Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 4539 City of Palo Alto (ID # 4539) Finance Committee Staff Report Report Type: Action Items Meeting Date: 6/3/2014 City of Palo Alto Page 1 Summary Title: Street Sweeping Cost Savings and Efficiencies Plan Title: Approval of Staff Plan That Would Reduce Costs and Increase Efficiencies by Contracting for Certain Street Sweeping Services and by Reducing the Frequency of Sweeping in Residential A reas to Every Other Week During the Non -leaf Season From: City Manager Lead Department: Public Works Recommendation Staff recommends that the Finance Committee recommend the City Council approve the following next steps in staff’s recommended Street Sweeping Efficiency and Cost Savings Plan: 1. Reduce the street sweeping frequency for Residential and Light/Commercial areas to every other week during the non-leaf season; and 2. In response to the City’s recent Request for Proposals (RFP), negotiate and develop an agreement with the apparent successful street sweeping proposer, Contract Sweeping Services, and return to the City Council for a contract award and a related Budget Amendment Ordinance. Executive Summary On February 4, 2014, Staff issued a Request for Proposals (RFP), and now recommends reducing street sweeping frequency and contracting out a major portion of the City’s street sweeping and debris management operation. The sweeping frequency would remain the same in the University Avenue and California Avenue areas (3 times per week), as well as El Camino (weekly), and would be reduced from weekly to every-other-week in residential and light commercial areas during the non-leaf season. Contracting out a major portion of City of Palo Alto Page 2 the street sweeping operation and reducing its frequency in this way would save approximately $649,000 per year by eliminating seven Full Time Equivalent positions (FTEs) and associated non-salary funding and removing street sweeping equipment from the City fleet. Additionally, savings will be realized in future years through reduced pension and healthcare costs. Because the cost of the Street Sweeping Program is budgeted primarily in the Refuse Fund, the cost savings would help reduce the need for larger future Refuse Rate increases for our residential and commercial customers. Potentially displaced street sweeping personnel have been offered and are receiving cross- training that would help them qualify for open positions within the City. Additionally, Contract Sweeping Services is amenable to interviewing and potentially hiring up to four of the displaced sweeping personnel. Background Currently, the City performs all of its street sweeping and sweeper debris handling operations with in-house staff and equipment. Residential/light commercial areas are swept weekly year-round and the University/California Avenue areas (i.e. the Parking District areas) are swept 3 times per week year-round. El Camino is swept weekly under an agreement with Caltrans. The estimated cost to conduct these operations is approximately $1.4 million per year. Most of these costs are funded within the Refuse Fund, with a portion funded from the University Avenue and California Avenue Parking Permit Funds. Based on 2012 survey results received by the City’s Administrative Services Department, Palo Alto sweeps its streets more frequently than any of the neighboring cities that were surveyed. Most of the cities surveyed are swept every other week on average during the year with some exceptions for the large retail/commercial areas. On March 19, 2013, staff met with the Finance Committee to present options for reducing costs in the City’s street sweeping operation (Staff Report No. 3483). Staff’s options included both reducing the frequency of street sweeping during the non-leaf season and utilizing outside contractors. All options dealt with the portion of the program that involves large street sweepers working on regular routes. Staff targeted this element of the program because it is much more amenable to analysis and utilizing outside contracts. The Finance Committee directed staff to perform an every other week street sweeping pilot program to City of Palo Alto Page 3 test the feasibility of reducing the frequency of sweeping in residential/light commercial areas to every other week during the non-leaf season. On December 9, 2013, staff returned to the Finance Committee (Staff Report No. 4128) and presented an updated efficiency and cost savings plan and the results of the every other week sweeping pilot. The pilot results demonstrated that the City could reduce the frequency of sweeping in the residential/light commercial areas to every other week during non-leaf season without adverse impacts to the public or the environment. At the meeting on December 9, staff explained that the next steps in the efficiency and cost savings plan was to develop and issue a RFP for street sweeping services that could confirm the expected cost savings. The Finance Committee unanimously approved the efficiency and cost savings plan and directed staff to add the option of a phased-in implementation into the RFP in order to mitigate any potential layoffs of current employees. The Finance Committee also directed staff that when proposals are evaluated, consideration should be given to those contractors who would be willing to hire any displaced City employees. The Finance Committee also directed staff to obtain Council approval for the issuance of the RFP. Some highlights of the efficiency and cost savings plan are: 1 Continue sweeping Downtown/California Avenue three (3) times per week. Contract for this work. 2 Continue weekly cleaning of parking lots, bike paths, dead-ends and downtown sidewalks. Continue using in-house staff and existing contracts to complete this work. 3 Reduce sweeping frequency to every other week during non-leaf season (except for Downtown/California Avenue areas and El Camino Real). 