HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-11-15 Finance Committee Agenda Packet Finance Committee
1
MATERIALS RELATED TO AN ITEM ON THIS AGENDA SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AFTER DISTRIBUTION OF THE AGENDA
PACKET ARE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION IN THE CITY CLERK’S OFFICE AT PALO ALTO CITY HALL, 250 HAMILTON AVE.
DURING NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS.
November 15, 2016
Special Meeting
Community Meeting Room
6:00 PM
Agenda posted according to PAMC Section 2.04.070. Supporting materials are available in
the Council Chambers on the Thursday 10 days preceding the meeting.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Members of the public may speak to agendized items. If you wish to address the Committee on any issue that is on this agenda, please complete a speaker request card located on the table at the entrance to the Council Chambers/Council Conference Room, and deliver it to the Clerk prior to discussion of the item. You are not required
to give your name on the speaker card in order to speak to the Committee, but it is very helpful.
Call to Order
Oral Communications
Members of the public may speak to any item NOT on the agenda.
Action Items
1. Macias Gini & O'Connell's Audit of the City of Palo Alto's Financial
Statements as of June 30, 2016 and Management Letter
2. Recommendation to Approve the FY 2016 Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report (CAFR) and Approve Budget Amendments in Various
Funds
3. Development Services Cost of Services Study Including Fiscal Year
2017 Fee Proposals
Future Meetings and Agendas
Adjournment
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITY ACT (ADA)
Persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids or services in using City facilities, services or programs or who would like information on the City’s compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, may contact (650) 329-2550 (Voice) 24 hours in advance.
2 November 15, 2016
MATERIALS RELATED TO AN ITEM ON THIS AGENDA SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AFTER DISTRIBUTION OF THE AGENDA
PACKET ARE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION IN THE CITY CLERK’S OFFICE AT PALO ALTO CITY HALL, 250 HAMILTON AVE.
DURING NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS.
Finance Committee Items Tentatively Scheduled
Meeting
Date
Line No. Item Title Referral Date
12/6/2016 1 FY18 General Fund Budget - Preliminary Budget Balancing Outline (ASD)
2 Review of Fees for Private Use of Public Streets and Sidewalks (Right of Way)
(Public Works)
3 Palo Alto CLEAN Update (Utilities)
City of Palo Alto (ID # 7383)
Finance Committee Staff Report
Report Type: Action Items Meeting Date: 11/15/2016
City of Palo Alto Page 1
Summary Title: Approve FY 2016 CAFR and Approve FY 2016 Budget
Amendments in Various Funds
Title: Recommendation to Approve the FY 2016 Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report (CAFR) and Approve Budget Amendments in Various Funds
From: City Manager
Lead Department: Administrative Services
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Finance Committee forward to the City Council with a
recommendation :
1. That the City Council amend the Fiscal Year 2016 Budget Appropriation Ordinance for
various funds as identified in Attachment B – Exhibit 1 and various capital projects as
identified in Attachment B – Exhibit 2; and
2. Approve the City’s FY 2016 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) (Attachment
C).
Financial Highlights for FY 2016
General Fund ended FY 2016 with a surplus of $7.7 million when compared to the
assumptions used in the development of the FY 2017 Adopted Operating Budget. However,
once adjusted for City Council approved uses and current pending staff recommended uses
of the Budget Stabilization Reserve (BSR), the remaining surplus balance is $429,000 when
compared to the level assumed in the FY 2017 Adopted Budget. The surplus was largely a
result of higher than estimated expense savings, as well as slight revenue increases in sales
and use taxes (approximately $1 million) when compared to the estimated activity levels
assumed in the development of the FY 2017 Adopted Budget. This surplus is recommended
to be utilized for the following purposes:
o Amendments to the FY 2017 budget appropriation ordinance as approved by or
scheduled for Council consideration ($1.3 million);
o Recommended FY 2016 Reappropriations to continue FY 2016 activities that were
not completed in time for the fiscal year end close ($1.3 million) as reviewed by the
City of Palo Alto Page 2
Finance Committee on October 18, 2016;
o Recommended transfer to the Infrastructure Reserve ($5.0 million) for
FY 2017 recommended project deferrals and the corresponding deferral of
General Fund transfer to the General Capital Fund ($4.3 million)
Recommended transfer of investment returns from the sale of former City
Manager property ($651,000); and
o Recommended reserve of revenues as a result of the fees received from the
Edgewood Plaza development ($365,000).
After adjusting for both the funds retained in the BSR for specific purposes ($2.1 million for
potential use in a pension trust fund) and deducting amounts summarized above, the
ending BSR balance of $41.6 million is 21.4 percent of FY 2017 General Fund budgeted
expenditures and operating transfers ($429,000 over the FY 2017 Adopted Budget BSR
balance of $41.1 million).
Enterprise Funds, except for the Electric Fund, ended the year in surplus positions, with the
ongoing drought continuing to negatively impact results, most notably affecting the Water
and Electric Funds.
The City received a “clean” audit opinion for FY 2016 from the external audit firm, Macias
Gini & O’Connell LLP. Once again, the City was awarded the prestigious GFOA award for
Excellence in Financial Reporting for FY 2015 – the 22nd consecutive year.
Background
The City’s fiscal year ends on June 30, at which time its financial records are closed for the year
and financial reports are prepared. The reports, along with the City’s financial data, are audited
by Macias Gini & O’Connell LLP (MGO), Certified Public Accountants, a firm hired by the City
Auditor. MGO issues an audit opinion on the financial position of the City’s activities and,
together with the City’s financial statements and other information, this comprises the City’s
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.
The attachments to this Staff Report provide the necessary documents for closing the FY 2016
Budget. In addition, they provide detailed information on the City’s financial activities for FY
2016 and highlight key fiscal issues affecting the City of Palo Alto. The Management’s
Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) section of the CAFR (Attachment C) also provides a discussion
and analysis of the City’s current fiscal health, and includes financial statements and analysis
that is compared to the prior year, along with capital asset and debt administration data.
Discussion
Economic Environment:
Solid tax revenues and a strong local economy show a rebounding from the Great Recession. A
continuously improving economic climate is noted by the majority of national, state, regional,
and local economic indicators. Therefore, the City’s most recent forecast and actual collections
City of Palo Alto Page 3
reflect the continued gradual growth in economically sensitive revenues such as Property Tax
and Transient Occupancy Tax collections. While these results are welcome, rising benefit and
other operating costs diminish this more positive outlook over the next ten or so years.
The City has been proactively taking steps the past few years to align expenses with revenues
through employee compensation savings, service and program cuts, and revenue
enhancements. Since the Great Recession, the City Council has approved various strategies to
reduce the costs of salaries and benefits. These strategies include: (1) employees paying their
own CalPERS contribution except for members of the Fire Chiefs’ Association (currently in
negotiations); (2) sharing the cost of health plan costs by shifting to a flat rate contribution
instead of a 90/10 split for the majority of the employee groups; (3) creating a second pension
tier (and the state implemented a third tier effective January 1, 2013); (4) reducing professional
development expenses; (5) cost of living freezes for four years; and (6) terminating the Variable
Management Compensation Plan. The City Council adopted a FY 2017 General Fund budget of
$194.2 million (including operating transfers), an increase of 4.9 percent from the prior year
Adopted Budget. The primary drivers of increased expenditures for FY 2017 are salaries and
benefits including pension and health care costs, continued investment in the City’s
infrastructure, and targeted position additions in response to community demands and Council
priorities. The City is continuing to mitigate the upward trend in pension and health care costs
by seeking to increase employee contributions to the PERS retirement plan (Safety and
Miscellaneous Plan employees will pay an additional 1 percent) and capping the City’s share of
health care premiums through a number of the recently approved labor agreements.
In spite of these measures, the City still faces a significant long-term liability for pension and
retiree medical costs. The combined unfunded liability according to the most recent actuarial
valuations is $495 million. Funded ratios for the Safety and Miscellaneous plans based on June
2015 actuarial valuations are 68.6 percent and 68.5 percent respectively, and 33.5 percent for
the retiree medical plan. The City continues to fully fund its annual required contribution for
these liabilities. An irrevocable trust fund for retiree medical benefits was authorized by the
City Council in May 2007 with initial funding of $32.8 million in March 2008. Subsequent
contributions and investment earnings have increased the trust balance to $85.4 million as of
September 30, 2016. The irrevocable trust fund balance reduces the City’s unfunded liability
for retiree medical.
In June 2014 Council approved a $125.8 million Infrastructure Plan, which includes projects
such as a new Public Safety Building, replacement of two Fire Stations, a Bike and Pedestrian
plan, and two parking garages. Funding for these projects will come from a variety of sources,
including TOT revenues, Stanford University Medical Center development agreement, and
developer impact fees. This plan was included in the 2017-2021 Adopted Capital Improvement
Program and is fully funded, however the plan as adopted did not allow for increases
attributable to scope increases, cost escalation, etc. As part of the FY 2017-2021 Adopted
Capital Improvement Plan, a reserve of $30 million was included as well as nominal changes in
eminent project costs resulting in a revised plan upwards of $160 million over the five-year
City of Palo Alto Page 4
period.
As part of the FY 2017 Budget Process, the deferral of three capital improvement projects was
recommended and approved by the City Council, resulting in a one-time reduction in the
transfer from the General Fund to the general Capital Improvement Fund in the amount of $4.3
million. After reviewing the status of current projects and the upcoming pipeline in the context
of resource capacity, three projects including the Municipal Services Center A, B, & C Roof
Replacement (PF-17000), Ramos Park Improvements (PG-14000); and Rinconada Park
Improvements (PE-08001) were deferred for one year, from FY 2017 to FY 2018. However, in
anticipation of the FY 2018 General Fund balancing needs, a transfer of $4.3 million from the FY
2016 surplus in the General Fund Budget Stabilization Reserve to the general Capital
Improvement Fund is recommended to ensure these three project deferrals are fully funded
over the course of the five-year capital improvement plan.
A detailed discussion of financial results for FY 2016 is included in the CAFR MD&A. In addition,
staff will return to the Finance Committee with further discussions on the financial outlook of
FY 2018 and potential strategies to employ during the FY 2018 budget development to address
the anticipated gap between revenue and expenses.
Results by Fund:
General Fund Reserves
At the end of the current fiscal year, fund balance of the General Fund was $51.6 million, an
increase of $3.4 million from the prior year. The $51.6 million fund balance is comprised of
several reserves: the Budget Stabilization Reserve (BSR), encumbrances, notes and loans,
inventory, prepaid items, unrealized gain on investments, and reappropriations. As described
in the BSR reserve policy approved by Council, any reserve balance in excess of 18.5 percent of
expenditures and transfers may be transferred to the Infrastructure Reserve (IR) in the Capital
Projects Fund at the discretion of the City Manager. A summary of the General Fund is outlined
in Attachment A reflecting budget versus actuals for FY 2016.
Over the past five fiscal years, a total of $32.6 million in surplus funds has been transferred to
the IR, as shown in the following table. In addition, $4.3 million of FY 2016 surplus has been
committed for transfer to the IR in FY 2017.
2012 $ 7,600
2013 8,900
2014 4,000
2015 5,087
2016 (FY2015 surplus) 7,000
32,587
2017 (FY2016 surplus) 4,327
City of Palo Alto Page 5
Total transfers $ 36,914
As part of the development of the FY 2017 Adopted Budget, within the BSR staff assumed a
level of excess revenues and additional expenses savings as well as the reserve of funds for
potentially establishing a pension trust fund ($2.1 million). Once adjusting for these, the BSR
balance was $48.9 million compared to the FY 2017 Adopted Budget targeted level of $41.1
million, a $7.7 million surplus. The chart below outlines the previously approved uses of this
surplus, as well as recommended uses. Once all these adjustments are taken into
consideration, the remaining BSR would be at $41.6 million, approximately 21.4 percent of the
FY 2017 Adopted Expenses of $194.2 million. This level is approximately $5.7 million above the
target level of 18.5% or $38.8 million. However, this projected BSR level of $41.6 million is only
$429,000 above levels assumed in the FY 2017 Adopted Budget which were assumed at this
higher level in order to proactively prepare for the anticipated needs of balancing the FY 2018
budget.
2016 Year-End Budget Stabilization Reserve (BSR) Summary
(000’s)
General Fund BSR Balance $51,582
Reserve: Potentially establish a pension trust fund (FY 2015
year end close $1.3 million; FY 2017 Adopted Budget $750,000)
(2,055)
BSR Balance, June 30 2016 $49,527
Uses of the FY 2016 Surplus
FY 2017 Approved and/or Recommended use of BSR
FY 2017 City Manager Reports Budget Amendment -
Approved (CMR’s #7065 & #7030)
(567)
FY 2017 City Manager Reports Budget Amendments -
Scheduled (as of October 11, 2016)
(735)
FY 2016 Recommended Reappropriations (approved by Finance
Committee October 18, 2016)
(1,309)
Recommended use of Surplus Funds*
Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund: FY 2017 Deferred CIP
projects
(4,327)
Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund: Investment Return
former City Manager Real Estate Sale
(651)
Reserve: Edgewood Plaza development fees (365)
Current Projected FY 2017 BSR Level (June 30, 2017) $41,573
* If approved, these transfers would be completed as part of the FY 2017 Mid-Year Budget Report.
General Fund Revenues
General Fund revenues for FY 2016 were $164.4 million, which is $6.8 million or 4.3 percent
higher than the prior year. Year over year changes in each of the major tax revenue categories
are summarized in the following table.
City of Palo Alto Page 6
Category FY 2016 FY 2015 % Change
Increase (Decrease)
Property tax $ 36,607 $ 34,117 7.3%
Sales tax 30,018 29,675 1.1%
Utility user tax 12,469 10,861 14.8%
Transient occupancy tax 22,366 16,699 33.9%
Documentary transfer tax 6,266 10,384 (39.6%)
Property tax revenue increased due to higher assessed values as a result of continued robust
commercial and residential real estate markets. Each of the fiscal years 2016 and 2015
included one-time receipts of $0.9 million for excess Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund
(ERAF) distributions from the County of Santa Clara.
Sales tax revenue in total is relatively flat year over year. However, in FY 2015 there was a
planned accounting adjustment to align the sales tax accrual with the fiscal year which resulted
in a one-time $2.6 million revenue increase. FY 2015 sales tax revenue without this adjustment
would have been $27.1 million. The City expected to receive $0.2 million in past due sales tax
as a result of a sales tax audit conducted by the City Auditor’s Office, however this amount did
arrive in time to be included in FY 2016. We expect to receive and report it in FY 2017.
Utility user tax (UUT) revenue increased 14.8 percent from the prior year, almost $2.0 million
higher than mid-year projections. The increase is driven by telephone user services due in part
to new UUT revenue on prepaid wireless cards and phone plans.
Transient occupancy tax (TOT) revenue experienced double digit growth over the prior year as
a result of the 2 percent rate increase from 12 percent to 14 percent that became effective
January 1, 2015, and the opening of several new hotels. The entire 14 percent TOT rate from
new hotels, plus the 2 percent increase from existing hotels, has been allocated to the
Infrastructure Plan pursuant to prior City Council direction. Following is a comparative
breakdown of the allocation of transient occupancy tax receipts:
FY 2016 FY 2015
General Fund: $ 15,187 $ 13,441
Infrastructure Plan: (12 months of receipts) (6 months of receipts)
New hotels – 12% 3,982 1,849
All hotels – 2% 3,197 1,409
7,179 3,258
Total TOT Receipts $ 22,366 $ 16,699
Documentary Transfer Tax (DTT) revenues decreased $4.1 million, or 39.6 percent, from prior
City of Palo Alto Page 7
year. FY 2015 revenue was extraordinarily high due to two commercial transactions which
generated DTT receipts of $3.6 million and $1.4 million, respectively.
Other revenues with significant year-over-year changes were as follows:
Charges for services decreased $1.8 million from the prior year due primarily to reduced
revenue for Stanford University fire services, and
Other revenue increased $1.7 million due to net sale proceeds from the former City
Manager’s house at 2257 Bryant Street.
Following is a chart which depicts the relative contribution of each tax category over the past
seven years (2010 through 2016), as well as the current budgeted year (2017).
General Fund Tax Revenues
Actual Fiscal Years 2010 – 2016
Budget Fiscal Year 2017
FY 2017 Budget
FY 2016 Actual
FY 2015 Actual
FY 2014 Actual
FY 2013 Actual
FY 2012 Actual
FY 2011 Actual
FY 2010 Actual
FY 2017
Budget
FY 2016
Actual
FY 2015
Actual
FY 2014
Actual
FY 2013
Actual
FY 2012
Actual
FY 2011
Actual
FY 2010
Actual
Property Tax 37,853 36,607 34,117 30,587 28,742 26,494 25,688 25,981
Sales Tax 28,668 29,613 29,675 29,424 25,606 22,132 20,746 17,991
Utility User Tax 11,209 12,469 10,861 11,008 10,861 10,834 10,851 11,295
Trans Occ Tax 23,134 22,366 16,699 12,255 10,794 9,664 8,082 6,858
Doc Transfer Tax 7,532 6,266 10,051 7,811 6,810 4,821 5,167 3,707
City of Palo Alto Page 8
General Fund Expenditures
General Fund expenditures for FY 2016, including encumbrances, totaled $163.0 million, an
increase of $8.1 million from the prior year. The Original Budget of $163.0 million was
increased to the Final Adjusted Budget amount of $170.8 million, primarily due to the
expenditure of prior year encumbered and reappropriated balances, increases for several
departments throughout the year through various City Manager Reports ($3.6 million), and
mid-year increases in department expenses ($1.4 million).
Following is a chart which compares actual departmental costs, including encumbrances, over
the past seven years and budgeted costs for FY 2017.
General Fund Departments
Actual Expenditures Fiscal Years 2010 – 2016 (including encumbrances)
Budgeted Expenditures Fiscal Year 2017
($ in thousands)
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
FY 2017 Budget
FY 2016 Actual
FY 2015 Actual
FY 2014 Actual
FY 2013 Actual
FY 2012 Actual
FY 2011 Actual
FY 2010 Actual
FY 2017
Budget
FY 2016
Actual
FY 2015
Actual
FY 2014
Actual
FY 2013
Actual
FY 2012
Actual
FY 2011
Actual
FY 2010
Actual
Public Safety 68,509 65,005 62,459 63,403 61,222 63,879 60,298 57,270
Community Services 25,390 25,262 23,902 23,402 22,279 21,399 20,518 20,846
Admin Depts 20,807 22,059 19,771 19,784 18,544 18,693 16,906 19,219
Public Works 16,054 15,084 14,210 14,138 13,987 13,789 13,842 13,405
Planning & Comm Env 8,843 10,912 9,026 14,637 13,112 11,186 10,416 10,058
Development Svcs 12,169 10,872 11,335 0 0 0 0 0
Library 8,992 8,217 8,144 8,072 7,555 7,714 6,722 6,623
Capital Projects Fund
The Capital Projects Fund ended the year with a fund balance of $70.3 million, which is
comprised of the following:
City of Palo Alto Page 9
Fund Balance Component Amount
($ in millions)
Restricted for Library projects $ 711
Reserved for Roth Building rehabilitation 3,954
Reserved for TDR qualified expenditures 656
Reserved for Cubberley expenditures 2,634
Assigned for all other Capital projects 62,395
Total Capital Projects Fund Balance $ 70,350
Restricted for Library projects of $0.7 million is the portion of fund balance dedicated to
remaining Library expenditures which, if considered bondable expenses, will be paid for with
cash from bond proceeds. Non-bondable expenditures such as salaries and benefits are funded
from the Infrastructure Reserve, as established at the time of the bond issuance.
Assigned for all other Capital projects of $62.4 million represents the amount of unspent funds
associated with Adopted Capital projects other than Library projects and other noted items.
Outside funding sources such as grants, donations and future debt issues are not factored into
this component of the fund balance until they are actually received. A significant portion of
these funds ($29.5 million) were reappropriated from FY 2016 to FY 2017 as part of the FY 2017
Adopted Capital Budget. These reflect projects that have yet to be completed and funds were
anticipated to be carried forward to FY 2017 based on estimates of anticipated spending in
Fiscal Year 2016.
Enterprise Funds
At June 30, 2016 the City’s Enterprise Funds reported total net position of $676.9 million, an
increase of $12.1 million from the prior year. The change in net position for each of the
Enterprise Funds is detailed in the following table.
City of Palo Alto Page 10
Enterprise Funds
Change in Net Position for the Year Ended June 30
(in Millions)
Increase/
Fund Name 2016 2015 (Decrease)
Water 4.7$ 5.1$ (0.4)$
Electric (8.3)(11.2)2.9
Fiber Optics 3.0 3.1 (0.1)
Gas 3.4 1.7 1.7
Wastewater Collection 1.6 2.4 (0.8)
Wastewater Treatment 1.7 2.9 (1.2)
Refuse 2.6 4.8 (2.2)
Storm Drainage 3.3 2.7 0.6
Airport 0.1 (0.1)0.2
Total Change in Net Position 12.1$ 11.4$ 0.7$
The total Change in Net Assets of $12.1 million is an increase of $0.7 million from the prior year,
primarily due to improvement in Electric and Gas Funds. Electric Fund experienced relatively
flat revenue and, combined with increased costs for electricity purchases due to lower
availability of hydroelectric energy because of the ongoing drought, ended the fiscal year in a
loss position of $8.3 million. This is an improvement of $2.9 million from the prior year. Gas
Fund improved by $1.7 million due to lower commodity prices. The corresponding reduction in
customer revenue (also commodity rate driven) was offset by increased consumption.
Refuse Fund net position decreased $2.2 million from prior year. FY 2015 included a one-time
increase in operating transfers in of $0.7 due to changes in street sweeping services. The
Greenwaste contract cost increased as a result of expanded services, partially offset by a 9
percent increase in residential rates.
Effective July 1, 2015, following a Council approved resolution, Reserves Management Practices
for the Electric, Gas, Wastewater Collection and Water Utilities were updated. Restructuring of
the reserve balances was designed to increase transparency, to make contingency reserves
easier to manage from year to year, and to eliminate reserves that are no longer necessary.
Guidelines for managing the reserves are contained in the Reserves Management Practices,
including actions to be taken when reserve balances are not within the guidelines.
Enterprise Fund Rate Stabilization, Operations and other reserve balances are shown in detail in
Note 10 of the CAFR. All Enterprise Funds maintained a positive unrestricted reserve balance as
of June 30, 2016 except for Wastewater Treatment which is in a deficit position of $2.1 million
City of Palo Alto Page 11
due to pension related items and Airport Fund which is in a deficit position of $2.3 million due
to life to date operating losses which are currently being funded by advances from the General
Fund.
Environmental Review
This is not a project for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act.
Attachments:
Attachment A: FY16 General Fund (XLSX)
Attachment B: FY 2016 Year End Clean-up Budget Adjustments (PDF)
Attachment C: City of Palo Alto FY2016 - CAFR (PDF)
11/3/20169:23 AM
Final Draft Attachment A Exhibit 2
GENERAL FUND SUMMARY ($000s)
FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016
Adopted Adjusted CAFR Basis Allocated Encum Actual Actual to
Budget Budget Rev/Exp Charges Rev/Exp Adj BudgetVariance
Revenues
Sales Tax 27,630 28,430 30,018 n/a 30,018 1,588
Property Tax 35,067 35,967 36,607 n/a 36,607 640
Transient Occupancy Tax 18,791 21,991 22,366 n/a 22,366 375
Documentary Transfer Tax 6,852 7,052 6,266 n/a 6,266 (786)
Utility Users Tax 11,189 10,489 12,469 n/a 12,469 1,980
Other Taxes and Fines 2,180 2,180 2,238 n/a 2,238 58
Charges for Services 25,399 24,768 23,910 n/a 23,910 (858)
Permits and Licenses 8,211 8,211 7,912 n/a 7,912 (299)
Return on Investment 824 824 1,104 n/a 1,104 280
Rental Income 15,296 15,299 15,769 n/a 15,769 470
From Other Agencies 1,659 659 3,190 n/a 3,190 2,531
Charges to Other Funds 11,930 11,929 - 11,576 n/a 11,576 (353)
Other Revenues 323 1,801 2,591 - n/a 2,591 790
Total Revenues 165,351 169,600 164,440 11,576 n/a 176,016 6,416
Add: Operating Transfers In 18,589 19,141 18,317 n/a 18,317 (824)
Prior Year Encum 5,573 5,606 n/a 5,606 33
Contribution from BSR 1,732 11,551
Total Source of Funds 185,672 205,865 182,757 17,182 n/a 199,939 5,625
Expenditures
City Attorney 3,101 3,719 2,634 162 390 3,186 533
City Auditor 1,175 1,261 1,057 55 47 1,159 102
City Clerk 1,328 1,373 871 130 57 1,058 314
City Council 455 502 428 2 21 451 51
City Manager 3,431 4,121 3,420 173 499 4,092 28
Administrative Services 7,635 7,957 7,045 452 118 7,615 342
Community Services 24,804 26,517 19,883 4,452 927 25,262 1,256
Fire 27,583 29,223 25,421 3,175 565 29,161 62
Police 36,859 36,924 32,703 2,970 171 35,844 1,080
Human Resources 3,555 4,029 3,324 192 333 3,849 180
Library 8,555 8,971 7,295 665 257 8,217 754
Planning & Community Environment 8,900 11,146 8,371 727 1,814 10,912 234
Development Services 11,901 12,281 9,851 814 207 10,872 1,409
Public Works 15,017 15,828 11,508 2,787 789 15,084 744
Non-Departmental 3,078 1,372 650 - 650 722
Cubberley Lease 5,584 5,584 5,584 - 5,584 (0)
Total Expenditures 162,961 170,808 140,045 16,756 6,195 162,996 7,812
Add: Operating Trans Out 1,834 5,548 5,096 - 5,096 452
Transfer to Infrastructure 20,877 29,509 29,365 - 29,365 144
Total Use of Funds 185,672 205,865 174,506 16,756 6,195 197,457 8,408
Net Surplus/(Deficit)- (0) 8,251 426 6,195 2,482 14,032
CAFR Reconciliation:Unrealized gain/loss on investments 1,390
Current year encumbrance 6,195
Prior Year encumbrances (5,606)
CAFR Net Income 4,461
C:\Users\jpollar\appdata\local\temp\minutetraq\paloaltocityca@paloaltocityca.iqm2.com\work\attachments\18737
ATTACHMENT B, EXHIBIT 1
Department Category Adjustment Category Adjustment
GENERAL FUND (102)
Administrative
Services
Management Development & Training (reallocation to
Non-Departmental)
This action reallocates departmental management
development savings to Non-Departmental to
reappropriate funds for city-wide training needs in FY
2018.
General
Expense
(30,000)$
City Attorney's
Office
Management Development & Training (reallocation to
Non-Departmental)
This action reallocates departmental management
development savings to Non-Departmental to
reappropriate funds for city-wide training needs in FY
2018.
General
Expense
(11,000)$
City Clerk's
Office
Management Development & Training (reallocation to
Non-Departmental)
This action reallocates departmental management
development savings to Non-Departmental to
reappropriate funds for city-wide training needs in FY
2018.
General
Expense
(1,000)$
City Manager's
Office
Management Development & Training (reallocation to
Non-Departmental)
This action reallocates departmental management
development savings to Non-Departmental to
reappropriate funds for city-wide training needs in FY
2018.
General
Expense
(7,500)$
Community &
Development
Services
Management Development & Training (reallocation to
Non-Departmental)
This action reallocates departmental management
development savings to Non-Departmental to
reappropriate funds for city-wide training needs in FY
2018.
General
Expense
(11,000)$
Community &
Development
Services
Salaries & Benefits
This action reallocates departmental salary and benefits
savings to Non-Departmental to offset an increase in the
transfer from the General Fund to the Public Art Fund in
order to fully fund administrative costs in excess of 20%
of art fee revenue as required by Ordinance #5226 in FY
2016.
Salaries &
Benefits
(38,500)$
CITY OF PALO ALTO
RECOMMENDED AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY MANAGER'S FY 2016 BUDGET
Revenues Expenses
Attachment B - 1
ATTACHMENT B, EXHIBIT 1
Department Category Adjustment Category Adjustment
GENERAL FUND (102)
CITY OF PALO ALTO
RECOMMENDED AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY MANAGER'S FY 2016 BUDGET
Revenues Expenses
Development
Services
Management Development & Training (reallocation to
Non-Departmental)
This action reallocates departmental management
development savings to Non-Departmental to
reappropriate funds for city-wide training needs in FY
2018.
General
Expense
(1,000)$
Fire Salary & Benefits (reallocation from Non-Departmental
reserve):
This action reallocates funding reserved for salary and
benefit increases due to pending labor negotiations to
the Fire Department for higher than anticipated salary
and benefit expenses in FY 2016. These higher than
anticipated expenses are due to a number of variables
though the primary causes of this reflects higher than
budgeted overtime expenses and higher salary and
benefit increases as approved by the City Council in April
2016 that were budgeted in the aforementioned
reserve.
Salaries &
Benefits
1,265,000$
Human
Resources
Management Development & Training (reallocation to
Non-Departmental)
This action reallocates departmental management
development savings to Non-Departmental to
reappropriate funds for city-wide training needs in FY
2018.
General
Expense
(104,000)$
Library Management Development & Training (reallocation to
Non-Departmental)
This action reallocates departmental management
development savings to Non-Departmental to
reappropriate funds for city-wide training needs in FY
2018.
General
Expense
(3,000)$
Non-
Departmental
Management Development & Training (reallocation to
Non-Departmental)
This action reallocates departmental management
development savings to Non-Departmental to
reappropriate funds for city-wide training needs in FY
2018.
General
Expense
202,000$
Non-
Departmental
Salary & Benefits Reserve (reallocation to Fire
Department)
This action reallocates the reserve for Salaries and
Benefits to the Fire Department to provide sufficient
funding for final FY2016 Fire Department salary and
benefits expenses.
Fund Balance/
Reserves
(1,265,000)$
Attachment B - 2
ATTACHMENT B, EXHIBIT 1
Department Category Adjustment Category Adjustment
GENERAL FUND (102)
CITY OF PALO ALTO
RECOMMENDED AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY MANAGER'S FY 2016 BUDGET
Revenues Expenses
Non-
Departmental
Transfer to the Public Art Fund
This action increases the transfer to the Public Art Fund
(from $68,500 to $107,000) to provide sufficient funding
for administrative costs associated with the Public Art
Program in FY 2016. Per Ordinance #5226,
administrative costs in excess of 20% of art fee revenue
require General Fund support.
Operating
Transfers
38,500$
Police Management Development & Training (reallocation to
Non-Departmental)
This action reallocates departmental management
development savings to Non-Departmental to
reappropriate funds for city-wide training needs in FY
2018.
General
Expense
(8,000)$
Public Works Management Development & Training (reallocation to
Non-Departmental)
This action reallocates departmental management
development savings to Non-Departmental to
reappropriate funds for city-wide training needs in FY
2018.
General
Expense
(25,500)$
GENERAL FUND (102) SUBTOTAL -$ -$
Attachment B - 3
ATTACHMENT B, EXHIBIT 1
Department Category Adjustment Category Adjustment
GENERAL FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (471)
Capital Capital Improvement Project Adjustments
This action reflects the combined impact from
adjustments to projects as outlined in Attachment A,
Exhibit 4.
Other
Revenues
45,000$ Capital
Improvement
929,823$
Capital Transfer to the Library Debt Service Fund
This action establishes a transfer from the General Fund
Capital Improvement Fund to the Library Debt Service
Fund for defeasance of Library bonds. This is due to
project savings of $3,007,702 which was approved in
CMR #6993 and $10,784 to transfer the remaining
balance in the bond issue bank account to the Debt
Service Fund. A corresponding decrease in the fund
balance, specifically the Reserve: Library Bond Proceeds
is recommended to offset this adjustment.
Operating
Transfer - Out
3,018,486$
Capital Reserve: Capital Fund Library Bond Proceeds
This action decreases the reserve for Library Bond
Proceeds to offset actions recommended in this report.
Fund Balance/
Reserves
(3,018,486)$
Capital Reserve: Capital Fund Infrastructure Reserve
This action decreases the fund balance to offset the net
changes resulting from the actions recommended in this
report.
Fund Balance/
Reserves
(884,823)$
GENERAL FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (471)
SUBTOTAL 45,000$ 45,000$
CITY OF PALO ALTO
RECOMMENDED AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY MANAGER'S FY 2016 BUDGET
Revenues Expenses
Attachment B - 4
ATTACHMENT B, EXHIBIT 1
Department Category Adjustment Category Adjustment
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
AIRPORT ENTERPRISE FUND (530)
Capital Capital Improvement Project Adjustments
This action reflects the combined impact from
adjustments to projects as outlined in Attachment A,
Exhibit 4.
Capital
Improvement
25,799$
Public Works Public Work's Salaries & Benefits
This action reallocates departmental salaries and benefit
savings to Capital Improvement Projects to provide
sufficient funding for final FY2016 capital project
expenses.
Salaries &
Benefits
(25,799)$
AIRPORT ENTERPRISE FUND (530) SUBTOTAL -$ -$
ELECTRIC FUND (523)
Capital Capital Improvement Project Adjustments
This action reflects the combined impact from
adjustments to projects as outlined in Attachment A,
Exhibit 4.
Capital
Improvement
278$
Capital Adjustment to Reserve for Capital Improvement
Projects
This action decreases the Capital Improvement Projects
Reserve to offset slightly higher capital improvement
expenses in FY 2016.
Fund Balance/
Reserves
(278)$
ELECTRIC FUND (523) SUBTOTAL -$ -$
GAS FUND (524)
Capital Capital Improvement Project Adjustments
This action reflects the combined impact from
adjustments to projects as outlined in Attachment A,
Exhibit 4.
Other
Revenues
70,528$ Capital
Improvement
70,528$
GAS FUND (524) SUBTOTAL 70,528$ 70,528$
CITY OF PALO ALTO
RECOMMENDED AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY MANAGER'S FY 2016 BUDGET
Revenues Expenses
Attachment B - 5
ATTACHMENT B, EXHIBIT 1
Department Category Adjustment Category Adjustment
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
CITY OF PALO ALTO
RECOMMENDED AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY MANAGER'S FY 2016 BUDGET
Revenues Expenses
REFUSE FUND (525)
Capital Capital Improvement Project Adjustments
This action reflects the combined impact from
adjustments to projects as outlined in Attachment A,
Exhibit 4.
Capital
Improvement
74,192$
Public Works Refuse Utility Purchases
This action increases the utility purchases expenses to
align with FY2016 year end expenses and encumbrances.
A corresponding increase in revenues from customer
sales offsets these increases expenses.
Customer
Sales
528,072$ Utility
Purchases
528,072$
Capital Adjustment to Rate Stabilization Reserve
This action decreases the Rate Stabilization Reserve to
offset slightly higher capital improvement expenses in FY
2016.
Fund Balance/
Reserves
(74,192)$
REFUSE FUND (525) SUBTOTAL 528,072$ 528,072$
WASTEWATER COLLECTION FUND (527)
Capital Capital Improvement Project Adjustments
This action reflects the combined impact from
adjustments to projects as outlined in Attachment A,
Exhibit 4.
Capital
Improvement
105,511$
Adjustment to Reserve for Operations
This action decreases the Reserve for Operations to
offset slightly higher capital improvement expenses in FY
2016.
Fund Balance/
Reserves
(105,511)$
WASTEWATER COLLECTION FUND (527) SUBTOTAL -$ -$
WATER FUND (522)
Capital Capital Improvement Project Adjustments
This action reflects the combined impact from
adjustments to projects as outlined in Attachment A,
Exhibit 4.
Capital
Improvement
783,717$
Adjustment to Reserve for Operations
This action decreases the Reserve for Operations to
offset slightly higher capital improvement expenses in FY
2016.
Fund Balance/
Reserves
(783,717)$
WATER FUND (522) SUBTOTAL -$ -$
Attachment B - 6
ATTACHMENT B, EXHIBIT 1
Department Category Adjustment Category Adjustment
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT & MAINTENANCE FUND (681)
Capital Capital Improvement Project Adjustments
This action reflects the combined impact from
adjustments to projects as outlined in Attachment A,
Exhibit 4.
Capital
Improvement
24,289$
Adjustment to Fund Balance
This action decreases the fund balance to offset slightly
higher capital improvement expenses in FY 2016.
Fund Balance/
Reserves
(24,289)$
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT & MAINTENANCE FUND (681)
SUBTOTAL -$ -$
CITY OF PALO ALTO
RECOMMENDED AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY MANAGER'S FY 2016 BUDGET
Revenues Expenses
Attachment B - 7
ATTACHMENT B, EXHIBIT 1
Department Category Adjustment Category Adjustment
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
HOUSING IN-LIEU/COMMERICAL FUND (234)
Transfer from Stanford Medical Development
Fund/Ending Fund Balance
This action recognizes a transfer from the Stanford
Medical Development Fund to the Housing In-
Lieu/Commercial Fund for developer impact fees
embedded in the SUMC Development Agreement. This
is in compliance with the City Attorney's interpretation
of the SUMC agreement. A corresponding increase in
the fund balance is recommended to offset this
adjustment.
Operating
Transfers-In
1,720,488$ Fund Balance/
Reserves
1,720,488$
HOUSING IN-LIEU/COMMERICAL FUND (234)
SUBTOTAL 1,720,488$ 1,720,488$
HOUSING IN-LIEU/RESIDENTIAL FUND (233)
Non-
Departmental
Transfer to Stanford Medical Center Development Fund
This action established a transfer from the Housing In-
Lieu Residential Fund to the Stanford Medical Center
Development Fund for repayment of funds previously
transferred in FY 2013. The funds were not needed and
have been returned. A corresponding decrease in the
fund balance is recommended to offset this adjustment.
Operating
Transfers
720,220$
Ending Fund Balance
This action decreases the fund balance to offset the
actions recommended in this report.
Fund Balance/
Reserves
(720,220)$
HOUSING IN-LIEU/RESIDENTIAL FUND (233) SUBTOTAL -$ -$
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES FUND (248)
Police COPS Grant Expenses/State Revenues
This action recognizes additional grant revenues and
corresponding expense in order to align budget levels
with actual FY2016 revenue, expense, and encumbrance
levels.
State
Revenues
12,695$ Contract
Services
12,695$
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES FUND (248) SUBTOTAL 12,695$ 12,695$
CITY OF PALO ALTO
RECOMMENDED AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY MANAGER'S FY 2016 BUDGET
Revenues Expenses
Attachment B - 8
ATTACHMENT B, EXHIBIT 1
Department Category Adjustment Category Adjustment
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
CITY OF PALO ALTO
RECOMMENDED AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY MANAGER'S FY 2016 BUDGET
Revenues Expenses
LIBRARY PROJECTS FUND (370)
Non-
Departmental
Transfer from the General Fund Capital Improvement
Fund
This action recognizes a transfer from the General Fund
Capital Improvement Fund to the Library Debt Service
Fund for defeasance of Library bonds. This is due to
project savings of $3,007,702 which was approved in
CMR#6993 and $10,784 to transfer the remaining
balance in the bond issue bank account to the Debt
Service Fund.
Operating
Transfer-In
3,018,486$
Non-
Departmental
General Expenses
This action recognizes additional expenses related to
defeasement of bonds resulting in higher than budgeted
expenses of $6.1 million. As outlined in CMR #6993, the
City opted to use project savings and bond premium to
defease $5.1 million in principal payments and $0.9
million in interest payments.
General
Expenses
6,108,892$
Ending Fund Balance
This action decreases the fund balance to offset the
actions recommended in this report.
Fund Balance/
Reserves
(3,090,406)$
LIBRARY PROJECTS FUND (370) SUBTOTAL 3,018,486$ 3,018,486$
PUBLIC ART FUND (207)
Community
Services
Department
Transfer from the General Fund/Fund Balance
Adjustment
This action increases the estimated transfer from the
General Fund to account for full funding of
administrative costs in excess of 20% of art fee revenue
as required by Ordinance #5226. A corresponding
increase in expenses is recommended to offset this
action.
Operating
Transfers-In
38,500$ Supplies &
Materials;
Contract
Services
38,500$
PUBLIC ART FUND (207) SUBTOTAL 38,500$ 38,500$
Attachment B - 9
ATTACHMENT B, EXHIBIT 1
Department Category Adjustment Category Adjustment
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
CITY OF PALO ALTO
RECOMMENDED AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY MANAGER'S FY 2016 BUDGET
Revenues Expenses
PUBLIC SERVICES DONATION FUND (191)
Various Expense/Miscellaneous Revenue (donations)
This action increases the appropriation for expenses in
the Public Services Donation Fund to align with FY2016
year end expense and encumbered funds. Donations
were for activities such as animal care services and parks
and open space activities. A corresponding increase in
the estimate for miscellaneous revenue is recommended
to offset this increase and reflects higher than budgeted
donations.
Miscellaneous
Revenue
46,637$ Supplies &
Materials;
Contract
Services
46,637$
PUBLIC SERVICES DONATION FUND (191) SUBTOTAL 46,637$ 46,637$
STANFORD MEDICAL CENTER DEVELOPMENT FUND (260)
Non-
Departmental
Transfer from Housing In-Lieu/Residential Fund/Fund
Balance
This action recognizes a transfer from the Housing In-
Lieu Residential Fund to the Stanford Medical Center
Development Fund for repayment of funds previously
transferred in FY 2013. The funds were not needed and
have been returned. A corresponding increase in the
fund balance is recommended to offset this adjustment.
Operating
Transfer-In
720,220$ Fund Balance/
Reserves
720,220$
Non-
Departmental
Transfer to Housing In-Lieu/Commercial Fund
This action established a transfer from the Stanford
Medical Center Development Fund to the Housing In-
Lieu Commercial Fund for developer impact fees
embedded in the SUMC Development Agreement. This
is in compliance with the City Attorney's interpretation
of the SUMC agreement. A corresponding decrease in
the fund balance is recommended to offset this
adjustment.
Operating
Transfer
1,720,488$
Ending Fund Balance
This action decreases the fund balance to offset the
actions recommended in this report.
Fund Balance/
Reserves
(1,720,488)$
STANFORD MEDICAL CENTER DEVELOPMENT FUND
(260) SUBTOTAL 720,220$ 720,220$
Attachment B - 10
ATTACHMENT B, EXHIBIT 1
Department Category Adjustment Category Adjustment
AGENCY TRUST FUNDS
CABLE - JPA FUND (779)
Administrative
Services
General Expenses
This action increases the general expense due to higher
than budgeted inter agency expenses at the end of FY
2016. A corresponding decrease in transfers to correctly
align the budget category and fund balance are
recommended to offset this action.
-$ General
Expense
1,290,571$
Administrative
Services
Transfer to General Fund
This action decreases the appropriation for transfer to
the General Fund and re-categorizes it as an interagency
expense to accurately align with the appropriate
treatment of expenses in this funds as an agency fund.
-$ Operating
Transfers
(824,000)$
Ending Fund Balance
This action decreases the fund balance to offset the
actions recommended in this report.
-$ Fund Balance/
Reserves
(466,571)$
CABLE - JPA FUND (779) SUBTOTAL -$ -$
EYERLY TRUST FUND (774)
Utilities General Expenses
This action increases the general expense due to higher
than budgeted expenses specifically for special events in
FY 2016. This action aligns the budget with actuals. A
corresponding decrease in fund balance is
recommended to offset this action.
-$ General
Expense
6,887$
Ending Fund Balance
This action decreases the fund balance to offset the
actions recommended in this report.
-$ Fund Balance/
Reserves
(6,887)$
EYERLY TRUST FUND (774) SUBTOTAL -$ -$
CITY OF PALO ALTO
RECOMMENDED AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY MANAGER'S FY 2016 BUDGET
Revenues Expenses
Attachment B - 11
ATTACHMENT B, EXHIBIT 2
Project Funding
Title Number Revenue Expense Source Comments
ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS
Art Center Auditorium Audio, Visual, and
Furnishings
AC-14000 $ 365 Infrastructure
Reserve
Increase to project due to higher than
anticipated expenditures
Furniture and Technology for Library
Projects
LB-11000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 Miscellaneous
Revenue
Increase revenue and project due to a
donation.
Highway 101 Pedestrian/Bicycle
Overcrossing
PE-11011 $ 130,367 Infrastructure
Reserve
Increase to project due to higher than
anticipated expenditures
Newell Road Bridge / SFC Bridge
Replacement
PE-12011 $ 2,569 Infrastructure
Reserve
Increase to project due to higher than
anticipated expenditures
Charleston Arastradero Corridor Project PE-13011 $ 288,196 Infrastructure
Reserve
Increase to project due to higher than
anticipated expenditures
El Camino Park Restoration PE-13016 $ 76,174 Infrastructure
Reserve
Increase to project due to higher than
anticipated expenditures
Fire Station 3 Replacement PE-15003 $ 84,584 Infrastructure
Reserve
Increase to project due to higher than
anticipated expenditures
Street Maintenance PE-86070 $ 242,778 Infrastructure
Reserve
Increase to project due to higher than
anticipated expenditures
California Avenue Parking District Parking
Improvements
PF-14004 $ 31,317 Infrastructure
Reserve
Increase to project due to higher than
anticipated expenditures
Transportation and Parking Improvements PL-12000 $ 6,765 Infrastructure
Reserve
Increase to project due to higher than
anticipated expenditures
El Camino/ Churchill Intersection
Improvements
PL-14000 $ 21,633 Infrastructure
Reserve
Increase to project due to higher than
anticipated expenditures
Embarcadero Road Corridor
Improvements
PL-15001 $ 75 Infrastructure
Reserve
Increase to project due to higher than
anticipated expenditures
$ 45,000 $ 929,823
ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS
Runway & Taxiway Rehabilitation AP-15003 $ 10,206 Increase to project due to higher than
anticipated expenditures
Airport Perimeter Fencing AP-16003 $ 15,593 Increase to project due to higher than
anticipated expenditures
$ - $ 25,799
ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS
AMR/AMI-Feasibility EL-10008 $ 278 Increase to project due to higher than
anticipated expenditures
$ - $ 278
CITY OF PALO ALTO
RECOMMENDED AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY MANAGER'S FY 2016 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
CAPITAL PROJECT FUND
AIRPORT ENTERPRISE FUND
ELECTRIC FUND
TOTAL ELECTRIC FUND CIP YEAR-END ADJUSTMENTS
TOTAL AIRPORT ENTERPRISE FUND CIP YEAR-END
ADJUSTMENTS
TOTAL GENERAL FUND CIP YEAR-END ADJUSTMENTS
Attachment B - 12
ATTACHMENT B, EXHIBIT 2
Project Funding
Title Number Revenue Expense Source Comments
CITY OF PALO ALTO
RECOMMENDED AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY MANAGER'S FY 2016 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS
Gas System, Customer Connections GS-80017 $ 70,528 $ 70,528 Increase to project due to higher than
anticipated expenditures. This project is
offset by additional revenue from
customers.
$ 70,528 $ 70,528
ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS
Landfill Closure RF-11001 $ 74,192 Increase to project due to higher than
anticipated expenditures
$ - $ 74,192
ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS
Vehicle Maintenance Facility Upgrade VR-04010 $ 24,289 Increase to project due to higher than
anticipated expenditures
$ - $ 24,289
ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS
Wastewater Collection System
Rehabilitation/Augmentation Project 22
WC-09001 $ 176 Increase to project due to higher than
anticipated expenditures
Wastewater Collection System
Rehabilitation/Augmentation Project 24
WC-11000 $ 11,788 Increase to project due to higher than
anticipated expenditures
Sewer System, Customer Connections WC-80020 $ 93,547 Increase to project due to higher than
anticipated expenditures
$ - $ 105,511
ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS
Water Regulation Station Improvements WS-07000 $ 159,544 Increase to project due to higher than
anticipated expenditures
Water Main Replacement-Project 25 WS-11000 $ 356,042 Increase to project due to higher than
anticipated expenditures
Water System, Customer Connections WS-80013 $ 157,955 Increase to project due to higher than
anticipated expenditures
Water Service Hydrant Replacement WS-80014 $ 110,176 Increase to project due to higher than
anticipated expenditures
-$ 783,717$
GAS FUND
TOTAL WATER FUND CIP YEAR-END ADJUSTMENTS
TOTAL WASTEWATER COLLECTION FUND CIP YEAR-
END ADJUSTMENTS
TOTAL VEHICLE REPLACEMENT & MAINTENANCE
FUND CIP YEAR-END ADJUSTMENTS
TOTAL REFUSE FUND CIP YEAR-END ADJUSTMENTS
TOTAL GAS FUND CIP YEAR-END ADJUSTMENTS
WASTEWATER COLLECTION FUND
WATER FUND
REFUSE FUND
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT & MAINTENANCE FUND
Attachment B - 13
2015-2016
Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report
City of Palo Alto, California
FISCAL YEAR ENDED: June 30, 2016
CITY OF PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA
2015-2016
Comprehensive
Annual
Financial Report
Fiscal Year Ended
June 30, 2016
Prepared by:
Administrative Services Department
CITY OF PALO ALTO
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
Table of Contents
Page
INTRODUCTORY SECTION:
Transmittal Letter .................................................................................................................................... i
City Officials ........................................................................................................................................... vi
Organizational Structure ....................................................................................................................... vii
Administrative Services Organization .................................................................................................. viii
GFOA Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting ............................................... ix
FINANCIAL SECTION:
Independent Auditor’s Report .............................................................................................................. 1
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
(Required Supplementary Information – Unaudited) ...................................................................... 5
Basic Financial Statements
Government‐wide Financial Statements:
Statement of Net Position ....................................................................................................... 29
Statement of Activities ............................................................................................................ 31
Governmental Fund Financial Statements:
Balance Sheet .......................................................................................................................... 33
Reconciliation of the Balance Sheet of Governmental Funds to
the Statement of Net Position ‐ Governmental Activities ................................................. 34
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances .................................. 35
Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes
in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities –
Governmental Activities ................................................................................................... 36
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance –
Budget and Actual – General Fund ................................................................................... 37
Proprietary Fund Financial Statements:
Statement of Net Position ....................................................................................................... 38
Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Fund Net Position ................................... 40
Statement of Cash Flows ......................................................................................................... 42
Fiduciary Fund Financial Statement:
Statement of Fiduciary Net Position ....................................................................................... 44
Index to the Notes to the Basic Financial Statements ................................................................. 45
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements ...................................................................................... 47
Required Supplementary Information:
Schedule of Changes in Net Pension Liability and related Ratios – Miscellaneous Plan ............. 105
Schedule of Contributions – Miscellaneous Plan ......................................................................... 106
CITY OF PALO ALTO
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
Table of Contents (Continued)
Page
Required Supplementary Information:
Schedule of Changes in Net Pension Liability and Related Ratios – Safety Plan ......................... 107
Schedule of Contributions – Safety Plan ...................................................................................... 108
Supplementary Information:
Non‐Major Governmental Funds:
Combining Balance Sheet ...................................................................................................... 109
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and
Changes in Fund Balances ............................................................................................... 111
Non‐Major Special Revenue Funds:
Combining Balance Sheet ...................................................................................................... 114
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and
Changes in Fund Balances ............................................................................................... 116
Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and
Changes in Fund Balances – Budget and Actual ............................................................. 118
Non‐Major Debt Service Funds:
Combining Balance Sheet ...................................................................................................... 124
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and
Changes in Fund Balances ............................................................................................... 125
Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and
Changes in Fund Balances – Budget and Actual ............................................................. 126
Non‐Major Permanent Fund:
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and
Changes in Fund Balances – Budget and Actual ............................................................. 128
Internal Service Funds:
Combining Statement of Fund Net Position .......................................................................... 130
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and
Changes in Fund Net Position ......................................................................................... 131
Combining Statement of Cash Flows ..................................................................................... 132
Fiduciary Funds:
Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities – All Agency Funds ...................................... 134
STATISTICAL SECTION:
Financial Trends:
Net Position by Component ......................................................................................................... 137
Changes in Net Position ............................................................................................................... 138
CITY OF PALO ALTO
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
Table of Contents (Continued)
Page
STATISTICAL SECTION:
Financial Trends:
Fund Balances of Governmental Funds ....................................................................................... 140
Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds ..................................................................... 142
Revenue Capacity:
Electric Operating Revenue by Source ......................................................................................... 143
Supplemental Disclosure for Water Utilities ............................................................................... 144
Assessed Value of Taxable Property ............................................................................................ 145
Property Tax Rates, All Overlapping Governments ..................................................................... 146
Property Tax Levies and Collections ............................................................................................ 147
Principal Property Taxpayers ....................................................................................................... 148
Assessed Valuation and Parcels by Land Use .............................................................................. 149
Per Parcel Assessed Valuation of Single Family Residential ........................................................ 150
Debt Capacity:
Ratio of Outstanding Debt by Type .............................................................................................. 151
Computation of Direct and Overlapping Debt ............................................................................. 152
Computation of Legal Bonded Debt Margin ................................................................................ 153
Revenue Bond Coverage .............................................................................................................. 154
Demographic and Economic Information:
Taxable Transactions by Type of Business ................................................................................... 155
Demographic and Economic Statistics ......................................................................................... 156
Principal Employers...................................................................................................................... 157
Operating Information:
Operating Indicators by Function/Program ................................................................................. 158
Capital Asset Statistics by Function/Program .............................................................................. 160
Full‐Time Equivalent City Government Employees by Function .................................................. 162
SINGLE AUDIT SECTION:
Index to the Single Audit Report .................................................................................................. 163
Independent Auditor’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and
on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements
Performed in Accordance With Government Auditing Standards ........................................ 165
Independent Auditor’s Report on Compliance for Each Major Program and
Report on Internal Control Over Compliance Required by Uniform Guidance .................... 167
Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards .............................................................................. 169
Notes to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards ......................................................... 170
Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs ................................................................................ 171
Schedule of Prior Years Findings and Questioned Costs ............................................................. 172
Introduction
………………………………………………….………………………
City of Palo Alto i
Transmittal Letter…………………………………………………...…
November 2, 2016
THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL
Palo Alto, California
Attention: Finance Committee
COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016
Members of the Council and Citizens of Palo Alto:
I am pleased to present the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2016 in accordance with Article III, Section 16 and Article IV, Section 13 of the City of Palo
Alto Charter. The format and content of this CAFR complies with the principles and standards of
accounting and financial reporting adopted by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board
(GASB), and contains all information needed for readers to gain a reasonable understanding of City of
Palo Alto financial affairs. Management takes sole responsibility for the completeness and reliability
of the information contained in this report, based upon a comprehensive framework of internal
control that it has established for this purpose. The objective of internal controls is to provide
reasonable, rather than absolute, assurance that the financial statements are free of any material
misstatements.
The City of Palo Alto’s financial statements have been audited by Macias Gini & O’Connell LLP,
Certified Public Accountants. The goal of the audit is to obtain reasonable assurance that the
financial statements are free of material misstatements and are fairly presented in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Macias Gini & O’Connell issued an unmodified
opinion for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 audit. Their report is presented as the first
component of the financial section of this report.
In addition, Macias Gini & O’Connell conducted the federally mandated “Single Audit” designed to
meet the special needs of federal grantor agencies. The standards governing the Single Audit require
the independent auditor to report on the fair presentation of the financial statements, government’s
internal controls and compliance with legal requirements. These reports are included in the Single
Audit section of the CAFR.
City of Palo Alto
Office of the City Manager
Introduction
…………………………………….………………………………….
ii City of Palo Alto
An overview of the City’s financial activities for the fiscal year is discussed in detail in the
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) section of the CAFR. MD&A complements this
transmittal letter and should be read in conjunction with it.
CITY OF PALO ALTO PROFILE
Palo Alto was incorporated in 1894 and named after a majestic coastal redwood
tree which lives along the San Francisquito Creek where early Spanish explorers
settled. Located between the cities of San Francisco and San Jose, Palo Alto is a
largely built‐out community of approximately 67,000 residents. Palo Alto
delivers a full range of municipal services and public utilities under the Council‐
Manager form of government, and offers an outstanding quality of life for its
residents. It covers an area of twenty‐six square miles, and has dedicated almost
one‐half of the area to open spaces of parks and wildlife preserves. Public
facilities include five libraries, four community centers, a cultural arts center, an
adult and children’s theater, a junior museum and zoo, and a golf course. The
City provides a diverse array of services for seniors and youth, an extensive continuing education
program, concerts, exhibits, team sports and special events. The independent Palo Alto Unified
School District (PAUSD) has achieved state and national recognition for the excellence of its
programs.
City Council: Council consists of nine members elected at‐large for four year staggered terms. At the
first meeting of each calendar year, Council elects a Mayor and Vice‐Mayor from its membership,
with the Mayor having the duty of presiding over Council meetings. Council is the appointing
authority for the positions of City Manager and three other officials, the City Attorney, City Clerk, and
City Auditor, all of whom report to Council. Effective January 1, 2019, Council will be reduced from
nine to seven members.
Finance Committee and Policy and Services Committee: While retaining the authority to approve all
actions, Council has established two subcommittees to consider and make recommendations on
matters relating to finance, budget, audits, capital planning and debt. Each of the subcommittees are
comprised of four Council members. Staff provides the subcommittees and Council with reports
such as the CAFR, quarterly budget‐versus‐actual results, and investment and performance measure
reports, all of which are utilized in their review of the City’s financial position.
FISCAL/ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AND OUTLOOK
Employment Trends: The City of Palo Alto is located in the heart of Silicon Valley and is adjacent to
Stanford University, one of the premier institutions of higher education in the nation which has
produced much of the talent that founded many successful high‐tech companies in Palo Alto and
Silicon Valley. With varied and relatively stable employers such as Stanford University, Stanford
Medical Center, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Palo Alto Unified School District, Stanford Shopping
Center and businesses such as Hewlett‐Packard, VMware, Tesla, Palantir and Space Systems Loral,
Palo Alto has enjoyed diverse employment and revenue bases. The City’s unemployment rate ended
the year at 2.8 percent, 0.1 percent higher than the prior year. This compares to Santa Clara
County’s unemployment rate of 4.0 percent, and the state’s unemployment rate of 5.7 percent.
Introduction
………………………………………………….………………………
City of Palo Alto iii
Real Estate Market: In its most recent annual report, the Santa Clara County Assessor’s Office noted
that Santa Clara County’s 2016/2017 assessment roll increased 7.9 percent, from $388 billion to $419
billion ‐ “assessment roll growth during the past four years has exceeded the growth for the
preceding ten years.” The assessment roll growth was balanced throughout the County, with the
highest growth rates in Santa Clara and Mountain View. Palo Alto’s assessment roll growth rate was
8.6 percent, compared to 8.1 percent in the prior report. Property sales and new construction were
the primary factors contributing to the robust growth. With its highly regarded school district, well‐
educated and high‐income population, cultural amenities, and the presence of Stanford University,
the City’s real estate activity continues to experience a pattern of high demand and short supply.
The result of this continued pattern is reflected in the substantial increase in FY 2016 property tax
revenue.
Local Trends: National, state, regional and local economic indicators point toward continuously
improving economic growth. Economically sensitive revenue sources such as transient occupancy tax
and documentary transfer tax remain strong, while sales tax revenue has levelled off. The robust
local economy and job growth are also driving increases in other revenues, such as permit and
license fees.
Looking forward, funding sources are sufficient to cover projected FY 2017 expenses, as written in
the City’s Adopted Budget. The FY 2017 budget was balanced by utilizing several one‐time solutions,
with the goal of implementing long‐term structural solutions as part of the FY 2018 budgeting
process. Council adopted a General Fund budget with expenses of $194.2 million for FY 2017, an
increase of $8.5 million, or 4.9 percent, from the prior year Adopted Budget. The increase is driven
by increased investment in infrastructure, increased salary and benefits, and the addition of staff
positions in response to community initiatives and Council priorities. In addition, a $2.3 million cost
for streetlight and traffic signal electricity has been shifted to the General Fund to increase alignment
with fund purpose, and a Budget Uncertainty Reserve of $2.0 million was created to provide
flexibility for several capital and operating items that may require additional funding, such as the Golf
Course renovation and rebuild of the Junior Museum and Zoo.
Pension and healthcare costs continue to dominate the conversation about long‐term future costs.
The most recent actuarial valuations show unfunded liabilities for pension and healthcare of $495
million. The City has proactively taken steps over the past several years to mitigate increased costs
by increasing employee contributions to the CalPERS retirement plan and capping the City’s share of
healthcare premiums. Implementation of a second tier retirement plan in 2011 and adoption of the
state‐mandated third tier pension benefit plan in 2013 also helps mitigate future pension cost
increases. New labor agreements include a provision for employees to start paying part of the City’s
share of pension contributions in addition to the employee’s share. Further pension cost sharing
with employees will be necessary to fund future cost increases.
Council has approved the concept of funding a Section 115 Trust
that is separate from CalPERS and would act as a mitigation
reserve if the City were unable to meet its annual required
contribution due to budget constraints in a given year.
As economic growth continues to flourish in this area of Silicon
Valley, it also exacerbates the challenges of increased traffic and congestion, affordable housing, and
demand for services. These issues were reflected in the setting of Council priorities for 2016:
Built Environment: Housing, Parking, Livability, Mobility
Introduction
…………………………………….………………………………….
iv City of Palo Alto
Infrastructure
Healthy City, Healthy Community
Completion of the Comprehensive Plan update
In keeping with these priorities, Council has approved implementation of strategies to address traffic
congestion in the City: parking management (Residential Preferential Parking program, parking
technology enhancements, garage wayfinding signage), transportation demand management
(Transportation Management Association, enhanced shuttle services, CalTrain GoPass program for
employees), and short and long‐term parking supply strategies (valet parking, construction of new
garages).
