Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-09-27 City Council (5)TO: FROM: City of Palo Alto City Manager’s Report HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL / CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DATE: SUBJECT: SEPTEMBER 27, 1999 CMR: 367:99 AMENDMENT #4 TO OPTION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF PALO ALTO AND COMMUNITY SKATING, INC. AND BUDGET AMENDMENT ORDINANCE NOT TO EXCEED $50,000 AS CITY CONTRIBUTION TO COST OF SOUND WALL FOR TENNIS FACILITY AT 3005 MIDDLEFIELD ROAD RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Council approve the attached: 1) Budget Amendment Ordinance (BAO) to appropriate $50,000 for the City’s contribution to the cost of a sound wall for the tennis facility at 3005 Middlefield Road; and 2) the related Amendment #4 to the Option Agreement between the City of Palo Alto and Community Skating, Inc. The City’s actual expenditure will be one half the cost of the sound wall, not to exceed $50,000. BACKGROUND On May 1, 1995, Council granted an option to lease to Community Skating, Inc. (CSI) for the development and operation of a tennis facility at 3005 Middlefield Road. On August 15, 1996, the Zoning Administrator approved a conditional use permit for the project, which was then appealed by three neighbors of the site. The three appeals were heard by the Planning Commission on November 13, 1996, after which several additional acoustical analyses were prepared for the project. The appeals were then heard by the City Council on September 15 and December 1, 1997, at which time staff was directed to revise the mitigated negative declaration to reflect the noise mitigations presented in the acousticai analyses and to assess any environmental impacts that could result from the height and location of the sound walls. On October 13, 1998, Council approved the revised mitigated negative declaration and the conditional use permit for the project; denied the three appeals; and directed staff to return with a BAO not to exceed $50,000 to pay up to one half of the cost to construct the sound walls. Following Council’s October 1998 approval, neighbors of the project filed three lawsuits challenging the approval, and the project has since been on hold. One lawsuit has now been settled, the other two dismissed, and the project can proceed. CMR: 367:99 Page 1 of 3 DISCUSSION The conditional use permit approved by Council requires that CSI construct a 10-foot high, air-tight, acoustical sound wall along the western edge of the site, adjacent to the tennis courts and Matadero Creek (commonly known as the northern property line, but referred to as the western property line in all previous discussions of this project) and along the shared property line with Price Court (commonly known as the western property line, but referred to-as the northern property line in all previous references to this project). The sound wall is to consist of masonry or concrete panels or concrete block. Preliminary estimates of the cost of the sound wall range from $50,000 to $100,000. Following Council approval of the attached BAO and Amendment, and CSI’s submission of appropriate documentation of actual costs, staff will process a reimbursement to CSI for up to one half the cost, not to exceed $50,000. RESOURCE IMPACT The attached BAO requests approval for an appropriation of $50,000 from the General Fund Budget Stabilization Reserve. This appropriation is a one-time expense and there are no future year resource needs anticipated as a result of this BAO. Attachment B summarizes the BAO’s approved to date in 1999-00 that impact the General Fund Budget Stabilization Reserve. This attachment also estimates future year ongoing costs associated with BAO’s approved to date to provide a projection for the future resource needs from the General Fund for those programs approved after the adoption of the 1999- 00 Budget. POLICY IMPLICATIONS The recommendation is consistent with Council direction given on October 13, 1998. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW A mitigated Negative Declaration for the project was approved by Council on October 13, 1998. No further environmental review for the project is necessary under the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Attachment B: Attachment C: PREPARED BY: Budget Amendment Ordinance Budget Amendment Ordinances Impacting General Fund Reserves Approved To Date in 1999-00 Amendment #4 to Option Agreement Janet Freeland, Senior Financial Analyst CMR: 367:99 Page 2 of 3 DEPARTMENT HEAD APPROVAL: CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: / City Manager cc: Community Skating, Inc. CMR: 367:99 Page 3 of 3 ATTACHMENT A ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALO ALTO AMENDING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1999-00 TO PROVIDE AN ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATION OF $50,000 FOR THE CITY’S CONTRIBUTION TO THE COST OF A SOUND WALL FOR THE TENNIS FACILITY AT 3005 MIDDLEFIELD ROAD WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 12 of Article III of the Charter of the City of Palo Alto, the Council on June 28, 1999 did adopt a budget for fiscal year 1999-00; and WHEREAS, on May i, 1995, Council granted an option to lease to Community Skating, Inc. (CSI) for the development and operation of a tennis facility at 3005 Middlefield Road; and WHEREAS, On August 15, 1996, the Zoning Administrator approved a conditional use permit for the project, which was appealed by three neighbors of the site; ana WHEREAS, the City Council directed staff to revise the Mitigated Negative Declaration to reflect the noise mitigations presented in the acoustical analyses and to assess any environmental impacts that could result from the height and location of the sound walls; and WHEREAS, On October 13, 1998, Council approved t.he revised mitigated negative declaration and the conditional use permit for the project; and WHEREAS, neighbors of the project filed three lawsuits challenging the approval, and the project has since been on hold; and WHEREAS, one lawsuit has now been settled, the other two dismissed, and the project can now proceed; and WHEREAS, the Council has agreed to City payment for one half the cost of the sound wall, in an amount not to exceed $50,000; and WHEREAS, City Council authorization