Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023-06-08 Historic Resources Board Agenda PacketHISTORIC RESOURCES BOARD Regular Meeting Thursday, June 08, 2023 Council Chambers & Hybrid 8:30 AM Pursuant to AB 361 Palo Alto City Council meetings will be held as “hybrid” meetings with the option to attend by teleconference/video conference or in person. To maximize public safety while still maintaining transparency and public access, members of the public can choose to participate from home or attend in person. Information on how the public may observe and participate in the meeting is located at the end of the agenda. Masks are strongly encouraged if attending in person. The meeting will be broadcast on Cable TV Channel 26, live on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/cityofpaloalto, and streamed to Midpen Media Center https://midpenmedia.org. Commissioner names, biographies, and archived agendas are available at https://bitly.com/paloaltoHRB.  VIRTUAL PARTICIPATION CLICK HERE TO JOIN (https://cityofpaloalto.zoom.us/j/96800197512) Meeting ID: 968 0019 7512    Phone: 1(669)900‐6833 PUBLIC COMMENTS Public comments will be accepted both in person and via Zoom for up to three minutes or an amount of time determined by the Chair. All requests to speak will be taken until 5 minutes after the staff’s presentation. Written public comments can be submitted in advance to hrb@cityofpaloalto.org and will be provided to the Council and available for inspection on the City’s website. Please clearly indicate which agenda item you are referencing in your subject line. Spokespersons that are representing a group of five or more people who are identified as present at the meeting at the time of the spokesperson's presentation will be allowed up to fifteen (15) minutes at the discretion of the Chair, provided that the non‐speaking members agree not to speak individually. The Chair may limit Public Comments to thirty (30) minutes for all combined speakers. The Chair may reduce the allowed time to speak on Study Sessions and Actions Items to two (2) minutes or less to accommodate a larger number of speakers. PowerPoints, videos, or other media to be presented during public comment are accepted only by email to hrb@cityofpaloalto.org at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Once received, the  Clerk will have them shared at public comment for the specified item. To uphold strong cybersecurity management practices, USB’s or other physical electronic storage devices are not accepted. CALL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMENT  Members of the public may speak to any item NOT on the agenda. Three (3) minutes per speaker. AGENDA CHANGES, ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS The Chair or Board majority may modify the agenda order to improve meeting management. CITY OFFICIAL REPORTS 1.Historic Resources Board Schedule of Meetings and Assignments STUDY SESSION Public Comment is Permitted. Three (3) minutes per speaker. 2.Study Session to Review the Draft North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan APPROVAL OF MINUTES 3.Approval of Historic Resources Board Draft Minutes of May 11, 2023 COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, ANNOUNCEMENTS OR FUTURE MEETINGS AND AGENDAS Members of the public may not speak to the item(s). ADJOURNMENT PUBLIC COMMENT INSTRUCTIONS Members of the Public may provide public comments to teleconference meetings via email, teleconference, or by phone. 1. Written public comments may be submitted by email to hrb@cityofpaloalto.org. 2. Spoken public comments using a computer will be accepted through the teleconference meeting. To address the Council, click on the link below to access a Zoom‐ based meeting. Please read the following instructions carefully. You may download the Zoom client or connect to the meeting in‐ browser. If using your browser, make sure you are using a current, up‐to‐date browser: Chrome 30 , Firefox 27 , Microsoft Edge 12 , Safari 7 . Certain functionality may be disabled in older browsers including Internet Explorer. You may be asked to enter an email address and name. We request that you identify yourself by name as this will be visible online and will be used to notify you that it is your turn to speak. When you wish to speak on an Agenda Item, click on “raise hand.” The Clerk will activate and unmute speakers in turn. Speakers will be notified shortly before they are called to speak. When called, please limit your remarks to the time limit allotted. A timer will be shown on the computer to help keep track of your comments. 3. Spoken public comments using a smart phone will be accepted  through the teleconference meeting. To address the Council, download the Zoom application onto your phone from the Apple App Store or Google Play Store and enter the Meeting ID below. Please follow the instructions B‐E above. 4. Spoken public comments using a phone use the telephone number listed below. When you wish to speak on an agenda item hit *9 on your phone so we know that you wish to speak. You will be asked to provide your first and last name before addressing the Council. You will be advised how long you have to speak. When called please limit your remarks to the agenda item and time limit allotted. CLICK HERE TO JOIN    Meeting ID: 968 0019 7512   Phone:1‐669‐900‐6833 Americans with Disability Act (ADA) It is the policy of the City of Palo Alto to offer its public programs, services and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to all. Persons with disabilities who require materials in an appropriate alternative format or who require auxiliary aids to access City meetings, programs, or services may contact the City’s ADA Coordinator at (650) 329‐2550 (voice) or by emailing ada@cityofpaloalto.org. Requests for assistance or accommodations must be submitted at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting, program, or service.  1 Regular Meeting June 08, 2023 HISTORIC RESOURCES BOARDRegular MeetingThursday, June 08, 2023Council Chambers & Hybrid8:30 AMPursuant to AB 361 Palo Alto City Council meetings will be held as “hybrid” meetings with theoption to attend by teleconference/video conference or in person. To maximize public safetywhile still maintaining transparency and public access, members of the public can choose toparticipate from home or attend in person. Information on how the public may observe andparticipate in the meeting is located at the end of the agenda. Masks are strongly encouraged ifattending in person. The meeting will be broadcast on Cable TV Channel 26, live onYouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/cityofpaloalto, and streamed to Midpen MediaCenter https://midpenmedia.org. Commissioner names, biographies, and archived agendas areavailable at https://bitly.com/paloaltoHRB. VIRTUAL PARTICIPATION CLICK HERE TO JOIN (https://cityofpaloalto.zoom.us/j/96800197512)Meeting ID: 968 0019 7512    Phone: 1(669)900‐6833PUBLIC COMMENTSPublic comments will be accepted both in person and via Zoom for up to three minutes or anamount of time determined by the Chair. All requests to speak will be taken until 5 minutesafter the staff’s presentation. Written public comments can be submitted in advance tohrb@cityofpaloalto.org and will be provided to the Council and available for inspection on theCity’s website. Please clearly indicate which agenda item you are referencing in your subjectline.Spokespersons that are representing a group of five or more people who are identified aspresent at the meeting at the time of the spokesperson's presentation will be allowed up tofifteen (15) minutes at the discretion of the Chair, provided that the non‐speaking membersagree not to speak individually. The Chair may limit Public Comments to thirty (30) minutes forall combined speakers. The Chair may reduce the allowed time to speak on Study Sessions andActions Items to two (2) minutes or less to accommodate a larger number of speakers. PowerPoints, videos, or other media to be presented during public comment are accepted only by email to hrb@cityofpaloalto.org at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Once received, the  Clerk will have them shared at public comment for the specified item. To uphold strong cybersecurity management practices, USB’s or other physical electronic storage devices are not accepted. CALL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMENT  Members of the public may speak to any item NOT on the agenda. Three (3) minutes per speaker. AGENDA CHANGES, ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS The Chair or Board majority may modify the agenda order to improve meeting management. CITY OFFICIAL REPORTS 1.Historic Resources Board Schedule of Meetings and Assignments STUDY SESSION Public Comment is Permitted. Three (3) minutes per speaker. 2.Study Session to Review the Draft North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan APPROVAL OF MINUTES 3.Approval of Historic Resources Board Draft Minutes of May 11, 2023 COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, ANNOUNCEMENTS OR FUTURE MEETINGS AND AGENDAS Members of the public may not speak to the item(s). ADJOURNMENT PUBLIC COMMENT INSTRUCTIONS Members of the Public may provide public comments to teleconference meetings via email, teleconference, or by phone. 1. Written public comments may be submitted by email to hrb@cityofpaloalto.org. 2. Spoken public comments using a computer will be accepted through the teleconference meeting. To address the Council, click on the link below to access a Zoom‐ based meeting. Please read the following instructions carefully. You may download the Zoom client or connect to the meeting in‐ browser. If using your browser, make sure you are using a current, up‐to‐date browser: Chrome 30 , Firefox 27 , Microsoft Edge 12 , Safari 7 . Certain functionality may be disabled in older browsers including Internet Explorer. You may be asked to enter an email address and name. We request that you identify yourself by name as this will be visible online and will be used to notify you that it is your turn to speak. When you wish to speak on an Agenda Item, click on “raise hand.” The Clerk will activate and unmute speakers in turn. Speakers will be notified shortly before they are called to speak. When called, please limit your remarks to the time limit allotted. A timer will be shown on the computer to help keep track of your comments. 3. Spoken public comments using a smart phone will be accepted  through the teleconference meeting. To address the Council, download the Zoom application onto your phone from the Apple App Store or Google Play Store and enter the Meeting ID below. Please follow the instructions B‐E above. 4. Spoken public comments using a phone use the telephone number listed below. When you wish to speak on an agenda item hit *9 on your phone so we know that you wish to speak. You will be asked to provide your first and last name before addressing the Council. You will be advised how long you have to speak. When called please limit your remarks to the agenda item and time limit allotted. CLICK HERE TO JOIN    Meeting ID: 968 0019 7512   Phone:1‐669‐900‐6833 Americans with Disability Act (ADA) It is the policy of the City of Palo Alto to offer its public programs, services and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to all. Persons with disabilities who require materials in an appropriate alternative format or who require auxiliary aids to access City meetings, programs, or services may contact the City’s ADA Coordinator at (650) 329‐2550 (voice) or by emailing ada@cityofpaloalto.org. Requests for assistance or accommodations must be submitted at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting, program, or service.  2 Regular Meeting June 08, 2023 HISTORIC RESOURCES BOARDRegular MeetingThursday, June 08, 2023Council Chambers & Hybrid8:30 AMPursuant to AB 361 Palo Alto City Council meetings will be held as “hybrid” meetings with theoption to attend by teleconference/video conference or in person. To maximize public safetywhile still maintaining transparency and public access, members of the public can choose toparticipate from home or attend in person. Information on how the public may observe andparticipate in the meeting is located at the end of the agenda. Masks are strongly encouraged ifattending in person. The meeting will be broadcast on Cable TV Channel 26, live onYouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/cityofpaloalto, and streamed to Midpen MediaCenter https://midpenmedia.org. Commissioner names, biographies, and archived agendas areavailable at https://bitly.com/paloaltoHRB. VIRTUAL PARTICIPATION CLICK HERE TO JOIN (https://cityofpaloalto.zoom.us/j/96800197512)Meeting ID: 968 0019 7512    Phone: 1(669)900‐6833PUBLIC COMMENTSPublic comments will be accepted both in person and via Zoom for up to three minutes or anamount of time determined by the Chair. All requests to speak will be taken until 5 minutesafter the staff’s presentation. Written public comments can be submitted in advance tohrb@cityofpaloalto.org and will be provided to the Council and available for inspection on theCity’s website. Please clearly indicate which agenda item you are referencing in your subjectline.Spokespersons that are representing a group of five or more people who are identified aspresent at the meeting at the time of the spokesperson's presentation will be allowed up tofifteen (15) minutes at the discretion of the Chair, provided that the non‐speaking membersagree not to speak individually. The Chair may limit Public Comments to thirty (30) minutes forall combined speakers. The Chair may reduce the allowed time to speak on Study Sessions andActions Items to two (2) minutes or less to accommodate a larger number of speakers.PowerPoints, videos, or other media to be presented during public comment are accepted onlyby email to hrb@cityofpaloalto.org at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Once received, the Clerk will have them shared at public comment for the specified item. To uphold strongcybersecurity management practices, USB’s or other physical electronic storage devices are notaccepted.CALL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALLPUBLIC COMMENT Members of the public may speak to any item NOT on the agenda. Three (3) minutes per speaker.AGENDA CHANGES, ADDITIONS AND DELETIONSThe Chair or Board majority may modify the agenda order to improve meeting management.CITY OFFICIAL REPORTS1.Historic Resources Board Schedule of Meetings and AssignmentsSTUDY SESSIONPublic Comment is Permitted. Three (3) minutes per speaker.2.Study Session to Review the Draft North Ventura Coordinated Area PlanAPPROVAL OF MINUTES3.Approval of Historic Resources Board Draft Minutes of May 11, 2023COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, ANNOUNCEMENTS OR FUTURE MEETINGS ANDAGENDASMembers of the public may not speak to the item(s). ADJOURNMENT PUBLIC COMMENT INSTRUCTIONS Members of the Public may provide public comments to teleconference meetings via email, teleconference, or by phone. 1. Written public comments may be submitted by email to hrb@cityofpaloalto.org. 2. Spoken public comments using a computer will be accepted through the teleconference meeting. To address the Council, click on the link below to access a Zoom‐ based meeting. Please read the following instructions carefully. You may download the Zoom client or connect to the meeting in‐ browser. If using your browser, make sure you are using a current, up‐to‐date browser: Chrome 30 , Firefox 27 , Microsoft Edge 12 , Safari 7 . Certain functionality may be disabled in older browsers including Internet Explorer. You may be asked to enter an email address and name. We request that you identify yourself by name as this will be visible online and will be used to notify you that it is your turn to speak. When you wish to speak on an Agenda Item, click on “raise hand.” The Clerk will activate and unmute speakers in turn. Speakers will be notified shortly before they are called to speak. When called, please limit your remarks to the time limit allotted. A timer will be shown on the computer to help keep track of your comments. 3. Spoken public comments using a smart phone will be accepted  through the teleconference meeting. To address the Council, download the Zoom application onto your phone from the Apple App Store or Google Play Store and enter the Meeting ID below. Please follow the instructions B‐E above. 4. Spoken public comments using a phone use the telephone number listed below. When you wish to speak on an agenda item hit *9 on your phone so we know that you wish to speak. You will be asked to provide your first and last name before addressing the Council. You will be advised how long you have to speak. When called please limit your remarks to the agenda item and time limit allotted. CLICK HERE TO JOIN    Meeting ID: 968 0019 7512   Phone:1‐669‐900‐6833 Americans with Disability Act (ADA) It is the policy of the City of Palo Alto to offer its public programs, services and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to all. Persons with disabilities who require materials in an appropriate alternative format or who require auxiliary aids to access City meetings, programs, or services may contact the City’s ADA Coordinator at (650) 329‐2550 (voice) or by emailing ada@cityofpaloalto.org. Requests for assistance or accommodations must be submitted at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting, program, or service.  3 Regular Meeting June 08, 2023 Item No. 1. Page 1 of 1 Historic Resources Board Staff Report From: Jonathan Lait, Planning and Development Services Director Lead Department: Planning and Development Services Meeting Date: June 8, 2023 Report #: 2305-1522 TITLE Historic Resources Board Schedule of Meetings and Assignments RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Historic Resources Board (HRB) review and comment as appropriate. BACKGROUND Attached is the HRB meeting schedule and attendance record for the calendar year. This is provided for informational purposes. If individual Boardmembers anticipate being absent from a future meeting, it is requested that it be brought to staff’s attention when considering this item. No action is required by the HRB for this item. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: 2023 HRB Meeting Schedule & Assignments AUTHOR/TITLE: Amy French, Chief Planning Official Item 1 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 4     Historic Resources Board 2023 Meeting Schedule & Assignments 2023 Meeting Schedule Meeting Dates Time Location Status Planned Absences 1/12/2023 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular 1/26/2023 8:30 AM Hybrid Cancelled 2/09/2023 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular 2/23/2023 8:30 AM Hybrid Cancelled 3/09/2023 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular 3/23/2023 8:30 AM Hybrid Cancelled 4/13/2023 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular 4/25/2023 6:00 PM Hybrid Community Meeting 4/27/2023 8:30 AM Hybrid Cancelled 5/11/2023 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular Heinrich 5/25/2023 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular 6/08/2023 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular Willis, Makinen 6/22/2023 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular 7/13/2023 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular Eagleston-Cieslewicz 7/27/2023 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular 8/10/2023 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular 8/24/2023 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular 9/14/2023 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular Rohman 9/28/2023 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular 10/12/2023 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular 10/26/2023 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular 11/09/2023 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular 11/23/2023 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular Cancelled - Thanksgiving 12/14/2023 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular 12/28/2023 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular Cancelled - Christmas 2023 Subcommittee Assignments January February March April May June July August September October November December Item 1 2023 HRB Meeting Schedule & Assignments     Packet Pg. 5     Item No. 2. Page 1 of 7 Historic Resources Board Staff Report From: Jonathan Lait, Planning and Development Services Director Lead Department: Planning and Development Services Meeting Date: June 8, 2023 Report #: 2304-1319 TITLE Study Session to Review the Draft North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Historic Resources Board (HRB) conduct a Study Session to review the draft North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan (NVCAP) as it relates to historic resources. There is no requirement for the HRB to formally recommend Council adoption of the NVCAP. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The draft NVCAP summarized in this report represents a major milestone in the preparation of the NVCAP (Attachment A).1 The draft is a culmination of extensive community outreach, input from decision-makers and stakeholders throughout multiple public hearings on the alternatives, and the refinement of the Council endorsed preferred alternative by consultants and staff. This report focuses the discussion on the aspects of the NVCAP that pertain to eligible historic resources, such as the building at 340 Portage that originally housed the Bayside Cannery and the associated 3201-3225 Ash Street office building. The primary objective of this study session is to receive feedback on the draft NVCAP as it relates to historic resources. For a more detailed review of the entire draft NVCAP, see the Planning & Transportation Commission (PTC) staff report for May 31, 2023.2 BACKGROUND The NVCAP project started in November 2017 via an adopted resolution by the City Council. Subsequently, the City Council approved goals and objectives for the project (Attachment B). The NVCAP is a direct outcome of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan (Program L-4.10.1) adopted in November 2017 and the process to develop the plan is governed by Palo Alto Municipal Code 1 Draft NVCAP, May 2023 (Without Appendices): https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/planning-amp- development-services/north-ventura-cap/230511_nvcap_completedraft.pdf 2 5/31/2023 PTC Staff Report: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/Planning-Development- Services/Planning-and-Transportation-Commission-PTC/Current-PTC-Agendas-Minutes Item 2 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 6     Item No. 2. Page 2 of 7 (PAMC) Chapter 19.10. Additional background information about the project, including prior reports and public meeting information can be found at the project website.3 Recent Board and Commission Study Sessions On May 31, 2023, the PTC conducted a study session on the NVCAP. The video of the PTC meeting is viewable at the below link4. The PTC comments included some concerns about building height, specifying use of the small office spaces to encourage neighborhood serving uses, the grid streets cut-through traffic and calming, specifying percentages of mixed uses, economic feasibility information and effect of state law AB2097 on parking. Specific to building height, there was general concern about the 33-feet additive height for 100% affordable housing and the PTC suggested there is a need for diagrams showing the use of the daylight plane to create stepped building design. On June 1, 2023, the Architectural Review Board (ARB) conducted a study session on the NVCAP. The video of the ARB meeting will be viewable at the below link5. The ARB comments included concerns about building height and transitions to lower density residential; ensuring consistency of text and graphics within the plan; ensuring that where applicable include essential information, otherwise refer to other master plan documents or municipal code; and providing greater detail on sustainability elements such as green roofs and permeable pavement. Project Site The approximately 60-acre NVCAP project area is roughly bounded by Page Mill Road, El Camino Real, Lambert Avenue, and the Caltrain tracks and represents a rare opportunity within the City to plan proactively for a transit-oriented mixed-use neighborhood. The project area includes one of the City’s largest housing opportunity sites, currently occupied by the cannery building. The plan area is developed with a mix of small and large businesses, mixed-use buildings and single- family residences. Attachment C is a location map of the plan area. Historic Resource Evaluation As part of the initial assessment of the NVCAP project area, staff retained Page and Turnbull to prepare an evaluation of the project area for potential historic resources.6 There are no properties located within the project boundary that are listed in the City of Palo Alto Historic Inventory, the National Register of Historic Places (National Register), or the California Register of Historic Resources (California Register), nor are there any recorded historic districts. Prior to the preparation of the Historic Resource Evaluation (HRE), there were no records found of any 3 NVCAP Project Website: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Long- Range-Planning/NVCAP 4 Link to the PTC May 31, 2023 meeting video: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/Planning-Development- Services/Planning-and-Transportation-Commission-PTC/Current-PTC-Agendas-Minutes 5 Link to the ARB June 1, 2023 meeting video: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/Planning-Development- Services/Architectural-Review-Board-ARB/Current-ARB-Agendas-Minutes 6 NVCAP Windshield Survey and Preliminary Historic Resource Eligibility Analysis (2019): https://cityofpaloalto.org//files/assets/public/planning-amp-development-services/north-ventura-cap/nvcap- reports/nvcap-historic-reports-preliminary-historic-resource-eligibility-analysis.pdf Item 2 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 7     Item No. 2. Page 3 of 7 properties identified as an eligible historic resource.7 Out of the entire 60-acre area, only 340 Portage Avenue (cannery) and the associated office building at 3201-3225 Ash Street have been found to be eligible historic resources, as further described in the HRE. The HRE was presented to the HRB on July 25, 20198 and included with the HRB May 25, 2023 packet for the HRB’s review of the 14.5-acre Sobrato development project at 200-404 Portage Avenue, 3040-3250 Park Boulevard, 3201-3225 Ash Street and 278 Lambert located within the NVCAP boundary. Links9 to the May 25, 2023 HRB staff report and video of the meeting are provided below. Pipeline Development Projects In the fall of 2022, the property owner (Sobrato) of the former Bayside Cannery building and office building currently eligible for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources (340 Portage Avenue and 3201-3225 Ash Street) submitted a development proposal. The proposal includes the retention of the Ash Street building and partial demolition of the cannery building to accommodate new residential dwellings and the renovation of the remaining cannery building for commercial use. The HRB discussed the Sobrato project during its public hearing on January 12, 202310 and again at a second hearing on May 25, 2023, as noted above. The project is considered a pipeline development project and not subject to the NVCAP policies and guidelines since the NVCAP is not yet adopted. Staff anticipates the Sobrato project would be considered by the City Council this year. Projects within the NVCAP area submitted after its adoption would be subject to the NVCAP. Process, Findings & Purview Development of the coordinated area plan followed the process contained within PAMC 19.10, Coordinated Area Plans. This chapter provides detail on the initiation, the process procedures, including the creation of goals and objectives; community involvement (the formation of a working group); public hearings, and adoption. The HRB is identified as a hearing body that will provide input on the draft NVCAP. The PTC will make a recommendation on the draft NVCAP to the City Council for their consideration of the plan. ANALYSIS This section provides a high-level summary of the NVCAP document, and an overview of historic designation action included in the NVCAP. NVCAP Summary 7 340 Portage Avenue Historic Resource Evaluation (2019): https://cityofpaloalto.org//files/assets/public/planning- amp-development-services/north-ventura-cap/nvcap-reports/nvcap-historic-reports-340-portage-evaluation.pdf 8 Historic Resources Board Staff Report July 25, 2019: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=72490 9 Links to the May 25, 2023 HRB report and video of the Sobrato development project: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/agendas-minutes-reports/agendas-minutes/historic-resources- board/2023/hrb-5.25-3200-park.pdf and https://midpenmedia.org/historic-resources-board-46-5252023/ 10 Historic Resources Board Staff Report January 12, 2023: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/agendas-minutes-reports/agendas-minutes/historic-resources- board/2023/hrb-1.12-3200-park.pdf Item 2 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 8     Item No. 2. Page 4 of 7 The NVCAP represents a rare opportunity within the City of Palo Alto to plan proactively for a transit-oriented, mixed-use, mixed-income, and walkable neighborhood. The NVCAP sets forth a vision that: •Honors the storied history and unique character of the North Ventura neighborhood •Understands the needs of current residents and puts forward near-term solutions to current challenges •Establishes a long-term framework for desired growth so that more people can call North Ventura home •Invests in community infrastructure to support an equitable, resilient, and sustainable Palo Alto. NVCAP is aligned with the goals and policies embedded in the adopted City of Palo Alto 2030 Comprehensive Plan, addressing the eight major themes: Building Community and Neighborhoods; Maintaining and Enhancing Community Character; Reducing Reliance on the Automobile; Meeting Housing Supply Challenges; Protecting and Sustaining the Natural Environment; Keeping Palo Alto Prepared for Future Natural and Human-Caused Hazards; Meeting Residential and Commercial Needs; and Providing Responsive Governance and Regional Leadership. Each chapter touches on these themes leading to a cohesive vision. Finally, this is a vision shaped by the Palo Alto community. This plan would not be possible without the guidance of stakeholders, decision-makers, residents, and other community members, who graciously volunteered their time as members of the Working Group to thoughtfully consider the challenges and opportunities of the Plan. The following summarizes the contents of the NVCAP: •Chapter 1: Introduction provides an overview of the NVCAP physical and regulatory context. The plan is shaped by the project goals and objectives, adopted and in-progress City plans and policies, recently enacted regional and state laws, and the comprehensive community planning process. •Chapter 2: The Vision provides an overview of the vision for the future of NVCAP built and natural environment. This includes urban design frameworks that calibrate the optimal mix of uses; support a multi-modal mobility framework within the neighborhood and how it connects to the rest of the city and the region; foster a regenerative and ecological framework to support the health of humans and wildlife while supporting the implementation of City’s Climate Action Plan; and the neighborhood’s context-specific urban form. •Design Standards and Guidelines include requirements that govern the construction and modification of the public realm including streets and open space, as well as new buildings. Standards are quantifiable, whereas guidelines are qualitative requirements. Item 2 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 9     Item No. 2. Page 5 of 7 o Chapter 3: Public Realm includes requirements and guidelines that govern the construction and modifications of the public realm including the sidewalk zone, traffic lanes and intersections, green infrastructure, paving, exterior lighting, wayfinding, and public art. o Chapter 4: Streets includes the requirements and guidelines that govern improvements adjacent and within Park Boulevard, Olive Avenue, Ash Street, Acacia Avenue, Pepper Avenue, Portage Avenue, Lambert Avenue, and Page Mill Road. In addition to public streets, this chapter discusses publicly accessible private streets. o Chapter 5: Parks includes the requirements and guidelines that govern improvements within park and open space areas such as Matadero Creek and the future public park. o Chapter 6: Buildings provides guidance on desired future built form and sets aspirations for how new buildings will contribute to the character of the NVCAP as it develops incrementally over time. This chapter discusses building heights and massing, retail and active frontage, Portage Avenue frontage, residential frontage and sustainable design. •Chapter 7: Implementation outlines the necessary steps to fulfill the vision of the plan, including funding, financing strategies, infrastructure improvements, and capital investments. This chapter will include the necessary steps for property owners considering improvements on their property. •Appendix includes information for reference used to prepare the NVCAP, including existing site conditions, market studies, and infrastructure analysis. 340 Portage - Historic Structures The draft NVCAP includes policies and implementation actions to facilitate the vision for the former Bayside Cannery building (340 Portage) and Ash Street office building (3201-3225 Ash). Staff seeks feedback from the HRB on these policies and implementation actions that affect historic resources. Within the Introduction chapter (pages 14-15), there is a spotlight on the cannery, providing background information and photographs. The draft NVCAP contains policies and guidelines that acknowledge the importance of the cannery and the Ash Street office building. The draft NVCAP maintains the cannery building and Ash Street office building and allows for two possible uses of the cannery: 1) Continued use as retail and office space; or 2) Adaptive re-use into housing (noting that a transition to housing is a long-term vision and converting a cannery building into residential use would be highly problematic at best). Item 2 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 10     Item No. 2. Page 6 of 7 The NVCAP also permits the construction of housing on remaining portions of the parcel, specifically the two remaining surface parking lots on the property. According to the NVCAP vision, the Ash Street building could become a “creative arts” space in the long-term. The NVCAP proposes that a portion of the southern parking lot become a public park along a re-naturalized Matadero Creek. The plan indicates that any adaptive re-use project would be consistent with the Secretary of Interior Standards for Treatment of Historic Properties, though additional analysis would be required to determine whether compliance with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards is feasible, depending on the proposed use. Additionally, the NVCAP includes the following guidelines pertaining to the cannery building: •Design of wayfinding signage would take cues from the design of the cannery (Guideline 3.6.4). •Any development within the cannery building footprint would be no taller than the existing monitor roof (Guideline 6.1.5). •Development along Portage Avenue adjacent to the Cannery should emulate the Cannery by taking cues from materiality and fenestration, and roof datum (Guideline 6.3.2). Historic Designation The Council expressed interest in exploring the possibility of placing the cannery and the Ash Street office building on the City’s historic inventory or pursing listing on the California Register of Historical Resources or National Register of Historic Places given the HRE found these eligible for such listing. The following NVCAP implementation action addresses the Council’s direction: •Explore within the first year after adoption of the NVCAP, the initiation of California or National Register and/or local Inventory as appropriate/as determined by Council for the cannery and the Ash Street office building. This implementation action could lead to the nomination and placement of the cannery and/or the Ash Street building on the Palo Alto Historic Inventory by Council action, or (if eligible at the time of nomination) nomination to the California or National Register (requiring the owner’s agreement and participation). The actions could occur regardless of the property owner’s pipeline project. Recommended Additions To reinforce these guidelines, staff seeks confirmation from the HRB to add a sub-section within Chapter 2 regarding historic resources, to consolidate vision statements describing potential adaptive re-use of the cannery and historic resource designation recommendations. This will make clear the intent of the NVCAP regarding historic resources. Item 2 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 11     Item No. 2. Page 7 of 7 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT Consistent with PAMC 19.10, the City Council appointed a 14-member working group. The working group met 17 times over the course of two years and concluded their effort once alternatives were forwarded to the PTC and City Council for consideration. Notifications throughout the process have been sent to the working group, stakeholders, and property owners. The City maintains a project website with archives of working group, workshops and public hearing materials related to the NVCAP. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW This study session does not trigger any California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) determination. However, the adoption of the NVCAP will require a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that tiers from the Comprehensive Plan EIR. Consistent with CEQA, a Notice of Preparation (NOP) was released on March 1, 2023.11 The NOP is the initial step in the EIR process where input may be gathered from the public and public agencies on the scope and content of the forthcoming Supplemental EIR. The NOP contains the project description, location, and probable environmental effects to be analyzed in the EIR. The comment period on the NOP ended on March 31, 2023. The next step in the environmental review process is to release a public draft of the Supplemental EIR for public comment for a period of 45-days. Any comment on the EIR requiring responses will be integrated into the Final Supplemental EIR for certification by the City Council when considering the NVCAP. NEXT STEPS The NVCAP is entering the final phase of the project. The next series of meetings include the additional follow-up study sessions, a PTC recommendation meeting and the City Council decision meeting. