HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-10-05 City Council (18)City of Palo Alto
City Manager’s Report
TO:HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DATE:October 5, 1998 CMR:387:98
SUBJECT:APPROVAL OF CONSULTANT AGREEMENT WITH NELSON~
NYGAARD CONSULTING ASSOCIATES FOR THE PALO ALTO
LOCAL BUS SYSTEM PLAN
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that Council approve the attached Agreement (Attachment A) with
Nelson~qygaard Consulting Associates, in the amount of $74,820, to develop a long-range
plan for a Palo Alto Local Bus System, and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement.
BACKGROUND
The 1997-98 Operating Budget included $75,000 to develop a long-range plan for a
community-based bus system serving Palo Alto residential neighborhoods and local
destinations, such as commercial areas, employment centers, transit stations, schools, cultural
centers, and social centers. The plan is intended to identify transportation needs that could
be served by a local bus. system and present options for an affordable local bus system to
serve the highest-priority community needs, a proposed funding strategy, and an
implementation plan~
DISCUSSION
The consultant scope of work describes the steps of the planning process, including needs
assessment, priority setting, development of system alternatives, choice of a preferred
alternative, analysis of altemative funding mechanisms and recommendations, and an action
plan for a first phase of service. The process will include public workshops, stakeholder
group meetings, and worldng papers that will be available for public comment. (Please refer
to Exhibit A attached to the agreement for details of the scope of work.) As reported to
Council in July (CMR:318:98), staff formed a Project Advisory Committee (PAC) to assist
with consultant selection, help the consultant gather input from the constituent groups
represented on the committee, and review and comment on the consultant’s work at various
stages of the study. Since the July status report (CMR:318:98), the PAC has been expanded
to include representatives from the Palo Alto Unified School District, Stanford Research
ClvlR:387:98 Page 1 of 3
Park, Duveneck Neighborhood Association, and the University South Neighborhood Group.
A revised roster of the PAC is provided as Attachment B.
Selection Process
During their review of the 199%98 list of proposed consultant services over $25,000, neither
the Policy and Services Committee nor the Finance Committee identified this project as one
of the projects for which it would like to review the draft scopeof work prior to beginning
the consultant selection process. Therefore, staff initiated a process to retain a consultant.
Staff reviewed the scope of work with the PAC, and its comments were incorporated into the
final document.
The PAC appointed a representative subgroup to serve as the Consultant Selection
Committee. Committee members were:
Phyllis Cassel
Will Beckett
Kathy Durham
Kathleen Owynn
Ashok Aggarwal
Gayle Likens
Julia Fremon
Planning Commission
Bma’on Park Association
PTA Council, Palo Alto Unified School District
Senior Coordinating Council
Transportation Division
Transportation Division
Transportation Division (contract project coordinator)
A request for Letters of Qualification was mailed to 28 firms on April 21, 1998 (Attachment
C). Of the 28 firrns, four responded with Letters of Qualification. On June 16, 1998, a
Request for Proposals (RFP) was mailed to three of the four finns and to an additional
consultant who requested a copy. The proposals were due on July 7, 1998. Of the four firms
mailed the RFP, two submitted proposals. Both consultant teams were interviewed by the
Consultant Selection Committee on July 22, 1998. The Committee selected NelsonkNygaard
.Consulting Associates as its fu’st choice based on the firm’s expertise in planning small
transit systems. The Committee also based its decision on the composition and experience
of the project team, as well as its understanding 0fthe project, extensive community planning
experience, and public presentation capabilities.
Consultant Agreement
Staff has negotiated an agreement (Attachment A) with NelsonkNygaard Consulting
Associates for this project, The total negotiated price of the agreement is $74,820. The
budget includes no contingency, so any new tasks requested by the City during the course
of the study will necessitate a reduction of scope in some other area.
RE R E IMPA T
Funding of $75,000 in the 1997-98 Operating Budget will be used to develop this long-range
.plan.
CMR:387:98 Page 2 of 3
POLICY IMPLICATION8
The recommendation of this report is consistent with Policy T-4 of the 1998-2010
Comprehensive Plan to provide local transit in Palo Alto, and Program T-13 to develop "a
jitney bus system similar to Stanford University’s Marguerite Shuttle."
TIMELINE
The planning process’ is expected to begin later this month, produci.ng a recommended
long-range plan by early Spring 1999, for consideration by the Planning Commission and
Council in late Spring 1999.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
An environmental impact assessment will be prepared for the final Plan.
ATTACHMENTS
A. Agreement with Nelson/Nygaard
B. Project Advisory Committee Roster
PREPARED BY:
DEPARTMENT HEAD:
Gayle Likens, Senior Planner
ANNE CRONIN MOORE
. Interim Director of Planning and
Community .Environment
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
EMILY HARRISON
Assistant City Manager
CO:Project Advisory Committee
Nelson/Nygaard Consulting Associates
CMR:387:98 Page 3 of 3
ATTACHMENT A
CONTRACT NO.
BETWEEN THE CITY OF PALO ALTO AND
NELSON\NYGAARD CONSULTING ASSOCIATES
FOR CONSULTING SERVICES
This Contract No. : is entered into ,
by and between the CITY OF PALO ALTO, a chartered city and a
municipal corporation of the State of California ("CITY"), and
Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates, a partnership, located at 833
Market Street, Suite 900, San Francisco, CA 94103 ("CONSULTANT").
RECITALS :
WHEREAS, CITY desires certain professional consulting
services (~Services") and the preparation and delivery of,’ without
limitation,, one or more sets of documents, drawings, maps, plans,
designs, data, calculations, surveys, specifications, schedules or
other writings (~Deliverables") (Services and Deliverables are,
collectively, the ~Project"), as more fully described in Exhibit
~A"; and
WHEREAS, CITY desires to engage CONSULTANT, including its
employees, if any, in providing the Services by reason of its
qualifications and experience in performing the Services, and
~CONSULTANT has offered to complete the Project on the terms and in
the manner set forth herein;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, terms,
conditions, and provisions of this Contract, .the parties agree:
SECTION I. ~TER~_
I.i This Contract will commence on the date of its
execution by CITY, and will terminate upon the compl.etion of. the
Project, unless this Contract is earlier terminated by CITY. Upon
the receipt of CITY’s notice to proceed, CONSULTANT will commence
work on the initial and subsequent Project tasks in accordance with¯
the time schedule set forth in Exhibit ~A"i Time is of the essence
of this Contract. In the event that the Project is not completed
within the time required through any fault of CONSULTANT, CITY’s
city manager will have the option of extending the time schedule
for any period of time. This provision will not preclude the
recovery of damages for delay caused by CONSULTANT.
