and Ramona districts and supports the Architectural Review Board in reviewing projects in
the Downtown and Significant properties (local inventory Categories 1 and 2) that are not single-family homes or
duplexes where they exist outside the Downtown.
2. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
•Explain the historic preservation staff and commission role in providing input to CEQA documents prepared for or by
the local government.
The Historic Preservation Planner and planning staff are involved in scoping and reviewing administrative draft CEQA
documents involving historical resources, and related technical reports including Historic Resource Evaluations (HRE)
and Secretary of the Interior’s Standards (SIS) reports. Generally, the Historic Resources Board (HRB) is not involved
in the development of draft environmental documents. However, staff seeks historic preservation consultant
assistance for CEQA documents for major Architectural Review projects that include properties listed on the local
historic inventory or determined California Register Eligible.
•Explain the staff and commission role in reviewing CEQA documents for projects that are proposed within the
jurisdiction of the local government.
Draft CEQA documents are made available for public review, including by HRB members. In addition, staff and/or
other City bodies may refer draft CEQA documents and/or related technical reports to the HRB for review and
comment. The HRB’s role is advisory. In some cases, staff conducts a hearing at the HRB for public review of
Environmental Impact Reports for properties containing listed historic resources.
3. Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act
•Explain the staff and commission role in providing input to Section 106 documents prepared for, or by, the local
government.
The Historic Preservation Planner, with consultant assistance, and/or HRB provide input to Section 106 documents as
requested.
Item 2
Attachment A: Draft CLG Annual
Report Palo Alto 23-24
Packet Pg. 14
Certified Local Government Program -- 2023-2024 Annual Report
(Reporting period is from October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024)
7
•Explain the staff and commission role in reviewing Section 106 documents for projects that are proposed within the
jurisdiction of the local government?
The Historic Preservation Planner, with consultant assistance, and/or HRB review Section 106 documents as
requested.
II. Establish an Adequate and Qualified Historic Preservation Review Commission by State or Local Legislation.
A. Commission Membership
Attach resumes and Statement of Professional Qualifications forms for all members.
1. If you do not have two qualified professionals on your commission, explain why the professional qualifications have not been
met and how professional expertise is otherwise being provided.
N/A
Name Professional Discipline Date Appointed Date Term Ends Email Address
Margaret Wimmer Architecture and Design 12/15/2017 3/31/2024 HRB@cityofpaloalto.org
Michael Makinen Engineering/Historian 12/15/2017 3/31/2024 HRB@cityofpaloalto.org
Gogo Heinrich Architecture 3/1/21 3/31/2024 HRB@cityofpaloalto.org
Alisa Eagleston-
Cieslewicz Museum Director 12/13/21; 4/10/23 3/31/2026 HRB@cityofpaloalto.org
Christian Pease Architecture/Analytics 12/15/17; 4/10/23 3/31/2026 HRB@cityofpaloalto.org
Samantha Rohman Master of Arts in Public
History 4/13/2023 3/31/2026 HRB@cityofpaloalto.org
Caroline Willis Architecture 3/1/21; 8/12/24 3/31/2027 HRB@cityofpaloalto.org
Geddes Ulinskas Architecture 8/12/2024 3/31/2027 HRB@cityofpaloalto.org
Item 2
Attachment A: Draft CLG Annual
Report Palo Alto 23-24
Packet Pg. 15
Certified Local Government Program -- 2023-2024 Annual Report
(Reporting period is from October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024)
8
2. If all positions are not currently filled, why is there a vacancy, and when will the position be filled?
All positions are currently filled. The next recruitment will occur in 2026 for three positions, or should a member leave the
board their vacancy would be filled for a partial term.
The City Clerk’s office frequently needed multiple recruitments for HRB positions. To address this, staff prepared an
Ordinance to modify PAMC Chapter 2.27 -Historic Resources Board to meet Certified Local Government (CLG) requirements.
The Ordinance, presented to the HRB on May 9, 2024, was approved by the City Council on May 13 (first reading) and June
3 (second reading). Key amendments reduced HRB board members from seven to five, professionals from three to two, and
adjusted meeting requirements to once per month with a quorum of three. The ordinance also ensured no fewer than four
HRB meetings per year. Geddes Ulinskas was appointed but did not serve during the reporting period due to the September
meeting cancellation.
B. Staff to the Commission/CLG staff
1. Is the staff to your commission the same as your CLG coordinator? ☒ Yes ☐ No
2. If not, please provide the Commission staff member’s contact information.
3. If the position(s) is not currently filled, why is there a vacancy? N/A
Attach resumes and Statement of Professional Qualifications forms for staff.
Name/Title Discipline Dept. Affiliation Email Address
Amy French, Chief Planning
Official (Retired Oct. 2024)
Planning Planning and Development
Services
Amy.French@cityofpaloalto.org
Steven Switzer, Historic
Preservation Planner
Planning Planning and Development
Services
Steven.Switzer@cityofpaloalto.org
Item 2
Attachment A: Draft CLG Annual
Report Palo Alto 23-24
Packet Pg. 16
Certified Local Government Program -- 2023-2024 Annual Report
(Reporting period is from October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024)
9
C. Attendance Record
Please complete the commission meeting attendance chart for each commissioner and staff member. Commissions are
required to meet a minimum of four times a year. If you haven’t met at least four times, explain why not.
D. Training Received
Please indicate the specific training each commissioner received last year.
Reminder: It is a CLG requirement that all commissioners and staff to the commission attend at least one training program
relevant to your commission each year. It is up to the CLG to determine the relevancy of the training.