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices) Attachment B: Council Adopted Goals & Objectives Attachment C: Location Map AUTHOR/TITLE: Sheldon Ah Sing, Principal Planner 11 NVCAP Notice of Preparation (March 2023): https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/planning-amp- development-services/north-ventura-cap/environmental/nop-nvcap-2.28.23-signed.pdf Item 2 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 12     North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Draft Plan: May 2023 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 13     City Council Lydia Kou Mayor Greer Stone Vice Mayor Patrick Burt Ed Lauing Julie Lythcott-Haims Greg Tanaka Vicki Veenker Planning & Transportation Commission Doria Summa Chair Bryna Chang Vice Chair Bart Hechtman Keith Reckdahl Carolyn Templeton George Lu Allen Akin Consultants Perkins&Will Prime Consultant Arup Mobility Strategic Economics Economics BKF Infrastructure Plan to Place Engagement City Staff Jonathan Lait Director of Planning and Development Services Clare Campbell Manager of Long Range Planning Sheldon S. Ah Sing Principal Planner, Project Manager Chitra Moitra City Planner Sylvia Star-Lack Transportation Planning Manager Shrupath Patel Transportation Planner Acknowledgments Architectural Review Board Osma Thompson Yingxi Chen Peter Baltay David Hirsch Kendra Rosenberg Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 14     North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Prepared by Perkins&Will Prepared for Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 15     Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 4CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Context 1.2 The Plan Area 1.3 The Project Goals 1.4 The Project Objectives 1.5 Citywide Planning 1.6 Regional and Statewide Planning 1.7 The Community Process 28 102 CHAPTER 2: THE VISION 2.1 Preferred Plan 2.2 Land Use 2.3 Ground Floor Edges 2.4 Mobility 2.5 Ecology and Sustainability 2.6 Urban Form CHAPTER 5: PARKS 5.1 Public Park 5.2 Matadero Creek CHAPTER 6: BUILDINGS 6.1 Building Heights and Massing 6.2 Retail and Active Frontages 6.3 Portage Avenue Frontages 6.4 Residential Frontages 6.5 Sustainable Design 92 v North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 16     CHAPTER 3: PUBLIC REALM 3.1 The Sidewalk Zone 3.2 Traffic Lanes and Intersections 3.3 Green Infrastructure 3.4 Paving 3.5 Exterior Lighting 3.6 Wayfinding 3.7 Public Art 58 114 72 CHAPTER 7: IMPLEMENTATION 7.1 Entitlement Process 7.2 Environmental Review 7.3 Transportation Infrastructure 7.4 Transportation Demand Management 7.5 Utilities 7.6 Matadero Creek Civil Infrastructure 7.7 Funding and Financing Strategy 7.8 Implementation Actions CHAPTER 4: STREETS 4.1 Park Boulevard 4.2 Olive Avenue 4.3 Ash Street 4.4 Acacia Avenue 4.5 Pepper Avenue 4.6 Portage Avenue 4.7 Lambert Avenue 4.8 El Camino Real 4.9 Page Mill Road 4.10 Publicly Accessible Private Streets APPENDIX A1 Existing Conditions Memo A2 Traffic Modelling vi Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 17     EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION Figures Figure 1 Photograph of architect Mike Lyzwa hold- ing a model of a proposed building at the intersection of Page Mill Road and Park Boulevard, circa 1984, xii. Credit: Palo Alto Historical Association. Figure 2 Photograph of the Cannery monitor roof supergraphic on the former Fry’s site, 3. Credit: Perkins&Will Figure 3 Bird’s eye photograph of the NVCAP Plan Area circa 1957, 4. Credit: Palo Alto Historical Association. Figure 4 Priority Development Areas (PDA) in the Bay Area, 7. Figure 5 Matadero Creek Existing Conditions, 8. Credit: Perkins&Will Figure 6 Former Cannery Building Existing Conditions, 8. Credit: Perkins&Will Figure 7 Existing Conditions of the NVCAP Plan Area, 9. Figure 8 Existing Zoning Districts of the NVCAP, 11. Figure 9 Photographs of recent development, 12. Credit: Premier Properties, Level 10 Construction. Figure 10 Renderings of development under construction, 12. Credit: Hayes Group Architects, Zillow. Figure 11 1941 aerial photograph of the Sutter Packing Company. Credit: Fairchild Aerial Surveys, Flight C-7065, Frame 92, Collection of UC Santa Barbara. Edited by Page & Turnbull, 14. Figure 12 Gabled addition attached to the southernmost monitor roof of 340 Portage Avenue. View northeast. Credit: Page & Turnbull, 14. Figure 13 A portion of the southwest facade of the former office building. Credit: Page & Turnbull, 15. Figure 14 Thomas Foon Chew with two foremen at his canning plant in Alviso. Credit: Our Town of Palo Alto, 15. Figure 15 Sutter Packing Plant, 1940. Credit: Palo Alto Historical Association, 15. Figure 16 An illustrative example of low-cost buffered bike lanes and intersection improvements, 17. Credit: Perkins&Will Figure 17 Building 0 in San Francisco, CA, an example of mixed-income multi-family apartments next to a public park, 17. Credit: Perkins&Will Figure 18 A breakout discussion during the NVCAP working group meeting, 19. Credit: City of Palo Alto Figure 19 Documenting feedback during a working group design charrette, 19. Credit: Perkins&Will Figure 20 A worksession during the NVCAP working group meeting, 24. Credit: City of Palo Alto Figure 21 A sketching session and report back during the NVCAP working group meeting, 26. Credit: City of Palo Alto Figure 22 A presentation during a community workshop, 27. Credit: Perkins&Will vii North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 18     CHAPTER 2: THE VISION Figure 23 The NVCAP Preferred Plan, 30. Figure 24 NVCAP Land Use Framework, 32. Figure 25 Example of High-Density Mixed Use Development in Palo Alto, 34 Credit: Steinberg Architects Figure 26 Example of Medium Density Mixed Use Development in Palo Alto, 34. Credit: BDE Architecture Figure 27 Example of Low-Density Mixed Use Development, 35 Credit: WHA Figure 28 Example of High-Density Residential Development in Palo Alto, 35 Credit: Redfin Figure 29 Example of Medium Density Residential Development in Palo Alto, 35. Credit: Compass Figure 30 Example of Low-Density Resident Development, 35 Credit: Google Figure 31 The Cloudera Galactic HQ is located at 395 Page Mill Road, 36. Credit: Perkins&Will Figure 32 NVCAP Ground Floor Edges Framework, 38. Figure 33 Building lobbies and other accessory spaces to residential uses are considered active uses, 40. Credit: Perkins&Will Figure 34 Neighborhood-serving retail along major boulevards like El Camino Real, 41. Credit: Bruce Damonte Figure 35 Residential stoops should be set back and elevated to provide privacy for residents, 41. Credit: Perkins&Will Figure 36 NVCAP Mobility Framework, 42. Figure 37 NVCAP Pedestrian Network, 44. Figure 38 View of the Bell Street Woonerf in Seattle, Washington, 45. Credit: Puget Sound Business Journal Figure 39 Bike Facility Degree of Separation, 46. Figure 40 NVCAP Bike Network Framework, 47. Figure 41 NVCAP Vehicle and Parking Framework, 49. Figure 42 NVCAP Ecology and Sustainability Framework, 50. Figure 43 A conceptual design for the future Public park, 52. Figure 44 An example of a restored creek in San Luis Obispo, CA, 53. Credit: Food and Wine Safari Figure 45 An example of green infrastructure integrated with street furnishings, 53. Credit: AJ Landskap Figure 46 NVCAP Urban Form Framework , 54. Figure 47 Internal streets have height allowances that are conducive with missing middle housing like townhomes, 56. Credit: Perkins&Will Figure 48 Urban form design standards requires setbacks and stepbacks for new development that is adjacent to single family zoning, 57. Credit: Perkins&Will CHAPTER 3: PUBLIC REALM Figure 49 The Sidewalk Zone, 61. Figure 50 Proposed improvements to El Camino Real, Hansen Way, and Portage Avenue will sup- port a safe, low-stress, multi-modal street environment, 63, Figure 51 Planting a double row of trees along the sidewalk and frontage zone creates connected canopy for a pleasant pedes- trian experience, improves neighborhood aesthetics, and fosters ecological corridors, 67. Credit: Scape Figure 52 Light colored pavement reduces the urban heat island effect, 68. Credit: John Keatley Figure 53 Dark sky compliant exterior light fixtures helps mitigate light pollution and the health of both humans and wildlife, 69. Credit: Edgar Zacarias via Foursquare. Figure 54 Neighborhood map and directional signage are effective wayfinding tools for visitors to the NVCAP, 70. Figure 55 An example of a recent public art installation, 71. Credit: Passages by Susan Zoccola viii Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 19     CHAPTER 4: STREETS Figures CHAPTER 5: PARKS Figure 56 Typical Park Boulevard Section, 75. Figure 57 Typical Olive Avenue section between Park Boulevard and Ash Street, 77. Figure 58 Typical Olive Avenue section between Ash Street and El Camino Real, 77. Figure 59 Typical Ash Street section between Page Mill Road and Olive Avenue, 79. Figure 60 Typical Ash Street section between Acacia Avenue and Lambert Avenue, 79. Figure 61 Typical Acacia Avenue Section, 81. Figure 62 Typical Pepper Avenue Section, 83. Figure 63 Typical Portage Avenue section between Park Boulevard and Ash Street, 85. Figure 64 Typical Portage Avenue section between Ash Street and El Camino Real, 85, Figure 65 Streetscape elements like double row of trees, textured pavement, pedestrian scale lighting , and seating encourages a low-carbon, welcoming neighborhood environment, 87. Credit: SWA Figure 66 Typical Lambert Avenue Sidewalk Zone Section, 88. Figure 67 Typical El Camino Real Sidewalk Zone Section, 89. Figure 68 Typical Page Mill Road Sidewalk Zone Section, 90. Figure 69 Typical mid-block connetion section, 93. Figure 70 Typical rear setback connection section, 93. Figure 71 Location of Park Gateways and Circulation Paths, 97. Figure 72 An example of passive park programming, 99. Credit: Jennifer Tyner Figure 73 An example of active park programming, 99. Credit: Daggett Figure 74 The location of the Matadero Creek buffer, circulation, and gateways, 101. Figure 75 The Matadero Creek Channel is currently a constrained concrete trapezoidal channel., 102. Credit: Perkins&Will Figure 76 A naturalized creek has the opportunity to provide multi-use trails and habitat areas, 103. Credit: Food and Wine Safari ix North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 20     CHAPTER 6: BUILDINGS CHAPTER 7: IMPLEMENTATION Figure 77 Stepdown to Single-Family Residential, 106. Figure 78 Allowable Height Map, 107. Figure 79 Retail ground floor provide adequate floor to ceiling heights, transparency, and signage, 108. Credit: David Baker Architects Figure 80 Ground floors can create notches of outdoor rooms to allow for lively spillover of retail, 109 Credit: Bruce Damonte Figure 81 Active ground floors provide openness, transparency and a connection to the street, 109 Credit: David Baker Architects Figure 82 Ground floors treatments can emulate the materiality, fenestration, and roof datum of historic structures, 110. Credit: Connect CRA Figure 83 Ground floor residential stoops can provide privacy for residents, neighborhood beautification, and stormwater management, 111. Credit: Perkins&Will Figure 84 Buidling roofs can be multi-purpose, including providing additional outdoor space for residents, 114. Credit: Kirstin Bucher Figure 85 Visible elements of sustainability can include design features such as celebrating secure bike parking, 115. Credit: Nelson / Nygaard Figure 86 Map of Conceptual Gateway Intersection Design Improvements, 123. Figure 87 El Camino Real and Page Mill Road Con- ceptual Intersection Design, 124. Figure 88 El Camino Real and Olive Avenue Concep- tual Intersection Design, 125. Figure 89 El Camino Real, Hansen Way, Portage Ave- nue Conceptual Intersection Design, 126. Figure 90 Lambert Avenue and Ash Street Conceptu- al Intersection Design, 127. Figure 91 Park Boulevard and Portage Avenue Con- ceptual Intersection Design, 128 Figure 92 The Matadero Creek Channel Today, along Ash Street, 145. Credit: BKF Engineers Figure 93 Storm Drain Outfalls to Matadero Creek Channel, 145. x Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 21     Tables CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION Table 1 Historical Population and Growth in Palo Alto, 1980 - 2040, 7. Table 2 Existing Zoning Designations, 10. Table 3 Existing and Future Development Potential by Land Use, 32. Table 4 Proposed Land Use, FAR, and Active Use Requirements, 36. Table 5 Bicycle Facility Classifications, 47. CHAPTER 2: THE VISION CHAPTER 3: PUBLIC REALM Table 6 Local native protected tree species, 64. Table 7 Trees to be exempt from protection, 65. CHAPTER 4: STREETS Table 8 Park Boulevard Street Design, 74. Table 9 Olive Avenue Street Design, 76. Table 10 Ash Street Street Design, 78. Table 11 Acacia Avenue Street Design, 80. Table 12 Pepper Avenue Street Design, 82. Table 13 Portage Avenue Street Design, 84. Table 14 Lambert Avenue Sidewalk Zone Design, 88. Table 15 El Camino Real Sidewalk Zone Design, 89. Table 16 Page Mill Road Sidewalk Zone Design, 90. Table 17 Mid-Block Paseo Design, 90. Table 18 Rear Setback Pathway Design, 90. xi North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 22     CHAPTER 7: IMPLEMENTATION Table 19 TDM Strategies Menu, 137. Table 20 Unit Flow Rates for ABWF, GWI, and RDI in the City of Palo Alto Water, Gas, & Wastewater Utility Standards Section 2730 Wastewater Design and Construction Standards, 140. Table 21 Existing and proposed wastewater generation for the NVCAP site, 141 Table 22 Proposed water demand for the NVCAP site, 142, Table 23 Funding Source Categories and Examples, 146. Table 24 Examples of Potential Regional or County Grant Funding Sources for NVCAP Improvements, 148. Table 25 Examples of Potential State Grant Funding Sources for NVCAP Improvements, 150. Table 26 Examples of Potential State Grant Funding Sources for NVCAP Improvements (Continued), 152. Table 27 Examples of Potential Federal Grant Funding Sources for NVCAP Improvements, 152. Table 28 Summary of Major District-Based Value Capture Tools, 154. Table 29 Infrastructure Improvements and Applicable Funding Sources in the NVCAP, 156. Table 30 Implementation Actions in the NVCAP, 158 Table 31 Implementation Actions in the NVCAP (Continued), 160 xii Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 23     Figure 1 Photograph of architect Mike Lyzwa holding a model of a proposed building at the intersection of Page Mill Road and Park Boulevard, circa 1984. xiii North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 24     The North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan (NVCAP) represents a rare opportunity within the City of Palo Alto to plan proactively for a transit-oriented, mixed-use, mixed-income, and walkable neighborhood. The NVCAP sets forth a vision that: • Honors the storied history and unique character of the North Ventura neighborhood; • Understands the needs of current residents and puts forward near-term solutions to current challenges; • Establishes a long-term framework for desired growth so that more people can call North Ventura home; and • Invests in community infrastructure to support an equitable, resilient, and sustainable Palo Alto. Executive Summary NVCAP is aligned with the goals and policies embedded in the adopted City of Palo Alto 2030 Comprehensive Plan, addressing the eight major themes: Building Community and Neighborhoods; Maintaining and Enhancing Community Character; Reducing Reliance on the Automobile; Meeting Housing Supply Challenges; Protecting and Sustaining the Natural Environment; Keeping Palo Alto Prepared for Future Natural and Human-Caused Hazards; Meeting Residential and Commercial Needs; and Providing Responsive Governance and Regional Leadership. Finally, this is a vision shaped by the Palo Alto community. This Plan would not be possible without the guidance of stakeholders, decision-makers, residents, and other community members, who graciously volunteered their time as members of the Working Group to thoughtfully consider the challenges and opportunities of the Plan. 1 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 25     Plan Organization The plan document is organized as follows: Introduction provides an overview of the NVCAP physical and regulatory context. The Plan is shaped by the project goals and objectives, adopted and in-progress City plans and policies, recently enacted regional and state laws, and the comprehensive community planning process. The Vision provides an overview of the vision for the future of NVCAP built and natural environment. This includes urban design frameworks that calibrate the optimal mix of uses; support a multi-modal mobility framework within the neighborhood and how it connects to the rest of the city and the region; foster a regenerative and ecological framework to support the health of humans and wildlife while supporting the implementation of City’s Climate Action Plan; and the neighborhood’s context- specific urban form. Design Standards and Guidelines (Public Realm, Streets, Parks, Buildings) include requirements that govern the construction and modification of horizontal and vertical development, standards are quantifiable, whereas guidelines are qualitative requirements. Implementation outlines the necessary steps to fulfill the vision of the Plan, including funding and financing strategies, infrastructure improvements, and capital investments. Appendix contains information for reference used to generate the NVCAP including existing site conditions, market studies, and infrastructure analysis. 2 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 26     Figure 2 Photograph of the Cannery monitor roof supergraphic on the former Fry’s site, 2022 Credit: Perkins&Will 3 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 27     1.1 The Context 1.2 The Plan Area 1.3 The Project Goals 1.4 The Project Objectives 1.5 Citywide Planning 1.6 Regional and Statewide Planning 1.7 The Community Process Introduction 1 Figure 3 Bird’s eye photograph of the NVCAP Plan Area circa 1957. Matadero Creek Sutter Packing Plant Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 28     Sutter Packing Plant Park Boulevard El Camino Real Southern Pacific Railroad Stanford Industrial Park Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 29     1.0 The Context The purpose of the NVCAP is to capture the City’s vision for the North Ventura neighborhood into a regulatory document that will guide the future development of the 60-acre Plan Area, including land use, development standards, and design guidelines This planning effort was initiated by Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan Program L-4.10, which states the following, Prepare a Coordinated Area Plan for the North Ventura area and surrounding California Avenue area. The Plan should describe a vision for the future of the North Ventura area as a walkable neighborhood with multi- family housing, ground-floor retail, a public park, creek improvements, and an interconnected street grid. It should guide the development of the California Avenue area as a well-designed mixed- use district with diverse land uses and a network of pedestrian-oriented streets. The NVCAP aligns with the Comprehensive Plan policy, however, the Plan Area focuses solely on the North Ventura neighborhood. On November 6, 2017, the City Council adopted Resolution 9717, authorizing the filing of an application to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for a Priority Development Area Grant for the North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan. The Council expressed local support and commitment of necessary matching funds and assurance of the completion of the project. City Policies Comprehensive Plan Policy 1.7: Use coordinated area plan to guide development Comprehensive Plan (Program L-4.10.1): Prepare a coordinated area plan for the North Ventura area and surrounding California Avenue area. On November 6, 2017, the City Council adopted a Resolution expressing local support and commitment for the preparation of the NVCAP. 6 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 30     The Region The Bay Area is expected to be home to an additional 1.4 million households by 2050. It is essential that housing, transportation, and other types of land use ning work together – as part of a regional growth framework – create an equitable, prosperous future for all Bay Area communities and make the best use of available resources. Priority Development Areas (PDA) are a key piece of the Bay Area’s regional growth framework. Approximately 70% of the Plan Area is located within the California Avenue PDA, which was selected as a PDA based on excellent access to transit, the proximity of the existing California Avenue Business District, and the availability of underutilized parcels of land. Figure 4 Priority Development Areas (PDA) in the Bay Area Palo Alto Growth Projections Additionally, the City of Palo Alto is growing. According to the City’s Housing Element Update, the total population is projected to grow to 82,835 people by 2030 and 86,510 people by 2040. Historically, the number of new homes built in the Bay Area has not kept pace with demand, resulting in longer commutes, increasing prices, and exacerbating issues of displacement and homelessness. The number of new homes in Palo Alto increased 3.8 percent from 2010 to 2020, which is below the growth rate for Santa Clara County and below the growth rate of the region’s housing stock during this time period. At the same time, Palo Alto’s population increased 6 percent. Table 1 Historical Population and Growth in Palo Alto, 1980 - 2040 Sources: U.S. Census 1980, 1990, 2000, 2010, California Department of Finance 2021 and ABAG Plan Bay Area 2040 Projections * Projections Year Population Numerical Change Percent Change 1980 55,225 741 1% 1990 55,900 675 1% 2000 58,598 2,698 5% 2010 64,403 5,805 10% 2020 68,145 3,254 6% 2030*82,835*15,178*22%* 2040*86,510*3,675*4%* California Avenue PDA IN T R O D U C T I O N 7 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 31     The Plan Area The NVCAP Plan Area is approximately 60 acres, roughly bounded by Oregon Expressway / Page Mill Road to the north, El Camino Real to the west, Lambert Avenue to the south, and the Caltrain rail corridor to the east. Nearby neighborhoods include the Evergreen neighborhood to the west, the Midtown neighborhood to the north, and Barron Park to the south. 1.1 Proximity to City Destinations The Plan Area is within walking and biking distance to several key destinations, including: •The California Avenue Caltrain Station, which is within a half mile of the Plan Area, and walking access to the station is primarily along Park Boulevard, a designated Bike Boulevard, •El Camino Real, which is a regional commercial and retail corridor, but has limited opportunities for pedestrians and bicyclists to cross Page Mill Road safely. •California Avenue, which is a regional retail attraction and social destination for the peninsula. •Stanford University, one of the premier higher- education institutions in the world •Stanford Research Park. A University affiliated employment center, which, along with California Avenue accounts for almost 40% of the City’s employment distribution. •Signature Palo Alto open spaces such as Sarah Wallis Park, Boulware Park, and J. Bowden Park. Plan Area Notable Sites Notable sites within the Plan Area include the Matadero Creek Channel and the buildings associated with the Cannery. The portion of the Matadero Creek running through the Plan Area is contained with a concrete trapezoidal channel, which was built in 1990 from El Camino Real to the Caltrain Tracks. Figure 5 The Matadero Creek Channel is currently a constrained concrete trapezoidal channel. Figure 6 The former Cannery building is 12.5 acres and located at the heart of the NVCAP. 8 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 32     Cloudera Galactic HQ The Cannery Matadero Creek Channel California Avenue Caltrain Station Boulware Park Park Plaza Apartments Cannery Office Building Figure 7 Existing Conditions of the NVCAP Plan Area IN T R O D U C T I O N Project Boundary Caltrain Station Bus Stops Traffic Signals Existing Sidewalks Major External Connections Surface Parking Parks 9 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 33     Land Use and Zoning The North Ventura neighborhood is already made up of a mix of multi-family and single- family residential, office, service, and retail. Service commercial uses are concentrated along El Camino Real, Lambert Avenue, and the southern segment of Portage Avenue. Additionally, office uses are located primarily along Page Mill Road and Park Boulevard, the most notable anchors being the Cloudera Galactic Headquarters at 395 Page Mill Road and the newly constructed 3045 Park Boulevard. Several smaller companies such as Blue Sky Outdoors and EarnIn are currently located in the historic Cannery building. About 70% of units in North Ventura are single- family detached homes, most built before 1950. Single-family homes occupy about 10 percent of the Plan Area and are generally found along Pepper Avenue and Olive Avenue. The Park Plaza Apartments is the most notable multi-family residential development within the Plan Area, situated at the corner of Park Boulevard and Page Mill Road. 1.1 Table 2 Existing Zoning Designations Zoning Map Designation District Name R-1 Single-family residence district RM-30 Medium density multiple-family residence district CS Service commercial district ROLM Research, office and limited manufacturing district GM General manufacturing district CN Neighborhood commercial GM General manufacturing PC Planned community district 10 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 34     Figure 8 Existing Zoning Districts of the NVCAP IN T R O D U C T I O N PC: Planned Community RM-30: Multiple-Family Residential R-1: Single Family Residential CS: Service Commercial ROLM: Industrial/Manufacturing CN: Neighborhood Commercial GM - General Manufacturing Project Boundary Historic Building 11 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 35     Recent and Pipeline Development The Plan Area is experiencing significant change and new investment in mixed-use development. This includes the following development: Completed 425 Page Mill Road: a three-story mixed use building with one level of underground parking. The project includes Class-A office space, ground floor retail, and 16 apartments. 3045 Park Boulevard: a two-story shell commercial building with underground parking. Under Construction 3225 El Camino Real: the project consists of two distinct mixed-use buildings. The first building is 4 stories with ground floor retail and apartments/ condos on the upper floors. The second building is 2 stories with ground floor retail and office on the upper floor. The project includes underground and podium parking. 3265 El Camino Real: a three-story mixed-use building with commercial space on the ground floor and residential on the upper floors. 1.1 Figure 9 Photographs of recent development Figure 10 Renderings of development under construction 12 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 36     The 340 Portage Avenue Development Agreement In parallel to the NVCAP planning process, a development agreement for the combined 14.65- acre parcel at the 340 Portage site also known as the Fry’s site has been underway with the City. The proposed development agreement includes the following: •Demolition of a portion of the Cannery building to develop 74 ownership townhouses. •Adaptive reuse of the historic portion of the Cannery to include research & development (R&D) and 2,600 square feet of retail. •The Ash Building will remain office space. •The 3250 Park Boulevard (Audi Building) will go from auto repair service to R&D space. •The developer will construct one level garage for R&D and retail parking needs on the existing surface parking lot. •Dedication of 2.25 acres for parkland. •Dedication of one (1) acre for affordable housing. •Contribution of $5 million for future park improvements and contributions to the City’s affordable housing fund. •Development of a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program for the R&D and office uses. It is not the intent of the development agreement to replace the NVCAP goals and objectives. The development agreement and development proposal are considered as a pipeline project being processed prior to the adoption of the NVCAP. Every attempt to ensure compatibility with the NVCAP goals, objectives and preferred plan were made. IN T R O D U C T I O N 13 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 37     Spotlight: The Palo Alto Cannery At the heart of the NVCAP is the 12.5- acre 340 Portage Avenue property. What appears to be one large building on the parcel is composed of approximately ten buildings that were constructed at various times between 1918 and 1949. The building is surrounded by a narrow parking lot to the north and a larger parking lot to the south bounded by Matadero Creek. The rectangular former cannery building features walls that are concrete, corrugated metal or wood siding, with a variety of roof shapes. Some of the most distinctive features include the monitor roofs, capped with composition shingles and clad with corrugated metal, wood clerestory ribbon windows and wire glass skylights. Historic Resource Evaluation 340 Portage Avenue Draft Palo Alto, California April 11, 2019 - 31 - Page & Turnbull, Inc. Figure 73: 1941 aerial photograph of the Sutter Packing Company. Subject property outlined in orange. Office building outlined in blue. Source: Fairchild Aerial Surveys, Flight C-7065, Frame 92, Collection of UC Santa Barbara. Edited by Page & Turnbull. Figure 72. Sutter Packing Plant, 1940. Source: Palo Alto Historical Association. Historic Resource Evaluation 340 Portage Avenue Draft Palo Alto, California April 11, 2019 - 13 - Page & Turnbull, Inc. Figure 23. The loading platform or cooling porch converted into a patio with replacement aluminum frame garage door window. View northeast. Figure 24. Rooftop parapet and small gabled roof in middle section of northwest façade. View northeast. Figure 25. Gabled addition attached to the southernmost monitor roof of 340 Portage Avenue. View northeast. Figure 26. Close-up of the gabled and flat- roofed additions. View northeast. Figure 27. A portion of the concrete loading platform or cooling porch with its shed awning and wood post-and-beam supports in the middle section of the northwest façade. View northeast. Figure 28. Outlines of shallow gabled roofs are visible along the concrete platform. View southeast. Figure 11 1941 aerial photograph of the Sutter Packing Company. Source: Fairchild Aerial Surveys, Flight C-7065, Frame 92, Collection of UC Santa Barbara. Edited by Page & Turnbull. Figure 12 Gabled addition attached to the southernmost monitor roof of 340 Portage Avenue. View northeast. Source: Page & Turnbull 1.1 14 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 38     Historic Resource Evaluation 340 Portage Avenue Draft Palo Alto, California April 11, 2019 - 31 - Page & Turnbull, Inc. Figure 73: 1941 aerial photograph of the Sutter Packing Company. Subject property outlined in orange. Office building outlined in blue. Source: Fairchild Aerial Surveys, Flight C-7065, Frame 92, Collection of UC Santa Barbara. Edited by Page & Turnbull. Figure 72. Sutter Packing Plant, 1940. Source: Palo Alto Historical Association. Historic Resource Evaluation 340 Portage Avenue Draft Palo Alto, California April 11, 2019 - 38 - Page & Turnbull, Inc. 1972 Bemiss & Jason Corp, shipping, receiving, paper products manufacturing 300 Portage Avenue 1962 Tubes & Cores Inc, paper products 1976 Ceilcote Company Inc, distribution office 303 Portage Avenue 1961-1965 Advance Transformer Co 1961-1976 James R W Packaging, packing, crating, and shipping 340 Portage Avenue 1985 Basket Galleria, Inc. ca. 1990-Present Fry’s Electronics 370 Portage Avenue 2002-2004 Lyncean Technologies 380 Portage Avenue 2006 Danger, Inc. 2016 – Present: Playground Global, technology Select Owner and Occupant Biographies The following biographies have been researched for longer-term owners and occupants. Thomas Foon Chew (1887-1931) and the Bayside Canning Company (1918-1936) Thomas Foon Chew was born in China around 1887, likely in the Loong Kai District of Guangdong Province, and became one of the richest and most influential Chinese- Americans in California. His father, Sai Yen Chew, emigrated to San Francisco when Thomas was a child, where he founded a small canning operation, Precinta Canning, around 1890. According to family members, Chew brought his son, Thomas, from China to San Francisco sometime around 1897, where he gained his first introduction to the canning business. Precinta Canning was located near Broadway and Sansome in San Francisco’s old Chinatown. The small cannery was equipped with a single 40- Figure 76: Thomas Foon Chew with two foremen at his canning plant in Alviso. Source: Our Town of Palo Alto. https://ourtownofpaloalto.wordpress.com/2016/12/30/histor y-of-mayfields-chinatown/ On the parcel is a one-story, wood frame office building on Ash Street located to the south of the former cannery building. The building appears to have been initially built as a dormitory for the cannery employees sometime between 1918 and 1925 and was moved to its current location in 1940. The building features a front- gabled roof, wraparound porch with a shed roof, and wood lap siding. Historic Resource Evaluation 340 Portage Avenue Draft Palo Alto, California April 11, 2019 - 20 - Page & Turnbull, Inc. Figure 57. A portion of the southwest façade of the former office building. View northeast. Figure 58. The rear portion of the southwest façade of the former office building. View northwest. SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD The subject property is located in the Ventura neighborhood, which is surrounded by the Evergreen Park, St. Claire Gardens, Charleston Meadow, Barron Park, Neal, and College Terrace neighborhoods in Palo Alto. The immediate surroundings of the subject property consist of office and commercial buildings, several of which appear to have been influenced by the industrial architecture of the property at 340 Portage Avenue, and parking lots associated with these properties (Figure 59 to Figure 62). Single-family residential buildings along Olive Avenue border the subject property to the west (Figure 63). Figure 59. A neighboring property on Park Boulevard to the east of Matadero Creek. View southeast. Figure 60. An office building at 3101 Park Boulevard. View northeast. The former cannery site was initially developed in April 1918, by Thomas Foon Chew, the owner of Bayside Canning Company or affectionately known in the press at the time as “the asparagus king”. This was intended to be Mr. Chew’s second cannery; the first cannery was built nearby in Alviso, California. The Palo Alto cannery was strategically located alongside a railroad spur of the Southern Pacific Railroad’s Los Gatos branch, which facilitated shipments, and Matadero Creek for a ready water supply. The cannery was expanded over the next several decades. The site operated as the Bay Side Cannery and then as the Sutter Packing Company in 1929. The cannery continued to grow through World War II and was closed in 1949. Although the building has undergone some exterior alterations throughout the expansion, aerial photos show that from 1965, the building continues to have the same shape and general form as now. Following the closure of the cannery, the site has been occupied by an anchor retailer Maximart and other retail and office uses. The next significant and largest tenant, Fry’s Electronics, continued to occupy the site until the end of 2019. Figure 13 A portion of the southwest facade of the former office building. Source: Page & Turnbull Figure 14 Thomas Foon Chew with two foremen at his canning plant in Alviso. Source: Our Town of Palo Alto. Figure 15 Sutter Packing Plant, 1940. Source: Palo Alto Historical Association IN T R O D U C T I O N 15 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 39     Project Goals On March 5th, 2018, the City Council approved the following goals to guide the NVCAP. A project goal refers to the desired outcome of a project. The following goals are high-level statements that provide an overall context for the aims and accomplishments of the project. Housing and Land Use Add to the City’s supply of multi-family housing, including market rate, affordable, “missing middle” and senior housing in a walkable, mixed- use, transit-accessible neighborhood, with retail and commercial services, open space, and possibly arts and entertainment uses. Transit, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Connections Create and enhance well-defined connections to transit, pedestrian, and bicycle facilities, including connections to the Caltrain Station, Park Boulevard, and El Camino Real. Connected Street Grid Create a connected street grid, filling in sidewalk gaps and street connections to California Avenue, the Caltrain Station, and El Camino Real where appropriate. Community Facilities and Infrastructure Carefully align and integrate development of new community facilities and infrastructure with private development, recognizing both the community’s needs and that such investments can increase the cost of housing. 1.2 16 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 40     Balance of Community Interests Balance community-wide objectives with the interests of neighborhood residents and minimize displacement of existing residents. Urban Design, Design Guidelines, and Neighborhood Fabric Develop human-scale urban design strategies, and design guidelines that strengthen and support the neighborhood fabric. Infill development will respect the scale and character of the surrounding residential neighborhood. Sustainability and the Environment Protect and enhance the environment, while addressing the principles of sustainability. Figure 16 (left) An illustrative example of low-cost buffered bike lanes and intersection improvements. Figure 17 (top) Building 0 in San Francisco, CA, an example of mixed-income multi-family apartments next to a public park. Throughout the document, applicable project goals are included in insets. IN T R O D U C T I O N 17 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 41     Project Objectives On March 5th, 2018, the City Council approved the following objectives to guide the NVCAP. Project objectives describe the optimal process and set the goalposts for a successful plan. Project objectives are measurable and achievable. Data-Driven Approach Employ a data-driven approach that considers community desires, market conditions and forecasts, financial feasibility, existing uses and development patterns, development capacity, traffic and travel patterns, historic/cultural and natural resources, need for community facilities (e.g., schools), and other relevant data to inform plan policies. Comprehensive User-Friendly Document and Implementation Create a comprehensive but user-friendly document that identifies the distribution, location and extent of land uses, planning policies, development regulations, and design guidelines to enable development and needed infrastructure investments in the project area. Guide and Strategy for Staff and Decision Makers Provide a guide and strategy for staff and decision-makers to bridge the gap between the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and individual development projects in order to streamline future land use and transportation decisions. 1.3 18 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 42     Meaningful Community Engagement Enable a process with meaningful opportunities for community engagement, within the defined timeline, and an outcome (the coordinated area plan document) that reflects the community’s priorities. Economic Feasibility A determination of the economic and fiscal feasibility of the plan with specific analysis of marketplace factors and incentives and disincentives, as well as a cost-benefit analysis of public infrastructure investments and projected economic benefits to the City and community. Environmental A plan that is protective of public health and a process that complies with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. Figure 18 (left) A breakout discussion during the NVCAP working group meeting, Figure 19 (top) Documenting feedback during a working group design charrette IN T R O D U C T I O N 19 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 43     Citywide Planning The standards and guidelines in this document are informed and in conformance with the following foundational city plans and policies. 2030 Comprehensive Plan The City adopted the 2030 Comprehensive Plan in November 2017, which is the primary tool for guiding preservation and development in Palo Alto. The Plan reflects community values and provides a collective vision that guides preservation, growth, and change. The Plan Area is a part of the California Avenue Multi- Neighborhood Center. A multi-neighborhood center is defined as retail shopping centers or districts that serves more than one neighborhood with a diverse mix of uses, including retail, service, office, and residential. Program L4.10.1 directs staff to prepare a coordinated area plan for the North Ventura area and surrounding California Avenue area. The plan should describe a vision for the future of the North Ventura area as a walkable neighborhood with multi-family housing, ground- floor retail, a public park, creek improvements, and an interconnected street grid. It should guide the development of the California Avenue area as a well-designed mixed-use district with diverse land uses and a network of pedestrian-oriented streets. Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan The City adopted the Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan in July 2012, which strategically guides public and private investments in non-motorized transportation facilities and related programs. The plan identifies several streets within the Plan Area as critical bicycle streets, including Portage Avenue as an enhanced bikeway as part of the Bay to Ridge Trail and Park Boulevard as a major north- south Bicycle Boulevard. Housing Element 2023-2031 The Housing Element update, one of the State-mandated components of the City’s Comprehensive Plan, represents the City of Palo Alto’s sixth Housing Element and plans for the years 2023 through 2031. In total, approximately 6,700 housing units are needed to accommodate the 2023-2031 growth for all income groups as part of the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) process. The Plan Area includes 15 properties identified by the Housing Element as opportunity sites that could help the City meet its housing needs (unit yield of 348). Palo Alto Municipal Code, Chapter 19.10: Coordinated Area Plans This chapter establishes the procedures for the preparation of coordinated area plans. The chapter’s sections outline the purpose of a CAP, the procedures needed to be performed throughout the planning process, the contents of the plan document, and the requirements for permitting and development once the CAP has been adopted. Palo Alto Municipal Code, Chapter 18.32: Affordable Housing Incentive Program The affordable housing incentive program is intended to promote the development of 100% affordable rental housing projects located within one-half mile of a major transit stop or one- quarter mile of a high-quality transit corridor. Due to the Plan Area’s proximity to transit and everyday needs, the NVCAP is a strong candidate to support the City’s goal of adding more affordable housing units to support a wider range of incomes. 1.4 20 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 44     Palo Alto Municipal Code, Chapter 18.24: Contextual Design Criteria and Objective Design Standards To comply with California’s recently adopted legislation (Senate Bill (SB) 35 and SB 330) to address the housing shortage within the state, Palo Alto adopted objective design standards to review new multi-family and mixed-use residential housing projects. The development standards and design guidelines included in the coordinated area plan are intended to be complementary to the objective design standards. Parks, Trails, Natural Open Space, and Recreation Master Plan Adopted in September 2017, the Parks Master Plan presents the vision for the future of Palo Alto’s parks, trails, natural open space, and recreation system. The plan identifies the entire Plan Area as an urban canopy target area, emphasizing the need for new green streets and parks. Additionally, Policy 1.B.10 states the following, ‘develop a creek walk along Matadero Creek that links parks and creates open space and a habitat corridor’. Finally, the plan designates Portage Avenue and Park Boulevard as ‘Pollinator Pathways,’ which are intended to provide connectivity for natural systems through the integration of green stormwater infrastructure. The future public park and the renaturalization of the creek can serve as an integral component of the City’s larger regional habitat connection concept, connecting people and wildlife from the foothills to the Baylands. Urban Forest Master Plan Adopted in February 2019, the Urban Forest Master Plan establishes long-term management goals and strategies to foster a sustainable urban forest in Palo Alto. The urban forest includes street trees, park trees, forested parklands, and trees in many private ownership settings. NVCAP is aligned with the master plan’s goals and policies including: •Goal 1: A well-developed contiguous, healthy, and ecologically resilient citywide urban forest; and •Goal 2: Re-generated native woodland and riparian landscapes as the key ecological basis of the urban forest with a focus on native species and habitat. Green Stormwater Infrastructure Plan Completed in 2019, the Green Stormwater Infrastructure (GSI) Plan provides a guidance framework to integrate GSI measures into the City’s urban landscape to properly manage and treat stormwater at its source, decreasing water quality impacts to local creeks, the Baylands, and the San Francisco Bay. Integration of GSI measures is critical for the Plan Area to address the current lack of open spaces, and high amount of imperviousness. Chapter 4 of the Green Stormwater Infrastructure Plan (GSI) specifies in the Developed Project Location Prioritization Criteria, that projects located within one of the key development areas should receive a higher priority than projects located outside one of these areas. Public Art Master Plan Completed in November 2016, the mission of the plan is to ensure that new public art reflects Palo Alto’s people, diverse neighborhoods, the innovative and global character of its businesses and academic institutions, and the beauty of its natural environment. Several of the plan’s objectives are applicable to NVCAP including: •Objective 1: Locate art in unexpected places, such as alleys to provide an element of surprise and whimsy to everyday life. •Objective 2: Integrate impactful, permanently- sited public art projects in business areas. •Objective 3: Install public art in neighborhoods for residents to enjoy on a daily basis. •Objective 4: Use art to promote environmental stewardship and sustainability. Create partnerships with Environmental Services and local regional agencies to integrate public art into environmental projects. •Objective 5: Commission artists or artist/design teams to create specific public art plans for areas of Palo Alto where development is taking place. IN T R O D U C T I O N 21 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 45     Relationship Between the NVCAP and Other City Plans and Ordinances The NVCAP implements the City of Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan and provides more detailed programs and policies for the specifically defined NVCAP. These policies and programs are consistent with those found in the Comprehensive Plan but address the unique characteristics of NVCAP. The NVCAP provides the zoning for the area, supplementing Title 18 Zoning of the Palo Alto Municipal Code (PAMC). In the case of a conflict between the CAP and the PAMC, the CAP prevails. References to the PAMC are to the PAMC as amended from time to time, unless otherwise noted. Regulatory Compliance The Plan was prepared in accordance with CEQA, and any state applicable law. The NVCAP guides all development within the Plan Area and will require amendments to the Zoning Ordinance to ensure consistency and to implement the development regulations and land uses established in this CAP. The CAP is adopted under the authority of the City’s Zoning Ordinance, which designates Coordinated Area Plans as a tool to guide land use and development consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 1.4 22 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 46     Regional and Statewide Planning Approximately 70% of the Plan Area is located within the California Avenue PDA, which was selected based on excellent access to transit, the proximity of the existing California Avenue Business District, and the availability of underutilized parcels of land. Therefore, NVCAP is subject to both regional and state legislation, developed and adopted to ensure new development within PDAs are supporting compact, equitable transit-oriented communities. Transit-Oriented Communities (TOC) Policy Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s (MTC’s) regional Transit-Oriented Communities (TOC) policy update seeks to support the region’s transit investments by creating communities around transit stations and along transit corridors that not only support transit ridership, but that are places where Bay Area residents of all abilities, and income levels, and racial and ethnic backgrounds can live, work and access services, such as education, childcare, and healthcare. The TOC policies would apply to PDAs that are served by fixed-guideway transit such as the California Avenue Station (Caltrain). PDAs that comply with these TOC policies are eligible for grant funding administered by the MTC. Jurisdictions adopting these policies would be required to implement the following: •New Residential Development: a minimum density of 50 units/net acre or higher and an allowable maximum density of 75 units/net acre or higher. •New Commercial Office Development: a minimum density of 2 Floor Area Ratio (FAR) or higher and an allowable maximum density of 4 FAR or higher. •Parking Management Requirements: no minimum parking requirement allowed. At the time of plan adoption, the City has not adopted the TOC policy. Assembly Bill 2097 (AB2097) The California State Legislature passed, and the Governor signed, Assembly Bill (AB) 2097 that eliminates minimum parking requirements for all uses/development, (except hotels) within a half- mile of public transit. This bill affects all properties within the NVCAP. The new requirements went into effect on January 1, 2023, ahead of the adoption of the NVCAP. 