HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-03-20 City CouncilC ty
TO:
FROM:
HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL
CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT:City Manager
AGENDA DATE: March 20, 1996 CMR:181:96
SUBJECT:Presentation of Massing Model Study Prepared by Hill-Glazier
Architects to Identify the Design Alternatives for a Hotel with
Conferencing Facilities on the 6.2 Acre Site Located at the
Northwest Intersection of Page Mill Road and El Camino Real by
Hill-Glazier Architects; and Consideration of Options Available to
the City Council for Proceeding with a Land Use Change and
Zoning Entitlements to Accommodate Hotel Development
REQUEST
Staff is pleased to present to the City Council a massing model study prepared by Hill-Glazier
Architects. The study was performed to identify the variable building height and floor area
ratios necessary to accommodate the potential room count and conferencing facilities for a
proposed hotel at the Page Mill/El Camino Real intersection.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends that the City Council consider the massing model studies prepared for a
potential hotel development at the E1 Camino Real / Page Mill intersection, and to provide
comment on various aspects of the study; building mass, hotel room count, conferencing needs,
and building height. Should the City Council support the Planning Commission
recommendation to consider a Hotel / High Density Multiple family designation on the property
for purposes of preparing the draft Comprehensive Plan and Environmental Impact Report, it
is staff’s intention to return to the City Council with a recommendation regarding alternatives
to complete the analyses for hotel use. Such alternatives could include the preparation of the
necessary economic / market and environmental studies to support hotel use within the context
of the existing Comprehensive Plan update or in parallel to that effort.
CMR:181:96 Page 1 of 7
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
The intent of the massing model study was to assist the City Council in evaluating the
appropriateness of the land use change from a site planning and design perspective only.. At
present, the subject site is designated for High Density Residential in the City’s
Comprehensive Plan. If a change in the Comprehensive Plan designation from high-density
residential to hotel use is not considered for future study, or if none of the development
scenarios is considered acceptable by the City Council, staff need not proceed. If, however,
there are one or more development scenarios which may meet both the needs and design
sensitivity of the community, Chamber of Commerce, and Stanford University, the City
Council ultimately has the option of directing staff to prepare the information necessary to
consider the site for the changes necessary for future hotel development on the subject site.
This may include preparation of Comprehensive Plan and zoning changes, and supporting
environmental documentation, including an in-depth traffic study and economic/market
analysis for a change in use from high density residential to hotel.
If the Council f’mds that the massing model study has identified potentially viable hotel
alternatives, and the City Council were to authorize staff in the future to proceed with the
necessary studies to prepare the site for future hotel development, the City (with Stanford
University support and concurrence) would initiate and bear the up-from costs for those
studies. Stanford has agreed to reimburse the City upon completion of the studies and final
City Council action, should approval be granted. Should the Council request staff to report
back on the required studies, staff would also investigate legal mechanisms available to
obligate Stanford for the attendant costs. If hotel development were to be realized, there
would initially be out-of-pocket expenditures to the City, but with eventual reimbursement
in one or two years as development occurs.
Although Stanford University strongly supports the City proceeding with a hotel designation
at Page Mill and E1 Camino Real, the University does not wish to initiate such a process.
The University is currently involved in a major application process to extend Sand Hill Road
and to develop the Stanford West project. Both applications require extensive time and
community outreach, and Stanford staff is concerned that any other application process would
deter these efforts. In addition, during the City’s Comprehensive Plan Update, many
development applications and certainly any unusual ones, such as a major new hotel, fall
within a policy arena that is not yet defined. The City, acting as applicant, can coordinate
these efforts more efficiently and with broader community perspective than the University
acting as applicant.
Key to any proposal to further study hotel use at on the Page Mill/El Camino Real site is the
issue of integration with the overall Comprehensive Plan update process. If the hotel analyses
were to proceed, potential land use and related traffic scenarios within the general intersection
area must be incorporated in the hotel traffic analysis. Secondly, consideration of alternative
CMR:181:96 Page 2 of 7
housing sites for any change in land use at Page Mill / E1 Camino Real from residential to
another use would remain an integral part of the City’s overall Comprehensive Plan
objectives.