Commissioner/Staff Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep
Amy French ☒☐☒☒☒☒☒☒☒☒☒☐
Steven Switzer ☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☒☒☒☒☐
Margaret Wimmer ☒☒☐☒☒☒☐☒☐☐☒☐
Michael Makinen ☒☒☒☒☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐
Gogo Heinrich ☒☐☒☒☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐
Alisa Eagleston-Cieslewicz ☒☒☐☒☒☐☒☒☒☒☒☐
Christian Pease ☒☒☐☒☒☒☒☐☒☒☒☐
Samantha Rohman ☐☒☒☒☒☒☒☒☒☒☒☐
Caroline Willis ☒☒☒☒☒☒☒☒☒☒☒☐
Geddes Ulinskas
(Appointed but did not serve
during reporting period)
☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐☐
Item 2
Attachment A: Draft CLG Annual
Report Palo Alto 23-24
Packet Pg. 17
Certified Local Government Program -- 2023-2024 Annual Report
(Reporting period is from October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024)
10
Commissioner/Staff
Name
Training Title & Description (including
method presentation, e.g., webinar,
workshop)
Duration of
Training
Training Provider Date
Gogo Heinrich
(No longer on board,
seat removed)
N/A N/A N/A N/A
Michael Makinen
(No longer on board,
seat removed)
A Refreshed Look at the Secretary of the
Interior Standards
3 Hours California Preservation
Foundation
February 29,
2024
Margaret Wimmer
(Term ended March
2024, but served until
successor appointed
in August 2024)
Enduring Places ICAA National
Conference
8 Hours
(1 Full Day)
Institute of Classical
Architecture and Art
November 3-5,
2023
Christian Pease A Refreshed Look at the Secretary of the
Interior Standards
NAPC Virtual Summer Short Course
(Recorded Sessions)
3 Hours
2 Days
California Preservation
Foundation
National Alliance of
Preservation Commissions
February 29,
2024
August 19, 2024
Caroline Willis A Refreshed Look at the Secretary of the
Interior Standards
Secretary of the Interior Standards
Bootcamp
NAPC Virtual Summer Short Course
(Recorded Sessions)
3 Hours
6 Hours
2 Days
California Preservation
Foundation
California Preservation
Foundation
National Alliance of
Preservation Commissions
February 29,
2024
July – September
2023
August 19, 2024
Alisa
Eagleston‐Cieslewicz
San Francisco Fire Department Museum
Tour (Preservation and Adaptive reuse
of building)
Problem Solving via Technology--
Audio Tours and More!
The Parent Trap--Challenges and
2 Hours
1 Hour
1 Hour
Bay Area Art Conservation
Guild
California Association of
Museums (CAM) conference
November 4,
2023
March 12, 2024
March 13, 2024
Item 2
Attachment A: Draft CLG Annual
Report Palo Alto 23-24
Packet Pg. 18
Certified Local Government Program -- 2023-2024 Annual Report
(Reporting period is from October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024)
11
Commissioner/Staff
Name
Training Title & Description (including
method presentation, e.g., webinar,
workshop)
Duration of
Training
Training Provider Date
Opportunities for Museums with
Parent Organizations
CAM annual conference
Samantha Rohman Architect Plan Books and The Small
House Movement: Preserving Small
Houses of the 1920s
NAPC Virtual Summer Short Course
(Recorded Sessions)
1.5 Hours
2 Days
California Preservation
Foundation
National Alliance of
Preservation Commissions
July 25, 2024
August 19, 2024
Geddes Ulinskas
(Appointed but did not
serve during reporting
period)
N/A N/A N/A N/A
Amy French Housing and Historic Preservation: A
Joint Webinar with NAPC and ACHP
NAPC Virtual Summer Short Course
(Recorded Sessions)
1 Hour
2 Days
National Alliance of
Preservation Commissions
National Alliance of
Preservation Commissions
May 23, 2024
August 19, 2024
Steven Switzer Housing and Historic Preservation: A
Joint Webinar with NAPC and ACHP
Architect Plan Books and The Small
House Movement: Preserving Small
Houses of the 1920s
Emerging Professional Mentorship
Series – Architect, Public Historian and
Cultural Resources Manager
NAPC Virtual Summer Short Course
(Recorded Sessions)
1 Hour
1.5 Hours
1 Hour
2 Days
National Alliance of
Preservation Commissions
California Preservation
Foundation
California Preservation
Foundation
National Alliance of
Preservation Commissions
May 23, 2024
July 25, 2024
August 6, 2024
August 19, 2024
Item 2
Attachment A: Draft CLG Annual
Report Palo Alto 23-24
Packet Pg. 19
Certified Local Government Program -- 2023-2024 Annual Report
(Reporting period is from October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024)
12
III. Maintain a System for the Survey and Inventory of Properties that Furthers the Purposes of the National Historic
Preservation Act
A. Historical Contexts: initiated, researched, or developed in the reporting year (excluding those funded by the OHP)
Reminder: California CLG procedures require CLGs to submit survey results, including historic contexts, to the OHP. If you have
not done so, submit an electronic copy or link if available online with this report. N/A
Context Name Description How it is Being Used Date Submitted to
the OHP
NONE N/A N/A N/A
B. New Surveys or Survey Updates (excluding those funded by the OHP)
Note: The evaluation of a single property is not a survey. Also, material changes to a property that is included in a survey, is not
a change to the survey and should not be reported here.
Explain how you are using the survey data: This survey data has been utilized to update our local historic inventory.
Survey Area Context
Based-
yes/no
Level:
Reconnaissance
or Intensive
Acreage # of
Properties
Surveyed
Date
Completed
Date
Submitted to
the OHP
Citywide (2023 Historic
Reconnaissance Survey
CRHR eligible properties
studied between October
2022 and September 2023
No Reconnaissance N/A
(Citywide)
167 properties August 19,
2024
CRHR Eligible
property DPR
forms
submitted with
this CLG
Report.
Item 2
Attachment A: Draft CLG Annual
Report Palo Alto 23-24
Packet Pg. 20
Certified Local Government Program -- 2023-2024 Annual Report
(Reporting period is from October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024)
13
IV. Provide for Adequate Public Participation in the Local Historic Preservation Program
A. Public Education
Has your CLG undertaken any public outreach, training, or publications programs this year? How were the commissioners
and staff involved? Please provide an electronic link to all publications or other products not previously provided to the OHP.
Item or Event Description Date
Second Community Meeting for the 2023
Historic Reconnaissance Survey
Shared information and updates about the 2023 Historic
Resources Reconnaissance Survey and received feedback on
the nomination of properties to the Palo Alto Historic Inventory.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ZUMqEQPy98
October 24, 2023
Community Meeting for Historic
Preservation Ordinance and Incentives
Discussed the existing Zoning Code benefits for properties listed
on the Palo Alto Historic Inventory and heard from members of
the public regarding incentives for historic preservation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A96LvgqZNx4
February 23, 2024
Historic Preservation Review Bulletin historic-resources-review-info-bulletin-sep.-2024.pdf
The document was updated for improved clarity with a table
format and revised hyperlinks to reflect updated webpages.
July 2024
Website updates to the following pages:
Historic Preservation Incentives, 2023
Reconnaissance Survey, and Historic
Inventory.
https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/Planning-
Development-Services/Historic-Preservation
https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/Planning-
Development-Services/Historic-Preservation/2023-
Reconnaissance-Survey
Updates occurred
throughout the
reporting period.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE ANNUAL PRODUCTS REPORTS FOR CLGS
During the reporting period (October 1, 2023 – September 30, 2024) how many historic properties did your local government
add to the CLG inventory? This is the total number of historic properties and contributors to districts (or your best estimate of
the number) added to your inventory from all programs, local, state, and Federal, during the reporting year. This includes
Item 2
Attachment A: Draft CLG Annual
Report Palo Alto 23-24
Packet Pg. 21
Certified Local Government Program -- 2023-2024 Annual Report
(Reporting period is from October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024)
14
the National Register, California Register, California Historical Landmarks, locally funded surveys, CLG surveys, and local
designations.
