HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-12-10 City CouncilCity of Palo Alto
C ty Manager’s Repor
TO:HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL
Policy and Services Committee
FROM:CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
AGENDA DATE: December 10, 1996
SUBJECT:Scope of Work for Traffic Signal Timing Project
REQUEST
The Policy and Services committee identified the Traffic Signal Timing Project as one of
the projects for which it would like to review the draft scope of work, prior to the start of
the consultant selection process.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends that the Committee approve the attached scope of work for use in hiring
a consultant to perform the Traffic Signal Timing Project.
POLICY, IMPLICATIONS
The recommendation of this report is consistent with existing Comprehensive Plan
Transportation Program 17: Make operational and intersection improvements to ease
traffic flow on major streets.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The current traffic signal timing plans for the City of Palo Alto traffic signals are based
on traffic conditions (volumes and travel speeds) that were last measured in 1986. Since
then, several new traffic signals have been added and traffic volumes and patterns have
likely changed. Therefore, there is a need to review and update the traffic signal timing
plans for the Palo Alto signals. Staff applied to the Metropolitan Transportation
Commission (MTC) for a grant, to establish new traffic signal timing plans and replace
one-quarter of the existing traffic signal controllers, which was subsequently approved.
The objective of the current Traffic Signal Timing Project is to develop new traffic signal
timing plans for 83 of the traffic signals trader Palo Alto’s jurisdiction. The scope of work
includes data collection and analysis, model calibration and application, testing and
CMR:490:96 Page 1 of 3
evaluation of alternatives, implementation and refinement, before and after studies, and
report documentation.
Staffhas prepared a draft scope of work to hire a consultant to perform the Traffic Signal
Timing portion of the work, because in-house resources are not available to do this type
and magnitude of work. Although the federal funds are to establish new traffic signal
timing plans and replace one-quarter of the existing traffic signal controllers (please refer
to discussion under Fiscal Impact), replacement of controllers is not a part of this current
effort. Controllers will be replaced/upgraded subject to the findings and conclusions of
a Traffic Signal System Evaluation Study, the scope of work for which will be the subject
of discussion at a later Policy and Services Committee meeting.
Staff has formed a Project Study Cormnittee (PSC) to assist with consultant selection, as
well as to review and comment on the consultant’s work during the course of the project.
The draft scope of work has been reviewed by the PSC and incorporates their comments.
The PSC consists of the following members:
Chief Transportation Official, Transportation Division
City Traffic Engineer, Transportation Division
Senior Power Engineer, Utilities Department
Supervisor, Traffic Signals - Coax, Utilities Depamnent
Following review and approval of the scope of services by the Policy anti Servicc~,
Committee, staffwN proceed with the Request for Proposals, evaluation of respondents,
selection of a consultant, and negotiation of a contract. The final agreement with the
consultant selected to perform the work will come before the full Council for review and
approval.
FISCAL IMPACT
As a means to improve and upgrade the traffic signal system, staff investigated potential
sources of funding, and identified the Regional Traffic Signal Operations Program
(RTSOP) administrated by MTC, as a potential applicable program. Subsequently, Palo
Alto’s grant application to MTC, in the amount of $459,845 ($407,100 federal funds and
$52,745 state Transportation System Management ftmds), to establish new traffic signal
timing plans and replace one-quarter of the existing traffic signal controllers was
approved.