The timing and coordination of these efforts with the on-going Comprehensive Plan update
is important. The results of the massing model study can be utilized within the context of the
present Comprehensive Plan Update, or a more specific analysis that is conducted in parallel
with the update could be initiated. If a parallel study were to proceed and was eventually
approved by the City Council, it could result in a two to three year time savings in recruiting
a new hotel for the site. The hotel market slump experienced in the late 1980’s and early
1990’s has ended, and staff has received numerous requests from hoteliers to participate in
any Request for Proposal (RFP) initiated by Stanford University for a hotel on the site. (See
the enclosed March 3, 1996 San Francisco Chronicle article on hotels.)
A parallel path of analyses for hotel development could allow for more targeted studies than
that permitted within the Comprehensive Plan update process. Specific needs for hotel room
and conferencing facilities can be identified, as well as an analysis of both fiscal/economic
impacts and alternative site availability for hotel use within the City. Finally, traffic
mitigation at the Page Mill/E1 Camino Real intersection necessary for any set of development
scenarios can be identified early on in the process, which can set the stage for defining
improvement obligations for future development, if any, within all four quadrants of the
intersection. The potential benefits of an in-depth Page Mill/El Camino Real traffic analysis
early on in the planning process are great; costs of improvements to the private sector and
right-of-way dedication for traffic improvements, if shown as necessary, can be explicitly
identified and allocated proportionately among new developments as they occur.
Alternatively, proceeding with a parallel path could have fiscal ramifications. If the City does
not ultimately approve a hotel use on the subject site or if hotel development is not feasible,
the costs associated with the supporting studies would not necessarily be subject to
reimbursement. Alternatively, app.roval for hotel use, if ultimately deemed appropriate and
environmentally sound, could generate revenues (estimated to be $958,000 per year) that
would more than offset the costs of hotel site readiness. (See CMR:269:94 of May 4, 1994
on hotel revenues anticipated for a 350-room facility.)
DISCUSSION
Massing Model Study
Hill-Glazier Architects have extensive experience in designing international resorts and
hotels, restaurants, conference centers, specialty stores, and commercial and office buildings.
CMR:181:96 Page 3 of 7
In addition to numerous and prestigious national and international awards, the firm has
received wide acclaim for its sensitivity to historic traditions, the natural environment, and
aesthetic concerns in each project’s community.
The architects have generated four different scenarios, ranging in number of rooms from 300
to 400 and in conferencing space from 15,000 square feet to 20,000 square feet. The
scenarios assume different parking, height, and Floor Area Ratio (FAR) requirements.
Included below are basic site characteristics, a summary of each scenario, and brief comments.
Based on Hill-Glazier’s experience and the technical knowledge of the architects, staff
considers scenarios B and C to be most suitable for the particular site.
All scenarios are based on the following:
Lot size: 5.88 acres (256,369 square feet)
Parking ratio: 1:1.25
Size of right turn declaration lane: 12’ x 100’
Parking setbacks for El Camino Real: 15’
Parking setbacks for Page Mill: 50’
Building setbacks for E1 Camino: 90’
Building setbacks for Page Mill: 140’
Scenario A
Height
FAR
Total hotel square
footage
Landscaped area
Scenario B
85’
1.08
Scenario C
100’
1.1
Floors
Rooms
Conference Area
Largest Conference
Room
221,275
34%
4
300
15,000
8,140
257,200
32%
7
350
18,300
9,900
270,0O0
31%
Two portions of
building: 4 and 9
stories each
350
20,000
10,100
Scenario D
100’
1.25
311,000
36%
9
400
20,000
12,100
CMR:181:96 Page 4 of 7
Comments
Scenario A: the hotel will be a short, block-like building much smaller than surrounding
structures. Its smaller size results in the ground floor’s ceiling height being limited to 10 - 12’
(i.e., a floor to floor height of 14’), where preferred ceiling heights are 12 - 14’. This poses
problems for the guest rooms and the conference facility in terms of installing and maintaining
the structure’s mechanical systems relating to ducting, lighting, and plumbing.