Program area Number of Properties added
Palo Alto Historic Inventory 21 Properties
(Individual addresses are listed in the New
Local Landmark Designations Section of this
report.)
A. Local Register (i.e., Local Landmarks and Historic Districts) Program
1. During the reporting period (October 1, 2023 – September 30, 2024) did you have a local register program to create
local landmarks and/or local districts (or a similar list of designations) created by local law?☒Yes ☐ No
2. If yes, how many properties have been added to your register or designated during the reporting period?
As mentioned in the New Local Landmark Designations section of this report, 21 properties were added to the Palo
Alto Local Historic Inventory as a result of the 2023 Reconnaissance Survey. The Historic Resources Board
considered the nominated properties at their November 9, 2023, December 14, 2023, and January 11, 2024,
meetings. City Council approved 16 properties at the April 22, 2024, meeting and an additional 5 properties at the
August 19, 2024, meeting.
C. Local Property Tax Incentive Program
1. During the reporting period (October 1, 2023 – September 30, 2024) did you have a Mills Act program? ☐ Yes ☒
No
2. If yes, how many properties entered into a contract during the reporting period?
Name of Program Number of Properties Added During
2023-2024
Total Number of Properties Benefiting
From Program
No City Mills Act
Program, but Mills
Act Property exists
0 1 (900 University Avenue, the Squire
House)
Item 2
Attachment A: Draft CLG Annual
Report Palo Alto 23-24
Packet Pg. 22
Certified Local Government Program -- 2023-2024 Annual Report
(Reporting period is from October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024)
15
D. Local “bricks and mortar” grants/loan program
1. During the reporting period (October 1, 2023 – September 30, 2024) did you have a local government historic
preservation grant and/or loan program for rehabilitating/restoring historic properties? ☒Yes ☐No
2. If yes, how many properties have been assisted under the program(s) during the reporting period?
Name of Program Number of Properties that have Benefited
2023 Historic Reconnaissance Survey 167 Properties in survey efforts. OHP grant
used to offset consultant costs.
E. Design Review/Local Regulatory Program
1. During the reporting period (October 1, 2023 – September 30, 2024) did your local government have a historic
preservation regulatory law(s) (e.g., an ordinance) authorizing Commission and/or staff review of local government
projects or impacts on historic properties? ☐ Yes ☒ No
2. If yes, how many historic properties did your local government review for compliance with your local government’s
historic preservation regulatory law(s) during the reporting period?
N/A
F. Local Property Acquisition Program
1. During the reporting period (October 1, 2023 – September 30, 2024) did you have a local program to acquire (or help
to acquire) historic properties in whole or in part through purchase, donation, or other means? ☐Yes ☒ No
2. If the answer is yes, then how many properties have been assisted under the program(s) during the reporting period?
Name of Program Number of Properties that have Benefited
NONE N/A
Item 2
Attachment A: Draft CLG Annual
Report Palo Alto 23-24
Packet Pg. 23
Certified Local Government Program -- 2023-2024 Annual Report
(Reporting period is from October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024)
16
IN ADDITION TO THE MINIMUM CLG REQUIREMENT THE OHP IS INTERESTED IN YOUR TRAINING NEEDS
In years past, the OHP sponsored a series of free CAMP trainings from the National Alliance of Preservation Commissions (NAPC).
Would you be interested in attending future CAMP trainings funded by the OHP?
Yes. There is interest in attending future CAMP trainings funded by the OHP by both staff and commissioners.
The OHP has also hosted training workshops and webinars of our own, and we plan to do so again in the coming year and beyond.
What are some topics you would like to see covered in these trainings?
•Historic designations and their relation to real estate markets.
With our most recent survey update there was a lot of public comments surrounding property valuations changing due to a
property being designated on the historic inventory. It would be helpful to have some language/trainings on this topic.
XII Attachments (electronic)
☒ Resumes and Statement of Qualifications forms for all commission members/alternatives and staff
•https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Historic-Resources-Board-HRB/Alisa-
Eagleston-Cieslewicz
•https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Historic-Resources-Board-
HRB/Samantha-Rohman
•https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Historic-Resources-Board-HRB/Caroline-
Willis
•https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Historic-Resources-Board-HRB/Christian-
Pease
•https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Historic-Resources-Board-HRB/Geddes-
Ulinskas
☒ Minutes from commission meetings
October 12, 2023:
https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Public/CompiledDocument?meetingTemplateId=12872&compileOutputType=1
Item 2
Attachment A: Draft CLG Annual
Report Palo Alto 23-24
Packet Pg. 24
Certified Local Government Program -- 2023-2024 Annual Report
(Reporting period is from October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024)
17
October 24, 2023:
Second Community Meeting for the 2023 Reconnaissance Survey https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ZUMqEQPy98
November 9, 2023:
https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Public/CompiledDocument?meetingTemplateId=12886&compileOutputType=1
December 14, 2023:
https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Public/CompiledDocument?meetingTemplateId=12900&compileOutputType=1
January 11, 2024:
https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Public/CompiledDocument?meetingTemplateId=13714&compileOutputType=1
January 25, 2024:
https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Public/CompiledDocument?meetingTemplateId=13721&compileOutputType=1
February 23, 2024:
Community Meeting for Historic Preservation Ordinance and Incentives https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A96LvgqZNx4
March 28, 2024:
https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Public/CompiledDocument?meetingTemplateId=13980&compileOutputType=1
April 11, 2024:
https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Public/CompiledDocument?meetingTemplateId=15021&compileOutputType=1
May 9, 2024:
https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Public/CompiledDocument?meetingTemplateId=13994&compileOutputType=1
June 13, 2024:
https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Public/CompiledDocument?meetingTemplateId=14015&compileOutputType=1
July 11, 2024:
https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Public/CompiledDocument?meetingTemplateId=14022&compileOutputType=1
Item 2
Attachment A: Draft CLG Annual
Report Palo Alto 23-24
Packet Pg. 25
Certified Local Government Program -- 2023-2024 Annual Report
(Reporting period is from October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024)
18
August 8, 2024:
https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Public/CompiledDocument?meetingTemplateId=14036&compileOutputType=1
☐ Drafts of proposed changes to the ordinance
☐ Drafts of proposed changes to the General Plan
☒ Public outreach publications
Historic Inventory Nomination Notice Letter - November 9, 2023
https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/v/1/planning-amp-development-services/historic-preservation/nomination-
notification-letter_11.9.2023.pdf
Historic Inventory Nomination Notice Letter - December 14, 2023
https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/5e73607e-5ab9-44da-aa65-89f1a2a986cb/Nomination-Notification-Letter_12.14.2023.pdf
Historic Inventory Nomination Notice Letter - January 11, 2024
https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/v/1/planning-amp-development-services/historic-preservation/2023-
reconnissance-survey_notification-letter_01-11-2024.pdf
Historic Resources and Permit Review Requirements Bulletin (Reviewed by HRB August 8, 2024):
https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Portal/Meeting?meetingTemplateId=14031
See Attachment D.