Funding, in the amount of $166,000, for the traffic signal timing portion of the project, is
included in the Electric Utility section of the 1996-97 Capital Improvement Program. Up
CMR:490:96 Page 2 of 3
to 88.1 percent of the actual project cost, or a maximum of $146,279, in federal and state
TSM match will be reimburs~.~d to the City for this portion of the work. The residual 11.9
percent, or $19,721, will come from budgeted Electric Utility funds.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
Approval ofa drat~ scope of work to retain a consultant is not considered a project under
the California Environmental Quality Act; therefore, no environmental assessment is
required.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Map illustrating traffic signal locations
2. Scope of Work for Traffic Signal Timing Project
Prepared by: Ashok Aggarwal, City Traffic Engineer
Department Head Review:
KENNETH R. SCHREIBER
Director of Planning
mad Community Envirolmaent
City Manager Approval:
city
cc:Hin Kung, Caltrans
CMR:490:96 Page 3 of 3
\EAST PALO ALTO
CITY OF
lo1
PALO ALTO
Legend
Cit7 of Palo Alto Traffic Signals
City of Menlo Park Traffic Signals
Santa Clara Counq~ Traffic Signals
San Mateo Count)." Traffic Signals
Cahwans Traffic Signals Not to Scale
City of Palo Alto
Transportation Division
Traffic Signal Locations
cAs~gna~sigl_bas.cdr
SCOPE OF WORK
Traffic Signal Timing Project
ATTACHMENT 2
Background
The City of Palo Alto has 87 traffic signals under its direct jurisdiction. These do not
include the traffic signals along Oregon Expressway, Page Mill Road, and Foothill
Expressway which are the responsibility of Santa Clara County, nor those along El Camino
Real which are the responsibility of the State of California. Attachment 1 illustrates the
location of all of the traffic signals and the jurisdiction with primary responsibility.
For each traffic signal, there is a traffic signal timing plan that specifies the amount of
green, yellow and red time, as well as pedestrian walk time, allocated for each movement
during various portions of the day. The current traffic signal timing plans for the City of
Palo Alto traffic signals are based on traffic conditions (volumes and travel speeds) that
were last measured in 1986. Since then several new traffic signals have been added and
traffic volumes and patterns have likely changed. Therefore, there is a need to review and
update the traffic signal timing plans for the Palo Alto signals.
The City has applied for and received approval of a grant for funds as part of the
Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s "Regional Traffic Signal Operations Program
(RTSOP)". The objective for the RTSOP program is to reduce congestion, improve air
quality, and improve traffic flow by replacing/updating traffic signal equipment and timing
plans. The total RTSOP grant is for $459,845, with the intent to use approximately
$146,279 for developing new traffic signal timing plans. The remainder of the grant is
available for traffic signal equipment changes.
The City’s present intent is to proceed with the collection and analysis of the data
necessary to evaluate and develop revised traffic signal timing plans, which can be used
with the existing traffic signal equipment, as well as any changes in equipment that may
be forthcoming in the future. The work is to be done by a consultant with supervision by
City staff.
Since the project involves the use of federal funds, Palo Alto is required to follow
procedures and standards established by the federal government and administered on its
behalf, by Caltrans. These include review and approval of several elements, including
following Caltrans required guidelines for selecting consultants.
Work Tasks
The scope of work for this contract includes data collection, analysis, evaluation and
development of traffic signal timing plans for 83 traffic signals (because four of the signals
are isolated and cannot be coordinated, the number of signals included in the project is
83 instead of 87). In general, the consultant will become familiar with the 83 intersections;
collect, reduce and check all data required as input to the TRANSYT program; code and
Page 1
keypunch input data; check data files; debug and calibrate TRANSYT; make production
runs for various time periods (e.g.a.m. peak, mid-day, p.m. peak and off-peak); interpret
and check output; prepare data for input to City’s VMS 300 central computer traffic signal
controller; monitor resultant traffic performance; adjust and fine tune the timing plans;
conduct before and after studies; and prepare all of the progress and final reports.
Specific tasks to be performed by the consultant include the following:
Task 1-Link/Node Diagram
Consultant will field check all of the existing traffic signal equipment, as well as
required intersection and roadway characteristics, develop the appropriate network
diagrams showing node numbers, link numbers, and link lengths, etc., and meet
with City staff;
Task 2-Data Collection
Consultant will collect and analyze all data (existing or new) to provide a data base
suitable for use in calibrating the TRANSYT model to existing traffic conditions.
Such data will include, but not be limited to: existing traffic signal phasing and
timing (green, yellow, red, lost time, extensions, pedestrian, etc.); coordination;
intersection geometrics; intersection volumes (through and turning); saturation
flows; queue length; vehicle speeds and mid-block flow profiles; travel time runs;
etc. A minimum of three or four runs in each direction on each major study street
will be made during the off-peak, a.m. peak, p.m. peak, and mid-day peak periods.