2.1 The scope of Services and Deliverables constituting
the Project will be performed, delivered or executed by CONSULTANT
under the phases of the Basic Services as described below.
980925 1. 0032038
2.2 CITY may order substantial changes in the scope or
character of the Basic Services, the Deliverables, or the Project’,
either decreasing or increasing the amount of work required of
CONSULTANT. In the event that such changes are ordered, subject to
the approval of CITY’s City Council, as may be required, CONSULTANT
will be entitled to fullcompensation for all work performed prior
to CONSULTANT’s receipt of the notice of change and further will be
entitled to an extension of the time schedule. Any increase in
compensation for substantial changes will be determined in
accordance with the provisions of this Contract. CITY will not be
liable for the cost or pa~yment of any change in work, unless the
amount of additional compensation attributable to the change in
work is agreed to, in writing, by CITY before CONSULTANT commences
the performance of any such change in work.
EI N 3 UALIFICATIONS.
CONSULTANT
STATUS. AND DUTIES OF
3.1 CONSULTANT represents and warrants that it has the
expertise and professional qualifications to furnish or cause to be
furnished the Services and Deliverables. CONSULTANT further
represents and warrants that the project director and every
individual, including any .consultant (including CONSULTANTs),
charged with the performance of the Services are duly licensed or
certified by the State of CalifQrnia, to the extent such licensing
or certification is required~by law to perform the Services, and
that the Project will be executed by them or under their
supervision. CONSULTANT will furnish to CITY for approval, prior
to execution of this Contract, a list of all individuals and the
names of their employers or principals to be employed as
consultants.
3.2 In reliance on the representations and warranties
set forth in this Contract, CITY hires CONSULTANT to execute, and
CONSULTANT covenants~and agrees that it will execute or~.cause to be
executed, the Project.
3.3 CONSULTANT will assign Jeffrey Timlin as the
Project director to’ have supervisory responsibility for the
performance, progress, and execution of the Project. If
circumstances or conditions subsequent to the execution of this
Contract cause the substitution of the project director or project
coordinator for any reason, the appointment of a substitute project
director or substitute project coordinator will be subject to the
prior written approval of the project manager.
3.4 CONSULTANT represents and warrants that it will:
3.4.1 Procure all permits and licenses, pay all
charges ~and fees, and give all notices which maybe necessary and-
incident to the due and lawful prosecution of the Project;
3.4.2 Keep itself fully informed of all Federal,
State of California, and local laws, ordinances, regulations,
orders, and decrees which may affect those engaged or employed
under this Contract and any materials used in CONSULTANT’s
performance of the Services;
3.4.3 At all times observe and comply with, and cause
its employees and consultants, if any, who are assigned to the
performance of this Contract to observe and comply with, the laws,
ordinances, regulations, orders and decrees mentioned above; and
3.4.4 Will report immediately to the project manager,
in writing, any discrepancy or inconsistency it discovers in the
laws, ordinances, regulations, orders, and decrees-mentioned above
in relation to the Deliverables.
3.5 Any Deliverables given to, or prepared or assembled
by, CONSULTANT or. its consultants, if any, under this Contract will
become the property of CITY and will not be made available to any
individual or organization by CONSULTANT or its- consultants, if
any, without the prior written approval of the city manager.
3.6 CONSULTANT will. provide CITY~ with copies of any
documents which are a part of the Deliverables, in the number
specified in Exhibit ~A", upon their completion and acceptance by
CITY.
3.7 If CITY requests additional copies of any documents
which are a part .of the Deliverables, CONSULTANT will provide such
additional copies and CITY will compensate CONSULTANT for its
duplicating costs.
3.8 CONSULTANT will be responsible for employing or
engaging all persons necessary to execute the Project, All
consultants of CONSULTANT will be deemed to be directlycontrolled
and supervised by CONSULTANT, which will be responsible for their
performance. If any employee or consultant of CONSULTANT fails or
refuses to carry out the provisions of this Contract or appears to
be fncompetent or to act~ in a disorderly or improper manner, the
.employee or consultant will be discharged immediately from further
performance under this Contract on demand of the project manager.
3.9 In the execution of the Project, CONSULTANT and its
consultants, if any, will at all times be considered independent
contractors and not agents or employees of CITY.
3.10 CONSULTANT will perform or obtain or. cause to be
performed or obtained any and all of the following Additional
Services, not included under the Basic Services, if so authorized,
in writing, by CITY:
98o925 h~ 0o32o38 3
3.10.1 Providing services as an expert witness in
connection with any public hearing or meeting, arbitration
proceeding,or proceeding of a court of record;
3.10.2 Incurring travel and subsistence expenses for
CONSULTANT and its staff beyond those normally required under the
Basic Services;
3.10o3 Performing any other Additional Services that
may be agreed upon by the parties subsequent to the execution of
this Contract; and
3.10.4 Other Additional Services now or hereafter
described in Exhibit "A" to this Contract.
3.11 CONSULTANT will be responsible for employing
all consultants deemed necessary to assist coNSULTANT in the
performance of the Services. The appointment of consultants must
be approved, in advance, by CITY, in writing, and must remain
acceptable to CITY during the term of this Contract..
4ol CITY will furnish or cause to be furnished the
services listed in Exhibit "A" and such information regarding its
requirements applicable to the Project as may be reasonably
requested byCONSULTANT.
4.2 CITY will review and approve, as necessary, in a
timely manner ~the Deliverables and each phase of work performed by
CONSULTANT. CITY’s estimated time of review and approval will be
furnished to CONSULTANT at the time of submission of each~phase of
work. CONSULTANT acknowledges and understands that the
interrelated exchange of information among CITY’s ~arious
departments makes it extremely difficult for CITY~ to firmly
establish the time of each review and approval task. CITY’s
failure to review and approve within the estimated time schedule
will not constitute a default under this Contract.
4.3 The city manager will represent CITY for all
purposes under this Contract. Ashok Aggarwal is designated as the
project manager for the city manager. The project manager will
supervise the performance, progress, and execution of the project,
and will be assisted by Gayle Likens, the Project-Plannero
4.4 If CITY observes or otherwise becomes aware of any
default in the performance of CONSULTANT, CITY will use reasonable
efforts to give.written notice thereof to CONSULTANT in a timely
manner°
9809~S |~c 003~,03~4
~_CT I ON 5.¢OMPENSATIQ~
5.1 CITY will compensate CONSULTANT for the following
.services and work:
5.1.1 In consideration of the full performance of the
Basic Services, including any authorized reimbursable expenses,
CITY will pay CONSULTANT a fee not to exceed Seventy-Four Thousand
Eight Hundred Twenty Dollars ($74,820.00). The amount of
compensation will be calculated in accordance with the hourly rate
schedule set forth in Exhibit "B", on a time and materials basis,
up to the maximum amount set forth in this Section.