Email to: info.calshpo@parks.ca.gov
Item 2
Attachment A: Draft CLG Annual
Report Palo Alto 23-24
Packet Pg. 26
Item No. 3. Page 1 of 5
Historic Resources Board
Staff Report
From: Planning and Development Services Director
Lead Department: Planning and Development Services
Meeting Date: February 13, 2025
Report #: 2501-4057
TITLE
Study Session to Discuss the HRB Awards and HRB Workplan Implementation
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Historic Resources Board (HRB) discuss the following potential
topics. The following order is only suggested and may be modified.
1. HRB Awards Program
2. HRB 24-25 Workplan Goal/Project Tracking
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The study session will focus on the HRB Awards Program and the implementation of the HRB
24-25 Workplan. Staff recommends discussing the HRB Awards first, followed by a review of the
workplan goals and project tracking. In the Discussion section below, each goal is listed,
followed by a summary of efforts and recommendations for implementation.
BACKGROUND
On August 8, 2024, the HRB added Goal #5 to the HRB Workplan1 to establish a historic award
program. On October 21, 2024, City Council Approved the HRB 24/25 Workplan.
On November 14, 2024, the HRB discussed establishment of a Historical Preservation Award
Program. It was agreed that launching and executing the program in 2025 would not allow
sufficient time for preparation. The awards will be named the 2025 Historical Preservation
Awards and will include consideration of all projects completed by the end of 2025, with
selection and presentation in 2026.
An ad hoc committee, led by Boardmember Willis and Vice Chair Rohman, was formed to
coordinate with Palo Alto Stanford Heritage (PAST) and explore potential collaborations. The
committee will report back to the board with their findings.
1 The HRB 2024-2025 Workplan is available at: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/v/2/agendas-
minutes-reports/agendas-minutes/historic-resources-board/council-approved-hrb-work-plan-fy-24-25.pdf
Item 3
Staff Report
Packet Pg. 27
Item No. 3. Page 2 of 5
Following the preparation of this report, staff and HRB members are scheduled to attend an
introductory meeting with local historical organizations, including PAST, the Museum of
American Heritage (MOAH), the Palo Alto Historical Association (PAHA), the Stanford Historical
Society, and the Palo Alto Museum. A summary of that meeting will be included in the staff
presentation of this report.
DISCUSSION
HRB Historic Preservation Awards
Implementation of an award program will fulfill Comprehensive Plan Policy L-7.6 and recognize
efforts to preserve Palo Alto's culturally, historically, and architecturally significant sites,
contributing to a vibrant and sustainable community that reflects the City’s diverse history.
Discussion of these awards should include the following:
A.Public Participation
The HRB should discuss and provide feedback on how the public can participate in the
process.
B.Frequency of Awards
At the November 14, 2024, meeting there was a consensus on establishing a five-year
cycle for the Historic Preservation Awards, with selection and awarding of the 2025
Historic Preservation Awards in 2026. The awards would also be staggered so not to
conflict with the Architecture Review Board (ARB) Design Awards, that occur a year
earlier and also operate on a five-year cycle.
C.Award Selection Criteria
At the November 14, 2024, meeting there was a consensus on only considering projects
that the HRB has reviewed and that have been completed. The actual award criteria
would remain flexible and be decided by the HRB for each cycle. The HRB should provide
direction on what timeframe the first award program should include. Staff suggests
utilizing a 10-year timeframe for the first award program then transition to projects
completed since the end of the previous five-year cycle.
D.Timing of Awards
In 1973, Senator Henry M. Jackson introduced a resolution designating May 6-12 as
National Preservation Week, that was later signed into law by President Nixon. In 2005,
the National Trust for Historic Preservation expanded the celebration to the entire
month of May. Staff suggest that the HRB consider holding the Historic Preservation
Awards in May and requesting that Council issue a proclamation for the awarded
projects, with displays of the winners in the City Hall lobby.
E.Adding Award Section to HRB By-Laws
The HRB should consider adding an article to its By-Laws to outline the award program’s
rules and regulations. Said article would ideally capture the intent, implementation,
Item 3
Staff Report
Packet Pg. 28
Item No. 3. Page 3 of 5
selection criteria, and frequency. See Attachment B for language regarding the ARB
Design Awards. Staff will prepare draft language for the amendment to the HRB By-laws
to be reviewed and approved by the HRB at a subsequent meeting.
Workplan Preparation
Each spring, City staff is tasked with preparing a workplan for the City’s historic preservation
program including the HRB’s efforts. The workplan includes a look back from the prior fiscal
year (July 1 to June 30) and sets the goals for the coming fiscal year.
Workplan Implementation
The “Prior Year Accomplishments” section of the workplan details the HRB’s progress on its
goals from the prior fiscal year. Accomplishments are also summarized and included in the
Certified Local Government annual report. These efforts are only highlighted at the end of the
workplan cycle. Though each goal is divided into high, low, and Council Directed priorities with
estimated timelines, there are few status updates and opportunities with the HRB to track
progress on the workplan’s implementation. The following workplan goals are detailed below
with status updates:
▪GOAL 1: Limited modification to PAMC 16.49, historic preservation, providing
clarifications regarding the HRB’s role. The HRB could discuss language providing
clarifications of its role with respect to three potential topics: (a) the nomination process,
(b) the effect of HRB recommendations regarding exterior modifications to residential
historic resources, and (c) category changes (upgrades, downgrades, removals).
The current website does include language addressing these points. As mentioned in the
suggested timeline section, this is subject to Council direction. In 2025 Council is expected to
direct staff to begin the process of a comprehensive update to the Palo Alto Municipal Code
(PAMC). At that time, staff will recommend that changes to Chapter 16.49 be included.
▪GOAL 2: Education and Creating New User-Friendly Resources/Communication
Regarding Historic Preservation. (a) find new ways to promote preservation, including
use of the existing zoning code incentives and State historic building code (b) improve
upon communication types to provide the community accessible information, including
the use of videos (linked to the City’s and State’s webpages) to help property owners
understand the local and State preservation incentives and codes, (c) continue to provide
updates to the historic review process bulletin as needed to communicate CEQA
requirements related to PAMC 16.49 and listed historic resources, and (d) enable the
HRB staff liaison(s), the City’s historic preservation consultant, and Chief Building Official
to implement training providing an ongoing opportunity for HRB members, staff, and the
community to gain working knowledge as to the use of the State’s historic building code.