1.5 IN T R O D U C T I O N 23 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 47     The Community Process The NVCAP was informed by a multi-year planning process, which prioritized a robust and authentic community process, and invited a diversity of voices from both city departmental agencies and community stakeholders to shape the future of the Plan Area. 1.6 Figure 20 A worksession during the NVCAP working group meeting Over the course of the planning process, City staff and consultants conducted extensive community outreach, providing numerous opportunities for public engagement and meaningful input. Stakeholders, decision-makers, residents, and other community members have volunteered their time to thoughtfully consider the challenges and opportunities afforded by this project and contribute to the evolving plan ideas. As part of the planning process, three draft alternatives were developed for the NVCAP. The draft alternatives take into account feedback provided by: (1) the NVCAP Working Group, (2) feedback from community members provided at community workshops, (3) analyses and information provided by the City’s consultant team to City staff and leadership. City Council deliberated and selected a preferred scenario. This community process led to the development of the draft plan including the vision and design framework included in Chapter 2. 24 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 48     2 The City of Palo Alto conducted: Spotlight: Community Workshops 17 NVCAP Working Group Meetings 2 Online Surveys 6 Stakeholder Group Meetings Meetings with Decision-Makers City Council Historic Resources Board (HRB) Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC) Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC) Architectural Review Board (ARB) IN T R O D U C T I O N 25 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 49     The NVCAP Working Group Consistent with PAMC 19.10.030 and to ensure significant and meaningful community engagement, the City Council appointed a 14-member Working Group (WG). The WG was made up of 14 individuals and two alternates. The group’s composition represented a diversity of interests and expertise, including homeowners and renters, people of different ages and cultural backgrounds. The WG included: •Residents (rents and property owners) living within the Plan Area boundaries or the greater North Ventura neighborhood. •Business owners and local employees working or owning a business within the Plan Area boundaries or nearby (mix of small and larger businesses). •Property owners (large and small properties). •City residents with expertise in urban design, housing development, environmental planning, transportation, or land economics. •Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC) member. •Architectural Review Board (ARB) member. •Parks and Recreation Commission member. Over the course of 17 meetings held from 2018 to 2020, the WG reviewed and provided feedback on existing conditions, planning alternatives, and other information related to the planning area. The WG created a vision statement for the Plan Area which is summarized below: ‘The Working Group envisions the Plan Area to replicate a European square with open plaza, colorful public art, beautiful landscaping with green open spaces and lots of public amenities such as benches, trails, and bike paths. The building designs should fit well within the existing context, between three and six stories, interconnected with pedestrian and bicycle paths. The bustling plaza should have lots of local-serving retail uses such as cafes, small local markets, and theaters, which encourage lively foot traffic. The Plan Area also should provide diverse housing opportunities, with minimum intrusion from automobile traffic.’ City Department Partnerships The planning process was informed by representatives from the City of Palo Alto to ensure the plan was aligned with foundational city plans, projects, and programs. The departments represented include Planning & Development, Transportation, Public Works, Utilities, and Community Services. 1.6 Figure 21 A sketch session and report back during the NVCAP working group meeting 26 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 50     The Community Workshops Two community workshops were held to share ideas, respond to study results, and weigh in on the vision and emerging policies of the plan. The first community workshop was held in February 2019. The community feedback helped to frame the basis of the proposed draft plans. The City hosted the second community workshop on February 27, 2020. The workshop solicited input on the three draft plan alternatives and endeavored to identify community priorities on various topics. Community Surveys Staff prepared two online community surveys (April 2020 and October 2020) to solicit input from the members of the community. The surveys aimed to reach community members unable to attend the workshops. An online questionnaire on the draft alternatives was created by staff to solicit input from the community at-large in October 2020. About 30 community members responded. The majority of the participants preferred Alternative 3, supporting higher residential densities and heights, allowing small office footprints. There was general agreement on the proposed transportation improvements, and parks and open space proposals. Opinions varied over preservation of the cannery building. Some preferred removal of old cannery building for better and efficient use of the existing space, while others supported partial retention. Project Website To augment the community engagement efforts, the city hosted a robust project website that served as the primary online portal for community engagement. It included information on project updates, upcoming events, updated summaries of workshops and staff reports. Public Noticing / Mailing List Notices of all public hearings and WG meetings were published in accordance with the regulations set forth by the Palo Alto Municipal Code and City regulations. Additionally, an extensive emailing list consisting of over 430 interested community members has been developed and maintained by City staff and is used for disseminating information to all interested individuals. Stakeholder Group Meetings Stakeholder groups including property owners, commercial tenants, area residents, Palo Alto Unified School District and affinity groups/ advocates (affordable housing representatives, bicycle groups, environmental representatives, etc.) were identified early in the NVCAP process and their input was gathered through a series of six meetings. Staff also presented to the Palo Alto Unified School District Committee on December 2018, on February 20, 2020, and on October 15, 2020. Palo Alto Unified School District Board Members indicated an interest to site a new school to serve new families conceived in the draft alternatives. The City is supportive of working together to understand student yield from proposed typologies and suitable sites. During the development and public review of alternatives, City staff have continued discussions with stakeholders, such as property owners and affordable housing advocates to gather their feedback on evolving policy ideas and aspects of the alternatives. Decision Maker Meetings Since the initiation of the NVCAP planning work in October 2018, City staff have provided several updates to the following boards: City Council, Historic Resources Board (HRB), Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC), Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC), and the Architectural Review Board (ARB). Figure 22 A presentation during a community workshop IN T R O D U C T I O N 27 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 51     The Vision 2 2.1 Preferred 2.2 Land Use 2.3 Ground Floor Edges 2.4 Mobility 2.5 Ecology and Sustainability 2.6 Urban Form Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 52     The North Ventura Coordinated Area Preferred Plan endorsed by Palo Alto City Council sets forth a flexible, aspirational vision to guide growth and investment to support a transit oriented, mixed-use, mixed-income, and walkable neighborhood. The vision frameworks described in the following pages illustrates the desired physical form delivered incrementally over time which: •Honors the storied history and unique character of the North Ventura neighborhood; •Understands the needs of current residents and puts forward near-term solutions to current challenges; •Establishes a long-term framework for desired growth so more people can call North Ventura home; and •Invests in community infrastructure to support an equitable, resilient, and sustainable Palo Alto. Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 53     2.1 Preferred Plan Figure 23 The NVCAP Preferred Plan SEAMLESS CONNECTION TO CALTRAIN ENERGY EFFICIENT BUILDINGS RESPECTING EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ENHANCED MULTI-MODAL INTERSECTIONS 30 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 54     GREEN STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FRIENDLY STREETS ENHANCED URBAN FOREST COMMUNITY OPEN SPACE CELEBRATING HISTORY NATURALIZED MATADERO CREEK ECOLOGICAL CORRIDORS AND HABITAT STREET-ACTIVATING BUILDINGS TH E V I S I O N AFFORDABLE HOUSING OPTIONS 31 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 55     2.2 Land Use Development Potential by Land Use NVCAP aims to achieve the following targets for these land uses within the Plan Area: •Allow up to 530 new dwelling units; •2.25 acres of public open space; •16,600 square feet of commercial development including existing and new local retail and professional services; and Table 3 Existing and Future Development Potential by Land Use Land Use Existing Future Residential (units) 142 units 672 units Parks (acres)0 acres 2.25 acres Office (sq.ft.)744,000 sq.ft.466,000 sq.ft. Retail (sq.ft.)111,200 sq.ft.103,700 sq.ft. Figure 24 NVCAP Land Use Framework Legend Medium Density Mixed-Use Active Ground Floor Required High Density Mixed-Use Low Density Mixed-Use Retail Required Low Density Residential High Density Residential Medium Density Residential Project Boundary Open Space Public Facilites Area* *Exact acreage and dimensions for the public park and affordable housing site within the public facilities area will be determined at a later date. 32 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 56     TH E V I S I O N 33 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 57     2.2 Residential The NVCAP land use framework is principally focused on supporting a variety of housing options and price points to support Palo Alto residents at different stages of life. Residential density will depend on its location within the Plan Area. For example, mixed use mid- rise development will be encouraged along commercial corridors whereas townhomes will be encouraged adjacent to existing residential development. The land use designations listed below are calibrated for a wide range of multi-family housing typologies: High-Density Mixed Use The high-density mixed-use designation is located along the southern segment of El Camino Real. The designation is intended to support 5 to 6 story mid-rise apartment buildings. This designation requires active uses for ground floor frontages with retail requirements at specific nodes along El Camino Real, to support its role as a regional commercial corridor. The designation requires that upper stories be residential. Medium-Density Mixed Use The medium-density mixed-use designation is located on the northern segment of El Camino Real and Page Mill Road. The designation is intended to support 4 to 5 story mid-rise apartment buildings. This designation requires active uses for ground floor frontages with retail requirements at specific nodes along El Camino Real, to support its role as a regional commercial corridor. The designation requires that upper stories be residential. Project Goals Housing and Land Use Add to the City’s supply of multi- family housing, including market rate, affordable, “missing middle,” and senior housing in a walkable, mixed-use, transit- accessible neighborhood, with retail and commercial services, open space, and possibly arts and entertainment uses. Balance of Community Interests Balance community-wide objectives with the interests of neighborhood residents and minimize displacement of existing residents. Figure 25 Example of High-Density Mixed Use in Palo Alto Figure 26 Example of Medium-Density Mixed Use in Palo Alto 34 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 58     Low-Density Mixed Use The low-density mixed-use designation serves as a transition between the high-density mixed- use area and the low-density residential areas located in the interior of the Plan Area. The designation area is also located along Ash Street and Lambert Avenue, to support mid- to-low-rise multi-family development near the proposed public park. Active ground floor uses are encouraged but not required. Residential is required on the upper floors. High-Density Residential The high-density residential designation is located in areas such as the 395 Page Mill surface parking lot to support the long-term goal of supporting additional affordable housing in the Plan Area. The designation requires that both the ground floor and upper floors are residential use. Limited retail may be permitted. Medium-Density Residential The medium-density residential designation is located at the 340 Portage site to support the long-term goal of supporting additional housing in the Plan Area. The designation requires that both the ground floor and upper floors are residential use. Limited retail may be permitted The designation is intended to support a mix of townhouses and mid-rise apartments. Allowable heights are calibrated to support sensitive structures such as the Cannery building. Figure 27 Example of Low-Density Mixed Use in Palo Alto Figure 28 Example of High Density Residential in Palo Alto Figure 29 Example of Medium Density Residential in Palo Alto Low-Density Residential The low-density residential designation is calibrated to both facilitate new housing development while also being sensitive to existing single-family neighborhood fabric, located along Pepper Avenue and Olive Avenue. This area of existing single-family homes has been designated as an area of stability and will not experience a significant degree of change. Figure 30 Example of Low Density Residential in Palo Alto TH E V I S I O N 35 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 59     2.2 Figure 31 The Cloudera Galactic HQ is located at 395 Page Mill Road Land Use Classification Anticipated Density (DU/AC) Maximum Height (FT)FAR Active Use Requirements Allowed Zoning Districts High-Density Mixed Use 61-100 55*3.0:1 Required NV-MX3 Medium-Density Mixed-Use 31-70 45*2.0:1 Required NV-MX2 Low-Density Mixed Use 3-17 35*0.5:1 Encouraged NV-MX1 High Density Residential 61-100 55*3.0:1 None NV-R4 NV-PF Medium Density Residential 16-30 36*1.5:1 None NV-R3 Low Density Residential 1 or 2 units/lot 30 0.45:1 None NV-R2 NV-R1 Public Facilities and Open Space n/a n/a n/a n/a NV-PF Table 4 Proposed Land Use, FAR, and Active Use Requirements Affordable Housing To bolster the City’s affordable housing program, new residential projects across the Plan Area would require 20% inclusionary below market rate (BMR) for-sale townhouses, 15% inclusionary BMR for-sale condominiums and rental projects. In accordance with the Palo Alto Municipal Code (PAMC), in-lieu fees may be paid in certain circumstances. Proposed 100% below-market-rate (BMR) projects in the NVCAP are eligible for an additional height bonus through either the State Density Bonus or the City’s Housing Incentive Program. * 100% Affordable Housing is eligible for an additional 33 feet. Open Space This land use designation is located in the southeastern corner of the Plan Area. This will include the proposed 2.25 acre public open space as well as the re-naturalization of the Matadero Creek between Park Boulevard and Lambert Avenue. Existing Uses Existing land uses are permitted to remain in place and continue operations. Existing buildings or land uses which become nonconforming as a result of the new zoning and land use classifications are governed by the provisions in the Zoning Code regarding nonconforming buildings and uses. Certain limits are established for repairs, additions, restoration, expansion, and occupancy after an extended vacancy. 36 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 60     TH E V I S I O N 37 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 61     2.3 Ground Floor Edges The street level is the most important interface between a building and the public realm. Each development should define and animate the street level, exploring active uses, transparency, and engaging design. Figure 32 NVCAP Ground Floor Edges Framework Required Retail Edge Office Edge Required Active Edge Encouraged Active Edge Residential Edge Project Boundary Legend For design standards and guidelines, go to: Chapter 5: Buildings REQUIRED RETAIL EDGE 38 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 62     REQUIRED RETAIL EDGE TH E V I S I O N 39 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 63     2.3 Active Uses To create a pedestrian-friendly environment and visual interest on the ground floors of buildings, new development within the high-density and low-density mixed-use designations will provide active uses on frontages facing a public right-of- way, greenway, or park, to the degree feasible. Retail or retail-like uses are required at specific frontages facing El Camino Real and encouraged along Park Boulevard. By requiring ground floor commercial uses at select nodes along prominent corridors, NVCAP is supporting the ability for residents to walk to everyday services and subsequently reduce the number of cars on the road. Active uses include but are not limited to the following: •Neighborhood-serving retail which provides goods and services that people would frequently use to take care of their personal and household needs. Examples include grocery stores, drug stores, restaurants, dry cleaners, hair salons, etc. •Professional Offices with regular customers such as dentists that are 5,000 sq. ft. or less. •Public Uses including a community room and daycare. •Building lobbies. •Spaces accessory to residential uses, such as fitness rooms, workspaces, leasing offices, shared kitchens, and mail rooms. •Building frontage for mechanical equipment, transformer doors, parking garage entrances, exit stairs, and other facilities necessary to the operation of the building are excluded from this requirement. Figure 33 Building lobbies and other accessory spaces to residential uses are considered active uses. 40 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 64     Retail Frontage Where ground floor retail is required within the Plan Area, an urban edge should be created to foster healthy street life. This includes storefronts with tall floor to ceiling heights to foster visibility and transparency for homegrown businesses. Traditional retail such as food and beverage establishments are a subset of active uses. Residential Frontage Residential stoops, porches, patios, terraces, and frontage courts create a social edge to a neighborhood street. When set back by a small distance and vertically above the sidewalk grade, they can also ensure privacy at a comfortable social distance for a residential unit. Figure 34 Neighborhood-serving retail along major boulevards like El Camino Real. Figure 35 Residential stoops should be set back and elevated to provide privacy for residents. TH E V I S I O N 41 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 65     2.4 Mobility The envisioned mobility framework for the NVCAP will provide an array of high-quality mobility options on safe, low-stress, and visually interesting streets. Pedestrian and bicycle facilities will be designed for people of all ages and abilities, and accessible paths to transit will include wayfinding signage and other amenities. Streets and intersections will be designed to prioritize local circulation and access and to encourage low vehicle speeds. The planned improvements will be fully integrated into the surrounding neighborhoods to ensure seamless connections for all users. Figure 36 NVCAP Mobility Framework Major Intersection Improvements Minor Intersection Improvements Bus Stops Traffic Signals Priority Streets Secondary Streets Tertiary Streets Private Connection First Mile / Last Mile Connections California Avenue Caltrain Pedestrian and Bicycle Streets Project Boundary Potential Location for Mobility Hub Park Trail For design standards and guidelines, go to: Chapter 3: Public Realm Chapter 4: Streets Legend Vehicular Movement Woonerf Vehicular Street on Private Property Surface Parking 42 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 66     TH E V I S I O N 43 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 67     2.4 Pedestrian Realm A well-designed, integrated pedestrian network is a vital component of the NVCAP. The mobility framework prioritizes a fully connected, ADA- accessible sidewalk network throughout the neighborhood. Wide, tree-lined sidewalks will foster a people-first environment, where all ages and abilities can move safely and conveniently throughout the neighborhood. Portage Avenue, Park Boulevard, and Olive Avenue will become priority walking routes to the California Avenue Caltrain Station and the bus stops along El Camino Real to ensure convenient alternatives to driving. In addition to established public sidewalks, the Plan envisions publicly accessible private paths to bridge existing gaps. Project Goals Transit, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Connections Create and enhance well-defined connections to transit, pedestrian, and bicycle facilities, including connections to the Caltrain Station, Park Boulevard, and El Camino Real. Connected Street Grid Create a connected street grid, filling in sidewalk gaps and street connections to California Avenue, the Caltrain Station, and El Camino Real where appropriate. Community Facilities and Infrastructure Carefully align and integrate development of new community facilities and infrastructure with private development, recognizing both the community’s needs and that such investments can increase the cost of housing. Figure 37 NVCAP Pedestrian Network Publicly accessible shared path on private property Pedestrian path Woonerf External pedestrian connections Project Boundary Legend 44 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 68     Spotlight: The Portage Avenue Woonerf Central to the vision for a re-imagined North Ventura neighborhood is a shared street, or “woonerf,” along Portage Avenue. Woonerf (“street for living”) is a Dutch term for an integrated, common space shared by pedestrians, bicyclists, and low-speed motor vehicles. They typically have no curbs or sidewalks, and vehicles are slowed by trees, planters, parking areas, and other traffic calming devices in the street. In addition to becoming a great space for walking and bicycling, the Portage Avenue woonerf can provide a placemaking space for community gatherings, events, retail, and other flexible uses. Figure 38 View of the Bell Street Woonerf in Seattle, Washington TH E V I S I O N 45 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 69     Bike Network The NVCAP will feature a high-quality, “low- stress” bikeway network that will be comfortable for people of all ages and abilities to use. The proposed network will be integrated into the citywide network to ensure safe, convenient connections to the adjacent neighborhoods. This will be achieved by selecting bicycle facilities that prioritize safety and comfort based on vehicle speeds and volumes, and with intersections that have appropriate bike-specific crossing treatments and traffic control. Wayfinding signage and ample bicycle parking are also integral elements of the network. The bicycle network will support a range of users, including the future integration of scooters, e-bikes, and other micromobility devices. The low-stress bike network will include separated bicycle lanes on busier streets, bicycle boulevards on calmer neighborhood streets, and well-designed intersections throughout the project Plan. Shared-Use Paths are off-street, two-way bikeways physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and used by people bicycling, walking, and other non-motorized users. Separated Bike Lanes are dedicated bikeways that combine the user experience of a multi- use path but are located on a street. They are physically distinct from the sidewalk and separated from motor vehicle traffic by physical objects such as parked vehicles, a curb, green stormwater infrastructure, or posts. 2.4 Buffered Bike Lanes provide dedicated on-street space for bicyclists delineated with a designated buffer space separating the bicycle lane from the adjacent motor vehicle travel lane. Bicycle Boulevards are streets with low vehicle volumes and speeds, designated and designed to prioritize bicyclists. Bicycle boulevards use signs, pavement markings, and speed and volume management measures to discourage vehicle cut-through trips and include safe, convenient bicycle crossings of busy arterials. Figure 39 Bike Facility Degree of Separation Gateway Intersections The intersections surrounding the Plan Area will be enhanced to improve access, safety, and connectivity to adjacent neighborhoods. This is particularly important for pedestrian and bicycle safety, as the current intersections’ designs largely prioritize vehicular speed and access. New design guidance and signal technology advancements offer options for improved intersection interactions between people walking, biking, and driving. In particular, intersections on the bicycle network with a high potential for conflicts between bicycles and vehicles must be designed thoughtfully. 46 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 70     Street From To Bike Facility El Camino Real Page Mill Road Lambert Avenue Separated and/or Buffered Bike Lane along segment Ash Street Page Mill Road Olive Avenue Shared Use Path Portage Avenue Lambert Avenue Bicycle Boulevard Park Boulevard Page Mill Road Lambert Avenue Buffered Bike Lanes Page Mill Road El Camino Real Park Boulevard Separated or Buffered Bike Lanes Olive Avenue El Camino Real Park Boulevard Bicycle Boulevard with Wide Sidewalks Portage Avenue El Camino Real Ash Street Shared Use Path or Bicycle Boulevard Ash Street Park Boulevard Woonerf or Shared Use Path Figure 40 NVCAP Bike Network Framework Table 5 Bicycle Facility Classifications TH E V I S I O N Separated Bike Lane Publicly Accessible Shared Paths on Private Property Woonerf Bike Boulevard External Bike Connections Project Boundary Legend Shared Paths 47 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 71     2.4 Transit The success of transit is strongly dependent upon the level of convenience that is offered to the patron. Currently, the North Ventura neighborhood contains two transit stops: a mid- block stop located at El Camino Real and Portage Avenue and a far-side stop located at El Camino Real and Page Mill Road. The mobility framework focuses on designing intuitive, accessible, and safe routes to transit through priority pedestrian and bike streets, wayfinding signage to navigate to Caltrain, enhanced bus stop amenities for passengers, and a mobility hub along Portage Avenue. Vehicles Circulation and Parking The mobility framework serves the needs of existing and future development with vehicle and parking strategies aimed to prioritize local circulation and access, encourage low speeds, and determine right-sized parking capacity. To support local access and mitigate cut-through traffic, the Plan proposes to convert Ash Street from Page Mill Road to Olive Avenue into a one- way southbound street. Olive Avenue from Ash Street to El Camino Real will remain a two-way street. Vehicular traffic on the woonerf on Portage Avenue is permitted but should be discouraged. Vehicle circulation in this area will be primarily for access to buildings located on the woonerf. Acacia Avenue from Ash Street to Park Boulevard will be a private aisle for accessing residential frontage on Acacia Avenue for parking and unloading. In compliance with AB-2097, no parking minimums are to be set as the neighborhood is near a Caltrain Station. However, there will also be no parking maximums, allowing the neighborhood to follow a market-based regulatory approach. No new surface parking is proposed, and new parking supply should be implemented on the ground or basement levels of new buildings. Where new buildings are not proposed, existing surface parking spaces are to remain to support remaining commercial offices. Street parking is to remain in front of single-family homes on Pepper Avenue and Olive Avenue, with no new street parking proposed along new developments. Street parking near intersections should be restricted to ensure large vehicles and emergency vehicles are able to safely make turns. To support the new ground-floor retail and active use frontage in new buildings, short-term parking should be implemented on the ground or basement levels of the new developments. Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Strategies TDM strategies can be effective at encouraging fewer trips made by single-occupancy vehicles (SOV). An effective TDM Plan ensures that alternative modes of transportation, such as walking, bicycling, public transit, or other forms of shared mobility, are made available to site occupants and nearby community members. TDM enhancements have additional benefits beyond reducing SOV trips, including: •Improving the environment by reducing traffic congestion and air quality impacts produced by new development. •Improving transportation circulation and safety conditions for community members •Quality of life enhancements that improve the public realm. Major Intersection Improvements Minor Intersection Improvements Traffic Signals Project Boundary Vehicular Movement Vehicular Street on Private Property Surface Parking Vehicular Street Legend 48 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 72     Spotlight: Mobility Hub Mobility hubs are places in a community that bring together public transit, bike share, car share and other sustainable transportation modes. The MTC Mobility Hub Program has identified the North Ventura neighborhood as a candidate for a mobility hub. This neighborhood’s proximity to the proposed public park, the California Avenue Caltrain Station, and bus stops on El Camino Real provides important connections to regional transit and micromobility pathways. The neighborhood mobility hub is proposed at the intersection of Portage Avenue and El Camino Real. This location is ideal given its proximity to varying active frontage uses as well as the proposed woonerf. Proposed amenities could include: • Transit shelters and waiting areas. • Bicycle parking facilities. • Shared mobility (bike share, scooter share, etc.) access points. • Electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure. • Designated parking for car share services. • Real-time travel information signage and interactive displays. • Area maps and bulletins promoting local amenities and events. • Monitoring systems to measure ridership, mobility, security, and public life metrics. • Digital and physical wayfinding tools. Figure 41 NVCAP Vehicle and Parking Framework TH E V I S I O N 49 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 73     2.5 Ecology and Sustainability NVCAP’s ecological framework takes direct inspiration from the City’s Sustainability and Climate Action Plan, putting forward design strategies that collectively expands the definition of sustainability. This framework goes beyond mitigation, adaptation, and resilience, but grounded in regeneration – identifying opportunities for renewal, restoration, carbon sequestration, and growth of the natural environment. The future streets, parks, natural areas, and buildings will restore and enhance habitat and pollinator pathways, flood protection and stormwater management, cleaner air and cleaner water, and healthier habitats for current and future generations. Figure 42 NVCAP Ecology and Sustainability Framework For design standards and guidelines, go to: Chapter 3: Public Realm Chapter 4: Streets Chapter 5: Parks Chapter 6: Buildings GREEN ROOFS 50 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 74     Figure 42 NVCAP Ecology and Sustainability Framework GREEN STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE ENHANCED URBAN FOREST ENERGY EFFICIENT BUILDINGS COMMUNITY OPEN SPACE CELEBRATING HISTORY NATURALIZED MATADERO CREEK ECOLOGICAL CORRIDORS AND HABITAT POLLINATOR PATHWAYS TH E V I S I O N 51 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 75     2.5 Public Park Located in the southeast corner of the Plan Area, NVCAP proposes to transform a 2-acre surface parking lot into a new 2.25 acre public park. The proposed naturalization of Matadero Creek between Park Boulevard and Lambert Avenue serves as the organizing framework for the park’s design and neighborhood destination, inviting Palo Alto residents, employees, and visitors to enjoy access to recreational activities, habitat, and inclusive community programming. Shared multi-use pathways weave through the Park, providing access to the Creek and seamless connections to the citywide pedestrian and bicycle network, ensuring that the park is a beloved city asset that can be enjoyed by the entire community. The primary entrance to the park is along the new Portage Avenue woonerf directly across from the historic Palo Alto Cannery, creating an iconic activity node. The curbless design of the proposed Portage Avenue woonerf supports a natural extension of the park to the renovated Cannery building. Project Goals Sustainability and the Environment Protect and enhance the environment, while addressing the principles of sustainability. Community Facilities and Infrastructure Carefully align and integrate development of new community facilities and infrastructure with private development, recognizing both the community’s needs and that such investments can increase the cost of housing. Figure 43 A conceptual design for the future public park SAFE CONNECTION TO BOULWARE PARK COMMUNITY GARDENS MULTI-USE OPEN SPACE ACTIVE ZONES OBSERVATION DECK 52 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 76     Matadero Creek NVCAP proposes to re-naturalize a section of the Matadero Creek, removing the existing U-shaped concrete channel and replacing it with a widened, natural channel. The goals of a renaturalization project are to provide community benefits, re-establish riparian ecosystem habitat, and avoid adverse impacts on hydraulic performance and flood risks. The NVCAP Preferred Plan1 supports a widened natural corridor with an area available for riparian plantings, creative landscape architecture design, and increased recreation access. This concept includes replacing the Lambert Avenue bridge with a longer span and widening the creek channel from approximately 30 feet wide to 100 feet wide. 1. City of Palo Alto Council Meeting, January 10, 2022 https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/ agendas-minutes-reports/agendas-minutes/city-coun- cil-agendas-minutes/2022/20220110/20220110p- ccsm-linked-updated.pdf Green Stormwater Infrastructure As an integral part of the Plan Area’s ecological and sustainability framework, the public realm consists of a coordinated network of multi- functional landscapes that effectively manage stormwater, create pollinator pathways, mitigate the urban heat island effect, and create usable public spaces for all to enjoy. Figure 44 An example of a restored creek in San Luis Obispo, CA. Figure 45 An example of green stormwater infrastructure integrated with street furnishings. TH E V I S I O N 53 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 77     2.6 Urban Form NVCAP’s Urban Form framework champions the design of buildings that are respectful neighbors, human-scaled, and embrace the street. New development will respond to the surrounding context such as building up to El Camino Real while creating a gentle transition to quieter residential portions of the neighborhood. Figure 46 NVCAP Urban Form Framework 55’ 45’ 30’ / 35’ / 36’ Open Space Project Boundary Priority Corridors Maximum Development Potential Building Height Stepdowns Area of Stability For design standards and guidelines, go to: Chapter 6: Buildings Legend STEP DOWN TO SINGLE FAMILY HOMES 54 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 78     Figure 46 NVCAP Urban Form Framework TH E V I S I O N RESPECT THE CANNERY MAXIMIZE HEIGHT ALONG MAJOR CORRIDORS 55 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 79     2.6 Allowable Heights Allowable building heights establish a consistent, urban character; protect access to sunlight and views, and appropriately frame the public realm. Allowable heights are calibrated to enable taller buildings along major corridors while requiring lower heights to respect single family houses and the roof datum of notable structures such as the 340 Portage Cannery building. Setbacks Building setbacks create a transitional zone between the building face and the sidewalk, where active uses can spill out or residential users can experience public life at a comfortable social distance. Additionally, rear and side setbacks are utilized to ensure the necessary buffering between new development and existing single- family residential and high-value habitat areas. Project Goals Urban Design, Design Guidelines, and Neighborhood Fabric Develop human-scale urban design strategies, and design guidelines that strengthen and support the neighborhood fabric. Infill development will respect the scale and character of the surrounding residential neighborhood. Design for living ― Residential Figure 47 Internal streets have height allowances that are conducive with missing middle housing like townhomes.For more information on setback requirements design standards and guidelines, go to: Chapter 4: Streets Chapter 6: Buildings 56 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 80     Figure 48 Urban form design standards requires setbacks and stepbacks for new development that is adjacent to single family zoning. TH E V I S I O N 57 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 81     3.1 The Sidewalk Zone 3.2 Traffic Lanes and Intersections 3.3 Green Stormwater Infrastructure 3.4 Paving 3.5 Exterior Lighting 3.6 Wayfinding 3.7 Public Art The Public Realm 3 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 82     The public realm is a connective tissue of streets, parks, plazas, and natural spaces that weaves throughout the neighborhood, serving as an organizing framework for future development while fostering inclusive, experience- rich spaces for the entire Palo Alto community. Building on the 2030 Comprehensive Plan’s Urban Design Vision, the Plan Area’s public realm will ‘serve as centers for public life with gathering places, bicycle and pedestrian access, safety- enhancing night-time lighting and clear visual access, and, in some cases, small- scale retail uses such as cafes.’ The standards and guidelines layout a planned, intentional, well-designed public realm network that works in unison to achieve multiple goals: •Aesthetically pleasing, context- appropriate streets that enhance residents’ quality of life and Palo Alto’s reputation as ‘a gracious residential community.’ •A comprehensive multi-modal network that provides equitable access to clean, safe, and reliable mobility options and seamlessly connects to the larger citywide transportation network. •Open spaces that blend people places with green stormwater infrastructure to provide new social gathering outdoor rooms while showcasing climate-positive design. Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 83     3.1 The Sidewalk Zone The Sidewalk Zone is described in Palo Alto Municipal Code, Chapter 18.24 – Contextual Design Criteria and Objective Design Standards, which delineates the sidewalk zone into three distinct zones: Frontage, Sidewalk, and Street. Definitions: Frontage: a zone along building frontages for active edge uses such as seating, signage, and merchandising. Frontage zone treatments can include private setbacks to widen the sidewalk as necessary. Sidewalk: a zone that includes both the pedestrian clear zone and the landscape/ furniture zone. The pedestrian clear zone is an unobstructed accessible path of travel for pedestrians. The landscape/furniture zone accommodates elements such as trees, lighting, furnishing, and green stormwater infrastructure. Street: a zone that includes the non-vehicle travel lane portion of the roadway such as on- street parking, bus stops, and parklets. Standards: The following standards are in accordance with Palo Alto Municipal Code Section 18.24.020: 3.1.1 Sidewalk Width Where site conditions allow, public sidewalks shall have a minimum of at least 12 feet. This can be met with a combination of the pedestrian clear zone and the landscape/furniture zone, provided the pedestrian clear path shall be no less than eight (8) feet. Publicly accessible private sidewalks or walkways, with landscape strips, connecting through a development parcel shall have a minimum of six (6) feet. Project Goal Community Facilities and Infrastructure Carefully align and integrate development of new community facilities and infrastructure with private development, recognizing both the community’s needs and that such investments can increase the cost of housing. 