4 Contract for the main street sweeping operation (i.e. street sweeping performed by the large sweepers). 5 Contract for materials management (i.e. hauling leaf litter/debris to SMaRT). 6 Require the successful contractor to obtain an encroachment permit from Caltrans to continue sweeping El Camino Real weekly. City of Palo Alto Page 4 7 Manage emergency responses with both in-house and contractor resources (traffic accidents, water main leaks, large rain events etc.). Comparison - Staffing and Equipment Cost Savings Plan Staff Current Program Efficiency and Cost Savings Plan Staffing Reduction Lead Heavy Equipment Operator 1 0 -1 FTE Heavy Equipment Operator 1 0 -1 FTE Street Sweeper Operators 7 2 -5 FTE Street Maintenance Assistants 2 2 0 Total Staff 11 4 -7 FTE Equipment Current Program Proposed Program Equipment Reduction Large Street Sweepers 7 2 -5 large sweepers Parking Lot Sweeper 1 1 0 Large Leaf Trucks (for picking up and hauling debris) 2 0 -2 large trucks Green Machines (small sweepers used to clean sidewalks and bike paths) 3 3 0 Small Dump Truck 1 1 0 Total Equipment 14 7 -7 Discussion On February 3, 2014, staff received Council’s approval for the issuance of the sweeping RFP (Staff Report No. 4337). An RFP for Street Sweeping Services was distributed to qualified street sweeper contractors on February 4, 2014. Contractors had six weeks to review the RFP and submit proposals to the City. Proposals were received from two qualified contractors on March 18, 2014. A summary of their proposals is included below. City of Palo Alto Page 5 Summary of Proposal Process Proposal Name/Number RFP Number 152971 For Professional Services – Street Sweeping Total Days to Respond to RFP 42 Number of Firms at Pre-Proposal Meeting 7 Number of Proposals Received 2 Proposal Price Range *$598,661.20 – $1,231,238 *Note: Fee proposal before minor scope of work modifications, and adding 10% contingency. Of the two proposals received, staff unanimously selected Contract Sweeping Services as the preferred proposer due mainly to the large cost difference. A local company, Contract Sweeping Services currently sweeps many cities similar to Palo Alto. Some of their other contracts include Cupertino, Foster City, San Carlos, Saratoga, Menlo Park, and East Palo Alto. Staff has checked references that Contract Sweeping Services provided in their proposal. All of the references provided positive reviews for the services provided by Contract Sweeping Services. Both of the proposals that were submitted indicated that a five-year term would be the minimum term of the agreement that they would accept. Contract Sweeping staff explained that the extended length of the contract would give adequate time to depreciate their capital investment in the equipment required for the operation. In discussions with similarly sized cities, it was determined that a five-year term, or a longer term in some instances, offered both sides an advantage. All of the cities that staff spoke with which had similar size and complexity of the proposed operation had contracts in place of at least five years. Both proposers stated that a five-year contract was necessary due to the initial investment, and the complexity of the operation in Palo Alto. Phasing Staff included in the RFP an option for a one-year phasing plan as directed by the Finance Committee. After review of the proposals and vetting of the issues involved, staff recommends not phasing the street sweeping operation. If the City were to phase-in the contractor for one year (assuming that the contractor would sweep half of the City’s curb miles): City of Palo Alto Page 6  The City would not realize a $649,000 cost savings during the first full year of the contract;  Contracting for only half the routes would be challenging from a coordination and logistical perspective. See examples of phasing challenges below.  Some of the environmental benefits listed below would not be realized during the year of phasing. Examples of Phasing-In Challenges 1) Managing two workgroups during the leaf season would be challenging. This is the busiest and most time intensive season of the year for the Public Works manager who handles a high volume of leaf season calls/complaints during this time. The manager may not have the amount of time needed to focus on and work with the new contractor’s staff on leaf season acclimation, as well as the typical challenges presented with a new sweeping contract. 