Scenario B: The hotel, with a building height of 85’, manages to retain a relatively small
appearance vis-a-vis surrounding structures while overcoming some of the shortcomings of
scenario A. The number of rooms and conferencing facility size is increased, and the floor to
floor height of 16’ creates adequate space to install and maintain mechanical systems.
Scenario C: This proposal includes a 100’ high-rise, with a four story and a nine story portion,
thereby blending with the surrounding architecture (Wilson Sonsini as well as Palo Alto
Square). The ARB and the City Council are provided with two options regarding the
configuration of the buildings and the orientation towards E1 Camino Real and Page Mill Road.
As expressed by the Palo Alto Chamber of Commerce’s Hotel Subcommittee, with respect to
the number of rooms and the conferencing space, scenario C is best suited to meet the spatial
needs of the community.
Scenario D: With a height of 100’, the building in scenario D will be a high rise of the same
height, but with greater building bulk than scenario C. The 400 rooms require a significant
number of parking spaces and will include 20,700 square feet of above grade parking.
Traffic Issues
The Page Mill/E1 Camino Real intersection currently operates at a level of service (LOS) D.
Increased traffic at that intersection, particularly peak hour traffic, is undesirable. Intersection
flow has actually improved, however, from the 1985 LOS of E-. While new or additional
development within the overall area could worsen conditions at that intersection, there are
offsetting traffic issues that are occurring. Due to the unique traffic characteristics of hotel use,
the change from high-density residential to hotel / conferencing at the Page Mill intersection is
not expected to have major impacts on the level of service of the Page Mill / E1 Camino Real
intersection. Actual traffic counts conducted by hotel managers are significantly lower than
projected counts noted by traffic engineers.
The Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual suggests 8.7 trips / room / day,
which is then modified based on the specific aspects of each hotel. Such trip generation is based
CMR:181:96 Page 5 of 7
on additive uses, and generally reflects the greatest traffic impact associated with hotels. Such
projections are based on all types of hotels, including "roadside hotels," that may not have guest
oriented, on-site conferencing facilities, shuttle services,-or public transportation. For example,
traffic counts given to staff from the management of two Peninsula hotels that are similar to
the conceptual proposals for this site range from 2.5 - 3.0 trips / room / day, including the use
of on-site conferencing and restaurant facilities.
It should be noted that hotels typically do not generate a significant amount of traffic during
peak commute hours. A majority of the guests return before 5:00 PM and hotel employees
generally work in three off-peak shifts. In addition, there are a number of visitors to the
University and the Research Park that require hotel accommodations. Due to a shortage of
hotel room availability, many stay outside Palo Alto, traveling through the city on a daily basis.
A hotel located in close proximity to the Research Park and the University may help to decrease
the number of trips made from outside the city.
The kinds of"high-end" housing units being developed in Palo Alto may tend to generate more
trips per household than suggested even by the ITE manual, in that each unit is generally
associated with multiple vehicles and may result in higher trip generation than ITE estimates
indicate. Traffic issues related to these and alternative uses must be carefully studied to
determine specific impacts, mitigation measures, and the trade-offs associated with future
development within the intersection area. An important assumption in any future studies should
be the understanding that significant intersection improvements, such as an urban interchange
or undergrounding of either Page Mill or E1 Camino Real, are not reasonable environmental or
economic alternatives.
STEPS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
Subsequent to Council review of the massing model study by Hill-Glazier Architects and
selection of appropriate scenarios, if any, the next step is to identify the comprehensive
planning, zoning, and development review processes necessary to proceed. These include
consideration of a land use change from high density residential to hotel, and a review of the
potential traffic, environmental, and economic impacts of the land use change. Ultimately,
the land use change and application of development review processes for the site would entail
extensive public hearings. It is anticipated that the costs incurred by the City, should a hotel
development ultimately proceed on the property, would be reimbursable.
