Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 4833 City of Palo Alto (ID # 4833) Finance Committee Staff Report Report Type: Action Items Meeting Date: 5/27/2014 City of Palo Alto Page 1 Summary Title: Retiree Healthcare Plan Actuarial Valuation Title: Accept the Retiree Healthcare Plan GASB 45 Actuarial Valuation as of June 30, 2013 From: City Manager Lead Department: Administrative Services RECOMMENDED MOTION The Finance Committee accepts the June 30, 2013 actuarial valuation of Palo Alto’s Retiree Healthcare Plan and recommends that the City Council approve full funding of the Annual Required Contribution (ARC) for Fiscal Year 2015 and Fiscal Year 2016. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Finance Committee accepts the June 30, 2013 actuarial valuation of the Palo Alto’s Retiree Healthcare Plan and recommends to the City Council to fully fund the Annual Required Contribution for Fiscal Year 2015 and Fiscal Year 2016. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report provides the Finance Committee with the actuarial study results required by the Government Accounting Standards Board's (GASB) Statement No. 45, Accounting and Financial Reporting by Employers for Post-Employment Benefits Other Than Pensions. (See Attachment A: June 30, 2013 GASB 45 Actuarial Valuation) The results of this study as compared to the 2011 study show a 9.6 percent increase in citywide costs, with the Annual Required Contribution (ARC) increasing from $13.0 million in FY 2014 to $14.3 million in FY 2015. In addition, the City’s actuarial unfunded liability is valued at $143.6 million as of June 30, 2013, a 16 percent increase over the $123.3 million unfunded liability as of June 30, 2011. The increase in the actuarial unfunded liability is primarily due to an upcoming actuarial standard which requires that actuaries need to account for the “implied subsidy” in the analysis of the unfunded liability. According to the Bartel Associates’ web site, “CalPERS…blends active employees with pre- Medicare retirees and charges them the same medical premium…However, younger employees on average are…subsidizing older employees and retirees … The Implied Subsidy is the difference between average retiree claims and premiums charged by…CalPERS.” City of Palo Alto Page 2 BACKGROUND GASB 45 requires the City to complete an actuarial study on a biennial basis, to determine the retiree medical liability and how much the City should be setting aside each year to fund the annual required contribution (ARC). Funding the ARC, as determined by Bartel Associates, City’s actuary, is paramount so that the City pays off the unfunded liability within 30 years. In Fiscal Year 2008, the City established an irrevocable trust with California Employers Retirees Benefit Trust (CERBT) for retiree medical benefits. In Fiscal Year 2008, the City transfe rred $33.8 million to the trust, with annual contributions each year thereafter. As of June 30, 2013, the market value of the trust was $60.1 million, with a projected June 30, 2014 value of $73.1 million. In comparison, the Actuarially Accrued Liability (AAL) for Retiree Medical was valued for June 30, 2013 at $203.6 million, indicating a 29% funded ratio. For June 30, 2014, that AAL is projected at $213.5 million, indicating a 34% funded ratio per the report submitted by Bartel Associates (see slide 25 of Attachment A). DISCUSSION Bartel Associates completed a June 30, 2013 actuarial valuation for the City on May 20, 2014 (Attachment A) that valued the City's unfunded retiree medical liability at $143.5 million, compared to the unfunded liability of $123.3 million on January 1, 2011 – an increase of $20 million or 16%. The Annual Required Contribution (ARC) associated with the valuation is $14.3 million for FY 2015 for all funds. This is an increase of $1.3 million (10%) over the FY 2014 ARC of $13.0 million. The General Fund’s portion of the citywide ARC is $9.6 million representing a $0.6 million, or 6 percent, increase over the FY 2014 General Fund ARC of $9.1 million. The FY 2016 ARC for all funds is projected at $14.8 million, with the General Fund’s portion at $10.0 million. The net increase in the City’s retiree medical liability between the 2011 and 2013 valuations is attributable to the actuarial valuation changes, demographic changes, and investment returns. The primary increase to the City’s unfunded liability is due to the “implied subsidy”, change in the benefits structure, and mortality improvements partially offset with lower than expected healthcare premiums, positive investment returns, , demographic changes, and the recently approved agreement with the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) contract. 1. Implied Subsidy: The new Implied Subsidy valuation adds $41.4 million to the liability and $3.5 million to the citywide ARC (slide 45). According to the Bartel Associates’ web site, “CalPERS…blends active employees with pre-Medicare retirees and charges them the same medical premium…However, younger employees on average are…subsidizing older employees and retirees … The Implied Subsidy is the difference between average retiree claims and premiums charged by…CalPERS.” City of Palo Alto Page 3 Cities will soon be required to account for the “implied subsidy” contained in active employees’ retiree medical premiums, as part of their retiree medical l iability. The Actuarial Standards Board’s new Actuarial Standard of Practice (ASOP 6) requires inclusion of the Implied Subsidy for valuations after March 31, 2015. Agencies are also encouraged to make the change earlier if possible. Staff recommends adopting this change as part the FY 2015 ARC calculation. 2. Mortality Improvements: Mortality improvement (people are living longer) projections for actives and retirees added $5.3 million to the unfunded liability and $0.6 million to the ARC. 3. Healthcare Premiums: Less-than-expected increases in CalPERS premiums reduced the unfunded liability by $35.7 million. 4. Investment Return: Increase in market value of the CERBT from $49.2 million on June 30, 2012 to $60.1 million on June 30, 2013 (22 percent increase), due to increased contributions from the City and investment returns. (See slide 22 in Attachment A for details regarding annual returns on CERBT.) 5. Memorandum of Agreement with SEIU The recently adopted agreement with SEIU, which includes fixed healthcar e premium amounts for each of the next two years, reduced about $1.9 million of the unfunded liability. The change in the valuation results is summarized by the table on slide 25 of Bartel Associates’ report (see below): City of Palo Alto Page 4 RESOURCE IMPACT The Fiscal Year 2015 Proposed Budget includes the cost to fully fund the Annual Required Contribution of $14.3 million for all funds ($9.6 million for the General Fund). If this report is approved by the City Council, the Fiscal Year 2016 Proposed Budget will include $14.8 million to fund the ARC for all funds ($10.0 million for the General Fund). ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The action recommended is not a project for the purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act. Attachments:  Attachment A: Bartel Associates, Retiree Healthcare Valuation (as of June 30, 2013) Report (PDF) CITY OF PALO ALTO RETIREE HEALTHCARE PLAN June 30, 2013 GASB 45 Actuarial Valuation Presented by John E. Bartel, President Prepared by Deanna Van Valer, Assistant Vice President & Actuary Mary Beth Redding, Assistant Vice President & Actuary Adam Zimmerer, Actuarial Analyst Bartel Associates, LLC May 20, 2014 Agenda O:\Clients\City of Palo Alto\Projects\OPEB\2013 Val\Reports\BA PaloAltoCi 14-05-20 OPEB 6-30-13 Final Results.docx Topic Page Benefit Summary 1 Implied Subsidy 6 Participant Statistics 9 Actuarial Assumptions Highlights 15 Actuarial Methods 20 Assets 22 Results 25 Assumption Sensitivities 42 Benefit Sensitivities 47 Actuarial Certification 49 Exhibits 50 Results by Fund and Department E-41 ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 1 BENEFIT SUMMARY  Eligibility  Retire directly from the City under CalPERS (age 50 and 5 years of CalPERS service or disability)  Medical Provider  CalPERS health plans (PEMHCA)  CalPERS administrative fees paid by City  Retiree Medical Hired < 1/1/04 (1/1/05 SEIU, 1/1/06 PAPOA)  GROUP 1: Retired < 1/1/07 (3/1/09 for PAPOA) • Full premium up to family coverage  GROUP 2: Retired between 1/1/07 (3/1/09 for PAPOA) and 5/1/11 (12/1/11 for IAFF) • Same as above but premium limited to 2nd most expensive Basic (non-Medicare) medical plan in the Bay Area Region (Blue Shield in 2012 & 2013, United Healthcare for 2014)  GROUP 3: Retired ≥ 5/1/11 (12/1/11 for IAFF) • 90% of premium up to 90% of Group 2 cap • PAPOA gets 100% (same as Group 2) • SEIU limited to dollar caps subject to bargaining for 2014 and later (see slide #3) May 20, 2014 2 BENEFIT SUMMARY  Retiree Medical Hired ≥ 1/1/04 (1/1/05 SEIU, 1/1/06 PAPOA)  GROUP 4: Vesting schedule (based on all CalPERS Service)1: Years of Service % < 10 0% 10 50% ↓ ↓ > 20 100%  100% vesting for disability retirements  Vesting applies to 100/90 formula amounts: 2012 2013 2014 Single $ 566 $ 622 $ 642 2-Party 1,074 1,183 1,218 Family 1,382 1,515 1,559  If have 20 years City service do not need to retire directly from City  Dental, Vision & Medicare Part B  None 1 Minimum 5 years City Service. ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 3 BENEFIT SUMMARY  Surviving Spouse Benefit  100% of retiree benefit continues to surviving spouse if retiree elects CalPERS pension survivor allowance  Waived Re- election  Waived retirees/beneficiaries may re-elect coverage at a future date  Pay-As-You- Go ($000s) (Cash only)  FY 2013/14 $8,800 estimated from data  FY 2012/13 $8,766 (from CAFR)  FY 2011/12 $8,165 (from CAFR)  FY 2010/11 $6,216  FY 2009/10 $5,519  SEIU Group 3 Medical Benefit  100% of premium limited to fixed dollar caps (which will be subject to bargaining) 2014 2015 Single $ 688 $ 708 2-Party 1,375 1,415 Family 1,788 1,840  Affects all SEIU Group 3 retirees and active employees May 20, 2014 4 BENEFIT SUMMARY Changes to Prior Valuation Benefit Group Prior Benefit Current Benefit  Group 3 Non- Safety  Full premium (up to family coverage) limited to 2nd most expensive Basic (non-Medicare) plan in Bay Area Region in 2011  All premium increases starting 1/1/11 shared evenly between City and employee, up to 10% of increase per year  90% of premium (up to family coverage) limited to 90% of 2nd most expensive Basic (non- Medicare) medical plan in the Bay Area Region  Group 4 Non- Safety  Vesting schedule applied to 2011 100/90 formula amounts  All premium & 100/90 formula increases starting 1/1/11 shared evenly between City and employee, up to 10% of increase per year  Vesting schedule applied to 100/90 formula amounts (additional detail on slide 2) ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 5 BENEFIT SUMMARY Monthly Benefit Cap Amounts 2013 20142 Group Single 2-Party Family Single 2-Party Family Group 13 $1,083.11 $2,166.22 $2,816.09 $ 836.59 $1,673.18 $2,175.13 Group 2 784.63 1,569.26 2,040.04 764.24 1,528.48 1,987.02 Group 34 706.17 1,412.33 1,836.04 687.82 1,375.63 1,788.32 Group 45 622.00 1,183.00 1,515.00 642.00 1,218.00 1,559.00 % Decrease from Group 1 Group 2 28% 28% 28% 9% 9% 9% Group 3 35% 35% 35% 18% 18% 18% Group 4 43% 55% 46% 23% 27% 28% 2 Large drop in most expensive premiums in 2014 due to PERS premium methodology change. 3 No cap for Group 1. Amount shown is most expensive Non-Medicare Bay Area region premium. 4 Except PAPOA 5 Assuming 20 years of service/100% vesting May 20, 2014 6 IMPLIED SUBSIDY  Background • For PEMHCA, employer cost for allowing retirees to participate at active rates. • GASB 45 defers to actuarial standards of practice. • Actuarial Standards of Practice No. 66 (ASOP 6) allows community rated plans to value their liability using premiums, resulting in no implied subsidy. 6 Measuring Retiree Group Benefits Obligations and Determining Retiree Group Benefits Plan Costs or Contributions. 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 Blended Premium $610 $610 $610 $610 $610 $610 $610 $610 $610 Cost by Age $343 $398 $442 $486 $586 $652 $752 $885 $1,041 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700 $800 $900 $1,000 $1,100 ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 7 IMPLIED SUBSIDY  In April 2012, Actuarial Standards Board released 2nd Exposure Draft for ASOP 6: • Would require implied subsidy valued for community rated plans such as PEMHCA. • Timing:  First Exposure Draft issued April 2012 (July 15, 2012 comment deadline)  Second Exposure Draft issued March 2013 (August 30, 2013 comment deadline)  Final Standard issued May 2014  Effective date March 31, 2015 with earlier implementation encouraged  Implied Subsidy impact depends on a number of factors including: • CalPERS provided information • Miscellaneous/Safety mix • Active/retiree proportions • Level of pre-funding May 20, 2014 8 IMPLIED SUBSIDY Estimated 2013/14 Implied Subsidy Transfer for Medical Coverage For Illustrative Purposes Only (Amounts in 000’s) Before GASB 45 Actives Retirees Total  Total Premium7 $ 15,343 $ 9,006 $ 24,349  Member Contribution8 - (103) (103)  Employer Contribution 15,343 8,903 24,246 After GASB 45 Actives Retirees Total  Total Premium $ 15,343 $ 9,006 $ 24,349  Member Contribution - (103) (103)  Implied Subsidy Transfer (1,852) 1,852 -  Employer Contribution 13,491 10,755 24,246 7 Estimated premium based on the 6/30/13 participant data and 2013 &2014 premiums 8 Assumes no member contribution for actives ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 9 PARTICIPANT STATISTICS Participant Statistics 9 From 1/1/09 Milliman report 10 1 retiree with missing birth date assumed to retire at average retirement age 11 Excludes 3 retirees with missing retirement date 12 All retirements included. Disability retirement data unreliable. 6/30/099 6/30/11 6/30/13  Actives • Count 955 923 948 • Average Age 45.3 44.7 45.2 • Average City Service 11.2 10.8 10.8 • Average PERS Service 13.7 11.7 • Average Salary $103,602 $86,007 $86,271 • Total Salary (000’s) $98,940 $79,384 $81,785  Retirees: • Count 710 860 968 • Average Age10 67.2 67.0 68.2 • Average Retirement Age11 o Service n/a 55.512 57.8 o Disability n/a n/a 45.3 May 20, 2014 10 PARTICIPANT STATISTICS Participant Statistics June 30, 2013 13 Group 3 PAPOA have Group 2 benefits 14 Actual 2012/13 pay paid for those hired < 7/1/12. New hire pay is annualized. 15 1 retiree with missing birth date assumed to retire at average retirement age 16 Excludes 3 retirees with missing retirement date Group 1 Group 2 Group 313 Group 4 Total  Actives • Count n/a n/a 518 430 948 • Average Age n/a n/a 49.1 40.6 45.2 • Average Entry Age n/a n/a 32.0 35.4 33.5 • Average City Service n/a n/a 16.5 4.0 10.8 • Average PERS Service n/a n/a 17.1 5.2 11.7 • Average Salary n/a n/a $92,284 $79,027 $86,271 • Total Salary (000’s)14 n/a n/a $47,803 $33,982 $81,785  Retirees: • Count 617 308 34 9 968 • Average Age15 72.6 61.0 56.0 56.1 68.2 • Avg Service Ret Age16 57.9 58.0 55.7 57.5 57.8 • Avg Disability Ret Age 45.2 46.8 47.5 31.1 45.3 ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 11 PARTICIPANT STATISTICS Participant Statistics June 30, 2013 17 Actual 2012/13 pay paid for those hired < 7/1/12. New hire pay is annualized. 