3.1.2 Sidewalk Zone Features All improved streets shall allow the following features within the sidewalk zone: •Pedestrian Clear •Landscape and Furniture •Street Trees, Green Stormwater Infrastructure, and Plantings •Street Lighting •Seating •Bike Parking •Public Art •Outdoor Dining •Bus Shelters •Utilities 3.1.3 Street Zone Features All improved streets shall allow the following features within the street zone: •On Street Parking •Bike Lanes •Drop-Off Zones •Parklets •Bus Stops 60 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 84     3.1.4 Frontage Zone Features All new development with a ground floor commercial use shall allow the following features within the frontage zone: •Sidewalk Dining •Outdoor Displays •Public Art •Seating •Trees / Plantings •Green Stormwater Infrastructure All new development with a ground floor residential use shall allow the following features within the frontage zone: •Stoops •Porches •Front Yards •Trees and Plantings •Green Stormwater Infrastructure PU B L I C R E A L M Frontage Zone Pedestrian Clear Landscape and Furniture Sidewalk Zone Street Zone Figure 49 The Sidewalk Zone For more information on street standards and guidelines, go to: Chapter 4: Streets 61 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 85     3.2 Traffic Lanes and Intersections The neighborhood is bounded on the west and north by two major vehicular roads: El Camino Real, a major arterial, and Oregon Expressway, an street designed to move higher volumes of vehicles quickly and efficiently. However, most streets within the Plan Area are classified in the Comprehensive Plan as local/ collectors, designed to calm traffic and give pedestrians priority in terms of scale and facility. The plan is aligned with the recommendations of the National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) which states that narrower lane widths such as 10 feet are appropriate in urban areas and have a positive impact on street safety without impacting traffic operations. Definitions: Traffic Lanes: Within the public right-of-way and outside of the sidewalk zones are the traffic lanes. According to 10.04.180 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code, a “Traffic Lane means that portion of any roadway, either marked or unmarked, being not less than eight and one-half feet in width.” The traffic lanes are intended to support safe and efficient vehicular traffic. Standards: 3.2.1 Local Street Traffic Lane Width All vehicle traffic lanes on local streets shall have a width of 10 feet. 3.2.2 California Fire Code All roadway configurations shall comply with the California Fire Code. This includes the following: •Roadway widths shall accommodate aerial fire apparatus set up at strategic locations for buildings over 27 feet tall. • Walkable pathways shall be a minimum of 16 feet wide and support fire apparatus weights if vehicle traffic circulation is being restricted. 3.2.3 Crosswalk Treatments All crosswalk surfacing and treatments shall follow the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) specifications. 3.2.4 Intersection Enhancements All intersection enhancements shall select from the following toolbox: •High visibility marked crosswalks. •Raised crosswalks. •Advance stop bars and yield lines. •Daylighting to improve sightlines by removing parking adjacent to the intersection. •ADA-accessible, bi-directional curb ramps. •Curb extensions or bulb-outs. •Bicycle detention and markings to indicate the position and path for bicyclists to cross the intersection. •Traffic signals. •Accessible pedestrian signals at intersections with clear markings, audio, and braille messaging. •Leading pedestrian intervals at signalized intersections for pedestrians to establish their presence in the crosswalks before vehicles proceed. •Green Stormwater Infrastructure Guidelines: 3.2.5 Artful Intersections To enhance the aesthetics and vibrancy of the roadway, key intersections and crosswalks should be evaluated for the inclusion of public art, such as unique pavers, intersection murals, or crosswalk artwork, where appropriate. 62 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 86     Figure 50 Proposed improvements to El Camino Real, Hansen Way, and Portage Avenue will support a safe, low-stress, multi-modal street environment. High visibility marked crosswalks Bicycle detention and markings Traffic signals ADA curb ramps Accessible pedestrian signalsADA Ramps Bicycle Lanes Sidewalks Legend PU B L I C R E A L M 63 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 87     3.3 Green Stormwater Infrastructure Project Goal Sustainability and the Environment Protect and enhance the environment, while addressing the principles of sustainability. As an integral part of the Plan Area’s ecological network, the public realm will consist of a coordinated network of green stormwater infrastructure intended to implement the Comprehensive Plan’s vision to “provide ecological and health benefits and a source of beauty for residents. Palo Alto will strive for clean air and clean water.” Inspired by natural systems, the following standards and guidelines for green stormwater infrastructure and the urban forest are aimed at creating multi-functional landscapes that: •Effectively manage stormwater. •Create pollinator pathways. •De-pave unnecessary hardscaped areas to mitigate the urban heat island effect. •Create usable outdoor rooms which are an extension of parks and plazas. Definition: Diameter at Breast Height or DBH: a standard method of expressing the diameter of the trunk or bole of a standing tree. DBH is one of the most common methods to measure trees. Green Stormwater Infrastructure: infrastructure built into our urban environment to collect, slow, and clean stormwater runoff through the use of natural processes. Species Name Common Name Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) Acer Macrophyllum Big Leaf Maple 11.5” or more Calocedrus Decurrens California Incense Cedar Quercus Agrifolia Coast Live Oak Quercus Douglasii Blue Oak Quercus Kelloggii California Black Oak Quercus Lobata Valley Oak Sequoia Sempervirens Coast Redwood 18” or more Standards: 3.3.1 Green Stormwater Infrastructure Green Stormwater Infrastructure shall adhere to Palo Alto Municipal Code Chapter 16.11 Stormwater Pollution Prevention and other stormwater design and maintenance requirements and specifications. 3.3.2 Protected Street Trees Any locally native mature tree measuring 15” or more DBH shall be protected. Use Table 7 for locally native protected species trees shall be protected and Table 8 for trees exempt for protection. Table 6 Local native protected tree species 64 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 88     Species Name Common Name List Category Alnus rhombifolia White Alder High Water Use Alnus rubra (alnus oregona)Red Alder High Water Use Araucaria Columnaris (A. cookii)New Caledonian Pine High Water Use Betua spp Birch Species High Water Use Metasequoia Glyptostroboides Dawn Redwood High Water Use Populus Trichocarpa (P. Balsamifera)Black Cottonwood High Water Use Populus x Canadensis Carolina Poplar High Water Use Salix spp. Willow Species High Water Use Acaia Dealbata Silver Wattle Invasive, Cal-IPC Acacia Melanoxylon Blackwood Acacia Cal-IPC, PlantRight Ailanthus Altissima Tree-of-Heaven Invasive, Cal-IPC Cotoneaster spp.Cotoneaster Species Invasive, Cal-IPC Crataegus Monogyna English Hawthorn Cal-IPC, Plant Right Elauagnus Angustifolia Russian Olive Invasive, Cal-IPC Eucalyptus Camaldulensis Red Gum Cal-IPC, PlantRight Eucalyptus Globulus Blue Gum Cal-IPC, PlantRight Fraxinus Uhdei Evergreen Ash Fruit Ficus Carica Edible Fig Invasive, Cal-IPC Ilex Aquifolium English Holly Cal-IPC, PlantRight Melaleuca Quinquenervia Cajeput Tree State of CA Myoporum Laetum Ngaio Tree Cal-IPC, PlantRight Olea Europaea European Olive Cal-IPC, PlantRight Phoenix Canariensis Canary Island Date Palm Cal-IPC, PlantRight Populus spp.Poplar, Cottonwood Downy Fruit Prunus Cerasifera Cherry Plum Cal-IPC, PlantRight Robinia Pseudoacacia Black Locust Cal-IPC, PlantRight Schinus Terebinthefolius Brazilian Pepper Invasive, Cal-IPC Washingtonia Robusta Mexican Fan Palm Invasive, Cal-IPC Table 7 Trees to be exempt from protection PU B L I C R E A L M 65 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 89     3.3 Standards: 3.3.3 Tree Species Selection Property owners shall consult with the City’s urban forestry division staff to determine the appropriate street tree. 3.3.4 Street Tree Spacing In accordance with Chapter 13.24.020 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code, All street trees shall be planted within the city easement in coordination with existing utilities. 3.3.5 Pollinator Pathways The adopted Palo Alto Parks, Trails, Natural Open Space, & Recreation Master Plan identifies Portage Avenue and Park Boulevard as Pollinator Pathways. Street design for these streets shall integrate native plantings (e.g. riparian, grassland, or oak woodland), and specific habitat plantings to support pollinators such as hummingbirds and butterflies. Guidelines: 3.3.6 Tree Spacing Sidewalks should include at least one tree for every 30 feet of sidewalk length. 3.3.7 Double Row of Trees Where space allows, either on private setbacks or within the sidewalk zones, the planting of a second row of street trees is encouraged. 3.3.8 Seasonal Interest Select a planting palette that provides seasonal interest, such as autumn colors. Seasonal interest should not be prioritized over enhancing biodiversity. 3.3.9 Tree Species Criteria Tree species should be selected based on a combination of their aesthetics and their ecological performance benefits including the following considerations: •California native trees •Biodiversity amongst street trees •Drought tolerance •Non-invasive •Proven long-term durability •Tolerance of urban conditions such as compacted soils and air pollution •Resistance to disease •Branching structure that will provide a shade structure •Ability to adapt to predicted future temperature increases related to climate change •Non-fruiting and free of significant seed pods •Wind tolerance •Habitat value 3.3.10 Stormwater Runoff In addition to the City of Palo Alto Municipal Code and city-specific design and maintenance requirements, all new Green Stormwater Infrastructure should adhere to the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program’s reports and work products for materials, precedents, and methods. The integration of green stormwater infrastructure when planting trees should always be considered. 66 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 90     Figure 51 Planting a double row of trees along the sidewalk and frontage zone creates connected canopy for a pleasant pedestrian experience, improves neighborhood aesthetics, and fosters ecological corridors. PU B L I C R E A L M 67 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 91     3.4 Paving Paving is a key component that will help define the character, connectivity, and identity of the North Ventura neighborhood’s varied streets and open spaces. A hierarchy of paving materials on streets like El Camino Real, Portage Avenue, and Park Boulevard can help create clear wayfinding and contributes aesthetically to the neighborhood. Standards: 3.4.1 City Standards All street paving shall meet City of Palo Alto Sidewalk Standards and be approved by the city engineer or designate. 3.4.2 Solar Reflectance Index (SRI) Materials that reduce the urban heat island effect by using pavement with a Solar Reflectance Index (SRI) of 29 or higher shall be selected for use. Guidelines: 3.4.3 Responsible Material Use Paved areas should be made of sustainable paving materials, including recycled, local, and sustainable sourced materials. Consider opportunities for the reuse of demolition waste from the site. 3.4.4 Accent Paving at Intersections Street improvement projects should install accent paving at key intersections and raised crossings. 3.4.5 Portage Avenue Special Paving The Portage Avenue Woonerf should incorporate a special paving pattern. The use of contrasting, tactile, and high-quality paving that distinguishes the bike lanes and vehicle lanes with a curbless street that prioritizes pedestrians, gathering and spill-over activities is encouraged. 3.4.6 El Camino Real Special Paving In coordination with Caltrans and VTA, the segment of El Camino Real within the neighborhood should incorporate a special paving pattern that reflects its position as a Grand Boulevard. The paving material should extend into the private setback along active ground floor uses to create a more comfortable and welcoming public space for adjacent businesses. 3.4.7 Pervious Paving for Green Stormwater Infrastructure Large hardscaped areas such as parking areas, sidewalks, and driveways could utilize types of pervious pavements to reduce ponding, recharge groundwater, and prevent stormwater pollution. Figure 52 Light colored pavement reduces the urban heat island effect. For more information on intersections go to: Chapter 7: Implementation 68 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 92     3.5 Exterior Lighting Adequate exterior lighting should be provided in all dedicated open spaces and along all streets and greenways to ensure clear wayfinding and safe pedestrian passage. Lighting design also has an opportunity to support habitat and mitigate light pollution, allowing current and future generations to be able to look up and clearly see the night sky. Standards: 3.5.1 City Standards All exterior light fixtures in the right-of-way shall meet City of Palo Alto standards and be approved by the City. 3.5.2 Full Shielded Fixtures All exterior light fixtures shall be fully shielded to minimize glare, light trespass, and light pollution throughout the neighborhood. 3.5.3 Dark Sky Compliant Exterior light fixtures shall meet or exceed applicable energy-efficiency standards while adhering to recommended kelvin temperature specified by the International Dark Sky Association to prevent negative health impacts on humans and wildlife. 3.5.4 Key Pedestrian Routes and Scale Lighting shall reinforce key active transportation streets and all lighting shall be scaled to the pedestrian and bicycle experience. 3.5.5 Safety Lighting shall allow facial recognition along paths of travel. Lighting shall not create glare or “hot spots” that would inhibit visual accessibility. Guidelines: 3.5.6 Habitat Areas If lighting is appropriate in the proposed public park adjacent to the Creek and sensitive habitat areas, light fixtures should be equipped with motion sensors or timers to not disrupt the circadian rhythms of wildlife. 3.5.7 Retail / Active Use Areas Lighting along El Camino Real and Portage should incorporate signature fixtures and a variety of special lighting types such as catenary string lights to reinforce an experience-rich street life. Figure 53 Dark sky compliant exterior light fixtures helps mitigate light pollution and the health of both humans and wildlife. PU B L I C R E A L M Credit: Edgar Zacarias via Foursquare 69 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 93     3.6 Wayfinding The design and integration of wayfinding is an effective tool that can celebrate the neighborhood’s history, foster a sense of place, and support clear and predictable navigability for residents, employees, and visitors. Standards: 3.6.1: Caltrans Standards Roadway signage shall comply with the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), and California Sign Specifications. 3.6.2: City Standards Active Transportation signage shall adhere to the Design Standards included in the City of Palo Alto’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan. Guidelines: 3.6.3: Shared Use Signage Curbless streets such as Portage Avenue Woonerf should have signage that indicates the delineation of the right of way for pedestrians, bicycles, and vehicles. Shared trails within the public park should include signage indicating the shared use area at pedestrian and bicycle eye level. 3.6.4: Celebrate the Cannery and Other Landmarks Signage and wayfinding that is not required to adhere to Caltrans and City standards should take cues from neighborhood landmarks like the Cannery by correlating graphically and emulating a consistent color and material palette. 3.6.5: Neighborhood Maps and Directional Signage Area-specific maps and directional signage that highlights nearby destinations along pedestrian pathways should be installed at major gateways into the neighborhood. 3.6.6: Mile Markers and Educational Placards The use of mile markers and educational and interpretive placards can be placed along the trails along Matadero Creek to inform visitors about the re-naturalization process and subsequent ecological benefits. Figure 54 Neighborhood map and directional signage are effective wayfinding tools for visitors to the NVCAP. For more information on wayfinding go to: Chapter 7: Implementation 70 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 94     3.7 Public Art Building on the City’s legacy of commissioning iconic public art within urban centers like Downtown Palo Alto and California Avenue, the integration of new and diverse public art can contribute significantly to the sense of place within the neighborhood. This plan is aligned with the City of Palo Alto’s Public Art Master Plan’s guiding principles which state that Palo Alto’s public art will: •Be distributed citywide, focusing on areas where people gather and in unexpected places that encourage exploration; •Represent a broad variety of artistic media and forms of expression; •Enhance City infrastructure, transportation corridors, and gateways; •Include both permanent and temporary artworks; •Strive for artistic excellence; •Be maintained for people to enjoy. Guidelines: 3.7.1 Location of Public Art Public art should be located at major social engagement areas such as the proposed public park and the Cannery Building, along transportation corridors such as El Camino Real, Portage Avenue, and Park Boulevard, and at major gateway moments announcing that you are entering the neighborhood. Figure 55 The location of public art such as Passages by Susan Zoccola should be located at the public park, major transportation corridors and major gateways. PU B L I C R E A L M 71 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 95     4.1 Park Boulevard 4.2 Olive Avenue 4.3 Ash Street 4.4 Acacia Avenue 4.5 Pepper Avenue 4.6 Portage Avenue 4.7 Lambert Avenue 4.8 El Camino Real 4.9 Page Mill Road 4.10 Publicly Accessible Private Streets Streets 4 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 96     Vibrant, pedestrian-oriented, and visually interesting streets will be the setting for the future of the North Ventura neighborhood. With generous and active sidewalks, traffic calming devices, and low-stress bicycle facilities, the street network will provide a variety of options to travel safely and conveniently through the neighborhood. Building on the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, the plan supports the implementation of the transportation chapter’s vision to,‘build and maintain a sustainable network of safe, accessible and efficient transportation and parking solutions for all users and modes, while protecting and enhancing the quality of life in Palo Alto. Programs will include alternative and innovate transportation processes, and the adverse impacts of automobile traffic on the environment in general and residential streets in particular will be reduced. Streets will be safe, attractive and designed to enhance the quality and aesthetics of Palo Alto neighborhoods. Palo Alto recognizes the regional nature of its transportation system, and will be a leader in seeking regional transportation solutions, prioritizing Caltrain service improvements and railroad grade separations.’ The following street sections are intended to illustrate the long term vision of the NVCAP mobility network. The design of the new streets will be built out over time. Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 97     4.1 Park Boulevard Park Boulevard is a priority north-south bicycle and pedestrian street that connects the NVCAP Plan Area to the California Avenue Caltrain Station and terminates at the California Avenue Business District. The street emphasizes multi- modal transportation with wide pedestrian sidewalks, bi-directional buffered bike lanes, and a two-way flow of vehicles is maintained. Park Boulevard is designated as a citywide pollinator pathway, the design of the street prioritizes a connected canopy of trees and a lush, landscaped streetscape to support the health and comfort of both people and wildlife. East West No r t h So u t h Park B o u l e v a r d Ash St r e e t Ash St r e e t Oli v e A v e n u e Ac a c i a A v e n u e Po r t a g e A v e n u e Pe p p e r A v e n u e El Cam i n o R e a l Pa g e M i l l R o a d Pedestrian Clear Zone 8 Feet Landscape / Furniture Zone 4.5 Feet Bicycle Facility Separated Buffered Bike Lanes 5 Feet Bike Lane 2-3 Feet Buffer Vehicle Travel Lanes 10 Feet One Lane in Each Direction Parking / Loading No On-Street Parking Frontage / Setback Western Edge: 20 Feet from Property Line Eastern Edge: 5 Feet from Property Line Building Entries New development shall provide a primary entry or entries on Park Boulevard. 4.1.1 Street Design Guidelines: 4.1.2 Widen the Pedestrian Throughway It is encouraged to extend the width of the standard pedestrian throughway on the western edge into the frontage zone to support a more generous pedestrian realm. 4.1.3 Streetscape Elements Streetscape elements should include: •Street trees that can create a connective canopy at full maturity •Lighting and wayfinding that provides a neighborhood branding/identity opportunity •Seating/rest areas for residents and commuters •Green Stormwater Infrastructure in the setbacks, landscape/furniture zone, and if space allows, the separated buffered bike lane. Standards: Table 8 Park Boulevard Street Design 74 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 98     Ex i s t i n g P r o p e r t y L i n e Ex i s t i n g P r o p e r t y L i n e Setback 10’2’ 59’ 10’5’8’20’4.5’2’5’4.5’8’5’ Clear Walkway Bike Lane Drive Lane Bike LaneDrive Lane Clear Walkway Tree Bed Tree BedBu f f e r Bu f f e r Setback ST R E E T S Figure 56 Typical Park Boulevard Section 75 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 99     4.2 Olive Avenue Olive Avenue is a priority east-west pedestrian and bicycle street that creates a direct link between the commercial activity on El Camino Real with the multi-modal mobility on Park Boulevard. Olive Avenue has two distinct street designs: Between Park Boulevard and Ash Street, the street is configured to accommodate comfortable sidewalks and two-way vehicle travel lanes. Due to the low traffic volumes and speeds on Olive Avenue, the street is designated as a bicycle boulevard which allows cyclists to ride with traffic. The setback on the northern edge of the street is 20 feet to protect the existing green stormwater infrastructure along the 395 Page Mill property. East West No r t h So u t h Park B o u l e v a r d Ash St r e e t Ash St r e e t Ol i v e A v e n u e Ac a c i a A v e n u e Po r t a g e A v e n u e Pe p p e r A v e n u e El Cam i n o R e a l Pa g e M i l l R o a d 1 2 Between Ash Street and El Camino Real, the street remains a two-way street. Due to the low traffic volumes and speeds on Olive Avenue, the street is designated as a bicycle boulevard which allows cyclists to ride with traffic. The on-street parking on both sides of the street is maintained. Pedestrian Clear Zone 8 Feet Landscape / Furniture Zone Northern Edge: 3 Feet Southern Edge: 4 Feet Bicycle Facility Bicycle Boulevard 10 Feet Vehicle Travel Lanes 10 Feet 1 Lane in Each Direction Parking / Loading 2 Lanes of On-Street Parking Frontage / Setback Northern Edge: 20 Feet (Existing Bioswale) Southern Edge: 12.5 Feet from Property Line Building Entries New development shall provide a primary entry or entries on Olive Avenue except for properties that are abutting Park Boulevard or Ash Street. Pedestrian Clear Zone 8 Feet Landscape / Furniture Zone Northern Edge: 3 Feet Southern Edge: 4 Feet Bicycle Facility Bicycle Boulevard 10 Feet Vehicle Travel Lanes 10 Feet 1 Lane in Each Direction Parking / Loading 2 Lanes of On-Street Parking Frontage / Setback Northern Edge: 12.5 Feet from Property Line Southern Edge: 10 Feet from Property Line Building Entries New development shall provide a primary entry or entries on Olive Avenue except for properties that are abutting El Camino Real or Ash Street. 4.2.1 Street Design Between Park Boulevard and Ash Street Between Ash Street and El Camino Real12 Standards: Table 9 Olive Avenue Street Design 76 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 100     Ex i s t i n g P r o p e r t y L i n e Exi s t i n g P r o p e r t y L i n e 59’ 20’8’8’12.5’ On-Street ParkingDrive Lane 10’ Clear Walkway Olive Avenue (Between Park and Ash, Looking towards East) Drive Lane 10’ Existing Bio Retention Setback Tree Bed 4’8’8’ Tree Bed 3’ On-Street Parking Clear Walkway Ex i s t i n g P r o p e r t y L i n e Ex i s t i n g P r o p e r t y L i n e 8’12.5’8’10’ Clear Walkway Olive Avenue (Between Ash and ECR, Looking towards East) 8’ SetbackSetback 59’ 8’ On-Street ParkingDrive Lane 10’ Drive Lane 10’ Tree Bed 4’ Tree Bed 3’ On-Street Parking Clear Walkway ST R E E T S Figure 57 Typical Olive Avenue section between Park Boulevard and Ash Street Figure 58 Typical Olive Avenue section between Ash Street and El Camino Real 1 2 77 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 101     4.3 Ash Street Ash Street is a quiet, predominately residential street, which provides a critical north-south connection throughout the Plan Area. A desired pedestrian connection across Olive Avenue to Acacia Avenue will provide seamless access from Page Mill Road to public park, Matadero Creek, and existing community amenities such as Bouleware Park. Ash Street has two distinct street designs: Between Page Mill Road and Olive Avenue, the street is converted from a two-way street to a one-way southbound street. This change prevents northbound traffic on El Camino Real from using the neighborhood as a cut-through to travel eastbound on Page Mill Road. The western edge of the street features a wide shared-use path for pedestrians and northbound cyclists. East West No r t h So u t h Park B o u l e v a r d Ash St r e e t Ash St r e e t Ol i v e A v e n u e Ac a c i a A v e n u e Po r t a g e A v e n u e Pe p p e r A v e n u e El Cam i n o R e a l Pa g e M i l l R o a d 1 2 Between Olive Avenue and Lambert Avenue, the street segment is designed with bi-directional sidewalks and vehicle lanes. The vehicle travel lanes are also designated as bicycle boulevards, where cyclists share the road with vehicles. Pedestrian Clear Zone Western Edge: Shared Use Path: 12 Feet Eastern Edge: 8 Feet Landscape / Furniture Zone Western Edge: 5 Feet Eastern Edge: 5 Feet Bicycle Facility Southbound: Bicycle Boulevard 10 Feet Vehicle Travel Lanes 10 Feet 1 Southbound Lane Frontage / Setback Western Edge: Maximum 5 Feet from Property Line Eastern Edge: Maximum 5 Feet from Property Line Building Entries New development shall provide a primary entry or entries on Ash Street except for properties that are abutting Page Mill or Olive Avenue. Pedestrian Clear Zone 8 Feet Landscape / Furniture Zone Western Edge: n/a Eastern Edge: 4 Feet Bicycle Facility Bicycle Boulevard: 10 Feet Vehicle Travel Lanes 10 Feet 1 Lane in Each Direction Frontage / Setback Maximum 5 Feet from Property Line Building Entries New development shall provide a primary entry or entries on Ash Street except for properties that are abutting Portage Avenue, Lambert Avenue or Acacia Avenue. 4.3.1 Street Design Between Page Mill Road and Olive Avenue Between Acacia Avenue and Lambert Avenue12 Standards: Table 10 Ash Street Street Design 78 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 102     Setback 5’8’ Clear Walkway 4’ Tree BedSetbackSetbackSetback Ex i s t i n g P r o p e r t y L i n e Ex i s t i n g P r o p e r t y L i n e Ex i s t i n g P r o p e r t y L i n e Exi s t i n g P r o p e r t y L i n e 5’5’10’5’12’ Shared Path Shared Lane Tree Bed 8’ Clear Walkway Ash Street (Between Page Mill and Olive, Looking towards North) 10’5’10’ Clear Walkway Shared Lane Shared Lane Ash Street (Between Olive and Lambert, Looking towards North) 5’ 40’40’ Tree Bed 8’ Setback 5’8’ Clear Walkway 4’ Tree BedSetbackSetbackSetback Ex i s t i n g P r o p e r t y L i n e Ex i s t i n g P r o p e r t y L i n e Ex i s t i n g P r o p e r t y L i n e Ex i s t i n g P r o p e r t y L i n e 5’5’10’5’12’ Shared Path Shared Lane Tree Bed 8’ Clear Walkway Ash Street(Between Page Mill and Olive, Looking towards North) 10’5’10’ Clear Walkway Shared Lane Shared Lane Ash Street (Between Olive and Lambert, Looking towards North) 5’ 40’40’ Tree Bed 8’ ST R E E T S Figure 59 Typical Ash Street section between Page Mill Road and Olive Avenue Figure 60 Typical Ash Street section between Acacia Avenue and Lambert Avenue 1 2 79 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 103     4.4 Acacia Avenue Acacia Avenue is an east-west street, primarily serving as service street for the Plan Area. The street extends from El Camino Real to Ash Street, at which point it becomes a private driveway for the 340 Portage site. The street design for the segment between Ash Street and El Camino Real consists of bi-directional pedestrian sidewalks along with two-way vehicle lanes. On-street parking is maintained on the southern edge of the street. East West No r t h So u t h Park B o u l e v a r d Ash St r e e t Ash St r e e t Ol i v e A v e n u e Ac a c i a A v e n u e Po r t a g e A v e n u e Pe p p e r A v e n u e El Cam i n o R e a l Pa g e M i l l R o a d Pedestrian Clear Zone 8 Feet Landscape / Furniture Zone Northern Edge: 4 Feet Southern Edge: n/a Bicycle Facility n/a Vehicle Travel Lanes 10 Feet 1 Lane in Each Direction Parking / Loading Southern Edge: 1 Lane of On- Street Parking Frontage / Setback Maximum 5 Feet from Property Line Building Entries New development shall provide a primary entry or entries on Acacia Avenue except for properties that are abutting El Camino Real or Park Boulevard. 4.4.1 Street Design Standards: Between Ash Street and El Camino Real Table 11 Acacia Avenue Street Design 80 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 104     10’8’10’ Clear Walkway Drive Lane Drive Lane 8’ Clear Walkway 8’ On-Street Parking 48’ Setback Setback Tree Bed 4’ Ex i s t i n g P r o p e r t y L i n e Ex i s t i n g P r o p e r t y L i n e 5’5’ Acacia Street (Looking towards East) ST R E E T S Figure 61 Typical Acacia Avenue Section 81 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 105     4.5 Pepper Avenue Pepper Avenue is a slow residential street, extending from El Camino Real to Ash Street. The street design supports existing residents with wide, tree-lined sidewalks and two-way traffic lanes. On-street parking is maintained on either side. East West No r t h So u t h Park B o u l e v a r d Ash St r e e t Ash St r e e t Ol i v e A v e n u e Ac a c i a A v e n u e Po r t a g e A v e n u e Pe p p e r A v e n u e El Cam i n o R e a l Pa g e M i l l R o a d Pedestrian Clear Zone 8 Feet Landscape / Furniture Zone Northern Edge: 5 Feet Southern Edge: 5 Feet Bicycle Facility n/a Vehicle Travel Lanes 10 Feet 1 Lane in Each Direction Parking / Loading 2 Lanes of On-Street Parking Frontage / Setback Minimum 3.5 Feet Maximum 12.5 Feet from Property Line Building Entries New development shall provide a primary entry or entries on Pepper Avenue except for properties that are abutting Ash Street. 4.5.1 Street Design Standards: Between Ash Street and El Camino Real Table 12 Pepper Avenue Street Design 82 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 106     Ex i s t i n g P r o p e r t y L i n e Ex i s t i n g P r o p e r t y L i n e 55’ 10’4.5’8’ Clear Walkway Drive Lane Tree Bed 12.5’ Setback On-Street Parking Pepper Ave (Looking towards East) 5’3.5’10’4.5’8’ Clear Walkway Drive Lane Tree Bed 12.5’ Setback On-Street Parking 5’3.5’ ST R E E T S Figure 62 Typical Pepper Avenue Section 83 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 107     4.6 Portage Avenue Portage Avenue is a priority east-west bicycle and pedestrian street which becomes a critical citywide link from Park Boulevard connecting the California Avenue Caltrain and Business District to the existing bicycle infrastructure on Hansen Way to the Stanford Research Park. Portage Avenue has two distinct street designs: Between Park Boulevard and Ash Street is the Portage Avenue woonerf, ‘the front door’ for the public park and the Cannery building. The woonerf, which will be a publicly accessible private street is an integrated, curbless street, shared by pedestrians, bicyclists, and low-speed vehicles. On-street parking will be integrated where possible to support visitors to the public park. The street incorporates outdoor furnishings such as trees, planters, green stormwater infrastructure and seating to ensure this space fosters community gatherings, events, retail, and other flexible uses. The city may consider a shared-use path on Portage Avenue. East West No r t h So u t h Park B o u l e v a r d Ash St r e e t Ash St r e e t Ol i v e A v e n u e Ac a c i a A v e n u e Po r t a g e A v e n u e Pe p p e r A v e n u e El Cam i n o R e a l Pa g e M i l l R o a d 1 2 Between Ash Street and El Camino Real, Portage Avenue takes on a more typical street configuration. The street design includes two sidewalks with a wide furnishing zone on the northern edge of the street. Two-way traffic lanes are retained with on-street parking on the southern edge of the street. Due to the low traffic volumes and speeds, this segment of Portage is designated as a bicycle boulevard, where cyclists share the road with vehicles. Pedestrian Clear Zone 8 Feet Landscape / Furniture Zone Northern Edge: 15 Feet Southern Edge: 8’ Bicycle Facility Bicycle Boulevard 10 Feet Vehicle Travel Lanes 10 Feet Frontage / Setback Northern Edge: Maximum 5 Feet from Property Line Southern Edge: n/a Building Entries New development shall provide a primary entry or entries on Portage Avenue except for properties that are abutting Park Boulevard. Pedestrian Clear Zone 8 Feet Landscape / Furniture Zone Northern Edge: 15 Feet Southern Edge: n/a Bicycle Facility Bicycle Boulevard 10 Feet Vehicle Travel Lanes 10 Feet 1 Lane in Each Direction Parking / Loading Southern Edge: 1 Lane of On- Street Parking Frontage / Setback Maximum 5 Feet from Property Line Building Entries New development shall provide a primary entry or entries on Olive Avenue except for properties that are abutting El Camino Real. 4.6.1 Street Design Standards: Between Park Boulevard and Ash Street Between Ash Street and El Camino Real12 Table 13 Portage Avenue Street Design 84 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 108     Setback Setback Ex i s t i n g P r o p e r t y L i n e Ex i s t i n g P r o p e r t y L i n e 10’8’10’ Clear Walkway Shared Lane Shared Lane 8’ Clear Walkway 15’ Tree Bed Portage Avenue (Between Ash and ECR, Looking towards East) 8’ On-Street Parking 59’ 5’5’ 10’8’10’ Clear Walkway Shared Lane Shared Lane 8’ Clear Walkway 15’ Tree Bed / Outdoor rooms Portage Avenue (Between Ash and ECR, Looking towards East) 8’ Street Life / Flower beds 59’ Setback Ex i s t i n g P r o p e r t y L i n e Ex i s t i n g P r o p e r t y L i n e 5’ ST R E E T S Figure 63 Typical Portage Avenue section between Park Boulevard and Ash Street Figure 64 Typical Portage Avenue section between Ash Street and El Camino Real 1 2 85 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 109     4.6 Guidelines: Streetscape elements of the Portage Avenue woonerf include: •A row of street trees on either side of the main travel way to designate pedestrian priority areas adjacent to building frontages •Signage emphasizing the presence of pedestrians and bicyclists •Textured or permeable pavement designed to slow vehicle speeds and provide stormwater management benefits •Pedestrian-scale lighting •Seating areas •Landscaping and green stormwater infrastructure •Design elements that highlight the community’s vision or character •Public art that will enhance the pedestrian experience and reflect the community’s unique character. 4.6.2 Streetscape Elements 86 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 110     ST R E E T S Figure 65 Streetscape elements like double row of trees, textured pavement, pedestrian scale lighting , and seating encourages a low-carbon, welcoming neighborhood environment. 87 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 111     East West No r t h So u t h Park B o u l e v a r d Ash Str e e t Ash St r e e t Ol i v e A v e n u e Ac a c i a A v e n u e Po r t a g e A v e n u e Pe p p e r A v e n u e El Cam i n o R e a l Pa g e M i l l R o a d 4.7 Lambert Avenue Lambert Avenue is improved on the northern half of the existing street to enhance the pedestrian experience along the edge of the NVCAP site boundary. The existing vehicular travel lane is narrowed, and on-street parking is eliminated to make space for a wider pedestrian thoroughfare and generous furnishing zone for enhanced bio- retention area and dense canopy trees. Ex i s t i n g P r o p e r t y L i n e Rig h t o f W a y C e n t e r l i n e Setback 10’7.5’10’ Clear Walkway Drive LaneTree Bed Lambert St. (Looking towards East) 27.5 3’20’ Shared Path Planter Bed 26’ 3’ Planter Bed Publically Accessible Private Streets Ex i s t i n g P r o p e r t y L i n e 10’16’ Shared Path Green Setback 5’ 22’ Pedestrian Clear Zone Northern Edge: 10 Feet Landscape / Furniture Zone Northern Edge: 7.5 Feet Vehicle Travel Lanes Westbound Lane 10 Feet Frontage / Setback Northern Edge: Maximum 5 Feet Building Entries New development shall provide a primary entry or entries on Lambert Avenue except for properties that are abutting Park Boulevard or El Camino Real. 4.7.1 Street Design Standards: Between Park Boulevard and El Camino Real1 Figure 66 Typical Lambert Avenue Sidewalk Zone Section Table 14 Lambert Avenue Sidewalk Zone Design 88 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 112     East West No r t h So u t h Park B o u l e v a r d Ash Str e e t Ash St r e e t Ol i v e A v e n u e Ac a c i a A v e n u e Po r t a g e A v e n u e Pe p p e r A v e n u e El Cam i n o R e a l Pa g e M i l l R o a d 4.8 El Camino Real El Camino Real is improved on the eastern half of the existing street. New development is required to setback by 5 feet in order to provide a wider pedestrian sidewalk and furnishing zone to support a more comfortable pedestrian experience. The configuration of the roadway will be determined in coordination with Caltrans independently of the NVCAP. Ex i s t i n g P r o p e r t y L i n e Setback 4’ Tree Bed El Camino Real (Looking towards South) 12’ 8’ Clear Walkway 5’ Ex i s t i n g P r o p e r t y L i n e Setback 4’ Tree Bed Page Mill Rd (Looking towards West 12’ 8’ Clear Walkway 5’ ST R E E T S Pedestrian Clear Zone Eastern Edge: 8 Feet Landscape / Furniture Zone Eastern Edge: 4 Feet Frontage / Setback Minimum 5 Feet Maximum 10 Feet Building Entries New development shall provide a primary entry or entries on El Camino Real. 4.8.1 Street Design Standards: Between Page Mill Road and Lambert Avenue1 Figure 67 Typical El Camino Real Sidewalk Zone Section Table 15 El Camino Real Sidewalk Zone Design 89 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 113     Ex i s t i n g P r o p e r t y L i n e Setback 4’ Tree Bed El Camino Real (Looking towards South) 12’ 8’ Clear Walkway 5’ Ex i s t i n g P r o p e r t y L i n e Setback 4’ Tree Bed Page Mill Rd (Looking towards West 12’ 8’ Clear Walkway 5’ East West No r t h So u t h Park B o u l e v a r d Ash St r e e t Ash St r e e t Ol i v e A v e n u e Ac a c i a A v e n u e Po r t a g e A v e n u e Pe p p e r A v e n u e El Cam i n o R e a l Pa g e M i l l R o a d 4.9 Page Mill Road Page Mill Road is improved on the southern half of the existing street to enhance the pedestrian experience along the edge of the NVCAP Plan Area boundary. New development will provide a wider pedestrian sidewalk and furnishing zone to support a more comfortable pedestrian experience. In order to provide a consistent width, the setback for new development will vary based on existing site conditions. The configuration of the roadway will be determined in coordination with Santa Clara County. Pedestrian Clear Zone Southern Edge: 8 Feet Landscape / Furniture Zone Southern Edge: 4 Feet Frontage / Setback Southern Edge: Minimum 5 Feet Building Entries New development shall provide a primary entry or entries on Page Mill road except for properties that are abutting Park Boulevard or El Camino Real. 4.9.1 Street Design Standards: Between Park Boulevard and El Camino Real1 Figure 68 Typical Page Mill Road Sidewalk Zone Section Table 16 Page Mill Road Sidewalk Zone Design 90 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 114     ST R E E T S This page is intentionally left blank 91 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 115     East West No r t h So u t h Park B o u l e v a r d Ash St r e e t Ash St r e e t Ol i v e A v e n u e Ac a c i a A v e n u e Po r t a g e A v e n u e Pe p p e r A v e n u e El Cam i n o R e a l Pa g e M i l l R o a d 4.10 Publicly Accessible Private Connections New publicly accessible connections on private property are intended to support greater porosity and walkability throughout the Plan Area. These connections can break up large ‘super-blocks’ and provide alternative routes for residents to move through the Plan Area. These connections include mid-block paseos in between the Cannery building, pedestrian pathways within the rear setback of new development along El Camino Real, and pedestrian pathways through the 395 Page Mill property. Pedestrian Clear Zone Shared Use Path: 20 Feet Landscape / Furniture Zone 3 Feet Vehicle Travel Lanes 26 Feet Emergency Vehicle Access Building Entries New development shall provide a secondary entry or entries on mid-block paseos. Pedestrian Clear Zone Shared Use Path: 12 Feet Landscape / Furniture Zone Rear Green Buffer : 10 Feet Frontage / Setback Rear Setback: Minimum 22 Feet Building Entries New development shall provide a secondary entry or entries on real setback pathways. 