2) If two work groups (City and Contractor) worked together for a one-year phasing period, then the Contractor and the City would need to share dump locations for sweeper debris management. Residents at these limited locations would be subjected to twice the amount of noise as vehicles from both work groups managed the debris and may lose parking spaces in front of their homes. The City’s debris management operation is incompatible with the apparent successful proposer’s method. Therefore, the operations would be in each other’s way at these dump locations. 3) Complaints – It would be challenging to follow up and reconcile complaints with two workgroups performing same function. 4) Debris management equipment is very old and likely in need of costly repair work in the near future. Spending a significant amount of time and money repairing these vehicles at this juncture is not cost effective if we can contract the same services at a decreased cost to the City. Another year operating our debris management equipment will also significantly lower its resale value. 5) City employees could leave without any warning due to the perceived lack of job security and the City would need to give the Contractor lead time to staff up to take on the additional routes. The City could not expect the City of Palo Alto Page 7 contractor to be able to take over that route right away. This would lead to routes not being completed. The Contract Sweeping Services proposal stated that they would like to interview and potentially hire up to 4 street sweeper operator staff. Interviewing affected City staff does not guarantee that the contractor would hire affected staff but the contractor did express a need for more sweeper operators if they were to be awarded this job. Environmental Benefits There are environmental benefits with the reduced frequency every other week sweeping during the non-leaf season. The City would realize a 22% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions per year equaling approximately 37 metric tons CO2 emissions per year (See Attachment A for Greenhouse Gas Calculations). Another potential benefit is the possible reduction of other air pollutants based on the fact that Contract Sweeping Services plans to use brand new PM10 compliant sweepers. These clean diesel sweepers are subject to stringent air quality regulations, and are tested to be up to three times cleaner than sweepers that comply with federal air quality standards. The contractor stated that they will not collect sweeper debris in piles on the street during the approximate 8 months of the non-leaf season. They will drive the sweepers directly to the Sunnyvale Materials Recovery and Transfer Station (SMaRT). This would be a great improvement for the City in terms of wind-blown litter/loose debris reaching storm drains, creeks and the bay. Street sweeping is an effective trash control measure that can reduce 80 to 99 percent of trash on the streets. In addition, street sweeping reduces sediments that may contain pollutants such as heavy metals, which can have water quality impacts when washed down storm drains. Therefore, reducing street sweeping frequency may have a water quality effect related to levels of trash and heavy metals; however, since the reduction in frequency is limited to residential/light commercial areas where there is little trash as well as to summer months when rain is unlikely, this potential impact is insignificant. Staffing Impact City of Palo Alto Page 8 If street sweeping is ‘contracted out’ as recommended by staff, then there are seven FTE positions that would be eliminated. Currently, only five of those positions are filled, as two vacancies resulted from employees moving to other positions in the City. Staff has already offered all potentially displaced employees ample time to cross-train in different positions, and to attempt to ensure that these employees are not laid off. As mentioned above, Contract Sweeping Services has indicated a willingness to interview and potentially hire up to four potentially laid-off employees at a wage that is comparable to their current salaries in Palo Alto. Resource Impact As described throughout this report, two significant changes are being proposed to the street sweeping program. First is a reduction in the frequency of street sweeping services, to every other week during the non-leaf season in residential and light/commercial areas. The pilot results demonstrated that the City could reduce the frequency of sweeping in the residential/light commercial areas to every other week during non-leaf season without adverse impacts to the public or the environment. Making this change permanent would result in anticipated savings of approximately $87,000 in the Refuse Fund, and would not result in the elimination of positions. The City lacks the flexibility to add or reduce the crew size in order to ramp up for the leaf season (November-February) and would need to be fully staffed year round in order to accommodate that workload. The anticipated savings of $87,000 would be from the result of reduced fuel consumption, vehicle maintenance, and vehicle replacement charges. Partially