5.1.2 The full payment of charges for extra work or
changes, or both, in the execution of the Project will be made,
provided such request for payment is initiated by CONSULTANT and
authorized, in writing,by the project manager. Payment will ~be
made within thirty (30) days of submission by CONSULTANT of a
statement, in triplicate, of itemized costs covering such work or
changes, or both. Prior to commencing such extra work or changes,
or both, the parties will agree upon an estimated maximum cost for
such extra work or Ghanges. CONSULTANT will not be paid for extra
work or changes,including, without limitation, any design work or
change order .preparation, which is made necessary on account of
CONSULTANT’s errors, omissions, or oversights.
5.1.3 Direct personnel expense of employees assigned
~to the execution of the Project by CONSULTANT will include only the
work of architects, engineers, designers, job captains, surveyors,
draftspersons, specification writers and typists, in consultation,~
research and design, work in producing drawings, specifications and
other documents pertaining to the Project, and in services rendered
during construction at the site, to the extent such services are
expressly contemplated under this Contract. Included in ~the cost
of direct personnel expense of these employees are salaries and
mandatory and ’customary benefits such as statutory employee
benefits, insurance, sick leave, holidays and vacations, pensions
and similar benefits.
5.2 The schedule of payments will be made as follows:
5.2.1 Payment of the Basic Services will be made in
~onthly progress payments in proportion to the quantum of services
performed, or in accordance with any other schedule of payment
mutually agreed upon by the parties, as set forth in Exhibit "B",
or within thirty (30) days of submission, in triplicate, of such
requests if .a schedule of payment is not specified. Final payment
will be. made by CITY after CONSULTANT has submitted all
Deliverables, including, without limitation, reports which have
been approved by the project manager.
5.2.2 Payment of the Additional Services will be
made in monthly progress payments for services rendered, within
thirty (30) days of submission, in triplicate, of such requests.
5.2.3 No deductions will be made from CONSULTANT’s
compensation on account of penalties, liquidated damages, or other
sums withheld by CITY from payments to general contractors.
SECTION 6.ACCOUNTING. AUDITS, OWNERSHIP OF RECORD~
6.1 Records of the direct personnel expenses and
expenses incurred in connection with the performance of Basic
Services and Additional Services pertaining to the Project will be
prepared, maintained, and retained by CONSULTANT in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles and will be made available
to CITY for auditing purposes at mutually convenient times during
the term of this Contract and for three (3) years following the
expiration or earlier termination of this Contract.
6.2 The originals of the Deliverables prepared by or
under the direction of CONSULTANT in the performance of this~
contract will~become the property of CITY irrespective, of whether
the Project is completed upon CITY’s payment of the amounts
required to be paid to CONSULTANT. These originals will ~be
delivered to CITY without additional compensation. CITY will have
the right to utilize any final and incomplete drawings, estimates,
specifications, and any other documents prepared hereunder by
CONSULTANT, but CONSULTANT disclaims any responsibility or
liability for any alterations or modifications of such documents.
SECTION 7.INDEMNITy
7.1 CONSULTANT agrees to protect, indemnify, defend and
hold harmless CITY, its Council members, officers, employees and
agents, from any and all demands, claims, or liability of any
nature, including death or injury to any person, property damage or
any other loss, caused by or arising out of CONSULTANT’s, its
officers’, agents’, consultants’ or employees’ negligent acts,
errors, or omissions, or willful misconduct, or conduct for which
applicable law may impose strict liability on CONSULTANT in the
performance of or failure to perform its obligations under this
Contract.
E T N 8 I R
8.1 The waiver by ~either party of’ any breach or
violation of any covenant, term, condition or provision of this
Contract or of the provisions of any ordinance or law will not be
deemed to be a waiver of any such covenant, term, condition,
provision, ordinance, or law or of any subsequent breach or
violation of the same or of any other covenant, term, condition,
provision, ordinance or law. The subsequent acceptance by either
party of any fee or other money which may become due hereunder will
980925 Me 0032038 6
not be deemed to be a waiver of any preceding breach or violation
by the other party of any covenant, term, condition or provision of
this Contract or of any applicable law or ordinance.
8.2 No payment, partial payment, acceptance, or partial
acceptance by CITY will operate as a waiver on the part of CITY of
any of its rights under this Contract.
SECTION 9. INSURANCE
9.1 CONSULTANT, at its sole cost and expense, will
obtain and maintain, in full force and effect during the term of
this Contract, the insurance coverage described in Exhibit "C",
insuring not only CONSULTANT and its consultants, if any, but also,
with the exception of workers’ compensation, employer’s liability
insurance, naming CITY as an additional insured concerning
CONSULTANT’s performance under this Contract.
9.2 All insurance coverage required hereunder will be
provided through carrie~s with Best’s Key Rating Guide ratings of
A:VII or higher which are admitted to transact insurance business
in the State of California. Any and all consultants of CONSULTANT
retained to perform Services under this Contract will obtain and
maintain, in full force and effect during the term of this
Contract, identical -insurance coverage, naming CITY as an
additional insured under.such policies as required above.
9.3 Certificates of such insurance, preferably on the
forms provided by CITY, will be filed with CITY concurrently with
the execution of this Contract. The certificates will be subject
to the approval of CITY’s risk manager and will contain an
endorsement stating that the insurance is primary coverage and will
not be canceled or altered by the insurer except 6fter filing, with
the CITY’s city clerk thirty (30) days’ prior written notice of
such cancellation or alteration, and that the City of Palo Alto is
named as an additional insured except in policies .of workers’
compensation, employer’s liability, and professional liability
insurance. ~ Current certificates of such insurance will be kept on
file at all times during the term of this Contract with the city
clerk.
9.4 The procuring of such required policy or policies
of insurance will not be construed to limit CONSULTANT’s liability
hereunder nor to fulfill the indemnification provisions of this
Contract. Notwithstanding the policy or policies of insurance,
CONSULTANT will be obligated for the full and total amount of any
damage, injury, or loss caused by or directly arising as a result
of the Services performed under this Contract.
98(~25 I~c 0032038 7
i0.i CONSULTANT, by executing this Contract, certifies
that. it is aware of the provisions of the Labor Code of the State
of California which require e~ery employer to be insured against
liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self-insurance
in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and certifies that
it will comply with such provisions, as applicable, before
commencing the performance of the Project.
