Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-08-03 City CouncilC ty "7 City of Palo Altom Manager’s Report TO:HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: POLICE DATE:AUGUST 3, 1998 CMR:299:98 SUBJECT:APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURE OF ASSET SEIZURE FUNDS RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Council approve expenditures of $22,000 from the Asset Seizure Fund to cover costs for Police Department cellular phones, communication headsets, and undercover and evidence collection equipment. BACKGROUND Sections of the California Health and Safety (H& S) code govern the seizure and forfeiture of property and money associated with drug trafficking. The seizure process typically occurs during an arrest or search warrant service related to sales of narcotics. While laws have placed some additional restrictions on the seizure of property, in certain situations the practice is permitted. Legislation stipulates that seized property funds are not to be used to defer normal operating expenses, but should be used for special purchases and projects associated with law enforcement activities, especially those related to drug enforcement. In Santa Clara County, ’a Deputy District Attorney is specifically assigned to handle asset forfeiture cases and to help local agencies properly process their cases. Monies seized by the Police Department are held by the District Attorney’s Office in a special account until the specific case is adjudicated. The process of seizing money is a civil proceeding, wholly independent of any criminal filing or conviction and requires strict procedural adherence. At the conclusion of the Superior Court proceedings, the money is returned to the City, deposited into an Asset Seizure Fund created by the City’s Administrative Services Department, and with City Council approval, released for expenditure purposes. DISCUSSION Currently, the Asset Seizure Fund account totals approximately $61,000.The Police CMR:299:98 Page 1 of 3 Department proposes spending $22,000 from the Fund to enhance the collection and processing of evidence by purchasing evidence collection equipment and to increase communications between officers, investigators, dispatchers, and the public with additional and improved communications equipment. Specifically, staffplans to spend $1,000 for a close-up camera, and $2,700 in miscellaneous evidence collection tools and equipment. A close-up camera system is a compact, portable unit, that is simple to use and allows officers and others to take instant, high-quality photographs that are ideal for tire tracks, shell casings, and other physical evidence recordings and forensic close-ups. Tools, such as electronic measuring tapes, a laser pointer used for determining bullet trajectory paths, a metal detector, and other devices, will assist officers in the field in the collection and analysis of evidence at major crime scenes. The department plans to improve communications capability and enhance officer safety in undercover operations and for bicycle officers. A body wire for undercover work by officers and detectives ($6,700), radio headsets for the bicycle team members ($5,600), and upgraded cell phones ($6,000) will be purchased. The body wire will be utilized for drug operations, property crime stings, and child exploitation and pornography cases. Similar to motorcycle officers’ equipment, the radio headsets for the bicycle team members incorporate safety features that allow riders to communicate with dispatchers and other officers without removing their hands from the bike. The department also plans to upgrade its fleet of cellular telephones to a newer generation of digital phones. The voice quality of the newer phones is superior to the department’s current equipment, has a longer battery life, and incorporates many new features such as the capability to receive pages, e-mail texts, and standby modes to receive calls when the phone is off. RESOURCE IMPACT In compliance with State requirements, the City has an established Asse~ Seizure Fund in which monies are deposited. Funds totaling $22,000 will be expended from the Asset Seizure Fund. POLICY IMPLICATIONS Expenditure of funds is consistent with State regulations and City policy.- ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW This is not a project subject to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements. CMR:299:98 Page 2 of 3 PREPARED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD: Pete Hazarian, Police Administrator PATRICI~DW~CER Chief of Police CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ~Y ~SON Assistant City Manager CMR:299:98 Page 3 of 3