HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-03-25 City Council~THIS PORT
IS A
*COUNCIL PRIORITY
P’ ZDGET 1996-98
of Palo Alto
Manager’s epert
TO:HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATIVE
SERVICES
ATTENTION: FINANCE COMMITTEE
AGENDA DATE: MARCH 25, 1996 CMR: 139:96
SUBJECT:BUDGET ISSUE: SERVICE PROPOSALS PROCEEDING ON
ALTERNATE TIMELINES FROM 1996-98 BUDGET PROCESS
RECOMMENDATIONS:
This is an informational report, and no Council action is required. This staff report provides
information to the Council about several major study areas that may potentially require
additional staffing or resource commitment from the City’s General Fund, but which will not
be completed in time for incorporation into the 1996-98 Budget. In some cases, an estimated
level of funding has been included in the base budget, pending Council review, and action on
the proposal.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS:
The policy implications of each of the studies and proposals discussed below will be
analyzed when specific recommendations are before the Council for review and approval.
DISCUSSION:
Several major studies and proposals are currently underway on timeframes that will not
accommodate full incorporation of Council’s review and decisions into the 1996-98 Budget.
These are discussed below:
Major Infrastructure Rehabilitation Program
As discussed in detail in another budget issues report (CMR:165:96), a number of major
infrastructure studies and proposals are proceeding with the goal of incorporation into the
second year of the two-year budget. These include projects arising from the Infrastructure
CMR:139:96 Page 1 of 6
Management System report on buildings and building support systems; the Golf Course
renovation; major capital work on the Palo Alto Unified School District fields; parks
infrastructure rehabilitation; implementation of the Cubberley Master Plan; the Community
Services facilities needs assessment; capital projects coming from the update to the
Comprehensive Plan; Downtown Business District improvements, a downtown parking
structure; and the Dream Team effort.
It is unclear at this time whether additional staffing will be required in the Public Works
Department to undertake the higher level of infrastructure rehabilitation and maintenance.
Any significant increase in project workload will require a combination of both staff and
consultant resource increases in order to be successfully implemented.
Permit Streamlinin~
Staff plans to forward to the Council in April 1996 a report from the Customer Working
Panel on permit streamlining. At the writing of this report, the recommendations are not
finalized, and have not been fully evaluated by staff, but a contingency appropriation will be
included for implementation costs (and associated revenues) in the Budget. Examples of
potential recommendations with associated costs include: an additional plan checking
position; increased funding for outside plan check consultants; concept of the one-stop permit
center with expanded hours, which could mean a staffing increase; and a full one-stop permit
center, including Utilities and Fire (hazardous materials), requiting facilities modifications
and/or relocation of the function.
Staff is also anticipating that recommendations to Council will include increases in building
permit fees to offset any costs associated with permit streamlining.
Comprehensive Plan - Service Level Changes
Adoption of a new Comprehensive Plan is anticipated in the first quarter of 1997-98.
Implementation activities associated with the new Plan will tend to fall in one of four
categories:
Policies and programs that influence the ongoing operations of the City, but do not
generate a specific implementation assignment (e.g. "Support expanded bicycle
storage on all trains and transit buses").
o Policies and programs that require new regulations and procedures. This is likely to
include a complete revision of the current zoning ordinance, estimated to cost
approximately $500,000.
CMR:139:96 Page 2 of 6
O Policies and programs that lead to special studies, such as coordinated area plans.
Cost sharing with the private sector will be explored in each instance, but may or may
not be feasible.
o Policies and programs that lead to capital improvements.
Implementation of the new Comprehensive Plan will be expensive, but the opportunity exists
to phase work over the 15-year anticipated life of the Plan. However, some of the more
costly elements are likely to be highly desirable or mandatory in the first few years of the
Plan, including new zoning regulations and a coordinated area plan for South E1 Camino
Real. More precise implementation information will be available in conjunction with
publication of the Draft Comprehensive Plan, in fall 1996.
Tree Program
On December 18, 1995, the Council approved in concept an augmented tree program, subject
to development and approval of a new revenue source to support the program. Council also
approved interim actions on partial funding for some components of the recommendations
during F¥ 1996-98 and subsequent budget years, depending on the availability of ongoing
revenues to support them. The 1996-98 Proposed Budget will include:
O Addition of a Contract Coordinator position to accomplish the increased
contract trimming, planting median and right-of-way maintenance currently
budgeted.
O In 1997-98, $123,000 in additional contract funds for tree removals, tree
planting and tree trimming/pruning.
O One-time startup costs for a nonprofit tree group. (A contingency amount of
$100,000 has been set aside, pending completion of Council discussions on
how to support this concept.)
The City Attomey is working on preparation of a tree protection ordinance, which will return
to the Council, along with an assessment of the costs of implementation, in April 1996. At
this time, it appears that one FTE would be required to enforce the ordinance. The position
would be located in the Planning Department. Funding has been set aside in the salary
contingency account for this position, should Council decide to move forward with the tree
protection ordinance and approve the related staffing.
Library. Master Plan
As part of the City Manager’s response to the Hughes Heiss Organizational Review, the
Community Services Department undertook a comprehensive review of library services and
¯ CMR:139:96 Page 3 of 6
is in the process of working with the community on a Library Master Plan. The Master Plan
should be ready for presentation to the Council in spring, 1996. Staff does not anticipate at
this time that the Master Plan will require additional resources be added to the budget.