4.10.1 Street Design Standards: Mid-Block Paseo Rear Setback Pathway12 Table 17 Mid-Block Paseo Design Table 18 Rear Setback Pathway Design For more information on public easements go to: Chapter 7: Implementation 92 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 116     ST R E E T S Ex i s t i n g P r o p e r t y L i n e Rig h t o f W a y C e n t e r l i n e Setback 10’7.5’10’ Clear WalkwayDrive LaneTree Bed Lambert St. (Looking towards East) 27.5 3’20’ Shared Path Planter Bed 26’ 3’ Planter Bed Publically Accessible Private Streets Ex i s t i n g P r o p e r t y L i n e 10’16’ Shared Path Green Setback 5’ 22’ Ex i s t i n g P r o p e r t y L i n e Rig h t o f W a y C e n t e r l i n e Setback 10’7.5’10’ Clear Walkway Drive LaneTree Bed Lambert St. (Looking towards East) 27.5 3’20’ Shared Path Planter Bed 26’ 3’ Planter Bed Publically Accessible Private Streets Ex i s t i n g P r o p e r t y L i n e 10’16’ Shared Path Green Setback 5’ 22’ Figure 69 Typical mid-block connection section Figure 70 Typical rear setback connection section 93 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 117     5.1 Public Park 5.2 Matadero Creek Parks and Open Space 5 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 118     NVCAP’s ecological framework takes direct inspiration from the City’s Sustainability and Climate Action Plan, putting forward design strategies that collectively expand the definition of sustainability beyond mitigation, adaptation, and resilience, but grounded in regeneration – identifying opportunities for renewal, restoration, carbon sequestration, and growth of the natural environment. The future streets, parks, natural areas, and buildings will restore and enhance habitat and pollinator pathways, and provide flood protection and stormwater management, cleaner air and cleaner water, and healthier habitats for current and future generations. The Ecological Framework includes the following: •Public Park •Matadero Creek Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 119     5.1 Public Park Located in the southeast corner of the Plan Area, the public park is a proposed 2.25-acre public open space. The proposed naturalization of Matadero Creek between Park Boulevard and Lambert Avenue will serve as the organizing framework for the park’s design and neighborhood destination, inviting Palo Alto residents, employees, and visitors to enjoy access to recreational activities, habitat, and inclusive community programming. Bounded by the proposed Portage Avenue woonerf and Park Boulevard, the proposed public park is seamlessly integrated into the adopted citywide Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan. The curbless design of the proposed Portage Avenue woonerf supports a natural extension of the park, directly connecting to the restored Cannery Building. Standards: 5.1.1 Park Acreage and Dimensions Public park shall be located according to Figure 60. 5.1.2 Circulation All multi-use paths shall form a continuous path connecting all points of entry as illustrated in Figure 60. Programmed spaces shall connect to the Plan Area mobility network via multi-use paths. The multi-use paths network shall create a safe connection across Lambert Street to Boulware Park. The minimum width of the multi-use path shall be 12 feet. 5.1.3 Park Gateways The park shall have five points of entry to connect with the pedestrian and bike mobility network around the park. The character of these gateways to the park is further outlined in Figure 60. 5.1.4 Utilities Electrical service, potable water, and sewer supply shall be provided to accommodate varied events such as movie nights, festivals to serve small park structures; and along the park trails and the Picnic Area. Refer to Chapter 7 for additional information regarding utilities. 5.1.5 Design Approval Once the park becomes a project, the design of the park shall go through the typical City review process including review by the Parks and Recreation Commission. Project Goals Sustainability and the Environment Protect and enhance the environment, while addressing the principles of sustainability. Balance of Community Interests Balance community-wide objectives with the interests of neighborhood residents and minimize displacement of existing residents. 96 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 120     Figure 71 Location of Park Gateways and Circulation Paths Park Gateways Access to park SAFE CONNECTION TO BOULWARE PARK COMMUNITY GARDENS MULTI-USE OPEN SPACE ACTIVE ZONES OBSERVATION DECK Viewing shed Legend PA R K S 97 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 121     Guidelines: 5.1.6 Programming Active Park programming may include but is not limited to a dog park, outdoor fitness area, natural habitat area, community garden, or amphitheater. In addition to active programming, park design should accommodate passive uses such as reading and picnicking. When siting park elements, consider types of activity, periods of use or vacancy, availability of sun or shade, and the differing needs of a diverse range of visitors such as small children, adult athletes, and dog owners. The park should include amenities to support the commercial environment on Portage Avenue such as flexible seating areas, social gathering spaces, play spaces, and public art. Surrounded by development on more than one side, the program elements should be designed to be protected from wind and down-drafts from buildings with strategic tree planting and thoughtful siting of passive programming. 5.1.7 Native Plantings Where possible, pollinator friendly native plants should be incorporated. 98 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 122     Figure 72 An example of passive park programming Figure 73 An example of active park programming PA R K S 99 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 123     5.2 Matadero Creek The Matadero creek will be fully naturalized between Park Boulevard and Lambert Avenue. The flood channel is widened to a 100 feet riparian corridor serving maximum geomorphic form and ecological function. Leading with resilience in mind, the design offers the creek the capability to convey 100-year flood events. Standards: 5.2.1 Creek Buffer The creek section between Park Boulevard and Lambert Avenue is buffered by a 100 feet riparian corridor. The Matadero creek riparian corridor shall have a naturalized buffer of 100 feet measured from the mid-point of the creek alignment. To determine the defined parameters for the buffer floodwalls, further City coordination is required. 5.2.2 Circulation The riparian corridor shall maintain public access on both sides of the creek front and be designed to embrace the Matadero creek as a central feature. Lambert Avenue bridge is replaced with a new bridge spanning 100 feet. The bridge shall be located as shown in Figure 63. It shall align with the first mid-block paseo parallel to Park Boulevard on the 340 Portage site and connect Portage Avenue and Lambert Avenue. 5.2.3 Wind Protection As the riparian corridor is 10 feet lower than the surrounding terrain, it should be designed to be protected from wind and down-drafts from surrounding areas with strategic tree planting and thoughtful design of the shared trail routes. 5.2.4 Ecology Impervious surfaces shall be prohibited in the 100 foot buffer as per Figure 65. Plant selections shall reinforce the native and surrounding ecology and promote habitat development. 5.2.5 Gateways Gateways to the corridor shall be at the following key intersections. See Figure 65. Sloped walks, terraces, stairs, or ramps for bicycle and pedestrian circulation shall be a key feature at these gateways, integrated with the flood wall designed to connect across the 10 feet grade change between the public park and the Matadero creek riparian corridor. This will ensure that pedestrians and bicyclists can access both the park and the riparian trail. Gateway access to multi-use paths shall be designed to be ADA accessible to traverse the 10 feet grade change from the public park to the creek. Project Goals Community Facilities and Infrastructure Carefully align and integrate development of new community facilities and infrastructure with private development, recognizing both the community’s needs and that such investments can increase the cost of housing. Sustainability and the Environment Protect and enhance the environment, while addressing the principles of sustainability. 100 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 124     PA R K S Figure 74 The location of the Matadero Creek buffer, circulation, and gateways 100 FEET RIPARIAN CORRIDOR 10 FEET GRADE DROP NATURALIZED CREEK Riparian Corridor Gateways NO IMPERVIOUS SURFACES IN 100 FEET BUFFER Shared Path PUBLIC ACCESS ALONG CREEK Riparian Corridor Buffer Boundary Legend 101 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 125     Figure 75 The Matadero Creek Channel is currently a constrained concrete trapezoidal channel. 5.2.6 Floodwalls Concrete retaining walls shall be designed to allow for vegetation. Refer to Chapter 7 for additional information regarding floodwalls. 5.2.7 Utilities Electrical service and potable water shall be provided along the trails. Guidelines: 5.2.8 Public Art Gateways may integrate public art/structures indicate major entry points, when appropriate. 5.2.9 The Matadero Creek Bridge Observation areas should be integrated with the design of the new bridge. Educational placards should inform the public on the re-naturalization of Matadero Creek.For more information on utilities, go to: Chapter 7: Implementation 102 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 126     PA R K S Figure 76 A naturalized creek has the opportunity to provide multi-use trails and habitat areas. 103 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 127     6.1 Building Heights and Massing 6.2 Retail and Active Frontage 6.3 Portage Avenue Frontage 6.4 Residential Frontage 6.5 Sustainable Design Buildings 6 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 128     NVCAP’s urban form framework champions the design of buildings that are respectful neighbors, human-scaled, and embrace the street. New development will respond to the surrounding context such as building up to El Camino Real while creating a gentle transition to quieter residential portions of the neighborhood. This chapter provides guidance on the desired future built form and sets aspirations for how new buildings will contribute to the character of the NVCAP as it continues to be developed incrementally over time. The key factors that contribute to good building architecture: building mass and bulk appearance; pedestrian-friendly design of the ground level, and visual interest created by architectural articulation, the materiality of the building, and sustainable design. The standards and guidelines have been organized to address these key elements under the following headings: •Building Heights and Massing •Building Frontages •Sustainable Design Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 129     6.1 Building Heights and Massing Building form and massing have a crucial role in forming NVCAP’s built environment as a framework for a comfortable and exciting public realm. Massing strategies reflected in NVCAP’s architecture make associated building uses more legible and well-organized. Massing regulations such as allowable building heights and stepbacks will support the gradual transition from taller buildings along El Camino Real to quieter, residential parts of the neighborhood. Standards: 6.1.1 Building Heights All new development shall conform to Figure 78 for maximum allowable building heights. 6.1.2 Affordable Housing Height Bonus Through the City’s Housing Incentive Program or the State Density Bonus, 100% below market rate projects shall be eligible for additional bonus height (up to 33 feet). 6.1.3 Stepdown to Single-Family Residential Based on the development standards of a adjacent zoning district, new development shall stepdown to existing single family residential. Refer to the Palo Alto Municipal Code, as setback and stepback requirements on side or rear lot lines shall vary based on zoning. 6.1.4 Utilities Overhead public utilities shall be buried for buildings with roof edge heights over 27 feet tall. Guidelines: 6.1.5 Cannery Building Roof Datum Any adaptive re-use projects directly adjacent to the Cannery should match the structure’s 36 foot roof datum. Re a r P r o p e r t y L i n e 60 Degree Stepdown for Clear Daylight Zone Single-Family Residential Da y l i g h t P l a n e High/Medium Density Mixed-Use Figure 77 An example of a daylight plane requirement for mixed-use development stepping down to single family residential neighborhoods. 106 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 130     BU I L D I N G S Figure 78 Allowable Height Map 107 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 131     6.2 Retail and Active Use Frontage Ground floor retail and other active uses enliven and activate streetscapes, enhancing the public interface between new buildings and the sidewalk. Within the Plan Area, the highest concentration of retail and active uses are located along El Camino Real. These ground floor spaces are designed to accommodate a wide variety of commercial spaces including local shops, cafes, maker spaces, co-working spaces, and professional services. The following uses qualify as active: •Neighborhood-serving retail that provides goods and services that people would frequently use to take care of their personal and household needs. Examples include grocery stores, drug stores, eating and drinking establishments, dry cleaners, hair salons, etc. •Professional services with regular customers such as dentists that are 5,000 sq. ft. or less; •Public uses including a community room and daycare; •Building lobbies; •Spaces accessory to residential uses, such as fitness rooms, workspaces, leasing offices, shared kitchens, mail rooms, and Class I bicycle parking facilities with direct access to the sidewalk or street. •Building frontage for mechanical equipment, transformer doors, parking garage entrances, exit stairs, and other facilities necessary to the operation of the building are excluded from this requirement. Standards: 6.2.1 El Camino Real Active Frontage Ground floor active uses shall be required along all new development fronting El Camino Real. Refer to Section 2.3 for a map of ground floor edges. 6.2.2 Ground Floor Retail Height Ground floor retail floor to ceiling height shall be a minimum of 15 feet. 6.2.3 Objective Standards For Corner Conditions, Primary Entries, Façade Design, and Transparency, new development shall adhere to Palo Alto Municipal Code, Chapter 18.24 Contextual Design Criteria and Objective Design Standards. Guidelines: Figure 79 Retail ground floors provides adequate floor to ceiling heights, transparency, and signage. 108 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 132     6.2.4 Park Boulevard Ground floor active uses should be encouraged for new development fronting Park Boulevard. 6.2.5 Storefront Frontages Storefronts should create a fine grain of variety along each street frontage, expressing the unique identity of each tenant. Where active uses or retail frontages are required or located, the following design standards shall apply: •Exterior windows on the ground floor shall use transparent glazing to the extent feasible. Low-e glass or minimal tinting to achieve sun control is permitted, provided the glazing appears transparent when viewed from the ground level. •Window coverings are not permitted on the ground floor during typical business hours. Where operations preclude transparency (e.g., theaters) or where privacy requires window coverings, sidewalk-facing frontage shall include items of visual interest including displays of merchandise or artwork; visual access shall be provided to a minimum interior depth of 3 feet. 6.1.5 Outdoor Rooms Outdoor rooms notched into the ground floor should be lined with active retail uses and have ample space for spillover for outdoor dining, murals, and retail displays. BU I L D I N G S Figure 80 Ground floors can create notches of outdoor rooms to allow for lively spillover of retail. Figure 81 Active ground floors provide openness, transparency and a connection to the street. 109 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 133     6.3 Portage Avenue Frontage The Portage Avenue Park Frontage Zone represents a human-scaled pedestrian environment punctuated by active programming that enlivens the woonerf along public park. Uses along this frontage will be excellent locations for outdoor dining, and a backdrop for activities at public park. Standards: 6.3.1 Ground Floor Entries Entries shall be flush at sidewalk grade and shall have a minimum of four (4) active doorways per 200 linear feet. Guidelines: 6.3.2 Balconies and Terraces The inclusion of balconies and terraces should be encouraged along the streetwall above the ground floor in the park frontage zone to take advantage of views of the public park and to allow greater programmatic and visual connection between uses in the buildings and the park. 6.3.2 Respect the Cannery Development along Portage Avenue adjacent to the Cannery should emulate the Cannery, taking cues from the materiality and fenestration, and roof datum. Figure 82 Ground floors treatments can emulate the materiality, fenestration, and roof datum of historic structures. 110 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 134     6.4 Residential Frontage The residential ground floor level is characterized by the lower intensity of activity, generally fronting onto streets that are quieter in character, and serves to foster neighborhood connection. Individual residential entries and stoops are an effective way to activate the street and create greater opportunities for social interaction. At the same time, they should provide a sense of privacy and comfortable social distance from the sidewalk. Standards: The following standards are in accordance with Palo Alto Municipal Code Section 18.24.020 (Contextual Design Criteria and Objective Design Standards): 6.4.1 Ground Floor Entries Entries must be raised above sidewalk grade based on the setback condition from the property line. Ground floor residential units shall have entries with direct, individual access onto a public right of way, open space, or easement. Guidelines: 6.4.2 Stoops Residential units should provide a stoop to create a social distance from the street; home office units are not required to have stoops and may be entered at grade. The design of stoops should balance the need to create privacy for the unit occupant and allow visual connection with the street. Areas between stoops should be planted and can be an opportunity to integrate Green Stormwater Infrastructure. BU I L D I N G S Figure 83 Ground floor residential stoops can provide privacy for residents and neighborhood beautification and Green Stormwater Infrastructure. 111 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 135     Sustainable Design Palo Alto has long been a leader in sustainability, making impressive progress towards reducing its carbon impacts, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and resource consumption. In October 2022, Palo Alto City Council passed an ambitious carbon neutrality by 2030 goal, building on the City’s existing goal of cutting emissions 80% below 1990 levels by 2030. The following standards and guidelines are intended to support the City’s larger climate action goals to ensure a sustainable and resilient future. Standards: 6.6.1 California Green Building (CALGREEN) Standards Code New development shall adhere to Chapter 16.14 California Green Building Standards Code. As stated in the code, all newly constructed residential buildings must meet CALGREEN Tier 2 requirements. 6.6.2 Bird-Safe Building Design All new mixed-use development that has facades exceeding 30 percent glazing shall utilize bird- safe design strategies. Applicants shall choose from the following materials list: A. Fritted Glass - Ceramic dots or ‘frits’ can be silk-screened, printed, or otherwise applied to the glass surface. This design element, useful primarily for new construction, can also improve solar heat gain control and reduce glare. B. Etched Glass – Glass etching on the surface of the glass can be achieved through acidic, caustic, or abrasive substances. The etched markers should be on the outside surface. C. UV Coated Glass – Some birds can see into the ultraviolet (UV) spectrum of light, a range largely invisible to humans. UV-reflective and/ or absorbing patterns (transparent to humans but visible to birds) are frequently suggested as a solution for many bird collision problems. This approach is not appropriate for situations where the glazing is back lit. E. Permanent Stencils or Frosting - Frosted glass is created by acid etching or sandblasting transparent glass. Frosted areas are translucent, but different finishes are available with different levels of light transmission. An entire surface can be frosted, or frosted patterns can be applied. F. Exterior Apparatus - Fixed exterior screens, grilles, netting, louvers, fins or mullions can effectively reduce visible reflections, provide insulation from strike impact, reduce solar heat gain, reduce glare and provide weather protection. 6.5 Project Goals Sustainability and the Environment Protect and enhance the environment, while addressing the principles of sustainability. Balance of Community Interests Balance community-wide objectives with the interests of neighborhood residents and minimize displacement of existing residents. 112 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 136     Guidelines: 6.6.3 Minimize Heat Gain Building facades should be designed to balance solar access with the need to control heat gain. This could include the following: •Shade windows with architectural features that add visual interest by creating textural variations. •Architectural elements that should be used on south-facing facades. •Fixed shading features, which are designed with a range of projection and spacing dimensions that minimize heat gain and composed with visually pleasing rhythms to avoid monotonous building facades. •Perforated horizontal overhang •Awnings that are well integrated with the overall building façade, especially for retail on the ground floor. •Sliding and folding perforated panels/shutters that double as privacy screens for outdoor private spaces such as balconies and terraces overlooking El Camino Real. •Trellis, Vegetation on windows and green walls allow for minimizing heat gain while additionally bolstering the overall concept of ecological design. BU I L D I N G S •Egg crate façades are not only effective in minimizing heat gain but can create privacy while providing structural supports for planter beds etc. •Shrubs and tree shade wherever possible should augment façade design to minimize heat gain. •Use of low-solar-transmittance glazing to reduce solar gain. •Use window treatments to reduce solar gain. •Reflective and Light-colored outer surfaces can minimally address heat gain but should be employed in combination with the other façade and roof treatments. 113 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 137     6.6.4 Daylighting and Natural Ventilation Buildings should be designed to maximize the use of daylighting for all inhabited interior spaces to provide a high-quality indoor environment, reduce overall energy consumption and reduce exposure to artificial lighting which can negatively impact human health. Buildings that allow for natural ventilation reduce energy consumption for heating and cooling and provide a higher-quality indoor environment. Consideration should be given to optimizing floor plates and unit layouts to allow for cross ventilation. 6.6.5 Roofs Where building roofs are free of solar panels or other sustainability infrastructure, they should be designed to include systems such as vegetated roof covers, plants, green stormwater infrastructure, and roofing materials with high albedo surfaces to reduce heat island effect and slow rainwater runoff. Building roofs should be designed to create usable recreational spaces. Rooftop shading structures mounted with solar panels can maximize the effective use of roof area. Pockets of green roof can help furnish these recreational spaces, and resist heat gain while also serving the concept of ecological design. 6.5 Figure 84 Building roofs can be multi-purpose including providing additional outdoor space for residents. 114 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 138     6.6.6 Renewable Energy Buildings should provide “solar ready” infrastructure such as solar panel standoffs, conduit, and roof water spigots that minimize the cost and effort of adding solar capacity later, as per the California Green Building Standards Code. 6.6.7 Visibility New development should incorporate visible elements of sustainability such as green roofs, shading devices or photovoltaic panels into the fabric of the building, to make visible the building’s energy saving features. New development should include interpretive signage to explain the features of the building which promote sustainability, and to educate visitors and occupants how their behavior can make an impact on overall building performance. BU I L D I N G S Figure 85 Visible elements of sustainability can include design features such as celebrating secure bike parking. 115 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 139     7.1 Entitlement Process 7.2 Environmental Review 7.3 Transportation Infrastructure 7.4 Transportation Demand Management 7.5 Utilities and Infrastructure 7.6 Matadero Creek Civil Infrastructure 7.7 Funding and Financing Strategy 7.8 Implementation Actions Implementation 7 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 140     The implementation of the NVCAP will require action by the public, City departments, regional agencies, and private property owners. The City will take the lead in coordinating areawide actions and establishing funding mechanisms for public investment in programs and capital projects. However, private investment through the architecture, landscaping, and maintenance of individual development projects will be a significant determinant of the look and feel of the Plan Area. Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 141     7.1 Entitlement Process Entitlement Process Development projects in NVCAP typically require two phases of review and approval: the planning/ zoning entitlement phase and the building permit phase. Planning / Zoning Entitlements Phase During the entitlement phase, developers of proposed projects submit applications for review by Planning staff and relevant City departments to determine whether the proposed project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, this Coordinated Area Plan, and other associated regulatory requirements, including the Zoning Ordinance. At a minimum in accordance with Palo Alto Municipal Code 19.10, a Coordinated Development Permit is necessary prior to construction or exterior alteration. Uses that are permitted by-right in a zoning district may only require administrative review by Planning staff. More complex development projects are reviewed by the Architectural Review Board and/ or City Council. Specifics are further outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. However, the recent changes in State Law related to affordable housing may alter the City’s processing and approval procedures. Applicants are advised to consult with the Planning and Development Services Department staff prior to project submittal. Planning fees are required at formal project submittal to the Planning and Development Services Department. Building Permits Phase Following the approval of all required planning entitlements, developers submit detailed building permit applications, which are reviewed by several departments including Building, Planning, Engineering, and Fire Department prior to approval and permit issuance. The payment of building permit fees, and other development impact fees is required prior to issuance of a building permit. 118 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 142     Environmental Review (CEQA) IM P L E M E N T A T I O N This Coordinated Area Plan is accompanied by the Supplement to the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR). 7.2 EIR Findings The EIR includes an Initial Study that concluded that impacts to the following resources would be less than significant: PLACEHOLDER FOR NOW. The Draft EIR also concluded that impacts to the following resources would be less than significant: PLACEHOLDER FOR NOW. Finally, the Draft SEIR identified PLACEHOLDER FOR NOW. As a result, individual projects consistent with the coordinated area plan PLACEHOLDER FOR NOW. 119 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 143     7.3 Transportation Infrastructure The envisioned street network for the NVCAP will provide an array of high-quality mobility options throughout the site. Pedestrian and bicycle facilities will be designed for people of all ages and abilities, and accessible paths to transit will include wayfinding signage and other amenities. Streets and intersections will be designed to prioritize local circulation and access, and to encourage low vehicle speeds. The planned improvements will be fully integrated into the surrounding neighborhoods to ensure seamless connections for all users. The mobility elements described in this section include the following: •Pedestrian realm •Bike network •Gateway intersections •Transit access •Vehicle circulation and parking •Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies Pedestrian Realm A well-designed, integrated pedestrian network is a vital component of the NVCAP. This section outlines a range of design strategies for a safe, attractive, and inviting public realm. It includes pedestrian-focused recommendations for: •Street design •Public realm elements (landscaping, amenities, etc.) •First/Last mile transit connections Pedestrian-Friendly Street Design The NVCAP includes a fully connected, ADA- accessible sidewalk network throughout the project site. Intersections will be enhanced with appropriate crossing treatments and traffic control to maximize pedestrian safety and access. Specific design treatments for the intersections within the NVCAP are provided in Section 7.4: Gateway Intersections. As vehicle volumes and speeds are key factors of the pedestrian experience, a series of traffic calming interventions are described in Section 7.6: Vehicle Circulation and Parking. Local disability organizations can provide resources to ensure both neighborhood and city-wide design guidelines are inclusive of all community members and reflect best practices. 120 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 144     Public Realm and Pedestrian Amenities Central to the vision for a re-imagined North Ventura neighborhood is a shared street, or “woonerf,” along Portage Avenue. Woonerf (“street for living”) is a Dutch term for an integrated, common space shared by pedestrians, bicyclists, and low-speed motor vehicles. They typically have no curbs or sidewalks, and vehicles are slowed by trees, planters, parking areas, and other obstacles in the street. In addition to becoming a great space for walking and bicycling, the Portage Avenue woonerf can provide a placemaking space for community gatherings, events, retail, and other flexible uses. Design elements of the Portage Avenue woonerf include: •A row of street trees on either side of the main travel way to designate pedestrian priority areas adjacent to building frontages. •Signage emphasizing the presence of pedestrians and bicyclists. •Textured or permeable pavement designed to slow vehicle speeds and provide stormwater management benefits. •Pedestrian-scale lighting •Seating areas •Landscaping and Green Stormwater Infrastructure •Design elements that highlight the community’s vision or character. Other public realm and pedestrian amenities that should be included throughout the neighborhood include: •Visually inviting and maintained ground floor frontage. •Drought-resistant landscaping that is aligned with City guidelines. •Trees and other forms of shade to provide refuge from the sun. •Green Stormwater Infrastructure, such as permeable pavement, bioretention and other types. •Pedestrian-scaled lighting •Signage and wayfinding, with designs unique to North Ventura that reflect landmark destinations in the neighborhood, to provide navigation to key destinations. •Flexible and fixed street furniture •Public art installations that will enhance the pedestrian experience and reflect the community’s unique character. First/Last Mile Transit Connections Safe and accessible walking routes to the California Avenue Caltrain Station and the bus stops along El Camino Real are a key strategy to provide convenient alternatives to driving. Currently, the two direct walking and bicycling routes to the California Avenue Caltrain Station are via El Camino Real and Park Boulevard. El Camino Real’s auto-oriented design deters many people from walking or bicycling alongside it. While there are long term plans to transform the street, opportunities to enhance the route along Park Boulevard should be pursued in the near- term. Recommendations include: •Pedestrian-scaled lighting •Wider sidewalks •Wayfinding signage •Buffered bike lanes •Collaborating with developers to restrict new curb cuts, close old ones, and design for activated ground floor frontages. In addition, installing a signalized crosswalk at Page Mill Road/ Ash Street will open another accessible route to the Caltrain Station. IM P L E M E N T A T I O N 121 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 145     Bike Network The NVCAP will feature a high quality, “low- stress” bikeway network that will be comfortable for people of all ages and abilities to use. The proposed network will be integrated into the citywide network to ensure safe, convenient connections to the adjacent neighborhoods. This will be achieved by selecting bicycle facilities that prioritize safety and comfort based on vehicle speeds and volumes, and with intersections that have appropriate bike-specific crossing treatments and traffic control. Wayfinding signage and ample bicycle parking are also integral elements of the network. The bicycle network will support a range of users, including scooters, e-bikes, and other micromobility devices. The low-stress bike network will include separated bicycle lanes on busier streets, bicycle boulevards on calmer neighborhood streets, and well-designed intersections throughout the project plan. Opportunities for shared-use paths and a woonerf are also identified. Shared-Use Paths are off-street two-way bikeways physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and used by people bicycling, walking, and other non-motorized users. Separated Bike Lanes are dedicated bikeways that combine the user experience of a multi- use path but are located on a street. They are physically distinct from the sidewalk and separated from motor vehicle traffic by physical objects such as parked vehicles, a curb, or posts. Buffered Bike Lanes provide dedicated on-street space for bicyclists, delineated with a designated buffer space separating the bicycle lane from the adjacent motor vehicle travel lane. Bicycle Boulevards are streets with low vehicle volumes and speeds, designated and designed to prioritize bicyclists. Bicycle boulevards use signs, pavement markings, and speed and volume management measures to discourage vehicle cut-through trips and include safe, convenient bicycle crossings of busy arterials. Support Facilities Facilities that support bicycle travel should be incorporated at various locations throughout the NVCAP. These include: •Wayfinding signage along the bicycle network that provides information on routes, destinations, and distances. •Bicycle parking: expand the availability of sidewalk bicycle parking, secure long-term bicycle parking, and install end-of-trip facilities at transit stops along El Camino Real and at the California Avenue Caltrain Station. These may be in the form of outdoor bicycle racks, indoor or outdoor bicycle lockers, or indoor bicycle parking cages for each tenant. •Shower facilities and lockers at places of employment. Gateway Intersections The intersections surrounding the NVCAP site will be enhanced to improve access, safety, and connectivity to adjacent neighborhoods. This is particularly important for pedestrian and bicycle safety, as the current intersections’ designs largely prioritize vehicular speed and access. New design guidance and signal technology advancements offer options for improved intersection interactions between people walking, biking, and driving. In particular, intersections on the bicycle network with a high potential for conflicts between bicycles and vehicles must be designed thoughtfully. The design toolbox for NVCAP intersection enhancements includes: •High visibility, marked crosswalks •Raised crosswalks •Advance stop bars and yield lines •Daylighting to improve sightlines by removing parking adjacent to the intersection •ADA-accessible, bi-directional curb ramps •Curb extensions or bulb-outs 7.3 122 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 146     •Bicycle detection and markings to indicate the position and path for bicyclists to cross the intersection •Traffic signals •Accessible pedestrian signals at intersections with clear markings, audio, and Braille messaging •Leading pedestrian intervals at signalized intersections for pedestrians to establish their presence in the crosswalks before vehicles proceed. Figure 86 Map of Conceptual Gateway Intersection Design Improvements IM P L E M E N T A T I O N 123 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 147     North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Draft Document: January 2023 7  Daylighting to improve sightlines by removing parking adjacent to the intersection  ADA-accessible, bi-directional curb ramps  Curb extensions or bulb-outs  Bicycle detection and markings to indicate the position and path for bicyclists to cross the intersection  Traffic signals  Accessible pedestrian signals at intersections with clear markings, audio, and Braille messaging  Leading pedestrian intervals at signalized intersections for pedestrians to establish their presence in the crosswalks before vehicles proceed Site-specific recommendations are provided for each intersection. 1. El Camino Real/Page Mill Road The intersection of El Camino Real and Page Mill Road will be redesigned with specific transit, pedestrian and bicycle elements. The eastbound right turn slip lane from Page Mill Road to El Camino Real will be demolished, tightening the turning radius, and thereby reducing vehicular turn speeds and pedestrian crossing distances. Separated bicycle lanes will provide dedicated space for bicyclists on El Camino Real, and they will also receive dedicated signal phasing to reduce conflicts with right-turning vehicles when crossing Page Mill Road. Red pavement markings will also indicate that buses can use the right-turn lanes to proceed forward across the intersection to far side bus stops with new transit boarding islands. El Camino Real and Page Mill Road The intersection of El Camino Real and Page Mill Road will be redesigned with specific transit, pedestrian and bicycle elements. The eastbound right turn slip lane from Page Mill Road to El Camino Real will be removed, tightening the turning radius, and thereby reducing vehicular turn speeds and pedestrian crossing distances. Separated bicycle lanes will provide dedicated space for bicyclists on El Camino Real, and they will also receive dedicated signal phasing to reduce conflicts with right-turning vehicles when crossing Page Mill Road. Red pavement markings will also indicate that buses can use the right-turn lanes to proceed forward across the intersection to far side bus stops with new transit boarding islands. Figure 87 El Camino Real and Page Mill Road Conceptual Intersection Design ADA Ramp Bus Lane Sidewalk Bicycle Lane Legend 1 7.3 124 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 148     ADA Ramp Bus Lane Sidewalk Bicycle Lane Legend El Camino Real and Olive Avenue The intersection of El Camino Real and Olive Avenue will be redesigned with high visibility marked crosswalks and bicycle elements will be painted across all approaches. While a traffic signal is not proposed for this intersection, other strategies should be explored to ensure improved pedestrian access and safety across El Camino Real. North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Draft Document: January 2023 8 2. El Camino Real/Olive Avenue A traffic signal is planned for this intersection to improve pedestrian access and safety across El Camino Real. High visibility marked crosswalks will be painted across all approaches. The signal timing will be coordinated with nearby intersections. 3. El Camino Real/Portage Avenue/Hansen Way Both slip lanes entering and exiting Hansen Way from El Camino Real will be closed and redesigned to include a dedicated bicycle cut-out to cross El Camino Real. Separated bicycle lanes will provide dedicated space to cyclists along El Camino Real. The existing northbound bus stop will be relocated to the far side of Portage Avenue with dedicated boarding islands separating transit users from cyclists. All existing crosswalks will be repainted to be high visibility, and the existing crosswalk at Portage Avenue will be straightened across El Camino Real. Portage Avenue is currently proposed to be bicycle boulevard and woonerf. Alternatively, a two-way bikeway on Portage Avenue from Park Boulevard to El Camino Real may alter the final design of this intersection. Figure 88 El Camino Real and Olive Avenue Conceptual Intersection Design ADA Ramp Sidewalk Bicycle Lane Legend 2 IM P L E M E N T A T I O N 125 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 149     El Camino Real and Portage Avenue / Hansen Way Both slip lanes entering and exiting Hansen Way from El Camino Real will be closed and redesigned to include a dedicated bicycle cut-out to cross El Camino Real. Separated bicycle lanes will provide dedicated space to cyclists along El Camino Real. The existing northbound bus stop will be relocated to the far side of Portage Avenue with dedicated boarding islands separating transit users from cyclists. All existing crosswalks will be repainted to be high visibility, and the existing crosswalk at Portage Avenue will be straightened across El Camino Real. Portage Avenue is currently proposed to be bicycle boulevard and woonerf. Alternatively, a two-way bikeway on Portage Avenue from Park Boulevard to El Camino Real may be included in the final design of this intersection. North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Draft Document: January 2023 8 2. El Camino Real/Olive Avenue A traffic signal is planned for this intersection to improve pedestrian access and safety across El Camino Real. High visibility marked crosswalks will be painted across all approaches. The signal timing will be coordinated with nearby intersections. 