Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-04-27 City Council (23)TO: City of Palo Alto City Manager’s Report HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL FROM:CITY MANAGER DEP.~RTMENT: POLICE AGENDA DATE: April 27, 1998 CMR:201:98 SUBJECT:ANNUAL UPDATE OF IMPLEMENTATION OF SIT/LIE ORDINANCE, PARKING LOT EMPLOYMENT SOLICITATION, AND ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONSUMPTION IN COMMERCIAL PARKING LOTS RECOMMENDATIONS This is an informational report and no Council action is required. BACKGROUND Three ordinances were adopted as part of the Council’s Downtown Health" and Safety plan. Section 9.04.030 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code (PAMC) became effective on August 22, 1996, allowing officers to cite individuals who leave any retail business after purchasing and consuming an alcoholic beverage in the parking lot or adjacent sidewalks of the business. Effective the same date was an amendment to Section 9.44 of the PAMC permitting officers to cite those persons who solicit for employment, business or contributions in public parking lots. This amendment was prompted by complaints from the business community and the public about individuals demanding payment for windshield washing in City parking lots. Effective April 24, 1997, Council amended PAMC Chapter 9.48 relating to the obstruction of streets and sidewalks. The amendment was made in response to police concerns about hazards associated with people sitting and/or lying on sidewalks, especially at certain locations along University Avenue between High Street and.Cowper Street. Of special concern were the hazards posted to the elderly and the disabled who had to maneuver around people and obstacles on the sidewalks. DISCUSSION Considerable publicity attended enactment and enforcement of the ordinances. Since last, reporting on downtown health and safety efforts in October 1977 (CMR:411:97), it has been CMR:201 Page 1 of 2 unnecessary to make any actua! arrests for violation of these ordinances. With respect to the sit!lie ordinance, nine warnings have been given along University Avenue. Two were given to people panhandling for money near Walgreen’s. The remainder were issued at the front of a variety of commercial establishments, primarily to people waiting outside. Officers indicated that these people were unaware of the ordinance. The problems these ordinances address appear to have largely abated. The Police Department is not receiving complaints about these issues as it did prior to their enactment. Nonetheless, the department will continue to monitor the downtown area for sidewalk blockage, drinking violations and employment solicitation in parking lots. RESOURCE IMPACT None. POLICY IMPLICATIONS None. PREPARED BY:TOM MERSON Police Captain DEPARTMENT HEAD REVIEW: @~~A ~ LYNNE JOHNSON Assistant Police Chief CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: HARRISON Assistant City Manager CMR:201 Page 2 of 2