Council approved a $125.8 million Infrastructure Plan, which includes projects such as a new Public
Safety Building, replacement of two Fire Stations, a Bike and Pedestrian plan, and two parking
garages. These projects will be funded partially by debt to be repaid with an increase in the transient
occupancy tax (TOT) rate which went into effect in January 2015, TOT from newly opened hotels, and
from other sources such as impact fees and Stanford University Medical Center development
agreement monies. The Plan was recently updated for scope increases and cost escalations, and a
reserve of $30 million for unanticipated costs and contingencies was added, resulting in a revised
Infrastructure Plan of $160 million. As a result of sound fiscal management and reserve policies,
General Fund surpluses from FY 2012 through FY 2016 totaling $32.6 million were transferred to the
Infrastructure Reserve. An additional $4.3 million from the FY 2016 surplus is proposed for transfer
to the Infrastructure Reserve in FY 2017, for a total contribution of surplus funds of $36.9 million
over six years.
Rate increases will take effect in FY 2017 for electric, gas, water, wastewater, storm drain, and refuse
services. Increases are necessary due to increased costs resulting from the prolonged drought and
water conservation measures, treatment plant rehabilitation costs, and expanded recycling services.
Long Range Financial Forecast: The City produces a 10 year General Fund Long Range Financial
Forecast (LRFF) annually. This comprehensive report analyzes local, state, and federal economic
conditions, short and long‐term revenue and expense trends, and addresses challenges such as
funding long‐term pension and healthcare liabilities and infrastructure needs. The forecast is
designed to highlight finance issues which the City can address proactively. Moreover, it is a tool
that allows policymakers an opportunity to prioritize funding needs over time. It sets the tone for
the annual budget process and is one of the many tools and reports that Council uses for financial
planning.
The most recent LRFF indicates a financial shift downward for FY 2017 and out years due to rising
pension and healthcare costs and increasing costs for Infrastructure Plan projects. The City maintains
a General Fund Budget Stabilization Reserve (BSR) level of 15 to 20 percent of the General Fund
operating budget, with a targeted goal of 18.5 percent. Council approval is required to set this
reserve balance lower than 15 percent. As of June 30, 2016 the BSR balance is $51.6 million, of
which $2.1 million has been approved by Council to set aside for establishment of a pension trust
fund. Staff will bring forward recommendations for a further $7.9 million of proposed BSR uses as
part of the FY 2016 year‐end close process. The remaining balance of $41.6 million represents 21.4
percent of FY 2017 expenditures, and is $5.7 million more than the 18.5 percent target balance for
the BSR.
Introduction
………………………………………………….………………………
City of Palo Alto v
Both Moody’s and Standard and Poor’s (S&P) awarded their highest credit rating of Triple A to the
City’s general obligation debt. This rating has been awarded to only a few cities in California.
SIGNIFICANT EVENTS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS
The City of Palo Alto is a community dedicated to meeting the social, cultural,
recreational, educational, commercial and retail needs of its citizens and
businesses. As such, open space, education, recreational facilities, cultural
events and safe streets and neighborhoods are important aspects of the
community and the City has been recognized for its accomplishments with a
wide variety of awards and recognitions over the past year. Following is a
sampling of those awards:
Awarded gold level status as a Bicycle Friendly Community by the League of American
Bicyclists based on a strong commitment to bicycling evidenced by major streets with bike
lanes, high ratio of bike network mileage to road network mileage, and Bike to Work events;
Earned a spot on the national Top 10 utility solar list compiled by the Smart Electric Power
Alliance in recognition of third place for “Watts per Customer” installed in 2015; and
Awarded Tree Line USA award by the National Arbor Day Foundation in recognition of the
Utilities exceeding the standard criteria for quality tree care, annual worker training, tree
planting and public education, a tree‐based energy conservation program, and an Arbor Day
celebration.
Awards: During the past year, the City received an award for the prior fiscal year CAFR from the
Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) for “excellence in financial reporting.” The 2016
CAFR will be submitted to the GFOA award program to be considered for this distinguished financial
reporting award.
Acknowledgments: This CAFR reflects the hard work, talent and commitment of the staff members
of the Administrative Services Department. This document could not have been accomplished
without their efforts and each contributor deserves sincere appreciation. Management wishes to
acknowledge the support of Laura Kuryk, Accounting Manager, and the entire accounting staff for
their high level of professionalism and dedication. Management would also like to express its
appreciation to Macias Gini & O’Connell, the City’s independent external auditors, who assisted and
contributed to the preparation of this Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.
Special acknowledgment must be given to City Council and the Finance and Policy and Services
Committees for their dedication to directing the financial affairs of the City in a responsible,
professional and progressive manner.
Respectfully submitted,
LALO PEREZ, JAMES KEENE,
Chief Financial Officer City Manager
Introduction
…………………………………….………………………………….
vi City of Palo Alto
City of Palo Alto City Officials ………………………….…………
Finance Committee
Eric Filseth, Chair
Karen Holman
Greg Schmid
Cory Wolbach
Policy and Services Committee
Tom DuBois, Chair
Marc Berman
Liz Kniss
Gregory Scharff
Council‐Appointed Officers
City Manager
James Keene
City Attorney
Molly Stump
City Clerk
Beth Minor
City Auditor
Harriet Richardson
City Council
Patrick Burt, Mayor
Gregory Scharff, Vice‐Mayor
Marc Berman
Tom DuBois
Eric Filseth
Karen Holman
Liz Kniss
Greg Schmid
Cory Wolbach
Introduction
………………………………………………….………………………
City of Palo Alto vii
Assistant City Managers (2)
Edward K. Shikada
Vacant (1)
City Attorney
Molly Stump
City Manager
James Keene
City Auditor
Harriet Richardson
City Clerk
Beth Minor
City of Palo Alto Organization ……………………………………
Palo Alto Residents
City Council
Community Services
Rob DeGeus, Director
Administrative Services
Lalo Perez, Chief Financial Officer
Fire
Eric Nickel, Chief
Human Resources
Rumi Portillo, Director
Police
Dennis Burns, Chief Planning & Community Environment
Hillary Gitelman, Director
Utilities
Edward K. Shikada, Acting Director
Public Works
Mike Sartor, Director
Library
Monique le Conge‐Ziesenhenne,
Director
Development Services
Peter Pirnejad, Director
Chief Communications Officer
Claudia Keith
Office of Emergency Services
Kenneth Dueker, Director
Office of Sustainability
Gil Friend, Chief Sustainability Officer
Information Technology
Jonathan Reichental,
Chief Information Officer
Introduction
…………………………………….………………………………….
viii City of Palo Alto
Administrative Services Organization ………
Administrative Division Treasury Division
Accounting Division Budget Division
Purchasing Division Real Estate Division
Mission Statement
To provide proactive administrative and technical support to
City departments and decision makers, and to safeguard and
facilitate the optimal use of City resources.
Administrative Services Department
Introduction
………………………………………………….………………………
City of Palo Alto ix
Government Finance Officers Association of
the United States and Canada – Award ……
Century City
Los Angeles
Newport Beach
Oakland
Sacramento
San Diego
San Francisco
Walnut Creek
Woodland Hills
www.mgocpa.com
Macias Gini & O’Connell LLP 2121 N. California Boulevard, Suite 750 Walnut Creek, CA 94596
1
Independent Auditor’s Report
Honorable Mayor and the Members
of the City Council of
City of Palo Alto, California
Report on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type
activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Palo Alto,
California (City), as of and for the year ended June 30, 2016, and the related notes to the financial
statements, which collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements as listed in the table of
contents.
Management’s Responsibility for the Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes
the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair
presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditor’s Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted
our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and
the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the
Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the
assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error.
In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation
and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in
the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s
internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the
appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for
our audit opinions.
2
Opinions
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund,
and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City as of June 30, 2016, and the respective changes
in financial position, and, where applicable, cash flows thereof and the respective budgetary comparison
for the General Fund for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America.
Other Matters
Required Supplementary Information
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the management’s
discussion and analysis, the schedules of changes in the net pension liability and related ratios and the
schedules of contributions, as listed in the table of contents, be presented to supplement the basic financial
statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the
Governmental Accounting Standards Board who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting
for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context.
We have applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with
auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of
management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for
consistency with management’s responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other
knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion
or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with
sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance.
Other Information
Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively
comprise the City’s basic financial statements. The introductory section, combining and individual
nonmajor fund financial statements and schedules, statistical section and the schedule of expenditures of
federal awards, as required by Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative
Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards,, are presented for purposes
of additional analysis and are not a required part of the basic financial statements.
The combining and individual nonmajor fund financial statements and schedules and the schedule of
expenditures of federal awards are the responsibility of management and were derived from and relate
directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements.
Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial
statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information
directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to
the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing
standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the combining and
individual nonmajor fund financial statements and schedules and the schedule of expenditures of federal
awards are fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole.
The introductory and statistical sections have not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the
audit of the basic financial statements, and accordingly, we do not express an opinion or provide any
assurance on them.
3
Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated
November 2, 2016 on our consideration of the City’s internal control over financial reporting and on our
tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and
other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over
financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on
internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit
performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the City’s internal control
over financial reporting and compliance.
Walnut Creek, California
November 2, 2016
4
This page is left intentionally blank.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
………………………………………………………..……….………………………………………
City of Palo Alto 5
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) provides an overview of the City of Palo Alto’s financial
performance for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016. To obtain a complete understanding of the City’s financial
condition, this document should be read in conjunction with the accompanying Transmittal Letter and Basic
Financial Statements.
Financial Highlights
The assets and deferred outflows of resources of the City of Palo Alto (City) exceeded its liabilities and
deferred inflows of resources at the close of Fiscal Year (FY) 2016 by $1,190.8 million. Of this amount,
$200.7 million represents unrestricted net position, which may be used to meet the government’s
ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors.
At the close of FY 2016, the City’s governmental funds reported combined fund balances of $245.7
million, an increase of $21.1 million from prior year. Approximately 21.0 percent of this amount, or
$51.6 million, is unassigned fund balance and available for spending at the government’s discretion.
At the end of the current fiscal year, unrestricted fund balance (the total of the committed, assigned
and unassigned components of fund balance) for the General Fund was $59.8 million, or 33.3 percent
of total general fund expenditures, including transfers.
The City’s total outstanding long‐term debt decreased by $11.4 million during the current fiscal year
due to scheduled debt retirement in the amount of $6.3 million and defeased debt of $5.1 million.
OVERVIEW OF THE COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT (CAFR)
The CAFR is presented in six sections:
An introductory section that includes the Transmittal Letter and general information
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
The Basic Financial Statements that include the Government‐wide and Fund Financial
Statements, along with the Notes to these statements
Supplemental Information
Statistical Information
Single Audit
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
……….…………………………………………………………………..……………………………
City of Palo Alto 6
Basic Financial Statements
The Basic Financial Statements contain the Government‐wide Financial Statements, the Fund Financial
Statements and the Notes to these financial statements. This report also includes supplementary information
intended to furnish additional detail to support the Basic Financial Statements.
For certain entities and funds, the City acts solely as a depository agent. For example, the City has several
Assessment Districts for which it produces fiduciary statements detailing the cash balances and activities of
these districts. These entities are independent, and their balances are excluded from the City’s government‐
wide financial statements.
Government‐wide Financial Statements
The Government‐wide Financial Statements provide a longer‐term view of the City’s activities as a whole.
They include the Statement of Net Position and the Statement of Activities.
The Statement of Net Position includes the City’s capital assets and long‐term liabilities on a full accrual basis
of accounting similar to that used by private sector companies. Over time, increases or decreases in net
position may serve as a useful indicator of whether the financial position of the City is improving or
deteriorating.
The Statement of Activities provides information about the City’s revenues and expenses on a full accrual
basis, with an emphasis on measuring net revenues or expenses for each of the City’s programs. The
Statement of Activities explains in detail the change in net position for the year. All changes in net position
are reported as soon as the underlying event giving rise to the change occurs, regardless of the timing of
related cash flows.
The amounts in the Statement of Net Position and the Statement of Activities are separated into
Governmental and Business‐type Activities in order to provide a summary of each type of activity.
Governmental Activities ‐ All of the City’s basic services are considered to be governmental activities. Included
in basic services are the City Council, City Manager, City Attorney, City Clerk, City Auditor, Administrative
Services, Human Resources, Public Works, Planning and Community Environment, Development Services,
Public Safety, Community Services, and Library. These services are supported by general City revenues such
as taxes, and by specific program revenues such as fees and grants.
The City’s governmental activities also include the activities of the Palo Alto Public Improvement Corporation,
which is a separate legal entity financially accountable to the City.
Business‐type Activities ‐ All of the City’s enterprise activities are reported as business‐type activities,
including Water, Electric, Fiber Optics, Gas, Wastewater Collection, Wastewater Treatment, Refuse, Storm
Drainage and Airport. Unlike governmental services, these services are intended to recover all or a significant
portion of their costs through user fees and charges, except for the Airport which is currently supported by a
long‐term advance from the General Fund, as discussed in Note 4.
The Government‐wide Financial Statements can be found on pages 29‐31 of this report.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
……………………………….…………..……………………………………………………………
City of Palo Alto 7
Fund Financial Statements
The Fund Financial Statements provide detailed information about each of the City’s most significant funds,
called major funds. The concept of major funds, and the determination of which are major funds, was
established by Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 34 and replaced the concept
of combining like funds and presenting them in total. Therefore, each major fund is presented individually,
with all non‐major funds combined in a single column on each fund statement. Subordinate schedules display
these non‐major funds in more detail. Major funds present the major activities of the City for the year. The
General Fund is always considered a major fund, but other funds may change from year to year as a result of
changes in the pattern of City activities.
The Fund Financial Statements display the City’s operations in more detail than the Government‐wide
Financial Statements. Their focus is primarily on the short‐term activities of the City’s General Fund and other
major funds such as Capital Projects, Water Services, Electric Services, Fiber Optics, Gas Services, Wastewater
Collection Services, Wastewater Treatment Services, Refuse Services and Storm Drainage Services.
Budget and actual financial comparison information is presented only for the General Fund.
Fund Financial Statements include Governmental, Enterprise, Internal Service and Agency Funds.
Governmental Funds
Governmental Fund Financial Statements are prepared on the modified accrual basis of accounting, which
means they measure only current financial resources and uses. Capital assets and other long‐lived assets,
along with long‐term liabilities, are presented only in the Government‐wide Financial Statements. In FY 2016,
the City had two major governmental funds, the General Fund and the Capital Projects Fund. Data from the
other governmental funds are combined into a single aggregated presentation. Individual fund data for each
of these non‐major governmental funds is provided in the Supplemental section of this report.
Because the focus of governmental funds is narrower than that of the Government‐wide Financial Statements,
it is useful to compare the information presented for governmental funds with similar information presented
for governmental activities in the Government‐wide Financial Statements. By doing so, readers may better
understand the long‐term impact of the government’s near‐term financing decisions. Both the Governmental
Fund Balance Sheet and the Governmental Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balances provide a reconciliation to facilitate this comparison between governmental funds and governmental
activities.
The Governmental Fund Financial Statements can be found on pages 33‐37 of this report.
Proprietary Funds
Enterprise and Internal Service Fund Financial Statements are prepared on the full accrual basis of accounting,
similar to that used by private sector companies. These statements include all of their assets, deferred
outflows and inflows of resources, and liabilities, both current and long‐term.
Since the City’s Internal Service Funds provide goods and services exclusively to the City’s governmental and
business‐type activities, their activities are only reported in total at the fund level. Internal Service Funds,
such as Technology and General Benefits, cannot be considered major funds because their revenues are
derived from other City funds. Revenues between funds are eliminated in the Government‐wide Financial
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
…………………………..……….……………………………………………………………………
City of Palo Alto 8
Statements, and any related profits or losses in Internal Service Funds are returned to the activities in which
they were created, along with any residual net assets of the Internal Service Funds.
The Proprietary Fund Financial Statements can be found on pages 38‐43 of this report.
Fiduciary Funds
The City is the fiduciary agent for certain assessment districts such as the University Avenue Area Off‐Street
Parking Assessment District. In this role, the City holds money collected from property owners and awaiting
transfer to the districts’ bond trustees. The City’s fiduciary activities are reported in the separate Statement
of Fiduciary Net Position and the supplemental Agency Funds Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities.
These activities are excluded from the City’s other financial statements because the City cannot utilize these
assets to finance its own operations.
The Fiduciary Fund Financial Statements can be found on page 44 of this report.
Notes to the Financial Statements
The Notes provide additional information that is necessary to acquire a full understanding of the data provided
in the Government‐wide and Fund Financial Statements. The Notes to the financial statements can be found
on pages 47‐103 of this report.
Other Information
The Required Supplementary Information related to the City’s pension plans is included after the Notes to the
Financial Statements on pages 105‐108. The combining statements referred to earlier in connection with non‐
major Governmental Funds and Internal Service Funds are presented immediately following the Required
Supplementary Information. Combining statements and individual fund statements and schedules can be
found on pages 109‐134 of this report.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
………………………………….……………………………………………………………………
City of Palo Alto 9
Financial Analysis of Government‐wide Financial Statements
This section focuses on the City’s net position and changes in net position of its governmental and business‐
type activities for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2016. As noted earlier, the City’s total assets and deferred
outflows of resources exceed total liabilities and deferred inflows of resources by $1,190.8 million at the end
of the fiscal year, an improvement in net position of $59.1 million.
STATEMENT OF NET POSITION
As of June 30, 2016
(in millions)
2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015
Cash and investments 295.0$ 280.9$ 244.7$ 253.7$ 539.7$ 534.6$
Other assets 62.3 57.2 35.3 39.2 97.6 96.4
Capital assets 496.0 485.2 576.8 558.5 1,072.8 1,043.7
Total Assets 853.3 823.3 856.8 851.4 1,710.1 1,674.7
Unamortized loss from refunding ‐ ‐ 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4
Pension related 21.2 19.2 9.4 8.1 30.6 27.3
Total Deferred Outflows of Resources 21.2 19.2 9.7 8.5 30.9 27.7
Net pension liabilities 230.1 208.8 89.5 81.1 319.6 289.9
Long‐term debt 71.5 78.8 68.1 72.2 139.6 151.0
Other liabilities 48.1 54.3 24.0 24.7 72.1 79.0
Total Liabilities 349.7 341.9 181.6 178.0 531.3 519.9
Pension related 13.7 36.7 5.1 14.1 18.8 50.8
Total Deferred Inflows of Resources 13.7 36.7 5.1 14.1 18.8 50.8
Net Position
Net investment in capital assets 425.2 405.9 512.9 490.9 938.1 896.8
Restricted 47.9 56.0 4.1 4.1 52.0 60.1
Unrestricted 37.9 2.0 162.8 172.8 200.7 174.8
Total Net Position 511.0$ 463.9$ 679.8$ 667.8$ 1,190.8$ 1,131.7$
Governmental
Activities
Business‐type
Activities
Government‐wide
Totals
The largest portion of the City’s net position (78.8 percent) is its investment in capital assets such as land,
buildings, infrastructure and vehicles, less any related outstanding debt that was used to acquire those assets.
The City uses these capital assets to provide a variety of services to its citizens. Accordingly, these assets are
not available for future spending. Although the City’s investment in capital assets is reported net of related
debt, it should be noted that the resources used to repay this debt must be provided from other sources, since
the capital assets themselves cannot be used to liquidate these liabilities.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
……….…………………………………………………………………………………..……………
City of Palo Alto 10
The restricted portion of the City’s net position (4.4 percent) represents resources that are subject to external
restrictions on how they may be used. The remaining balance of $200.7 million, representing 16.8 percent of
the City’s net position, is unrestricted and may be used to meet the government’s ongoing obligations to its
citizens and creditors.
At the end of the current fiscal year, the City is able to report positive unrestricted net positions both for the
government as a whole and for its separate governmental and business‐type activities, except for the
following three funds:
Wastewater Treatment Fund $2.1 million deficit due to pension related items;
Airport Fund $2.3 million deficit due to cumulative operating losses; and
Printing and Mailing Services Fund $0.3 million deficit due to pension related items.
Components of the $59.1 million increase in total net position are discussed in the following sections for
governmental activities and business‐type activities.
Governmental Activities – Net Position
The following analysis focuses on the net position and changes in net position of the City’s Governmental
Activities, presented in the Government‐wide Statement of Net Position and Statement of Activities.
GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
Net Position at June 30
(in millions)
Increase/
2016 2015 (Decrease)
Cash and investments 295.0$ 280.9$ 14.1$
Other assets 62.3 57.2 5.1
Capital assets 496.0 485.2 10.8
Total Assets 853.3 823.3 30.0
Pension related 21.2 19.2 2.0
Total Deferred Outflows of Resources 21.2 19.2 2.0
Net pension liabilities 230.1 208.8 21.3
Long‐term debt 71.5 78.8 (7.3)
Other liabilities 48.1 54.3 (6.2)
Total Liabilities 349.7 341.9 7.8
Pension related 13.7 36.7 (23.0)
Total Deferred Inflows of Resources 13.7 36.7 (23.0)
Net Position
Net investment in capital assets 425.2 405.9 19.3
Restricted 47.9 56.0 (8.1)
Unrestricted 37.9 2.0 35.9
Total Net Position 511.0$ 463.9$ 47.1$
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
………………………………….……………………………………………………………………
City of Palo Alto 11
The City’s Governmental Activities total net position increased $47.1 million to $511.0 million as of June 30,
2016. This increase was a result of the following:
Cash increased $14.1 million due to a higher cash position in the Capital Projects Fund as a result of
higher operating transfers in and lower capital expenditures due to completion of major Library
projects in the prior year.
Capital assets net of depreciation increased $10.8 million due to major capital projects such as El
Camino Park improvements, and street and sidewalk improvements throughout the City.
Long‐term debt decreased $7.3 million due to scheduled debt repayments of $2.2 million, and
defeased payments of $5.1 million on the General Obligation Bonds using funds from bond premium
and project savings.
Other liabilities decreased $6.2 million due to lower accounts payable balances because of completion
of Library projects, and to current year reduction of deposits held for Transfer Development Rights.
Net investment in capital assets increased $19.3 million to $425.2 million. Restricted net position
decreased $8.1 million to $47.9 million due primarily to expenditure of remaining bond proceeds for
Library project expenses and defeasance of bonds. Unrestricted net position increased by $35.9
million to $37.9 million as a result of lower capital expenditures in the Capital Projects Fund and
increased fund balance of $7.7 million in the Housing‐in‐Lieu Funds. Unrestricted net position
represents current net assets available to finance subsequent year operations and other expenditures
approved by City Council.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………
City of Palo Alto 12
Governmental Activities – Revenues
The table below shows that Governmental Activities revenues totaled $193.3 million in FY 2016, an increase
of $7.5 million from prior year revenues of $185.8 million.
GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
Revenues for the Year Ended June 30
(in millions)
Increase/
Revenues by Source 2016 2015 (Decrease)
Program Revenues:
Charges for services 67.4$ 63.5$ 3.9$
Operating grants and contributions 2.2 5.3 (3.1)
Capital grants and contributions 0.3 0.6 (0.3)
Total Program Revenues 69.9 69.4 0.5
General Revenues:
Property tax 41.2 38.8 2.4
Sales tax 30.0 29.7 0.3
Utility user tax 12.4 10.9 1.5
Transient occupancy tax 22.4 16.7 5.7
Documentary transfer tax 6.3 10.4 (4.1)
Other tax 1.6 1.5 0.1
Investment earnings 8.6 5.0 3.6
Rents and miscellaneous 0.9 3.4 (2.5)
Total General Revenues 123.4 116.4 7.0
Total Revenues 193.3$ 185.8$ 7.5$
Program Revenues such as charges for services, operating grants and contributions, and capital grants and
contributions are generated from or restricted to each activity. Total Program Revenues increased $0.5
million from the prior year.
General Revenues increased $7.0 million, or 6.0 percent, from the prior year primarily due to increased
General Fund tax revenues. Further analysis of general revenues can be found in the Financial Analysis of
Governmental Funds section of the MD&A.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
…………………………………….………………………………………………..…………………
City of Palo Alto 13
Governmental Activities – Revenues by Source
The chart below presents revenues by source for Governmental Activities. General Revenues are composed
of taxes and other revenues not specifically generated by, or restricted to, individual activities. All tax revenues
and investment earnings are included in General Revenues.
Program Revenues
36%
Property Tax
21%
Sales Tax
16%
Utility User Tax
6%
Transient Occupancy Tax
12%
Documentary
Transfer Tax
3%
Other
6%
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
…………………………….………………………………………………………..…………………
City of Palo Alto 14
Governmental Activities – Expenses
The table below presents a comparison of FY 2016 and FY 2015 expenses by function, along with interest and
other expense. Total Governmental Activities functional expense was $164.9 million in FY 2016, an increase
of $13.5 million.
GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
Expenses and Change in Net Position for the Year Ended June 30
(in millions)
Increase/
Activities 2016 2015 (Decrease)
City Council 0.4$ 0.3$ 0.1$
City Manager 2.7 2.2 0.5
City Attorney 2.5 1.8 0.7
City Clerk 0.6 0.7 (0.1)
City Auditor 0.4 0.4 0.0
Administrative Services 10.6 10.0 0.6
Human Resources 2.2 1.4 0.8
Public Safety 56.6 58.7 (2.1)
Planning and Community Environment 10.2 8.4 1.8
Development Services 11.2 10.4 0.8
Public Works 24.6 21.1 3.5
Community Services 28.5 24.7 3.8
Library 10.8 7.7 3.1
Interest and Other Expense 3.6 3.6 0.0
Total Functional Expense 164.9 151.4 13.5
Increase in Net Position
before Transfers 28.4 34.4 (6.0)
Transfers in 18.7 16.4 2.3
Change in Net Position 47.1 50.8 (3.7)
Net Position, Beginning 463.9 413.1 50.8
Net Position, Ending 511.0$ 463.9$ 47.1$
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
……………………………………………………………………..…………………………………
City of Palo Alto 15
In addition to the variances at the fund level which are explained in the Financial Analysis of Governmental
Funds section of the MD&A, year over year variances in Functional expenses at the government‐wide level
are due to the following:
Change in pension related adjustments to defer current year contributions and expense prior year
contributions as required by GASB 68 ($0.4 million);
Allocation of the Internal Service Funds net position ($1.8 million);
Capital asset activities such as depreciation and asset retirements ($0.5 million); and
Repayment of excess bond funds to University Avenue Area Off‐Street Parking Assessment District
($1.8 million).
Governmental Activities – Functional Expenses
The functional expenses chart below includes only current year expenses. It does not include capital outlays,
as those are added to the City’s capital assets. Functions which comprise 1 percent or less of total expenses
are combined into the All Other category in the chart below. All Other includes City Council, City Manager,
City Attorney, City Clerk, City Auditor and Human Resources.
Administrative
Services
7%
Public Works
15%
Interest and Other
2%
Planning and
Community
Environment
6%
Development Svcs
7%
Public Safety
34%
Community Services
17%
Library
7%
All Other
5%
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………
City of Palo Alto 16
Business‐type Activities – Net Position
The following analysis focuses on the net position and changes in net position of the City’s Business‐type
Activities presented in the Government‐wide Statement of Net Position and Statement of Activities.
Increase/
2016 2015 (Decrease)
Cash and investments 244.7$ 253.7$ (9.0)$
Other assets 35.3 39.2 (3.9)
Capital assets 576.8 558.5 18.3
Total Assets 856.8 851.4 5.4
Unamortized loss from refunding 0.3 0.4 (0.1)
Deferred pension contribution 9.4 8.1 1.3
Total Deferred Outflows of Resources 9.7 8.5 1.3
Net pension liabilities 89.5 81.1 8.4
Long‐term debt 68.1 72.2 (4.1)
Other liabilities 24.0 24.7 (0.7)
Total Liabilities 181.6 178.0 3.6
Difference between expected and actual
earnings on investments 5.1 14.1 (9.0)
Total Deferred Outflows of Resources 5.1 14.1 (9.0)
Net Position
Net investment in capital assets 512.9 490.9 22.0
Restricted 4.1 4.1 0.0
Unrestricted 162.8 172.8 (10.0)
Total Net Position 679.8$ 667.8$ 12.0$
BUSINESS‐TYPE ACTIVITIES
Net Position at June 30
(in millions)
The City’s Business‐type Activities total net position increased $12.0 million to $679.8 million as of
June 30, 2016.
Cash and investments decreased $9.0 million primarily due to Electric Fund decrease in net position of $8.3
million.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………
City of Palo Alto 17
Capital assets increased $18.3 million to $576.8 million in FY 2016 primarily due to capital improvements in
the Gas Fund. This infrastructure improvement, in addition to the $4.1 million reduction in long‐term debt by
Enterprise Funds, created the increase of $22.0 million in the net investment in capital assets to $512.9 million.
Unrestricted net position of $162.8 million, a decrease of $10.0 million from the prior year, represents liquid
assets available to finance day‐to‐day operations and other expenditures approved by Council. The amount
includes rate stabilization reserves (RSR) of $44.7 million and operations reserves of $49.9 million, along with
the Electric special projects (Calaveras) reserve of $51.8 million, and the hydro stabilization reserve of $11.4
million. The positive balances in these reserves are offset by the GASB 68 adjustment pension reserve of $85.1
million. Additional detail is included in Note 10.
Business‐type Activities – Revenues
The table below presents the revenues for each of the City’s Business‐type Activities or Enterprise Funds. The
City operates the Water, Electric, Fiber Optics, Gas, Wastewater Collection, Wastewater Treatment, Refuse,
Storm Drainage and Airport Funds.
BUSINESS‐TYPE ACTIVITIES
Revenues for the Year Ended June 30
(in millions)
Increase/
Revenues by Source 2016 2015 (Decrease)
Program Revenues:
Charges for services 272.9$ 270.9$ 2.0$
Operating grants and contributions 0.7 0.5 0.2
Capital grants and contributions 1.1 2.1 (1.0)
Total Program Revenues 274.7 273.5 1.2
General Revenues:
Investment earnings 7.3 4.9 2.4
Total General Revenues 7.3 4.9 2.4
Total Revenues 282.0$ 278.4$ 3.6$
Business‐type Activities revenues totaled $282.0 million, an increase of $3.6 million from the prior year.
Program revenues increased $1.2 million year over year. Revenues for all funds were relatively flat year over
year with the exception of Water Fund which had increased revenue of $1.7 million due to rate increases in
July and September.
Investment earnings increased due to the unrealized gain which resulted from adjusting investments to
market value at year‐end, as required by GASB 31.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
……….……………………………………………………………………………………………..…
City of Palo Alto 18
Business‐type Activities – Expenses
The table below presents a comparison of the FY 2016 and FY 2015 expenses for the City’s Business‐type
Activities. Encumbrances and reappropriations are not included.
BUSINESS‐TYPE ACTIVITIES
Expenses and Change in Net Position for the Year Ended June 30
(in millions)
Increase/
Business‐type Activities 2016 2015 (Decrease)
Water 35.1$ 33.2$ 1.9$
Electric 120.3 122.4 (2.1)
Fiber Optics 2.1 1.9 0.2
Gas 20.9 23.5 (2.6)
Wastewater Collection 15.2 14.6 0.6
Wastewater Treatment 22.5 21.6 0.9
Refuse 30.4 28.0 2.4
Storm Drainage 3.7 3.7 0.0
Airport 1.0 1.0 0.0
Total Functional Expense 251.2 249.9 1.3
Increase in Net Position
before Transfers 30.7 28.4 2.3
Transfers out (18.7) (16.4) (2.3)
Change in Net Position 12.0 12.0 0.0
Net Position, Beginning 667.8 655.8 12.0
Net Position, Ending 679.8$ 667.8$ 12.0$
Business‐type Activities expenses increased $1.3 million for a total of $251.2 million. Year over year expenses
were significantly affected by the following events:
Water Fund expenses increased $1.9 million due to increased wholesale water rates to cover the cost
of upgrades and improvements to the water supply distribution system.
Electric Fund expenses decreased $2.1 million due to decreased energy purchase costs. The
availability of hydroelectric energy resources is lower than average due to the ongoing drought, which
necessitates higher than average electricity purchases at market rates, but lower than expected
market rates drove total purchase costs lower.
Gas Fund expenses decreased $2.6 million due to lower commodity prices.
Refuse Fund expenses increased $2.4 million due to the cost of providing expanded services for
recycling and composting as a means to accomplish zero waste and reduced greenhouse gas emissions
goals.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
………………………………………………………..……….………………………………………
City of Palo Alto 19
FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Financial Analysis of Governmental Funds
As noted earlier, the City uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance‐related
legal requirements.
Governmental Funds
The focus of the City’s Governmental Funds is to provide information on near‐term inflows, outflows, and
balances of spendable resources. Such information is useful in assessing the City’s financing requirements. In
particular, the unassigned fund balance may serve as a useful measure of a government’s net resources
available for discretionary use as it represents the portion of fund balance not yet limited to use for a particular
purpose by either an external party, the City itself, or an entity that has been delegated authority by the City
Council to assign resources for use.
As of June 30, 2016, the City’s Governmental Funds reported combined fund balances of $245.7 million, an
increase of $21.1 million from the prior year. Approximately 21.0 percent, or $51.6 million, constitutes
unassigned fund balance, which is available for spending at the government’s discretion. The remainder of
the fund balance is either non‐spendable, restricted, committed, or assigned to indicate that it is: 1) not in
spendable form ($8.6 million); 2) restricted for particular purposes ($47.1 million); 3) committed for particular
purposes ($65.7 million); or 4) assigned for particular purposes ($72.7 million).
Governmental Fund revenues increased $7.4 million, or 4.0 percent, from prior year to $191.9 million.
Revenues in the General Fund increased $8.3 million and Capital Projects Fund revenue increased $0.8 million.
Other Governmental Funds revenue decreased by $1.8 million due to reduced developer impact and housing‐
in‐lieu fees.
Governmental Fund expenditures were $186.2 million, a decrease of $2.9 million from the prior year. General
Fund expenditures increased $6.4 million, Capital Projects Fund expenditures decreased by $15.7 million, and
Non‐major Fund expenditures increased by $6.4 million. Details of significant changes are discussed in the
following sections.
General Fund
Balance Sheet
The General Fund is the primary operating fund of the City. At the end of the current fiscal year, fund balance
of the General Fund was $66.9 million, compared to $62.5 million in the prior year. The fund balance has
been classified as $7.1 million non‐spendable, $8.3 million assigned, and $51.6 million unassigned. The
unassigned amount of $51.6 million is designated by the Council for budget stabilization. Proposed uses are
as follows:
$1.3 million for FY 2017 Budget Amendment Ordinances approved to date;
$1.3 million for Council approved reappropriations for various City departments;
$2.1 million to fund a Council approved pension trust fund; and
$5.3 million for transfer to Capital Projects Fund for deferred projects and reserved uses.
The remaining balance of $41.6 million represents 21.4 percent of FY 2017 expenditures and operating
transfers, which is $5.7 million above the target reserve guideline of 18.5 percent set by Council. Staff will
bring forward further recommendations as part of the year‐end close process.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
……….…………………………………..……………………………………………………………
City of Palo Alto 20
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance
Revenues
The City’s General Fund revenues totaled $165.8 million in FY 2016. This represents an increase of $8.3 million,
or 5.3 percent, compared to the prior year. The year over year change in significant revenue sources is noted
in the following table.
GENERAL FUND
Revenues for the Year Ended June 30
(in millions)
Increase/
Revenues by Source 2016 2015 (Decrease)
Property tax 36.6$ 34.1$ 2.5$
Sales tax 30.0 29.7 0.3
Utility user tax 12.5 10.9 1.6
Transient occupancy tax 22.4 16.7 5.7
Documentary transfer tax 6.3 10.4 (4.1)
Charges for services 23.9 25.9 (2.0)
Permits and licence 7.9 7.1 0.8
Rental income 15.8 14.9 0.9
All other 10.4 7.8 2.6
Total Revenues 165.8$ 157.5$ 8.3$
Property tax revenue increased by $2.5 million, or 7.3 percent, due to increased property assessment roll
growth.
Utility user tax revenue increased $1.6 million from prior year due to increased telephone utility user receipts.
Transient occupancy tax (TOT) ended the year $5.7 million, or 34.1 percent, higher than prior year due to
higher room rates, newly opened hotels that performed better than expected, and a new revenue stream
from Airbnb rentals. Also, FY 2016 reflects a full year of the Council approved two percent increase in the TOT
rate from 12 percent to 14 percent, compared to FY 2015 which only included six months of the increase that
took effect January 1, 2015.
Documentary transfer tax decreased $4.1 million to $6.3 million due to the unusually high dollar commercial
property transactions that occurred in FY 2015.
All other revenue increased from prior year by $2.6 million primarily due to $1.7 million in net proceeds from
the sale of the former City Manager’s house.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
……….………………………………………………………………………………………………
City of Palo Alto 21
Expenditures
General Fund expenditures totaled $145.2 million for FY 2016 compared to $138.8 in the prior year. This
amount excludes encumbrances and reappropriations. The year over year change for major functions is noted
in the following table:
GENERAL FUND
Expenditures for the Year Ended June 30
(in millions)
Increase/
Expenditures by Function 2016 2015 (Decrease)
Administrative Services 3.5$ 3.7$ (0.2)$
Public Works 12.3 11.4 0.9
Planning and Community Environment 9.1 7.4 1.7
Development Services 10.6 11.1 (0.5)
Police 35.2 34.1 1.1
Fire 28.3 27.1 1.2
Community Services 24.3 23.0 1.3
Library 8.0 8.0 0.0
Non‐Departmental 5.7 5.6 0.1
All other 8.2 7.4 0.8
Total Expenditures 145.2$ 138.8$ 6.4$
Planning and Community Environment expenses increased $1.7 million due to the addition of three full‐time
equivalent positions ($0.5 million) and increased contract services expense related to initiatives such as
Shuttle Service program enhancements, parking management, and Transportation Management Association
initialization.
Police expenses increased $1.1 million due to $0.4 million increased salaries and benefits, and increased
expenditures for training, travel and equipment.
Fire expenses increased $1.2 million due to $0.7 million overtime and $0.4 million in allocated charges.
Community Services expenses increased $1.3 million due to increased salaries and benefits of $0.4 million,
increased expenses for class activities, and increased allocated charges.
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance ‐ Budget and Actual
Original budget compared to final budget
Revenues were originally budgeted at $153.4 million and were revised upward by $4.3 million. Revenue
categories that were adjusted are shown in the table below.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
……………………………………………….……………………………………………………..…
City of Palo Alto 22
GENERAL FUND
Budgeted Revenues for the Year Ended June 30
(in millions)
Adopted Final Increase/
Budgeted Revenues Budget Budget (Decrease)
Property tax 35.1$ 36.0$ 0.9$
Sales tax 27.6 28.4 0.8
Utility user tax 11.2 10.5 (0.7)
Transient occupancy tax 18.8 22.0 3.2
Documentary transfer tax 6.8 7.0 0.2
All other 53.9 53.8 (0.1)
153.4 157.7 4.3
Charges to other funds 11.9 11.9 ‐
Prior year encumbrances and appropriations ‐ 5.6 5.6
Total Budgeted Revenues 165.3$ 175.2$ 9.9$
Adjustments to the Adopted Budget were based on the following:
Sales tax was increased by $0.8 million due to higher than expected receipts.
Property tax was increased by $0.9 million due to receipt of excess funds from the Educational
Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF).
Transient occupancy tax was increased by $3.2 million due to higher than expected receipts driven by
higher room rates, newly opened hotels performing above expectations, and a new revenue stream
from Airbnb rentals.
Documentary transfer tax was increased by $0.2 million based on year‐to‐date receipts tracking
slightly higher than anticipated.
Actual revenues of $164.4 million were $6.8 million higher than final budgeted revenues of $157.7 million due
to the following:
$1.7 million net proceeds from the sale of former City Manager’s house;
$0.9 million revenue from Cable Joint Powers Authority budgeted in operating transfers in;
$2.0 million higher than expected utility user tax; and
$1.6 million higher than anticipated sales tax revenue.
Expenditures were originally budgeted at $162.9 million and were revised upward by $7.9 million, including
prior year encumbrances of $5.6 million, for a final budgeted amount of $170.8 million.
Current year budgeted expenditures and operating transfers include a draw of $11.5 million from FY 2015
surplus that was approved in November 2015 as part of the FY 2015 year‐end close City Manager Report
#6251, and was incorporated into the FY 2016 mid‐year budget changes.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
……………………………………………………………………………………………………..…
City of Palo Alto 23
The approved items are:
$1.0 million transfer to Technology Fund for the Radio Infrastructure Replacement Fund;
$6.0 million transfer to Capital Improvement Fund;
$1.0 million transfer to Capital Improvement Fund for Roth Building rehabilitation reserve;
$2.6 million to fund FY 2016 expenditures.
GENERAL FUND
Budgeted Expenditures for the Year Ended June 30
(in millions)
Adopted Final Increase/ Actuals, plus
Budgeted Expenditures Budget Budget (Decrease) Encumbrances
Community Services 24.8$ 26.5$ 1.7$ 25.3$
Police 36.8 36.9 0.1 36.1
Fire 27.6 29.1 1.5 28.9
Library 8.6 9.0 0.4 8.2
Planning and Community Environment 8.9 11.1 2.2 10.9
Public Works 15.0 15.9 0.9 15.1
Development Services 11.9 12.3 0.4 10.9
Non‐departmental 8.7 7.0 (1.7) 6.2
All other 20.6 23.0 2.4 21.4
Total Budgeted Expenditures 162.9$ 170.8$ 7.9$ 163.0
Less: Charges to Other Funds (11.6)
Less: Encumbrances (6.2)
Net General Fund Expenditures 145.2$
The final budgeted expenditure amount of $170.8 million compares to the actual expenditures plus
encumbrances of $163.0 million, a difference of $7.9 million, of which $6.2 million is encumbrances carried
forward to FY 2017. The lower than budgeted expenditures were primarily due to vacancy and benefits
savings higher than expected.
Transfers out were originally budgeted at $22.7 million, with the final budget number at $35.0 million, an
increase of $12.3 million. The increase was due primarily to the additional $8.0 million transferred to the
Capital Improvement and Technology Funds as noted above, $2.3 million additional TOT transferred to the
Capital Improvement Fund, $0.5 million additional to Residential Parking Fund, and $0.5 million to the Vehicle
Maintenance Fund. Actual transfers out for the year were $34.5 million, a difference of $0.5 million from final
budget due to reclass of the Airport Fund transfer to interfund advance at year‐end.
Capital Projects Fund
Capital Projects Fund expenditures and other uses were $26.2 million in FY 2016, a decrease of $15.8 million
from the prior year driven by reduced construction and renovation costs for Library projects that were
completed in FY 2015. This level of expenditure is consistent with the City’s effort to rehabilitate and maintain
its existing infrastructure.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
……….…………………………………………………………………………..……………………
City of Palo Alto 24
Non‐major Funds
These funds are not presented separately in the Basic Financial Statements, but are individually presented as
Supplemental Information.
Financial Analysis of Enterprise Funds
At June 30, 2016, the City’s Enterprise Funds reported total net position of $676.9 million, an increase of $12.1
million or 1.8 percent from the prior year. The increase was primarily from the Electric and Gas Funds. Further
analysis is noted in the following section. Unrestricted net position for the Enterprise Funds totaled $159.9
million, a 5.8 percent decrease from FY 2015. Following is a table which compares the year over year change
in net position for each of the Enterprise Funds:
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
Change in Net Position for the Year Ended June 30
(in millions)
Increase/
Fund Name 2016 2015 (Decrease)
Water 4.7$ 5.1$ (0.4)$
Electric (8.3) (11.2) 2.9
Fiber Optics 3.0 3.1 (0.1)
Gas 3.4 1.7 1.7
Wastewater Collection 1.6 2.4 (0.8)
Wastewater Treatment 1.7 2.9 (1.2)
Refuse 2.6 4.8 (2.2)
Storm Drainage 3.3 2.7 0.6
Airport 0.1 (0.1) 0.2
Total Change in Net Position 12.1$ 11.4$ 0.7$
The most significant factors in the year over year change in net position for Enterprise Funds are as follows:
Electric change in net position increased $2.9 million. Revenue was flat and the continued drought
necessitated the purchase of electricity due to lower hydroelectric generation, but on peak energy
prices were lower than prior year, resulting in lower overall costs.
Gas change in net position increased $1.7 million from the prior year due to lower commodity prices.
The corresponding reduction in customer revenue (also commodity rate driven) was offset by
increased consumption.
Wastewater Collection decreased its change in net position by $0.8 million. A rate increase to
customers was offset by reduced revenue from service connections and increased administrative
expenses.
Wastewater Treatment decreased its change in net position by $1.2 million due to significant
operating expenses for bypass and emergency work, as well as engineering costs and chemical
supplies.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
…………………………………………..……………………………………………………………
City of Palo Alto 25
Refuse Fund change in net position decreased $2.2 million from prior year. A residential rate increase
was offset by reduced miscellaneous revenues and increased expense for expanded contract services
for yard trimmings and food scraps.
CAPITAL ASSETS
GASB 34 requires that the City record all its capital assets, including infrastructure and intangible assets.
Infrastructure includes roads, bridges, signals and similar assets used by the entire population. The table
below shows capital assets and the amount of accumulated depreciation for these assets for Governmental
and Business‐type Activities. Further detail can be found in Note 6 to the financial statements.
Increase/
2016 2015 (Decrease)
Governmental Activities
Capital Assets
Land and improvements 78.5$ 79.0$ (0.5)$
Street trees 15.1 15.1 0.0
Construction in progress 46.5 39.3 7.2
Buildings and improvements 220.9 221.7 (0.8)
Intangible assets 3.8 3.8 0.0
Equipment 12.9 12.3 0.6
Roadway network 308.6 299.2 9.4
Recreation and open space network 33.1 27.6 5.5
Less accumulated depreciation (239.8) (228.2) (11.6)
Internal Service Fund Assets
Construction in progress 1.8 1.4 0.4
Equipment 55.4 53.5 1.9
Less accumulated depreciation (40.8) (39.5) (1.3)
Total Governmental Activities 496.0$ 485.2$ 10.8$
Business‐type Activities
Land 5.0$ 5.0$ ‐$
Construction in progress 93.9 89.9 4.0
Buildings and improvements 56.9 53.5 3.4
Transmission, distribution and treatment systems 746.7 717.6 29.1
Less accumulated depreciation (325.7) (307.5) (18.2)
Total Business‐type Activities 576.8$ 558.5$ 18.3$
CAPITAL ASSETS AT JUNE 30
(in millions)
Governmental Activities’ capital assets net of depreciation increased by $10.8 million from the prior year. The
increase was primarily due to El Camino Park improvements, and street and sidewalk improvements
throughout the City.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
…………………………………………………………….…………………………………………
City of Palo Alto 26
Council approved a $125.8 million Infrastructure Plan in June 2014, which includes projects such as a new
Public Safety Building, replacement of two Fire Stations, a Bike and Pedestrian plan, and two parking garages.
Funding for these projects will come from a variety of sources, including TOT revenues, Stanford University
Medical Center development agreement, and developer impact fees. The Plan was recently updated for cost
escalations, scope increases and a $30 million contingency reserve, resulting in a revised Infrastructure Plan
of $160 million. In the past five years, General Fund surpluses totaling $32.6 million have been transferred to
the Capital Projects Infrastructure Reserve, with an additional $4.3 million committed from FY 2016 surplus
funds.
Major Governmental Activities’ capital projects that are currently in progress, including the remaining capital
commitment of each, are as follows:
Golf Course reconfiguration and Baylands Athletic Center ‐ $10.2 million
Lucie Stern Buildings mechanical and electrical upgrades ‐ $2.8 million
Bicycle and pedestrian transportation plan ‐ $2.6 million
Business‐type Activities’ capital assets net of depreciation increased by $18.3 million over FY 2015. The
increase is due primarily to Gas infrastructure improvements.
Major Business‐type Activities’ capital projects that are currently in progress, including the remaining capital
commitment of each, are as follows:
Seismic water system upgrades for Water Fund ‐ $4.4 million
Channing Avenue/Lincoln Avenue storm drain improvement ‐ $3.6 million
Wastewater Collection Fund rehabilitation/augmentation project ‐ $9.2 million
The City depreciates its capital assets over their estimated useful lives, as required by GASB 34. The purpose
of depreciation is to spread the cost of a capital asset over the years of its useful life so that an allocable
portion of the cost of the asset is borne by all users. Additional information on capital assets and depreciable
lives are in Note 6.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………
City of Palo Alto 27
DEBT ADMINISTRATION
Each of the City’s debt issues is discussed in detail in Note 7 to the financial statements. At June 30, 2016, the
City’s debt was comprised of the following:
LONG‐TERM DEBT AT JUNE 30
(in millions)
Increase/
2016 2015 (Decrease)
Governmental Activities
General Long‐Term Obligations
Certificates of Participation
2002B Downtown Parking Improvements 1.1$ 1.3$ (0.2)$
General Obligation Bonds
2010 48.1 51.5 (3.4)
2013A 17.1 20.3 (3.2)
2011 Lease Purchase Agreement 1.3 1.6 (0.3)
Add: unamortized premium 3.9 4.1 (0.2)
Total Governmental 71.5$ 78.8$ (7.3)$
Business‐type Activities
Enterprise Long‐Term Obligations
Utility Revenue Bonds
1995 Series A2.4$ 2.9$ (0.5)
1999 Refunding 9.7 10.3 (0.6)
2009 Series A29.7 30.7 (1.0)
2011 Refunding 12.3 13.3 (1.0)
Add: unamortized premium 0.8 0.9 (0.1)
Energy Tax Credit Bonds
2007 Series A0.6 0.7 (0.1)
Less: unamortized discount (0.1) (0.1)‐
State Water Resources Loan
2007 5.9 6.3 (0.4)
2009 6.8 7.2 (0.4)
Total Business‐type 68.1$ 72.2$ (4.1)$
Long‐term debt decreased a total of $11.4 million due to scheduled debt repayments of $6.3 million, and
defeasance payments of $5.1 million on the General Obligation Bonds. As noted in the Statistical Section of
the CAFR, the combined direct debt ratio to assessed valuation for the General Fund is 0.25 percent compared
to the allowable legal debt margin of 15 percent.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………
City of Palo Alto 28
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DEBT
Special assessment districts throughout different parts of the City have also issued debt to finance
infrastructure and facilities construction exclusively in their districts. As of June 30, 2016, the City had no
special assessment district debt with City commitment outstanding.
ECONOMIC OUTLOOK
The economy of the City is discussed in the accompanying Transmittal Letter.
CONTACTING THE CITY’S FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
The CAFR is intended to provide citizens, taxpayers, investors, and creditors with a general overview of the
City’s finances. Questions about this report should be directed to the Administrative Services Department, at
250 Hamilton Avenue, 4th Floor, Palo Alto, California. The Department can also be contacted by email at:
adminsvcs@cityofpaloalto.org. This report and other financial reports can be viewed on the City of Palo Alto
website at: www.cityofpaloalto.org. On the home page, select Departments, select Administrative Services,
and select Financial Reporting. Within Financial Reporting, there are links to reports by title and reporting
date.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Statement of Net Position
June 30, 2016
(Amounts in thousands)
Governmental Business‐Type
Activities Activities Total
ASSETS:
Cash and investments available for operations (Note 3)294,051$ 240,570$ 534,621$
Receivables, net:
Accounts and intergovernmental 15,985 29,251 45,236
Interest receivable 1,363 1,053 2,416
Notes and loans receivable (Note 5)19,243 ‐ 19,243
Internal balances (Note 4)(680)680 ‐
Net OPEB asset (Note 12)21,662 ‐ 21,662
Due from other government agencies ‐3,900 3,900
Inventory of materials and supplies, prepaids and deposits 4,732 374 5,106
Restricted cash and investments with fiscal agents (Note 3)959 4,115 5,074
Capital assets (Note 6):
Nondepreciable 145,481 98,943 244,424
Depreciable, net of accumulated depreciation 350,506 477,864 828,370
Total assets 853,302 856,750 1,710,052
DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES:
Unamortized loss from refunding ‐324 324
Pension related 21,181 9,414 30,595
Total deferred outflows of resources 21,181 9,738 30,919
LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable and accruals 7,272 15,348 22,620
Accrued salaries and benefits 4,346 1,986 6,332
Unearned revenue 1,895 ‐ 1,895
Accrued compensated absences (Note 1):
Due in one year 4,936 ‐ 4,936
Due in more than one year 6,286 ‐ 6,286
Claims payable (Note 14):
Due in one year 5,237 ‐ 5,237
Due in more than one year 18,142 ‐ 18,142
Landfill post‐closure liability (Note 9):
Due in more than one year ‐6,618 6,618
Net pension liabilities (Note 11):230,122 89,500 319,622
Long‐term debt (Note 7):
Due in one year 2,224 4,198 6,422
Due in more than one year 69,295 63,915 133,210
Total liabilities 349,755 181,565 531,320
DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES:
Pension related 13,737 5,084 18,821
NET POSITION (Note 10):
Net Investment in capital assets 425,179 512,918 938,097
Restricted for:
Transportation, infrastructure and other 42,547 ‐ 42,547
Debt service 3,855 4,115 7,970
Nonexpendable ‐ Eyerly Family 1,505 ‐ 1,505
Total restricted net position 47,907 4,115 52,022
Unrestricted 37,905 162,806 200,711
Total net position $ 510,991 $ 679,839 $ 1,190,830
See accompanying notes to the basic financial statements.
29
30
This page is left intentionally blank.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Statement of Activities
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
(Amounts in thousands)
Net (Expense) Revenue and
Program Revenues Changes in Net Position
Operating Capital
Charges for Grants and Grants and Governmental Business‐Type
Functions/Programs Expenses Services Contributions Contributions Activities Activities Total
Governmental Activities:
City Council 352$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ (352)$ ‐$ (352)$
City Manager 2,662 ‐ ‐ ‐ (2,662) ‐ (2,662)
City Attorney 2,472 ‐ ‐ ‐ (2,472) ‐ (2,472)
City Clerk 582 ‐ ‐ ‐ (582) ‐ (582)
City Auditor 414 ‐ ‐ ‐ (414) ‐ (414)
Administrative Services 10,637 9,444 ‐ 344 (849) ‐ (849)
Human Resources 2,224 ‐ ‐ ‐ (2,224) ‐ (2,224)
Public Works 24,613 599 733 ‐ (23,281) ‐ (23,281)
Planning and Community Environment 10,208 9,071 605 ‐ (532) ‐ (532)
Development Services 11,158 12,570 ‐ ‐ 1,412 ‐ 1,412
Public Safety 56,653 13,945 765 ‐ (41,943) ‐ (41,943)
Community Services 28,547 21,551 43 ‐ (6,953) ‐ (6,953)
Library 10,825 198 18 ‐ (10,609) ‐ (10,609)
Interest on long‐term debt 3,552 ‐ ‐ ‐ (3,552) ‐ (3,552)
Total Governmental Activities 164,899 67,378 2,164 344 (95,013) ‐ (95,013)
Business‐Type Activities:
Water 35,120 37,588 637 641 ‐ 3,746 3,746
Electric 120,319 120,743 ‐ ‐ ‐ 424 424
Fiber Optics 2,107 4,505 ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,398 2,398
Gas 20,879 30,212 ‐ ‐ ‐ 9,333 9,333
Wastewater Collection 15,199 16,496 ‐ 288 ‐ 1,585 1,585
Wastewater Treatment 22,546 23,825 ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,279 1,279
Refuse 30,370 32,169 12 ‐ ‐ 1,811 1,811
Storm Drainage 3,735 6,520 ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,785 2,785
Airport 970 826 95 132 ‐ 83 83
Total Business‐Type Activities 251,245 272,884 744 1,061 ‐ 23,444 23,444
Total 416,144$ 340,262$ 2,908$ 1,405$ (95,013) 23,444 (71,569)
General Revenues:
Taxes:
Property tax 41,189 ‐ 41,189
Sales tax 30,018 ‐ 30,018
Utility user tax 12,469 ‐ 12,469
Transient occupancy tax 22,366 ‐ 22,366
Documentary transfer tax 6,266 ‐ 6,266
Other taxes 1,602 ‐ 1,602
Investment earnings 8,639 7,282 15,921
Miscellaneous 894 ‐ 894
Transfers (Note 4)18,705 (18,705) ‐
Total general revenues and transfers 142,148 (11,423) 130,725
Change in net position 47,135 12,021 59,156
Net position, beginning of year 463,856 667,818 1,131,674
Net position, end of year 510,991$ 679,839$ 1,190,830$
See accompanying notes to the basic financial statements.
31
32
This page is left intentionally blank.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Governmental Funds
Balance Sheet
June 30, 2016
(Amounts in thousands)
Capital Other Total
General Projects Governmental Governmental
Fund Fund Funds Funds
ASSETS:
Cash and investments available for operations (Note 3)53,113$ 71,461$ 89,433$ 214,007$
Receivables, net:
Accounts and intergovernmental 15,676 163 31 15,870
Interest receivable 640 ‐ 382 1,022
Notes and loans receivable (Note 5)513 ‐ 18,730 19,243
Advance to other fund (Note 4) 2,211 ‐ ‐ 2,211
Inventory of materials and supplies 4,364 ‐ ‐ 4,364
Restricted cash and investments with fiscal agents (Note 3)‐ 711 248 959
Total assets 76,517$ 72,335$ 108,824$ 257,676$
LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES:
Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accruals 3,832$ 1,809$ 354$ 5,995$
Accrued salaries and benefits 3,859 176 46 4,081
Unearned revenue 1,895 ‐ ‐ 1,895
Total liabilities 9,586 1,985 400 11,971
Fund balances (Note 10):
Nonspendable:
Notes and loans receivable 513 ‐ ‐ 513
Inventories 4,364 ‐ ‐ 4,364
Advance to other fund 2,211 ‐ ‐ 2,211
Eyerly family ‐ ‐ 1,505 1,505
Restricted for:
Transportation mitigation ‐ ‐ 10,841 10,841
Federal revenue ‐ ‐ 4,569 4,569
Street improvement ‐ ‐ 1,308 1,308
Local law enforcement ‐ ‐ 180 180
Library bond project ‐ 711 ‐ 711
Public benefit ‐ ‐ 25,649 25,649
Debt service ‐ ‐ 3,855 3,855
Committed for:
Roth Building Rehabilitation ‐ 3,953 ‐ 3,953
Cubberley Improvements ‐ 2,634 ‐ 2,634
Developer impact fees ‐ ‐ 14,169 14,169
Housing in‐lieu ‐ ‐ 41,251 41,251
Special districts ‐ ‐ 3,704 3,704
Downtown business ‐ ‐ 34 34
Assigned for:
Unrealized gains on investments 2,066 ‐ 1,358 3,424
Capital projects ‐ 63,052 ‐ 63,052
Other general government purposes 6,195 ‐ 1 6,196
Unassigned for:
Budget Stabilization 51,582 ‐ ‐ 51,582
Total fund balances 66,931 70,350 108,424 245,705
Total liabilities and fund balances 76,517$ 72,335$ 108,824$ 257,676$
See accompanying notes to the basic financial statements.
33
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Reconciliation of the Balance Sheet of Governmental Funds to
the Statement of Net Position ‐ Governmental Activities
June 30, 2016
Total fund balances reported on the governmental funds balance sheet 245,705$
Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of net position
are different from those reported in the governmental funds balance sheet because
of the following:
Deferred outflows and inflows of resources in governmental activities are not
financial resources and, therefore, are not reported in the governmental funds.
Deferred outflows of resources 21,181
Deferred inflows of resources (13,737)
Capital assets used in governmental activities are not current assets or financial
resources and therefore are not reported in the governmental funds (Note 6)495,987
Internal service funds are used by management to charge the costs of activities
such as insurance, equipment acquisition and maintenance, and certain
employee benefits to individual funds. The assets and liabilities of the
internal service funds are therefore included in governmental activities in
the statement of net position (excludes capital assets, deferred outflows
of resources, deferred inflows of resources and net pension liabilities reported herein)64,766
Some liabilities, including bonds payable, are not due and payable in the
current period and therefore are not reported in the governmental funds:
Interest payable (1,270)
Net pension liabilities (Note 11)(230,122)
Long‐term debt (Note 7)(71,519)
Net position of governmental activities 510,991$
(Amounts in thousands)
See accompanying notes to the basic financial statements.
34
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Governmental Funds
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
(Amounts in thousands)
Capital Other
General Projects Governmental
Fund Fund Funds Total
REVENUES:
Property tax 36,607$ ‐$ 4,582$ 41,189$
Special assessments ‐ ‐ 100 100
Sales tax 30,018 ‐ ‐ 30,018
Utility user tax 12,469 ‐ ‐ 12,469
Transient occupancy tax 22,366 ‐ ‐ 22,366
Documentary transfer tax 6,266 ‐ ‐ 6,266
Other taxes and fines 2,238 ‐ 1,570 3,808
Charges for services 23,910 ‐ ‐ 23,910
From other agencies 3,190 861 366 4,417
Permits and licenses 7,912 ‐ 3,316 11,228
Investment earnings 2,494 1,102 2,898 6,494
Rental income 15,769 ‐ 6 15,775
Other revenue 2,591 3,596 7,640 13,827
Total revenues 165,830 5,559 20,478 191,867
EXPENDITURES:
Current:
City Council 330 ‐ ‐ 330
City Manager 2,567 ‐ ‐ 2,567
City Attorney 2,212 ‐ ‐ 2,212
City Clerk 488 ‐ ‐ 488
City Auditor 313 ‐ ‐ 313
Administrative Services 3,545 ‐ 203 3,748
Human Resources 1,843 ‐ ‐ 1,843
Public Works 12,315 ‐ 797 13,112
Planning and Community Environment 9,059 ‐ 663 9,722
Development Services 10,643 ‐ ‐ 10,643
Police 35,247 ‐ 225 35,472
Fire 28,312 ‐ ‐ 28,312
Community Services 24,280 ‐ 1,231 25,511
Library 7,960 ‐ ‐ 7,960
Non‐Departmental 5,680 1,790 598 8,068
Capital outlay ‐ 24,457 ‐ 24,457
Debt service:
Principal 395 ‐ 6,735 7,130
Interest and fiscal charges 36 ‐ 4,230 4,266
Total expenditures 145,225 26,247 14,682 186,154
EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES
OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES 20,605 (20,688) 5,796 5,713
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES):
Transfers in (Note 4)18,317 36,702 6,816 61,835
Transfers out (Note 4)(34,461) (3,018) (9,013) (46,492)
Total other financing sources (uses) (16,144) 33,684 (2,197) 15,343
Change in fund balances 4,461 12,996 3,599 21,056
FUND BALANCES, BEGINNING OF YEAR 62,470 57,354 104,825 224,649
FUND BALANCES, END OF YEAR 66,931$ 70,350$ 108,424$ 245,705$
See accompanying notes to the basic financial statements.