3. El Camino Real/Portage Avenue/Hansen Way Both slip lanes entering and exiting Hansen Way from El Camino Real will be closed and redesigned to include a dedicated bicycle cut-out to cross El Camino Real. Separated bicycle lanes will provide dedicated space to cyclists along El Camino Real. The existing northbound bus stop will be relocated to the far side of Portage Avenue with dedicated boarding islands separating transit users from cyclists. All existing crosswalks will be repainted to be high visibility, and the existing crosswalk at Portage Avenue will be straightened across El Camino Real. Portage Avenue is currently proposed to be bicycle boulevard and woonerf. Alternatively, a two-way bikeway on Portage Avenue from Park Boulevard to El Camino Real may alter the final design of this intersection. Figure 89 El Camino Real, Hansen Way, Portage Avenue Conceptual Intersection Design ADA Ramp Sidewalk Bicycle Lane Legend 3 7.3 126 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 150     ADA Ramp Sidewalk Bicycle Lane Lambert Avenue and Ash Street A raised crosswalk with advance yield lines will be located on the east side of the intersection. This will provide a direct connection for the proposed path along Matadero Creek between John Boulware Park and the proposed park on the NVCAP site. The segment of Ash Street adjacent to Boulware Park is being removed and will become a part of the park. North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Draft Document: January 2023 9 4. Lambert Avenue/Ash Street A raised crosswalk with advance yield lines will be located on the east side of the intersection. This will provide a direct connection for the proposed path along Matadero Creek between John Boulware Park and the proposed park on the NVCAP site. 5. Park Boulevard/Portage Avenue This intersection is the primary access point into the woonerf along Portage Avenue. The intersection will be stop-controlled and have high visibility crosswalks on all approaches. A bike box on the northbound leg of Park Boulevard will provide a space for bicyclists to turn left onto the woonerf. “North Ventura” gateway signage should be installed at the entrance to the woonerf. Figure 90 Lambert Avenue and Ash Street Conceptual Intersection Design ADA Ramp Sidewalk Matadero Creek Legend 4 IM P L E M E N T A T I O N 127 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 151     Park Boulevard and Portage Avenue This intersection is the primary access point into the woonerf along Portage Avenue. The intersection will be stop-controlled and have high visibility crosswalks on all approaches. A bike box on the northbound leg of Park Boulevard will provide a space for bicyclists to turn left onto the woonerf. “North Ventura” gateway signage should be installed at the entrance to the woonerf. North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Draft Document: January 2023 9 4. Lambert Avenue/Ash Street A raised crosswalk with advance yield lines will be located on the east side of the intersection. This will provide a direct connection for the proposed path along Matadero Creek between John Boulware Park and the proposed park on the NVCAP site. 5. Park Boulevard/Portage Avenue This intersection is the primary access point into the woonerf along Portage Avenue. The intersection will be stop-controlled and have high visibility crosswalks on all approaches. A bike box on the northbound leg of Park Boulevard will provide a space for bicyclists to turn left onto the woonerf. “North Ventura” gateway signage should be installed at the entrance to the woonerf. Figure 91 Park Boulevard and Portage Avenue Conceptual Intersection Design ADA Ramp Sidewalk Bicycle Lane Legend 5 7.3 128 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 152     ADA Ramp Sidewalk Bicycle Lane Legend Page Mill Road and Park Boulevard Page Mill Road/Park Boulevard was recently redesigned as part of the construction of adjacent development. While vehicle volumes are currently quite low there today, they are projected to increase over time. To support the transition to a more pedestrian and bicycle-friendly neighborhood, additional safety treatments such as leading pedestrian intervals, advance stop bars, and a “bike box” for northbound Park Boulevard may be considered. Page Mill Road and Ash Street A hybrid beacon or full traffic signal and a marked crosswalk should be installed at this location to support pedestrians and bicyclists crossing Page Mill Road. Santa Clara County to determine if a signal or crossing is feasible. IM P L E M E N T A T I O N 129 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 153     Transit Access The North Ventura neighborhood contains two transit stops: a mid-block stop located at the southeast boundary of the site at El Camino Real/ Portage Avenue; and a far side stop located at the southwest boundary of the site at Page Mill Road/ El Camino Real. Four transit operators are located within the site boundaries and an approximately 15-minute walk surrounding the site boundaries: •VTA local and regional bus service, with connections to the California Avenue Caltrain Station, the Palo Alto VA Hospital, the Milpitas BART station, and Eastridge Transit Center in San Jose •AC Transit Dumbarton Express regional bus service between Palo Alto and the Union City BART station •Caltrain regional rail service at the California Avenue station, connecting Palo Alto to San Francisco and San Jose •Stanford Marguerite local shuttle service between the Palo Alto Caltrain Station and Research Park •Palo Alto provides on-demand shuttle service within the City of Palo Alto. Plans to enhance transit access within the North Ventura neighborhood focus on designing intuitive, accessible, and safe routes to transit. Recommendations include: •Wayfinding signage •Enhanced bus stop amenities for passengers •A mobility hub along Portage Avenue Wayfinding Signage Major destinations and their distance, available transit service and other transportation options should be clearly noted on signage throughout the neighborhood. Where possible, signage should reflect a design unique to North Ventura that reflects landmark destinations in the neighborhood. Mediums such as paint, art installations, and other location markers can also be used to communicate relevant information. An informational kiosk may be installed as part of the proposed mobility hub. Bus Stop Amenities Guidance from VTA and AC Transit will ensure that neighborhood bus shelters reflect agency- wide design standards and the latest industry best practices. In accordance with AC Transit’s Multimodal Corridor Guidelines and VTA’s Better Bus Stop Program, the contextually appropriate bus stop enhancements and amenities include: •Bus shelters protecting riders from the elements •Energy-efficient lighting to ensure visibility and enhance safety •Comfortable seating •Digital signage with real-time information informing riders of available service •Posted information with route information and service schedules, available in English, Spanish, and other locally prevalent languages as well as Braille placards •Audio capabilities to communicate real-time information to hearing-impaired riders 7.3 130 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 154     Portage Avenue Mobility Hub Mobility hubs are places in a community that bring together public transit, bike share, car share and other Sustainable transportation modes. The MTC Mobility Hub Program has identified the North Ventura neighborhood as a candidate for a mobility hub. This neighborhood’s proximity to Matedero Park, the California Avenue Caltrain Station, and bus stops on El Camino Real provides important connections to regional transit and micromobility pathways. The neighborhood mobility hub is proposed along Portage Avenue between El Camino Real and the intersection of Portage Avenue and Ash Street. This location is ideal given its proximity to varying active frontage uses as well as the proposed woonerf. The mobility hub will be able to accommodate a range of active transportation and micromobility options. Given the site’s half-mile distance to Caltrain, the mobility hub would be classified as a “suburban or rural hub” according to the site typologies outlined in MTC’s Mobility Hub Implementation Playbook. The available amenities and the design of the mobility hub should reflect the following principles as outlined by MTC and the City’s design guidelines: •Sustainable access and mobility to encourage mode shift. Proposed amenities include: •Transit shelters and waiting areas •Bicycle parking facilities •Shared mobility (bike share, scooter share, etc.) access points •Electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure •Designated parking for car share services High-quality customer experience to create a positive experience for transit riders. Interventions such as improving the ease of fare payment through kiosks and vending machines would be the responsibility of transit operators (AC Transit and VTA). Additional improvements relating to information access can also improve the customer experience. •Access to information to improve transit ease of use and customer experiences. Proposed amenities include: •Real-time travel information signage and interactive displays •Area maps and bulletins promoting local amenities and events •Monitoring systems to measure ridership, mobility, security, and public life metrics •Digital and physical wayfinding tools IM P L E M E N T A T I O N 131 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 155     Vehicle Circulation and Parking The proposed vehicle and parking strategies aim to prioritize local circulation and access, encourage low speeds, and determine right-sized parking capacity. Circulation To support local access and mitigate cut- through traffic, Ash Street from Page Mill Road to Olive Avenue is proposed to become one- way southbound. This change will help prevent northbound traffic on El Camino Real from using the neighborhood as a cut-through to travel eastbound on Page Mill Road. Vehicular traffic on the woonerf on Portage Avenue is permitted but should be discouraged. Vehicle circulation in this area will be primarily for access to buildings located on the woonerf. Acacia Avenue from Ash Street to Park Boulevard will be a private aisle for accessing the parking garage for research and development use per the 340 Portage Avenue development as well as residential frontage on Acacia Avenue for parking and unloading. Traffic Calming Measures Traffic calming measures such as speed humps and raised crosswalks to maintain low vehicle speeds are recommended along Olive Avenue and Lambert Avenue. A chicane, which is an offset curve to the road, is recommended for Pepper Avenue. To prioritize local circulation and access, encourage low vehicle speeds, and to accommodate emergency vehicles, travel lanes within the NVCAP are recommended to be a maximum of 10 feet wide where possible. To keep traffic volumes on Portage Avenue at a minimum to provide a low stress environment for bicyclists and pedestrians, vehicle entrances to the Portage Avenue woonerf on Park Boulevard and Ash Street should be only wide enough to accommodate one vehicle at a time. Trees or landscaping can be used to create this bottleneck to restrict the flow of vehicles. 7.3 132 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 156     Parking In compliance with AB-2097, no parking minimums are to be set as the neighborhood is near a Caltrain Station. However, there will also be no parking maximums, allowing the neighborhood to follow a market- based regulatory approach. No new surface parking is proposed, and new parking supply should be implemented on the ground or basement levels of new buildings. Where new buildings are not proposed, existing surface parking spaces are to remain to support remaining commercial offices. Street parking is to remain in front of single- family homes on Pepper Avenue and Olive Avenue, with no new street parking proposed along new developments. Street parking near intersections should be restricted to ensure large vehicles and emergency vehicles are able to safely make turns. To support the new ground-floor retail and active use frontage in new buildings, short-term parking should be implemented on the ground or basement levels of the new developments. In coordination with jurisdictional partners on the future re-configuration of El Camino Real, ground-level short-term parking should be located along El Camino Real where the highest concentration of retail and active uses is located. Concentrating short-term parking along El Camino Real reduces vehicle volumes traveling throughout the neighborhood, supporting a low- volume environment within the neighborhood. Additional parking management strategies include: •Preferred parking for carpools •Parking time limits •Unbundled Parking •Shared parking locations •Carshare memberships and designated parking spots Once the NVCAP is adopted, City staff will explore the following: •Evaluate as needed future parking strategies to maintain parking availability such as a parking benefit district, pricing options, time-of-day restrictions, residential parking permits, and shared parking. •If hourly pricing is used, then the parking strategy should create targets such that 85% of the spaces are used at any time or such that 15% of the parking supply is available at any time. •Unbundling commercial parking or require the parking to be made to the public. •Parking pricing or a parking benefit district could help support on-demand transit, transportation demand management measures, active transportation investments, transit pass programs, etc. IM P L E M E N T A T I O N 133 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 157     7.4 Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Strategies TDM strategies can be effective at encouraging fewer trips made by single-occupancy vehicles (SOV). An effective TDM plan ensures that alternative modes of transportation, such as walking, bicycling, public transit, or other forms of shared mobility, are made available to site occupants and nearby community members. TDM enhancements have additional benefits beyond reducing SOV trips, including: •Improving the environment by reducing traffic congestion and air quality impacts produced by new development •Improving transportation circulation and safety conditions for community members •Quality of life enhancements that improve the public realm In addition to alignment with the Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan, various local and State regulations require TDM planning as part of new development activities. The Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) under Regulation 14 Rule 1 requires that all employers with 50 or more full-time employees provide commuter benefits. State legislation, such as SB 743, requires that certain activities within the City enforce VMT reduction targets, including the design of City impact fee programs and project approval under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In addition to the development of a TDM plan, North Ventura will need to comply with any City VMT mitigation or performance monitoring and reporting efforts. Program T1.2.3 of the Comprehensive Plan also recommends that any TDM strategies established by proposed development along the El Camino Real Corridor achieve a 30 percent minimum reduction below ITE rates in peak hour motor vehicle trips. Any assumptions and metrics for evaluating the effectiveness of TDM strategies, and for calculating the vehicle miles traveled (VMT) generated by site-specific activities, should be in alignment with adopted city- wide guidance. Resources such as the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures Handbook can provide guidance on the metrics for evaluating VMT reduction strategies. Recommendations The purpose of including TDM strategies in the NVCAP is to optimize the use of programs that encourage and incentivize alternatives to driving- alone trips. Employers and major residential developments within the North Ventura neighborhood are already eligible to become members of the Palo Alto Transportation Management Association (PATMA). The PATMA provides resources for eligible members, such as free transit passes, rideshare coupons, bicycle trip incentives, and telework guidance. The PATMA can also provide resources for conducting an annual employee commuter survey to gather information on travel behavior. While not required, an on-site TDM coordinator for major employers or residential developments could also support existing PATMA efforts and work with major employers or residential developments to offer additional TDM strategies. 134 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 158     This page is intentionally left blank IM P L E M E N T A T I O N 135 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 159     7.4 Strategy Description Responsible Entity Active Transportation Shared bike or scooter service Conventional or electric, docked or dockless bikes and scooters can increase first-/ last-mile connections and offer alternative transportation Third party operators City staff to determine regulations, applicable geo- fencing Bicycle support facilities Supportive facilities such as short-/long-term bicycle parking, showers, and lockers that increase active transportation trips Developer Major employers or residential tenants Shared Mobility Car share For people who do not own cars, car share can offer vehicle access without significantly increasing GHG emissions and necessary parking. Vehicles can be provided to tenants of certain buildings, or through designated parking spaces such as dedicated on- street spots noted with signage. Third party operators City staff to determine regulations Shuttle service and new stops With increased residential and employment density, additional shuttle stops may be necessary. Major employers or residential developments in the area may also operate shuttle service that would serve the neighborhood. The upcoming City on- demand shuttle service may also necessitate additional designated stops. Stanford shuttle operator City shuttle operator Major employers or residential tenants offering shuttles Parking Electric vehicle charging facilities Encourage electric vehicle usage to decrease GHG emissions by providing necessary charging facilities Developer Table 19 TDM Strategies Menu 136 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 160     Strategy Description Responsible Entity Transportation Program Coordination Membership in the Palo Alto Transportation Management Association (PATMA) Joining the PATMA can provide developers, major employers, or residential tenants with access to transportation resources available for community members. The PATMA also works closely with the City to offer events and other relevant programming. Developer and/or tenants (employers, residential) Carpool resources Resources for organizing neighborhood carpools to nearby major activity centers Developer and/or tenants (employers, residential)* Active transportation incentives Resources such as bike/ scooter share coupons, or bicycle purchase subsidies can encourage active transportation Developer and/or tenants (employers, residential)* Shared mobility incentives Resources such as rideshare discounts, carshare discounts, free or subsidized transit passes can decrease trips made by a single occupancy vehicle Developer and/or tenants (employers, residential)* Promotional materials on transportation offerings (flyers, emails, websites, etc.) Resources advertising alternative modes of transportation can raise awareness to people who primarily rely on their car Developer and/or tenants (employers, residential)* Bulletin boards or kiosks displaying transportation alternatives Participation in City- wide events encouraging alternative modes of transportation Encouraging major employers, residential developments, and community members to participate in City-wide events, such as the annual Bike to Wherever Day, can expose people to alternative modes of transportation Developer and/or tenants (employers, residential)* *If responsible entities decides to join, PATMA can be a facility/ resource provider. IM P L E M E N T A T I O N 137 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 161     7.5 Utilities and Infrastructure This analysis was prepared to provide an overview of the utility infrastructure that serves the North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan (NVCAP) area, identify existing infrastructure constraints, and provide recommendations as determined during review of the proposed NVCAP land-use plan. As an existing, developed area, the NVCAP area is served by existing utilities. The future NVCAP development will increase water demand and sewer generation. This may require upgrades to aging infrastructure and/or new utilities to meet the needs of the increased development intensities. The existing conditions are described in detail in the Infrastructure Report prepared by BKF Engineers, dated December 10, 2018. Development Program Summary The existing program consists of multiple land- use types, including commercial, multi-family residential, research/office park, light industrial, single family residential, and neighborhood commercial. Specifically, the existing NVCAP area includes 142 residential units and approximately 870,000 sf of commercial area. The future development program consists of 672 residential units and approximately 615,000 sf of commercial area. This is an increase of 530 residential units and a decrease of approximately 255,000 sf of commercial area. Along with the residential and commercial work, 2 acres of park land is proposed for the development including the renaturalization of Matadero Creek. Utility Infrastructure Storm Drainage Storm drainage facilities in and around NVCAP are owned and maintained by the City of Palo Alto’s Department of Public Works. The Palo Alto models, provided as part of the City’s Storm Drain Master Plan1, split the storm drain system into three parts. The entirety of NVCAP is contained within the Matadero Creek Watershed, which consists of 55 linear miles of pipe (greater than 12-inches in diameter) and four pump stations. The Matadero Creek watershed drains to the San Francisco Bay. Per City of Palo Alto’s records, the storm drain pipes around NVCAP were installed between the 1950’s and the 1960’s, with the exception of the pipes running through the site (between Ash Street and Park Boulevard), which were built in the 1990’s. The City of Palo Alto Storm Drain Master Plan by Schaaf & Wheeler concluded the following about the drainage systems within the North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan: The Matadero watershed analysis for a 10-year storm event shows flooding occurs at 694 of the 1,373 nodes. The model predicts less than 6 inches of flooding at 353 nodes; between 6 inches and 12 inches of flooding occur at 129 nodes; and more than 12 inches of flooding will occur at 212 nodes. The Matadero watershed analysis above shows that flooding occurs at multiple locations within the NVCAP area during a 10-year storm event and that existing pipes on Page Mill Road and Portage Avenue lack the capacity for a 10- year storm event. The Storm Drain Master Plan recommends multiple capital improvement projects (CIP) be performed near the NVCAP area. Recommended CIP improvements include upgrades to the Oregon Expressway Pump Station and upsizing pipes on Page Mill Road and Portage Avenue. Further discussion with City staff is needed to determine if any of these CIP projects have already been implemented or scheduled. Implementation of these capital improvement projects will improve storm drain capacity compared to existing conditions. However, individual developers within the NVCAP area may be required to upgrade storm drain infrastructure near their project to further improve performance of the storm drain system. 1 City of Palo Alto, Storm Drain Master Plan, Schaaf & Wheeler Consulting Civil Engineers, June 2015138 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 162     Stormwater Management Redevelopment within the NVCAP area is subject to the Bay Area Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit (MRP). The third reissuance of the Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit, or MRP 3.0, was adopted by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board in May 2022. MRP 3.0 includes significant changes and additional stormwater management requirements which are outlined in Provision C.3. These requirements become effective July 1, 2023. Under MRP 3.0, parcel-based development or redevelopment is considered a Regulated Project (i.e., triggers requirements) if it will create or replace 5,000 square feet (sf) or more of impervious area. This includes any impervious surface, sidewalk, or street frontage that is created or replaced in the public right-of-way as part of a project. The 5,000 sf threshold also applies to new roads, sidewalks, and bike lanes. For redevelopment projects, the “50% Rule” applies as noted in the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program (SCVURPPP) guidance. Projects that alter or replace less than 50 percent of existing impervious surface need to treat stormwater runoff only from the portion of the site that is redeveloped. Projects that alter or replace 50 percent or more of the existing impervious surface are required to treat runoff from the entire site. It is likely that all horizontal and vertical development projects within the NVCAP area will trigger the Regulated Project criteria and be required to comply with MRP Provision C.3. requirements. Projects will need to implement stormwater management measures that collect and treat stormwater runoff from all onsite impervious areas prior to discharge into the City storm drain system. If a Regulated Project creates or replaces less than 50% of the impervious surface within an existing road or public right of way, stormwater runoff from only the new portion of the road must be included in the treatment system design. If runoff from that portion of the road cannot be separated from runoff from the rest of the road, the runoff from the entire surface draining onto the reconstructed portion must be treated. If a project disturbs 50% or more of the existing roadway, the entire road surface must be included in the treatment system design. Treatment measures may include bioretention areas, flow-through planters, or facilities for capture and use of stormwater such as cisterns. With the incorporation of C.3. treatment measures on a project by project basis, dedication of at least two acres of park space, and proposed renaturalization of Matadero Creek, the future NVCAP development is expected to reduce the total impervious surface at the site. This will result in a net decrease of stormwater flow to the City storm drain system and creeks. Implementation of green stormwater infrastructure measures, such as bioretention areas and pervious pavement, within the public streets in the North Ventura area will also slow and reduce runoff to the storm drain system. Wastewater Treatment The City of Palo Alto owns and operates the existing sanitary sewer mains within and surrounding the North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan.2 The project’s wastewater will be treated at the Regional Water Quality Control Plant that is operated by the City of Palo Alto in partnership with the City of Mountain View, City of Los Altos, East Palo Alto Sanitary Sewer District, Town of Los Altos Hills and Stanford University. The North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan currently consists of sanitary sewer mains within each public road and between the dead end of Portage Avenue and Park Boulevard. These existing sewer mains vary in size from 6” to 15”. There are also two parallel sewer mains in Olive Avenue-one 15” and one 8”, which connect to two parallel sewer mains in Park Avenue (one 12” and one 15”). The City of Palo Alto’s Wastewater Map shows that there will be upgrades to existing sanitary sewer mains along the NVCAP perimeter, in El Camino Real, Page Mill Road and Lambert Avenue. According to the City of Palo Alto Wastewater Capital Improvements Plan 2016- 2020, improvements to the existing wastewater infrastructure around the site were implemented in 2018. 2 City of Palo Alto, Sanitary Sewer Management Plan, City of Palo Alto Wastewater Ops, 2016 IM P L E M E N T A T I O N 139 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 163     BKF prepared wastewater generation projections based on the proposed NVCAP land-use and densities. The City of Palo Alto Water Gas & Wastewater Utility Standards state that the proposed wastewater demand shall be based off of the Peak Base Wastewater Flow (PBWF). PBWF is the Average Base Wastewater Flow (ABWF) multiplied by a peaking factor between one and four. ABWF is the average dry weather wastewater flow contributed from residential, commercial and industrial users for the proposed development. The ABWF is calculated using unit flow rates shown in Table 1-1 in The City of Palo Alto Water Gas & Wastewater Utility Standards Section 2730 Wastewater Design and Construction Standards and also shown in Table 20. DRAFT B. Wastewater Treatment The City of Palo Alto owns and operates the existing sanitary sewer mains within and surrounding the North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan2. The project’s wastewater will be treated at the Regional Water Quality Control Plant that is operated by the City of Palo Alto in partnership with the City of Mountain View, City of Los Altos, East Palo Alto Sanitary Sewer District, Town of Los Altos Hills and Stanford University. The North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan currently consists of sanitary sewer mains within each public road and between the dead end of Portage Avenue and Park Boulevard. These existing sewer mains vary in size from 6” to 15”. There are also two parallel sewer mains in Olive Avenue-one 15” and one 8”, which connect to two parallel sewer mains in Park Avenue (one 12” and one 15”). The City of Palo Alto’s Wastewater Map shows that there will be upgrades to existing sanitary sewer mains along the NVCAP perimeter, in El Camino Real, Page Mill Road and Lambert Avenue. According to the City of Palo Alto Wastewater Capital Improvements Plan 2016-2020, improvements to the existing wastewater infrastructure around the site were implemented in 2018. BKF prepared wastewater generation projections based on the proposed NVCAP land-use and densities. The City of Palo Alto Water Gas & Wastewater Utility Standards state that the proposed wastewater demand shall be based off of the Peak Base Wastewater Flow (PBWF). PBWF is the Average Base Wastewater Flow (ABWF) multiplied by a peaking factor between one and four. ABWF is the average dry weather wastewater flow contributed from residential, commercial and industrial users for the proposed development. The ABWF is calculated using unit flow rates shown in Table 1-1 in The City of Palo Alto Water Gas & Wastewater Utility Standards Section 2730 Wastewater Design and Construction Standards and also shown below. Table 1-1 in The City of Palo Alto Water Gas & Wastewater Utility Standards Section 2730 Wastewater Design and Construction Standards Wastewater generation estimates for the existing and proposed developments are calculated based on the City’s design standards. Wastewater generation estimates are summarized below and account for the entire 2 City of Palo Alto, Sanitary Sewer Management Plan, City of Palo Alto Wastewater Ops, 2016. 7.5 Table 20 Unit Flow Rates for ABWF, GWI, and RDI in the City of Palo Alto Water, Gas, & Wastewater Utility Standards Section 2730 Wastewater Design and Construction Standards 140 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 164     DRAFT NVCAP area. Wastewater generation rates for both the existing and proposed conditions were compared in order to understand the impact the development will have on the existing wastewater infrastructure. The results are summarized in Table X.X below: Table X.X- Existing and proposed wastewater generation for the NVCAP site The proposed NVCAP development will have an average base wastewater flow (ABWF) of approximately 197,000 gallons per day (GPD), a net increase of 46,000 GPD compared to existing conditions. Peak wastewater flow will increase from 416 GPM to 546 GPM, a net increase of 130 GPM. The future NVCAP redevelopment will increase sewer flows compared to existing conditions. According to the City of Palo Alto Wastewater Capital Improvements Plan 2016-2020, improvements to the existing wastewater infrastructure around the site were implemented in 2018. For future projects within the NVCAP area, developers will need to conduct an analysis to determine if the local City infrastructure can accommodate project flows, or if additional improvements to sewer infrastructure are required. BKF to check with the City on what analyses are typically used to assess if a project’s increased sewer flows trigger an upgrade. C. Potable Water and Fire Water The City of Palo Alto’s water comes from the City and County of San Francisco’s Regional Water Supply System (RWS), operated by the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC). This water supply consists almost entirely of Sierra Nevada snowmelt delivered through the Hetch Hetchy aqueducts, but also includes treated water produced by the SFPUC from its local watersheds and facilities in Alameda and San Mateo Counties. The water demand for the developed site was calculated by using the assumption that wastewater generation is 95% of water demand for the site. The proposed water demand for the site is summarized in Table X.X below: Table X.X- Proposed water demand for the NVCAP site Wastewater generation estimates for the existing and proposed developments are calculated based on the City’s design standards. Wastewater generation estimates are summarized below and account for the entire NVCAP area. Wastewater generation rates for both the existing and proposed conditions were compared in order to understand the impact the development will have on the existing wastewater infrastructure. The results are summarized in Table 21. The proposed NVCAP development will have an average base wastewater flow (ABWF) of approximately 197,000 gallons per day (GPD), a net increase of 46,000 GPD compared to existing conditions. Peak wastewater flow will increase from 416 GPM to 546 GPM, a net increase of 130 GPM. The future NVCAP redevelopment will increase sewer flows compared to existing conditions. According to the City of Palo Alto Wastewater Capital Improvements Plan 2016-2020, improvements to the existing wastewater infrastructure around the site were implemented in 2018. For future projects within the NVCAP area, developers will need to conduct an analysis to determine if the local City infrastructure can accommodate project flows, or if additional improvements to sewer infrastructure are required. BKF to check with the City on what analyses are typically used to assess if a project’s increased sewer flows trigger an upgrade. Table 21 Existing and proposed wastewater generation for the NVCAP site IM P L E M E N T A T I O N 141 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 165     7.5 Potable Water and Fire Water The City of Palo Alto’s water comes from the City and County of San Francisco’s Regional Water Supply System (RWS), operated by the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC). This water supply consists almost entirely of Sierra Nevada snowmelt delivered through the Hetch Hetchy aqueducts, but also includes treated water produced by the SFPUC from its local watersheds and facilities in Alameda and San Mateo Counties. The water demand for the developed site was calculated by using the assumption that wastewater generation is 95% of water demand for the site. The proposed water demand for the site is summarized in Table X.X. Using the same assumption that existing wastewater generation is 95% of existing water demand, the existing peak water demand for the site is 438 GPM. The proposed development will result in a peak flow demand increase of 139 GPM, from 438 GPM to 577 GPM. The SFPUC has adequate supplies to meet its contractual obligation to the wholesale customers (City of Palo Alto) of 184 MPG, through the year 2030. The City has an ISG of 17.07 MGD (or 19,118 SFY). The water distribution system is operated by the City of Palo Alto Public Works. DRAFT NVCAP area. Wastewater generation rates for both the existing and proposed conditions were compared in order to understand the impact the development will have on the existing wastewater infrastructure. The results are summarized in Table X.X below: Table X.X- Existing and proposed wastewater generation for the NVCAP site The proposed NVCAP development will have an average base wastewater flow (ABWF) of approximately 197,000 gallons per day (GPD), a net increase of 46,000 GPD compared to existing conditions. Peak wastewater flow will increase from 416 GPM to 546 GPM, a net increase of 130 GPM. The future NVCAP redevelopment will increase sewer flows compared to existing conditions. According to the City of Palo Alto Wastewater Capital Improvements Plan 2016-2020, improvements to the existing wastewater infrastructure around the site were implemented in 2018. For future projects within the NVCAP area, developers will need to conduct an analysis to determine if the local City infrastructure can accommodate project flows, or if additional improvements to sewer infrastructure are required. BKF to check with the City on what analyses are typically used to assess if a project’s increased sewer flows trigger an upgrade. C. Potable Water and Fire Water The City of Palo Alto’s water comes from the City and County of San Francisco’s Regional Water Supply System (RWS), operated by the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC). This water supply consists almost entirely of Sierra Nevada snowmelt delivered through the Hetch Hetchy aqueducts, but also includes treated water produced by the SFPUC from its local watersheds and facilities in Alameda and San Mateo Counties. The water demand for the developed site was calculated by using the assumption that wastewater generation is 95% of water demand for the site. The proposed water demand for the site is summarized in Table X.X below: Table X.X- Proposed water demand for the NVCAP site The NVCAP area consists of existing water mains within the public streets (and between the dead end of Acacia Avenue and Park Boulevard), varying in size from 6” to 12”. The network of piping within NVCAP will need to be evaluated for adequacy on a project by project basis. It is likely that the existing 6” water mains are not able to provide sufficient flow and pressure to meet required fire demands for new construction. Depending on the actual building heights, locations, densities, and construction types, water mains may need to be replaced and upsized to meet fire flow requirements. Table 22 Proposed water demand for the NVCAP site 142 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 166     Recycled Water No recycled water is currently available in the study area. BKF to confirm with City if there is any intent to extend recycled water to this area. BKF to also check if the City has or wants to implement any requirements for new developments to be “recycled water ready” (dual plumbed, site irrigation, etc.). Electrical Utilities Based on the Electrical and Fiber Optic Service Maps provided by the City of Palo Alto (Figures 16 and 17), there are existing electrical and fiber optic lines serving NVCAP. The existing electrical utilities consist of both overhead and underground lines. There are overhead electric lines serving existing buildings on each road within the NVCAP project boundaries. Based on the City of Palo Alto’s 2019-2023 Capital Improvement Program, the NVCAP project site is not within an area that the City plans on undergrounding between now and 2023. However, as part of individual development projects’ conditions of approval, the City may require projects to underground all overhead electric lines along their street frontage. The majority of the existing electrical utilities, including a 60KV electric line and a fiber optic backbone line, run along Lambert Avenue and Park Boulevard to an existing substation, “Park Boulevard Substation” at the corner of Park Boulevard and Lambert Avenue. The Park Boulevard Substation is not within the North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan. It should be noted that proposed horizontal development will need to address how critical infrastructure will either be maintained or relocated. The underground 60kV lines on Lambert cannot be relocated. Existing equipment that won’t be moved still needs to be accessible for maintenance and clearance requirements need to be met. The utility substation on Park Boulevard and Lambert Avenue will need to be fully accessible during construction. Gas Based on the existing underground Map provided by the City of Palo Alto to BKF Engineers on October 29, 2018, there are multiple gas mains servicing the NVCAP project site. The existing gas mains vary in size from 2” to 4”, and run within every public street in the North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan. IM P L E M E N T A T I O N 143 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 167     7.6 Matadero Creek Civil Infrastructure Definition: Tailwater Condition: the receiving water elevation (or pressure) at the final discharge point of a stormwater management system. The Matadero Creek Channel is maintained by the Santa Clara Valley Water District (Valley Water). The portion of Matadero Creek running through the North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan is contained within a concrete trapezoidal channel, which was built in 1990 from El Camino Real to the Caltrain tracks. NVCAP proposes in concept to renaturalize a section of Matadero Creek that is within the Plan Area. There is an existing concrete flood control channel that flows south to north through the Plan Area. This creek corridor is constrained by existing infrastructure and urban development. The proposed renaturalization would remove the existing U-shaped concrete channel and replace it with a widened, natural channel. The goals of a renaturalization project are to provide community benefits, re-establish riparian ecosystem habitat, and avoid adverse impacts on hydraulic performance and flood risks. The NVCAP Preferred Plan3 supports a widened natural corridor with area available for riparian plantings, creative landscape architecture design, and increased recreation access. This concept is described in detail as Concept 3 in the Matadero Creek Conceptual Alternative Analysis1 prepared by WRA, Inc. This concept includes replacing the Lambert Avenue bridge with a longer span and widening the creek channel from approximately 30 feet wide to 100 feet wide. As described by WRA in Section 9.4 of the Matadero Creek Conceptual Alternative Analysis4: Hydraulic modeling indicates that Concept 3 would increase water surface elevations 3 City of Palo Alto Council Meeting, January 10, 2022. https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/agendas- minutes-reports/agendas-minutes/city-council-agendas-min utes/2022/20220110/20220110pccsm-linked-updated.pdf 4 Matadero Creek Conceptual Alternative Analysis, WRA Inc., 2020 in some portions of the project reach by as much as one foot, but decrease water surface elevations upstream of El Camino Real by roughly 0.5 feet. Increases in water surface elevation between El Camino Real and Park Boulevard may be mitigated by floodwalls and no adverse effect would occur further upstream. Concept 3 appears to be feasible from a hydraulics perspective. Where the Matadero Creek channel runs through NVCAP (Figure 93), the existing site has several existing outfalls connected to the channel, with sizes varying from 12” storm drain inlet connections up to 60” storm drain mains. Local stormwater runoff is collected in a series of storm drain pipes and discharged at these outfall locations. Due to the widening of the creek channel, the existing outfalls will need to be relocated or otherwise accommodated in place. Hydraulic modeling by WRA indicates that water surface elevations in some portions of the project may increase by up to one foot. Further investigation will be required to assess if the increased tailwater condition at the creek will adversely impact performance of the outfalls and connected, upstream storm drain infrastructure. An additional study will also be needed to confirm that hydraulic performance at the Park Blvd culvert and Lambert Bridge is acceptable and not worse than the existing condition. The creek widening will require replacement of the Lambert Avenue bridge with a longer span. Currently, a City water main is supported by the existing bridge and spans over the concrete channel. This utility will be impacted by the proposed bridge improvements and will need to be relocated onto the new bridge structure. Service to nearby properties will need to be identified to determine if these properties will be impacted. There are also overhead electrical lines that are supported by poles on either side of the channel. Future development in this area will need to be coordinated with the Valley Water to ensure adequate measures are implemented to reduce impact to the existing channel, and to ensure the project meets Valley Water standards. 