18 1 retiree with missing birth date assumed to retire at average retirement age 19 Excludes 3 retirees with missing retirement date Miscellaneous Police Fire Total  Actives • Count 765 82 101 948 • Average Age 46.4 38.5 42.1 45.2 • Average City Service 10.8 10.0 12.2 10.8 • Average PERS Service 11.7 10.8 12.8 11.7 • Average Salary $80,179 $117,217 $107,291 $86,271 • Total Salary (000’s)17 $61,337 $9,612 $10,836 $81,785  Retirees: • Count 690 121 157 968 • Average Age18 68.9 64.4 67.6 68.2 • Avg Service Ret Age19 58.8 52.1 54.5 57.8 • Avg Disability Ret Age 48.4 40.6 47.3 45.3 May 20, 2014 12 PARTICIPANT STATISTICS Participant Statistics June 30, 2011 20 1 retiree with missing birth date assumed to retire at average retirement age 21 Excludes 3 retirees with missing retirement date. All retirements included. Data on disability retirements unreliable. Miscellaneous Police Fire Total  Actives • Count 737 82 104 923 • Average Age 45.7 38.2 43.4 44.7 • Average City Service 10.4 10.8 14.0 10.8 • Average PERS Service 13.8 11.4 15.0 13.7 • Average Salary $78,762 $117,924 $112,185 $86,007 • Total Salary (000’s) $58,047 $9,670 $11,667 $79,384  Retirees: • Count 659 87 114 860 • Average Age20 67.5 63.0 67.2 67.0 • Average Retirement Age21 57.2 47.9 52.1 55.5 ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 13 PARTICIPANT STATISTICS Data Reconciliation 6/30/2011 to 6/30/2013 Actives Retirees Disabled Benefic. Total  June 30, 2011 923 787 73 - 1,783 • New Hires/Rehires 143 - - - 143 • Disabled (7) - 7 - - • Terminated22 (62) - - - (62) • Died with Benefic.23 - (56) (3) 59 - • Died, no Beneficiary (28) (2) (30) • Retired (50) 50 - - - • Reinstatement 1 (1) - - - • Retired  Disabled (84) 84 - • Adjustment/Other - 34 21 27 82  June 30, 2013 948 702 180 86 1,916 22 All actives in June 30, 2011 valuation and not in June 30, 2013 valuation assumed terminated. 23 Retirees in the June 30, 2011 valuation not in the June 30, 2013 valuation assumed deceased. May 20, 2014 14 PARTICIPANT STATISTICS Medical Plan Participation – January 1, 2014 Non-Waived Participants Retirees Medical Plan Actives < 6524 ≥ 6525 Total Miscellaneous/Safety M S M S M S M S Anthem BC Select 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Anthem BC Traditional 19% 17% 6% 11% 0% 0% 4% 9% Blue Shield 12% 3% 27% 18% 33% 16% 29% 18% Blue Shield NetValue 6% 4% 1% 4% 0% 0% 0% 3% Kaiser 37% 32% 28% 15% 27% 41% 28% 20% PERS Choice 13% 1% 29% 0% 23% 9% 27% 2% PERS Select 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% PERSCare 2% 1% 2% 2% 16% 22% 6% 6% PORAC 1% 35% 2% 47% 1% 13% 2% 41% United Healthcare 10% 7% 4% 4% 1% 0% 3% 3% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 24 Only includes employees who retired on or after June 30, 2008. 25 Only includes retirees up to age 70. ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 15 ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS HIGHLIGHTS June 30, 2011 Valuation June 30, 2013 Valuation  Valuation Date  June 30, 2011  Fiscal Years 2012/13 & 2013/14 ARCs (end of year)  1 year lag  June 30, 2013  Fiscal Years 2014/15 & 2015/16 ARCs (end of year)  1 year lag  Funding Policy  Full Pre-funding through CalPERS trust (CERBT)  Asset allocation #1 beginning 6/30/2011  Same  Discount Rate  7.61% (no Margin for Adverse Deviation)  Same  Sensitivity analysis at 7.25%  Payroll Increases  Aggregate Increases – 3.25%  Merit Increases – CalPERS 1997-2007 Experience Study  Same May 20, 2014 16 ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS HIGHLIGHTS June 30, 2011 Valuation June 30, 2013 Valuation  Increase to Dollar Caps for SEIU Group 3  N/A  ½ of Medical Trend, not less than assumed inflation (3.0%). Increase is for purposes of financial projection only and does not imply any obligation to increase the cap in the future  Medical Trend Increase from Prior Year Year Non-Medicare Medicare 2011 Premiums 2012 Premiums 2013 9.0% 9.4% 2014 8.5% 8.9% 2015 8.0% 8.3% 2016 7.5% 7.8% 2017 7.0% 7.2% 2018 6.5% 6.7% 2019 6.0% 6.1% 2020 5.5% 5.6% 2021+ 5.0% 5.0% Increase from Prior Year Year Non-Medicare Medicare 2011 n/a 2012 n/a 2013 Premiums 2014 Premiums 2015 8.0% 8.3% 2016 7.5% 7.8% 2017 7.0% 7.2% 2018 6.5% 6.7% 2019 6.0% 6.1% 2020 5.5% 5.6% 2021+ 5.0% 5.0% ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 17 ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS HIGHLIGHTS June 30, 2011 Valuation June 30, 2013 Valuation  Participation at Retirement  DOH < 1/1/04: 100%  DOH > 1/1/04: 95%  Employees with cost sharing: reduce above %’s by 5%  Groups 1 & 2: already retired  Group 3: 90%  Group 4: 85% May 20, 2014 18 ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS HIGHLIGHTS June 30, 2011 Valuation June 30, 2013 Valuation  Retirement, Mortality, Termination, Disability  CalPERS 1997-2007 Experience Study Misc Fire Police Benefit 2.7%@55 3%@50 3%@50 2%@6026 ERA27 57.5 54.5 54.0  CalPERS 1997-2007 Experience Study  Includes fully generational mortality projected with Scale AA  Sensitivity analysis without mortality projection Misc Fire & Police Tier 1 2.7%@55 3%@50 ERA27 59.3 55.7 & 54.5 Tier 2 2%@6026 3%@5528 ERA 61.1 n/a & 59.7 PEPRA29 2.5%@67 2.7%@57 ERA 61.0 n/a & 56.8 26 Applies to non-PEPRA (Classic) employees hired after 7/17/2010 27 Expected Retirement Age 28 Applies to non-PEPRA (Classic) Police employees hired after 12/7/2012 and Fire employees hired after 6/7/2012 29 Applies to employees hired after 1/1/2013 and considered “New Members” under PEPRA ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 19 ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS HIGHLIGHTS June 30, 2011 Valuation June 30, 2013 Valuation  Medical Plan at Retirement & Retirees Attaining age 65  Rates based on elections in June 30, 2011 data (see slide E-34 for further details)  Rates based on elections in January 2014 (see slide E-34 for further details)  Family Coverage at Retirement  Actives • Misc : 10% until age 65 • Safety : 20% until age 65  Retirees: based on current elections until age 65  Actives • Misc : 15% until age 65 • Safety : 40% until age 65  Retirees: based on current elections until age 65  Waived Retiree Re-election  N/A  Pre-65 – 20% re-elect at age 65  Post-65 – 0%  CalPERS Service  City service plus ½ service between age 30 and City hire date  Actual data May 20, 2014 20 ACTUARIAL METHODS Method June 30, 2011 Valuation June 30, 2013 Valuation  Cost Method  Entry Age Normal Level % of Pay  Same  Unfunded Liability Amortization  30 years open period30  30 years closed period  Sensitivity analysis: 25 & 20 year periods  Actuarial Asset Value  Market Value of Assets31  Same  Future New Entrants  Closed group – no new participants  Same  Implied Subsidy  No implied subsidy valued  Implied subsidy valued  Sensitivity: no implied subsidy 30 30-year open amortization period meets GASB 45 accounting standards but results in negative amortization and does not meet a funding policy consistent with paying off the City’s unfunded liability. 31 Using Market Value of Assets to determine the ARC will result in more volatile future ARCs than if a smoothed Market Value were used. ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 21 ACTUARIAL METHODS Method June 30, 2011 Valuation June 30, 2013 Valuation  Plan Continuance  For purposes of financial projections, the plan and benefits are assumed to continue unchanged. The calculation of this accounting obligation does not imply that there is any legal liability to provide or continue providing the benefits valued. May 20, 2014 22 ASSETS Market Value of Plan Assets – CERBT (Amounts in 000’s) 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 Projected 2013/1432  MVA (Beg. of Year) $ 34,014 $ 44,774 $ 49,238 $ 60,070 • Contributions 2,447 4,419 5,248 4,149 • Benefit Payments33 - - - - • Admin. Expenses (50) (52) (80) (95) • Investment Return 8,363 97 5,664 9,017  MVA (End of Year) 44,774 49,238 60,070 73,141  Approx. Annual Return 24.4% 0.1% 11.2% 14.7% 32 Projected from actual 12/31/2013 balance using assumed rate of return for last half of fiscal year. 33 Benefit Payments made outside of trust by City. Refer to Slide 3 for fiscal year amounts. ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 23 ASSETS Historical Assets (Amounts in 000’s) $0 $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 $50,000 $60,000 $70,000 $80,000 6/30/07 6/30/08 6/30/09 6/30/10 6/30/11 6/30/12 6/30/13 Proj 6/30/14 Market Value of Assets May 20, 2014 24 ASSETS Historical Returns34 34 Projected return for 2013/14 uses actual investment return for first half of fiscal year and assumed rate of return for last half of fiscal year 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 Proj 13/14 Assets -22.5% 15.1% 24.4% 0.1% 11.2% 14.7% Expected Return 7.75% 7.75% 7.75% 7.61% 7.61% 7.61% (30%) (20%) (10%) 0% 10% 20% 30% ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 25 RESULTS Actuarial Obligations (Amounts in 000’s) 6/30/11 Valuation 6/30/13 Valuation 6/30/11 Projected 6/30/12 6/30/13 Projected 6/30/14  Present Value of Benefits • Actives $ 87,186 $ 105,008 • Retirees 115,644 139,378 • Total 202,830 244,386  Actuarial Accrued Liability • Actives 52,409 64,264 • Retirees 115,644 139,378 • Total 168,053 $ 177,304 203,642 $ 213,458  Actuarial Value of Assets 44,774 52,331 60,070 73,124  Unfunded AAL 123,279 124,973 143,572 140,333  Funded Ratio 27% 30% 29% 34%  Normal Cost 5,091 5,674  Pay-As-You-Go Cost (Cash) 8,944 8,903 9,152  Pay-As-You-Go Cost (IS) 1,852 1,916 May 20, 2014 26 RESULTS Historical Funded Status (Amounts in 000’s) $0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 1/1/09 1/1/11 6/30/11 6/30/13 Retiree pay-go Retiree AAL less pay-go Active AAL MVA ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 27 RESULTS Actuarial Gain/Loss (Amounts in 000’s) AAL (AVA) UAAL  Actual 6/30/11 $ 168,053 $ (44,774) $ 123,279  Expected 6/30/14 195,805 (67,114) 128,691  Assumption Changes • Participation at Retirement (6,859) (6,859) • Family Coverage at Retirement 876 876 • Medical Plan Election (897) (897) • Projected Mortality Improvement 5,290 5,290  Contribution (Gain)/Loss (1,095) (1,095)  Investment (Gain)/Loss (3,734) (3,734)  Plan Changes • Benefit Changes → Slide 4 18,687 18,687 • Implied Subsidy 43,448 43,448 • SEIU Agreement Change (1,944) (1,944)  Experience (Gains)/Losses • Premiums/Caps < Expected (35,674) (35,674) • Demographic & Other (5,276) (1,199) (6,475)  Total (Gain)/Loss 17,652 (6,011) 11,641  Projected 6/30/14 213,458 (73,124) 140,334 May 20, 2014 28 RESULTS Schedule of Funding Progress (Amounts in 000’s) Actuarial Valuation Date Actuarial Value of Assets (a) Entry Age Actuarial Accrued Liability (b) Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (b-a) Funded Ratio (a/b) Covered Payroll (c) UAAL as Percentage of Covered Payroll ((b-a)/c) 1/1/2011 $ 40,213 $ 165,660 $ 125,447 24.3% $ 98,940 126.8% 6/30/2011 44,774 168,053 123,279 26.6% 80,664 152.8% 6/30/2013 60,070 203,642 143,572 29.5% 81,785 175.5% ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 29 RESULTS Annual Required Contribution (ARC) (Amounts in 000’s) 6/30/11 Valuation 6/30/13 Valuation 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16  ARC - $ • Normal Cost $ 5,091 $ 5,256 $ 5,674 $ 5,880 • UAAL Amortization 7,665 7,779 8,607 8,887 • Total 12,756 13,035 14,282 14,767  Projected Payroll 83,285 85,992 87,187 90,021  ARC - %Pay • Normal Cost 6.1% 6.1% 6.5% 6.5% • UAAL Amortization 9.2% 9.1% 9.9% 9.9% • Total 15.3% 15.2% 16.4% 16.4% May 20, 2014 30 RESULTS Annual Required Contribution (ARC) (Amounts in 000’s) $0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 $14,000 $16,000 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 Normal Cost 3,478 3,478 4,782 5,091 5,256 5,674 5,880 Amortization 6,308 6,308 7,802 7,665 7,779 8,607 8,887 ARC 9,786 9,786 12,584 12,756 13,035 14,282 14,767 ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 31 RESULTS Amortization Bases & Payments (000’s Omitted) 6/30/2011 Valuation 6/30/2013 Valuation 6/30/2012 6/30/2013 6/30/2014 6/30/2015  UAAL Balance $ 124,973 $ 126,819 $ 140,333 $ 142,405  Amortization Payment - $ 7,665 7,779 8,607 8,887  Amortization Period 30 30 30 29 May 20, 2014 32 RESULTS This page intentionally blank ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 33 RESULTS Estimated Net OPEB Obligation/(Asset) Illustration (Amounts in 000’s) 6/30/11 Valuation 6/30/13 Valuation CAFR 2012/13 Estimate 2013/14 Estimate 2014/15 Estimate 2015/16  NOO/(NOA) at Beginning of Year $(21,271) $(21,851) $(22,174) $(22,501)  Annual OPEB Cost • Annual Required Contribution 12,756 13,035 14,282 14,767 • Interest on NOO (1,619) (1,663) (1,687) (1,712) • NOO Adjustment 2,057 1,340 1,360 1,404 • Annual OPEB Cost 13,194 12,712 13,954 14,459  Contributions • Cash Benefit Payments35 8,766 8,886 9,152 9,841 • Implied Subsidy Benefit Payments36 - - 1,916 2,102 • Trust Funding 5,008 4,149 3,214 2,824 • Total Contributions 13,774 13,035 14,282 14,767  NOO/(NOA) at End of Year (21,851) (22,174) (22,501) (22,809) 35 Estimated cash payments shown for all years after 2012/13. Actual cash payments should be used for OPEB footnote. 36 Use amounts listed here for 2014/15 and 2015/16 OPEB footnotes. May 20, 2014 34 RESULTS Estimated Full ARC Funding Projection (Amounts in 000’s) FYE Begin Year NOO ARC AOC Contribution Pay ARC % of Pay Cash BP IS BP Pre- Funding Total 2015 $(22,174) $14,282 $13,954 $9,152 $1,916 $3,214 $14,282 $87,187 16.4% 2016 (22,501) 14,767 14,459 9,841 2,102 2,824 14,767 90,021 16.4% 2017 (22,809) 15,269 14,984 10,640 2,387 2,242 15,269 92,947 16.4% 2018 (23,095) 15,790 15,529 11,388 2,631 1,771 15,790 95,967 16.5% 2019 (23,356) 16,328 16,096 12,056 2,835 1,437 16,328 99,086 16.5% 2020 (23,587) 16,883 16,684 12,672 3,026 1,185 16,883 102,307 16.5% 2021 (23,786) 17,456 17,294 13,291 3,251 914 17,456 105,632 16.5% 2022 (23,949) 18,047 17,926 13,882 3,507 658 18,047 109,065 16.5% 2023 (24,070) 18,656 18,581 14,545 3,838 273 18,656 112,609 16.6% 2024 (24,145) 19,285 19,261 15,132 4,081 72 19,285 116,269 16.6% ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 35 RESULTS Actuarial Obligations June 30, 2013 (Amounts in 000’s) Benefits < Age 65 Benefits > Age 65 Total  Present Value of Benefits • Actives $ 58,253 $ 46,755 $ 105,008 • Retirees 48,165 91,212 139,378 • Total 106,418 137,968 244,386  Actuarial Accrued Liability • Actives 34,085 30,179 64,264 • Retirees 48,165 91,212 139,378 • Total 82,250 121,391 203,642  Normal Cost 2014/15 3,289 2,386 5,674 May 20, 2014 36 RESULTS Actuarial Obligations June 30, 2013 (Amounts in 000’s) Group 1 Group 2 Group 337 Group 4 Total  Present Value of Benefits • Actives $ - $ - $ 74,267 $ 30,741 $105,008 • Retirees 65,602 63,910 8,511 1,355 139,378 • Total 65,602 63,910 82,778 32,096 244,386  Actuarial Accrued Liability • Actives - - 55,118 9,145 64,264 • Retirees 65,602 63,910 8,511 1,355 139,378 • Total 65,602 63,910 63,629 10,500 203,642  Normal Cost 2014/15 - - 2,962 2,712 5,674  NC as % of Payroll 6.3% 6.9% 6.6% 37 PAPOA Group 3 members have Group 2 benefits. There are 39 PAPOA Group 3 active members. ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 37 RESULTS Actuarial Obligations June 30, 2013 (Amounts in 000’s) Misc Safety Total  Present Value of Benefits • Actives $ 74,520 $ 30,488 $ 105,008 • Retirees 90,106 49,272 139,378 • Total 164,626 79,760 244,386  Actuarial Accrued Liability • Actives 47,555 16,709 64,264 • Retirees 90,106 49,272 139,378 • Total 137,661 65,981 203,642  Actuarial Value of Assets38 40,773 19,298 60,070  Unfunded AAL 96,888 46,683 143,572  Normal Cost 2014/15 4,041 1,634 5,674  Pay-As-You-Go Cost 2014/15 7,592 3,476 11,068 38 Allocated in proportion to the Actuarial Accrued Liability before SEIU benefit change. May 20, 2014 38 RESULTS Annual Required Contribution (ARC) 2014/15 Fiscal Year (Amounts in 000’s) Misc Safety Total  ARC - $ • Normal Cost $ 4,041 $ 1,634 $ 5,674 • UAAL Amortization39 5,811 2,795 8,607 • ARC 9,852 4,429 14,282  Projected Payroll 65,389 21,799 87,187  ARC - % • Normal Cost 6.2% 7.5% 6.5% • UAAL Amortization 8.9% 12.8% 9.9% • ARC 15.1% 20.3% 16.4% 39 Allocated in proportion to the Actuarial Accrued Liability before SEIU benefit change. ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 39 RESULTS Actuarial Obligations June 30, 2013 (Amounts in 000’s) FCA IAFF M/C PAPOA PMA SEIU UMPA Total  PVB • Actives $ 820 $15,400 $18,811 $12,239 $1,458 $49,863 $6,416 $105,008 • Retirees 814 24,825 43,500 18,502 407 50,307 1,022 139,378 • Total 1,634 40,225 62,311 30,741 1,865 100,170 7,438 244,386  AAL • Actives 721 9,077 11,373 5,380 1,122 31,773 4,818 64,264 • Retirees 814 24,825 43,500 18,502 407 50,307 1,022 139,378 • Total 1,535 33,902 54,873 23,882 1,529 82,080 5,840 203,642  AVA40 449 9,915 16,049 6,985 447 24,517 1,708 60,070  UAAL 1,086 23,987 38,824 16,897 1,082 57,563 4,132 143,572  NC 14/15 25 759 1,122 761 56 2,689 264 5,674  Pay-Go 57 1,745 3,448 1,302 19 4,372 125 11,068 40 Allocated in proportion to the Actuarial Accrued Liability before SEIU benefit change. May 20, 2014 40 RESULTS Annual Required Contribution (ARC) 2014/15 Fiscal Year (Amounts in 000’s) FCA IAFF M/C PAPOA PMA SEIU UMPA Total  ARC - $ • Normal Cost $ 25 $ 759 $1,122 $ 761 $ 56 $ 2,689 $ 264 $ 5,674 • UAAL Amort41 65 1,437 2,292 1,015 68 3,470 261 8,607 • ARC 90 2,195 3,414 1,776 124 6,159 526 14,282  Proj. Payroll 642 10,570 21,287 8,805 1,260 39,170 5,454 87,187  ARC - % • Normal Cost 3.9% 7.2% 5.3% 8.7% 4.4% 6.9% 4.8% 6.5% • UAAL Amort 10.1%13.6% 10.7% 11.5%5.4% 8.9%4.8% 9.9% • ARC 14.0% 20.8% 16.0% 20.2%9.8% 15.7% 9.6% 16.4% 41 Allocated in proportion to the Actuarial Accrued Liability before SEIU benefit change. ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 41 RESULTS Annual Required Contribution (ARC) 2015/16 Fiscal Year (Amounts in 000’s) FCA IAFF M/C PAPOA PMA SEIU UMPA Total  ARC - $ • Normal Cost $ 25 $ 783 $1,164 $ 787 $ 58 $ 2,783 $ 280 $ 5,880 • UAAL Amort 67 1,483 2,367 1,049 70 3,581 270 8,887 • ARC 92 2,266 3,531 1,836 128 6,364 550 14,767  Proj. Payroll 663 10,913 21,979 9,091 1,301 40,443 5,631 90,021  ARC - % • Normal Cost 3.7% 7.2% 5.3% 8.7% 4.4% 6.9% 5.0% 6.5% • UAAL Amort 10.1%13.6% 10.8%11.5%5.4% 8.9% 4.8% 9.9% • ARC 13.8% 20.8% 16.1% 20.2% 9.8% 15.7% 9.8% 16.4% May 20, 2014 42 ASSUMPTION SENSITIVITIES Discount Rate Sensitivity (Amounts in 000’s) Discount Rate 7.61% 7.25%  PVPB @ 6/30/13 $ 244,386 $ 257,348  AAL @ 6/30/13 • AAL 203,642 212,483 • Assets 60,070 60,070 • Unfunded AAL 143,572 152,413  2014/15 ARC • Normal Cost $ 5,674 $ 6,081 • UAAL Amort. 42 8,607 8,790 • Total ARC 14,282 14,871 • ARC – % of pay 16.4% 17.1% 42 Amortized over 30 years ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 43 ASSUMPTION SENSITIVITIES Mortality Projection Sensitivity (Amounts in 000’s) Mortality Projection Included Not Included  PVPB @ 6/30/13 $ 244,386 $ 236,653  AAL @ 6/30/13 • AAL 203,642 197,379 • Assets 60,070 60,070 • Unfunded AAL 143,572 137,309  2014/15 ARC • Normal Cost $ 5,674 $ 5,484 • UAAL Amort. 43 8,607 8,183 • Total ARC 14,282 13,667 • ARC – % of pay 16.4% 15.7% 43 Amortized over 30 years May 20, 2014 44 ASSUMPTION SENSITIVITIES Amortization Period Sensitivity (Amounts in 000’s) Amortization Period 30 Years 25 Years 20 Years  PVPB @ 6/30/13 $ 244,386 $ 244,386 $ 244,386  AAL @ 6/30/13 • AAL 203,642 203,642 203,642 • Assets 60,070 60,070 60,070 • Unfunded AAL 143,572 143,572 143,572  2014/15 ARC • Normal Cost $ 5,674 $ 5,674 $ 5,674 • UAAL Amort. 8,607 9,495 10,873 • Total ARC 14,282 15,169 16,547 • ARC – % of pay 16.4% 17.4% 19.0% ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 45 ASSUMPTION SENSITIVITIES Implied Subsidy Sensitivity (Amounts in 000’s) Implied Subsidy Included Not Included  PVPB @ 6/30/13 $ 244,386 $ 197,307  AAL @ 6/30/13 • AAL 203,642 162,199 • Assets 60,070 60,070 • Unfunded AAL 143,572 102,129  2014/15 ARC • Normal Cost $ 5,674 $ 4,871 • UAAL Amort. 44 8,607 5,942 • Total ARC 14,282 10,813 • ARC – % of pay 16.4% 12.4% 44 Amortized over 30 years May 20, 2014 46 ASSUMPTION SENSITIVITIES Combination Sensitivity (Amounts in 000’s) Discount Rate 7.61% 7.25% Amortization Period 30 Years 25 Years Mortality Projection Yes Yes Implied Subsidy Yes Yes  PVPB @ 6/30/13 $ 244,386 $ 257,348  AAL @ 6/30/13 • AAL 203,642 212,483 • Assets 60,070 60,070 • Unfunded AAL 143,572 152,413  2014/15 ARC • Normal Cost $ 5,674 $ 6,081 • UAAL Amort. 8,607 9,749 • Total ARC 14,282 15,830 • ARC – % of pay 16.4% 18.2% ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 47 BENEFIT SENSITIVITIES Benefit Sensitivity – SEIU Agreement (Amounts in 000’s) Benefits Prior Current Change  PVPB @ 6/30/13 $ 246,665 $ 244,385 $ 2,280  AAL @ 6/30/13 • AAL 205,388 203,641 1,747 • Assets 60,070 60,070 - • Unfunded AAL 145,318 143,571 1,747  2014/15 ARC • Normal Cost $ 5,720 $ 5,675 $ 45 • UAAL Amort.45 8,725 8,607 118 • Total ARC 14,445 14,282 163 • ARC – % of pay 16.6% 16.4% 0.2% 45 Amortized over 30 years. Previous estimates amortized SEIU plan change over 15 years. May 20, 2014 48 BENEFIT SENSITIVITIES Benefit Sensitivity – SEIU Agreement (SEIU Only) (Amounts in 000’s) Benefits Prior Current Change  PVPB @ 6/30/13 $ 102,450 $ 100,170 $ 2,280  AAL @ 6/30/13 • AAL 83,827 82,080 1,747 • Assets 24,517 24,517 - • Unfunded AAL 59,310 57,563 1,747  2014/15 ARC • Normal Cost $ 2,734 $ 2,689 $ 45 • UAAL Amort. 46 3,588 3,470 118 • Total ARC 6,322 6,159 163 • ARC – % of pay 7.3% 7.0% 0.3% 46 Amortized over 30 years. Previous estimates amortized SEIU plan change over 15 years. ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 49 ACTUARIAL CERTIFICATION This report presents the City of Palo Alto’s Retiree Healthcare Plan (“Plan”) June 30, 2013 actuarial valuation. The purpose of this valuation is to:  Determine the Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement Nos. 43 and 45 June 30, 2013 Benefit Obligations,  Determine the Plan’s June 30, 2013 Funded Status, and  Calculate the 2014/15 and 2015/16 Annual Required Contributions. The report provides information intended for reporting under GASB 43 and 45, but may not be appropriate for other purposes. Information provided in this report may be useful to the City for the Plan’s financial management. Future valuations may differ significantly if the Plan’s experience differs from our assumptions or if there are changes in Plan design, actuarial methods, or actuarial assumptions. The project scope did not include an analysis of this potential variation. The valuation is based on Plan provisions, participant data, and asset information provided by the City as summarized in this report, which we relied on and did not audit. We reviewed the participant data for reasonableness. To the best of our knowledge, this report is complete and accurate and has been conducted using generally accepted actuarial principles and practices. Additionally, in our opinion, actuarial methods and assumptions comply with GASB 43 and 45. As members of the American Academy of Actuaries meeting the Academy Qualification Standards, we certify the actuarial results and opinions herein. Respectfully submitted, John E. Bartel, ASA, MAAA, FCA President Bartel Associates, LLC May 20, 2014 Deanna Van Valer, ASA, MAAA, EA, FCA Assistant Vice President Bartel Associates, LLC May 20, 2014 Mary Elizabeth Redding, FSA, MAAA, EA, FCA Assistant Vice President Bartel Associates, LLC May 20, 2014 May 20, 2014 50 EXHIBITS Topic Page Premiums E- 1 Data Summary E- 5 Actuarial Assumptions E-31 Results by Fund E-42 Results by GF Department E-46 Definitions E-50 ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 E-1 PREMIUMS 2012 PEMHCA Monthly Premiums Bay Area Non-Medicare Eligible Medicare Eligible Medical Plan Single 2-Party Family Single 2-Party Family Blue Shield Access+ $711.10 $1,422.20 $1,848.86 $337.99 $675.98 $1,013.97 Blue Shield NetValue 611.59 1,223.18 1,590.13 337.99 675.98 1,013.97 Kaiser 610.44 1,220.88 1,587.14 277.81 555.62 833.43 PERS Choice 574.15 1,148.30 1,492.79 383.44 766.88 1,150.32 PERS Select 487.39 974.78 1,267.21 383.44 766.88 1,150.32 PERSCare 1,029.23 2,058.46 2,676.00 432.43 864.86 1,297.29 PORAC 556.00 1,041.00 1,323.00 418.00 833.00 1,331.00 May 20, 2014 E-2 PREMIUMS 2013 PEMHCA Monthly Premiums Bay Area Non-Medicare Eligible Medicare Eligible Medical Plan Single 2-Party Family Single 2-Party Family Blue Shield $ 784.63 $1,569.26 $2,040.04 $261.32 $522.64 $ 783.96 Blue Shield NetValue 670.21 1,340.42 1,742.55 261.32 522.64 783.96 Kaiser 668.63 1,337.26 1,738.44 288.37 576.74 865.11 PERS Choice 667.03 1,334.06 1,734.28 325.74 651.48 977.22 PERS Select 487.20 974.40 1,266.72 325.74 651.48 977.22 PERSCare 1,083.11 2,166.22 2,816.09 370.43 740.86 1,111.29 PORAC 581.00 1,088.00 1,382.00 418.00 833.00 1,331.00 ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 E-3 PREMIUMS 2014 PEMHCA Monthly Premiums Bay Area