35
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances
of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities ‐ Governmental Activities
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
Net change in fund balances ‐ total governmental funds 21,056$
Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of activities are different
from those reported in the governmental funds because of the following:
Governmental funds report capital outlays as expenditures. However, in the statement of
activities, the costs of these assets are capitalized and allocated over their estimated useful
lives and reported as depreciation expense. Therefore, the activities associated with
capital assets are as follows:
Capital outlay added back to fund balance for current year additions 24,694
Depreciation expense is deducted from fund balance (depreciation expense is net of
internal service fund depreciation of $2,525 (Note 6), which has already been allocated
through the internal service fund activities below (14,539)
Disposal of capital assets (508)
Pension contribution made subsequent to the measurement date is an expenditure in the
governmental funds, but reported as a deferred outflows of resources in the
government‐wide financial statements 18,516
Pension expenses reported in the statement of activities do not require the use of current
financial resources and, therefore, are not reported as expenditures in governmental funds (15,320)
Principal payments on long‐term liabilities are reported as expenditures in governmental
funds when paid. The governmental activities, however, report principal payments as
a reduction of long‐term debt on the statement of net position. Interest accrued on
long‐term debt and amortization of premiums do not require the use of current financial
resources and therefore are not reported as expenditures in governmental funds. Therefore,
the activities associated with long‐term debt are as follows:
Principal paid during the year 7,130
Change in interest payable 556
Amortization of bond premium 158
Internal service funds are used by management to charge the costs of activities, such
as insurance, equipment acquisition and maintenance, and employees benefits to
individual funds. The portion of the net revenue of these internal service
funds arising out of their transactions with governmental funds is reported with
governmental activities.5,392
Change in net position of governmental activities 47,135$
(Amounts in thousands)
See accompanying notes to the basic financial statements.
36
Variance with
Budgeted Amounts Final Budget
Actual, plus Positive
Adopted Final Encumbrances (Negative)
27,630$ 28,430$ 30,018$ 1,588$
35,067 35,967 36,607 640
18,791 21,991 22,366 375
Documentary transfer tax 6,852 7,052 6,266 (786)
11,189 10,489 12,469 1,980
2,180 2,180 2,238 58
25,399 24,768 23,910 (858)
8,211 8,211 7,912 (299)
824 824 1,104 280
15,296 15,299 15,769 470
1,659 659 3,190 2,531
323 1,801 2,591 790
153,421 157,671 164,440 6,769
11,930 11,929 11,576 (353)
‐ 5,573 5,606 33
165,351 175,173 181,622 6,449
3,101 3,719 3,186 533
1,175 1,261 1,159 102
1,328 1,373 1,058 315
455 502 451 51
3,431 4,121 4,092 29
7,635 7,957 7,615 342
24,804 26,517 25,262 1,255
Police 36,859 36,924 36,096 828
27,583 29,223 28,909 314
3,555 4,029 3,849 180
8,555 8,971 8,217 754
8,900 11,146 10,912 234
Development Services 11,901 12,281 10,872 1,409
15,017 15,828 15,084 744
8,662 6,955 6,234 721
162,961 170,807 162,996 7,811
2,390 4,366 18,626 14,260
18,589 19,141 18,317 (824)
(22,711) (35,057) (34,461) 596
(4,122) (15,916) (16,144) (228)
(1,732)$ (11,550)$ 2,482 14,032$
Unrealized gain/loss on investments 1,390
Current year encumbrances 6,195
Prior year encumbrances (5,606)
4,461
62,470
66,931$
REVENUES:
CITY OF PALO ALTO
General Fund
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance ‐ Budget and Actual
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
(Amounts in thousands)
Charges to other funds
Sales tax
Property tax
Transient occupancy tax
Utility user tax
Other taxes, fines and penalties
Charges for services
Permits and licenses
Investment earnings
Rental income
From other agencies
Other revenues
Fire
Prior year encumbrances
Total revenues
EXPENDITURES:
Current:
City Attorney
City Auditor
City Clerk
City Council
City Manager
Administrative Services
Community Services
Total other financing sources (uses)
Human Resources
Library
Planning and Community Environment
Total expenditures
EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES):
Transfers in
Transfers out
Public Works
Non‐Departmental
FUND BALANCE AT BEGINNING OF YEAR, GAAP BASIS
FUND BALANCE AT END OF YEAR, GAAP BASIS
EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES OVER (UNDER)
EXPENDITURES, BUDGETARY BASIS
Adjustment to Budgetary Basis:
CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE, GAAP BASIS
See accompanying notes to the basic financial statements.
37
Fiber
Water Electric Optics Gas
ASSETS:
Current assets:
Cash and investments available for operations (Note 3)35,832$ 100,414$ 25,069$ 25,289$
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $478 5,337 13,008 864 2,105
Interest receivable 159 462 102 105
Due from other government agencies ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Inventory of materials and supplies ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Restricted cash and investments with fiscal agents (Note 3)3,299 ‐ ‐ 816
Total current assets 44,627 113,884 26,035 28,315
Noncurrent assets:
Due from other government agencies ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Deposit ‐ 49 ‐ ‐
Prepaid expense 108 ‐ ‐ ‐
Capital assets (Note 6):
Nondepreciable 18,832 24,244 1,719 3,066
Depreciable, net 101,398 163,415 6,195 99,469
Net OPEB asset (Note 12)‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Total noncurrent assets 120,338 187,708 7,914 102,535
Total assets 164,965 301,592 33,949 130,850
DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES:
Unamortized loss from refunding 129 ‐ ‐ 168
Pension related 1,218 3,173 201 1,327
Total deferred outflows of resources 1,347 3,173 201 1,495
LIABILITIES:
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accruals 5,082 4,242 418 829
Accrued salaries and benefits 265 696 40 279
Accrued compensated absences (Note 1)‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Current portion of long term debt (Note 7)1,510 100 ‐ 575
Accrued claims payable (Note 14)‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Total current liabilities 6,857 5,038 458 1,683
Noncurrent liabilities:
Accrued compensated absences (Note 1)‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Accrued claims payable (Note 14)‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Advance from other fund (Note 4)‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Landfill post‐closure liability (Note 9)‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Net pension liabilities (Note 11)12,100 28,893 1,777 12,941
Long term debt, net of
unamortized discounts/premiums (Note 7)34,780 468 ‐ 6,682
Total noncurrent liabilities 46,880 29,361 1,777 19,623
Total liabilities 53,737 34,399 2,235 21,306
DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES:
Pension related 727 1,564 85 752
Total deferred inflows of resources 727 1,564 85 752
NET POSITION (Note 10):
Net Investment in capital assets 84,069 187,091 7,914 95,446
Restricted for debt service 3,299 ‐ ‐ 816
Unrestricted (deficit)24,480 81,711 23,916 14,025
Total net position 111,848$ 268,802$ 31,830$ 110,287$
Some amounts reported for Business‐type Activities in the statement of net position are different because certain
Internal Service Fund net positions are included with Business‐type Activities
Net position reported in Business‐type Activities
Business‐Type Activities‐Enterprise Funds
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Proprietary Funds
Statement of Net Position
June 30, 2016
(Amounts in thousands)
See accompanying notes to the basic financial statements.
38
Governmental
Activities ‐
Wastewater Wastewater Storm Internal Service
Collection Treatment Refuse Drainage Airport Totals Funds
14,718$ 13,757$ 14,511$ 10,562$ 418$ 240,570$ 80,044$
1,922 2,021 3,273 674 47 29,251 115
66 57 60 41 1 1,053 341
‐ 300 ‐ ‐ ‐ 300 ‐
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 368
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4,115 ‐
16,706 16,135 17,844 11,277 466 275,289 80,868
‐ 3,600 ‐ ‐ ‐ 3,600 ‐
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 49 ‐
‐ 217 ‐ ‐ ‐ 325 ‐
26,002 10,978 2,524 10,526 1,052 98,943 1,829
53,386 29,962 2,768 21,271 ‐ 477,864 14,637
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 21,662
79,388 44,757 5,292 31,797 1,052 580,781 38,128
96,094 60,892 23,136 43,074 1,518 856,070 118,996
‐ ‐ ‐ 27 ‐ 324 ‐
723 1,930 429 309 104 9,414 1,440
723 1,930 429 336 104 9,738 1,440
938 654 2,759 264 162 15,348 7
149 385 87 58 27 1,986 265
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4,936
85 1,318 ‐ 610 ‐ 4,198 ‐
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5,237
1,172 2,357 2,846 932 189 21,532 10,445
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 6,286
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 18,142
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,211 2,211 ‐
‐ ‐ 6,618 ‐ ‐ 6,618 ‐
7,255 18,042 4,987 3,050 455 89,500 12,675
734 15,895 ‐ 5,356 ‐ 63,915 ‐
7,989 33,937 11,605 8,406 2,666 162,244 37,103
9,161 36,294 14,451 9,338 2,855 183,776 47,548
418 1,013 334 182 9 5,084 725
418 1,013 334 182 9 5,084 725
78,569 27,627 5,292 25,858 1,052 512,918 16,466
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4,115 ‐
8,669 (2,112) 3,488 8,032 (2,294) 159,915 55,697
87,238$ 25,515$ 8,780$ 33,890$ (1,242)$ 676,948 72,163$
2,891
679,839$
Business‐Type Activities‐Enterprise Funds
See accompanying notes to the basic financial statements.
39
Fiber
Water Electric Optics Gas
OPERATING REVENUES:
Sales to:
Customers 33,967$ 104,458$ 3,532$ 27,555$
City departments 1,602 3,127 855 1,110
Service connection charges and miscellaneous 903 2,756 86 961
Charges for services ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other 1,116 10,402 32 586
Total operating revenues 37,588 120,743 4,505 30,212
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Retail purchase of utilities 17,626 73,440 ‐ 8,127
Administrative and general 4,813 6,395 363 3,329
Engineering (operating)409 1,592 ‐ 426
Resource management and energy efficiency 594 5,765 ‐ 1,037
Operations and maintenance 5,440 11,524 1,360 4,153
Rent 1,677 4,991 71 568
Depreciation and amortization 2,719 7,607 328 2,795
Claims payments and changes in
estimated self‐insurance liability ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Refund of charges for services ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Compensated absences and other benefits ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Total operating expenses 33,278 111,314 2,122 20,435
Operating income (loss)4,310 9,429 2,383 9,777
NONOPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES):
Investment earnings 1,144 3,126 726 712
Interest expense (1,822) (8,889) ‐ (249)
Gain on disposal of capital assets ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Loss on disposal of capital assets (70) (74) ‐ (187)
Other nonoperating revenues 637 ‐ ‐ ‐
Total nonoperating revenues (expenses)(111) (5,837) 726 276
Income (loss) before transfers and capital contributions 4,199 3,592 3,109 10,053
Capital contributions 641 ‐ ‐ ‐
Transfers in (Note 4)222 259 ‐ ‐
Transfers out (Note 4)(364) (12,110) (121) (6,670)
Change in net position 4,698 (8,259) 2,988 3,383
NET POSITION (DEFICIT), BEGINNING OF YEAR 107,150 277,061 28,842 106,904
NET POSITION (DEFICIT), END OF YEAR 111,848$ 268,802$ 31,830$ 110,287$
Some amounts reported for Business‐type Activities in the statement of activities are different because certain
Internal Service Fund activities are included with Business‐type Activities
Change in net position reported in Business‐type Activities
Business‐Type Activities‐Enterprise Funds
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Proprietary Funds
Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Fund Net Position
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
(Amounts in thousands)
See accompanying notes to the basic financial statements.
40
Governmental
Activities‐
Wastewater Wastewater Storm Internal Service
Collection Treatment Refuse Drainage Airport Totals Funds
15,572$ 14,759$ 27,763$ 5,961$ 459$ 234,026$ ‐$
76 8,818 787 364 ‐ 16,739 ‐
506 ‐ ‐‐ ‐ 5,212 ‐
‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐85,810
342 248 3,619 195 367 16,907 37
16,496 23,825 32,169 6,520 826 272,884 85,847
8,770 ‐ 16,251 ‐ ‐ 124,214 ‐
1,205 ‐ 1,794 669 705 19,273 12,743
347 2,056 208 407 ‐ 5,445 ‐
‐ ‐ ‐290 ‐ 7,686 ‐
2,635 16,962 8,962 1,212 231 52,479 25,287
293 ‐ 2,452 39 ‐ 10,091 ‐
1,933 2,958 77 743 ‐ 19,160 2,525
‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐3,132
‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐54
‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐42,538
15,183 21,976 29,744 3,360 936 238,348 86,279
1,313 1,849 2,425 3,160 (110) 34,536 (432)
475 370 426 293 10 7,282 2,156
(47) (497) (565) (373) (38) (12,480) ‐
‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐185
(5) ‐ ‐‐ ‐ (336) ‐
‐ ‐ 12 ‐ 95 744 40
423 (127) (127) (80) 67 (4,790) 2,381
1,736 1,722 2,298 3,080 (43) 29,746 1,949
288 ‐ ‐‐ 132 1,061 ‐
‐ ‐ 356 234 ‐ 1,071 5,888
(396) (12) (97) (6) ‐ (19,776) (2,526)
1,628 1,710 2,557 3,308 89 12,102 5,311
85,610 23,805 6,223 30,582 (1,331) 66,852
87,238$ 25,515$ 8,780$ 33,890$ (1,242)$ 72,163$
(81)
12,021$
Business‐Type Activities‐Enterprise Funds
See accompanying notes to the basic financial statements.
41
Fiber
Water Electric Optics Gas
Cash flows from operating activities:
Cash received from customers 34,553$ 107,967$ 3,991$ 28,734$
Cash refunds to customers ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Cash payments to suppliers for goods and services (23,779) (99,593) (1,408) (14,864)
Cash payments to employees (5,100) (6,921) (384) (3,560)
Internal activity‐ receipts (payments) from (to) other funds 1,602 3,127 855 1,110
Other receipts 1,116 10,402 32 586
Net cash provided by operating activities 8,392 14,982 3,086 12,006
Cash flows from noncapital financing activities:
Receipt of loans from other funds ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Operating grants and contributions 111 ‐ ‐ ‐
Interest subsidy received from Build America Bonds 526 ‐ ‐ ‐
Transfers in 222 259 ‐ ‐
Transfers out (364) (12,110) (121) (6,670)
Net cash flows provided by
(used in) noncapital financing activities 495 (11,851) (121) (6,670)
Cash flows from capital and related financing activities:
Acquisition and construction of capital assets (9,085) (14,127) (634) (3,298)
Proceeds from sale of capital assets ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Capital grants and contributions 641 ‐ ‐ ‐
Principal paid on long‐term debt (1,457) (100) ‐ (553)
Interest paid on long‐term debt (1,822) (8,888) ‐ (248)
Net cash flows used in capital and related
financing activities (11,723) (23,115) (634) (4,099)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Interest received 1,146 3,211 715 719
Net cash flows provided by investing activities 1,146 3,211 715 719
Net change in cash and cash equivalents (1,690) (16,773) 3,046 1,956
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 40,821 117,187 22,023 24,149
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $ 39,131 $ 100,414 $ 25,069 $ 26,105
Financial statement presentation:
Cash and investments available for operations 35,832$ 100,414$ 25,069$ 25,289$
Restricted cash and investments with fiscal agent 3,299 ‐ ‐ 816
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year 39,131$ 100,414$ 25,069$ 26,105$
Reconciliation of operating income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Operating income (loss)4,310$ 9,429$ 2,383$ 9,777$
Adjustments to reconcile operating income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 2,719 7,607 328 2,795
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Change in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (317) 753 373 218
Inventory of materials and supplies ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Deposit 9 65 ‐ ‐
Net OPEB asset ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Deferred outflow of resources ‐ pension plans (171) (459) (20) (176)
Accounts payable and accruals 1,958 (2,346) 23 (553)
Accrued salaries and benefits (9) 102 5 47
Accrued compensated absences ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unearned revenue ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Accrued claims payable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Net Pension liabilitty 1,076 2,789 185 1,183
Deferred inflow of resources ‐ pension plans (1,183) (2,958) (191) (1,285)
Net cash provided by operating activities $ 8,392 $ 14,982 $ 3,086 $ 12,006
Business‐Type Activities‐Enterprise Funds
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Proprietary Funds
Statement of Cash Flows
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
(Amounts in thousands)
See accompanying notes to the basic financial statements.
42
Governmental
Activities‐
Wastewater Wastewater Storm Internal Service
Collection Treatment Refuse Drainage Airport Totals Funds
16,522$ 15,719$ 27,823$ 5,883$ 838$ 242,030$ 86,230$
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (54)
(11,621) (18,988) (27,152) (1,935) (163) (199,503) (25,986)
(1,256) (332) (1,881) (732) (737) (20,903) (54,853)
76 8,818 787 364 ‐ 16,739 (3,589)
342 248 3,971 195 462 17,354 40
4,063 5,465 3,548 3,775 400 55,717 1,788
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 516 516 ‐
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 111 ‐
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 526 ‐
‐ ‐ 356 234 ‐ 1,071 5,888
(396) (12) (97) (6) ‐ (19,776) (2,526)
(396) (12) 259 228 516 (17,552) 3,362
(5,305) (3,020) (2,139) (1,086) (670) (39,364) (3,713)
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 221
288 300 12 ‐ 132 1,373 ‐
(82) (1,283) ‐ (575) ‐ (4,050) ‐
(44) (496) (565) (372) (38) (12,473) ‐
(5,143) (4,499) (2,692) (2,033) (576) (54,514) (3,492)
474 373 418 287 9 7,352 2,133
474 373 418 287 9 7,352 2,133
(1,002) 1,327 1,533 2,257 349 (8,997) 3,791
15,720 12,430 12,978 8,305 69 253,682 76,253
$ 14,718 $ 13,757 $ 14,511 $ 10,562 $ 418 $ 244,685 $ 80,044
14,718$ 13,757$ 14,511$ 10,562$ 418$ 240,570$ 80,044$
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4,115 ‐
14,718$ 13,757$ 14,511$ 10,562$ 418$ 244,685$ 80,044$
1,313$ 1,849$ 2,425$ 3,160$ (110)$ 34,536$ (432)$
1,933 2,958 77 743 ‐ 19,160 2,525
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 95 95 40
444 960 60 (12) 379 2,858 665
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2
‐ 16 ‐ ‐ ‐ 90 ‐
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,209
(73) (280) (40) (43) (42) (1,304) (298)
424 14 1,073 13 68 674 (1,634)
77 72 14 6 5 319 77
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 466
‐ ‐ ‐ (66) ‐ (66) ‐
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (739)
668 1,695 400 273 64 8,333 1,174
(723) (1,819) (461) (299) (59) (8,978) (1,267)
$ 4,063 $ 5,465 $ 3,548 $ 3,775 $ 400 $ 55,717 $ 1,788
Business‐Type Activities‐Enterprise Funds
See accompanying notes to the basic financial statements.
43
Agency
Funds
ASSETS:
Cash and investments available for operations (Note 3)2,647$
Restricted cash and investments with fiscal agents (Note 3)2,550
Account receivable 505
Interest receivable 12
Total assets 5,714$
LIABILITIES:
Due to bondholders 4,565$
Due to other governments 1,149
Total liabilities 5,714$
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Statement of Fiduciary Net Position
June 30, 2016
(Amounts in thousands)
See accompanying notes to the basic financial statements.
44
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Index to the Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
45
Page
1.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies ........................................................................... 47
2.Budgets and Budgetary Accounting ........................................................................................ 56
3.Cash and Investments ............................................................................................................. 56
4.Interfund Transactions ............................................................................................................ 62
5.Notes and Loans Receivable .................................................................................................... 64
6.Capital Assets .......................................................................................................................... 70
7.General Long‐Term Obligations .............................................................................................. 75
8.Special Assessment Debt ......................................................................................................... 81
9.Landfill Post‐Closure Maintenance ......................................................................................... 81
10.Net Position and Fund Balances .............................................................................................. 82
11.Pension Plans ........................................................................................................................... 85
12.Retiree Health Benefits ........................................................................................................... 92
13.Deferred Compensation Plan .................................................................................................. 95
14.Risk Management .................................................................................................................... 96
15.Joint Ventures .......................................................................................................................... 97
16.Commitments and Contingencies ......................................................................................... 100
Notes are essential to present fairly the information contained in the overview level of the basic financial
statements. Narrative explanations are intended to communicate information that is not readily apparent
or cannot be included in the statements themselves, and to provide additional disclosures as required by
the Governmental Accounting Standards Board.
46
This page is left intentionally blank.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
47
NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The City of Palo Alto (the City) was incorporated in 1894 and operates as a charter city, having had its first
charter granted by the State of California in 1909. The City operates under the Council‐Manager form of
government and provides the following services: public safety (police and fire), public works, electric, fiber
optics, water, gas, wastewater, storm drain, refuse, airport, golf course, planning and zoning, general
administration services, library, open space and science, recreational and human services.
(a) Reporting Entity
The City is governed by a nine‐member council, elected by City residents. The City is legally
separate and fiscally independent, which means it can issue debt, set and modify budgets and
fees, and sue or be sued. The accompanying basic financial statements present the financial
activities of the City, which is the primary government presented, along with the financial
activities of its component unit, which is an entity for which the City is financially accountable.
Although a separate legal entity, a blended component unit is, in substance, part of the City’s
operations and is reported as an integral part of the City’s financial statements. The City’s
component unit described below is blended.
The Palo Alto Public Improvement Corporation (the Corporation) provides financing of public
capital improvements for the City through the issuance of Certificates of Participation (COPs), a
form of debt that allows investors to participate in a stream of future lease payments. Proceeds
from the COPs are used to construct projects that are leased to the City. The lease payments are
sufficient in timing and amount to meet the debt service requirements of the COPs. The Board of
Directors of the Corporation is composed of the same members as the City Council. The
Corporation is controlled by the City, which performs all accounting and administrative functions
for the Corporation. The financial activities of the Corporation are included in the Downtown
Parking Improvement Debt Service Fund.
Financial statements for the Corporation may be obtained from the City of Palo Alto,
Administrative Services Department, 4th Floor, 250 Hamilton Avenue, Palo Alto, CA 94301.
(b) Basis of Presentation
The City’s basic financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. The Governmental Accounting Standards
Board (GASB) is the acknowledged standard setting body for establishing accounting and financial
reporting standards followed by governmental entities in the United States.
These standards require that the financial statements described below be presented:
Government‐wide Statements: The Statement of Net Position and the Statement of Activities
display information about the primary government and its component unit. These statements
include the financial activities of the overall City government, except for fiduciary activities.
Eliminations have been made to minimize the double counting of internal activities. However,
interfund goods and services transactions have not been eliminated in the consolidation process.
These statements distinguish between the governmental and business‐type activities of the City.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
48
NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
(b) Basis of Presentation (Continued)
Governmental activities generally are financed through taxes, intergovernmental revenues, and
other non‐exchange transactions. Business‐type activities are financed in whole or in part by fees
charged to external parties.
The Statement of Activities presents a comparison between direct expenses and program
revenues for each segment of the business‐type activities of the City and for each function of the
City’s governmental activities. Direct expenses are those that are specifically associated with a
program or function and, therefore, are clearly identifiable to a particular function. Program
revenues include: (a) charges paid by the recipients for goods and services offered by the
programs, (b) grants and contributions that are restricted to meeting the operational needs of a
particular program, and (c) fees, grants and contributions that are restricted to financing the
acquisition or construction of capital assets. Revenues that are not classified as program
revenues, including all taxes, are presented as general revenues.
Fund Financial Statements: The fund financial statements provide information about the City’s
funds, including fiduciary funds and its blended component unit. Separate statements for each
fund category – governmental, proprietary and fiduciary – are presented. The emphasis of fund
financial statements is on major individual governmental and enterprise funds, each of which is
displayed in a separate column. All remaining governmental and internal service funds are
aggregated and reported as non‐major funds.
Proprietary fund operating revenues, such as utilities sales and charges for services, result from
exchange transactions associated with the principal activity of the fund. Exchange transactions
are those in which each party receives and gives up essentially equal values. Nonoperating
revenues, such as subsidies and investment earnings, result from non‐exchange transactions or
ancillary activities.
Operating expenses for enterprise funds and internal service funds include the cost of sales and
services, administrative expenses, and depreciation on capital assets. All expenses not meeting
this definition are reported as nonoperating expenses.
(c) Major Funds and Other Funds
The City’s major governmental and enterprise funds need to be identified and presented
separately in the fund financial statements. All other funds, called non‐major funds, are combined
and reported in a single column, regardless of their fund type.
Major funds are defined as funds that have assets and deferred outflows of resources, liabilities
and deferred inflows of resources, revenues or expenditures/expenses equal to at least 10
percent of their fund type total and at least 5 percent of the grand total. The General Fund is
always a major fund. The City may also select other funds it believes should be presented as major
funds on a qualitative basis.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
49
NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
(c) Major Funds and Other Funds (Continued)
The City reported the following major governmental funds in the accompanying financial
statements:
General Fund – This is the City’s primary operating fund. It accounts for all financial resources of
the general government, except those required to be accounted for in another fund.
Capital Projects Fund – This fund accounts for resources used for the acquisition and construction
of capital facilities by the City, with the exception of those assets financed by proprietary funds.
The City reported the following enterprise funds as major funds in the accompanying financial
statements:
Water Services Fund – This fund accounts for all financial transactions relating to the City’s water
service. Services are on a user‐charge basis to residents and business owners located in the City.
Electric Services Fund – This fund accounts for all financial transactions relating to the City’s
electric service. Services are on a user‐charge basis to residents and business owners located in
the City.
Fiber Optics Fund – This fund accounts for all financial transactions relating to the City’s fiber
optics service. Services are on a user‐charge basis to licensees located in the City.
Gas Services Fund – This fund accounts for all financial transactions relating to the City’s gas
service. Services are on a user‐charge basis to residents and business owners located in the City.
Wastewater Collection Services Fund – This fund accounts for all financial transactions relating
to the City’s wastewater collection service. Services are on a user‐charge basis to residents and
business owners located in the City.
Wastewater Treatment Services Fund – This fund accounts for all financial transactions relating
to the City’s wastewater treatment. Services are on a user‐charge basis to residents and business
owners located in the City.
Refuse Services Fund – This fund accounts for all financial transactions relating to the City’s refuse
service. Services are on a user‐charge basis to residents and business owners located in the City.
Storm Drainage Services Fund – This fund accounts for all financial transactions relating to the
City’s storm drainage service. Services are on a user‐charge basis to residents and business
owners located in the City.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
50
NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
(c) Major Funds and Other Funds (Continued)
The City also reports the following funds:
Airport Fund – This non‐major enterprise fund accounts for all financial transactions relating to
the Palo Alto Airport (PAO). The City assumed control over operation of PAO from the County of
Santa Clara, effective August 11, 2014.
Internal Service Funds – These funds account for fleet replacement and maintenance, technology,
central duplicating, printing and mailing services, administration of compensated absences and
health benefits, and the City’s self‐insured workers’ compensation and general liability programs,
all of which are provided to other departments on a cost‐reimbursement basis. Also included is
the Retiree Health Benefits Internal Service Fund, which accounts for benefits to retirees.
Vehicle Replacement and Maintenance – This fund accounts for the maintenance and
replacement of vehicles and equipment used by all City departments. The source of revenue is
from reimbursement of fleet replacement and maintenance costs allocated to each department
by usage of vehicle.
Technology – This fund accounts for replacement and upgrade of technology, and covers four
primary areas used by all City departments: desktop, infrastructure, applications, and technology
research and development. The source of revenue is from reimbursement of costs for support
provided to other departments.
Printing and Mailing Services – This fund accounts for central duplicating, printing and mailing
services provided to all City departments. The source of revenue for this fund is from
reimbursement of costs for services and supplies purchased by other departments.
General Benefits – This fund accounts for the administration of compensated absences and health
benefits.
Workers’ Compensation Insurance Program – This fund accounts for the administration of the
City’s self‐insured workers’ compensation program.
General Liability Insurance Program – This fund accounts for the administration of the City’s self‐
insured general liability program.
Retiree Health Benefits – This fund accounts for retiree health benefits.
Fiduciary Funds – These funds account for assets held by the City, an agent for assessment
districts, and members of the Cable Joint Powers Authority. These funds are custodial in nature
and do not involve measurement of results of operations. The City maintains three agency funds.
The financial activities of these funds are excluded from the government‐wide financial
statements, but are presented in separate fiduciary fund financial statements. Agency funds
apply the accrual basis of accounting but do not have a measurement focus.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
51
NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
(c) Major Funds and Other Funds (Continued)
California Avenue Parking Assessment District – This fund accounts for the receipts and
disbursements associated with the 1993 Parking District No. 92‐13 Assessment Bonds.
Cable Joint Powers Authority – This fund accounts for the activities of the cable television system
on behalf of the members.
University Avenue Area Off‐Street Parking Assessment District – This fund accounts for the
receipts and disbursements associated with the 2012 Limited Obligation Refunding Improvement
Bonds.
(d) Basis of Accounting
The government‐wide and proprietary fund financial statements are reported using the economic
resources measurement focus and the full accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recorded
when earned and expenses are recorded at the time liabilities are incurred, regardless of when
the related cash flows take place.
Governmental funds are reported using the current financial resources measurement focus and
the modified accrual basis of accounting. Under this method, revenues are recognized when
measurable and available. The City considers revenues susceptible to accrual reported in the
governmental funds to be available if the revenues are collected within ninety days after year‐
end, except for property taxes, which are available if collected within sixty days after year‐end.
Expenditures are recorded when the related fund liability is incurred, except for principal and
interest on general long‐term debt, claims and judgments, and compensated absences, which are
recognized as expenditures to the extent they have matured. General capital asset acquisitions
are reported as expenditures in governmental funds. Proceeds of general long‐term debt and
acquisitions under capital leases are reported as other financing sources.
Revenues susceptible to accrual include taxes, intergovernmental revenues, interest and charges
for services.
Grant revenues are recognized in the fiscal year in which all eligibility requirements are met.
Under the terms of grant agreements, the City may fund certain programs with a combination of
cost‐reimbursement grants, categorical block grants, and general revenues. Thus, both restricted
and unrestricted net position may be available to finance program expenditures. The City’s policy
is to first apply restricted grant resources to such programs, followed by general revenues if
necessary.
Certain indirect costs are included in program expenses reported for individual functions and
activities. Transactions representing the exchange of interfund goods and services have also been
included.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
52
NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
(e) Cash and Cash Equivalents
Restricted and unrestricted pooled cash and investments held in the City Treasury, and other
unrestricted investments invested by the City Treasurer, are considered cash equivalents for
purposes of the statement of cash flows because the City’s cash management pool and funds
invested by the City Treasurer possess the characteristics of demand deposit accounts. Other
restricted and unrestricted investments with maturities of less than three months at the time of
purchase are considered cash equivalents for purposes of the statement of cash flows.
(f) Investments
The City’s investments are carried at fair value, and its fair value measurements are categorized
within the fair value hierarchy established by generally accepted accounting principles.
(g) Inventory of Materials and Supplies
Materials and supplies are held for consumption and are valued at average cost. The consumption
method is used to account for inventories. Under the consumption method, inventories are
recorded as expenditures at the time inventory items are used, rather than purchased.
(h) Prepaid items
Prepaid items are recorded at cost. Using the consumption method, prepaid items are recorded
as expenditures over the period that service is provided.
(i) Compensated Absences
The liability for compensated absences includes the vested portion of vacation, sick leave, and
overtime compensation pay. The City’s liability for accrued compensated absences is recorded in
the General Benefits Internal Service Fund. The fund is reimbursed through payroll charges to all
other funds. Earned but unpaid vacation and overtime compensation pay are recognized as an
expense or expenditure in the proprietary and governmental fund types when earned because
the City has provided financial resources for the full amount through its budgetary process.
Vested accumulated sick pay is paid in the event of termination due to disability and, under certain
conditions, is specified in employment agreements.
During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016, changes to the compensated absences liabilities were
as follows (in thousands):
Beginning balance 10,756$
Additions 6,133
Payments (5,667)
Ending balance 11,222$
Current portion 4,936$
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
53
NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
(j) Property Tax
Santa Clara County (the County) assesses properties and bills, collects, and distributes property
taxes to the City. The County remits the entire amount levied and handles all delinquencies,
retaining interest and penalties.
The County assesses property values, levies bills and collects taxes as follows:
Secured Unsecured
Lien Dates January 01 January 01
Levy Dates October 01 July 01
Due Dates 50% on November 01 Upon receipt of billing
50% on February 01
Delinquent after December 10 (for November)August 31
April 10 (for February)
The term “unsecured” refers to taxes on personal property other than real estate, land and
buildings. These taxes are secured by liens on the property being taxed. Property tax revenues
are recognized by the City in the fiscal year they are assessed, provided they become available as
defined previously within sixty days after year‐end.
(k) Deferred Outflows of Resources and Deferred Inflows of Resources
A deferred outflow of resources is the consumption of net position that is applicable to a future
reporting period. A deferred inflow of resources is defined as an acquisition of net position
applicable to a future reporting period.
(l) Pensions
For purposes of measuring the net pension liability and deferred outflows/inflows of resources
related to pensions and pension expense, information about the fiduciary net position of the City’s
California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) Plans and additions to/deductions from
the Plans’ fiduciary net position have been determined on the same basis as they are reported by
CalPERS. For this purpose, benefit payments (including refunds of employee contributions) are
recognized when due and payable in accordance with the benefit terms. Investments are reported
at fair value.
(m) Rounding
All amounts included in the basic financial statements and footnotes are presented to the nearest
thousand.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
54
NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
(n) Effects of New Pronouncements
As of July 1, 2015, the City implemented the following GASB Statements:
In February 2015 GASB issued Statement No. 72, Fair Value Measurement and Application. This
Statement provides guidance for determining fair value measurement for financial reporting
purposes and for applying fair value to certain investments, and requires disclosures to be made
about fair value measurements, the level of fair value hierarchy, and valuation techniques. It also
requires additional disclosures regarding investments in certain entities that calculate net asset
value per share (or its equivalent). See Note 3 for more information.
In June 2015 GASB issued Statement No. 73, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions and
Related Assets that are not within the Scope of GASB Statement No. 68 and amendments to certain
provisions of GASB Statements No. 67 and 68. This Statement establishes requirements for
defined benefit pensions that are not within the scope of Statement No. 68 as well as for the
assets accumulated for purposes of providing those pensions. It amends certain provisions of
Statement No. 68 for pension plans and pensions that are within its scope. The Statement also
clarifies the application of certain provisions of Statement No. 68. This Statement is effective for
the City’s fiscal year ending June 30, 2016, except for those provisions that address employers
and government nonemployer contribution entities for pensions that are not within the scope of
Statement No. 68, which are effective for the City’s fiscal year ending June 30, 2017. The
Statement did not have a significant impact on the City’s financial statements.
GASB issued Statement No. 76, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles for
State and Local Governments, which supersedes Statement No. 55. This statement is effective for
the City’s fiscal year ending June 30, 2016. The Statement did not have a significant impact on the
City’s financial statements.
In December 2015, the GASB issued Statement No. 79, Certain External Investment Pools and Pool
Participants. The statement addresses accounting and financial reporting for certain external
investment pools and pool participants. This statement is effective for the City’s fiscal year ending
June 30, 2016. The Statement did not have a significant impact on the City’s financial statements.
The City is currently analyzing its accounting practices to determine the potential impact on the
financial statements for the following GASB Statements:
In June 2015, GASB issued Statement No. 74, Financial Reporting for Postemployment Benefit
Plans Other Than Pension Plans. This statement addresses reporting by OPEB plans that
administer benefits on behalf of governments. This statement is effective for the City’s fiscal year
ending June 30, 2017.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
55
NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
(n) Effects of New Pronouncements (Continued)
In June 2015, GASB issued Statement No. 75, Accounting and Financial Reporting for
Postemployment Benefits Other Than Pensions. This statement addresses reporting by
governments that provide OPEB to their employees and for governments that finance OPEB for
employees of other governments. This statement is effective for the City’s fiscal year ending
June 30, 2018.
In August 2015 GASB issued Statement No. 77, Tax Abatement Disclosures. The Statement defines
tax abatement agreements and requires certain disclosures regarding the tax abatement in its
financial statements. This statement is effective for the City’s fiscal year ending June 30, 2017.
In December 2015, the GASB issued Statement No. 78, Pensions Provided through Certain
Multiple‐Employer Defined Benefit Pension Plans. The objective of this statement is to address a
practice issue regarding the scope and applicability of Statement No. 68 associated with pensions
provided through certain cost‐sharing multiple‐employer defined benefit pension plans and to
state or local governmental employers whose employees are provided with such pensions. Such
plans are not considered a state or local government pension plan and are used to provide
benefits to both employees of state and local governments and employees of employers that are
not state or local governments. This statement is effective for the City’s fiscal year ending
June 30, 2017.
In January 2016, the GASB issued Statement No. 80, Blending Requirements for Certain
Component Units—an amendment of GASB Statement No. 14. The objective of this statement is
to improve financial reporting by clarifying the financial statement presentation requirements for
certain component units. This statement amends the blending requirements established in GASB
Statement No. 14, The Financial Reporting Entity, as amended. This statement is effective for the
City’s fiscal year ending June 30, 2017.
In March 2016, the GASB issued Statement No. 81, Irrevocable Split‐Interest Agreements. The
statement provides recognition and measurement guidance for situations in which a government
is a beneficiary of these agreements. This statement is effective for the City’s fiscal year ending
June 30, 2018.
In March 2016, the GASB issued Statement No. 82, Pension Issues – An Amendment of GASB
Statements No. 67, No. 68 and No. 73. The Statement addresses issues raised with respect to
GASB Statements No. 67, 68 and 73, regarding: (1) the presentation of payroll‐related measures
in required supplementary information; (2) the selection of assumptions and the treatment of
deviations from the guidance in an Actuarial Standard of Practice for financial reporting purposes;
and (3) the classification of payments made by employers to satisfy employee (plan member)
contribution requirements. This is effective for the City’s fiscal year ending June 30, 2017, except
for the requirements for selection of assumptions which will be effective during the City’s fiscal
year ending June 30, 2018.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
56
NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
(o) Use of Estimates
The accompanying basic financial statements have been prepared on the modified accrual and
accrual basis of accounting in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. This
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in
the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
NOTE 2 – BUDGETS AND BUDGETARY ACCOUNTING
1.The City Manager submits proposed operating and capital budgets to the City Council for the fiscal
year commencing the following July 1. The operating budget includes proposed expenditures and the
means of financing them.
2.Public hearings are conducted to obtain comments on the proposed budgets.
3.The Budget is approved with the adoption of a budget ordinance for all funds except Agency Funds.
4.Per the Palo Alto Municipal Code, only the City Manager is authorized to reallocate funds from
contingency accounts maintained in the General Fund. Additional appropriations to departments in
the General Fund, or to total appropriations for all other budgeted funds, or transfers of
appropriations between funds, require approval by the City Council. Amendments to budgeted
revenue and expenditures are added to or subtracted from the Adopted Budget and the resulting
totals are reflected as Final Budget amounts.
5.As defined in the Palo Alto Municipal Code, expenditures may not exceed budgeted appropriations at
the department level for the General Fund, and at the fund level for Enterprise, Special Revenue and
Debt Service Funds.
6.Budgets for governmental funds are adopted on a basis consistent with generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP), except that unrealized gains or losses are not recognized as investment earnings
on a budgetary basis and encumbrances are treated as budgetary expenditures when incurred.
7.Expenditures for the Capital Projects Fund are budgeted and maintained at a project level for the life
of the project. Budget to actual comparisons for these expenditures have been excluded from the
accompanying financial statements.
NOTE 3 – CASH AND INVESTMENTS
The City pools cash from all sources and all funds, except restricted bond proceeds with fiscal agents, and
invests its pooled idle cash according to State of California law and the City’s Investment Policy. The basic
principles underlying the City’s investment philosophy are to ensure the safety of public funds, ensure
that sufficient funds are available to meet current expenditures, and achieve a reasonable rate of return
on investments.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
57
NOTE 3 – CASH AND INVESTMENTS (Continued)
Policies
The City invests in individual investments and in investment pools. Individual investments are evidenced
by specific identifiable securities instruments, or by an electronic entry registering the owner in the
records of the institution issuing the security, called the book entry system. In order to increase security,
the City employs the trust department of a bank as the custodian of certain City managed investments.
Classification
Cash and investments are classified in the financial statements as shown below, based on whether or not
their use is restricted under the terms of City debt instruments or agency agreements (in thousands):
Governmental Business‐Type Fiduciary
Activities Activities Funds Total
Cash and investments:
Available for operations 294,051$ 240,570$ 2,647$ 537,268$
Held with fiscal agents 959 4,115 2,550 7,624
Total cash and investments 295,010$ 244,685$ 5,197$ 544,892$
Investments Authorized by the City’s Investment Policy and Debt Agreements
The table below identifies the investment types that are authorized by the California Government Code
(Code) and the City’s Investment Policy. The table also identifies certain provisions of the City’s
Investment Policy that address interest rate risk, credit risk and concentration of credit risk. The table
addresses investment of debt proceeds held by bond trustees that are governed by the provisions of debt
agreements of the City, rather than the general provisions of the City’s Investment Policy.
The City must maintain required amounts of cash and investments with trustees under the terms of
certain debt issues. These funds are unexpended bond proceeds or are pledged as reserves to be used if
the City fails to meet its obligations under these debt issues. The Code requires these funds to be invested
in accordance with City ordinance, bond indentures or state statute. All of these funds have been invested
as permitted under the Code and the investment policy approved by the City Council.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
58
NOTE 3 – CASH AND INVESTMENTS (Continued)
Maximum
Maturity
Minimum
Credit Quality
Maximum
Percentage
of Portfolio
Maximum
Investment in
One Issuer
U.S. Government Securities 10 years (*) N/A No Limit No Limit
U.S. Federal Agency Securities (C) 10 years (*) N/A No Limit (A) No Limit
Certificates of Deposit 10 years (*) N/A 20%
10% of the par
value of
portfolio
Bankers Acceptances 180 days (D) N/A (D) 30% $5 million
Commercial Paper 270 days A‐1 15% $3 million (B)
Local Agency Investment Fund N/A N/A No Limit
$50 million per
account
Short‐Term Repurchase Agreements 1 year N/A No Limit No Limit
City of Palo Alto Bonds N/A N/A No Limit No Limit
Money Market Mutual Funds N/A N/A (E) No Limit No Limit
Mutual Funds (F) N/A N/A 20% 10%
Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 10 years (*) N/A 10% $5 million
Medium‐Term Corporate Notes 5 years AA 10% $5 million
10 years (*) AA/AA2 10% No Limit
(A)
(B) The lesser of $3 million or 10% of outstanding commercial paper of any one institution.
Debt Agreements:
(C)
(D)
(E)
(F)
(*)The maximum maturity is based on the Investment Policy that is approved by the City Council and is less
restrictive than the California Government Code.
Utility Revenue Bonds 2011 Refunding, General Obligation Bonds 2010 and 2013A, and University Avenue Parking
Bond 2012 are allowed to invest in the California Asset Management Program.
Authorized Investment Type
Bonds of State of California
Municipal Agencies
Callable and multi‐step securities are limited to no more than 25% of the par value of the portfolio, provided that:
1) the potential call dates are known at the time of purchase, 2) the interest rates at which they "step‐up" are
known at the time of purchase, 3) the entire face value of the security is redeemable at the call date.
Utility Revenue Bonds 2011 Refunding and 1999 Refunding allow general obligations of states with a minimum
credit quality rating of A2/A by Moody's and Standard & Poor's.
Utility Revenue Bonds 2011 Refunding and 1999 Refunding require a minimum credit quality rating of A‐1/P‐1 by
Moody's and Standard & Poor's and maturing after no more than 360 days. Utility Revenue Bonds 1995 Series A
limit the maximum maturity to 365 days.
Water Revenue Bonds 2009 Series A, Utility Revenue Bonds 2011 Refunding and 1999 Refunding require a
minimum credit quality rating of AAAm or AAAm‐G by Standard & Poor's.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
59
NOTE 3 – CASH AND INVESTMENTS (Continued)
Fair Value Measurements
The City categorizes its fair value measurements within the fair value hierarchy established by generally
accepted accounting principles. The hierarchy is based on the valuation inputs used to measure fair value
of the assets. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in an active market for identical assets; Level 2 inputs are
significant other observable inputs; and Level 3 inputs are significant unobservable inputs. All of the
investments are measured using level 2 inputs, except for investments in money market mutual funds,
California Asset Management Program and Local Agency Investment Fund, which are not subject to the
fair value hierarchy.
Investment securities classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy are valued using prices determined
by the use of matrix pricing techniques maintained by the pricing vendors for these securities. Matrix
pricing is used to value securities based on the securities relationship to benchmark quoted prices.
The following is a summary of the fair value measurements of the City as of June 30, 2016:
Type of Investment June 30, 2016 Level 2
Investments by fair value hierarchy
U.S. Federal Agency Securities 382,730$ 382,730$
U.S. Treasury Notes 11,607 11,607
Local Government Bonds 32,408 32,408
Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 34,273 34,273
Corporate Bonds 15,571 15,571
Total investments by fair value hierarchy 476,589 476,589$
Investment not subject to fair value hierarchy
Money Market Mutual Funds 6,754
California Asset Management Program 3,247
Local Agency Investment Fund 57,487
Total investments not subject to fair value hierarchy 67,488
Total investments measured at fair value 544,077$
Local Agency Investment Fund
The City is a participant in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) that is regulated by California
Government Code Section 16429 under the oversight of the Treasurer of the State of California. LAIF
management calculates the fair value and cost of the entire LAIF pool. The City adjusts its cost basis
invested in LAIF to fair value based on this ratio. The fair value of the City’s position in the pool is the
same as the value of the pool share. The balance available for withdrawal on demand is based on
accounting records maintained by LAIF, which are recorded on an amortized cost basis. At June 30, 2016,
LAIF had a weighted average maturity of 167 days.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
60
NOTE 3 – CASH AND INVESTMENTS (Continued)
California Asset Management Program
The City is a voluntary participant in the California Asset Management Program (CAMP). CAMP is an
investment pool offered by the California Asset Management Trust (the Trust). The Trust is a joint powers
authority and public agency created by the Declaration of Trust and established under the provisions of
the California Joint Exercise of Powers Act (California Government Code Sections 6500 et seq., or the
“Act”) for the purpose of exercising the common power of its participants to invest certain proceeds of
debt issues and surplus funds. The City’s investments are limited to investments permitted by
subdivisions (a) to (n), inclusive, of Section 53601 of the California Government Code. The City reports its
investments in CAMP at the fair value amounts provided by CAMP, which is the same as the value of the
pool share. At June 30, 2016, the fair value approximated the City’s cost. CAMP had a weighted average
maturity of 45 days at June 30, 2016.
Fidelity Institutional Asset Management
Money market mutual funds are available for withdrawal on demand and at June 30, 2016, had a weighted
average maturity of 34 days.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk is the risk that changes in market interest rates may adversely affect the fair value of an
investment. Normally, the longer the maturity of an investment, the greater the sensitivity its fair value
is to changes in market interest rates.
Type of Investment
Less Than
One Year
One to
Three Years
Three to
Five Years
Over
Five Years Total
U.S. Federal Agency Securities 66,280$ 116,905$ 77,049$ 122,496$ 382,730$
U.S. Treasury Notes ‐ 8,589 3,018 ‐ 11,607
Local Government Bonds ‐ 263 9,025 23,120 32,408
Corporate Bonds ‐ 2,915 12,656 ‐ 15,571
Money Market Mutual Funds 6,754 ‐ ‐ ‐ 6,754
Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 246 9,751 15,262 9,014 34,273
California Asset Management Program 3,247 ‐ ‐ ‐ 3,247
Local Agency Investment Fund 57,487 ‐ ‐ ‐ 57,487
Total Investments 134,014$ 138,423$ 117,010$ 154,630$ 544,077
Cash in bank and on hand 815
Total Cash and Investments 544,892$
Maturities
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
61
NOTE 3 – CASH AND INVESTMENTS (Continued)
Investment with Fair Values Highly Sensitive to Interest Rate Fluctuations
At June 30, 2016, the City’s investments (including investments held by bond trustees) include U.S. Federal
Agency Callable Securities in the amount of $107.4 million that are highly sensitive to interest rate
fluctuations (to a greater degree than already indicated in the information provided in the previous page).
These securities are subject to early redemption at par in a period of declining interest rates.
Credit Risk
Credit risk is the risk that an issuer of an investment will not fulfill its obligation to the holder of the
investment. This is measured by the assignment of a rating by a nationally recognized statistical rating
organization. Presented below is the actual rating as provided by Standard & Poor’s investment rating
system as of June 30, 2016, for each investment type (in thousands):
Type of Investment Rating Total
U.S. Federal Agency Securities AA+ 382,730$
Corporate Bonds AAA 15,571
Local Government Bonds AAA 32,408
Money Market Mutual Funds AAAm 6,754
Total Investments 437,463
Not Applicable:
U.S. Treasury Notes 11,607
Not Rated:
California Asset Management Program 3,247
Local Agency Investment Fund 57,487
Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 34,273
Cash in bank and on hand 815
Total Cash and Investments 544,892$
Concentration of Credit Risk
Investments in any one issuer, other than U.S. Treasury securities, mutual funds, and external investment
pools, that represent 5 percent or more of total City portfolio investments are as follows at June 30, 2016
(in thousands):
Investments Reporting Type Fair Value at Year‐End
Federal Home Loan Bank U.S. Federal Agency Securities 120,065$
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation U.S. Federal Agency Securities 104,357
Federal National Mortgage Corporation U.S. Federal Agency Securities 44,843
Federal Farm Credit Bank U.S. Federal Agency Securities 72,407
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation U.S. Federal Agency Securities 27,354
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
62
NOTE 3 – CASH AND INVESTMENTS (Continued)
Custodial Credit Risk
California law requires banks and savings and loan institutions to pledge government securities with a
market value of 110 percent of the City’s cash on deposit or first trust deed mortgage notes with a value
of 150 percent of the deposit as collateral for these deposits. Under California Law, this collateral is
considered held in the City’s name and places the City ahead of general creditors of the institution. The
City has waived collateral requirements for the portion of deposits covered by federal deposit insurance.
The custodial credit risk for investments is the risk that, in the event of the failure of the counterparty to
a transaction, the City will not be able to recover the value of its investment or collateral securities that
are in the possession of another party. The City’s Investment Policy limits its exposure to custodial credit
risk by requiring that all security transactions entered into by the City be conducted on a delivery‐versus‐
payment basis. Securities are to be held by a third‐party custodian.
NOTE 4 – INTERFUND TRANSACTIONS
Transfers Between Funds
With Council approval, resources may be transferred from one City fund to another. The purpose of the
majority of transfers is to subsidize a fund. Less often, a transfer may be made to open or close a fund.
Transfers between City funds during FY 2016 were as follows (in thousands):
Fund Making Transfer
Amount
Transferred
General Fund Nonmajor Governmental Funds 422$ A
Electric Services Fund 11,659 A
Gas Services Fund 6,194 A
Internal Service Funds 42 A
Capital Projects Fund General Fund 30,367 B
Nonmajor Governmental Funds 5,674 B
Water Services Fund 113 B
Electric Services Fund 273 B
Fiber Optics Fund 17 B
Gas Services Fund 101 B
Wastewater Collection Fund 58 B
Refuse Services Fund 69 B
Internal Service Funds 30 B
Nonmajor Governmental Funds General Fund 946 A
Capital Projects Fund 3,018 F
Nonmajor Governmental Funds 2,816 A
Water Services Fund 5 A
Electric Services Fund 12 A
Fiber Optics Fund 1 A
Gas Services Fund 4 A
Wastewater Collection Fund 2 A
Internal Service Funds 12 A
Subtotal 61,835
Fund Receiving Transfer
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
63
NOTE 4 – INTERFUND TRANSACTIONS (Continued)
Fund Making Transfer
Amount
Transferred
Water Services Fund Gas Services Fund 111$ B
Wastewater Collection Fund 111 B
Electric Services Fund General Fund 33 D
Fiber Optics Fund 102 D
Internal Service Funds 124 C
Refuse Services Fund General Fund 40 D
Nonmajor Governmental Funds 101 D
Internal Service Funds 215 C
Storm Drainage Services Fund General Fund 234 C
Internal Service Funds General Fund 2,841 E
Water Services Fund 247 B
Electric Services Fund 166 B
Fiber Optics Fund 1 B
Gas Services Fund 260 B
Wastewater Collection Fund 224 B
Wastewater Treatment Fund 12 B
Refuse Services Fund 28 B
Storm Drainage Services Fund 6 B
Internal Service Funds 2,103 E
Subtotal 6,959
Total 68,794$
The reasons for these transfers are set forth below:
(A) Transfer to fund governmental funds for services provided.
(B) Allocation of funds to construct, purchase or maintain capital assets.
(C) Transfer to refund replacement charges.
(D) Transfer to fund Utility funds for services provided.
(E) Transfer to fund Internal Service funds for services provided.
(F) Transfer remaining bond proceeds to debt service.
Fund Receiving Transfer
Long‐Term Interfund Advance
On December 6, 2010, the City Council accepted an Airport Business Plan of the Palo Alto Airport (PAO)
and approved creation of the Airport Enterprise Fund to facilitate the transition of PAO control from
County of Santa Clara to the City. Council approved the following General Fund advances to the Airport
Fund:
$ 610,000 Due June 2019
325,000 Due July 2023
760,000 Due July 2024
516,000 Due July 2025
All advances bear interest equal to the average return yield on the City’s investment portfolio. As of
June 30, 2016, the total outstanding principal amount is $2.2 million.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
64
NOTE 4 – INTERFUND TRANSACTIONS (Continued)
Internal Balances
Internal balances represent the net interfund receivables and payables remaining after the elimination of
all such balances within governmental and business‐type activities.
NOTE 5 – NOTES AND LOANS RECEIVABLE
At June 30, 2016, the City’s notes and loans receivable totaled (in thousands):
Palo Alto Housing Corporation:
Oak Manor Townhouse 68$
Tree House Apartments 5,343
Emerson Street Project 375
Alma Single Room Occupancy Development 2,222
Barker Hotel 2,111
Sheridan Apartments 2,222
Oak Court Apartments, L.P. 7,834
Mid‐Peninsula Housing Coalition:
Palo Alto Gardens Apartments 100
Community Working Group, Inc.1,280
Opportunity Center Associates, L.P.750
Home Rehabilitation Loans 52
Executive Relocation Assistance Loans 513
Below Market Rate Assessment Loans 54
Oak Manor Townhouse Water System 114
Lytton Gardens Assisted Living 101
Emergency Housing Consortium 75
Alma Gardens Apartments 1,150
2811‐2825 Alma Street Acquisition 1,890
Palo Alto Family Housing, 801 Alma Street 6,422
Palo Alto Senior Housing Project ‐ Stevenson House, LLC 1,000
Colorado Park Housing Corporation 204
Total Notes and Loans 33,880
Less: Valuation Allowance (14,637)
Total Notes and Loans, Net 19,243$
Housing Loans
The City engages in programs designed to encourage construction or improvement in low‐to‐moderate
income housing or other projects. Under these programs, grants or loans are provided under favorable
terms to homeowners or developers who agree to spend these funds in accordance with the City’s terms.
These loans have been offset by restricted or committed fund balances, as they are not expected to be
repaid immediately.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
65
NOTE 5 – NOTES AND LOANS RECEIVABLE (Continued)
Some of these loans contain forgiveness clauses that provide for the amount loaned to be forgiven if the
third party maintains compliance with the terms of the loan and associated regulatory agreements. Since
some of these loans are secured by trust deeds that are subordinated to other debt on the associated
projects or are only repayable from residual cash receipts on the projects, collectability of some of the
outstanding balances may not be realized. As a result of the forgiveness clauses and nature of these
housing projects and associated cash flows, a portion of the outstanding balances of the loans has been
offset by a valuation allowance.
Oak Manor Townhouse
On January 7, 1991, the City loaned $2.1 million to Palo Alto Housing Corporation Apartments, Inc. to
assist in the acquisition of an apartment complex to be used to provide rental housing for low and very
low income households. This loan bears interest at 3 percent, is due in annual installments until 2017 and
is collateralized by a subordinated deed of trust. Under the terms of the loan agreement, annual loan
payments are forgiven if the Corporation meets the objective of this project. During the year ended
June 30, 2016, the objective was met and the annual loan payment was forgiven.
Tree House Apartments
In March 2009, the City agreed to loan $2.8 million to Tree House Apartments, L.P. (THA) for the purchase
of the real property located at 488 West Charleston Road. The loan accrues simple interest at the rate of
3 percent per annum. The loan was funded with $1.8 million of Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) funds and $1.0 million of residential housing funds. An additional development loan in the amount
of $2.5 million was approved by the City on October 18, 2010. As of June 30, 2016, the outstanding
balance for THA in aggregate is $5.3 million. Principal and interest payments will be deferred, however if
the borrower has earned extra income, and if it is acceptable to the other entities providing final
permanent sources of funds, payment of interest and principal based on the City’s proportionate share of
the project’s residual receipts from net operating income shall be made by the borrower. In no event
shall full payment be made by the borrower later than concurrently with the expiration or earlier
termination of the loan agreement, which is December 31, 2067.
Emerson Street Project
On November 8, 1994, the City loaned $375,000 to Palo Alto Housing Corporation (PAHC) for expenses
necessary to acquire an apartment complex for the preservation of rental housing for low and very low
income households in the City. This loan is collateralized by a second deed of trust. The loan bears interest
at 3 percent.
Alma Single Room Occupancy Development
On December 13, 1996, the City loaned $2.2 million to Alma Place Associates, L.P. for development of a
107‐unit single room occupancy development. This loan bears interest at 3 percent and is collateralized
by a subordinated deed of trust. The principal balance is due in 2041.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
66
NOTE 5 – NOTES AND LOANS RECEIVABLE (Continued)
Barker Hotel
On April 12, 1994, the City loaned a total of $2.1 million for the preservation, rehabilitation and expansion
of a low‐income, single occupancy hotel. This loan was funded by three sources: $400,000 from the
Housing In‐Lieu Fund, $1 million from HOME Investment Partnership Program Funds, and $670,000 from
CDBG funds. All three notes bear no interest and are collateralized by a deed of trust, which is
subordinated to private financing. Loan repayments are deferred until 2035.
In July 2004, the City agreed to loan up to $41,000 to PAHC to rehabilitate the interior of the Barker Hotel.
The loan was funded with CDBG funds and is collateralized by a deed of trust on the property. Annual
loan payments are deferred until certain criteria defined in the loan agreement are reached. The loan will
be forgiven if the borrower satisfactorily complies with all terms and conditions of the loan agreement.
Sheridan Apartments
On December 8, 1998, the City loaned $2.5 million to PAHC for the purchase and rehabilitation of a 57‐
unit apartment complex to be used for senior and low‐income housing. The loan was funded with $1.6
million in CDBG funds, and $825,000 of Housing In‐Lieu funds. The note bears interest at 9 percent when
available surplus cash from the project equals or exceeds 25 percent of interest calculated using 9 percent.
When available surplus cash falls below this level, the note bears interest at 3 percent. The note is
collateralized by a second deed of trust and an affordability reserve account held by PAHC. As of June 30,
2016, principal payments totaling $228,000 have been made, and interest has also been paid. The
remaining principal balance is due in 2033.
Oak Court Apartments, L.P.
On August 18, 2003, in connection with the loan to Oak Court Apartments, L.P. discussed in the next
section, the City loaned $5.9 million to PAHC for the purchase of land on which Oak Court Apartments,
L.P. constructed a 53‐unit rental apartment complex for low and very low income households with
children. The note bears interest of 5 percent and is secured by a deed of trust. Note payments are due
annually after 55 years, or beginning in 2058, unless PAHC elects to extend the note until 2102, as defined
in the regulatory agreement.
On August 18, 2003, the City loaned $1.9 million to Oak Court Apartments, L.P. for the construction of a
53‐unit rental apartment complex for low and very low‐income households with children, which was
completed in April 2005. The note bears no interest until certain criteria defined in the note are satisfied,
at which time the note will bear an interest rate not to exceed 3 percent. The note is secured by a
subordinate deed of trust. The principal balance is due in 2060.
Palo Alto Gardens Apartments
On April 22, 1999, the City loaned $1 million to Mid‐Peninsula Housing Coalition (the Coalition) for the
purchase and rehabilitation of a 155‐unit complex for the continuation of low‐income housing. The loan
was funded with $659,000 of CDBG funds and $341,000 of Housing In‐Lieu funds. The two notes bear
interest at 3 percent and are secured by second deeds of trust and a City Affordability Reserve Account
held by the Coalition. Principal and interest payments began in FY 2008. The principal balance of $100,000
is due in 2039.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
67
NOTE 5 – NOTES AND LOANS RECEIVABLE (Continued)
Community Working Group, Inc.