offsetting the savings would be reduced parking citation revenue. The changes are outlined in the following table: Savings from reducing the frequency of street sweeping services provided by In-house City Staff and Equipment Category Projected Savings Fuel $17,000 Vehicle Maintenance $36,000 Vehicle Replacement $71,000 Reduced citation revenue ($37,000) Total $87,000 The savings figures are based on an estimated 22% reduction in the number of City of Palo Alto Page 9 curb miles swept each year. This reduction would result in reduced fuel expenses and vehicle maintenance expenses. With a reduction in the annual utilization of the vehicles and equipment for this program, it is assumed that replacements will not be needed as frequently as they are currently, which would result in a reduced set-aside for vehicle replacement through the annual Vehicle Fund internal service fund replacement charge. The change to every other week sweeping will prevent weekly sweeping per the permanently posted No Parking on Sweep Day signs in the Downtown North neighborhood during non-leaf season. Sweeping in this neighborhood per the No Parking on Sweep Day signs will resume for leaf season, October thru February. It is estimated the citation revenue loss for non-leaf season period would be approximately $37,000 in the General Fund. The second change proposed for this program is to cease providing street sweeping services by City staff and contract for this service, at the reduced frequency described above. Outsourcing the regular street sweeping operations would save approximately $649,000, across all funds, per year as shown in the following table. Annual Cost Estimates for the street sweeping operation with reduced frequency (Affected Staff and Equipment) Current Costs In-house Outsourced and Reduced Frequency Savings (all funds) City Equipment Costs Fuel $79,000 $4,000 $75,000 Maintenance/Repair $164,000 $4,000 $160,000 Vehicle Replacement $321,000 $57,000 $264,000 Subtotal $564,000 $65,000 $499,000 Personnel Costs (with benefits) (1) Lead Heavy Equipment Operator $137,000 0 (1) Heavy Equipment Operator $128,000 0 (5) Street Sweeper Operators $566,000 0 Associated Non-Salary Expenses (Uniforms, Supplies, etc.) $19,000 0 City of Palo Alto Page 10 Subtotal $850,000 $0 $850,000 Contractor Costs Sweeping fee - 17,272 curb miles @ $28.35 /mile. $490,000 Debris management fee – 2,500 tons per year @ $28.00 per ton $70,000 Unscheduled Service 500 hours @ $65.00 per hour $33,000 Emergency Service (as requested) $10,000 Contract Contingency @ 10% $60,000 Subtotal $663,000 ($663,000) Parking Citation Revenue ($55,000) ($18,000) ($37,000) Total Annual Net Costs $1,359,000 $710,000 $649,000 Other cost impacts which are not included in cost comparison above: 1) Existing eqipment could be salvaged at auction. A preliminary estimate shows that the equipment would be sold for over $400,000. These one- time funds would be returned to the Refuse Enterprise Fund that ultimately has funded the purchase of this equipment. 2) Some indirect allocated charges, such as General Fund cost allocation plan, which spreads the cost of the City’s administrative functions across the organization, could be reduced. These changes are difficult to quantify, however, as the annual charges are dependent upon many factors, such as the level of support provided to each fund/department, the overall budget for each department and fund, and the number of positions in each department and fund. As a result, these savings are not included in the anticipated ongoing savings amount of $649,000. 3) Pension and long term retirement health costs would be reduced by the elimination of seven full time positions. These costs are not included in the savings amount, as it is difficult to predict with any level of certainty these cost avoidance figures. Notes 1) Fuel and Maintenance costs estimated using an average of costs per equipment from FY12, FY13 and FY14 (projected). City of Palo Alto Page 11 2) Vehicle replacement costs represent the estimated replacement charge necessary to replace equipment every seven years. 3) The assumption is that the City would retain two sweepers that could be operated by the two Sweeping Operators that are proposed to be retained for part time sweeping of permanently posted areas and use in problem areas as needed. As a result of the reduced utilization for the remaining sweepers, the annual replacement allocation could be reduced, as reflected in the table above. 