CMR:181:96 Page 6 of 7
FISCAL IMPACT
The massing model study was completed within the budgeted amount of $10,000 for
consultant services.
ATTACHMENTS
A. Analysis prepared by Hill-Glazier Architects
B. March 3, 1996 San Francisco Chronicle article on hotel markets
C. List of Palo Alto Chamber of Commerce Hotel Subcommittee Members
PREPARED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
Carol Jansen, Manager, Economic Resources Planning
Bernard M. Strojny, Assistant City Manager
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
Assistant CitsrManager
cc:Chamber of Commerce Hotel Subcommittee
Peninsula / West Valley Association of Realtors
CPAC Co-Chairs
Margaret Donohoe, American Red Cross
Sanford Blovad, A.L. Schultz Jewish Community Center
Patricia Gardner, Peninsula Children’s Center
James R. Brown, Palo Alto Unified School District
Dan Theobald, Sandroz Agro, Inc.
Elsie Begle, 1319 Bryant Street
Herb Borock, 2731 Byron Street
Lorilee Houston, 520 Cowper Street
Lane Liroff, 4221 Wilkie Way
Jerry Matters, 4261 E1 Camino Real
Bob Moss, 4010 Orme
Bill-Peterson, 228 Fulton Street
CMR:181:96 Page 7 of 7
ATTACHMENT A
PAGE MILL ROAD HOTEL
DRAFT ANALYSIS APRIL 26, 1995
Prepared by Hill-Glazier Architects, Inc.
700 Welch Road, Suite 300
Palo A!to, California 94304 (415) 617.43366
PAGE MILL ROAD HOTEL
SCENARIO SUMMARY APRIL 26, 1995
Scenario A Scenario B Scenario C"Scenario D
Site Area (5.88 acres)"256,369 sf 256,369 sf 256,369 sf 256,369 sf
Total RoomsfModules 300 / 318 350 / 372 350 / 372 400 / 424
Total Footprint 66,600 sf 70,760 sf 85,575 sf 97,435 sf
(Second lev~l Public or BOIl’) (Below grade)(0) (0)(7,300) (0)(11,200) (0)(11,200) (20,700)
Landscape Area 88,289 (34%)81,827 (32%)80,987 (31%)93,309 (36%)
Total Hotel Area 221,275 sf 257,200 sf 270,000 sf 311,000 sf
Tower Footprint(s)/Bays per fir.37,980 / 79.5 26,770 / 53 varies 23,759 / 47
Guestroom Floors 4 7 9 and 4"9
Net Meeting Space/Ballroom 15,000 / 8,140 18,300 / 9,900 20,000 / 10,100 20,000 / 12,100
Parking Spaces/Ratio 375 / 1:1.25 438 / 1:1.25 438 / 1:1.25 500 / 1:1.25
(w/ structured parking)
Floor Area Ratio (F.A.tL)"".96 1.08 1.10 1.25
El Camino Setbacks
Parking 15’15’15’15’
Building 90’90’90’90’
Page Mill Road Setbacks
Parking 50’50’50’50’
Building 140’140’140’140’
Ground Floor Ceiling Height 10’-12’12-14’12-14’12-14’
(Floor Iv floor heighl)(14’)(16’)(16")(16’)
Guestroom Fir. Hgt / Total Bldg.’’"4 @ 9’/50’7@9’/79’9 @9’/97’9 @ 9’/97’
Maximum Building Height .....50’ (non high-rise)85’ (non high-rise)100’ (high-rise)100’ 0dgh-rise)
An alternate configuration of Scenario C could be the opposite location of the 4 and 9 sto~" portions
of the tower with the 9 sto~" tower perpendicular to El Camino ReaL
This area represents the site area after the 12’x100’ right turn decelaration lane has been
constructed.
F.A.IL is based on the net hotel square footage with an allowance for miscellaneous dei’med as
’gross floor area’ in the planning code.