SECTION Ii.TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION OF CONTRACT...OR
ii.I The city manager may suspendthe execution of the
Project, in whole or in part, or terminate this Contract, with or
without cause, by giving thirty (30) days’ prior written notice
thereof to CONSULTANT, or immediately after submission to CITY by
CONSULTANT of any completed item of Basic Services. Upon receipt
of such notice, -CONSULTANT will immediately discontinue its
performance under this Contract.
11.2 CONSULTANT may terminate this Contract or suspend
its execution of the Project by giving thirty (30) days’ prior
written notice thereof to CITY, but only in the event of a
substantial failure of performance by CITY or in the event CITY
indefinitely withholds or withdraws its request for the initiation
or continuation of Basic Services~or the execution of the Project.
11.3 Upon such suspension or termination by CITY,
CONSULTANT will be compensated for the Basic Services and
Additional Services performed and Deliverables received and
approved prior to receipt of written notice from CITY of such
suspension or abandonment, together with authorized additional and
reimbursable expenses then due.~ If the Project is resumed after it
has been suspended for more than 180 days, any change in
CONSULTANT’s compensation will be subject to renegotiation and, if
necessary, approval of CITY’s City Council. If this Contract is
suspended or terminated on account of a default by CONSULTANT, CITY
will be obligated to compensate CONSULTANT only for that portion of
CONSULTANT’s services which are Of ~direct and immediate benefit to
CITY, as such determination may be made by the city manager in the
reasonable exercise of her discretion.
11.4 In the event of termination of this Contract or
suspension of work on the Project by CITY where CONSULTANT is not
in default, CONSULTANT will receive compensation as follows:
11.4.1 For approved items of services, CONSULTANT will
be compensated for each item of service fully performed in the
amounts authorized under this Contract.
11.4.2
to proceed is
For approved
issued by CITY,
items, of services on which a
but which are not fullynotice
performed, CONSULTANT will be compensated for each item of service
in an amount which bears the same ratio to the total fee otherwise
payable for the performance of the service a~ the quantum of
service actually rendered bears to the services necessary for the
full performance of that item of service.
11.4.3 The total compensation payable under the
preceding Paragraphs of this Section will not exceed the payment
specified under Section 5 for the respective items of service to be
furnished by CONSULTANT.
11.5 Upon such suspension or termination, CONSULTANT
will deliver to the city manager immediately any and all copies of
the Deliverables, whether or not-completed, prepared by CONSULTANT
or its consultants, if any, or given, to CONSULTANT or its
consultants; if any, in connection with this Contract. Such
materials will.become the.property of CITY.
11.6 The failure of CITY to agree with CONSULTANT’s
independent findings, conclusions, or recommendations, if the same
are called for under this Contract, on the basis of differences in
matters of judgment, will not be construed as a failure on the part
of CONSULTANT to fulfill its obligations under this Contract.
12~i This Contract is for the personal services of
CONSULTANT, therefore, CONSULTANT will not assign, transfer,
convey, or otherwise dispose of this Contract or any right, title
or interest in or to the same or any part thereof without the prior
written Consent ~f CITY. A consent to one assignment will not be
deemed to be a consent to any subsequent assignment. Any
assignment made without the approval of CITY will be void and, at
the option of the city manager, this Contract may be~terminated.
This Contract will not be assignable by operation of law.
SECTION 13.NOTICE~
13.1 All notices hereunder will~ be given, in writing,
and mailed, postage prepaid, by certified mail, addressed as
follows:
To CITY:Office of the City Clerk
City of Palo Alto
Post Office Box 10250
Palo Alto, CA 94303
To CONSULTANT: Attention of the project director
at the address of CONSULTANT recited above
N N T F N T
14.1 In accepting this Contract, CONSULTANT covenants
that it presently has no interest, and will not acquire any
interest, direct or indirect, financial or otherwise, which would
conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of the
Services.
14.2 CONSULTANT further covenants that, in the
performance of this Contract, it will not employ .contractors or
persons having such an interest mentioned above. CONSULTANT
certifies that no one who has or will have any financial interest
under this Contract is an officer or employee of .CITY; this
provision will be interpreted in accordance with the applicable
provisions of the Palo Alto Municipal Code and the Government Code
of the State of California.
SECTION.15,NONDISCRIMINATION~
15.1 As set forth in the Palo Alto Municipal Code, no
discrimination will be made in the employment of persons under this
Contract because of the age, race, ¯ color, national origin,
ancestry, religion, disability, sexual preference or gender of such
person. If the value of this Contract is’, or may be, five thousand
dollars ($5,000) or more, CONSULTANT agrees to meet all
requirements of the~ Palo Alto Municipal Code pertaining to
nondiscrimination in employment, including completing the requisite
form furnished by CITY and set forth in Exhibit "D".
15.2 CONSULTANT agrees that each contract for services
from independent providers will contain a provision substantially
as follows:
"[Name of Provider] will provide CONSULTANT
with .a certificate stating that [Name of
Provider] is currently in compliance with all
Federal and State of California laws covering
nondiscrimination in employment; and that
[Name of Provider] will not discriminate ~in
the employmen[ of any person under this
contract because of the age, race, color,
national origin, ancestry, religion,
disability, sexual preference or gender of
such person°"
15.3 If CONSULTANT is found in violation of the
nondiscrimination provisions of the State of California Fair
Employment Practices Act orsimilar provisions of Federal law or
executive order in the performance of this Contract, it will be in
default of this Contract. Thereupon, CITY will have the power to
cancel or suspend this Contract, in whole or in part, or to deduct
the sum of twenty-five dollars ($25) for each person for each
98o925 ~c 0o32o38 1 0
¯ calendar day during which such person was subjected to
discrimination, as damages for breach of contract, or both. Only
a finding of the State of California Fair Employment Practices
Commission or the equivalent federal agency or officer will
constitute evidence of a breach of this Contract.
15.4 If CONSULTANT is found in default of the
nondiscrimination provisions of this Contract, CONSULTANT will be
found in material breach of this Contract. Thereupon, CITY will
have the power to cancel or suspend this Contract, in whole.or in
part, or to deduct from the amount payable to CONSULTANT the sum of
two hundred fifty dollars ($250) for each calendar day during which
CONSULTANT is not in compliance with this provision as damages for
breach of contract, or both.
SECTION 16.MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
16.1 CONSULTANT represents and warrants that it has
knowledge of the requirements of the federal Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990, and the Government Code and the Health
and Safety Code of the State of California,.relating to access to
public buildings and accommodations for disabled persons, and
relating to facilities for disabled persons. CONSULTANT will
comply with or ensure by its advice that compliance with such
provisions will be effected pursuant to the terms of this Contract.