is needed to amend the 1999-00 budget to make an additional appropriation of $50,000 as hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, the additional appropriation of funds from the General Fund Budget Stabilization Reserve is a one-time cost and no future year General Fund ongoing costs are anticipated from the construction of this Sound Wall. NOW, THEREFORE, the Counci! of [he City of Palo Alto does ORDAIN as follows: SECTION i. The sum of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000)) is hereby appropriated to non-salary expenses in the Property Management Functional Area in the Administrative Services Department, and the Budget Stabilization Reserve is correspondingly reduced. SECTION 2. This transaction will reduce the Stabilization Reserve from $19,443,339 to $19,393,339. Budget SECTION 3. As specified in Section 2.28.080(a) of the Palo Alto Municipal Code, a two-thirds vote of the City Council is required to adopt this ordinance. SECTION 4. A mitigated Negative Declaration for the project was approved by Council on October 13, 1998. No further environmental review for the project is necessary under the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). SECTION 5. As provided in Section 2.04.350 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code, this ordinance shall become effective upon adoption. INTRODUCED AND PASSED: AYES: NOES: ABSTENTIONS: ABSENT: ATTEST:APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM:City Manager Senior Asst. City Attorney Director Services of Administrative S : \ASD \ BUDGET \ 9 8 9 9 BU- 1 \ 9 9 BAO- 1 \WORDPERF \ SOUNDW. WPD Attachment B Budget Amendment Ordinances Impacting General Fund Reserves Approved To Date in 1999-00 Net Cost "Revenue Already in the Impact on the1999~00 Adopted General Fund ~ ~ BSR ~ Future Year Ongoing C~ts Estimated Beginning Budget Stabilization Reserve (BSR) Balance $18,877,888 Adopted Budget Addition to BSR $1.214,000 Downtown Urban Design Improvements, CIP 19608 Downtown Parking Structure Feasibility Study, CIP 19530 Sala_rT and Benefit Increases Retroactive to July 1, 1999 for Management and Confidential Employees City Manager Executive Recruitment Friends of the Palo Alto Library Grant Arts Council of Santa Clara County Grant Palo Alto Art Center Foundation Donation Historic Preservation Officer Cost of Sound Wall for Tennis Facility at 3005 Middlefield ($120,349) ($70,000) (S432,200) ($26,000) ($58,000) ($5,407) ($10,000) ($71,883) (S50,000) $58,000 S5,407 $10,000 ($120,349) ($70,000) (S432,200) ($26,000) $0 $0 $0 $0 ($50,000) ($432,200) ($95.839) Total BAOs ($843,839)$73,407 $0 ($698,549)($528,039) BSR Balance After BAO’s $19,393,339 ATTACHMENT C AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO OPTION AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF PALO ALTO AND COMMUNITY SKATING, INC. This Amendment No. 4 to the Option Agreement Between the City of Palo Alto and Community Skating Inc., dated June 20, 1995 (hereinafter referred to as the "Option"), is made and entered into this __ day of ,1999, by and between the CITY OF PALO ALTO, a California municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY," and COMMUNITY SKATING, INC., a California non-profit corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CSI"; RECITALS WHEREAS, the Option provides for an exclusive option to lease the property located at 3005 Middlefield Road, Palo Alto, hereinafter referred to as the "Premises," for the purpose of constructing improvements and operating a recreational tennis facility, hereinafter referred to as the "Project," as described in the Option and the lease attached thereto as Exhibit I, hereinafter referred to as the "Lease;" and WHEREAS, Amendment No. 1 to the Option, dated May 15, 1997, extended the option term an additional nine (9) months to March 20, 1998; and WHEREAS, Amendment No. 2 to the Option, dated March 20, 1998, extended the option term an additional nine months until December 20, 1998; and WHEREAS, Amendment No. 3 to the Option, dated April 4, 1999 extended the option term to one hundred and eighty (180) days after the date of final disposition of the following three pending cases: Middlefield Road Homeowners Assoc. v. City. of Palo Alto, et al., SCC Sup’r Ct. No. CV 778008; Wei Wang, et al. v. City. of Pa!Q.. Alto. et al., SCC Sup’r Ct. No. CV 778019; and Natalie Fisher. et al. v. City. of Palo Alto. et al., SCC Sup’r. Ct. No. CV 777977; and WHERAS, on October 13, 1998, Council approved a mitigated negative declaration and conditional use permit for the Project, which included the requirement for a 10-foot high sound wall to mitigate impacts on private property adjacent to the Premises; and WHEREAS, concurrently herewith, Council approved a Budget Amendment Ordinance to appropriate $50,000 for the city’s contribution to the cost of a sound wall, with the City’s actual expenditure to be one-half the cost of the sound wall, not to exceed $50,000; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual covenants, the parties hereto agree as follows: SECTION 1 The following paragraph D shall be added to the Lease under Section XIV (CONSTRUCTION AND/OR ALTERATION BY TENANT): "D. CITY Contribution for Cost of Sound Wall. The master plan approved for development of the PREMISES includes a 10-foot high, air-tight, acoustical sound wall along the northerly and westerly property lines of the PREMISES, which shall consist of masonry, or concrete panels or concrete block. Following construction of the wall by TENANT, CITY agrees to reimburse TENANT for one half the cost of the sound wall, not to exceed $50,000, provided TENANT has furnished the Manager of Real Property with the following: 1) appropriate documentation of actual construction costs; and 2) evidence of final inspection of the sound wall by the Chief Building Official." SECTION 2. Except as herein modified, all other provisions of and exhibits to the Option shall remain in full force and effect. 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment the day and year first above written. CITY OF PALO ALTO COMMUNITY SKATING, INC. City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Its: Senior Assistant City Attorney APPROVED: Assistant City Manager Director of Administrative Services Director of Planning and Community Environment Manager, Real Property