1991 UBC states that a building which has a habitable floor at or above 75’ above the lowest
level of fire department vehicle access shall require smokeproof enclosures for all required exits.
Maximun Building Height shall be measured from grade to top of roof or parapet framing of
heighest floor level and does not include mechanical penthouses, elevator or stair over runs,
mechanical equipment or asssociated screening or any other appurtenances.
Prepared by Hill-Glazier Arckitecls, Inc.700 Welch Road, Suite 300 Palo Aho, California 94304 (415) 617-0366
L~ROAD
F ~mG E~ M IL L~,~R 0 A D
r ~ ~=,,,~, M I L L~R 0 A D
SCENARIO C
SCENARIO D
Sunday, March 3, 1996
ATTACHMENT B
Bay Area market is back to high-flying ’80s levels, with some
properties selling for twice what they were worth a few years ago
EXAMINER STAFF WRITER
T gan about two years ago
and is expected to continue until
the turn of the century, according
to a new report published by the
San Francisco office of Colliers In-
ternational Hotel Realty.
The new survey noted that the
region’s properties are the most
expensive in the West. The selling
price per hotel room is estimated
he West Coast hotel industry has risen hke a phoenix from the ash-
es of a moribund real estate market, with property values reaching
-- and in some instances surpassing -- those of the late 1980s.
And Bay Area hotels appear to be leading the charge, which be-
to have climbed I1 percent in 1995 compared
with a 4 percent rise the previous year. Col-
liers’ report also forecasted a 12 percent
jump in room values this year.
Overall, Northern California hotel values
are approaching 1987’s peak price of
$126,000 per room on average.
The market% remarkable rebound from
its low point in 1992 is due both to an up-
swing in the economy, which has fueled more
leisure and business travel, and to the fact
that no new hotels have been built for sever-
al years.
"Most (travelers) are going places, paying
higher room rates. (Last year) was the best
year in history for hotel industry across the
country," said Richard Alter, managing di-
rector of Los Angeles-based Financia! Capi-
tal Investment Co.
Bob Eaton, a Collie~ vice presider aid: "N~w the economics have been
bolstered enough and there’s been. .~ew supply for the last five years.
We’ve come back to an equilibrium we had nine years ago."
Bay Area hoteliers have been rejoicing about the rebounding values.
~We’re pleased with the trend and hope it continues," said Tom LaTour,
president of the Kimpton Group, the San Francisco-based boutique hotel
firm that.purchased the old Bellevue Hotel
on Geary Street in 1994 for $5 million and
reopened it last June as the Hotel Monaco.
The recession, overbuilding during the
’80s and the Loma Prieta earthquake in
1989 together dealt a serious blow to the
Bay Area hotel industry, driving down oc-
cupancy rates and room rates, which made
it nearly impossible for owners to pay down
development costs, the Colliers re-
port stated.
As a result, hotel values hit rock
bottom in 1992 -- just three years
. after their peak -- plummeting by
nearly 30 percent on average in
nost West Coast metropolitan at-
The dismal property values cut
off future investment and forced
many owners to foreclose or take
huge losses, selling their hotels at
half the development costs.
For example, industry observers
said that in 1993, when hotel values
were still lagging, the Days Inn at
the San Francisco International
Airport sold to a private partner-
ship for about $6 million, or
$30,000 per room. Last year, the
hotel sold again to Columbus,
Ohio-based Red Roof Inn for about
$9.5 milh’on, or $47,500 per room.
Red Roof would not comment
on the sale price but said each
room would be valued at about
$50,000 after renovations.
The Bay Area’s resuscitation
began in 1994, when a number of
properties started changing hands,
industry expert~ said. Over the
past two years, at least 20 Bay Area
properties have found new owners
and more transactions are cegudn
to follow.
EX/~AIN EP, q~ARK COSTt~NTINI
Lisa Impagllazzo is general manager of the
Marriott Fisherman’s Wharf, which was pur-
chased by Marriott International for $25
million, $97,000 per room, in 1994.