16.2 Upon the agreement of the parties, any controversy
or claim arising out of or relating to this Contract may be settled
by arbitration in accordance with the Rules of the American
Arbitration Association, and judgment upon the award rendered by
the Arbitrators may be entered in any court having jurisdiction
thereof.
16.3 This Contract will be governed by the laws of the
State of California, excluding its. conflicts of law.
16.4 In the event that an action is brought, theparties
agree that trial of such action will be vested exclusively in the
state courts of California or in the United-States District COurt
for the Northern District of California in the County of Santa
Clara, State of California.
16.5 The prevailing party in any action brought to
enforce the terms of this Contract or arising out of this Contract
may recover its reasonable costs and attorneys’ fees expended in
connection with that action.
16.6 This document represents the entire and integrated~
Contract between the parties and supersedes all prior negotiations,
representations, and contracts, either written or oral. This
document may be amended only by a written instrument, which is
signed by the parties.
980925 l~e 0032038 1 1
16.7 All provisions of this Contract, whether covenants
or conditions, will be deemed to be both covenants and conditions.
16.8 The covenants, terms, conditions and provisions of
this Contract will apply to, and will bind, the heirs, successors,
executors, administrators, assignees, and consultants, as the case
may be, of the parties.
16.9 If a court of competent jurisdiction finds or rules
that any provision of this Contract or any amendment thereto is
void or unenforceable, the unaffected provisions of this Contract
and any amendments thereto will remain in full force and effect.
-16.10 All exhibits referred to in this Contract and any
addenda, appendices, attachments, and schedules which, from time
to time, may be referred to in any duly executed amendment hereto
are by such reference incorporated in this Contract and will be
deemed to be a part of this Contract.
16.11 This Contract may be executed in any number of
counterparts, each of which will be an original, but all of which
together will constitute one and the same instrument.
16.12 This Contract is subject~to the fiscal’provisions
of .the Charter of the City of Palo Alto and the Palo Alto Municipal
Code. This Contract will terminate without any penalty (a) at the
end of any fiscal year in the event that funds are not appropriated
for the following fiscal year,~ or (b) at any time within a fiscal
year in the event that funds are only appropriated for a portion of
the fiscal year and funds for this Contract are no longer
available. This Section 16.12 will take precedence in the event of
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
980925 1~ 0037.038
a conflict with any other covenant, term, condition, or provision
of this Contract°
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have by their duly
authorized representatives executed this Contract on the date first
above written.
ATTEST:CITY OF PALO ALTO
City Clerk Mayor
AgPROVED AS TO FORM:
Senior Asst. City Attorney
¯ AgPROVED :
Assistant City Manager
Director of Administrative
Services
NE LSON\NYGAARD CONSULTING
ASSOCIATES, A Partnership
Title:
Taxpayer Identification No.
94-3032001
Director of
iisk Manager
Attachments:
EXHIBIT "A":
EXHIBIT "B":
EXHIBIT "C":
EXHIBIT "D":
SCOPE OF PROJECT &TIME SCHEDULERATE SCHEDULE
INSURANCE
NONDISCRIMINATION COMPLIANCE FORM
98O925 h,e 0O32O38 13
CERTIFICATE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT
(ciVil Code § 1189)
Notary P_ub~ic~ and for said Co~-ty and State, oer~on~]
m~ or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory e~idence to be~
person(s) whose name(s).is/are subscribed to the Within instrument
and acknowledged to me that. he/she/they executed the same in
his/her/their authorized capacity(ies)~, and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon
behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature .
EXHIBIT A
Palo Alto Local Bus Plan
Work Scope
Task 1: Assess Needs, Analyze Demand and Market Segments, and
Recommend System Priorities
1.1
At this
Meet with thePAC to identify system goals, opportunities and trade-offs
meeting N\N will begin to:
Outline key goa~s, values and priorities
¯Determine measures of success
Lay out major issues that will need to be resolved as part of planning process
Strategize for public kickoff meeting
1.2 Hold public kickoff meeting
N\N will organize a weekday evening meeting for the general public. At this meeting N\N
will:
.Describe the planning process to the public
o Alert them to the basic trade-off issues involved
¯Gather information from the public about their priorities
o Describe future opportunities for additional public input
To help ascertain the public’s general priorities, N\N will break up into small groups and have
the groups come to consensus as to their priorities. N\N will then bring everyone back
together to develop a general list of key objectives for the bus system.
NXN will prepare press releases in advance of the meeting, but the City will be responsible, for
distributing the releases to various media. The City, if it chooses, may also arrange to have
the event videotaped, N\N will make electronic copies of all its documents available to the
City for use on their web page.
1.3 Review existing data
From the City’s Planning Department N\N will gather existing data on:
¯residentialdensity
o employment density
o commercial density
¯planned new developments that would increase residential,
commercial density
employment or
NELSONINYGAARD CONSULTING ASSOCIATES 1-I SEPTEMBE~ 1998
LOCAL BUS SYSTEM PLAN
From participating employers ,and the Employee Transportation Coordinator council of the
Stanford Research Park N\N will gather:
o total employee count
large employer home zip code data of employees
expansion plans
existing transportation program details
From the Palo Alto Unified School District N\N will gather:
o existing and planned student counts at each of the City’s public schools
¯catchment areas of each of the schools
¯previous and existing operations data from the district’s school bus program, focusing
on the years when the program was at its peak
From VTA N\N will gather
°improvement plans for transit on El Camino Real
°details on their "Local Access Node" concept and thoughts for implementation in Palo
Alto
¯design.and schedule details for the new San Antonio Road Transit Center
°design and schedule details for the expansion of the bus transfer facility of the
University Avenue station
o ridership and passenger survey data on existing bus lines and at the University Avenue
and California Avenue multimodal centers,, as well as all bus lines in the City.
From Caltrain and SamTrans N\N will gather:
o the Caltrain Market Demand Study and Short Range .Transit Plan
°the latest plans from SamTrans: Bus Evaluation Study, including their thoughts for
through-routing the 5L and 50V
From Stanford’s Parking and Transportation Services Department N\N will gather:
°most recent statistics on the performance of the Marguerite
o ,data from their recent passenger survey
°updated service expansi’on plans
o updated plans for improving their bus stop at the Palo Alto train station
°updated staging plans for improvements at the Stanford Shopping Center
o their evaluation of their Phase 1 transit improvements
From the Metropolitan Transportation Commission and Association of Bay Area Governments
N\N will obtain:
°the latest projections on employment and population growth in the subregion
surrounding Palo Alto
NELSON~NYGAARD CONSULTING ASSOCIATES SEPTEMBEP~ 1998
the latest projections on increases in traffic congestion and decreases in air quality in
the Palo Alto area
N\N will then develop amap of transit needs and issues for the entire city, showing at a glance
the relative potential of transit in different parts of Palo Alto. N\N will identify both the places
that have true potential for generating ridership, as well as places of civic importance, such
as libraries or the Baylands, where there may be other reasons for serving with transit.