On May 13, 2002, the City loaned $1.3 million to Community Working Group, Inc. for predevelopment,
relocation and acquisition of land for development of an 89‐unit complex and homeless service center for
very low income households. The loan was funded with $1.3 million of CDBG funds. The note bears no
interest and is secured by a first deed of trust. No repayment of the $1.3 million will be required, provided
that compliance with the City’s agreement is maintained. After 89 years of compliance with the regulatory
agreement, the City’s loan would convert to a grant and its deed of trust would be re‐conveyed.
Opportunity Center Associates, L.P.
On July 19, 2004, the City loaned $750,000 for a 55‐year term to Opportunity Center Associates, L.P. for
construction of 89 units of rental housing for extremely low‐income and very low‐income households.
The loan was funded with $750,000 of residential housing funds. The note bears 3 percent interest and
is secured by a deed of trust. The loan remains outstanding and becomes due at the end of the 55‐year
term.
Home Rehabilitation Loans
The City administers a closed housing rehabilitation loan program initially funded with CDBG funds. Under
this program, individuals with incomes below a certain level are eligible to receive low interest loans for
rehabilitation work on their homes. These loans are secured by deeds of trust, which may be subordinated
to subsequent encumbrances upon said real property with the prior written consent of the City. The loan
repayments may be amortized over the life of the loans, deferred, or a combination of both.
Executive Relocation Assistance Loans
The City Council may authorize a mortgage loan as part of a relocation assistance package to executive
staff. The loans are secured by first deeds of trust, and interest is adjusted annually based on the rate of
return of invested funds of the City for the year ended June 30 plus one‐quarter of 1 percent. Principal
and interest payments are due bi‐weekly. Employees must pay any outstanding balance on their loans
within a certain period after ending employment with the City. As of June 30, 2016, the City had one
outstanding home loan from the current City Manager.
The original purchase cost for the current City Manager’s home was $1.9 million and the City holds a 75
percent equity share. The loan balance owed as of June 30, 2016 is $403,000. During FY 2011, the Council
authorized a capital improvement loan of $125,000. Loans for capital improvements are made on a dollar
for dollar matching basis, with an equal equity contribution made by the City Manager. The loan balance
owed as of June 30, 2016 was $110,000.
Below Market Rate Assessment Loans
In December 2002, the City loaned $53,000 to below market rate homeowners with low incomes and/or
very limited assets for capital repairs, special assessments and improvements of their properties. The
loans bear interest at 3 percent and are secured by a deed of trust on each property. Loan payments are
deferred until 2032. In 2016, the City did not receive interest payments.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
68
NOTE 5 – NOTES AND LOANS RECEIVABLE (Continued)
Oak Manor Townhouse Water System
On May 12, 2003, the City Council approved an allocation of $114,000 to Palo Alto Housing Corporation
Apartments, Inc (PAHCA, Inc) to replace the water pipes. Repayment of the loan will not be required unless
the property is sold, the program is terminated or purpose of the program is changed without City’s
approval prior to July 1, 2033. The loan for this project is subordinated to the existing City loan with
PAHCA, Inc dated January 7, 1991 for the acquisition of the project site, which is discussed earlier in this
section.
Lytton Gardens Assisted Living
In June 2005, the City loaned $101,000 to Community Housing, Inc. to upgrade and modernize the existing
kitchens at the senior residential facility known as Lytton Gardens Assisted Living. The loan was funded
with CDBG funds, and bears simple interest of 3 percent. Principal and interest payments are deferred
until July 1, 2035, as long as the borrower continues to comply with all terms and conditions of the
agreement.
Emergency Housing Consortium
In November 2005, the City agreed to loan up to $75,000 to Emergency Housing Consortium to cover
architectural expenses that will be incurred in rehabilitating and expanding the property. The loan was
funded with CDBG funds, and bears simple interest of 3 percent. Principal and interest payments are
deferred until July 1, 2035, as long as the borrower continues to comply with all terms and conditions of
the agreement.
Alma Garden Apartments
In March 2006, the City agreed to loan up to $1.2 million to Community Working Group, Inc. to acquire a
10‐unit multi‐family housing complex known as Alma Garden Apartments. The loan was funded with
CDBG funds. Principal and interest payments are deferred until July 1, 2061 as long as the borrower
complies with all terms and conditions of the agreement.
2811‐2825 Alma Street Acquisition
On October 9, 2011, the City agreed to loan $1.3 million to PAHC Properties Corporation (PAHC) to acquire
properties on Alma Street for the purpose of developing an affordable rental housing project. On June
29, 2015, the City loaned PAHC an additional $0.6 million, and entered into an Amended and Restated
Acquisition and Development Agreement which combined the two loans for a total loan of $1.9 million.
The loan term expires on December 8, 2066 with an option to extend the term for an additional 44 years.
The loan bears simple interest of 3 percent, however in the event of default interest will accrue at the
lesser of 8 percent or the highest rate permitted by law. Principal and interest payments are payable
during the term of the agreement on a “residual receipt” basis as described in the agreement. All principal
and interest is due in the event of an unauthorized transfer, a default or the expiration of the term. As of
June 30, 2016, the outstanding balance was $1.9 million.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
69
NOTE 5 – NOTES AND LOANS RECEIVABLE (Continued)
Palo Alto Family Housing, 801 Alma Street
On February 14, 2011, the City agreed to loan Palo Alto Family, LP up to $9.3 million for the purposes of
predevelopment expenses and acquiring certain real property for the Alma Street Affordable Multi‐Family
Rental Housing Project. The loan bears simple interest of 3 percent. Principal and interest are due and
payable during the term of the agreement on a “residual receipt” basis as described in the agreement.
Except in the case of default, all remaining principal and interest shall be payable on the Restriction
Termination Date as defined in the agreement. As of June 30, 2016, the outstanding amount is $6.4
million.
Palo Alto Senior Housing Project
On October 1, 2015, the City entered into an affordable housing fund loan agreement with PASHPI
Stevenson House LP, a California limited partnership, in the principal amount of $1 million to assist in the
rehabilitation of the Stevenson House. The loan bears simple interest of 3 percent. The loan remains
outstanding and is due at the end of the 55‐year term.
Colorado Park Housing Corporation
On September 8, 2014, the City entered into an affordable housing fund loan agreement with Colorado
Park Housing Corporation (CPHC), a California nonprofit public benefit corporation, in the principal
amount of $204,000. The loan bears no interest except in the event of default. The principal and any
accrued interest is due and payable on the earlier of (a) expiration of the term, or (b) a default by CPHC
which has not been cured as provided for in the agreement.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
70
NOTE 6 – CAPITAL ASSETS
Valuation
Capital assets are valued at historical cost or estimated historical cost if actual historical cost is not
available. Contributed capital assets are valued at their estimated fair value on the date contributed. The
City’s policy is to capitalize all assets when costs are equal to or exceed $5,000 and the useful life exceeds
one year. Infrastructure assets are capitalized when costs are equal to or exceed $100,000.
Proprietary fund capital assets are recorded at cost including significant interest costs incurred under
restricted tax‐exempt borrowings, which finance the construction of capital assets. These interest costs,
net of interest earned on investment of proceeds of such borrowings, are capitalized and added to the
cost of capital assets during the construction period. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred.
The City has recorded all its public domain capital assets, consisting of roadway and recreation and open
space, in its government‐wide financial statements. GASB Statement No. 34 requires that all capital assets
with limited useful lives be depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Alternatively, the “modified
approach” may be used for certain capital assets. Depreciation is not provided under this approach, but
all expenditures on these assets are expensed unless they are additions or improvements. The City has
elected to use the depreciation method for its capital assets. The purpose of depreciation is to spread the
cost of capital assets equitably among all users over the life of those assets. The amount charged to
depreciation expense each year represents that year’s pro rata share of the cost of capital assets.
Depreciation of capital assets is charged as an expense against operations each year and the total amount
of depreciation taken over the years, called accumulated depreciation, is reported on the statement of
net position as a reduction in the book value of capital assets.
Depreciation is calculated using the straight line method, which means the cost of the asset is divided by
its expected useful life in years, and the result is charged to expense each year until the asset is fully
depreciated. The City has assigned the useful lives listed below to capital assets.
Governmental Activities Years
Buildings and structures 20 ‐ 30
Equipment:
Computer equipment 3 ‐ 5
Office machinery and equipment 5
Machinery and equipment 5 ‐ 30
Intangible assets ‐ software 5‐20
Roadway network:
5 ‐ 40
Recreation and open space network:
25 ‐ 40
Business‐type Activities
Buildings and structures 25 ‐ 60
Vehicles and heavy equipment 3 ‐ 10
Machinery and equipment 10 ‐ 50
Transmission, distribution and treatment systems 10 ‐ 100
Includes pavement, striping and legends, curbs, gutters and sidewalks, parking lots,
traffic signage, and bridges
Includes major park facilities, park trails, bike paths and medians
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
71
NOTE 6 – CAPITAL ASSETS (Continued)
General Capital Assets
Changes in the City’s general capital assets during the year ended June 30, 2016 were (in thousands):
Balance Balance
July 1, 2015 Additions Retirements Transfers June 30, 2016
Governmental activities
Nondepreciable capital assets:
Land and improvements 79,047$ ‐$ (566)$ ‐$ 78,481$
Street trees 15,077 ‐ ‐ ‐ 15,077
Intangible assets ‐ Easement 3,567 ‐ ‐ ‐ 3,567
Construction in progress 39,333 24,361 (349) (16,818) 46,527
Total nondepreciable capital assets 137,024 24,361 (915) (16,818) 143,652
Depreciable capital assets:
Buildings and structures 221,696 25 (1,898) 1,087 220,910
Intangible assets ‐ Software 279 ‐ ‐ ‐ 279
Equipment 12,265 308 ‐ 286 12,859
Roadway network 299,242 ‐ ‐ 9,330 308,572
Recreation and open space network 27,632 ‐ (669) 6,115 33,078
Total depreciable capital assets 561,114 333 (2,567) 16,818 575,698
Less accumulated depreciation:
Buildings and structures (76,179) (6,020) 2,974 ‐ (79,225)
Intangible assets ‐ Software (206) (59) ‐ ‐ (265)
Equipment (7,944) (426) ‐ ‐ (8,370)
Roadway network (134,027) (7,069) ‐ ‐ (141,096)
Recreation and open space network (9,908) (965) ‐ ‐ (10,873)
Total accumulated depreciation (228,264) (14,539) 2,974 ‐ (239,829)
Depreciable capital assets, net 332,850 (14,206) 407 16,818 335,869
Internal service fund capital assets
Construction in progress 1,350 3,704 ‐ (3,225) 1,829
Equipment 53,419 9 (1,241) 3,225 55,412
Less accumulated depreciation (39,454) (2,525) 1,204 ‐ (40,775)
Net internal service fund capital assets 15,315 1,188 (37) ‐ 16,466
Governmental activities capital assets, net 485,189$ 11,343$ (545)$ ‐$ 495,987$
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
72
NOTE 6 – CAPITAL ASSETS (Continued)
Business‐type Capital Assets
Changes in the City’s enterprise fund capital assets during the year ended June 30, 2016 were
(in thousands):
Balance Balance
July 1, 2015 Additions Retirements Transfers June 30, 2016
Business‐type activities
Nondepreciable capital assets:
Land and improvements 4,973$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 4,973$
Construction in progress 89,909 39,088 (1,566) (33,461) 93,970
Total nondepreciable capital assets 94,882 39,088 (1,566) (33,461) 98,943
Depreciable capital assets:
Buildings and structures 53,505 ‐ ‐ 3,424 56,929
Transmission, distribution and treatment systems 717,669 269 (1,323) 30,037 746,652
Total depreciable capital assets 771,174 269 (1,323) 33,461 803,581
Less accumulated depreciation:
Buildings and structures (10,606) (970) ‐ ‐ (11,576)
Transmission, distribution and treatment systems (296,917) (18,210) 986 ‐ (314,141)
Total accumulated depreciation (307,523) (19,180) 986 ‐ (325,717)
Depreciable capital assets, net 463,651 (18,911) (337) 33,461 477,864
Business‐type activities capital assets, net 558,533$ 20,177$ (1,903)$ ‐$ 576,807$
Capital Asset Contributions
Some capital assets may be acquired using federal and state grant funds, or they may be contributed by
developers or other governments. Generally accepted accounting principles require that these
contributions be accounted for as revenues at the time the capital assets are contributed.
Depreciation Allocation
Depreciation expense was charged to functions and programs based on their usage of the related assets.
The amount allocated to each function or program is as follows (in thousands):
Governmental Activities Business‐type Activities
City Manager 37$ Water 2,743$
City Attorney 3 Electric 7,601
Administrative Services 2 Fiber Optics 328
Community Services 1,814 Gas 2,827
Public Safety 334 Wastewater Collection 1,932
Public Works 9,863 Wastewater Treatment 2,956
Planning and Community Environment 166 Refuse 77
Library 2,320 Storm Drainage 716
Internal Service Funds 2,525 19,180$
17,064$
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
73
NOTE 6 – CAPITAL ASSETS (Continued)
Construction In Progress
Construction in progress as of June 30, 2016 is comprised of the following (in thousands):
Governmental Activities
Expended to
June 30, 2016
California Avenue‐Transit Hub Corridor 6,703$
City Hall First Floor Renovation 4,307
Magical Bridge Playground 3,554
Traffic Signal Upgrades 2,529
Furniture/Technology for Library Bond Project 2,324
Highway 101 Pedestrian/Bicycle Overpass 1,918
Telephone Infrastructure and Network 1,582
Transportation and Parking Improvements 1,413
Safe Routes To School 1,148
Bicycle Boulevards Implementation Project 1,127
Golf Reconfig and Baylands Athletic Center 1,119
Curb & Gutter Repairs 1,104
Charleston/Arastradero Corridor 1,023
Park Trails 960
Parks Master Plan 852
Eleanor Pardee Park Imp 739
Newell Road Bridge/SFC Bridge Replacemen 719
Library & Comm Center Temp Facilities 657
Benches/Signage/Fencing/Walkways 596
Interior Finishes Construction 584
Temporary Main Library 536
Other Construction In Progress 12,862
Total Governmental Activities Construction In Progress 48,356$
Business‐type Activities
Expended to
June 30, 2016
Water system extension replacements and improvements 10,928$
Gas system extension replacements and improvements 2,184
Sewer system rehabilitation and extensions 6,765
Electric distribution system improvements 7,753
Water quality control plant equipment replacement and lab facilities 3,612
Storm drainage structural and water quality improvements 3,097
Other electrical improvements projects 1,430
Other construction in progress 58,201
Total Business‐type Activities Construction In Progress 93,970$
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
74
NOTE 6 – CAPITAL ASSETS (Continued)
Construction In Progress
Allocations of business‐type activity administration and general expenses of $12.0 million have been
capitalized and included in amounts expended to June 30, 2016.
Major governmental capital projects that are currently in progress, and the remaining capital commitment
of each, are as follows:
Golf Course reconfiguration and Baylands Athletic Center ‐ $10.2 million
Lucie Stern Buildings mechanical and electrical upgrades ‐ $2.8 million
Bicycle and pedestrian transportation plan ‐ $2.6 million
Major business‐type capital projects that are currently in progress, and the remaining capital commitment
of each, are as follows:
Seismic water system upgrades for Water fund ‐ $4.4 million
Channing Avenue/Lincoln Avenue storm drain improvement ‐ $3.6 million
Wastewater Collection Fund rehabilitation/augmentation ‐ $9.2 million
Vehicle Registration Fees (VRF)
In FY 2016, the City received VRF funds from the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority and
expended the full amount on capital expenditures for Alma/Middlefield Resurfacing Project (Project PE‐
86070).:
Starting VRF balance July 1, 2015 ‐$
VRF revenue 406,022
VRF interest 4,300
VRF expense (410,322)
Ending VRF balance June 30, 2016 ‐$
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
75
NOTE 7 – GENERAL LONG‐TERM OBLIGATIONS
Long‐Term Obligations
Bond premiums and discounts of long‐term debt issues are amortized over the life of the related debt.
The City’s long‐term debt issues and transactions, other than special assessment debt discussed in Note 8,
are as follows (in thousands):
Original Balance Balance Current
Issue Amount July 1, 2015 Additions Retirements June 30, 2016 Portion
Governmental Activities Debt:
General Long‐Term Obligations:
2002B Downtown Parking Improvements,
Certificates of Participation,
6.50%, due 03/01/2022
3,555$ 1,285$ ‐$ 150$ 1,135$ 160$
2010 General Obligation Bonds,
3.25% ‐ 5%, due 08/01/2040
55,305 51,470 ‐ 3,380 48,090 1,110
2011 Lease‐Purchase Agreement 3,222 1,643 ‐ 395 1,248 406
2013A General Obligation Bonds,
2 ‐ 5%, due 08/01/2041
20,695 20,325 ‐ 3,205 17,120 390
Add: Unamortized Premium ‐ 4,084 ‐ 158 3,926 158
Total Governmental Activities Debt 82,777$ 78,807$ ‐$ 7,288$ 71,519$ 2,224$
Original Issue
Amount
Balance
July 1, 2015 Additions Retirements
Balance
June 30, 2016
Current
Portion
Business‐type Activities Debt:
Enterprise Long‐Term Obligations:
Utility Revenue Bonds
1995 Series A,
5.00‐6.25%, due 06/01/2020
8,640$ 2,860$ ‐$ 505$ 2,355$ 535$
1999 Refunding,
3.25‐5.25%, due 06/01/2024
17,735 10,345 ‐ 665 9,680 700
2009 Series A,
1.80‐5.95%, due 06/01/2035
35,015 30,700 ‐ 955 29,745 990
2011 Refunding,
3‐4%, due 06/01/2035
17,225 13,320 ‐ 1,005 12,315 1,045
Add: Unamortized Premium ‐ 840 ‐ 70 770 ‐
Energy Tax Credit Bonds
2007 Series A, 0%, Due 12/15/2021 1,500 700 ‐ 100 600 100
Less: Unamortized Discount ‐ (38) ‐ (5) (33) ‐
State Water Resources Loans
2007, 1.02%, due 06/30/2029 9,000 6,300 ‐ 450 5,850 450
2009, 2.6%, due 11/30/2030 8,500 7,200 ‐ 369 6,831 378
Total Business‐type Activities Debt 97,615$ 72,227$ ‐$ 4,114$ 68,113$ 4,198$
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
76
NOTE 7 – GENERAL LONG‐TERM OBLIGATIONS (Continued)
Description of Long‐Term Debt Issues
2002B Downtown Parking Improvements Project Certificates of Participation (COPs) – On
January 16, 2002, the City issued $3.6 million of COPs to finance the construction of certain improvements
to the non‐parking area contained in the City’s Bryant/Florence Garage complex. Principal payments are
due annually on March 1 and interest payments semi‐annually at 6.5 percent on March 1 and September
1, and are payable from lease revenues received by the Corporation from the City’s available funds.
2010 General Obligation Bonds (GO bonds) – On June 30, 2010, the City issued $55.3 million of GO bonds
to finance costs for constructing a new Mitchell Park Library and Community Center, as well as making
substantial improvements to the Rinconada Library and the Downtown Library. Principal payments are
due annually on August 1 and interest payments semi‐annually on February 1 and August 1 from 3.25
percent to 5 percent, and are payable from property tax revenues.
On June 28, 2016, the City defeased $2.3 million of 2010 GO bonds using funds from bond premiums
received at time of issue by depositing the amount in an irrevocable trust account. The trust account
assets and the liability for the defeased bonds are not included in the City’s financial statements. The
economic gain associated with interest savings is estimated at $0.9 million. The City legally remains the
primary obligor on the $2.3 million of defeased bonds until they are paid on August 1, 2020.
2013A General Obligation Bonds (GO bonds) – On June 30, 2013, the City issued $20.7 million of GO
bonds to finance costs for constructing a new Mitchell Park Library and Community Center, as well as
making substantial improvements to the Rinconada Library and the Downtown Library. Principal
payments are due annually on August 1 and interest payments semi‐annually on February 1 and August 1
from 2 percent to 5 percent, and are payable from property tax revenues.
On June 28, 2016, the City defeased $2.8 million of 2013A GO bonds using funds remaining at completion
of the project by depositing the amount in an irrevocable trust account The trust account assets and the
liability for the defeased bonds are not included in the City’s financial statements. The economic gain
associated with interest savings is estimated at $0.7 million. The City legally remains the primary obligor
on the $2.8 million of defeased bonds until they are paid on August 1, 2023.
The City’s 2010 and 2013A GO bonds are payable from pledged ad valorem property taxes until the final
maturity dates of the bonds on August 1, 2040 and August 1, 2041 respectively. For the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2016, the City received $4.6 million in ad valorem property taxes for principal of $1.4 million and
interest of $3.2 million for both 2010 and 2013A GO bonds.
2011 Lease‐Purchase Agreement – On August 2, 2011, the City entered into a master lease‐purchase
agreement with JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. to finance redemption of the 1998 Golf Course COPs. The
lease is secured by a first priority security interest in twenty‐one Fire Department emergency vehicles.
Lease proceeds were $3.2 million. Principal payments are due annually on September 1 and interest
payments are due semi‐annually on September 1 and March 1 at a rate of 2.49 percent, payable from
General Fund revenues.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
77
NOTE 7 – GENERAL LONG‐TERM OBLIGATIONS (Continued)
1995 Utility Revenue Bonds, Series A – The City issued $8.6 million of Utility Revenue Bonds on
February 1, 1995 to finance certain extensions and improvements to the City’s Storm Drainage and
Surface Water System. The Bonds are special obligations of the City payable solely from and secured by
a pledge of and lien upon the revenues derived by the City from the funds, services and facilities of all
Enterprise Funds except the Refuse Services Fund, Fiber Optics Fund and Airport Fund. Principal payments
are payable annually on June 1 and interest payments semi‐annually on June 1 and December 1. A $2.9
million 6.3 percent term bond is due June 1, 2020.
As required by the Indenture, the City established a debt service reserve fund for the Bonds (the “Reserve
Account”), with a minimum funding level requirement in the Reserve Account (the “Reserve
Requirement”). At the time it issued the Bonds, the City satisfied the Reserve Requirement with a deposit
into the Reserve Account of a surety bond (the “Surety Bond”) in the amount of $685,340 issued by Ambac
Indemnity Corporation (renamed to Ambac Assurance Corporation in 1997).
The pledge of future Net Revenues for the above bonds ends upon repayment of the $2.4 million principal
and $0.4 million interest as the remaining debt service on the bonds, which is scheduled to occur in FY
2020. For FY 2016, Net Revenues, including operating revenues and non‐operating interest earnings,
amounted to $241.5 million; operating costs, including operating expenses but not interest, depreciation
or amortization, amounted to $186.8 million. Net Revenues available for debt service amounted to $54.7
million, which represented coverage of 80 times over the $0.7 million in debt service.
1999 Utility Revenue and Refunding Bonds – The City issued $17.7 million of Utility Revenue Bonds on
June 1, 1999, to refund the 1990 Utility Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series A and the 1992 Utility Revenue
Bonds, Series A, and to finance rehabilitation of two Wastewater Treatment sludge incinerators. The 1990
Utility Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series A and the 1992 Utility Revenue Bonds, Series A, were
subsequently retired.
The 1999 Bonds are special obligations of the City payable solely from and secured by a pledge of and lien
upon certain net revenues derived by the City’s sewer system and its storm and surface water system (the
“Storm Drain System”). As of June 30, 2001, the 1999 Bonds had been allocated to and were repayable
from net revenues of the following enterprise funds: Wastewater Collection (10.2 percent), Wastewater
Treatment (64.6 percent) and Storm Drainage (25.2 percent). Principal payments are payable annually on
June 1 and interest payments semi‐annually on June 1 and December 1. A $3.1 million 5.3 percent term
bond and a $5.1 million 5.3 percent term bond are due June 1, 2021 and 2024, respectively.
As required by the Indenture, the City established a debt service reserve fund for the Bonds (the “Reserve
Account”), with a minimum funding level requirement in the Reserve Account (the “Reserve
Requirement”). At the time it issued the Bonds, the City satisfied the Reserve Requirement with a deposit
into the Reserve Account of a surety bond (the “Surety Bond”) in the amount of $1,647,300 issued by
Ambac Indemnity Corporation (renamed to Ambac Assurance Corporation in 1997).
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
78
NOTE 7 – GENERAL LONG‐TERM OBLIGATIONS (Continued)
The pledge of future Net Revenues for the above bonds ends upon repayment of the $9.7 million principal
and $2.7 million interest as the remaining debt service on the bonds, which is scheduled to occur in FY
2024. For FY 2016, Net Revenues, including operating revenues and non‐operating interest earnings,
amounted to $48.0 million; operating costs, including operating expenses but not interest, depreciation
or amortization, amounted to $34.9 million. Net Revenues available for debt service amounted to $13.1
million, which represents coverage of 10.8 times over the $1.2 million in debt service.
2007 Electric System Clean Renewable Energy Tax Credit Bonds, Series A – In October 2007, the City
issued $1.5 million of Electric Utility Clean Renewable Energy Tax Credit Bonds (CREBs), 2007 Series A, to
finance the City’s photovoltaic solar panel project. The CREBs do not bear interest. In lieu of receiving
periodic interest payments, bondholders are allowed annual federal income tax credits in an amount
equal to a credit rate for such CREBs multiplied by the outstanding principal amount of the CREBs owned
by the bondholders. The CREBs are payable solely from and secured solely by a pledge of the Net Revenues
of the Electric system and the other funds pledged under the Indenture.
The pledge of future Electric Fund Net Revenues ends upon repayment of the $0.6 million remaining debt
service on the bonds, which is scheduled to occur in FY 2022. For FY 2016, Net Revenues, including
operating revenues and non‐operating interest earnings, amounted to $123.9 million; operating costs,
including operating expenses but not interest, depreciation or amortization, amounted to $103.7 million.
Net Revenues available for debt service amounted to $20.2 million, which represented coverage of
202 times over the $0.1 million in debt service.
2009 Water Revenue Bonds, Series A – On October 6, 2009, the City issued $35.0 million of Water
Revenue Bonds to finance certain improvements to the City’s water utility system. Principal payments are
due annually on June 1, and interest payments are due semi‐annually on June 1 and December 1 from
1.80 percent to 5.95 percent. The 2009 Revenue Bonds are secured by net revenues generated by the
Water Services Fund. The 2009 Bonds were issued as bonds designated as “Direct Payment Build America
Bonds” under the provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“Build America
Bonds”). The City expects to receive a cash subsidy payment from the United States Treasury equal to 35
percent of the interest payable on the 2009 Bonds. The lien of the 1995 Bonds on the Net Revenues is
senior to the lien on Net Revenues securing the 2009 Bonds and the 2011 Bonds. The City received subsidy
payments amounting to $526 thousand, which represents 32.6 percent of the interest payments due on
December 1 and June 1.
The pledge of future Net Revenues for the above bonds ends upon repayment of the $29.7 million
principal and $19.0 million interest as the remaining debt service on the bonds, which is scheduled to
occur in FY 2035. For FY 2016, Net Revenues, including operating revenues and non‐operating interest
earnings, amounted to $38.7 million; operating costs, including operating expenses but not interest,
depreciation or amortization, amounted to $30.6 million. Net Revenues available for debt service
amounted to $8.1 million, which represented coverage of 3.19 times over the $2.6 million in debt service.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
79
NOTE 7 – GENERAL LONG‐TERM OBLIGATIONS (Continued)
2011 Utility Revenue Refunding Bonds – On September 8, 2011, the City issued $17.2 million in Lease
Revenue Bonds (2011 Bonds) to refund the outstanding 2002 Series A Utility Revenue Bonds (2002 Bonds)
on a current basis. The 2002 Bonds were issued to finance improvement to the City’s municipal water
utility system and the natural gas utility system. Principal of the 2011 Bonds is payable annually on June
1, and interest on the 2011 Bonds is payable semi‐annually on June 1 and December 1. The 2011 Bonds
are secured by net revenues generated by the Water Services and Gas Services Funds.
The pledge of future Net Revenues of the above bonds ends upon repayment of the $12.3 million principal
and $2.3 million interest as remaining debt service on the bonds, which is scheduled to occur in FY 2035.
For FY 2016, Net Revenues, including operating revenues and non‐operating interest earnings, amounted
to $69.7 million; operating costs, including operating expenses but not interest, depreciation or
amortization, amounted to $48.2 million. Net Revenues available for debt service amounted to $21.5
million, which represented coverage of 14.7 times over the $1.5 million in debt service.
2007 State Water Resources Loan – In October 2007, the City approved a $9 million loan agreement with
State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) to finance the City’s Mountain View/Moffett Area
reclaimed water pipeline project. Under the terms of the contract, the City has agreed to repay $9 million
to the State in exchange for receiving $7.5 million in proceeds to be used to fund the Project. The
difference of $1.5 million between the repayment obligation and proceeds represents in‐substance
interest on the outstanding balance. Principal payments are payable annually on June 30.
Concurrently with the loan, the City entered into various other agreements including a cost sharing
arrangement with the City of Mountain View. Pursuant to that agreement, City of Mountain View agreed
to finance a portion of the project with a $6 million loan repayable to the City. This loan has been recorded
as “Due from other government agencies” in the accompanying financial statements.
2009 State Water Resources Loan – In October 2009, the City approved an $8.5 million loan agreement
with SWRCB to finance the City’s Ultraviolet Disinfection project. Principal and interest payments are
payable annually on November 30.
Debt Service Requirements (in thousands):
Debt service requirements are shown below for all long‐term debt.
For the Year Ending
June 30 Principal Interest Total Principal Interest Total
2017 2,066$ 3,032$ 5,098$ 4,198$ 2,818$ 7,016$
2018 2,156 2,942 5,098 4,363 2,656 7,019
2019 2,251 2,844 5,095 4,533 2,484 7,017
2020 1,920 2,758 4,678 4,713 2,300 7,013
2021 1,985 2,674 4,659 4,899 2,118 7,017
2022‐2026 10,355 12,045 22,400 23,204 7,704 30,908
2027‐2031 12,775 9,296 22,071 12,569 4,382 16,951
2032‐2036 15,920 6,108 22,028 8,895 1,361 10,256
2037‐2041 17,615 2,050 19,665 ‐ ‐ ‐
2042‐2046 550 11 561 ‐ ‐ ‐
Total 67,593$ 43,760$ 111,353$ 67,374$ 25,823$ 93,197$
Governmental Activities Business‐Type Activities
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
80
NOTE 7 – GENERAL LONG‐TERM OBLIGATIONS (Continued)
Debt Call Provisions
Long‐term debt as of June 30, 2016 is callable on the following terms and conditions:
Initial Call Date
Governmental Activities Long‐Term Debt
2002B Certificates of Participation 03/01/11 (2)
2010 General Obligation Bonds
$6.595 million due 08/01/2032 08/01/31 (3)
$4.890 million due 08/01/2034 08/01/33 (3)
$17.725 million due 08/01/2040 08/01/35 (3)
Business‐Type Activities Long‐Term Debt
Utility Revenue Bonds
1999 Refunding 06/01/09 (1)
2011 Refunding 06/01/21 (1)
(1) Callable in inverse numerical order of maturity at par plus a premium of 2 percent beginning on the
initial call date. The call price declines subsequent to the initial date.
(2) Callable in any order specified by the City at par plus a premium of 1 percent beginning on the initial
call date. The call price declines subsequent to the initial date.
(3) Callable in any order specified by the City at par value plus any accrued interest beginning on the
initial call date.
Leasing Arrangements
COPs and Capital Leases are issued for the purpose of financing the construction or acquisition of projects
defined in each leasing arrangement. Projects are leased to the City for lease payments which, together
with unspent proceeds of the leasing arrangement, will be sufficient to meet the debt service obligations
of the leasing arrangement. At the termination of the leasing arrangement, title to the project will pass to
the City.
Leasing arrangements are similar to debt in that they allow investors to participate in a share of
guaranteed payments made by the City. Because they are similar to debt, the present value of the total
payments to be made by the City is recorded as long‐term debt. The City’s leasing arrangements are
included in long‐term obligations discussed above.
Conduit Financing
On December 15, 1996, the City acted as a financial intermediary in order to assist Lytton Gardens Health
Care Center in issuing Insured Revenue Refunding Bonds. The Bonds are payable solely from revenues
collected by Lytton Gardens Health Care Center. The City has not included these bonds in its basic financial
statements since it is not legally or morally obligated for the repayment of the bonds. At June 30, 2016,
the amount of bonds outstanding was $1.2 million.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
81
NOTE 8 – SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DEBT
Special Assessment Debt with no City Commitment
The California Avenue Parking Assessment District No. 92‐13 issued Assessment Bonds of 1993, but the
City has no legal or moral liability with respect to the payment of this debt, which is secured only by
assessments on the properties in this District. Therefore, this debt is not included in Governmental
Activities long‐term debt of the City. At June 30, 2016, the debt has been fully paid off.
On February 29, 2012, the University Avenue Area Off‐Street Parking Assessment District issued Limited
Obligation Refunding Improvement Bonds (2012 Bonds), but the City has no legal or moral liability with
respect to the payment of this debt, which is secured only by assessments on properties in this District.
Therefore, this debt is not included in Governmental Activities long‐term debt of the City. At
June 30, 2016, the District’s outstanding debt amounted to $25.1 million. The proceeds from the 2012
Bonds, combined with available Assessment Funds, were used to redeem the outstanding University
Avenue Area Off‐Street Parking Assessment District Series 2001‐A and Series 2002‐A Bonds. On June 28,
2016, the District defeased $1.6 million of the 2012 Bonds using funds remaining from completion of the
project. The defeased debt will be paid on September 2, 2022.
NOTE 9 – LANDFILL POST‐CLOSURE MAINTENANCE
The 126 acre Palo Alto Refuse Disposal Site (Palo Alto Landfill) was filled to capacity and stopped accepting
waste in July 2011. State and federal laws and regulations require the City to construct a final cover to
cap the waste, and to perform certain post‐closure maintenance and monitoring activities at the site for
a minimum of thirty years after closure. As of November 2015, the Palo Alto Landfill has been fully capped
and subsequently converted to a pastoral park (Byxbee Park) that is open to the public. A final post‐
closure maintenance plan and cost estimate for the thirty year post‐closure related activities was
approved by state and local regulatory agencies in 2014. This cost estimate is adjusted annually for
inflation at a percentage provided by the State. Landfill post‐closure liabilities as of June 30, 2016 are $6.6
million. The City is required by state and federal laws and regulations to fund post‐closure maintenance
activities by pledging future revenue received from Refuse customers through rate fees.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
82
NOTE 10 – NET POSITION AND FUND BALANCES
Net Position
Net Position is the excess of the City’s assets and deferred outflows of resources over its liabilities and
deferred inflows of resources. Net position is divided into three categories that are described below:
Net Investment in Capital Assets describes the portion of net position, which is represented by current net
book value of the City’s capital assets, less the outstanding balance of any debt issued to finance these
assets.
Restricted describes the portion of net position that is reduced by liabilities related to restricted assets.
Generally a liability relates to restricted assets if the asset results from a resource flow that also results in
the recognition of a liability or if the liability will be liquidated with the restricted assets reported.
Unrestricted describes the portion of net position which is not restricted as to use.
Fund Balances
As prescribed by GASB Statement No. 54, governmental funds report fund balances in classifications based
primarily on the extent to which the City is bound to honor constraints on the specific purposes for which
amounts in the funds can be spent. Fund balances for governmental funds are made up of the following:
Nonspendable – This category is comprised of amounts that are: (a) not in spendable form, or (b) legally
or contractually required to be maintained intact. The “not in spendable form” criterion includes items
that are not expected to be converted to cash, for example: prepaid items. The corpus of the permanent
fund is contractually required to be maintained intact.
Restricted – This category is comprised of amounts that can be spent only for the specific purposes
stipulated by external resource providers, constitutionally or through enabling legislation. Restrictions
may effectively be changed or lifted only with the consent of resource providers.
Committed – This category is comprised of amounts that can only be used for the specific purposes
determined by the action that constitutes the most binding constraint (i.e. ordinance) of the City’s highest
level of decision‐making authority, the City Council. Commitments may be changed or lifted only by the
City taking the same formal action that imposed the constraint originally.
Assigned – This category is comprised of amounts intended to be used by the City for specific purposes
that are neither restricted nor committed. Intent is expressed by the City Council or the City Manager, to
whom the City Council has delegated the authority to assign amounts to be used for specific purposes.
Unassigned –This category is the residual classification for the General Fund and includes all amounts not
contained in the other classifications. Unassigned amounts are technically available for any purpose.
Other governmental funds may report negative unassigned fund balance, which occurs when a fund has
a residual deficit after allocation of fund balance to the nonspendable, restricted or committed categories.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
83
NOTE 10 – NET POSITION AND FUND BALANCES (Continued)
The fund balances of all governmental funds are presented by the above mentioned categories on the
face of the financial statements. In circumstances when an expenditure is made for a purpose for which
amounts are available in multiple fund balance categories, fund balance is depleted in the order of
restricted, committed, assigned, and unassigned.
The General Fund Budget Stabilization Reserve (BSR) is established by authority of the General Fund
Reserve Policy, which is approved by the City Council and included in the City’s annual adopted budget.
The BSR is maintained in the range of 15 to 20 percent of General Fund expenditures and operating
transfers, with a target of 18.5 percent. Any reserve level below 15 percent requires City Council approval.
At the discretion of the City Manager, a reserve balance above 18.5 percent may be transferred to the
Infrastructure Reserve within the Capital Projects Fund. The purpose of the General Fund BSR is to fund
unbudgeted, unanticipated one‐time costs. The BSR is not meant to fund ongoing, recurring General Fund
expenditures.
As of June 30, 2016 total outstanding encumbrances related to governmental activities were $6.2 million
for the General Fund, $30.6 million for the Capital Projects Fund, and $0.5 million for the Special Revenue
Funds. General Fund encumbrances are reserved for the following governmental activities: Planning &
Community Environment $1.8 million, Development Services $0.1 million, Public Works $0.8 million,
Community Services $0.9 million, Fire $0.6 million, Library $0.3 million, and the remaining City
departments $1.7 million.
Enterprise Funds
At June 30, 2016, Enterprise Fund unrestricted net position (in thousands) were as follows:
Water Electric Fiber Optics Gas
Wastewater
Collection
Wastewater
Treatment Refuse
Storm
Drainage Airport Total
Unrestricted
Rate stabilization
Supply ‐$ 9,011$ ‐$ 409$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 9,420$
Distribution 1,877 ‐ 24,329 5,610 342 (2,365) 6,147 1,760 (2,393) 35,307
1,877 9,011 24,329 6,019 342 (2,365) 6,147 1,760 (2,393) 44,727
Operations
Supply ‐ 15,642 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 15,642
Distribution 14,607 6,208 ‐ 10,296 3,211 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 34,322
14,607 21,850 ‐ 10,296 3,211 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 49,964
Emergency plant replacement ‐ ‐ 1,000 ‐ ‐ 1,980 ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,980
Electric special projects ‐ 51,838 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 51,838
Reappropriations 10,530 6,239 158 5,346 1,842 12,225 43 5,210 18 41,611
Commitments 6,349 5,209 91 909 9,246 2,614 1,203 3,985 442 30,048
Underground loan ‐ 729 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 729
Notes and loans ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 559 ‐ ‐ ‐ 559
Landfill corrective action ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 719 ‐ ‐ 719
Hydro stabilization reserve ‐ 11,400 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 11,400
Public benefit program ‐ 1,839 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,839
Central Valley Project ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
CIP reserve 2,726 880 ‐ 3,820 978 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 8,404
Geng Road Reserve ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 268 ‐ ‐ 268
GASB 68 Pension reserve (11,609) (27,284) (1,662) (12,365) (6,950) (17,125) (4,892) (2,923) (361) (85,171)
Total 24,480$ 81,711$ 23,916$ 14,025$ 8,669$ (2,112)$ 3,488$ 8,032$ (2,294)$ 159,915$
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
84
NOTE 10 – NET POSITION AND FUND BALANCES (Continued)
The City Council has set aside unrestricted net position for general contingencies, and future capital and
debt service expenditures including operating and capital contingencies for unusual or emergency
expenditures.
Internal Service Funds
At June 30, 2016, Internal Service Funds unrestricted net position (in thousands) were as follows:
Vehicle
Replacement
and
Maintenance Technology
Printing and
Mailing
Services
General
Benefits
Workers'
Compensation
Insurance
Program
General
Liabilities
Insurance
Program
Retiree Health
Benefits Total
Unrestricted net position:
Commitments 3,088$ 2,317$ 13$ 239$ 7$ 37$ ‐$ 5,701$
Future catastrophic losses ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,913 3,263 ‐ 6,176
Retiree health care ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 25,750 25,750
Capital projects 4,849 3,774 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 8,623
GASB68 pension reserve (2,589) (9,080) (292) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (11,961)
Available 3,573 15,537 9 2,289 ‐ ‐ ‐ 21,408
Total 8,921$ 12,548$ (270)$ 2,528$ 2,920$ 3,300$ 25,750$ 55,697$
Commitments represent the portion of net position set aside for open purchase orders.
Future catastrophic losses represent the portion of net position to be used for unforeseen future losses.
Retiree health care represents the portion of net position set aside to defer future costs of retiree health
care coverage.
Capital projects represent the portion of net position set aside for adopted capital projects.
GASB68 pension reserve is the portion of net position required to be set aside to meet defined benefit
pension obligations.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
85
NOTE 11 – PENSION PLANS
(a) General Information about the Pension Plans
Plan Descriptions ‐ Substantially all permanent City employees are eligible to participate in the City’s
separate Safety (police and fire) and Miscellaneous (all other) Plans, agent multiple‐employer defined
benefit pension plans administered by California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS), which
acts as a common investment and administrative agent for its participating member employers. Benefits
provisions under the Plans are established by State statute and City resolution. CalPERS issues publicly
available reports that include a full description of the pension plans including benefits provisions,
assumptions and membership information. The reports can be found on the CalPERS website at:
<http://www.calpers.ca.gov/index.jsp?bc=/about/forms‐pubs/calpers‐reports/actuarial‐
reports/home.xml>
Benefits Provided ‐ CalPERS provides retirement and disability benefits, annual cost of living adjustments
and death benefits to Plan members, who must be public employees and beneficiaries. Benefits are based
on years of credited service (equal to one year of full‐time employment), age at retirement and final
compensation. The death benefit is one of the following: the 1959 Survivor Benefit, or the pre‐retirement
option 2W Death Benefit for local fire members only.
The Plans’ provisions and benefits in effect at June 30, 2016, are summarized in the following table.
Contribution rates are based on the Actuarial Valuation Report as of June 30, 2013.
Safety Plan
Fire Fighters,
Fire Chief
Association,
Police Officers,
Fire Fighters,
Fire Chief Association
Police Officers,
Police Management
Fire Fighters,
Fire Chief
Association,
Police Officers,
Hire Date Prior to June 8, 2012
On or after June 8,
2012
On or after Dec. 8,
2012
On or after Jan 1,
2013
Benefit formula1 3% at 55 3% at 55 3% at 50 2.7% at 57
Benefit vesting schedule 5 years service 5 years service 5 years service 5 years service
Benefit payment monthly for life monthly for life monthly for life monthly for life
Retirement age 50 551 551 571
Monthly benefit as % of eligible compensatio 3%3%3%2.7%
Actuarially determined contribution rate ‐ EE 9%9%9%11.25%
Actuarially determined contribution rate ‐ ER 41.932%41.932%41.932%41.932%
Hire Date Prior to July 17, 2010
On or after July 17,
2010
On or after Jan 1,
2013
Benefit formula 2.7% at 552 2% at 602 2% at 623
Benefit vesting schedule 5 years service 5 years service 5 years service
Benefit payments monthly for life monthly for life monthly for life
Retirement age 552 602 623
Monthly benefit as % of eligible compensatio 2.70%2.0% ‐ 2.418%2%
Actuarially determined contribution rate ‐ EE 8%7%6.25%
Actuarially determined contribution rate ‐ ER 27.694%27.694%27.694%
1 Employees can retire at age 50 with reduced benefits of 2.4% ‐ 2.88% if hired before Jan 1, 2013, or 2.0% ‐ 2.6% if hired on or
after Jan 1, 2013.
2 Employees can retire at age 50 with reduced benefits of 2.0% ‐ 2.56% if hired before July 17, 2010, or 1.092% ‐ 1.874% if hired on or
after July 17, 2010.
3 Employees can retire at age 52 with reduced benefits of 1.0% ‐ 1.9%
Miscellaneous Plan
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
86
NOTE 11 – PENSION PLANS (Continued)
Employees Covered – Based on the Actuarial Valuation Report as of June 30, 2015, the following
employees were covered by the benefits terms for each Plan:
Miscellaneous Plan Safety Plan
Inactive employees or beneficiaries currently receiving benefits 1,027 414
Inactive employees entitled to but not yet receiving benefits 714 98
Active employees 796 179
Total 2,537 691
Contributions –Section 20814(c) of the California Public Employees’ Retirement Law requires that the
employer contribution rates for all public employers be determined on an annual basis by the actuary and
shall be effective on the July 1 following notice of a change in the rate. Funding contributions for the Plans
are determined annually on an actuarial basis as of June 30 by CalPERS. The actuarially determined rate
is the estimated amount necessary to finance the costs of benefits earned by employees during the year,
with an additional amount to finance any unfunded accrued liability. The City is required to contribute
the difference between the actuarially determined rate and the contribution rate of employees.
Further detail can be found in the Required Supplemental Information Schedule of Contributions.
(b) Net Pension Liability
The City’s net pension liability for both Plans is measured as the total pension liability, less the plan’s
fiduciary net position. Net pension liability is measured as of June 30, 2015 (measurement date), using
the Actuarial Valuation Report as of June 30, 2014 rolled forward to June 30, 2015 using standard update
procedures. At June 30, 2016, the City reported a net pension liability of $319.6 million for both plans. A
summary of principal assumptions and methods used to determine the net pension liability is as follows:
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
87
NOTE 11 – PENSION PLANS (Continued)
Actuarial Assumptions ‐ The total pension liabilities were determined using the following actuarial
assumptions in the Accounting Valuation Report:
Miscellaneous Plan Safety Plan
Valuation Date June 30, 2014 June 30, 2014
Measurement Date June 30, 2015 June 30, 2015
Actuarial Cost Method Entry Age Normal Entry Age Normal
Actuarial Assumptions:
Discount Rate 7.65% 7.65%
Inflation 2.75% 2.75%
Payroll Growth 3.00% 3.00%
Investment Rate of Return1 7.50%7.50%
Retirement Age
Mortality2
1 Net of pension plan investment and administrative expenses, including inflation.
2 Mortality table used was developed based on CalPERS Experience Study for period
1997 to 2007. Pre‐ and post‐retirement mortality rates include 5 years of projected
mortality improvement using Scale AA published by the Society of Actuaries.
Further details of the Experience Study can be found on the CalPERS website.
Derived using CalPERS membership data
for all funds.
Probabilities of retirement are based on
the 2010 CalPERS Experience Study for
the period 1997 to 2007.
Change in Assumptions ‐ GASB 68, paragraph 68 states that the long‐term expected rate of return should
be determined net of pension plan investment expense but without reduction for pension plan
administrative expense. The discount rate of 7.50 percent used for the June 30, 2014 measurement date
was net of administrative expenses. The discount rate of 7.65 percent used for the June 30, 2015
measurement date is without reduction of pension plan administrative expense.
Discount Rate – The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability was 7.65 percent for each
Plan. To determine whether the municipal bond rate should be used in the calculation of a discount rate
for each Plan, CalPERS stress tested plans that would most likely result in a discount rate that would be
different from the actuarially assumed discount rate. Based on the testing, none of the tested plans ran
out of assets. Therefore, the current 7.65 percent discount rate is appropriate and the use of the
municipal bond rate calculation is not deemed necessary. The long term expected discount rate of 7.65
percent is applied to all plans in the Public Employees Retirement Fund for the June 30, 2015
measurement date. The stress test results are presented in a detailed report that can be obtained from
the CalPERS website under GASB Statement No. 68 section.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
88
NOTE 11 – PENSION PLANS (Continued)
The long‐term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was determined using a building‐
block method in which best estimate ranges of expected future real rates of return (expected returns, net
of pension plan investment expense and inflation) are developed for each major asset class.
In determining the long‐term expected rate of return, CalPERS took into account both short‐term
and long‐term market return expectations as well as the expected pension fund cash flows. Such cash
flows were developed assuming that both members and employers will make their required contributions
on time and as scheduled in all future years. Using historical returns of all the funds’ asset classes,
expected compound geometric returns were calculated over the short‐term (first ten years) and the
long‐term (11‐60 years) using a building‐block approach. Using the expected nominal returns for both
short‐term and long‐term, the present value of benefits was calculated for each fund. The expected rate
of return was set by calculating the single equivalent expected return that arrived at the same present
value of benefits for cash flows as the one calculated using both short‐term and long‐term returns.
The expected rate of return was then set equivalent to the single equivalent rate calculated above
and rounded down to the nearest one quarter of one percent.
The table below reflects the long‐term expected real rate of return by asset class for both Miscellaneous
and Safety Plans. The rate of return was calculated using the capital market assumptions applied to
determine the discount rate and asset allocation. These rates of return are net of administrative
expenses.
Asset Class
New
Strategic
Allocation
Real Return
Years 1 - 101
Real Return
Years 11+2
Global Equity 51.0% 5.25% 5.71%
Global Fixed Income 19.0 0.99 2.43
Inflation Sensitive 6.0 0.45 3.36
Private Equity 10.0 6.83 6.95
Real Estate 10.0 4.50 5.13
Infrastructure and Forestland 2.0 4.50 5.09
Liquidity 2.0 (0.55) (1.05)
1 An expected inflation of 2.5% used for this period.
2 An expected inflation of 3.0% used for this period.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
89
NOTE 11 – PENSION PLANS (Continued)
(c) Changes in the Net Pension Liability
The following table is based on the GASB 68 Accounting Valuation Report and shows the changes in the
net pension liability for the Miscellaneous Plan (in thousands):
Total Pension
Liability
Plan Net
Position
Net Pension
Liability
Balances calculated at July 1, 2015 663,471$ 476,363$ 187,108$
Changes for the year:
Service cost 12,183 ‐ 12,183
Interest on total pension liability 49,345 ‐ 49,345
Differences between expected and actual
experiences 3,507 ‐ 3,507
Changes in assumptions (11,552) ‐ (11,552)
Contributions from employer ‐ 18,610 (18,610)
Contributions from employees ‐ 5,730 (5,730)
Net investment income ‐ 10,597 (10,597)
Benefit payments, including refunds of
employee contributions (32,980) (32,980) ‐
Administrative expense ‐ (538) 538
Net changes 20,503 1,419 19,084
Balances reported at June 30, 2016 $ 683,974 $ 477,782 $ 206,192
The following table is based on the GASB 68 Accounting Valuation Report and shows the changes in the
net pension liability for the Safety Plan (in thousands):
Total Pension
Liability
Plan Net
Position
Net Pension
Liability
Balances calculated at July 1, 2015 367,403$ 264,579$ 102,824$
Changes for the year:
Service cost 5,959 ‐ 5,959
Interest on total pension liability 27,047 ‐ 27,047
Differences between expected and actual
experiences 75 ‐ 75
Changes in assumptions (6,327) ‐ (6,327)
Contributions from employer ‐ 8,617 (8,617)
Contributions from employees ‐ 2,047 (2,047)
Net investment income ‐ 5,774 (5,774)
Benefit payments, including refunds of
employee contributions (21,148) (21,148) ‐
Administrative expense ‐ (290) 290
Net changes 5,606 (5,000) 10,606
Balances reported at June 30, 2016 $ 373,009 $ 259,579 $ 113,430
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
90
NOTE 11 – PENSION PLANS (Continued)
Sensitivity of the Net Pension Liability to Changes in the Discount Rate ‐ The following table presents the
net pension liability of the Plans as of the measurement date, calculated using the discount rate of 7.65
percent, compared to a discount rate that is 1 percentage point lower (6.65 percent) or 1 percentage
point higher (8.65 percent). Amounts shown below are in thousands:
Discount Rate ‐ 1%
(6.65%)
Current Discount Rate
(7.65%)
Discount Rate + 1%
(8.65%)
Miscellaneous Plan:
Plan's Net Pension Liability/(Asset) 293,361$ 206,192$ 133,730$
Safety Plan:
Plan's Net Pension Liability/(Asset)160,809$ 113,430$ 74,244$
Plan Fiduciary Net Position – Detailed information about the Plan’s fiduciary net position is available in
the separately issued CalPERS financial report: Schedule of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position by Rate Plan.
(d) Pension Expenses and Deferred Outflows/Inflows of Resources Related to Pensions
For the year ended June 30, 2016, the City recognized a pension expense of $14.7 million and $7.9 million
for the Miscellaneous and Safety Plan respectively. At June 30, 2016, the City reported pension related
deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources from the following sources (in
thousands):
Deferred
Outflows
of Resources
Deferred
Inflows
of Resources
Pension contributions subsequent to
measurement date 28,203$ ‐$
Change of assumptions ‐ 12,168
Difference between expected and actual experience 2,392 ‐
Net difference between projected and actual earnings
on plan investments ‐6,653
Total 30,595$ 18,821$
The $28.2 million reported as deferred outflows of resources relates to contributions paid by the City from
July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016 which is subsequent to the City’s measurement date of June 30, 2015
for both the Miscellaneous and Safety Plans. This amount will be recognized as a reduction of the net
pension liability in the year ended June 30, 2017.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
91
NOTE 11 – PENSION PLANS (Continued)
The net differences reported as deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related
to pensions will be recognized in future pension expense as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended June 30,
Miscellaneous
Plan
Safety
Plan Total
2017 (5,732)$ (3,623)$ (9,355)$
2018 (5,732) (3,623) (9,355)
2019 (3,050) (2,519) (5,569)
2020 5,053 2,797 7,850
(9,461)$ (6,968)$ (16,429)$
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
92
NOTE 12 – RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS
In addition to providing pension benefits, the City participates in the California Public Employees’ Medical
and Health Care Act program to provide certain health care benefits for retired employees. Employees
who retire directly from the City are eligible for retiree health benefits if they retire on or after age 50
with 5 years of service and are receiving a monthly pension from CalPERS. Details of benefits provided to
retirees are noted in the following tables:
Unit
Hired
Before
Retiree
Coverage1
Dependent
Coverage
Retired on
or After
Retiree
Contribution
Management & Professional2 1/1/2004 100% 100% 5/1/2011 Flat rate4
Police Management2 1/1/2004 100% 100% 6/1/2012 Flat rate5
Fire Fighters2 1/1/2004 100% 100% 12/1/2011 10%
Fire Chiefs Association2 1/1/2004 100% 100% 1/1/2013 10%
SEIU 1/1/2005 100% 100% 5/1/2011 Flat rate4
Police Officers3 1/1/2006 100% 100% 4/1/2015 10%
Utilities Managers & Professional2 1/1/2004 100% 100% 5/1/2011 10%
2 Effective 1/1/2007 plan capped at the second highest CalPERS Bay Area Basic plan premium.
3 Effective 7/1/2014 plan capped at the second highest CalPERS Bay Area Basic plan premium.
4 Effective 4/1/2014 City pays $688 for employee, $1,375 for employee +1, $1,788 for family. Effective 1/1/2015 City pays
$708 for employee, $1,415 for employee +1, $1,840 for family.
5 Effective 1/1/2015 City pays $708 for employee, $1,415 for employee +1, $1,840 for family. Effective 1/1/2016 City pays
$743 for employee, $1,485 for employee +1, $1,931 for family.
Unit
Hired on or
After
Retiree
Coverage1
Dependent
Coverage2
Management & Professional 1/1/2004 50%‐100% Max. 90%
Police Management 1/1/2004 50%‐100% Max. 90%
Fire Fighters 1/1/2004 50%‐100% Max. 90%
Fire Chiefs Association 1/1/2004 50%‐100% Max. 90%
Utilities Managers & Professional 1/1/2004 50%‐100% Max. 90%
SEIU 1/1/2005 50%‐100% Max. 90%
Police Officers 1/1/2006 50%‐100% Max. 90%
specified employer contribution, with the City portion increasing by 5% for each additional year of service credit.
2 Maximum of 90% once employee completes 20 years of service.
1 100% of benefits if the employee has five years CalPERS service credit and the employee retired from the City.
1 Employees with ten years of CalPERS service, at least five of which are at the City of Palo Alto, receive 50% of the
Retiree contributions for units with the following hire dates are determined by Government Code
Section 22893, 20 year graduated schedule:
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
93
NOTE 12 – RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS (Continued)
In FY 2008, the City elected to participate in an irrevocable trust to provide a funding mechanism for
retiree health benefits. The Trust, California Employers’ Retirees Benefit Trust (CERBT), is administrated
by CalPERS and managed by a separately appointed board, which is not under control of the City Council.
This Trust is not considered a component unit of the City.
Funding Policy and Actuarial Assumptions
The City’s policy is to prefund these benefits by accumulating assets in the Trust Fund discussed above
pursuant to City Council Resolution. The annual required contribution (ARC) was determined as part of a
June 30, 2013 actuarial valuation using the entry age normal actuarial cost method. This is a projected
benefit cost method, which takes into account those benefits that are expected to be earned in the future
as well as those already accrued. The actuarial assumptions include: (a) 7.6125 percent investment rate
of return, (b) 3.25 percent projected annual salary increase, (c) market value of assets, (d) inflation rate
of 3 percent, and (e) health care cost trend data as noted in the following table:
Year Non‐Medicare Medicare
2015 8.0% 8.3%
2016 7.5% 7.8%
2017 7.0% 7.2%
2018 6.5% 6.7%
2019 6.0% 6.1%
2020 5.5% 5.6%
2021+ 5.0% 5.0%
The actuarial methods and assumptions used include techniques that smooth the effects of short‐term
volatility in actuarial accrued liabilities and the actuarial value of assets. Actuarial calculations reflect a
long‐term perspective and actuarial valuations involve estimates of the value of reported amounts and
assumptions about the probability of events far into the future. The calculations are based on the types
of benefits provided under the terms of the substantive plan at the time of each valuation and on the
pattern of sharing costs between the City and Plan members to that point. Actuarially determined
amounts are subject to revision at least biennially as results are compared to past expectations and new
estimates are made about the future. The City’s unfunded actuarial accrued liability for retiree health
benefits is being amortized as a level percentage of projected payroll using a 30 year closed amortization
period.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
94
NOTE 12 – RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS (Continued)
Generally accepted accounting principles permit assets to be treated as other post employment benefit
(OPEB) assets and deducted from the actuarial accrued liability when such assets are placed in an
irrevocable trust or equivalent arrangement. During the year ended June 30, 2016, the City made
contributions and amortized the Net OPEB asset to fund the current year annual required contribution
(ARC). As a result, the City has calculated and recorded the Net OPEB Asset, representing the difference
between the ARC, amortization and contributions, as presented below (in thousands):
Annual required contribution 14,767$
Amortization of the Net OPEB Asset 2,183
Interest on the Net OPEB Asset (1,658)
Annual OPEB Cost 15,292
Contributions made:
Contributions to OPEB Trust 2,442
Contributions to Retirees 7,921
Implicit rate subsidy 2,102
City portion of current year premiums paid*1,618
Total contributions made 14,083
Change in Net OPEB Asset (1,209)
Net OPEB Asset, beginning of year 22,871
Net OPEB Asset, end of year 21,662$
* FY 2016 premiums for 920 retirees.
Shortly after year‐end, the City contributed an additional $2.8 million to the Trust.
The Plan’s annual OPEB cost and actual contributions for the past three years ended June 30 are set forth
below (in thousands):
Fiscal Year
Annual OPEB
Cost
Actual
Contribution
Percentage
of OPEB Cost
Net OPEB
Obligation
(Asset)
June 30, 2014 13,255$ 14,014$ 106% (22,610)$
June 30, 2015 14,773 15,034 102% (22,871)
June 30, 2016 15,292 14,083 92% (21,662)
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
95
NOTE 12 – RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS (Continued)
The Schedule of Funding Progress presents multi‐year trend information about whether the actuarial
value of plan assets is increasing or decreasing over time relative to the actuarial accrued liability for
benefits. Trend data from the actuarial studies is presented below (in thousands):
Valuation Date
Entry Age
Accrued
Liability
Value of
Assets
Unfunded
Liability
Funded
Ratio
Annual
Covered
Payroll
Unfunded
Liability as a
% of Payroll
June 30, 2011 168,053$ 44,774$ 123,279$ 26.6% 80,664$ 152.8%
June 30, 2013 203,642 60,070 143,572 29.5% 81,785 175.5%
June 30, 2015 234,795 78,578 156,217 33.5% 87,586 178.4%
NOTE 13 – DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
City employees may defer a portion of their compensation under City sponsored Deferred Compensation
Plans created in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 457. Under these Plans, participants are
not taxed on the deferred portion of their compensation until distributed to them. Distributions may be
made only at termination, retirement, death or in an emergency as defined by the Plans.
The laws governing deferred compensation plan assets require plan assets to be held by a Trust for the
exclusive benefit of plan participants and their beneficiaries. Since the assets held under these plans are
not the City’s property and are not subject to City control, they have been excluded from these financial
statements.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
96
NOTE 14 – RISK MANAGEMENT
Coverage
The City provides dental coverage to employees through a City plan, which is administered by a third party
service agent. The City is self‐insured for dental claims.
The City has a workers’ compensation insurance policy with coverage up to the statutory limit set by the
State of California. The City retains the risk for the first $500,000 in losses for each accident and employee
under this policy.
The City also has public employee dishonesty insurance with a $5,000 deductible and coverage up to
$1.0 million per loss. The Chief Financial Officer and City Manager each have coverage up to $4.0 million
per loss.
The City’s property, boiler, and machinery insurance policy has various deductibles and coverage based
on the type of property.
The City is a member of the Authority for California Cities Excess Liability (ACCEL), which provides excess
general liability insurance coverage, including auto liability, up to $100 million per occurrence. The City
retains the risk for the first $1.0 million in losses for each occurrence under this policy.