144 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 168     DRAFT Figure X.X - Existing Matadero Creek Channel NVCAP proposes in concept to renaturalize a section of Matadero Creek that is within the Plan area. There is an existing concrete flood control channel that flows south to north through the Plan area. This creek corridor is constrained by existing infrastructure and urban development. The proposed renaturalization would remove the existing U-shaped concrete channel and replace it with a widened, geomorphic bankfull channel. The goals of a renaturalization project are to provide community benefits, re-establish riparian ecosystem habitat, and avoid adverse impacts on hydraulic performance and flood risks. The NVCAP Preferred Plan supports a widened natural corridor with area available for riparian plantings, creative landscape architecture design, and increased recreation access. This concept is described in detail as Concept 3 in the Matadero Creek Conceptual Alternative Analysis3 prepared by WRA Inc. This concept includes replacing the Lambert Avenue bridge with a longer span and widening the creek channel from approximately 30 feet wide to 100 feet wide. As described by WRA in Section 9.4 of the Matadero Creek Conceptual Alternative Analysis: Hydraulic modeling indicates that Concept 3 would increase water surface elevations in some portions of the project reach by as much as one foot, but decrease water surface elevations upstream of El Camino Real by roughly 0.5 feet. Increases in water surface elevation between El Camino Real and Park Boulevard may be mitigated by floodwalls and no adverse effect would occur further upstream. Concept 3 appears to be feasible from a hydraulics perspective. Where the Matadero Creek channel runs through NVCAP, the existing site has several existing outfalls connected to the channel, with sizes varying from 12” storm drain inlet connections up to 60” storm drain mains. Local stormwater runoff is collected in a series of storm drain pipes and discharged at these outfall locations. Due to the widening of the creek channel, the existing outfalls will need to be relocated or otherwise accommodated in place. Hydraulic modeling by WRA indicates that water surface elevations in some portions of the project may increase by up to one foot. Further investigation will be required to assess if the increased tailwater condition at the creek will adversely impact performance of the outfalls and connected, upstream storm drain infrastructure. Additional study will also be needed to confirm that hydraulic performance at the Park Blvd culvert and Lambert Bridge is acceptable and not worse than the existing condition. 3 Matadero Creek Conceptual Alternative Analysis, WRA Inc., 2020. DRAFT Figure X.X-Storm Drain Outfalls to Matadero Creek Channel The creek widening will require replacement of the Lambert Avenue bridge with a longer span. Currently, a City water main is supported by the existing bridge and spans over the concrete channel. This utility will be impacted by the proposed bridge improvements and will need to be relocated onto the new bridge structure. Service to nearby properties will need to be identified to determine if these properties will be impacted. There are also overhead electrical lines that are supported by poles on either side of the channel. Future development in this area will need to be coordinated with the SCVWD to ensure adequate measures are implemented to reduce impact to the existing channel, and to ensure the project meets SCVWD standards. Figure 92 The Matadero Creek Channel Today along Ash Street Figure 93 Storm Drain Outfalls to Matadero Creek Channel IM P L E M E N T A T I O N 145 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 169     7.7 Funding and Financing Strategy The NVCAP specifies new public infrastructure and amenities required to support the emergence of a walkable, transit-oriented, mixed- use neighborhood. The funding and financing strategy identifies the primary categories of capital improvement projects included in the NVCAP, and describes applicable funding and financing sources and mechanisms for constructing those projects. Major Project Categories The public infrastructure and amenity improvements identified in the NVCAP fall into five primary categories consisting of bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure, streetscape, parks and open space, green stormwater infrastructure, and the re-naturalization of Matadero Creek. Funding and Financing Sources and Mechanisms A variety of potential funding sources and financing mechanisms exist for implementing the improvements identified in the NVCAP. This section describes these sources and mechanisms and their potential uses within the Plan Area. In many cases, multiple funding sources will need to be combined to pay for specific projects. Although the terms “funding” and “financing” are often used interchangeably, there is an important distinction between the two terms. “Funding” typically refers to a revenue source such as a tax, fee, or grant that is used to pay for an improvement. Some funding sources, such as impact fees, are one-time payments, while others, such as assessments, are ongoing payments. “Financing” involves borrowing from future revenues by issuing bonds or other debt instruments that are paid back over time through taxes or fee payments, enabling agencies to pay for infrastructure before the revenue to cover the full cost of the infrastructure is available. Potential funding for improvements includes a mix of developer contributions (both required and negotiated, such as via the 340 Portage development agreement), City resources, outside grants, and district-based tools. Funding Source Category Examples Developer Contributions Development Standards CEQA Mitigations Impact / In-Lieu Fees Negotiated Agreements City Resources General Fund Capital Improvement Plan User Fees Outside Grants Regional, State, and Federal Grants District-Based Tools Special Assessment District Community Facilities District Enhanced Infrastructure Finance District Table 23 Funding Source Categories and Examples 146 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 170     Developer Contributions Development Standards: Each new development project will contribute to the NVCAP’s implementation by meeting requirements regulating each project’s land uses, height, density, setbacks, parking requirements, street frontage improvements, pedestrian access, and other requirements specified in the NVCAP. These standards are adopted in the City’s zoning ordinance and must be satisfied for a project to be granted approval. Reimbursement Agreements: If a developer is required to provide additional infrastructure capacity or amenities to serve the entire district, a reimbursement agreement can be established to receive payments from later developers who benefit from these early improvements. This allows for areawide cost- sharing. CEQA Mitigations: Developers may be required to contribute to environmental mitigation measures, both for areawide needs and for their specific development projects. Impact / In-Lieu Fees: Impact fees are one-time fees imposed on new developments to pay for improvements and facilities that either serve the new development or reduce the impacts of the project on the existing community. Fee revenues cannot be used to fund existing deficiencies in infrastructure. The City of Palo Alto already has citywide impact fees for Housing, Community and Public Safety Facilities, Traffic, Parks, and Public Art. All development projects within the Plan Area must meet citywide impact and in-lieu fee requirements. Negotiated Agreements: Community benefits are developer contributions that exceed the baseline features required under development standards, environmental mitigation measures, and impact fees. Community benefits agreements are negotiated with developers individually in exchange for additional development rights. As noted earlier in the NVCAP, a development agreement negotiation is underway for the 340 Portage Avenue site. The developer proposes to provide more than three acres of land for a new public park surrounding Madero Creek and one acre for affordable housing, in addition to monetary contributions to both park improvements and the city’s affordable housing fund. City Resources: General Fund: General Fund revenues include property tax, sales tax, transient occupancy tax, and other revenues that are primarily used to pay for ongoing municipal services and operations. Capital Improvement Plan (CIP): Infrastructure projects identified in the NVCAP are candidates for inclusion in the City’s Capital Improvement Plan, which identifies a range of specific funding sources for capital improvement projects throughout the City of Palo Alto. For example, sanitary sewer and water main replacement projects and fiber optic backbone extensions within the NVCAP area are included in the Fiscal Year 2023 CIP, which plans expenditures for 2023-2027. User Fees: User fees and rates include the fees charged for the use of public infrastructure or goods. It may be possible to use a portion of user fee or rate revenue toward financing the costs of new infrastructure, but user fees are unlikely to be a major source of funding for implementation of the NVCAP. IM P L E M E N T A T I O N 147 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 171     Outside Grants Various federal, state, and regional grant programs distribute funding for public improvements. Because grant programs are typically competitive, grant funds are an unpredictable funding source, and the City of Palo Alto must remain vigilant in applying for grants to implement the NVCAP. Unique grant funding opportunities may become available due to the area’s designation as a Priority Development Area by the Association of Bay Area Governments, and because most of the Plan Area is within ½ mile of a Caltrain station— enabling access to funds directed to transit- oriented locations. However, access to grant funds may be contingent on adopting land use policies that comply with MTC’s Transit-Oriented Communities policy, with particular impacts on the Mobility Hubs and One Bay Area grants describe below. Listing of the former cannery at 340 Portage Avenue in the California Register of Historical Resources may allow that private property to become eligible for State and Federal historic preservation grants and loans, which are not detailed in the table below. However, the more significant preservation benefit would likely be associated with tax incentives, such as the Mills Act, that encourage the private property owner to preserve the resource. These grants and incentives would not be available if alterations to the property make it ineligible for listing. The following table describes outside grant funding sources that may be applicable to public capital improvements as of the passage of the NVCAP; this is not an exhaustive list, however, and new grant funding programs will open during the implementation of the NVCAP. 7.7 Table 24 Examples of Potential Regional or County Grant Funding Sources for NVCAP Improvements Program Adminstering Agency Description Eligible Capital Projects Bicycle and Pedestrian Access Streetscape Parks, Trails, and Open Space Storm Drainage and Flood Control Regional or County Mobility Hubs MTC The Mobility Hubs program funds projects in designated mobility hubs that connect services and infrastructure that promote the use of mobility options besides private vehicles. This includes connecting public transit, bike and pedestrian facilities, and bike or car share facilities. x x x Transportation for Clean Air (TFCA) Regional Program: Bicycle Facilities Grant Program Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) The TFCA program, administered by the BAAQMD, funds projects that reduce vehicle emissions. Sixty percent of funds collected go to the TFCA Regional Fund for competitive grants. Eligible projects must demonstrate air quality benefits and reduction of emissions from motor vehicles. One sub-program within the TFCA Regional Fund is the Bicycle Facilities Grant Program, which funds the construction of new bikeways and the installation of new bike parking facilities. x Santa Clara County Measure B: Bicycle and Pedestrian Program VTA Measure B was passed by Santa Clara County voters in 2016. Measure B authorized a 30-year, half-cent countywide sales tax to invest in transit, highway, and active transportation projects. Measure B includes nine different program areas, one of which is the Bicycle and Pedestrian Program (BPP). The BPP provides funding for bicycle and pedestrian capital projects and planning studies. Priority is given to projects that connect schools, transit and employment centers, and that fill gaps in existing bike/ped networks. x One Bay Area Grant (round 3) MTC OBAG 3 is MTC’s comprehensive policy and funding framework for distributing federal funding. OBAG 3 includes a Regional Program and a County Program. The county programs includes various competitive sub-programs. x x x Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 Program MTC TDA funds are derived from a 1/4 cent of the State’s general sales tax. Article 3 of the TDA makes a portion of these funds available for use on bicycle and pedestrian projects. MTC programs TDA funds in the Bay Area. x 148 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 172     ProgramAdminstering Agency Description Eligible Capital Projects Bicycle and Pedestrian Access Streetscape Parks, Trails, and Open Space Storm Drainage and Flood Control Regional or County Mobility HubsMTC The Mobility Hubs program funds projects in designated mobility hubs that connect services and infrastructure that promote the use of mobility options besides private vehicles. This includes connecting public transit, bike and pedestrian facilities, and bike or car share facilities. x x x Transportation for Clean Air (TFCA) Regional Program: Bicycle Facilities Grant Program Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) The TFCA program, administered by the BAAQMD, funds projects that reduce vehicle emissions. Sixty percent of funds collected go to the TFCA Regional Fund for competitive grants. Eligible projects must demonstrate air quality benefits and reduction of emissions from motor vehicles. One sub-program within the TFCA Regional Fund is the Bicycle Facilities Grant Program, which funds the construction of new bikeways and the installation of new bike parking facilities. x Santa Clara County Measure B: Bicycle and Pedestrian Program VTA Measure B was passed by Santa Clara County voters in 2016. Measure B authorized a 30-year, half-cent countywide sales tax to invest in transit, highway, and active transportation projects. Measure B includes nine different program areas, one of which is the Bicycle and Pedestrian Program (BPP). The BPP provides funding for bicycle and pedestrian capital projects and planning studies. Priority is given to projects that connect schools, transit and employment centers, and that fill gaps in existing bike/ped networks. x One Bay Area Grant (round 3) MTC OBAG 3 is MTC’s comprehensive policy and funding framework for distributing federal funding. OBAG 3 includes a Regional Program and a County Program. The county programs includes various competitive sub-programs. x x x Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 Program MTC TDA funds are derived from a 1/4 cent of the State’s general sales tax. Article 3 of the TDA makes a portion of these funds available for use on bicycle and pedestrian projects. MTC programs TDA funds in the Bay Area. x IM P L E M E N T A T I O N 149 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 173     Program Adminstering Agency Description Eligible Capital Projects Bicycle and Pedestrian Access Streetscape Parks, Trails, and Open Space Storm Drainage and Flood Control State Infill Infrastructure Grant California Department of Housing and Community Development The Infill Infrastructure Grant program provides fund for infrastructure improvements necessary to enable residential or mixed-use infill development. x x x x Transformative Climate Communities California Strategic Growth Council Proceeds from California’s Cap-and-Trade Program help fund the Transformative Climate Communities (TCC) program. The TCC provides competitive grants for coordinated, community-led development and infrastructure projects focused on achieving multiple environmental, health, and economic benefits within a given community. Examples of eligible projects include affordable housing, transit, bicycle/pedestrian improvements, and urban green infrastructure. The TCC program prioritizes disadvantaged communities that have been most impacted by pollution, as measured by the CalEnviroScreen index. The TCC program offers Implementation Grants and Planning Grants. x x x x Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities California Strategic Growth Council Proceeds from California’s Cap-and-Trade Program help fund the AHSC program. AHSC is a competitive state grant program that promotes infill development and the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions through transportation and land use change. AHSC encourages combined investments in affordable housing, transit, and active transportation infrastructure, with a majority of funds typically awarded to the affordable housing component of a project. x x x Urban Greening Program California Natural Resources Agency Proceeds from the State’s Cap-and-Trade Program help fund California’s Urban Greening Program. The Urban Greening Program provides competitive funding for projects that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and provide other benefits related to reducing air/water pollution and the consumption of natural resources, and/or to increasing green spaces and green infrastructure. Eligible projects include the enhancement or expansion of neighborhood parks, green streets, urban trails, facilities that encourage active transportation, and other urban heat island mitigation measures. The program prioritizes projects that benefit disadvantaged communities, as determined by the CalEnviroScreen index. x x x x Active Transportation Program (ATP) California Transportation Commission/MTC ATP provides statewide competitive grants for pedestrian and bicycle capital projects. Certain trail projects are also eligible if they meet the requirements of the Recreational Trails Program (RTP), a sub-program within ATP. Beyond the statewide competitive grants, ATP funds are also distributed to MPOs. A minimum of 25% of ATP funds must be allocated to disadvantaged communities. x x x Urban Streams Restoration Program (USRP) California Department of Water Resources The USRP funds projects and provides technical assistance to restore urban streams to a more natural state. Funds used for planning only must be used for projects that will serve disadvantaged communities once completed. Matching funds of 20 percent must be provided unless the grant will benefit a disadvantaged community. Examples of eligible projects include installation of green infrastructure such as bioswales, removing culverts or storm drains, and flood protection enhancements. x Land and Water Conservation Fund California Department of Parks and Recreation The LWCF is a competitive grant program focused on creating new outdoor recreation opportunities for Californians. The program funds the acquisition or the development of recreational space. Eligible projects include the acquisition of land to create a new park, a buffer for an existing park, or a recreational/active transportation trail corridor, or the development of recreational features (e.g. sports fields, dog parks, gardens, open space, etc.) x Table 25 Examples of Potential State Grant Funding Sources for NVCAP Improvements 7.7 150 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 174     ProgramAdminstering AgencyDescription Eligible Capital Projects Bicycle and Pedestrian Access Streetscape Parks, Trails, and Open Space Storm Drainage and Flood Control State Infill Infrastructure GrantCalifornia Department of Housing and Community Development The Infill Infrastructure Grant program provides fund for infrastructure improvements necessary to enable residential or mixed-use infill development. x x x x Transformative Climate Communities California Strategic Growth Council Proceeds from California’s Cap-and-Trade Program help fund the Transformative Climate Communities (TCC) program. The TCC provides competitive grants for coordinated, community-led development and infrastructure projects focused on achieving multiple environmental, health, and economic benefits within a given community. Examples of eligible projects include affordable housing, transit, bicycle/pedestrian improvements, and urban green infrastructure. The TCC program prioritizes disadvantaged communities that have been most impacted by pollution, as measured by the CalEnviroScreen index. The TCC program offers Implementation Grants and Planning Grants. x x x x Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities California Strategic Growth Council Proceeds from California’s Cap-and-Trade Program help fund the AHSC program. AHSC is a competitive state grant program that promotes infill development and the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions through transportation and land use change. AHSC encourages combined investments in affordable housing, transit, and active transportation infrastructure, with a majority of funds typically awarded to the affordable housing component of a project. x x x Urban Greening ProgramCalifornia Natural Resources Agency Proceeds from the State’s Cap-and-Trade Program help fund California’s Urban Greening Program. The Urban Greening Program provides competitive funding for projects that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and provide other benefits related to reducing air/water pollution and the consumption of natural resources, and/or to increasing green spaces and green infrastructure. Eligible projects include the enhancement or expansion of neighborhood parks, green streets, urban trails, facilities that encourage active transportation, and other urban heat island mitigation measures. The program prioritizes projects that benefit disadvantaged communities, as determined by the CalEnviroScreen index. x x x x Active Transportation Program (ATP) California Transportation Commission/MTC ATP provides statewide competitive grants for pedestrian and bicycle capital projects. Certain trail projects are also eligible if they meet the requirements of the Recreational Trails Program (RTP), a sub-program within ATP. Beyond the statewide competitive grants, ATP funds are also distributed to MPOs. A minimum of 25% of ATP funds must be allocated to disadvantaged communities. x x x Urban Streams Restoration Program (USRP) California Department of Water Resources The USRP funds projects and provides technical assistance to restore urban streams to a more natural state. Funds used for planning only must be used for projects that will serve disadvantaged communities once completed. Matching funds of 20 percent must be provided unless the grant will benefit a disadvantaged community. Examples of eligible projects include installation of green infrastructure such as bioswales, removing culverts or storm drains, and flood protection enhancements. x Land and Water Conservation Fund California Department of Parks and Recreation The LWCF is a competitive grant program focused on creating new outdoor recreation opportunities for Californians. The program funds the acquisition or the development of recreational space. Eligible projects include the acquisition of land to create a new park, a buffer for an existing park, or a recreational/active transportation trail corridor, or the development of recreational features (e.g. sports fields, dog parks, gardens, open space, etc.) x IM P L E M E N T A T I O N 151 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 175     Program Adminstering Agency Description Eligible Capital Projects Bicycle and Pedestrian Access Streetscape Parks, Trails, and Open Space Storm Drainage and Flood Control State Local Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Caltrans HSIP is funded by federal aid as a core program and was codified under the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Job Act. HSIP seeks to achieve significant reductions in traffic fatalities and injuries on public roads. Funds are eligible for work on any public road or publicly owned bicycle or pedestrian pathway or trail, so long as the investment is focused on improving user safety for and addresses a specific safety problem. Non-safety related capital improvements (e.g. landscaping, street beautification) cannot exceed 10 percent of project costs. Caltrans requires that projects be consistent with California’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan. x x Senate Bill 1: Local Partnership Program (LP) California Transportation Commission SB 1, which was signed into law in 2017, is a $54-billion legislative package to fix and enhance roads, freeways, bridges, and transit across California. Funds are split among numerous programs. SB 1 created the LP program to reward jurisdictions and transportation agencies that have passed sales tax measures, developer fees, or other imposed transportation fees. The LP program includes a formula allocation as well as a competitive component. Eligible projects include a wide variety of transportation improvements – roads, pedestrian/bicycle facilities, transit facilities, and other improvements to mitigate urban runoff from new transportation infrastructure. For the competitive grant program, funds can only be used for capital improvements. x x x Table 26 Examples of Potential State Grant Funding Sources for NVCAP Improvements (Continued) Table 27 Examples of Potential Federal Grant Funding Sources for NVCAP Improvements 7.7 Program Adminstering Agency Description Eligible Capital Projects Bicycle and Pedestrian Access Streetscape Parks, Trails, and Open Space Storm Drainage and Flood Control Federal Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, Federal Railway Administration, and Federal Aviation Administration The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act provides over $550 billion for the nation’s infrastructure. Estimated apportionments are available for Fiscal Years 2022 - 2026. Funds are available for a wide array of infrastructure needs including those related to public transit, airports, ports, bridges, water systems, and more. Most of the funds will be distributed through state agencies which will be accessible through a range of state grant programs, whereas other funds will be apportioned directly to urbanized areas, and additional funds will be available through federal grants processes. The State of California is estimated to be apportioned more than $35 billion over five fiscal years, and the San Jose urbanized area, which includes Palo Alto, is expected to be directly apportioned $536 million over this same time period. x x x 152 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 176     ProgramAdminstering AgencyDescription Eligible Capital Projects Bicycle and Pedestrian Access Streetscape Parks, Trails, and Open Space Storm Drainage and Flood Control State Local Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) CaltransHSIP is funded by federal aid as a core program and was codified under the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Job Act. HSIP seeks to achieve significant reductions in traffic fatalities and injuries on public roads. Funds are eligible for work on any public road or publicly owned bicycle or pedestrian pathway or trail, so long as the investment is focused on improving user safety for and addresses a specific safety problem. Non-safety related capital improvements (e.g. landscaping, street beautification) cannot exceed 10 percent of project costs. Caltrans requires that projects be consistent with California’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan. x x Senate Bill 1: Local Partnership Program (LP) California Transportation Commission SB 1, which was signed into law in 2017, is a $54-billion legislative package to fix and enhance roads, freeways, bridges, and transit across California. Funds are split among numerous programs. SB 1 created the LP program to reward jurisdictions and transportation agencies that have passed sales tax measures, developer fees, or other imposed transportation fees. The LP program includes a formula allocation as well as a competitive component. Eligible projects include a wide variety of transportation improvements – roads, pedestrian/bicycle facilities, transit facilities, and other improvements to mitigate urban runoff from new transportation infrastructure. For the competitive grant program, funds can only be used for capital improvements. x x x ProgramAdminstering AgencyDescription Eligible Capital Projects Bicycle and Pedestrian Access Streetscape Parks, Trails, and Open Space Storm Drainage and Flood Control Federal Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, Federal Railway Administration, and Federal Aviation Administration The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act provides over $550 billion for the nation’s infrastructure. Estimated apportionments are available for Fiscal Years 2022 - 2026. Funds are available for a wide array of infrastructure needs including those related to public transit, airports, ports, bridges, water systems, and more. Most of the funds will be distributed through state agencies which will be accessible through a range of state grant programs, whereas other funds will be apportioned directly to urbanized areas, and additional funds will be available through federal grants processes. The State of California is estimated to be apportioned more than $35 billion over five fiscal years, and the San Jose urbanized area, which includes Palo Alto, is expected to be directly apportioned $536 million over this same time period. x x x IM P L E M E N T A T I O N 153 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 177     7.7 District-Based “Value Capture” Tools Land-based financing tools are typically associated with new real estate development to generate benefit-based special assessment revenues or property tax revenues to finance improvements through bond repayment or paying for improvements over time. District- based tools provide a stable revenue stream while ensuring that properties benefitting from improvements also contribute to those public investments. The table below describes the three primary types of district-based funding and financing tools. Note that assessment districts and community facilities districts primarily capture additional funding from private entities, while the enhanced infrastructure financing district reinvests growth in public property tax revenues within the district. If a district-based tool is utilized, the boundaries do not necessarily need to align with the NVCAP Plan Area boundaries. Table 28 Summary of Major District-Based Value Capture Tools Funding Tools Description Uses Considerations Special Assessment Districts Additional assessment against a range of participants, depending on the type of district and relative benefit received. Examples include: Landscaping and Lighting District, Community Benefit District, Business Improvement District. Most useful for funding ongoing operations and maintenance. Requires simple majority vote of paying stakeholders. Increases costs and risk for paying stakeholders. Stakeholders need to perceive a clear benefit for themselves. Impacts paying stakeholders’ overall ability to support other taxes, fees, and community benefits. Little financial risk to the City or public agencies; could lead to increased tax revenue based on private reinvestment. Additional City staff time to administer districts could offset some gains. Community Facilities District (Mello-Roos) Additional assessment on property, levied and varied based on a selected property characteristic (excluding property value). Financing infrastructure improvements, development of public facilities; also, ongoing operations and maintenance. Requires approval of 2/3 of property owners (by land area) if there are fewer than 12 registered voters residing in the district. Boundaries can include non-contiguous parcels. Fees can be proportionally subdivided and passed on to future property / home owners. Increases costs and risk for landowners and homeowners if fees dissuade buyers or reduce achievable sales prices. Impacts paying stakeholders’ overall ability to support other taxes, fees, and community benefits. Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD) Diverts a portion of future municipal General Fund property tax revenues generated within the district to help fund infrastructure projects. Climate resilience districts are a type of EIFD specifically intended to fund climate projects such as addressing sea level rise. Financing infrastructure improvements, development of public facilities, affordable housing development. Formation and bond issuance does not require a local vote. Does not cost individual property owners additional fees and taxes. Does not divert revenues from schools. Reduces future General Fund revenues by restricting use of the district’s future property tax revenue growth. 154 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 178     Table 28 Summary of Major District-Based Value Capture Tools Funding ToolsDescription Uses Considerations Special Assessment Districts Additional assessment against a range of participants, depending on the type of district and relative benefit received. Examples include: Landscaping and Lighting District, Community Benefit District, Business Improvement District. Most useful for funding ongoing operations and maintenance. Requires simple majority vote of paying stakeholders. Increases costs and risk for paying stakeholders. Stakeholders need to perceive a clear benefit for themselves. Impacts paying stakeholders’ overall ability to support other taxes, fees, and community benefits. Little financial risk to the City or public agencies; could lead to increased tax revenue based on private reinvestment. Additional City staff time to administer districts could offset some gains. Community Facilities District (Mello-Roos) Additional assessment on property, levied and varied based on a selected property characteristic (excluding property value). Financing infrastructure improvements, development of public facilities; also, ongoing operations and maintenance. Requires approval of 2/3 of property owners (by land area) if there are fewer than 12 registered voters residing in the district. Boundaries can include non-contiguous parcels. Fees can be proportionally subdivided and passed on to future property / home owners. Increases costs and risk for landowners and homeowners if fees dissuade buyers or reduce achievable sales prices. Impacts paying stakeholders’ overall ability to support other taxes, fees, and community benefits. Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD) Diverts a portion of future municipal General Fund property tax revenues generated within the district to help fund infrastructure projects. Climate resilience districts are a type of EIFD specifically intended to fund climate projects such as addressing sea level rise. Financing infrastructure improvements, development of public facilities, affordable housing development. Formation and bond issuance does not require a local vote. Does not cost individual property owners additional fees and taxes. Does not divert revenues from schools. Reduces future General Fund revenues by restricting use of the district’s future property tax revenue growth. IM P L E M E N T A T I O N 155 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 179     7.7 Infrastructure Improvements and Applicable Funding Sources The following table describes the applicability of various funding sources to the improvement needs identified in the NVCAP. Funding availability for improvements within the Plan Area will vary based on development activity, economic conditions, and availability of grants. Table 29 Infrastructure Improvements and Applicable Funding Sources in the NVCAP Developer Contributions City Resources District Based Outside Sources Development Standards CEQA Mitiga- tion Impact and In- Lieu Fees Negotiated Agreements General Fund Capital Im- provement Plan User Fees CFD EIFD Special Assess- ment District Grants (Fed- eral, Regional, State) Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure, Streetscape Improvements Public Right of Way Improvements X X X X X X X X X Intersection Improvements X X X X X X X X X Parks and Open Space Land Acquisition X X X X X X Construction of New Parks or Plazas X X X X X X Matadero Creek Re-Naturalization Land Acquisition X X X X X X Construction of New Infrastructure X X X X X X X Utilities District-wide: Stormwater, Water, and Sewer Improvements X X X X X X X X On-site/Project Specific: Stormwater, Water, and Sewer Improvements X X X X 156 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 180     Developer Contributions City Resources District Based Outside Sources Development Standards CEQA Mitiga- tion Impact and In- Lieu Fees Negotiated Agreements General Fund Capital Im- provement Plan User Fees CFD EIFD Special Assess- ment District Grants (Fed- eral, Regional, State) Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure, Streetscape Improvements Public Right of Way Improvements XXXX X X X X X Intersection ImprovementsXXXXX X X X X Parks and Open Space Land AcquisitionXX X X X X Construction of New Parks or Plazas XX X X X X Matadero Creek Re-Naturalization Land AcquisitionXX X X X X Construction of New Infrastructure XX X X X X X Utilities District-wide: Stormwater, Water, and Sewer Improvements XXX X X X X X On-site/Project Specific: Stormwater, Water, and Sewer Improvements XXXX IM P L E M E N T A T I O N 157 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 181     7.8 Implementation Actions Plan policies in the preceding chapters will be implemented by developers, property owners, and the City over the course of the Plan horizon, many because of development applications. However, certain policies require implementation that must be initiated by City staff and/or coordinated with other public agencies. Table 30 summarizes proactive steps needed to implement the NVCAP, agencies responsible for implementation, and the expected timeframe for each action. Related policies and goals from preceding chapters for each implementation action are also referenced. Following Plan Adoption actions are anticipated to completed directly following the adoption of the NVCAP. •Ongoing actions are expected to be implemented throughout the planning period. •Short-term actions are actions that are expected to be completed within 0 to 4 years from plan adoption. •Mid-term actions are anticipated to be implemented within 5 to 9 years from plan adoption. •Long-term actions are expected to be completed between 10 to 20 years from plan adoption. Table 30 Implementation Actions in the NVCAP Implementation Action Number Action Description City Department or Public Agency Responsible Timeframe Land Use and Zoning IM 1 Field questions, facilitate desired project design, and proactively reach out to property owners and local brokers to identify opportunities for investment and lot consolidation and to promote the vision of the Plan. Planning Ongoing Open Space IM 2 Renaturalize Matadero Creek: Take actions to implement a concept for Matadero creek that will fully naturalize (removal of concrete channel) between Park Boulevard and Lambert Avenue. The flood channel is widened up to a 100 feet riparian corridor serving maximum geomorphic form and ecological function. Multiple Long-Term IM 3 Public Park: Take actions to acquire, plan and implement the vision for a public park adjacent to Matadero Creek. Multiple Long-Term Street Improvements IM 4 Wayfinding Signs: Explore a program to design and implement a wayfinding sign program as an effective tool to celebrate history and provide a clear and predictable navigation for residents, visitors and employees. Multiple Ongoing IM 5 Woonerf: Explore and implement a concept for a woonerf that may either be a private or public/private partnership to implement a concept that integrates vehicular, pedestrian and traffic calming elements for the segment of Portage Avenue between Ash Street and Park Boulevard. Multiple Ongoing Historic Preservation IM 6 Explore within the first year after adoption of the Plan, the initiation of California or National Register and/or local Inventory as appropriate/as determined by Council for the cannery and the Ash office building. Planning Short-Term Parking Management IM 7 Evaluate as needed future parking strategies to maintain parking availability such as a parking benefit district, pricing options, time-of-day restrictions, Residential Parking Permits, and shared parking. Office of Transportation Mid-Term to Long- Term IM 8 If hourly pricing is used, then explore a strategy that creates targets such that 85% of the spaces are used at any time OR such that 15% of the parking supply is available at any time. Office of Transportation Mid-Term to Long- Term 158 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 182     Table 30 Implementation Actions in the NVCAP Implementation Action Number Action Description City Department or Public Agency Responsible Timeframe Land Use and Zoning IM 1Field questions, facilitate desired project design, and proactively reach out to property owners and local brokers to identify opportunities for investment and lot consolidation and to promote the vision of the Plan. Planning Ongoing Open Space IM 2Renaturalize Matadero Creek: Take actions to implement a concept for Matadero creek that will fully naturalize (removal of concrete channel) between Park Boulevard and Lambert Avenue. The flood channel is widened up to a 100 feet riparian corridor serving maximum geomorphic form and ecological function. Multiple Long-Term IM 3Public Park: Take actions to acquire, plan and implement the vision for a public park adjacent to Matadero Creek. Multiple Long-Term Street Improvements IM 4Wayfinding Signs: Explore a program to design and implement a wayfinding sign program as an effective tool to celebrate history and provide a clear and predictable navigation for residents, visitors and employees. Multiple Ongoing IM 5Woonerf: Explore and implement a concept for a woonerf that may either be a private or public/private partnership to implement a concept that integrates vehicular, pedestrian and traffic calming elements for the segment of Portage Avenue between Ash Street and Park Boulevard. Multiple Ongoing Historic Preservation IM 6Explore within the first year after adoption of the Plan, the initiation of California or National Register and/or local Inventory as appropriate/as determined by Council for the cannery and the Ash office building. Planning Short-Term Parking Management IM 7Evaluate as needed future parking strategies to maintain parking availability such as a parking benefit district, pricing options, time-of-day restrictions, Residential Parking Permits, and shared parking. Office of Transportation Mid-Term to Long- Term IM 8If hourly pricing is used, then explore a strategy that creates targets such that 85% of the spaces are used at any time OR such that 15% of the parking supply is available at any time. Office of Transportation Mid-Term to Long- Term IM P L E M E N T A T I O N 159 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 183     Implementation Action Number Action Description City Department or Public Agency Responsible Timeframe IM 9 Explore unbundling commercial parking or require the parking to be made to the public.Office of Transportation Mid-Term to Long- Term IM 10 Explore a parking pricing or a parking benefit district that could help support on-demand transit, transportation demand management measures, active transportation investments, transit pass programs, etc. Office of Transportation Mid-Term to Long- Term Infrastructure Improvements IM 11 Evaluate water main capacity that may need to be upgraded on a project-by-project basis. It is likely that the existing six-inch (6”) water mains are not able to provide sufficient flow and pressure to meet required fire demands for new construction. Depending on the development project, water mains may need to be replaced and upsized to meet fire flow requirements. Public Works Ongoing IM 12 Paving: Explore including into the Capital Improvement Program designs and implementation at key intersections and raised crossings. Public Works Short-term to long-term Public Art IM 13 Evaluate the placement of public art in relation to the Public Art Master Plan for the NVCAP.Community Services Ongoing IM 14 Explore updating the Public Art Master Plan as necessary to reconcile the vision of the NVCAP.Community Services Mid-Term to Long- Term Mobility IM 15 Publicly accessible shared path on private property: Implement locations indicated within NVCAP by requiring recorded easements over private property when property redevelops. Public Works/Planning Ongoing 7.8 Table 31 Implementation Actions in the NVCAP (Continued) 160 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 184     Implementation Action Number Action Description City Department or Public Agency Responsible Timeframe IM 9Explore unbundling commercial parking or require the parking to be made to the public.Office of Transportation Mid-Term to Long- Term IM 10Explore a parking pricing or a parking benefit district that could help support on-demand transit, transportation demand management measures, active transportation investments, transit pass programs, etc. Office of Transportation Mid-Term to Long- Term Infrastructure Improvements IM 11Evaluate water main capacity that may need to be upgraded on a project-by-project basis. It is likely that the existing six-inch (6”) water mains are not able to provide sufficient flow and pressure to meet required fire demands for new construction. Depending on the development project, water mains may need to be replaced and upsized to meet fire flow requirements. Public Works Ongoing IM 12Paving: Explore including into the Capital Improvement Program designs and implementation at key intersections and raised crossings. Public Works Short-term to long-term Public Art IM 13Evaluate the placement of public art in relation to the Public Art Master Plan for the NVCAP.Community Services Ongoing IM 14Explore updating the Public Art Master Plan as necessary to reconcile the vision of the NVCAP.Community Services Mid-Term to Long- Term Mobility IM 15Publicly accessible shared path on private property: Implement locations indicated within NVCAP by requiring recorded easements over private property when property redevelops. Public Works/Planning Ongoing IM P L E M E N T A T I O N 161 Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 185     Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 186     Item 2 ATTACHMENT A - Public Draft NVCAP May 2023 (Without Appendices)     Packet Pg. 187     North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Project Goals, Objectives, Milestones and Proposed Boundary March 5, 2018 Proposed NVCAP Goals 1.Housing and Land Use Add to the City’s supply of multifamily housing, including market rate, affordable, “missing middle,” and senior housing in a walkable, mixed use, transit-accessible neighborhood, with retail and commercial services, open space, and possibly arts and entertainment uses. 2.Transit, Pedestrian and Bicycle Connections Create and enhance well-defined connections to transit, pedestrian, and bicycle facilities, including connections to the Caltrain station, Park Boulevard and El Camino Real. 3.Connected Street Grid Create a connected street grid, filling in sidewalk gaps and street connections to California Avenue, the Caltrain Station, and El Camino Real where appropriate. 