1.4 Gather travel demand information from the community at large
N\N has budgeted for a total of 6 stakeholder group meetings. At the direction of the PAC,
N\N will schedule these meetings includingall or some of the following groups:
the Chamber of Commerce, including the Downtown Marketing Group and the
California Avenue Association
¯the Employee Transportation Coordinator Council of the Stanford Research Park
¯officials and boardmembers from the school district, and key members of the PTA
including the chair of the Safe Routes to School committee
¯the Palo Alto Senior Center
¯local neighborhood groups
¯others that the PAC will help us to identify, including coordinators of the libraries,
communitycenters, after-school programs, parks and recreation programs, senior care
facilities, Urban Ministry, major developers, and so on.
1,5 Meet with the PAC to identify travel demand and transportation needs of the
community that might be served by a local shuttle system,
N\N’s second meeting with the PAC will focus on refining the transit needs and issues map
developed in Task 1.3. After this meeting, N\N will produ.ce a refined map.
1,6 . Review and. summarize transportation literature relevant to a Palo Alto transit system,
N\N will gather materials from the following communities whose transit experience is directly
relevant to Palo Alto’s situation, and provide a summary document to the PAC:
Emeryville, which createdits own shuttle system in partnership with local businesses
and developers.
Wilsonville, OR, which broke away from Portland METRO ,to form its own transit
system.
Corvallis, OR, a college town like Palo Alto, which restructured their transit system to
support the community’s goals.
NELSONINYGAARD CONSUL TII~IG ASSOCIATES 1-3 SEPTEI~IBERp 1998
CITY OF PALO ALT~~ ~LOCAL BUS SYSTEM PLAN
DublinlPleasanton, part of the Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority, which has
a unique demand-responsive system.
Menlo Park, which has been developing a variety of midday shuttle services, including
a demand responsive route.
1.7 Develop criteria necessary for a Palo Alto shuttle bus system to be attractive to its
potential riders, including frequency, service hours and vehicle specifications
From information gathered in the previous tasks along with national standards, N\N will
produce a technical memo describing the qualities necessary to attract riders to its bus system.
1.8 Establish priorities among various trip purposes and market segments
Based on the knowledge and understanding gained in Tasks 1.1 -1.6, N\N will meet with the
PAC to establish priorities for various types of trips and rank specific route segments. Sample
two-directional trip purposes may include:
Weekday home to regional transit center (Caltrain)
Regional transit center to office park area
Regional transit center to office front door
Regional transit center to retail
Home to school
Office to lunchtime food and retail
Weekend home to retail
Weekend home to regional transit center
Weekday home to retail
Home to library or cultural facility
Home to medical facility
Home to recreational facility, including the Baylands and Foothills Park
Remote parking to office .~
Trips to places outside Palo Alto city limits
NELSONINYGAARD CONSULTING ASSOCIATES I-4 SEPTEI~BE~, ~998
CITY OF PALO ALT~: .....~LOCAL Bus SYSTEM PLAN
Task 1 deliverable:
Key staff:
Meetings:
Working Paper including
- the City’s goals and objectives
- results from community and stakeholders meetings
- summary of existing data
-travel demand maps
- relevant literature summary
- ~:riteria to attract ridership
- service priorities
Jeffrey Tumlin and Jarrett Walker
1 Kickoff Meeting ¯
2 PAC meetings
6 Stakeholder meetings
Task 2: Develop Funding Plan
2.1 Review all potential funding sources
N\N’s review will include an evaluation of all potential funding sources that could be available
for a Palo Alto local shuttle system.. It.will identify all possible funding opportunities,
including, both traditional and ’!creative" sources. The identified sources will state whether
they can be used for capital investments or as operating subsidy or whether there is flexibility
and they could be used for either purpose. Funding sources that will be explored include, but
are not necessarily limited to:
Federal
¯TEA-21 (CMAQ/STP) "
° TEA-211(Enhancements)
State
¯STIP ,"Regional Shares"
¯Caltrans Discretionary Grant
LocallRegional
¯TFCA(AB 434)
,°City of Palo Alto In-Kind Services
°City of Palo Alto General Funds
°Petroleum Violation Escrow Account (PVEA) Grant°MTC Discretionary Grants
°Local tax revenues
NELSONINYGAARD CONSULTING ASSOCIATES 1-5 SEPTEMBER,,
LOCAL BUS SYSTEM PLAN
Passenger fares
Parking charges in certain business districts
Traffic Impact Fees
Revenue-Sharing with VTA
Private Contributions
¯Developer Contributions/Exactions
¯Homeowner Associations Fees
¯Employers/Developer Groups
°Merchant Contributions
For each source, N\N will project how much it is expected to generate, the likelihood of
success, ease of implementation, and political viability. Of particular interest may be the
concept of a public-private partnership with funding contributions from a variety of sources.
2.2 Evaluate the pros and cons of charging a fare
N\N will evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of imposing a passenger fare on the
proposed local Palo Alto service. N\N will project ridership and revenues assuming a modest
fare structure and assess the impact on ridership with and without a fare. An important
element of this analysis is to assess how much revenue will be generated compared to the
administrative costs associated with fare collection. To double-check our analysis, N\N Will
examine the experiences of other relevant local services.
2.3 Present Preliminary Findings~ to City Staff and the PAC
N\N will present our progress on Tasks 2.1 and.2.2 for review by City staff and the PAC. Our
report will include a matrix on the funding potential with corresponding text to clarify .and
analyze the likelihood and applicability of these various funding opportunities. N\N will also
review our analysis of passenger fares in a technical memorandum format. N\N expects that
City staff and the PAC will provide us with feedback and direction which will provide the
foundation for an evaluation of funding opportunities.
2.4 Develop a Priority Ranking of Funding of Funding Sources
Based on the results of Task 2.3, N\N will prioritize the potential funding sources. The ranking
will be based on agreed upon criteria, including level of funds likely to be generated,
application process and likelihood of success, timing/funding cycles, funding restrictions and
other appropriate factors.
2.5 Summarize funding sources in a Working Paper
A preliminary financial plan will then be prepared in Working Paper format. It will be
reviewed in detail with staff so that they have a full understanding of its assumptions and
NELSONINYGAARD CONSULTING ASSOCIATES I-6 SEPTEMBER
CITY OF PALO ALT(.~ :~LOCAL BUS SYSTEM PLAN
projection methods. It will be organized so as to be useful as an ongoing tool for financial
planning, and it will feed directly into the Long-Range Plan developed in Task 4.