ACCEL was established for the purpose of creating a risk management pool for central California
municipalities. ACCEL is governed by a Board of Directors consisting of representatives of its member
cities. The board controls the operations of ACCEL, including selection of claims management, general
administration and approval of the annual budget.
The City’s deposits with ACCEL equal the ratio of the City’s payroll to the total payroll of all entities. Actual
surpluses or losses are shared according to a formula developed from overall loss costs and spread to
member entities on a percentage basis after a retrospective rating.
During the year ended June 30, 2016, the City paid $0.9 million to ACCEL for current year coverage.
Audited financial statements are available from ACCEL at 100 Pine Street, 11th Floor, San Francisco,
California 94110.
Claims Liability
The City provides for the uninsured portion of claims and judgments in the General Liabilities insurance
program funds. Claims and judgments, including a provision for claims incurred but not reported, and
claim adjustment expenses are recorded when a loss is deemed probable of assertion and the amount of
the loss is reasonably determinable. As discussed above, the City has coverage for such claims, but it has
retained the risk for the deductible or uninsured portion of these claims.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
97
NOTE 14 – RISK MANAGEMENT (Continued)
The City’s liability for uninsured claims is limited to dental, general liability, and workers’ compensation
claims, as discussed above. Dental liability is based on a percentage of current year actual expense.
General and workers’ compensation liabilities are based on the results of actuarial studies, and include
amounts for claims incurred but not reported as follows as of June 30 (in thousands):
2016 2015
Beginning balance 24,118$ 26,753$
Liability for current and prior fiscal years claims
and claims incurred but not reported (IBNR)2,850 574
Claims paid (3,589) (3,209)
Ending balance 23,379$ 24,118$
Current portion 5,237$ 5,317$
Year Ended June 30
The City has not incurred a claim that has exceeded its insurance coverage limits in any of the last three
years, nor have there been any significant reductions in insurance coverage.
NOTE 15 – JOINT VENTURES
General
The City participates in joint ventures through Joint Powers Authorities (JPAs) established under the Joint
Exercise of Powers Act of the State of California. As separate legal entities, these JPAs exercise full powers
and authorities within the scope of the related Joint Powers Agreement, including the preparation of
annual budgets, accountability for all funds, the power to make and execute contracts and the right to
sue and be sued. Obligations and liabilities of the JPAs, including the long‐term debt in which the City
participates in repayment, are not obligations and liabilities of the City, and are not reported on the City’s
financial statements.
Each JPA is governed by a board consisting of representatives from each member agency. Each board
controls the operations of its respective JPA, including selection of management and approval of operating
budgets, independent of any influence by member agencies beyond their representation on the Board.
Northern California Power Agency
The City is a member of Northern California Power Agency (NCPA), a joint powers agency which operates
under a joint powers agreement among fifteen public agencies. The purpose of NCPA is to use the
combined strength of its members to purchase, generate, sell and interchange electric energy and
capacity through the acquisition and use of electrical generation and transmission facilities. Each agency
member has agreed to fund a pro rata share of certain assessments by NCPA and enter into take‐or‐pay
power supply contracts with NCPA. While NCPA is governed by its members, none of its obligations are
those of its members unless expressly assumed by them.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
98
NOTE 15 – JOINT VENTURES (Continued)
During the year ended June 30, 2016, the City incurred expenses totaling $73.4 million for purchased
power and assessments earned by NCPA.
The City’s interest in NCPA projects and reserves, as computed by NCPA, was $7.8 million at June 30, 2016.
This amount represents the City’s portion of funds, which resulted from the settlement with third parties
of issues with financial consequences and reconciliations of several prior years’ budgets for programs. It
is recognized that all the funds credited to the City are linked to the collection of revenue from the City’s
ratepayers, or to the settlement of disputes relating to electric power supply and that the money was
collected from the City’s ratepayers to pay power bills. Additionally, the NCPA Commission identified and
approved the funding of specific reserves for working capital, accumulated employees’ post‐retirement
medical benefits, and billed property taxes for the geothermal project. The Commission also identified a
number of contingent liabilities that may or may not be realized, the cost of which in most cases is difficult
to estimate at this time. One such contingent liability is the steam field depletion, which will require
funding to cover debt service and operational costs in excess of the expected value of the electric power.
The General Operating Reserve (GOR) is intended to minimize the number and amount of individual
reserves needed for each project, protect NCPA’s financial condition and maintain its credit worthiness.
There are no funds on deposit with NCPA as a reserve against these contingencies identified by NCPA.
Members of NCPA may participate in an individual project of NCPA without obligation for any other
project. Member assessments collected for one project may not be used to finance other projects of NCPA
without the member’s permission.
Geothermal Projects
A purchased power agreement with NCPA obligated the City for 6.2 percent and 6.2 percent, respectively,
of the operating costs and debt service of the two NCPA 110‐megawatt geothermal steam‐powered
generating plants, Project Number 2 and Project Number 3.
The City’s participation in the Geothermal Project was sold to Turlock Irrigation District in October 1984.
Accordingly, the City is liable for payment of outstanding geothermal related debt only in the event that
Turlock fails to make specified payments. Total outstanding debt of the NCPA Geothermal Project at
June 30, 2016 is $78.9 million. The City’s participation in this project was 6.2 percent, or $4.9 million.
Calaveras Hydroelectric Project
In July 1981, NCPA agreed with Calaveras County Water District to purchase the output of the North Fork
Stanislaus River Hydroelectric Development Project and to finance its construction. Debt service payments
to NCPA began in February 1990 when the project was declared substantially complete and power was
delivered to the participants. Under its power purchase agreement with NCPA, the City is obligated to pay
22.9 percent of this Project’s debt service and operating costs. At June 30, 2016, the book value of this
Project’s plant, equipment and other assets was $435 million, while its long‐term debt totaled
$356 million and other liabilities totaled $70 million. The City’s share of the Project’s long‐term debt
amounted to $81.5 million at that date.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
99
NOTE 15 – JOINT VENTURES (Continued)
Geothermal Public Power Line
In 1983, NCPA, the Sacramento Municipal Utility District, the City of Santa Clara and the Modesto Irrigation
District (Joint Owners) initiated studies for a Geothermal Public Power Line (GPPL), which would carry
power generated at several existing and planned geothermal plants in The Geysers area to a location
where the Joint Owners could receive it for transmission to their load centers. NCPA has an 18.5 percent
share of this Project and the City has an 11.1 percent participation in NCPA’s share. In 1989, the
development of the proposed Geothermal Public Power Line was discontinued because NCPA was able to
contract for sufficient transmission capacity to meet its needs in The Geysers.
However, because the project financing provided funding for an ownership interest in a Pacific Gas &
Electric (PG&E) transmission line, a central dispatch facility and a performance bond pursuant to the
Interconnection Agreement with PG&E, as well as an ownership interest in the proposed GPPL, NCPA
issued $16 million in long‐term, fixed‐rate revenue bonds in November 1989 to defease the remaining
variable rate refunding bonds used to refinance this project. The City is obligated to pay its 11.1 percent
share of the related debt service, but debt service costs are covered through NCPA billing mechanisms
that allocate the costs to members based on use of the facilities and services.
At June 30, 2016, the book value of this Project’s plant, equipment and other assets was zero, and its long‐
term debt totaled zero.
NCPA’s financial statements can be obtained from NCPA, 180 Cirby Way, Roseville, CA 95678.
Transmission Agency of Northern California (TANC)
The City is a member of a joint powers agreement with 14 other entities in Transmission Agency of
Northern California (TANC). TANC’s purpose is to provide electrical transmission or other facilities for the
use of its members. While governed by its members, none of TANC’s obligations are those of its members
unless expressly assumed by them. The City was obligated to pay 4 percent of TANC’s debt‐service and
operating costs. However, a Resolution was approved authorizing the execution of a Long‐Term Layoff
Agreement (LTLA) between the Cities of Palo Alto and Roseville. These two agencies desired to “layoff”
their entitlement rights to the California‐Oregon Transmission Project (COTP) (and Roseville’s South of
Tesla entitlement rights) for a period of 15 years to those acquiring members (Sacramento Municipal
Utility District, Turlock Irrigation District, and Modesto Irrigation District). The effective date of this
Agreement was February 1, 2009. As a result, the City is not obligated to pay TANC’s debt‐service and
operating costs starting February 1, 2009, for a period of fifteen years.
TANC’s financial statements can be obtained from TANC, P.O. Box 15129, Sacramento, CA 95851.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
100
NOTE 15 – JOINT VENTURES (Continued)
Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency (BAWSCA)
The City is a member of a regional water district with 26 other entities, the Bay Area Water Supply and
Conservation Agency (BAWSCA). BAWSCA was created on May 27, 2003 to represent the interests of 24
cities and water districts and two private utilities in Alameda, Santa Clara and San Mateo counties that
purchase water on a wholesale basis from the San Francisco regional water system. It has the power to
issue debt and plan, finance, construct, and operate water supply, transmission, reclamation, and
conservation projects on behalf of its members.
In 2013 the City participated in a debt issuance by BAWSCA. The debt was issued to repay certain long‐
term costs associated with the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) water supply contract.
During the fiscal year, the City paid its share of the annual debt service of $1.9 million, which will vary
based on annual water purchases of the City compared to other BAWSCA agencies.
BAWSCA’s financial statements can be obtained from BAWSCA, 155 Bovet Road, Suite 650, San Mateo,
California 94402.
NOTE 16 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Palo Alto Unified School District – The City leases a portion of the former Cubberley School site and twelve
extended day care sites from Palo Alto Unified School District (PAUSD). The lease is part of a larger
agreement, which includes a mechanism for a joint planning process between the City and PAUSD to
develop a long‐term master plan for the Cubberley site. The City will pay $1.86 million annually into a
separate fund to be used for repairing, renovating and/or improving the infrastructure at the Cubberley
site. The lease term expired on December 31, 2014, and the City exercised its option to extend for 5 years,
with a new expiration date of 12/31/2019. The lease provides for one more five‐year option to extend
from 1/1/2020 to 12/31/2024. The City’s rent and infrastructure payment for the facilities is $7.3 million
per year plus insurance, repairs and maintenance. The rent may vary from year to year depending on the
actual number of days used. Should any new law or regulation require the expenditure of work in excess
of $250,000, per the terms of the lease, the City and PAUSD may renegotiate the lease. This lease is
cancelable upon 90 days’ written notice in the event funds are not appropriated by the City. In addition,
the lease is contingent upon authorization by the Palo Alto electorate if it exceeds the City’s Proposition
4 (GANN) appropriations limitation in any fiscal year. Lease expenditures for the year ended June 30,
2016amounted to $7.4 million. Future minimum annual lease and infrastructure payments are as follows
(in thousands):
Year Ending
June 30 Payment
2017 7,565$
2018 7,736
2019 7,912
2020 4,001
27,214$
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
101
NOTE 16 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)
GreenWaste of Palo Alto – GreenWaste of Palo Alto is the City’s contractor for waste collection,
transportation, and processing services. The agreement expires June 30, 2021. The base compensation
for GreenWaste is adjusted annually based on CPI indicators stipulated in the contract. In FY 2016
payments to GreenWaste were $10.5 million.
City of Palo Alto Regional Water Quality Control Plant – The cities of Palo Alto, Mountain View and Los
Altos (the Partners) participate jointly in the cost of maintaining and operating the City of Palo Alto
Regional Water Quality Control Plant and related system (the Plant). The City is the owner and
administrator of the Plant, which provides the transmission, treatment and disposal of sewage for the
Partners. The cities of Mountain View and Los Altos are entitled to use a portion of the capacity of the
Plant for a specified period of time. Each partner has the right to rent unused capacity from/to the other
partners. The expenses of operations and maintenance are paid quarterly by each partner based on its
pro rata share of treatment costs. Additionally, joint system revenues are shared by the partners in the
same ratio as expenses are paid. The amended agreement has a term of fifty years beginning from the
original signing in October 1968, but may be terminated by any partner upon ten years’ notice to the other
partners. All sewage treatment property, plant and equipment are included in the Wastewater Treatment
Enterprise Fund’s capital assets balance. If the City initiates the termination of the contracts, it is required
to pay the other partners their unamortized contribution towards the capital assets.
Solid Waste Materials Recovery and Transfer Station (SMaRT Station) – On June 9, 1992, the City, along
with the City of Mountain View, signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the City of
Sunnyvale (Sunnyvale) to participate in the construction and operation of the SMaRT station, which
recovers recyclable materials from the municipal solid waste delivered from participating cities. Per the
MOU, the City has a capacity share of 21.3 percent of this facility and reimburses its proportionate capacity
share of design, construction and operation costs to Sunnyvale.
On December 1, 1992, the Sunnyvale Financing Authority issued $24.6 million in revenue bonds to finance
the design and construction costs of the SMaRT Station. In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003, the 1992
bonds were refunded by issuing the 2003 Solid Waste Revenue Bonds in the amount of $20.6 million. Even
though these bonds are payable from and secured by the net revenues of Sunnyvale’s Utilities Enterprise,
the City is obligated to reimburse Sunnyvale 21.3 percent of total debt service payments related to these
bonds. The City’s portion of remaining principal balance for SMaRT revenue bonds as of June 30, 2016, is
$0.4 million. During the year ended June 30, 2016, the City paid $0.4 million as its portion of current debt
service.
In FY 2008, the members agreed to finance an Equipment Replacement Project from existing reserves and
proceeds from the Solid Waste Revenue Bond, Series 2007. The City has committed to repay 27.8 percent
of the remaining debt service on the Bonds. The City’s portion of the Bonds amounts to $0.9 million as of
June 30, 2016. During the year ended June 30, 2016, the City paid $0.2 million as its portion of current
debt service.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
102
NOTE 16 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)
UTILITIES ENERGY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Electric Power Supply Purchase Agreements – The City has numerous power purchase agreements with
power producers to purchase capacity and energy to supply a portion of its load requirements. As of
June 30, 2016, the approximate minimum obligations for the contracts, assuming the energy is delivered
over the next five years, are as follows:
Fiscal Year Projected Obligation
2017 $64.7 million
2018 $64.2 million
2019 $64.7 million
2020 $65.3 million
2021 $66.1 million
Contractual Commitments beyond 2021 (Electricity) – Several of the City’s purchase power and
transmission contracts extend beyond the five‐year summary presented above. These contracts expire
between 2021 and 2051 and provide for power under various terms and conditions. The City estimates
that its annual minimum commitments under the contracts, assuming the energy is delivered, ranges
between $67.3 million in 2022 and $48.9 million in 2043. The City’s largest single purchase power source
is the Western Base Resource contract, whereby the City receives 12.31 percent of the amount of energy
made available by Western, after meeting Central Valley Project use requirements, in any given year after
2014 at a 12.31 percent share of their revenue requirement. The Western contract expires on December
31, 2024. The City expects the Western contract to be extended for another 20 years beyond 2024,
although likely at a slightly lower percent share of the total energy output.
Gas Accord V – The City is a party to the Gas Accord V, a natural gas transportation contract between
Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) and its gas transportation customers. New rates are determined
through a proceeding at the California Public Utilities Commission. A final CPUC decision on Pacific Gas
and Electric Company’s (PG&E) Gas Transmission and Storage Case was issued June 2016. Although
several appeals are underway, Palo Alto’s gas transmission rates increased by 230% and Palo Alto’s local
transmission rates increased by $2 million on August 1, 2016.
San Francisco Public Utilities Commission – The City purchases water to deliver to the customers of its
water utility from the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) under a contract terminating in
2034. The City’s wholesale water rate under this contract is determined by a ratemaking process under
the authority of the SFPUC, with contractual limitations on the types of costs that may be allocated to
wholesale water purchasers like the City. The City is prohibited from purchasing from other water
suppliers under this contract, though it is not prohibited from using ground water. The City’s cost of water
under this contract is projected to increase by 74% by 2021 as the SFPUC completes an upgrade to its
regional water system facilities under its Water System Improvement Program (WSIP).
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
103
NOTE 16 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)
Litigation
The City is subject to litigation arising in the normal course of business. In the opinion of the City Attorney,
there is no pending litigation, claims or assessments that are likely to have a materially adverse effect on
the City’s financial condition.
A class action lawsuit for refund of telephone users tax was filed against the City in August 2015. At this
time, the City Attorney is of the opinion that a potential loss is neither probable nor can it be reasonably
estimated.
A class action lawsuit for refund of allegedly illegal charges to gas and electrical customers was filed
against the City in October 2016. At this time, the City Attorney is of the opinion that a potential loss is
neither probable nor can it be reasonably estimated.
Grant Programs
The City participates in Federal and State grant programs. These programs have been audited by the City’s
independent auditors in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Single Audit Act amendments of
1996 and applicable State requirements. No costs were questioned as a result of these audits; however,
these programs are still subject to further examination by the grantors and the amount, if any, of
expenditures which may be disallowed by the granting agencies cannot be determined at this time. The
City expects such amounts, if any, to be immaterial.
104
This page is intentionally left blank.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Required Supplemental Information (Unaudited)
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
105
I. SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN NET PENSION LIABILITY AND RELATED RATIOS – MISCELLANEOUS PLAN
(Calculated as of June 30, 2015 and reported as of June 30, 2016, in thousands)
Fiscal year 2015‐16 2014‐15
Measurement Period 2014‐15 2013‐14
Total pension liability
Service cost 12,183$ 12,442$
Interest 49,345 46,963
Changes of assumptions (11,552) ‐
Difference between expected and actual experience 3,507 ‐
Benefit payments, including refunds of employee contributions (32,980) (31,781)
Net change in total pension liability 20,503 27,624
Total pension liability ‐ beginning 663,471 635,847
Total pension liability ‐ ending (a)683,974$ 663,471$
Plan fiduciary net position
Contributions ‐ employer 18,610$ 17,400$
Contributions ‐ employee 5,730 6,345
Net investment income 10,597 70,989
Benefit payments, including refunds of employee contributions (32,980) (31,781)
Administrative expense (538) ‐
Net change in fiduciary net position 1,419 62,953
Plan fiduciary net position ‐ beginning 476,363 413,410
Plan fiduciary net position ‐ ending (b)477,782$ 476,363$
Plan net pension liability/(asset) ‐ Ending (a) ‐ (b) 206,192$ 187,108$
Plan fiduciary net position as a percentage of total pension liability 69.9% 71.8%
Covered‐employee payroll 69,837$ 66,373$
Plan net pension liability/(asset) as a percentage of covered employee payroll 295.2% 281.9%
Notes to Schedule:
Benefit changes ‐ The figures above do not include any liability that may have resulted from plan changes
which occurred after the June 30, 2013 valuation date. This applies for voluntary benefit changes as well as any
offers of two years additional service credit (Golden Handshake).
Changes in assumptions ‐ The discount rate was changed from 7.5 percent (net of administrative expense) to
7.65 percent
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Required Supplemental Information (Unaudited)
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
106
II. SCHEDULE OF CONTRIBUTIONS– MISCELLANEOUS PLAN
(Paid as of June 30, 2016 and deferred to June 30, 2017, in thousands)
Fiscal Year 2015‐16 2014‐15 2013‐14
Contractually required contribution (actuarially determined)18,808$ 17,958$ 16,209$
Actual contribution (18,808) (17,958) (16,209)
Contribution deficiency/(excess)‐$ ‐$ ‐$
Covered‐employee payroll 70,415$ 68,744$ 65,889$
Contributions as percentage of covered‐employee payroll 26.71%26.12%24.60%
Notes to Schedule:
The actuarial methods and assumptions used to set the actuarially determined contributions for
fiscal year 2016 contribution rates are as follows:
Valuation date June 30, 2013
Actuarial cost method Entry age normal
Amortization method/period For details, see June 30, 2013 Actuarial Valuation Report
Asset valuation method Actuarial Value of Assets. For details, see June 30, 2013
Actuarial Valuation Report
Inflation 2.75%
Salary increases Varies by entry age and service
Payroll growth 3.00%
Investment rate of return 7.50% net of pension plan investment and administrative
expense, includes inflation
Retirement age Probabilities of retirement are based on the 2010
CalPERS experience study of the period 1997 to 2007
Mortality Probabilities of mortality are based on the 2010 CalPERS
experience study of the period 1997 to 2007. Pre‐ and
post‐retirement mortality rates include 5 years of
projected mortality improvement using Scale AA
published by the Society of Actuaries.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Required Supplemental Information (Unaudited)
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
107
III. SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN NET PENSION LIABILITY AND RELATED RATIOS – SAFETY PLAN
(Calculated as of June 30, 2015 and reported as of June 30, 2016, in thousands)
Fiscal Year 2015‐16 2014‐15
Measurement Period 2014‐15 2013‐14
Total pension liability
Service cost 5,959$ 6,221$
Interest 27,047 26,113
Changes of assumptions (6,327) ‐
Difference between expected and actual experience 75 ‐
Benefit payments, including refunds of employee contributions (21,148) (19,985)
Net change in total pension liability 5,606 12,349
Total pension liability ‐ beginning 367,403 355,054
Total pension liability ‐ ending (a)373,009$ 367,403$
Plan fiduciary net position
Contributions ‐ employer 8,617$ 7,616$
Contributions ‐ employee 2,047 2,762
Net investment income 5,774 40,033
Benefit payments, including refunds of employee contributions (21,148) (19,985)
Administrative expense (290) ‐
Net change in fiduciary net position (5,000) 30,426
Plan fiduciary net position ‐ beginning 264,579 234,153
Plan fiduciary net position ‐ ending (b)259,579$ 264,579$
Plan net pension liability/(asset) ‐ Ending (a) ‐ (b) 113,430$ 102,824$
Plan fiduciary net position as a percentage of total pension liability 69.59% 72.01%
Covered‐employee payroll 21,912$ 21,896$
Plan net pension liability/(asset) as a percentage of covered employee payroll 517.66% 469.60%
Notes to Schedule:
Benefit changes ‐ The figures above do not include any liability that may have resulted
from plan changes which occurred after the June 30, 2013 valuation date. This applies for voluntary benefit
changes as well as any offers of two years additional service credit (Golden Handshake).
Changes in assumptions ‐ the discount rate was changed from 7.5 percent (net of administrative expense) to
7.65 percent.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Required Supplemental Information (Unaudited)
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
108
IV.SCHEDULE OF CONTRIBUTIONS – SAFETY PLAN
(Paid as of June 30, 2016 and deferred to June 30, 2017, in thousands)
Fiscal Year 2015‐16 2014‐15 2013‐14
Contractually required contribution (actuarially determined)9,395$ 9,036$ 8,323$
Actual contribution (9,395) (9,036) (8,323)
Contribution deficiency/(excess)‐$ ‐$ ‐$
Covered‐employee payroll 23,229$ 22,860$ 24,886$
Contributions as percentage of covered‐employee payroll 40.45%39.53%33.44%
Notes to Schedule:
The actuarial methods and assumptions used to set the actuarially determined contributions for
fiscal year 2016 contribution rates are as follows:
Valuation Date June 30, 2013
Actuarial cost method Entry age normal
Amortization method/period For details, see June 30, 2013 Actuarial Valuation Report
Asset valuation method Actuarial Value of Assets. For details, see June 30, 2013
Actuarial Valuation Report
Inflation 2.75%
Salary increases Varies by entry age and service
Payroll growth 3.00%
Investment rate of return 7.50% net of pension plan investment and administrative
expense, includes inflation
Retirement age Probabilities of retirement are based on the 2010
CalPERS experience study of the period 1997 to 2007
Mortality Probabilities of mortality are based on the 2010 CalPERS
experience study of the period 1997 to 2007. Pre‐ and
post‐retirement mortality rates include 5 years of
projected mortality improvement using Scale AA
published by the Society of Actuaries.
Special Debt
Revenue Service Permanent
Funds Funds Fund Total
ASSETS:
Cash and investments:
Available for operations 84,373$ 3,561$ 1,499$ 89,433$
Cash and investments with fiscal agents ‐ 248 ‐ 248
Receivables, net:
Accounts 7 24 ‐ 31
Interest 354 22 6 382
Notes 18,730 ‐ ‐ 18,730
Total assets 103,464$ 3,855$ 1,505$ 108,824$
Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accruals 354$ ‐$ ‐$ 354$
Accrued salaries and benefits 46 ‐ ‐ 46
Total liabilities 400 ‐ ‐ 400
Fund balances:
Nonspendable
Eyerly family ‐ ‐ 1,505 1,505
Restricted
Transportation mitigation 10,841 ‐ ‐ 10,841
Federal revenue 4,569 ‐ ‐ 4,569
Street improvement 1,308 ‐ ‐ 1,308
Local law enforcement 180 ‐ ‐ 180
Debt service ‐ 3,855 ‐ 3,855
Public benefit 25,649 ‐ ‐ 25,649
Committed
Developer impact fee 14,169 ‐ ‐ 14,169
Housing In‐Lieu 41,251 ‐ ‐ 41,251
Special districts 3,704 ‐ ‐ 3,704
Downtown business 34 ‐ ‐ 34
Assigned
Unrealized gain on investment 1,358 ‐ ‐ 1,358
Other general government 1 ‐ ‐ 1
Total fund balances 103,064 3,855 1,505 108,424
Total liabilities and fund balances 103,464$ 3,855$ 1,505$ 108,824$
LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES:
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Non‐major Governmental Funds
Combining Balance Sheet
June 30, 2016
(Amounts in thousands)
109
110
This page is intentionally left blank.
Special Debt
Revenue Service Permanent
Funds Funds Fund Total
REVENUES:
Property tax ‐$ 4,582$ ‐$ 4,582$
Special assessments 100 ‐ ‐ 100
Other taxes and fines 1,570 ‐ ‐ 1,570
From other agencies:
Community Development Block Grants 240 ‐ ‐ 240
State of California 126 ‐ ‐ 126
Permits and licenses
University Avenue Parking 2,309 ‐ ‐ 2,309
California Avenue Parking 214 ‐ ‐ 214
Other permits and licenses 793 ‐ ‐ 793
Investment earnings 2,727 127 44 2,898
Rental income 6 ‐ ‐ 6
Other:
Housing In‐Lieu ‐ residential 5,554 ‐ ‐ 5,554
Other fees 2,086 ‐ ‐ 2,086
Total revenues 15,725 4,709 44 20,478
EXPENDITURES:
Current:
Administrative Services 203 ‐ ‐ 203
Public Works 797 ‐ ‐ 797
Planning and Community Environment 663 ‐ ‐ 663
Police 225 ‐ ‐ 225
Community Services 1,231 ‐ ‐ 1,231
Non‐Departmental 559 32 7 598
Debt service:
Principal retirement ‐ 6,735 ‐ 6,735
Interest and fiscal charges ‐ 4,230 ‐ 4,230
Total expenditures 3,678 10,997 7 14,682
EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES 12,047 (6,288) 37 5,796
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES):
Transfers in 3,564 3,252 ‐ 6,816
Transfers out (9,013) ‐ ‐ (9,013)
Total other financing sources (uses)(5,449) 3,252 ‐ (2,197)
Change in fund balances 6,598 (3,036) 37 3,599
FUND BALANCES, BEGINNING OF YEAR 96,466 6,891 1,468 104,825
FUND BALANCES, END OF YEAR 103,064$ 3,855$ 1,505$ 108,424$
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Non‐major Governmental Funds
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
(Amounts in thousands)
111
112
This page is intentionally left blank.
113
NON‐MAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Street Improvement
This fund accounts for revenues received from state gas tax. Allocations must be spent on the construction
and maintenance of the road network system of the City.
Federal Revenue
This fund accounts for grant funds received under the Community Development Act of 1974 and HOME
Investment Grant Programs, for activities approved and subject to federal regulations.
Housing In‐Lieu
This fund accounts for revenues from commercial and residential developers to provide housing under
the City’s Below Market Rate program.
Special Districts
This fund accounts for revenues from parking permits and for maintenance of various parking lots within
the City’s parking districts.
Transportation Mitigation
This fund accounts for revenues from fees or contributions required for transportation mitigation issues
encountered as a result of City development.
Local Law Enforcement
This fund accounts for revenues received in support of City’s law enforcement program.
Asset Seizure
This fund accounts for seized property and funds associated with drug trafficking. Under California
Assembly Bill No. 4162, the monies are released to the City for specific expenditures related to law
enforcement activities.
Developer Impact Fee
This fund accounts for fees imposed on new developments to be used for parks, community centers and
libraries.
Downtown Business Development District
The Downtown Business Development District Fund was established to account for the activities of the
Palo Alto Downtown Business Development District, which was established to enhance the viability of the
downtown business district.
Public Benefit
This fund accounts for the activities of the Stanford University Medical Center (SUMC) Development
Agreement (DA) whereby SUMC will enhance and expand their facilities and the City will grant SUMC the
right to develop the facilities in accordance with the DA.
Street Federal Housing Special
Improvement Revenue In‐Lieu Districts
ASSETS:
Cash and investments:
Available for operations 1,327$ 455$ 27,021$ 3,796$
Receivables:
Accounts ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Interest 6 ‐ 101 12
Notes ‐ 4,165 14,565 ‐
Total assets 1,333$ 4,620$ 41,687$ 3,808$
Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accruals ‐$ 47$ 35$ 76$
Accrued salaries and benefits ‐ 4 ‐ 28
Total liabilities ‐ 51 35 104
Fund balances:
Restricted
Transportation mitigation ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Federal revenue ‐ 4,569 ‐ ‐
Street improvement 1,308 ‐ ‐ ‐
Local law enforcement ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Public benefit ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Committed
Developer impact fee ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Housing In‐Lieu ‐ ‐ 41,251 ‐
Special districts ‐ ‐ ‐ 3,704
Downtown business ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Assigned
Unrealized gain on investment 25 ‐ 401 ‐
Other general government ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Total fund balances 1,333 4,569 41,652 3,704
Total liabilities and fund balances 1,333$ 4,620$ 41,687$ 3,808$
LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES:
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Non‐major Special Revenue Funds
Combining Balance Sheet
June 30, 2016
(Amounts in thousands)
114
Downtown
Business
Transportation Local Law Asset Developer Development Public
Mitigation Enforcement Seizure Impact Fee District Benefit Total
11,136$ 173$ 3$14,349$ 86$26,027$ 84,373$
‐ 7 ‐‐‐‐ 7
50 1 ‐59 ‐125 354
‐ ‐ ‐‐‐‐ 18,730
11,186$ 181$ 3$14,408$ 86$26,152$ 103,464$
146$ ‐$ ‐$‐$50$‐$ 354$
‐ ‐ ‐6 ‐8 46
146 ‐ ‐6 50 8 400
10,841 ‐ ‐‐‐‐ 10,841
‐ ‐ ‐‐‐‐ 4,569
‐ ‐ ‐‐‐‐ 1,308
‐ 178 2 ‐‐‐ 180
‐ ‐ ‐‐‐25,649 25,649
‐ ‐ ‐14,169 ‐‐ 14,169
‐ ‐ ‐‐‐‐ 41,251
‐ ‐ ‐‐‐‐ 3,704
‐ ‐ ‐‐34 ‐ 34
199 3 ‐233 2 495 1,358
‐ ‐ 1 ‐‐‐ 1
11,040 181 3 14,402 36 26,144 103,064
11,186$ 181$ 3$14,408$ 86$26,152$ 103,464$
115
Street Federal Housing Special
Improvement Revenue In‐Lieu Districts
REVENUES:
Special assessments ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$
Other taxes and fines 1,461 ‐ ‐ 109
From other agencies:
Community Development Block Grants ‐ 240 ‐ ‐
State of California ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Permits and licenses
University Avenue Parking ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,309
California Avenue Parking ‐ ‐ ‐ 214
Other permits and licenses ‐ ‐ ‐ 793
Investment earnings 46 ‐ 956 91
Rental income ‐ ‐ 6 ‐
Other:
Housing In‐Lieu ‐ ‐ 5,554 ‐
Other fees ‐ 365 ‐ 4
Total revenues 1,507 605 6,516 3,520
EXPENDITURES:
Current:
Administrative Services ‐ ‐ ‐ 203
Public Works ‐ ‐ ‐ 797
Planning and Community Environment ‐ 444 (449) 668
Police ‐ ‐ 135 ‐
Community Services ‐ ‐ ‐ 22
Non‐Departmental ‐ 34 165 249
Total expenditures ‐ 478 (149) 1,939
EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES 1,507 127 6,665 1,581
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES):
Transfers in ‐ ‐ 2,095 642
Transfers out (1,724) ‐ (1,095) (532)
Total other financing sources (uses)(1,724) ‐ 1,000 110
Change in fund balances (217) 127 7,665 1,691
FUND BALANCES, BEGINNING OF YEAR 1,550 4,442 33,987 2,013
FUND BALANCES, END OF YEAR 1,333$ 4,569$ 41,652$ 3,704$
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Non‐major Special Revenue Funds
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
(Amounts in thousands)
116
Downtown
Business
Transportation Local Law Asset Developer Development Public
Mitigation Enforcement Seizure Impact Fee District Benefit Total
‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 100$ ‐$ 100$
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,570
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 240
‐ 126 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 126
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,309
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 214
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 793
353 6 1 419 3 852 2,727
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 6
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5,554
274 ‐ ‐ 1,443 ‐ ‐ 2,086
627 132 1 1,862 103 852 15,725
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 203
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 797
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 663
‐ 90 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 225
‐ ‐ ‐ 135 ‐ 1,074 1,231
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 111 ‐ 559
‐ 90 ‐ 135 111 1,074 3,678
627 42 1 1,727 (8) (222) 12,047
‐ ‐ ‐ 107 ‐ 720 3,564
(1,550) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (4,112) (9,013)
(1,550) ‐ ‐ 107 ‐ (3,392) (5,449)
(923) 42 1 1,834 (8) (3,614) 6,598
11,963 139 2 12,568 44 29,758 96,466
11,040$ 181$ 3$ 14,402$ 36$ 26,144$ 103,064$
117
Street Improvement Federal Revenue
Variance Variance
Actual, plus Positive Actual, plus Positive
Budget Encumbrances (Negative) Budget Encumbrances (Negative)
REVENUES:
Special assessments ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$
Other taxes and fines 1,416 1,461 45 ‐ ‐ ‐
From other agencies:
Community Development Block Grants ‐ ‐ ‐ 442 240 (202)
State of California ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Permits and licenses
University Avenue Parking ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
California Avenue Parking ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other permits and licenses ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Investment earnings 13 46 33 ‐ ‐ ‐
Rental income ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other:
Housing In‐Lieu ‐ residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other fees ‐ ‐ ‐ 136 365 229
Total revenues 1,429 1,507 78 578 605 27
EXPENDITURES:
Current:
Administrative Services ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Public Works ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Planning and Community Environment ‐ ‐ ‐ 625 483 142
Police ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Community Services ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Non‐Departmental ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 34 (34)
Total expenditures ‐ ‐ ‐ 625 517 108
Excess (deficiency) of revenues
over (under) expenditures 1,429 1,507 78 (47) 88 135
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES):
Transfers in ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Transfers out (1,724) (1,724) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Total other financing sources (uses)(1,724) (1,724) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Change in fund balances, budgetary basis (295)$ (217) 78$ (47)$ 88 135$
Adjustment to Budgetary Basis:
Current year encumbrances/reappropriations ‐ 39
(217) 127
FUND BALANCES, BEGINNING OF YEAR, GAAP BASIS 1,550 4,442
FUND BALANCES, END OF YEAR, GAAP BASIS 1,333$ 4,569$
CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE, GAAP BASIS
(Amounts in thousands)
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Non‐major Special Revenue Funds
Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances ‐
Budget and Actual
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
118
Housing In‐Lieu Special Districts Transportation Mitigation
Variance Variance Variance
Actual, plus Positive Actual, plus Positive Actual, plus Positive
Budget Encumbrances (Negative) Budget Encumbrances (Negative) Budget Encumbrances (Negative)
‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$‐$ ‐$ ‐$‐$
‐‐‐43 109 66 ‐ ‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐
‐‐‐1,695 2,309 614 ‐ ‐‐
‐‐‐195 214 19 ‐ ‐‐
‐‐‐508 793 285 ‐ ‐‐
274 956 682 27 91 64 172 353 181
9 6 (3) ‐‐‐‐ ‐‐
5,085 5,554 469 ‐‐‐‐ ‐‐
‐‐‐‐4 4 1,717 274 (1,443)
5,368 6,516 1,148 2,468 3,520 1,052 1,889 627 (1,262)
‐‐‐205 203 2 ‐ ‐‐
‐‐‐998 896 102 ‐ ‐‐
2,592 (371) 2,963 1,456 878 578 ‐ ‐‐
‐135 (135) ‐‐‐‐ ‐‐
‐‐‐26 22 4 ‐ ‐‐
378 165 213 166 249 (83) ‐ ‐‐
2,970 (71) 3,041 2,851 2,248 603 ‐ ‐‐
2,398 6,587 4,189 (383) 1,272 1,655 1,889 627 (1,262)
‐2,095 2,095 642 642 ‐‐ ‐‐
‐(1,095) (1,095) (532) (532) ‐(1,550) (1,550) ‐
‐1,000 1,000 110 110 ‐(1,550) (1,550) ‐
2,398$ 7,587 5,189$ (273)$ 1,382 1,655$ 339$ (923) (1,262)$
78 309 ‐
7,665 1,691 (923)
33,987 2,013 11,963
41,652$ 3,704$ 11,040$
119
Local Law Enforcement Asset Seizure
Variance Variance
Actual, plus Positive Actual, plus Positive
Budget Encumbrances (Negative) Budget Encumbrances (Negative)
REVENUES:
Special assessments ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$
Other taxes and fines ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
From other agencies:
Community Development Block Grants ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
State of California 106 126 20 ‐ ‐ ‐
Permits and licenses
University Avenue Parking ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
California Avenue Parking ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other permits and licenses ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Investment earnings ‐ 6 6 ‐ 1 1
Rental income ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other:
Housing In‐Lieu ‐ residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other fees ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Total revenues 106 132 26 ‐ 1 1
EXPENDITURES:
Current:
Administrative Services ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Public Works ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Planning and Community Environment ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Police 143 156 (13) ‐ ‐ ‐
Community Services ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Non‐Departmental ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Total expenditures 143 156 (13) ‐ ‐ ‐
Excess (deficiency) of revenues
over (under) expenditures (37) (24) 13 ‐ 1 1
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES):
Transfers in ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Transfers out ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Total other financing sources (uses)‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Change in fund balances, Budgetary basis (37)$ (24) 13$ ‐$ 1 1$
Adjustment to Budgetary Basis:
Current year encumbrances/reappropriations 66 ‐
42 1
FUND BALANCES, BEGINNING OF YEAR, GAAP BASIS 139 2
FUND BALANCES, END OF YEAR, GAAP BASIS 181$ 3$
CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE, GAAP BASIS
(Amounts in Thousands)
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Non‐major Special Revenue Funds
Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances ‐
Budget and Actual
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
120
Developer Impact Fee Downtown Business Improvement District Public Benefit
Variance Variance Variance
Actual, plus Positive Actual, plus Positive Actual, plus Positive
Budget Encumbrances (Negative) Budget Encumbrances (Negative) Budget Encumbrances (Negative)
‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 100$ 100$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$‐$
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐
215 419 204 2 3 1 663 852 189
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐
1,569 1,443 (126) ‐‐‐‐ ‐‐
1,784 1,862 78 102 103 1 663 852 189
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐
136 135 1 ‐‐‐1,318 1,075 243
‐‐‐136 124 12 ‐ ‐‐
136 135 1 136 124 12 1,318 1,075 243
1,648 1,727 79 (34) (21) 13 (655) (223) 432
69 107 38 ‐‐‐‐ 720 720
‐‐‐‐‐‐(2,392) (4,112) (1,720)
69 107 38 ‐‐‐(2,392) (3,392) (1,000)
1,717$ 1,834 117$ (34)$ (21) 13$ (3,047)$ (3,615) (568)$
‐13 1
1,834 (8)(3,614)
12,568 44 29,758
14,402$ 36$ 26,144$
121
122
This page is left intentionally blank.
123
NON‐MAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
Downtown Parking Improvement
This fund accounts for revenues received from the General Fund to provide payment of principal and
interest associated with the 2002B Downtown Parking Improvement Certificates of Participation as they
become due.
Library Projects
This fund accounts for revenues received from property taxes to provide payment of principal and interest
associated with the 2010 and 2013A General Obligation Bonds as they become due.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Non‐major Debt Service Funds
Combining Balance Sheet
June 30, 2016
(Amounts in thousands)
Downtown
Parking Library
Improvement Projects Total
ASSETS:
Cash and investments:
Available for operations 14$ 3,547$ 3,561$
Cash and investments with fiscal agents 237 11 248
Receivables:
Accounts ‐ 24 24
Interest ‐ 22 22
Total assets 251$ 3,604$ 3,855$
FUND BALANCES:
Debt service 251$ 3,604$ 3,855$
124
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Non‐major Debt Service Funds
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
(Amounts in thousands)
Downtown
Parking Library
Improvement Projects Total
REVENUES:
Property tax ‐$4,582$ 4,582$
Investment earnings ‐127 127
Total revenues ‐4,709 4,709
EXPENDITURES:
Current:
Non‐Departmental ‐32 32
Debt service:
Principal retirement 150 6,585 6,735
Interest and fiscal charges 84 4,146 4,230
Total expenditures 234 10,763 10,997
(DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES
(UNDER) EXPENDITURES (234) (6,054) (6,288)
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES):
Transfers in 234 3,018 3,252
Total other financing sources (uses)234 3,018 3,252
Change in fund balances ‐(3,036) (3,036)
FUND BALANCES, BEGINNING OF YEAR 251 6,640 6,891
FUND BALANCES, END OF YEAR 251$ 3,604$ 3,855$
125
Downtown Parking Improvement Library Projects
Variance Variance
Actual, plus Positive Actual, plus Positive
Budget Encumbrances (Negative) Budget Encumbrances (Negative)
REVENUES:
Special assessments ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 4,655$ 4,582$ (73)$
Investment earnings ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 127 127
Total revenues ‐ ‐ ‐ 4,655 4,709 54
EXPENDITURES:
Current:
Non‐Departmental ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 32 (32)
Debt service:
Principal retirement 150 150 ‐ 1,445 6,585 (5,140)
Interest and fiscal charges 93 84 9 3,210 4,146 (936)
Total expenditures 243 234 9 4,655 10,763 (6,108)
Excess (deficiency) of revenues
over (under) expenditures (243) (234) 9 ‐ (6,054) (6,054)
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES):
Transfers in 243 234 (9) ‐ 3,018 3,018
Total other financing sources (uses)243 234 (9) ‐ 3,018 3,018
Change in fund balances, Budgetary basis ‐$ ‐ ‐$ ‐$ (3,036) (3,036)$
‐ (3,036)
FUND BALANCES, BEGINNING OF YEAR 251 6,640
FUND BALANCES, END OF YEAR 251$ 3,604$
CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE, GAAP BASIS
(Amounts in thousands)
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Non‐major Debt Service Funds
Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances ‐
Budget and Actual
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
126
127
NON‐MAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
PERMANENT FUND
Eyerly Family
This fund accounts for the revenues received from assets donated by Mr. and Mrs. Fred Eyerly for the City
and or its citizenry.
Eyerly Family Permanent Fund
Variance
Actual, plus Positive
Budget Encumbrances (Negative)
REVENUES:
Investment earnings 27$ 44$ 17$
Total revenues 27 44 17
EXPENDITURES:
Current:
Non‐Departmental ‐ 7 (7)
Total expenditures ‐ 7 (7)
Excess (deficiency) of revenues
over (under) expenditures 27 37 10
Change in fund balance 27$ 37 10$
37
FUND BALANCE, BEGINNING OF YEAR 1,468
FUND BALANCE, END OF YEAR 1,505$
CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE, GAAP BASIS
(Amounts in thousands)
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Non‐major Permanent Fund
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance ‐
Budget and Actual
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
128
129
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
INTRODUCTION
Internal Service Funds are used to finance and account for special activities and services performed by a
designated department for other departments in the City on a cost reimbursement basis.
Vehicle Replacement and Maintenance
This fund accounts for the maintenance and replacement of vehicles and equipment used by all City
departments. The source of revenue is from reimbursement of fleet replacement and maintenance costs
allocated to each department by usage of vehicle.
Technology
This fund accounts for replacement and upgrade of technology, and covers four primary areas used by all
City departments: desktop, infrastructure, applications, and technology research and development. The
source of revenue is from reimbursement of costs for support provided to other departments.
Printing and Mailing Services
This fund accounts for central duplicating, printing and mailing services provided to all City departments.
Source of revenue for this fund is from reimbursement of costs for services and supplies purchased by
other departments.
General Benefits
This fund accounts for the administration of compensated absences and health benefits.
Workers’ Compensation Insurance Program
This fund accounts for the administration of the City’s self‐insured workers’ compensation programs.
General Liabilities Insurance Program
This fund accounts for the administration of the City’s self‐insured general liability programs.
Retiree Health Benefits
This fund accounts for the retiree health benefits.
Vehicle Printing Workers' General
Replacement and Compensation Liabilities Retiree
and Mailing General Insurance Insurance Health
Maintenance Technology Services Benefits Program Program Benefits Total
ASSETS:
Current Assets:
Cash and investments:
Available for operations 11,134$ 22,403$ 24$ 12,977$ 21,231$ 8,203$ 4,072$ 80,044$
Accounts receivable, net 34 ‐‐33 48 ‐ ‐115
Interest receivable 46 91 ‐62 92 34 16 341
Inventory of materials and supplies 368 ‐‐‐‐‐ ‐368
Total current assets 11,582 22,494 24 13,072 21,371 8,237 4,088 80,868
Noncurrent Assets:
Capital assets:
Nondepreciable 247 1,582 ‐‐‐‐ ‐1,829
Depreciable, net 13,006 1,631 ‐‐‐‐ ‐14,637
Net OPEB asset ‐‐‐‐‐‐ 21,662 21,662
Total noncurrent assets 13,253 3,213 ‐‐‐‐ 21,662 38,128
Total assets 24,835 25,707 24 13,072 21,371 8,237 25,750 118,996
DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES:
Deferred pension contribution 357 1,053 30 ‐‐‐ ‐1,440
Total deferred outflows of resources 357 1,053 30 ‐‐‐ ‐1,440
LIABILITIES:
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accruals ‐644 ‐(792) 155 ‐ ‐7
Accrued salaries and benefits 64 196 3 2 ‐‐ ‐265
Accrued compensated absences 8 26 ‐4,902 ‐‐ ‐4,936
Accrued claims payable ‐ current ‐‐‐146 3,181 1,910 ‐5,237
Total current liabilities 72 866 3 4,258 3,336 1,910 ‐10,445
Noncurrent liabilities:
Accrued compensated absences ‐‐‐6,286 ‐‐ ‐6,286
Accrued claims payable ‐‐‐‐15,115 3,027 ‐18,142
Net pension liabilities 2,807 9,565 303 ‐‐‐ ‐12,675
Total noncurrent liabilities 2,807 9,565 303 6,286 15,115 3,027 ‐37,103
Total liabilities 2,879 10,431 306 10,544 18,451 4,937 ‐47,548
DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES:
Pension Related 139 568 18 ‐‐‐ ‐725
Total deferred inflows of resources 139 568 18 ‐‐‐ ‐725
NET POSITION:
Net Investment in capital assets 13,253 3,213 ‐‐‐‐ ‐16,466
Unrestricted 8,921 12,548 (270) 2,528 2,920 3,300 25,750 55,697
Total net position 22,174$ 15,761$ (270)$ 2,528$ 2,920$ 3,300$ 25,750$ 72,163$
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Internal Service Funds
Combining Statement of Fund Net Position
June 30, 2016
(Amounts in thousands)
130
Vehicle Printing Workers' General
Replacement and Compensation Liabilities Retiree
and Mailing General Insurance Insurance Health
Maintenance Technology Services Benefits Program Program Benefits Total
OPERATING REVENUES:
Charges for services 7,325$ 13,334$ 1,296$ 46,925$ 2,189$ 2,398$ 12,343$ 85,810$
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 282 (245) ‐ 37
Total operating revenues 7,325 13,334 1,296 46,925 2,471 2,153 12,343 85,847
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Administrative and general 1,777 6,820 905 176 831 1,638 596 12,743
Operations and maintenance 3,594 6,155 377 789 ‐ ‐ 14,372 25,287
Depreciation and amortization 2,046 479 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,525
Claim payments and change in estimated
self‐insured liability ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,572 1,349 211 ‐ 3,132
Refund of charges for services 46 8 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 54
Compensated absences and other benefits ‐ ‐ ‐ 42,538 ‐ ‐ ‐ 42,538
Total operating expenses 7,463 13,462 1,282 45,075 2,180 1,849 14,968 86,279
Operating income (loss)(138) (128) 14 1,850 291 304 (2,625) (432)
NONOPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES):
Investment earnings 311 630 (1) 241 638 234 103 2,156
Gain on disposal of capital assets 185 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 185
Other nonoperating revenues 40 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 40
Total nonoperating revenues (expenses)536 630 (1) 241 638 234 103 2,381
Income (loss) before transfers 398 502 13 2,091 929 538 (2,522) 1,949
Transfers in 1,306 2,480 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,102 5,888
Transfers out (367) (57) ‐ (2,102) ‐ ‐ ‐ (2,526)
Change in net position 1,337 2,925 13 (11) 929 538 (420) 5,311
NET POSITION, BEGINNING OF YEAR 20,837 12,836 (283) 2,539 1,991 2,762 26,170 66,852
NET POSITION, END OF YEAR 22,174$ 15,761$ (270)$ 2,528$ 2,920$ 3,300$ 25,750$ 72,163$
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Internal Service Funds
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Fund Net Position
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
(Amounts in thousands)
131
Vehicle Printing Workers' General
Replacement and Compensation Liabilities Retiree
and Mailing General Insurance Insurance Health
Maintenance Technology Services Benefits Program Program Benefits Total
Cash flows from operating activities:
Cash received from customers 7,629$ 13,334$ 1,296$ 46,937$ 2,288$ 2,403$ 12,343$ 86,230$
Cash refunds to customers (46) (8) ‐‐‐‐ ‐(54)
Cash payments to suppliers for goods and services (3,304) (7,049) (142) (2,328) ‐‐ (13,163) (25,986)
Cash payments to employees (2,132) (5,702) (1,150) (42,877) (758) (1,638) (596) (54,853)
Cash payments for judgments and claims ‐‐‐(1,572) (1,904) (113) ‐(3,589)
Other cash receipts 40 ‐‐‐‐‐ ‐40
Net cash flows provided by (used in)
operating activities 2,187 575 4 160 (374) 652 (1,416) 1,788
Cash flows from noncapital financing activities:
Transfers in 1,306 2,480 ‐‐‐‐ 2,102 5,888
Transfers out (367) (57) ‐(2,102) ‐‐ ‐(2,526)
Net cash flows provided by (used in)
noncapital financing activities 939 2,423 ‐(2,102) ‐‐ 2,102 3,362
Cash flows from capital and related financing activities:
Acquisition of capital assets (2,709) (1,004) ‐‐‐‐ ‐(3,713)
Proceeds from sale of capital assets 221 ‐‐‐‐‐ ‐221
Net cash flows (used in)
capital and related financing activities (2,488) (1,004) ‐‐‐‐ ‐(3,492)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Interest received 313 624 (1) 229 630 229 109 2,133
Net cash flows provided by investing activities 313 624 (1) 229 630 229 109 2,133
Net change in cash and cash equivalents 951 2,618 3 (1,713) 256 881 795 3,791
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 10,183 19,785 21 14,690 20,975 7,322 3,277 76,253
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $ 11,134 $ 22,403 $ 24 $ 12,977 $ 21,231 $ 8,203 $ 4,072 $ 80,044
Reconciliation of operating income (loss) to net cash
flows provided by (used in) operating activities:
Operating income (loss)(138)$ (128)$ 14$ 1,850$ 291$ 304$ (2,625)$ (432)$
Adjustments to reconcile operating income (loss)
to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation 2,046 479 ‐‐‐‐ ‐2,525
Other 40 ‐‐‐‐‐ ‐40
Change in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 304 ‐‐12 99 250 ‐665
Inventory of materials and supplies 2 ‐‐‐‐‐ ‐2
Net OPEB asset ‐‐‐‐‐‐ 1,209 1,209
Deferred outflows of resources ‐ pension plans (77) (217) (4) ‐‐‐ ‐(298)
Accounts payable and accruals ‐448 ‐(2,155) 73 ‐ ‐(1,634)
Accrued salaries and benefits 19 69 (2) (9) ‐‐ ‐77
Accrued compensated absences ‐5 (1) 462 ‐‐ ‐466
Accrued claims payable ‐‐‐‐(837) 98 ‐(739)
Net pension liability 288 859 27 ‐‐‐ ‐1,174
Deferred inflows of resources ‐ pension plans (297) (940) (30) ‐‐‐ ‐(1,267)
Net cash flows provided by (used in)
operating activities 2,187$ 575$ 4$ 160$ (374)$ 652$ (1,416)$ 1,788$
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Internal Service Funds
Combining Statement of Cash Flows
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
(Amounts in thousands)
132
133
FIDUCIARY FUNDS
INTRODUCTION
Fiduciary Funds are used to account for assets held by the City acting in a fiduciary capacity for other
entities and individuals. The funds are operated to carry out the specific actions required by the trust
agreements, ordinances and other governing regulations.
Fiduciary Funds are presented separately from the Citywide and Fund financial statements.
Agency Funds are custodial in nature and do not involve measurement of results of operations. The City
maintains three agency funds, as follows:
California Avenue Parking Assessment District
This fund accounts for receipts and disbursements associated with the 1993 Parking District No. 92‐13
Assessment Bonds.
Cable Joint Powers Authority
The fund was established to account for the activities of the cable television system on behalf of the
members.
University Avenue Area Off‐Street Parking Assessment District
The fund accounts for the receipts and disbursements associated with the Series 2012 Limited Obligation
Refunding Improvement Bonds.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
All Agency Funds
Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
Balance Balance
California Avenue Parking Assessment District June 30, 2015 Additions Deletions June 30, 2016
ASSETS:
Cash and investments available for operations 175$ ‐$ 175$ ‐$
LIABILITIES:
Due to bondholders 175$ ‐$ 175$ ‐$
Cable Joint Powers Authority
ASSETS:
Cash and investments available for operations 660$ ‐$ 9$ 651$
Accounts receivable 503 ‐ 8 495
Interest receivable 3 ‐ ‐ 3
Total assets 1,166$ ‐$ 17$ 1,149$
LIABILITIES:
Due to other governments 1,166$ ‐$ 17$ 1,149$
ASSETS:
Cash and investments available for operations 2,192$ ‐$ 196$ 1,996$
Cash and investments with fiscal agents 2,543 7 ‐ 2,550
Accounts receivable 9 1 ‐ 10
Interest receivable 9 ‐ ‐ 9
Total assets 4,753$ 8$ 196$ 4,565$
LIABILITIES:
Due to bondholders 4,753$ ‐$ 188$ 4,565$
Total Agency Funds
ASSETS:
Cash and investments available for operations 3,027$ ‐$ 380$ 2,647$
Cash and investments with fiscal agents 2,543 7 ‐ 2,550
Accounts receivable 512 1 8 505
Interest receivable 12 ‐ ‐ 12
Total assets 6,094$ 8$ 388$ 5,714$
LIABILITIES:
Due to bondholders 4,928$ ‐$ 363$ 4,565$
Due to other governments 1,166 ‐ 17 1,149
Total liabilities 6,094$ ‐$ 380$ 5,714$
(Amounts in thousands)
University Avenue Area
Off‐Street Parking Assessment District
134
135
STATISTICAL SECTION
The statistical section contains comprehensive statistical data, which relates to physical, economic, social
and political characteristics of the City. It is intended to provide users with a broader and more complete
understanding of the City and its financial affairs than is possible from the financial statements and
supporting schedules included in the financial section.
In this section, readers will find comparative information related to the City’s revenue sources,
expenditures, property tax valuations, levies and collections, general obligation bonded debt, utility
revenue debt service, and demographics. Where available, the comparative information is presented for
the last ten fiscal years.
In addition, this section presents information related to the City’s legal debt margin computation, principal
taxpayers, notary and security bond coverages, and other miscellaneous statistics pertaining to services
provided by the City.
In contrast to the financial section, the statistical section information is not usually subject to independent
audit.
Financial Trends
These schedules contain trend information to help the reader understand how the City’s financial
performance and well‐being have changed over time:
Net Position by Component
Changes in Net Position
Fund Balances of Governmental Funds
Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds
Revenue Capacity
These schedules contain information to help the reader assess the City’s most significant local revenue
sources, property tax and electric charges:
Electric Operating Revenue by Source
Supplemental Disclosure for Water Utilities
Assessed Value of Taxable Property
Property Tax Rates, All Overlapping Governments
Property Tax Levies and Collections
Principal Property Taxpayers
Assessed Valuation and Parcels by Land Use
Per Parcel Assessed Valuation of Single Family Residential
Debt Capacity
These schedules present information to help the reader assess the affordability of the City’s current levels
of outstanding debt and the City’s ability to issue additional debt in the future:
Ratio of Outstanding Debt by Type
Computation of Direct and Overlapping Debt
Computation of Legal Bonded Debt Margin
Revenue Bond Coverage
136
STATISTICAL SECTION
Demographic and Economic Information
These schedules offer demographic and economic indicators to help the reader understand the
environment within which the City’s financial activities take place:
Taxable Transactions by Type of Business
Demographic and Economic Statistics
Principal Employers
Operating Information
These schedules contain service and infrastructure data to help the reader understand how the
information in the City’s financial report relates to the services the City provides and the activities it
performs:
Operating Indicators by Function/Program
Capital Asset Statistics by Function/Program
Full‐Time Equivalent City Government Employees by Function
Sources
Unless otherwise noted, the information in these schedules is derived from the Comprehensive Annual
Financial Reports for the relevant year.
