Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-12-07 City Council (12)City of Palo Alto City Manager’s Rep°rt 4 TO:HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL FROM:CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: POLICE DATE:DECEMBER 7, 1998 CMR:445:98 SUBJECT:APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURE OF ASSET SEIZURE FUNDS RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends that Council approve expenditures in the amount of $10,400 from .the Asset Seizure Fund to cover costs for six undercover radios and a frequency scrambling device to be used for undercover surveillance operations. Additionally, staff recommends that funds in the amount of $5,600 previously approved for the purchase of bicycle headsets be used instead for the purchase of new bicycles. BACKGROUND Sections of the California Health and Safety (H&S) Code govern the seizure and forfeiture of property and money associated with drug trafficking. The seizure process typically occurs during an arrest or search warrant service related to sales of narcotics. While laws have placed some additional restrictions on the seizure of property, in certain situations the practice is permitted. Legislation stipulates that seized property funds are not to be used to defer normal operating expenses, but should be used for special purchases and projects associated with law enforcement activities, especially those related to drug enforcement. In Santa Clara County, a Deputy District Attorney is specifically assigned to handle asset forfeiture cases and to help local agencies properly process their cases. Monies seized by the Police Department are held by the District Attorney’s Office in a special account until the specific case is adjudicated. The process of seizing money is a civil proceeding, wholly independent of any criminal filing or conviction and requires strict procedural adherence. At the conclusion of the Superior Court proceedings, the money is returned to the City, deposited into an Asset Seizure Fund created by the City’s Administrative Services Department, and with City Council approval, released for expenditure purposes. CMR:445:98 Page 1 of 3 DISCUSSION Currently, the Asset Seizure Fund totals approximately $40,000. In August 1998, Council authorized expenditures in the amount of $22,000 to enhance evidence collection equipment; and to increase communications between officers, investigators, dispatchers and the public with additional and improved communication equipment. Of that $22,000, staff originally proposed to spend $5,600 for radio headsets for the bicycle officers. Since receiving Council approval,however, staff has learned that there are previously unknown problems with the headsets and thus, has elected not to purchase them. Instead, staff proposes to use the $5,600 for the purchase of new bicycles. These bicycles will be used by the Downtown Health and Safety Officers and for covert enforcement operations. Additionally, the Police Department proposes spending $10,400 for the purchase of six undercover radios and a frequency scrambling device for the body transmitters and undercover radios. This will provide additional security for radio transmissions and increase officer safety. RESOURCE IMPACT In compliance with State requirements, the City has an established Asset Seizure Fund in which monies are deposited. If the staff recommendation is approved, $30,000 will remain in the fund. POLICY IMPLICATIONS Expenditures of funds are consistent with State regulations and City policy. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW This is not a project subject to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements. PREPARED BYi Torin G. Fischer, Police Lieutenant CMR:445:98 Page 2 of 3 DEPARTMENT HEAD: PATRICK DWYER Chief of Police EMILY !kAKRIS~--~ - Assistant City Manager CMR:445:98 Page 3 of 3