Task2 deliverable:
Key staff
Meetings:
Recommended funding plan, a wide
opportunities, including .a priority ranking of each
recommended funding strategy and the steps required to
apply for funds.
Linda Rhine, N\N partner
1 PAC meeting
outlining range, of funding
source, a
pursue or
Task 3: Identify and Analyze System Alternatives
3.1 Determine service concepts most appropriate for Palo Alto
N\N will examine three types of service concepts and provide summary explanations of each
with recommendations as to their applicability in Palo Alto:
¯Standard, fixed-route transit
.°Timed transfer employer shuttles, and
o DART, or Direct Access Rapid Transit
°Standard Dial-a-Ride and more modern versions using GPS technology
3.2 Map routes and route segments based on priorities from Task 1
N\N will lay out all the key route segments identified in Task 1, weighted according to their
priority, on a series of presentation board-sized maps. With many overlapping lines of varying
thickness, clear patterns will emerge showing key potential transit corridors. N\N will then
apply these composite lines to the city street grid.
3.3 Develop a matrix of system alternatives and select three forfurther study
N\N will work with the PAC on a matrix of system alternatives including the following factors:
°service concepts
°route structure
¯frequency, hours, time of day and day of week
°funding opportunities/levels
With advice from the PAC, N\N will compose three specific, recommended system
alternatives for furt.her study.
NELSONINYGAARD CONSULTING ASSOCIATES 1-7 SEPTEMBER~ 1998
LOCAL BUS SYSTEM PLAN
3.4 Analyze costs and benefits of each alternative
N\N will take the priorities developed in Task 1 and convert these into weighted criteria. After
securing agreement on the criteria from.the PAC, N\N will rank each of the three system
alternatives, creating a large evaluation matrix.
To add to the evaluation matrix, N\N will also measure the relative ridership potential of each
alternative.
3.5 Analyze opportunities for coordination with other agencies
N\N will analyze the following opportunities for coordination,
recommendations to answer the following questions:
and will make
Can Palo Alto become VTA’s first test case of its new "Local Access Node" B or LAN
R concept?
How may Palo Alto’s needs be addressed in VTA’s Commute Service Plan?
How might Palo Alto restructure its relationship with VTA to maintain important
regional services but provide for its own local needs?
Should Palo Alto join VTA’s EcoPass program for free resident rides on VTA lines?
What are VTA’s future plans for the bus facility at the downtown Caltrain station? How
can VTA help accommodate additional shuttle vehicles there?
How should Palo Alto relate to the new light rail station in Mountain View?
SamTrans
How should existing services such as the 50C, 50V, 5L and 5M be incorporated into
a Palo Alto shuttle system, and how should planned changes like the rerouting of the
5L and the restructuring of the 50 lines be accommodated?
Caltrain ’
How can Caltrain help fund and promote additional shuttle service in Palo Alto?
How can Caltrain help develop additional shuttle stops at its Palo Alto stations?
Stanford University
N\N will meet with the directors of the Parking and Transportation Services group and the
Facilities Department to ascertain their current interests with regard to a Palo Alto shuttle. N\N
will also address the following questions:
~How should the Research Park-be included in the shuttle plan?
¯How might overlapping service at the Stanford Shopping Center be addressed? Might
the Shopping Center be a source of funding?
¯How should the existing Marguerite Downtown Express be managed?
NEtSONINYGAARD CONSUt TING ASSOCIATES 1-8 SEPTEMBERt 1998
CITY OF PALO ALT(~r~LOCAL BUS SYSTEM PLAN
What is Stanford’s interest with regard to participating in the operations of the shuttle,
and/or through-routing existing Marguerite lines?
Menlo Park
N\N will meet with Menlo Park’s Transportation Manager to discuss opportunities for
coordination and cooperation with Menlo Park’s planned and existing shuttle services.
3.6 Present alternatives at a public workshop
Using a large set of color display boards, N\N will walk the public through our process of
arriving at three alternatives. N\N will take time to highlight the trade-offs of transit planning:
coverage versus intensity
timed transfers versus strict schedule adherence
mobility for all versus congestion reduction
how increasing total costs can decrease cost per passenger ride
how neighborhood density determines ridership
how multiple transfers decrease ridership
how no service is often better than just a little service
and so on
N\N will break the meeting into small groups, so that everyone present can have a real
conversation about the planned service. Since N\N expects .a large turnout at our hearing,
N\N will rely on all the members of the PAC, plus everyone on the Nelson\Nygaard team, to
lead small group discussions. Each group should appoint a spokesperson who will summarize
comments for the full audience.
At the end of the meeting, N\N will summarize the summaries so the attendees are certain
they have been heard. Finally, N\N will describe to the attendees what the next steps are and
how they can submit additional comments.
3.7 Refine alternatives based on public input and summarize in a working paper
After the public hearing N\N will produce a substantial working paper, describing the process
to date and the whole range of alternatives that had been analyzed and discussed. N\N will
discuss why some alternatives were rejected, then focus on the three alternatives still being
explored, including refinements from the public hearing. N\N will provide analysis of the
relative merits and disadvantages of each alternative, along with a refined version of the matrix
N\N produced in Task 3.4. The working paper will include maps and illustrations throughout,
and be aimed at both technical and non-technical .audiences.
NELSONINYGAARD CONSULTING ASSOCIATES 1-9 SEPTEMBE~ 1998
LOCAL BUS SYSTEM PLAN
Task 3 deliverable:
Key staff:
Meetings:
Working paper and planning maps on service models and key demand
corridors, including analysis of three refined system alternatives.
Jeffrey Tumlin and Jarrett Walker
1 PAC
1 Public Workshop
Task 4: Develop Optimal Long-Range P.lan and Phasing Strategy
4.1 Present the alternatives!!~to the Planning Commission, Policy and Services Committee
and full City Council
After further refinements ~to the system alternatives based on all the comments N\N has
gathered from the public, N\N will present plans toii~!~working sessions of the Planning
Commission, the Policy and Services Committee and the full City Council with a focus on
refinements, funding issues and implementation details.
To help commissioners and councilmembers make very difficult decisions about exactly how
the service is implemented, N\N will provide each member with a summary booklet of the
project’s goals, constraints, trade-offs and measures of success.
N\N expects that by the end of the Council meeting, N\N will have clear direction as to what
kind of system the City prefers. To help resolve complex issues that will inevitably arise, N\N
is prepared to return to the Planning Commission and the City Council for one additional
meeting.