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Governmental Activities
Investment in capital assets 326,411$ 343,537$ 356,657$ 369,499$ 364,747$ 370,111$ 378,047$ 386,696$ 405,921$ 425,179$
Restricted 32,576 27,428 36,632 34,323 16,437 52,934 71,717 68,331 55,963 47,907
Unrestricted 127,190 130,460 118,133 102,199 134,722 142,102 165,810 187,386 1,972 37,905
Total Governmental Activities Net Position 486,177$ 501,425$ 511,422$ 506,021$ 515,906$ 565,147$ 615,574$ 642,413$ 463,856$ 510,991$
Business‐type Activities
Investment in capital assets 342,922$ 370,303$ 384,313$ 399,317$ 416,418$ 437,151$ 446,597$ 473,795$ 490,874$ 512,918$
Restricted 1,732 1,732 1,732 4,300 ‐ ‐ 4,060 4,166 4,142 4,115
Unrestricted 230,912 226,539 208,025 232,420 253,740 262,602 269,926 266,794 172,802 162,806
Total Business‐type Activities Net Position 575,566$ 598,574$ 594,070$ 636,037$ 670,158$ 699,753$ 720,583$ 744,755$ 667,818$ 679,839$
Primary Government
Investment in capital assets 669,333$ 713,840$ 740,970$ 768,816$ 781,165$ 807,262$ 824,644$ 860,491$ 896,795$ 938,097$
Restricted 34,308 29,160 38,364 38,623 16,437 52,934 75,777 72,497 60,105 52,022
Unrestricted 358,102 356,999 326,158 334,619 388,462 404,704 435,736 454,180 174,774 200,711
Total Primary Government Net Position 1,061,743$ 1,099,999$ 1,105,492$ 1,142,058$ 1,186,064$ 1,264,900$ 1,336,157$ 1,387,168$ 1,131,674$ 1,190,830$
Source: Annual Financial Statements, Statement of Net Position
Fiscal Year Ended June 30
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Net Position by Component
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(Amounts in thousands)
(Accrual basis of accounting)
$0
$100,000
$200,000
$300,000
$400,000
$500,000
$600,000
$700,000
$800,000
$900,000
$1,000,000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
$ Th
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
Primary Government
Investment in capital assets Restricted Unrestricted
137
PROGRAM REVENUES 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Governmental Activities
Charges for services
City Attorney 13$ 16$ 12$ 53$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$
City Clerk ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
City Auditor ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Administrative Services 835 870 726 984 2,889 1,647 15,629 4,055 5,460 9,444
Human Resources 11 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Public Works 968 1,310 1,169 1,258 2,419 1,008 1,314 1,093 1,209 599
Planning & Community Environment 6,267 5,498 4,704 4,813 7,237 31,491 28,768 12,896 8,090 9,071
Development Services3 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 12,019 12,570
Public Safety 13,789 13,692 14,670 14,337 15,274 15,658 16,139 14,902 15,726 13,945
Community Services 9,128 10,314 8,522 8,729 7,724 11,365 13,808 20,882 20,912 21,551
Library 146 176 177 199 480 1,600 187 166 137 198
Operating grants and contributions 5,642 4,029 3,599 4,829 2,884 3,441 5,038 5,360 5,300 2,164
Capital grants and contributions 1,756 1,930 3,810 1,280 1,903 1,064 515 917 619 344
Total Governmental Activities
Program Revenues 38,555 37,835 37,389 36,482 40,810 67,274 81,398 60,271 69,472 69,886
Business‐type Activities
Charges for services
Water 23,495 26,510 27,120 26,259 26,624 31,467 37,746 40,291 35,847 37,588
Electric 102,549 103,833 119,320 121,900 122,109 118,886 121,805 121,916 120,842 120,743
Fiber Optics1 ‐ ‐ 3,336 3,105 3,322 3,662 4,382 4,485 4,627 4,505
Gas 42,221 49,021 47,838 44,450 43,584 41,774 34,633 35,737 30,751 30,212
Wastewater Collection 14,848 15,102 14,486 15,136 15,094 14,942 16,077 15,599 16,182 16,496
Wastewater Treatment 16,957 22,889 28,425 16,915 18,830 22,200 21,528 18,460 24,120 23,825
Refuse 25,532 28,805 29,101 28,568 30,469 30,645 30,583 30,297 31,576 32,169
Storm Drainage 5,181 5,450 5,505 5,647 5,796 5,892 6,053 6,183 6,281 6,520
Airport ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 683 826
External Services 789 112 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Operating grants and contributions ‐ ‐ ‐ 361 610 605 572 549 534 744
Capital grants and contributions 756 1,594 639 475 3,004 1,526 2,224 2,005 2,080 1,061
Total Business‐type Activities
Program Revenues 232,328 253,316 275,770 262,816 269,442 271,599 275,603 275,522 273,523 274,689
Total Primary Government
Program Revenues 270,883$ 291,151$ 313,159$ 299,298$ 310,252$ 338,873$ 357,001$ 335,793$ 342,995$ 344,575$
EXPENSES
Governmental Activities
City Council 180$ 323$ 394$ 455$ 15$ 345$ 94$ 387$ 271$ 352$
City Manager 1,760 2,273 2,085 2,399 1,842 1,960 1,237 2,180 2,155 2,662
City Attorney 2,390 2,653 2,575 2,621 953 1,656 1,642 1,797 1,759 2,472
City Clerk 900 1,241 1,098 1,369 803 908 330 641 680 582
City Auditor 838 1,379 2,053 2,601 138 235 464 489 362 414
Administrative Services2 6,419 15,477 17,784 17,893 9,888 10,100 7,614 11,388 9,980 10,637
Human Resources 2,472 2,806 3,448 3,707 1,346 1,071 1,420 1,346 1,464 2,224
Public Works 16,645 18,565 21,270 18,658 19,357 14,568 20,816 24,577 21,075 24,613
Planning & Community Environment 12,929 16,388 12,940 12,114 15,031 12,074 13,549 14,926 8,423 10,208
Development Services3 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 10,449 11,158
Public Safety 43,391 50,126 52,487 55,799 58,996 62,817 59,452 62,883 58,660 56,653
Community Services 15,729 17,736 19,862 17,171 22,845 21,915 22,705 23,822 24,688 28,547
Library 5,347 6,321 6,244 6,143 6,920 7,323 7,319 7,758 7,721 10,825
Non‐departmental2 12,133 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Interest on long term debt 477 438 404 370 2,742 2,575 2,562 3,367 3,658 3,552
Total Governmental
Activities Expenses 121,610 135,726 142,644 141,300 140,876 137,547 139,204 155,561 151,345 164,899
Business‐type Activities
Water 16,794 18,842 20,271 21,037 24,268 29,093 30,707 31,593 33,205 35,120
Electric 99,294 108,032 122,268 107,910 100,130 102,030 106,438 113,004 122,499 120,319
Fiber Optics1 ‐ ‐ 1,284 1,407 1,561 1,489 1,437 1,661 1,891 2,107
Gas 30,690 37,211 34,603 32,498 32,051 28,878 26,749 26,869 23,525 20,879
Wastewater Collection 10,085 12,023 14,875 10,696 12,275 14,825 14,313 13,235 14,595 15,199
Wastewater Treatment 15,901 18,902 36,896 13,466 19,731 20,712 20,635 21,018 21,553 22,546
Refuse 25,372 28,827 37,217 28,119 30,684 31,900 28,542 28,413 27,974 30,370
Storm Drainage 2,517 3,202 2,943 2,491 3,229 3,103 3,703 3,644 3,721 3,735
Airport ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 31 153 246 466 1,004 970
External Services 767 984 ‐‐‐‐‐ ‐ ‐‐
Total Business‐type
Activities Expenses 201,420 228,023 270,357 217,624 223,960 232,183 232,770 239,903 249,967 251,245
Total Primary
Government Expenses 323,030$ 363,749$ 413,001$ 358,924$ 364,836$ 369,730$ 371,974$ 395,464$ 401,312$ 416,144$
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Changes in Net Position
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(Accrual basis of accounting)
(Amounts in thousands)
Fiscal Year Ended June 30
138
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
NET (EXPENSE)/REVENUE
Governmental Activities (83,055)$ (97,891)$ (105,255)$ (104,818)$ (100,066)$ (70,273)$ (57,806)$ (95,290)$ (81,873)$ (95,013)$
Business‐type Activities 30,908 25,293 5,413 45,192 45,482 39,416 42,833 35,619 23,556 23,444
Total Primary Government
Net (Expense)/Revenue (52,147)$ (72,598)$ (99,842)$ (59,626)$ (54,584)$ (30,857)$ (14,973)$ (59,671)$ (58,317)$ (71,569)$
GENERAL REVENUES AND OTHER CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
Governmental Activities
Taxes
Property tax 21,466$ 23,084$ 25,432$ 25,981$ 29,156$ 30,104$ 31,929$ 35,299$ 38,750$ 41,189$
Sales tax 22,194 22,623 20,089 17,991 20,746 22,132 25,606 29,424 29,675 30,018
Utility user tax 9,356 10,285 11,030 11,295 10,851 10,834 10,861 11,008 10,861 12,469
Transient occupancy tax 6,709 7,976 7,111 6,858 8,082 9,664 10,794 12,255 16,699 22,366
Other taxes 6,293 6,261 3,364 4,055 8,156 8,173 10,504 9,660 11,867 7,868
Investment earnings 8,747 12,313 8,525 6,514 3,500 6,238 (1,228) 5,859 5,010 8,639
Rents and miscellaneous 13,670 11,896 15,682 12,729 12,377 14,943 518 2,575 3,428 894
Transfers 15,754 18,701 24,020 13,994 17,083 17,426 19,249 17,103 16,405 18,705
Total Governmental Activities 104,189 113,139 115,253 99,417 109,951 119,514 108,233 123,183 132,695 142,148
Business‐type Activities
Investment earnings 11,910 16,416 14,103 10,769 5,722 7,605 (2,754) 6,379 4,857 7,282
Transfers (15,754) (18,701) (24,020) (13,994) (17,083) (17,426) (19,249) (17,103) (16,405) (18,705)
Total Business‐type Activities (3,844) (2,285) (9,917) (3,225) (11,361) (9,821) (22,003) (10,724) (11,548) (11,423)
Total Primary Government 100,345$ 110,854$ 105,336$ 96,192$ 98,590$ 109,693$ 86,230$ 112,459$ 121,147$ 130,725$
CHANGE IN NET POSITION
Governmental Activities 21,134$ 15,248$ 9,998$ (5,401)$ 9,885$ 49,241$ 50,427$ 27,893$ 50,822$ 47,135$
Business‐type Activities 27,064 23,008 (4,504) 41,967 34,121 29,595 20,830 24,895 12,008 12,021
Total Primary Government
Change in Net Position 48,198$ 38,256$ 5,494$ 36,566$ 44,006$ 78,836$ 71,257$ 52,788$ 62,830$ 59,156$
Notes:1Prior to 2009, Fiber Optics was included in Electric.
2Beginning in 2008, includes Non‐departmental expenses.
3The Development Services Department was formed in FY15.
Source: Annual Financial Statements, Statement of Activities
Fiscal Year Ended June 30
139
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
General Fund
Nonspendable 5,002$ 7,286$ 6,476$ 6,581$ 6,085$ 6,007$ 5,749$ 6,188$ 6,296$ 7,088$
Assigned 6,855 4,851 6,100 7,295 6,235 6,400 5,415 5,432 7,976 8,261
Unassigned 27,551 30,278 30,648 27,581 31,859 29,616 30,913 36,690 48,198 51,582
Total General Fund 39,408$ 42,415$ 43,224$ 41,457$ 44,179$ 42,023$ 42,077$ 48,310$ 62,470$ 66,931$
Source: Annual Financial Statements, Balance Sheet
Fiscal Year Ended June 30
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Fund Balances of Governmental Funds (General Fund)
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(Modified accrual basis of accounting)
(Amounts in thousands)
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
$70,000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
$ Th
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
Nonspendable Assigned Unassigned
140
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
All Other Governmental Funds
Nonspendable ‐$ 731$ 1,308$ 1,402$ 1,422$ 11,112$ 18,189$ 14,869$ 1,468$ 1,505$
Restricted 1,540 1,406 1,412 55,400 50,646 61,324 84,688 68,468 59,650 47,113
Committed 22,883 15,207 22,043 16,962 24,775 14,284 20,400 27,145 48,434 65,745
Assigned 41,684 44,116 36,629 38,538 20,114 33,264 45,514 55,211 52,627 64,411
Total All Other
Governmental Funds 66,107$ 61,460$ 61,392$ 112,302$ 96,957$ 119,984$ 168,791$ 165,693$ 162,179$ 178,774$
Source: Annual Financial Statements, Balance Sheet
Fiscal Year Ended June 30
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Fund Balances of Governmental Funds (All Other Governmental Funds)
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(Modified accrual basis of accounting)
(Amounts in thousands)
$0
$20,000
$40,000
$60,000
$80,000
$100,000
$120,000
$140,000
$160,000
$180,000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
$ Th
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
Nonspendable Restricted Committed Assigned
141
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Revenues
Property tax 21,466$ 23,084$ 25,432$ 25,981$ 29,248$ 30,216$ 32,040$ 35,393$ 38,836$ 41,289$
Sales tax 22,194 22,623 20,089 17,991 20,746 22,132 25,606 29,424 29,675 30,018
Other taxes and fines 26,215 27,385 24,843 25,063 27,890 29,231 32,141 35,305 41,576 44,909
Charges for services 19,929 19,610 19,837 19,775 22,311 46,273 38,976 23,962 25,973 23,910
From other agencies 3,448 4,300 5,984 3,035 1,614 1,116 4,109 5,700 7,727 4,417
Permits and licenses 4,711 4,761 4,033 4,408 5,433 7,136 8,218 8,990 9,179 11,228
Interest and rentals 17,750 20,507 19,183 19,045 16,553 18,583 12,136 18,445 18,658 22,269
Other revenue 7,503 4,713 6,223 4,724 8,624 12,739 17,570 7,471 12,837 13,827
Total Revenues 123,216 126,983 125,624 120,022 132,419 167,426 170,796 164,690 184,461 191,867
Expenditures
Administration1 14,399 16,250 16,002 17,353 8,351 9,412 8,291 9,961 10,806 11,501
Public Works 9,256 10,072 10,064 9,787 11,317 11,304 11,489 12,439 12,276 13,112
Planning and Community Environment 11,874 9,861 10,462 9,480 10,309 11,966 13,474 14,761 8,628 9,722
Development Services3 ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 11,152 10,643
Public Safety 42,451 48,650 48,957 51,022 58,874 62,418 59,537 62,028 61,447 63,784
Community Services2 16,533 17,138 17,451 16,451 20,029 20,860 21,661 22,644 23,553 25,511
Library2 5,260 6,219 5,985 5,900 6,509 7,072 6,902 7,340 7,980 7,960
Non‐departmental 12,122 14,089 10,765 10,149 7,352 6,819 4,567 8,135 6,180 8,068
Special revenue and capital projects 17,478 21,626 21,485 22,006 35,486 29,154 29,542 37,035 41,754 24,457
Debt service ‐ principal payments 850 885 800 840 870 1,743 1,489 1,524 1,948 7,130
Debt service ‐interest and fiscal fees 489 451 416 382 1,815 2,757 2,659 3,196 3,404 4,266
Payment to bond refunding escrow ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 586 540 ‐ ‐ ‐
Total Expenditures 130,712 145,241 142,387 143,370 160,912 164,091 160,151 179,063 189,128 186,154
Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues
Over (Under) Expenditures (7,496) (18,258) (16,763) (23,348) (28,493) 3,335 10,645 (14,373) (4,667) 5,713
Other Financing Sources (Uses)
Transfers in 27,701 33,437 39,903 34,835 30,323 47,200 50,343 41,683 45,137 61,835
Transfers out (15,882) (16,819) (22,399) (21,415) (14,352) (29,782) (33,833) (24,175) (29,824) (46,492)
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (101) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Proceeds from long term debt ‐ ‐ ‐ 59,071 ‐ 3,222 21,706 ‐ ‐ ‐
Payments to refund bond escrow ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (3,104) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Total Other Financing Sources (Uses)11,819 16,618 17,504 72,491 15,870 17,536 38,216 17,508 15,313 15,343
Net Change in Fund Balances 4,323$ (1,640)$ 741$ 49,143$ (12,623)$ 20,871$ 48,861$ 3,135$ 10,646$ 21,056$
Debt Service as a Percentage of
Non‐Capital Expenditures 1.2% 1.1% 1.0% 1.0% 2.2% 3.5% 3.2% 3.3% 3.7% 7.1%
Notes:
2Prior to 2005, Library was included in Community Services.
3The Development Services Department was formed in FY15.
Source: Annual Financial Statements, Governmental Funds, Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances
1Comprised of the following departments: City Council, City Manager, City Attorney, City Clerk, City Auditor, Administrative Services and Human Resources.
Fiscal Year Ended June 30
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(Modified accrual basis of accounting)
(Amounts in thousands)
142
Fiscal Commercial & City of
Year Residential Industrial Palo Alto Total
2007 15,150$ 68,214$ 2,466$ 85,830$
2008 16,109 72,632 2,571 91,312
2009 17,939 83,710 2,823 104,472
2010 19,898 89,315 2,890 112,103
2011 19,848 88,076 2,991 110,915
2012 20,328 85,895 3,352 109,575
2013 19,951 86,998 3,265 110,214
2014 18,744 88,419 3,225 110,388
2015 17,404 88,257 3,234 108,895
2016 18,191 86,715 3,127 108,033
529 Bryant Street LLC Technology
City of Palo Alto Municipal
Communications & Power Industries (CPI)Research
Hewlett‐Packard Company Computer
Hewlett‐Packard Enterprise Computer
Space Systems/Loral Satellite & Satellite Systems
Stanford Hospital & Clinics Hospital
Varian Medical Systems, Inc.Manufacturing
Veterans Admin Hospital Hospital
VMware, Inc.Computer
Number Kilowatt‐hour
of Customers Sales (kWh)Revenue2
Residential 25,372 150,111,759 18,191$
Commercial 3,715 589,091,303 68,953
Industrial 91 168,141,493 17,762
CPA 126 29,812,407 3,127
Total 29,304 937,156,962 108,033$
City of Palo Alto Power Purchase
Western Area Power Administration Hydroelectric 27%
Forward Market Purchases 29%
Wind Energy 11%
Landfill Gas Energy 10%
Solar Energy 9%
Northern California Power Agency Hydroelectric 11%
Short‐Term Market 3%
Source: City of Palo Alto, Utilities and Accounting Departments
Customer (alphabetical order)Type of Business
1The top ten customers accounted for approximately 37.5% of total kWh consumption (351,514,504 kWh)
and 33.7% of revenue ($38,108,715). The largest customer accounted for 8.7% of total kWh consumption
and 7.7% of revenue. The smallest customer accounted for 1.8% of total kWh consumption and 1.5% of
revenue. Revenue used to determine top ten electric customers includes metered and non‐metered
charges, adjustments, surcharges, and discounts. Revenue does not include Utility Users Tax (UUT) and
deposits.
2Revenue includes metered and non‐metered charges and revenue adjustments. Revenue does not
include California Energy Commission (CEC) surcharges, Utility Users Tax (UUT), Primary Voltage and Rate
Assistance (RAP) discounts and deposits. Parts of this schedule are provided as required by the Continuing
Disclosure Agreement for the City's Utility Revenue Bond and are not required by Governmental
Accounting Standards Board (GASB).
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Electric Operating Revenue by Source
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(Amounts in thousands)
Top Ten Electric Customers by Revenue1
143
The top ten customers total consumption is 747,045 CCF with revenue of $6,347,933.
This amount accounts for approximately 19.6% of total consumption and 17.2% of total
revenue. The largest customer (other than the City of Palo Alto) accounted for 4.5% of
consumption and 3.3% of revenue. The smallest customer accounted for 0.7% of
consumption and 0.7% of revenue. Revenue used to determine top ten water utility
customers includes metered and non‐metered charges, adjustments, surcharges
and discounts. Revenue does not include Utility Users Tax (UUT) and deposits.
Note:
Source:City of Palo Alto, Utilities Department
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Supplemental Disclosure for Water Utilities
Fiscal Year 2016
Top Ten Largest Water Utility Customers (alphabetical order)
City of Palo Alto
Hewlett‐Packard Company
VMware Inc.
This schedule is provided as required by the Continuing Disclosure Agreement for the City's Utility Revenue
Bond and is not required by Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB).
Palo Alto Hills Golf & Country Club
Palo Alto Unified School District
Oak Creek Apartments
Stanford Hospital & Clinics
Stanford West Management
Veterans Admin Hospital
Space Systems/Loral, Inc.
144
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Net Local Secured Roll
Land 8,725,485$ 9,497,746$ 10,420,139$ 11,007,650$ 11,011,160$ 11,352,993$ 12,255,515$ 13,357,851$ 14,409,837$ 15,718,665$
Improvements 8,915,623 9,453,436 10,527,617 10,752,671 10,962,928 11,703,597 12,381,306 12,984,735 13,633,986 14,998,502
Personal property 213,154 228,875 303,688 288,148 241,280 257,436 287,296 307,499 290,590 310,929
17,854,262 19,180,057 21,251,444 22,048,469 22,215,368 23,314,026 24,924,117 26,650,085 28,334,413 31,028,096
Less:
Exemptions net of state aid (1,639,856) (1,797,327) (1,871,292) (1,809,119) (1,757,241) (2,346,728) (2,589,653) (2,610,521) (2,761,495) (3,409,836)
Total Net Local Secured Roll 16,214,406 17,382,730 19,380,152 20,239,350 20,458,127 20,967,298 22,334,464 24,039,564 25,572,918 27,618,260
Public utilities 3,923 3,174 2,573 2,573 2,573 2,573 2,573 2,573 2,573 2,573
Unsecured property 1,391,284 1,536,584 1,702,884 1,638,436 1,495,574 1,516,837 1,355,970 1,493,922 1,622,636 1,794,921
Total Assessed Value 17,609,613$ 18,922,488$ 21,085,609$ 21,880,359$ 21,956,274$ 22,486,708$ 23,693,007$ 25,536,059$ 27,198,127$ 29,415,754$
Total Direct Tax Rate 1%1%1%1%1%1%1%1%1%1%
Note: The State Constitution requires property to be assessed at 100% of the most recent purchase price, plus an increment of no more than 2% annually,
plus any local over‐rides. These values are considered to be full market values.
Source: County of Santa Clara Assessor's Office
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Assessed Value of Taxable Property
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(Amounts in thousands)
Fiscal Year Ended June 30
$13,000,000
$15,000,000
$17,000,000
$19,000,000
$21,000,000
$23,000,000
$25,000,000
$27,000,000
$29,000,000
$31,000,000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
$ Th
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
Total Assessed Value
145
Basic County Total
County County Hospital City Library Santa Clara Direct and
Fiscal Wide Retirement G.O. Bond G.O. Bond Valley Water School Community Midpeninsula Overlapping
Year Levy Levy (Measure A)1 (Measure N)2 District District College Open Space3 Rates
2007 1.00 0.0388 ‐ ‐ 0.0072 0.0720 0.0346 1.15
2008 1.00 0.0388 ‐ ‐ 0.0071 0.0702 0.0113 1.13
2009 1.00 0.0388 ‐ ‐ 0.0061 0.0674 0.0123 1.12
2010 1.00 0.0388 0.0122 ‐ 0.0074 0.0686 0.0322 1.16
2011 1.00 0.0388 0.0095 0.0171 0.0072 0.0751 0.0326 1.18
2012 1.00 0.0388 0.0047 0.0155 0.0064 0.0742 0.0297 1.17
2013 1.00 0.0388 0.0051 0.0129 0.0069 0.0718 0.0287 1.16
2014 1.00 0.0388 0.0035 0.0177 0.0070 0.0655 0.0290 1.16
2015 1.00 0.0388 0.0091 0.0159 0.0065 0.0657 0.0276 1.16
2016 1.00 0.0388 0.0088 0.0148 0.0057 0.0604 0.0240 0.0008 1.15
Notes:1The County General Obligation Bond (Measure A) was passed in 2008 to fund the seismic upgrade of the
Santa Clara Valley Medical Center. Rates were first levied for the 2009‐10 fiscal year.
2The City of Palo Alto General Obligation Bond (Measure N) was passed in 2008 to fund the construction and
renovation of three of the City's libraries. Rates were first levied for the 2010‐11 fiscal year.
3The Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Bond Issue and Property Tax, Measure AA, passed in 2014.
Source: County of Santa Clara, Tax Rates and Information
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Property Tax Rates
All Overlapping Governments
Last Ten Fiscal Years
$1.10
$1.12
$1.14
$1.16
$1.18
$1.20
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Rate per $100 of Assessed Value
146
Fiscal Year Total Tax Percentage Collections in Percentage of
Ended June 30 Levy1 for FY Amount of Levy Subsequent Years2 Amount Levy
2007 21,466 21,466 100%‐ 21,466 100%
2008 23,084 23,084 100%‐ 23,084 100%
2009 25,432 25,432 100%‐ 25,432 100%
2010 25,981 25,981 100%‐ 25,981 100%
2011 25,688 25,688 100%‐ 25,688 100%
2012 26,494 26,494 100%‐ 26,494 100%
2013 28,742 28,742 100%‐ 28,742 100%
2014 30,587 30,587 100%‐ 30,587 100%
2015 34,117 34,117 100%‐ 34,117 100%
2016 36,607 36,607 100%‐ 36,607 100%
Notes:
Source:Annual Financial Statements, Government Funds, Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and
Changes in Fund Balances.
1During fiscal year 1995, the County of Santa Clara began providing the City 100% of its tax levy
under an agreement which allows the county to keep all interest and delinquency charges
collected.
2Effective fiscal year 1994, the City is on the Teeter Plan, under which the County of Santa Clara
pays the full tax levy due. All prior delinquent taxes were also received in that fiscal year.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Property Tax Levies and Collections
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(Amounts in thousands)
Collected within the
Fiscal Year of the Levy Total Collections to Date
147
Taxable Assessed
Value Rank
Percentage of
Total Taxable
Assessed Value
Taxable
Assessed
Value Rank
Percentage of
Total Taxable
Assessed Value
Leland Stanford Jr. University 3,952,158$ 1 13.4%2,632,853$ 1 15.0%
Loral Space & Communications 215,180 2 0.7%180,779 2 1.0%
Google Inc.158,245 3 0.5%
PPF OFF 3301 Hillview Avenue LP 130,150 4 0.4%
EOSII Palo Alto Technology Center LLC 121,692 5 0.4%
Whisman Ventures, LLC 112,001 6 0.4%
SI 43 LLC 76,823 7 0.3%
BVK Hamilton Ave LLC 69,290 8 0.2%
Ronald & Ann Williams Charitable Foundation 62,685 9 0.2%
PPC Forest Towers LLC 56,610 10 0.2%
Agilent Technologies 81,285 3 0.5%
Harbor Investment Partners 52,165 4 0.3%
EOP‐Embarcadero Place, LLC 40,000 5 0.2%
Hamilton Associates 38,843 6 0.2%
California Pacific Commercial Corp.37,339 7 0.2%
Palo Alto Town & Country Village Inc.36,306 8 0.2%
Pacific Hotel Dev Venture LP 32,796 9 0.2%
Thoits Bros Inc.29,751 10 0.2%
Total 4,954,834$ 16.7%3,162,117$ 18.0%
Total City Taxable Assessed Value:
FY 2016 29,415,754$
FY 2007 17,609,613$
Source: California Municipal Statistics, Inc.
Fiscal Year 2016 Fiscal Year 2007
Taxpayer
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Principal Property Taxpayers
Current Year and Nine Years Ago
(Amounts in thousands)
148
2015‐16 No. of
Assessed % of No. of % of Taxable % of
Valuation1 Total Parcels Total Parcels Total
Non‐Residential:
Agricultural/forest 32,729,878$ 0.12 % 49 0.24 % 31 0.16 %
Commercial 1,532,265,585 5.55 454 2.20 450 2.34
Professional/office 3,344,356,151 12.11 536 2.60 519 2.70
Industrial/research & development 1,863,968,386 6.75 179 0.87 175 0.91
Recreational 34,692,318 0.13 14 0.07 12 0.06
Government/social/institutional 149,945,877 0.54 115 0.56 46 0.24
Miscellaneous 7,121,330 0.03 18 0.09 17 0.09
Subtotal Non‐Residential 6,965,079,525$ 25.22 % 1,365 6.62 % 1,250 6.50 %
Residential:
Single family residence 16,457,914,524$ 59.59 % 14,968 72.57 % 14,922 77.55 %
Condominium/townhouse 2,117,116,117 7.67 3,033 14.71 2,027 10.53
Mobile Home 71,060 0.00 7 0.03 7 0.04
2‐4 Residential units 423,208,249 1.53 506 2.45 506 2.63
5+ Residential units 1,434,539,561 5.19 336 1.63 321 1.67
Subtotal Residential 20,432,849,511$ 73.98 % 18,850 91.39 % 17,783 92.41 %
Vacant Parcels 220,331,113$ 0.80 % 410 1.99 % 210 1.09 %
Total 27,618,260,149$ 100 % 20,625 100 % 19,243 100 %
Notes: This schedule is provided as required by the Continuing Disclosure Agreement for the City's General Obligation
2010 and 2013A Bonds and is not required by Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). Therefore,
ten years of comparison data is not presented.
1Local secured assessed valuation, excluding tax‐exempt property.
Source: California Municipal Statistics, Inc.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Assessed Valuation and Parcels by Land Use
As of June 30, 2016
149
No. of
Taxable Average
Parcels1 Assessed Valuation
Single Family Residential 14,922 $1,102,930
No. of % of Cumulative % of Cumulative
Taxable Total % of Total Total Total % of Total
Parcels1 Parcels Parcels Valuation Valuation Valuation
1,334 8.94 8.94 105,594,792$ 0.64 0.64
1,802 12.08 21.02 249,254,241 1.51 2.16
854 5.72 26.74 212,390,602 1.29 3.45
738 4.95 31.68 256,832,299 1.56 5.01
673 4.51 36.19 303,279,249 1.84 6.85
745 4.99 41.19 409,892,140 2.49 9.34
660 4.42 45.61 427,407,181 2.60 11.94
583 3.91 49.52 435,859,453 2.65 14.59
597 4.00 53.52 509,043,262 3.09 17.68
640 4.29 57.81 607,105,607 3.69 21.37
605 4.05 61.86 635,783,858 3.86 25.23
507 3.40 65.26 582,031,906 3.54 28.77
465 3.12 68.38 582,887,097 3.54 32.31
438 2.94 71.31 590,918,861 3.59 35.90
444 2.98 74.29 642,860,649 3.91 39.81
395 2.65 76.93 612,251,107 3.72 43.53
364 2.44 79.37 599,972,971 3.65 47.17
327 2.19 81.56 572,303,695 3.48 50.65
301 2.02 83.58 556,091,276 3.38 54.03
241 1.62 85.20 470,501,131 2.86 56.89
2,209 14.80 100.00 7,095,653,147 43.11 100.00
14,922 100.00 16,457,914,524$ 100.00
Notes:
Source: California Municipal Statistics, Inc.
This schedule is provided as required by the Continuing Disclosure Agreement for the City's General
Obligation 2010 and 2013A Bonds and is not required by Governmental Accounting Standards Board
(GASB). Therefore, ten years of comparison data is not presented.
1Improved single family residential parcels. Excludes condominiums and parcels with multiple family
units.
$1,900,000‐1,999,999
$2,000,000 and greater
Total
$1,800,000‐1,899,999
$700,000‐799,999
$800,000‐899,999
$900,000‐999,999
$1,000,000‐1,099,999
$1,100,000‐1,199,999
$1,200,000‐1,299,999
$1,300,000‐1,399,999
$1,400,000‐1,499,999
$1,500,000‐1,599,999
$1,600,000‐1,699,999
$1,700,000‐1,799,999
$600,000‐699,999
$16,457,914,524 $815,747
2015‐2016
Assessed Valuation
$0‐99,999
$100,000‐199,999
$200,000‐299,999
$300,000‐399,999
$400,000‐499,999
$500,000‐599,999
Assessed Valuation Assessed Valuation
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Per Parcel Assessed Valuation of Single Family Residential
As of June 30, 2016
2015‐2016 Median
150
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
9,175$ 8,405$ 7,605$ 6,765$ 5,895$ 1,685$ 1,560$ 1,430$ 1,285$ 1,135$
‐ ‐ ‐ 55,305 55,305 54,540 74,235 73,215 71,795 65,210
115 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
2011 Lease‐Purchase Agreement ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,764 2,400 2,026 1,643 1,248
Add: unamortized premium ‐ ‐ ‐ 3,766 3,640 3,514 4,400 4,242 4,084 3,926
‐‐‐ (571) ‐‐‐‐‐‐
9,290 8,405 7,605 65,265 64,840 62,503 82,595 80,913 78,807 71,519
41,859 40,334 38,744 72,104 69,551 65,879 63,104 60,224 57,224 54,095
Energy Tax Credits ‐ 1,400 1,300 1,200 1,100 1,000 900 800 700 600
State Water Resources Loan ‐ 5,629 9,000 13,080 16,696 15,900 15,109 14,309 13,500 12,681
(972) (1,053) (2,479) (2,737) (229) 580 543 867 803 737
40,887 46,310 46,565 83,647 87,118 83,359 79,656 76,200 72,227 68,113
Outstanding Debt 50,177$ 54,715$ 54,170$ 148,912$151,958$145,862$162,251$157,113$ 151,034$139,632$
1.51% 1.53% 1.50% 4.48% 4.10% 3.61% 3.80% 3.39% 3.09% 2.67%
Population 62,615 63,367 64,484 65,408 64,417 65,544 66,368 66,861 66,029 66,968
0.80$ 0.86$ 0.84$ 2.28$ 2.36$ 2.23$ 2.44$ 2.35$ 2.29$ 2.09$
Notes:
Sources:
2016 Official City Data Set (population)
California Department of Transportation Long‐Term Socio‐Economic Forecasts (personal income)
Annual Financial Statements, Note 7 General Long‐Term Obligations and Note 8 Special Assessment Debt
Debt Per Capita
1See the schedule of Demographic and Economic Statistics for personal income data. Per capita personal income is only available for Santa Clara
County, therefore personal income is the product of the countywide per capita amount and the City's population.
County of Santa Clara (assessed valuation)
Percentage of Personal Income1
Certificates of Participation
General Obligation Bonds
Special Assessment Debt
Less: unamortized discount/
issuance costs
Total Governmental Activities
Business‐type Activities
Utility Revenue Bonds
Less: unamortized discount/
issuance costs
Total Business‐type Activities
Total Primary Government
Governmental Activities
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Ratio of Outstanding Debt by Type
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(Amounts in thousands)
Fiscal Year Ended June 30
$0
$20,000
$40,000
$60,000
$80,000
$100,000
$120,000
$140,000
$160,000
$180,000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
$ Th
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
Total Governmental Activities Total Business‐type Activities
151
2015‐2016 Assessed Valuation 29,415,753,627$
Percentage Amount
Applicable Applicable
Total Debt to City of to City of
Outstanding Palo Alto1 Palo Alto
Santa Clara County 792,585,000$ 7.58%60,085,869$
Foothill‐DeAnza Community College District 584,782,455 22.09% 129,155,053
Palo Alto Unified School District 306,673,766 87.20% 267,431,791
Fremont Union High School District 365,975,088 0.01%40,257
Los Gatos‐Saratoga Joint Union High School District 70,320,000 0.01%9,142
Mountain View‐Los Altos Union High School District 59,156,005 1.12%661,956
Cupertino Union School District 292,848,688 0.02%55,641
Los Altos School District 73,555,000 1.33%976,810
Mountain View‐Whisman School District 189,475,000 0.92%1,748,854
Saratoga Union School District 33,775,241 0.03%9,457
Whisman School District 19,357,334 2.50%483,933
City of Palo Alto 70,345,000 100%70,345,000
El Camino Hospital District 136,280,000 0.09% 118,564
Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 45,000,000 13.05% 5,870,250
City of Palo Alto Special Assessment Bonds 25,130,000 100% 25,130,000
Santa Clara Valley Water District Benefit Assessment District 99,060,000 7.58% 7,509,739
Total Direct and Overlapping Tax and Assessment Debt 569,632,316
683,441,121 7.58% 51,811,671
367,118,349 7.58% 27,831,242
6,380,000 7.58%483,668
9,723,341 22.09%2,147,497
6,260,000 0.01%814
2,415,000 1.12%27,024
4,600,000 0.03%1,288
City of Palo Alto General Fund Obligations 2,383,453 100%2,383,453
2,890,000 7.58%219,091
Midpeninsula Regional Open Space Park District General Fund Obligations 122,305,886 13.05% 15,954,803
$ 100,860,551
27,766,974
$ 73,093,577
$ 642,725,893
Ratio to
Assessed Valuation
Total Direct Debt 0.25%72,728,453$
Total Overlapping Debt 1.94%569,997,440
Total Direct and Overlapping Debt 2.18%642,725,893$ 2
Notes:
1Percentage of overlapping agency's assessed valuation located within boundaries of the city.
2Excludes tax and revenue anticipation notes, enterprise revenue, mortgage revenue and tax allocation bonds and
non‐bonded capital lease obligations.
Source: California Municipal Statistics, Inc.
Santa Clara County Pension Obligations
Santa Clara County Board of Education Certificates of Participation
Foothill‐DeAnza Community College District Certificates of Participation
Los Gatos‐Saratoga Joint Union High School District Certificates of Participation
Santa Clara County General Fund Obligations
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Computation of Direct and Overlapping Debt
As of June 30, 2016
Direct and Overlapping Tax and Assessment Debt
Direct and Overlapping General Fund Debt
Mountain View‐Los Altos Union High School District Certificates of Participation
Saratoga Union High School District Certificates of Participation
Less: Santa Clara County supported obligations
Total Net Direct and Overlapping General Fund Debt
Overlapping debt is the financial obligations of one political jurisdiction that also falls partly on a nearby jurisdiction. The amount of debt of each
unit applicable to the reporting unit is arrived at by 1) determining what percentage of the total assessed value of the overlapping jurisdiction
lies within the limits of the reporting unit, and 2) applying this percentage to the total debt of the overlapping jurisdiction.
Santa Clara County Vector Control District Certificates of Participation
Total Gross Direct and Overlapping General Fund Debt
Total Combined Debt
152
Assessed Valuation:
Secured property assessed value,
net of exempt real property 29,415,754$
Bonded Debt Limit (3.75% of Assessed Value) 1 1,103,091
Direct Debt:
Certificates of Participation 1,135
Lease Purchase Agreement 1,248
General Obligation bonds 65,210
Total Direct Debt 67,593
Less: Amount of Debt Not Subject to Limit 2 2,383
Total Net Debt Applicable to Limit 65,210
Legal Bonded Debt Margin 1,037,881$
Total Bonded Total Net Debt Legal Total Net Debt Ratio of Net General
Fiscal Assessed Debt Limit Applicable to Bonded Debt Applicable to the Debt to Bonded Debt
Year Value (AV)(3.75% of AV)Limit Margin Population Debt as a %Assessed Value Per Capita
2007 17,609,613 660,360 ‐660,360 62,615 0.00%‐0.00
2008 18,922,488 709,593 ‐709,593 63,367 0.00%‐0.00
2009 21,085,609 790,710 ‐790,710 64,484 0.00%‐0.00
2010 21,880,359 820,513 55,305 765,208 65,408 6.74%0.0025 0.85
2011 21,956,274 823,360 55,305 768,055 64,417 6.72%0.0025 0.86
2012 22,486,708 843,252 54,540 788,712 65,544 6.47%0.0024 0.83
2013 23,693,007 888,488 74,235 814,253 66,368 8.36%0.0031 1.12
2014 25,536,058 957,602 73,215 884,387 66,861 7.65%0.0029 1.10
2015 27,198,127 1,019,930 71,795 948,135 66,029 7.04%0.0026 1.09
2016 29,415,754 1,103,091 65,210 1,037,881 66,968 5.91%0.0022 0.97
Notes:
Source:
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Computation of Legal Bonded Debt Margin
As of June 30, 2016
(Amounts in thousands)
1California Government Code, Section 43605 sets the debt limit at 15% of the assessed value of all real and personal property of the City. Because this
Code section was enacted when assessed value was 25% of market value, the limit is calculated at one‐fourth, or 3.75%. This legal debt margin applies
to General Obligation debt. Prior year limits have been adjusted to conform to the current year methodology.
2In accordance with California Government Code Section 43605, only the City's General Obligation bonds are subject to the legal debt limit of 15%.
Annual Financial Statements, Assessed Value of Taxable Property and Note 7 General Long‐Term Obligations
153
Less: Net Revenue
Fiscal Gross Direct Operating Available for
Year Revenue Expenses2 Debt Service Principal Interest3 Total Coverage Ratio
2007 203,146 151,196 51,950 1,465 2,147 3,612 14.38
2008 219,801 173,620 46,181 1,525 2,088 3,613 12.78
2009 242,693 180,880 61,813 1,590 2,024 3,614 17.10
2010 230,308 171,320 58,988 1,755 1,954 3,709 15.90
2011 234,278 151,641 82,637 2,655 3,261 5,916 13.97
2012 235,160 169,777 65,383 2,945 2,959 5,904 11.07
2013 237,842 173,510 64,332 2,875 3,167 6,042 10.65
2014 239,948 176,718 63,230 2,980 3,073 6,053 10.45
2015 234,025 188,276 45,749 3,100 2,954 6,054 7.56
2016 235,386 186,793 48,593 3,230 2,823 6,053 8.03
Notes:1Airport, Refuse and Fiber Optics funds have no debt and are therefore excluded from this schedule.
2Excludes depreciation and amortization expense.
3Excludes joint venture debt service and federal interest subsidy.
Source: City of Palo Alto, Accounting Department
Debt Service
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Revenue Bond Coverage
Business‐type Activities1
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(Amounts in thousands)
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
$70,000
$80,000
$90,000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
$ Th
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
Net Revenue Available for Debt Service Total Debt Service
154
Fiscal
Year
2007 2,751 2,486 1,109 1,485 374 602 203 5,075 7,139 21,224
2008 2,685 2,566 1,685 1,497 349 622 405 4,682 6,797 21,288
2009 2,251 2,443 1,431 1,258 315 493 214 4,284 6,635 19,324
2010 2,215 2,418 1,402 1,254 343 549 219 4,458 5,556 18,414
2011 2,374 2,621 1,564 1,292 381 630 242 4,873 6,322 20,299
2012 2,445 2,937 1,590 1,492 387 722 257 5,049 7,034 21,913
2013 2,478 3,160 1,465 1,656 424 765 259 4,056 13,729 27,992
2014 2,097 3,541 1,555 2,041 392 772 444 4,845 9,890 25,577
2015 2,398 3,894 1,672 1,708 435 699 265 3,674 11,253 25,998
2016 2,250 4,134 1,410 1,694 448 582 257 4,949 12,423 28,147
Source: California State Board of Equalization, compiled by MuniServices LLC
Sales Tax Rates for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2016
State Rate:7.50%
Special District Tax Rates:
Santa Clara County Transit District (SCCT) 0.50%
Santa Clara County Valley Transportation Authority (SCVT) 0.50%
Santa Clara VTA BART Operating and Maintenance Transactions and Use Tax (SVTB)0.125%
Santa Clara Retail Transactions and Use Tax (SCCR)0.125%
Total Sales and Use Tax Rate:8.750%
Source: California State Board of Equalization
Food
Markets
Service
Stations
Drug
Stores Other Retail All Other
Apparel
Stores
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Taxable Transactions by Type of Business
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(Amounts in thousands)
Total
ECONOMIC SEGMENT
Department
Stores Restaurants
Furniture/
Appliance
Department Stores
8%
Restaurants
15%
Furniture/ Appliance
5%
Apparel Stores
6%
Food Markets
2%
Service Stations
2%Drug Stores
1%
Other Retail
17%
All Other
44%
Fiscal Year 2016
155
Santa Clara Santa Clara
City of Palo Alto City of Palo Alto Santa Clara City Population County Total County Per Capita
Fiscal City of Palo Alto Unemployment School County as a Percentage of Personal Income Personal Income
Year Population Rate Enrollment Population County Population (in thousands)(in thousands)
2007 62,615 2.6%11,056 1,808,056 3.46% 95,200,000 *52,653 *
2008 63,367 3.5%11,329 1,837,075 3.45% 102,300,000 *55,686 *
2009 64,484 6.5%11,329 1,857,621 3.47% 101,800,000 *54,801 *
2010 65,408 6.2%11,565 1,880,876 3.48% 95,000,000 *50,508 *
2011 64,417 5.3%12,024 1,781,427 3.62% 101,700,000 *57,089 *
2012 65,544 4.7%12,286 1,816,486 3.61% 112,800,000 *62,098 *
2013 66,368 3.6%12,396 1,842,254 3.60% 124,800,000 *67,743 *
2014 66,861 2.8%12,483 1,868,558 3.58% 130,600,000 *69,893 *
2015 66,029 2.7%12,532 1,889,638 3.49% 139,800,000 *73,982 *
2016 66,968 2.9%12,488 1,927,888 3.47% 150,600,000 *78,117 *
Note: Data on personal income and per capita personal income is only available for Santa Clara County.
Source: Beginning in 2015 population is sourced from the US Census Bureau Community Survey (via the City of Palo Alto's Official City Data Set).
State Employment Development Office (unemployment rate)
Palo Alto Unified School District (school enrollment)
* California Department of Transportation Long‐Term Socio‐Economic Forecasts (personal income). Forecasts from prior years are updated annually.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Demographic and Economic Statistics
Last Ten Fiscal Years
60,000
61,000
62,000
63,000
64,000
65,000
66,000
67,000
68,000 City Population
10,000
10,500
11,000
11,500
12,000
12,500
13,000 School Enrollment
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%City Unemployment Rate
156
Number of
Employees Rank
Percentage of Total
City Employment
Number of
Employees Rank
Percentage of Total
City Employment
Stanford University3 11,500 1 9.0% 9,821 1 7.0%
Stanford Health Care3 5,000 2 3.9% 5,025 2 3.6%
Lucile Packard Children's Hospital3 4,700 3 3.7% 3,326 4 2.4%
Veteran's Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System 3,900 4 3.0%3,500 3 2.5%
VMware Inc.3,500 5 2.7%
SAP 3,500 6 2.7%
Space Systems/Loral 2,800 7 2.2%1,700 7 1.2%
Hewlett‐Packard Company 2,500 8 1.9%2,001 5 1.4%
Palo Alto Medical Foundation 2,200 9 1.7%2,000 6 1.4%
Varian Medical Systems 1,400 10 1.1%
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati 1,500 8 1.1%
Palo Alto Unified School District 1,304 9 0.9%
City of Palo Alto 1,074 10 0.8%
Total 41,000 31.9% 31,251 22.3%
Estimated Total City Day Population:
FY 2016 128,282
FY 2008 140,000
Notes:
Source:
1Comparable data was not available until FY 2008.
2016 Official City Data Set (total City day population); AtoZ databases; Stanford website.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Principal Employers
Current Year and Eight Years Ago
FY 20162 FY 20081
Employer
2Available data sources are limited and may be unreliable. The City does not affirm the validity of this data. 2016 numbers are
rounded.
3Includes employees not located within City limits.
157
2006 2007 2008 2009
Governmental activities
Community Services
Number of theater performances 183 171 166 159
Total hours of athletic field usage2 65,791 70,769 63,212 45,762
Number of rounds of golf 76,000 76,241 74,630 72,170
Enrollment in recreation classes (includes summer camps)14,768 14,460 13,851 13,091
Planning and Community Environment
Planning applications completed 408 299 257 273
Building permits issued 3,081 3,136 3,046 2,543
Caltrain average weekday boarding3 3,876 4,132 4,589 4,407
Police
Calls for service 56,211 60,079 58,742 53,275
Total arrests 2,530 3,059 3,253 2,612
Parking citations issued 56,502 57,222 50,706 49,996
Animal Services
Number of service calls 2,861 2,990 3,059 2,873
Number of animals handled 3,839 3,578 3,532 3,422
Fire
Calls for service 6,897 7,236 7,723 7,549
Number of fire incidents 211 221 192 239
Number of fire inspections 899 1,021 1,277 1,028
Library
Total number of cardholders 55,909 53,099 53,740 54,878
Total number of items in collection 260,468 270,755 279,403 293,735
Total checkouts 1,280,547 1,414,509 1,542,116 1,633,955
Public Works
Street resurfacing (lane miles)20 32 27 23
Number of potholes repaired 1,049 1,188 1,977 3,727
Sq. ft. of sidewalk replaced or permanently repaired 126,574 94,620 83,827 56,909
Number of trees planted 263 164 188 250
Total tons of waste landfilled 59,276 59,938 61,866 68,228
Tons of materials recycled or composted 56,013 56,837 52,196 49,911
Business‐type activities
Electric
Number of customer accounts 28,653 28,684 29,024 28,527
Residential MWH consumed 161,202 162,405 162,680 159,899
Gas
Number of customer accounts 23,353 23,357 23,502 23,090
Residential therms consumed 11,745,883 11,759,842 11,969,151 11,003,088
Water
Number of customer accounts 19,645 19,726 19,942 19,422
Residential water consumption (CCF)2,647,758 2,807,477 2,746,980 2,566,962
Wastewater collection
Number of customer accounts 21,784 21,789 21,970 21,210
Millions of gallons processed 8,972 8,853 8,510 7,958
Notes:
2According to the department, this measure was not accurately tracked during FY13 or FY14.
Source:
FUNCTIONS/PROGRAMS
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Operating Indicators by Function/Program
Last Ten Fiscal Years1
City of Palo Alto Performance Report (formerly the Service Efforts and Accomplishments Report); 2015 Official City Data Set
(Caltrain)
3Prior‐year data has been updated based on annual counts revised by Caltrain. Beginning 2015, data source is Official City Data
Set.
1Ten most recent years available.
Fiscal Year Ended June 30
158
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
174 175 175 184 108 172
41,705 42,687 44,226 ‐‐47,504
69,791 67,381 65,653 60,153 46,527 42,048
12,880 12,310 11,703 11,598 11,997 12,586
226 238 204 307 310 335
2,847 3,559 3,320 3,682 3,624 3,844
4,359 4,923 5,730 6,763 7,564 8,294
55,860 52,159 51,086 54,628 58,559 59,795
2,451 2,288 2,212 2,274 2,589 3,273
42,591 40,426 41,875 43,877 36,551 41,412
2,692 2,804 3,051 2,909 2,398 2,013
3,147 3,323 3,379 2,675 2,480 2,143
7,468 7,555 7,796 7,904 7,829 8,548
182 165 186 150 150 135
1,526 1,807 1,654 2,069 1,741 1,964
51,969 53,246 60,283 51,007 46,950 51,792
298,667 314,101 306,160 277,749 361,103 429,460
1,624,785 1,476,648 1,559,932 1,512,975 1,364,872 1,499,406
32 29 40 36 36 31
3,149 2,986 3,047 2,726 3,418 2,487
54,602 71,174 72,787 82,118 74,051 120,776
201 150 143 245 148 305
48,955 38,524 43,947 45,411 47,088 43,730
48,811 56,586 51,725 47,941 49,594 50,546
29,430 29,708 29,545 29,299 29,338 29,065
163,098 160,318 160,604 156,411 153,190 145,284
23,724 23,816 23,915 23,659 23,592 23,461
11,394,712 11,476,609 11,522,999 10,834,793 10,253,776 8,537,754
20,134 20,248 20,317 20,043 20,037 20,061
2,415,467 2,442,415 2,513,595 2,521,930 2,496,549 2,052,176
22,231 22,320 22,421 22,152 22,105 21,990
8,184 8,652 8,130 7,546 7,186 6,512
Fiscal Year Ended June 30
159
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
FUNCTION/PROGRAM
Public Safety
Fire:
Fire Stations Operated 8 8 8 8 8
Police:
Police Stations 1 1 1 1 1
Police Patrol Vehicles 30 30 30 30 30
Community Services
Acres ‐ Downtown/Urban Parks2 157 157 157 157 157
Acres ‐ Open Space2 3,744 3,744 3,744 3,744 3,744
Acres ‐ Parks and Preserves2 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Acres ‐ Open Space2 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Parks and Preserves 36 36 36 36 36
Golf Course 1 1 1 1 1
Tennis Courts 51 51 51 51 51
Athletic Center 4 4 4 4 4
Community Centers 4 4 4 4 4
Theaters 3 3 3 3 3
Cultural Center/Art Center 1 1 1 1 1
Junior Museum and Zoo 1 1 1 1 1
Swimming Pools 1 1 1 1 1
Nature Center 3 3 3 3 3
Libraries
Libraries 5 5 5 5 5
Public Works:
Number of Trees Maintained 34,556 35,058 34,991 35,025 34,977
Electric Utility1
Miles of Overhead Lines 194 193 193 193 193
Miles of Underground Lines 252 253 253 253 253
Water Utility
Miles of Water Mains 217 217 214 214 214
Gas Utility
Miles of Gas Mains 207 207 207 205 205
Waste Water
Miles of Sanitary Sewer Lines 202 202 207 207 207
Note:
Source: City of Palo Alto
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Capital Asset Statistics by Function/Program
Last Ten Fiscal Years
2Beginning in 2016 park acreage is sourced from the Official City Data Set.
1The City of Palo Alto Utilities Department recently completed the conversion of its electric system maps
to a GIS mapping system database. Therefore, the distances reported for FY 11/12 and forward are more
accurate than the distances reported in previous years.
Fiscal Year Ended June 30
160
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
7 7 7 7 7
1 1 1 1 1
30 30 30 30 30
157 157 157 157 ‐
3,744 3,744 3,744 3,752 ‐
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 3,921
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4,489
36 36 36 36 36
1 1 1 1 1
51 51 51 51 51
4 4 4 4 4
4 4 4 4 4
3 3 3 3 3
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
3 3 3 3 3
5 5 5 5 5
34,874 34,907 34,741 34,636 34,683
223 222 223 223 222
245 246 249 262 268
234 233 236 236 235
210 210 214 211 209
217 217 217 217 216
Fiscal Year Ended June 30
161
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Governmental Funds
General Fund:
Administrative 99 98 98 89 83 83 85 83 84 86
Community Services 97 96 97 94 74 74 74 74 76 77
Development Services6 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 38 38
Fire 127 127 127 123 121 122 119 116 107 107
Library 44 44 44 42 41 41 41 42 44 48
Office of Emergency Services5 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 3 3 3
Planning and Community Environment6 53 53 53 49 44 43 48 49 28 31
Police 163 163 164 161 157 157 154 155 155 155
Public Works1 68 68 69 64 59 56 57 56 53 54
Subtotal General Fund 651 649 652 622 579 576 578 578 588 599
All Other Funds:
Capital Projects Fund 20 20 21 24 24 24 26 27 27 28
Special Revenue Fund 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 9 10 9
Total Governmental Funds 672 670 674 647 605 602 606 614 625 636
Enterprise Funds
Public Works2 113 113 113 115 115 115 104 99 100 95
Utilities3 235 235 238 242 251 251 254 255 258 256
External Services4 6 6 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Total Enterprise Funds 354 354 351 357 366 366 358 354 358 351
Internal Service Funds
Printing and Mailing 4 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2
Technology 30 30 31 31 30 30 31 32 32 34
Vehicle Replacement 16 16 16 16 16 16 17 17 17 17
Total Internal Service Funds 50 50 51 51 48 48 50 51 51 53
Total 1,076 1,074 1,076 1,055 1,019 1,016 1,014 1,019 1,034 1,040
Notes: 1Fleet and Facilities Management
2Refuse, Storm Drainage, Wastewater Treatment
Numbers adjusted for rounding purposes.
Source: City of Palo Alto ‐ Fiscal Year 2016 Adopted Operating Budget
6ln FY15, staff was moved from Planning and Community Environment (PC&E), Public Works and Fire to create
Development Services.
5In 2014, emergency services and disaster preparation activities have been removed from the Fire Department and are now
shown in newly created Office of Emergency Services.
4In 2009, External Services was dissolved. 5 FTEs were eliminated and 1 FTE was transferred to the Technology Fund.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Full‐Time Equivalent City Government Employees by Function
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Full Time Equivalent Employees as of June 30
3Electric, Gas, Wastewater Collection, Water
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Fu
l
l
Ti
m
e
Eq
u
i
v
a
l
e
n
t
s
Governmental Funds Enterprise Funds Internal Service Funds
162
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Index to the Single Audit Report
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
163
Page
Independent Auditor’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial
Statements Performed in Accordance With Government Auditing Standards ..................................... 165
Independent Auditor’s Report on Compliance for Each Major Federal Program and
Report on Internal Control Over Compliance Required by Uniform Guidance ..................................... 167
Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards ........................................................................................... 169
Notes to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards ...................................................................... 170
Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs ............................................................................................. 171
Schedule of Prior Years Findings and Questioned Costs ........................................................................... 172
164
This page is intentionally left blank.
Century City
Los Angeles
Newport Beach
Oakland
Sacramento
San Diego
San Francisco
Walnut Creek
Woodland Hills
www.mgocpa.com
Macias Gini & O’Connell LLP 2121 N. California Boulevard, Suite 750 Walnut Creek, CA 94596
165
Independent Auditor’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial
Statements Performed in Accordance With Government Auditing Standards
Honorable Mayor and the Members
of the City Council of the City of Palo Alto
Palo Alto, California
We have audited, in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of
America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards,
issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental
activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of
the City of Palo Alto, California (City), as of and for the year ended June 30, 2016, and the related notes
to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements, and have
issued our report thereon dated November 2, 2016.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the City’s internal control
over financial reporting (internal control) to determine the audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the
purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control. Accordingly, we do
not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control.
A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow
management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or
detect and correct, misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination
of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement
of the entity’s financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected on a timely basis. A
significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less
severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with
governance.
Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this
section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material
weaknesses or significant deficiencies. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any
deficiencies in internal control that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses
may exist that have not been identified.
166
Compliance and Other Matters
As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the City’s financial statements are free from
material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations,
contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the
determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those
provisions was not an objective of our audit, and accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The
results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be
reported under Government Auditing Standards.
Purpose of this Report
The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance
and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal
control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with
Government Auditing Standards in considering the entity’s internal control and compliance. Accordingly,
this communication is not suitable for any other purpose.
Walnut Creek, California
November 2, 2016
Century City
Los Angeles
Newport Beach
Oakland
Sacramento
San Diego
San Francisco
Walnut Creek
Woodland Hills
www.mgocpa.com
Macias Gini & O’Connell LLP 2121 N. California Boulevard, Suite 750 Walnut Creek, CA 94596
167
Independent Auditor’s Report on Compliance for Each Major Federal Program and
Report on Internal Control Over Compliance Required by Uniform Guidance
Honorable Mayor and the Members
of the City Council of the City of Palo Alto
Palo Alto, California
Report on Compliance for Each Major Federal Program
We have audited the City of Palo Alto’s, California (City) compliance with the types of compliance
requirements described in the OMB Compliance Supplement that could have a direct and material effect
on the City’s major federal program for the year ended June 30, 2016. The City’s major federal program
is identified in the summary of auditor’s results section of the accompanying schedule of findings and
questioned costs.
Management’s Responsibility
Management is responsible for compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of
its federal awards applicable to its federal programs.
Auditor’s Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on compliance for the City’s major federal program based on
our audit of the types of compliance requirements referred to above. We conducted our audit of
compliance in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; the
standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the
Comptroller General of the United States; and the audit requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal
Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for
Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Those standards and the Uniform Guidance require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether noncompliance with the types of
compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal
program occurred. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence about the City’s compliance
with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion on compliance for the major federal
program. However, our audit does not provide a legal determination of the City’s compliance.
Opinion on the Major Federal Program
In our opinion, the City complied, in all material respects, with the types of compliance requirements
referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on its major federal program for the year
ended June 30, 2016.
168
Report on Internal Control Over Compliance
Management of the City is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over
compliance with the types of compliance requirements referred to above. In planning and performing our
audit of compliance, we considered the City’s internal control over compliance with the types of
requirements that could have a direct and material effect on the major federal program to determine the
auditing procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing an opinion on
compliance for the major federal program and to test and report on internal control over compliance in
accordance with the Uniform Guidance, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the
effectiveness of internal control over compliance. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the
effectiveness of the City’s internal control over compliance.
A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over
compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned
functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a
federal program on a timely basis. A material weakness in internal control over compliance is a
deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance, such that there is a
reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal
program will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency in
internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over
compliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program that is less severe than a material
weakness in internal control over compliance, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged
with governance.
Our consideration of internal control over compliance was for the limited purpose described in the first
paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over
compliance that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. We did not identify any
deficiencies in internal control over compliance that we consider to be material weaknesses. However,
material weaknesses may exist that were not identified.
The purpose of this report on internal control over compliance is solely to describe the scope of our
testing of internal control over compliance and the results of that testing based on the requirements of
Uniform Guidance. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose.
Walnut Creek, California
November 2, 2016
Grantor Federal
Identifying CFDA Passed Through
Grantor/Pass‐Through Grantor/Program Title Number Number Expenditures to Subrecipients
U.S Department of Housing and Urban Development
Direct B‐13‐MC‐06‐0020
CDBG ‐ Entitlement Grants Cluster B‐14‐MC‐06‐0020
Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants B‐15‐MC‐06‐0020 14.218 478,193$ 411,453$
U.S Department of Interior
Direct
ARRA ‐ Water Reclamation and Reuse Program R10AP20003 15.504 111,014 ‐
U.S. Department of Justice
Direct
Bulletproof Vest Partnership BA‐3A00S‐SM01 16.607 9,286 ‐
U.S. Department of Transportation
Direct 3‐06‐0182‐009‐2014
Airport Improvement Program 3‐06‐0182‐010‐2015 20.106 244,070 ‐
Pass‐through from State of California Office of the Traffic Safety
Minimum Penalties for Repeat Offenders for Driving While Intoxicated PT16113 20.608 15,487 ‐
Highway Safety Cluster
State and Community Highway Safety PT16113 20.600 4,835 ‐
National Priority Safety Program PT1618 20.616 14,813 ‐
Subtotal Highway Safety Cluster 19,648 ‐
Subtotal 35,135 ‐
Pass‐through from State of California Department of Transportation
Highway Planning and Construction BRLS‐5100(017)132,457
Highway Planning and Construction CML‐5100(018)20.205 148,978 ‐
Subtotal 281,435 ‐
Pass‐through from Dept of Resources Recycling & Recovery (CalRecycle)
Highway Planning and Construction TRPS‐14‐0073 20.205 63,000 ‐
Pass‐through from State of California Department of Water Resources
Highway Planning and Construction 4600010471 20.205 44,330 ‐
Total Highway Planning and Construction 388,765 ‐
Total U.S. Department of Transportation 667,970 ‐
Institute of Museum and Library Services
Pass‐through from California State Library MA‐10‐14‐0431‐14
Museums for America MA‐11‐15‐02014‐15 45.301 51,858 ‐
TOTAL FEDERAL FINANCIAL AWARDS 1,318,321$ 411,453$
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
169
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Notes to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
170
NOTE 1 – REPORTING ENTITY
The schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes expenditures of federal awards
for the City of Palo Alto, California (City), and its component unit as disclosed in the notes to the basic
financial statements.
NOTE 2 – BASIS OF ACCOUNTING
Basis of accounting refers to when revenues and expenditures or expenses are recognized in the
accounts and reported in the financial statements, regardless of measurement focus applied. All
governmental funds are accounted for using the modified accrual basis of accounting. All proprietary
funds are accounted for using the accrual basis of accounting. Expenditures of federal awards reported
in the Schedule are recognized when incurred and all eligibility requirements have been met. Such
expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in 2 CFR 200, Subpart E (Cost
Principles), wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
The City did not elect to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in 2 CFR 200.414(F&A) costs.
NOTE 3 – DIRECT AND INDIRECT (PASS‐THROUGH) FEDERAL AWARDS
Federal awards may be granted directly to the City by a federal granting agency or may be granted to
other government agencies which pass‐through federal awards to the City. The Schedule includes both
of these types of federal award programs when they occur.
NOTE 4 – RELATIONSHIP TO FEDERAL FINANCIAL REPORTS
Amounts reported in the Schedule agree to or can be reconciled with the amounts reported in the
related federal financial reports.
NOTE 5 – RELATIONSHIP TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Federal awards and expenditures agree to or can be reconciled with the amounts reported in the City’s
basic financial statements.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
171
Section I ‐ Summary of Auditor’s Results
Financial Statements
Type of auditor’s report issued on the
basic financial statements of the City: Unmodified
Internal control over financial reporting:
Material weakness(es) identified? No
Significant deficiency(ies) identified? None reported
Noncompliance material to the financial statements
noted? No
Federal Awards
Internal control over major programs:
Material weakness(es) identified? No
Significant deficiency(ies) identified? None reported
Type of auditor’s report issued on compliance for
major programs: Unmodified
Any audit findings disclosed that are required to be
reported in accordance with Uniform Guidance? No
Identification of Major Programs: CFDA No. 14.218 Community Development
Block Grant
Dollar threshold used to distinguish between type A
and type B programs: $750,000
Auditee qualified as a low‐risk auditee? Yes
Section II – Financial Statements Findings
No findings reported.
Section III ‐ Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs
No findings reported.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Schedule of Prior Years Findings and Questioned Costs
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
172
Financial Statement and Federal Award Findings
No financial statement nor federal award findings were reported for the year ended June 30, 2015.
……….…………………………...…………………………………….
City of Palo Alto 173
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT STATEMENT
In compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990,
this document may be provided in other accessible formats.