4) Personnel costs are based on the 2014 approved pay increases, inclusive of benefit costs Timeline and Next Steps If approved by the Finance Committee, staff would return to Council in August 2014 to present this item to the full Council. At this time, staff would have a contract drafted and ready to be executed. Contract Sweeping Services would begin their sweeping on or around September 30, 2014. The implementation timeline is listed below:  Negotiate and develop street sweeping contract (July 31, 2014);  Current crew cross-training and opportunities to move potentially into vacant positions (continuous);  Finalize and determine exact budget and operational impacts (July 31, 2014);  Council approval of street sweeping agreement (August 18, 2014);  Notice to Proceed (August 22, 2014);  Contractor begins work (September 30, 2014). Environmental Review: Outsourcing the street sweeping operation is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The reduction of sweeping from weekly to every other week in residential/light commercial areas during the non-leaf season is not expected to generate significant impacts to the environment. Most neighboring cities sweep less frequently than Palo Alto and the Regional Water Quality Control Board has stated that residential areas are not a large generator of litter. The City’s recent every other week pilot project showed no significant adverse affects to the environment. Positive environmental impacts are expected such as: City of Palo Alto Page 12  Less impacts to roadway surfaces because of less frequent sweeping;  The contractor will not generate leaf piles throughout the City during the non-leaf season, thereby decreasing wind blown debris;  The contractor would utilize new sweeping equipment with lower air quality emissions; and  Less sweeping means less environmental impacts to noise, traffic congestion, vehicle emissions, etc. Prior to the Council meeting on August 18, staff will work with staff from the City’s Attorney Office and Planning and Community Environment Department to confirm that the program changes would be exempt from CEQA. Attachments:  Attachment A - Final Method for CO2 Reduction Calculation (3) (DOCX) Palo Alto Sweeping Program Carbon Dioxide Emissions Calculation Method for Calculating CO2 Emissions Reduction The City is in the preliminary stage of investigating program changes that would reduce the frequency of street sweeping services. If the City were to reduce the frequency of sweeping, then there would be a resulting reduction in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. This paper documents the calculation of the reduction of CO2 emissions if sweeping frequencies are reduced from once a week to once every two weeks from approximately mid-February through mid-October (8-months, non-leaf season). If the City decides these frequency changes are accepted and approved, Palo Alto will continue to maintain once per week frequency, during the “leaf season” (4 months, approximately mid-October through mid-February). The method documented below is an effort to identify factors in the calculation of this reduction in CO2. This calculation is only an estimate based on the fuel usage of sweepers for calendar year 2013 and the reduction in curb miles if sweeping frequency changes are accepted and approved. In order to estimate the current total of CO2 emissions from the vehicles of the street sweeping program, we first retrieved fuel usage data for all sweepers. The City uses seven full time sweepers to sweep weekly, five full time and two used as spares. Of those seven sweepers, four use diesel fuel and three use compressed natural gas (CNG). Sweeper Calendar Year 2013 Fuel Usage Diesel Sweeper ID # Gallons Diesel CNG Sweeper ID# Standard Cubic Foot 4482 2,262 4483 546,074 4493 2,109 4485 365,975 4494 1,621 4422 652,465 4415 2,119 Total 8,110 1,564,514 CO2 emissions were calculated based on the 2013 fuel usage and uses as a reference EPA’s Direct Emissions from Mobile Combustion Sources-Appendix B. Total 2013 CO2 Emissions Calculation From Fuel Usage Gallons (or Standard Cubic Foot-SCF) x Emission Factor (kg CO2 /gal or SCF)=1000 kg CO2 = Metric Tons CO2 Gallons Diesel or SCF Emission Factor1 Metric Tons CO2 8,110 gal X 10.15 kg CO2/gal = 82,317 Kg CO2 1,564,514 SCF X 0.054 kg CO2/SCF = 84,484 Kg CO2 Total CO2 Emissions = 167 Metric Tons 1. This calculation is based on EPA’s Direct Emissions from Mobile Combustion Sources-Appendix B http://www.epa.gov/climateleadership/documents/resources/mobilesource_guidance.pdf and http://www.nat-g.com/why-cng/cng- units-explained/. Palo Alto Sweeping Program Carbon Dioxide Emissions Calculation Using EPA’s emission factors for fuel types, 8,110 gallons diesel (diesel sweeper’s fuel) calculates to 82,317 kg or 82.3 metric tons CO2 and 1,564,514 SCF CNG sweeper fuel calculates to 84,484 kg or 84.5 metric tons CO2. Combining these amounts and rounding up, the total CO2 emissions for all sweeping activities for 2013 was 167 metric tons CO2 in Palo Alto’s current street sweeping program. CO2 Reduction Due to Sweeping Frequency Change The reduction due to sweeping frequency change is calculated by assessing the reduction in curb miles of those routes for which frequency will be reduced. It is estimated that in 2013, the sweeping routes logged a total of 22,204 curb miles. After taking into account a proposed reduction in frequency of the non-leaf season routes from once a week to once every two weeks, the resulting change in mileage will be 17,272 curb miles, which calculates to a 22.2% reduction. 167 metric tons CO2 emissions X 22.2% reduction (0.222) = 37 metric tons CO2 emissions per year Therefore, the total estimated reduction of CO2 emissions from a potential change in street sweeping frequency, if accepted and approved, will be 37 metric tons per year. Prepared by Sean Kennedy, P.E., 4/14/14