Staff has updated the Historic Resources Review Bulletin earlier in this workplan cycle, fulfilling
goal item (c). Additionally, staff revised the historic preservation incentives webpage, removing
outdated code references to partially satisfy goal item (a). Staff will continue to coordinate with
the HRB to create new user-friendly resources.
Item 3
Staff Report
Packet Pg. 29
Item No. 3. Page 4 of 5
▪GOAL 3: Conduct a survey of the local inventory resources listed prior to the 2023
Historic Reconnaissance Survey, to determine historic conditions. If Council directs a
survey update, that work would require resources and may extend into the next year
workplan.
As mentioned in the suggested timeline section, this goal is subject to Council direction. Given
other Council priorities, no further survey update has been initiated. However, there are
opportunities to update the City’s Historic Preservation Inventory document. Minor efforts
could potentially proceed without specific Council direction when existing staff capacity is
available, for example, removing structures that have been demolished, and adding the 21
properties from the 2023 survey effort.
▪GOAL 4: Additional preservation incentives (a) discuss and recommend additional zoning
code incentives to continue the community engagement process that began with the
2023 reconnaissance survey/ inventory update; (b) represent the HRB’s interests during
public hearings, or participate in joint meetings with the Planning and Transportation
Commission and City Council, to review any proposed zoning code modifications
incentivizing historic preservation incentives; (c) outreach to the community after
adoption of any adopted new incentives.
As mentioned in the suggested timeline section, goal item (a) was projected to begin during
plan quarter 2 (September 2024 – November 2024) and are expected to be considered within
the future comprehensive Zoning Code update effort. The remaining potions of this goal (b-c)
are subject to Council direction. In the previous workplan cycle, the HRB held a community
meeting on preservation incentives on February 23, 2024.2
▪GOAL 5: Establish a Historical Preservation Award Program. (a) discuss and determine
the selection criteria for eligible projects and/or properties; (b) discuss and determine
frequency of awards (e.g., annual, bi-annual, 5-year cycle, etc.); (c) select projects and/or
properties to award; (d) conduct an award ceremony and present historic preservation
awards.
The HRB is continuing to develop the Historical Preservation Award Program, as discussed
above, with prior discussions on August 8, 2024,3 and November 14, 2024.4
NEXT STEPS
Following this discussion on workplan implementation and the Historical Preservation Award
program, staff will:
•Prepare a draft 2025-2026 HRB Workplan for board review at a future meeting; and
2 February 23, 2024, HRB Meeting, Agenda Item 1:
https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Portal/Meeting?meetingTemplateId=14834
3 August 8, 2024, HRB Meeting, Agenda Item 2:
https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Portal/Meeting?meetingTemplateId=14031
4 November 14, 2024, HRB Meeting, Agenda Item 3:
https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Portal/Meeting?meetingTemplateId=14073
Item 3
Staff Report
Packet Pg. 30
Item No. 3. Page 5 of 5
•Amend the HRB By-Laws to incorporate rules and regulations for the HRB Awards for
board review at a future meeting.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: HRB 24/25 Workplan
Attachment B: Article VIII of the ARB By-Laws
AUTHOR/TITLE:
Steven Switzer, Historic Preservation Planner
Item 3
Staff Report
Packet Pg. 31
Prior Year Accomplishments
During the work plan period the HRB held 14 public meetings, met the objectives in the 'ongoing' goals 1 and 2 of the plan, completed goal 3 of the
plan (providing recommendations on nominations of properties previously found eligible for the National and State historic registers to the City's local
historic inventory, unless property owners submitted objections to listing; known as the 2023 Historic Reconnaissance Survey), and many objectives
set forth in goal 4 of the plan. The staff continued to implement policy L7.2 as an ongoing activity, and conducted three evening community meetings
over the plan's term, to further encourage community participation.
Historic Resources Board
Staff Liaison: Steven Switzer, Historic Preservation Planner
Lead Department: Planning and Development Services
About the Commission
The HRB is now five members, effective July 4, 2024. Four candidates are set for August 2024 interviews, for two positions. The City is a Certified
Local Government (CLG) responsible for historic preservation - to identify, evaluate, register, and preserve historic properties within its jurisdictions
and promote the integration of local preservation interests and concerns into local planning and decision-making processes. Staff prepares an annual
report of the activities of the Certified Local Government each spring for the prior year and submits these to the State Office of Historic Preservation.
This HRB Work Plan covers July 2024 - July 2025. HRB member terms are for 3 years and are staggered per PAMC Section 2.27.020. For more
information please visit https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/City-Hall/Boards-Commissions/Historic-Resources-Board. The Department webpages are a
wealth of information, go to: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Historic-Preservation
2024-2025 Workplan
Mission Statement
Per Palo Alto Municipal Code Chapter 2.27 Historic Resources Board, Section 2.27.040 Duties, HRB purview is:
(a) Render advice and guidance to a property owner upon the owner's application for alteration of any historic single-family or duplex building in the downtown area and any such building
designated as significant elsewhere in the city
(b) Inform the ARB of the historical and/or architectural significance of historic commercial and multiple-family structures in the downtown area and any such buildings designated as
significant elsewhere in the City that are under review by the ARB. Submit recommendations to the ARB regarding proposed exterior alterations of such historic structures
(c) Recommend to the Council the designation of additional buildings and districts as historic. Research available information and add historical information to the inventory sheets of
historic structures/sites. This inventory is maintained in the department of planning and development services.
(d) Perform such other functions as may be delegated from time to time to the HRB by the City Council.
Current Commissioners Alisa Eagleston-Cieslewicz (chair), Samantha Rohman (vice chair), Christian Pease, and Caroline Willis, Margaret Wimmer or Mike Makinen (until
two successors are appointed)
Item 3
Attachment A: HRB 24/25 Workplan
Packet Pg. 32
TIMELINE RESOURCES NEEDED MEASURE OF SUCCESS STATE MANDATED / LOCAL
LAW / COUNCIL-APPROVED
Subject to Council direction, to begin in the
second quarter
City Council direction and accommodation
in the PDS department workplan would be
needed. HRB subcommittee and staff of
planning and city attorney departments to
prepare draft amendments for Council
review and adoption
Well-written ordinance language that
assists the public's understanding and
calms the fears of property owners
about governmental overreach
Council may provide
direction to modify
PAMC 16.49; CLG
cities maintain historic
preservation
ordinances.