For information contact:
ADA Coordinator
250 Hamilton Avenue
(650) 329-2550
ADA@cityofpaloalto.org
Spanish explorers named the area for the tall, twin-
trunked redwood tree they camped beneath in 1769. Palo
Alto incorporated in 1894 and the State of California
granted its first charter in 1909. The City has long been
known for its innovative people and its exploration of
ideas that have changed the world. In Palo Alto, our
history has always been about the future.
City of Palo Alto 250 Hamilton Avenue, Palo Alto, CA 94301 P 650.329.2100 W cityofpaloalto.org
City of Palo Alto (ID # 7347)
Finance Committee Staff Report
Report Type: Action Items Meeting Date: 11/15/2016
City of Palo Alto Page 1
Summary Title: Development Services Cost of Services Study
Title: Development Services Cost of Services Study Including Fiscal Year 2017
Fee Proposals
From: City Manager
Lead Department: Development Services Department
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Finance Committee recommend that the City Council adopt an
ordinance amending to Development Services Municipal Fees as described in Attachment A,
based on the completion of a Cost of Services Study (Attachment B) and adjusted by the annual
inflator applied to Municipal Fees from Fiscal Year 2016 to Fiscal Year 2017.
Executive Summary
The Development Services Department (DSD) undertook a Cost of Services Study in 2015 to
evaluate development related service fees incurred by applicants seeking a construction related
permit. These fees had not been reevaluated for many years, and the resulting
recommendations -- if approved -- would increase fee revenues and lower General Fund
subsidies consistent with the Cost Recovery Policy adopted by the City Council in May 2015.
The proposed changes would amend the fee schedule to reflect current International Code
Council (ICC) unit fee schedule structures and the City’s Green Building and Energy Ordinances
by eliminating some fees, proposing new fees, consolidating or expanding others, and adjusting
certain fees to a single flat-fee per permit. The City Council has the discretion to determine the
level of cost recovery for each of these fees. However, under State law, fees cannot be set
above the cost of service.
The consultant report is discussed in detail below, and the recommended fee changes
(Attachment A) and the full text of the consultant report (Attachment B) are attached. This
study was completed based on Fy2016 data, therefore an annual inflation value of 5.5%, as
recommended by the Office of Management and Budget for all Citywide fees in Fiscal Year
2017, is not included in the fees detailed in Attachment A but staff does recommend that this
increase be applied to all Development Services related fees in order to capture their cost in FY
2017 and included as part of the final ordinance action for City Council consideration.
City of Palo Alto Page 2
Background
In July 2010, the City Manager launched the comprehensive “Development Center Blueprint”
(Blueprint) project to restructure and adopt more holistic approaches to integrated
development review, permitting services, and staff coordination in order to improve
organizational efficiencies and minimize unnecessary costs and delays to customers. Since the
inception of the Blueprint, DSD has implemented new technologies, acquired additional space,
upgraded the existing space, and consolidated into a central department, that consists of
Building (formerly within the Planning department), Planning, Public Works, and Fire Prevention
divisions. Development Services is now a “one-stop” shop, located in a leased space across
from City Hall. Design development projects now have a single point of contact that facilitates
the customers’ experience throughout the permitting and construction process.
As part of the Fiscal Year 2014 Adopted Budget, and in efforts to better align the budget with
the current operational structure, the City Council created the Development Services
Department. Development Services embodies all development-related activities, including staff
allocations, resources, and associated service fees across multiple departments. The operating
budget currently relies on development review fees, permitting fees, and a subsidy from the
General Fund. Though the fees have been adjusted annually for inflation factors, it has been at
least five years since the fee schedule and structure were last subject to a full evaluation.
The Development Services Department is made up of key representatives from four different
departments including the Building, Planning, Public Works, and Fire divisions. These
representatives are physically stationed at the Development Center (285 Hamilton Avenue) or
elsewhere in the City, and provide development-related services to applicants seeking a
construction-related permit. In the current budget structure, representatives are allocated
proportionally to Development Services based on their time involved in the review process.
Approximately 80 employees are fully or fractionally budgeted to the department, resulting in a
total of 40 FTE. For example, Development Services has watershed protection representatives
in the Public Works department and transportation planners in the Planning department that
review building permits. In addition to personnel costs, Development Services has specific
overhead and indirect
charges such as the rent,
administrative functions,
and city support services
like Administrative Services,
City Attorney, and Human
Resources that must also
be accounted for. As a
department that operates
based on fee revenues, the
incoming fees must offset
all expenses which include
City of Palo Alto Page 3
personnel, overhead, and indirect charges.
On May 18, 2015 the City Council adopted the User Fee Recovery Level Policy (CMR 5735) that
suggests levels of cost recovery (high, medium, and low) based upon policy considerations. As
referenced in the table below, activities in which participants receive most or all of the benefit
from the service provided (i.e. issuance of building permits), or which are regulatory in nature,
fall within the “high” cost recovery level group.
The City retained the services of Capital Accounting Partners (CAP) to complete a cost of
services study to identify the total cost of providing services for which the City charges fees,
Phase I of which is included as Attachment D. CAP has prepared hundreds of cost allocation
plans for cities, counties and special districts throughout California, Texas, Washington and
more. Some of their clients include San Diego, Glendale, Los Gatos, Santa Barbara, Burbank and
Sacramento. Dan Edds is a project manager with CAP and has more than 15 years of experience
consulting within the public sector. His operational improvement work has involved problem
solving and process improvement opportunities for core business processes.
CAP uses an activity-based costing model to calculate the cost of a specific service (detailed
further in Attachment D), which identifies activities in an organization and assigns the cost of
each activity with resources to all services according to the consumption by each. The model
assigns direct and indirect costs to each fee, and therefore, calculates the cost of each fee at full
cost recovery. As discussed below, Phase I of the study includes recommendations for the
Department’s flat fees only.
Discussion
Fees and Fee Structure:
Development Services fees are structured in two ways: flat or project valuation-based. Based
on estimated FY 2016 revenues, approximately 75%, or $8.6 million, of departmental revenue is
derived from project valuation-based fees. Major project valuation-based fees include the
Building Permit and Plan Check fees. Industry practice correlates the valuation of a job to its
complexity, in the aggregate, and as such fees are calculated based on a percentage of a
projects valuation. Currently, the department uses the construction value for labor and
materials of the permitted work as the basis for determining the total Building Permit fee. An
additional Plan Check fee is assessed on top of the Building Permit, which is based on a
percentage of the total Permit fee. The Plan Check fee is intended to recover costs associated
with the Building, Fire & Life Safety, Zoning, and Public Works review of applicant plan
submittals. In contrast, flat rate fees are fees costed based on time and materials and activity
levels. These fees comprise the remaining Development Services revenue. The following
represents the projected breakdown of FY 2016 revenues evaluated as part of the fee study, at
current fee levels:
City of Palo Alto Page 4
FY 2016 Development Services Projected Revenue
Fee Study Project Steps and Process:
CAP was tasked to prepare a detailed cost analysis of its Development Services user fees with
the objective of ensuring that the Development Services Department is fully accounting for all
costs and recovering adequate revenues to cover expenses. Based on the current organizational
structure, CAP developed a costing model to analyze the total cost of fee generating services
and recommend adjustments necessary to reach full recovery.
As the study progressed, it was determined that additional data points were necessary to
recommend adjustments for valuation-based fee activities. Therefore, the report includes only
a high-level assessment of aggregated building permit and plan check activities. Staff is
currently in the process of implementing new data collection fields in the permit system and is
expanding the existing study to include a survey of other comparable City valuation tables and
alternative permit fee structures for what are currently valuation-based fees.
The study conducted by CAP for all Non-Valuation-based fees, or “flat rate” fees as referenced
earlier in this report, utilized an activity-based costing model to calculate the full cost of
providing specific services. This methodology identifies activities in an organization and assigns
the cost of each activity with resources to all services according to the consumption by each.
The model assigns direct and indirect costs to each fee, where all proposed fees have been
calculated at full recovery. A summary of how CAP builds cost structures follows:
1. Direct Costs
Through meetings with staff, CAP identified all direct staff time spent on fee-related activities
or services, where direct time is indicative of workers who are directly involved with activities
of a specific fee or service. Average salaries and the City Standard productive rate of 1,600
hours/year were used for these calculations. Additionally, CAP identified other operational
costs that are directly attributed to certain services, such as the Department’s use of on-call
consultants for inspections in the Building and Fire divisions.
City of Palo Alto Page 5
2. Indirect Costs (citywide administration)
These costs include processes that support, but do not directly apply to any specific activity or
fee, such as the Citywide and Departmental Overhead. The Citywide overhead costs are
allocated to departments based on the City’s Cost Allocation Plan. These represent expenses of
supporting departments including the offices of the City Manager, City Attorney, City Auditor,
City Clerk, Administrative Services, Human Resources, Information Technology, and Facilities
Maintenance.
3. Overhead (departmental administration)
Department Overhead is represented in two aspects: 1) Development Services as a whole; and
2) Divisional Overhead. Development Services overhead includes the salaries of the Director,
the Director’s Administrative Assistant, and the Senior Management Analyst, as well as rent,
and other supplies commonly used by all divisions of the department (Building, Planning, Public
Works, and Fire Prevention). These are not assigned to any particular service, but are allocated
to all fees since these professionals support all the activities of the department as a whole.
The Divisional Overhead represents costs associated with managers, supervisors, and support
staff and common purpose operational costs of the Public Works, Planning, and Fire
Departments. For example, direct staff is allocated as a percentage of an FTE to Development
Services based upon activity levels for Public Works, while divisional overhead which reflects
the Public Works administrative costs such as budget, contract, and executive leadership costs
are calculated as a rate that is applied to the salaries allocated to Development services and
executed through a year-end adjustment. The rate assumes that the same level of
administrative support provided to the Public Works Department is provided to the Public
Works division within Development Services. These are not assigned to any particular service,
but are allocated to all fees in the respective division.
4. Reserve
A reserve fund provides a mechanism to finance future unanticipated events and other
identified or planned needs of the department. For purposes of the calculation, the reserve
amount is allocated to all fees, similar to Overhead. As part of the study, the consultant
recommended that the City set a specific reserve policy, however included an optional common
practice to build 6-12 months of operating expenses over a three year period. The original
consultant study incorporates a $2.3 million reserve within the cost structure of the
department, where results show the full cost of fees with and without a reserve. However, due
to the recommended significant changes to move closer towards cost recovery, and the delay
necessary to adjust valuation-based fees, staff does not recommend the establishment of a
reserve at this time. As such, the proposed fees presented in Attachment A do not include any
assumption for reserve costs.
Projections:
The study indicates a total projected General Fund subsidy in FY 2016 of $1,787,985, excluding
City of Palo Alto Page 6
impacts of one-time activities, such as deferred revenue for large projects and expense savings.
Once adjusted for one-time revenues, the net general fund subsidy in FY 2016 is approximately
$294,000.
Drivers of Cost Recovery Variances:
Staff believes the following to be key drivers for cost recovery variances within the Public
Works, Planning, and Fire Prevention divisions:
1. Length of time since last comprehensive Fee Study. While fees have been adjusted annually
for inflation factors, it has been at least five years since the fee schedule and structure were last
subject to a full evaluation.
2. Fee levels in Planning, Public Works, and Fire have historically been set below full cost
recovery.
3. As part of the creation of Development Services, the cost structure for Planning, Public
Works, and Fire divisions has significantly changed. For example, divisions are now responsible
for overhead allocations such as rent, Development Services managerial staff, and other
commonly used operating expenses (e.g. scanning services, office supplies, etc.).
Findings & Recommendations:
Modifications to flat fees, representing approximately 25% or $2.7 million of departmental
revenues, are representative of current resources, activities, and activity levels, as well as
changes to California Building and Fire Codes, and/or state mandates. Recommended
modifications to fees included re-naming fees, altering tiered fees and triggers, removing, and
creating new fees. The proposed fees, including a description of changes where applicable, are
included as Attachment A (excluding the recommended 5.5% increase to align with FY 2017
costs).
Fire Prevention
The largest impact of the Fee Study is anticipated in the Fire Prevention Division. Fire
Prevention fees have historically been set below cost recovery, or were provided at no cost,
and a complete fee study or evaluation has not been completed in at least five years. Further,
as part of creating Development Services, all Fire Prevention staff and associated costs were
moved to Development Services offices resulting in the need for additional space. Moving Fire
Prevention entirely out of the Fire Department and into Development Services means that this
division is now subject to a different cost structure that includes overhead allocations such as
rent, Development Services managerial staff, and other commonly used operating expenses
(e.g. scanning services, office supplies, etc.).
All fees in Fire Prevention were calculated according to the consultant’s activity-based model,
where fees have been proposed at full cost based on current activities, activity levels, and
City of Palo Alto Page 7
proposed resources. These proposed fees are included in the fee study and are proposed to be
increased as recommended by CAP.
Public Works
Public Works, like Planning, has a host of fees. However, many of their fees can be applied to
both development and non-development-related work. The differentiating factor is that
development-related work is entirely the result of private development. For example, a
commercial developer has to apply for a street work permit to work in the right-of-way. That is
entirely due to the impacts associated with their project. That work is driven by private
interests and it has been the direction from Council to ensure that those fees are set at full cost
recovery. Those fees are collected by and reside in Development Services as do the subsequent
direct, indirect and overhead Public Works costs associated with providing those services.
For purposes of this study, private development work is separate and distinct from non-
development related work. Therefore, those services and fees are provided by Public Works as
a whole, and the fees are set by Public Works as a whole through the Public Works
departmental municipal fee schedule. Public Works, with direction from the City Council,
decides how close to full cost recovery they should set those fees. The CAP study did include
analysis of the Public Works Department, however, subsequent to the kick-off of the consultant
study, updated analysis on staff allocations, time estimates, and fee volumes were obtained
and staff was unable to incorporate this more current data into the consultant’s final results.
Therefore, Public Works municipal fee proposals included as part of the development of the
Adopted Fiscal Year 2017 Municipal Fee Schedule are reflective of a full cost recovery model,
however, were not reflective of the specific methodologies and assumptions used in the CAP
study. The FY 2017 Adopted Fees utilized the Questica Calculator launched by the Office of
Management and Budget as opposed to those fees recommended in the CAP study. The
Adopted amendments to Public Works’ fees in the Development Services Department
represent significant recommended increases from the 2016 fees, and are expected to bring
the Public Works fees much closer to cost recovery. As part of the FY 2018 budget process, the
Office of Management and Budget, Development Services and Public Works will review these
fees and ensure they are at full cost recovery and/or bring forward recommended adjustments
to the fees and appropriate based on FY 2017 actual activity levels and estimated FY 2018 costs.
Building
Non-valuation fees were updated to reflect current ICC unit fee schedule structures, per
California State code. Similar to Fire Prevention, a complete fee study or evaluation has not
been completed in the last five years, and all fees are proposed at full cost according to the
consultant’s activity based model and current activities, activity levels, and resources.
The most significant changes recommended within the Building division are a result of
restructuring Mechanical, Plumbing, and Electric Permit fees. These fees are charged in
conjunction with the Building Permit and generally charge a Base Fee (representing
administrative costs to process) and new or remodeled supplemental fee (based on square
City of Palo Alto Page 8
footage and representative of inspection costs). As a result of the study, current processing and
inspection times have both decreased. At full cost, the base fee is proposed to decrease to $82,
from $92, and the square footage fee to decrease to $0.02, from $0.11 per square foot.
Mechanical, Plumbing, and Electric fees can also be charged as stand-alone permits. These fees
are structured as a Base fee (representing administrative costs to process) plus a supplemental
permit fee (representing inspection costs). The base fee is proposed to decrease to $82 from
$92 as stated above, where the unit of measure for the supplemental permit is proposed to
change from “each” to “per permit”. The current unit of measure is reflective of time estimates
for each incremental measure of an activity, such as the inspection of each individual light
fixture or switch at $0.50/each. Determining the incremental unit of time is incredibly difficult,
hard to justify, and is no longer a method promoted by ICC. As such, Development Services has
revised these fees on a per permit basis, using time estimates of an average project (5,000 sq.
ft.). In the case of the light fixture, the permit would be issued at a total cost of $82 for the
Base Fee, representing administrative processing costs, plus $68 for the inspection of any
number of light fixtures.
Green Building
Development Services continues to expand and develop the Green Building program in efforts
to follow the City Council’s lead and maintain a leadership role in environmental sustainability.
Fees were updated and new fees implemented to comply with State mandates, such as a
Landscape review and permit management, as well as the current Green Building and Energy
Ordinance. The cost structure of these fees includes consulting services associated with the
integration and management of sustainable building practices and policies, Landscape review
and permit management, as well as staff training, quality control, reporting, and informational
outreach to the community.
Use & Occupancy
Use & Occupancy fees were included in the study; however, staff does not propose to adjust
these fees at this time. These fees will be studied separately with the integration of the
Business Registry fee where staff anticipates that drivers to calculate cost, such as activities and
resources, will change as the program is developed.
Next Steps:
Development Services strives to operate as a revenue-supported department within the
General Fund with the ultimate goal of being an enterprise fund. The ultimate goal of
Development Services is to reach full cost recovery in all divisions and the adoption of the Fees
outlined in Attachment A represents the next step towards this goal of full cost recovery.
The department will continue to track revenues and expenditures at a divisional level through
Fiscal Year 2017 in order to analyze their cost-recovery performance and will work
collaboratively with the Office of Management and Budget, and the City Attorney’s Office to
identify and define a reserve policy that is appropriate and specific to the Development
City of Palo Alto Page 9
Services. Staff anticipates returning to City Council with iterative recommendations, including
adjustments to valuation-based fees and the inclusion of reserve costs, through subsequent
budget processes.
Resource Impact
The actions recommended in this report would increase the estimated revenue generated by
the Development Service Department flat fee activities. Given the changing economic
environment and the unknown potential impacts of the increases on activity levels (estimated
to be minor), no adjustment to the budget is assumed. Revenue collections will be monitored
and factored into the annual development of the budget as data is availabe and adjustments
are found to be necessary.
Environmental Review
Adoption of an ordinance amending Development Services Municipal Fees is not a project for
the purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and therefore no
environmental review is necessary.
Attachments:
Attachment A_Municipal Fee Proposals (PDF)
Attachment B_CAP Cost of Services Study (PDF)
FY 2016 Fee Proposed Fee Total
Surcharge/(Subsidy)Notes
Administration
Business Registry
Business Registry Fee $50.00 per business $50.00 per business No Change Business Registry fees
studied separately
Building
Building Permit Fees
A. $1.00 - $1,000.00 $69.20 base fee
B. $1,000.01 - $2,000.00 $69.20 for the first $1,000.00 plus $5.47 for each additional
$100.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000.00
C. $2,000.01 - $25,000.00 $123.91 for the first $2,000.00 plus $25.03 for each additional
$1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including
$25,000.00
D. $25,000.01 - $50,000.00 $699.59 for the first $25,000.00 plus $18.58 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including
$50,000.00
E. $50,000.01 - $100,000.00 $1,163.98 for the first $50,000.00 plus $12.50 for each additional
$1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including
$100,000.00
F. $100,000.01 - $500,000.00 $1,789.20 for the first $100,000.00 plus $10.03 for each additional
$1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including
$500,000.00
G. $500,000.01 - $1,000,000.00 $5,800.59 for the first $500,000.00 plus $8.52 for each additional
$1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including
$1,000,000.00
H. $1,000,000.01 and Up
$10,058.55 for the first $1,000,000.00 plus $6.72 for each additional
$1,000.00 or fraction thereof
If valuation exceeds $5,000,000.00, an alternative fee arrangement
may be established by the Chief Building Official to achieve full cost
recovery
I. Building Demolition Permit $320.00 (does not include C&D fees)$386 ($66)
J. Commercial Interior Non-Structural Demolition Permit $194.00 (does not include C&D fees)$175 $19
Construction & Demolition
Commercial and Multi-Family Projects greater than or equal to $25,000.00 in Valuation1 $238.00 per permit $369 ($131)
Single Family and Two Family Projects greater than
$25,000.00 and less than $75,000.00 in Valuations1 $80.00 per permit $154 ($74)
Single Family and Two Family Projects greater than
$75,000.00 in Valuation1 $212.00 per permit $225 ($13)
Electrical Permits
Base Fee $92.00 per permit $82 $10
New or Remodeled Square Footage $0.11 per square foot $0.02 $0.09
Air Conditioners $29.00 per unit $81 ($52)
Air Cooled or Oil Cooled Lighting and/or Power Transformer Each KVA shall be considered as one horsepower and charged for
as per motor schedule Delete Not actively charged
Conditional Utility Agreement $252.00 each $237 $15
Busway, Power Duct, or Floor Duct Per Foot $0.50 each $68
Each Additional Meter $5.00 each $68
Fixtures, Switches, and Outlets $1.00 each $68
Lighting, Power and/or Control Panel Board, Switchboard Cabinet or Panel $5.00 each $68
Motor $23.00 each $68
Motor Generator $3.00 per KVA $68
Range, Electric Clothes Dryer, or Water Heater $5.00 each $68
Special Circuit (Not Listed Herein)$5.00 each $68
Service Conductor/Switch - Greater than 800 ampre $40.00 each $243 ($203)
Service Conductor/Switch - Less than 200 ampre $18.00 each $122 ($104)
Service Conductor/Switch - Less than 800 ampre $29.00 each $162 ($133)
Temporary Power Pole $56.00 each $68 ($12)
Temporary Wiring for Construction $56.00 each $68 ($12)
Electrical Permits - Electrical Vehicle Charging Stations
Commercial (Level 1 and 2)$370.00 $382 ($12)
plus $92.50 for each additional station $74 $18
Commercial (Level 3 and 4)$560.00 $464 $96
plus $140.00 for each additional station $91 $49
Residential (All Types)$160.00 per station Delete
Residential (Level 1 and 2)$168 Add
Residential (Level 3)$236 Add
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
No change to Valuation Table DSD to complete
separate study
Restructured to a single
flat-fee per permit
Converted to a multi-level
fee.
Attachment A
FY 2016 Fee Proposed Fee Total
Surcharge/(Subsidy)Notes
Electrical Permits - Photovoltaic Systems
Residential System $311.00 each Delete
Residential Systems (less than 10kW)$81 Add
Residential Systems (greater than 10kW)$304 Add
Commercial System (less than 10 kW)$565.00 each $537 $28
Commercial System (10kW - 49kW)$850.00 each $805 $45
Commercial System (greater than 49kW)$900.00 each $873 $27
General & Miscellaneous Fees
Address Change $224.00 single address; $356 ($132)
$112.00 each additional address $171 ($59)
All Other Publications $16.00 each No Change
Construction/Maintenance Vehicles $76.00 per space per week No Change
Electric Service and Safety Inspection $84.00 per hour $151 ($67)
Extension of Building Permit or Building Permit Application $56.00 per application $86 ($30)
Inspections and Investigations - Outside Normal Business Hours
Note: Inspections and investigations outside normal business hours (2- hour minimum).$202.00 per 1.5x OT hour; $365 ($163)
$226.00 per 2.0x OT hour $486 ($260)
Inspections and Investigations - Unclassified
Note: Inspections and investigations for which no fee is specifically indicated (2-hour minimum).$163.00 per hour $228 ($65)
Reactivation of Expired Building Permit $168.00 per permit plus Plan Check Fees as applicable $189 ($21)
Reactivation of Expired Building Permit - All Others 50% of original Building Permit Fee not to exceed the full cost to
perform remaining inspections as determined by the Chief Building
Official
No Change
Reactivation of Expired Building Permit - Final Inspection Only $375.00 or 50% of original Building Permit Fee, whichever is less $253 $122
Real Property Research Fee (1-hour minimum)$127.00 per hour $243 ($116)
Records Retention $4.00 per plan sheet $6 ($2)
Reinspection Fee - Multi-Family Residential and Non- Residential $308.00 each $281 $27
Reinspection Fee - Single Family Residential $84.00 each secondary inspection type;$220 ($136)
$308.00 each primary inspection type $281 $27
Request for Release of Building Plans $45.00 each $76 ($31)
Residential Inspection GuidelinesNote: Available free online $33.00 each No Change
Green Building
Residential - Single Family and Two Family New Construction1
Note: New construction plus additions greater than 1,250 sq. ft. and rebuilds.$677.00 per review Delete
New Single Family $1,373 Add
Residential - Existing Home Renovations, Rebuilds, and/or Additions
Note: Any existing home renovation, rebuilds, and/or additions greater than 250 sq. ft. and less than
1,250 sq. ft. and/or greater than
$100,000.00 valuation.
$56.00 per review Delete
Residential - Multi-Family Renovations or Alterations
Note: Renovations or alterations greater than 50% of the existing unit sq. ft. and that include
replacement or alteration of at least of the following: HVAC system, building envelope, hot water system,
or lighting system.
$1,190.00 per review Delete
Alterations and additions for single and multifamily < 1,000 sq ft and increases conditioned
space $1,097 Add
Alterations and additions for single and multifamily > 1,000 sq ft $1,232 Add
Residential - Multi-Family New Construction of Three or More Units (attached)$1,190.00 (1-10 units); $1,388.00 (11-24 units); $1,687.00 (25 units
or more)Delete
Multi Family New Construction of 3 or More (attached) Units $1,508 Add
Multi Family New Construction of < 4 $1,238 Add
Non-Residential - New Construction1
Note: New construction plus additions greater than 1,000 sq. ft. and rebuilds.$1,495.00 per review Delete
New commercial 1000 - 25,000 SF $1,778 Add
New commercial 25,001-50,000 SF $2,048 Add
New commercial >50,000 SF $2,183 Add
Non-Residential - Tenant Improvements, Renovations, or Alterations (greater than 5,000 sq.
ft)
Note: Any existing tenant improvement, renovation, rebuilds, and/or additions greater than 5,000 sq. ft.
that include replacement or alteration of at least two of the following: HVAC system, building envelope,
hot water system, or lighting system.
$976.00 per review Delete
Tenant improvements, renovations, or alterations > 5,000 sq ft
Note: includes replacement or alteration of at least two of the following: HVAC system, building envelope,
hot water system, or lighting system and project value greater than $200,000.$1,508 Add
Tenant improvements, renovations or alterations > $200,000 in valuation (and not triggered
by a Calgreen Tier) $1,238 Add
Non-Residential - Tenant Improvements, Renovations, or Alterations (greater than $100,000
valuation)
Note: Any existing tenant improvement, renovation, or alterations greater than $100,000.00 in valuation
and/or landscape renovations 21,000 sq. ft.
$357.00 per review Delete
If the project is over $100,000 Energy Star is required after 12 months of occupancy $698 Add
Landscape Plan Review - Single Family Residential $894 NEW
Landscape Plan Review - Non-Residential & Multi-Family $1,453 NEW
Landscape Inspection $218 NEW
Converted to a multi-level
fee.
Green Building Fees have been updated in
accordance with the current Green Building and
Energy Ordinance.
Necessary to provide
services and compliance
with the Emergency
Building Standards for
Outdoor Potable Water
FY 2016 Fee Proposed Fee Total
Surcharge/(Subsidy)Notes
Mechanical Permits
Base Fee $92.00 per permit $82 $10
New or Remodeled Square Footage $0.11 per square foot $0.02 $0.09
Flue $5.00 each Delete
Furnace and Flue $28.00 each Delete
Furance, Flue, and Associated Ducts $163 Add
Boiler (Certified Design)$28.00 each Delete
Boilers, Compressors, and Absoprtion Systems:
For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compresor up to 30 hp, or each
absopration system up to and including 1,000,000 Btu/h $109 Add
For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor exceeding 30 hp, or each
absorption system exceeding 1,000,000 Btu/h $163 Add
Air Conditioner or Heat Pump $28.00 each Delete
Duct Outlet $0.50 each Delete
Air Handlers up to and including 10,000 cfm $54 Add
Exhaust Hood - Kitchen or Industrial $28.00 each Delete
Vent Fan (Bath, Dryer, Residential Kitchen)$11.00 each Delete
Ventilation and Exhaust $54 Add
Fire Damper $5.00 each Delete
Miscellaneous
For each appliance or piece of equipment regulated by this code, but not classed in other appliance
categories, or for which no other fee is listed
$54 Add
Process Piping System $28.00 each $54 ($26)
Process Piping System - Hazardous $56.00 each $130 ($74)
Swimming Pool Heater $28.00 each $65 ($37)
Evaporative Cooler $28.00 each Delete Not actively charged
Plan Review Fees
Additional Plan Review
Note: Required by changes, additions, or revisions to plans including Alternative Means and Methods (2-
hour minimum). For Elective (3rd party) and over-the-counter reviews (half hour minimum).$191.00 per hour $201 ($10)
Certified Access Specialist (CASp) Review/Consultation Actual cost of CASp Consultant plus 15%$262
Building Plan Check 80% of Building Permit fee
Elective Plan Check 35% of Building Plan Check fee
Fire and Life Safety Plan Check 45% of Building Permit fee
Public Works Plan Check 12% of Building Permit fee
Zoning Plan Check 30% of Building Permit fee
Plumbing Permits
Base Fee $92.00 per permit $82 $10
New or Remodeled Square Footage $0.11 per square foot $0.02 $0.09
Plumbing Fixtures $3.00 each Delete
Plumbing Fixtures:
For each plumbing fixture on one trap or a set of fixtures on one trap (including water, drainage piping,
and backflow protection therefore)$81 Add
Commercial/Industrial Sewer $28.00 each Delete
Residential Sewer $11.00 each Delete
Plumbing Fixtures:
For each building sewer $130 Add
Rain Water System $5.00 each Delete
Rain Water Systems $81 Add
Water Heater $5.00 each Delete
Water Heater, Vent, or Other $97 Add
Gas Outlet $5.00 each Delete
Radiant Heat Piping System $28.00 each Delete
Gas Piping System $195 Add
Industrial Waste System $28.00 each Delete
Industrial Waste Pretreatment Interceptor
(including trap and vent, except kitchen-type grease interceptors functioninga fixture traps)$195 Add
Water Piping System or Repair $5.00 each Delete
Water Piping
Installation, alteration or repair of water piping, water treatment equipment or both.$97 Add
Solar Hot Water System
Note: Does not include Plan Check fee.$224.00 each $195 $29
Storm Drain System $28.00 each $195 ($167)
Swimming Pool $28.00 each $65 ($37)
Atmospheric-type Vaccume Breakers $97 New
Backflow protective device other than atmospheric-type $195 New
Medical Gas Piping Systems $195 New
Plumbing Permits - Graywater Systems
Clotheswasher System $56.00 each $81 ($25)
Complex System $88.00 plus plan review at cost $195 ($107)
Simple System $61.00 plus plan review at cost $81 ($20)
Restructured to a single
flat-fee per permit and re-
named to be consistent
with ICC permit fee tables
Reflective of curent ICC
tables and activities for which no other fee
currently exists.
Plumbing Fees have been updated to reflect
current ICC table 114.1 unit fee schedule
structure, per California state plumbing code.
Mechanical Fees have been updated to reflect
current ICC table 114.1 unit fee schedule
structure, per California state mechanical code.
Restructured to a single
flat-fee per permit and re-
named to be consistent
with ICC permit fee tables
No Change to Plan Check
Permit Fees
FY 2016 Fee Proposed Fee Total
Surcharge/(Subsidy)Notes
SB 1473 Fee
A. $1.00 - $25,000.00 Permit Valuation $1.00 per valuation increment
B. $25,001.00 - $50,000.00 Permit Valuation $2.00 per valuation increment
C. $50,001.00 - $75,000.00 Permit Valuation $3.00 per valuation increment
D. $75,001.00 - $100,000.00 Permit Valuation $4.00 per valuation increment
E. Each $25,000.00 Increment or Fraction Thereof Above
$100,000.00 Add $1.00 per valuation increment
F. Minimum $1.00 minimum
Strong Motion Instrument Program
Commercial $28.00 per $100,000.00 permit valuation ($0.50 minimum)
Residential $13.00 per $100,000.00 permit valuation ($0.50 minimum)
Use & Occupancy Permits
Certificate of Use and Occupancy $287.00 each
Certificate of Use and Occupancy - Replacement $123.00 each
SB 1186 Mandated FeeNote: Does not include fees collected by the Fire Department.$1.00 each No Change State mandated
Temporary Occupancy Permit - Multi-Family Residential, Non-Residential, and Other
Commercial $896.00 each $602 $294
Temporary Occupancy Permit - Single Family Residential and Commercial Tenant
Improvement less than 10,000 sq. ft.$375.00 each $445 ($70)
Fire Prevention
Compliance Fees
Emergency Response Fee - Hazmat (PAMC 17.24.050)Up to $1,212.00 for each incident up to 100% cost recovery No Change
Installation or Closure Without Approved Plans and/or Permits $275.00 - $813.00 average fee range No Change
Documents
Emergency Planning Guide $253.00 each No Change
Long-term Offsite Document Storage $0.25 per page No Change
Microfilm Copy/Print $3.25 per blueprint page; $0.30 per specification/ calculation page No Change
Photographs $30.00 first print; $0.55 each additional print No Change
Hazardous Materials Classification Permits
Compressed Gas $139.00 annually $350 ($211)
Corrosives $139.00 annually $350 ($211)
Cryogenic Fluid $139.00 annually $350 ($211)
Flammable and Combustible Liquids $139.00 annually $350 ($211)
Flammable Gas $139.00 annually $350 ($211)
Flammable Solids $139.00 annually $350 ($211)
Health Hazard (Liquids & Solids)$139.00 annually $350 ($211)
Liquefied Petroleum Gases $139.00 annually $350 ($211)
Organic Coatings $175.00 annually $350 ($211)
Organic Peroxides $139.00 annually $350 ($211)
Ovens - Industrial Baking or Drying $102.00 annually $350 ($211)
Oxidizers (Liquids & Solids)$139.00 annually $350 ($211)
Oxidizing Gas $139.00 annually $350 ($211)
Pyrophoric Gas $139.00 annually $350 ($211)
Pyrophoric Materials (Liquids & Solids)$139.00 annually $350 ($211)
Pyrotechnical Special Effects Material $29.00 annually $350 ($211)
Radioactive Materials $139.00 annually $350 ($211)
Refrigeration Equipment $175.00 annually $350 ($211)
Spraying/Dipping $175.00 annually $350 ($211)
Toxic, Highly Toxic, Moderately Toxic, Health Hazard Gas
Note: Includes pesticides, fumigants, and etiologic agents.$139.00 annually $350 ($211)
Toxic, Highly Toxic, Moderately Toxic, Health Hazard Materials $139.00 annually $350 ($211)
Unstable Reactive Gas $139.00 annually $350 ($211)
Unstable Reactive Materials (Liquids & Solids)$139.00 annually $350 ($211)
Water Reactive Materials (Liquids & Solids)$139.00 annually $350 ($211)
Other Hazardous Materials - Unclassified
Note: Inspections and investigations for which no fee is specifically indicated (1-hour maximum).$350 NEW
General category to
include other hazardous materials not listed above
Tire Recapping/Tire Storage $575.00 annually $1,396 ($821)
No Change
These will be studied
separately, with the
integration of the Business Registry fee.
No Change State mandated
No Change State mandated
FY 2016 Fee Proposed Fee Total
Surcharge/(Subsidy)Notes
Hazardous Materials Storage Permits
Additional Approvals for Hazardous Materials Storage Permit Note: Additional approval for
permit to construct, temporary closure, permanent closure, otherwise modify a hazardous materials storage facility. See CEQA for additional fees.$356.00 per occurrence, plus $758 ($402)
$159.00 per hour for time above two hours $496 ($140)
Business Plan (HMBP)$256.00 per location annually $496 ($240)
Late Fee for Hazardous Materials Storage Permit 25% of total Hazerdous Material permit fee No Change
Level I Facility (Includes 1 hr of Inspection Time)
Note: Minimal storage as defined by having no hazardous materials over CFC permit amounts as
specified in CFC section 105.
$264.00 annually per location $350 ($86)
Level II Facility (Includes 2 hrs of Inspection Time)
Note: Quantities exceeding CFC permit threshold, but less than 50 gal., 500lbs or 200 cu. ft. Category
also includes dry cleaning, fixed medical gas, auto or aircraft repair, and service stations.
$404.00 annually per location plus other hazardous materials
classification permit if applicable $700 ($296)
Level III Facility (Includes 4 hours of Inspection Time)
Note: Quantities exceed 50 gal. 500lbs, or 200 cu. ft. and not categorized as Level II.$729.00 annually per location plus other hazardous materials classification permit if applicable $1,399 ($670)
Petroleum Aboveground Storage Tank (Includes 2hrs of Inspection Time)$593.00 annually $700 ($107)
Provisional/6 Month (Includes 2 hrs of Inspection Time)$186.00 plus other hazardous materials classification permit fees if
applicable $700 ($514)
Inspection Fees
Additional Inspection or Resinspection Fee $323.00 for up to 2 hours resinspection, plus $698 ($375)
$159.00 per hour (during business hours)$349 ($190)
After Hours Inspection Fee
Note: Fee for before or after normal business hours; weekends and holidays included. Fee is to be paid
in advance of inspection.
$165.00 per hour; 4 hour minimum $523 ($358)
Care Facility
Note: Includes community, child day care and residential care for the elderly (CFC 111.4). Excludes
residential elderly care facilities with six or fewer persons.$175.00 annually Delete Not actively charged
Care Facility Inspection Including Fire Clearance $73.00 for facilities with 7-14 clients; $349 ($276)
$140.00 for facilities with more than 14 clients $698 ($558)
Christmas Tree Lot/Pumpkin Patch $175.00 each $349 ($174)
$713.00 annually for up to 4 hours; plus $1,454 ($741)
$159.00 for each additional hour $349 ($190)
Outside Cooking Booths $198.00 each $523 ($325)
Standby Fire Watch (Per Person)$159.00 per hour $349 ($190)
Use and Occupancy Fire Inspection
$148.00 per inspection No Change
To be studied separately,
with the integration of the Business Registry fee
As-Built Plan Check and Additional Work
$698 New
Implemented to recover
costs for activity in which
no other permit currently
exists
Consultations
Additional Hours Over Plan Review/Inspection $155.00 each $276 ($121)Changing to a Per Hour
fee
Alternate Means and Methods Application (2 hr Maximum)$356.00 per application $657 ($301)
Appeals to Decisions $159.00 per hour $349 ($190)
Consultation Fee $166.00 per hour $349 ($183)
Hazardous Materials Data Entry Fee $77.00 per hour; 1 hour minimum Delete Not actively charged
Hydrant Flow Fee $165.00 per occurrence $349 ($184)
Prior Fee Range was 7-
25 clients & 25+
High Rise Building - Certificate of Compliance
Note: Certificate of compliance inspection for each high rise building which is required by state law to be inspected and certified annually as meeting minimum compliance with applicable state of California fire
and life safety standards for existing high rise buildings (CFC 111.4.3).
FY 2016 Fee Proposed Fee Total
Surcharge/(Subsidy)Notes
Life Safety & Fire Protection
Automatic Fire Sprinkler Installation/Modification:
1-19 Sprinkler Heads $356.00 $698 ($342)
19+ Sprinkler Heads (Includes Hydrostatic Test), plus additional per head fee $1,541
plus $1.80 per head $3 ($2)
Express Fire Protection Plan Check Fee $163.00 per occurrence No Change
Fire Alarm System Installation and Modification $356.00 plus $974 ($618)
$2.00 a device or contact point $21 ($19)
Fire and Life Safety Plan Check - Commercial
Note: Includes one inspection and reinspection.The Fire and Life Safety Plan Review Fee is 45% of the Building
Plan Check Fee and is collected by the Building Division at the time
an application of a Building Permit is submitted
No Change
Fire Protection and Fire Access Plan Review for New Single Family Dwellings or Additions $100.00 each $800 ($700)
Underground Fire Service Line
Note: Includes 4 hrs of Inspection & 1 hr of Plan Check $356.00 per occurrence $1,672 ($1,316)
Previously included one
inspection and one
reinspection
Hydrant/Appliance Installation or Modification $261.00 Delete
plus $59.00 per hydrant $174 ($115)
Other Automatic Fire Extinguishing System
Note: Includes hood and duct, FM 200, Inergen, and C02. If a system has a release panel, Fire Alarm
fees apply as well.$356.00 plus $7.25 per nozzle $974 ($618)
Site Disaster Planning $166.00 per hour $349 ($183)
Standpipe System - Wet, Dry, or Combination $208.00 per riser $698 ($490)
Temporary Certificate of Occupancy
$356.00 per occurrence No Change
To be studied separately,
with the integration of the
Business Registry fee.
Verification of Fire Protection System Maintenance and Certification $89.00 annually $78 $11
Food truck permits
$174 New
Implemented to recover
costs for activity in which
no other permit currently
exists
Multifamily dwellings, hotels & motels
4-50 units $349 New
51-100 units $698 New
Greater than 100 units $1,047 New
Fire Prevention Inspection of Private Schools $698 New
Specific Hazard Permits
Aerosol Products $102.00 annually $436 ($334)
Amusement Buildings $410.00 each $0 Delete Not actively charged
Automobile Wrecking Yard or Junk Yard $179.00 annually $0 Delete Not actively charged
Bowling Alley and Pin Refinishing Involving the use of Flammable Liquids $179.00 each $1,018 ($839)
Candles and Open Flames in Assembly Areas $142.00 annually $349 ($207)
Carnivals and Fairs $179.00 each $1,454 ($1,275)
Cellulose Nitrate Storage/Nitrate Film $102.00 annually $102 $0
Combustible Fiber/Material Storage $179.00 annually Delete Not actively charged
Confined Space $148.00 annually Delete Not actively charged
Dust Producing Devices $126.00 annually Delete Not actively charged
Excavate within 10 ft. of Flammable or Combustible Pipeline $88.00 each Delete Not actively charged
Explosive or Blasting Agents $102.00 annually Delete Not actively charged
Fireworks Display $565.00 each Delete Not actively charged
High-piled Combustible Storage $102.00 annually Delete Not actively charged
Hot Work (Welding) Operations $179.00 annually $349 ($170)Changing to a one-time
fee
Liquid or Gas-Fueled Powered Equipment/Generator $88.00 each $349 ($261)
Liquid or Gas-Fueled Vehicles or Equipment in Assembly Buildings $103.00 each Delete Not actively charged
Magnesium Working $103.00 annually Delete Not actively charged
Malls - Covered $103.00 annually $698 ($595)
Occupant Load Increase - Temporary Assembly $236.00 each $349 ($113)
Open Burning $236.00 each $349 ($113)
Open Flame/Flame Producing Devices $88.00 each $349 ($261)
Operate a Tank Vehicle to Transport Flammable/Combustible Liquids $102.00 annually $494 ($392)Changing to a per-vehicle
fee
Parade Float $115.00 per hour $350 ($211)
Place of Assembly $236.00 per occurrence $700 ($464)
Place of Public Assembly - Temporary $236.00 each $349 ($113)
Special Events Permit
$349 New
Implemented to recover
costs for activity in which
no other permit currently
exists
Tent or Air Supported Structure
Note: Tent or air-supported structure having an area in excess of 200 sq. ft. or canopies in excess of 400
sq. ft. Fee includes a public assembly permit of $125.00 for all tents.
$290.00 each $741 ($451)
Restructuring to a two-tier
fee
Restructuring to one per-
device fee to be charged
in conjunction with the
Underground Fire Service Line fee.
New Fee and Fee
Ranges implemented per
State mandate to inspect
these facilities
Capital Accounting Partners Page 1
Report – Development Services Fee Study
June 2016
CITY OF PALO
ALTO
Development Services
Department
CAPITAL ACCOUNTING PARTNERS, LLC
Daniel B Edds, MBA, PMP
3570 Buena Vista Dr.
Sacramento, Ca 95864
916.670.0001
danedds@mycapartner.com
Attachment B
Capital Accounting Partners Page 2
Contents
Development Services Department ........................................................................................................................... 3
Introduction and Scope ................................................................................................................................... 3
Summary of Costing Methodologies ............................................................................................................... 3
Assuring Quality Results .................................................................................................................................. 6
Quantitative ............................................................................................................................................. 6
Qualitative ................................................................................................................................................ 6
Summary of Results ................................................................................................................................................ 8
General Observations of Cost Recovery and Pricing ....................................................................................... 8
Valuation Based Fees ............................................................................................................................... 8
Modifications to the Fee Schedule ........................................................................................................... 9
Results ............................................................................................................................................................. 9
Projecting Revenues ................................................................................................................................. 9
Challenges to Accurately Projecting Revenues .......................................................................................10
Reasons Revenues Can Fail to Meet Expenses .......................................................................................10
Summary of Results by Division or Work Unit ...............................................................................................11
Why Differences in Recovery Levels? .....................................................................................................11
Observations and Recommendations ......................................................................................................................13
General Observations and Recommendations .......................................................................................13
What is Not Covered in this Analysis ......................................................................................................13
Assessing Valuation Based Fees .............................................................................................................13
Adjusting the Fee Schedule ....................................................................................................................13
Building Reserves ...................................................................................................................................14
Development Services Fee Table ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 15
Capital Accounting Partners Page 3
Development Services Department
The City’s Development Services Department is comprised of four divisions or functions:
1. Building;
2. Fire prevention;
3. Planning; and
4. Public works.
Together, they form a valuable resource for home owners, businesses, contractors, developers, and
citizens to build safe buildings that comply with the code requirements of the City. The long term
objective of the Department is to become an enterprise fund. Financially, this means that fees for its
various services must be sufficient to recover the cost of the Department.
Introduction and Scope
As part of its effort to manage its financial resources wisely, the City of Palo Alto engaged Capital
Accounting Partners to prepare a detailed cost analysis of its Development Services user fees. The City's
objectives for the study were to ensure that the Development Services Department is fully accounting
for all of its costs and recovering adequate revenues to cover its expenses.
The scope of this study included the following:
Review and update the fee schedule;
Calculate the total cost of fee generating services;
Calculate the cost of plan check and inspection services from valuation based fees;
Analyze cost recovery level;
Develop a cost model based on the current organizational structure;
Reviewing the results with staff; and
Provide recommendations or methodologies on how to adjust fees annually.
Summary of Costing Methodologies
Driver Based Costing Models
Developing driver based costing models is a detailed and robust method of calculating the cost of a
specific service. It is based on the principles of activity based costing so it seeks to understand cost at an
operational level. This means it relies on understanding the time staff invests in core business processes
to provide fee and non-fee services. This provides the ability to understand staff time and cost as each
Capital Accounting Partners Page 4
staff position participates in providing fee services. Graphically, the following figure illustrates this
methodology.
Hypothetical Illustration of a Driver Based Costing Model
Contributing Staff Process Steps Fee
Project Managers
Permit Intake
Plan Reviewer
Building Inspector
Chief Building Official
Plan Review
Inspection
7500 SF SFR
Zoning Code Review
Project Steps and Process
Step 1: Collect Data – This first step involves discussions with staff to identify those positions within the
department that provide and support direct services. It also involves collecting departmental budget and
expenditure data, identifying the salary and benefits for each position, and identifying non-personnel
expenditures, as well as any departmental and City wide overhead. Specifically, the steps involve the
following:
Identifying staff positions – This includes identifying both position titles and names.
Calculating the number of productive hours – For each position, vacation time, sick leave, paid
holidays, professional development (training), routine staff meetings, and daily work breaks are
deducted from the standard 2,080 annual hours. The result is a range of hours available for each
position on an annual basis. This range is typically 1,500 to 1,600 hours. Factors that influence
this range are length of service with the jurisdiction and local policies for holiday and personal
leave time. However, based on previous work with the City where the calculated number of
productive hours was almost exactly 1600 hours, and at the request of the Office of
Management and Finance, we set all positions at 1600 productive hours.
Identifying and allocating non-personnel costs – Costs for materials and supplies are allocated
to the salary and benefits for each position.
Capital Accounting Partners Page 5
Assigning any other expenses that are budgeted in other areas – There are often expenses that
should be included with the total cost of services. Examples of such costs might include
amortized capital expenses for vehicles and technology.
Identifying core business processes or activities – This step also involves discussions with staff
to understand, at an operational level, the work of the operating unit. Core business processes
used to provide services are identified and then defined by the tasks that are involved.
Processes are also organized by direct and indirect categories:
Direct processes and activities – Those processes that directly contribute to the processing of
an application or permit are first identified. Examples of a direct activity are building inspection,
application intake, and pre-application review.
Indirect processes and activities – Those processes that support, but do not directly apply to the
processing of a specific application or permit. An example of an indirect activity is customer
service or staff training to maintain certifications.
Step 2: Building cost structures – This second step involves significant interaction with staff and the
development of time estimates for both direct and indirect processes in each department. Specifically,
this step is at the core of the analysis. There are four processes that comprise this step:
Gathering time estimates for direct processes – By interviewing staff in individual and group
meetings, an estimate of time was assigned to each service by the process that is indicated. For the
most part, the processes included three primary steps:
Permit intake;
Plan review; and
Construction inspections.
In this analysis, staff time is estimated and assigned to each step. The sum of all the process steps is
the total time that is required to provide that specific service.
Assigning indirect and annual process time – An annual time estimate is gathered from staff for
those indirect or support processes in which they are involved. These may include activities such as
program administration, customer service, and department administration. These costs are
allocated to all services proportionately to all services provided by the department.
Calculating fully loaded hourly rates and the cost of service – Once the total time for each direct
and indirect service is estimated, the cost of service is calculated by using the fully loaded hourly
rates for each staff member or position that is involved with the service. The fully loaded hourly
rate for each employee is based on the employee's salary and benefit costs plus a share of non-
personnel and City overhead costs divided by the employee's available work hours (i.e. 2,080 hours
minus all leave hours). Thus, the direct and indirect cost by activity also includes departmental and
citywide overhead as well as non-labor costs. The source of City indirect costs and non-personnel
costs is from the annual budget or cost allocation that has been established by the City.
Gathering activity or volume data – A critical element in the analysis is the number of times a given
service is provided on an annual basis. This is critical data for three reasons:
It allows a calculated projection of current revenue based on current prices. This is compared
with actual revenue to see if there is a close match as the data should match.
Capital Accounting Partners Page 6
It allows for a calculated projection of revenue at full cost. This is compared to actual
expenditures to see if there is a close match as the data should match.
It allows for a calculation of total hours consumed. Hours consumed must closely match actual
hours available.
If any of the three calculations do not approximate actual numbers, then time estimates and/or volume
data need to be re-evaluated. These are critical quality checks for costing accuracy.
Step 3: Calculating the full cost of services – This third step calculates the full cost of service for each
direct service in the department. In the previous step, the cost of service was calculated for each direct
and indirect service. In this step, the cost layers are brought together to establish the full cost of service
for a specific direct service, program, or activity. As previously mentioned the cost of each direct service
is calculated. To determine the full cost of service, the cost of indirect services is allocated to each direct
service. The indirect services costs are allocated to each direct service based on each direct services
proportion of labor spent processing each permit and application. By summing the direct and allocated
indirect costs and multiplying that by the activity data, a total cost of service is calculated for both an
individual service and the operating unit as a whole.
Step 4: Set fees
Based on any new, existing, or revised cost recovery policies, the recommended fees can be established.
The recommended fees will be established based on City staff recommendations and Council discussion
in the future. The fee analyses in this report are based on full cost recovery.
Assuring Quality Results
In our analysis we utilize both quantitative and qualitative tests for quality.
Quantitative
Our process incorporates substantial input from both individuals and groups. Our belief is that we get
the best data from group interviews. For example, in determining how much time is required for any
specific type of building inspection, we want to hear the perspective of an inspector, of the inspector
supervisor, and the counter tech or project manager. Each will have a perspective. Each will contribute
value to the estimate. When all perspectives agree, we gave have a good sense of confidence in our
results.
Qualitative
We also utilize four qualitative measure of quality data. When each of these measures match and there
are no major disagreements with the qualitative assessment, we have significant confidence in our
results. These qualitative measures are:
Quantitative Analysis Targeted Margin of Error
1) Budgeted expenses entering the cost models must equal total expenses accounted for in the
costing model.
0%
2) Projected revenue from fees must closely match actual revenue from fees. + or – 5%-10%
Capital Accounting Partners Page 7
3) Available staff time must be fully accounted for in the costing models. 0%
4) Total revenues from fees and contributions from the general fund or other sources must match
total expenses.
0%
Capital Accounting Partners Page 8
Summary of Results
General Observations of Cost Recovery and Pricing
In general, our results suggest that on average, Development Services has a level of cost recovery that
almost covers its budgeted costs. However, our results also show some services are over recovering costs
while other services are significantly under recovering cost. From our experience, this is fairly normal.
One important result of a fee study is the “right sizing” of fees and a rebalancing of fees. The State of
California requires that fees be in proportion to costs.
For example, plumbing fees cannot be priced below cost while mechanical fees are price above cost.
Similarly, green building fees cannot be priced below cost but new construction fees cannot be priced
above cost to compensate for the loss of revenues.
Therefore, establishing the full cost, and setting the price at or as near full cost is an important result of
a fee study.
Valuation Based Fees
The Department recovers a substantial portion of its cost from its valuation based fees. These fees are
generally for construction projects where the fee is based on a multiplier of construction value. Currently,
the City is recovering about the correct amount from these fees. However, year over year, recovery from
these fees may be a little over or a little under full cost. Expenses can be relatively constant but building
activity can be volatile. As building activity heats up, revenues may exceed expenses. As building activity
cools down, revenues may come short of expenses. Graphically, this relationship may appear this way.
Currently, the City uses construction value to determine value as opposed to an independent
assessment of value such as the International Code Council (ICC) valuation tables. Our
recommendation to the City, and one that has been adopted by the Department, is to move towards
using the ICC tables to determine value. This provides an independent assessment of valuation that is
not tied to construction. Using construction value to calculate building fees means that Department
revenues may move up or down depending upon market forces of supply and demand. A tight labor
market will be higher labor costs for construction and City revenues will go up. Conversely, an
Capital Accounting Partners Page 9
Projected
Revenue at
Full Cost
Current
Revenue Difference
$ 2,500 $ 750 ($1,750)
$ 500 $ 750 $250
$ 10,000 $ 7,000 ($3,000)
$ 12,500 $ 3,750 ($8,750)
$ 2,500 $ 1,250 ($1,250)
$ 28,000 $ 13,500 ($14,500)
oversupply of wood products may mean that construction costs go down and the City fees will go
down with accordingly.
The classic example of the two approaches can be seen when two houses with the exact floor plans
are constructed. They both are the same size, they both have the same number of bathrooms, outlets,
electrical panels, and sinks. However, one builder utilizes the cheapest materials and the homeowner
wants the cheapest fixtures. The other builder utilizes the best materials and the home owner wants
the finest fixtures available. The two homes will have very different construction values but the time
and effort to review the plans and conduct all the inspections will be the same.
To move to the ICC valuation of building, and to assure it will recover its cost, the City will need to start
collecting three additional sources of data within its permitting system:
1.Building square footage;
2.Building type of construction; and
3.Building occupancy type.
Without these additional data, it will be impossible to determine the correct multiplier that will result in
full cost recovery. Therefore, we recommend the City begin collecting these data and when there are 6
months of data then calculate the correct multiplier.
Modifications to the Fee Schedule
Another result of a fee study is bringing the schedule of fees up to current code. As part of this study, we
modified the schedule of fees to best reflect the California Building Standards Code. In some cases, this
required little modification. In others, fees were dropped, fees were added, or some fees were simply
renamed. However, in consultation with staff, it is our view that the schedule of fees reflected in our
model brings the City’s fees into alignment with the California Building Standards Code.
Results
Projecting Revenues
The math involved in projecting revenues is basic:
Annual number of times a fee is charged X full cost = annual revenue.
Hypothetical Example of how Revenue is Projected
Fee Description Annual
Activity Full cost Current
Price
Fee 1 10 $ 250 $ 75
Fee 2 5 $ 100 $ 150
Fee 3 20 $ 500 $ 350
Fee 4 50 $ 250 $ 75
Fee 5 25 $ 100 $ 50
Capital Accounting Partners Page 10
In this example, revenues from current fee levels is $13,500 and while these same services priced at full
cost will generate $28,000 or $14,500 more.
Challenges to Accurately Projecting Revenues
Projecting future revenues should be simple. However, there are several challenges to projecting
revenues accurately. Among these are:
1. Errors in the annual activity data;
2. Changes in fee descriptions;
3. New fees that are being from existing fees;
4. Fees where the work is being done but there is no fee to collect; and
5. Differences in timing between permitting systems and financial systems.
Fire Prevention
Fire Prevention is a classic example of how challenging projecting revenues can be. Frequently, Fire
Prevention will be tasked for making inspections, but decisions by the Council prohibit or restrict the
charging of full cost. Many councils will reduce or even eliminate some fees for non-profits, social
service agencies, religious institutions, or operations catering to children.
Public Works and Planning
The Development Services Department is being charged for Planning and Public Works staff. These staff
are built into the Departments budget in the normal budget cycle. The challenge for the Department is
that these costs can be difficult to manage. The fees for Planning and Public Works are set by Council.
The budgets for Planning and Public Works are based upon an assumed level of activity in the spring
before the activity is actually realized. So if the actual activity is greater than projected activity, revenues
higher than cost flow to the Department. However, if actual activity is lower than projected activity,
then the Department has costs that it cannot recover.
Reasons Revenues Can Fail to Meet Expenses
There are several reasons why the Department might fail to meet its expenses. Among these are:
1. The Department is charged with inspection activity but it cannot charge for the service;
2. The Department has budgeted expenses but activity levels are lower than projected;
3. Former estimates required for plan review and inspection are not accurate; and
4. Productive hourly rates assumed in the calculations are not accurate.
Capital Accounting Partners Page 11
Fee Type
Projected Fee
Revenues at Full
Cost
Projected
Revenues at
Current Prices
Difference Surplus /
Subsidy
Valuation
Bldg Permit & Plan Check $ 8,490,666 $ 8,599,967 $ 109,301 1%
Non-Valuation
Building Total 1,819,529$ 1,836,334$ $16,804 1%
Construction & Demolition 149,930$ 124,042$ ($25,888)-17%
Mechanical 166,768$ 387,519$ $220,751 132%
Plumbing 222,406$ 358,690$ $136,284 61%
Electrical 399,632$ 646,484$ $246,852 62%
Green Building 675,347$ 187,421$ ($487,926)-72%
Use and Occupancy 205,447$ 132,178$ ($73,269)-36%
Fire Prevention Total 1,925,540$ 602,020$ ($1,323,520)-69%
Public Works Total 860,363$ 269,792$ ($590,571)-69%
Total Resources Consumed $ 13,096,098 $ 11,308,113 $ (1,787,985)-14%
Summary of Results by Division or Work Unit
The following graphic outlines various levels of recovery for each of the major work units within the
Development Services Department. It shows, for example, that the Building function is subsidizing Fire
Prevention, Planning, and Public Works. It should be noted however, that these data are based on
current activity levels and the normal year to year changes to these activity levels can change these
results.
Project Revenues Based on Current Activity Levels
Why Differences in Recovery Levels?
There can be a many reasons why there are differences in cost recovery levels. Our observation is that
the Department is under-recovering its fees. Much of this can be corrected by a rebalancing of fees. In
other words, each division should be generating enough revenue to recover its costs. From our
observations, the following are some reasons why each work group is either over recovering or under
recovering its expenses.
Building Observations
The data suggests that Building Division is financially supporting the Department. There can be several
reasons for this:
Activity levels are escalating faster than staffing (expenses) can be added. This has the input of
showing that revenues are exceeding expenses.
Reliance on construction value vs an independent calculation such as the ICC valuation table. As
building activity increases, basic supply and demand rules will push construction value higher.
This will have the impact of increasing revenues to the City without incurring additional
expenses.
Capital Accounting Partners Page 12
Estimates of time to provide inspection and plan review services are incorrect. We see this in
the current rates for mechanical, electrical, and plumbing fees for new construction. The
current price is $.11/SF. Based on our analysis and in discussions with inspectors, the actual
calculated cost is $.02/SF.
Fire Prevention Observations
Under recovering costs for Fire Prevention services is fairly common in the State of California.
Sometimes this is by design but of often is it is not. From our observation there are three reasons why
the City is under recovering costs of Fire Prevention:
1. Previous estimates of how much time is required for inspection and plan review time is different
than actual.
2. Previous estimates of productive hourly rates are different and have not been updated until
now.
3. The work unit is making inspections and providing a services but either the fee is not being
charged or there is no fee.
If the City were to decide that full cost recovery is in its best interest, then the fees the department
collects, based on our calculations, should fully recover the cost of this function.
Capital Accounting Partners Page 13
Observations and Recommendations
General Observations and Recommendations
As stated earlier, we observe that the Department is nearly recovering its expenses. However, “right
sizing” its fees and adjusting its fees so that each division is recovering its costs is an important result of
a fee study. We also observe that there are no built in costs to build reserves. We generally recommend
reserves for building departments to be targeted at 6-12 months of operating expenses. For the
Department, this would be a range of $6,500,000 - $13,000,000.
What is Not Covered in this Analysis
We are frequently asked “did you look at efficiency”. The simple answer is no, this was not within the
scope of the project. However, we would add that with experience, certifications, and qualifications that
we hold in the disciplines of process management and the application of lean thinking within the public
sector we are very sensitive to this question. We would also add, that from our experience in providing
these services, that seldom do they generate short term cost savings. The benefit they do bring in the
short term is improvements in customer service. Plan review is completed faster. In the long term, they
can reduce the escalation of costs.
We are also frequently asked about work load demands. Again, this was outside project scope.
However, we understand that the City is an ISO Class 1 accredited City. Only one of four in the State of
California and one of 9 in the country. This is a prestigious award. From discussions with leadership,
maintaining this certification may be a challenge going forward. Additional resources may be required to
maintain the staffing to workload levels required by ISO.