Non-Medicare Eligible Medicare Eligible Medical Plan Single 2-Party Family Single 2-Party Family Anthem Select $657.33 $1,314.66 $1,709.06 $341.12 $682.24 $1,023.36 Anthem Traditional 728.41 1,456.82 1,893.87 341.12 682.24 1,023.36 Blue Shield Access+ 836.59 1,673.18 2,175.13 298.21 596.42 894.63 Blue Shield NetValue 704.01 1,408.02 1,830.43 298.21 596.42 894.63 Kaiser 742.72 1,485.44 1,931.07 294.97 589.94 884.91 United Healthcare 764.24 1,528.48 1,987.02 193.33 386.66 579.99 PERS Choice 690.77 1,381.54 1,796.00 307.23 614.46 921.69 PERS Select 661.52 1,323.04 1,719.95 307.23 614.46 921.69 PERSCare 720.04 1,440.08 1,872.10 327.36 654.72 982.08 PORAC 634.00 1,186.00 1,507.00 397.00 791.00 1,264.00 May 20, 2014 E-4 PREMIUMS PEMHCA Monthly Premium Increases Bay Area Non-Medicare Eligible Medicare Eligible Medical Plan 2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2014 Blue Shield 5.3% 10.3% 6.6% 0.1% (22.7%) 14.1% Blue Shield NetValue 5.2% 9.6% 5.0% 0.1% (22.7%) 14.1% Kaiser 7.3% 9.5% 11.1% (1.6%) 3.8% 2.3% PERS Choice 1.9% 16.2% 3.6% 2.0% (15.1%) (5.7%) PERS Select (1.1%) (0.1%) 35.8% 2.0% (15.1%) (5.7%) PERSCare 15.1% 5.2% (33.5%) (0.3%) (14.3%) (11.6%) PORAC 5.5% 4.5% 9.1% 0.0% 0.0% (5.0%) ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 E-5 DATA SUMMARY Medical Plan Participation – June 30, 2013 Non-Waived Participants Retirees Medical Plan Actives < 65 ≥ 65 Total Miscellaneous/Safety M S M S M S M S Blue Shield 46% 32% 35% 31% 25% 18% 29%24% Blue Shield NetValue 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0%0% Kaiser 37% 31% 31% 13% 25% 26% 27%20% PERS Choice 15% 1% 29% 4% 17% 17% 22%11% PERS Select 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%0% PERSCare 0% 0% 3% 20% 33% 34% 21%27% PORAC 1% 35% 2% 33% 0% 5% 1%18% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%100% May 20, 2014 E-6 DATA SUMMARY Medical Plan Participation – June 30, 2011 Non-Waived Participants Retirees Medical Plan Actives < 65 ≥ 65 Total Miscellaneous/Safety M S M S M S M S Blue Shield 47% 32% 34% 28% 20% 25% 27% 27% Blue Shield NetValue 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% Kaiser 36% 28% 30% 13% 24% 23% 27% 18% PERS Choice 16% 2% 26% 8% 18% 11% 22% 9% PERS Select 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% PERSCare 0% 0% 6% 25% 37% 36% 23% 30% PORAC 1% 38% 3% 26% 0% 3% 1% 15% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 E-7 DATA SUMMARY Active Medical Coverage - Miscellaneous Medical Plan Single 2-Party Family Waived Total Blue Shield 86 72 156 - 314 Blue Shield NetValue 1 1 3 - 5 Kaiser 70 59 123 - 252 PERS Choice 32 26 43 - 101 PERS Select 2 - - - 2 PERSCare - - 1 - 1 PORAC 4 3 2 - 9 Waived - - - 81 81 Total 195 161 328 81 765 % as of June 30, 2013 25% 21% 43% 11% 100% % as of June 30, 2011 21% 22% 47% 10% 100% May 20, 2014 E-8 DATA SUMMARY Active Medical Coverage - Safety Medical Plan Single 2-Party Family Waived Total Blue Shield 13 4 37 - 54 Blue Shield NetValue 1 - - - 1 Kaiser 12 7 33 - 52 PERS Choice - 1 1 - 2 PERS Select - - - - - PERSCare - - - - - PORAC 10 7 42 - 59 Waived - - - 15 15 Total 36 19 113 15 183 % as of June 30, 2013 20% 10% 62% 8% 100% % as of June 30, 2011 23% 10% 64% 4% 100% ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 E-9 DATA SUMMARY Retiree Medical Coverage47 - Miscellaneous Medical Plan Single 2-Party Family Waived Total <65 65+ <65 65+ <65 65+ <65 65+ Blue Shield 38 54 35 35 15 5 - - 182 Kaiser 38 44 24 46 14 4 - - 170 PERS Choice 34 31 29 33 8 2 - - 137 PERS Select 1 - - - - - - - 1 PERSCare 6 77 2 46 - 1 - - 132 PORAC 3 - 1 1 1 - - - 6 Waived - - - - - - 14 48 62 Total 120 206 91 161 38 12 14 48 690 % as of June 30, 2013 46% 48% 35% 38% 14% 3% 5% 11% 100% % as of June 30, 2011 47% 54% 40% 44% 14% 2% 0% 0% 100% 47 Approximately 69% of retirees have coverage in a Bay Area region plan. The rest are in other state regions or out of state. May 20, 2014 E-10 DATA SUMMARY Retiree Medical Coverage48 - Safety Medical Plan Single 2-Party Family Waived Total <65 65+ <65 65+ <65 65+ <65 65+ Blue Shield 11 13 7 11 20 - - - 62 Blue Shield NetValue - 1 - - - - - - 1 Kaiser 3 14 5 19 8 2 - - 51 PERS Choice 1 8 2 14 2 1 - - 28 PERSCare 15 27 7 18 2 1 - - 70 PORAC 9 2 13 3 18 2 - - 47 Waived - - - - - - 3 16 19 Total 39 65 34 65 50 6 3 16 278 % as of June 30, 2013 31% 43% 27% 43% 40% 4% 2% 11% 100% % as of June 30, 2011 40% 49% 29% 47% 30% 3% 0% 0% 100% 48 Approximately 51% of retirees have coverage in a Bay Area region plan. The rest are in other state regions or out of state. ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 E-11 DATA SUMMARY Retirees Medical Coverage by Age – Miscellaneous Age Single 2-Party Family Waived Total Under 50 3 - 1 2 6 50-54 14 8 8 6 36 55-59 42 33 16 5 96 60-64 61 50 13 1 125 65-69 61 65 9 12 147 70-74 61 35 2 5 103 75-79 30 32 - 4 66 80-84 24 19 1 13 57 85 & Over 30 10 - 14 54 Total 326 252 50 62 690 Average Age 69.5 68.7 60.3 74.2 68.9 May 20, 2014 E-12 DATA SUMMARY 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 <50 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 ≥85 Nu m b e r Age Retiree Age Distribution Miscellaneous 6/30/11 Valuation 6/30/13 Valuation ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 E-13 DATA SUMMARY Retirees Medical Coverage by Age – Police Age Single 2-Party Family Waived Total Under 50 2 2 3 - 7 50-54 10 3 7 1 21 55-59 5 4 10 - 19 60-64 11 6 1 1 19 65-69 5 7 2 3 17 70-74 7 4 - 2 13 75-79 4 3 - 1 8 80-84 8 1 - 2 11 85 & Over 4 2 - - 6 Total 56 32 23 10 121 Average Age 66.9 65.3 54.9 69.4 64.4 May 20, 2014 E-14 DATA SUMMARY 0 5 10 15 20 25 <50 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 ≥85 Nu m b e r Age Retiree Age Distribution Police 6/30/11 Valuation 6/30/13 Valuation ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 E-15 DATA SUMMARY Retirees Medical Coverage by Age – Fire Age Single 2-Party Family Waived Total Under 50 1 1 3 - 5 50-54 2 2 15 1 20 55-59 3 9 9 - 21 60-64 5 7 2 - 14 65-69 6 14 2 3 25 70-74 10 14 2 1 27 75-79 14 11 - 2 27 80-84 3 9 - 2 14 85 & Over 4 - - - 4 Total 48 67 33 9 157 Average Age 72.3 69.7 55.4 71.5 67.6 May 20, 2014 E-16 DATA SUMMARY 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 <50 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 ≥85 Nu m b e r Age Retiree Age Distribution Fire 6/30/11 Valuation 6/30/13 Valuation ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 E-17 DATA SUMMARY Retirees Medical Coverage by Age – Total Age Single 2-Party Family Waived Total Under 50 6 3 7 2 18 50-54 26 13 30 8 77 55-59 50 46 35 5 136 60-64 77 63 16 2 158 65-69 72 86 13 18 189 70-74 78 53 4 8 143 75-79 48 46 - 7 101 80-84 35 29 1 17 82 85 & Over 38 12 - 14 64 Total 430 351 106 81 968 Average Age 69.4 68.6 57.6 73.3 68.2 May 20, 2014 E-18 DATA SUMMARY 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 <50 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 ≥85 Nu m b e r Age Retiree Age Distribution Total 6/30/11 Valuation 6/30/13 Valuation ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 E-19 DATA SUMMARY Actives by Age and Service – Miscellaneous City Service Age < 1 1-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 ≥ 25 Total < 25 6 5 - - - - - 11 25-29 10 23 6 1 - - - 40 30-34 9 32 27 14 - - - 82 35-39 8 28 28 29 4 - - 97 40-44 5 21 22 32 12 4 - 96 45-49 3 24 22 34 16 16 4 119 50-54 5 22 23 36 29 28 17 160 55-59 2 13 20 18 16 7 14 90 60-64 - 5 9 16 12 6 3 51 ≥ 65 - 1 3 4 3 5 3 19 Total 48 174 160 184 92 66 41 765 May 20, 2014 E-20 DATA SUMMARY Actives by Age and Service – Police City Service Age < 1 1-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 ≥ 25 Total < 25 1 - - - - - - 1 25-29 - 4 2 - - - - 6 30-34 2 11 15 - - - - 28 35-39 - 3 1 10 1 - - 15 40-44 2 1 3 4 1 2 - 13 45-49 - - - 1 6 5 - 12 50-54 - 1 1 1 1 1 - 5 55-59 - - - 1 - - 1 2 60-64 - - - - - - - - ≥ 65 - - - - - - - - Total 5 20 22 17 9 8 1 82 ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 E-21 DATA SUMMARY Actives by Age and Service – Fire City Service Age < 1 1-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 ≥ 25 Total < 25 - 1 - - - - - 1 25-29 - 7 2 - - - - 9 30-34 - 6 6 1 - - - 13 35-39 - 3 4 1 - - - 8 40-44 - 4 6 11 6 - - 27 45-49 1 - 2 6 10 10 2 31 50-54 - - 1 2 3 1 2 9 55-59 - - - - - - 1 1 60-64 - - - - - 1 1 2 ≥ 65 - - - - - - - - Total 1 21 21 21 19 12 6 101 May 20, 2014 E-22 DATA SUMMARY Actives by Age and Service – Total City Service Age < 1 1-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 ≥ 25 Total < 25 7 6 - - - - - 13 25-29 10 34 10 1 - - - 55 30-34 11 49 48 15 - - - 123 35-39 8 34 33 40 5 - - 120 40-44 7 26 31 47 19 6 - 136 45-49 4 24 24 41 32 31 6 162 50-54 5 23 25 39 33 30 19 174 55-59 2 13 20 19 16 7 16 93 60-64 - 5 9 16 12 7 4 53 ≥ 65 - 1 3 4 3 5 3 19 Total 54 215 203 222 120 86 48 948 ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 E-23 DATA SUMMARY 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 <25 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-65 ≥65 Nu m b e r Age Active Age Distribution Miscellaneous 6/30/11 Valuation 6/30/13 Valuation May 20, 2014 E-24 DATA SUMMARY 0 50 100 150 200 250 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 >25 Nu m b e r Service Active Service Distribution Miscellaneous 6/30/11 Valuation 6/30/13 Valuation ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 E-25 DATA SUMMARY 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 <25 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-65 ≥65 Nu m b e r Age Active Age Distribution Police 6/30/11 Valuation 6/30/13 Valuation May 20, 2014 E-26 DATA SUMMARY 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 >25 Nu m b e r Service Active Service Distribution Police 6/30/11 Valuation 6/30/13 Valuation ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 E-27 DATA SUMMARY 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 <25 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-65 ≥65 Nu m b e r Age Active Age Distribution Fire 6/30/11 Valuation 6/30/13 Valuation May 20, 2014 E-28 DATA SUMMARY 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 >25 Nu m b e r Service Active Service Distribution Fire 6/30/11 Valuation 6/30/13 Valuation ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 E-29 DATA SUMMARY 0 50 100 150 200 250 <25 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-65 ≥65 Nu m b e r Age Active Age Distribution Total 6/30/11 Valuation 6/30/13 Valuation May 20, 2014 E-30 DATA SUMMARY 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 >25 Nu m b e r Service Active Service Distribution Total 6/30/11 Valuation 6/30/13 Valuation ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 E-31 ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS June 30, 2011 Valuation June 30, 2013 Valuation  Valuation Date  June 30, 2011  Fiscal Years 2012/13 & 2013/14 ARCs (end of year)  1 year lag  June 30, 2013  Fiscal Years 2012/13 & 2013/14 ARCs (end of year)  1 year lag  Funding Policy  Full Pre-funding through CalPERS trust (CERBT)  Asset allocation #1 beginning 6/30/2011  Same  General Inflation  3.00%  Same  Discount Rate  7.61% (no Margin for Adverse Deviation)  Same  Payroll Increases  Aggregate Increases – 3.25%  Merit Increases – CalPERS 1997-2007 Experience Study  Same May 20, 2014 E-32 ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS June 30, 2011 Valuation June 30, 2013 Valuation  Increase to Dollar Caps for SEIU Group 3  N/A  ½ of Medical Trend, not less than assumed inflation (3.0%). Increase is for purposes of financial projection only and does not imply any obligation to increase the cap in the future.  Medical Trend Increase from Prior Year Year Non-Medicare Medicare 2011 Premiums 2012 Premiums 2013 9.0% 9.4% 2014 8.5% 8.9% 2015 8.0% 8.3% 2016 7.5% 7.8% 2017 7.0% 7.2% 2018 6.5% 6.7% 2019 6.0% 6.1% 2020 5.5% 5.6% 2021+ 5.0% 5.0% Increase from Prior Year Year Non-Medicare Medicare 2011 n/a 2012 n/a 2013 Premiums 2014 Premiums 2015 8.0% 8.3% 2016 7.5% 7.8% 2017 7.0% 7.2% 2018 6.5% 6.7% 2019 6.0% 6.1% 2020 5.5% 5.6% 2021+ 5.0% 5.0% ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 E-33 ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS June 30, 2011 Valuation June 30, 2013 Valuation  Mortality, Termination, Disability  CalPERS 1997-2007 Experience Study  CalPERS 1997-2007 Experience Study  Includes fully generational mortality projected with Scale AA  Retirement  CalPERS 1997-2007 Experience Study Misc Fire Police Benefit 2.7%@55 3%@50 3%@50 2%@6049 ERA50 57.5 54.5 54.0  CalPERS 1997-2007 Experience Study Misc Fire & Police Tier 1 2.7%@55 3%@50 ERA 59.3 55.7 & 54.5 Tier 2 2%@6049 3%@55 ERA 61.1 n/a & 59.7 PEPRA51 2.5%@67 2.7%@57 ERA 61.0 n/a & 56.8 49 Applies to employees hired after July 17, 2010 50 Expected Retirement Age 51 Applies to employees hired after 1/1/13 and considered “New Hires” under PEPRA May 20, 2014 E-34 ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS June 30, 2011 Valuation June 30, 2013 Valuation  Medical Plan at Retirement & Retirees Attaining age 65  Miscellaneous: <65 65+ Blue Shield 35% 20% Kaiser 25% 25% PERS Choice 30% 20% PERSCare 10% 35%  Safety: <65 65+ Blue Shield 35% 20% Kaiser 25% 25% PERS Choice 20% 20% PERSCare 10% 35% PORAC 10% 0%  Miscellaneous: <65 65+ Anthem Tradition 5% 0% Blue Shield 25% 30% Kaiser 30% 25% PERS Choice 30% 25% PERSCare 5% 20% United HC 5% 0%  Safety: <65 65+ Anthem Tradition 10% 0% Blue Shield 20% 20% Blue Shield NV 5% 0% Kaiser 15% 35% PERS Choice 0% 10% PERSCare 0% 25% PORAC 45% 10% United HC 5% 0% ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 E-35 ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS June 30, 2011 Valuation June 30, 2013 Valuation  Participation at Retirement  DOH < 1/1/04: 100%  DOH > 1/1/04: 95%  Employees with cost sharing: reduce above %’s by 5%  Groups 1 & 2: already retired  Group 3: 90%  Group 4: 85%  Medicare Eligible Rate  Actives hired < 4/1/86: • Miscellaneous – 80% • Safety – 90%  Actives hired > 4/1/86: 100%  Retirees < 65: 90%  Everyone eligible for Medicare will elect Part B coverage  Same  Spousal Coverage at Retirement  Currently covered: based on current elections  Currently waived: 80%  Same May 20, 2014 E-36 ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS June 30, 2011 Valuation June 30, 2013 Valuation  Family Coverage at Retirement  Actives • Misc : 10% until age 65 • Safety : 20% until age 65  Retirees: based on current elections until age 65  Actives • Misc : 15% until age 65 • Safety : 40% until age 65  Retirees: based on current elections until age 65  Waived Retiree Re-election  N/A  Pre-65 – 20% re-elect at age 65  Post-65 – 0%  CalPERS Service  City service plus ½ service between age 30 and City hire date  Actual data ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 E-37 ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS June 30, 2011 Valuation June 30, 2013 Valuation  2014/15 HMO Medical Claims Costs PEMHCA Implied Subsidy Estimate  Monthly claims costs estimated from Bartel Associates PEMHCA client database and PEMHCA premiums Bay Area Region – Non-Medicare Eligible BS Access+ BS NetValue Kaiser Age M F M F M F 45 $533 $645 $485 $587 $531 $642 55 890 900 810 819 886 896 60 1,137 1,063 1,034 967 1,131 1,058 Bay Area Region – Medicare Eligible BS Access+ BS NetValue Kaiser Age M F M Age M F 65 $306 $284 $306 $284 $295 $273 70 288 275 288 275 277 265 75 360 322 360 322 347 311 80 386 342 386 342 372 330 85 384 341 384 341 370 329 90 365 319 365 319 352 307 May 20, 2014 E-38 ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS June 30, 2011 Valuation June 30, 2013 Valuation  2014/15 PPO Medical Claims Costs PEMHCA Implied Subsidy Estimate  Monthly claims costs estimated from Bartel Associates PEMHCA client database and PEMHCA premiums Bay Area Region – Non-Medicare Eligible PERS Choice PERSCare PORAC Age M F M F M F 45 $518 $567 $563 $616 $526 $577 55 766 741 832 804 780 754 60 920 851 999 924 934 865 Bay Area Region – Medicare Eligible PERS Choice PERSCare PORAC Age M F M Age M F 65 $302 $316 $322 $337 $407 $426 70 288 306 306 326 387 413 75 324 338 346 360 437 455 80 335 348 357 371 452 469 85 331 344 353 367 446 463 90 315 322 335 343 424 433  