COUNCIL-DIRECTED
POLICY UPDATE
Council may provide
direction to modify
PAMC 16.49; CLG
cities maintain historic
preservation
ordinances
Historic Resources Board
PROJECT/GOAL 1:
BENEFICIAL IMPACTS
Limited modification to PAMC 16.49, historic preservation, providing clarifications regarding the HRB’s role. The HRB could discuss language
providing clarifications of its role with respect to three potential topics: (a) the nomination process, (b) the effect of HRB recommendations regarding
exterior modifications to residential historic resources, and (c) category changes (upgrades, downgrades, removals)
Staff Liaison: Steven Switzer, Historic Preservation Planner
Lead Department: Planning and Development Services
PURPOSE STATEMENT:
The Board/Commission's goals and purposes (purview) are set in Palo Alto Municipal Code Chapter 2.27 Historic Resources Board, Section 2.27.040
Duties. These duties include reviewing alterations to historic resources and providing recommendations on nominations to the local historic resources
inventory. The City's historic program includes the implementation of Comprehensive Plan policies on an ongoing basis including Policy L7.2 (preparation
of historic evaluations to determine eligibility for the California Register of Historical Resources and associated tracking), Policy L7.1.1 (recommend
eligible resources to the local inventory), and Policy L7.1.2: Reassess Historic Preservation Ordinance.
HIGH PRIORITY
Priority is high to enable greater understanding of the HRB's role and address property
owners' concerns with respect to Goal items (a) and (b)
LOWER PRIORITY
Lower priority: Goal item (c) - listed historic resources placed on the City's
inventory in the late 1970s and 1980s have not been reviewed to determine whether
any modifications reduce critical aspects of integrity and drop or lower the properties'
local historic resource category.
2024-2025 Workplan
The benefits are providing clarification of the
HRB's role for the public
Item 3
Attachment A: HRB 24/25 Workplan
Packet Pg. 33
TIMELINE RESOURCES NEEDED MEASURE OF SUCCESS STATE MANDATED / LOCAL
LAW / COUNCIL-APPROVED
Goal 2 to begin during plan quarter 1 and
continue through quarter 2 (October -
December)
Staff of PDS would be tasked as well as an
HRB ad hoc committee to make progress.
Website contains links to information
resources and videos, to assist property
owners, staff, and others.
N/A
COUNCIL-DIRECTED
POLICY UPDATE
N/A
TIMELINE RESOURCES NEEDED MEASURE OF SUCCESS STATE MANDATED / LOCAL
LAW / COUNCIL-APPROVED
Subject to Council direction/ resource
allocation and to begin in fourth quarter
Budget for and assistance from qualified
consultant to assess conditions of
inventory properties listed prior to April 22,
2024
Data on conditions of buildings placed
on the local inventory prior to April 22,
2024
No
COUNCIL-DIRECTED
POLICY UPDATE
No
Determining conditions of existing inventory
properties (listed prior to April 22, 2024)
would allow better clarity.
HIGH PRIORITY LOWER PRIORITY
Properties that have been demolished remove from local inventory Properties that have lost integrity over time that may need a category change
HIGH PRIORITY LOWER PRIORITY
Items (c) and (d)
PROJECT/GOAL 2:
BENEFICIAL IMPACTS
Education and Creating New User-Friendly Resources/Communication Regarding Historic Preservation. (a) find new ways to promote
preservation, including use of the existing zoning code incentives and State historic building code (b) improve upon communication types to provide the
community accessible information, including the use of videos (linked to the City’s and State’s webpages) to help property owners understand the local
and State preservation incentives and codes, (c) continue to provide updates to the historic review process bulletin as needed to communicate CEQA
requirements related to PAMC 16.49 and listed historic resources, and (d) enable the HRB staff liaison(s), the City’s historic preservation consultant, and
Chief Building Official to implement training providing an ongoing opportunity for HRB members, staff, and the community to gain working knowledge as
to the use of the State’s historic building code
PROJECT/GOAL 3:Conduct a survey of the local inventory resources listed prior to the 2023 Historic Reconnaissance Survey, to determine historic conditions. If
Council directs a survey update, that work would require resources and may extend into the next year work plan.
BENEFICIAL IMPACTS
The benefits would be to improve
preservation in Palo Alto and clarity for
owners of historic properties.
Item (a) a table of existing zoning code incentives and another table of historic building
code provisions and Item (b) improvements to types of communications used to promote
historic preservation.
Item 3
Attachment A: HRB 24/25 Workplan
Packet Pg. 34
TIMELINE RESOURCES NEEDED MEASURE OF SUCCESS STATE MANDATED / LOCAL
LAW / COUNCIL-APPROVED
Goal 2 to begin during plan quarter 2 (item
a) and subject to Council direction,
continue through quarter 4 (April - June
2025, items b and c)
PDS staff and CAO staff. City Council
direction and accommodation in the PDS
department workplan would be needed.
More historic properties are preserved
for future enjoyment of the owners and
community, due to the additional
incentives.
Council may provide
direction to modify
PAMC title 18.
COUNCIL-DIRECTED
POLICY UPDATE
N/A
TIMELINE RESOURCES NEEDED MEASURE OF SUCCESS STATE MANDATED / LOCAL
LAW / COUNCIL-APPROVED
Goal 5 to begin during plan quarter 1 (item
a) and continue through quarter 4 (April -
June 2025, items b and c)
Staff of PDS would be tasked as well as an
HRB ad hoc committee to make progress.
Establish historic preservation award
selection criteria and frequency of
awards by end of 24-25 Fiscal Year.
Comprehensive Plan
Policy L-7.6
COUNCIL-DIRECTED
POLICY UPDATE
No
Item a is to gather ideas for new incentives in the zoning code to add to a table of
existing incentives in the zoning code.Subject to Council direction, items b and c would follow item a.
Benefit will be for all property owners who do
not currently see any benefit to listing their
property on the City's historic inventory
HIGH PRIORITY LOWER PRIORITY
PROJECT/GOAL 5:
Establish a Historical Preservation Award Program. (a) discuss and determine the selection criteria for eligible projects and/or properties; (b) discuss
and determine frequency of awards (e.g., annual, bi-annual, 5-year cycle, etc.); (c) select projects and/or properties to award; (d) conduct an award
ceremony and present historic preservation awards.
BENEFICIAL IMPACTS
PROJECT/GOAL 4:
Additional preservation incentives (a) discuss and recommend additional zoning code incentives to continue the community engagement process that
began with the 2023 reconnaissance survey/ inventory update; (b) represent the HRB’s interests during public hearings, or participate in joint meetings
with the Planning and Transportation Commission and City Council, to review any proposed zoning code modifications incentivizing historic preservation
incentives; (c) outreach to the community after adoption of any adopted new incentives.
BENEFICIAL IMPACTS
A HRB historical preservation award
program would express appreciation for the
efforts to preserve and protect Palo Alto’s
culturally, historically, and architecturally
significant places that create a vibrant and
sustainable community that fully reflects
Palo Alto’s diverse past.