Hotels are busier these days,
too, with a stronger economy al-
lowing tourists and businesspeople
to travel again. As a result, Bay
Area hotel occupancy levels rose to
73 percent in 1995, a 3 percent
increase over the previous year, ac-
cording to statistics generated by
PKF Consulting, a hotel market
research firm.
These occupancy increases, in
turn, have allowed hoteliers to raise
nightly room rates, from $88 on
average in 1994 to $92 last year.
But investors also know the ho-
tel gravy train won’t last forever.
"If you were a perfect genius,
you would have started buying two
years agoP to get thebest hotel
deals, said Alter of Financial Capi-
tal Investment Co., which helped
Chinese investors purchase the
Pleasanton Hilton at the Club last
month. Although Alter wouldn’t
comment on the sale price, sources
put the price tag for the 296-room
property at $22 million.
"The window of opportunity is
going to last another 12 months,"
Alter said. "Cal£fornia and Hawaii
are at the bottom of the cycle on
valuations. Most opportune invest-
ments in other states have been
done. It’s last in, last out," regard.
ing the effects of the recession.
"It’s not like the stock market
where value fluctuations change
overnight," said Louis Stervinou,
associate director of Colliers, who
noted that hotel real estate cycles
last at least six months.
Suzarme Mellen, managing di-
rector of the San Francisco office
of hotel consultants HVS Interna-
tional, had this analysis: "There’s a
lot of money chasing hotels now.
Companies realize they have to
control the assets, not just manage
them. ~so, a lot of international
investors are looking (for hotel
properties) as well as pension
funds and hotel REITS (invest-
ment trusts). Securitized debt is
returning to the market."
Despite rising hotel values, Pa-
cific Rim investors most likely will
become prominent players here
again.
"Relatively speaking, every-
thing in San Francisco is still ex-
pensive, but relatively inexpensive
to Asia," said Financial Capital’s
Alter.
Some savvy Bay Area investors
knew it would only be a matter of
time before the hotel industry
bounced back. ¯
Chip Conley, president of San
Francisco-based Joie De Vivre Ho-
tels, which owns and manages 11
boutique hotels in The City, put.
chased the 94-room Orchard Hotel
on Sutter Street for $6.29 million
in September. Conley is currently
negotiating for a Union Square
boutique property.
Colliers’ Eaton said many hotels
that have minimized their ex-
penses for the past several years
stand to make greater profits be-
cause they can charge higher room
rates.
"Now you’ve got increased reve-
nue and a leaner machine," he said.
"Hotels will be excellent invest-
ment vehicles in the near term."
And while rising hotel values are
making investors happy, them may
also be benefits for guests, like bet-
ter customer service.
Conley said he was able to hire a
senior concierge last year to train
his concierge staff.
In the past, "hotels looked to
save money," he said. "Now we can
preserve and enhance our staffing."
EXAMINER/PAUL CHINN
~,ol~ey purchased the Orchard Hotel on Sutter Street and is currently renovaling tltc property to be called the Hotel Rex.
Average construction costs per hotel room in the Bay Area since 1987,
S.F. S.F. 8.F.
.S.F.Fisherman’s 8.F.Union Van S.F.San Santa
Year Financial Wharf Nob Hill Square Ness SFO Jose Clara
1987 $184,000 $131,000 $179,000 $184,000.$ 94,000 $ 89,000 $ 53,000 $ 95,000
1988 154,000 129,000 160,000 173,000 98,000 82,000 55,000 121,000
1989 112,000 126,000 150,000 179,000 94,000 73,000 70,000 128,000
1990 ~122,000 99,000 148,000 147,000 67,000 66,000 70,000 94,000
1991 131,000 84,000 146,000 121,000 58,000 43,000 55,000 62,000
1992 142,000 80,000 144,000 126,000 47,000 50,000 53,000 53,000
1993 147,000 93,000 163,000 142,000 55,000 62,000 65,000 66,000
1994 156,000 97,000 169,000 147,000 57,000 66,000 66,000 67,000
1995’171,000 112,000 188,000 159,000 61,000 72,000 . 76,000 77,000
1996"193,000 123,000 207,000 183,000 66,000 81,000 88,000 89,000
¯
S~CE: Cog~rs ~temalio;’.al Hotel Ready EXAM~ G~
EXAMINEP, il~ COSTANTINI
Ti~ Red Roof Inn, now managed by Michelle Tor-
nay and Gary Sr~w, was purchased for about
$9.5 million last year from a private par~ner.
ship that had paid $6 million for it 1993.