4.Community Facilities and Infrastructure Carefully align and integrate development of new community facilities and infrastructure with private development, recognizing both the community’s needs and that such investments can increase the cost of housing. 5.Balance of Community Interests Balance community-wide objectives with the interests of neighborhood residents and minimize displacement of existing residents. 6.Urban Design, Design Guidelines and Neighborhood Fabric Develop human-scale urban design strategies, and design guidelines that strengthen and support the neighborhood fabric. Infill development will respect the scale and character of the surrounding residential neighborhood. Proposed NVCAP Objectives 1.Data Driven Approach: Employ a data-driven approach that considers community desires, market conditions and forecasts, financial feasibility, existing uses and development patterns, development capacity, traffic and travel patterns, historic/cultural and natural resources, need for community facilities (e.g., schools), and Item 2 ATTACHMENT B - Council Adopted Goals & Objectives     Packet Pg. 188     other relevant data to inform plan policies. 2. Comprehensive User Friendly Document and Implementation: Create a comprehensive but user-friendly document that identifies the distribution, location and extent of land uses, planning policies, development regulations and design guidelines to enable development and needed infrastructure investments in the project area 3. Guide and Strategy for Staff and Decision Makers: Provide a guide and strategy for staff and decision-makers to bridge the gap between the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and individual development projects in order to streamline future land use and transportation decisions. 4. Meaningful Community Engagement: Enable a process with meaningful opportunities for community engagement, within the defined timeline, and an outcome (the CAP document) that reflects the community’s priorities. 5. Economic Feasibility: A determination of the economic and fiscal feasibility of the plan with specific analysis of market place factors and incentives and disincentives, as well as a cost-benefit analysis of public infrastructure investments and projected economic benefits to the City and community. 6. Environmental: A plan that is protective of public health and a process that complies with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. Item 2 ATTACHMENT B - Council Adopted Goals & Objectives     Packet Pg. 189     ATTACHMENT C – LOCATION MAP Image: CNES/Airbus, Maxar Technologies, Planet.com, USGS, USDA, FPAC, GEO, Google 2023 Item 2 ATTACHMENT C - Location Map     Packet Pg. 190     Item No. 3. Page 1 of 1 Historic Resources Board Staff Report From: Jonathan Lait, Planning and Development Services Director Lead Department: Planning and Development Services Meeting Date: June 8, 2023 Report #: 2305-1514 TITLE Approval of Historic Resources Board Draft Minutes of May 11, 2023 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Historic Resources Board (HRB) adopt the attached meeting minutes. BACKGROUND Attached are minutes for the following meeting(s): •May 11, 2023 ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: HRB 5.11 Minutes AUTHOR/TITLE: Veronica Dao, Administrative Associate Item 3 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 191     City of Palo Alto Page 1 `` Call to Order/Roll Call Present: Chair Caroline Willis; Vice Chair Christian Pease; Board Members Samantha Rohman, Michael Makinen, Margaret Wimmer, and Alisa Eagleston-Cieslewicz Absent: Board Member Heinrich Oral Communications Agenda Changes, Additions and Deletions City Official Reports 1. Historic Resources Board Schedule of Meetings and Assignments Chair Willis will be absent on June 8th. Election of Chair and Vice Chair will take place at the June 22nd meeting, as well as the Sobrato Project. Chair Willis wanted to pick a date for a retreat. This could be held in the Community Room; however, Chair preferred to hold it offsite for a more relaxed atmosphere. She and Ms. French will discuss this. Chair Willis preferred to have the retreat during the summer, perhaps in July or August. She requested Board Members email her if they have any date restrictions during those months. Ms. French said a Saturday afternoon may be possible, although she may not be able to attend. Chair Willis wished to put Mills Act on the agenda. Chair Willis asked if June 22nd would work. Ms. French will put it on the tentative agenda for June 22nd. Action Item 2. Review and Adopt 2023-24 HRB Work Plan Ms. French gave an overview of the work plan. The Annual CLG report, discussed at the last meeting, has been sent off to the State. The Work Plan needs to be finished and sent to the City Clerk. It will be presented to the City Council, and they will choose probably two dates for each of the Boards and Commissions to have a representative attend and engage with the Council. It will be an opportunity to review the Work Plan and ask questions of the Chair and staff. Ms. French went over the Work Plan goals presented for adoption. Goal one is to review alterations to Historic Resources. Goal two is Implementation of Comp Plan Policy L7.2, which says that before demolition permits are issued, it must be confirmed that the property is not eligible for the California Register. The Preservation Consultant prepares a Historic Resource Evaluation, and sometimes eligible resources are discovered. More often, the ones noted as potentially eligible from 1948 and earlier that didn’t make the cut to National Register usually come back as not eligible. That result is noted in the GIS system online for the parcel reports. Ms. French explained that she reports out in the CLG report every year the status of the new HREs. HISTORIC RESOURCES BOARD MEETING DRAFT MINUTES: May 11, 2023 Council Chamber & Virtual Zoom 8:30 A.M. Item 3 HRB 5.11 Minutes     Packet Pg. 192     City of Palo Alto Page 2 Goal three is to implement Comp Plan Policies L7.1.1, which is the purpose of the current project, the Inventory Update, focused on the properties from 2000. The project is proceeding, and a community meeting was held on April 25th. Outreach, Incentives and Work Program Development is the fourth goal. Although a Mills Act Program is one of the potential incentives, and they are working on getting it to Council, there is no program right now. The incentives for Goal 4 could include other incentives. There are some incentives within the Code, and these could be studied, as well as looking at what other cities are doing for incentives to preservation. Goal four includes implementing additional policies in the Comp Plan, such as L7.1.2, which is to re-assess the Historic Preservation Ordinance. This is already in the HRB Work Plan as a possible task or goal. Goal five is the Mills Act Program. Ms. French stated that the other part of the Work Plan is to cite the prior year’s accomplishments, which included the preparation of the report each year to send to the CLG. She noted that the HRB met 15 times from March of 2022 to the present. As usual, there were exterior alterations for listed properties and sometimes for eligible projects going through CEQA. These are ongoing accomplishments. Additionally, there were four study sessions held in the past year – the flagpole, the inventory update, a Pedro De Lamos property at Cowper, and the approaching outreach program. Action items included the Sobrato/Fry’s project, the bylaws update, 321 Cal Avenue and 525 University, which was found to be California Register eligible. Chair Willis invited comments from the public. There were no public comments. [Board Member Makinen joined the meeting remotely] Chair Willis opened discussion of the HRB Work Plan. Regarding the first goal, reviewing alterations, she shared that she is most concerned about Category 3’s and 4’s. The categories were determined long ago, and some may be accurate, but others may have might have gained more historic value with more now known about them. She referenced the Review Bulletin and felt they should have a discussion and clarification of its wording, particularly regarding the distinction between 1’s, 2’s, 3’s and 4’s. Ms. French noted that the Review Bulletin was intended to help members of the public and property owners when they come forward to modify their historic category buildings, to know what the ordinance sets forth as the process, combined with CEQA. The process depends on what type of project and what inventory category and is based on the existing ordinance. She offered to speak more about this at the next meeting and can send materials out on it ahead of time. Chair Willis suggested that they also look at the ordinance that dictates the information in the Bulletin. Ms. French will send this out also. Board Member Wimmer noted that they have previously talked about having this discussion. She asked if this could be a primary topic for the retreat where they could more freely discuss and throw out ideas and perhaps craft a proposal to change it or keep as is, but further define it. Chair Willis agreed with this suggestion. Ms. French will send out the Bulletin and the Ordinance as well as some artifacts she found about how the documents were created back in the 1970s, to help explain the history. She suggested that she could also present about it at a meeting, and then the Boardmembers could think about it and come back at the retreat to have the discussion. Board Member Wimmer and Chair Willis supported this idea. Chair Willis moved on to Goal 2, “Continue to support Comp Plan 7.2 implementation (preparing HRE’s to determine eligibility for the California Register is demolition is proposed.” Ms. French pointed out that the wording, “if demolition is proposed,” is included in the policy, but there is a program in place whereby, not just in the case of demolition, but also if a property owner is going sell a property or someone is about the buy they property, they will perform an HRE for the property owner. This is through the City’s consultant, but at the property owner’s expense. Item 3 HRB 5.11 Minutes     Packet Pg. 193     City of Palo Alto Page 3 Chair Willis wondered if they could simply do a windshield survey conducted by the HRB to eliminate some of the 500 properties listed. She felt that they could conduct some research, do a windshield survey including a couple of photos of each property as well as make some calls to get a few of them off of the list. Board Member Wimmer asked if the 500 properties are considered potentially eligible on their parcel reports. Ms. French said these are some that did not move forward when they were looked at by windshield survey in 1998. Some of the 165 on the Priority 1 list moved forward and were found eligible. Others on the list moved forward and were found ineligible, and then there were some in which no further research was done past the windshield survey, and some of them are gone. Board Member Wimmer said, since they are potentially eligible, if the homeowner wanted to do alterations, they would have to go through a historic evaluation review, which would result in a professional evaluation of its historic rating at that point. She asked why the Board would want to review the 500 properties. Chair Willis said that she would like a list that was positive every time. She said that a list of properties that are potentially historic seems like somewhat of a negative. It would be better to strongly identify the properties that are of real interest and not promote an idea that it’s kind of a 50-50 chance that a house is historic. Ms. French noted that the ones for which they’ve done HRE’s case-by-case, using a professional, have come back not eligible for the California register. They do not look at whether they belong on the Local Register, only the California Register, because that is related to CEQA. Those that have been demolished can certainly be removed from the list if not already done in the system. Vice Chair Pease asked if it is difficult to query the system to find out whether a home has been demolished. Ms. French responded that she has not tried this and would have to work with the tech team to answer the question. Board Member Eagleston-Cieslewicz wondered if this is potentially an area where another survey might make sense. Ms. French wasn’t sure, stating that homes still exist that were on the previous survey. There are no rules on reporting for the potentially eligible, which includes homes built prior to 1948 which have not been evaluated. Board Member Eagleston-Cieslewicz asked if that applied to homes which were not eligible at the time of the last survey based on age, but is now aged in for potential eligibility. Ms. French said they have narrowly interpreted Comp Plan Policy 7.2 to apply to those that were potentially eligible in the last survey, built prior to 1948. They have not applied Policy 7.2 to homes that have reached 50 years or older since then. Board Member Wimmer thought that potentially eligible homes could be one of the categories, perhaps Category 4, because it collects them into an easily understood category. Chair Willis suggested putting this on the agenda for the retreat. She felt it might be worth looking at 10 or 12 of these properties. She said she would rather work on the past 20 years since the last survey and add some properties that are obviously significant to the inventory rather than getting bogged down on the existing list. However, they should also figure out a way to deal with the existing list. She felt that making people go through the process does not build goodwill in the community. Vice Chair Pease asked if there was a way to test whether the system could determine which ones had been demolished since the list was created. Ms. French said anyone can enter an address in the parcel report system to see what it says. The list of potentially eligible homes could be systematically checked in the system, one-by-one, to see what it says on that parcel report. Vice Chair Pease wondered if this would have to be done manually, one-by-one. Item 3 HRB 5.11 Minutes     Packet Pg. 194     City of Palo Alto Page 4 Ms. French believed this would be the case. She would have to check with the tech team on this. Vice Chair Pease felt if there was a way to do this it would be very helpful, as checking 500 one-by-one is a lot of work. Ms. French suggested there could perhaps be a subcommittee formed to assist her in bringing forward the information. There are no pictures for the potentially eligible homes. Having photos of what exists today would be helpful. Vice Chair Pease asked again if she would talk to the information systems team since a list does exist on some system. If 300 of the homes do not exist, it would make a big difference in how they approach the list. Ms. French commented that she didn’t not think there would be that many that don’t exist and that it was more likely that there have been alterations to them between 2000 and 2018 when the policy originated – Vice Chair Pease asked if alterations would be listed in permits. Ms. French acknowledged that could be researched as well. Driving by to check and see if there has been an addition between 2000 and 2018 could yield information that could be compiled and would help inform a decision if an addition has been done that is not compliant with Secretary of the Interior standards. Vice Chair Pease asked if it would be possible to ask tech department how big the scope of work for them would be to do such a search if it’s possible and practical to do. Ms. French clarified that this would be consistent with Goal 2, to see if they could make inroads into a broader look, rather than case-by-case. Vice Chair Pease thought if some sort of criteria could be applied to the list, they could possibly prioritize those and make the Board’s efforts much more focused. Ms. French said anything is possible if it is included as one of the objectives of the goal. The Council would see this on the Work Plan, and if resources or money are needed, they will see that and possibly direct staff to do more than just have the HRB driving around taking pictures. She felt that the HRB would need to vote to put this on the work plan, to show consensus. Chair Willis noted that she would like to discuss this at the retreat. Ms. French said it can be left as is for now and not specifically called out. Chair Willis asked for consensus on this, whether they want it left the way it is. Ms. French said the work plan itself cites the policy. Chair Willis thought they might want to add something like, “general review of current list.” Board Member Rohman asked if the question was whether to leave the wording “as changes are proposed reviewing on a case-by-case basis,” or whether they are going to be proactive about reviewing the list. She felt it would be fine to define this as a priority and for the HRB to call it out so that they can follow up rather than be reactive. Board Member Eagleston-Cieslewicz when the Work Plan is due. Ms. French stated it would need to be finished that day. Board Member Eagleston-Cieslewicz thought it made more sense to leave the wording as is, because crafting something new would be challenging. Chair Willis noted that they would be doing this work themselves and wouldn’t really need resources. Ms. French reiterated that it’s easy to drive by and look at the properties. Chair Willis suggested having a subcommittee to work on making inroads into the list and that it should be added the retreat agenda, along with reviewing the Bulletin and the supporting materials that Ms. French would be presenting at the next meeting. Ms. French said she put this into the work plan as something to do in the first quarter. Chair Willis noted on Goal 3, Council has directed staff to work with the HRB to review the approximately 165 properties deemed eligible previously and make recommendations for listing on the City’s local inventory. This is the project that they are currently working extensively on, and it and it is obviously a priority. Item 3 HRB 5.11 Minutes     Packet Pg. 195     City of Palo Alto Page 5 Board Member Wimmer commented on the community meeting dates associated with this project. Ms. French acknowledged this should be shown in accomplishments rather than on upcoming goals. However, there is another community meeting that will be held for this project. Board Member Wimmer thought they should also discuss the results of the current community outreach, as there was some positive support but also some that was not as positive. Chair Willis thought they could have an update on it and discussion at the retreat. She felt they were doing great in the implementation of the project. Board Member Wimmer said it would also be good to review the outcome and feedback from the community meeting. Ms. French suggested that community meetings could be the topic, also reviewing what went well, what improvements could be made for the next one, what the role of the Board is. Board Member Wimmer felt the Board did not have a big role, as staff and Page and Turnbull directed most of it, which was good. Ms. French agreed and thought the next community might be a different type and set of discussions. Vice Chair Pease wondered if the numbering of the goals indicated their priority or if there was a process in which they could discuss priority. He felt that an order of priority would drive their approach. Ms. French said with the plan the priority is indicated, notating which quarter each would be worked on. Chair Willis asked for comments on Goal 4, “Review incentives and develop a work program for next year.” Ms. French said it would be important to look at the existing incentives and possibly brainstorm other incentives. She pointed out that the California tax break just came through so it might be something to start advocating. Board Member Rohman asked if the intention is to have a subcommittee for each of the goals, to make sure there is action taken on each one. She wondered who is analyzing and measuring the level of success. Vice Chair Pease agreed this is important. If there is another City Council by the time they get this item done, there will be an entirely different environment. Board Member Rohman thought agreeing on the “buckets” for the Work Plan is great, but then wondered if subcommittees within those buckets could assign specific goals and then coming back at the meetings to update the Board. Chair Willis supported this suggestion but commented that she has had a hard time getting that going in the past. She felt everyone buys in at some level, but somehow the cohesion and forward movement doesn’t always happen. However having a more functional group would be a good goal. Vice Chair Pease said they just need to be mindful of how much time each of them can actually put into all of these items. For example, promoting benefits as a part of outreach. They currently don’t have a Mills Act, and they have no idea when the State might codify one, or the details about it that people will want to know. Board Member Eagleston-Cieslewicz said in her reading of the proposed state legislation, many homeowners in Palo Alto may not qualify based on income. One must be below a certain threshold, and it is lower than the income required to buy the median home in Palo Alto. Ms. French thought that it may be more for seniors or retired people to take advantage of. Vice Chair Pease said that then defines the potential audience and constituency for the benefit. Ms. French said when they had a Historic Planner, they were celebrating certain things, such as Eichler, and they had some resources for community meetings. She thought it would be nice when something is under the threshold for the State tax benefit, if they could have a community meeting to help people understand, and maybe have someone from the State come and present on it, so everyone can learn. She said she could reach out to the State and ask if they might be able to do this. Item 3 HRB 5.11 Minutes     Packet Pg. 196     City of Palo Alto Page 6 Vice Chair Pease thought it was a good idea, but the current challenge was looking at the inventory. They need to be able to tell people what is definitely available and can be counted on as far as responsibilities and benefits. Right now, neither of these things seem like they will be in place in time to do that. Chair Willis suggested this be a Priority 1, to identify what can be offered to people if they are deemed historic in the latest round. Vice Chair Pease said much of it was discussed in the recent outreach meeting, including flag lots, et cetera. Ms. French said there are things on the web pages which may not be widely known. As suggested for Goal 4, they could discuss what kind of outreach can be done to help the community learn what’s available, and they could study those incentives as a Board and brainstorm, perhaps looking at other cities. Board Member Rohman thought they should be taking the list and getting volunteers to spearhead the programs. She said she signed up to be on the Board to commit a good amount of time to doing the work outside of the meetings. She said, knowing that they all have jobs and responsibilities, she did not think it out of the question to ask for commitment to a subcommittee for a certain number of hours per month, to drive the goals forward. Chair Willis agreed. She said they needed to go through the five goals, discuss all of them at the retreat, and focus on how to move forward on them, discussing the priorities and afterwards perhaps dividing into subcommittees focusing on the highest priorities first. Board Member Wimmer expressed her wish for a way to change the narrative on the whole historic topic and try to find out why people do not want to have a historic piece of Palo Alto, to protect it, take care of it and celebrate it. She felt history is not celebrated in the city at all, and real estate agents may even discourage buying a historic house. She asked why that narrative couldn’t be changed so that everyone would want a piece of that history, the history of one of the best cities to live in within the United States. She suggested a campaign to “Celebrate Palo Alto.,” including such things as the HP garage, Steve Jobs, the birth of Silicon Valley. The idea should be, “This is cool. You should be part of it.” They could promote the campaign on their website, with testimonials from people who own historic homes explaining why it is a great thing. She acknowledged it could be challenging in that people who do own these houses are private people. However, perhaps other people could get behind such a campaign. Board Member Wimmer expressed her opinion that the goals are getting them nowhere and that they needed to rethink the whole topic. She felt they also need to get the City Council behind them, because she is not sure the HRB’s goals are a priority. Board Member Rohman added that they should reach out to other historical organizations in Palo Alto to garner help and support. It needs to be an integrated community outreach program. She noted examples, such as Pasadena’s Bungalow Heaven program, which is a citywide walking tour of historic homes. Chair Willis said she will review the PAST spring calendar of walking tours, as she felt this would be a good start. Vice Chair Pease suggested talking about this as well at retreat. He agreed with Board Member Rohman’s comments. The story about tech seems to currently be the one thing that gets peoples’ attention. Other stories, such as some of the big pop culture figures that started out in the area, seem to garner interest more than style of building, architectural era, et cetera. Chair Willis agreed and said what they need is to have a more popular page on their website, perhaps working with The Weekly, working with PAST and the Historical Association. This could be agendized for the next meeting and would fit in with the community engagement topic. Board Member Rohman felt all of the goals were good, but were very large buckets, and they need to drill down and decide the details of what is involved. Overall, she felt all of the goals were fine. Ms. French said she could add “Celebrate Palo Alto” into one of the goals. Something like, “working towards innovating how to tell the story and change the narrative.” Vice Chair Pease said this would get to the heart of making the Board more relevant. Item 3 HRB 5.11 Minutes     Packet Pg. 197     City of Palo Alto Page 7 Board Member Wimmer noted that although they are all very enthusiastic people on the Board, sometimes the structure of the system is rigid. Chair Willis thought historic appreciation has ebbed and flowed in Palo Alto in her time there. There were times of strong preservation activities, great tours, open houses, et cetera, during some moments, and then things slowed down. She said it is time for an upswing and they should collect their resources and make this discussion a framework for their retreat, including the five goals related to that. She felt it would be goodwill to narrow down the list of priorities and to start working on the last 20 years that have not been looked at before they are lost. Chair Willis opened discussion on the last goal – the Mills Act. She said they were close to being able to present it to Council and she thought if it was agendized for one more meeting they would be able to finalize it to the point where they can take it to Council. As one of the basics that the State offers, they should make an effort to get it back on the books a high priority. Vice Chair Pease whether they should just vote on the Mills Act and put it before the Council directly, or if they go through staff before that is done. Ms. French responded that the pilot program document in regard to the Mills Act could be forwarded to the Council along with a staff report that explains the history, and possibly discusses what other cities do. Other cities are currently talking about things like how many properties they allow and whether there should be a limit, since there has been discussion about what impact it may have on schools. The question would be how many would the HRB recommend? And which categories would be eligible? She thought a full meeting would be needed to discuss these things. She said she could write a staff report to Council transmitting the program. Board Member Wimmer noted that Board Member Eagleston-Cieslewicz owns a historic property which could be used as a trial. Ms. French pointed out that there would be a conflict of interest in that, and Board Member Eagleston- Cieslewicz stated that there is still a question as to what she can participate in. Board Member Wimmer responded that Board Member Eagleston-Cieslewicz could still be an advisory person in regard to tailoring the pilot program. Board Member Eagleston-Cieslewicz agreed, with the caveat that she was allowed to participate. She was not sure to what degree she could participate at this point. Ms. French noted that once the Mills Act is agendized, Board Member Eagleston-Cieslewicz will do what she is legally advised to do, as per the Attorney’s advice. Vice Chair Pease referenced a three-page document he was looking at regarding the Mills Act pilot program. Chair Willis explained that the document included history about the Mills Act, including past reports to Council, information about when it was dropped, et cetera. Vice Chair Pease thought that all of the previous steps taken historically seemed to him irrelevant to what they now put in front of the Council. There is nothing in the history of the program that indicates that it can get done. His experience has been that anything that comes out of the HRB comes with a recommendation from the staff. It is what goes to the Council and is what they vote on. However, staff is short, and everything takes a long time. Consultants must be hired, and it looks like another bottleneck to him. Ms. French shared a Mills Act program that was presented back in September of 2021. This was one of the documents she had sent out to the Board. The January 2018 document was the most recently packaged document that had changes accepted. Vice Chair Pease said he had looked at this document previously. The content in red was the output of the subcommittee that was working on it. He wondered why they couldn’t just submit this now. Ms. French said she could discuss it with the Director and let him know that the HRB unanimously wants to send this to Council, as is. Alternately, it could be agendized for discussion with the Council, or a study session could be scheduled. Item 3 HRB 5.11 Minutes     Packet Pg. 198     City of Palo Alto Page 8 Vice Chair Pease thought it would make sense to have someone else outside of the Board look at what has been done and make a judgment about it. Then they could hear back about it and review it. His point was that the work has already been done and he wondered what they are waiting for. He asked Board Member Wimmer if she would be comfortable at this point for the document to be submitted for review by staff or someone else. Board Member Wimmer felt that the committee at the time did get the document to a point where they did try to bring it to the Council. She pointed out that it is ultimately up to the City Council on whether they want to adopt it or not. From what she remembered, it stopped there. Vice Chair Pease said if they considered it, there would probably be some requests to change it. He asked again, why the document couldn’t be moved out of the Board to somewhere else to see if the system could begin to do something with it. Board Member Wimmer suggested it would take a session like a retreat to discuss this. She wanted to review where they left off to refresh her mind. Or, they could agendize the Mills Act for one of their meetings. She felt they should receive the past information and review it. Chair Willis reminded the Board that they are planning to agendize the item for the June 22nd meeting. Ms. French added that she did send the information from the past work on the Mills Act the previous day, because it is Goal 5 in the Work Plan and they needed to decide whether or not to keep it there and if so, what the timing and priority should be for working on it. Chair Willis said it needed to stay on the Work Plan. It is a question of priorities. Chair Willis suggested that each Board Member express their opinion on the priorities. Board Member Eagleston-Cieslewicz remarked that a couple of the items are ongoing activities, such as reviewing exterior alterations, so goal one is the purview of the Board. Chair Willis noted that reviewing the Bulletin is an action item that should be prioritized. From 2016 it no longer coordinates with the ordinance. She suggested listing their action items and then prioritizing them. Ms. French pointed out packet page 10, under Priority Discussion for Goal One, stating, “Bulletin revisions are a higher priority for Quarter 1 of this Work Plan. Reviewing process clarifications would help staff and the community.” That box could be used to say which of the objectives for that goal is the highest priority. Vice Chair Pease felt that the Bulletin, the inventory review, and the public outreach are all inter-related, as well as the Mills Act, and he wasn’t sure how to separate any of them out and make an intelligent case for any of them. Chair Willis wondered then if they should separate out action items instead of priorities. Board Member Eagleston-Cieslewicz wondered if each subcommittee should prioritize their items and then bring them back to the larger group. Chair Willis thought the idea was to base subcommittees on projects, so they need to find out what product they’re looking for to define the subcommittees. Board Member Wimmer suggested that each Board Member take a goal. Chair Willis thought that would be fine for the retreat. The Review Bulletin needs to be agendized with staff putting information together to be voted on. It is a priority but probably doesn’t need a subcommittee. Ms. French shared the format the City Clerk has given the Board to work with and where the priority for Goal 1 is shown. She asked if the wording “ongoing” should be tweaked. Chair Willis said she is fine with the wording, but just wants to get it on an agenda so they can get it done and get it checked off. She thought it could be on the agenda for the 25th but didn’t know what to expect for the Sobrato project. Ms. French said there will be public speakers for that. Board Member Wimmer added that there will also be elections, so that’s probably enough for one meeting. Item 3 HRB 5.11 Minutes     Packet Pg. 199     City of Palo Alto Page 9 Chair Willis then suggested the 22nd, along with the Mills Act. Ms. French will send out something by email to explain what she is talking about with the Bulletin. She can make a presentation, without action, if there is time. Chair Willis noted on Goal 3, she is willing to wait until the retreat. They do need to look at the 500 on the list as well as the last 20 years, but it’s not a high priority and can be put off until after the retreat. She didn’t see anything specific that needed to be addressed before the retreat. On Goal 4, outreach, she thought that Mills Act is its own goal, but it might be a good place for a subcommittee to begin strategizing about how to do outreach and how they could integrate with PAST and the Historic Association. If there was subcommittee work done before the retreat it could help set them up for a productive discussion at the retreat. Board Member Rohman volunteered to sit on the subcommittee or be the sole member. Chair Willis said at the moment their interaction with the public is a top priority because it would make everything go better. Her suggestion was that Mills Act be the one subcommittee they work on at the moment. Vice Chair Pease supported this suggestion. Chair Willis suggested putting Board Member Rohman in charge of forming the subcommittee. Board Member Rohman wanted to make sure it wasn’t something Board Member Eagleston-Cieslewicz wanted to drive. Board Member Eagleston-Cieslewicz was fine with her being in charge. Chair Willis noted that she can reach out to all of the Board for help and input. Chair Willis invited any members of the public present to speak. There were no public speakers, or observers. Chair Willis asked Board Member Makinen if he had any comments. Ms. French pointed out Goal 5, in the “High Priority” box, it says “Finish the work previously drafted – Ad Hoc Committee effort and prepare a report to City Council.” She asked for confirmation on the wording. Chair Willis affirmed it, stating even if they never decide that they never want a Mills Act, they need to at least get to that point, with it going either up or down. She reiterated agendizing it and thought they had what they needed with the materials they have. She advocated the idea of giving Council a summary of it without having to wade through every detail, although the Board Members together do need to wade through the details and history, and strategize how to sell it, or decide they or not interested in it for their community. Ms. French said a vote is needed for the work plan. The Board voted on approval of the Work Plan as presented. The Plan was approved (6-0) by roll call vote. Approval of Minutes 3. Approval of Historic Resources Board Draft Minutes of April 13, 2023 The Board voted unanimously to approve the minutes of the April 13, 2023, with a correction, by voice vote. Subcommittee Items Board Member Questions, Comments, Announcements or Future Meetings and Agendas Vice Chair Pease asked about the Sobrato project on the next agenda. Ms. French responded that it is regarding the former Fry’s site. Ms. French asked if the proclamation regarding Birge Clark could be discussed. Item 3 HRB 5.11 Minutes     Packet Pg. 200     City of Palo Alto Page 10 Board Member Eagleston-Cieslewicz explained that she has a draft of a proclamation commemorating the 100th anniversary of Birge Clark’s architectural practice opening in Palo Alto, which she sent to Ms. French. Chair Willis thought it would be good to run it by PAST. She also was going to look at the book on Birge Clark and see if there was anything they wanted to add. Board Member Eagleston-Cieslewicz said she could send the draft to a contact for PAST. Board Member Rohman asked if PAST had plans to do a celebration of some kind. Chair Willis informed her that they did this at the joint meeting with the Historic Association the past Sunday. She was disappointed that she wasn’t able to make it to the meeting. Ms. French shared the draft proclamation on the screen for the Board to read. She said it will likely be in the Council’s packet for June. Chair Willis announced that the upcoming Saturday PAST is conducting a downtown Birge Clark tour, she thought at 10:00. On the 20th they will be doing a Mayfield tour. On May 27th they will do a tour called “Beyond Professorville.” She said the tours are always very enjoyable and informative. Adjournment Motion by Board Member Eagleston-Cieslewicz to adjourn. Seconded by Vice Chair Pease, the motion carried unanimously by voice vote. The meeting was adjourned at 10:15 a.m. Item 3 HRB 5.11 Minutes     Packet Pg. 201