HIGH PRIORITY LOWER PRIORITY
Item (a) discuss and determine the selection criteria for eligible projects and/or
properties and establish award frequency, and Item (b) discuss and determine award
frequency (e.g., annual, bi-annual, 5-year cycle, etc.)
Items (c) and (d)
Item 3
Attachment A: HRB 24/25 Workplan
Packet Pg. 35
Item 3
Attachment B: Article VIII
of the ARB By-Laws
Packet Pg. 36
Item No. 4. Page 1 of 1
Historic Resources Board
Staff Report
From: Planning and Development Services Director
Lead Department: Planning and Development Services
Meeting Date: February 13, 2025
Report #: 2501-4017
TITLE
Approval of Historic Resources Board Draft Minutes of November 14, 2024
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Historic Resources Board (HRB) review and approve the attached
meeting minutes.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: November 14, 2024 Draft HRB Minutes
AUTHOR/TITLE:
Steven Switzer, Historic Preservation Planner
Item 4
Staff Report
Packet Pg. 37
City of Palo Alto Page 1
HISTORIC RESOURCES BOARD MEETING
DRAFT MINUTES: November 14, 2024
Council Chambers & Zoom
8:30 AM
Call to Order / Roll Call
The Historic Resources Board (HRB) of the City of Palo Alto met on November 14, 2024, in Council
Chambers and virtual teleconference at 8:30 AM.
Present: Chair Alisa Eagleston-Cieslewicz, Vice Chair Samantha Rohman, Boardmember Christian
Pease, Boardmember Geddes Ulinskas (remote), and Boardmember Caroline Willis.
Absent: None.
Public Comment
There were no requests to speak.
Agenda Changes, Additions and Deletions
Chair Eagleston-Cieslewicz moved the Chair and Vice Chair elections to the last item on the agenda.
There were no further agenda changes.
City Official Reports
1. Historic Resources Board Schedule of Meetings and Assignments
Historic Preservation Planner Steven Switzer noted there were two more HRB meetings before the end
of the year, including this one. The December 12 meeting will include tentative bonus floor area
projects, which may be pushed out to January. He updated on the recent Veterans Day Recognition
Event and described that the removal of "potentially eligible" historic status from the parcel report
would be coming forward in the new year after the recent Council determination.
Boardmember Willis asked for clarification on the potentially eligible status.
Mr. Switzer explained that the removal is only for the 1500 properties that were effectively unevaluated
and identified for potentially having other eligibility or meeting some of the criteria for Historic Resource
designation. None of the previously determined or designated properties will be affected.
Assistant Director Jennifer Armer added that the only change is that when someone prints out a parcel
report on their property, there will no longer be the potentially eligible tag on it as it has not been
updated or analyzed in 30 years and the label was given primarily based on age.
Item 4
Attachment A: November
14, 2024 Draft HRB
Minutes
Packet Pg. 38
City of Palo Alto Page 2
Study Session
2. Discussion for Establishing a Historical Preservation Award Program to Implement Goal #5 of the
Approved Historic Resources Board 24/25 Work Plan.
Mr. Switzer presented four items for discussion on building out the Historic Preservation Award
Program: selection criteria, frequency of awards, timing of awards, and amending bylaws to include an
article on the award program. He reviewed the considerations under each item, including determining
what projects to include, retaining flexibility in award criteria, staggering awards with the ARB Design
Awards, considering a 5-year cycle, potentially aligning with National Preservation Month in May, and
considering adding an article to the bylaws, with an example of language used by the ARB.
Chair Eagleston-Cieslewicz thought the outline sounded good. She felt the five-year cycle made sense
and gave enough time to evaluate a good number of projects. She liked the flexible selection criteria as
there could be really different features within the bucket of projects.
PUBLIC COMMENT
There were no requests to speak.
Boardmember Pease agreed with Chair Eagleston-Cieslewicz's comments.
Boardmember Willis was worried about stepping on the toes of PAST Heritage and suggested
coordinating and building a relationship with them.
Vice Chair Rohman agreed and felt this program should complement any programs PAST is already
running. She also thought there was an opportunity for the HRB to recognize properties PAST may not
otherwise recognize, as she noted they focus to a large extent on residential and community properties,
whereas the HRB may look at business projects in the downtown corridor like the Graduate Hotel or
adaptive reuse in the Ventura Area Coordinated Plan. She suggested the flexibility of award criteria
would help with not overtaking PAST as the Board would have the discretion to tailor it in a way that
provided for some differentiation.
Boardmember Willis wanted to be diplomatic and not seem as though HRB was trying to take over
something PAST has worked hard on.
Vice Chair Rohman questioned the timing of the 5-year cycle, whether the Board would be expedient
enough to talk to PAST and get the criteria in order to do an award for 2025 or not start until 2030.
Chair Eagleston-Cieslewicz noted the suggestion was to start in 2026 to avoid doing awards in the same
year as the ARB, giving an additional year.
Vice Chair Rohman asked if the ARB did a recognition celebration and wondered if it made more sense
to coordinate and do it the same year so that could be joined.
Mr. Switzer described the ARB hearings for the selection of the projects and stated the recognition
event could be aligned. He suggested the Board could extend an invitation for PAST to attend a future
meeting on the topic, and/or the Chair could establish an ad hoc for further coordination with PAST.
Item 4
Attachment A: November
14, 2024 Draft HRB
Minutes
Packet Pg. 39
City of Palo Alto Page 3
Chair Eagleston-Cieslewicz was open to both options.
Boardmember Ulinskas thought this awards program was a great opportunity to educate people about
well-done preservation projects. Owners of those projects are often happy to share about the process,
and he wondered if there was way to build on the preservation program as an education tool.
Boardmember Willis believed the Board should be more active with Preservation Week, as it had been
more active with community outreach in the past. She suggested getting out during Preservation Week
to see what is available in the community and supported using 2025 as a test period to get a better idea
of what the awards could look like in 2026.
Vice Chair Rohman looked at the PAST website and their preservation awards page. They have been
actively giving awards since 1998 on "people, business, and groups," but did not explicitly list categories.
She felt HRB had an opportunity to define categories, and she was interested in including adaptive
reuse.
Chair Eagleston-Cieslewicz asked if there was interest in participation in an ad hoc committee regarding
outreach to PAST. She wondered if that would allow more natural dialogue than a meeting would
permit.
Boardmember Willis and Vice Chair Rohman were both interested in participating in an ad hoc
committee in order to be more involved in building that relationship.
Chair Eagleston-Cieslewicz suggested meeting with PAST and reporting back on their reactions. She
thought it would be helpful to broadly agree on a general proposal as a basis for discussion. Based on
the staff report and discussion, she suggested awards potentially starting in 2026 and a 5-year cadence
with an acknowledgement via proclamation, a lobby display, and website content.