The runs will be conducted for both the before and after situations. All of the data
will be transferred to data reduction sheets.
Task 3-Calibrated Simulation Run/Field Calibration Data
Consultant will prepare and enter input data, complete initial simulation runs, and
calibrate model. The purpose of this task is twofold: (1) to develop a complete and
properly formatted set of input data for each time period that is to be studied, and
(2) to calibrate the model to observed existing conditions for each time period. The
result of this task will be an operational and calibrated TRANSYT model for each
of the four time periods to be studied.
Task 4-VWVV Clocks
Consultant will determine the need for the VVWV clocks. If required, consultant will
prepare the necessary hardware specifications and assist with the installation of the
necessary hardware.
Task 5 - Model Analysis and Evaluation
The purpose of this task is to complete TRANSYT analysis runs and an evaluation
of alternative timing plans. The consultant will develop a recommended timing plan
for each traffic signal subsystem within the study area (1) for each of four time
periods (AM, mid-day, PM, and off-peak), (2) for each of four travel speeds (posted
speed limit, five miles above the posted speed limit, prevailing speed, and the
Page 2
speed for optimum two way progression), and (3) for each of two optimization
criteria (maximum two-way rogression on main roadway and cross-street/main
roadway balanced appro£c~-,). The recommended timing plans will be developed
through a series of model applications. Measures of effectiveness will be reported
for each condition. Time space diagrams will be prepared to ensure that the timing
plans are reasonable.
Task 6 - Implementation and Fine-Tuning
The purpose of this task is to implement and fine-tune the preferred timing plans,
complete a before and after field evaluation, and complete the final TRANSYT
simulation runs of field implemented fine-tuned timing plans.
Based upon the option selected by the City, the Consultant will generate refined
timing plans for each of the four time periods, including time of day and traffic-
responsive commands, properly formatted for input into the City’s VMS 330
computer. While City staff will actually enter the data into the computer, the
consultant will be on hand to resolve any problems.
Field observations will be conducted by the consultant, with City staff participation,
to evaluate system operation. Based on the field observations, consultant will
adjust timing plans either manually or with additional model runs with revised data
to remedy any operational problems.
The consultant will conduct field surveys to measure changes in the network’s
performance before and after the implementation of the new timing plans. The
surveys will consist of multiple floating car runs along subsystems to collect data
on total travel time and number of stops. The number of runs must be statistically
valid for before and after comparisons.
Task 7 - Final Report
The consultant will prepare and provide an individual progress report for each task,
as well as a final report. The final report will summarize the entire project, including
existing traffic flow conditions and the resulting effects of the newly implemented
traffic signal timing plans (e.g. measures of effectiveness, before and after
comparisons, sub-system performance summary, etc.).
Consultant’s Proposal
The consultant’s proposal shall include, but not be limited to, information concerning the
following items:
a.A work plan
b.An organization chart,
c.The firm’s experience with interconnect systems in general,
Page 3
go
The firm’s familiarity with VMS operation,
TRANSYT model and computer resources needed for the project,
The firm’s success with implementation of coordinated timing plans,
Names of specific individuals to be assigned to this project, including their
respective roles and relevant experience,
A schedule indicating the time required to complete the project,
Estimated fee, broken down by tasks, and
Information about the consultant’s use of Disadvantaged Business
Enterprises (DBEs).
Consultant Selection Criteria
The following criteria will be used in evaluating consultants:
f.
g.
h.
I.
Specialized experience in this type of work,
Familiarity with VMS 330,
Familiarity with traffic-responsive coordinated traffic signal timing plans,
Success in achieving efficiently coordinated traffic signal systems,
Geographic location of the firm relative to Palo Alto,
Completeness in answering the RFP,
Make-up of the team,
Innovative aspects of the proposal,
Presentation at the oral interview, and
Proposed fee.
C:~ASHO~SIGNALS~CONTROLL\SCP-WK,WPD
Page 4