Bay Area hotels (with number of rooms) that were sold in the last two years.
The names of some have changed since the transactions.
Los Gatos Pal~ AJto Orchard Hotel 94
Los Gatos Lodge 108 Imperial Motel 62 Powell Hotel 123
Savoy Hotel 83MillbraePieasantonLombard Hotel 101Marriott at SFO 685 Doubletree Club 170 York Hotel 96
Milpitas Pleasanton Hilton 296 Surf Motel 35
Best Western 73 Richmond San RafaelBroOksidelnnThe Days Hotel 152 Holiday Inn Matin 230Mountain View -San Francisco Sunnyvale
Residence Inn 112by Marriott Queen Anne Hotel 48 Radisson Hotel 136Holiday Inn 389NewarkCivic Center Walnut Creek
Newark Fremont 313 Sir Francis Drake 417 Marriott 337HiltonHotelWalnut Creek
~,I:{CE: CoPiers ~temahonal Hotel Realty
Hotel Sub-committee
March 1996 17 me~nbers
CC: Hotel Subcommmittee
Chop Keenan
Keenan Land Co.
700 Emerson Street
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Ph: 326-2244 Fax: 326-2920
ATTACHMENT C
Will Beckett
4189 Baker Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94306
Ph: 494-6922
Fax:
J’wn Kirk
Innkeeper Associates
II0 Sutter Street, Ste. 1001
San Francisco, CA 94104
ph: 986-1166 fax:
Trina Camacho-London
Hyatt Rickeys in Palo Alto
4219 E1 Camino Real
Palo Alto, CA 94306
843-2505 858-1151
Nancy Peterson
Roche Bioscience, Public Affairs
P.O. Box 10850
Palo Alto, CA 94303
ph: 855-5567 fax: 855-5526
Clement Chen
Clement Chen & Associates
831 Montgomery Street
San Francisco, CA 94133
Ph: 392-8260 Fax: 392-0558
Steve Player
Law Offices of Stephen W. Player
2600 E1 Camino Real, Ste. 410
Palo Alto, CA 94306
Ph:494-9102 Fax: 856-8448
Curtis Feeny
Stanford Management Company
2770 Sand Hill Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Ph: 926-0220 Fax: 854-9268
David Ross
Architectural Review Board
2712 Cowper Street
Palo Alto, CA 94306
Ph: 322-0363 Fax: 322-2336
Susan Frank
Palo Alto Chamber of Commerce
325 Forest Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Ph: 324-3121 Fax: 324-1215
Ken Schreiber
City, of Palo Alto, Planning Dept.
P.O. Box 10250
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Ph: 329-2354 Fax: 329-2240
Emily Harrison
City of Palo Alto
P.O. Box 10250
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Ph:Fax:
Rick Stern
Stem Mortgage Company
480 Lytton Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94301
ph: 322-7277 fax: 322-2074
John C. Hill, AIA
Hill/Glazier Architects
700 Welch Road, Suite 330
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Ph: 617-0366 Fax: 617-0373
Rick Tipton
Tipton Mgmt./American Hotels
P.O. Box 1281
Pato Alto, CA 94302
Ph: 321-4106 Fax: 321-0165
Carol Jansen
City of Palo Alto
P.O. Box 10250
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Ph:329-2604 Fax: 328-3631
Jeff Vaillant
E.P.R.I.
3412 Hillview Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Ph: 855-1040 Fax: 855-2774