Boardmember Willis was unsure about a 5-year cadence starting in 2026 as it was more difficult to
remember than 2025 or 2030.
Vice Chair Rohman agreed on coupling with Preservation Week but also thought it made sense to be on
the same cadence as the ARB awards.
Mr. Switzer noted the ARB typically does awards in the spring.
Chair Eagleston-Cieslewicz was concerned about lobby density.
Ms. Armer had the same concern, wanting to make sure there was sufficient space to showcase both
ARB's and HRB's awards. She felt having both displayed at the same time would be less clear.
Boardmember Ulinskas questioned how long the displays are up for.
Ms. Armer believed the displays were monthly but would look into that.
Boardmember Willis did not believe that should sway the decision and felt it might get more people in
to look at the historic awards rather than distract from it. She suggested 2026 followed by 2030.
Chair Eagleston-Cieslewicz agreed that 2025 was too soon and felt 2026 was achievable.
Item 4
Attachment A: November
14, 2024 Draft HRB
Minutes
Packet Pg. 40
City of Palo Alto Page 4
Vice Chair Rohman added that the Board also needed to evaluate whether to look at projects from the
past 10 to 20 years, what the criteria is, and whether to consider only projects that are finished.
Boardmember Ulinskas agreed about 2026, noting that announcements for submissions for awards
usually come out 6 months before submissions, followed by a 2-month evaluation period.
Boardmember Pease asked if there were categories for the ARB awards.
Ms. Armer responded the ARB has multiple awards in each cycle under different categories that are
defined each time.
Boardmember Willis questioned how many awards the ARB typically does in a cycle.
Mr. Switzer noted it can be anywhere from one award to five. The numbers change based on
development and what the Board thinks of note to recognize.
Chair Eagleston-Cieslewicz liked the idea of recognizing completed projects in case something changes
dramatically or goes wrong.
Vice Chair Rohman asked Boardmember Ulinskas about awards his firm has participated in and what
type of recognition is involved.
Boardmember Ulinskas explained that awards are often associated with design magazines, so the prize
is to be featured in the magazine issue. He felt it would be nice to be able to give the design teams
involved a lot of recognition and visibility.
Vice Chair Rohman questioned whether this was something that would be opened up for nominations or
applications or, since it is a small local honor, the Board would just proactively review projects.
Mr. Switzer believed it would be the latter; Staff could compile the list of projects that have come before
the Board as well as completed ones. He also directed attention to Work Plan Goal #2, creating more
user friendly and educational resources regarding historic preservation. He thought including the awards
or featuring these projects on the website would be in alignment with that goal.
Ms. Armer added, regarding the discussion on timing, that while there would be no requests for
submittals, one way to characterize the award is projects completed through the end of 2025 on a 5-
year cycle, to tie into that easier-to-remember number, even if the award is actually given in 2026.
It was discussed that the awards could be considered the 2025 awards in that case.
Chair Eagleston-Cieslewicz asked if it was reasonable for the subcommittee to check in with PAST in the
next couple of months and check in with the Board early in the new year.
Boardmember Willis suggested coming back in January for an update.
Mr. Switzer confirmed for the record that the ad hoc committee was Boardmember Willis and Vice Chair
Rohman.
Item 4
Attachment A: November
14, 2024 Draft HRB
Minutes
Packet Pg. 41
City of Palo Alto Page 5
Chair Eagleston-Cieslewicz confirmed that there was a general outline, the committee would discuss
with PAST, and the Board would talk about it again in January.
Approval of Minutes
3. Approval of Historic Resources Board Draft Minutes of October 10, 2024
Boardmember Willis requested in the future to add a section in the minutes reviewing future discussion
or agenda items.
There was further discussion on this.
Ms. Armer felt that doing an independent summary out of order of what was actually conducted during
the meeting would not be appropriate as part of the meeting minutes.
Boardmember Willis wanted to correct her statement on page 20, "She hoped PAST Heritage would
share some of their resources," to reflect that she meant the homeowners' resources and not PAST's.
MOTION: Chair Eagleston-Cieslewicz moved to approve the minutes from the October 10, 2024,
meeting. This was seconded by Boardmember Pease.
VOTE: The motion carried by roll call vote, 5-0.
Action Item
4. Chair and Vice Chair Elections
Chair Eagleston-Cieslewicz opened this up to general discussion, noting this would lead to a very
abbreviated term because the election typically takes place in the spring. She asked if there were
reactions to maintaining the status quo until the typical election because of this.
Boardmember Pease thought that was an excellent idea.
Vice Chair Rohman was also supportive of the Chair and Vice Chair continuing their terms until the
spring election.
MOTION: Boardmember Willis made a motion to continue with the current Chair and Vice Chair until
the next election. This was seconded by Vice Chair Rohman.
VOTE: The motion carried by roll call vote, 5-0.
Board Member Questions, Comments, Announcements or Future Meetings and Agendas
Boardmember Willis stated she went to the Veterans Event, which she really enjoyed. She felt people
should visit the charming MacArthur Park more. She had spoken with Council Member Burt at the event,
who was looking forward to incorporating MacArthur Park into the new plan for the train station. She
also noted questions for the community from Steve Staiger, who is on the board of the History Museum:
What do you expect to see when you walk in the History Museum? What is something significant about
Palo Alto history that might not be included in the History Museum? She encouraged providing this
Item 4
Attachment A: November
14, 2024 Draft HRB
Minutes
Packet Pg. 42
City of Palo Alto Page 6
input for the new director. She felt the Board could schedule a group or individual tour of the museum
and asked for input.
Vice Chair Rohman was interested in a tour of the museum.
Mr. Switzer stated Staff would need to check with the attorneys to ensure there was no Brown Act
violation for such an event.
Boardmember Willis felt it would be good to have that information in writing for the future. She noted
she did not like the present venue and requested moving to the conference room.
Mr. Switzer responded Staff could look into it but that the Council Chambers were equipped with
everything needed for the meetings. Another venue would require investigation and planning.
Ms. Armer explained that since it is a hybrid-style public meeting, the Council Chambers was set up for
that with the cameras.
There was some discussion about the setup required to move the venue.
Vice Chair Rohman noted she had registered for online learning through the National Association of
Preservation Committees, which she needed to do before the end of November. She wanted to get on
the agenda for January to come back with a brief readout of the sessions she attended, specifically one
on community engagement.
Adjournment
MOTION: Chair Eagleston-Cieslewicz moved to adjourn, seconded by Boardmember Pease.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:22 AM.
Item 4
Attachment A: November
14, 2024 Draft HRB
Minutes
Packet Pg. 43