Missing PERS Group  Retirees missing PERS group assumed to be Misc unless fund designates Police or Fire  N/A (none missing) ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 E-39 ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS June 30, 2011 Valuation June 30, 2013 Valuation  Surviving Spouse Participation  100%  Same  Missing Bargaining Unit  Retirees missing bargaining unit assumed to be SEIU unless fund designates Police (PAPOA) or Fire (IAFF)  Retirees missing bargaining unit assumed to have the same BU as in the prior valuation if available; otherwise, assumed to be SEIU unless fund designates Police (PAPOA) or Fire (IAFF)52  Missing Fund  Retirees missing fund assumed to be 80% GF, 10% Elec, and 10% WWT  Retirees missing fund assumed to be 90% GF, 5% Elec, and 5% UTL52 52 Fewer than 10% of retirees have missing Bargaining Unit, Fund or Department. Does not affect results, but does affect internal cost allocations used by the City. May 20, 2014 E-40 ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS June 30, 2011 Valuation June 30, 2013 Valuation  Missing Department  Liability for retirees assumed to be 80% GF from above assumption allocated proportionately across all Departments  Liability for retirees assumed to be 90% GF from above assumption allocated proportionately across all Departments52  Spouse Age  Actives – Males 3 years older than females  Retirees – Males 3 years older than females if spouse birth date not available  Same  Future New Participants  None – Closed Group  Same ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 E-41 RESULTS BY FUND Actuarial Accrued Liability (AAL) (Amounts in 000’s) January 1, 2011 June 30, 2011 June 30, 2013 7.75% 7.61% 7.61%  Airport $ - $ - $ -  CIP 2,362 2,411 3,058  Elec53,54 16,004 16,216 23,260  Gas53 6,106 6,254 8,596  GF55 115,628 116,987 136,011  ISF – Technology 2,038 2,111 3,921  ISF – Vehicle 1,383 1,422 1,421  ISF – Printing & Mailing - - 825  Refuse 4,835 4,939 6,100  Storm Drain 1,448 1,468 811  Water53 5,087 5,200 5,518  WWC53 2,062 2,165 2,028  WWT 8,707 8,879 12,094  Total 165,660 168,053 203,642 53 AAL for UTL employees allocated to Elec, Gas, Water, and WWC in proportion to each Fund’s AAL 54 Assets for Fiber Optics Fund appropriated to Elec in 1/1/11 & 6/30/11 valuations due to no Fiber Optics employees in data 55 Assets for Printing & Mailing Fund appropriated to GF in 1/1/11 & 6/30/11 valuations due to no P&M employees in data May 20, 2014 E-42 RESULTS BY FUND Annual Required Contribution (ARC) (Amounts in 000’s) 6/30/11 Valuation 6/30/13 Valuation 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16  Airport $ - $ - $ 12 $ 12  CIP 214 219 241 249  Elec53,54 1,082 1,106 1,589 1,644  Gas53 450 460 611 636  GF55 8,896 9,084 9,648 9,970  ISF – Technology 218 224 311 320  ISF – Vehicle 116 119 91 93  ISF – Printing & Mailing - - 62 64  Refuse 376 385 375 387  Storm Drain 106 108 65 68  Water53 409 419 294 305  WWC53 196 201 140 146  WWT 691 707 842 873  Total 12,754 13,033 14,282 14,767 ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 E-43 RESULTS BY FUND Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL) (Amounts in 000’s) January 1, 2011 June 30, 2011 June 30, 2013 7.75% 7.61% 7.61%  Airport $ - $ - $ -  CIP 1,796 1,808 2,232  Elec56,57 10,464 10,200 15,520  Gas56 3,950 3,878 5,522  GF58 91,718 90,149 99,712  ISF - Technology 1,106 1,059 2,539  ISF - Vehicle 749 726 526  ISF – Printing & Mailing - - 548  Refuse 3,437 3,400 4,073  Storm Drain 1,161 1,145 340  Water56 3,466 3,399 3,187  WWC56 1,263 1,270 822  WWT 6,338 6,243 8,552  Total 125,448 123,277 143,572 56 UAAL for UTL employees allocated to Elec, Gas, Water, and WWC in proportion to each Fund’s UAAL 57 Assets for Fiber Optics Fund appropriated to Elec in 1/1/11 & 6/30/11 valuations due to no Fiber Optics employees in data 58 Assets for Printing & Mailing Fund appropriated to GF in 1/1/11 & 6/30/11 valuations due to no P&M employees in data May 20, 2014 E-44 RESULTS BY FUND This page intentionally blank ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 E-45 RESULTS BY GF DEPARTMENT Actuarial Accrued Liability (AAL) (Amounts in 000’s) January 1, 2011 June 30, 2011 June 30, 2013 7.75% 7.61% 7.61%  ASD $ 9,051 $ 9,003 $ 7,900  ATT 1,879 1,899 1,876  AUD 137 143 380  CLK 841 849 975  COU 1,787 1,802 1,337  CSD 12,403 12,529 14,375  FIR 31,517 32,030 39,946  HRD 3,066 3,057 2,818  LIB 4,020 4,061 4,750  MGR 1,801 1,829 1,824  PLA 6,826 6,916 7,524  PLN 241 242 -  POL 30,928 31,396 38,532  PWD 11,131 11,231 13,776  Total 115,628 116,987 136,012 May 20, 2014 E-46 RESULTS BY GF DEPARTMENT Annual Required Contribution (ARC) (Amounts in 000’s) 6/30/11 Valuation 6/30/13 Valuation 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16  ASD $ 585 $ 597 $ 557 $ 574  ATT 148 151 150 155  AUD 13 13 36 37  CLK 78 80 84 86  COU 133 136 86 89  CSD 890 908 981 1,015  FIR 2,374 2,423 2,614 2,699  HRD 202 205 198 205  LIB 458 469 458 466  MGR 146 149 130 134  PLA 546 559 557 576  PLN 11 11 - -  POL 2,490 2,544 2,813 2,907  PWD 822 839 986 1,027  Total 8,896 9,084 9,650 9,970 ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 E-47 RESULTS BY GF DEPARTMENT Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL) (Amounts in 000’s) January 1, 2011 June 30, 2011 June 30, 2013 7.75% 7.61% 7.61%  ASD $ 7,180 $ 6,938 $ 5,790  ATT 1,490 1,463 1,378  AUD 109 111 279  CLK 667 655 717  COU 1,417 1,389 982  CSD 9,838 9,654 10,507  FIR 25,000 24,682 29,328  HRD 2,433 2,356 2,069  LIB 3,189 3,129 3,475  MGR 1,428 1,410 1,339  PLA 5,414 5,329 5,511  PLN 191 186 -  POL 24,533 24,194 28,248  PWD 8,829 8,654 10,091  Total 91,717 90,150 99,714 May 20, 2014 E-48 RESULTS BY GF DEPARTMENT This page intentionally blank ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 E-49 DEFINITIONS  GASB 45 Accrual Accounting • Project future employer-provided benefit cash flows for current active employees and current retirees • Discount projected cash flow to valuation date using discount rate (assumed return on assets used to pay benefits) and other actuarial assumptions to determine present value of projected future benefits (PVB) • Allocate PVB to past, current, and future periods using the actuarial cost method • Actuarial cost method used for this valuation is the Entry Age Normal Cost method which determines Normal Cost as a level percentage of payroll (same method used by CalPERS) • Normal Cost is amount allocated to current fiscal year • Actuarial Accrued Liability (AAL) is amount allocated to prior service with employer • Unfunded AAL (UAAL) is AAL less plan assets pre-funded in a segregated and restricted trust  PayGo Cost • Cash subsidy is the pay-as-you-go employer benefit payments for retirees • Implied subsidy is the difference between the actual cost of retiree benefits and retiree premiums subsidized by active employee premiums May 20, 2014 E-50 DEFINITIONS Present Value of Benefits Present Value of Benefits (With Plan Assets) Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Future Normal Costs Normal Cost Assets Present Value of Benefits (Without Plan Assets) Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability Future Normal Costs Normal Cost ATTACHMENT A May 20, 2014 E-51 DEFINITIONS  Annual Required Contribution (ARC) • “Required contribution” for the current period including:  Normal Cost  Amortization of: - Initial UAAL - AAL for plan, assumption, and method changes - Experience gains/losses (difference between expected and actual) - Contribution gains/losses (difference between ARC and contributions) • ARC in excess of pay-as-you-go costs not required to be funded  Net OPEB Obligation (NOO) • Net OPEB Obligation is the accumulated amounts expensed but not funded • Net OPEB Asset if amounts funded exceed those expensed  Annual OPEB Cost (AOC) • Expense for the current period including:  ARC  Interest on NOO  Adjustment of NOO • NOO adjustment prevents double counting of expense since ARCs include an amortization of prior contribution gains/losses previously expensed ATTACHMENT A