Assessing Valuation Based Fees
As stated previously, the current methodology of assessing value, from which new construction building
permits are based, is to use construction value. In addition, several other fees are derived from the
calculation of permit value. From our observation, a better approach is to base value off an independent
calculation of value such as the International Code Council (ICC) Valuation Table. This reduces
fluctuations in revenues (up or down) to the City due to local supply & demand pressures, pricing and
selection of internal fixtures, and temporary swings in commodities.
However, moving toward this method will require additional data to be gathered on building permits.
This will include data on the square footage of buildings, occupancy type, and building construction
type. Without these data it will be impossible to accurately calculate what the multiplier needs to be to
generate an appropriate level of cost recovery.
We understand that this will be the objective of phase two of the user fee study.
Adjusting the Fee Schedule
A standard recommendation of ours is that fees be adjusted annually. We also recommend a complete
review of costs for fee services every three to five years. With the annual update of fees, we
recommend using a simple CPI type increase that is attached to the City’s labor cost. For example, if the
Capital Accounting Partners Page 14
labor cost for the City goes up by 2% then adjust each fee by 2%. This is the simplest and most common
method of adjusting fees annually. It is our observation that the regulatory requirements change enough
within a three to five years that a comprehensive review of costs is then warranted.
We understand that the City’s policy is to adjust fees annually based on changes to salaries and benefits.
We would affirm this practice and find that those cities that do this, maintain better cost recovery levels
over the long term.
Building Reserves
We regularly recommend 6-12 months of operating expenses as a reserve. We understand from staff
that this will be a discussion for a later time. We would affirm this plan but also recommend that a
reserve policy be set into place. This policy might target:
Specific reserves (such as 12 months of operating expenses);
An understanding of how the reserve will be managed; and
How will a reserve be defined and realized?
Capital Accounting Partners Page 15
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FEE TABLE
The following table details the individual unit costs of each fee in the Department and provides annual revenue
impacts for each fee and all fees collectively.
Palo Alto Building Dept
Building Fees
Service
# If
Any
Fee Name Unit/Notes Actual Work
Volume Bldg Time Fire Time Planning
Time PW Time Direct Unit Cost
Indirect Unit
Allocated
Costs
Other
external
costs
Total Cost
Assigned
Current
Fee / Revenue
Unit Surcharge or
(Subsidy)
Unit Cost SummaryUnit Time Assignments
BUILDING FEES
1,165 Business Registry Fee per business -$ 50.00$ $50
-$
Building New Construction -$
All Valuation Based Building Fees Combined (total annual
Calculations)5,973,018$ 2,517,648$ $8,490,666 8,599,967.00$ $109,301
-$
1,217 I. Building Demolition Permit 177 1.17 0.333 234$ $152 $386 320.00$ ($66)
1,218 J. Commercial Interior Non-Structural Demolition Permit 39 0.33 0.333 106$ $69 $175 194.00$ $19
-$
1,207 Additional Plan Review per hour 117 1 122$ $79 $201 191.00$ ($10)
1,202 Building Plan Check per hour -$ -$
1,208 Certified Access Specialist (CASp) Review/Consultation Hourly 1 159$ $103 $262 -$ ($262)
1,203 -$
1,204 Address change - single address 1 0.25 216$ $140 $356 224.00$ ($132)
1,206 Address change - each additional address 0.42 0.167 104$ $67 $171 112.00$ ($59)
1,205 -$
-$
Construction & Demolition -$
1,198
Commercial and Multi-Family Projects greater than or equal to
$25,000.00 in Valuation per permit 89 0.334 1.000 224$ $145 $369 238.00$ ($131)
1,200
Single Family and Two Family Projects greater than $25,000.00 and
less than $75,000.00 in Valuations per permit 18 0.334 0.250 93$ $61 $154 80.00$ ($74)
1,199
Single Family and Two Family Projects greater than $75,000.00 in
Valuation per permit 71 0.334 0.500 137$ $89 $225 212.00$ ($13)
-$
-$
ELECTRICAL PERMITS
1,228 Air Conditioners per unit 39 0.5 49$ $32 $81 29.00$ ($52)
1,230 Air Cooled or Oil Cooled Lighting and/or Power Transformer per permit 0.50 49$ $32 $81 -$ ($81)
1,226 Base Fee per permit 1,696 0.33 50$ $32 $82 92.00$ $10
1,240 Busway, Power Duct install, repair or replace per permit 20 0.42 41$ $27 $68 0.50$ ($67)
1,229 per permit 0.42 41$ $27 $68 252.00$ $184
1,249 Each Additional section of meter per permit 2 0.42 41$ $27 $68 5.00$ ($63)
1,234 Fixtures, Switches, and Outlets per permit 1,633 0.42 41$ $27 $68 1.00$ ($67)
1,241
Lighting, Power and/or Control Panel Board, Switchboard Cabinet or
Panel per permit 43 0.42 41$ $27 $68 5.00$ ($63)
1,236 Motor per permit 13 0.42 41$ $27 $68 23.00$ ($45)
1,235 Motor Generator per permit 40 0.42 41$ $27 $68 3.00$ ($65)
1,227 New or Remodeled Square Footage Per SqFt 3,723,840 0.00012 $0.01 $0.01 $0.02 0.11$ $0.09
1,237 Range, Electric Clothes Dryer, or Water Heater per permit 2 0.42 41$ $27 $68 5.00$ ($63)
-$
1,248 Service Conductor/Switch - Greater than 800 ampre per permit 2 1.50 148$ $96 $243 40.00$ ($203)
1,246 Service Conductor/Switch - Less than 200 ampre per permit 128 0.75 74$ $48 $122 18.00$ ($104)
1,247 Service Conductor/Switch - Less than 800 ampre per permit 11 1.00 98$ $64 $162 29.00$ ($133)
1,238 Special Circuit (Not Listed Herein)per permit 26 0.42 41$ $27 $68 5.00$ ($63)
1,250 Temporary Power Pole per permit 149 0.42 41$ $27 $68 56.00$ ($12)
1,251 Temporary Wiring for Construction per permit 0.42 41$ $27 $68 56.00$ ($12)
-$
Electrical Permits - Electrical Vehicle Charging Stations -$
Capital Accounting Partners Page 1 of 14 BldCostCalcs
Palo Alto Building Dept
Building Fees
Service
# If
Any
Fee Name Unit/Notes Actual Work
Volume Bldg Time Fire Time Planning
Time PW Time Direct Unit Cost
Indirect Unit
Allocated
Costs
Other
external
costs
Total Cost
Assigned
Current
Fee / Revenue
Unit Surcharge or
(Subsidy)
Unit Cost SummaryUnit Time Assignments
1,232 Commercial (Level 1 and 2)17 2.00 232$ $150 $382 370.00$ ($12)
1,233 Commercial (Level 1 and 2) - each additional station 79 0.42 45$ $29 $74 92.50$ $18
1,233 Commercial (Level 3 and 4)1 2.50 281$ $182 $464 560.00$ $96
1,234 Commercial (Level 3 and 4) - each additional station 0.50 55$ $36 $91 140.00$ $49
1,231 Residential (level 1 & 2)per station 57 0.92 102$ $66 $168 160.00$ ($8)
Residential (level 3)1.33375 143$ $93 $236 ($236)
Electrical Permits - Photovoltaic Systems -$
Residential System (less than 10 kw)127 0.5 49$ $32 $81 ($81)
1,242 Residential System (greater than 10 kw)each 1.875 185$ $120 $304 311.00$ $7
1,243 Commercial System (less than 10 kW)each 2.833333333 326$ $211 $537 565.00$ $28
1,244 Commercial System (10kW - 49kW)each 3 4.25 489$ $317 $805 850.00$ $45
1,245 Commercial System (greater than 49kW)each 1 4.666666667 530$ $343 $873 900.00$ $27
MECHANICAL PERMITS
Swimming Pool Heather 23 0.40 39$ $26 $65 28.00$ ($37)
1,254 Admin base fee 1,021 0.334 50$ $32 $82 92.00$ $10
Mechanical new or remodel cost/SF Per SqFt 2,632,100 0.00012 $0.012 $0.008 $0.02 0.11$ $0
1a -$ 28.00$ $28
1b Furnaces 98 1.002 99$ $64 $163 92.00$ ($71)
1c 0.002 0$ $0 $0 ($0)
1d -$
2 Appliance vents: installation, relocation or replacement of…0.335333 33$ $21 $54 28.00$ ($26)
3 Repairs, alteration or addition of each heating appliance… 0.335333 33$ $21 $54 28.00$ ($26)
Boilers, Compressors, and Absorption Systems:-$
4a
Up to and including 3 HP, absorption system up to and including
100,000 Btu/h 0.67 66$ $43 $109 5.00$ ($104)
4b
Up to and including 15HP, absorption system exceeding 100,000
Btu/h and including 500,000 Btu/h 86 0.67 66$ $43 $109 28.00$ ($81)
4c
Up to and including 15-30HP, absorption system exceeding 500,000
Btu/h and including 1,000,000 Btu/h 0.67 66$ $43 $109 0.11$ ($108)
4d
Up to and including 30-50HP, absorption system exceeding
1,000,000 Btu/h and including 1,750,000 Btu/h 1.00 99$ $64 $163 28.00$ ($135)
4e Greater than50HP, absorption system exceeding 1,750,000 Btu/h 1.00 99$ $64 $163 56.00$ ($107)
5 Air handlers up to and including 10,000 cf per cfm…0.34 33$ $21 $54 28.00$ ($26)
Ventilation and exhaust:-$
7a Each ventilation FAC connect to a single duct 76 0.34 33$ $21 $54 11.00$ ($43)
7b
Each ventilation system that is not a portion of a heating or air-
conditioning system …0.34 33$ $21 $54 ($54)
7c
Installation of each hood that is served by mechanical exhaust,
including the ducts of such hood 2 0.34 33$ $21 $54 28.00$ ($26)
Miscellaneous -$
9
Each appliance or piece of equipment regulated by this code, but
not classed in other appliance categories for which no other fee is
listed in this table 0.34 33$ $21 $54 ($54)
Full Gas Piping -$
10a Each gas piping system of 1-5 outlets 4 0.60 59$ $38 $98 28.00$ ($70)
10b Each additional gas piping system per outlet 0.33 33$ $21 $54 ($54)
Process Piping -$
11a Each hazardous process piping system 1-4 outlets 0.34 33$ $21 $54 28.00$ ($26)
11b Each hazardous process piping system >5 outlets 0.33 33$ $21 $54 28.00$ ($26)
11c Each nonhazardous process piping system of 1-4 outlets 0.80 79$ $51 $130 56.00$ ($74)
Capital Accounting Partners Page 2 of 14 BldCostCalcs
Palo Alto Building Dept
Building Fees
Service
# If
Any
Fee Name Unit/Notes Actual Work
Volume Bldg Time Fire Time Planning
Time PW Time Direct Unit Cost
Indirect Unit
Allocated
Costs
Other
external
costs
Total Cost
Assigned
Current
Fee / Revenue
Unit Surcharge or
(Subsidy)
Unit Cost SummaryUnit Time Assignments
11d Each NPP piping system of >5 outlets, per outlet 0.80 79$ $51 $130 5.00$ ($125)
PLUMBING PERMITS - GRAY WATER SYSTEMS
1,266 Admin base fee 1,310 0.334 50$ $32 $82 92.00$ $10
1 For each plumbing fixture on one trap or set of fixtures..0.5 49$ $32 $81 3.00$ ($78)
2 For each building sewer and each trailer park sewer 15 0.802 79$ $51 $130 28.00$ ($102)
3 Rainwater system - per drain (inside building)66 0.5 49$ $32 $81 5.00$ ($76)
4 For each private sewage disposal system 120 0.802 79$ $51 $130 11.00$ ($119)
6 For each water heater, vent, or both 56 0.6 59$ $38 $97 5.00$ ($92)
7 For each gas piping system of one to five outlets 142 1.2 118$ $77 $195 28.00$ ($167)
8 For each additional gas piping system outlet, per outlet 0.3 30$ $19 $49 5.00$ ($44)
9
Industrial waste pretreatment interceptor, including trap and vent, X
kitchen-type grease interceptors 1.2 118$ $77 $195 11.00$ ($184)
10
Installation, alteration or repair of water piping, water treatment
equip or both 1 0.6 59$ $38 $97 5.00$ ($92)
11 Repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping, each fixture 16 0.5 49$ $32 $81 28.00$ ($53)
12
Lawn sprinkler system on one meter including backflow protection
devices 0.5 49$ $32 $81 28.00$ ($53)
13A Atmospheric-type vacuum breakers not referenced above (1-5)0.6 59$ $38 $97 5.00$ ($92)
13B Atmospheric-type vacuum breakers not referenced above (>5)0.5 49$ $32 $81 5.00$ ($76)
14 Backflow protective device other than atmospheric-type (any size)78 1.2 118$ $77 $195 5.00$ ($190)
Plumbing Permits - Graywater Systems -$
1,271 Clothes washer System 0.5 49$ $32 $81 56.00$ ($25)
1,273 Complex System 1 1.2 118$ $77 $195 88.00$ ($107)
1,272 Simple System 3 0.5 49$ $32 $81 61.00$ ($20)
16 Installation and testing for a reclaimed water system 1.2 118$ $77 $195 -$ ($195)
17 Annual cross-connection testing of reclaimed water system…2.4 236$ $153 $390 ($390)
18 Each medical gas piping system 1-5 outlets 1.2 118$ $77 $195 ($195)
Additional medical gas inlet(s)0.25 25$ $16 $41 -$ ($41)
Electrical new or remodel cost/SF 2,127,236 0.00012 0.012$ 0.008$ 0.02$ 0.11$ $0
Solar hot water system 1.2 118.187$ 76.594$ 194.78$ 224.00$ $29
1,190 Storm drain system 1.2 118$ $77 $195 28.00$ ($167)
1,191 Swimming pool 0.4 39$ $26 $65 28.00$ ($37)
Use & occupancy Permits
1,187 Certificate of Use and Occupancy each 155 2.5 456$ $296 $752 287.00$ ($465)
1,188 Certificate of Use and Occupancy - Replacement each 0.5 94$ $61 $155 123.00$ ($32)
1,189 -$
1,186
Temporary Occupancy Permit - Multi-Family Residential, Non-
Residential, and Other Commercial each 33 2.3 365$ $237 $602 896.00$ $294
1,185
Temporary Occupancy Permit - Single Family Residential and
Commercial Tenant Improvement less than 10,000 sq. ft.each 155 1.7 270$ $175 $445 375.00$ ($70)
-$
FIRE FEES
Hazardous Materials Classification Permits -$
1,367 Compressed Gas annually 28 1 229$ $121 $350 139.00$ ($211)
1,363 Corrosives annually 54 1 229$ $121 $350 139.00$ ($211)
1,364 Cryogenic Fluid annually 42 1 229$ $121 $350 139.00$ ($211)
1,365 Flammable and Combustible Liquids annually 172 1 229$ $121 $350 139.00$ ($211)
1,368 Flammable Gas annually 28 1 229$ $121 $350 139.00$ ($211)
1,366 Flammable Solids annually 1 229$ $121 $350 139.00$ ($211)
1,373 Health Hazard (Liquids & Solids)annually 33 1 229$ $121 $350 139.00$ ($211)
Capital Accounting Partners Page 3 of 14 BldCostCalcs
Palo Alto Building Dept
Building Fees
Service
# If
Any
Fee Name Unit/Notes Actual Work
Volume Bldg Time Fire Time Planning
Time PW Time Direct Unit Cost
Indirect Unit
Allocated
Costs
Other
external
costs
Total Cost
Assigned
Current
Fee / Revenue
Unit Surcharge or
(Subsidy)
Unit Cost SummaryUnit Time Assignments
1,381 Liquefied Petroleum Gases annually 10 1 229$ $121 $350 139.00$ ($211)
1,354 Organic Coatings annually 1 229$ $121 $350 175.00$ ($175)
1,374 Organic Peroxides annually 1 1 229$ $121 $350 139.00$ ($211)
1,355 Ovens - Industrial Baking or Drying annually 4 1 229$ $121 $350 102.00$ ($248)
1,375 Oxidizers (Liquids & Solids)annually 16 1 229$ $121 $350 139.00$ ($211)
1,369 Oxidizing Gas annually 34 1 229$ $121 $350 139.00$ ($211)
1,356 Parade Float per hour 1 229$ $121 $350 115.00$ ($235)
1,357 Place of Public Assembly per occurrence 2 457$ $242 $700 236.00$ ($464)
1,370 Pyrophoric Gas annually 1 1 229$ $121 $350 139.00$ ($211)
1,376 Pyrophoric Materials (Liquids & Solids)annually 4 1 229$ $121 $350 139.00$ ($211)
1,358 Pyrotechnical Special Effects Material annually 1 229$ $121 $350 29.00$ ($321)
1,377 Radioactive Materials annually 28 1 229$ $121 $350 139.00$ ($211)
1,359 Refrigeration Equipment annually 1 229$ $121 $350 175.00$ ($175)
1,360 Spraying/Dipping annually 17 1 229$ $121 $350 175.00$ ($175)
1,361
Tent or air-supported structure having an area in excess of 200
square feet; or canopies in excess of 400 square feet (includes a
public assembly permit of $125.00 for all tents)each 2.167 485$ $257 $741 290.00$ ($451)
1,362 Tire Recapping/Tire Storage annually 4 913$ $483 $1,396 575.00$ ($821)
1,371 Toxic, Highly Toxic, Moderately Toxic, Health Hazard Gas annually 11 1 229$ $121 $350 139.00$ ($211)
1,378 Toxic, Highly Toxic, Moderately Toxic, Health Hazard Materials annually 38 1 229$ $121 $350 139.00$ ($211)
1,372 Unstable Reactive Gas annually 1 1 229$ $121 $350 139.00$ ($211)
1,379 Unstable Reactive Materials (Liquids & Solids)annually 1 229$ $121 $350 139.00$ ($211)
1,380 Water Reactive Materials (Liquids & Solids)annually 1 229$ $121 $350 139.00$ ($211)
1 229$ $121 $350 ($350)
Hazardouis Materials County Reimbursement -$ 348,000.00$ $348,000
Hazardous Materials Storage Permits -$
1,311
Additional Approvals for Hazardous Materials Storage Permit (first 2
hours)2.167 496$ $262 $758 356.00$ ($402)
1,312
Additional Approvals for Hazardous Materials Storage Permit (per
hour for time above 2 hours)1.417 324$ $172 $496 159.00$ ($337)
1,308 Business Plan (HMBP)annually 234 1.417 324$ $172 $496 256.00$ ($240)
1,312 Late Fee for Hazardous Materials Storage Permit -$ -$
1,305 Level I Facility 81 1 229$ $121 $350 264.00$ ($86)
1,306 Level II Facility 119 2 457$ $242 $700 404.00$ ($296)
1,307 Level III Facility 191 4 915$ $484 $1,399 729.00$ ($670)
1,309 Petroleum Aboveground Storage Tank annually 26 2 457$ $242 $700 593.00$ ($107)
1,310 Provisional (6 Month)2 457$ $242 $700 186.00$ ($514)
-$
-$
Fire Inspection Fees -$
1,313
Additional Resinspection Fee (up to 2 hours during normal business
hours)150 2 456$ $242 $698 323.00$ ($375)
1,313 Additional Resinspection Fee (each additional hour)1 228$ $121 $349 159.00$ ($190)
1,314 After Hours Inspection Fee 1.5 342$ $181 $523 165.00$ ($358)
Capital Accounting Partners Page 4 of 14 BldCostCalcs
Palo Alto Building Dept
Building Fees
Service
# If
Any
Fee Name Unit/Notes Actual Work
Volume Bldg Time Fire Time Planning
Time PW Time Direct Unit Cost
Indirect Unit
Allocated
Costs
Other
external
costs
Total Cost
Assigned
Current
Fee / Revenue
Unit Surcharge or
(Subsidy)
Unit Cost SummaryUnit Time Assignments
1,316 Care Facility annually -$ 175.00$ $175
1,317 Care Facility Inspection Including Fire Clearance (greater than 25 2 456$ $242 $698 73.00$ ($625)
Care Facility Inspection Including Fire Clearance (7-25 clients)1 228$ $121 $349 140.00$ ($209)
1,315 Christmas Tree Lot/Pumpkin Patch each 1 228$ $121 $349 175.00$ ($174)
1,321 High Rise Building - Certificate of Compliance (annually up to 4 4.167 951$ $503 $1,454 713.00$ ($741)
1,322 High Rise Building - Certificate of Compliance (each additional hour))1 228$ $121 $349 159.00$ ($190)
1,318 Outside Cooking Booths each 1.5 342$ $181 $523 198.00$ ($325)
1,320 Standby Fire Watch or After Hours at Fire or Incident Scene per hour 1 228$ $121 $349 159.00$ ($190)
1,319 Use and Occupancy Fire Inspection per inspection 155 1 228$ $121 $349 148.00$ ($201)
As-Built Plan Check and Additional Work each 75 2 456$ $242 $698 ($698)
-$
Investigations & Consultations -$
1,325 Additional Hours Over Plan Review/Inspection each 1 181$ $96 $276 155.00$ ($121)
1,323 Alternate Means and Methods Application per application 75 2 429$ $227 $657 356.00$ ($301)
1,324 Appeals to Decisions per hour 1 228$ $121 $349 159.00$ ($190)
1,322 Consultation Fee per hour 475 1 228$ $121 $349 166.00$ ($183)
1,328 Hazardous Materials Data Entry Fee per hour -$ 77.00$ $77
1,327 Hydrant Flow Fee per occurrence 75 1 228$ $121 $349 165.00$ ($184)
1,326 Site Disaster Planning per hour 1 228$ $121 $349 166.00$ ($183)
-$
-$
Life Safety & Fire Protection
1294A Automatic Fire Sprinkler Installation/Modification > 19 heads 4.417 1,008$ $534 $1,541 356.00$ ($1,185)
1,295 Automatic Fire Sprinkler Installation/Modification (plus per head)0.01 2$ $1 $3.49 1.80$ ($2)
1,301 Express Fire Protection Plan Check Fee 50% of usual fee -$ 163.00$ $163
1,296 Fire Alarm System Installation and Modification 3 637$ $337 $974 356.00$ ($618)
1,297
Fire Alarm System Installation and Modification (plus a device or
contact point)0.060 14$ $7 $20.94 2.00$ ($19)
1,303
Fire Protection and Fire Access Plan Review for New Single Family
Dwellings or Additions each 2.5 523$ $277 $800 100.00$ ($700)
1,298 Hydrant Installation/Modification - Private 0.5 114$ $60 $174 261.00$ $87
1,295 Other Automatic Fire Extinguishing System 3 637$ $337 $974 356.00$ ($618)
1,297 Standpipe System - Wet, Dry, or Combination 25 2 456$ $242 $698 208.00$ ($490)
1,300 Temporary Certificate of Occupancy per occurrence 2.167 494$ $262 $756 356.00$ ($400)
1,299 Underground Fire Service Line
per 200LF of pipe
(inspection,
reinspection - 150 5 1,093$ $579 $1,672 356.00$ ($1,316)
1,304 Verification of Fire Protection System Maintenance and Certification annually 0.3 51$ $27 $78 89.00$ $11
Food truck permits 0.5 114$ $60 $174 ($174)
Multifamily dwellings, hotels & motels -$
4-50 units 1 228$ $121 $349 ($349)
51-100 units 2 456$ $242 $698
Greater than 100 units 3 684$ $362 $1,047 ($1,047)
Fire Prevention Inspection of Private Schools 2 456$ $242 $698 ($698)
1294B Automatic Fire Sprinkler Installation/Modification > 19 heads 2 456$ $242 $698 ($698)
Specific Hazard Permits -$
1,329 Aerosol Products annually 1.25 285$ $151 $436 102.00$ ($334)
1,330 Amusement Buildings Delete -$ 410.00$ $410
Capital Accounting Partners Page 5 of 14 BldCostCalcs
Palo Alto Building Dept
Building Fees
Service
# If
Any
Fee Name Unit/Notes Actual Work
Volume Bldg Time Fire Time Planning
Time PW Time Direct Unit Cost
Indirect Unit
Allocated
Costs
Other
external
costs
Total Cost
Assigned
Current
Fee / Revenue
Unit Surcharge or
(Subsidy)
Unit Cost SummaryUnit Time Assignments
1,331 Automobile Wrecking Yard or Junk Yard Delete -$ 179.00$ $179
1,332 Bowling Alley and Pin Refinishing Involving the use of Flammable each 2.917 666$ $352 $1,018 179.00$ ($839)
1,333 Candles and Open Flames in Assembly Areas annually 1 228$ $121 $349 142.00$ ($207)
1,334 Carnivals and Fairs each 4.167 951$ $503 $1,454 179.00$ ($1,275)
1,335 Cellulose Nitrate Storage/Nitrate Film annually 0.292 67$ $35 $102 102.00$ $0
1,337 Combustible Fiber/Material Storage Delete -$ 179.00$ $179
1,336 Confined Space annually -$ 148.00$ $148
1,338 Hot Work permit fee (one time permit)One time 1 228$ $121 $349 126.00$ ($223)
1,339 Hot Work permit fee (monthly permit)Monthy -$ 88.00$ $88
1,340 -$ 102.00$ $102
1,341 Fireworks Display Delete 3.167 723$ $383 565.00$ $565
1,342 High-piled Combustible Storage Delete -$ 102.00$ $102
1,343 Hot Work (Welding) Operations Delete -$ 179.00$ $179
1,349 Liquid or Gas-Fueled Powered Equipment each 1 228$ $121 $349 88.00$ ($261)
1,344 Liquid or Gas-Fueled Vehicles or Equipment in Assembly Buildings each -$ 103.00$ $103
1,350 Magnesium Working annually -$ 103.00$ $103
1,345 Malls - Covered annually 2 456$ $242 $698 103.00$ ($595)
1,351 Occupant Load Increase - Temporary Public Assembly each 1 228$ $121 $349 236.00$ ($113)
1,352 Open Burning each 1 228$ $121 $349 236.00$ ($113)
1,348 Open Flame/Flame Producing Devices each 1 228$ $121 $349 88.00$ ($261)
1,353 Operate a Tank Vehicle to Transport Flammable/Combustible annually 1.417 323$ $171 $494 102.00$ ($392)
1,347 Place of Public Assembly - Temporary each 1 228$ $121 $349 236.00$ ($113)
1,346 Temporary Kiosks -$ -$
-$
Fire Miscellaneous Fees -$
TCO fee for Vendors/Stock occupancy (Requires at least one
additional inspection)250 3.5 752$ $398 $1,150 ($1,150)
1,288 Emergency Response Fee - Hazmat (PAMC 17.24.050)Per hour 1 228$ $121 $349 -$ ($349)
1,289 Installation or Closure Without Approved Plans and/or Permits Fine -$ -$
Fire plans revision 76 -$
Building General & Miscellaneous Fees -$
1,176 All Other Publications each -$ 16.00$ $16
1,201 Construction/Maintenance Vehicles -$ 76.00$ $76
1,172 Electric Service and Safety Inspection per hour 1 98$ $52 $151 84.00$ ($67)
1,181 Extension of Building Permit or Building Permit Application per application 31 0.33 56$ $30 $86 56.00$ ($30)
1,174
Inspections and Investigations - Outside Normal Business Hours
(1.5xOThour)1 1.5 238$ $126 $365 202.00$ ($163)
1,175
Inspections and Investigations - Outside Normal Business Hours
(2.0xOThour)52 2 318$ $168 $486 226.00$ ($260)
1,173 Inspections and Investigations - Unclassified per hour 1 159$ $84 $243 163.00$ ($80)
1,184 Reactivation of Expired Building Permit - All Others 19 0.75 149$ $79 $228 ($228)
1,183 Reactivation of Expired Building Permit - Final Inspection Only 16 1.1 165$ $88 $253 375.00$ $122
1,182 Reactivation of Expired Building Permit Application 16 0.7 124$ $65 $189 168.00$ ($21)
1,178 Real Property Research Fee (1-hour minimum)per hour 1.0 159$ $84 $243 127.00$ ($116)
1,177 Records Retention per plan sheet 20,234 0.0 4$ $2 $6 4.00$ ($2)
1,180 Reinspection Fee - Multi-Family Residential and Non-Residential each 2 1.2 184$ $97 $281 308.00$ $27
1,179
Reinspection Fee - Single Family Residential (each secondary
inspection type)14 0.9 144$ $76 220$ 84.00$ ($136)
Capital Accounting Partners Page 6 of 14 BldCostCalcs
Palo Alto Building Dept
Building Fees
Service
# If
Any
Fee Name Unit/Notes Actual Work
Volume Bldg Time Fire Time Planning
Time PW Time Direct Unit Cost
Indirect Unit
Allocated
Costs
Other
external
costs
Total Cost
Assigned
Current
Fee / Revenue
Unit Surcharge or
(Subsidy)
Unit Cost SummaryUnit Time Assignments
1,180
Reinspection Fee - Single Family Residential (each primary
inspection type)1.2 184$ $97 281$ 308.00$ $27
1,171 Request for Release of Building Plans each 0.3 50$ $26 $76 45.00$ ($31)
1,175 Residential Inspection Guidelines each -$ 33.00$ $33
Conditional Utility Agreement 187 0.98 155$ $82 $237 252.00$ $15
Emergency Responder Radio Coverage (testing) fee.25 2 409$ $216 $625 ($625)
GREEN BUILDING FEES
Bldg
Alterations and additions for single and multifamily < 1,000 sq ft and
increases conditioned space Residential 99 3.70 495$ $602 $1,097 677.00$ ($420)
Bldg Alterations and additions for single and multifamily > 1,000 sq ft Residential 166 4.20 556$ $676 $1,232 173.00$ ($1,059)
Bldg Multi Family New Construction of 3 or More (attached) Units 4 5.10 681$ $827 $1,508 668.00$ ($840)
Bldg Multi Family New Construction of < 4 Residential 4.10 559$ $679 $1,238 1,388.00$ $150
Bldg New Single family Residential 7 4.60 620$ $753 $1,373 1,687.00$ $314
Bldg
Tenant improvements, renovations, or alterations > 5,000 sq ft that
includes replacement or alteration of
at least two of the following: HVAC system, building envelope, hot
water system, or lighting
system and project value greater than $200,000.Non-Residential 34 5.10 681$ $827 $1,508 942.00$ ($566)
Bldg
C. Tenant improvements, renovations or alterations > $200,000 in
valuation (and not triggered by a Calgreen Tier) Non-Residential 42 4.10 559$ $679 $1,238 354.00$ ($884)
Bldg
If the project is over $100,000 Energy Star is required after 12
months of occupancy Non-Residential 2.10 315$ $383 $698 976.00$ $278
Bldg New commercial 1000 - 25,000 SF Non-Residential 21 6.10 803$ $975 $1,778 1,443.00$ ($335)
Bldg New commercial 25,001-50,000 SF Non-Residential 7.10 924$ $1,123 $2,048 ($2,048)
Bldg New commercial >50,000 SF Non-Residential 7.60 985$ $1,197 $2,183 ($2,183)
Bldg Landscape Review - plan review Non-Residential 60 3.25 656$ $797 $1,453 ($1,453)
Bldg Landscape Review - inspection Non-Residential 60 1.00 98$ $120 $218 ($218)
Bldg Landscape Review - plan review SFR 80 2.00 404$ $490 $894 ($894)
Bldg Landscape Review - inspection SFR 80 1.00 98$ $120 $218 ($218)
Bldg Landscape Review - plan review Multifamily 10 3.25 656$ $797 $1,453 ($1,453)
Bldg Landscape Review - inspection Multifamily 10 1.00 98$ $120 $218 ($218)
Bldg -$
Fee # 325 Current -$
Capital Accounting Partners Page 7 of 14 BldCostCalcs
Palo Alto Building Dept
Building Fees
Service
# If
Any
Fee Name
BUILDING FEES
1,165 Business Registry Fee
Building New Construction
All Valuation Based Building Fees Combined (total annual
Calculations)
1,217 I. Building Demolition Permit
1,218 J. Commercial Interior Non-Structural Demolition Permit
1,207 Additional Plan Review
1,202 Building Plan Check
1,208 Certified Access Specialist (CASp) Review/Consultation
1,203
1,204 Address change - single address
1,206 Address change - each additional address
1,205
Construction & Demolition
1,198
Commercial and Multi-Family Projects greater than or equal to
$25,000.00 in Valuation
1,200
Single Family and Two Family Projects greater than $25,000.00 and
less than $75,000.00 in Valuations
1,199
Single Family and Two Family Projects greater than $75,000.00 in
Valuation
ELECTRICAL PERMITS
1,228 Air Conditioners
1,230 Air Cooled or Oil Cooled Lighting and/or Power Transformer
1,226 Base Fee
1,240 Busway, Power Duct install, repair or replace
1,229
1,249 Each Additional section of meter
1,234 Fixtures, Switches, and Outlets
1,241
Lighting, Power and/or Control Panel Board, Switchboard Cabinet or
Panel
1,236 Motor
1,235 Motor Generator
1,227 New or Remodeled Square Footage
1,237 Range, Electric Clothes Dryer, or Water Heater
1,248 Service Conductor/Switch - Greater than 800 ampre
1,246 Service Conductor/Switch - Less than 200 ampre
1,247 Service Conductor/Switch - Less than 800 ampre
1,238 Special Circuit (Not Listed Herein)
1,250 Temporary Power Pole
1,251 Temporary Wiring for Construction
Electrical Permits - Electrical Vehicle Charging Stations
Annual Revenue
Revenue at Full Cost of
Services
Projection of
Revenues at
Current Fees
Annual Surplus
(subsidy)
R
e
q
u
i
6 Months Reserve,
3 yr build up Full Cost / Unit With Reserves
Annual Cost Calculations w/o Reserves Reserve Requirements
BUILDING FEES $ 2,307,699
1,165Business Registry Feeper business -$ 50.00$ $50 -$ $ -
-$ -$ $ - $ -
Building New Construction -$ -$ $ - $ -
5,973,018$ 2,517,648$ $8,490,666 8,599,967.00$ $109,301 8,490,666$ 8,599,967$ $109,301 $1,496,163 $ 9,986,829.26 $9,986,829
-$ -$ $ -
1,217I. Building Demolition Permit1771.17 0.333 234$ $152 $386 320.00$ ($66)68,288$ $56,640 ($11,648)$68 $ 453.79 $80,321
1,218J. Commercial Interior Non-Structural Demolition Permit390.33 0.333 106$ $69 $175 194.00$ $19 6,833$ $7,566 $733 $31 $ 206.09 $8,037
-$ -$ $ -
1,207Additional Plan Reviewper hour1171 122$ $79 $201 191.00$ ($10)23,497$ $22,347 ($1,150)$35 $ 236.21 $27,637
1,202Building Plan Checkper hour -$ -$ -$ $ -
1,208Certified Access Specialist (CASp) Review/ConsultationHourly1 159$ $103 $262 -$ ($262)-$ $46 $ 308.01
1,203 -$ -$ $ -
1,204Address change - single address10.25 216$ $140 $356 224.00$ ($132)-$ $63 $ 418.65
1,206Address change - each additional address0.420.167 104$ $67 $171 112.00$ ($59)-$ $30 $ 201.53
1,205 -$ -$ $ -
-$ -$ $ -
Construction & Demolition -$ -$ $ -
1,198per permit890.334 1.000 224$ $145 $369 238.00$ ($131)32,623$ $21,063 ($11,560)$65 $ 433.57 $38,371
1,200per permit180.334 0.250 93$ $61 $154 80.00$ ($74)2,725$ $1,416 ($1,309)$27 $ 181.05 $3,205
1,199per permit710.334 0.500 137$ $89 $225 212.00$ ($13)15,965$ $15,010 ($955)$40 $ 265.23 $18,778
-$ -$ $ -
-$ $ -
3,165$ $1,131 ($2,034)$14 $ 95.46 $3,723
-$ $14 $ 95.46
139,694$ $156,032 $16,338 $15 $ 96.88 $164,310
1,353$ $10 ($1,343)$12 $ 79.55 $1,591
-$ $12 $ 79.55
135$ $10 ($125)$12 $ 79.55 $159
110,444$ $1,633 ($108,811)$12 $ 79.55 $129,906
2,908$ $215 ($2,693)$12 $ 79.55 $3,421
879$ $299 ($580)$12 $ 79.55 $1,034
2,705$ $120 ($2,585)$12 $ 79.55 $3,182
72,534$ $409,622 $337,089 $0.003 $ 0.0229 $85,315
135$ $10 ($125)$12 $ 79.55 $159
-$ $ -
487$ $80 ($407)$43 $ 286.38 $573
15,583$ $2,304 ($13,279)$21 $ 143.19 $18,328
1,785$ $319 ($1,466)$29 $ 190.92 $2,100
1,758$ $130 ($1,628)$12 $ 79.55 $2,068
10,077$ $8,344 ($1,733)$12 $ 79.55 $11,853
-$ $12 $ 79.55
-$ $ -
-$ $ -
Capital Accounting Partners Page 8 of 14 BldCostCalcs
Palo Alto Building Dept
Building Fees
Service
# If
Any
Fee Name
1,232 Commercial (Level 1 and 2)
1,233 Commercial (Level 1 and 2) - each additional station
1,233 Commercial (Level 3 and 4)
1,234 Commercial (Level 3 and 4) - each additional station
1,231 Residential (level 1 & 2)
Residential (level 3)
Electrical Permits - Photovoltaic Systems
Residential System (less than 10 kw)
1,242 Residential System (greater than 10 kw)
1,243 Commercial System (less than 10 kW)
1,244 Commercial System (10kW - 49kW)
1,245 Commercial System (greater than 49kW)
MECHANICAL PERMITS
Swimming Pool Heather
1,254 Admin base fee
Mechanical new or remodel cost/SF
1a
1b Furnaces
1c
1d
2 Appliance vents: installation, relocation or replacement of…
3 Repairs, alteration or addition of each heating appliance…
Boilers, Compressors, and Absorption Systems:
4a
Up to and including 3 HP, absorption system up to and including
100,000 Btu/h
4b
Up to and including 15HP, absorption system exceeding 100,000
Btu/h and including 500,000 Btu/h
4c
Up to and including 15-30HP, absorption system exceeding 500,000
Btu/h and including 1,000,000 Btu/h
4d
Up to and including 30-50HP, absorption system exceeding
1,000,000 Btu/h and including 1,750,000 Btu/h
4e Greater than50HP, absorption system exceeding 1,750,000 Btu/h
5 Air handlers up to and including 10,000 cf per cfm…
Ventilation and exhaust:
7a Each ventilation FAC connect to a single duct
7b
Each ventilation system that is not a portion of a heating or air-
conditioning system …
7c
Installation of each hood that is served by mechanical exhaust,
including the ducts of such hood
Miscellaneous
9
Each appliance or piece of equipment regulated by this code, but
not classed in other appliance categories for which no other fee is
listed in this table
Full Gas Piping
10a Each gas piping system of 1-5 outlets
10b Each additional gas piping system per outlet
Process Piping
11a Each hazardous process piping system 1-4 outlets
11b Each hazardous process piping system >5 outlets
11c Each nonhazardous process piping system of 1-4 outlets
Annual Revenue
Revenue at Full Cost of
Services
Projection of
Revenues at
Current Fees
Annual Surplus
(subsidy)
R
e
q
u
i
6 Months Reserve,
3 yr build up Full Cost / Unit With Reserves
Annual Cost Calculations w/o Reserves Reserve Requirements
6,501$ $6,290 ($211)
5,850$ $7,308 $1,458 $13 $ 87.10 $6,881
464$ $560 $96 $82 $ 545.24 $545
-$ $16 $ 106.78
9,579$ $9,120 ($459)$30 $ 197.66 $11,266
-$ $42 $ 277.29
-$ $ -
10,307$ ($10,307)$14 $ 95.46 $12,123
-$ $39,497 $39,497 $ 304.35
-$ $95 $ 631.53
2,416$ $2,550 $134 $142 $ 947.29 $2,842
873$ $900 $27 $154 $ 1,026.84 $1,027
1,493$ $644 ($849)$11 $ 76.37 $1,756
84,096$ $93,932 $9,836 $15 $ 96.88 $98,915
51,268$ $289,531 $238,263 $0 $ 0.02 $60,303
-$ $ -
15,939$ ($15,939)$29 $ 191.30 $18,748
-$ $ 0.32
-$ $ -
-$ $10 $ 64.02
-$ $10 $ 64.02
-$ $ -
-$ $19 $ 127.66
9,334$ $2,408 ($6,926)$19 $ 127.66 $10,979
-$ $19 $ 127.66
-$ $29 $ 191.30
-$ $29 $ 191.30
-$ $10 $ 64.02
-$ $ -
4,137$ $836 ($3,301)$10 $ 64.02 $4,866
-$ $10 $ 64.02
109$ $56 ($53)$10 $ 63.96 $128
-$ $ -
-$ $10
$ 63.96
-$ $ -
391$ $112 ($279)$17 $ 114.87 $459
-$ $10 $ 63.64
-$ $ -
-$
-$ $10 $ 63.64
-$ $23 $ 153.05
Capital Accounting Partners Page 9 of 14 BldCostCalcs
Palo Alto Building Dept
Building Fees
Service
# If
Any
Fee Name
11d Each NPP piping system of >5 outlets, per outlet
PLUMBING PERMITS - GRAY WATER SYSTEMS
1,266 Admin base fee
1 For each plumbing fixture on one trap or set of fixtures..
2 For each building sewer and each trailer park sewer
3 Rainwater system - per drain (inside building)
4 For each private sewage disposal system
6 For each water heater, vent, or both
7 For each gas piping system of one to five outlets
8 For each additional gas piping system outlet, per outlet
9
Industrial waste pretreatment interceptor, including trap and vent, X
kitchen-type grease interceptors
10
Installation, alteration or repair of water piping, water treatment
equip or both
11 Repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping, each fixture
12
Lawn sprinkler system on one meter including backflow protection
devices
13A Atmospheric-type vacuum breakers not referenced above (1-5)
13B Atmospheric-type vacuum breakers not referenced above (>5)
14 Backflow protective device other than atmospheric-type (any size)
Plumbing Permits - Graywater Systems
1,271 Clothes washer System
1,273 Complex System
1,272 Simple System
16 Installation and testing for a reclaimed water system
17 Annual cross-connection testing of reclaimed water system…
18 Each medical gas piping system 1-5 outlets
Additional medical gas inlet(s)
Electrical new or remodel cost/SF
Solar hot water system
1,190 Storm drain system
1,191 Swimming pool
Use & occupancy Permits
1,187 Certificate of Use and Occupancy
1,188 Certificate of Use and Occupancy - Replacement
1,189
1,186
Temporary Occupancy Permit - Multi-Family Residential, Non-
Residential, and Other Commercial
1,185
Temporary Occupancy Permit - Single Family Residential and
Commercial Tenant Improvement less than 10,000 sq. ft.
FIRE FEES
Hazardous Materials Classification Permits
1,367 Compressed Gas
1,363 Corrosives
1,364 Cryogenic Fluid
1,365 Flammable and Combustible Liquids
1,368 Flammable Gas
1,366 Flammable Solids
1,373 Health Hazard (Liquids & Solids)
Annual Revenue
Revenue at Full Cost of
Services
Projection of
Revenues at
Current Fees
Annual Surplus
(subsidy)
R
e
q
u
i
6 Months Reserve,
3 yr build up Full Cost / Unit With Reserves
Annual Cost Calculations w/o Reserves Reserve Requirements
-$ $23 $ 153.05
107,900$ $120,520 $12,620 $15 $ 96.88 $126,914
-$ $14 $ 95.46
1,953$ $420 ($1,533)$23 $ 153.12 $2,297
5,356$ $330 ($5,026)$14 $ 95.46 $6,300
15,621$ $1,320 ($14,301)$23 $ 153.12 $18,374
5,454$ $280 ($5,174)$17 $ 114.55 $6,415
27,659$ ($27,659)$34 $ 229.10 $32,533
-$ $710 $710 $ 48.70
-$ $34 $ 229.10
97$ $5 ($92)$17 $ 114.55 $115
1,299$ $448 ($851)$14 $ 95.46 $1,527
-$ $14 $ 95.46
-$ $17 $ 114.55
-$ $14 $ 95.46
15,193$ $390 ($14,803)$34 $ 229.10 $17,870
-$ $ -
-$ $14 $ 95.46
195$ $88 ($107)$34 $ 229.10 $229
243$ $183 ($60)$14 $ 95.46 $286
-$ $34 $ 229.10
-$ $69 $ 458.21
-$ $34 $ 229.10
Additional medical gas inlet(s)0.25 25$ $16 $41 -$ ($41)-$ $7 $ 47.73
Electrical new or remodel cost/SF2,127,2360.00012 0.012$ 0.008$ 0.02$ 0.11$ $0 41,435$ $233,996 $192,561 $0 $ 0.02 $48,736
Solar hot water system1.2 118.187$ 76.594$ 194.78$ 224.00$ $29 -$ $34 $ 229.10
1,190Storm drain system1.2 118$ $77 $195 28.00$ ($167)-$ $34 $ 229.10
1,191Swimming pool 0.4 39$ $26 $65 28.00$ ($37)-$ $11 $ 76.37
Use & occupancy Permits
1,187Certificate of Use and Occupancyeach1552.5 456$ $296 $752 287.00$ ($465)116,569$ $44,485 ($72,084)$133 $ 884.58 $137,109
1,188Certificate of Use and Occupancy - Replacementeach0.5 94$ $61 $155 123.00$ ($32)-$ $27 $ 182.64
1,189 -$ -$ $ -
1,186each332.3 365$ $237 $602 896.00$ $294 19,876$ $29,568 $9,692 $106 $ 708.43 $23,378
1,185each1551.7 270$ $175 $445 375.00$ ($70)69,003$ $58,125 ($10,878)$78 $ 523.62 $81,162
-$ -$ $ -
FIRE FEES
Hazardous Materials Classification Permits -$ -$
1,367Compressed Gasannually281 229$ $121 $350 139.00$ ($211)9,795$ ($9,795)$62 $ 411.45 $11,521
1,363Corrosivesannually541 229$ $121 $350 139.00$ ($211)18,890$ ($18,890)$62 $ 411.45 $22,219
1,364Cryogenic Fluidannually421 229$ $121 $350 139.00$ ($211)14,692$ ($14,692)$62 $411 $17,281
1,365Flammable and Combustible Liquidsannually1721 229$ $121 $350 139.00$ ($211)60,168$ ($60,168)$62 $411 $70,770
1,368Flammable Gasannually281 229$ $121 $350 139.00$ ($211)9,795$ ($9,795)$62 $411 $11,521
1,366Flammable Solidsannually1 229$ $121 $350 139.00$ ($211)-$ $62 $411
1,373Health Hazard (Liquids & Solids)annually331 229$ $121 $350 139.00$ ($211)11,544$ ($11,544)$62 $ 411.45 $13,578
Capital Accounting Partners Page 10 of 14 BldCostCalcs
Palo Alto Building Dept
Building Fees
Service
# If
Any
Fee Name
1,381 Liquefied Petroleum Gases
1,354 Organic Coatings
1,374 Organic Peroxides
1,355 Ovens - Industrial Baking or Drying
1,375 Oxidizers (Liquids & Solids)
1,369 Oxidizing Gas
1,356 Parade Float
1,357 Place of Public Assembly
1,370 Pyrophoric Gas
1,376 Pyrophoric Materials (Liquids & Solids)
1,358 Pyrotechnical Special Effects Material
1,377 Radioactive Materials
1,359 Refrigeration Equipment
1,360 Spraying/Dipping
1,361
Tent or air-supported structure having an area in excess of 200
square feet; or canopies in excess of 400 square feet (includes a
public assembly permit of $125.00 for all tents)
1,362 Tire Recapping/Tire Storage
1,371 Toxic, Highly Toxic, Moderately Toxic, Health Hazard Gas
1,378 Toxic, Highly Toxic, Moderately Toxic, Health Hazard Materials
1,372 Unstable Reactive Gas
1,379 Unstable Reactive Materials (Liquids & Solids)
1,380 Water Reactive Materials (Liquids & Solids)
Hazardouis Materials County Reimbursement
Hazardous Materials Storage Permits
1,311
Additional Approvals for Hazardous Materials Storage Permit (first 2
hours)
1,312
Additional Approvals for Hazardous Materials Storage Permit (per
hour for time above 2 hours)
1,308 Business Plan (HMBP)
1,312 Late Fee for Hazardous Materials Storage Permit
1,305 Level I Facility
1,306 Level II Facility
1,307 Level III Facility
1,309 Petroleum Aboveground Storage Tank
1,310 Provisional (6 Month)
Fire Inspection Fees
1,313
Additional Resinspection Fee (up to 2 hours during normal business
hours)
1,313 Additional Resinspection Fee (each additional hour)
1,314 After Hours Inspection Fee
Annual Revenue
Revenue at Full Cost of
Services
Projection of
Revenues at
Current Fees
Annual Surplus
(subsidy)
R
e
q
u
i
6 Months Reserve,
3 yr build up Full Cost / Unit With Reserves
Annual Cost Calculations w/o Reserves Reserve Requirements
1,381Liquefied Petroleum Gasesannually101 229$ $121 $350 139.00$ ($211)3,498$ ($3,498)$62 $ 411.45 $4,115
1,354Organic Coatingsannually1 229$ $121 $350 175.00$ ($175)-$ $62 $ 411.45
1,374Organic Peroxidesannually11 229$ $121 $350 139.00$ ($211)350$ ($350)$62 $ 411.45 $411
1,355Ovens - Industrial Baking or Dryingannually41 229$ $121 $350 102.00$ ($248)1,399$ ($1,399)$62 $ 411.45 $1,646
1,375Oxidizers (Liquids & Solids)annually161 229$ $121 $350 139.00$ ($211)5,597$ ($5,597)$62 $ 411.45 $6,583
1,369Oxidizing Gasannually341 229$ $121 $350 139.00$ ($211)11,894$ ($11,894)$62 $411 $13,989
1,356Parade Floatper hour1 229$ $121 $350 115.00$ ($235)-$ $62 $411
1,357Place of Public Assembly per occurrence2 457$ $242 $700 236.00$ ($464)-$ $123 $823
1,370Pyrophoric Gasannually11 229$ $121 $350 139.00$ ($211)350$ ($350)$62 $411 $411
1,376Pyrophoric Materials (Liquids & Solids)annually41 229$ $121 $350 139.00$ ($211)1,399$ ($1,399)$62 $411 $1,646
-$ $62 $411
9,795$ ($9,795)$62 $411 $11,521
-$ $62 $411
5,947$ ($5,947)$62 $411 $6,995
-$ $131 $872
-$ $246 $1,642
1,371Toxic, Highly Toxic, Moderately Toxic, Health Hazard Gasannually111 229$ $121 $350 139.00$ ($211)3,848$ ($3,848)$62 $411 $4,526
13,293$ ($13,293)$62 $411 $15,635
350$ ($350)$62 $411 $411
-$ $62 $411
-$ $62 $411
-$ $62 $411
-$ $348,000 $348,000
-$
-$ $134 $892
-$ $87 $583
115,990$ ($115,990)$87 $583 $136,429
-$
1,305Level I Facility811 229$ $121 $350 264.00$ ($86)28,335$ ($28,335)$62 $411 $33,328
83,256$ ($83,256)$123 $823 $97,926
267,257$ ($267,257)$247 $1,646 $314,351
18,190$ ($18,190)$123 $823 $21,396
-$ $123 $823
-$ -$
-$ -$
-$
104,687$ ($104,687)$123 $821 $123,134
-$ $61 $410
-$ $92 $616
Capital Accounting Partners Page 11 of 14 BldCostCalcs
Palo Alto Building Dept
Building Fees
Service
# If
Any
Fee Name
1,316 Care Facility
1,317 Care Facility Inspection Including Fire Clearance (greater than 25
Care Facility Inspection Including Fire Clearance (7-25 clients)
1,315 Christmas Tree Lot/Pumpkin Patch
1,321 High Rise Building - Certificate of Compliance (annually up to 4
1,322 High Rise Building - Certificate of Compliance (each additional hour))
1,318 Outside Cooking Booths
1,320 Standby Fire Watch or After Hours at Fire or Incident Scene
1,319 Use and Occupancy Fire Inspection
As-Built Plan Check and Additional Work
Investigations & Consultations
1,325 Additional Hours Over Plan Review/Inspection
1,323 Alternate Means and Methods Application
1,324 Appeals to Decisions
1,322 Consultation Fee
1,328 Hazardous Materials Data Entry Fee
1,327 Hydrant Flow Fee
1,326 Site Disaster Planning
Life Safety & Fire Protection
1294A Automatic Fire Sprinkler Installation/Modification > 19 heads
1,295 Automatic Fire Sprinkler Installation/Modification (plus per head)
1,301 Express Fire Protection Plan Check Fee
1,296 Fire Alarm System Installation and Modification
1,297
Fire Alarm System Installation and Modification (plus a device or
contact point)
1,303
Fire Protection and Fire Access Plan Review for New Single Family
Dwellings or Additions
1,298 Hydrant Installation/Modification - Private
1,295 Other Automatic Fire Extinguishing System
1,297 Standpipe System - Wet, Dry, or Combination
1,300 Temporary Certificate of Occupancy
1,299 Underground Fire Service Line
1,304 Verification of Fire Protection System Maintenance and Certification
Food truck permits
Multifamily dwellings, hotels & motels
4-50 units
51-100 units
Greater than 100 units
Fire Prevention Inspection of Private Schools
1294B Automatic Fire Sprinkler Installation/Modification > 19 heads
Specific Hazard Permits
1,329 Aerosol Products
1,330 Amusement Buildings
Annual Revenue
Revenue at Full Cost of
Services
Projection of
Revenues at
Current Fees
Annual Surplus
(subsidy)
R
e
q
u
i
6 Months Reserve,
3 yr build up Full Cost / Unit With Reserves
Annual Cost Calculations w/o Reserves Reserve Requirements
-$
-$ $123 $821
-$ $61 $410
-$ $61 $410
-$ $256 $1,710
-$ $61 $410
-$ $92 $616
-$ $61 $410
54,088$ $22,940 ($31,148)$61 $410 $63,619
52,344$ ($52,344)$123 $821 $61,567
-$
-$
-$ $49 $325
49,242$ ($49,242)$116 $772 $57,919
-$ $61 $410
165,755$ $78,850 ($86,905)$61 $410 $194,963
-$
26,172$ ($26,172)$61 $410 $30,784
-$ $61 $410
-$
-$
-$ $272 $1,813
-$ $1 $4
-$
-$ $172 $1,146
-$ $4 $25
-$ $141 $941
-$ $31 $205
-$ $172 $1,146
17,448$ ($17,448)$123 $821 $20,522
-$ $133 $889
250,817$ ($250,817)$295 $1,967 $295,015
-$ $14 $92
-$ $31 $205
-$
-$ $61 $410
-$ $698
-$ $184 $1,231
-$ $123 $821
-$ $123 $821
-$
-$ $77 $513
-$
Capital Accounting Partners Page 12 of 14 BldCostCalcs
Palo Alto Building Dept
Building Fees
Service
# If
Any
Fee Name
1,331 Automobile Wrecking Yard or Junk Yard
1,332 Bowling Alley and Pin Refinishing Involving the use of Flammable
1,333 Candles and Open Flames in Assembly Areas
1,334 Carnivals and Fairs
1,335 Cellulose Nitrate Storage/Nitrate Film
1,337 Combustible Fiber/Material Storage
1,336 Confined Space
1,338 Hot Work permit fee (one time permit)
1,339 Hot Work permit fee (monthly permit)
1,340
1,341 Fireworks Display
1,342 High-piled Combustible Storage
1,343 Hot Work (Welding) Operations
1,349 Liquid or Gas-Fueled Powered Equipment
1,344 Liquid or Gas-Fueled Vehicles or Equipment in Assembly Buildings
1,350 Magnesium Working
1,345 Malls - Covered
1,351 Occupant Load Increase - Temporary Public Assembly
1,352 Open Burning
1,348 Open Flame/Flame Producing Devices
1,353 Operate a Tank Vehicle to Transport Flammable/Combustible
1,347 Place of Public Assembly - Temporary
1,346 Temporary Kiosks
Fire Miscellaneous Fees
TCO fee for Vendors/Stock occupancy (Requires at least one
additional inspection)
1,288 Emergency Response Fee - Hazmat (PAMC 17.24.050)
1,289 Installation or Closure Without Approved Plans and/or Permits
Fire plans revision
Building General & Miscellaneous Fees
1,176 All Other Publications
1,201 Construction/Maintenance Vehicles
1,172 Electric Service and Safety Inspection
1,181 Extension of Building Permit or Building Permit Application
1,174
Inspections and Investigations - Outside Normal Business Hours
(1.5xOThour)
1,175
Inspections and Investigations - Outside Normal Business Hours
(2.0xOThour)
1,173 Inspections and Investigations - Unclassified
1,184 Reactivation of Expired Building Permit - All Others
1,183 Reactivation of Expired Building Permit - Final Inspection Only
1,182 Reactivation of Expired Building Permit Application
1,178 Real Property Research Fee (1-hour minimum)
1,177 Records Retention
1,180 Reinspection Fee - Multi-Family Residential and Non-Residential
1,179
Reinspection Fee - Single Family Residential (each secondary
inspection type)
Annual Revenue
Revenue at Full Cost of
Services
Projection of
Revenues at
Current Fees
Annual Surplus
(subsidy)
R
e
q
u
i
6 Months Reserve,
3 yr build up Full Cost / Unit With Reserves
Annual Cost Calculations w/o Reserves Reserve Requirements
-$
-$ $179 $1,197
-$ $61 $410
-$ $256 $1,710
-$ $18 $120
-$
-$
1,338Hot Work permit fee (one time permit)One time1 228$ $121 $349 126.00$ ($223)-$ $61 $410
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$ $61 $410
-$
-$
-$ $123 $821
-$ $61 $410
-$ $61 $410
-$ $61 $410
-$ $87 $582
-$ $61 $410
-$
-$
-$
287,438$ ($287,438)$203 $1,352 $338,088
-$ $61 $410
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
1,172Electric Service and Safety Inspectionper hour1 98$ $52 $151 84.00$ ($67)-$ $27 $177
2,656$ $1,736 ($920)$15 $101 $3,124
365$ $202 ($163)$64 $429 $429
25,274$ $11,752 ($13,522)$86 $572 $29,727
-$ $43 $286
4,325$ ($4,325)$40 $268 $5,087
4,049$ $6,000 $1,951 $45 $298 $4,762
3,023$ $2,688 ($335)$33 $222 $3,556
-$ $43 $286
118,656$ $80,936 ($37,720)$1 $7 $139,564
562$ $616 $54 $50 $331 $661
3,086$ $1,176 ($1,910)$220 $3,086 $43,200
Capital Accounting Partners Page 13 of 14 BldCostCalcs
Palo Alto Building Dept
Building Fees
Service
# If
Any
Fee Name
1,180
Reinspection Fee - Single Family Residential (each primary
inspection type)
1,171 Request for Release of Building Plans
1,175 Residential Inspection Guidelines
Conditional Utility Agreement
Emergency Responder Radio Coverage (testing) fee.
GREEN BUILDING FEES
Bldg
Alterations and additions for single and multifamily < 1,000 sq ft and
increases conditioned space
Bldg Alterations and additions for single and multifamily > 1,000 sq ft
Bldg Multi Family New Construction of 3 or More (attached) Units
Bldg Multi Family New Construction of < 4
Bldg New Single family
Bldg
Tenant improvements, renovations, or alterations > 5,000 sq ft that
includes replacement or alteration of
at least two of the following: HVAC system, building envelope, hot
water system, or lighting
system and project value greater than $200,000.
Bldg
C. Tenant improvements, renovations or alterations > $200,000 in
valuation (and not triggered by a Calgreen Tier)
Bldg
If the project is over $100,000 Energy Star is required after 12
months of occupancy
Bldg New commercial 1000 - 25,000 SF
Bldg New commercial 25,001-50,000 SF
Bldg New commercial >50,000 SF
Bldg Landscape Review - plan review
Bldg Landscape Review - inspection
Bldg Landscape Review - plan review
Bldg Landscape Review - inspection
Bldg Landscape Review - plan review
Bldg Landscape Review - inspection
Bldg
Fee # 325
Annual Revenue
Revenue at Full Cost of
Services
Projection of
Revenues at
Current Fees
Annual Surplus
(subsidy)
R
e
q
u
i
6 Months Reserve,
3 yr build up Full Cost / Unit With Reserves
Annual Cost Calculations w/o Reserves Reserve Requirements
-$ $50 $331
-$ $13 $90
-$
44,292$ $47,124 $2,832 $42 $279 $52,097
15,631$ ($15,631)$110 $735 $18,386
108,626$ $67,023 ($41,603)$193 $1,291 $127,767
204,545$ $28,718 ($175,827)$217 $1,449 $240,588
6,032$ $2,672 ($3,360)$266 $1,774 $7,095
-$ $218 $1,456
9,611$ $11,809 $2,198 $242 $1,615 $11,305
51,271$ $32,028 ($19,243)$266 $1,774 $60,305
51,997$ $14,868 ($37,129)$218 $1,456 $61,160
-$ $123 $821
37,336$ $30,303 ($7,033)$313 $2,091 $43,915
-$ $361 $2,409
-$ $385 $2,567
87,160$ ($87,160)$256 $1,709 $102,519
13,091$ ($13,091)$38 $257 $15,397
71,516$ ($71,516)$158 $1,051 $84,118
17,454$ ($17,454)$38 $257 $20,530
14,527$ ($14,527)$256 $1,709 $17,087
2,182$ ($2,182)$38 $257 $2,566
-$
-$
Annual Revenue
Impact
Revenue at Full Cost of
Services
Projection of
Revenues at
Current Fees
Annual Surplus
(subsidy)With Reserves
13,096,098$ 11,308,113$ ($1,787,985)$15,435,720
Annual Revenue Impacts
Capital Accounting Partners Page 14 of 14 BldCostCalcs