4.2 Identify and EvaluateGovernance Structure
The purpose of this.task is to identify a structure of governance, management and operation
for a proposed local Palo Alto bus service. Depending upon the type and extent of services
proposed, the options include, but are not limited to:
Department within the City of Palo Alto
Transportation Management Association (TMA)
Joint Powers Authority
VTA
N\N will identify the advantages and disadvantages of each type of governance in the context
of the recommended service scenarios.
4.3 Compile a Long-Range Local Bus System Plan
NELSONINYGAARD CONSULTING ASSOCIATES 1-10 SEPTEMBER, 1998
(~ITY OF PALO ALT(I LOc,~L BUs SYSTEM PLAN
With final direction from the City Council, N\N will develop a Long-Range Local Bus System
Plan, addressing the following issues:
a.preferred routes, identifying neighborhoods, districts and trip types served;
b.recommended hours and frequency of service;
c.vehicle specifications;
d.recommended bus stop amenities;
e.staffing requirements;
f.operating responsibilities of the City and of the vendor providing the service;
g.a financial plan, including operating and capital funding strategies and possible fare
structure;
h.a capital plan, detailing expenses for bus stop, streetscape and transit center capital
improvement, and a funding plan to pay for those investments.
I.a .marketing plan, including key messages, strategies, media, public education
programs and incentive programs;
j.performance criteria to measure the system’s success, and an evaluation plan;
k.an implementation and phasingplan for the first five years of service;
I.organizational structure recommendations.
Task 4 deliverable:
Key staff
Meetings:
Long-Range Local Bus System Plan,A thoroughly illustrated
summarizing all the work to date and outlining all the steps the City and
its partners must take to create a successful system. N\N will provide 25
copies, plus an original, of both a draft and final plan.
Jeffrey Tumlin and Jarrett Walker ~
1 Planning Commission
1 Polic.y and Services Committee ....
1 City Council
NELSONINYGAARD CONSULTING ASSOCIATES I-11 SEPTEMBEI~ 1998
LOCAL BUS SYSTEM PLAN
Task 5: Develop a Work Plan for the First Phase of Service
As an extension of the Local Bus System Plan developed in Task 4, N\N will also detail a
specific implementation plan for a first phase of service. This document will be more
technical than the Long-Range Plan, .but N\N will still strive to make it understandable to all
members of the community. The plan will include the following:
o
critical path schedule, including clear roles and responsibilities for each task
draft RFPs for service vendors
sample route map and schedule brochures
detailed capital and operating costs and funding plans
an organizational structure for implementing the service, overseeing it, evaluating its
success, and recommending improvements
timetables and guidelines for on-board customer surveys
system logo and other identification
a determination of what level of environmental clearance will be required, and which
agency will be responsible
¯detailed bus stop standards
detailed vehicle standards, including seat type and configuration, space for destination
signage, space for brochuresand marketing materials, etc.
procedures for updating and refining schedules and timed transfers based on actual
performance and changes in street system and other transit operators’ schedules
an evaluation plan for measuring the demonstration program’s success and refining it
a specific intervals
N\N will attend the City Council meeting when the final plan is presented.
Task 5 deliverable:
Key staff
Meetings:
A detailed implementation plan, clearly stating all the steps necessary to
begin a demonstration service, fund it, operate it, evaluate it and adjust
it as necessary.
Jeffrey Tumlin
~1 City Council ........
Note on deliverables: Unless otherwise noted, N\N will provide one camera-ready hard
copy and an electronic file of all deliverables. The City will produce additional copies and
NELSONINYGAARD CONSULTING ASSOCIATES ~- ~ 2 SEPTEMBER ~998
0
0
0
EXHIBIT
09/29/98 15: 21 EXHIBIT C
MARINA DEVOULIN INS
1511 CLEMENT STREET
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94118
FAX: 221-8950
NELSON/NYGAARD
833 MARKET STREET #900
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103
57SBAEQ6282
57SBAEQ6282
57RHU XII591
~TWEC EK3484
’AL LIABILITY wITH
~ICY #940703, 12/1/I
~URED WITH RESPECT
911198
9/1/9s
:1,000,00(
’7 - 12/1,
’0 THIS Pi
9/1/99
9/1/99
’98. CER~
)LICY.
BOOTY INJUS¥
EO(:~L,Y
,1, o.o,.o,.
i~1,000,000
~I,000,000
Ce~tlficate holder is an additional insured/indemnlfied. Insured’s coverage
is primary only for claims relating to this contract.Severability of interest
of
OTHER THAN AUTO ONL,y;’.’:’.::".’ ;.. .... .....i
~ 0~x~il, 000,000
~-~P~l~l, 000,000
PROVIDED ~ER I
71FICATE HOLDER IS NOT I
City of Palo Alto, its
agents, employees
250 Hamilton Ave.
Palo Alto, CA, 94301
officers,
EXHIBIT D
PART I!1 FORM 410
.PROJECT TITLE:CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR LOCAL BUS SYSTEM PLAN
Certification of Nondiscrimination: ,As suppliers of goods or services to the Ci~! of Palo Alto, the finn
and individuals listed below certify that they do not discriminate in employment with regards to age, race,
color, religion, sex, national origin, ancestry, disability, or sexual preference; that they are in compliance
with all Federal, State and loca! directives and executive orders regarding nondiscrimination in
employment.
Finn: 0
Title of Officer Signing:~
RFP NO. 107022 Page 9 of 11
PROJECT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Palo Alto,Local Bus System Plan
ATTACHMENT B
Representing Organizations & Agencies
Will Beckett
Barron Park Association
Rick Ferguson
Community Center Neighbors Association
Walter Hays
Greenmeadow Community Association
Aldrich Lau
Middlefield Road Residents’ Association
Alice Fischgrund
Midtown Residents Association
Shulamith Rubinfien
University South Neighborhoods Group
Iris Kriegler
Duveneck Neighborhood Association
Kathy Durham
PTA Council, PAUSD
Phyllis Cassel
Planning Commission
Bill Capps
Valley Transportation Authority
Alternates:
Joseph Lee
Midtown Residents Assn
Glenn Rennels
Community Center Neighbors
Staff."
Gayle Likens (Project Manager)
Transportation Division, City of Palo Alto
Julia Fremon (project Coordinator)
Transportation Division, City of Palo Alto
June Schiller
Palo Alto Unified School District
Kathleen Gwynn
Senior Coordinating Council
Tony Carrasco
Palo Alto Chamber of Commerce
Chris Christofferson
Stanford University
Cathy Cianciolo
Stanford Research Park Forum
C:L~LLDATA\CMRS\TRANSIT2.ATB