Positive Alternatives for Youth
Another effort which is in the development stage, but which will probably have a fiscal
impact in 1996-97, is the Positive Alternatives for Youth. A committee composed of
representatives from the Police and Community Services Departments, Human Relations
Commission, the Palo Alto Unified School District (PAUSD) (including School Board
members), PTA Council, Adolescent Counseling Services, Family Services MidPeninsula,
Mayfield Community Clinic, Chamber of Commerce, Downtown Marketing Committee and
the YMCA are working together to define "positive altematives for youth." The program
to address at-risk youth would be a public/private partnership between the City, PAUSD and
private business. Based upon a successful program implemented in the City of Vacaville and
using existing programs and services, such as the Recreation Department’s "Outlet Program"
and Adolescent Counseling Services as a foundation, the program could be expanded to
include the following components: mentoring/job placement (provide part-time job
opportunities for at-risk youth), community services (volunteer public services for youth),
life skills/counseling, and tutoring. The big difference between Vacaville’s program and the
one the City is developing is that Vacaville’s is primarily subsidized by City funds. Staff’s
intent is to provide a valuable program with funding from the City, business, grants, and
PAUSD. Due to the fact that the program components are using existing programs provided.
by the City, PAUSD and other agencies as the foundation, the goal is to keep additional costs
to a minimum. The committee is currently putting together program plans for each
component that would include specific goals/objectives, target groups, estimated resources,
and component evaluation criteria.
Family Resource Center
Staff recently updated the Council on this effort (CMR: 125:96). A task force is currently
working on this issue and developing recommendations. Approximately 30 people serve on
the task force, which has conducted focus groups, phone interviews and is developing a
business plan for the proposed Resource Center. At this time, the plan is to present the
business plan to the Council for review in late March or early April 1996. Staff does not
anticipate that the plan will call for capital outlay or new infrastructure.
Staff anticipates that the plan will request City funds for staffing and one-time start-up costs
such as furniture and capital equipment. A major goal of the business plan will be to
augment City funds with a 50 percent match to be raised from local foundations and other
outside sources. Long-term funding for the Family Resource Center is envisioned as a
collaboration between the City, PAUSD, the nonprofit community, and private foundations
and corporations. It is unclear at this time where the proposed Resource Center will be
CMR:139:96 Page 4 of 6
physically located, although staff anticipates that the Center will be housed in an existing
facility such as a school or community center.
Emergency Management Plan
Staff plans to present the Council with a proposed Emergency Management Plan in May
1996. Based upon the draft.Plan, currently under review internally, there may be requests
for additional staffing to coordinate and administer the program; capital outlay (remodel of
the current Emergency Operations Center (EOC) and other areas of the Civic Center;
creation of a computer training facility at Cubberley to accommodate conversion of the EOC,
and trailers to store supplies for the community to be used in the event of a disaster); and
additional operating budget expenditures. The total cost of renovating the Emergency
Operations Center, including capital costs, is estimated at $670,000. A contingency amount
of $100,000 has been set aside to begin implementation of the Plan in 1996-97, should
Council give its approval.
Fire Services Consolidation Study
Staffrecently updated the Council (CMR:149:96) on the status of this project. It is too early
at this time to predict either the outcome of the multi-jurisdictional discussions or their fiscal
impact for Palo Alto. The Study is scheduled to be on a Policy and Services Committee
agenda in May.
Emergency Medical Service/Paramedic Plan
The Fire Department is developing a proposal to increase its current emergency medical
service capability. The plan involves increasing the number of authorized paramedics
through training, without any incremental increase in full-time staffing; and the conversion
of two fire engines to accommodate transporting patients. The plan may also involve
implementing emergency medical dispatching (EMD); which would require training in
Police Communications. (There is no recommendation to implement EMD at this time, as
considerable staff work remains to be done, including coordination with a Countywide task
force created to look at issues surrounding EMD.) A contingency amount of$150,000 has
been set aside in the 1996-97 budget, representing some of the anticipated costs of
implementation, and offset by revenues. The Fire Department hopes to present the proposal
to the Council in April or May 1996.
Utilities Organization Review
A consultant has been selected and approved by Council. Work will begin immediately. A
final report to the Utilities Advisory Committee is expected 24 to 28 weeks after project
initiation, with review by the City Council 32 weeks from project initiation.
FISCAL IMPACT"
CMR:139:96 Page 5 of 6
The fiscal impact of each of these programs has been estimated on the attached exhibit,
where sufficient information is available to make an estimate. However, continuing internal
review and final Council action may increase or decrease these estimates. In addition, some
proposals are dependent upon Council direction regarding the pursuit of alternate revenue
sources and/or long-term financing.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:
Staffwill report upon the environmental impact of each of the proposals, where appropriate,
when it is brought before the City Council.
ATTACHMENTS
Service Proposals on Alternative Timelines
DEPARTMENT HEAD APPROV g~
Emi~Harris~n - -
Deputy City Manager,
Administrative Services
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
~une )leming
~i’ty Manager
CC:N/A
CMR:139:96 Page 6 of 6